ML20151Y001

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Request for Addl Info for Review of Units 1 & 2 Integrated Plant Assessment Repts for Saltwater Cooling Sys
ML20151Y001
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/28/1998
From: Dave Solorio
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Cruse C
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
References
TAC-M99219, TAC-MA1020, TAC-MA1021, NUDOCS 9809180051
Download: ML20151Y001 (4)


Text

- . - - - . _ - - . _ . - . - . _ _ - - - . _ - . - . . . - - - - . - - _ - .

,, August 28, 1998

.- Mr. Charles H. Cruse, Vice President Nuclear Energy Division Baltimore Gas and Electric Company 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, MD 20657-47027

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REVIEW OF THE CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NOS.1 & 2, l lNTEGRATED PLANT ASSESSMENT REPORTS FOR THE SALTWATER COOLING SYSTEM (TAC NOS. MA1020, MA1021, AND M99219)

Dear Mr. Cruse:

By letter dated December 17,1997, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE) submitted for  ;

review the Saltwater Cooling System (5.16) integrated plant assessment technical report as attached to the " Request for Review and Approval of System and Commodity Reports for License Renewal." BGE requested that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff review >

the Saltwater Cooling System (5.16) integrated plant assessment technical report te determine if the report meets the requirements of 10 CFR 54.21(a)," Contents of application-technical information," and the demonstration required by 10 CFR 54.29(a)(1), " Standards for issuance of a renewed license," to support an application for license renewalif BGE applied in the future.

By letter dated April 8,1998, BGE formally submitted its license renewal application.

The NRC staff has reviewed the Saltwater Cooling System (5.16) integrated plant assessment technical report against the requirements of 10 CFR 54.21(a)(1) and 10 CFR 54.21(a)(3). By letter dated April 4,1996, the staff approved BGE's methodology for meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 54.21(a)(2). Based on a review of the information submitted, the staff has identified in the enclosure, areas where additional information related to scoping is needed to complete its review. Should the staff have additionalinformation needs related to aging management they will be forwarded in future correspondence.

Plaase provide a schedule by letter or telephonically for the submittal of your responses within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Additionally, the staff would be willing to meet with BGE prior to submittal of the responses to provide clanfications of the staff's requests for additional information.

Sincer David L. Solorio, Proje Manager License Renewal Project Directorate Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318

Enclosure:

Request for AdditionalInformation D ST T N .

See next page

  • See previous concurrence DOCUMENT NAME G \ WORKING \SOLORIO\SWC RAI LTR 2 OFFICE LA:PDI-1 PDLR/DRPM PDLR/DRPM:D

%DRPNf:ASC NAME Slittle DSolorio BPrap( CGrime[h DATE 8/27/98* 8/27/98* / 8/ /98\ 8/2T(98 * >

[

  • ~_,,m OFFICIAL RECORD COPY f Dk l 9809180051 980828 PDR ADOCK 05000317 P PM g

L ,. 3

,.o

! Mr. Charles H. Cruse Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant ,

[ ,

Baltimore' Gas & Electric Company Unit Nos.1 and 2  !

L cc:  !

Mr. Joseph H. Walter, Chief Engineer  !

President Public Service Cornmission of -I Calvert County Board of Maryland Commissioners Engineering Division 175 Main Street 6 St. Paul Centre l l Prince Frederick, MD 20678 Baltimore, MD 21202-6806 j i  :

James P. Bennett, Esquire Kristen A. Burger, Esquire C;unsel Marylared People's Counsel

!. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company 6 St. Paul Centre l- P.O. Box 1475. - Suite 2102 Baltimore, MD 21203 Baltimore, MD 21202-1631 Jay E. Silberg, Esquire Patricia T, B'rnie, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts, and Trowbridge Co-Director ,

j - 2300 N Street, NW- Maryland Safe Energy Coalition l- Washington, DC 20037 P.O. Box 33111 l- .

Baltimore, MD 21218 i l- Mr. Thomas N. Prichett, Director - _

1 NRM Mr. Loren F. Donatell l

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant NRC Technical Training Center 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway ' 5700 Brainerd Road Lusby, MD 20657-4702 Chattanooga, TN 37411-4017 i Resident inspector David Lewis l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Shaw, Pittman, Potts, and Trowbridge i- P,0. Box 287 2300 N Street, NW l

St. Leonard, MD 20685 Washington, DC 20037 Mr. Richard I. McLean Douglas J. Walters Nuclear Programs Nuclear Energy institute l

Power Plant Research Program 1776 i Street, N.W.

t-Maryland Dept. of Natural Resources Suite 400 Tawes State Office Building, B3 Washington, DC 20006-3708 Annapchs, MD 21401 - DJW@NEl.ORG Regional Adminie',ator, Region i Barth W. Doroshuk

, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Baltimore Gas and Electric Company 475 Allendale Road Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant King of Prussia, PA 19406 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway NEF ist Floor

!- Lusby, Maryland 20657 r

{'

f .

is d

- , , -.,-.r-i -,m -

-- , s --

[;.

1 A,-

u Distribution:

e l PUBLIC PDLR R/F MEl-Zeftawy DISTRIBUTION: E-MAIL-FMiraglia (FJM)

JRoe (JWR)

DMatthews (DBM)

CGrimes (ClG)

TEssig (THE)

' GLainas (GCL)

JStrosnider (JRS2)

GHolahan (GMH)

SNewberry (SFN)

GBagchi(GXB1)

.RRothman (RLR)

JBrammer (HLR)

CGratton (CXG1)

JMoore (JEM)

MZobier/RWeisman (MLZ/RMW)

SBajwa/ADromerick (SSB1/AXD)

LDoerflein (LTD)

BBores (RJB)

SDroggitis (SCD)

RArciiitzel(REA)

CCraig (CMC 1)

LSpessard (RLS) I RCorreia (RPC)

RLatta (RML1)

EHackett (EMH1)-

AMurphy (AJM1)

TMartin (TOM 2)

DMartin (DAM 3)

GMeyer (GWM)

WMcDowell(WDM)

SStewart (JSS1)

THiltz (TGH)

SDroggitis (SCD)

DSolorio (DLS2)- '

PDL R Staff 1

. j TMarsh (LBM) . )

GHubbard (GTH) {

BLeFave (WTL) a SLittle (SLL) 1 1

)

I 1

1 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION j CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NOS.1 & 2 l SALTWATER SYSTEM INTEGRATED PLANT ASSESSMENTECTION 5.16 DOCK?T NOS. 50-317 AND 50 318 Section 5.16.1 - Sconina

1. According to Figure 5.16-1 and Subsection 5.16.1.1, essentially all of the saltwater l system is within the scope of license renewal. The saltwater supply to the circulating I water system (CWS) pump seals and the CWS discharge conduits are identified as nc,t within the scope of license renewal. Since Figure 5.16-1 does not show any valves, it is not clear where the interface location is between the portions of the system that are within and outside the scope of license renewal, and how the interfacing locations were ,

chosen. Please identify more clearly the interfaces between the portions of the  !

saltwater system that are within and outside the scope of license renewal, and if  !

possible, provide a revised drawing that shows the interface locations more clearly. '

Please provide the basis for the %terfaces that define the portions of the saltwater system that are within and outside the scope of license renewal, and if possible, a more general discussion of the process used for identifying interfaces to assist tne NRC staff with its review of other sections of the license renewal application (LRA) where scoping interfaces are discussed.

2. Figure 5.16-1 shows an emergency discharge line coming off the pump discharge header (in lieu of the system discharge header). The NRC staff believes, based on the information provided, that the emergency discharge line coming off the pump discharge l would be a safety-related attemative to the system's normal discharge path to the CWS )

discharge conduits. Please describe the function of this line. j 1

3. Figure 5.16-1 does not show the suction piping to the saltwater pumps. Please identify i whether the suction pioing is included within the scope of license renewal. If so, provide 1 a cross reference to where the suction piping is addressed in the LRA. Also, identify  ;

any strainers and/or screens associated with this system anti discuss whether these components are within the scope of license renewal. !f so, provide a cross reference to where these components are addressed in the LRA. If either of these components are not within the scope of license renewal provide the basis for their exclusion.

l i

l Enclosure )

l l

1