ML20065C938

Submits Addl Info to 820112 Response to Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-334/81-16.Corrective Actions:Records of Qualifications,Experiences,Training & Retraining to Be Maintained & Training Program to Be Improved

ML20065C938
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	08/10/1982
From:	Carey J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:	Haynes R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20065C879	List: ML20065C910 ML20065C938
References
NUDOCS 8209240346
Download: ML20065C938 (21)

Text

.\.

'Af M Teieanon. s t2) 4564o00 Nuclear Division August 10, 1982 P.O. Box 4 Snippingport, PA 150774004 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission '

Office of Inspection and Enforcement Attn: Mr. R. C. Haynes, Regional Administrator Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

Reference:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 NRC Inspection 81-16 -

Additional Information Gentlemen:

This letter documents telephone conversations between Mr. T. T. Martin of your office and Mr. J. D. Sieber of my office clarifying the Company's response to Violation B of NRC Inspection 81-16 as set forth in our January 12, 1982 letter. Additional information was requested regarding the manner in which the on-the-job training program modifications identified in the " action to prevent recurrence" satisfies the requirements of ANSI N18.1-1971.

By internal letter dated August 24, 1981 (Attachment A),

an " Employee Qualification Statement", along with instructions for its use, was prepared. This " Employee Qualification Statement" was designed to satisfy Section 5.6 of ANSI N18.1-1971 which requires that " records of the qualifications, experiences, training and retraining of each member of the plant organization should be maintained".

On May 5, 1982, a new procedure (Attachment B) was made effective in the Station Administrative Procedures (SAP-15) which requires a special written evaluation of an employee following an incident which is considered to demonstrate either outstanding or unsatisfactory performance. All members of the station staff are evaluated on an annual basis. This comprehensive evaluation of job performance was designed to reveal not only defects in the training program but also many other factors considered by us to be valuable in managing the work force. SAP-15 requires the Director of Nuclear Division Training to modify the training programs to correct group deficiencies or trends identified to him 8209240346 820916 PDR ADOCK 05000334 a PDR

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 NRC Inspection 81-16 -

Additional Information Page 2 by the various group supervisors. This evaluation procedure was implemented in addition to other Corporate rating and deficiency 4

documentation systems which have been in use for a number of years -

and which yield similar information. We believe that the use of SAP-15 satisfies the requirements of ANSI N18.1-1971, Section 5.5 which requires that a "means should be provided in the training programs for appropriate evaluation of its effectiveness".

In reviewing the records related to this action to prevent recurrence, we concluded that additional improvements could be made to the on-the-job training program to more closely meet the requirements of ANSI N18.1-1971. A Standing Operating Order containing the text provided as Attachment C to this letter has been issued. This Standing Operating order will be incorporated into the Operating Manual, Chapter 48, Section 4, " Qualification Of Operating Personnel", by September 1, 1982. This order provides the following additional assurances of compliance:

i

1) Makes mandatory the use of qualified personnel

2) Sets controls on and documents the content of the training

3) Provides a qualitative assessment of the effectiveness of the training before the trainee is allowed to perform the task without direct supervision

4) Requires a review by the Nuclear Training Section which will permit the evaluation of the adequacy of training being conducted by this method.

We have also noted that editorial changes to Paragraph V -

Section I of SAP-15 are needed to clarify the intent of that section.

l It is not our intent to utilize on-the-job training as the major basis for overall qualification of operating personnel. This program is intended to be used to train operations personnel to perform relatively simple tasks under situations where formally i

trained personnel are not available. We believe that these methods meet the requirements of ANSI N18.1-1971 and will provide a satisfactory amount of training so that the related tasks can be accomplished in a safe manner.

l

4 .

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 NRC Inspection 81-16 -

Additional Information Page 3 Should you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me.

Very trul yours, J. . arey Vice President - Nuclear Attachments i

cc: Mr. W. M. Troskoski, Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Beaver Valley Power Station Shippingport, PA 15077 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o Document Management Branch Washington, D. C. 20555 b

,1 t

,, , - - _ , _ .-, _ - -- - --.,. -,-, . - _ - - - ~ , - - - , , - - , , , - - - - - - . m .- - w - ,--p m - , -- n-

4 4

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY ATIACHMC E "A" Nuclear Support Services Department Page 1 of 2 August 24, 1981

! MNS:024 Training on Shift Mr. T. D. Jones:

Trainees assigned to plant operations for on-the-job j

training in preparation for licensing or qualification as 4 " Auxiliary" ators duringOperators, should normally not be used as oper-the training period. In the event that they are required to perform certain functions, the trainee may be instructed on-shift, provided the training received is documented, utilizing the Employee Qualification Statement, Figure 0.2.

The sheet shall identify the portion of or component 3

in the system in which training was provided, the student's

! name, received. the date, and a brief description of the training A licensed operator / supervisor's signature is required, noting the trainee is qualified to perform the task. A Training Sheet and also sign the form.

Instructor will review the Checkoff in ourI discussion believe the on above August addresses

18. areas of concern noted

/ .

F MY/

J. Bissert Attachmen t cc: J. V. Vassello I

---,,~ _ . _ . . _ _ ._.~._, - - _ . - - . - . , _ _ - - -_ . . . _ _ _ . . _ , _ . . _ . , ,

l' .- .

DUQUES::E LIGHT COMPANY Fig. 0.2 Beaver Valley Poacr Station Training Manual ATDCHME:7I "A"

1. 98 Of

EMPLOYEE QUALIFICATI_ON ST ATEM ENT Employee Name/ Number Course Title (1) Completion Date Employee Job Title Ralph Code Description of Instruction

(1) 1 I

t i

Description of Tasks: (1): -

t i

Reason / Requirement for Instruction:

i This qualification is conditional and limited by the following waivers or physical limitations. (If no restrictions, state "None ")

i e

Employee qualified to perform spacific tasks noted above. Supportive documentation attached.

cc: Manager Nuclear Operators Manager Nuclear Support Services Signature of NSS, NSOF, or i Individual Sta f f Supervisor Person Responsible for Trng.

Reviewed:

Supervisor of Training (1) If course or training is not described in TM-1, a description of instruction completed must be provided under " Description"

OCQUI5:i! I. 0C COMPANT 3eaver Valley Power 5:szien - Uni: 1 ATIAOCCTr "B" APPROVAL SEZIT - ADM*'T*SUAT M Page 1 of 14 STATICN ADMI!TISTRAT!"E PROCEDURIS Chapter 15 , ri:la Evaluation of Job Performance OSC Rev. Reviev OA Review Acereval Effective No. Pages Issued Da:e Ini:ialsi Date i Sienature i Da a i Date 0 1 -11 4/

N/A N/A N/A / / 4/*// -

~/~*o/ .

(ULWh4 'I!?. 23

-1 1 - 11 N/A N/A N/A [<! ff67 2C[h. E/!M I

i i i I 4

l l

l i .'

F f

E Page cf :.11 Rev sion . .

) .

l

8 e } e

• 3CQUISNI L;CII COMP.Ci?

3esvar Valley Power 5:2:1on - Uni: 1 ATUONE27T "B" Sta:1on Ad-*-ds::a:1ve ?:ocedures Page 2 of 14 i

1 LIST OF :.:: C"'T ?ACIS Chap::: is Ti:le Evaluation of Job Perfor ance Page No. Rev. No. Effee:1ve Date Psee No. Rev. No. Effee:1ve Date 1 1 5/21/82 2 1 5/21/82 3 1 5/21/82 4 1 5/21/82 5 1 5/21/82 6 1 5/21/82 7 1 5/21/82 8 1 5/21/82

• 9 1 5/21/82 10 1 5/ 21 /82 11 1 5/21/82 I

Page 11 of 111 Re'rision ;

e

ATIACEMNT "B" Page 3 of 14 Beaver Valley Power Station Station Administrative Procedures Chapter 15 EVALUATION OF JOB PERFOPS.ANCE Chepter Index Page I. PURPOSE 1

II. APPLICABILITY 1

III. FREOUENCY l

IV. DEFINITIONS 1

A. Evaluation of Job Performance 1 B. Quality of Work 1

C. Quantity of Work 2 D. Job Knowledge 2 E. Critical Incident 2 7 RESPONSIBILITIES 2 A. Operations Supervisor 2 B. Operations Support Coordinator 2 C. Maintenance Supervisor

• 3 D. Maintenance Support Coordinator 3 E. Supervisor I:.strumentation and Controls 3 F. Instrumentation and Controls Sup> ort Coordinator 4 G. Supervisor of Testing and Plant Performance 4 H. Coordinator of Station Study Projects 4 I. Director of Nuclear Division Training 4 J. Evaluator 5

.. REFERENCES 5

VII. INSTRUCTIONS 5

A. General 5 B. Mechanics of Preparing Work Incident Sur: nary (Form A) 5 C. MechJ.nics of Preparing the Perfo::ance Review i

L (Form B) 5 D. Evaluation Review and Processing 6 E. Guidelines for Evaluation of E=p syee 6 F. Guidelines for Review of Evaluation with j Employee 7 Section A Work Incident Su ary .

8 Section 3 Perfor=ance Review 9 Page 111 of 1. ' Revision 1

BVPS - AP Chapter 15 ATrICDETE "B" EVALUATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE Page 4 of 14 I. PURPOSE The purpose of the Evaluation of Job Perfor=ance is to:

1. Provide for periodic evaluation of station Testing and Plant Pe rfo rmance, Maintenance, Instrue.entation and Control, and Operations job personnels performance in relationship to specific related standards.

2.

Provide a means for objective feecback on job performance to management.

3.

Provide for accumulation of data for use in determining individual and group deficiencies, strong points and knowledge and attitude trends. This data will be incorporated into training, and/or in an immediate on shift correction of an identified deficiency.

4 II APPLICABILITY This evaluation is to be used by the Testing and Plant Performance Supervisor, the Operations Supervisor, the Instrument and Control Supervisor, Maintenance Supervisor, and all designated subordinates in performing evaluations of all person:e1 under their responsibility.

III. _FREOUENCY i

The Evaluation of Job Performance is to be performed for each applicable employee at a minimum annually, and should be performed l in the event defined of an individuals in Section involvement in a Critical Incident as IV of this chapter.

IV. DEFINITIONS A. Evaluation of Job Performance A standard process used to analyze a series of documented subjective evaluations and to arrite at an objective indicator of an employees performance level.

B. Cuality of Work The nature or character of an indisiduals performance.

Page 1 of 11 Revision i

BVPS - AP Chapter 13 ATTACHE 2,7 "B" E7ALUATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE (Continued) Page 5 of 14 C. Quantity of Work The amount or number of projects, operations or evolutions an individual may be involved with.

D. Job Knowledge The familiarity, awareness, or understanding of job related projects, operations or evolutions, possessed by an individual, gained through experience or study.

E. Critical Incident An action, either taken, or not taken by an individual which illustrates either outstanding or unsatisfactory job performance.

V. RESPONSIBILITIES A.

Operations Supervisor (Supervisor Nuclear Station Ooerations)

The Operations Supervisor is responsible to the Station Super-intendent for ensuring that annual Evaluations of Job Performance are conducted for each person assigned to the Plant 03erations Croup. He personally conducts evaluations of thoes individuals assigned as Shift Supervisors (Nuclear),

Radioactive Wer*.e Disposal Coordinator, Operations Support Coordinator, and in turn assigns appropriate subordinates for the performance of evaluations for the remainder of the Operations Group. He will review the results of all evaluations performed.

The Operations Supervisor additionally is responsible to ensure any group deficiencies or trends are identified to the Director of Nuclear Training Division for specific upgrading program incorporation into the requalification program.

B. Operations Supeort Coordinator The Operations fupport Coordinator is responsible to the l

Operations Supervisor for the collection of completed Evaluations of Job Performance, and appropriate distribution and filing of the evaluations in accordance with prevailing company policy. He will maintain a supply of Evaluation of Job Performance forms for issue to applicable persons upon request.

Page 2 of 11 Revision 2 l

l

+

3VPS - AP Chapter 13 C. Maintennnee Suoervisor 1s is responsible to the Station Superintendent for ensuring that annual Evaluations of Job Performance are conducted for each person assigned to the Instrument and Controls Group. He personally conducts evaluations n! those individuals assigned as Senior Instrument and Controls sintenance Engineer, Senior Instrument and Controls Calibration Fagineer, Lastrument and Control Coordinator, and in turn assigns

ppropriate subordinates for the performance of evaluations for n.he remainder of the Instrument and Controls Group. He will review l ihe results of all evaluations performed.

1 .

' The Supervisor of Instrumentation and Cont ols additionally is tesponsible to ensure any group deficiencias or trends are identified

' to the Director of Nuclear Training Division for specific upgrading program incorporation into the periodic training program.

i i

i l

Page 3 of 11 Revision 1 i

i e

S r

- _ _ _ . _ ._ . - _ - = - . .. .. -.

l . .

SVPS - AP Chapter 15 E'.'ALUATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE (Continued)

Page 7 of 14 F.

Instrumentation and Controls Suenort Coordinato r The Instrumentation and Controls Suppor: Coordinator is re-sponsible to the Instrumentation and Controls Supervisor for -

the collection of completed Evaluations of Job Performance and appropriate company distribution and filing in accordance with prevailing policy.

He will maintain a supply of Evaluation of Job Performance forms for issue to applicable persons upon request.

G. Suoervisor of Testing and Plant Performance

)

The Supervisor of Testing and Plant Performance is responsible l'

to the Station Superintendent for ensuring that annual Evaluations j of Job Performance are conducted for each person assigned to the Testing and Plant Performance Group. He personally conducts evalua-tions of those individuals assigned as Senior Testing Coordinators, Csordinator of Station Study Projects, and in turn, assigns appropriate

.csordinates for the performance of evaluations for the remainder of the Testing and Plant Performance Group. He will review the results of all evaluations performed.

The Supervisor of Testing and Plant Perforrance additionally is responsible to ensure any group deficiencir.; or trends are

' identified to the Director of Nuclear Tr.uning Division for j

specific program. upgrading program incorporation into the periodic training H. Coordinator of Station Study Projects i

Ine Coordinator of Station Study Projects is responsible to the

'upervisor of Testing and Plant Performance for the collection of completed Evaluations of Job Performacce and appropriate distribution and filing in accordance with prevailing company policy.

He will maintain a supply of Evaluation of Job Performance i

forms for issue to applicable persons up)n request.

l I.

Director of Nuclear Division Training The Director of Nuclear Divisien Trainin:; is responsible for ensuring group deficiencies or trends id.istified to him by the various Group Supervisors are incorporacol into applicable training programs, or in the case of Operations Group, Operator Requalification Training, as specific upgrading progra=s.

f Page !. of 11 Revision i

BVPS - AP Chapter 15 ATTTGETI "B" EVALUATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE (Continued) Page 8 of 14 t

J. Evaluator The individual assigned by an applicable Group Supervisor is responsible to conduct an Evaluation of Job Performance for the person he has been assigned.

He will conduct the evaluation in accordance with this procedure, prepare and process performance ratings sheets (form A and B attached), and will conduct a post evaluation interview with the individual.

1 i VI. REFERENCES

• None i

71!. INSTRUCTIONS A. General 4

1. Form A (Attached) is used to record pertinent administrative data, the reason for the evaluation and any comments or recommendations reached as a result of the evaluation.

2.

! Form B (Attached) provides criteria for evaluation of job performance and specific areas to which these criterion will be applied.

B.

Mechanics of Preoaring Work Incidett Summarv (Form A)

1. Fill in the heading of the foLa as follows:

a. Record Employee's Name, Job Ittle, and Number.

I

b. Record date of work incident. (If evaluation is being 1

performed as a periodic requirement, record N/A).

c.

Record date of initial evaluation and date the form is prepared.

d. Record a brief description of the incident, or reason for this evaluation. (If this evaluation is being performed as a periodi: requirement, record " Periodic Review") .

t

! C.

Mechanics of Preoarine ,1,ha Performance Review (Section 3) .

i

l. Fill in the heading of the form as follows:

a. Record e=ployee 's name and nunber.

l

b. Record employee 's job title, date evaluation is performed.

I and the na=e of the individual performing the evaluatien.

Page 5 of 11 Revision .

. l EVPS - AP Chapter 13 ATIX2 BENT "B" EVALUATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE (Continued) Page 9 of 14

2. Fill in the Evaluation Rating as follows:

j j a. Determine the description of behavior most applicable to the area of review in question per the Performance '

Rating Guide.

b. Record this number in the space provided.

c. If an explanation of the description selected is

(

necessary, mark the appropriate column and record the comment in Secticn A beneath the heading " Comments".

' of Review", merk the appropriate column and record explanation in Section A under the heading

" Comments." -

D. Evaluation Review and Processing i

1.

Review the comments and overall evaluation with the j individual in accordance with Section VII.F of this

' procedure. This review will include any immediate

corrections of identified dificiencies.

2. Sign the Evaluation of Job istformance.

3.

Submit the final Evaluation of Job Performance to the applicable Group Support Coordinator.

i '

! E. Guidelines for Evaluation of Emplovee i

t

1. The evaluation should be limited to the time period or incident covered by the rating. It is not good practice to review old evaluation sheets until the current evaluation is complete. The rating sh

21d reflect the employees performance for the current seriod and the evaluators review l

could be biased by reviewini data from outside the period.

[ 2.

' The evaluator must employ diseplined thinking so as to rate the employee on each " Area for Review" separately, and not allow his decision on one area sway his decision on others.

3.

The evaluator should determine his personal prejudices towards the employee and exercise caution that these prejudices good or bad do not interfere with an objective i

evaluation of e=ployee.

l l

t t

l l

Page 6 of 11 Revision ' .

I

-n--- -- , - , - . . , . _ , . , _ , - , , - - , , , . - . - - - - , _ _ - . . - . . - , , , - . _ . - - - , - -

BVPS - AP Chapter 15 ATU O M2.T "B" EVALL'ATION OF J03 PERFORMANCE (Continued) 4 When deter =1ning the description of behavior most applicable the evaluator must bear in mind the e=ployees Quality of Work, Quantity of Work, and Job Knowledge. .

F. Guidelines for Review of Evaluation with Emoloyee

1. The review should be conducted in private.

2. The review should be conducted as soon as possible after 4

the evaluation is performed.

3. The evaluator should point out strong points as well as weak areas, and should offer recommendations for improve-munts in areas identified as needing improvement. He will institute immediate on shift corrective action of any identified deficiency.

J 9

Page 7 cf 11 Revision 1 ,

, i

, -n- , - - - r

. =__ .-. - . - - _ _ .

.s i

BVPS AP Chapter 15 A MAEtTr "B" EVALUATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE Page 11 of 14 SECTION A - UORK INC!nENT SLW.ARY NOTE:

Significant work incidents of employees - both satisfactory and unsatisfactory should be recorded as follows:

Employee's Name Job Title Employee No.

Date of Work Incident Date of Talk with Employee Date of this Report Description of this significant work incident or review:

Comments (Data from talk with employee and special recommendations)

NOTE:

Record data of this significant work incident on " Performance Review" report opposite specific job characteristics which'are specifically related to this work incident.

Signature of Evaluator Page S of L; Revision 1

{

BVPS AP Chaptar 15 ATIX2MT7I' "B" EVALUATION OF JOB PERFOPS.ANCE Page 12 of 14 SECTION B - PERFOP3ANCE REVIE*4 PEPJORMANCE RATING GUIDE

1. Poor judgment, needs constant supervision Employee 's Name/Numoer 2. Must be checked closely, difficulty in application ~

3. Avoids responsibilities, cooperation fair 4 Adequate, understands p.:11cies Job Title 5. Satisfactory, needs occasional supervision

6. Usually accurate and dependable, constructive Evaluation Date 7. Good judgment, good leader, thinks independently 8.

Well informed, consistent, keen and original, plans well

9. Willing to be held accountable, maintains consistent Evaluator controls

10. Self starter, recogniaed authority, excellent, dynamic, outstanding (vo M l Evalu '

i s ation g u u *]

AREA 0F REVIEW o a- yu Rating 2y i3 l

A. PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE ' (1-10) o .9 " l

x. Adherence to . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . x

y. Attitude toward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y B. SAFETY

x. Ut111aation of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x Attitude toward l y. .

. . . . .. . . . . . . . . y l

C. SECURITY 1

}

. l l.

x. Compliance with

.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . X e

, y. Attitude toward ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 'y 1 i

! D. RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS ,l ,i i , t 1

1 -

x. Application of . '

. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . x ,I -

1 l

y. Attitude toward i l

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y  ;

E. TRAINING

x. Co= prehension of .

. . . .. . . . . . . . . . x i

y. Attitude toward . . . . . . . . . .. . . .

r Page 9 of 11 Revision 1 -

e =a e .

n s--, - ,-

~

BVPS - AP Chapter'13 EVALUATION OF JOB PERF0PMANCE SECTION 3 - PERFORMANCE REVIEi4 NENT "B" Page 13 of 14 PERFC2&ViCE laTING GUIDE

1. Poor judg=ent, needs constant supervision Employee 's Name/ Number 2. Must be checked closely, difficulty in application 3.

Avoids responsibilities, cocpe' ration fair 4  ?>.dequate, understands :mst policies Job Title 5. Satisfactory, needs occasional supervision '

6. Usually accurate and dependable, construc':ive

7. Good judgment, good leader, thinks Evaluation Date independently '

8. Well informed, consistent, keen and origitral, plans well

9. Willing to be held accountable, maintains Evaluator consistent controls

10. Self starter, recognized authority, excellent, dynamic, outstanding W V) iEvalu-

'a tio n Jw 'ys j AREA 0F REVIE'4 m .; , - .v. - . _

Rating -c a EO (1210) ' * $ l. S " . _

F. HOUSECLEANING

x. Exercise of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . x

y. Attitude toward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y G. WATCH STANDING -

l

x. Alertness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x i i

y. Attitude toward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I

y E. LOG TAKING  !

I  :

t  !

x. Adeptness I i

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,x {

y. Attitude toward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i

'y I. ADAP~ABILI'"Y i t

x. Accepts and promotes change . . . . . . . . . . 'x l

t i

y. Attitude toward change . . . . . . . . . . . . ;y i s

3 J. LEADERSEIP

, x. Ability to lead .

J

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'x

y. Attitude toward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y -

/

Page 10 cf 11 , Eevisic: 1 7 .

.---H

BVPS-AP Chapter 15 Id"4OECT "B"  !

EVALUATION OF JOB PERFOPyE'CE Page 14 of 14 SECTION B - PERFOUAiCE REVIra', I PERF0Py.ANCE RATING GUIDE E=ployee 's Name/Nu=oer 1. Poor judgment, needs constant supervision 2.

3. Must be checked closely, difficulty in applicatio Job Title 4.

Avoids responsibilities, cooperation fair Adequate, understands most policies 5.

6.

Satisfactory, needs occasional supervision Evaluation Date Usually accurate and dependable, constructive 7.

8. Good ,,udgment, good leader, thinks independently Well informed, consistent, keen and original, plans well

9. Willing to be held accountable, maintains Evaluator consistent controls 10.

Self starter, recognized authority, excellent dynamic, outstanding (d (4 Evalu- ,e ,

AREA 0F REVIEW ation v @

Rating w E "Ni (1-10) SE 53

$ EE K. Coch1 TION

x. Job Knowledge .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x

y. Job Initiative . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . y L. DECISION MAKING I

! x. Ju dgment.

. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .. . . x l y.

Acceptance of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . fy ,

l l  !

I  ;

I j

i I 1 . ,  !

. I

.f 4 t

Page 11 of 11 Revisien 1

_, -.-y-

ATDGMENT "C" Page 1 of 2 1

Only qualified individuals shall be assigned to perform safety-related operations duties. Qualification to perform safety-related operations may be obtained and documented by successful completion of the appropriate training as set forth in the BVPS-TM -

or by on-the-job training documented on the attached Employee Qualification Statemen.t.

The content of "on-the-job" training for performance of an operations task involving safety-related equipment shall be determined by a qualified Operations Supervisor. A training plan will be prepared to provide guidance to the Trainer. The Trainer shall be a person qualified to perform the task and shall instruct the individual in the proper performance of the task. The Trainer shall complete the Employee Qualification Statement form and shall attach the Training Plan and other specific items not covered on the form. The Trainer shall determine through questioning and/or demonstration that the Trainee understands the training received and is qualified to perform the task for which instruction was j given. By his signature on the Employee Qualification Statement i

form, the Trainer certifies that the training has been given as described on the form and its attachments and that the Trainee

' has been examined and found to possess a satisfactory degree of knowledge to perform the task. The Employee Qualification Statement form and attachments shall be sent to the Director, Nuclear Training, for review and inclusion in the training records.

The Evaluation of Job Performance form, as described in SAP Chapter 15, shall be utilized to determine the long-term effectiveness of training.

4 i

... o . :e.> .. i --

_, ,; . 3,. .

194 C4,CC1.002 , , l-DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY.' Figure 0.2 Beaver Valley Power Station Training Manual g g ,,C" EMPLOYEE QUALIFICATION STATEMENT a@ f2 Employee Name/ Number i Course Title (1) Completion Date

! Employee Job Title Ralph Code Dascription of Instruction:

Dascription of Tasks:

Re.ason/ Requirement for Instruction:

This qualification is conditional and limited by the following waivers or physical limitations. (.If no restrictions, state "None").

Employee qualified to perform specific tasks noted above. Supportive documentation atteched.

ces Manager Nuclear Operations Manager Nuclear Support Services Signature of NSS, NSOF, or Individual Staff Supervisor

. Employee's File Person Responsible for Trng.

Reviewed by:

Supervisor of Training (1)

If course or training is not described in TM-1, a description of instruction-completed and assigned task must be provided.

f 0.9 ISSUE 3

% y= - - -++ - --- - , - - .