ML20049H594
| ML20049H594 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1982 |
| From: | Madsen E DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20049H587 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8203030338 | |
| Download: ML20049H594 (43) | |
Text
, _ .
. af
, .t
's4
.J * .
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of:
THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY ) Docket # 50-341 Enrico Fermi Atomic Power )
Plant Unit 2 )
TESTIMONY OF EVELYN F. MADSEN on INTERVENOR'S CONTENTION 8 March, 1982 8203030338 820226 PDR ADOCK 05000341 T PDR
. _. .. ~ _ . .. --
'1 .
TESTIMONY OF EVELYN F. MADSEN ENVIRONMENTAL LICENSING ENGINEER-FERMI 2 THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY ON INTERVENOR'S CONTENTION 8 1 My name is Evelyn F. Madsen and I am the Environ-2 mental Licensing Engineer for the Fermi 2 Project for The 3 Detroit Edison Company (" Edison"). My business address is 4 2000 Second Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48226.
5 I have been requested to respond to Intervenor's 6 Contention 8 which alleges:
7 CEE is concerned over whether there is a feasible escape route for the residents of the Stony 8 Point area which is adjacent to the Fermi 2 site.
The only road leading to and from the area, 9 Pointe Aux Peaux, lies very close to the reactor site. In case of an accident the residents would 10 have to travel toward the accident before they could move away from it.
11 Edison believes that the road system as it presently 12 exists is adequate to evacuate the residents of Stony Point 13 on a timely basis. This opinion is based on:
14 Evacuation studies conducted for Stony Point; 15 Installation of a siren system and the use of 16 the Emergency Broadcast System (EBS), as a general warning system, including events at 17 Fermi 2; 18
- Radiation dose evaluations of the residents of Stony Point during evacuation based on 19 a highly incredible event at Fermi 2; 20 -
The Protective Action Guidelines set forth by the EPA and endorsed by the NRC and FEMA 21 for protection of the health and safety of the public.
22
\ -
1 I. Evacuation Time Estimates 2 The residential community of Stony Point is situated 3 on the shore of Lake Erie in Monroe County, approximately 4 one mile south of the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant 5 (Figure 1). The geographic extent and the local street 6 system in the community is illustrated in Figure 2; Figure 3 is 7 an aerial photograph of the area taken in October, 1981. '
8 It is estimated that there are approximately 1400 9 residents in Stony Point based on the 1980 Advance U. S.
10 Census Report for the area. An independent analysis was 11 conducted to test the Advance Census information against 12 detailed electric meter records available from Detroit 13 Edison. This analysis indicated that the population estimates 14 from the two independent data sources (U. S. 1980 Advance 15 Census and Detroit Edison meter records) were consistently 16 within two or three percentage points for the several areas 17 analyzed.
18 On the basis of actual site visits to Stony Point 19 and examinations of detailed area maps, the distribution 20 of the area population by sector within the community has been 21 estimated. The greatest population concentration is in the 22 area west of Dewey Drive between Venice and Shady Lane 24 (Figure 4).
25 Based on available U. S. Census data for Monroe County, 26 the total automobile fleet in Stony Point is estimated at 27 738. It is expected that during an evacuation not all cars 28 will be used or be available. On the average, at least one
s .
1 car per dwalling unit can be expected to be used during I
2 an evacuation. In larger households, especially households 3 with multiple wage-earners, the number of cars used may be 4 greater than one per dwelling unit. Based on average 5 family size and total car availablity, it is estimated 6 that as many as 600 autos may be used during an evacuation 7 (Figure 5).
8 One of the fundamental principles of transportation 9 system management involves the design and application of 10 traffic engineering techniques that support and reinforce 11 the natural tendencies of people using the system. This 12 principle is of major importance in the event of an evacuation 13 during a potentially health threatening situation and must 14 guide the selection and designation of evacuation routes.
15 The most desirable evacuation routes are those routes that 16 people would normally select in rapidly leaving an area.
17 Changes to this " natural" route pattern should only be made 18 if significant risks exist in following such natural routes.
19 Such risks may exist if 1) the natural route induces 20 traffic well in excess of the route's capacity, resulting 21 in traffic congestion and lengthy delays to evacuees in 22 traffic queues; and 2) the natural route carries the evacuees 23 into the actual or projected area of the radiation plume.
24 There are significant differences in traffic control 25 requirements along " natural" evacuation routes and along 26 routes that are not natural to the evacuees. Along natural 27 routes police officers offer guidance at key locations which
1 will expsdito the flow of traffic. Along routes that are 2 not perceived by the public as logical exit routes, police 3 officer control will be essential. For example, the 4 diversion of traffic from a major route onto a secondary 5 street will require barricades and police officer presence, 6 and even then some public resistance to the diversion may 7 be encountered.
8 The major road facilities recommended as the evacuation 9 routes in the Stony Point Community are shown in Figure 6.
10 All traffic is channeled into Pointe Aux Peaux Road which 11 is the normal entrance and exit facility for Stony Point.
12 The evacuation process must be viewed as a dynamic 13 process (comprised of a series of actions by the individual 14 residents), rather than discrete and simultaneous actions 15 by the entire population. This dynamic process can be 16 effectively reflected throug.k a joint probability analysis 17 technique. The factors that influence the departure rate 18 of evacuees, more fully described in a report entitled 19 " Evacuation Time Estimate"l, include:
20 -
Alerting and notification of the area residents 21 Area workers leaving their place of work to return home 22 Area workers traveling home 23 Area residents preparing to leave home 24 On weekends, when few people are at work, the impact 25 of some of these factors will be minimal. The estimated 26 cate of evacuee departure following initiation of a general 27 1/ Evacuation Time Estimate, Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2; PRC Voorhees, March 1982
Q n .
1 emergency for both an average weekday and a weekend are 2 listed in Table 1.
3 The departure rate has two effects on the total time 4 required to evacuate an area: 1) it determines the overall 5 time required for everyone to leave the area, and 2) it 6 determines the extent of the traffic congestion that may 7 occur on the road systems, and thus, the time that evacuees 8 may spend in traffic queues on various parts of the evacua-9 tion routes.
10 In addition to the departure rate, roadway capacity 11 is a key factor in determing evacuation time. The capa-12 city of Pointe Aux Peaux Road is estimated at 1200 vehicles 13 per hour on the outbound lane. This estimate is based 14 on average vehicle headways" of three seconds and reflects 15 an operating speed of 15 to 20 miles per hour. On Lake-15 shore and Dewey Drive the average operating speed is 17 estimated to be about 10 miles per hour with average 18 vehicle headways about four seconds. A conservative estimate 19 of capacity for these streets is 900 vehicles per hour out-20 bound.
21 A detailed analysis of traffic flow on Lakeshore, 22 Dewey Drive, and Pointe Aux Peaux Road, conducted with 23 the aid of a computer simulation program, indicates that 24 no significant traffic congestion would occur during an 25 evacuation on either a weekday or a weekend day. On an 26 average weekday the point of maximum traffic would occur 27 about one hour and fifteen minutes following the initiation Headway is the spacing between vehicles, and is a
, measure of the time lapse between one vehicle and a successive vehicle passing a given point.
1 of the siren system and EBS at the intersection of Dewey 2 Drive and Pointe Aux Peaux Road. During a 15 minute period 3 a total of 180 cars would be expected to arrive at this inter-4 section. The exit capacity along Pointe Aux Peaux Road 5 during that same 15 minute period is 300 and well in 6 excess of the arriving vehicles.
7 On a weekend day the point of maximum traffic is 8 the same as for the weekday, but with more autos arriving 9 within a 15 minute period. The maximum 15 minute auto 10 arrivals on a weekend is estimated to be 252 and thus still 11 below the 15 minute capacity of 300.
12 Without any significant traffic delays, as illustrated 13 by the preceeding paragraphs, the entire population of 14 Stony Point can evacuate on an average weekday and be 15 at or near the North Dixie Highway, west of the plant, within 16 two and one-half hours from initiation of the sirens and 17 EBS. The travel time of individual evacuees, measured from 18 the southern tip of Stony Point to North Dixie Highway, is 19 conservatively estimated to be 12 minutes.
20 On a weekend the individual travel time would be the 21 same as noted above. Since more area residents can be 22 expected to be at home on a weekend they would be able to 23 depart more rapidly. The total evacuation time for the 24 entire area population on a weekend is estimated to be 25 one hour and forty-five minutes.
26 During adverse weather conditions, such as snow 27 or icy road conditions, drivers would adjust normal driving
-5t + - a
- t a 1 bchavior in two ways (1) operating speed would be reduced, 2 and (2) separation (or headways) between vehicles would be 3 increased. Adjustments in operating speed would be more 4 significant when normal speeds are relatively high, i.e.,
5 in excess of 20 miles per hour. At speeds below 20 miles 6 per hour the most significant driver adjustment to adverse 7 weather conditions would be increased distance between vehicles.
8 For the evacuation from Stony Point, relatively low 9 operating speeds were assumed during normal weather condi-10 tions (about 10 miles per hour on side streets and 15 to 20 11 miles per hour on Pointe Aux Peaux Road). Little reduction 12 in operating speed would be expected during inclement weather, 13 but headways are estimated to increase by as much as 50 14 per cent. Such a change in headways has a major impact on 15 the maximum utilization (capacity) of the roadway. The 16 capacity effects are as follows:
17 Normal Adverse Roadway Conditions Conditions 18 Pointe Aux Peaux Road 1200 vph* 800 vph 19 Side streets 900 vph 600 vph 20 During any 15 minute interval the number of vehicles 21 that can exit along the sidestreets and Pointe Aux Peaux 22 Road are 150 and 200 respectively.
! 23 l On Lakeshore and Dewey Drive the maximum expected 15 24 minute vehicle arrivals is 128 on an average weekday and 25 26 thus within the capacity limits of those streets during
' Vehicles per hour i
i
1 adverse weather conditions. On Pointe Aux Peaux Road the 2 maximum expected vehicle arrivals during one 15 minute 3 period ir 203 on an average weekday and thus at the capacity 4 of that facility during adverse weather conditions.
5 These data indicate that during a fifteen minute 6 period, approximately one hour following the initiation of 7 the siren system and EBS, there would likely be some 8 congestion at the intersection of Dewey Drive and Pointe 9 Aux Peaux Road, but such congestion would not exist for 10 more than about 15 minutes. No congestion would be expected 11 to exist on Lakeshore and Dewey Drive.
12 In the event that adverse weather conditions existed 13 on a weekend, the level of congestion would increase because 14 of the more rapid departure rate of the area residents.
15 Congestion of about 15 minute duration would likely occur 16 at the intersection of Lakeview and Shady Lane at Dewey 17 Drive. Similar congestion would be expected at the inter-18 section of Dewey Drive and Pointe Aux Peaux Road.
19 The overall evacuation time for the entire popula-20 tion will not be affected by this temporary congestion.
21 The travel time to exit from Stony Point for those 22 residents that encounter the congestion would be 23 increased by an estimated maximum of five to seven minutes.
24 The evacuation times for normal and adverse conditions 25 are summarized in Table 2.
. o 1 II. Notification System 2 Edison will be installing a siren system within ten miles 3 around the Fermi 2 plant that will provide for notification 4 to the residents within of a radiological emergency 5 within fifteen minutes of the system's activation. In 6 concept, the siren system will be owned and activated by 7 the local County officials as a general warning system 8 for all emergencies, including natural disasters. Upon 9 activation, residents in the area will tune to the EBS 10 for instructions ,concerning the type of emergency and 11 resultant actions.
12 In the event of a radiological emergency at Fermi 2, 13 instructions would be given to either " shelter" (e.g., stay 14 indoors), or to evacuate to predetermined reception points 15 and congregate care centers. For radiolegical emergencies, 16 the system would be activated upon orders of the Governor pursuant 17 to authority conferred by State law, Michigan Compiled Laws, 18 Public Acts of 1976, No. 390.
i 19 Information brochures are published annually under 20 the joint auspices of the Emergency Services Division, 21 Michigan Department of State Police; Monroe County Office of 22 Civil Preparedness; Wayne County Emergency Preparedness 23 Office; and Edison, primarily to inform the public of 24 actions it should take when the siren system is activated.
25 These actions will initially include tuning to the local 26 EBS radio or television stations to receive further instructions.
1 According to present plans, the community of Stony 2 Point will be more than adequately covered by the siren 3 placed as shown on Figure 4. This will provide the 4 residents of the area with prompt notification of any 5 natural disasters, as well as radiological emergencies 6 at Fermi 2 that may require a protective action. It should 7 be noted that the evacuation time estimates discussed 8 previously are based on time after initiation of the 9 siren system and receipt of instructions.
f
1 III. Radiological Dose Evaluation 2 Thus far, we have discussed the time required to 3 evacuate the Stony Point area and the siren system that 4 will provide prompt notification to the residents. An 5 additional evaluation was performed to determine the radiation 6 exposure to the residents of Stony Point in the unlikely 7 event of a release occurring concurrently with an evacua-8 tion action.
9 In order to discuss the possibility of the residents 10 of Stony Point receiving a radiation dose as a result of a 11 release at the Fermi 2 plant, it was necessary to postulate 12 a hypothetical accident at the plant which would result in 13 radiation being released into the environment. The 14 scenario selected for this analysis is beyond that of 15 a design basis accident and assumes the highly unlikely 16 and improbable event of a core meltdown. The scenario 17 is assumed to occur without technical justification 18 and is developed solely for the purpose of creating an 19 evacuation situation to make assessments of radiation dose 20 to the residents in the Stony Point area and along various 21 evacuation routes.
22 As stated earlier, the scenario is initiated by 23 a core melt creating an increase in the reactor vessel 24 pressure sufficient to cause radioactive steam leakage 25 into the primary containment and from there into the 26 reactor building or secondary containment. Once in the 27 secondary containment, release to the atmosphere is
1 throuten the standby gas treatment system (SGTS) which 2 automatically activates at high radioactivity levels. The 3 SGTS exhausts the radioactive material through a series 4 of filters that effectively remove iodine at 99% efficiency.
5 The radioactivity released to the atmosphere is assumed to 6 be 100% of the noble gases since the nobles are not removed 7 by the filter system. Noble gases, such as xenon and 8 krypton, are not absorbed by the SGTS, but are chemically 9 inert and also have relatively short half-lives (anywhere 10 from several minutes to several days).
11 The scenario is developed over a period of eight (8) 12 hours, the time assumed for the SGTS to purge completely the 13 volume of the secondary containment. The purge of radio-14 activity is assumed to progress on a linear basis, although, 15 in fact, due to recycling, radioactivity will decline 16 exponentially. Radioactive decay is applied over the eight i
17 (8) hours to the noble gases released.
18 The meteorological conditions assumed for plumc.
19 characteristics are highly conservative. The scenario was 20 designed to assume that the wind is blowing from the N/NNE 21 placing the downwind direction of the plume directly S/SSW 22 over Stony Pointe for the eight (8) hour period of the 23 release. In addition, the wind speed is assumed to be 24 2.24 mph (1 m/sec.) and an inversion condition exists that 25 assumes very poor dispersion causing the plume to spread
. i
1 horizontally over the ground in a 25 sector -- much like a 2 layer of fog.
3 Conditions of this nature are not prevalent at the 4 Fermi 2 site. Since 1974, when meteorological data has 5 been collected, the predominant wind direction is away from 6 Stony Point, S/SW to N/NE, at average wind speeds of 7 8 to 10 mph. Data indicates that the wind blows toward 8 Stony Point less than five (5%) per cent of the time.
9 Nine locations were selected in and around the 10 Stony Point area for the asessment of radiation doses 11 resulting from the radioactive plume. These " dose points" 12 are shown on Figure 7 and Table 3 13 Evacuation routes were selected in the area that were 14 a combination of transversing the plume as well as requiring 15 travel near the centerline. In addition to the existing 16 routes along Pointe Aux Peaux Road, non-existent southern 17 routes that would require road construction through wetlands 18 were examined. These routes are shown in Figure 8 (A) (B) and 19 (C) and listed in Table 4. For the purposes of this study, 20 the evacuation route included the streets within the Stony 21 Point area and Pointe Aux Peaux Road, to North Dixie Highway.
22 Calculations of radiation doses were made at the 23 various dose points listed in Table 3 using standard 24 techniques developed by the nuclear community and e
1 by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Dose rates in the 2 radioactive plume are highest along the plume centerline 3 and decrease rapidly as one moves away from the centerline.
4 At the plume edges the radiation levels drop to negligible 5 values. Fifteen isotopes of krypton, xenon, and iodine 6 were selected as contributors to the dose in the plume. j 7 At each dose point calculations were made for each isotope, !
8 and the results were then summed to yield the total dose.
9 Table 3 summarizes the dose received by persons at each 10 dose point, assuming no evacuation and that persons 11 remaining at the dose locations would receive doses 12 for the eight-hour duration of the plume.
13 Radiation doses during evacuation were calculated by 14 averaging the dose rates along various segments of the 15 evacuation routes and time-integrating the results with 16 the motion along the routes. The total doses received by 17 the evacuees were determined by adding their doses received 18 during evacuation to those received before evacuation.
19 Table 4 presents the results of the evacuation dose calcu-21 lations, showing the doses received by people who evacuate 22 in two and one-half hours.
_14-
.- . . . . - . . . - - . . . . - - .. . . . ~ . . .
1 IV. Summary and Conclusions 2 As indicated from the results in Tables 3 and 4, 3 evacuation reduces the dose to the individual and would 4 be preferred to nonevacuation. Both the evacuation time 5 estimate and the dose evaluation assume that Stony Point 6 can be evacuated within two hours and thirty minutes.
7 Any differences that may exist initially in time between 8 recation to the notification system and actually leaving 9 the residence would be insignificant since everyone is 10 out of the area within the same overall time frame.
11 The Environmental Protection Agency has issued pro-12 tective actions in its report entitled " Manual of Protective 13 Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents",
14 EPA-520/1-75-001, revised June, 1979 These protective 15 action guidelines (PAG) are shown in Table 5 and are 16 recommended for use by the NRC and FEMA during nuclear 17 incidents. A review of the results in Table 4 show that 18 the total dose received prior to and during evacuation 19 would be within the range of 1 to 5 rem (1000 to 5000 20 mrem) stated for protective actions resulting in evacuation 21 requirements. The results of the studies conducted clearly 22 indicate that the postulated, highly incredible accident 23 scenario would result in doses to the residents in Stony 24 Point that under realistic evacuation conditions would 25 fall within the range of accepted protective actions.
o 1 In reviewing the results, an obvious conclusion can 2 be drawn that Pointe Aux Peaux Road is a reasonable and 3 reliable exit route from Stony Point since the doses 4 received by those leaving via the non-existent routes are 5 higher than those for all but one Stony Point route.
6 Thus, there is little to be gained by attempting to 7 construct new routes through wetlands for the purpose of 8 an evacuation that is highly unlikely to occur and that 9 results in dose rates that are within the protective 10 action guidelines.
4 O
s Table 1 Time after Percent of Percent of Initiation of Population Population Notification System Ready to Ready to Evacuate Evacuate (weekday) (Sunday) 0:00 - 0:15 -- --
0:15 - 0: 30 -- --
1 0: 30 - 0: 45 6% 10%
0:45 - 1:00 23% 39%
1:00 - 1:15 35% 49%
1:15 - 1: 30 21% 2%
1: 30 - 1: 45 7% --
i 1: 45 - 2:00 4% --
i
- 2
- 00 - 2:15 4% --
l l
100% 100%
l l
l
Table 2
SUMMARY
OF i
EVACUATION TIMES FOR STONY POINT ESTIMATED TIME TO ESTIMATED EVACUATE MAXIMUM ENTIRE TRAVEL TIME EVACUATION STONY POINT FOR INDIVIDUAL CONDITION POPULATION FAMILIES 1
Normal weather, 2-1/2 hours 12 minutes weekday Normal weather, 1-3/4 hours 12 minutes weekend Adverse weather, 2-1/2 hours 15 minutes weekday Adverse weather, 1-3/4 hours 19 minutes weekend
, - , , . - - - __m. _,-- ,.- , v _.
TABLE 3 DOSE POINT LOCATIONS AND DOSE EVALUATIONS FOR THE POSTULATED SCENARIO DOSE POINT TOTAL DOSE (0 to 8hr) (MREMS)
NO. LOCATION NO EVACUATION 1
Pointe Aux Peaux Road at Lake Erie (Eastern end) 1,180.
2 Pointe Au- Peaux Road at Dewey St. 17,800.
3 Dewey St. at Parkview Road 19,900.
4 Western end of Parkview Road 8,350.
5 Stony Point 8,660.
6 Pointe Aux Peaux Rd. at Lagoona Boulevard 13 7 Pointe Aux Peaux Rd. at Brest Road 0.0 8 Pointe Aux Peaux Rd. at North Dixie Highway 0.0 9 Brest Road at its junction with Brest Bay 0.0 9
+
TABLE 4 EVACUATION ROUTES AND ESTIMATED DOSES RECIEVED l
DOSE (MREM)
ROUTE POINTS INVOLVED DURING BEFORE TOTAL NO. STATUS START END EVAC. EVAC. DOSE 1 Existing 1-2-6-7-8 470 80 550 2 Existing 4-3-2-6-8 670 580 1,250 l
3 Existing 5-3-2-6-8 1,340 600 1,940 ,
4 Existing 1-2-6-7-9 470 80 550 5 Non-existent 1-2-3-4-9 940 80 1,020 6 Non-existent 5-3 9 820 580 1,400 l 9
9 e *
. W
Table 5 - Recomiended protective actions to reduce whole body and thyroid dose from exposure to a gaseous plume Projected Dose (Rem) to ga) the Population Reconmended Ictions CIxments Whole body <1 No planned protective actions. (b) Previously ravvm,mded State may issue an advisory to seek shelter protective actions may Thyroid <5 further instructions. be reconsidered or Monitor environmental rMinticn levels. terminated.
Whole body 1 to <5 Seek shelter as a muunum. If constraints exist, Consider evacuation. Evacuate unless special consideration Thyroid 5 to <25 constraints make it impractical. should be given for lenitor environmental radiation levels. evacuation of children Control access. and pregnant wonen. .
Whole Indy 5 and above Conduct endatory evacuation. Seeking shelter would be mnitor environmental radiation levels and adjust an alternative if Thyroid 25 and above for mandatory evacuation based on these evacuation were not levels. imrediately possible.
Control access.
(a)These actions are reommended for planning purposes. Protective action decisions at the time of the incidst nust take existing conditicus into ccnsideraticn.
(b)At the time of the incident, officials may implement low-inpact protective acticms in keeping with the principle of maintaining rMiaticn exposures as low as reasonably achievable.
i a
p .
l .
e e
.o l
a i .--
J 1. Ing j i % gigin -
l~
m i n.. ii 3_. n, -
&--). y~. :
, _, ,[EIMI M I E.l E II I ET- --
- .'%j~ ~g'
- -.
g ,
[' /l- ~
D J_, ,[ . .
M y /M, [ } .'. '.s.
i _
uf -
.rs i
-I. B" 1-~
= l" -~
/i*Y .j - - - .j b,. \
l \
n',Na_s k -~t , -I,_ ~ l ~,
~
/
j'
./
N i/ L ,,;^%f ;
~~ h 7 ~.- -
k'/A f _
- , g
- p.=
/
- ~~ ,
l
<[ g~,.
Ns '"
\ ~, \ sY+
% i \! A %\ Q_ J. t c
/ ,, ) ,'o- _-
, - - ~
%, " ~ I ~
Stony
. / d'
- = //., \ -
Point s.
\ '" oV s f ,Nee ,
I N I N I N I Emergency Planning Zone
~'
\ ;, k'
.,,'s IO N, #e Figure 1 Regional I.ocation
....,.......--------u--.-.. ~ - - - - . - - - --
CEACT02 . ..
UNIT 2 ' *
. . I I
i 1
REACTOR _
UNITI -
1 8
i s
I
/
ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC i j
POWER PLANT J
. .e '
+ '
--i-- tf I BREST ~E - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "~
\
- b
- 0 -
r -
.= = $h Bl o
= . 6 cm :
}
o -._
% 1 ,
b 1r === BunE:g ,) !! kolfii
\
~
TLM gg
' um = = 6, -
= JL gg _ L_g c,em_
l #I dL5,"A'JUM}?(QD, F "
B D 0 0[Td M % G untEsv JFrr
\\.B /
otst tr .
1 E
A .
STONY 7(::~ '
+
POINT l 3
BEACH STONY POINT o i MILE l{2 3{4 j g
____ _ _ -- _ _ -=
i Figure 2 l Street System in Stony Point l
l"* r-
,e 4 _. "TugwMC _---g--y.- N r / ~
-.. N '
9 -
?
- >
- [/ I I. -
h
- f,h. . , -' h'a , 'A
. O k;O/Q i g. I n.,(i -m .ti$*h -c TNl r
g N.7
! Q' p?' d
} n. ai, .1. h.
l f,e ** O$ *,%f
.r"N bOl. . Q, w9l : 4e.
s :
.,).I(L.,
, i .
, ~---g .ews h ie
. .ur v .,,.
p 1 92
- %Q. n f k. ;e,y & ,F
.N. s,g 4 , qYM t e/ r.2 *Qh w y7c 3(7
~
- Qh9wsep?.. F n%A ..
'~'
a -1 ,e ~'~ ? $ / .'
h.c j
/
f a- r m q 5 9, y g s
- p. .- -- y .g Mcp h 3 s,.,' [' r, gh%
_ .;,1 q't.-
k.,c. ,,
4
. I ., i - <,
~
... ,,,A.:..'~~
I J.,<
j
^
WN .h .gk N *[G$&.$&i,%.Lkhit$,r.,.h.y.'s3f# V '
~h% % )
T S -:-c.:t-at: 6 h/ Q]f *
,h,
~
1,
?
'mannmun==e.ee
& Q.
h
- -'%-, l 4, g'y ' -
f hj .
?. j
- '. 7
~
, $, 't f %,,
.]. '.-:'! t e ,
j $ $
%N& estgf#!
~
m?') i % '
?d ? f2iF#p xM ' '
Nj '
"\ < h
- i? b fIy,~h$ -
' E, oMl'h! '
.= pMEN,j$I'.Ih'.4h
^$ <f,Y
- .;R ;
i~ g,- Mk" k@
- M' y.. M,.h%c$ *.
~
1 I% . 9 s ,
Mig.1, [ z' *r3[, .
ff 'f,
.h.h *',
.&lif.if .
k[$5 $ Y$ g$$h~>1 h'N $?',' ,
^
Sh , .*'-) , qlr -
- ~ ,*
f Cf ? % '.
$Q&N..QTO ~'*
e ". -
t0' " ' l ~
wpqnn l3*c ~ ')g '%"I .
Y .
Wig' r:h' Q p
%q9h y ')p~: m;;.f i i if '
- b ' k% i
'y'
,- : ,~,L4 y
-)' [T.Ni Qs.W: s?. .?'
[ '* ni$. g,;$,Jf W'.Q (: .,;s :.,--$J[: g k ,a
+
f ~ f ;, -
& a .n . z.
g.
i,' .
~
[h; trylkk~>*:(
.rf*,{jg::R
~
i .
, i '
.:= :
3 y
r.v . .
'. Figure 3
/crial Motograph of Stony Poir.t 7rea F
[ ,
reale: 1 inch = 3000 feet fr[ ,
.. 'R??'- --e
- a?"- ,
i ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC POWER PLANT
/
N T' ) '
BREST T i '
= l 3
. 0 .3 m.= = 0 I g E '= m:m h
5 Di"""IAKE=c====) II -
' 2Q u ' main ' ' L 2
,, -'-a fh JL %
JOOD 9 i]D00
" Emu l
i Population 5 l Area Ntuber 1 82 3 2 232 STONY
$ $0 POINT \
5 239 BEACH Total 1400 STONY POINT X Siren location O l{2 3(4 i MILE
_ _ _ _ _ _ _"""""_m.y. d Figure 4 Population
UN 2 O
.. e ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC f POWER PLANT J 2
/
4 *
$' l BREST " i'
= l
. ~
'E
, g so m b
h ,7=== ma s_,_) n == = - -
=dh_N pg ni==L ,?
$? J a1 e a
- T J0000 9 '
0 1_]D_0_g l
3 as STONY 59
, 'N POINT (0 i 4 292 5 103 BEACH mai e' STONY POINT O l{2 5(4 i
l Mld
= " '
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ % w: w N Figure 5 Estinated Autos 1
Used in an Evacuation
cEcetoa
,
- UNIT I O R.E.A. C.T.OR- O h
ENRICO FEp 1 ATO p pLA T e
/ # 1
~
BREST - .
g l 1
3
[ ~ s I \= n;nTn 5 \
r """"'"*'"# j a - ,
11 \
= dp =$in *
- b 7-t
._ a --~
l
" a ya s 00bs g'
\
}
<- /
(
1 STONY POINT l BEACH
/
STONY POINT os g /. 2 Sf i mt_ c j
- p. .- _ , ,.- -
_ _ _ _ = - - - , n,-
I Figure 6 mg g ni: Miff
l \ w d' s x ,
. z3
. . Q\.
sx< is w
($3 W z L*L w i .
\* \ -
- eas lg 11611 N83I5Y3 3 . EM
=--~-
I g g gg3g '
- I-- I ! I, w 5 !
!! I i
I Ei a w I.
Ell 5! i s!
l '
/
...5'SITFirg33 5E?iTJ' /tL/!____, -
um '
I l
lll l I
- g ._
3I10 g ,
I
...' ~% r,
~. l w rI F , .
t
,5 ld_ ~7 MOIEdAS l ...,
i l
9 ' e h5 , z
$ -!. l/ ('~ - h a m
. 'iim m f
'. f=>, ,I >
R a4w
,' / '
J I Il. .;..
l l '
.$ g j
- a. ' '
, o i. $ ! 17, !
m w - -
./
/ / o p . i :
< \ l* ! z /
/ a< \ <
\s k 3 p . '
,7
/
$y< '~
p;
. w ' ,j a 3
,/ 2 I 4' .
-_/____s)
/
3 imiars j
/ 31dyn
/ .'jg 5' G j E jusw3As ,
I d j f
- > ,/
5I s 5 ,/
m
, m ,/ 5 -
o i o
- r. - o v
,/ w!L'5 3 '
i
/ $wEg -
i / g
,i Ch*:o m
a o
~'
l O
/
/
i .
', I
/ V Wl f
\l / I -
'n $ / &l! t N l .
N, FERMI [ SITE
/
kf*
_I l ]
3 \ U 3 ( 'N, o -I PTE. AUX PEAUX RD.
1' 1 s 's in/ g 6 'N -
anEST m. ~ 3,.!
j' g q c.j 7-- - - - - ,
s , . " . y g.%.
UNPOPULATED /
/
l I'-+.d !
______ L l I l AREA
/..- ,,) - ] 1 l ; l g ,. >}p
/ .
l gSB/ j ,
Q'::NJ '
g g I I POINTE
- w agEE ,,.........../-..j /
l w j AUX g\
w s, w- / R ig i PEAUX q_ I )
.lRIN ST._f s
's
'N w
k E
5 WETLANDS /
/
S""" !
f
/
/
i z '
F
'\ - / SHADY LANE H N
BREST / / 2 H
'N -
N BAY i' l i
z.
's, 8
I
! LAKE w
flIj
~
,,,, I $A
/ I ERIE g
- / , 1
' 7 A./ . ,,'- - $ t,4-FIGURE 8A STONY POINT AND N
$/ . .
' ~.
"I j'/
ENVIRONS - EVACUATION ROUTES - 8 LEGEND AND PLUME LOCATIONS /
((I/ ====== DIRES ROUTE le 1-2-6-7-8 e/ --
FE M SITE BOLDIDARY g/i !
PL M CENTERLINE OR BOU SARIES RADIAL DISTANCES FROM ROUTE 3 'u/ '
FE M -2 REACTUR 5-3-2-6-7-8 c/ - NONEXISTENT SOUTHODI ROUTE v
q/ 5 STONY POINT l. @ DOSE POINT LOCATIONS SCALE: l' - 1200' EVACUATION ROUTES
l ,l O
6 T X I
N U S
1, o @ E I
N P R
, A E W T N, L O
D U O
R
,y y I
1 t
YRR BW WS N j r m$ ,2a$"I l
W ESOFRO OO HIE S r 2H l
T TT
,/
I
~ NNE IC ACUA OC U T
- - D L
-l ~
{ - i
- ~ ._ E E
G ETS 2NT m TNI - EN IEDI SC TI ISO T
- ~ " E L LWIP A U
~ SIEAOX
~ K A
I R ~
EMA K
IEUA I
D F EE NS AC OO V
~ L E DFPR ND E
- ' ~
/
!y! \ -
~
k$, !u l r'l 3 g 9. -
=
=-
=
tba/* - -
[, s *
- =- -
h8 5
i l l H
f
- T j! -
E U I !
T O /
/' I - S e
/ ,!
S
- r. E- N 4 hp -
5 mh t
- .j I ~
T i
- - u -
M s N R
E f/' -
I F /./
N
,,I
, d ,
O P
- - j/. ,
_ Y
,' ,/,
~
. N
- ew s s *
- ss 4
~ O T
/ ..
' S
- - T.
D - Y -
s' E T
S-m.
S ,/ /
D j -
A *
- N -
\ G L A *
, A . i U E ,[ ., L l '
\ P R ' ,\ T
,j'/L ,
OA 1 E
,\ P W N ,/
I J Bl l ( U g5= -
$ /'
N s ,/
/
wh ' /',
\
/
Q , /
s vq/
g -
. s D -
R X ~
U E
A S P ,s E
, Y T X
U D
. A U A R T B N O
' R T S E. S E N M,,,,
T E P R R O B I B T '
- A 0 DU 0
_ \ NC 2
' AA 1
_ 2 N V -
TE 9 N -
s BI -
8O e -
7 e
9 l
4 -
PS 26 47 N E N - -
E s
RYC E2 E6 s' UNR T - T - L GOI U3 U2 A 2 ITV O- O- C
~ FSE R4 R1 S
' s s
s' i ' . ; .
T X
. g, N U A S E
E n
@P E' I
t W E T
1 M
U O
BW U
O R
O NS
-1u YRR RN
- m4wI:l3a. rl
'~
~ - j:
- ROFREO
)'g t.
lI [ z w1 - DEST;UE A OHT A T S
MNEC CEC otI.NrSO t
AO U f_ . D N
BRAp ET G L R I N
_{t; i! - ~
E G ERS 2 ON T I O -
Ir
- - ~ E L
- E E SIEAaX U
- K I ~ EWNIrEE R D CNS A A R ~ IDUA OO V
- - L E DFPR ND E
~
- \ ~
r '
u -
!l2I t ,! -
\ ~ - -- -- -
a -@
t ig
"$O ol3*i ~ - -
r -
t s* ,Tf:/ s ~ - -- - -
1
~
' I Qj /
T P
/ f
! ;e
~
~
~
E ~
O U
,.*/*
T S
. ,/ I T.. E M
A 5
S '
/l/,, 'T ! L ,. ,'
I *' / ' d T U
A I
I T
M ',-
H 5
W E g N s'
I I R '
V K O E 'ji R A - P F s /,' , .,
P
- - Y
' [-l/ ,
- - N a* g '
~ -
/ t 1
' O T
.s ' -
- s e 7/,
. t -
S D .pT
. S
/[S/ '
s' E
- T . D ! ,/
A . .'
,N' 6 L A U E
,N L
A
/
,/
/
\
s PR T s OA $
E
\
P N
W /'q'/.
%A p/
/
,l N
~
NI ,( U
@5*
s' y/* /[/'/ -
s
, s uh s ^ [/ /y 3 - eg// vq/
s 2 N 5 c; -
s o
R r ,s' S E
uA T E N U P Y ' O r A R o.
n u
A E
R T
S E
m K T S
E R
B
,N T
N E
T S
B N I '0
- X 0 DE 2
\ NN 1 AO T
N-N -
CI 9 'l 8OS e - e E
PNO 54 69 - - s
,\ RYR E3 E4 E UNI L
~
\ GOV T ITN U2O- -U3 T -
O -
A C
FSE R1 R5 S
. =- _\
hI
r . _ . . - _ _ _ . . __ _ _ _ _ _
4
,/
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS EVELYN F. MADSEN ENVIRONMENTAL LICENSING ENGINEER ENRICO FERMI 2 PROJECT THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY 1 My name is Evelyn F. Madsen and I am the Environmental 2 Licensing Engineer for the Enrico Fermi 2 Project. My business 3 address is 2000 Second Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48226.
4 I received a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry 5 from New Jersey College for Woman, Rutgers University, New 6 Brunswick, New Jersey in 1951.
7 I have been associated with the Fermi 2 Project since 8 January 1973, when, as Environmental and Land Use Coordinator, I 9 became responsible for all Federal, State, and local permits 10 and licenses necessary to construct and operate Fermi 2. My 11 areas of responsiblity involve those areas of the plant 12 environs that are affected by plant operation. Ir, August, 1978 13 I became Environmental Licensing Engineer for Fermi 2; however, 14 my basic responsibilities remained the same.
15 Since 1973, I have been responsible for the contents 16 and filing of the Environmental Report for the Operating 17 License for Fermi 2. This also includes the responses to any 18 NRC and other agency questions, comments and concerns.
19 The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Operating 20 License for Fermi 2 was issued by the NRC in September, 21 1981.
22 In addition to the above, I am responsible for plant 23 effluent water quality, acquatic and terrestrial studies, 24 meteorological programs, offsite environmental radiological 25 monitoring, and the radiological effluent technical specifica-26 tions for normal plant operation.
O 3
o 1 I am also responsible for licensing the Radiological 2 Emergency Response Plan pursuant to 10 CFR 50 Appendix E which 3 includes the basic plan and its implementing procedures; the 4 evacuation time estimates for the 10-mile EPZ that are required 5 of the Applicant by the NRC; the prompt notification system; 6 the meteorology and lake breeze modeling; and the offsite acci-7 dent dose assessment methodology - both manual and computerized.
8 The evacuation time and dose assessment evaluations for Stony 9 Point were done under my direction.
10 From 1964 to 1972, while employed by Atomic Power 11 Development Associates, Inc., I was associated with the Fermi 1 12 fast breeder reactor as a Senior Technical Writer / Editor 13 responsible for writing and publishing documents related to the 14 design, operation, and licensing of Fermi 1. During 1972, I 15 was under contract to Edison to assist in the prepara-16 tion of the Environmental Report for the Construction Permit 17 for Fermi 2, including the responses to various comments 18 required for issuance by the NRC of the Final Environmental 19 Impact Statement in July, 1972.
20 From 1959 to 1963 I was employed by American Machine 21 and Foundry Co. (AMF) as a Senior Research Chemist in their 22 Stamford, Connecticut, research laboratories. While employed 23 by AMF, I was responsible for consumer acceptance testing of 24 the various AMF products prior to their marketing.
25 From 1951 to 1958 I was employed by American Cyanamid 26 Co. initially as a research chemist at the Stamford, 27 Connecticut research laboratories and as an Assistant to the 28 Technical Director of the Refinery Chemicals Division in the
. 29 New York sales and marketing office.
o 1 I presently belong to the American Nuclear Society 2 and, since 1978, have been the Edison representative on the 3 Atomic Industrial Forum's Committee for the Environment and 4 Committee on Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications.
5 In 1980 I was appointed representative for Edison on the KMC, 6 Inc. Coordinating Group for Emergency Planning - a group of 7 about 26 utilities that exchange information on Emergency 8 Planning requirements and implementation.
t i
e 4
~ __ _ . . . -- _. ._.__ _ . -
's o PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS HERBERT EUGENE HUNGERFORD PROFESSOR OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING SCHOOL OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, PURDUE UNIVERSITY 1 My name is Herbert Eugene Hungeford, and'I am a 2 Professor of Nuclear Engineering at Purdue University, West 3 Lafayette, Indiana 47907 4 I received a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics 5 from Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut, in 1941; a Master 6 of Science degree in Physics from the University of Alabama, 7 in 1950; and a Doctorate in Nuclear Engineering from Purdue 8 University in 1964.
9 From 1950 to 1954, I served as an experimental physi-10 cist at Oak Ridge National Laboratory associated with the Buck 11 Shielding Facility and swimming pool reactor. I was in charge 12 of all radiation flux density and dose rate measurements. From 13 1955 to 1962, I was associated with Atomic Power Development 14 Associates, Inc. as Head, Shielding and Health Physics. With a 15 staff of six, I was responsible for the design of all 16 shielding, the design of the health physics laboratories and l
17 facilities, and development of all health physics procedures 18 for the Fermi 1 fast breeder reactor.
19 From 1963 to present, I have been associated with the 20 School of Nuclear Engineering at Purdue University and have j 21 specialized in teaching radiation shields:s to undergraduate 22 and graduate students. Over the years I have been major pro-l !
23 fessor for 11 doctoral candidates and 20 masters candidates.
1 Since 1965, I have also served as a private consultant 2 to various companies in the general field of radiation 3 shielding. During the summer of 1981, as a consultant to 4 Detroit Edison, I investigated the consequences of a radiologi-5 cal release on the residents of Stony Point which included an 6 assessment of the dose received while evacuating.
7 I have authored or co-authored over 100 technical reports,
~
8 journal articles, and book chapters. I am a member of the American 9 Nuclear Society, the Health Physics Society, American Physical 10 Society, Sigmi Xi and others. I am included in Who's Who in 11 the World, Who's Who in America, and Who's Who in the Atom.
I i
I
e
- DROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ANDREW C. KANEN VICE PRESIDENT PRC V0ORHEES 1 My name is Andrew C. Kanen, and I am a Vice President 2 in the firm of PRC Voorhees. My business address is 1500 3 Planning Research Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102.
4 I have been retained by Detroit Edison to conduct an 5 evacuation time evaluation for the residents of the Stony 6 Point area in connection with Edison's development of compre-7 hensive emergency planning.
8 I received a Bachelor of Science degree from the 9 University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada and a Masters of Science 10 degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology.
11 Prior to my position with PRC Voorhees, I was a regional 12 manager for InterBase Incorporated Group from 1976 to 1977 13 From 1972 to 1976 I was Vice President for Traffic Planning 14 Associates, Inc. From 1969 to 1972 I held the position of 15 Senior Transportation Planner for Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
16 (U. S.). From 1967 to 1969 I was Senior Transportation Planner 17 for Peat, Marwick, Kates & Co. (U.K.) and from 1965 to 1967 I 18 was a Transportation Planner for Traffic Research Corporation 19 (Canada). From 1959 to 1963 I was employed as Assistant County 20 Engineer for Welland County, Ontario, Canada.
21 My experience in the areas of transportation and 22 emergency planning include:
23 Emergency Management Planning. Responsible for the emergency 24 planning activities of the firm. Directed the nuclear power plant
g O 1 evacuation studies and mass notification studies at the 2 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station and Beaver Valley Power 3 Station in Pennsylvania; at the North Perry Power Plant in Ohio; 4 North Anna and Surry Plants in Virginia; and the Enrico Fermi 2 5 Station in Michigan. Also assumed responsibility for the inde-6 pendent evacuation time assessments conducted for the Federal 7 Emergency management Agency at the Seabrook Plant in New 8 Hampshire and Zion Nuclear Power Plant in Illinois.
9 In addition to evacuation planning studies, directed the 10 Overall preparedness plan development at the North Perry Power 11 Plant, Diablo Canyon, and provided planning assistance in con-12 nection with the Enrico Fermi 2 offsite plan.
13 Transportation and Urban Planning. Directed the transportation 14 plan development for the new towe of Milton Keynes (U.K.) in 15 which a town plan was developed to accommodate a population of 16 250,000 within a three-decade development period. The recom-17 mended transportation plan allowed for major variations in 18 development densities, highrise development, and employment 19 concentration to assure that future development aspirations 20 within the community would not be unrealistically constrained 21 by the transportation infrastructure.
21 Also directed the transportaion plan development of a 4
22 new town in Round Rock, Texas. As technical director of the 23 Liverpool Conurbation Study, developed and applied 24 transportation / land use simulation techniques in assessing 25 alternative urban development options for an urban region adja-26 cent to Toronto, and included transportation, municipal ser-27 vices, regional government, and land use planning.
, o 1 Participated in the evaluation of the 1900 Km Trunk B 2 road system to determine a priority road construction program 3 as part of an update of Nigeria's Five Year National Plan.
4 Played a major role in a study to identify the relative 5 importance of various economic, social, and environmental para-6 meters in the development of a multimodal transportation corri-7 dor from the Southeast Atlantic Coast to Kansas City.
8 Directed a study for Middle Georgia Planning and 9 Development Commission directed towards the development of a 10 regional accessibility plan. The recommended plan and funding 11 program were adopted by the State and incorporated in the sta-12 tewide implementation program.
13 Transit Planning. Conducted several transit station area 14 impact studies in Atlanta, Georgia, for both government agen-15 cies and prive developers.
16 Prepared Transit Development Plans for several cities in 17 Georgia. These studies included potential market analyses, 18 management organization, system ownership alternatives, and 19 systems operation and planning.
20 Traffic Operations and Site Planning. Conducted site access 21 and traffic impact studies for the R. J. Reynolds Industries,
! 22 Inc. planned world headquarters offices in Winston-Salem. Also l
! 23 developed Site Transportation Plans for numerous major commer-24 cial centers and multiuse developments, including Coca Cola and 25 Southern Bell Telephone Company.
26 My professional affiliations include: the Association 27 of Professional Engineers of Ontario; Society of Sigma Xi; and 28 the Institute of Transportation Engineers. I am a registered
- 29 Professional Engineer in the State of New Hampshire.
. J PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICIATIONS ROGER A. NELSON SENIOR TECHNICAL MANAGER CERTIFIED CONSULTING METEOROLOGIST CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC.
1 My name is Roger A. Nelson and I am Senior Technical 2 Manager and Certified Consulting Meteorologist for Camp Dresser 3 & McKee, Inc. (CDM). My business address is 11455 West 48th 4 Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 5 From 1973 to the present, I have been associated with 6 the meteorological program at the Fermi 2 site. This association 7 included system design, installation of the 60-meter tower, data 8 acquisition and analysis, operation and maintenance, and 9 quality assurance. In addition, I have provided various stu-10 dies for the site such as the meteorological section for the 11 Final Safety Analysis Report and Environmental Report, com-12 parison studies of the data from the 150-meter and 60-meter 13 towers, a 10-year correlation study of the 60-meter tower 14 data, control room ventilation studies, data analysis for 15 compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, puff advection modeling 16 for the radiological effluent technical specifications, and 17 most recently, a study to determine the thermal internal boundry 18 layer at the site for lake breeze modeling.
19 I was awarded a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics 20 from New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, 21 New Mexico in 1971 followed by a Master of Science degree in 22 Physics from New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology in 23 1973 I have completed coursework towrd a Ph.D. in Atmospheric 23 Physics and am currently enrolled in a Doctoral program at
,, a Y
1 Colorado School of Mines - Applied Nuclear Physics. I am cer-2 tified by the American Meteorological Society as Consulting 3 Meteorologist No. 471.
4 From January, 1980 to present I have been the 5 Operations Manager - Environmental Sciences Division for CDM.
6 In this position, my responsibilities include the overal per-7 formance for the Air Quality, Biology, Geotechnical, and 8 Permitting Departments. I am also the Project Maneger for 9 selected high technology air quality, meteorological, and 10 radiolgoical programs.
11 From December 1977 to January 1980, I was Manager of 12 CDM's Atmospheric Sciences Department, responsible for the 13 overall performance on all atmospheric related studies. As 14 such, I managed a 12-staff group solely devoted to meteorological 15 and air quality monitoring, as well as air quality modeling.
16 My responsibilities also included all data processing and numeri-17 cal analysis performed in the Denver office of the 18 Environmental Sciences Division. In addition, I was the 19 Project manager for major studies in the atmospheric sciences.
20 From August, 1976 to December, 1977, I was CDM's Senior 21 Atmospheric Scientist responsible for air quality and meteoro-22 logical systems design and operation, atmospheric diffusion 23 modeling, data analysis and interpretation, and overall air l
24 quality and meteorological program operation. I was also the
! 25 Project manager for meteorological and air quality monitoring 26 studies with the responsibility for overall performance on 27 radiological and health physics related programs.
%.r.._... ._~.._..._..___.._.__..-_.........____.:.
.. v 1 From April, 1975 to August, 1976, I was employed by EG&G 2 Environmental Consultants, Denver, Colorado, with the respon-3 siblity for scientific aspects of air quality and meteorologi-4 cal project operations, atmospheric diffusion modeling, data 5 analysis and interpretation, and regulatory agency interface 6 for clients.
7 From February, 1974 to April, 1975, I worked for EG&G, 8 Inc., Albuquerque, New Mexico, as a scientist with the respon-9 sibility for air quality and meteorological systems design and 10 operation, data analysis, field program data acquisition, and 11 computer programming.
12 My professional affiliations include the Air Pollution 13 Control Association and the American Meteorological Society.
14 I have authored or co-authored over 29 papers and reports 15 in the areas of meteorology, physics, and air quality.
I i