ML20052A798
| ML20052A798 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 04/28/1982 |
| From: | Woodhead C NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8204290193 | |
| Download: ML20052A798 (10) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of DETROIT EDISON COMPANY Docket Nos. 50-341
)
(Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2)
NRC STAFF TRANSCRIPT CORRECTIONS The flRC Staff hereby submits the following corrections to be made to the transcript of the hearing held in this docket in Monroe, Michigan March 31 through April 2,1982.
On the second introductory page of the March 31, April 1 and April 2,1982 transcripts, " Office of Executive Legal Director, United States Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C." should appear imediately below the names of Ms. Woodhead and Mr. Swanson.
Page Line Correction 216 4
Insert "the" af ter "is" 4-5 Change "for the Division" to "from the Division" 6
Change " Regulatory Comission" to " Regulation of the Comission" 9
Delete "the" 10 Change " pre-trial" to " pre-filed" 218 18 Insert " Fermi-2" after "the" D50Y 8204290l-9.3 5k'
Page Line Correction 218 24 Insert "at" before "the" 219 11 Insert " Reactor" after " Nuclear" 220 3
Insert "the" after " considers" 5
Change "have" to "has" 8
Add "s" to " impact" 9
Delete "s" from " Plants" 11 Change " addenda" to " addendum" 11 Change "This" to "These" 251 4
Change " presentation, the" to " presentation. The" 8
Change "now" to " putting" 12 Change "there is" to "it" 13 Change " throw out" to " throw it out" 17 Change "4, we" to "4.
We" 18 Delete "we" 19 Change " convention" to " contention" 253 16 Change "put into" to "put testiony into" 17 Change "if" to "and" 269 2
Change "showed" to "show" 8
Change "50-341/7904" to "50-341/79-04" 270 2
Change "a" to "as" Staff testimony following 270 omits the last two pages (27 & 28) of Appendix A, Report No. 50-341/79-04 by the U.S.N.R.C. Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Region III. These missing two pages are attached to these transcript corrections.
Page Line Correction 271 10 Change " testimony. The" to " testimony, the" 387 4
Delete "in" 388 11 Change answer to "I was not" 394 4
insert " Judge" before " Morris" 438 14 Change "and" to_"before" 18 Delete "in the path" 440 21 Insert "in" after "And" 23 Delete "of"; insert "cn" after "both" 441 8
Change " time; that" to " time. That" 442 1
Change "per" to "by"; "to" to "do"; " worse" to
" worst" 443 5
Add commas after " duties" and "briefly" 448 7
Change "--does" to " dose" 450 15 Change " accident, at" to " accident. At" 16 Change " plant; is" to " plant? Is" 453 6
Change " postulates" to " postulate" 454 5
Change "can" to "have" and " consider" to " considered" 456 2
Insert "A." before "Let's" 520 23 Insert "who" after "of course,"
l 24 Insert a comma after " plans" 25 Add " answers" after " provide."
521 22 Delete "just" 24 Change "and those" to "on doses" 522 1
Change " voiced" to " versed" 7
Change "for" to "more" 8
change "would" to "could
t
. Page Line Correction 525 3
Change " caucus" to " focus" 526 8
Add " regulations" after " plans" and add a period 9
Delete "and"; capitalize "the" 9
Change "that further" to "further that" 527 7
Change " kind of" to "like to" 530 5
Change "woulr" to " work" 16 Change "a" to "the" 17 Change "whicn" to "which" 531 1
Change "doucment" to " document" 5
Delete "page five" 6
Change " Anthony, are" to " Anthony. Are" 25 Change "IWTNESS" to " WITNESS" 532 16 Change ""1125," that" to ""1125."
That" 534 1
Change " Courts" to " Boards" 2
Change "?"
to "."
5 change "and" to "an" 11 Insert "not" after "was" 534 16 Insert "from" af ter "be" 16 Change "is" to "if" 538 8
Insert "in" before " testimony" 8
Add a comma after " testimony",
9 Change " read" to " ready" 539 6
Change " concern.--is" to " concern. That is,"
540 22 Delete "--are"
a 3 Page Line Correction 541 3
Change "emeregency" to " emergency" 5
Change "in " to "re "
542 7
Change " questions- " to " questions."
14 Change "ments, in" to "ments.
In" 15 Change " evaluation" to " evaluating" 23 Change "NRC- " to "NRC."
544 2
Insert "as" after "early" 5
Change "- " to "they" 9
Delete "is" 16 Change "--than" to "and then" 545 7
Delete the comma between " source" and " term" 546 3
Change "didn't" to " don't" 8
Change "out" to "our" 14 Change "to" to "on" 15 Change " supplement of" to " supplement reference to" 547 1
Delete " plant" add";" after " system", add " " af ter
" temperature" 2
Add ";" after " tion" 2
Add ";" after " equipment" 2
Change " equal" to " fluid" 6
Add "it" after "but" l
7 Change "we had made" to "had been made" 8
Delete "them" 15 Change " licensing any" to " licensing. Any" 16 Change "or" to "are" and insert "I" before
" understand"
. i page Line Correction 1
548 16 Add "is" after " plume" 17 Add "are" before " told" 19 Add "rather" after " plant" 21 Change " limited" to " limiting" 549 4
Change " develops, the" to " develops. The" 5
Add a consna after " determine" 551 7
Change "right, there" to "right. That" 9
Delete "on" 20 Change "from" to "of" 554 13 Change " accuracy" to " adequacy" 21 Change "the truck's position to" to "the proximate position of" 555 5
Add "is" after " planning" 557 9
change " nearest" to " distance" 10 Change " point, do" to " point. Do" 13 Add "at" af ter "down" 14 Add a comma after " question" 15 Change " plant are" to " plant? Are" 15 Change "it is" to "it?
Is" 558 9
Change the comma to a period after " point" 10 Capitalize "is"; add a question mark after
" distance"; capitalize "are" 22 Change "1.9" to "1 or.9" 559 5
Insert a period after closer. Capitalize "is" 12 Insert a question mark after " Dixie Highway" and insert "It" before "is"
Page Line Correction 559 15 Change " travel, a" to " travel?
A" 16
. Change " difference" to " distance" 24 Change " based, is" to " based? Is" 560 1
Change " analysis, risk analysis" to " analysis, and risk analysis" 2
Add "a" after "of" 2
Add "of" after " spectrum" 2
Change " Wash 14 hundred" to " WASH 1400" 4
Add "a" after "was" 22 Delete "I thought" 25 Change "beknownst" to " applied" 561 1
Delete "and" 564 1
Change "Pinte" to " Pointe" 566 2
Insert "to a" after "six hundred" 574 10 Change "it believes- " to " include" 11 Change " routs" to " routes" 12 change "also there" to "also."
19 Change " dosage" to " doses" 23 Change " occasion" to " occurrence" 575 1
Change "that" to "when" i
5 Change "radialogical" to " radiological" 12 Change "at" to "in" Resppctfully sub tted, lQ y Ldf l
Colleen P. Woodhead Counsel for NRC Staff l
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this
Th2 invsstigntica essseicted with this allegation did not reveal any evidence that would lead to the conclusion that reinforcing steel was omitted from the RHR Building. No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Allegation No. 20: Cracks in the concrete base mat of the Reactor
~
Building.
Mr. Euron erpressed his concern of the concrete cracks which developed in the reactor building base sat at elevation 540'.
He felt that the cracking might " allow radiation to leak out of the reactor building" and that the structural integrity of the base mat may have been impaired.
Findina: DECO had previously identified the cracks in the reactor building base slab in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Paragraph 50.55(e)(3).
The final technical report from Deco was dated November 8, 1974, No.
EFZ-29,537.
Deco summarized the reactor building base sat cracking problem as being one of ground water, which was seeping through the radial and circumferential cracks present in the base slab. Evaluation and disposition of the cracking problem by the licensee included the
~
following actions:
Building Outleakage - In the case of a pipe rupture in the Reactor Building, there would be no outward leakage of radioactive water through the cracks in the floor of the building unless the basement areas became flooded to such a depth that the head of water inside was equal to or higher than that of the ground water outside. Under normal plant operation conditions, this would require flooding in the basement to a depth of approximately 30 feet before reaching the same head at the normal external ground water.
If this flooding began to occur, the reactor would be brought to a safe shutdown and the water contained within the building would be processed through the radwaste system.
It should be noted that this case is only valid if the cracks were not repaired.
Sargent and Lundy, the structural designers for the reactor building, performed a thorough anlysis and concluded that the observed cracks did not impair,the structural strength of the base slab.
A program was initiated to monitor the width and length of selected cracks for an increase in length or width and to identify any new cracks which might develop.
l l
Crack width and the pentiration into the base slab was determined by taking random concrete cores at various specified locations.
l l l l
e Devalepsd, cyprev:d cnd cascuta precaduras fer the drilli g, pressure testing and grouting of all cracks present in the base mat.
As of the date of this investigation, Deco personnel indicated that they felt the grouting program had effectively sealed the cracks in the base slab due to the lack of infiltrating ground water. The NRC team toured the elevation 540 base slab on February 22, 1979, and found no evidence of continued water seepage. No items of noncompliance or deviations were noted.
6.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, or deviations. Unresolved items disclosed during the investigation are discussed on pages 12 and 13 (Allegations 2 and 3),
and on page 22 (Allegation No. 15) of this report.
7.
Exit Interview The investigators met with site staff representatives (denoted in the Persons Contacted paragraph) at the conclusion of the investigation on March 2, 1979. The investigators summarized the scope and findings of the investigation, ircluding the apparent items of noncompliance identified in the Results section of this report. The licensee acknowledged the findings.
6 e.
O UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DESIGliATED ORIGINAB (.
SIDH p
NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMIgartifiedByp..W h i BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD /
,j In the Matter of DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-341
~
)
4
- /
(Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,
)
Unit 2)
)
RECEIVED 3
E-APR 281982>- T 4
~
n urm mm twem CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6
M "ng "
u S
I hereby certify that copies of "NRC STAFF TRANSCRIPT CORRECTIONS" i e
the above captioned proceeding have been served on the following by N
deposit in the United States mail, first class or, as indicated by an asterisk, through deposit in the Nuclear Regulatory Comission's internal mail system, this 28th day of April,1982.
Gary L. Milhollin, Esq., Chairman Peter A. Marquardt, Esq.
Administrative Judge The Detroit Edison Company Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 2000 Second Avenue 1815 Jefferson Street Detroit, MI 48226 Madison, WI 53711 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Dr. Peter A. Morris, Administrative Panel
- Judge
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington, DC 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (5)*
Dr. David R. Schink U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Department of Oceanography Washington, DC 20555 Texas A & M University College Station, TX 77840 Docketing and Service Section*
Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harry Voigt, Esq.
Washington, DC 20555 LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae l
1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
l Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20036 Mr. David E. Howell 3239 Woodward Avenue
[
Berkley, MI 48072 la' l l
Col leen ').
Woodhead
~
l Counsel for NRC Staff 1
l sn