ML18086B561

Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 82-10 Re NUREG-0737,TMI Action Items I.A.1.3.1,I.A.1.3.2,I.C.1,II.D.1.2,II.D.1.3, II.K.3.30,II.K.3.31,III.A.1.2,III.A.2.2 & III.D.3.4

ML18086B561
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	07/15/1982
From:	Liden E Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.A.1.3, TASK-1.C.1, TASK-2.D.1, TASK-2.K.3.30, TASK-2.K.3.31, TASK-3.A.1.2, TASK-3.A.2.2, TASK-3.D.3.4, TASK-TM GL-82-10, NUDOCS 8207220489
Download: ML18086B561 (4)

Text

PS~G Filblic Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Plaza, Newark, NJ 07101 / 201 430-7000 MAILING ADDRESS/ PO. Box 570, Newark, NJ 07101 July 15, 1982 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation u.s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014 Attention: Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Gentlemen:

POST-TMI REQUIREMENTS (GENERIC LETTER NO. 82-10)

SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 This letter transmits to you, in its enclosure, our response to Generic Letter 82-10.

Should you have any questions in this regard, do not hesi-tate to contact us.

Very truly yours, A. Liden, Manager uclear Licensing and Regulation Attachment CC: Mr. Leif Norrholm NRC Senior Resident Inspector Mr. William J. Ross NRC Licensing Project Manager 8207220489 820715 PDR ADOCK 05000272 P PDR The Energy People 95-2001 (400M) 10-81

STATE OF NEW JERSEY )

) SS: COUNTY OF ESSEX COUNTY OF ESSEX )

FREDERICK Wo SCHNEIDER, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says:

I am a Vice President of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and as such, I find the matters set forth in our letter, dated July 15, 1982 in response to Generic Letter No. 82-10, are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.

Subscribed and sworn to before me this J 9 day of -~...;..,.;;;u...;;;1...;...yr----' 19 a2 THOMAS F. LAFFAH, JR.

My Commission expires on NOTARY P"lll.IG QI' NEl!J ERSEY My Commission Expires Sept 24, 1984

SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 NURID-0737 ITEMS SCHEDULED AFI'ER MARCH 1, 1982 Canpletion Date I tan Actual/(Scheduled) Remarks I.A.1.3.l (October 1, 1982*) Will revise administrative procedures to limit overtim~

Limit overtime in accordance with NRC Policy Statement issued by Generic Letter No. 82-12, dated June 15, 1982.

I.A.1.3.2 June 3, 1981 Complete.

Minimum Shift Crew I.C.l (First refueling after 10/1/82.) Will revise procedures by next refueling outage.

Revise Emergency Procedures

• II.D.1.2 June 30, 1982 Final information will be provided by December 31, 1982.

JN & SV Test Programs II.D.1.3 June 30, 1982 Final information will be provided by December 31, 1982.

Block Valve Test Program II.K.3.30 & 31 (One year after staff approval Will submit plant specific analyses.

SB IDCA Analysis of nodel.)

III.A.1.2 See remarks Figure 3-4 "Staffing Requirements" of the Salem Gener-Staffing Levels for ating Station Emergency Plan shows the correlation be-Emergency Situations tween Table B-1 of NURB}-0654 and the conmitments of PUblic Service Electric and Gas Company for ~rgency staffing :requirements. In addition, Section 3.4 "Staf-fing Commitments" of the Salem Generating Station E:rrw:r-gency Plan states our camnitment to meet the intent of the requirein:nts of NOREG-0654. Ten copies of the Errergency Plan have previously been sent to the Direc-tor - NRR.

• schedule revised by Camnission action on SECY-81-440

SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 NUREG-0737 ITEMS SCHEDULED AFTER MARCH l, 1982

• Canpletion Date Item Actual/(Scheduled) Remarks III.A.1.2 See Remarks A response to the Post-TM! Requirements for ~:rgency Upgrade ~:rgency Response Facilities for the Salem Generating Station .~

Support Facilities was sent to the Director - NRR on December 29, 1981.

This response was developed in acoordance with all

. available criteria at that time. To date we have not received a reply fran the NRC ooncerning the submit-tal. ~ are aware of the high level of activity cerning the erre:rgency response facilities and the eon- e recent approval of SECY 82-111 by the Commissioners.

It is our understanding that this document JIDdifies previous requirements for emergency response facilities and that an additional submittal will be required by licensees sanetine in the future. It is our intent to review our December 29th submittal against these re-vised requirerrents when they becone available and re-vise our submittal in a timely manner.

III.A.2.2 (Four :rronths after staff approval Will canplete JIDdif ications.

Meteorological Data of functional r>escription, submitted June, 1981.)

III.D.3.4* See Remarks Existing Plant design adequate for both Salem Units per Control Roan Salem Unit No. 2 SER Supp. 5, Page 22.2-37. ~

Habitability