ML18054B415

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Plant Approach to Licensing of Restructured Tech Specs.Major Effort Undertaken to Develop Approach Which NRC & Util Can Compare Present & Proposed Requirements,Show Deletions,Additions & Justify Differences
ML18054B415
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/26/1990
From: Kuemin J
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9002080165
Download: ML18054B415 (28)
v • d • e


Text

consumers Power POWERiNii MICHlliAN'S PROliRESS General Offices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson .. Ml 49201 * (517) 788-0550 January 26, 1990 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT -

RESTRUCTURED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS In Consumers Power Company's September 23, 1988 response to the NRC's SALP 8 Board Report, we informed the NRC of our participation in the industry and NRC efforts to develop Restructured Standard Technical Specifications (RSTS).

Following approval of the Combustion Engineering (CE) O~mers Group RSTS and approval of the CE lead plant Restructured Technical Specifications (RTS), by the NRC, we indicated we would submit the Palisades RTS. The goal date of the first quarter of 1990 for our submittal was based on the schedule for completion of both the CE RSTS and the lead plant (San Onofre). During the last few months, several interactions between the NUMARC working group on Technical Specifications Improvements and the NRC have taken place concerning review of the RSTS. On December 12, 1989, the NUMARC Working Group met with Dr. TE Murley and members of his staff. A schedule for obtaining NRC review comments and conducting meetings between the industry and NRC staff was agreed upon. The meeting was held as a result of utility concerns expressed in a NUMARC letter dated November 15, 1989, T E Tipton to Dr T E Murley and the NRC response letter dated November 27, 1989, F J Miraglia to TE Tipton.

This agreed upon review schedule presently continues through the end of April 1990. The issuance of the RSTS for all utility owners groups, including the CE Owners Group, will follow. The CE lead plant submittal will follow after April 1990. The NRC staff previously indicated it would require six to nine months to review the lead plant submittals. We expect to submit the Palisades RTS prior.to completion of the NRC staff review of the CE lead plant submittal. However, because of uncertainties with the RSTS and lead plant reviews, we cannot provide a firm commitment date. Our goal, though, is to complete our RTS for submittal by the last quarter of 1990.

Slippage in the completion and approval of the CE RSTS has caused the completion date of the Palisades RTS to enter into the same time frame as the scheduled 1990 refueling outage and steam generator replacement. This may

-- - - - -- - - - - ---- --~-~ - --------

9002080165 9001?A

  • PDR p ADOCK b~Afi5~~~

~--pfit-OC0190-0249-NL04 A CMS' ENERGY COMPANY

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Palisades Plant Restructured Technical Specifications

  • 2 January 26, 1990 have an impact on in-house review efforts near the completion of our RTS schedule.

Since Palisades presently has custom Technical Specifications, a major effort has been undertaken to develop an approach which we and the NRC can use to compare present and proposed requirements, show deletions and additions and justify differences. Enclosure 1 provides the approach we plan on using in submitting the Palisades Restructured Technical Specifications. We believe this approach is logical and well suited to our custom Technical Specifications. We have previously discussed this approach with Mr Jose Calvo and members of his Technical Specification Improvement Branch. is provided for your information and consideration. We welcome any comments you may have to improve our planned submittal approach.

~~

s L Kuemin f Licensing Engineer CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades Attachments OC0190-0249-NL04

ENCLOSURE I Consumers Power Company Palisades Plant Docket 50-255 PALISADES APPROACH TO LICENSING OF RESTRUCTURED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS January 26, 1990 25 Pages OC0190-0249-NL04

ENCLOSURE 1 PALISADES APPROACH TO LICENSING OF RESTRUCTURED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS The Owners Groups' Restructured Standard Technical Specifications (RSTS) submittals and future lead plant Restructured Technical Specifications (RTS) submittals will incorporate marked up copies of the current Standard Technical Specifications (STS) to indicate how present requirements were dispositioned along with justifications for change. This approach was attempted in our initial efforts to convert the present custom Technical Specifications (TS) to RTS. However, we determined that this approach was ineffective for custom TS and are modifying the Owners Group approach (see Attachment 1 for some typical examples comparing the modified approach we are taking to the Owners Group approach of page markups). The structure and content of our TS did not lend themselves to the Owners Groups'and lead plants' approach. Our present TS often have LCOs, applicabilities, action statements and administrative information combined in paragraphs within a single specification.

Additionally, the_grouping of information is inconsistent and often scattered throughout the TS. In general, the contents are arranged completely different from the CEOG RSTS. For these reasons, we have developed a modified approach which is adaptable to our custom TS and, in our opinion, is superior to the approach used by the Owners Group for Standard Technical Specifications.

We have discussed our present TS Sections 3 & 4 into a listing of approximately 2,000 separate LCOs, surveillances, actions, exceptions, etc.

The initial effort on Sections 5 & 6 has identified an additional 500 requirements. This listing has allowed us to identify each present requirement which will allow comparison to the RTS, and which will form the bases for our RTS submittal.

We are structuring our RTS for internal review so that each section will be made up of a package containing the following items:

1) The RTS section and the Basis for the section.
2) A list of the existing Palisades TS requirements (LCO, Action, SR, etc) which gives either the corresponding Palisades Restructured Tech Specs (RTS) requirement number or, for relocated or deleted material, states its disposition. The comment section notes the differences between existing TS and RTS requirements. Justification for major differences is provided in the comment section.
3) A similar list of RTS requirements, which gives the corresponding TS number, or denotes material as "NEW".
4) A list of the RTS requirements, and corresponding CE Owners Group RSTS section numbers noting added and deleted material. The comment section notes the differences between our RTS submittal and the CEOG RSTS.

Discussion of major differences is provided.

OC0190-0249-NL04

  • ' t Items 1 through 3 will make up the bulk of the Palisades RTS submittal to the NRC. It will form the basis for a Technical Specification Change Request, providing changes, reasons for each change and justification for major changes. The bi-directional listings will assist us and the NRC in our reviews and provide assurance that all present TS requirements are dispositioned.

The justification of changes in Item 2 will be similar to that used for the CEOG RSTS. Some general guidelines to be used are:

a) Justifications need not address changes in Completion Times for Required Actions, nor surveillance requirement frequencies which are changed solely to agree with RSTS. These two types of changes will be addressed generally. Deviations from the RSTS will be noted and justified.

b) In many cases, LCOs are being added or made more restrictive in order to agree with RSTS. In those cases, a statement to that effect is sufficient. The same can be said about mode applicability.

c) Material, which is to be relocated and which is addressed in the "split" document, should refer to that document. It should be verified, however, that the reasons given in the split document are appropriate for Palisades.

d) Material which is to be relocated, but not addressed in the split document, should discuss why the Interim Policy Statement Criteria does not apply, and where the material will be located after removal for the TS.

e) Material which is to be deleted should have an adequate explanation.

f) Major differences between existing TS and RTS will be discussed and justified.

A sample of Item 2 is shown in Attachment 2.

Item 3 will not contain nearly as much descriptive information as Item 2.

This list will point our new requirements_ which will not .show up on Item 2. A sample of Item 3 is shown in Attachment 3.

Item 4 is to assist the NRC in their review. It will identify the correlation between tbe RSTS and RTS numbering, and point out those items which are different. Added or deleted items will have a brief explanatory note. Item 4 will also explain the differences between RTS and RSTS to point out plant specific differences. See Attachment 4.

The advantages of the approach described versus submittal of marked up Technical Specifications are:

1. The listing readily shows the relationship of present TS to proposed RTS and identifies relocated and deleted material. The listing is a valuable organizational tool for reviewers since it shows disposition of all present requirements.

OC0190-0249-NL04

2. The cross reference of RTS to TS identifies all new requirements.
3. Palisades' custom Technical Specifications have Actions, LCOs, Applicabilities and Surveillances mixed together and often poorly grouped. The TS to RTS listing groups all requirements for ready.

reference.

4. The listing can be sorted many ways, eg, grouping of all LCOs, Actions, SR, etc. The information is on disc which allows users flexibility to update, edit and track.
5. The listing established if a present TS requirement is an LCO, SR, Action, Definition or Administrative requirement.

OC0190-0249-NL04

3. 1 PRIMARY COOLANT SYSTEM
  • Attachment 1 Page 1 of 10 Applicability Applies to the operable.status of the primary coolant system. (0 Objective To specify certain conditions of the primary coolant system which~

must be met to assure safe reactor operation. ~

Specifications 3.1.l Operable Components At least one primary coolant pump or on* shutdown cooling \<TS LC..D pump with a flow rate greatar than or equal to 2810 gpm shall x.X*X be in operation whenever &.change is ba made in the boron co cent at ion of the primary coolant and the lant R. TS :X _ x . X o eratin in cold shutdowo oz. abov*~, mept. dur1.ng ..

emergency los~ of coolant flow situation ... Under_:. these --1?-TS" X. )(.. y

. ~ circumstances, the boron concentration ma~ ,De'* increased with: 1c

~ ,xc.. ef) ~ "'o..J w L~ [ no primary coolant pumps or shutdown cooling pumps running. .

WA.::. 1-"0 ll.c:~I ~~~\l~~.\.uiu . , .. .

  • L,(. O @.

S\ t-'C. t:l.~""C"" -A.ci-llu .....s. b.. Four primary coolant pump* sh&ll. be -~n.o~tion whenever:. ~ i\.prl\cM. l 1..L.t

\_vu.u,~ pruvA.d the react~r is operated above hot shutdown, wit t e - *\2:\.'.) x. )<.. .x:. I fallowing except ion~- . . * ~ : ~ > - :i-: '. . * : ~ *. R. T~ x, f:. . x Before removing a_pump froa aarvic*s;:the~ power shall be reduced as specified in Table 2.3.1 and ~iate correctiv action impl*ented. With one puap-.outr '.oi **P~* return.

pump to service w th n 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />

  • _ eration) (2.~ K*>c*K ot shutdown (or below) with the reactor tripped (from f{l;fl {) \.)

the C-06 panal, openina th* 42-01 and 42-02 circuit breakers R.-c~ )<. 'l(. ~

- L.C. 0 withi the n*xt 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> . Start-u* (abo e hot shutdown) with less than four pumps is not permitted and gowaw,~operation w t ©

@ less than t ree p~s is not p*rmitted.

c. e measure our, primary coolan* pumpa*.. operating L c o__ -~-@ vessel flov shall be 124.3 x 106 lb/hr or greater, correc~edi;to 532°1.*
  • 1

~ Both steaa'generators shall be capable of performing their L CO $~ heat transfer* function whenever the average temperature of the p.. ~ r\l l "'\'.).

\~ ~ .,___

Pr"'-..- 3 coolant is above 325°r-;

e. Maximum primary system pressure differentials shall not exceed the f ollovinl:

(1) Delete I Foll. .5-\-QN:lcc. rd I t.c,;h Spec.. \'IA I\.ts Q \

\'\.\,~ 0 l":> p~e.J.e ..\ _ +t>

~~~en.. -!-\...A. R.e\/\-eweCL *

-to 4-\.u... )U.'-~'~\~"!\.i. 1 u .. of- Amendment No Jt, 8J, U8, 119 c..\A.IA'4'i<::> 'oe.b-c.-c.., ~~ D cember 12, 1988

'T ~ P,v c). rz.. 1' '5

'R\S Y:-X.*K \$ ~~ {o ~~+'t:.l\.-+\u.:iie.~1e.~e.~t_;\k~e.>poucL1....,l\_ 'R.TS

$\...ic:"e.. ~\\ ~"'-\AA ()£-(I.I.:-> (hf°-+'e~ o-e_-l.wee.iJ \"S. ~ ....<.\.. {L~s CT 4

  • rs Number RTS Number Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (11/14/89).

TS requirement description

  • Attachment 1 Page 2 of 10 Comment on chanoes 3.01 3.3 PCS requirements 3.01.01.a I ~*kf'L LCO: PCS flow > 2810; during boron changes 3.01.01.b LCO: Four PCP's running; > Hot SD
3. 01. 01. b ACTION: < 4 PCPs; reduce pwr iaw tbl 2.3.1 3.01.01.b ACTION: < 4 PCPs; restore 4 PCPs; 12 hrs 3.01.01.b ACTION: < 4 PCPs > 12 hrs; Trip Rx from C0-6 3.01.01.b LCO: No startup; w < 4 pumps 3.01.01.b LCO: No power ops; < 3 pumps 3.01.01.c LCO: 4 PCP flow > 124.3E6 #/hr at 532F; 3.01.01.d LCO: Both SG's req operable; > 325F

3.10 CONTROL ROD AND POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS

  • ;,_ttacl-nucilt 1 Page 3 of 10 Applicability Applies to operation of control rods and hot channel £actors during operation.

Objective To specify limits of control rod movement to assure an acceptable power distribution during power operation, limit worth of individual rods to values analyzed for accident conditions, maintain adequate shutdown margin after a reactor trip and to specify acceptable power limits for power tilt conditions.

Specif !cations 3.10.1 Shutdown Margin Requirements

({) LC o

~---r~ x * ~ -'£ a.------

=--==:._:__.=_:___-=----==----------------:rr::--~--Ao--~

t four primary coolant pumps in operation a:_~hut~-- __

- ,1- ,. l\ \ ,_ L ~ ___/_ ~, the shutdown margin shall be 2%. --

15 ""~~ v \ C->\_ ::.>!.. L \ gLS k . x.~~~~~,.._--=========::;::::::~~::;::::==:=:::=~----~=--

{,\L,. <.J d \l,.--c!::"c~. rr4ifth less than four primi.rr. coqla.n.t ~~:_s i~ ~pex:atio_n ~-tJi

~ '-- c.r 'I' '-~ shutdown and abov 0ooration shall be immediate!

D c_TL D 0 ~l'. ":> ~- )c.

~~~l\CV\.-~~tl l"'"CS~-~>~3~*~7~5~%2,~~~-~-~-=~--~------~----

e c. ~ less than th;-hot shutdown condition~ with at least one I F ~ r Q~\,C..v\.-~ l l L ~ - - - - primary coolant pump in operation or at, least one_ shutdown I R TS x_. """.x cooling pump in operation, with a flow rate > 2s10- gpm, the I

~ L\r\ ~l? ~ .. v. boron concentration shall be greater than the cold shutdown

~ l<-~~ ~~~boron concentration for normal cooldowns and heatups, ie, I

I nonemergency conditions. I the hot I coolant pumps I

< 2810 gpm I I

1. (a) Establish a shutdown margin of > 3.5% I and - I (b) asnre two of the three charging pumps are I electrically disabled. I Oil I rc-csx-x*;>c
2. At least every ~minute i -*t at no char in I

-$> ~#\c.-Ho u are o eratin ** If one or more charging pumps are I

\'Z. \.S 'X

  • x* r determined to be operating in any 15 minute surveillance I

~c_,~\Ju ~ period, terminate charging pUmp operation and insure that I the shutdown margin requirements are met and maintained. I 3-58 Amendment No. lt, IJ, $1, ~8,

10. 118 November 15, 1988 TSP1088-0181-NL04

3 .10 CONTROL ROD AND POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS (Continued)

  • Attac1Utid1t 1 Page 4 of 10 I

3.10.l Shutdown Margin Requirements (Continued) /

12..TS l"-* ;x. x.. -~ ---.___

(OJ ft-PrL1<v\.:--.,::-,*1-:-,~;-::---__,.n-u=r~1=n=g-cn=o~n::emergency conditions, ~s than the_hot shutdo!zn-> /

\::::/ P--C~ Y.:.-'x:-:><. condition with no operating primary coolant pumps and a e...,-r':/> K*"l<-'f<

@ Pi'-11 ~ lJ

  • r ary s stem recirculating flow rate less than 65,0 gpm, ~ t"2- /~

within one hour: ~ /\Y (a) Initiate surveillance at least every 15 minutes to verify \?.,"j0 X.- 'L ><-

~ ~(f) that no charging pumps are operating.

charging pumps are eterm ne S 15-minute surv ance eriod terminate charging pump I operation an insure that the shutdownmargin requirements are met ~aintai~ --........_

If a control rod cannot be tripped, shutdown margin shall be

__, cs;.'R._

(§)

increased by boration as necessary to compensate for the Q.:tS X, X* x worth of the withdrawn inoperable rod.

(v) L cu e. The drop time of each control rod shall be no greater than 2.5 seconds from the beginning of rod motion to 90%

V \2..\:S Y:.* >-*r insertion.

3.10.2 (Deleted) I 3.10.3 Part-Length Control Rods L co@ The rod exercisea and physics tests

  • awn from tz_ """t..S ~. x.. ;><. the core

@=:t-Lep--rl0 u (2. . . Ts x:. * 'I"- *'IC 3-59 Amendment No. 118 November 15, 1988 TSP1088-0181-NL04

3.10 CONTROL ROD.AND POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS (Contd)

a. A control rod or a part-length rod is considered misaligned if Q~V.-\, ~ u i.)
})

R.""CSr* .>:>e it is out of position from the remainder* of the bank by more than 8 inches.

lLT':. f><., r -/\ b. inoperable if it cannot be moved b

[)c~....,,~~

~--~~..Q:i;!JU:.il.k.2.I:---2.;~~...J.,J;~-&asg.~~-J;J;r~i:P.E~ part- ength ro n....t.S>K* r*i:'. considered inoperable if it is not fully with he co De~'-.._,,_A..\_~ ....., and cannot be ed by its operator. ore than one con i2-i:.'.:>K.* X.*f".. od or part-length rod becomes m sa igned or inoperable, the

~(__.\ : l 0 .._) reactor shall be placed in the hot shutdown* condition within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.

I<-\ ;:. X* ~ ',x.. c *

@ lf\c_"""\.1.-sV x.

\L\. s ')<.. i'-

~c__ ~\.. uY' s

p...:t )<.. x. . x.

(__!~~~......._~'""""~!...-Ml~~~~~

© ~J.&. I r~~l..W fuel burnup part-1 or 3.10.5 Regulating Group Insertion Limits

' i2-l:S)(* x..,x a. To implement the limits on shutdown marg~. individual rod

@ LCO worth and hot channel factors, tlN ltmit*:cm-eontrol rod regulating grou i ion shal! ~ c l!:t:decl*:aa shown Figure 3-6 e 4~pump operation liaits of Figure 3-6 do not

~"'\:& X.* :X..-)<...

p or decreasing power level rapidly when such a decrease is

@ er--c.er~o u needed to avoid or minimize a situation harmful to the (2)

. 1CL'S >C. ><._. ;x.

f\C TlO -.J personnel or e ui ment. Once~ such a power increase is achieved, t e limits of Figure 3-6 will be returned to by berating the_..,---..._

control r e h rtion limit within two hours. Limits more restrictive than Figure 3-6 may be implemented during fuel R-"\s x. x.. >< cycle life based on physics' calculations and physics data

~J.W\\,~ obtained during plant start-up and subsequent operation. New limita. -shall be submitted to the NRC within 45 days *

.. ~ .

e_~s. 'f..* )<;.*X. b. Th* sequenc* of withdrawal of the regulating groups shall be Leo 2 *. ~. 4~*,.,__:;-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

\2..l'.) x.. )<.. x. Aa overlap of control banks in excess to 40% shall not be c.

Leo permitted.

R..-cs x. x.,.;<:. d. If the reactor is subcritical, the rod position at which L.C.O criticality could be achieved if the control rods were withdrawn

~- ~~r l\c lA-L::JL~ in normal sequence shall not be lower than tha insertion limit lL-cs. )<.. x. .x for zero power shown on Figure 3-6.

3-60 Amendment No 31 November 1, 1977 TSP1088-0181-NL04

Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (11/14/89).

TS Number RTS Number Attachment 1 Page 6 of 10 Comment on chanoes 3.10 3.1 Control Rad &Power Distribution Limits 3.10.01 3.1.1 & .2 Shutdown Margin Requirements 3.10.01.a 3.1.1 LCD: SDM = 2Z > 525F; w 4 PCPs 3.10.01.b 3.1.2 LCD: SOM > 3.75Z; w < 4 PCPs > 525F 3.10.01.b 3.1.2 ACTION: < 4 PCPs &> 525F; borate to req SOM 3.10.01.c 3.1.1 LCO: Baron > CSD boron; < 525F w flaw (Cold Shutdown Boron Cone not defined) 3.10.01.c.01.a \'AiCR_ ACTION: < 525F, lo flow; establish SDM > 3.51., and 3.10.01.c.01.b ACTION: < 525F, lo flow; disable 2 Chg pumps, OR 3.10.01.c.02 ACTION: < 525F, lo flow; initiate SR 3.10.1.c.2 3.10.01.c.02 ACTION: < 525F, lo flow, Chg on; stop Chg &check SDM 3.10.01.c.02 SR: Chg pumps; verify pumps off; 15 min 3.10.01.? ACTION: < 525F, lo lo flow; initiate SR 3.10.1.c.2 3.10. 01.? ACTION: < 525F, lo lo flow; check Chg & SDM 3.10.01.d 3.1. 7 c ACTION: untrippable rod; verify SDM 3.10.01.e SR 3.1. 7. 3 LCD: Each rod drop time < 2.5 sec 3.10.02 Deleted 3.10.03 3.1.10 LCD: PL rods withdrawn 3.10.03 3.1.10 Except: 3.10.3 NA; rod exercising 3.10.04 3.1. 7 Misaligned or lnop Control Rods 3.10.04.a Deleted Definition: Misaligned rod ( ) B" out) not a defined term in RSTS 3.10.04.b Deleted Definition: Inop control rod not a defined term in RSTS 3.10 .04. b Deleted Definition: Inop PL rod not a defined term in RSTS 3.10.04.b 3.1.7 c ACTION: > 1 misaligned or inop rod; HSD in 12 hrs (there is no LCO on misaligned rods) 3.10.04.c 3.1.7 B ACTION: misaligned rod; hot chnl OK or be < 751.

3.10.04.c 3.1.7 B ACTION: misaligned rod; Verify SDM 3.10.04.c Deleted ACTION: misaligned rodj Verify rod worths withdraw! analysis assumes rods @POIL (there are no req for rod worths) 3.10.05 3.1. 9 Regulating Group Insertion Limits 3.10.05.a 3.1. 9 LCD: Reg rod insertion ( Fig 3.b limits; steady state 3.10.05.a Deleted Except: Fig 3.6 limit NA; rapid power decreases rapid dwn pwr, enter cond 3.1.9 A 3.10.05.a 3.1.9 A ACTION: Rods < PDIL after down power; fix in 2 hrs 3.10.05.a Deleted Admin: New limits to NRC w/in 45 days limit now in Tech Specs 3.10.05.b 3.1. 9 LCD: Sequence of rod withdrawal 1,2,3,4 3.10.05.c 3.1.9 LCO: Rod overlap < 40Z 3.10.05.d 3.1.1, .2 &.9 LCD: Crit pos must be above PDIL; wsubcrit SDM treated iaw RSTS 2

POWER DISTRIBUTION INSTRUMENTATION 3.11.2 EXCORE POWER DISTRIBUTION MONITORING SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION

  • Attaci1111t::11t 1 Page 7 of 10 excore monitoring system shall be operable with:

The target Axial Off set (AO) and the Excore Monitoring Allowable

, Power Level (AP~)~determined within the previous 31 days using the incore detectors;..,* nd t e m asure not eviated from the target AO by more 0;:95

  • n the previous 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. be_

The AO measu'red~ by the excore detectors calibrated with the AO measured b the inc'ore detectors. * .. * *.*.*. .

The quadrant tilt t~e excore detectors calibrated with the uadrant by the incore detectors.

e ~re when the excore detectors LHR, c above is'. applicable when th detectors are used for v-...mA.......trioring quadrant' tilt.

s\app icable for each channel of the TM/LP trip and I Index (AS!) alarm. I I ACTION 1:

G) 1\1..... \~ L>'"'. With the excore monitoring system inoperable, do not us.e the* system for g:tS >c. X.:i>'monitoring LHR.

ACTION 2:

~ . If the measured quadrant tilt has not been calibrated with the incores,

~c.. - do not use the .system for monitoring quadrant tilt.

\<, t.>X* ')(. .X ACTION 3: I

~~ When the measured AO uncertainty is greater than specified in Specification* I

"~~ ~-~.y4.18.2, the 'TM/LP trip function and the AS! alarm setpoints shall be I

~ conservatively ~djus~t~d~w~n..i.:~~~l"e---\-!~_n.cu.r.s.....QJLJrn.l:Lt_~h~a~n~n!e~l~sh~a~l~l:!:_!b~e I

~ decla The operability requirements TM/LP and AS! are I

\\./~() give.n in Table 3.17.1 and 3.17.4, respectively. I

\~~?

Basis .

x.. 'x..*f.

The excore power distribution monitoring system consists of Power Range Detector Channels 5 through 8.

The operability of the excore monitoring system ensures that the assumptions employed in the PDC-II analysis(!) f~r determining AO limits that ensure operation within allowable LHR limits are valid.

3-66a Amendment No ~J, J~, J~, ~S, 118 November 15, 1988 TSP1088-0181-NL04

I Attachment 1 Page 8 of 10

... \

Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (11/14/89)

  • TS Number RTS Number TS requirement description Comment on changes 3.11.02 Ex core Power Distribution Monitoring System L A\i:; R..

3.11.02.a SR 3.1. 3.3 SR: Incore AO &APL Target determined w/in 31 days; for monitoring LHR w excores 3.11.02.a Relocated LCO: Meas AO w/in .05 of target for last 24 hrs; for monitoring LHR w excores 3.11. 02. b SR 3.2.12.3 LCO: Excore AO cal w incore; monitoring LHR w excores 3.11. 02. b SR 3.2.2 &.12 LCO: Excore AO cal w incore; each TM/LP trip chnl 3.11.02.b SR 3.2.12.4 LCO: Excore AO cal w incore; ASI alm 3.11.02. c SR 3.2.12.4/3.0.4 LCO: Excore Tq cal w incore; monitoring LHR wexcores 3.11.02. c SR 3.2.12.3/3.0.4 LCO: Excore Tq cal w incore; monitoring Tq w.excores 3.11.02 Al ACTION: Excore monit sys inop; dont use for LHR 3.11.02 A2 ACTION: Meas Tq not cal w incores; do not use for Tq 3.11.02 A3 ACTION: AO uncert > LCO 4.18.2; adj TM/LPT &AS! aim (AO uncertainty not mentioned in 4.18.2) 3

  • Attachment 1

-~-~~g~_ 9__of 10 4.10 REACTIVITY ANOMALIES

~pplicability Applies to potential reactivity anomalies.

Objective To require evaluation of reactivity anomalies within the reactor.

Specif;cations R~ /<* )<_.X Following a normalization of the computed boron concentration as a function of burnup, the actual boron concentration of the primary c olant shall be eriodically compared with the predicted value.

IW\ro \l.v-1 D e difference between the observed and pre cted steady-st~a~t~~~

@Le. entr , , ent of 1% in reactivi C§) ~D'M l v-:> Atomic E Commission shall be notified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and a evaluation as to the cause* of the discrepancy shall be ma f:i.b('()\ vV reported to the Atomic Energy Commission within 30 diys. * *

\<.'T'S )GI K._ ,K_

To eliminate possible errors in the calcul~tions of the initial

\<.. 1: 5 x ' ">\* ')< reactivity of the core and the reactivity ~epletion rate, the predicted relation between fuel burnup an~ the. boron concentration,

\l. -cs,<. )C' y necessary to maintain adequate control characteristics, must be adjusted (normalized) to accurately r~flect actual core conditions.

When rated power is reached initially, ancl-with the control rod groups in the desired positions, the boron concentration is measured and the predicted curve is adjusted to this-point. As power operation proceeds, the measured boron concentration is compared with the predicted concentration and the slope of the curve relating burnup and reactivity is compared with that predicted. This process of normalization shall be completed after about 10% of the total core burnup. Thereafter, actual boron concentration can be compared with prediction and the reactivity status of the core. can be continuously evaluated. Any reactivity anomaly greater than 1%

would be unexpected, and its occurrence would be thoroughly investigated and evaluated. Th* methods employed in calculating the reactivity of the core vs burnup and the reactivity worth of boron vs burnup are given in the FSAll.

The value of 1% is considered a safe limit since-a shutdown margin of at leaat 2% with th* most rtt~tive rod in the fully withdrawn position is always maintained.

References (1) FSAR, Section 3.3.2 4-46 TSP0885-0268-NL04

~ - I Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (11/14/89).

TS Number RTS Number TS requirement description Attachment 1 Page 10 of 10 Comment on changes 4.10 Reactivity Anomalies 4.10 Relocated LCO: Critical Boron; Actual w/in 11. of Predicted 4.10 Deleted Admin: Crit/Predicted B Bk ) 11.i notify AEC, 24 hrs 4.10 Deleted Admin: Grit/Predicted B Sk ) 11.; Eva! to AEC,30 days 4.10 Relocated SR: Critical Boron; compare w predicted; periodically 4

Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (12/14/89). Corrected through A1endment # 129.

Attachment 2 Page 1 Of 6 '

This is a list of all of the requirements of the existing Palisades Plant Technical Specifications (TS) as interpreted for the process of writing Palisades Restructured Technical Specifications (RTS). /

First Column; Existing Palisades Tech Spec (TS) numbering Each numbered section of the TS is listed in the left-most column.

Items which contain more than one requirement are listed once for each requirement.

Second Column; Palisades Restructured Tech Spec (RTS) numbering The nearest corresponding numbered item of the Palisades Restructured Technical Specifications is listed in the next column.

If the requirement does not appear in RTS, it is noted as "Deleted" or "Relocated."

"Deleted" is used to note where a requirement has been deleted.

ie deleting, iaw GL 84-15, the requirement to test a D.G. when an ECCS pump in the opposite train becomes inoperable.

"Relocated" is used to note where a requirement has been moved from tech specs to another controlled program or document.

Third Column: Existing Requirement An abbreviation of the TS requirement appears in the third column.

Each item is identified as: LCD, ACTION, SR, Admin, Exception, etc.

Some items are implied, rather than explicit, for examplel a LCD is implied when an ACTION exists without a stated LCO.

Forth Column: Comments and Justifications for Change Comments may appear in the forth column. . . .

This column notes when a written justification for change supports differences between TS and RTS.

General Comments:

1) Completion Times for required ACTIONS and Frequencies for Surveillance Requirements have, in almost all cases, been changed to agree with the CEDG-RSTS. In both cases, these times and frequencies are based on engineering judgement and operating experience, rather than on analyses. Therefore the Completion Times and Frequencies approved for the standard Technical Specifications were used. In a few cases, plant hardware dictated deviating from the RSTS times or Frequencies. Each of these cases is explained individually.
2) The CEOG-RSTS used 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> as the Completion Time for going to MODE 3. The Palisades de-gasing system does not allow reducing PCS Hydrogen levels sufficiently, in 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, to permit opening the PCS for maintenance. The.de-gas system is not effective at low pressures. Since shutdowns to MODE 4 or 5 are normally followed by maintenance, Palisades RTS use 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br /> for attaining MODE 4. Thirty hours is sufficient to reduce PCS disolved gas levels to shutdown values. The Completion Time for attaining MODE 5, 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />, is unchanged.
3) Several existing Palisades Tech Specs require testing the redundant components when a required piece of equipment is found inoperable. These requirements have been deleted. There are no similar requirements in RSTS, and it is the general philosophy that equipment is OPERABLE as long as its Surveillance Requirements are met, unless there is a spacific reason to suspect otherwise.
4) Completion Times for Required Actions which, due to equipment differences, do not have identical counterparts in RSTS were determined using the same general rules as used when standardizing Completion Times for the RSTS:

a) 7 Days: The specified Condition did not eliminate the plant's ability to meet single failure criterion.

b) 72 Hours: The specified Condition did not eliminate the plant's ability to cope with design accidents, given no additional failures.

c) 24 Hours:

d) e)

KEY:

TS requirement type:

  • Column 3 syntax:
  • Attachment 2 Page 2 of 6 Safety Limit SL: Safety limit; Applicable conditions Surveillance Requirement SR: Equipment to be tested; Test description; Frequency Limiting Safety Setting LSS: RPS Trip Chnl &setting Limiting Condition for Operation LCD: Equipment to be operable; Applicable conditions Action ACTION: Condition requiring action; Required action; Completion time Administrative Requirement Admin: Administrative requirement Permitted Instrument Bypass Bypass: Bypassable component; conditions when bypass permitted
  • Defined Term Definition: Name of defined item
  • Exception to other TS Requirement Except: Excepted spec or condition; Applicable conditions Foot Note or other Hate Note: Subject of note Pal-TS to Pal-RTS Correlation:

TS Number RTS Number TS requirement description Comment on changes 3.07 3.7 Electrical Systems Availability 3.07 .01.a 3.7.1 LCD: Sta Pwr Xfmr 1-2; > 325F Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS. RTS LCO 3. 7.1 requires 2 off-site circuits, but does not specifically require station power xfmr 1-2.

3.07 .01.b 3.7.1 LCD: Startup Xfmr 1-2; > 325F Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS. RTS LCO 3.7.1 requires 2 off-site circuits, but does not specifically require startup xfmr 1-2.

3.07 .01.c 3.7.5 LCD: Eng Safeguards Buses lC and lD; > 325F Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS. RTS LCD 3.7.5 requires all buses required by TS LCD 3.7.1.a thru g, and also requires buses listed in withdrawn TSCR of 3/25/86 the required buses are listed in basis table 3.7.5-1.

3.07 .01.d 3.7.5 LCD: 480V Distribution Buses 11 &12; > 325F See 3.7.1.c comment, above.

3.07 .01.e 3.7.5 LCD: MCC No 1, 2, 7, and 8; > 325F See 3.7.1.c comment, above.

3.07 .01.f 3.7.5 LCD: 125 VD-C Buses 1 and 2; > 325F See 3.7.1.c comment, above.

3.07 .01.g 3.7.5 LCD: Four preferred A-C Buses; > 325F See 3.7.1.c comment, above.

3.07.01.h 3.7.3 LCO: 2 station Batteries; > 325F Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS.

3.07 .01.h 3.7.5 LCD: the DC [distribution] systems; > 325F Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS.

3.07 .01.h 3.7.3 LCD: 1 battery charger per bus; > 325F Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS.

3.07.01.i 3.7.1 LCD: DG 1-1 &1-2; > 325F Applicability for 2 DGs extended through MODE 4 and added requirement for l DG operable in MODES 5 &6, iaw RSTS.

2

  • Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (12/14/89).
  • TS Number RTS Number TS reauirement description
  • Attachment 2 Page 3 of 6 Comment on changes 3.07 .01. i SR 3. 7.1. 3 LCO: 2500 gal fuel per day tank; > 325F RTS requires day tank check whenever DG is required to be operable. Also req in LCD 3.7.2 (Modes 5 &6).

3.07.01.i SR 3. 7.1.6 LCD: 16000 gal in storage tank; > 325F Applicability extended to all MODES iaw RSTS. SR 3. 7. l. 6 is also required by LCD 3.7.2. Required capacity increased iaw latest analyses.

3.07.01.j Relocated LCD: Switchyard Battery; > 325F Switchyard equipment requirements relocated to ******** The operability of equipment in the switchyard is not assumed in the safety analysis, and does not meet any of the "split criterion."

3.-07 .01.j Relocated LCO: Switchyard D-C system; > 325F See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.01.j Relocated LCD: 1 swyd battery charger; > 325F See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.01.k Relocated . LCO: Swyd 240V A-C Panels 1 &2 and Dist sys; > 325F See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.01.l Relocated LCO: 2400 Vbus lE; > 325F The requirement to have bus lE energized above 325.F has been relocated to******

Bus lE is not a safety grade _bus. Its operability is not assumed in_any safety analysis, and it does not meet any of the "split criterion."

3.07.02 Applic LCO ACTION: LCD 3.7.1 not met Specific conditions and ACTIONS are listed in 3.7.2.a thru m, below.

3.07.02.a 3.7.1 A.2 ACTION: Sta Pwr Xfmr inop; restore w/in 24 hrs If xfmr is being used as one of the .

required off-site circuits, it must be restored w/in 72 hrs iaw RSTS.

3.01.02.a Deleted ACTION: Sta Pwr Xfmr inop; test both DGs Deleted iaw RSTS and GL 84-15.

3.07.02.b 3.7.1 A.2 ACTION: SU Xfmr inop; restore w/in 24 hrs If xfmr is being used as one of the required off-site circuits, it must be restored w/in 72 hrs iaw RSTS.

  • 3.07.02.b Deleted ACTION: SU Xfmr inop; test both DGs Deleted iaw RSTS and GL 84-15.

3.07.02.b - Deleted ACTION: SU Xfmr inop; notify NRC of > 24 hr outage Deleted. No similar requirement in RSTS; LCO requires 2 circuits from off-site, and limits operation to 72 hrs with < 2 circuits.

3.07.02.c 3.7.5 A.3 ACTION: bus lC inop; restore w/in 8 hrs Unchanged 3.07.02.c 3.7.l A.l ACTION: bus lC inop; no inop equip on lD RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

3.07.02.c Deleted ACTION: bus lC inop; test opposite DG Deleted iaw RSTS and GL 84-15.

3.07.02.c 3.7.5 A.3 ACTION: bus lD inop; restore w/in 8 hrs Unchanged 3

'Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (12/14/89).

" TS Number RTS Number TS requirement description

  • Attachment 2 Page 4 of 6 Comment on changes ACTION: bus lD inop; no inop equip on lC RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, 3.07.02.c 3.7.5 A.1 thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

ACTION: bus lD inop; test opposite DG Deleted iaw RSTS and GL 84-15.

3.07.02.c Deleted 3.7.5 A.3 ACTION: Bus 11 inop; restore w/in 8 hrs Unchanged 3.07.02.d RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, 3.07.02.d 3.7.5 A.1 ACTION: Bus 11 inop; no inop equip on 12 thus entering a condition far that equipment iaw RSTS.

3.7.5 A.3 ACTION: Bus 12 inop; restore w/in 8 hrs Unchanged 3.07.02.d RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, 3.07.02.d 3.7.5 A.1 ACTION: Bus 12 inop; no inop equip on 11 thus entering a condition far that equipment iaw RSTS.

ACTION: MCC 1&7 inop; restore w/in 8 hrs RTS CONDITION applies even if only one 3.07.02.e 3.7.5 A.3 MCC is de-energized. Otherwise unchanged.

ACTION: MCC 1&7 inop; no inop equip on goad MCCs RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, 3.07.02.e 3.7.5 A.l thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

ACTION: MCC 1&2 inap; restore w/in 8 hrs RTS CONDITION applies even if only one 3.07.02.e 3.7.5 A.3 MCC is de-energized. Otherwise unchanged; ACTION: MCC 1&2 inop; no inap equip on goad MCCs RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, 3.07.02.e 3.7.5 A.1 thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

3.7.5 A.2 ACTION: 125VDC bus 1 inap; restore w/in 8 hrs AOT reduced to 2 hrs iaw RSTS.

3.07.02.f ACTION: 125VDC bus 1 inop; no inop equip on bus. 1 RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, 3.07.02.f 3.7.5 A.l thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

ACTION: 125VOC bus 2 inop; restore w/in 8 hrs AOT reduced to 2 hrs iaw RSTS.

3.07.02.f 3.7.5 A.2 RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, 3.07.02.f 3.7.5 A.l ACTION: 125VDC bus 2 inop; no inop equip on bus 2 thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

ACTION: 125VDC bus 2 inop; provide emerg lighting* Emergency lighting requirements 3.07.02.f Relocated relocated ta ***** Emergency lighting is not addressed in accident analyses, nor in RSTS. It does not meet any of the "split criterion."

3.7.5 A.3 ACTION: 1 Pref AC bus inop; restore w/in 8 hrs Unchanged.

3.07.02.g 3.07.02.g 3.7.5 A.l ACTION: 1 Pref AC bus inop; no inop equip on op buses RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RS.TS.

ACTION: 1 battery inop; restore w/in 24 hrs AOT reduced to 2 Hrs iaw RSTS 3.07.02.h 3.7.3 B.1 4

'~alisades Technical Specification Requirement List (12/14/89).

, Attachment 2 Page 5 of. 6

~ TS Number RTS Number TS requirement description Comment on changes 3.07.02.h Relocated ACTION: 1 battery inop; run both chgrs on affected bus Relocated to ****** RTS CONDITION -is written assuming entire DC train is inoperable. The AOT has been reduced from 24 to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> accordingly. There is no need to require both chargers to

  • be in operation. In addition, since the CONDITION is entered whether the fault lies with a battery or charger, the former ACTION requiring both chargers is inappropriate.

3.07.02.i 3.7.l B.4 Admin: max 7 days/month for < 2 DGs operable. AOT changed to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> per occasion iaw RSTS.

3.07.02.i 3.7.1 B.3 ACTION: 1 DG inop; test other DG RTS ACTION allows verification that DG is OPERABLE w/o actual start, if difficulty with inoperable DG does not affect starting equipment. Verification that the fault is not common is required. *

3. 07. 02 .i SR 3. 7.1.1 ACTION: 1 DG inop; controls on other DG in auto The actual check of controls in RTS is a weekly SR, iaw RSTS. If the *difficulty with the inop DG involved lineup of controls, ACTION C.3 of LCO 3.7.1 jOUld require verifying lineup of controls on the OPERABLE DG.

3.07.02.i -3.7.1 B.2 &C.2 ACTION: 1 DG inop; no inop equip on other side RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

3. 07. 02. j Relocated ACTION: swyd 240 VAC pnl inop; keep its ACBs operable See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.02.j Relocated ACTION: swyd 240 VAC pnl &ACBs inop; fix w/in 24 hrs See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.02.j Relocated ACTION: swyd 240 VAC pnl &ACBs inop; keep ACBs open See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.02.k Relocated ACTION: swyd batt inop; restore w/in 24 hrs See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.02.k Relocated ACTION: swyd batt inop; both chgrs must be operable See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.02.l Relocated ACTION: 2400 VAC bus lE inop; restore w/in 24 hrs See 3. 7.1.l comment, above.

3.07.02.m Relocated ACTION:. swyd 125 VDC pnl inop; keep its ACBs operable See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.02.m Relocated ACTION: swyd 125 VDC pnl &ACBs inop; fix w/in 24 hrs See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

3.07.02.m Relocated ACTION: swyd 125 VDC pnl &ACBs inop; keep ACBs open See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

4. 01. 02. 03. a SR: SIS woffsite pwr; test wtest ckt; 92 days 4.01. 02. 03.a SR: SIS w/o offsite pwr; test wtest ckt; 92 days 4.01. 02. 09. a SR 3.7.1.16 &18 SR: OBA Seq; test operation; 92 days (see 3(a) above) Freq changed to 18 months iaw RSTS. SR #

16 verifies timing, SR # 18 verifies loading of equip.

4.01.02.10.a SR 3.7.1.16 &21 SR: Shutdown Seq; test operation; 18 months SR 116 verifies timing, SRl21 verifies loading of equi~. Essentially no change.

4.01.02.11.a SR 3. 7. 1. 8 &9 SR: DG; test manual start, sync, &loading; 31 days Na change.

...:. !1ali.sades' Technical Specification Re!ment List (12/14/89).

, Attachment 2 Page 6 of 6 1, TS Number RTS Number TS requirement description Comment on changes 4.01.02.11.b SR 3. 7.1.18 & 21 SR: DG; test auto start, load shed, & loa*ding; 18 Mo. Ho change.

4.01.02.11.c Deleted SR: DG; test auto start initiating ckts; 84 SU This DG start test has no parallel in RSTS, and has been deleted iaw recommendations of GL 84-15.

4.02.02.09 SR 3. 7.1. 3 & 6 SR: DG Fuel Supply; inventory; daily No change for storage tank, day tank iaw RSTS, belly tank added iaw RG 1.137.

4.07 3.7 Emergency Power System Periodic Tests 4.07.01 3.7.1 &2 Diesel Generators DG Surveillance covered under LCO 3.7.1 4.07 .01.a SR 3. 7.1. 8 SR: DGs; start manually; monthly No Change 4.07 .01.a Relocated SR: DGs; alternate tested start ckt; monthly Details of test relocated to Surv procedure; 4.07.01.a SR 3.7.1.13 SR: DGs; verify start time c* 10 sec; monthly Freq 184 days iaw RSTS 4.07 .01.a SR 3. 7.1. 9 SR: DGs; Test load to 2400 Kw; monthly RTS SR specifies a band of 2300 to 2500 kw iaw guidance of RSTS.

4.07 .01.b SR 3. 7.1.18 SR: OBA DG auto loading; integrated test; refueling Freq changed to 18 mo; added requirements on voltage, freq, and run.

time ia1<1 RSTS.

4.07 .01.b SR 3.7.1.16 & 18 LCO: OBA DG auto loading w/in 30 sec. The 30 sec requirement is replaced by SR 116 verifying design sequencer timing and SR 118 verifying actual loading of equipment onto DG. Essentially no change.

4.07 .01.c SR 3. 7.1. 26 SR: DGs; Inspect iaw Alco instructions; Refueling Freq changed to 18* months iaw RSTS 4.07 .01.d SR 3. 7.1. 25 LCO: DG loads < 750A at 2400V 4.07 .01.e SR 3. 7.1.12 SR: Fuel Xfer pumps; verify operable; monthly Freq 92 days iaw RSTS and IS! testing of other pumps.

4.07.02 3.7.3 & 4 Station Batteries 4.07.02.a SR 3.7.3.3 SR: Sta Batteries; Record each cell voltage; monthly Freq changed to 92 days iaw RSTS.

4.07.02.a SR 3.7.3.2 SR: Sta Batteries; Record 1 pilot cell s.g.; monthly Freq changed to weekly iaw RSTS.

4.07.02.a SR: Sta Batteries; Record 1 pilot cell temp; monthly 4.07.02.b SR 3.7.3.3 SR: Sta Batteries; Record each cell gravity; 3 months Ho change.

4.07.02.b SR 3.7.3.2 SR: Sta Batteries; Record each 5th cell temp; 3 months No change.

4.07.02.b SR 3.7.3.2 & 3 SR: Sta Batteries; Record lvl &water added; 3 months No change.

4..07. 02. c SR 3.7.3.10 SR: Sta Batteries; Battery Service test; refueling Freq changed to 18 months iaw RSTS.

4.07.02.d SR 3. 7.3.11 SR: Sta Batteries; Test discharge; each third refuelin Freq changed to 5 years iaw RSTS.

4.07.02.d SR 3.7.3.10 Except: SR 4.7.2.d (test disch) OK 4 SR 4.7.2.c Ho change.

4.07.03 Relocated Emergency Lighting 4.07.3 Relocated SR: Ernerg Light outside CB; verify operable; l year 4.07.3 Relocated SR: Emerg Light inside CB; verify operable; B4 Rx head removal 6

~--

,. ~TS Number I

TS Number R~eguirement Description

  • Attachment 3 Page .1 of .2 Comments 3.7.1.a 3.7.l.a & b LCD: Two off-site ckts OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 3.7.l.b 3.7.1.i LCD: Two DGs OPERABLE, MODES 1-4
3. 7.1 A 3.7.2.a &b
  • ACTIONS: one off-site ckt inop 3.7.1 B 3.7.2.i ACTIONS: one DG inop 3.7.1 c 3.0.3 ACTIONS: one DG &one off-site ckt inop 3.7.1 D 3.0.3 ACTIONS: two DGs inop 3.7.1 E 3.0.3 ACTIONS: two off-site ckts inop 3.7.1 F 3.7.2 ACTIONS: req actions not met in time; 3.7.1.l New SR: DG lineup check 3.7.1.2 New SR: DG starting air check 3.7.1.3 4.2.2.9 SR: DG flltl tank level check cl ,1'\

3.7.1.4 New SR: DG fuel tank water check 3.7.1.5 New SR: DG new fuel sample

3.7.1.6 4.2.2.9 SR: DG fuel storage tank level check 3.7.1.7 New SR: Off-site ckt breaker check
3. 7.1.8 4. 7.l.a SR: DG starting test 3.7.l.9 4. 7.1.a SR: DG monthly load test 3.7.1.10 New SR: DG fuel storage tank water check 3.7.1.11 New SR: DG fuel storage tank sample 3.7.1.12 4.7.l.e SR: DG fuel xfer system test 3.7.1.13 New SR: DG 6 mo start &load test 3.7.1.14 New SR: Manual xfer of power to off-site ckts
3. 7. l.15 New SR: Auto xfer of power to SU ~fmr 3.7.1.16 4.1. 2. 9. a'* 1O. a SR: Sequencer timing test 3.7.1.17 New SR: Loadshed bypass test 3.7.1.18 4.1.2.11.b SR: LOSP wSIS test 3.7.1.19 NeH SR: DG 18 mo load test.
3. 7.1. 20 New SR: Load xfer f roil DG to off-site 3.7.1.21 4.1.2.10.a SR: LOSP w/o SIS test
3. 7.1. 22 New SR: DG single load rejection test
3. 7.1. 23 New SR: DG total load rejection test 3.7.1.24 New SR: LOSP wDG paralleled
3. 7.1. 25 4.7.1.d SR: DG load verification 3.7.1.26 4.7.1.c SR: DG inspection 3.7.1.27 NeN SR: DG simultaneous start
3. 7.1. 28 New SR: DG fuel tank cleaning 3.7.2.a New LCD: One off-site ckt OPERABLE, MODES 5 &6 3.7.2.b New LCD: One DG OPERABLE, MODES 5 &6 3.7.2 A New ACTIONS: less than req AC sources OPERABLE 3.7.2.l New SR: Required SRs from LCO 3.7.1, for MODES 5 &6 3.7.3 3.7.1.h LCD: Two batteries wassco charger OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 3.7.3 A New ACTIONS: battery cell not fully charged 3.7.3 B 3.7.2.h ACTIONS: one DC source inop 3.7.3 c 3.7.2 ACTIONS: req actions not met in time 3.7.3.l 4.7.2.a SR: Battery terminal voltage check 3.7.3.2 4.7.2.a SR: Battery cell checks, pilot cells
  • 3, 7.3 .3 4.7.2.b SR: Battery cell checks, all cells

, 3. 7.3.5 0 3.7.3.6 i

" 3~7. 3. 4 3.7.3.7 Nel'l 4.7.2.b New New SR:

SR:

SR:

SR:

Battery Battery Battery Battery cell connector check temp check inspection cell connector maintenance

  • Attachment 3 Page 2 of 2 3.7.3.8 Hew SR: Battery cell resistance check 3.7.3.9 New SR: Battery charger capacity check 3.7.3.10 4.7.2.c SR: Battery service test 3.7.3.11 4.7.2.d SR: Battery performance test 3.7.4 New . LCO: one DC source OPERABLE; MODES 5 &6 3.7.4 A New ACTIONS: No DC source OPERABLE, MODES 5 &6 3.7.4.1 New SR: Required SRs from LCD 3.7.3, for MODES 5 &6 3.7.5 3. 7.1.c-g & etc. LCO: Two elec dist trains energized MODES 1-4 3.7.5 A 3.7.2.c-g &etc. ACTIONS: One elec dist train not fully energized 3.7.5 B 3.7.2 ACTIONS: req actions not met in time 3.7.5.l New SR: Breaker alignment check 3.7.6 New LCO: One elec dist train energized, MODES 5 &6
3. 7.6 A New ACTIONS: No elec dist train fully energized 3.7.6.1 New SR: Breaker alignment check.

2

~ Attachment 4 Page .. 1 of 4 *

    • '-1'TS Number*

RSTS Number Description of RTS Requirement Com111ents i;* 3.7.1.a 3.7.1.a LCO: Two off-site ckts OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 No change

3. 7.1.b 3. 7.1.b LCO: Two DGs OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 No change 3.7.l A 3.7.1 A ACTIONS: one off-site ckt inop No change 3.7.1 8 3.7.1 B ACTIONS: one DG inop Added verification of turbine driven AFW pump operability iaw STS, reworded required action statements for brevity and clarity. Retained all RSTS action.

3.7.1 c 3.7.1 c ACTIONS: one DG &one off-site ckt inop Made similar changes to those for condition B. Retained all RSTS action.

3. 7.1 D 3. 7.1 D ACTIONS: two DGs inop No change.

3.7.l E 3.7.1 E ACTIONS: two off-site ckts inop No change.

3.7.1 F 3.7.l F ACTIONS: req actions not met in time; No change 3.7.1.1 3.7.1.7 SR: DG lineup check Reworded for clarity; no other change.

3. 7.1.2 3.7.1.8 SR: DG starting air check Reworded for clarity; no other change.

3.7.1.3 3.7.1.2 SR: DG fuel tank level check Reworded for clarity; added verification of engine mounted tank iaw ANSI N195 and GL 84-15. Used Pal numbers.

3.7.1.4 3.7.1.11 SR: DG fuel tank water check Reworded for clarity; deleted redundant 31 day frequency notation: DG 111ust be -

run monthly, and remaining frequency entry required SR to be run after each DG run .

3.7.1.5 . 3.7.1.12 SR: DG new fuel sample Seperated SR for sa1pling neH fuel from that for sampling storage tank to enhance clarity of requirements; speci tied uni ts for viscosity, reworded.

No technical change.

3.7.1.6 3. 7.1.3 SR: DG fuel storage tank level chec~ Reworded to reflect palisades equipment and usage.

3.7.1.7 3. 7.1.1 SR: Off-site ckt breaker check No change in SR or frequency. Deleted notes calling out ACTIONS which require SR to be run; these add little and were neither complete nor correct.

3.7.1.8 3. 7.1.5 SR: DG monthly starting test Added verification of 10 second timing; moved note tl to basis; deleted note 32 which is not applicable to Palisades (we have our DGs prewarmed and prelubed at all times and have no alternate starting sequences for gradual speed increases);

enhanced frequency column entry to aviod having to ref er to table on seperate page.

3.7.1.9 3. 7;1.6 SR: DG monthly load test Moved nofe 11 to bases; deleted note t2 which is inappropriate to Palisades; reworded note t3* to agree with similar notes elsewhere in this section; used Palisades values~ enhanced frequency column entry as, in SR #8.

Attachment 4 Page 2 of 4

..: _-J v*"

~ 3.7.1.10 3.7.1.14 ~R: DG fuel storage tank water check Reworded using Palisades tank

\I designation; changed frequency to 31

  • days iaw RG 1.137 for tanks below ground water level.
3. 7.1.11 3. 7.1.12
  • SR: DG fuel storage tank sample Separated SR for sampling new fuel from that for sampling storage tank to enhance clarity of requirements; specified units for viscosity, reworded.

No technical change.

3.7.1.12 3.7.1.4 SR: DG. fuel xfer system test Added reference to engine mounted tank iaw GL 84-15; reworded using Palisades designations.

3.7.1.13 3.7.1.9 & 10 SR: DG 6 mo start &load test Combined SRs # 9 &10 from RSTS; deleted notes inappropriate to Palisades; reworded using Palisades usage and values,

3. 7.1.14 3. 7.1.15 SR: Manual xfer of power to off-site ckts Seperated ~R for auto f romand manual xfer.
3. 7.1.15 3. 7.1.15 SR: Auto xfer of power to s.u xfmr Separated SR for auto* from manual xfer;.

reworded using Palisades designators.

3.7.1.16 3.7.1.18 SR: Sequencer timing test Reworded using Palisades designators and values.

3.7.1.17 3. 7.1.22 SR: Lo~dshed bypass test This is a Palisades specific SR. Pal does not h~ve any DG trips which are bypassed during emergency operation. We do, however, bypass the undervoltage load shedding from the 2400 volt safeguards buses when the DG breaker is clos~d. This SR verifies that action.

3.7.1.18 3.7.L21 SR: LOSP N SIS test Reworded-using Palisades values and designations; deleted note inappropriate to Palisades ..

3. 7.1.19 3. 7.1. 23 SR: DG 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> load test Added 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> test at two hour rating iaw RG 1.108; reworded for clarity and consistancy with other SRs in this section.
3. 7.1.20 3. 7.1. 25 SR: triad xfer from DG to off-site Reworded for clarity.

3.7.1.21 3.7.1.19 . SR: LOSP w/o SIS test Deleted note* inappropriate to Palisades;

  • used Palisades designations and values.

Deleted 3. 7.1. 20 SR: DG start on ESF signal test Palisades* does not start DGs w/o LOSP 3;7.1.22 3.7.1.16 . SR: DG single load rejection test Reworded for clarity; used Palisades values.

2

  • .*...'Y.7.1.23

,, **' \,[\

3.7.1.17 SR: DG total load rejection test

~

Attachment 4 Page 3 of 4 Reworded to aviod question as to wether or not the DG breaker may be tripped to accomplish the total load rejection or not. That is the only method available to achieve a total load rejection, but it could be construed to be prohibited by RSTS wording; used Palisades values.

3. 7.1.24 3. 7.1. 26 SR: LOSP wDG paralleled Reworded to take differences between Palisades and "standard plant" into account, while accomplishing same purpose.

3.7.1.25 3.7.1.24 SR: DG load verification Used Palisades value.

3. 7.1. 26 3. 7.1.27 SR: DG inspection No change.
3. 7.1. 27 3. 7.1. 28 SR: DG simultaneous start Used Palisades values.
3. 7.1. 28 added SR: DG fuel tank cleaning Added this SR iaw RG 1.137.
3. 7.1-1 3.7.1-1 Table: DG test schedule Deleted words in note (2) refering to fast &slow starts, which do not apply to Palisades; Listed those SRs which do not affect DG starting or loading as not constituting failures which require ~ore_

frequent DG testing; ie don't test DG starting .mar~ frequently if a breaker was found misaligned.

3.7.2.a 7.7.2.a LCD: One off-site ckt OPERABLE, MODES 5 &6 No change.

3.7.2.b 3.7.2.b LCD: One DG OPERABLE, MODES 5 &6 No change 3.7.2 A 3.7.2 A ACTIONS: less than req AC sources OPERABLE No .change 3.7.2.l 3.7.2.1 SR: Required SRs from LCO 3.7.1, for MODES 5 &6 Specified those SRs which test features required in MODES 5 &6; ie excluded verification of SIS signal loading,

3. 7.3 3.7.3 LCO: Two batteries wassco charger OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 No change.

3.7.3 A added ACTIONS: battery cell not fully charged CONDITION Awas added in order to remove the implied Required Actions from the battery cell testing SRs. It also assures that a battery, with a cell not meeting catigory Aor B limits, is OPERABLE within the 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> AOT. The other requirements are the same as in RSTS SRs #2 and #3.

3.7.3 B 3.7.3 A ACTIONS: one DC source inop No change.

3.7.3 c 3.7.32 B ACTIONS: req actions not met in time No change.

3.7.3.l 3.7.3.2 SR: Battery terminal voltage check No change.

3. 7.3.2 3.7.3.l SR: Battery cell checks, pilot cells This SR was rewritten to put the implied Required Actions into Condition A.

3

Attachment 4 Page 4 of 4 3.7.3.3 SR: Battery cell checks, all cells This SR was rewritten to put the implied Required Actions into Condition A.

3.7.3.4 3.7.3.4 SR: Battery cell connector check Rewritten for clarity and brevity.

3.7.3.5 3.7.3.5 SR: Battery temp check Used Palisades values.

3.7.3.6 3.7.3.6 SR: Barrery inspection No change.

3.7.3.7 3.7.3.7 SR: Battery cell connector maintenance No change.

3.7.3.8 3.7.3.8 SR: Battery cell resistance check No change.

3.7.3.9 3.7.3.9 SR: Battery charger capacity check No change.

3.7.3.10 3.7.3.10 SR: Battery service test Used Palisades values.

3.7.3.11 3.7.3.11 SR: Battery performance test No change.

3.7.3-1 3.7.3-1 Table: Battery Surv Requirements Used Palisades values.

3.7.4 3.7.4 LCD: one DC source OPERABLE; MODES 5 &6 No change'.

3.7.4 A 3.7.4 A ACTIONS: No DC source OPERABLE, MODES 5 &6 No change.

3.7.4.1 3.7.4.1 SR: Required SRs from LCD 3.7:3, for MODES 5 &6 No change.

3.7.5 3.7.5 LCD: Two alee ~ist trains energized MODES 1-4 Rewritten extensively, putting the description of each train into the bases, and combining AC and DC into the same requirement. This is done to disallow si~ultaneously having a DC bus out in one train and an AC train out in the other. The declairation of affected equipment to be inoperable, in RSTS,*

would accomplish the same thing, but this way is intended to be more direct.

There are no other effects of the rewording.

3.7.5 A 3.7.5 A&B ACTIONS: One elec dist train not fully energized No change other than combining RSTS conditions Aand B into one.

3. 7.5 B 3.7.5 c ACTIONS: req actions not met in time No change.

3.7.5.1 3.7.5.l SR: Breaker alignment check No change.

3.7.6 3.7.6 LCD: One elec dist train energized, MODES 5 &6 This LCD changed in same manner as LCD 3.7.5, and for the same reasons.

3.7.6 A 3.7.6 A ACTIONS: No elec dist train fully energized No change.

3.7.6.1 3.7.6.l SR: Breaker alignment check. No change.

4

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18054B415&oldid=2414741"