Text

Forwards Plant Approach to Licensing of Restructured Tech Specs.Major Effort Undertaken to Develop Approach Which NRC & Util Can Compare Present & Proposed Requirements,Show Deletions,Additions & Justify Differences
	ML18054B415
Person / Time
Site:	Palisades
Issue date:	01/26/1990
From:	Kuemin J; CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	; NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
	NUDOCS 9002080165
	Download: ML18054B415 (28)
	v • d • e

consumers Power POW ERi Nii MICHlliAN'S PROliRESS General Offices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson.. Ml 49201 * (517) 788-0550 January 26, 1990 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT -

RESTRUCTURED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS In Consumers Power Company's September 23, 1988 response to the NRC's SALP 8 Board Report, we informed the NRC of our participation in the industry and NRC efforts to develop Restructured Standard Technical Specifications (RSTS).

Following approval of the Combustion Engineering (CE)

O~mers Group RSTS and approval of the CE lead plant Restructured Technical Specifications (RTS), by the NRC, we indicated we would submit the Palisades RTS.

The goal date of the first quarter of 1990 for our submittal was based on the schedule for completion of both the CE RSTS and the lead plant (San Onofre).

During the last few months, several interactions between the NUMARC working group on Technical Specifications Improvements and the NRC have taken place concerning review of the RSTS.

On December 12, 1989, the NUMARC Working Group met with Dr. TE Murley and members of his staff.

A schedule for obtaining NRC review comments and conducting meetings between the industry and NRC staff was agreed upon.

The meeting was held as a result of utility concerns expressed in a NUMARC letter dated November 15, 1989, T E Tipton to Dr T E Murley and the NRC response letter dated November 27, 1989, F J Miraglia to TE Tipton.

This agreed upon review schedule presently continues through the end of April 1990.

The issuance of the RSTS for all utility owners groups, including the CE Owners Group, will follow.

The CE lead plant submittal will follow after April 1990.

The NRC staff previously indicated it would require six to nine months to review the lead plant submittals.

We expect to submit the Palisades RTS prior.to completion of the NRC staff review of the CE lead plant submittal.

However, because of uncertainties with the RSTS and lead plant reviews, we cannot provide a firm commitment date.

Our goal, though, is to complete our RTS for submittal by the last quarter of 1990.

Slippage in the completion and approval of the CE RSTS has caused the completion date of the Palisades RTS to enter into the same time frame as the scheduled 1990 refueling outage and steam generator replacement.

This may

--~-~ - --------

9002080165 9001?A

PDR ADOCK b~Afi5~~~

p

~--pfit-OC0190-0249-NL04 A CMS' ENERGY COMPANY

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Palisades Plant Restructured Technical Specifications January 26, 1990 have an impact on in-house review efforts near the completion of our RTS schedule.

Since Palisades presently has custom Technical Specifications, a major effort has been undertaken to develop an approach which we and the NRC can use to compare present and proposed requirements, show deletions and additions and justify differences. provides the approach we plan on using in submitting the Palisades Restructured Technical Specifications.

We believe this approach is logical and well suited to our custom Technical Specifications.

We have previously discussed this approach with Mr Jose Calvo and members of his Technical Specification Improvement Branch. is provided for your information and consideration.

We welcome any comments you may have to improve our planned submittal approach.

~~

s L Kuemin f Licensing Engineer CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades Attachments OC0190-0249-NL04 2

OC0190-0249-NL04 ENCLOSURE I Consumers Power Company Palisades Plant Docket 50-255 PALISADES APPROACH TO LICENSING OF RESTRUCTURED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS January 26, 1990 25 Pages

ENCLOSURE 1 PALISADES APPROACH TO LICENSING OF RESTRUCTURED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS The Owners Groups' Restructured Standard Technical Specifications (RSTS) submittals and future lead plant Restructured Technical Specifications (RTS) submittals will incorporate marked up copies of the current Standard Technical Specifications (STS) to indicate how present requirements were dispositioned along with justifications for change.

This approach was attempted in our initial efforts to convert the present custom Technical Specifications (TS) to RTS.

However, we determined that this approach was ineffective for custom TS and are modifying the Owners Group approach (see Attachment 1 for some typical examples comparing the modified approach we are taking to the Owners Group approach of page markups).

The structure and content of our TS did not lend themselves to the Owners Groups'and lead plants' approach.

Our present TS often have LCOs, applicabilities, action statements and administrative information combined in paragraphs within a single specification.

Additionally, the_grouping of information is inconsistent and often scattered throughout the TS.

In general, the contents are arranged completely different from the CEOG RSTS.

For these reasons, we have developed a modified approach which is adaptable to our custom TS and, in our opinion, is superior to the approach used by the Owners Group for Standard Technical Specifications.

We have discussed our present TS Sections 3 & 4 into a listing of approximately 2,000 separate LCOs, surveillances, actions, exceptions, etc.

The initial effort on Sections 5 & 6 has identified an additional 500 requirements.

This listing has allowed us to identify each present requirement which will allow comparison to the RTS, and which will form the bases for our RTS submittal.

We are structuring our RTS for internal review so that each section will be made up of a package containing the following items:

1)

The RTS section and the Basis for the section.

2)

A list of the existing Palisades TS requirements (LCO, Action, SR, etc) which gives either the corresponding Palisades Restructured Tech Specs (RTS) requirement number or, for relocated or deleted material, states its disposition.

The comment section notes the differences between existing TS and RTS requirements.

Justification for major differences is provided in the comment section.

3)

A similar list of RTS requirements, which gives the corresponding TS number, or denotes material as "NEW".

4)

A list of the RTS requirements, and corresponding CE Owners Group RSTS section numbers noting added and deleted material.

The comment section notes the differences between our RTS submittal and the CEOG RSTS.

Discussion of major differences is provided.

OC0190-0249-NL04

t Items 1 through 3 will make up the bulk of the Palisades RTS submittal to the NRC.

It will form the basis for a Technical Specification Change Request, providing changes, reasons for each change and justification for major changes.

The bi-directional listings will assist us and the NRC in our reviews and provide assurance that all present TS requirements are dispositioned.

The justification of changes in Item 2 will be similar to that used for the CEOG RSTS.

Some general guidelines to be used are:

a)

Justifications need not address changes in Completion Times for Required Actions, nor surveillance requirement frequencies which are changed solely to agree with RSTS.

These two types of changes will be addressed generally. Deviations from the RSTS will be noted and justified.

b)

In many cases, LCOs are being added or made more restrictive in order to agree with RSTS.

In those cases, a statement to that effect is sufficient.

The same can be said about mode applicability.

c)

Material, which is to be relocated and which is addressed in the "split" document, should refer to that document.

It should be verified, however, that the reasons given in the split document are appropriate for Palisades.

d)

Material which is to be relocated, but not addressed in the split document, should discuss why the Interim Policy Statement Criteria does not apply, and where the material will be located after removal for the TS.

e)

Material which is to be deleted should have an adequate explanation.

f)

Major differences between existing TS and RTS will be discussed and justified.

A sample of Item 2 is shown in Attachment 2.

Item 3 will not contain nearly as much descriptive information as Item 2.

This list will point our new requirements_ which will not.show up on Item 2.

A sample of Item 3 is shown in Attachment 3.

Item 4 is to assist the NRC in their review.

It will identify the correlation between tbe RSTS and RTS numbering, and point out those items which are different.

Added or deleted items will have a brief explanatory note.

Item 4 will also explain the differences between RTS and RSTS to point out plant specific differences.

See Attachment 4.

The advantages of the approach described versus submittal of marked up Technical Specifications are:

1.

The listing readily shows the relationship of present TS to proposed RTS and identifies relocated and deleted material.

The listing is a valuable organizational tool for reviewers since it shows disposition of all present requirements.

OC0190-0249-NL04

2.

The cross reference of RTS to TS identifies all new requirements.

3.

Palisades' custom Technical Specifications have Actions, LCOs, Applicabilities and Surveillances mixed together and often poorly grouped.

The TS to RTS listing groups all requirements for ready.

reference.

4.

The listing can be sorted many ways, eg, grouping of all LCOs, Actions, SR, etc.

The information is on disc which allows users flexibility to update, edit and track.

5.

The listing established if a present TS requirement is an LCO, SR, Action, Definition or Administrative requirement.

OC0190-0249-NL04

3. 1 3.1.l LC..D PRIMARY COOLANT SYSTEM Applicability Page 1 of 10 Applies to the operable.status of the primary coolant system. (0 Objective To specify certain conditions of the primary coolant system which~

must be met to assure safe reactor operation.

~

Specifications Operable Components At least one primary coolant pump or on* shutdown cooling pump with a flow rate greatar than or equal to 2810 gpm shall be in operation whenever &.change is ba made in the boron

\\<TS x.X*X co cent at ion of the primary coolant and the lant R. TS :X _ x. X o eratin in cold shutdowo oz. abov*~, mept. dur1.ng

~

circumstances, the boron concentration ma~,De'* increased with: 1c

[

emergency los~ of coolant flow situation... Under_:.. these

--1?-TS" X. )(.. y

~

,xc.. ef) ~ "'o..J w L~

no primary coolant pumps or shutdown cooling pumps running.

WA.::.

1-"0 ll.c:~I ~~~\\l~~.\\.uiu L,(. O @.

S\\ t-'C.

t:l.~""C"" -A.ci-llu.....s. b..

Four primary coolant pump* sh&ll. be -~n.o~tion whenever:.

~ i\\.prl\\cM. l 1..L.t

\\_vu.u,~ pruvA.d the react~r is operated above hot shutdown, wit t e

-*\\2:\\.'.) x. )<...x:.

I fallowing except ion~-

.. * ~ : ~ > - :i-:

'.. * : ~ *.

R. T~ x, f:.. x L.C. 0 Before removing a_pump froa aarvic*s;:the~ power shall be reduced as specified in Table 2.3.1 and

~iate correctiv action impl*ented. With one puap-.outr '.oi **P~* return.

pump to service w th n 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months eration) ot shutdown (or below) with the reactor tripped (from the C-06 panal, openina th* 42-01 and 42-02 circuit breakers withi the n*xt 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months . Start-u* (abo e hot shutdown) with less than four pumps is not permitted and gowaw,~operation w t less than t ree p~s is not p*rmitted.

L c o __ -~-@

c.

e measure our, primary coolan* pumpa*.. operating vessel flov shall be 124.3 x 106 lb/hr or greater, correc~edi;to 532°1.*

1

~

Both steaa'generators shall be capable of performing their L CO $~

heat transfer* function whenever the average temperature of the

\\

Pr"'-.. -

coolant is above 325°r-;

p.. ~ r

\\l l "'\\'.).

~

~.,__ _

3 ------'-----

e.

Maximum primary system pressure differentials shall not exceed the f ollovinl:

(2.~ K*>c*K R.-c~ )<. 'l(. ~

f{l;fl {) \\.)

Delete I

Foll..5-\\-QN:lcc. rd I t.c,;h Spec.. \\'IA I\\. ts Q \\'\\.\\,~ \\ 0 l":>

p~e.J.e..\\ _ +t>

~~~en.. -!-\\...A. R.e\\/\\-eweCL

-to 4-\\.u... )U.'-~'~\\~"!\\.i. 1 u.. of-Amendment No Jt, 8J, U8, 119 c..\\A.IA'4'i<::> 'oe.b-c.-c.., ~~

D cember 12, 1988

'T ~ P,v c).

rz.. 1' '5

'R\\S Y:-X.*K

\\$ ~~

{o

~~+'t:.l\\.-+\\u.:iie.~1e.~e.~t_;\\k~e.>poucL1....,l\\_ 'R.TS

$\\...ic:"e..

~\\\\ ~"'-\\AA ()£-(I.I.:->

(hf°-+'e~ o-e_-l.wee.iJ \\"S. ~.... <.\\..

{L~s CT 4

Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (11/14/89).

rs Number 3.01 3.01.01.a 3.01.01.b

3. 01. 01. b 3.01.01.b 3.01.01.b 3.01.01.b 3.01.01.b 3.01.01.c 3.01.01.d RTS Number 3.3 I ~*kf'L TS requirement description PCS requirements LCO: PCS flow > 2810; during boron changes LCO: Four PCP's running; > Hot SD ACTION: < 4 PCPs; reduce pwr iaw tbl 2.3.1 ACTION: < 4 PCPs; restore 4 PCPs; 12 hrs ACTION: < 4 PCPs > 12 hrs; Trip Rx from C0-6 LCO: No startup; w < 4 pumps LCO: No power ops; < 3 pumps LCO: 4 PCP flow > 124.3E6 #/hr at 532F; LCO: Both SG's req operable; > 325F Page 2 of 10 Comment on chanoes

,_ttacl-nucilt 1 Page 3 of 10 3.10 CONTROL ROD AND POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS Applicability Applies to operation of control rods and hot channel £actors during operation.

Objective To specify limits of control rod movement to assure an acceptable power distribution during power operation, limit worth of individual rods to values analyzed for accident conditions, maintain adequate shutdown margin after a reactor trip and to specify acceptable power limits for power tilt conditions.

Specif !cations 3.10.1 Shutdown Margin Requirements

~---r~ x * ~ -'£

=--==:._:__.=_:___-=----==----------------:rr::--

~--Ao --~

({) LC o a.------

t four primary coolant pumps in operation a:_~hut~-- __

,1-,.

l\\ \\

,_ L ~

___/_

~,

the shutdown margin shall be 2%.

15 ""~~ v \\ C->\\_ ::.>!..

L

\\ gLS k. x.~~~~~,.._--=========::;::::::~~::;::::==:=:::=~----~=--

{,\\L,. <.J d

\\l,.--c!::"c~. rr4ifth less than four primi.rr. coqla.n.t ~~:_s i~ ~pex:atio_n ~-tJi

~ '--

c.r

'I' '-~ shutdown and abov 0ooration shall be immediate!

D c_ TL D 0

~l'. ":> ~- )c.

initiated to increase an ma ntain the shutdown margin

~~~l\\CV\\.-~~tl l"'"CS~-~>~3~*~7~5~%2,~~~-~-~-=~--~------~----

e

c. ~ less than th;-hot shutdown condition~ with at least one F ~ r Q ~\\,C..v\\.-~ l l L ~

primary coolant pump in operation or at, least one_ shutdown R TS x_. """.x cooling pump in operation, with a flow rate > 2s10- gpm, the

~

L\\r\\ ~l? ~.... v. boron concentration shall be greater than the cold shutdown

~

l<-~~ ~~~boron concentration for normal cooldowns and heatups, ie, nonemergency conditions.

rc-csx-x*;>c

-$> ~#\\c.-Ho u

\\'Z. \\.S 'X

x* r

1.

Oil

2.

~c_,~\\Ju ~

TSP1088-0181-NL04 (a)

(b) the hot coolant pumps

< 2810 gpm Establish a shutdown margin of > 3.5%

and asnre two of the three charging pumps are electrically disabled.

At least every ~minute i

-*t at no char in are o eratin **

If one or more charging pumps are determined to be operating in any 15 minute surveillance period, terminate charging pUmp operation and insure that the shutdown margin requirements are met and maintained.

3-58 Amendment No. lt, IJ, $1, ~8,

10. 118 November 15, 1988 I

I I

I

3.10 CONTROL ROD AND POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS (Continued)

Attac1Utid1t 1 Page 4 of 10 I

3.10.l Shutdown Margin Requirements (Continued)

/

12.. TS l"-* ;x. x..

-~

(OJ ft-PrL1<v\\.:--.,::-,*1-:-,~;-::---__,.n-u=r~1=n=g-cn=o~n::emergency conditions, ~s than the_hot shutdo!zn->

/

\\::::/

P--C~ Y.:.-'x:-:><.

condition with no operating primary coolant pumps and a e...,-r':/> K*"l<-'f<

Pi'-11 ~ lJ

r ary s stem recirculating flow rate less than 65,0 gpm,

~ t"2-

/~

within one hour:

~

/\\Y (a) verify

\\?.,"j0 X.- 'L ><-

S ~ ~(f)

Initiate surveillance at least every 15 minutes to (v) L cu V

\\2.. \\:S Y:.* >-*r

e.

that no charging pumps are operating.

charging pumps are eterm ne 15-minute surv ance eriod terminate charging pump operation an insure that the shutdownmargin requirements are met ~aintai~

__, cs;.'R._

If a control rod cannot be tripped, shutdown margin shall be increased by boration as necessary to compensate for the worth of the withdrawn inoperable rod.

The drop time of each control rod shall be no greater than 2.5 seconds from the beginning of rod motion to 90%

insertion.

3.10.2 (Deleted) 3.10.3 Part-Length Control Rods L co@

The tz_ """t..S ~. x.. ;><.

the core

@=:t-Lep--rl0 u (2...... Ts x:. * 'I"- *'IC TSP1088-0181-NL04 awn from rod exercisea and physics tests

3-59 Amendment No. 118 November 15, 1988 I

(§)

Q.:tS X, X* x I

Page S of 10 3.10 CONTROL ROD.AND POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS (Contd) 3.10.4 Misaligned or Inoperable Control Rod or Part-Length Rod

}) Q~V.-\\, ~ u i.)

R.""CSr*.>:>e lL T':. f><., r -/\\

[)c~....,,~~

n....t.S>K* r*i:'.

De~'-.._,,_A.

.\\_~.....,

i2-i:.'.:>K.* X.*f"..

~(__. \\: l 0.._)

a.

b.

A control rod or a part-length rod is considered misaligned if it is out of position from the remainder* of the bank by more than 8 inches.

inoperable if it cannot be moved b

~--~~..Q:i;!JU:.il.k.2.I:---2.;~~...J.,J;~-&asg.~~-J;J;r~i:P.E~

part-ength ro considered inoperable if it is not fully with he co and cannot be ed by its operator.

ore than one con od or part-length rod becomes m sa igned or inoperable, the reactor shall be placed in the hot shutdown* condition within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

I<-\\ ;:. X* ~ ',x..

c

lf\\c_"""\\.1.-sV

©

\\L \\. s x. ')<.. i'-

~

c__ ~\\.. uY'

(__!~~~......._~'""""~!...-Ml~~~~~

p... :t s )<.. x.. x.

~J.&. I r~~l..W fuel burnup part-1 or 3.10.5 Regulating Group Insertion Limits i2-l:S)(* x..,x

@ LCO

~

"'\\:& X.* :X..-)<...

@ er--c.er~o u

. 1C L'S >C. ><._. ;x.

(2) f\\C TlO -.J R-"\\s x. x.. ><

~J.W\\\\,~

e_ ~s. 'f..* )<;.*X.

Leo

\\2.. l'.) x.. )<.. x.

Leo

a.

b.

c.

R.. -cs x. x.,.;<:.

d.

L.C.O

~- ~~r l\\c lA-L::JL~

lL -cs. )<.. x.. x To implement the limits on shutdown marg~. individual rod worth and hot channel factors, tlN ltmit*:cm-eontrol rod regulating grou i

ion shal!

~

c l!:t:decl*:aa shown Figure 3-6 e 4~pump operation liaits of Figure 3-6 do not p

or decreasing power level rapidly when such a decrease is needed to avoid or minimize a situation harmful to the personnel or e ui ment.

Once~ such a power increase is achieved, t e limits of Figure 3-6 will be returned to by berating the _

control r e

h rtion limit within two hours.

Limits more restrictive than Figure 3-6 may be implemented during fuel cycle life based on physics' calculations and physics data obtained during plant start-up and subsequent operation.

New limita.. -shall be submitted to the NRC within 45 days *

.. ~.

Th* sequenc* of withdrawal of the regulating groups shall be 2 *. ~. 4~*,.,__:;-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Aa overlap of control banks in excess to 40% shall not be permitted.

If the reactor is subcritical, the rod position at which criticality could be achieved if the control rods were withdrawn in normal sequence shall not be lower than tha insertion limit for zero power shown on Figure 3-6.

3-60 Amendment No 31 November 1, 1977 TSP1088-0181-NL04

Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (11/14/89).

TS Number 3.10 3.10.01 3.10.01.a 3.10.01.b 3.10.01.b 3.10.01.c 3.10.01.c.01.a 3.10.01.c.01.b 3.10.01.c.02 3.10.01.c.02 3.10.01.c.02 3.10.01.?

3.10. 01.?

3.10.01.d 3.10.01.e 3.10.02 3.10.03 3.10.03 3.10.04 3.10.04.a 3.10.04.b 3.10.04. b 3.10.04.b 3.10.04.c 3.10.04.c 3.10.04.c 3.10.05 3.10.05.a 3.10.05.a 3.10.05.a 3.10.05.a 3.10.05.b 3.10.05.c 3.10.05.d RTS Number 3.1 3.1.1 &.2 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.2 3.1.1

\\'AiCR_

3.1. 7 c SR 3.1. 7. 3 3.1.10 3.1.10 3.1. 7 Deleted Deleted Deleted 3.1.7 c 3.1.7 B 3.1.7 B Deleted 3.1. 9 3.1. 9 Deleted 3.1.9 A Deleted 3.1. 9 3.1.9 3.1.1,.2 &.9 Control Rad & Power Distribution Limits Shutdown Margin Requirements LCD: SDM = 2Z > 525F; w 4 PCPs LCD: SOM > 3.75Z; w < 4 PCPs > 525F ACTION: < 4 PCPs & > 525F; borate to req SOM LCO: Baron > CSD boron; < 525F w flaw (Cold Shutdown Boron Cone not defined)

ACTION: < 525F, lo flow; establish SDM > 3.51., and ACTION: < 525F, lo flow; disable 2 Chg pumps, OR ACTION: < 525F, lo flow; initiate SR 3.10.1.c.2 ACTION: < 525F, lo flow, Chg on; stop Chg & check SDM SR: Chg pumps; verify pumps off; 15 min ACTION: < 525F, lo lo flow; initiate SR 3.10.1.c.2 ACTION: < 525F, lo lo flow; check Chg & SDM ACTION: untrippable rod; verify SDM LCD: Each rod drop time < 2.5 sec Deleted LCD: PL rods withdrawn Except: 3.10.3 NA; rod exercising Misaligned or lnop Control Rods Definition: Misaligned rod ( ) B" out)

Definition: Inop control rod Definition: Inop PL rod ACTION: > 1 misaligned or inop rod; HSD in 12 hrs (there is no LCO on misaligned rods)

ACTION: misaligned rod; hot chnl OK or be < 751.

ACTION: misaligned rod; Verify SDM ACTION: misaligned rodj Verify rod worths (there are no req for rod worths)

Regulating Group Insertion Limits LCD: Reg rod insertion ( Fig 3.b limits; steady state Except: Fig 3.6 limit NA; rapid power decreases ACTION: Rods < PDIL after down power; fix in 2 hrs Admin: New limits to NRC w/in 45 days LCD: Sequence of rod withdrawal 1,2,3,4 LCO: Rod overlap < 40Z LCD: Crit pos must be above PDIL; w subcrit 2

Page 6 of 10 Comment on chanoes not a defined term in RSTS not a defined term in RSTS not a defined term in RSTS withdraw! analysis assumes rods @ POIL rapid dwn pwr, enter cond 3.1.9 A limit now in Tech Specs SDM treated iaw RSTS

Attaci1111t::11t 1 Page 7 of 10 POWER DISTRIBUTION INSTRUMENTATION 3.11.2 EXCORE POWER DISTRIBUTION MONITORING SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION excore monitoring system shall be operable with:

The target Axial Off set (AO) and the Excore Monitoring Allowable

, Power Level (AP~)~determined within the previous 31 days using the incore detectors;..,* nd t e m asure not eviated from the target AO by more 0;:95

n the previous 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

be_

The AO measu'red~ by the excore detectors calibrated with the AO measured b the inc'ore detectors.

The quadrant tilt with the uadrant e ~re

LHR, t~e excore detectors calibrated by the incore detectors.

when the excore detectors c

above is'. applicable when th v-...mA....... trioring quadrant' tilt.

detectors are used for s\\app icable for each channel of the TM/LP trip and Index (AS!) alarm.

I ACTION 1:

G) 1\\1..... \\~ L>'"'.

With the excore g:tS >c. X.:i>'monitoring LHR.

monitoring system inoperable, do not us.e the* system for ACTION 2:

~

If the measured quadrant tilt has not been calibrated with the incores,

~c.. -

do not use the.system for monitoring quadrant tilt.

\\<, t.>X* ')(..X ACTION 3:

~ ~

When the measured AO uncertainty is greater than specified in Specification*

"~~

~-~.y4.18.2, the 'TM/LP trip function and the AS! alarm setpoints shall be

~

conservatively ~djus~t~d~w~n..i.:~~~l"e---\\-!~_n.cu.r.s.....QJLJrn.l:Lt_~h~a~n~n!e~l~sh~a~l~l:!:_!b~e

~

decla The operability requirements TM/LP and AS! are

\\\\./~()

give.n in Table 3.17.1 and 3.17.4, respectively.

\\~~?

x.. 'x..*f.

Basis.

The excore power distribution monitoring system consists of Power Range Detector Channels 5 through 8.

The operability of the excore monitoring system ensures that the assumptions employed in the PDC-II analysis(!) f~r determining AO limits that ensure operation within allowable LHR limits are valid.

TSP1088-0181-NL04 3-66a Amendment No ~J, J~, J~, ~S, 118 November 15, 1988 I

I I

I

\\

Page 8 of 10 Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (11/14/89)

TS Number RTS Number 3.11.02 3.11.02.a SR 3.1. 3.3 3.11.02.a Relocated 3.11. 02. b SR 3.2.12.3 3.11. 02. b SR 3.2.2 &.12 3.11.02.b SR 3.2.12.4 3.11.02. c SR 3.2.12.4/3.0.4 3.11.02. c SR 3.2.12.3/3.0.4 3.11.02 Al 3.11.02 A2 3.11.02 A3 TS requirement description Comment on changes Ex core Power Distribution Monitoring System L A\\i:; R..

SR: Incore AO & APL Target determined w/in 31 days; for monitoring LHR w excores LCO: Meas AO w/in.05 of target for last 24 hrs; for monitoring LHR w excores LCO: Excore AO cal w incore; monitoring LHR w excores LCO: Excore AO cal w incore; each TM/LP trip chnl LCO: Excore AO cal w incore; ASI alm LCO: Excore Tq cal w incore; monitoring LHR w excores LCO: Excore Tq cal w incore; monitoring Tq w.excores ACTION: Excore monit sys inop; dont use for LHR ACTION: Meas Tq not cal w incores; do not use for Tq ACTION: AO uncert > LCO 4.18.2; adj TM/LPT & AS! aim (AO uncertainty not mentioned in 4.18.2) 3

-~-~~g~_ 9 __ of 10 4.10 REACTIVITY ANOMALIES

~pplicability R~

/<* )<_.X IW\\ro \\l.v-1 D

@Le.

C§) ~D'M l v-:>

f:i.b('()\\ vV

\\<.'T'S )GI K._,K_

\\<.. 1: 5 x ' ">\\* ')<

\\l. -cs,<. )C' y Applies to potential reactivity anomalies.

Objective To require evaluation of reactivity anomalies within the reactor.

Specif;cations Following a normalization of the computed boron concentration as a function of burnup, the actual boron concentration of the primary c olant shall be eriodically compared with the predicted value.

e difference between the observed and pre cted steady-st~a~t~~~

entr ent of 1% in reactivi Atomic E Commission shall be notified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months and a evaluation as to the cause* of the discrepancy shall be ma reported to the Atomic Energy Commission within 30 diys. *

To eliminate possible errors in the calcul~tions of the initial reactivity of the core and the reactivity ~epletion rate, the predicted relation between fuel burnup an~ the. boron concentration, necessary to maintain adequate control characteristics, must be adjusted (normalized) to accurately r~flect actual core conditions.

When rated power is reached initially, ancl-with the control rod groups in the desired positions, the boron concentration is measured and the predicted curve is adjusted to this-point.

As power operation proceeds, the measured boron concentration is compared with the predicted concentration and the slope of the curve relating burnup and reactivity is compared with that predicted. This process of normalization shall be completed after about 10% of the total core burnup.

Thereafter, actual boron concentration can be compared with prediction and the reactivity status of the core. can be continuously evaluated.

Any reactivity anomaly greater than 1%

would be unexpected, and its occurrence would be thoroughly investigated and evaluated.

Th* methods employed in calculating the reactivity of the core vs burnup and the reactivity worth of boron vs burnup are given in the FSAll.

The value of 1% is considered a safe limit since-a shutdown margin of at leaat 2% with th* most rtt~tive rod in the fully withdrawn position is always maintained.

References (1)

FSAR, Section 3.3.2 4-46 TSP0885-0268-NL04

~ - I Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (11/14/89).

TS Number 4.10 4.10 4.10 4.10 4.10 RTS Number Relocated Deleted Deleted Relocated TS requirement description Reactivity Anomalies LCO: Critical Boron; Actual w/in 11. of Predicted Admin: Crit/Predicted B Bk ) 11.i notify AEC, 24 hrs Admin: Grit/Predicted B Sk ) 11.; Eva! to AEC,30 days SR: Critical Boron; compare w predicted; periodically 4

Page 10 of 10 Comment on changes

Page 1 Of 6 Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (12/14/89). Corrected through A1endment # 129.

This is a list of all of the requirements of the existing Palisades Plant Technical Specifications (TS) as interpreted for the process of writing Palisades Restructured Technical Specifications (RTS).

/

First Column; Existing Palisades Tech Spec (TS) numbering Each numbered section of the TS is listed in the left-most column.

Items which contain more than one requirement are listed once for each requirement.

Second Column; Palisades Restructured Tech Spec (RTS) numbering The nearest corresponding numbered item of the Palisades Restructured Technical Specifications is listed in the next column.

If the requirement does not appear in RTS, it is noted as "Deleted" or "Relocated."

"Deleted" is used to note where a requirement has been deleted.

ie deleting, iaw GL 84-15, the requirement to test a D.G. when an ECCS pump in the opposite train becomes inoperable.

"Relocated" is used to note where a requirement has been moved from tech specs to another controlled program or document.

Third Column: Existing Requirement An abbreviation of the TS requirement appears in the third column.

Each item is identified as: LCD, ACTION, SR, Admin, Exception, etc.

Some items are implied, rather than explicit, for examplel a LCD is implied when an ACTION exists without a stated LCO.

Forth Column: Comments and Justifications for Change Comments may appear in the forth column.

This column notes when a written justification for change supports differences between TS and RTS.

General Comments:

1)

Completion Times for required ACTIONS and Frequencies for Surveillance Requirements have, in almost all cases, been changed to agree with the CEDG-RSTS.

In both cases, these times and frequencies are based on engineering judgement and operating experience, rather than on analyses. Therefore the Completion Times and Frequencies approved for the standard Technical Specifications were used.

In a few cases, plant hardware dictated deviating from the RSTS times or Frequencies.

Each of these cases is explained individually.

2)

The CEOG-RSTS used 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months as the Completion Time for going to MODE 3.

The Palisades de-gasing system does not allow reducing PCS Hydrogen levels sufficiently, in 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months , to permit opening the PCS for maintenance. The.de-gas system is not effective at low pressures. Since shutdowns to MODE 4 or 5 are normally followed by maintenance, Palisades RTS use 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months for attaining MODE 4. Thirty hours is sufficient to reduce PCS disolved gas levels to shutdown values.

The Completion Time for attaining MODE 5, 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months , is unchanged.

3)

Several existing Palisades Tech Specs require testing the redundant components when a required piece of equipment is found inoperable. These requirements have been deleted. There are no similar requirements in RSTS, and it is the general philosophy that equipment is OPERABLE as long as its Surveillance Requirements are met, unless there is a spacific reason to suspect otherwise.

4)

Completion Times for Required Actions which, due to equipment differences, do not have identical counterparts in RSTS were determined using the same general rules as used when standardizing Completion Times for the RSTS:

a) 7 Days: The specified Condition did not eliminate the plant's ability to meet single failure criterion.

b) 72 Hours: The specified Condition did not eliminate the plant's ability to cope with design accidents, given no additional failures.

c) 24 Hours:

d) e)

KEY:

TS requirement type:

Safety Limit Surveillance Requirement Limiting Safety Setting Limiting Condition for Operation Action Administrative Requirement Permitted Instrument Bypass

Defined Term Exception to other TS Requirement Foot Note or other Hate Pal-TS to Pal-RTS Correlation:

TS Number RTS Number 3.07 3.07.01.a 3.07.01.b 3.07.01.c 3.07.01.d 3.07.01.e 3.07.01.f 3.07.01.g 3.07.01.h 3.07.01.h 3.07.01.h 3.07.01.i 3.7 3.7.1 3.7.1 3.7.5 3.7.5 3.7.5 3.7.5 3.7.5 3.7.3 3.7.5 3.7.3 3.7.1 Column 3 syntax:

SL: Safety limit; Applicable conditions

Page 2 of 6 SR: Equipment to be tested; Test description; Frequency LSS: RPS Trip Chnl & setting LCD: Equipment to be operable; Applicable conditions ACTION: Condition requiring action; Required action; Completion time Admin: Administrative requirement Bypass: Bypassable component; conditions when bypass permitted Definition: Name of defined item Except: Excepted spec or condition; Applicable conditions Note: Subject of note TS requirement description Electrical Systems Availability LCD: Sta Pwr Xfmr 1-2; > 325F LCD: Startup Xfmr 1-2; > 325F LCD: Eng Safeguards Buses lC and lD; > 325F LCD: 480V Distribution Buses 11 & 12; > 325F LCD: MCC No 1, 2, 7, and 8; > 325F LCD: 125 V D-C Buses 1 and 2; > 325F LCD: Four preferred A-C Buses; > 325F LCO: 2 station Batteries; > 325F LCD: the DC [distribution] systems; > 325F LCD: 1 battery charger per bus; > 325F LCD: DG 1-1 & 1-2; > 325F 2

Comment on changes Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS.

RTS LCO 3. 7.1 requires 2 off-site circuits, but does not specifically require station power xfmr 1-2.

Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS.

RTS LCO 3.7.1 requires 2 off-site circuits, but does not specifically require startup xfmr 1-2.

Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS.

RTS LCD 3.7.5 requires all buses required by TS LCD 3.7.1.a thru g, and also requires buses listed in withdrawn TSCR of 3/25/86 the required buses are listed in basis table 3.7.5-1.

See 3.7.1.c comment, above.

Applicability extended thru MODE 4 iaw RSTS.

Applicability for 2 DGs extended through MODE 4 and added requirement for l DG operable in MODES 5 & 6, iaw RSTS.

Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (12/14/89).

TS Number 3.07.01. i 3.07.01.i 3.07.01.j 3.-07.01.j 3.07.01.j 3.07.01.k 3.07.01.l 3.07.02 3.07.02.a 3.01.02.a 3.07.02.b 3.07.02.b 3.07.02.b -

3.07.02.c 3.07.02.c 3.07.02.c 3.07.02.c RTS Number SR 3. 7.1. 3 SR 3. 7.1.6 Relocated Relocated Relocated Relocated Relocated Applic LCO 3.7.1 A.2 Deleted 3.7.1 A.2 Deleted Deleted 3.7.5 A.3 3.7.l A.l Deleted 3.7.5 A.3 TS reauirement description LCO: 2500 gal fuel per day tank; > 325F LCD: 16000 gal in storage tank; > 325F LCD: Switchyard Battery; > 325F LCO: Switchyard D-C system; > 325F LCD: 1 swyd battery charger; > 325F

. LCO: Swyd 240V A-C Panels 1 & 2 and Dist sys; > 325F LCO: 2400 V bus lE; > 325F ACTION: LCD 3.7.1 not met ACTION: Sta Pwr Xfmr inop; restore w/in 24 hrs ACTION: Sta Pwr Xfmr inop; test both DGs ACTION: SU Xfmr inop; restore w/in 24 hrs ACTION: SU Xfmr inop; test both DGs ACTION: SU Xfmr inop; notify NRC of > 24 hr outage ACTION: bus lC inop; restore w/in 8 hrs ACTION: bus lC inop; no inop equip on lD ACTION: bus lC inop; test opposite DG ACTION: bus lD inop; restore w/in 8 hrs 3

Page 3 of 6 Comment on changes RTS requires day tank check whenever DG is required to be operable.

Also req in LCD 3.7.2 (Modes 5 & 6).

Applicability extended to all MODES iaw RSTS.

SR 3. 7. l. 6 is also required by LCD 3.7.2. Required capacity increased iaw latest analyses.

Switchyard equipment requirements relocated to ********

The operability of equipment in the switchyard is not assumed in the safety analysis, and does not meet any of the "split criterion."

See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

The requirement to have bus lE energized above 325.F has been relocated to******

Bus lE is not a safety grade _bus. Its operability is not assumed in_any safety analysis, and it does not meet any of the "split criterion."

Specific conditions and ACTIONS are listed in 3.7.2.a thru m, below.

If xfmr is being used as one of the.

required off-site circuits, it must be restored w/in 72 hrs iaw RSTS.

Deleted iaw RSTS and GL 84-15.

If xfmr is being used as one of the required off-site circuits, it must be restored w/in 72 hrs iaw RSTS.

Deleted iaw RSTS and GL 84-15.

Deleted.

No similar requirement in RSTS; LCO requires 2 circuits from off-site, and limits operation to 72 hrs with < 2 circuits.

Unchanged RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

Deleted iaw RSTS and GL 84-15.

Unchanged

Page 4 of 6

'Palisades Technical Specification Requirement List (12/14/89).

" TS Number 3.07.02.c 3.07.02.c 3.07.02.d 3.07.02.d 3.07.02.d 3.07.02.d 3.07.02.e 3.07.02.e 3.07.02.e 3.07.02.e 3.07.02.f 3.07.02.f 3.07.02.f 3.07.02.f 3.07.02.f 3.07.02.g 3.07.02.g 3.07.02.h RTS Number 3.7.5 A.1 Deleted 3.7.5 A.3 3.7.5 A.1 3.7.5 A.3 3.7.5 A.1 3.7.5 A.3 3.7.5 A.l 3.7.5 A.3 3.7.5 A.1 3.7.5 A.2 3.7.5 A.l 3.7.5 A.2 3.7.5 A.l Relocated 3.7.5 A.3 3.7.5 A.l 3.7.3 B.1 TS requirement description ACTION: bus lD inop; no inop equip on lC ACTION: bus lD inop; test opposite DG ACTION: Bus 11 inop; restore w/in 8 hrs ACTION: Bus 11 inop; no inop equip on 12 ACTION: Bus 12 inop; restore w/in 8 hrs ACTION: Bus 12 inop; no inop equip on 11 ACTION: MCC 1&7 inop; restore w/in 8 hrs ACTION: MCC 1&7 inop; no inop equip on goad MCCs ACTION: MCC 1&2 inap; restore w/in 8 hrs ACTION: MCC 1&2 inop; no inap equip on goad MCCs ACTION: 125VDC bus 1 inap; restore w/in 8 hrs ACTION: 125VDC bus 1 inop; no inop equip on bus. 1 ACTION: 125VOC bus 2 inop; restore w/in 8 hrs ACTION: 125VDC bus 2 inop; no inop equip on bus 2 ACTION: 125VDC bus 2 inop; provide emerg lighting*

Comment on changes RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

Deleted iaw RSTS and GL 84-15.

Unchanged RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition far that equipment iaw RSTS.

RTS CONDITION applies even if only one MCC is de-energized. Otherwise unchanged.

RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

RTS CONDITION applies even if only one MCC is de-energized. Otherwise unchanged; RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

AOT reduced to 2 hrs iaw RSTS.

RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

AOT reduced to 2 hrs iaw RSTS.

RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

Emergency lighting requirements relocated ta ***** Emergency lighting is not addressed in accident analyses, nor in RSTS. It does not meet any of the "split criterion."

ACTION: 1 Pref AC bus inop; restore w/in 8 hrs ACTION: 1 Pref AC bus inop; no inop equip on op buses Unchanged.

RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RS.TS.

ACTION: 1 battery inop; restore w/in 24 hrs AOT reduced to 2 Hrs iaw RSTS 4

'~alisades Technical Specification Requirement List (12/14/89).

Page 5 of. 6

~ TS Number RTS Number 3.07.02.h Relocated 3.07.02.i 3.7.l B.4 3.07.02.i 3.7.1 B.3

3. 07. 02.i SR 3. 7.1.1 3.07.02.i

-3.7.1 B.2 & C.2

3. 07. 02. j Relocated 3.07.02.j Relocated 3.07.02.j Relocated 3.07.02.k Relocated 3.07.02.k Relocated 3.07.02.l Relocated 3.07.02.m Relocated 3.07.02.m Relocated 3.07.02.m Relocated

4. 01. 02. 03. a 4.01. 02. 03.a 4.01. 02. 09. a SR 3.7.1.16 & 18 4.01.02.10.a SR 3.7.1.16 & 21 4.01.02.11.a SR 3. 7. 1. 8 & 9 TS requirement description Comment on changes ACTION: 1 battery inop; run both chgrs on affected bus Relocated to ******

RTS CONDITION -is written assuming entire DC train is inoperable.

The AOT has been reduced from 24 to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months accordingly. There is no need to require both chargers to

Admin: max 7 days/month for < 2 DGs operable.

ACTION: 1 DG inop; test other DG ACTION: 1 DG inop; controls on other DG in auto ACTION: 1 DG inop; no inop equip on other side ACTION: swyd 240 VAC pnl inop; keep its ACBs operable ACTION: swyd 240 VAC pnl & ACBs inop; fix w/in 24 hrs ACTION: swyd 240 VAC pnl & ACBs inop; keep ACBs open ACTION: swyd batt inop; restore w/in 24 hrs ACTION: swyd batt inop; both chgrs must be operable ACTION: 2400 VAC bus lE inop; restore w/in 24 hrs ACTION:. swyd 125 VDC pnl inop; keep its ACBs operable ACTION: swyd 125 VDC pnl & ACBs inop; fix w/in 24 hrs ACTION: swyd 125 VDC pnl & ACBs inop; keep ACBs open SR: SIS w offsite pwr; test w test ckt; 92 days SR: SIS w/o offsite pwr; test w test ckt; 92 days SR: OBA Seq; test operation; 92 days (see 3(a) above)

SR: Shutdown Seq; test operation; 18 months SR: DG; test manual start, sync, & loading; 31 days be in operation.

In addition, since the CONDITION is entered whether the fault lies with a battery or charger, the former ACTION requiring both chargers is inappropriate.

AOT changed to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months per occasion iaw RSTS.

RTS ACTION allows verification that DG is OPERABLE w/o actual start, if difficulty with inoperable DG does not affect starting equipment. Verification that the fault is not common is required.

The actual check of controls in RTS is a weekly SR, iaw RSTS. If the *difficulty with the inop DG involved lineup of controls, ACTION C.3 of LCO 3.7.1 jOUld require verifying lineup of controls on the OPERABLE DG.

RTS ACTION declares affected equip inop, thus entering a condition for that equipment iaw RSTS.

See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

See 3. 7.1.l comment, above.

See 3.7.1.j comment, above.

Freq changed to 18 months iaw RSTS. SR #

16 verifies timing, SR # 18 verifies loading of equip.

SR 116 verifies timing, SRl21 verifies loading of equi~. Essentially no change.

Na change.

...:. !1ali.sades' Technical Specification Re!ment List (12/14/89).

, Attachment 2 Page 6 of 6 1, TS Number 4.01.02.11.b 4.01.02.11.c 4.02.02.09 4.07 4.07.01 4.07.01.a 4.07.01.a 4.07.01.a 4.07.01.a 4.07.01.b 4.07.01.b 4.07.01.c 4.07.01.d 4.07.01.e 4.07.02 4.07.02.a 4.07.02.a 4.07.02.a 4.07.02.b 4.07.02.b 4.07.02.b 4.. 07. 02. c 4.07.02.d 4.07.02.d 4.07.03 4.07.3 4.07.3 RTS Number SR 3. 7.1.18 & 21 Deleted SR 3. 7.1. 3 & 6 3.7 3.7.1 & 2 SR 3. 7.1. 8 Relocated SR 3.7.1.13 SR 3. 7.1. 9 SR 3. 7.1.18 TS requirement description SR: DG; test auto start, load shed, & loa*ding; 18 Mo.

SR: DG; test auto start initiating ckts; 84 SU SR: DG Fuel Supply; inventory; daily Emergency Power System Periodic Tests Diesel Generators SR: DGs; start manually; monthly SR: DGs; alternate tested start ckt; monthly SR: DGs; verify start time c* 10 sec; monthly SR: DGs; Test load to 2400 Kw; monthly SR: OBA DG auto loading; integrated test; refueling Comment on changes Ho change.

This DG start test has no parallel in RSTS, and has been deleted iaw recommendations of GL 84-15.

No change for storage tank, day tank iaw RSTS, belly tank added iaw RG 1.137.

DG Surveillance covered under LCO 3.7.1 No Change Details of test relocated to Surv procedure; Freq 184 days iaw RSTS RTS SR specifies a band of 2300 to 2500 kw iaw guidance of RSTS.

Freq changed to 18 mo; added requirements on voltage, freq, and run.

time ia1<1 RSTS.

SR 3.7.1.16 & 18 LCO: OBA DG auto loading w/in 30 sec.

The 30 sec requirement is replaced by SR 116 verifying design sequencer timing and SR 118 verifying actual loading of equipment onto DG. Essentially no change.

SR 3. 7.1. 26 SR 3. 7.1. 25 SR 3. 7.1.12 3.7.3 & 4 SR 3.7.3.3 SR 3.7.3.2 SR 3.7.3.3 SR 3.7.3.2 SR 3.7.3.2 & 3 SR 3.7.3.10 SR 3. 7.3.11 SR 3.7.3.10 Relocated Relocated Relocated SR: DGs; Inspect iaw Alco instructions; Refueling LCO: DG loads < 750A at 2400V SR: Fuel Xfer pumps; verify operable; monthly Station Batteries SR: Sta Batteries; Record each cell voltage; monthly SR: Sta Batteries; Record 1 pilot cell s.g.; monthly SR: Sta Batteries; Record 1 pilot cell temp; monthly Freq changed to 18* months iaw RSTS Freq 92 days iaw RSTS and IS! testing of other pumps.

Freq changed to 92 days iaw RSTS.

Freq changed to weekly iaw RSTS.

SR: Sta Batteries; Record each cell gravity; 3 months Ho change.

SR: Sta Batteries; Record each 5th cell temp; 3 months No change.

SR: Sta Batteries; Record lvl & water added; 3 months No change.

SR: Sta Batteries; Battery Service test; refueling Freq changed to 18 months iaw RSTS.

SR: Sta Batteries; Test discharge; each third refuelin Freq changed to 5 years iaw RSTS.

Except: SR 4.7.2.d (test disch) OK 4 SR 4.7.2.c Ho change.

Emergency Lighting SR: Ernerg Light outside CB; verify operable; l year SR: Emerg Light inside CB; verify operable; B4 Rx head removal 6

~--

I

~TS Number 3.7.1.a 3.7.l.b

3. 7.1 A 3.7.1 B 3.7.1 c 3.7.1 D 3.7.1 E 3.7.1 F 3.7.1.l 3.7.1.2 3.7.1.3 3.7.1.4 3.7.1.5

3.7.1.6 3.7.1.7

3. 7.1.8 3.7.l.9 3.7.1.10 3.7.1.11 3.7.1.12 3.7.1.13 3.7.1.14

3. 7. l.15 3.7.1.16 3.7.1.17 3.7.1.18 3.7.1.19

3. 7.1. 20 3.7.1.21

3. 7.1. 22

3. 7.1. 23 3.7.1.24

3. 7.1. 25 3.7.1.26 3.7.1.27

3. 7.1. 28 3.7.2.a 3.7.2.b 3.7.2 A 3.7.2.l 3.7.3 3.7.3 A 3.7.3 B 3.7.3 c 3.7.3.l 3.7.3.2

3, 7.3.3 TS Number 3.7.l.a & b 3.7.1.i 3.7.2.a & b 3.7.2.i 3.0.3 3.0.3 3.0.3 3.7.2 New New 4.2.2.9 New New 4.2.2.9 New

4. 7.l.a

4. 7.1.a New New 4.7.l.e New New New 4.1. 2. 9. a'* 1 O. a New 4.1.2.11.b NeH New 4.1.2.10.a New New New 4.7.1.d 4.7.1.c NeN New New New New New 3.7.1.h New 3.7.2.h 3.7.2 4.7.2.a 4.7.2.a 4.7.2.b R~eguirement Description LCD: Two off-site ckts OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 LCD: Two DGs OPERABLE, MODES 1-4

ACTIONS: one off-site ckt inop ACTIONS: one DG inop ACTIONS: one DG & one off-site ckt inop ACTIONS: two DGs inop ACTIONS: two off-site ckts inop ACTIONS: req actions not met in time; SR: DG lineup check SR: DG starting air check SR: DG flltl tank level check cl,1'\\

SR: DG fuel tank water check SR: DG new fuel sample SR: DG fuel storage tank level check SR: Off-site ckt breaker check SR: DG starting test SR: DG monthly load test SR: DG fuel storage tank water check SR: DG fuel storage tank sample SR: DG fuel xfer system test SR: DG 6 mo start & load test SR: Manual xfer of power to off-site ckts SR: Auto xfer of power to SU ~fmr SR: Sequencer timing test SR: Loadshed bypass test SR: LOSP w SIS test SR: DG 18 mo load test.

SR: Load xfer f roil DG to off-site SR: LOSP w/o SIS test SR: DG single load rejection test SR: DG total load rejection test SR: LOSP w DG paralleled SR: DG load verification SR: DG inspection SR: DG simultaneous start SR: DG fuel tank cleaning LCD: One off-site ckt OPERABLE, MODES 5 & 6 LCD: One DG OPERABLE, MODES 5 & 6 ACTIONS: less than req AC sources OPERABLE SR: Required SRs from LCO 3.7.1, for MODES 5 & 6 Page.1 of.2 Comments LCD: Two batteries w assco charger OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 ACTIONS: battery cell not fully charged ACTIONS: one DC source inop ACTIONS: req actions not met in time SR: Battery terminal voltage check SR: Battery cell checks, pilot cells SR: Battery cell checks, all cells

i

" 3~7. 3. 4

, 3. 7.3.5 0 3.7.3.6 3.7.3.7 3.7.3.8 3.7.3.9 3.7.3.10 3.7.3.11 3.7.4 3.7.4 A 3.7.4.1 3.7.5 3.7.5 A 3.7.5 B 3.7.5.l 3.7.6

3. 7.6 A 3.7.6.1 Nel'l 4.7.2.b New New Hew New 4.7.2.c 4.7.2.d New New New

3. 7.1.c-g & etc.

3.7.2.c-g & etc.

3.7.2 New New New New SR: Battery cell connector check SR: Battery temp check SR: Battery inspection SR: Battery cell connector maintenance SR: Battery cell resistance check SR: Battery charger capacity check SR: Battery service test SR: Battery performance test

. LCO: one DC source OPERABLE; MODES 5 & 6 ACTIONS: No DC source OPERABLE, MODES 5 & 6 SR: Required SRs from LCD 3.7.3, for MODES 5 & 6 LCO: Two elec dist trains energized MODES 1-4 ACTIONS: One elec dist train not fully energized ACTIONS: req actions not met in time SR: Breaker alignment check LCO: One elec dist train energized, MODES 5 & 6 ACTIONS: No elec dist train fully energized SR: Breaker alignment check.

2 Page 2 of 2

~ Attachment 4 Page.. 1 of 4 *

'-1'TS Number RSTS Number Description of RTS Requirement Com111ents i;* 3.7.1.a 3.7.1.a LCO: Two off-site ckts OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 No change

3. 7.1.b

3. 7.1.b LCO: Two DGs OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 No change 3.7.l A 3.7.1 A ACTIONS: one off-site ckt inop No change 3.7.1 8 3.7.1 B ACTIONS: one DG inop Added verification of turbine driven AFW pump operability iaw STS, reworded required action statements for brevity and clarity. Retained all RSTS action.

3.7.1 c 3.7.1 c ACTIONS: one DG & one off-site ckt inop Made similar changes to those for condition B.

Retained all RSTS action.

3. 7.1 D

3. 7.1 D ACTIONS: two DGs inop No change.

3.7.l E 3.7.1 E ACTIONS: two off-site ckts inop No change.

3.7.1 F 3.7.l F ACTIONS: req actions not met in time; No change 3.7.1.1 3.7.1.7 SR: DG lineup check Reworded for clarity; no other change.

3. 7.1.2 3.7.1.8 SR: DG starting air check Reworded for clarity; no other change.

3.7.1.3 3.7.1.2 SR: DG fuel tank level check Reworded for clarity; added verification of engine mounted tank iaw ANSI N195 and GL 84-15. Used Pal numbers.

3.7.1.4 3.7.1.11 SR: DG fuel tank water check Reworded for clarity; deleted redundant 31 day frequency notation: DG 111ust be -

run monthly, and remaining frequency entry required SR to be run after each DG run.

3.7.1.5

. 3.7.1.12 SR: DG new fuel sample Seperated SR for sa1pling neH fuel from that for sampling storage tank to enhance clarity of requirements; I

speci tied uni ts for viscosity, reworded.

I No technical change.

I 3.7.1.6

3. 7.1.3 SR: DG fuel storage tank level chec~

Reworded to reflect palisades equipment and usage.

3.7.1.7

3. 7.1.1 SR: Off-site ckt breaker check No change in SR or frequency. Deleted notes calling out ACTIONS which require SR to be run; these add little and were neither complete nor correct.

3.7.1.8

3. 7.1.5 SR: DG monthly starting test Added verification of 10 second timing; moved note tl to basis; deleted note 32 which is not applicable to Palisades (we have our DGs prewarmed and prelubed at all times and have no alternate starting sequences for gradual speed increases);

enhanced frequency column entry to aviod having to ref er to table on seperate page.

3.7.1.9

3. 7;1.6 SR: DG monthly load test Moved nofe 11 to bases; deleted note t2 which is inappropriate to Palisades; reworded note t3* to agree with similar notes elsewhere in this section; used Palisades values~ enhanced frequency column entry as, in SR #8.

_-J v*"

~ 3.7.1.10

\\I

3. 7.1.11 3.7.1.12 3.7.1.13

3. 7.1.14

3. 7.1.15 3.7.1.16 3.7.1.17 3.7.1.18

3. 7.1.19

3. 7.1.20 3.7.1.21 Deleted 3;7.1.22 3.7.1.14

3. 7.1.12 3.7.1.4 3.7.1.9 & 10

3. 7.1.15

3. 7.1.15 3.7.1.18

3. 7.1.22 3.7.L21

3. 7.1. 23

3. 7.1. 25 3.7.1.19

3. 7.1. 20 3.7.1.16.

~R: DG fuel storage tank water check

SR: DG fuel storage tank sample SR: DG. fuel xfer system test SR: DG 6 mo start & load test SR: Manual xfer of power to off-site ckts SR: Auto xfer of power to s.u xfmr SR: Sequencer timing test SR: Lo~dshed bypass test SR: LOSP N SIS test SR: DG 24 hour2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months load test SR: triad xfer from DG to off-site

. SR: LOSP w/o SIS test SR: DG start on ESF signal test SR: DG single load rejection test 2

Page 2 of 4 Reworded using Palisades tank designation; changed frequency to 31

days iaw RG 1.137 for tanks below ground water level.

Separated SR for sampling new fuel from that for sampling storage tank to enhance clarity of requirements; specified units for viscosity, reworded.

No technical change.

Added reference to engine mounted tank iaw GL 84-15; reworded using Palisades designations.

Combined SRs # 9 & 10 from RSTS; deleted notes inappropriate to Palisades; reworded using Palisades usage and

values, Seperated ~R for auto f romand manual xfer.

Separated SR for auto* from manual xfer;.

reworded using Palisades designators.

Reworded using Palisades designators and values.

This is a Palisades specific SR. Pal does not h~ve any DG trips which are bypassed during emergency operation.

We do, however, bypass the undervoltage load shedding from the 2400 volt safeguards buses when the DG breaker is clos~d. This SR verifies that action.

Reworded-using Palisades values and designations; deleted note inappropriate to Palisades..

Added 2 hour2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months test at two hour rating iaw RG 1.108; reworded for clarity and consistancy with other SRs in this section.

Reworded for clarity.

Deleted note* inappropriate to Palisades;

used Palisades designations and values.

Palisades* does not start DGs w/o LOSP Reworded for clarity; used Palisades values.

\\,[\\

.* 'Y.7.1.23

3. 7.1.24 3.7.1.25

3. 7.1. 26

3. 7.1. 27

3. 7.1. 28

3. 7.1-1 3.7.2.a 3.7.2.b 3.7.2 A 3.7.2.l

3. 7.3 3.7.3 A 3.7.3 B 3.7.3 c 3.7.3.l

3. 7.3.2 3.7.1.17

3. 7.1. 26 3.7.1.24

3. 7.1.27

3. 7.1. 28 added 3.7.1-1 7.7.2.a 3.7.2.b 3.7.2 A 3.7.2.1 3.7.3 added 3.7.3 A 3.7.32 B 3.7.3.2 3.7.3.l SR: DG total load rejection test SR: LOSP w DG paralleled SR: DG load verification SR: DG inspection SR: DG simultaneous start SR: DG fuel tank cleaning Table: DG test schedule LCD: One off-site ckt OPERABLE, MODES 5 & 6 LCD: One DG OPERABLE, MODES 5 & 6 ACTIONS: less than req AC sources OPERABLE SR: Required SRs from LCO 3.7.1, for MODES 5 & 6

~ Attachment 4 Page 3 of 4 Reworded to aviod question as to wether or not the DG breaker may be tripped to accomplish the total load rejection or not. That is the only method available to achieve a total load rejection, but it could be construed to be prohibited by RSTS wording; used Palisades values.

Reworded to take differences between Palisades and "standard plant" into account, while accomplishing same purpose.

Used Palisades value.

No change.

Used Palisades values.

Added this SR iaw RG 1.137.

Deleted words in note (2) refering to fast & slow starts, which do not apply to Palisades; Listed those SRs which do not affect DG starting or loading as not constituting failures which require ~ore_

frequent DG testing; ie don't test DG starting.mar~ frequently if a breaker was found misaligned.

No change.

No change No.change Specified those SRs which test features required in MODES 5 & 6; ie excluded verification of SIS signal loading, LCO: Two batteries w assco charger OPERABLE, MODES 1-4 No change.

ACTIONS: battery cell not fully charged CONDITION A was added in order to remove the implied Required Actions from the battery cell testing SRs. It also assures that a battery, with a cell not meeting catigory A or B limits, is OPERABLE within the 2 hour2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months AOT.

The other requirements are the same as in RSTS SRs #2 and #3.

ACTIONS: one DC source inop No change.

ACTIONS: req actions not met in time No change.

SR: Battery terminal voltage check No change.

SR: Battery cell checks, pilot cells This SR was rewritten to put the implied Required Actions into Condition A.

3

3.7.3.4 3.7.3.5 3.7.3.6 3.7.3.7 3.7.3.8 3.7.3.9 3.7.3.10 3.7.3.11 3.7.3-1 3.7.4 3.7.4 A 3.7.4.1 3.7.5 3.7.5 A

3. 7.5 B 3.7.5.1 3.7.6 3.7.6 A 3.7.6.1 3.7.3.3 3.7.3.4 3.7.3.5 3.7.3.6 3.7.3.7 3.7.3.8 3.7.3.9 3.7.3.10 3.7.3.11 3.7.3-1 3.7.4 3.7.4 A 3.7.4.1 3.7.5 3.7.5 A & B 3.7.5 c 3.7.5.l 3.7.6 3.7.6 A 3.7.6.l SR: Battery cell checks, all cells SR: Battery cell connector check SR: Battery temp check SR: Barrery inspection SR: Battery cell connector maintenance SR: Battery cell resistance check SR: Battery charger capacity check SR: Battery service test SR: Battery performance test Table: Battery Surv Requirements LCD: one DC source OPERABLE; MODES 5 & 6 ACTIONS: No DC source OPERABLE, MODES 5 & 6 SR: Required SRs from LCD 3.7:3, for MODES 5 & 6 LCD: Two alee ~ist trains energized MODES 1-4 ACTIONS: One elec dist train not fully energized ACTIONS: req actions not met in time SR: Breaker alignment check LCD: One elec dist train energized, MODES 5 & 6 ACTIONS: No elec dist train fully energized SR: Breaker alignment check.

4 Page 4 of 4 This SR was rewritten to put the implied Required Actions into Condition A.

Rewritten for clarity and brevity.

Used Palisades values.

No change.

Used Palisades values.

No change.

Used Palisades values.

No change'.

No change.

Rewritten extensively, putting the description of each train into the bases, and combining AC and DC into the same requirement. This is done to disallow si~ultaneously having a DC bus out in one train and an AC train out in the other. The declairation of affected equipment to be inoperable, in RSTS,*

would accomplish the same thing, but this way is intended to be more direct.

There are no other effects of the rewording.

No change other than combining RSTS conditions A and B into one.

No change.

This LCD changed in same manner as LCD 3.7.5, and for the same reasons.

No change.

ML18054B415

Text

Navigation menu

Search