Text

Forwards Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Jul-Dec 1993, Including Summary of Gaseous,Liquid & Solid Effluents Released During Reporting Period & Summary of Revs to ODCM & PCP
	ML18041A024
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	02/25/1994
From:	Terry C; NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To:	; NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML18040A221	List: ML18040A220; ML18041A024;
References
	NMP2L-1463, NUDOCS 9403140242
	Download: ML18041A024 (388)
	v • d • e

ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTPA,TION SYSTEM

'ir'4 .

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9403140242 DOC.DATE: 94/02/25 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-410 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Niagara Moha 05000410 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION TERRY,C.D. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Forwards "Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Jul-Dec 1993," including summary of gaseous, liquid & solxd effluents released during D reporting period & summary of revs to ODCM & PCP.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE48D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR TITLE: 50.36a(a) (2) Semiannual Effluent Release Report 2 ENCL / SIZE: I + C7&

/

NOTES: A RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL D PD1-1 LA 3 3 PD1-1 PD 1 1 MENNING,J 1 1 D INTERNAL: AC 1 1 NRR/DRSS/PRPBl1 2 2 EG 01 1 1 RGN1 DRSS/RPB 2 2 RGN1 FILE 02 1 1 EXTERNAL BNL TICHLER g J0 3 1 1 EG&G S IMPSON g F 2 2 NRC PDR 1 1 R

D NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 16 ENCL 16 8'

h

~ 'I C

.J~

V HI!AS%.lRA Q Pg~ogg~g NIAGARAMOHAWKPOVI/ER CORPORATION/301 PLAINFIELDROAD, SYRACUSE, N.Y, 13212/TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 February 25, 1994 NMP2L 1463 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No, 50-410 NPF-Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

JULY - DECEMBER 1993 SEMI-ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT In conformance with the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 (NMP2) Technical Specifications, we are enclosing the Semi-Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the reporting period July - December 1993. Included in this report is a summary of gaseous, liquid, and solid effluents released from the station during the reporting period (Attachments 1-6), a summary of revisions to the Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual and the Process Control Program during the reporting period (Attachments 7 and 8), and an explanation as to the cause and corrective actions regarding the inoperability of any station liquid and/or gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation (Attachment 9).

Attachments 10 and 11 provide a summary and assessment of radiation doses to members of the public within and outside the site boundary, respectively, from liquid and gaseous effluents as well as direct radiation.

The format used for the effluent data is outlined in Appendix B of Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 1.

Dose assessments were made in accordance with the NMP2 Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual.

Distribution is in accordance with Regulatory Guide 10.1, 10CFR50.4(b)(1) and the Technical Specifications.

Included with the report is an update of actual data for the month of June used in the second quarter of the January - June 1993 Semi-Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report.

During the reporting period from July - December 1993, NMP2 did not exceed any 10CFR20, 10CFR50 or Technical Specification limits for gaseous or liquid effluents. An independent technical evaluation of the off-site vendor analyses performed by Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation has indicated a potential for a discrepancy in the data results. The resident inspectors at Nine Mile Point have been informed and corrective actions initiated. The evaluation is continuing and future Semi-Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports will reflect any changes as a result of this technical evaluation.

If you have any questions concerning the attached report, please contact Ms. Elizabeth D. Thomas (315) 428-7188, or Mr. Anthony M. Salvagno (315) 428-7189, Chemistry and Radiation Protection Support, Salina Meadows.

Very tr I yours, C. D. Terry Vice President - Nuclear Engineering EDT/sek On O,gP-' ~,

OO4447LL 63 Enclosures pc: Regional Administrator, Region 1 Mr. B. S. Norris, Senior Resident Inspector Mr. R. A. Capra, Director, Project Directorate l-1, NRR Mr, J. E. Menning, Project Manager, NRR Records Management 9403140242 940225 PDR ADOCK .050004i0'.F!DR

NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 OPP-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL ODCM DATE TIALS APROVALS SIGNATURES REVISION 9 J. H. Mueller Plant Manager Unit 2 C. D. Terry V. P. Nuclear Engineering i~/z NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION 9403>40242 Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL December 1993

SUMMARY

OF REVISIONS REVISION 9 EFFECTIVE 2/31/93 PAGE DATE iiig 12 14g 18g 28 31g 34g May 1986 37 53g 55 58g 60 82g 87 89g 92 15 May 1987 54 May 1987 (TCN-1) 19 June 1987 (TCN-2) 90-91,93-103 February 1988 20-27, 83-86 April 1988 i-ii November 1988 1 llg 16g 32 33g 35 36g 59 February 1990 100-102, 106 June 1992 i-viii Part I >> added section December 1992 Part ZZ 19, 21-25, 28-31, 33, 35-53, 55 Part ZZ added Appendices pp.60-104 Part ZI - added pp. 77, 78g 88g 94g 99g 102 Part I 3/4 12-10 February 1993 Part ZZ 28, 29, 31, 55, 58, IZ 104a-c Part I i, ii, iii, iv, I l-l, 3/4 3-75, 3/4 3 76g 3/4 3 96g 3/4 3 102g 3/4 12 12g December 1993 3/4 12 14g B 3/4 3 5g I 5 6g I 6 20g I 6 21g I 6-22, Part II - ZI 25, IZ 59, II 63, ZZ 105 Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL December 1993

TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables viii List of Figures Introduction xi PART I- RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS SECTION 1,0 DEFINITIONS I 1-0 SECTION 2.0 (Retained in Technical Specifications)

SECTIONS 3 ' AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE I 3/4 0-0 REQUIREMENTS 3/4.0 Applicability I 3/4 0-1 3/4.1 (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.2 3/4.3 Instrumentation I 3/4 3-74 3/4.3.1 ~ (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.3.6 3/4.3.7 Monitoring Znstrumentation I 3/4 3-74 3/4.3.7.1 (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.3.7.2 3/4.3.7.3 Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation I 3/4 3-74 3/4.3.7.4 -+ (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.3.7.8 3/4. 3. 7. 9 Radioactive Liquid Ef fluent I 3/4 3-92 Monitoring Instrumentation 3/4.3.7.10 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent I 3/4 3-97 Monitoring Instrumentation 3/4.3.8 (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.3.9 3/4.4 ~ (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.9 3/4.11 Radioactive Effluents I 3/4 11-1 3/4.11.1 Liquid Effluents I 3/4 11-1 3/4.11.1.1 Liquid Effluents Concentration I 3/4 11-1 3/4.11.1.2 Liquid Effluents - Dose I 3/4 11-5 3/4.11.1.3 Liquid Effluents Liquid Radwaste I 3/4 11-6 Treatment System 3/4.11.1.4 (Retained in the Technical Specifications)

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL December 1993

TABLE OF CONTENTS 3/4.11.2 Gaseous Effluents I 3/4 11-8 3/4.11.2.1 Gaseous Effluents Dose Rate I 3/4 11-8 3/4.11.2.2 Gaseous Effluents Dose Noble Gases I 3/4 11-12 3/4.11.2.3 Gaseous Effluents Dose - Iodine-131/ I 3/4 11-13 Zodine-133, Tritium, and Radioactive Material in Particulate Form 3/4.11.2.4 Gaseous Effluents - Gaseous Radwaste I 3/4 11-14 Treatment System 3/4.11.2.5 Gaseous Effluents >> Ventilation Exhaust I 3/4 11-15 Treatment System 3/4.11.2.6, (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.11.2.7 3/4.11.2.8 Venting or Purging I 3/4 11-18 3/4.11.3 (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.11.4 Radioactive Effluents Total Dose I 3/4 11-21 3/4.12 Radiological Environmental Monitoring I 3/4 12-1 3/4.12.1 Monitoring Program I 3/4 12-1 3/4.12.2 Land Use Census I 3/4 12-14 3/4.12.3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program I 3/4 12-16 BASES (Sections 3/4.1 and 3/4.2 are Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.3 Znstrumentation I B 3/4 3-5 3/4.3.1 ~ (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.3.6 3/4.3.7 Monitoring Instrumentation I B 3/4 3-5 3/4.3.7.1 (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.3.7.2 3/4.3.7.3 Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation I B 3/4 3-5 3/4.3.7.5 ~ (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.3.7.8 3/4.3.7.9 Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring I B 3/4 3-7 Instrumentation 3/4.3.7.10 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring I B 3/4 3-7 Instrumentation 3/4.3.8 (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.3.9 Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL December 1993

TABLE OF CONTENTS 3/4.4 ~ (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.10 3/4.11 Radioactive E ffluents I B 3/4 11>>1 3/4.11.1 Liquid Effluents I B 3/4 11-1 3/4.11.1.1 Concentration I B 3/4 11-1 3/4.11.1.2 Dose I B 3/4 11-1 3/4.11.1.3 Liquid Radwaste Treatment System I B 3/4 11-2 3/4.11.1.4 (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.11.2 Gaseous Effluents I B 3/4 11-2 3/4.11.2.1 Dose Rate I B 3/4 11-2 3/4.11.2.2 Dose Noble Gases I B 3/4 11-3 3/4.11.2.3 Dose - Zodine-131, Iodine-133, Tritium, and I B 3/4 11-4 Radioactive Material in Particulate Form 3/4.11.2.4 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System I B 3/4 11-5 3/4.11.2.5 Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System I B 3/4 11-5 3/4.11.2.6 (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4.11.2.7 3/4.11.2.8 Venting or Purging I B 3/4 11-5 3/4.11.3 (Retained in the Technical Specifications) 3/4-11.4 Total Dose I B 3/4 11-6 3/4.12.1 Monitoring Program I B 3/4 12-1 3/4.12.2 Land Use Census I B 3/4 12-1 3/4.12.3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program I B 3/4 12-2 SECTION 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES (5.1.1 thru 5.1.2, I 5-0 5.2 thru 5.4, 5.6 and 5.7 are retained in the Technical Specifications) 5.1.3 Map Defining Unrestricted Areas and I 5-1 Site Boundary For Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluents 5.5 Meteorological Tower Location I 5-1 SECTION 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (6.1 thru 6.8 and I 6-0 6.10 thru 6.13 are Retained in the Technical Specifications) 6.9 Reporting Requirements I 6-19 Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL December 1993

0 e

TABLE OF CONTENTS Routine Reports (6.9.1.1 thru 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.9 are Retained i.n the Techni.cal Specifi.cations) 6.9.1.7 Annual Radiological Environmental I 6-19 Operating Report 6.9.1.8 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent I 6-20 Release Report 6.9.2 (Retained in the Technical Specifications)

(Retained in the Technical Specifications)

6. 14 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual I 6-26 6.15 Ma)or Changes to Liquidi Gaseous and I 6-27 Solid Radwaste Treatment Systems Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL iv December 1993

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION SUBJECT REC SECTION PAGE Part II Calculational Methodologies 1.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Li.quid Effluent Monitor Alarm Setpoints 1.1.1 Basi.s 3.11.1.1 1.1.2 Setpoint Determination Methodology 3.3.7.9 1.1.2.1 Li.quid Radwaste Effluent Radiation Alarm Setpoint 1.1.2.2 Contaminated Dilution Water Radwaste Effluent Monitor Alarm Setpoint Calculations

1. 1.2.3 Service Water and Cooling Tower Blowdown Effluent Radiation Alarm Setpoint 1.2 Liquid Effluent Concentration 3.11.1.1 Calculation 4.11.1.1.2 1.3 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation 3.11.1.2 Methodology 4.11.1.2 1.4 Liquid Effluent Sampling Table 4.11.1-1 Representativeness note b 1.5 Liquid Radwaste System Operability 3.11.1.3 4.11.1.3 '

4.11.1.3.2 2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 10 2.1. Gaseous Effluent Monitor Alarm Setpoints 10 2.1.1 Basis 3.11.2.1 10 2.1.2 Setpoint Determination Methodology 3.3.7.10 10 Discussion 2.1.F 1 Stack Noble Gas Detector Alarm Setpoint Equation 2.1.2.2 Vent Noble Gas Detector Alarm Setpoint 12 Equation

2. 1.2.3 Offgas Pretreatment Noble Gas Detector 13 Alarm Setpoint Equation 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Dose Rate Calculation 3.11.2.1 14 Methodology Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL December 1993

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION SUBJECT REC SECTION PAGE 2.2.1 X/Q and W Disperst.on Parameters for Dose Rate, Table 3-23 14 2 ' ' Whole Body Dose Rate Due to Noble Gases 3.11.2.1.a 15 4.11.2.1.1 2 ' 3 Skin Dose Rate Due to Noble Gases 3.11.2.1.a 15 4.11.2.1.1 2.2.4 Organ Dose Rate Due to I-131, I-133, 16 Tritium and Particulates with 3.11.2.1.b half-lives greater than 8 days 4.11.2.1.2 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Dose Calculation 3.11.2.2 17 Methodology 3.11.2.3 3.11.2.5 2.3.1 W, and W Dispersion Parameters 18 For Dose, Table 3-23 2.3.2 Gamma Air Dose Due to Noble Gases 3.11.2.2.a./b. 18 4.11.2.2 2.3.3 Beta Air Dose Due to Noble Gases 3.11.2.2.a./b. 18 2.3.4

~ ~ Organ Dose Due to I-131, I-133, Tritium 18 and Particulates with half-lives 3.11.2.3 greater than 8 days. 3.11.2.5 4.11.2.3 4.11.2.5.1 2.4 I-133 and I-135 Estimation 19 2.5 Isokinetic Sampling 19.

2.6 Use of Concurrent Meteorological Data 19 versus Historical Data 2 ' Gaseous Radwaste T'reatment System 3.11.2.4 20 Operation 2.8 Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System 3 11 ' ' 20 Operation 3.0 URANIUM FUEL,,CYCLE 3.11.4 20 3.1 Evaluation of Doses From Liquid Effluents 4.11.4.1 21 3 2 Evaluation of Doses From Gaseous Effluents 4.11.4.1 23 3' Evaluation of Doses From Direct Radiation 4.11.4.2 23 3.4 Doses to Members of the Public Within the 6.9.1 8 23 Site Boundary Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL vi December 1993

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION SUBJECT REC SECTION PAGE 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 3. 12 26

4. 12 4.1 Sampling Stations 3.12.1 26 4.12.1 4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program 4.12.3 26 4.3 Capabilities for Thermoluminescent Dosimeters 26 Used for Environmental Measurements Appendix A Liquid Dose Factor Derivation 61 Appendix B Plume Shine Dose Factor Derivation Appendix C Dose Parameters for Iodine 131 and 133, 68 Particulates and Tritium Appendix D Diagrams of Liquid and Gaseous Radwaste 78 Treatment Systems and Monitoring Systems Appendix E Nine Mile Point On-Site and Off-Site Maps 103 Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL vii December 1993

LIST OF TABLES PART I RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE Surveillance Frequency Notations I 1-5 1.2 Operational Conditions I 1-6 3.3.7.3-1 Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation I 3/4 3-75 4.3.7.3-1 Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation I 3/4 3-76 Surveillance Requirements 3.3.7.9-1 Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring I 3/4 3-93 4.3.7.9-1 Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring I 3/4 3-95 Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements 3.3.7.10-1 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring I 3/4 3-98 Instrumentation 4.3.7.10-1 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring I 3/4 3-100 Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements 4.11.1-1 Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and I 3/4 11-2 Analysis Program 4.11.2-1

~ ~ Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and I 3/4 11-9 Analysis Program 3.12.1-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring I 3/4 12-3 Program 3.12 '-2 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity I 3/4 12-10 Concentrations in Environmental Samples 4.12.1-1 Detection Capabilities for Environmental I 3/4 12-11 Sample Analyses (Lower Limit of Detection)

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL viii December 1993

0 LIST OF TABLES PART II - CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES TABLE NO ~ TITLE PAGE 2-1 Liquid Effluent Detector Response II 28 2-2 thru 2-5 A. Values Liquid Effluent Dose Factor ZZ 29 3-1 Offgas Pretreatment Detector Response II 33 3-2 Finite Plume Ground Level Dose Factors from an Elevated Release II 34 3-3 Immersion Dose Factors ZZ 35 3-4 thru 3-22 Dose And Dose Rate Factors, R, ZZ 36 3-23 Dispersion Parameters at Controlling ZI 55 Locations, X/Q, W and W, Values 3-24 Parameters For the Evaluation of Doses to Real Members of the Public From Gaseous II 56 And Liquid Effluents 5.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring II 57 Program Sampling Locations Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL ix December 1993

f 3

LIST OF FIGURES TABLE NO+ TITLE PAGE 5.1.3-1 Site Boundaries I 5-5 5.1-1 Nine Mile Point On-Site Map II 104 5.1-2 Nine Mile Point Off-Site Map II 105 Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL December 1993

INTRODUCTION The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) is a supporting document of the Technical Specifications. The previous Limiting Conditions for Operation that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications are now transferred to the ODCM as Radiological Effluent Controls. The ODCM contains two parts: Radiological Effluent Controls, Part I; and Calculational Methodologies, Part II. Radiological Effluent Controls, Part 1, includes the following: (1) The Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specification 6.8.4, (2) descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating and Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports required by Technical Specifications 6.9.1.3 and 6.9.1.4, and (3) Controls for Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation. Calculational Methodologies, Part II, describes the methodology and parameters to be used in the calculation of liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip setpoints and the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents. The ODCM also contains a list and graphical description of the specific sample locations for the radiological environmental monitoring program, and liquid and gaseous radwaste treatment system conf igurations.

The ODCM follows the methodology and models suggested by NUREG-0133 and Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1. Simplifying assumptions have been applied in this manual where applicable to provide a more workable document for implementing the Radiological Effluent Control requirements; this simplified approach will result in a more conservative dose evaluation for determining compliance with regulatory requirements.

The ODCM will be maintained by the Corporate Chemistry and Radiological Support Group for use as a reference and training document of accepted methodologies and calculations. Changes to the calculation methods or parameters will be incorporated into the ODCM to assure that the ODCM represents the present methodology in all applicable areas. Any changes to the ODCM will be implemented in accordance with Section 6.14 of the Technical Specifications.

Until the Unit 2 Technical Specifications are revised to delete the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications, the ODCM Part I will be used as a reference only, and the Technical Specifications with LCO's and Surveillance requirements will remain the primary controlling document.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL Xi December 1993

't (

PART I RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS SECTION 1.0 DEFINITIONS Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 1-0 December 1993

I 1.0 DEFINITIONS The following terms are defined so that the CONTROLS may be uniformly interpreted. The defined terms appear in capitalized type throughout the controls.

ACTION 1.1 ACTION shall be that part of a CONTROL which prescribes remedial measures required under designated conditions.

CHANNEL CALIBRATION 1.4 A CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be the adjustment, as necessary, of the channel output so that it responds with the necessary range and accuracy to known values of the parameter which the channel monitors. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall encompass the entire channel including the sensor and alarm and/or trip functions, and shall include the CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION may be performed by any series of sequential, overlapping or total channel steps such that the entire channel is calibrated.

CHANNEL CHECK 1.5 A CHANNEL CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by observation. This determination shall include, where possible, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the same parameter.

CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1.6 A CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be:

a. Analog channels the injection of a simulated signal into the channel as close to the sensor as practicable to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions and channel failure trips.

b. Bistable channels the injection of a simulated signal into the sensor to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions.

The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST may be performed by any series of sequential overlapping or total channel steps so that the entire channel is tested.

CONTROL The present Limiting Conditions for Operation or LCO's that are contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications are being transferred to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and being renamed to CONTROLS. This is to distinguish between those LCO's which are being retained in the Technical Specifications and those LCO's or CONTROLS that are being transferred to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 1-1 December 1993

r DOSE E UIVALENT I-131 1.10 DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 shall be that concentration of Z-131, expressed .in microcuries per gram, which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity and isotopic mixture of I 131i I 132 I 133i I 134'nd I-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall be those listed in Table III of TID-14844, "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites."

FRE UENCY NOTATION 1.16 The FREQUENCY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance

~,

Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined in r Table 1.1.

GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM A GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and

-. 1.17 installed to reduce radioactiye gaseous egfluents by collecting offgases from the main condenser evacuation syslem~and~groviding-.for, delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment.

MEMBER S OF THE PUBLIC 1.23 MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC shall include all persons who are not occupationally associated with the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station and James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. This category does not include employees of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 co-tenantsi the New York State Power Authority, their contractors or vendors. Also excluded from this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make deliveries. This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational, occupational, or other purposes not associated with Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station and James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.

MILK SAMPLING LOCATION 1.24 A MILK SAMPLING LOCATION is a location where 10 or more head of milk animals are available for collection of milk samples.

OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL 1.26 The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATZON MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the current methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses that result from radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring Alarm/Trip Setpoints, and in the conduct of the environmental radiological monitoring program. The ODCM shall also contain: (1) the radioactive effluent controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program required by Section 6.8.4 and, (2) descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating and Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports required by CONTROLS 6.9.1.7 and 6.9.1.8.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 1-2 December 1993

v' OPERABLE - OPERABILITY 1.27 A. system, subsys tern, train, component, or device shall be OPERABLE or .

have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s) and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, electrical power, cooling or seal water, lubrication, or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component, or device to perform its function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s).

OPERATIONAL CONDITION CONDITION 1.28 An OPERATIONAL CONDITION, i.e., CONDITION, shall be any one inclusive combination of mode switch position and average reactor coolant temperature as specified in Table 1.2.

PURGE PURGING 1.33 PURGE and PURGING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement.

RATED THERMAL POWER 1.34 RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 3323 MWt.

REPORTABLE EVENT 1.36 A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions specified in 10 CFR 50.73.

SITE BOUNDARY 1.40 THE SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line around the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station beyond which the land is not owned, leased or otherwise controlled by the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation or the New York State Power Authority.

REPRESENTATIVE COMPOSITE SAMPLE (Not Transferred from Technical Specifications)

A REPRESENTATIVE COMPOSITE SAMPLE is that part of more than one liquid or gaseous streams or volumes that contains the same radioactive nuclides or materials in the same ratios as the whole streams or volumes, that is obtained over short-time intervals.

SOURCE CHECK 1.42 A SOURCE CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel xesponse when the channel sensor is exposed to a source of increased radioactivity.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 1-3 December 1993

II THERMAL POWER 1.44 THERMAL POWER Qhall be the total .reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.

UNRESTRICTED AREA 1.47 An UNRESTRICTED AREA shall be any area at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY, access to which is not controlled by the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation or the New York State Power Authority for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential quarters or for industrial, commercial, institutional, and/or recreational purposes.

VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.48 A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radioiodine or radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment (such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents). Engineered safety features (ESF) atmospheric cleanup systems are not considered to be VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components.

VENTING 1.49 VENTZNG shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is not provided or required during VENTZNG. Vent, used in system names, does not imply a VENTING process.

-Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 1-4 December 1993

TABLE F 1 SURVEILLANCE FRE UENCY NOTATIONS NOTATION FREQUENCY At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months D At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months At least once er 7 da s At least once per 31 days At least once per 92 days SA At least once per 184 days At least once er 366 da s At least once er 18 months (550 days)

S/U Prior to each reactor startup Prior to each radioactive release Not applicable Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 1-5 December 1993

I TABLE 1.2 OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS AVERAGE REACTOR CONDITION MODE SWITCH POSITION COOLANT TEMPERATURE

1. Power 0 eration Run An tern erature

2. Startup Startup/Hot Standby Any temperature

3. Hot Shutdown Shutdown*,** 200 F

4. Cold Shutdown Shutdown*,**t < 2004F

5. Refuelingtt Shutdown or Refuel*g < 1404F TABLE NOTATIONS

The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Run or Startup/Hot Standby position to test the switch interlock functions provided that the control rods are verified to remain fully inserted by a second licensed operator or other technically qualified member of the unit technical staff.

- The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod is being recoupled provided that the one-rod-out interlock is OPERABLE.

t The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod drive is being removed from the reactor pressure vessel per Technical Specification 3.9.10.1.

Fuel in the reactor vessel with the vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the head removed.

See Technical Specification Special Test Exceptions 3.10.1 and 3.10.3.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 1-6 December 1993

P a I y

PART I- RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS SECTIONS 3 ' AND 4 '

CONTROLS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 0-0 December 1993

1 ~

3 4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 3 4.0 APPLICABILITY CONTROLS 3.0.1 Compliance with the CONTROLS is required during the OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other conditions specified thereiny except that upon failure to meet the CONTROL, the associated ACTION requirements shall be met.

3.0.2 Noncompliance with a CONTROL shall exist when the requirements of the CONTROL and associated ACTION requirements are not met within the specified time intervals. If the CONTROL is restored prior to expiration of the specified time intervals, completion of the ACTION requirements is not required.

3.0.3 When a CONTROL is not met, except as provided in the associated ACTION requirements, within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months action shall be initiated to place the unit in an OPERATZONAL CONDITION in which the CONTROL does not apply by placing it, as applicable, in:

1. At least STARTUP within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months ,

2. At least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months , and

3. At least COLD SHUTDOWN within the subsequent. 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

Where corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the ACTION requirements, the ACTION may be taken in accordance with the specified time limits as measured from the time of failure to meet the CONTROL. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.

This CONTROL is not applicable in OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 4 or 5.

3.0.4 Entry into an OPERATZONAL CONDITION or other specified condition shall not be made unless the conditions 'for the CONTROL are met without reliance on provisions contained in the ACTION requirements. This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS as required to comply with ACTION requirements. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 0-1 December 1993

APPLICABILITY SURVEILLANCE RE UIREHENTS 4.0.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS shall be met during the OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other conditions specified for individual Controls unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement.

4.0.2 Each SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT shall be performed within the specified time interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25% of the surveillance interval.

4.0.3 Failure to perform a SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT within the allowed surveillance interval, defined by Specification 4.0.2, shall constitute noncompliance with the OPERABILITY requirements for a CONTROL. The time limits of the ACTION requirements are applicable at the time it is identified that a SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT has not been performed. The ACTION requirements may be delayed for up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to permit the completion of the surveillance when the allowable outage time limits of the ACTION requirements are less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment.

4.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL CONDITION or other specified applicable condition shall not be made unless the Surveillance Requirement(s) associated with the CONTROL have been performed within the applicable surveillance interval or as otherwise specified. This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS as required to comply with ACTION requirements.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 0-2 December 1993

h

~ ~

INSTRUMENTATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 3.3.7.3 The Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3.7.3-1 shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With one or more meteorological monitoring instrumentation channels inoperable for more than 7 days, in lieu of any other report required by Controls 6.9.1, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Controls 6.9.2 within the next 10 days outlining the cause of the malfunction and the plans for restoring the instrumentation to OPERABLE status.

b. The provisions of Controls 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.3.7.3 Each of the above required Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation channels shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by the performance of the CHANNEL CHECK and CHANNEL CALIBRATION operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3.7.3-1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-74 December 1993

TABLE 3.3.7.3-1 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM INSTRUMENTS INSTRUMENT ELEVATION OPERABLE

1. Wind Speed 30 200

2. Wind Direction 30 200

3. Air Temperature Difference 30 ft./200 Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-75 December 1993

U' A

V 1

TABLE 4.3.7.3-1 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS CHANNEL CHANNEL INSTRUMENT ELEVATION CHECK CALIBRATION

1. Wind Speed 30 D SA 200 D SA

2. Wind Direction 30 D SA 200 D SA

3. Air Temperature Difference 30 ft./200 D SA Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-76 December 1993

f 1

o INSTRUMENTATION MONITORING ZNSTRUMEN -ATION RADIOACTIVE LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3.3.7.9 The radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3.7.9-1 shall be OPERABLE with their Alarm/Trip Setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded. The Alarm/Trip Setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) ~

APPLICABILITY: During releases via this pathway.

ACTION$

a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel Alarm/Trip Setpoint less conservative than required by the above control, immediately suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored'y the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

b. With the number of channels OPERABLE less than the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3.7.9-1. Restore the instruments to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.3.7.9 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION AND CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3.7.9-1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-92 December 1993

I,

'd VI I

TABLE 3.3.7.9-1

~ = RADIOACT 9E LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE ACTION

1. Radioactivity Monitors Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 128 Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line

2. Radioactivity Monitors Providing Alarm but not Providing Automatic Termination of Release

a. Service Water Effluent Line A 130

b. Service Water Effluent Line B 130

c. Cooling Tower Blowdown Line 130

3. Flow Rate Measurement Devices

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line 131

b. Service Water Effluent Line A 131

c. Service Water Effluent Line B 131

d. Cooling Tower Blowdown Line 131

4. Tank Level Indicating Devices* 132

Tanks included in this control are those outdoor tanks that are not surrounded by liners, dikes, or walls capable of holding the tank contents and do not have tank overflows and surrounding area drains connected to the liquid radwaste treatment 'system, such as temporary tanks.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-93 December 1993

III a

TABLE 3.3.7.9-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION TABLE NOTATIONS ACTION 128 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases may continue provided that before initiating a release:

a. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with Surveillance 4.11.1.1.1, and

b. At least two technically qualified members of the facility staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving; Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

ACTION 129 Not used.

ACTION 130 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that, at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months , grab samples are collected and analyzed for radioactivity at a limit of detection of at least 5 x 10 microcuries/ml.

ACTION 131 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue, provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months during actual releases. Pump performance curves generated in place may be used to estimate flow.

ACTION 132 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, liquid additions to this tank may continue provided the tank liquid level is estimated during all liquid additions to the tank.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL Z 3/4 3-94 December 1993

IJ 0

TABLE 4.3.7.9<<1 RADIOACTIVE LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL ~i INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST

1. Radioactivity Monitors Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line R(c) M(a)(b)

2. Radioactivity Monitors Providing Alarm but not Providing Automatic Termination of Release R(c) SA(b)

a. Service Water Effluent Line A R(c) SA(b)

b. Service Water Effluent Line B R(c) SA(b)

c. Cooling Tower Blowdown Line

3. Flow Rate Measurement Devices

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line D(d) NA

b. Service Water Effluent Line A D(d) NA

c. Service Water Effluent Line B D(d) NA

d. Cooling Tower Blowdown Line D(d) NA

4. Tank Level .Indicating Devices* D** NA

Tanks included in this control are those outdoor tanks that are not surrounded by liners, dikes, or walls capable of holding the tank contents and do not have tank overflows and surrounding area drains connected to the liquid radwaste treatment system, such as temporary tanks.

- During liquid additions to the tank.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-95 December 1993

TABLE 4.3.7.9-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS TABLE NOTATIONS I.)

(a) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and con(rol room alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument indicates measured levels above the Alarm/Trip Setpoint.

(b) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exists:

(1) Instrument indicates measured levels above the Alarm Setpoint, or (2) Circuit failure, or (3) Instrument indicates a downscale failure, or (4) Instrument controls not set in operate mode.

(c) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards certified by the National Bureau of Standards* (NBS), standards that are traceable to the NBS standards, or using actual samples of liquid effluents that have been analyzed on a system that has been calibrated with National Institute of Standards and Testing traceable sources. These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and measurement. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, sources that have been related to the initial calibration may be used.

(d) CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made.

When the technical specification change is complete to delete the procedural details that are being transferred to the ODCM, then the NBS will be changed to the correct NIST.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-96 December 1993

4 INSTRUMENTATION MON1TORING INSTRUMEN TION RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION v CONTROLS 3.3.7.10 The radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3.7.10-1 shall be OPERABLE with their Alarm/Trip Setpoints ~

set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. The Alarm/Trip Setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 3.3.7.10-1.

ACTION:

a. With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel Alarm/Trip Setpoint less conservative than required by the above control/

immediately suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel, 'or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

b. With the number of channels OPERABLE less than the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3.7.10-1. Restore the instruments to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.3.7.10 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3.7.10-1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-97 December 1993

TABLE 3.3.7.10-1 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE APPLICABILITY ACTION

1. Offgas System

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release 135

b. System Flow-Rate Measuring Device 136

c. Sampler Flow-Rate Measuring Device 136

2. Offgas System Explosive Gas Monitoring System - Retained in the RETS

3. Radwaste/Reactor Building Vent Effluent System

a. Noble Gas Activity 139 Monitort 138

b. Zodine Sampler 138

c. Particulate Sampler 136

d. Flow-Rate Monitor 136

e. Sample Flow-Rate Monitor

4. Main Stack Effluent

a. Noble Gas Activity 139 Monitort 138

b. Zodine Sampler 138

c. Particulate Sampler 136

d. Flow-Rate Monitor 136

e. Sample Flow-Rate Monitor Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-98 December 1993

TABLE 3.3.7.10-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION TABLE NOTATIONS

During offgas system operation.

Includes high range noble gas monitoring capability.

At all times.

ACTIONS ACTION 135 a. With the number of OPERABLE channels one less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the inoperable channel is placed in the tripped condition within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

b. With the number of OPERABLE channels two less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months and these samples are analyzed for gross activity within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

ACTION 136 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate for the inoperable channel(s) is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

ACTION 137 Retained in the RETS.

ACTION 138 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided samples are continuously collected starting within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months of discovery, using auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Table 4.11.2-1.

ACTION 139 a. With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months and these samples are analyzed for gross activity within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months for a radioactivity limit of detection of at least 1 x 10~

microcurie/ml.

b. Restore the inoperable channel(s) to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months or in lieu of another report required by Technical Specification 6.9.1, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2 within 14 days following the event outlining the action taken, the cause of the inoperability and the schedule for restoring the system to OPERABLE status.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-99 December 1993

TABLE 4.3.7.10-1 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL SURVEILLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST REQUIRED

1. Offgas System

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release NA R(a,e) M(b,c)

b. System Flow-Rate Measuring Device NA

c. Sample Flow-Rate Measuring Device NA

2. Offgas System Explosive Gas Monitoring System Retained in RETS

3. Radwaste/Reactor Building Vent Effluent System

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitort D R(a) Q(c)

b. Iodine Sampler NA NA NA

c. Particulate Sampler NA NA NA

d. Flow-Rate Monitor NA

e. Sample Flow-Rate NA Monitor Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-100 December 1993

TABLE 4.3.7.10-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL SURVEILLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST REQUIRED

4. Main Stack Effluent

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitored R(a) Q(c)

b. Iodine Sampler NA NA NA

c. Particulate Sampler NA NA NA

d. Flow-Rate Monitor D NA

e. Sample Flow-Rate NA Monitor Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-101 December 1993

TABLE 4.3.7.10-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS TABLE NOTATIONS

At all times.

- During offgas system operation.

Includes high range noble gas monitoring capability.

(a) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards certified by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers that participate in measurement assurance activities with NBS, or using actual samples of gaseous effluents that have been analyzed on a system that has been calibrated with NBS traceable sources. These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and measurement. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, sources that have been related to the initial calibration may be used.

(b) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate the automatic isolation capability of this pathway and that control room alarm annunciation occurs if the instrument indicates measured levels above the Alarm/Trip Setpoint (each channel will be tested independently so as to not initiate isolation during operation).

(c) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exists:

(1) Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint.

(2) Circuit failure.

(3) Instrument indicates a downscale failure.

(4) Instrument controls not set in operate mode.

(d) Retained in RETS.

(e) The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway occurs when the instrument channels indicate measured levels above the Trip Setpoint.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 3-102 December 1993

3 4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3 4.11:1 L1 UID EFFLfJRNTS CONCENTRATION CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases; For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 10~

microcurie/ml total activity.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the concentration to within the above limits.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.1.1.1 Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis program of Table 4.11.1-1.

4.11.1.1.2 The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-1 December 1993

)

I

TABLE 4.11.1-1 RADIOACTIVE LI UID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM MINIMUM LOWER LIMIT OF LIQUID RELEASE SAMPLING ANALYSIS TYPE OF ACTIVITY DETECTION (LLD)(a)

TYPE FRE UENCY FRE UENCY ANALYSIS uCi ml Batch Waste P P Principal Gamma Sx10 Release Each Batch Each Batch Emitters c Tanks(b)

a. 2LWS-TK4A I-131 lx10+

b. 2LWS-TK4B

c. 2LWS-TK5A 2LWS-TK5B P One Batch/M Dissolved and lx10~

One Batch/M Entrained Gases (Gamma Emitters)

P M H-3 lx10~

Each Batch Composite (d)

Gross Alpha lx10'7 P Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10~

Each Batch Composite(d)

Fe-55 lx10 Continuous Grab Sample Grab Sample Principal Gamma 5x10 Releases M(e) M(e) Emitters(c)

I-131 lx10~

a. Service Water Dissolved and lxlo~

Effluent A Entrained Gases (Gamma Emitters)

b. Service Water H-3 lx10~

Effluent B Gross Alpha lxl0 C~ Cooling Tower Grab Sample Grab Sample Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10~.

Blowdown Q(e) Q(e)

Fe-55 lx10

d. Auxiliary Grab Sample Grab Sample Principal Gamma 5x10 Boiler M(f) M(f) Emitters(c)

Pump Seal and Sample Cooling Discharge (Service Grab Sample Grab .Sample H-3 Water) f f Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-2 December 1993

TABLE 4.11.1-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE LI UID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM TABLE NOTATIONS (a) The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yi.eld a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95%

probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.

For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

4.66 S>

LLD E V 2.22x106 Y exp(-Xht)

Where:

LLD the before-the-fact lower limit of detection (microcurie per unit mass or volume),

Sl the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (counts per minute),

E the counting efficiency (counts per disintegrati.on),

V the sample size (units of mass or volume),

2.22x106 = the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, Y the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec'), and the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and the time of counting (seconds).

Typical values of E, V, Y, and ht should be used in the calculation.

It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as a before-the-fact limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an after-the-fact limit for a particular measurement.

(b) A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume.

Prior to sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed by a method described in the ODCM to assure representative sampling.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-3 December 1993

TABLE 4.11.1-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE LI UID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM TABLE NOTATIONS (c) The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies include the following radionuclides: Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137 and Ce-141. Ce-144 shall also be measured, but with an LLD of 5 x 10~. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other gamma peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8 in the format outlined in RG 1.21, Appendix B, Revision 1, June 1974.

(d) A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released.

(e) If the alarm setpoint of the effluent monitor, as determined by the method presented in the ODCM, is exceeded, the frequency of sampling shall be increased to daily until the condition no longer exists.

Frequency of analysis shall be increased to daily for principal gamma emitters and an incident composite for H-3, gross alpha, Sr-89, Sr-90, and Fe-55.

(f) If the alarm setpoint of Service Water Effluent Monitor A and/or B, as determined by the method presented in the ODCMg is exceeded, the frequency of sampling shall be increased to daily until the condition no longer exists. Frequency of analysis shall be increased to daily for principal gamma emitters and an incident composite for H-3, gross alpha, Sr-89, Sr-90, and Fe-55.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-4 December 1993

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS LI UID .EFFLUENTS DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.1.2 The dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released, from each unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited:

a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the whole body and to less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and

b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the whole body and to less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.1.2 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents for the current calendar quarter and the current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days'04324LL Unit 2 Revision 9 I 3/4 11~5 December 1993

b RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS e LI LI UID EFFCUENTS UID RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM CONTROLS 3.11.1.3 The liquid radwaste treatment system shall be OPERABLE, and appropriate portions of the system shall be used to reduce releases of radioactivity when the projected doses due to the liquid effluent, from the unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.3-1) would exceed 0.06 mrem to the whole body or 0.2 mrem to any organ in a 31-day period.

APPLICABILITY't all times.

ACTION:

a. With radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits and any portion of the liquid radwaste treatment system not in operation, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:

1. Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability,

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

j SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.1.3.1 Doses due to liquid releases from each unit to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM when liquid radwaste treatment systems are not being fully utilized.

4.11.1.3.2 The installed liquid radwaste treatment system shall be considered OPERABLE by meeting CONTROLS 3.11'.l.l and 3.11.1.2.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-6 December 1993

k ~

f IP

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3 4.11.-2 GASEOUS EFF 'QENTS DOSE RATE CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 The dose rate from radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited to the following:

a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the whole body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and

b. For iodine-131, for iodine-133, for tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the release rate to within the above limit(s).

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.2.1.1 The dose rate from noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

4.11.2.1.2 The dose rate from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4.11.2-1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-8 December 1993

TABLE 4.11.2-1 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM MINIMUM LOWER LIMIT OF SAMPLING ANALYSIS TYPE OF DETECTION (LLD)~i GASEOUS RELEASE TYPE FRE UENCY FRE UENCY ACTIVITY ANALYSIS uCi ml

1. Containment(b) Each PURGE Principal Gamma Emitters(c) lx10 Each PURGE H-3 (oxide), Principal Gamma lx10 , lx10~

Emitters (c)

2. Main Stack M(d) M(d) Principal Gamma Emitters(c) lx10~

Radwaste/Reactor Building Vent Grab Sample M(e) H-3 (oxide) lx10+

M(e)

Continuous(f) W(g) I-131 Charcoal Sample lx10'xl0" Continuous(f) W(g) Principal Gamma Emitters(c)

Particulate Sample Gross Alpha lx10" Continuous(f) Q Sr-89, Sr-90 Composite Particulate Sam le lx10'04324LL Unit 2 Revision 9 I 3/4 11-9 December 1993

TABLE 4.11.2-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM TABLE NOTATIONS (a) The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents<y.

"real" signal. I For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

4.66 Sb LLD E V 2.22x10' exp(-ht)

Where:

LLD The before-the-fact lower limit of detection (microcuries per unit mass or volume)

Sb the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (counts per minute)

E the counting efficiency (counts per disintegration) the sample size (units of mass or volume) 2.22 x 10~ = the number of disintegrations per minute per micro curie the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec')

the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and the time of counting (seconds)

Typical values of E, V, Y, and ht should be used in the calculation.

It should measurement be recognized that the LLD is defined as a before-the-fact limit representing system and not as an after-the-fact limit for a particular measurement.

the capability of a I

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-10 December 1993

TABLE 4.11.2-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM TABLE NOTATIONS (b) Sample and analysis before PURGE is used to determine permissible PURGE rates. Sample and analysis during actual PURGE is used for offsite dose calculations.

(c) The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies include the following radionuclides:

Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, and Xe-138 in noble gas releases and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, I-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144 in iodine and particulate releases. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other gamma peaks that are identifiablei together-with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8 in the format outlined in RG 1.21, ~

Appendix Bt Revision 1, June 1974.

(d) If the main stack or reactor/radwaste building isotopic shall also be performed following shutdown, startup, or monitor is not OPERABLE, sampling and analysis when there is an alarm on the offgas pretreatment monitor.

(e) Tritium grab samples shall be taken weekly from the reactor/radwaste ventilation system when fuel is offloaded until stable tritium release levels can be demonstrated.

for the time period (f) The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known3.11.2.1.b covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with CONTROLS and 3.11.2.3.

(g) When the release rate of the main stack or reactor/radwaste building vent exceeds its alarm setpoint, the iodine and particulate device shall be removed and analyzed to determine the changes in iodine and particulate release rates. The analysis shall be done daily until the release no longer exceeds the alarm setpoint. When samples collected for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-11 December 1993

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GASEOUS EFFKUENTS DOSE NOBLE GASES CONTROLS 3.11.2.2 The air dose from noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each unit, to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarters Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation, and

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation.

APPLICABIL1TY: At'll times.

ACTION:

a~ With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.2.2 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for noble gases shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-12 December 1993

~ t

'N

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE - IODINE-131 IODINE-133 TRITIUM AND RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN PARTICULATE FORM CONTROLS 3.11.2.3 The dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radioactive material in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each unit", to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and,

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION%

a. With the calculated dose from the release of iodine-131, iodine-133g tritium, and radioactive material in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium and radioactive material in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-13 December 1993

DIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GASEOUS EFFLUENTS GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM CONTROLS 3.11.2.4 The GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be in operation.

APPLICABILITY Whenever the main condenser air ejector system is in operation.

ACTION:

a~ With gaseous radwaste from the main condenser air ejector system being discharged without treatment for more than 7 days, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information.

1. Identification of the inoperable equipment or subsystems and the reason for the inoperability,

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.2.4

~ ~ ~ The readings of the relevant instruments shall be checked every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months when the main condenser air ejector is in use to ensure that the gaseous radwaste treatment system is functioning.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-14 December 1993

14 1 l

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GASEOUS EFPTUENTS VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM CONTROLS 3.11.2.5 The VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be OPERABLE and appropriate portions of this system shall be used to reduce releases of radioactivity when the projected doses in 31 days from iodine and particulate releases, from each unit, to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.3-1) would exceed 0.3 mrem to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC.

APPLICABILITY< At all times.

ACTION:

a. With radioactive gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:

1. Identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability,

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.2.5.1 Doses from iodine and particulate releases from each unit to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be pro)ected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM when the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM is not being fully utilized.

4.11.2.5.2 The installed VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be considered OPERABLE by meeting CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 or 3.11.2.3.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-15 December 1993

II, C

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GASEOUS EFFTUENTS VENTING OR PURGING CONTROLS 3.11.2.8 VENTING or PURGING of the drywell and/or suppression chamber shall be through the standby gas treatment system.*

APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1, 2, and 3.

ACTION$

a. With the requirements of the above CONTROL not satisfied, suspend all VENTZNG and PURGING of the drywell and/or suppression chamber.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.2.8.1 The drywell and/or suppression chamber shall be determined to be aligned for VENTING or PURGING through the standby gas treatment system within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months before start of and at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months during VENTING or PURGING.

See Technical Specification 3.6.5.3.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-18 December 1993

lt

'N 5

r

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3 4 ~ 11'4 TOTAL DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.4 The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and to radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the whole body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a ~ With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2.a, 3.11.1.2.b, 3.11.2.2.a, 3.11.2.2.b, 3.11.2.3.a, or 3.11.2.3.b, calculations shall be made including direct radiation contributions from the units (including outside storage tanksg etc.) to determine whether the above limits of CONTROL 3.11.4 have been exceeded.

If such is the case, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR 20.405(c), shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR 190 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190.

Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.4.1 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with CONTROLS 4.11.1.2, 4.11.2.2, and 4.11.2.3, and in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

4.11.4.2 Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the units (including outside storage tanks, etc.) shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. This requirement is applicable only under conditions set forth in ACTION a of CONTROL 3.11.4.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 11-21 December 1993

3 4. 12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3 4.12..1 MONITORING ROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.1 The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program shall be conducted as specified in Table 3.12.1-1.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a0 With the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program not being conducted as specified in Table 3.12.1-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by CONTROL 6 ' 1 7i a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence.

b. With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table 3.12.1-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, or 3.11.2.3. When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 3.12.1-2 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if:

concentration 1 + concentration 2 +...>1.0 reporting level 1 reporting level 2 When radionuclides other than those in Table 3.12.1-2 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is equal to or greater than the calendar year limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, or 3.11.2.3. This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

The methodology and parameters used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be indicated in this report.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-1 December 1993

I RADIOLOG1CAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.1 (Continued)

ACTION:

C~ With milk or fresh leafy vegetation samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 3.12.1-1, identify specific locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them within 30 days to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the monitoring program. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, submit in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report documentation for a change in the ODCM including a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples and justifying the selection of the new location(s) for obtaining samples.

d. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are riot applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.12.1 The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.12.1-1 from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) in the ODCM, and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 3.12.1-1 and the detection capabilities required by Table 4.12.1-1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-2 December 1993

TABLE 3 ~ 12.1-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS a COLLECTION FRE UENCY OF ANALYSIS

1. Direct Radiation(b) 32 routine monitoring stations Once per 3 months Gamma dose once per either with 2 or more dosimeters 3 months or with 1 instrument for measuring l,~

and recording dose rate continuously, I placed as follows:

An inner ring of stations, one in each meteorological sector in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY An outer ring of stations, one in each land base meteorological sector in the 4 to 5-mile* range from the site The balance of the stations should be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in one or two areas to serve as control stations(c).

At this distance, 8 windrose sectors, (W, WNW, NW, NNW, N, NNE, NE, and ENE) are over Lake Ontario.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-3 December 1993

0 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY) )

AND OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS a COLLECTION FRE UENCY OF ANALYSIS I

2. Airborne Radio- Samples from five locations: Continuous sampler oper- Radioiodine Canister iodine and ation with sample collec- I-131 analysis weekly Particulates 3 samples from offsite loca- tion weekly, or more tions close to the site bound- frequently if required by 'Particulate Sam ler ary (within one mile) in dust loading Gross beta radioactivity different sectors of the high- analysis following filter est calculated annual site change(d) and gamma isotopic average ground-level D/Q (based analysis(e) of composite (by on all site licensed reactors) location) at least quarterly 1 sample from the vicinity of an established year-round community having the highest calculated annual site average ground-level D/Q (based on all site licensed reactors) 1 sample from a control location, at least 10 miles distant and in a least prevalent wind direction(c)

3. Waterborne

a. Surface(f) One sample upstream(c)g Composite sample over Gamma isotopic analysis(e) one sample from the site's 1-month period(g) once/month; composite for downstream cooling water tritium analysis once/

intake 3 months Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-4 December 1993

TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER. OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS a COLLECTION FRE UENCY OF ANALYSIS

3. Waterborne (Continued)

b. Ground Samples from one or two sources; Quarterly grab sample Gama isotopic(e) only if likely to be affected(h) and tritium analysis quarterly

c. Drinking 1 sample of each of one to three Composite sample over I-131 analysis on of the nearest water supplies a 2-week period(g) each composite when the that could be affected by its when I-131 analysis is dose calculated for the discharge(i) performed; monthly composite consumption of the water otherwise is greater than 1 mrem per year.(j) Composite for gross beta and gamma isotopic analyses(e) monthly. Composite for tritium analysis quarterly

d. Sediment 1 sample from a downstream area Twice per year Gamma isotopic analysis(e) from with existing or potential Shoreline recreational value Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-5 December 1993

TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCYI ~

AND OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS a COLLECTION FRE UENCY OF ANALYSIS I

4. Ingestion

a. Milk Samples from MILK SAMPLING LOCA- Twice per month, April- Gamma isotopic(e) and TIONS in three locations within December (samples will be I-131 analysis twice/

3.5 miles distance having the collected January-March month when animals highest calculated site average all licensed site if I-131 November is detected in and December of are on pasture (April-December); once per D/Q (based on

. reactors). If there are. none, the preceding year) month at other times (January-March if required) then 1 sample from MILK SAMPLING LOCATIONS in each of three areas 3.5-5.0 miles distant having the highest calculated site average D/Q (based on all licensed site reactors). One sample from a MILK SAMPLING LOCATION at a control location 9-20 miles distant and in a least prevalent wind direction(c)

b. Fish One sample each of two com- Twice per year Gamma isotopic analysis(e) mercially or recreationally im- on edible portions twice portant species in the vicinity per year of a plant discharge area(k)

One sample of the same species in areas not influenced by station discharge(c)

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-6 December 1993

TABLE 3.12.1<<1 (Continued)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS a COLLECTION FRE UENCY OF ANALYSIS

4. Ingestion (Continued)

c. Food One sample of each principal At time of harvest(m) Gamma isotopic(e)

Products class of food products from analysis of edible any area that is irrigated by portions (isotopic water in which liqu'id plant to include I-131) wastes have been discharged(l)

Samples of three different kinds Once per year during Gamma isotopic(e) of broad leaf vegetation (such the harvest season analysis of edible as vegetables) grown nearest to portions (isotopic each of two different offsite to include I-131) locations of highest calculated site average D/Q (based on all licensed site reactors)

One sample of each of the similar Once per year during Gamma isotopic(e) broad leaf vegetation grown at the harvest season analysis of edible least 9.3 miles distant in a portions (isotopic least prevalent wind direction to include I-131)

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-7 December 1993

0 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM TABLE NOTATIONS I (a) Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of one reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 3.12.1-1 in a table and figure(s) in the ODCM. Refer to NUREG-0133, "Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants, "October 1978, and to Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring, Revision 1, November 1979. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable because of such circumstances as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability,* or malfunction of automatic sampling equipment. If specimens are unobtainable because sampling equipment malfunctions, effort shall be made to complete corrective action before the end of the next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practical to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. Zn these instances, suitable alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions may be made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, submit in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for that pathway and justifying the selection of new location(s) for obtaining samples.

(b) One or more instruments, such as a pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to integrating dosimeters. For the purpose of this table, a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) is considered to be one phosphor; two or more phosphors in a packet are considered as two or more dosimeters. Film badges shall not be used as dosimeters for measuring direct radiation.

(c) The purpose of these samples is to obtain background information. If it is not practical to establish control locations in accordance with the distance and wind direction criteria, other sites, which provide valid background data, may be substituted.

(d) Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate samples is greater than 10 times the previous yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples.

(e) Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.

Seasonal unavailability is meant to include theft and uncooperative residents.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-8 December 1993

TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM TABLE NOTATIONS l.~

l (f) The "upstream" sample shall be taken at a distance beyond si.gnificant influence of the discharge. The "downstream" sample shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone.

(g) In this program, representative composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short (e.g., hourly) relative to the compositing period (e.g., monthly) i.n order to assure obtaining a representative sample (refer to the ODCM for definition of representative composite sample).

(h) Groundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes i.n areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for contamination (see ODCM for discussion).

(i) Drinking water samples shall be taken only when drinking water is a dose pathway (see ODCM for discussion).

(j) Analysis for I-131 may be accomplished by Ge-Li analysis provided that the lower limit of detecti.on (LLD) for I-131 in water samples found on Table 4.12.1-1 can be met. Doses shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group; using the methodology in the ODCM.

(k) In the event two commercially or recreationally important species are not available, after three attempts of collection, then two samples of one species or other species not necessari.ly commercially or recreationally important may be utilized.

(1) This CONTROL applies only to major irrigation projects within 9 miles of the site in the general "downcurrent" direction (see ODCM for discussion).

(m) If harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during each discrete harvest. If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be taken monthly. Attention shall be paid to includi.ng samples of tuberous and root food products.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-9 December 1993

TABLE 3.12.1-2 REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES AIRBORNE PARTICULATE RADIONUCLIDE WATER OR GASES FISH MILK FOOD PRODUCTS ANALYSIS (pCi/1) (pCi/m ) (pCi/kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/kg, wet)

H-3 20,000*

Mn-54 1,000 30,000 Fe-59 400 10,000 Co-58 1,000 30,000 Co-60 300 10,000 Zn-65 300 20,000 Zr-95, Nb-95 400 I-131 0.9 100 Cs-134 30 10 1, 000 60 1,000 Cs-137 50 20 2, 000 70 2,000 Ba/La-140 200 300

For drinking water samples. This is a 40 CFR 141 value. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 30,000 pCi/liter may be used.

- If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 20 pCi/liter may be used.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-10 December 1993

16 Table 4.12.1-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS a b LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION c AIRBORNE PARTICULATE RADIONUCLUDE WATER OR GASES FISH MILR FOOD PRODUCTS SEDIMENT ANALYSIS (pCi/1) (pCi/m ) (pCi/kg, wet) (PCi./1) (pCi/kg, wet) (pCi./kg, dry)

Gross Beta 0.01 H-3 2,000*

Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58, 60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-95, Nb-95 15 I-131 0.07 60 Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba/La-140 15 15

If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 3000 pCi/liter may be used.

- If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 15 pCi/liter may be used.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-11 December 1993

TABLE 4.12.1>>1 (Continued)

DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION TABLE NOTATIONS (a) This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

(b) Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements are given in ANSI N-545, Section 4.3 1975. Allowable exceptions to ANSI N-545, Section 4.3 are contained in the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ODCM.

(c) The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.

For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

4.66 sb LLD E V 2.22 Y exp(-Xht)

Where:

LLD the before-the-fact lower limit of detection (picocuries per unit mass or volume)

Sb the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (counts per minute) the counting efficiency (counts per disintegration) the sample size (units of mass or volume) 2.22 the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-')

dt the elapsed time between environmental collection, or end of the sample collection periodi and time of counting (seconds)

Typical values of Ei Vt Yt and dt should be used in the calculation.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-12 December 1993

TABLE 4.12.1-1 (Continued)

DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS - LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION TABLE NOTATIONS It should measurement be recognized that the LLD is defined as a before-the-fact limit representing the capability of a system and not as an after-the-fact limit for a particular measurement. Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions. Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidable small sample sizes, the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs unachievable. In such cases, the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-13 December 1993

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3 4.12;2 LAND USE CE SUS CONTROL 3.12.2 A land use census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 5 miles the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal and the nearest residence, and the nearest garden* of greater than 500 square feet producing broad leaf vegetation. For elevated releases as defined in RG 1.111, Revision 1, July 1977, the land use census shall also identify within a distance of 3 miles the locations in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of all milk animals and all gardens* greater than 500 square feet producing broad leaf vegetation.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose, dose commitment, or D/Q value greater than the values currently being calculated in CONTROL 4.11.2.3, pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8, identify the new location(s) in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report.

b. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose, dose commitment, or D/Q value (via the same exposure pathway) significantly greater (50%) than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with CONTROL 3.12.1-1, add the new location(s) within 30 days to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM. The sampling location(s), excluding the control station location, having the lowest calculated dose, dose commitment(s) or D/Q value, via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this monitoring program after (October 31) of the year in which this land use census was conducted. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.8 submit in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report documentation for a change in the ODCM including a revised figure(s) and table(s) for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with information supporting the change in sampling locations.

c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.12.2 The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once every 12 months using that information that will provide the best results, such as by a door-to-door survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities. The results of the land use census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

Broad leaf vegetation sampling of't least three different kinds of vegetation, such as garden vegetables, may be performed at offsite locations in each of two different locations with the highest predicted D/Qs in lieu of the garden census. CONTROLS for broad leaf vegetation sampling in Table 3.12.1-1, Part 4.c, shall be followed, including analysis of control samples.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-14 December 1993

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3 4 12 3 -'INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.3 Analyses shall be performed'n all radioactive materials, supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program that has been approved by the Commission, that correspond to samples required by Table 3.12.1-1.

Participation in this program shall include media for which environmental samples are routinely collected and for which intercomparison samples are available.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTIONS

a. With analyses not being performed as recpxired above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.12.3 The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the ODOM.

A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 3/4 12-16 December 1993

PART I RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS BASES

n INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3 4.3.7.3 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The OPERABILITY of the meteorological monitoring instrumentation ensures that sufficient"meteorological data are available for estimating potential radiation doses to the public as a result of routine or accidental release of radioactive materials to the atmosphere. This capability is required to evaluate the need for initiating protective measures to protect the health and safety of the public. This instrumentation is consistent with the recommendations of RG 1.23 "Onsite Meteorological Programs," February 1972.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 3-5 December 1993

INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3 4.3.7.9 RADIOACTIVE LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents. The alarm/Trip Setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur before exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of GDC 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50. The purpose of tank level indicating devices is to assure the detection and control of leaks that if not controlled could potentially result in the transport of radioactive materials to UNRESTRICTED AREAS.

3 4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The alarm/Trip Setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur before exceeding the limits of 10 CFR 20. The range of the noble gas channels of the main stack and radwaste/reactor building vent effluent monitors is sufficiently large to envelope both normal and accident levels of noble gas activity. The capabilities of these instruments are consistent with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.97, "Instrumentation for Light Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants to Assess Plant Conditions During and Following an Accident," December 1980 and NUREG-0737, "Clarification of the TMI Action Plan Requirements," November 1980. This instrumentation also includes provisions for monitoring and controlling the concentrations of potentially explosive gas mixtures in the offgas system. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of GDC 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 3-7 December 1993

I

't "e

l

3 4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3 4.11.1 LI UID EFFLUENTS 3 4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within: (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of 10 CFR 20.106(e) to the 'population. The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption. that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2.

This CONTROL applies to the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents from all units at the site.

The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs) .

Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in L.

A. Currie, "Lower Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements,"

NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and in the HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually).

3 4.11.1.2 DOSE This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, IZZ.A, and IV.A of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section ZI.A of Appendix I. The ACTZON statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive materialS in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept as low as is reasonably achievable. Also, for fresh water sites with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the potable drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR 141. The dose calculation methodology and parameters in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section ZZZ.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, so that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses that result from actual release rates of radioactive material in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in RG 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses To Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I,"

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 11-1 December 1993

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES LI UID EFFLUENTS DOSE 3/4.11.1.2 (Continued)

Revision 1, October 1977 and R.G. 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purpose of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977. This CONTROL applies to the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each unit at the site. For units with shared radwaste treatment systems, the liquid effluents from the shared system are to be proportioned among the units sharing that system.

3 4.11.1.3 LI UID RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the liquid radwaste treatment system ensures that this system will be available for use whenever liquid effluents require treatment before release to'he environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used when specified provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept as low as is reasonably achievable. This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36a, GDC 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50 and the design ob)ective given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design ob)ectives set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50 for liquid effluents. This CONTROL applies to the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each unit at the site. For units with shared radwaste treatment systems, the liquid effluents from the shared system are to be proportioned among the units sharing that system.

3 4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3 4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the dose rate at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR 20 to UNRESTRICTED AREAS.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 11-2 December 1993

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES ~

GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE RATE 3/4.11.2.1 (Continued)

The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table ZZ, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in an UNRESTRICTED AREA, either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table II of 10 CFR 20.106(b).

For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of that MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. Examples of calculations for such MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, with the appropriate occupancy factors, shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal to 500 mrem/year to the whole body or to less than or equal to 3000 mrem/year to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all'times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mrem/year. This CONTROL applies to the release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents from all units at the site.

The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in gaseous waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs).

Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in L. A. Currie, "Lower Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of'a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environments Measurements,"

NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and in the HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually) .

3 4.11.2.2 DOSE NOBLE GASES This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section IZ.B,,ZZZ.A, and ZV.A of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and, at the same time, implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept as low as is reasonably achievable. The Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guidelines of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data so that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The dose calculation methodology and parameters established in the ODCM for calculating the doses from the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 11-3 December 1993

h RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE NOBLE GASES 3/4.11.2.2 (Continued) in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in RG 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I,"

Revision 1, October 1977, and: RG 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1," July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for determining the air doses at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon real-time meteorological conditions or the historical average atmospheric conditions. This CONTROL applies to the release of radioactive material in gaseous effluents from each unit at the site.

3 4.11.2.3 DOSE IODINE-131 IODINE-133 TRITIUM AND RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN PARTICULATE FORM This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.C, III.A, and IV.A of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept as low as is reasonably achievable. The ODCM calculational methods specified in the Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section ZII.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, so that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The ODCM calculational methodology and parameters for calculating the doses from the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in RG 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Eifluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Revision 1, October 1977, and RG 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual doses based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. The release rate CONTROLS for iodine-131, iodine-133i tritium, and radioactive material in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days are dependent upon the existing radionuclide pathways to man, in the areas at or beyond the SZTE BOUNDARY. The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: (1) individual inhalation of airborne radioactive material, (2) deposition of radioactive material onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, (3) deposition onto grassy areas where milk-producing animals and meat-producing animals graze (human consumption of the milk and meat is assumed), and (4) deposition on the Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 11-4 December 1993

/

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE IODINE-131 IODINE-133 TRITIUM AND RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN PARTICULATE FORM 3/4.11.2.3 (Continued) ground with subsequent exposure to man. This CONTROL applies to the release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents from each unit at the site. For units with shared radwaste treatment systems, the gaseous effluents from the shared system are proportioned among the units sharing that system.

3 4.11.2.4 6 3 4.11.2.5 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM AND VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM ensures that the systems will be available for use whenever gaseous effluents require treatment before release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of these systems be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept as low as is reasonably achievable. This CONTROL implements the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36a, GDC 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50, and the design objectives given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50. Limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Sections II.B and II.C of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50, for gaseous effluents. This CONTROL applies to the release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents from each unit at the site. For units with shared radwaste treatment systems, the gaseous effluents from the shared system are proportional among the units sharing that system.

3 4.11.2.8 VENTING OR PURGING This CONTROL provides reasonable assurance that releases from drywell and/or suppression chamber purging operations will not exceed the annual dose limits of 10 CFR 20 for unrestricted areas.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 11-5 December 1993

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3 4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE This CONTROL is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR 190 that have been incorporated into 10 CFR 20 by 46 FR 18525. The CONTROL requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses from releases of radioactivity and from radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources exceed 25 mrem to the whole body or any organ, except the thyroid (which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem). For sites containing up to four reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR 190 if the individual reactors remain within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses from the units including outside storage tanks, etc., are kept small. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR 190 limits. For the purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible, with the exception that dose contributions from other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a radius of 5 miles must be considered. If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR 190, the Special Report with a request for a variance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR 190 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190.11 and 10 CFR 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR 190 until NRC staff action is completed. The variance only relates to the 'limits of 40 CFR 190, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR 20, as addressed in CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 .and 3.11.2.1.

An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which the individual is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 11-6 December 1993

3 4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES 3 4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program required by this CONTROL provides representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposure of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the plant operation. This monitoring program implementsSection IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50 and thereby supplements the Radiological Effluent Monitoring Program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways. Guidance for this monitoring program is provided by the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring, Revision 1, November 1979. The initially specified monitoring program will be effective for at least the first 3 years of commercial operation. After this period, program changes may be initiated based on operational experience.

The required detection capabilities for environmental sample analyses are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). The LLDs required by Table 4.12.1-1 are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as a before-the-fact limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an after-the-fact limit for a particular measurement.

Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits, can be found in L. A. Currie, "Lo~er Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements,"

NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and in the HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually).

3 4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS This CONTROL is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM are made required by the results of this census. The best information, such as from a if door-to-door survey, from an aerial survey, or from consulting with local agricultural authorities, shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 500 square feet provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in RG 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: (1) 20% of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage) and (2) the vegetation yield was 2 kg/m A MILK SAMPLING LOCATION, as defined in Section 1.0, requires that at least 10 milking cows are present at a designated milk sample location. It has been Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 12-1 December 1993

r RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES LAND USE CENSUS 3/4.12.2 (Continued) found from past experience, and as a result of conferring with local farmers, that a minimum of 10 milking cows is necessary to guarantee an adequate supply of milk twice a month for analytical purposes. Locations with fewer than 10 milking cows are usually utilized for breeding purposes, eliminating a stable supply of milk for samples as a result of suckling calves and periods when the adult animals are dry.

3 4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM The requirement for participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive materials in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR 50.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I B 3/4 12-2 December 1993

PART I- RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS SECTION 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 5-0 December 1993

5.0 DESIGN FEATURES Sections 9 1 'i 5 '1 2g 5 '@ 5 'i 5 ' 5.6, and 5.7 are retained in the RETS.

5.1 ' MAP DEFINING UNRESTRICTED AREAS AND SITE BOUNDARY FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LI UID EFFLUENTS. Information regarding radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, which will allow identification of structures and release points as well as definition of UNRESTRICTED AREAS within the SITE BOUNDARY that are accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, shall be as shown in Figure 5.1.3-1.

5.5 METEOROLOGICAL TOWER LOCATION The Meteorological Tower shall be located as shown on Figure 5.1.3-1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 5-1 December 1993

~ ~c)- ~(r) 7 A R ( 0 (d) 0 N K E

~ (b) ~

~Cg A~fatCK K7wca (k) ear jtJDOa (c)

(0) i re>vlf t L,aamew AA LlQHAWIC C RPORAHoCH Mal sr'v AUTXQRlTY

~cw voRX t

(s)

Hiner Road Lycee'ng Figure 5.1.3-1 Site Boundaries NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 r. 5-5

NOTES TO FIGURE 5 ~ lo3-1 (a) NMP1 Stack (height is 350')

(b) NMP2 Stack (height is 430')

(c) JAFNPP Stack (height is 385')

(d) NMP1 Radioactive Liquid Discharge (Lake Ontario, bottom)

(e) NMP2 Radioactive Liquid Discharge (Lake Ontario, bottom)

(f) JAFNPP Radioactive Liquid Discharge (Lake Ontario, bottom)

(g) Site Boundary (h) Lake Ontario Shoreline (i) Training Center Meteorological Tower (j) Information Center (k) Energy Additional Information:

NMP2 Reactor Building Vent is located 187 feet above ground level JAFNPP Reactor and Turbine Building Vents are located 173 feet above ground level JAFNPP Radwaste Building Vent is 112 feet above ground level The Energy Center and adjoining picnic area are UNRESTRICTED AREAS within the SITE BOUNDARY that are accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC Lake Road, a private road, is an UNRESTRICTED AREA within the SITE BOUNDARY accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 5-6 December 1993

PART I- RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS SECTION 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS Uni.t 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 6-0 December 1993

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS ANNUAL BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT*

6.9.1.7 Routine Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted before May 1 of each year. The initial report shall be submitted befoqe May 1 of the year after the plant achieves initial criticality.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report shall also include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison, as appropriate, with preoperational studiesf operational controls, previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment.

The reports shall also include the results of the land use census required by CONTROL 3.12.2.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include the results of analysis of all radiological environmental samples and of all environmental radiation measurements taken during the period pursuant to the locations specified in the table and figures in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL, as well as summarized and tabulated results of these analyses and measurements in the format of the table in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. In the event that some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results.

The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplemental report.

The reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program; at least two legible maps**

covering all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the centerline of one reactor; the results of licensee participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, required by CONTROL 3.12.3; discussion of all deviations from the Sampling Schedule of Table 3.12.1-1; and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 4.12.1-1 was not achievable.

A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit site. The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the site.

One map shall cover stations near the SITE BOUNDARYi a second shall include the more distant stations.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 6-19 December 1993

1'I H

\

SEMIANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT*

6.9.1.8 .Routine Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports covering the operation of the unit during the previous 6 months of operation shall be submitted within 60 days after January 1 and July 1 of each year. The period of the first report shall begin with the date the plant achieves initial criticality.

The Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall also include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.

For solid wastes, the format for Table 3 in Appendix B shall be supplemented with three additional categories; class of solid wastes (as defined by 10 CFR 61), type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Large Quantity), and SOLIDIFICATION agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde).

The Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report to be submitted within 60 days after January 1 of each year shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing on magnetic tape of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured)g or in the form of joint frequency distribution of wind speed, wind directioni and atmospheric stability.** This same report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit during the previous calendar year. This same report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC from their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figure 5.1.3-1) during the report period.

All assumptions used in making these assessments, i.e., specific activityi exposure time, and location, shall be included in these reports. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).

The Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report to be submitted within 60 days after January 1 of each year shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources, including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR 190, "Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation." Acceptable methods for calculating dose contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in the ODCM. 'he The Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include a list and description of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.

A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit site. The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the siteg however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.

In lieu of submission with the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, the licensee has the option of retaining this summary of required meteorological data on site in a file that shall be provided to the NRC upon request.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 6-20 December 1993

1(

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS SEMIANNUAL-RADIOACTIVEEFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 6.9.1.8 (Continued)

The Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include any changes made during the reporting period to the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) and to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), pursuant to Technical Specification 6.13 and CONTROL 6.14, respectively, as well as any ma)or change to liquid, gaseous, or solid radwaste treatment systems pursuant to CONTROL 6.15. It shall also include a listing of new locations for dose calculations and/or environmental monitoring identified by the land use census pursuant to CONTROL 3.12.2.

The Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall also include the following: an explanation of why the inoperability of liquid or gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation was not corrected within the time specified in CONTROLS 3.3.7.9 or 3.3.7.10 respectively, and a description of the events leading to liquid holdup tanks exceeding the limits of Technical Specification 3.11.1.4.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 6-21 December 1993

6.14 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL 6.14,1 . The.'OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall be approved by the.

Commission before implementation.

6.14.2 Licensee-initiated changes to the ODCM:

a. Shall be submitted to the Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the change(s) was made effective. This submittal shall contain:

1. Sufficiently detailed information to totally support the rationale for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information. Information submitted should consist of a package of those pages of the ODCM to be changed; each page should be numbered, dated, and marked with the revision number; appropriate analyses or evaluations )ustifying the change(s) should be included;

2. A determination that the change will not reduce the accuracy or reliability of dose calculations or setpoint determinations; and

3. Documentation of the fact that the SORC has reviewed the change and found it acceptable.

b. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the SORC.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 6-26 December 1993

)

6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO LI UID GASEOUS AND SOLID RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS*

6.15.1 . Licensee-initiated ma)or changes to the radwaste treatment systems (liquid, gaseous, and solid):

a. Shall be reported to the Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the SORC. The discussion of each change shall contain:

1. A summary of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59.

2. Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information;

3. A detailed description of the equipment, components, and processes involved and the interfaces with other plant systems;

4. An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents and/or quantity of solid waste that differ from those previously predicted in the license application and amendments thereto;

5. An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in the UNRESTRICTED AREA and to the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the license application and amendments thereto;

6. A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive materials, in liquid and gaseous effluents and in solid waste, to the actual releases for the period that precedes the time when the change is to be madel'.

An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel as a result of the change; and

8. Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the SORC.

b. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the SORC.

Licensees may choose to submit the information called for in this CONTROL as part of the annual FSAR update.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004324LL I 6-27 December 1993

PART II CALCULATIONALMETHODOLOGIES Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZZ 1 December 1993

1.0 LI UID EFFLUENTS Service Water A and B, Cooling Tower Blowdown and the Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharges comprise the Radioactive Liquid

.E'dfluents ak. Unit 2. Presently there are no. temporary outdoor tanke containing radioactive water capable of affecting the nearest known or future water supply in an unrestricted area. NUREG 0133 and Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 were followed in the development of this section.

Liquid Effluent Monitor Alarm Setpoints 1.1.1 Basis The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited to the concentrations speci. fied in 10 CFR 20, Appendix Bg Table ZI, Column 2, for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained nobles gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2E-04 uCi/ml total activity.

1.1.2 Setpoint Determination Methodology 1.1.2.1 Li.quid Radwaste Effluent Radiation Alarm Setpoint The Liquid Radioactive Waste System Tanks are pumped to the discharge tunnel which in turn flows directly to Lake Ontario. At the end of the discharge tunnel in Lake Ontario, a diffuser structure has been installed. Its purpose is to maintain surface water temperatures low enough to meet thermal pollution limits.

However, released.

it also assists in the near field dilution of any activity Service Water and the Cooling Tower Blowdown are also pumped to the discharge tunnel and will provide diluti.on. Zf the Service Water or the Cooling Tower Blowdown is found to be contaminated, then its activity will be accounted for when calculating the permissible radwaste effluent flow for a Liquid Radwaste discharge. The Liquid Radwaste System Monitor provides alarm and automatic termination of release its alarm setpoint are detected.

if radiation levels above The radiation detector is a sodium iodide crystal. It is a scintillation device. The crystal is sensitive to gamma and beta radiation. However, because of the metal walls of the sample chamber and the absorption characteristics of water, the monitor is not particularly sensitive to beta radiation. Actual detector response E<(CG,/CF,), cpm, has been evaluated by placing a sample of typical radioactive waste into the monitor and recording the gross count rate, cpm. A calibration ratio was developed by dividing the noted detector response, E,(CG</CF,) cpm, by total concentration of activity E<(CG<) i uCi/cc. The quantification of the gamma activi.ty was completed with gamma spectrometry equipment whose calibration is traceable to NZST. This calibration ratio verified the manufacturer's prototype calibration, and any subsequent transfer calibrations performed. The current calibration factor (expressed as the reciprocal conversion factor, uCi/ml/cpm), will be used for subsequent setpoint calculations in the determination of detector response:

E< ( CG</CF<) = E< (CG</CF<)

Where the factors are as defined above.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL IZ 2 December 1993

t lA For the calculation of RDF = Z MPC fraction ~ Z<(C,/MPC>) the contribution from non gamma emitting nuclides except tritium will be initially estimated based on the expected ratios to quantified nuclides as listed in the FSAR Table 11.2.5. Fe-55, Sr-89 and Sr-90

'are 2.5, OAS and 0.02 times the concentration of Co-60. These values may be replaced by ratios calculated from analysis of composite samples.

Tritium concentration is assumed to equal the latest concentration detected in the monthly tritium analysis (performed offsite) of liquid radioactive waste tanks discharged.

Nominal flow rates of the Liquid Radioactive Waste System Tanks discharged is < 165 gpm while dilution flow from the Service Water Pumps, and Cooling Tower Blowdown cumulatively is typically over 10,200 gpm. Because of the large amount of dilution the alarm setpoint could be substantially greater than that which would correspond to the concentration actually in the tank. Potentially a discharge could continue even if the distribution of nuclides in the tank were substantially different from the grab sample obtained prior to discharge which was used to establish the detector alarm point. To avoid this possibility of "Non representative Sampling" resulting in erroneous assumptions about the discharge of a tank/

the tank is recirculated for a minimum of 2.5 tank volumes prior to sampling.

This monitor's setpoint takes into account the dilution of Radwaste Effluents provided by the Service Water and Cooling Tower Blowdown flows. Detector response for the nuclides to be discharged (cpm) is multiplied by the Actual Dilution Factor (dilution flow/waste stream flow) and divided by the Required Dilution Factor (total fraction of MPC in the waste stream). A safety factor is used to ensure that the limit is never exceeded. Service Water and Cooling Tower Blowdown are normally non-radioactive. If they are found to be contaminated prior to a Liquid Radwaste discharge then an alternative equation is used to take into account the contamination.

If they become contaminated during a Radwaste discharge, then the discharge will be immediately terminated and the situation fully assessed.

Normal Radwaste Effluent Alarm Setpoint Calculation:

Alarm Setpoint < 0.8

TDF/PEF

TGC/CF

1/RDF + Background.

Where:

Alarm Setpoint The Radiation Detector Alarm Setpoint, cpm 0.8 Safety Factor, unitless TDF Nonradioactive dilution flow rate, gpm. Service Water Flow ranges from 30,000 to 58,000 gpm.

Blowdown flow is typically 10,200 gpm C; Concentration of isotope i in Radwaste tank prior to dilution, uCi/ml (gamma + non-gamma emitters)

CF> Detector response for isotope i, net uCi/ml/cpm See Table 2-1 for a list of nominal values PEF The permissible Radwaste Effluent Flow rate, gpm, 165 gpm is the maximum value used in this equation MPC< Concentration limit for isotope i from 10CFR20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, uCi/ml Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 3 December 1993

C I Background Detector response when sample chamber is filled with nonradioactive water, cpm CF Monitor Conversion Factor, uCi/ml/cpm, determined at each calibration of the effluent monitor CG) Concentration of gamma emitting nuclide in Radwaste tank prior to dilution, uCi/ml TGC = ZCGi Summation of all gamma emitting nuclides (which monitor will respond to)

Z ( CG(/CFi) The total detector response when exposed to the concentration of nuclides in the Radwaste tanki cpm RDF = Z>(C,/MPCt) ,The total fraction of the 10CFR20, Appendix Bg Table II, Column 2 limit that is in the Radwaste tank, unitless. This is also known as the Required Dilution Factor (RDF), and includes non-gamma emitters TGC/CF An approximation to Z,(CG,/CF,) using CF determined at each calibration of the effluent monitor TDF/PEF An approximation to (TDF + PEF)/PEF, the Actual Dilution Factor in effect during a discharge.

Permissible effluent flow, PEF, shall be calculated to determine that MPC will not be exceeded in the discharge canal.

PEF ~ Dilution Flow 1 Fraction Tem erin (RDF) 1.5 Fraction Tempering = A diversion of some fraction of discharge flow to the intake canal for the purpose of temperature control.

If Actual Dilution Factor is set equal to the Required Dilution Factor, then the alarm points required by the above equations correspond to a concentration of 80% of the Radwaste Tank concentration. No discharge could occur, since the monitor would be in alarm as soon as the discharge commenced. To avoid this situation, maximum allowable radwaste discharge flow is calculated using a multiple (usually 1.5 to 2) of the Required Dilution Factor, resulting in discharge canal concentration of 2/3 to 1/2 of MPC prior to alarm and termination of release. In performing the alarm calculation, the smaller of 165 gpm (the maximum possible flow) and PEF will be used.

To ensure the alarm setpoint is not exceeded, an alert alarm is provided. The alert alarm will be set in accordance with the equation above using a safety factor of 0.5 (or lower) instead of 0.8.

1.1.2.2 Contaminated Dilution Water Radwaste Effluent Monitor Alarm Setpoint Calculation:

The allowable discharge flow rate for a Radwaste tank, when one of the normal dilution streams (Service Water A, Service Water B, or Cooling Tower Blowdown) is contaminated, will be calculated by an iterative process. Using Radwaste tank concentrations with a total liquid effluent flow rate the resulting fraction of MPC in the discharge canal will be calculated.

FMPC = Z,(F,/Z,(F,) Zi(C+ MPH) ]

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 4 December 1993

1 n V

'\

1 4

Then the permissible radwaste effluent flow rate is given bye PEF = Total Radwaste Effluent Flow FMPC corresponding Alarm Setpoint will then be calculated using the I'he following equation, with PEF limited as above.

TGC/CF Alarm Setpoint < 0.8 + Background FMPC Where:

Alarm Setpoint The Radiation Detector Alarm Setpoint, cpm 0.8 Safety Factor, Unitless F, An Effluent flow rate 'for stream 's, gpm C) Concentration of isotope i tank prior to dilution, uCi/ml in Radwaste Cg Concentration of isotope i in Effluent stream s including the Radwaste Effluent tank undiluted, uCi/ml CF Average detector response for all isotopes in the waste stream, net uCi/ml/cpm MPC) Concentration limit for isotope i Appendix B, Table ZI, Column 2, uCi/ml.

from 10CFR20 PEF The permissible Radwaste Effluent Flow rate, gpm Background Detector response when sample chamber is filled with nonradioactive water, cpm TGC/CF The total detector response when exposed to the Z) (CG(/CF) concentration of nuclides in the Radwaste tank, cpm Es[FsC~) The total activity of nuclide streams, uci-gpm/ml i in all Effluent L',[F,] The total Liquid Effluent Flow rate, gpm (Service Water 6 CT Blowdown & Radwaste) 1.1.2.3 Service Water and Cooling Tower Blowdown Effluent Alarm Setpoint These monitor setpoints do not take any credit for dilution of each respective effluent stream. Detector response for the distribution of nuclides potentially discharged is divided by the total MPC fraction of the radionuclides potentially in the respective stream.

A safety factor is used to ensure that the limit is never exceeded.

Service Water and Cooling Tower Blowdown are normally non-radioactive. Zf they are found to be contaminated by statistically significant increase in detector response then grab samples will be obtained and analysis meeting the LLD requirements of Table 4.11.1-1 completed so that an estimate of offsite dose can be made and the situation fully assessed.

Service Water A and B and the Cooling Tower Blowdown are pumped to the discharge tunnel which in turn flows directly to Lake Ontario.

Normal flow rates for each Service Water Pump is 10,000 gpm while that for the Cooling Tower Blowdown may be as much as 10,200 gpm.

Credit is not taken for any dilution of these individual effluent streams.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZI 5 December 1993

b I

The radiation detector is a sodium iodide crystal. It is a scintillation device. The crystal is sensitive to gamma and beta radiation. However, because of the metal walls in its sample chamber and the absorption characteristics of water, the monitor is

~

not particularly sensitive to beta radiation,.

Detector response Z,(C,/CF,) has been evaluated by placing a diluted sample of Reactor Coolant (after a two hour decay) in a representative monitor and noting its gross count rate. Reactor Coolant was chosen because it represents the most likely contaminant of Station Waters.

A two hour decay was chosen by )udgement of the staff of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation. Reactor Coolant with no decay contains a considerable amount of very energetic nuclides which would bias the detector response term high. However assuming a longer than 2 hour2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months decay is not realistic as the most likely release mechanism is a leak through the Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchangers which would contain Reactor Coolant during shutdowns.

Service Water and Cooling Tower Blowdown Alarm Setpoint Equation:

Alarm Setpoint ( 0.8 1/CF Z> C,/[Z,(C,/MPC,) ] + Background.

Where:

Alarm Setpoint The Radiation Detector Alarm Setpoint, cpm 0.8 Safety Factor, unitless C, Concentration of isotope i contaminated stream, uCi/ml in potential CFI Detector response for isotope i, net uCi/ml/cpm

.See Table 2-1 for a list of nominal values MPC< Concentration limit for isotope i from 10CFR20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, uCi/ml Background Detector response when sample chamber is filled with nonradioactive water, cpm Z( ( C(/CFi) The total detector response when exposed to the concentration of nuclides in the potential contaminant, cpm Z( ( Ci/MPCi) The total fraction of the 10CFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 limit that is in the potential contaminated stream, unitless.

(1/CF)ZLCI An approximation to Z<(C,/CF,), determined at each calibration of the effluent, monitor CF Monitor Conversion Factor, uCi/ml/cpm 1.2 Liquid Effluent Concentration Calculation This calculation documents compliance with CONTROLS Section 3.11.1.1:

The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2E-04 microcurie/ml total activity.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 6 December 1993

I I

f

The concentration of radioactivity from Liquid Radwaste, Service Water A and B and the Cooling Tower Blowdown are included in the calculation. The calculation is performed for a specific period of time. No credit is taken for averaging. The limiting concentration fs calculated as follows:

FMPC Z,[F,/Z,(F,) Z)(C.+MPCi) )

Where: FMPC The fraction of MPC, the ratio at the point of discharge of the actual concentration to the limiting concentration of 10 CFR 20, Appendix Bi Table II, Column 2, for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases, unitless CL The concentration .of nuclide particular effluent stream s, uCi/ml i in a F, The flow rate of a particular effluent stream s, gpm The limiting concentration of a MPC>

specific nuclide Appendix b, i from 10CFR20, Table II, Column 2 (for noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2E-4 microcurie/ml),

uCi/ml Z,(C/MPC,) The MPC fraction of stream s prior to dilution by other streams Z,(Fs) The total flow rate of all effluent streams s gpm A value of less than one for MPC fraction is required for compliance.

1.3 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation Methodology The dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released, from each unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited:

a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the whole body and to less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and

b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the whole body and to less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.

Doses due to Liquid Effluents are calculated monthly for the fish and drinking water ingestion pathways and the external sediment exposure pathways from all detected nuclides in liquid effluents released to the unrestricted areas using the following expression from NUREG 0133, Section 4.3.

D, ~ Z)[Aii Zt.(hT~C~Ft ) )

Where:

Di The cumulative dose commitment to the total body or any organ, t from the liquid period Z(hT), mrem effluents for the total time The length of the L th time period over which C and F are averaged for all liquid releases, hours Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 7 December 1993

~ L 1I

The average concentration of radionuclide, i, in undiluted liquid effluents during time period hT from any liquid release, uCi/ml The site related ingestion dose commitment factor for the maximum individual to the total body or any organ t for each identified principal gamma or beta emitter, mrem/hr per uCi/ml. Table 2-2.

Fg The near field average dilution factor for C during any liquid effluent release. Defined as the ratio of the maximum undiluted liquid waste flow during release to the product of the average flow from the site discharge structure to unrestricted receiving waters times 5.9.

(5.9 is the site specific applicable factor for the mixing effect of the discharge structure.) See the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Environmental Report Operating License Stage, Table 5.4-2 footnote 1.

1.4 Liquid Effluent Sampling Representativeness There are four tanks in the radwaste system designed to be discharged to the discharge canal. These tanks are labeled 4A, 4B, SA, and'B.

Liquid Radwaste Tank 5A and 5B at Nine Mile Point Unit 2 contain a sparger spray ring which assists the mixing of the tank contents while it is being recirculated prior to sampling. This sparger effectively mixes the tank four times faster than simple recirculation.

Liquid Radwaste Tank 4A and 4B contain a mixing ring but no sparger.

No credit is taken for the mixing effects of the ring. Normal recirculation flow is 150 gpm for tank 5A and 5B, 110 gpm for tank 4A and 4B while each tank contains up to 25,000 gallons although the entire contents are not discharged. To assure that the tanks are adequately mixed prior to sampling, it is a plant requirement that the tank be recirculated for the time required to pass 2.5 times the volume of the tank:

Recirculation Time ~ 2.5T/RM Where:

Recirculation Time Is the minimum time to recirculate the Tank, min 2.5 Is the plant requirement, unitless Is the tank volume, gal Is the recirculation flow rate, gpm.

Is the factor that takes into account the mixing of the sparger, unitlessg four for tank SA and B, one for tank 4A and B.

Additionally, the Alert Alarm setpoint of the Liquid Radwaste Effluent monitor is set at approximately 60% of the High alarm setpoint. This alarm will give indication of incomplete mixing with adequate margin to exceeding MPC.

Service Water A and B and the Cooling Tower Blowdown are sampled from the radiation monitor on each respective stream. These monitors continuously withdraw a sample and pump it back to the effluent stream. The length of tubing between the continuously flowing sample and the sample spigot contains less than 200 ml which is adequately purged by requiring a purge of at least 1 liter when grabbing a sample.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 8 December 1993

1.5 Liquid Radwaste System Operability The Liquid Radwaste Treatment System shall be OPERABLE and used when pro)ected doses due to liquid radwaste effluents would exceed 0.06

~

mrem to the-whole body or 0.2 mrem to any organ in a 31-day period Cumulative doses will be determined at least once per 31 days (as indicated in Section 1.3) and doses wi,ll also be pro)ected if the radwaste treatment systems are not being fully utilized.

The system collection tanks are processed as follows:

1) Low Conductivity (Waste Collector): Radwaste Filter and Radwaste Demineralizer

2) High Conductivity (Floor Drains): Floor Drain Filter or Waste Evaporator or Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS)

3) Regenerant Waste: Zf resin regeneration is used at NMP-2; the waste will be processed through the floor drain filter or waste evaporator.

NOTES Regenerant Evaporator and Waste Evaporator may be used interchangeably.

The dose pro)ection indicated above will be performed in accordance with the methodology of Section 1.3.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL lZ 9 December 1993

2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS The gaseous effluent release points are the stack and the combined Radwaste/Reactor Building vent. The stack effluent point includes

.Turbine BuQ.ding ventilation, main condenser offgas (after charcoal-bed holdup), and Standby Gas Treatment System exhaust. NUREG 0133 and Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 were followed in the development of this section.

2.1 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Alarm Setpoints 2 '.1 Basis The dose rate from radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited to the following:

a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the whole body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and

b. For iodine-131, for iodine-133, for tritium, and for all radionuclides with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.

The radioactivity rate of noble gases measured downstream of the recombiner shall be limited to less than or equal to 350,000 microcuries/second during offgas system operation.

2.1.2 Setpoint Determination Methodology Discussion Nine Mile Point Unit 1 and the James A FitzPatrick nuclear plants occupy the same site as Nine Mile Point Unit 2. Because of the independence of these plants safety systemsi control rooms and operating staffs it is assumed that simultaneous accidents are not likely to occur at the different units. However, there are two release points at Unit 2. It is assumed that if an accident were to occur at Unit 2 that both release points could be involved.

The alarm setpoint for Gaseous Effluent Noble Gas Monitors are based on a dose rate limit of 500 mRem/yr to the Whole Body. Since there are two release points at Unit 2, the dose rate limit of 500 mRem/yr is divided equally for each release point, but may be apportioned otherwise, gases.

if required. These monitors are sensitive to only noble Because of this it is considered impractical to base their alarm setpoints on organ dose rates due to iodines or particulates.

Additionally skin dose rate is never significantly greater than the whole body dose rate. Thus the factor R which is the basis for the alarm setpoint calculation is nominally taken as equal to 250 mRem/yr. If there are significant releases from any gaseous release point on the site (>25 mRem/yr) for an extended period of time then the setpoint will be recalculated with an appropriately smaller value for R. 4 The high alarm setpoint for the Offgas Noble Gas monitor is based on a limit of 350,000 uCi/sec. This is the release rate for which a FSAR accident analysis was completed. At this rate the Offgas System charcoal beds will not contain enough activity so that their failure and subsequent release of activity will present a significant offsite dose assuming accident meteorology.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 10 December 1993

8 ~

Initially, in accordance with CONTROL 4.3.7.10, the Germanium multichannel analysis systems of the stack and vent will be calibrated with gas standards (traceable to NIST) in accordance with Table 4.3.7.10-1, note (a). Subsequent calibrations may be

-performed with gas standards, or with related solid sources. The quarterly Channel Functional Test will include operability of the 30cc chamber and the dilution stages to confirm monitor high range capability. (Appendix D, Gaseous Effluent Monitoring System).

The alert is set at a small multiple of current operating level.

2.1.2.1 Stack Noble Gas Detector Alarm Setpoint Equations The stack at Nine Mile Point Unit 2 receives the Offgas after charcoal bed delay, Turbine Building Ventilation and the Standby Gas Treatment system exhaust. The Standby Gas Treatment System Exhausts the primary containment during normal shutdowns and maintains a negative pressure on the Reactor Building to maintain secondary containment integrity. The Standby Gas Treatment will isolate on high radiation detected (by the SGTS monitor) during primary containment purges.

The stack noble gas detector is made of germanium. It is sensitive to only gamma radiation.

multichannel analysis system However, because it it is a computer based is able to accurately quantify the activity released in terms of uCi of specific nuclides. Only pure alpha and beta emitters are not detectable, of which there are no common noble gases. A distribution of Noble Gases corresponding to offgas is chosen for the nominal alarm setpoint calculation. Offgas is chosen because it represents the most significant contaminant of gaseous activity in the plant. The release rate g,g corresponds to offgas concentration expected with the plant design limit for fuel failure. The alarm setpoint may be recalculated release is encountered.

if a significant In that case the actual distribution of noble gases will be used in the calculation.

The following calculation will be used for the initial Alarm Setpoint.

O.SR Z Alarm Setpoint, uCi/sec El(()IVI) 0.8 Safety Factor, unitless Allocation Factor. Normally, 250 mrem/yr; the value must be 500 mrem/yr or less depending upon the dose rate from other release points within the site such that the total dose rate corresponds to < 500 mrem/yr The release rate of nuclide i, uCi/sec Vi The constant for each identified noble gas nuclide accounting for the whole body dose from the elevated finite plume listed on Table 3-2, mrem/yr per uCi/sec E) (Qi) The total release rate of noble gas nuclides in the stack effluent, uCi/sec El (()lVI) The total of the product of each isotope release rate times its respective whole body plume constant, mrem/yr, uci/sec Unit 2 Revision II ll 9

004337LL December 1993

'l l

The alert alarm is normally set at less than 10% of the high alarm.

2.1.2.2 Vent Noble Gas Detector Alarm Setpoint Equation:

The vent contains the Reactor Building ventilation above and below-the refuel floor and the Radwaste Building ventilation effluents.

The Reactor Building Ventilation will isolate when radiation monitors detect high levels of radiation (these are separate monitors, not otherwise discussed in the ODOM). Nominal flow rate for the vent is 2.37ES CFM.

This detector is made of germanium. It is sensitive to only gamma radiation. However, because analysis system it it 'is a computer based multichannel is able to accurately quantify the activity released in terms of uCi of specific nuclides. Only pure alpha and beta emitters are not detectable, of which there are no common noble gases. A distribution of Noble Gases corresponding to that expected with the design limit for fuel failure offgas is chosen for the nominal alarm setpoint calculation. Offgas is chosen because represents the most significant contaminant of gaseous activity in it the plant. The alarm setpoint may be recalculated release is encountered.

if In that case the actual distribution of a significant noble gases will be used in the calculation.

0.8R Z Alarm Setpoint, uCi/sec (X/Q). Ei(QA)

Where:

0.8 Safety Factor, unitless Allocation Factor. Normally, 250 mrem/yr; the value must be 500 mrem/yr or less depending upon the dose rate from other release points within the site such that the total rate corresponds to

< 500 mrem/yr Q; The release rate of nuclide i, uCi/sec (X/Q). The highest annual average atmospheric dispersion coefficient at the site boundary as listed in the Final Environmental Statement, NUREG 1085, Table D-2, 2.0E-6 sec/m'he constant for each identified noble gas nuclide accounting for the whole body dose from the semi-infinite cloud, listed on Table 3-3, mrem/yr per uci/m~

E (Q) The total release rate of noble gas nuclides in the vent effluent, uCi/sec Z( (Q;Q) The total of the product of the each isotope release rate times its respective whole body immersion constant, mrem/yr per sec/m~

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 12 December 1993

P' 4

The alert alarm is normally set at less than 10% of the high alarm.

2.1.2.3 Offgas Pretreatment Noble Gas Detector Alarm Setpoint Equation:

~

The Offgas~ystem has a radiation detector downstream of the recombiners and before the charcoal decay beds. The offgasg after decay, is exhausted to the main stack. The system will automatically isolate if its pretreatment radiation monitor detects levels of radiation above the high alarm setpoint.

The Radiation Detector is a sodium iodide crystal. It is a scintillation device and has a thin mylar window so that it is sensitive to both gamma and beta radiation. Detector response Z,(C,/CF,) has been evaluated from isotopic analysis of offgas analyzed on a multichannel analyzer, traceable to NIST. A distribution of offgas corresponding to that expected with the design limit for fuel failure is used to establish the initial setpoint. However, the alarm setpoint may be recalculated using an updated nuclide distribution based on actual plant process conditions. The monitor nominal response values will be confirmed during periodic calibration using a Transfer Standard source traceable to the primary calibration performed by the vendor.

Particulates and Iodines are not included in this calculation because this is a noble gas monitor.

To provide an alarm in the event of failure of the offgas system flow instrumentation, the low flow alarm setpoint will be set at or above 10 scfm, (well below normal system flow) and the high flow alarm setpoint will be set at or below 110 scfm, which is well above expected steady-state flow rates with a tight condenser.

To provide an alarm for changing conditions, the alert alarm will normally be set at 10,000 uCi/sec above current operating level (15%

of level if greater than 75,000 uCi/sec). This alert allows conformance with Technical Specifications 3.4.5 Specific Activity Actions.

3.50E+05 2.12 E-03 Z C CF Alarm Setpoint, cpm ( 0.8 F Ei(Ci) + Background Where:

Alarm Setpoint The alarm setpoint for the offgas pretreatment Noble Gas Detector, cpm 0.8 Safety Factor, unitless 350,000 The Technical Specification Limit for Offgas Pretreatment, uCi/sec 2.12E-03 Unit conversion Factor, 60 sec/min / 28317 cc/CF C) The concentration of nuclidei ip in the Offgas, uci/cc CF( The Detector response to nuclide i, uCi/cc/cpm; See Table 3-1 for a list of nominal values Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 13 December 1993

C The Offgas System Flow rate, CFM Background The detector response when its chamber is filled with nonradioactive air, cpm

'El(Ci/CFL) The summation of the nuclide concentration divided by the corresponding detector response, net cpm Ei(Ci) The summation of the concentration of nuclides in offgas, uCi/cc 2.2 Gaseous Effluents Dose Rate Calculation Dose rates will be calculated monthly at a minimum to demonstrate that the release of noble gases, tritium, iodines, and particulates with half lives greater than 8 days are within the dose rate limits specified in 10CFR20. These limits are as follows:

The dose rate from radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited per 10CFR20 to the following:

a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the whole body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and

b. For iodine-131, iodine-133, for tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ:

2 ' ' X/Q and W Dispersion Parameters for Dose Rate, Table 3-23 The dispersion parameters for the whole body and skin dose rate calculation correspond to the highest annual average dispersion parameters at or beyond the unrestricted area boundary. This is at the east site boundary. These values were obtained from the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Final Environmental Statement, NUREG 1085 Table D-2 for the vent and stack. These were calculated using the methodology of Regulatory Guide 1.111, Rev. 1. The stack was modeled as an elevated release point because its height is more than 2.5 times any ad)acent building height. The vent was modeled as a ground level release because even though adjacent building it it is higher than any is not more than 2.5 times the height.

The NRC Final Environmental Statement values for the site boundary X/Q and D/Q terms were selected for use in calculating Effluent Monitor Alarm Points and compliance with Site Boundary Dose Rate specifications because they are conservative when compared with the corresponding NMPC Environmental Report values. In addition, the stack "intermittent release" X/Q was selected in lieu of the "continuous" value, since it is slightly larger, and also would allow not making a distinction between long term and short term releases.

The dispersion parameters for the organ dose calculations were obtained from the Environmental Report, Figures 7B-4 (stack) and 7B-8 (vent) by locating values corresponding to currently existing (1985) pathways. It should be noted that, the most conservative pathways do not all exist at the same location. It is conservative to assume that a single individual would actually be at each of the receptor locations.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 14 December 1993

2.2.2 Whole Body Dose Rate Due to Noble Gases The ground level gamma radiation dose from a noble gas stack release (elevated), referred to as plume shine, is calculated using the dose factors from Appendix B of this document. The ground level gamma radiation dose from a noble gas vent release accounts for the exposure from immersion in the semi-infinite cloud. The dispersion of the cloud from the point of release to the receptor at the east site boundary is factored into the plume shine dose factors for stack releases and through the use of X/Q in the equation for the immersion ground level dose rates for vent releases. The release rate is averaged over the period of concern. The factors are discussed in Appendix B.

Whole body dose rate (DR)Y due to noble gases:

(DR)Y = 3 '7E-08 Z) [V(Q + Q (X/Q)Q~]

Where:

DRY Whole body dose rate (mrem/sec)

V) The constant accounting for the gamma whole body dose rate from the finite plume from the elevated stack releases for each identified noble gas nuclide, i. Listed on Table 3 2i mrem/yr per uCi/sec The constant accounting for the gamma whole body dose rate from immersion in the semi-infinite cloud for each identified noble gas nuclide, i. Listed in Table 3-3, mrem/yr per uCi'/m~ (From Reg. Guide 1.109)

X/Q The relative plume concentration at or beyond the X/Q land sector site boundary. Average meteorological data is used. Elevated X/Q values are used for the stack releases (s=stack); ground X/Q values are used for the vent releases (v=vent). Listed on Table 3-23 Q iQ. The release rate of each noble gas nuclide i, from the stack (s) or vent (v). Averaged over the time period of concern. (uCi/sec) 3.17E-08 ~ Conversion Factor; the inverse of the number of seconds in one year. (yr/sec) 2.2.3 Skin Dose Rate Due to Noble Gases There are two types of radiation from noble gas releases that contribute to the skin dose rate: beta and gamma.

For stack releases this calculation takes into account the dose from beta radiation in a semi infinite cloud by using an immersion dose factor. Additionally, the dispersion of the released activity from the stack to the receptor is taken into account by use of the factor (X/Q). The gamma radiation dose from the elevated stack release is taken into account by the dose factors in Appendix B.

For vent releases the calculations also take into account the dose from the beta (I)) and gamma (Y) radiation of the semi infinite cloud by using an immersion dose factor. Dispersion is taken into account by use of the factor (X/Q).

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZZ 15 December 1993

d t k

The release rate is averaged over the period of concern.

Skin dose rate (DR),+> due to noble gases:

(DR),+p 3. 17E-8 Z,[ (L,(X/Q),+1. 11(B,) Q+ (L,+1. lip) (X/g) Q]

Where:

(DR)~+p ~ Skin dose rate (mrem/sec)

L, The constant to account for the gamma and beta skin dose rates for each noble gas nuclide, i, from immersion in the semi-infinite cloud, mrem/yr per uCi/m~, listed on Table 3-3 (from R.G. 1.109)

The constant to account for the air gamma dose rate for each noble gas nuclide, i, from immersion in the semi-infinite cloud, mrad/yr per uCi/m, listed on Table 3-3 (from R.G. 1.109)

Unit conversion constant, mrem/mrad

~ 7 Structural shielding factor, unitless B( The constant accounting for the air gamma dose rate from exposure to the overhead plume of elevated releases of each identified noble gas nuclide, i.

Listed on Table 3-2, mrad/yr per uCi/sec.

(x/g), The relative plume concentration at or beyond the land (x/g) sector site boundary. Average meteorological data is used. Elevated X/Q values are used for the stack releases (s=stack); ground X/Q values are used for the vent, releases (v=vent).

3.17E-8 = Conversion Factor; the inverse of the number of seconds in a year; (yr/sec)

The release rate of each noble gas nuclide i, from the stack(s) or vent (v) averaged over the time period of concern, uci/sec.

2.2.4 Organ Dose Rate Due to I-131, I-133, Tritium, and Particulates with Half-lives greater than 8 days.

The organ dose rate is calculated using the dose factors (g) from Appendix C. The factor Q takes into account the dose rate received from the ground plane, inhalation and ingestion pathways. W, and W take into account the atmospheric dispersion from the release point to the location of the most conservative receptor for each of the respective pathways. The release rate is averaged over the period of concern.

Organ dose rates (DR) due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days (DR)a '7E Zj[ZiR"ai [Wage + Wvgiv] ]

Where:

(DR) = Organ dose rate (mrem/sec)

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 16 December 1993

The factor that takes into account the dose from nuclide i through pathway $ to an age group a, and individual organ t. Units for inhalation pathway, mrem/yr per uCi/m~. Units for ground and ingestion pathways, m'-mrem/yr per uCi/sec. See Tables 3-4 through 3-22).

W i Wv Dispersion parameter either X/Q (sec/m ) or D/Q (1/m )

depending on pathway and receptor location. Average meteorological data is used (Table 3-23). Elevated W, values are used for stack releases (s=stack)g ground W values are used for vent releases (v=vent).

The release rates for nuclide i, from the stack (s) and vent (v) respectively, uCi/sec.

When the release rate exceeds 0.75 uCi/sec from the stack or vent, the dose rate assessment shall, also, include JAF and NMPl dose contributions. The use of the 0.75 uCi/sec release rate threshold is conservative because it is based on the dose conversion factor (Q) for the Sr-90 child bone which is significantly higher than the dose factors for the other isotopes present in the stack or vent release.

2.3 Gaseous Effluent Dose Calculation Methodology Doses will be calculated monthly at a minimum to demonstrate that doses resulting from the release of noble gases, tritium, iodines, and particulates with half lives greater than 8 days are within the limits specified in 10CFR.50. These limits are as follows:

The air dose from noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each unit, to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited to the following.

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation, and

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation.

The dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radioactive material in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each unit, to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.3-1) shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and,

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.

The VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be OPERABLE and appropriate portions of this system, shall be used to reduce releases of radioactivity when the pro)ected doses in 31 days from iodine and particulate releases, from each unit, to areas at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.3-1) would exceed 0.3 mrem to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 17 December 1993

I 2.3.1 W and W, Dispersion Parameters for Dose, Table 3-23 The dispersion parameters for dose calculations were obtained chiefly from the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Environmental Report Appendix 7B.

These were calculated using the methodology of Regulatory Guide 1.111 and NUREG 0324. The stack was modeled as an elevated release point because height is more than 2.5 times the height of any ad)acent building. The vent was modeled as a combined elevated/ground level release because the vent's height is not more than 2.5 times the height of any ad)acent building. Average meteorology over the appropriate time period was used. Dispersion parameters not available from the ER were obtained from C.T. Main Data report dated November, 1985, or the FES.

2 ' ' Gamma Air Dose Due to Noble Gases Gamma air dose from the stack or vent noble gas releases is calculated monthly. The gamma air dose equation is similar to the gamma dose rate equation except the receptor is air instead of the whole body or skin of whole body. Therefore, the stack noble gas releases use the finite plume air dose factors, and the vent noble gas releases use semi-infinite cloud immersion dose factors. The factor X/Q takes into account the dispersion of vent releases to the most conservative location. The release activity is totaled over the period of concern. The finite plume factor is discussed in Appendix B.

Gamma air dose due to noble gases:

D 3 ~ 17E 8 E)[M((X/Q)v Qw + B) Q>>]

D The gamma air dose for the period of concern, mrad t The duration of the dose period of concern, sec Where all other parameters have been previously defined.

2.3.3 Beta Air Dose Due to Noble Gases The beta air dose from the stack or vent noble gas releases is calculated using the semi-infinite cloud immersion dose factor in beta radiation. The factor X/Q takes into account the dispersion of releases to the most conservative location.

Beta air dose due to noble gases:.

Dp3 ~ 17E8Z[NJ[(X/Q)yQ~+(X/Q) Q>>]x ~

Dp Beta air dose (mrad) for the period of concern N, ~ The constant accounting for the beta air dose from immersion in the semi-infinite cloud for each identified noble gas nuclide, i. Listed on Table 3-3, mrad/yr per uCi/m~. (From Reg. Guide 1.109).

t = The duration of the dose period of concern, sec Where all other parameters have .been previously defined.

2.3.4 Organ Dose Due to I-131, I-133, Tritium and Particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 18 December 1993

The organ dose is based on the same equation as the dose rate equation except the dose is compared to the 10CFR50 dose limits. The factor g takes into account the dose received from the ground plane, inhalation, food (cow milk, cow meat and vegetation) pathways. W, and W take into acceunt the atmospheric dispersion from the release point to the location of the most conservative receptor for each of the respective pathways. The release is totaled over the period of concern. The Q factors are discussed in Appendix C.

Organ dose D due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days.

DN 3 17E 8 Zj [ ZtRgai [WsQ~+WvQ]) x t Where:

D = Dose to the critical organ t, for age group a, mrem t ~ The duration of the dose period of concern, sec Where all other parameters have been previously defined in Section 2.2.4.

2.4 I-133 and I-135 Estimation Stack and vent effluent iodine cartridges are analyzed to a sensitivity of at least 1E-12 uCi/cc. If detected in excess of the LLDg the I-131 and I-133 analysis results will be reported directly from each cartridge analyzed. Periodically, (usually quarterly but on a monthly frequency if effluent iodines are routinely detected) a short-duration (12 to 24 hour2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months ) effluent sample is collected and analyzed to establish an I-135/I-131 ratio and an I-133/I-131 ratio, if each activity exceeds LLD.

confirm the routinely measured The short-duration ratio is used to I-133 values. The short-duration I-135/I-131 ratio (if determined) is used with the I-131 release to estimate the I-135 release. The short-duration I-133/I-131 ratio may be used with the I-131 release to estimate the I-133 release directly measured I-133 release appears non-conservative.

if the 2.5 Isokinetic Sampling Sampling systems for the stack and vent effluent releases are designed to maintain isokinetic sample flow at normal ventilation flow rates. During periods of reduced ventilation flow, sample flow may be maintained at a minimum flow rate (above the calculated isokinetic rate) in order to sample line losses due to particulate deposition at low velocity.

2.6 Use of Concurrent Meteorological Data vs. Historical Data It is the intent of NMPC to use dispersion parameters based on historical meteorological data to set alarm points and to determine or predict dose and dose rates in the environment due to gaseous effluents. If effluent levels approach limiting values, meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release may be used to determine gaseous pathway doses.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 19 December 1993

I 2.7 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System Operation CONTROL 3.11.2.4 requires the Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System to be in operation whenever the main condenser air ejector system is in operation. The~ystem may be operated for short.periods with the charcoal beds bypassed to facilitate transients. The components of the system which normally should operate to treat offgas are the Preheater, Recombiner, Condenser, Dryer, Charcoal Adsorbers, HEPA Filter, and Vacuum Pump. (See Appendix D, Offgas System).

2 ' Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System Operation CONTROL 3.11.2.5 requires the Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System to be OPERABLE when projected doses in 31 days due to iodine and particulate releases would exceed 0.3 mrem to any organ of a member of the public. The appropriate components, which affect iodine or particulate release, to be OPERABLE are:

1) HEPA Filter Radwaste Decon Area

2) HEPA Filter Radwaste Equipment Area

3) HEPA Filter Radwaste General Area Whenever one of these filters is not OPERABLE, iodine and particulate dose projections will be made for 31-day intervals starting with filter inoperability, and continuing as long as the filter remains inoperable, in accordance with Surveillance 4.11.2.5.1. Predicted release rates will be used, along with the methodology of Section 2.3.4. (See Appendix D, Gaseous Radiation Monitoring.)

3.0 URANIUM FUEL CYCLE The "Uranium Fuel Cycle" is defined in 40 CFR Part 190.02 (b) as follows:

"Uranium fuel cycle means the operations of milling of uranium ore chemical conversion of uranium, isotopic enrichment of uranium, fabrication of uranium fuel, generation of electricity by a light-water-cooled nuclear power plant using uranium fuel, and reprocessing of spent uranium fuel, to the extent that these directly support the production of electrical power for public use utiliring nuclear energy, but excludes mining operations, operations at waste disposal sites, transportation of any radioactive material in support of these operations, and the reuse of recovered non-uranium special nuclear and by-product materials from the cycle."

Section 3/4.11.4 of the CONTROLS requires that when the calculated doses associated with the effluent releases exceed twice the applicable quarter or annual limits, the licensee shall evaluate the calendar year doses and, NRC and limit subsequent if required, submit a Special Report to the releases such that the dose commitment to a real individual from all uranium fuel cycle sources is limited to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ (except the thyroid, which is limited to 75 mrem). This report is to demonstrate that radiation exposures to all real individuals from all uranium fuel cycle sources (including all liquid and gaseous effluent pathways and direct radiation) are less than the limits in 40 CFR Part 190. If releases that result in doses exceeding the 40 CFR 190 limits have occurred, then a variance from the NRC to permit such releases will be requested and releases.

if possible, action will be taken to reduce subsequent Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 20 December 1993

/

The report to the NRC shall contain:

1) Identification of all uranium fuel cycle facilities or operations within 5 miles of the nuclear power reactor units at

.the site, that contribute to the annual dose. of the maximum exposed member of the public.

2) Identification of the maximum exposed member of the public and a determination of the total annual dose to this person from all existing pathways and sources of radioactive effluents and direct radiation.

The total body and organ doses resulting from radioactive material in liquid effluents from Nine Mile Point Unit 2 will be summed with the doses resulting from the releases of noble gases, radioiodines, and particulates. The direct dose components will also be determined by either calculation or actual measurement. Actual measurements will utilize environmental TLD dosimetry. Calculated measurements will utilize engineering calculations to determine a pro)ected direct dose component. In the event calculations are used, the methodology will be detailed as required in Section 6.9.1.8 of the CONTROLS. The doses from Nine Mile Point Unit 2 will be added to the doses to the maximum exposed individual that are contributed from other uranium fuel cycle operations within 5 miles of the site.

For the purpose of calculating doses, the results of the Environmental Monitoring Program may be included to provide more refined estimates of doses to a real maximum exposed individual.

Estimated doses, as calculated from station effluents, may be replaced by doses calculated from actual environmental sample results.

3.1 Evaluation of Doses From Liquid Effluents For the evaluation of doses to real members of the public from liquid effluents, the fish consumption and shoreline sediment ground dose will be considered. Since the doses from other aquatic pathways are insignificant, fish consumption and shoreline sediment are the only two pathways that will be considered. The dose associated with fish consumption may be calculated using effluent data and Regulatory Guide 1.109 methodology or by calculating a dose to man based on actual fish sample analysis data. Because of the nature of the receptor location and the extensive fishing in the area, the critical individual may be a teenager oz an adult. The dose associated with shoreline sediment is based on the assumption that the shoreline would be utilized as a recreational area. This dose may be derived from liquid effluent data and Regulatory Guide 1.109 methodology or from actual shoreline sediment sample analysis data.

Equations used to evaluate fish and shoreline sediment samples are based on Regulatory Guide 1.109 methodology. Because of the sample medium type and the half-lives of the radionuclides historically observed, the decay corrected portions of the equations are deleted.

This does not reduce the conservatism of the calculated doses but increases the simplicity from an evaluation point of view. Table 3-24 presents the parameters used for calculating doses from liquid effluents.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 21 December 1993

The dose'rom fish sample media is calculated as:

Zi [C~ (U) (D~) f] (1E+3)

Where:

The total annual dose to organ ), of an individual of age group a, from nuclide if i, via fish pathway p, in calculating to the adult whole mrem per year; ex.

body, then ~ ~ and D~ D~

The concentration of radionuclide pci/gram i in fish samples in The consumption rate of fish 1E+3 Grams per kilogram The ingestion dose factor for age group a, nuclide i, fish pathway p, and organ ), (Reg. Guide 1.109, Table E-11) (mrem/pCi). ex. when calculating to the adult whole body D< ~ D~

The fractional portion of the year over which the dose is applicable The dose from shoreline sediment sample media is calculated as!

R,~ = E( [C(U) (4E+4) (0.3) (D~) f ]

Where:

The total annual dose to organ ), of an individual of age group a, from nuclide p, in mrem per year; ex. ifi, via the sediment pathway calculating to the adult whole body, then + R~ and D~ = D~

CL The concentration of radionuclide sediment in pCi/gram i in shoreline The usage factor, (hr/yr) (Reg. Guide 1.109) 4E+4 The product of the assumed density of shoreline sediment (40 kilogram per square meter to a depth of 2.5 cm) times the number of grams per kilogram 0.3 The shore width factor for a lake The dose factor for age group a, nuclide i, sediment pathway s, and organ ). (Reg. Guide 1.109, Table E-6)

(mrem/hr per pCi/m~); ex. when calculating to the adult whole body D~ = D~

The fractional'portion of the year over which the dose is applicable NOTE% Because of the nature of the receptor location and the extensive fishing in the area, the critical individual may be a teenager or an adult.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZI 22 December 1993

3.2 Evaluation of Doses From Gaseous Effluents For the evaluation of doses to real members of the public from gaseous effluents~ the pathways contained in section 2 of the calculational mothodologies section in the ODCM .will be considered and include ground deposition, inhalation, cows milk, goats milk, meat, and food products (vegetation). However, any updated field data may be utilized that concerns locations of real individuals, real time meteorological data, location of critical receptors, etc.

Data from the most recent census and sample location surveys should be utilized. Doses may also be calculated from actual environmental sample media, as available. Environmental sample media data such as TLD, air sample, milk sample and vegetable (food crop) sample data may be utilized in lieu of effluent calculational data.

Doses to members of the public from the pathways considered in the ODCM section 2 as a result of gaseous effluents will be calculated using the methodology of Regulatory Guide 1.109 or the methodology of the ODCM, as applicable. Doses calculated from environmental sample media will be based on methodologies found in Regulatory Guide 1.109.

3' Evaluation of Doses From Direct Radiation The dose contribution as a result of direct radiation shall be considered when evaluating whether the dose limitations of 40 CFR 190 have been exceeded. Direct radiation doses as a result of the reactor, turbine and radwaste buildings and outside radioactive storage tanks (as applicable) may be evaluated by engineering calculations or by evaluating environmental TLD results at critical receptor locations, site boundary or other special interest locations. For the evaluation of direct radiation doses utilizing environmental TLDs, the critical receptor in question, such as the critical residence, etc., will be compared to the control locations.

The comparison involves the difference in environmental TLD results between the receptor location and the average control location result.

3.4 Doses to Members of the Public Within the Site Boundary The Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to members of the public due to their activities inside the site boundary as defined by Figure 5.1.3-1. A member of the public, would be represented by an individual who visits the sites'nergy Center for the purpose of observing the educational displays or for picnicking and associated activities.

Fishing is a major recreational activity in the area and on the Site as a result of the salmon and trout populations in Lake Ontario.

Fishermen have been observed fishing at the shoreline near the Energy Center from April through December in all weather conditions. Thus@

fishing is the major activity performed by members of the public within the site boundary. Based on the nature of the fishermen and undocumented observations, it is conservatively assumed that the maximum exposed individual spends an average of 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months per week fishing from the shoreline at a location between the Energy Center and the Unit 1 facility. This estimate is considered conservative but not necessarily excessive and accounts for occasions where individuals may fish more on weekends or on a few days in March of the year.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZZ 23 December 1993

0 The pathways considered for the evaluation include the inhalation pathway with the resultant lung dose, the ground dose pathway with the resultant whole body and skin dose and the direct radiation dose pathway with the associated total body dose. The direct radiation dose pathway, in: actuality, includes several pathways. These include: the direct radiation gamma dose to an individual from an overhead plume, a gamma submersion plume dose, possible direct radiation dose from the facility and a ground plane dose (deposition). Because the location is in close proximity to the site, any beta 'plume submersion dose is felt to be insignificant.

Other pathways, such as the ingestion pathway, are not applicable.

In addition, pathways associated with water related recreational activities, other than fishing, are not applicable here. These include swimming, boating and wading which are prohibited at the facility.

The inhalation pathway is evaluated by identifying the applicable radionuclides (radioiodine, tritium and particulates) in the effluent for the appropriate time period. The radionuclide concentrations are then multiplied by the appropriate X/Q value, inhalation dose factor, air intake rate, and the fractional portion of the year in question.

Thus, the inhalation pathway is evaluated using the following equation adapted from Regulatory Guide 1.109. Table 3-24 presents the reference for the parameters used in the following equation.

NOTE: The following equation is adapted from equations C-3 and C-4 of Regulatory Guide 1.109. Since many of the factors are in units of pC1/m~, m'/sec., etc., and since the radionuclide decay expressions have been deleted because of the short distance to the receptor location, the equation presented here is not identical to the Regulatory Guide equations.

/Q) ( )i ( ).")

Where:

The maximum dose from all nuclides to the organ j Dp and age group (a) in mrem/yr; ex. if to the adult lung, then D>, = Dz and DFA- ~ DF+

-calculating The average concentration in the stack or vent C,

release of nuclide i for the period in pCi/m~.

Unit 2 average stack or vent flowrate in m~/sec.

X/Q The plume dispersion pa'rameter for a location approximately 0.50 miles west of NMP-2 (The plume dispersion parameters are 9. 6E-07 ( stack) and 2.8E-06 (vent) and were obtained from the C.T.

Main five year average annual X/Q tables. The vent X/Q (ground level) is ten times the listed 0.50 mile X/Q because the vent is approximately 0.3 miles from the receptor location. The stack (elevated) X/Q is conservative when based on 0.50 miles because of the close proximity of the stack and the receptor location.

(DFA) p the dose factor for nuclide i, organ j, and age group a in mrem per pCi (Reg. Guide 1.109, Table E-7); ex.

D FA'ja if D FAg calculating to the adult lung the Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 24 December 1993

(BR), ~ annual air intake for individuals in age group a in M'er year (obtained from Table E-5 of Regulatory Guide 1.109).

fractional portion of the year for which radionuclide is to be i was detected and for which a dose calculated (in years).

The ground dose pathway (deposition) will be evaluated by obtaining at least one soil or shoreline sediment sample in the area where fishing occurs. The dose will then be calculated using the sample results, the time period in question, and the methodology based on Regulatory Guide 1.109 as presented in Section 3.1. The resultant dose may be adjusted for a background dose by subtracting the applicable off-site control soil or shoreline sediment sample radionuclide activities. In the event it is noted that fishing is not performed from the shoreline but is instead performed in the water (i.e., the use of waders), then the ground dose pathway (deposition) will not be evaluated.

The direct radiation gamma dose pathway includes any gamma doses from an overhead plume, submersion in the plume, possible radiation from the facility and ground plane dose (deposition). This general pathway will be evaluated by average environmental TLD readings. At least two environmental TLDs will be used at one location in the approximate area where fishing occurs. The TLDs will be placed in the field on approximately the beginning of each calendar quarter and removed approximately at the end of each calendar quarter (quarter 2, 3, and 4).

The average TLD readings will be adjusted by the average control TLD readings. This is accomplished by subtracting the average quarterly control TLD value from the average fishing location TLD value. The applicable quarterly control TLD values will be used after adjusting for the appropriate time period (as applicable). In the event of loss or theft of the TLDs, results from a TLD or TLDs in a nearby area may be utilized.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 25 December 1993

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROG Sampling Stations The current sampling locations are specified in Table 5-1 and Figures 5.1-1, 5.1-2. The meteorological tower location is shown on Figure 5.1-1. The location is shown as TLD location g17. The Environmental Monitoring Program is a joint effort between the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and the New York Power Authority, the owners and operators of the Nine Mile Point Units 1 and 2 and the James A.

FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plants, respectively. Sampling locations are chosen on the basis of historical average dispersion or deposition parameters from both units. The environmental sampling location coordinates shown on Table 5-1 are based on the NMP-2 reactor centerline.

The average dispersion and deposition parameters for the three units have been calculated for a 5 year period, 1978 through 1982. The calculated dispersion or deposition parameters will be compared to the results of the annual land use census. If it is determined that a milk sampling location exists at a location that yields a significantly higher (e.g. 50%) calculated D/Q rate, the new mi.lk sampling location will be added to the monitoring program within 30 days. If a new location is added, the old location that yields the lowest calculated D/Q may be dropped from the program after October 31 of that year.

4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program Analyses shall be performed on samples containing known quantities of radioactive materials that are supplied as part of a Commission approved or sponsored Interlaboratory Comparison Program, such as the EPA Crosscheck Program. Participation shall be only for those media, e.g., air, milk, water, etc., that are included in the Nine Mile Point Environmental Monitoring Program and for which cross check samples are available. An attempt will be made to obtain a QC sample to program sample ratio of 5% or better. The Quality Control sample results shall be reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report so that the Commission staff may evaluate the results.

Specific sample media for which EPA Cross Check Program samples are available include the following:

gross beta in air particulate filters gamma emitters in air particulate filters gamma emitters in milk gamma emitters in water tritium in water I-131 in water 4.3 Capabilities for Thermoluminescent Dosimeters Used for Environmental Measurements Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used

'or environmental measurements required by the Technical Specifications are based on ANSI Standard N545, section 4.3. TLDs are defined as phosphors packaged for field use.

In regard to the detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters, only one determination is required to evaluate the above capabilities per type of TLD. Furthermore, the above capabilities may be determined by the vendor who supplies the TLDs. Required detection capabilities are as follows.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 26 December 1993

4.3.1 Uniformity shall be determined by giving TLDs from the same batch an exposure equal to that resulting from an exposure rate of 10 uR/hr during the field cycle. The responses obtained shall have a relative standard deviation of less than 7.5%. A total of at least 5 TLDs shall-be evaluated.

4.3.2 Reproducibility shall be determined by giving TLDs repeated exposures equal to that resulting from an exposure rate of 10 uR/hr during the field cycle. The average of the relative standard deviations of the responses shall be less than 3.0%. A total of at least 4 TLDs shall be evaluated.

4.3.3 Dependence of exposure interpretation on the length of a field cycle shall be examined by placing TLDs for a period equal to at least a field cycle and a period equal to half the same field cycle in an area where the exposure rate is known to be constant. This test shall be conducted under approximate average winter temperatures and approximate average summer temperatures. For these tests, the ratio of the response obtained in the field cycle to twice that obtained for half the field cycle shall not be less than 0.85. At least 6 TLDs shall be evaluated.

4.3.4 Energy dependence shall be evaluated by the response of TLDs to photons for several energies between approximately 30 keV and 3 MeV.

The response shall not differ from that obtained with the calibration source by more than 25% for photons with energies greater than 80 keV and shall not be enhanced by more than a factor of two for photons with energies less than 80 keV. A total of at least 8 TLDs shall be evaluated.

4.3.5 The directional dependence of the TLD response shall be determined by comparing the response of the TLD exposed in the routine orientation with respect to the calibration source with the response obtained for different orientations. To accomplish this, the TLD shall be rotated through at least two perpendicular planes. The response averaged over all directions shall not differ from the response obtained in the standard calibration position by more than 10%. A total of at least 4 TLDs shall be evaluated.

4.3.6 Light dependence shall be determined by placing TLDs in the field for a period equal to the field cycle under the four conditions found in ANSI N545, section 4.3.6. The results obtained for the unwrapped TLDs shall not differ from those obtained for the TLDs wrapped in aluminum foil by more than 10%. A total of at least 4 TLDs shall be evaluated for each of the four conditions.

4.3.7 Moisture dependence shall be determined by placing TLDs (that is, the phosphors packaged for field use) for a period equal to the field cycle in an area where the exposure rate is known to be constant.

The TLDs shall be exposed under two conditions: (1) packaged in a thin, sealed plastic bag, and (2) packaged in a thin, sealed plastic bag with sufficient water to yield observable moisture throughout the field cycle. The TLD or phosphor, as appropriate, shall be dried before readout. The response of the TLD exposed in the plastic bag containing water shall not differ from that exposed in the regular plastic bag by more than 10%. A total of at least 4 TLDs shall be evaluated for each condition.

4.3.8 Self irradiation shall be determined by placing TLDs for a period equal to the field cycle in an area where the exposure rate is less than 10 uR/hr and the exposure during the field cycle is known. If necessary, corrections shall be applied for the dependence of exposure interpretation on the length of the field cycle (ANSI N545, section 4.3.3). The average exposure inferred from the responses of the TLDs shall not differ from the known exposure by more than an exposure equal to that resulting from an exposure rate of 10 uR/hr during the field cycle. A total of at least 3 TLDs shall be evaluated.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 27 December 1993

TABLE 2-1 LIQUID EFFLUENT DETECTORS RESPONSES*

NUCLIDE CPM Ci ml X 10'.78E-04 Sr 89 Sr 91 1.22 Sr 92 0.817 Y 91 2.47 Y 92 0.205 Zr 95 0.835 Nb 95 0.85 Mo 99 0.232 Tc 99m 0.232 Te 132 1.12 Ba 140 0.499 Ce 144 0.103 Br 84 1.12 I 131 F 01 I 132 2.63 I 133 0.967 I 134 2.32 I 135 1.17 Cs 134 1.97 Cs 136 2.89 Cs 137 0.732 Cs 138 1.45 Mn 54 0.842 Mn 56 1.2 Fe 59 0.863 Co 58 1.14 Co 60 1.65

Values from SWEC purchase specification NMP2-P281F.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 28 December 1993

lit TABLE 2-2 24,i VALUES LIQUID ADULT mrem << ml hr - uCi NUCLIDE T BODY GI-TRACT BONE LIVER KIDNEY THYROID LUNG H 3 3.67E-1 3.67E-1 3.67E-1 3.67E-1 3.67E-1 3.67E-1 Cr 51 1.26 3.13E2 1.18E-2 1.18E-2 2.86E-1 7.56E-1 1.66 Cu 64 1.28 2.33E2 2 '3 6.89 Mn 54 8.38E2 1 ~ 34E4 3.98 4.38E3 1.31E3 3.98 3.98 Fe 55 1.07E2 2.62E2 6. 62E2 4.57E2 2.55E2 Fe 59 9.28E2 8.06E3 1.03E3 2.42E3 7.53E-1 7.53E-1 6.76E2 Co 58 2.01E2 1.81E3 1. 07 9.04E1 1.07 1.07 1.07 Co 60 6.36E2 4.93E3 6.47E1 3.24E2 6.47E1 6.47E1 6.47E1 Zn 65 3.32E4 4.63E4 2.31E4 7.35E4 4.92E4 2.21 2.21 Sr 89 6.38E2 3.57E3 2.22E4 6.18E-S 6.18E-S 6.18E-5 6.18E-5 Sr 90 1.36ES 1.60E4 5.55E5 Sr 92 1.44E-2 6.61 3.34E-1 Zr 95 7.59E-1 2.83E2 9.77E-1 7 '8E-1 8.39E-1 6.99E-1 6.99E-1 Mn 56 3.07E-2 5.52 1.73E-1 2.20E-1 Mo 99 1.60E1 1.95E2 1.97E-3 8.42E1 1.91E2 1.97E-3 1.97E-3 Na 24 1.34E2 1.34E2 1.34E2 1.34E2 1.34E2 1.34E2 1.34E2 I 131 1.16E2 5.36E1 1.42E2 2.03E2 3.48E2 6.65E4 2.77E-2 I 132 4.34E-3 2.33E-3 4.64E-3 1,24E-2 1.98E-2 4.34E-1 1.22El 3.59E1

\

2.30E1 3.99E1 6.97E1 5.87E3 Ni 65 1.14E-2 6.35E-1 1.93E-1 2.50E-2 Cs 134 5.79ES 1.24E4, 2.98ES 7.08ES 2.29E5 2.04E1 7.61E4 Cs 136 8.42E4 1.33E4 2.96E4 1.17E5 6.51E4 3.28E-1 8.92E3 Cs 137 3.42E5 1.01E4 3.82ES 5.22E5 1.77E5 3.10E1 5.89E4 Ba 140 1.37E1 4.30E2 2.09E2 3.04E-1 1.31E-1 4.17E-2 1.92E-1 Ce 141 3.79E-2 8.81E1 6.93E-2 5.83E-2 4.60E-2 3.53E-2 3.53E-2 Nb 95 1.31E2 1.48E6 4.38E2 2.44E2 2.41E2 3.56E-1 3.56E-1 La 140 1.62E-2 3.72E3 1.03E-1 5.36E-2 2.83E-3 2.83E-3 2.83E-3 Ce 144 3.03E-1 6.15E2 2. 02 9.66E-1 6.57E-1 2.06E-1 2.06E-1 Tc 99m 2.05E-2 9.54E-01 5.71E-4 1.61E-3 2.45E-2 7.90E-4 Np 239 1.8E-3 4.47E2 2.28E-2 2.78E-3 7.40E-3 5.95E-4 5.95E-4 Te 132 1.18E3 5.97E4 1.95E3 1.26E3 1.22E4 1.39E3 2.66E-3 Zr 97 5.08E-4 3.39E2 5.44E-3 1.10E-3 1.66E-3 7.11E-6 7.11E-6 W 187 4.31E1 4.04E4 1.48E2 1.23E2 4.43E-5 4.43E-5 4.43E-S Ag 110m 1.09E1 3.94E2 1.14E1 1.13E1 1.22E1 1.04E1 1.04E1 Calculated in accordance with NUREG 0133, Section 4. 3. 1; and Regulatory Guide 1.109, Regulatory position C, Section 1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL 29 December 1993

TABLE 2-3 A VALUES - LIQUID TEEN mrem ml hr uCi NUCLIDE T BODY GI-TRACT BONE LIVER KIDNEY THYROID LUNG H 3 2.73E-1 2.73E-l 2.73E-1 2.73E-1 2.73E-1 2.73E-1 Cr 51 1.35 2.16E2 6.56E-2 6.56E-2 3.47E-1 7 '9E-1 1.90 Cu 64 1.35 2.23E2 2.87 7 '7 Mn 54 8.75E2 8.84E3 2.22E1 4.32E3 1.31E3 2.22E1 2 '2El Fe 55 1.15E2 2.13E2 6.93E2 4.91E2 3.11E2 Fe 59 9.59E2 5.85E3 1.06E3 2.48E3 4. 20 4.20 7.84E2 Co 58 2.10E2 1.23E3 5.98 9.47E1 5.98 5.98 5.98 Co 60 9.44E2 3.73E3 3.61E2 6.20E2 3.61E2 3.61E2 3.61E2 Zn 65 3.40E4 3.08E4 2.10E4 7.28E4 4.66E4 1.24E1 1.24E1 Sr 89 6.92E2 2.88E3 2.42E4 3.45E-4 3.45E-4 3.45E-4 Sr 90 1.14ES 1.30E4 4.62E5 Sr 92 1.54E-2 9.19El 3.61E-1 Zr 95 3.96 2.10E2 4. 19 3.99 4.03 3.90 3.90 Mn 56 3.22E-2 1.19E1 1.81E-1 2.29E-1 Mo 99 1.71E1 1.60E2 1.10E-2 8.95E1 2.05E2 1.10E-2 1.10E-2 Na 24 1.38E2 1.38E2 1.38E2 1.38E2 1.38E2 1.38E2 1.38E2 I 131 1.14E2 4 '1E1 1.52E2 2.12E2 3 '6E2 6.19E4 1.55E-1 I 132 4.56E-3 5 '4E-3 4.86E-3 1.27E-2 2.00E-2 4.29E-1 1.28E1 3.17E1 2.47E1 4.19E1 7.35E1 5.85E3 1.02E-4 Ni 65 1.21E-2 1.44 2.08E-1 2.66E-2 Cs 134 3.33ES 9.05E3 3.05ES 7.18ES 2.28E5 1.14E2 8.72E4 Cs 136 7.87E4 9.44E3 2.98E4 1.17E5 6.38E4 1.83 1.01E4 Cs 137 1.90E5 7.91E3 4.09ES 5.44E5 1.85ES 1.73E2 7.21E4 Ba 140 1.44El 3.40E2 2.21E2 5.03E-1 3.25E-1 2.33E-1 4.15E-1 Ce 141 2.00E-1 6.85E1 2.33E-1 2.21E-1 2.08E-1 1.97E-l 1.97E-1 Nb 95 1.17E2 1.05E6 4.43E2 2.47E2 2.39E2 1.99 1.99 La 140 2.97E-2 3.01E3 1.22E-1 6.82E-2 1.58E-2 1.58E-2 1.58E-2 Ce 144 1.25 4.83E2 3.07 1.94 1.62 1.15 1.15 Tc 99m 2.11E-2 1.07 5.84E-4 1.63E-3 2.43E-2 9.04E-4 Np 239 4.63E<<3 3.78E2 2.82E-2 . 5.67E-3 1.07E-2 3.32E-3 3.32E-3 Te 132 1.23E3 4.13E4 2.06E3 1.30E3 1.25E4 1.37E3 1.48E-2 Zr 97 5.68E-4 3.11E2 5.84E-3 1.19E-3 1.78E-3 3.97E-S 3.97E-5 W 187 4.55E1 3.52E4 1.59E2 1.30E2 2.47E-4 2.47E-4 2.47E-4 Ag 110m 5.85E1 3.17E2 5.89E1 5.88E1 5.97E1 5.79E1 5.79E1 Calculated in accordance with NUREG 0133, Section 4.3.1; and Regulatory Guide 1.109, Regulatory position C, Section l.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL 30 December 1993

h TABLE 2-4 A VALUES - LIQUID~

CHILD mrem - ml hr uCi NUCLIDE T BODY GI-. TRACT BONE LIVER KIDNEY THYROID LUNG H 3 3.34E-1 3.34E-l 3.34E-1 3.34E-1 3.34E-l 3.34E-1 Cr 51 1.39 7.29El 1.37E-2 1.37E-2 2.22E-1 7 '6E-1 1.41 Cu 64 1.60 1.25E2 2 '5 6.41 Mn 54 9.02E2 2 '3E3 4.65 3.37E3 9.49E2 4.65 4. 65 Fe 55 1.50E2 8.99E1 9.15E2 4.85E2 2.74E2 Fe 59 1.04E3 2.18E3 1.29E3 2.09E3 8.78E-1 8.78E-1 6 08E2 Co 58 2.21E2 4.20E2 1.25 7.30E1 1.25 1.25 1.25 Co 60 7.03E2 1.25E3 7.55E1 2.88E2 7.55E1 7 '5E1 7 '5E1 Zn 65 3.56E4 1.01E4 2.15E4 5.73E4 3.61E4 2.58 2.58 Sr 89 9.13E2 1.24E3 3.20E4 Sr 90 1.06E5 5.62E3 4.17ES Sr 92 1 85E-2 8.73 4.61E-1 Zr 95 8.95E-1 9%36E1 1.22 9.04E-1 9.43E-1 8.15E-1 8.15E-1 Mn 56 3.73E-2 2.39E1 1.65E-1 2.00E-1 Mo 99 2.22E1 7.42E1 2.30E-3, 8.98E1 1.92E2 2.30E-3 2.30E-3 Na 24 1.51E2 1.51E2 1.51E2 1.51E2 1.51E2 1.51E2 1.51E2 I 131 1.14E2 1.80E1 2.00E2 2.01E2 3.31E2 6.66E4 3.23E-2 I 132 5.08E-3 1.30E-2 6.01E-3 1.10E-2 1.69E-2 5.13E-1 I 133 1.51E1 1.60E1 3.22E+1 3.98E1 6.64El 7.40E3 Ni 65 1.46E-2 3.07 2.66E-1 2.51E-2 Cs 134 1.27E5 3.28E3 3.68ES 6.04ES 1.87ES 2.38E1 6.72E4 Cs 136 6 26E4 3.40E3 3.52E4 9.67E4 5.15E4 3.82E-1 7.68E3 Cs 137 7.28E4 3.12E3 5.15E5 4.93E5 1.61E5 3.62E1 5.78E4 Ba 140 1.87E1 1.62E2 3.19E2 3.28E-1 1.40E-1 4.87E-2 2.15E-1 Ce 141 4.61E-2 4.14E1 1.08E-1 7.43E-2 5.57E-2 4.12E-2 4.12E-2 Nb 95 1.45E2 3.75E5 5.21E2 2.03E2 1.91E2 4.16E-1 4.16E-1 La 140 1.93E-2 1.33E3 1.39E-1 5.09E-2 3.30E-3 3.30E-3 3.30E-3 Ce 144 4.31E-1 2.92E2 3.81 1.36 8.61E-1 2.40E-1 2.40E-1 Tc 99m 2.29E-2 7.87E-1 7.05E-4 1.38E-3 2.01E-2 7.02E-4 Np 239 2.40E-3 1.79E2 3.44E-2 3.12E-3 7.70E-3 6.94E-4 6.94E-4 Te 132 1.38E3 1 ~ 15E4 2.57E3 1.14E3 1.06E4 1.66E3 3.10E-3 Zr 97 6.99E-4 1.77E2 8.11E-3 1.18E-3 1.69E-3 8.29E-6 8.29E-6 W 187 5.37E1 1.68E4 2.02E2 1.20E2 5.16E-5 5.16E-5 5.16E-S Ag 110m 1.29El 1.24E2 1.35E1 1 ~ 30E1 1.39El 1.21El 1.21E1 Calculated in accordance with NUREG 0133, Section 4.3.1; and Regulatory Guide 1.109, Regulatory position C, Section l.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 31 December 1993

I TABLE 2-5

~ VALUES - LIQUID INFANT mrem ml hr - uCi NUCLIDE T BODY GI-TRACT BONE LIVER KIDNEY THYROID LUNG H 3 1.87E-1 1 ~ 87E-1 1.87E-1 1. 87E-1 1.87E-1 1.87E-1 Cr 51 8.21E-3 2.39E-1 1.17E-3 5.36E-3 1.04E-2 Cu 64 1.96E-2 8 '0E-1 4.24E-2 7.17E-2 Mn 54 2.73 4.42 1.20E1 2.67 Fe 55 1.45 6.91E-1 8.42 5.44 2.66 Fe 59 1.25E1 1.52E1 1.82E1 3.18E1 9.41 Co 58 5.36 5.36 2.15 Co 60 1.55E1 1 ~ 56E1 6.55 Zn 65 1.76E1 3 '2E1 1.11E1 3.81E1 1.85E1 Sr 89 4,27E1 3.06E1 1.49E3 Sr 90 2.86E3 1 ~ 40E2 1.12E4 Sr 92 1.56E-5 4.54E-3 4.21E-4 Zr 95 2.12E-2 1.49E1 1.23E-1 2.99E-2 3.23E-2 Mn 56 1.81E-6 9.56E-4 1.05E-S 9.05E-6 Mo 99 2.65 4.48 1.36E1 2.03E1 Na 24 9.61E-1 9.61E-1 9.61E-l 9.61E-1 9.61E-1 9.61E-1 9 61E-1 I 131 9.78 7.94E-1 1.89E1 2.22E1 2.60E1 7.31E3 I 132 3.43E-6 7.80E-6 4.75E-6 9.63E-6 1.07E-5 4.52E-4 8.26E-1 4.77E-1 1.94 2.82 3.31 5.13E2 Ni 65 2.96E-6 4.96E-4 5.75E-5 6 '1E-6 Cs 134 4.30E1 1.16 2.28E2 4.26E2 1.10E2 4.50E1 Cs 136 2.81E1 1.14 2.56E1 7.53El 3.00E1 6. 13 Cs 137 2.63E1 1.16 3.17E2 3.71E2 9.95E1 4.03E1 Ba 140 4.88 2.33E1 9.48E1 9.48E-2 2.25E-2 5.82E-2 Ce 141 3.31E-3 1.45E1 4.61E-2 2.81E-2 8.67E-3 Nb 95 5.87E-3 8.57 2.47E-2 1.02E-2 7.28E-3 La 140 6.52E-4 2.98E1 6.43E-3 2.53E-3 Ce 144 1.01E-1 1.03E2 1.80 7.37E-l 2.98E-1 Tc 99m 3.17E-4 7.14E-3 1.19E-5 2.46E-5 2.64E-4 1.28E-5 Np 239 2.08E-4 1.06E1 4.12E-3 3.68E-4 7.34E-4 Te 132 4.08 1.62E1 8.83 4.37 2.74El 6.46 Zr 97 1.38E-4 1.92E1 1.76E-3 3.02E-4 3.04E-4 W 187 4.13E-2 7.02 1.72E-1 1.19E-1 Ag 110m 2.91E-1 2.28El 6.02E-1 4.39E-l 6.28E-1

'alculated in accordance with NUREG 0133, Section 4.3.1; and Regulatory Guide 1.109, Regulatory position C, Section 1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZZ 32 December 1993

r ~

,D

TABLE 3-1 OFFGAS PRETREATMENT*

DETECTOR RESPONSE NUCLIDE NET CPM Ci cc Kr 85 4.30E+3 Kr 85m 4.80E+3 Kr 87 8.00E+3 Kr 88 7,60E+3 Xe 133 1.75E+3 Xe 133m Xe 135 5.10E+3 Xe 135m Xe 137 8.10E+3 Xe 138 7.10E+3

Values from SWEC purchase specification NMP2-P281F Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LI II 33 December 1993

'4 TABLE 3-2 PLUME SHINE PARAMETERS NUCLIDE ~Bmrad r V mrem r uci/sec uCi/sec Kr 83m 9.01E-7 Kr 85 6.92E-7 Kr 85m 5.09E-4 4.91E-4 Kr 87 2.72E-3 2.57E-3 Kr 88 7.23E-3 7.04E-3 Kr 89 1.15E-2 1.13E-2 Kr 90 6.57E-3 4.49E-3 Xe 131m 7.76E-6 Xe 133 7.46E-5 6 '2E-5 Xe 133m 4.79E-S 3.95E-5 Xe 135 7.82E-4 7.44E-4 Xe 135m 1.45E-3 1.37E-3 Xe 137 6.25E-4 5.98E-4 Xe 138 4.46E-3 4.26E-3 Xe-127 1.96E-3 1.31E-3 Ar 41 S.OOE-3 4.79E-3 Bi and Vi are calculated for critical site boundary location; 1 . 6km in the easterly direction. See Appendix B. Those values that show a dotted line were negligible because of high energy absorption coefficients.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 34 December 1993

V TABLE 3-3 ZMMERSZON DOSE FACTORS Nuclide .Q~B~od ~L-Skin i M~A~ir ~ ~N-Ai.r ~

Kr 83m 7.56E-02 1.93E1 2 '8E2 Kr 85m 1.17E3 1.46E3 1.23E3 1.97E3 Kr 85 1.61E1 1.34E3 1.72E1 1.95E3 Kr 87 5.92E3 9.73E3 6.17E3 1.03E4 Kr 88 1.47E4 2.37E3 1,52E4 2.93E3 Kr 89 1.66E4 1.01E4 1.73E4 1.06E4 Kr 90 1.56E4 7.29E3 1.63E4 7.83E3 Xe 131m 9 '5E1 4.76E2 1.56E2 1.11E3 Xe 133m 2.51E2 9.94E2 3 '7E2 1.48E3 Xe 133 2.94E2 3.06E2 3.53E2 1 ~ 05E3 Xe 135m 3.12E3 7.11E2 3.36E3 7.39E2 Xe 135 1 ~ 81E3 1.86E3 1.92E3 2.46E3 Xe 137 1.42E3 1.22E4 1.51E3 1.27E4 Xe 138 8.83E3 4.13E3 9.21E3 4.75E3 Ar 41 8.84E3 2.69E3 9.30E3 3.28E3

'From, Table B-l.Regulatory Guide 1.109 Rev. 1 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

'mrad/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZZ 35 December 1993

A TABLE 3-4 DOSE AND DOSE RATE VALUES INHALATION INFANTt pi~rem ~r uCi/m NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY 'HYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H 3* 6.47E2 6.47E2 6.47E2 6.47E2 6.47E2 6.47E2 C 14* 2.65E4 5.31E3 5.31E3 5.31E3 5.31E3 5.31E3 5.31E3 Cr 51 8.95E1 5.75E1 1.32E1 1.28E4 3.57E2 Mn 54 2.53E4 4.98E3 4.98E3 1.00E6 7 '6E3 Fe 55 1.97E4 1.17E4 3.33E3 8.69E4 1.09E3 Fe 59 1.36E4 2.35E4 9.48E3 1.02E6 2.48E4 Co 58 1.22E3 1.82E3 7.77E5 1.11E4 Co 60 8.02E3 1.18E4 4.51E6 3.19E4 Zn 65 1.93E4 6.26E4 3.11E4 3.25E4 6.47E5 5.14E4 Sr 89 3,98E5 1.14E4 2.03E6 6.40E4 Sr 90 4.09E7 2.59E6 1.12E7 1.31E5 Zr 95 1.15E5 2.79E4 2.03E4 3.11E4 1.75E6 2.17E4 Nb 95 1.57E4 6.43E3 3.78E3 4.72E3 4.79ES 1.27E4 Mo 99 1.65E2 3.23E1 2.65E2 1.35E5 4.87E4 I-131 3.79E4 4.44E4 1.96E4 1.48E7 5.18E4 1.06E3 I 133 1.32E4 1.92E4 5.60E3 3.56E6 2.24E4 2.16E3 Cs 134 3.96E5 7.03ES 7.45E4 1.90E5 7.97E4 1.33E3 Cs 137 5.49E5 6.12ES 4.55E4 1.72E5 7.13E4 1.33E3 Ba 140 5.60E4 5.60E1 2.90E3 1.34E1 1.60E6 3.84E4 La 140 5.05E2 2.00E2 5.15El 1.68ES 8.48E4 Ce 141 2.77E4 1.67E4 1.99E3 5.25E3 5.17E5 2.16E4 Ce 144 3.19E6 1.21E6 1.76ES 5.38ES 9.84E6 1.48ES Nd 147 7.94E3 8.13E3 5.00E2 3.15E3 3.22E5 3.12E4

mrem/yr per pci/m~

'This and following g Tables Calculated in accordance with NUREG 0133, Section 5.3.1, except C 14 values in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.109 Equation C-8.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 36 December 1993

t TABLE 3-5 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES INHALATION CHILD

~mrem r uci/m~

NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY 'HYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI-H 3* 1.12E3 1.12E3 1. 12E3 1.12E3 1.12E3 1.12E3 C 14* 3.59E4 6.73E3 6.73E3 6.73E3 6.73E3 6.73E3 6.73E3 Cr 51 1.54E2 8.55E1 2.43E1 1.70E4 1.08E3 Mn 54 4.29E4 9.51E3 1.00E4 1 ~ 58E6 2 '9E4 Fe 55 4.74E4 2.52E4 7.77E3 1.11E5 2.87E3 Fe 59 2.07E4 3 34E4 1.67E4 1.27E6 7.07E4 Co 58 1.77E3 3.16E3 1.11E6 3.44E4 Co 60 1.31E4 2.26E4 7.07E6 9.62E4 Zn 65 4.26E4 1.13E5 7.03E4 7.14E4 9.95E5 1.63E4 Sr 89 5.99E5 1.72E4 2.16E6 1.67E5 Sr 90 1.01E8 6.44E6 1.48E7 3.43ES Zr 95 1.90E5 4.18E4 3.70E4 5.96E4 2.23E6 6.11E4 Nb 95 2.35E4 9.18E3 6.55E3 8.62E3 6.14E5 3.70E4 Mo 99 1.72E2 4.26E1 3.92E2 1.35E5 1.27ES I 131 4.81E4 4.81E4 2.73E4 1.62E7 7.88E4 2.84E3 I 133 1.66E4 2.03E4 7.70E3 3.85E6 3.38E4 5.48E3 Cs 134 6.51ES 1.01E6 2.25ES 3.30E5 1.21E5 3 85E3 Cs 137 9.07E5 8.25ES 1.28E5 2.82E5 1.04E5 3.62E3 Ba 140 7.40E4 6.48E1 4.33E3 2.11El 1.74E6 1.02ES La 140 6.44E2 2.25E2 7.55E1 1.83ES 2.26ES Ce 141 3.92E4 , 1.95E4 2.90E3 8.55E3 5.44ES 5.66E4 Ce 144 6.77E6 2.12E6 3.61ES 1.17E6 1.20E7 3.89ES Nti 147 1.08E4 8.73E3 6.81E2 4.81E3 3.28E5 8.21E4

mrem/yr per pci/m~

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 37 December 1993

TABLE 3-6 DOSE AND DOSE RATE R; VALUES INHALATION- TEEN mrem r uCi/m

~UCLI DE BONE LIVER T. BODY 'HYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LL1 H 3* 1 27E3 1.27E3 1.27E3 1.27E3 1.27E3 1 ~ 27E3 C 14* 2.60E4 4.87E3 4.87E3 4.87E3 4.87E3 4 '7E3 4 '7E3 Cr 51 1.35E2 7.50E1 3.07E1 2.10E4 3.00E3 Mn 54 5.11E4 8.40E3 1.27E4 1.98E6 6.68E4 Fe 55 3.34E4 2.38E4 5.54E3 1.24E5 6.39E3 Fe 59 1.59E4 3.70E4 1.43E4 1.53E6 1.78E5 Co 58 2.07E3 2.78E3 1.34E6 9.52E4 Co 60 1.51E4 1.98E4 8.72E6 2.59E5 Zn 65 3.86E4 1.34ES 6.24E4 8.64E4 1.24E6 4.66E4 Sr 89 4.34ES 1.25E4 2.42E6 3 '1ES Sr 90 1.08E8 6.68E6 1.65E7 7.65E5 Zr 95 1.46ES 4.58E4 3.15E4 6.74E4 2 '9E6 1.49ES Nb 95 1.86E4 1.03E4 5.66E3 1.00E4 7.51E5 9.68E4 Mo 99 1.69E2 3.22E1 4.11E2 1.54ES 2.69E5 I 131 3.54E4 4. 91E4 2.64E4 1.46E7 8.40E4 6.49E3 I 133 1.22E4 2.05E4 6.22E3 2.92E6 3.59E4 1.03E4 Cs, 134 5.02E5 1.13E6 5.49E5 ~ 3.75ES 1.46ES 9.76E3 Cs 137 6.70E5 8.48E5 3.11E5 3.04ES 1.21E5 8.48E3 Ba 140 5.47E4 6.70E1 3.52E3 2.28E1 2.03E6 '.29ES La 140 4.79E2 2.36E2 6.26E1 2.14ES 4.87E5 Ce 141 2.84E4 1.90E4 2.17E3 8.88E3 6.14E5 1.26E5 Ce 144 4.89E6 2.02E6 2.62E5 1 '1E6 1.34E7 8.64E5 Nd 147 7.86E3 8.56E3 5.13E2 5.02E3 3.72ES 1.82ES

mrem/yr per pci/m~

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 38 December 1993

~ ~

\* 'I

, TABLE 3-7 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES INHALATION ADULT mrem r uci/m NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY 'HYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLT H 3* 1.26E3 1.26E3 1.26E3 1.26E3 1.26E3 1.26E3 C 14* 1.82E4 3.41E3 3.41E3 3.41E3 3.41E3 3.41E3 3.41E3 Cr 51 1.00E2 5.95E1 2.28E1 1.44E4 3.32E3 Mn 54 3.96E4 6.30E3 9.84E3 1.40E6 7.74E4 Fe 55 2.46E4 1 '0E4 3.94E3 7 21E4 6.03E3 Fe 59 1.18E4 2.78E4 1.06E4 1.02E6 1.88E5 Co 58 1 58E3 2.07E3 9.28ES 1.06ES Co 60 1.15E4 1.48E4 5.97E6 2.85E5 Zn 65 3.24E4 1.03E5 4.66E4 6.90E4 8 '4E5 5.34E4 Sr 89 3.04E5 8.72E3 1.40E6 3.50E5 Sr 90 9.92E7 6.10E6 9.60E6 7.22E5 Zr 95 1.07E5 3.44E4 2.33E4 5.42E4 1.77E6 1.50ES Nb 95 1.41E4 7.82E3 4.21E3 7.74E3 5.05ES 1.04E5 Mo 99 1.21E2 2.30E1 2.91E2 9.12E4 2.48E5 I 131 2.52E4 3.58E4 2.05E4 1.19E7 6.13E4 6 '8E3 I 133 8 '4E3 1.48E4 4.52E3 2.15E6 2.58E4 8.88E3 Cs 134 3.73E5 8.48ES 7.28E5 2.87E5 9.76E4 1.04E4 Cs 137 4.78ES 6.21E5 4.28E5 2.22ES 7.52E4 8.40E3 Ba 140 3.90E4 4.90E1 2.57E3 1.67E1 1.27E6 2.18E5 La 140 3.44E2 1.74E2 4.58E1 1.36E5 4.58ES Ce 141 1.99E4 1.35E4 1.53E3 6 26E3 3.62ES 1.20E5 Ce 144 3.43E6 1.43E6 1.84ES 8.48E5 7.78E6 8.16E5 Nd 147 5.27E3 6.10E3 3.65E2 3.56E3 2.21ES 1.73E5

mrem/yr per pci/m'04337LL Unit 2 Revision 9 II 39 December 1993

TABLE 3-8 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES GROUND PLANE ALL AGE GROUPS gi~mrem r uci/sec NUCLIDE TOTAL BODY SKIN H 3 C 14 Cr 51 4.65E6 5.50E6 Mn 54 1.40E9 1.64E9 Fe 55 Fe 59 2.73E8 3.20E8 Co 58 3.80E8 4.45E8 Co 60 2 '5E10 2.53E10 Zn 65 7.46E8 8.57E8 Sr 89 2.16E4 2.51E4 Sr 90 Zr 95 2.45E8 2.85E8 Nb 95 1.36E8 1.61E8 Mo 99 3.99E6 4.63E6 I 131 1.72E7 2.09E7 I 133 2.39E6 2.91E6 Cs 134 6.83E9 7.97E9 Cs 137 1.03E10 1.20E10 BR 140 2.05E7 2.35E7 LR 140 1.92E7 2.18E7 Ce 141 1.37E7 1.54E7 Ce 144 6.96E7 8.07E7 Nd 147 8.46E6 1.01E7 Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 40 December 1993

5 TABLE 3-9 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES - COW MILK INFANT m~~mrem r uci/sec NUCLIDE BONE" LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H 3 2.38E3 2.38E3 2.38E3 2.38E3 2.38E3 2.38E3 C 14'r 3.23E6 6.89E5 6.89E5 6.89E5 6.89E5 6.89ES 6.89ES 51 8.35E4 5.45E4 1.19E4 1.06ES 2.43E6 Mn 54 2.51E7 5.68E6 5.56E6 '.21E6 Fe 55 8.43E7 5.44E7 1.45E7 2 66E7 6. 91E6 Fe 59 1.22ES 2.13ES 8.38E7 6.29E7 1.02ES Co 58 1.39E7 3.46E7 3.46E7 Co 60'n 5.90E7 1.39ES 1.40ES 65 3.53E9 1.21E10 5.58E9 5.87E9 1.02E10 Sr 89 6.93E9 1.99ES 1.42E8 Sr 90 8.19E10 2.09E10 1.02E9 Zr 95 3.85E3 9.39E2 6.66E2 1.01E3 4.68ES Nb 95 4.21E5 1.64E5 1.17E5 1.54E5 3.03ES Mo 99 1.04ES 2.03E7 1.55ES 3.43E7 I 131 6.81ES 8.02ES 3.53E8 2.64E11 9.37ES 2.86E7 I 133 8.52E6 1.24E7 3.63E6 2.26E9 1.46E7 2.10E6 Cs 134 2.41E10 4.49E10 4.54E9 1.16E10 4.74E9 1.22E8 Cs 137 3.47E10 4.06E10 2.88E9 1.09E10 4.41E9 1.27ES BB 140 1.21ES 1.21E5 6.22E6 2.87E4 7.42E4 2.97E7 La 140 2.03E1 7.99 2.06 9.39E4 Ce 141 2.28E4 1.39E4 1.64E3 4.28E3 7.18E6 Ce 144 1.49E6 6.10E5 8.34E4 2.46ES 8.54E7 Nd 147 4.43E2 4.55E2 2.79E1 1.76E2 2.89E5 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 41 December 1993

"~

t I ~ r

TABLE 3-10 DOSE AND DOSE RATE R; VALUES COW MILK CHILD m~~mrem r uci/sec

~UC:DE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-L I H 3 1.57E3 1.57E3 1.57E3 1.57E3 1.57E3 1.57E3 C 14 1.65E6 3.29ES 3.29E5 3.29E5 3.29E5 3.29ES 3.29ES Cr 51 5.27E4 2.93E4 7.99E3 5.34E4 2.80E6 Mn 54 1.35E7 3.59E6 3.78E6 1.13E7 Fe 55 6.97E7 3.07E7 1.15E7 2.09E7 6.85E6 Fe 59 6.52E7 1.06E8 5.26E7 3.06E7 1.10E8 Co 58 6.94E6 2.13E7 4.05E7 Co 60 2.89E7 8.52E7 1.60E8 Zn 65 2.63E9 7.00E9 4.35E9 4.41E9 1.23E9 Sr 89 3.64E9 1. 04EB 1.41E8 Sr 90 7.53E10 1.91E10 1.01E9 Zr 95 2.17E3 4.77E2 4.25E2 6.83E2 4.98ES Nb 95 1.86E5 1.03E4 5.69E4 1.00E5 4.42E8 Mo 99 4.07E7 1.01E7 8.69E7 3 37E7 I 131 3.26E8 3.28E8 1.86E8 1.08E11 5.39E8 .2.92E7 I 133 4.04E6 4.99E6 1.89E6 9.27E8 8.32E6 2.01E6 Cs 134 1.50E10 2.45E10 5.18E9 7.61E9 2.73E9 1.32E8 Cs 137 2.17E10 2.08E10 3.07E9 6.78E9 2.44E9 1.30E8 Ba 140 5.87E7 5.14E4 3.43E6 1.67E4 3.07E4 2.97E7 La 140 9.70 3.39 1.14 9.45E4 Ce 141 1.15E4 5.73E3 8.51E2 2.51E3 7.15E6 Ce 144 1.04E6 3.26E5 5.55E4 1.80ES 8.49E7 Nd 147 2.24E2 1.81E2 1.40E1 9.94E1 2.87E5 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 42 December 1993

I V t

TABLE 3-11 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES COW MILK TEEN md~mr em r uCi/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI-H 3' 9.94E2 9.94E2 9.94E2 9.94E2 9.94E2 9.94E2 14'r 6.70E5 1.34ES 1.34E5 1.34ES 1 ~ 34ES 1 35E5 1.34ES 51 2.58E4 1.44E4 5.66E3 3.69E4 4.34E6 Mn 54 9.01E6 1.79E6 2.69E6 1.85E7 Fe 55 2.78E7 1.97E7 4.59E6 1.25E7 8.52E6 Fe 59 2.81E7 6.57E7 2.54E7 2.07E7 1.55E8 Co 58 4.55E6 1.05E7 6.27E7 Co 60 1 ~ 86E7 4.19E7 2.42ES Zn 65 1.34E9 4.65E9 2.17E9 2.97E9 1.97E9 Sr 89 1.47E9 4.21E7 1.75ES Sr 90 4.45E10 1.10E10 1.25E9 Zr 95 9.34E2 2.95E2 2.03E2 4.33E2 6.80ES Nb 95 1.86E5 1.03ES 5.69E4 1.00E5 4.42ES Mo 99 2.24E7 4.27E6 5.12E7 4.01E7 I 131 1.34ES 1.88ES 1.01E8 5.49E10 3.24ES 3.72E7 I 133 1.66E6 2.82E6 8.59E5 3.93ES 4.94E6 2.13E6 Cs 134 6.49E9 1.53E10 7.08E9 4.85E9 1.85E9 1.90E8 Cs 137 9.02E9 1.20E10 4.18E9 4.08E9 1.59E9 1.71ES Ba 140 2.43E7 2.98E4 1.57E6 1.01E4 2.00E4 3.75E7 La 140 4.05 1.99 5.30E-1 1.14ES Ce 141 4.67E3 3.12E3 3.58E2 1.47E3 8.91E6 Ce 144 4.22E5 1.74ES 2.27E4 1.04E5 1.06ES Nd 147 9.12E1 9.91El 5.94EO 5.82E1 3.58E5 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 43 December 1993

TABLE 3-12 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES COW MILK ADULT m~~mrem r uCi/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLT'.63E2 H 3 7.63E2 7.63E2 7.63E2 7.63E2 7.63E2 c 14 3.63E5 7.26E4 7.26E4 7.26E4 7.26E4 7.26E4 7.26E4 Cr 51 1.48E4 8.85E3 3.26E3 1.96E4 3.72E6 Mn 54 5.41E6 1.03E6 1.61E6 1.66E7 Fe 55 1.57E7 1 OBE7 2.52E6 6.04E6 6.21E6 Fe 59 1.61E7 3.79E7 1.45E7 1.06E7 1.26ES Co 58 2.70E6 6.05E6 5.47E7 Co 60 1.10E7 2.42E7 2.06ES .

Zn 65 8.71ES 2.77E9 1.25E9 1.85E9 1.75E9 Sr 89 7.99ES 2.29E7 1.28ES Sr 90 3.15E10 7.74E9 9. 11EB Zr 95 5.34E2 1.71E2 1.16E2 2.69E2 5.43E5 Nb 95 1.09E5 6.07E4 3.27E4 6.00E4 3.69EB Mo 99 1.24E7 2 36E6 2.81E7 2.87E7 I 131 7.41E7 1. 06EB 6.08E7 3.47E10 1.82ES 2.80E7 I 133 '9.09ES 1.58E6 4.82E5 2.32ES 2.76E6 1.42E6 Cs 134 3.74E9 8.89E9 7.27E9 2.88E9 9.55EB 1.56ES Cs 137 4.97E9 6.80E9 4.46E9 2.31E9 7.68EB 1.32ES Ba 140 1.35E7 1.69E4 8.83ES 5.75E3 9.69E3 2.77E7 La 140 2.26 1.14 3.01E-1 8.35E4 Ce 141 2.54E3 1.72E3 1.95E2 7.99E2 6.58E6 Ce 144 2.29ES 9.58E4 1.23E4 5.68E4 7.74E7 Nd 147 4.74El 5.48E1 3.28EO 3.20E1 2.63E5 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 44 December 1993

4 TABLE 3-13 DOSE AND DOSE RATE VALUES GOAT MILK INFANT m~~mr emr uCi/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H 3 6.33E3 6.33E3 6.33E3 6.33E3 6.33E3 6.33E3 C 14 3.23E6 6.89E5 6.89E5 6.89ES 6.89E5 6.89E5 6.89E5 Cr 51 1.00E4 6.56E3 1.43E3 1.28E4 '.93E5 Mn 54 3.01E6 6~82E5 6.67ES 1. 11E6 Fe 55 1. 10E6 7.08E5 1.89E5 3.46E5 8.98E4 Fe '59 1.59E6 2.78E6 1.09E6 8.21ES 1.33E6 Co 58 1.67E6 4.16E6 4.16E6 Co 60 7.08E6 1.67E7 1.68E7 Zn 65 4.24E8 1.45E9 6.70E8 7.04E8 1.23E9 Sr 89 1.48E10 4.24E8 3 '4E8 Sr 90 1 ~ 72E11 4.38E10 2.15E9 Zr 95 4.66E2 1.13E2 8.04E1 1.22E2 5.65E4 Nb 95 9.42E4 3.88E4 2.24E4 2.78E4 3.27E7 Mo 99 1.27E7 2.47E6 1.89E7 4.17E6 I 131 8.17E8 9.63E8 4.23E8 3.16E11 1.12E9 3.44E7 I 133 1.02E7 1.49E7 4.36E6 2.71E9 1.75E7 2.52E6 Cs 134 7.23E10 1.35E11 1.36E10 3.47E10 1.42E10 3.66E8 Cs 137 1.04E11 1.22E11 8.63E9 3.27E10 1.32E10 3.81E8 Ba 140 1.45E7 1. 45E4 7.48E5 3.44E3 8.91E3 3.56E6 La 140 2.430 9.59E-1 2.47E-1 1.13E4 Ce 141 2.74E3 1.67E3 1.96E2 5.14E2 8.62E5 Ce 144 1.79ES 7.32E4 1.00E4 2 '6E4 1.03E7 Nd 147 5.32E1 5.47El 3.35EO 2.11E1 3.46E4 mrem/yr per uci/mi.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 45 December 1993

l 4

a

TABLE 3-14 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES GOAT MILK CHILD me~mrem r uCi/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H 3 4.17E3 4.17E3 4.17E3 4.17E3 4.17E3 4.17E3 C 14'r 1.65E6 3.29E5 3.29ES 3.29E5 3.29E5 3.29E5 3.29E5 51 6.34E3 3.52E3 9.62E2 6.43E3 3.36ES Mn 54 1.62E6 4.31ES 4.54E5 1.36E6 Fe 55 9.06ES 4.81ES 1.49E5 2.72ES 8.91E4 Fe 59 8.52E5 1.38E6 6.86ES 3.99E5 1.43E6 Co 58 8.35E5 2.56E6 4 87E6 Co 60 3.47E6 1.02E7 1.92E7 Zn 65 3.15E8 8.40ES 5.23ES 5.29ES 1.48ES Sr 89 7.77E9 2.22ES 3.01E8 Sr 90 1.58E11 4.01E10 2.13E9 Zr 95 2.62E2 5.76E1 5.13E1 8.25E1 6.01E4 Nb 95 5.05E4 1.96E4 1.40E4 1.85E4 3.63E7 Mo 99 4.95E6 1.22E6 1.06E7 4.09E6 I 131 3.91ES 3.94E8 2.24ES 1.30E11 6.46ES 3.50E7 I 133 4.84E6 5.99E6 2.27E6 1.11E9 9.98E6 2.41E6 Cs 134 4.49E10 7.37E10 1.55E10 2.28E10 8.19E9 3.97ES Cs 137 6. 52E10 6.24E10 9.21E9 2.03E10 7.32E9 3.91ES Ba 140 7.05E6 6.18E3 4.12E5 2.01E3 3.68E3 3.57E6 La 140 1.16 4.07E-1 1.37E-1 1.13E4 Ce 141 1.38E3 6.88E2 1.02E2 3.02E2 8.59ES Ce 144 1.25ES 3.91E4 6.66E3 2.16E4 1.02E7 Nd 147 2.68E1 2.17E1 1.68EO 1.19E1 3.44E4 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

~ Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 46 December 1993

~ '

C

TABLE 3-15 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES GOAT MILKTEEN micr emr uCi/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLT H 3 2.64E3 2.64E3 2.64E3 2.64E3 2.64E3 2.64E3 C 14 6.70E5 1.34E5 1.34ES 1.34ES 1 ~ 34E5 1.35E5 1.34E5 Cr 51 3.11E3 1.73E3 6.82E2 4.44E3 5 '3E5 Mn 54 1 OSE6 2.15E5 3.23E5 2.22E6 Fe 55 3.61E5 2.56E5 5.97E4 1.62E5 1.11ES Fe 59 3.67E5 8.57E5 3.31E5 2.70E5 2.03E6 Co 58 5.46E5 1.26E6 7.53E6 Co 60 2.23E6 5.03E6 2.91E7 Zn 65 1.61ES 5.58ES 2.60ES 3.57ES 2.36ES Sr 89 3.14E9 8.99E7 3.74E8 Sr 90 9.36E10 2.31E10 2.63E9 Zr 95 1.13E2 3.56E1 2.45E1 5.23E1 8.22E4 Nb 95 2.23E4 1.24E4 6.82E3 1.20E4 5.30E7 Mo 99 2.72E6 5.19E5 6.23E6 4.87E6 I 131 1. 61ES 2.26E8 1.21E8 6.59E10 3.89ES 4.47E7 I 133 1.99E6 3.38E6 1.03E6 4.72E8 5.93E6 2.56E6 Cs 134 1.95E10 4.58E10 2.13E10 1-46E10 5.56E9 5.70ES Cs 137 2.71E10 3.60E10 1.25E10 1.23E10 4.76E9 5.12ES Ba 140 2.92E6 3.58E3 1.88ES 1.21E3 2.41E3 4.50E6 La 140 4.86E-1 2.39E-1 6.36E-2 1.37E4 Ce 141 5.60E2 3.74E2 4.30E1 1.76E2 1.07E6 Ce 144 5.06E4 2.09E4 2.72E3 1.25E4 1.27E7 Nd 147 1.09E1 1.19E1 7.13E-1 6.99EO 4.29E4 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 47 December 1993

tl

.4

TABLE 3-16 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES GOAT MILK ADULT mr~mrem uci/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY 'THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H 3 2.03E3 2.03E3 2.03E3 2.03E3 2.03E3 2.03E3 C 14 3.63E5 7.26E4 7.26E4 7.26E4 7.26E4 7.26E4 7.26E4 Cr 51 1.78E3 1.06E3 3.92E2 2.36E3 4.48E5 Mn 54 6 50E5 1.24ES 1.93E5 1.99E6 Fe 55 2.04ES 1.41E5 3.28E4 7.85E4 8.07E4 Fe 59 2.10E5 4.95ES 1.90E5 1.38ES 1.65E6 Co 58 3.25E5 7.27E5 6 '8E6 Co 60 1.32E6 2.91E6 2.48E7 Zn 65 1.05ES 3.33ES 1.51ES 2.23E8 2.10E8 Sr 89 1.70E9 4.89E7 2.73ES Sr 90 6.62E10 1.63E10 1.91E9 Zr 95 6.45E1 2.07E1 1.40E1 3.25E1 6.56E4 Nb 95 1.31E4 7.29E3 3.92E3 7.21E3 4.42E7 Mo 99 1.51E6 2.87E5 3.41E6 3.49E6 I 131 8.89E7 1.27ES 7.29E7 4.17E10 2.18ES 3.36E7 I 133 1.09E6 1.90E6 5.79E5 2.79ES 3.31E6 1.71E6 Cs 134 1.12E10 2.67E10 2.18E10 8.63E9 2 86E9 4.67ES Cs 137 1.49E10 2.04E10 1.34E10 6.93E9 2.30E9 3.95E8 Ba 140 1.62E6 2.03E3 1.06E5 6.91E2 , 1.16E3 3.33E6 La 140 2.71E-1 1.36E-1 3.61E-2 1.00E4 Ce 141 3.06E2 2.07E2 2.34E1 9.60E1 7.90E5 Ce 144 2.75E4 1.15E4 1.48E3 6.82E3 9.30E6 Nd 147 5.69EO 6.57EO 3.93E-1 3.84EO 3.15E4 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 48 December 1993

TABLE 3-17 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES - COW MEAT - CHILD gP~meem r uCi/sec NUCLIDE LIVER T. BODY 'HYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLT'.34E2 H 3 BONE'.29E5 2.34E2 2.34E2 ,2.34E2 2.34E2 2.34E2 C 14 1 ~ 06ES 1.06ES 1.06E5 1.06E5 1.06E5 1.06E5 Cr 51 4.55E3 2.52E3 6.90E2 4.61E3 2.41E5 Mn 54 5.15E6 1.37E6 1.44E6 4.32E6 Fe 55 2.89ES 1.53ES 4.74E7 8.66E7 2.84E7 Fe 59 2.04ES 3.30ES 1.65E8 9.58E7 3.44E8 Co 58 9.41E6 2.88E7 5.49E7 Co 60 4.64E7 1.37ES 2.57E8 Zn 65 2.38ES 6.35ES 3.95E8 4.00E8 1.12E8 Sr 89 2.65ES 7.57E6 1.03E7 Sr 90 7.01E9 1.78E9 9.44E7 Zr 95 1.51E6 3.32E5 2.95E5 4.75ES 3.46E8 Nb 95 4.10E6 1.59E6 1.14E6 1.50E6 2.95E9 Mo 99 5.42E4 1.34E4 1.16E5 4.48E4 I 131 4.15E6 4.18E6 2.37E6 1.38E9 6.86E6 3.72E5 I 133 9.38E-2 1.16E-1 4.39E-2 2.15E1 1.93E-1 4.67E-2 Cs 134 6.09E8 1.00E9 2.11ES 3.10ES 1.11ES 5.39E6 Cs 137 8.99E8 8.60E8 1.27ES 2.80ES 1.01ES 5.39E6 Ba 140 2.20E7 1.93E4 1.28E6 6.27E3 1.15E4 1.11E7 La 140 2.80E-2 9.78E-3 3.30E-3 2.73E2 Ce 141 1.17E4 5.82E3 8.64E2 2.55E3 7.26E6 Ce 144 1.48E6 4.65ES 7.91E4 2.57E5 1. 21ES Nd 147 5.93E3 4.80E3 3.72E2 2.64E3 7.61E6 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 49 December 1993

I' TABLE 3-18 DOSE AND DOSE RATE R; VALUES - COW MEAT - TEEN gi~mr em uCi/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG 'GI-LLI-H 3 1.94E2 1.94E2 1.94E2 1.94E2 1.94E2 1.94E2

'.81E5 C 14'r 5~62E4 5.62E4 5.62E4 5.62E4 5.62E4 5.62E4 51 2.93E3 1.62E3 6.39E2 4.16E3 4.90ES Mn 54 4.50E6 8.93E5 1.34E6 9.24E6 Fe 55 1.50E8 1.07ES 2.49E7 6.77E7 , 4.62E7 Fe 59 1.15ES 2.69ES 1.04ES 8.47E7 6 '6ES Co 58 8.05E6 1.86E7 1. 11ES Co 60 3.90E7 S.SOE7 5.09ES Zn 65 1.59ES 5.52ES 2.57ES 3.53ES 2 '4E8 Sr 89 1.40ES 4.01E6 1.67E7 Sr 90 5.42E9 1.34E9 1.52ES .

Zr 95 8.50E5 2.68ES 1.84ES 3.94ES 6.19ES Nb 95 2.37E6 1.32E6 7.24ES 1.28E6 5.63E9 Mo 99 3.90E4 7.43E3 8 92E4 6.98E4 I 131 2.24E6 3.13E6 1 68E6 9.15E8 5.40E6 6.20ES I 133 5.05E-? 8.57E-2 2.61E-2 1.20E1 1.50E-1 6.48E-2 Cs 134 3.46ES 8.13ES 3.77ES 2.58ES 9.87E7 1.01E7 Cs 137 4.88ES 6.49ES 2.26ES 2 21ES 8.58E7 9.24E6 Ba 140 1.19E7 1.46E4 7.68ES 4.95E3 9.81E3 1.84E7 La 140 1.53E-2 7.51E-3 2.00E-3 4.31E2 Ce 141 6.19E3 4.14E3 4.75E2 1.95E3 1.18E7 Ce 144 7.87E5 3.26E5 4.23E4 1.94ES 1.98ES Nd 147 3.16E3 3-44E3 2.06E2 2.02E3 1.24E7 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 50 December 1993

~~ ~

TABLE 3-19 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Ri VALUES COW MEAT ADULT

~modem uci/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY jUNG GI-LLI H 3 3.25E2 3.25E2 3.25E2 3 '5E2 3.25E2 3.25E2

'.33E5 C. 14 6.66E4 6.66E4 6.66E4 6.66E4 6.66E4 6.66E4 Cr 51 3.65E3 2.18E3 8.03E2 4.84E3 9.17E5 Mn 54 5 90E6 1.13E6 1 ~ 76E6 1 81E7 Fe 55 1.85E8 1. 28ES 2.98E7 7.14E7 7.34E7 Fe 59 1.44ES 3.39E8 1.30ES 9.46E7 1.13E9.

Co 58 1.04E7 2.34E7 2.12ES Co 60 5.03E7 1.11E8 9.45E8 Zn 65 2.26ES 7.19ES 3.25ES 4.81E8 4.53ES Sr 89 1.66E8 4.76E6 2.66E7 Sr 90 8.38E9 2.06E9 2.42ES Zr 95 1.06E6 3.40ES 2.30E5 5 '4E5 1.08E9 Nb 95 3.04E6 1.69E6 9.08E5 1.67E6 1.03E10 Mo 99 4.71E4 8.97E3 1.07ES 1.09E5 I 131 2.69E6 3 '5E6 2.21E6 1.26E9 6.61E6 1.02E6 I 133 6.04E-2 1.05E-1 3.20E-2 1.54El 1.83E-1 9.44E-2 Cs 134 4.35ES 1.03E9 8.45ES 3 '5ES 1.11ES 1.81E7 Cs 137 5 88ES 8.04ES 5.26ES 2.73ES 9.07E7 1.56E7 Ba 140 1.44E7 1.81E4 9.44ES 6.15E3 1.04E4 2.97E7 La 140 1.86E-2 9.37E-3 2.48E-3 6.88E2 Ce 141 7.38E3 4.99E3 5.66E2 2.32E3 1.91E7 Ce 144 9.33E5 3.90E5 5.01E4 2.31ES 3. 16ES Nd 147 3.59E3 4.15E3 2.48E2 2.42E3 1.99E7 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 51 December 1993

0 P ~

~1 I

TABLE 3-20 DOSE AND DOSE RATE VALUES VEGETATIONCHILD m~~mrem r uCi/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H 3 4.01E3 4.01E3 4.01E3 4.01E3 4.01E3 4.01E3 C 14 3.50E6 7.01E5 7.01E5 7.01ES 7.01E5 7.01ES 7.01E5 Cr 51 1.17E5 6.49E4 1.77E4 1.18E5 6.20E6 Mn 54 6.65ES 1.77ES 1.86ES 5.58ES Fe 55 7.63ES 4.05ES 1 '5ES 2.29ES 7.50E7 Fe 59 3.97ES 6.42ES 3.20ES 1. 86ES 6.69ES Co 58 6.45E7 1.97ES 3 '6ES Co 60 3.78ES 1.12E9 2.10E9 Zn 65 8. 12ES 2.16E9 1.35E9 1.36E9 3.80ES Sr 89 3.59E10 1.03E9 1.39E9 Sr 90 1.24E12 3.15E11 1.67E10 Zr 95 3.86E6 8.50E5 7 56E5 1.22E6 8.86ES Nb 95 1.02E6 3.99E5 2.85E5 3.75E5 7.37ES Mo 99 7.70E6 1.91E6 1.65E7 6.37E6 I 131 7.16E7 7.20E7 4.09E7 2.38E10 1.18ES 6.41E6 I 133 1.69E6 2.09E6 7.92E5 3.89E8 3.49E6 8.44E5 Cs 134 1.60E10 2.63E10 5.55E9 8.15E9 2.93E9 1.42ES Cs 137 2.39E10 2.29E10 3.38E9 7.46E9 2.68E9 1.43E8 Ba 140 2.77E8 2.43ES 1.62E7 7.90E4 1.45E5 1.40ES La 140 3.25E3 1.13E3 3.83E2 3.16E7 Ce 141 6.56E5 3.27ES 4.85E4 1.43E5 4.08ES Ce 144 1.27ES 3.98E7 6.78E6 2.21E7 1.04E10 Nd 147 7.23E4 5.86E4 4.54E3 3.22E4 9.28E7 mrem/yr per uci/m~.

Unit 2 Revision 9

'004337LL II 52 December 1993

TABLE 3-21 DOSE AND DOSE RATE Q VALUES - VEGETATION TEEN gi~mrem r uci/sec NUCLIDE BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H 3 2.59E3 2.59E3 2.59E3 2.59E3 2.59E3 2-59E3 C 14 1.45E6 2.91E5 2.91ES 2.91ES 2 '1ES 2.91E5 2.91E5 Cr 51 6.16E4 3.42E4 1.35E4 8.79E4 1.03E7 Mn 54 4.54EB 9.01E7 1.36ES 9.32ES Fe 55 3.10ES 2.20EB 5.13E7 1.40ES 9.53E7 Fe 59 1.79ES 4.18ES 1.61ES 1.32ES 9.89ES Co 58 4.37E7 1.01EB 6.02EB Co 60 2.49EB 5.60EB 3.24E9 Zn 65 4.24ES 1.47E9 6.86EB 9. 41EB 6.23ES Sr 89 1.51E10 4.33ES 1.80E9 Sr 90 7.51E11 1.85E11 2.11E10 Zr 95 1.72E6 5.44E5 3.74ES 7.99ES 1.26E9 Nb 95 4.80E5 2.66E5 1.46E5 2.58ES 1.14E9 Mo 99 5.64E6 1.08E6 1.29E7 1.01E7 I 131 3.85E7 5.39E7 2.89E7 1.57E10 9.28E7 1.07E7 I 133 9.29E5 1.58E6 4.80E5 2.20EB 2. 76E6 1.19E6 Cs 134 7.10E9 1.67E10 7.75E9 5.31E9 2.03E9 2.08EB Cs 137 1.01E10 1.35E10 4.69E9 4.59E9 1.78E9 1.92ES Ba 140 1.38ES 1.69E5 8.91E6 5.74E4 1.14E5 2.13EB La 140 1.81E3 8.88E2 2.36E2 5.10E7 Ce 141 2.83E5 1.89ES 2.17E4 8.89E4 5.40ES Ce 144 5.27E7 2.18E7 2.83E6 1.30E7 1.33E10 Nd 147 3.66E4 3.98E4 2.3863 2.34E4 1.44ES mrem/yr per uci/m~

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 53 December 1993

4, TABLE 3-22 DOSE AND DOSE RATE VALUES VEGETATION ADULT md~mr em r uCi/sec NUCLIDE BONE I IVER T. BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H 3 2.26E3 2.26E3 2 '6E3 2.26E3 2.26E3 2.26E3 C 14'r 8.97ES 1.79ES 1.79E5 1.79E5 1.79E5 1.79E5 1.79E5 51 4.64E4 2.77E4 1.02E4 6.15E4 1.17E7 Mn 54 3.13ES 5.97E7 9.31E7 9.58ES Fe 55 2.00ES 1.38ES 3.22E7 7.69E7 7.91E7 Fe 59 1.26ES '.96E8 1.13ES 8.27E7 1.02E9 Co 58 3.08E7 6.90E7 6.24ES Co 60 1.67E8 3.69ES 3.14E9 Zn 65 3.17ES 1.01E9 4.56E8 6.75ES 6.36E8 Sr 89 9.96E9 2.86ES 1.60E9 Sr 90 6.05E11 1.48E11 1.75E10 Zr 95 1.18E6 3.77ES 2.55ES 5.92ES 1.20E9 Nb 95 3.55E5 1.98ES 1". 06E5 1.95ES 1.20E9 Mo 99 6.14E6 1.17E6 1.39E7 1.42E7 I 131 4.04E7 5.78E7 3.31E7 1.90E10 9.91E7 1.53E7 I 133 1.00E6 1.74E6 5.30E5 2.56ES 3.03E6 1 '6E6 Cs 134 4.67E9 1.11E10 9.08E9 3.59E9 1.19E9 1.94E8 Cs 137 6.36E9 8.70E9 5.70E9 2.95E9 9.81ES 1. 68ES Ba 140 1.29ES 1.61E5 8.42E6 5.49E4 9.25E4 2.65ES La 140 1.98E3 9.97E2 2.63E2 7.32E7 Ce 141 1.97E5 1.33ES 1.51E4 6.19E4 5.09ES Ce 144 3.29E7 1.38E7 1.77E6 8.16E6 1.11E10 Nd 147 3.36E4 3.88E4 2.32E3 2.27E4 1. 86ES mrem/yr per uci/m~

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 54 December 1993

t a b ~

TABLE 3-23 DISPERSION PARAMETERS AT CONTROLLING LOCATIONS'X)

Wand W VALUES

. DIRECTION. DISTANCE m X sec m~ ~D~m~

Site Boundary~ 1,600 2.00 E-6 2 '0E-9 Inhalation and Ground E (1040) 1,800 1.42E-7 2.90E-9 Plane Cow Milk ESE (1300) 4,300 4.11E-8 4.73E-10 Goat SE (1400) 4,800 3.56E-08 5.32E-10 Milk'eat Animal E (1140) 2,600 1.17E-7 1.86E-9 Vegetation E (960) 2,900 1.04E-7 1.50E-9 STACK Site Boundary~ 1,600 4.50E-8 6.00E-9 Inhalation and Ground E (1090) 1,700 8.48E-9 1.34E-9 Plane Cow Milk ESE (1350) 4,200 1.05E-8 3.64E-10 Goat SE (1400) 4,800 2.90E-08 5.71E-10 Milk'eat Animal E (114 ) 2, 500 1.13E-8 1.15E-9

,Vegetation E (960) 2,800 1.38E-8 9.42E-10 NOTEc Inhalation and Ground Plane are annual average values. Others are grazing season only.

X/Q and D/Q values from NMP-2 ER-OLS.

X/Q and D/Q from NMP-2 FES, NUREG-1085, May 1985, Table D-2.

X/Q and D/Q from C.T. Main Data Report dated November 1985.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 55 December 1993

TABLE 3-24 PARAMETERS FOR THE EVALUATION OF DOSES TO REAL MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC FROM GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS

~Pathwa . Parameter Value Reference Fish U (kg/yrJ adult 21 Reg. Guide 1.109 Table E-5 Fish D~ (mrem/pCi) Each Radionuclide Reg. Guide 1. 109 Table E-11 Shoreline U (hr/yr) adult 67 Reg. Guide 1.109 teen 67 Assumed to be Same as Adult Shoreline Each Radionuclide Reg. Guide 1.109 (mrem/hr per pci/mi) Table E-6 Inhalation DFA;. Each Radionuclide Reg. Guide 1. 109 Table E-7 Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 56 December 1993

'I 0

r

TABLE 5. 1 NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Map Collection Site T e of Sam le Location Env. Pro ram No. Location Radioiodine and Nine Mile Point Road North 1.8 mi 9 88' Particulates (air) (R-1)

Radioiodine and County Route 29 6 Lake Road 1.1 mi 9 104'SE Particulates (air) (R-2)

Radioiodine and County Route 29 1.5 mi 8 1324 SE Particulates (air) (R-3)

Radioiodine and Village of Lycoming, NY 1.8 mi 9 1434 SE Particulates (air) (R-4)

Radioiodine and Montario Point Road 16.4 mi 9 424 NE Particulates (air) (R-5)

Direct Radiation (TLD) North Shoreline Area 0 lmi 8 54 N (75)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 7 North Shoreline Area 0. 1 mi 8 25'NE (76)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 8 North Shoreline Area 0.2 mi Q 45~ NE (77)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 9 North Shoreline Area 0.8 mi 9 70 ENE (23)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 10 JAF East Boundary 10 mi 8 904 E (78)

Direct Radiation (TLD) ll Route 29 (79) 1.1 mi 8 1154 ESE Direct Radiation (TLD) 12 Route 29 1.4 mi 8 1334 SE (80)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 13 Miner Road 1.6 mi 9 1594 SSE (81)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 14 Miner Road 1 6mi 9 1814 S (82)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 15 Lakeview Road 1.2 mi 8 200'SW (83)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 16 Lakeview Road 1.1 mi 9 2254 SW (84)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 17 Site Meteorological Tower 0. 7 mi 8 2504 WSW (7)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 18 Energy Information Center 0.4 mi 8 2650 W (18)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 19 North Shoreline 0.2 mi 9 294'NW (85)

See Figures 5.1-1 and 5.1-2.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 57 December 1993

I' TABLE 5.1 (Cont'd)

NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Map Collection Site T e of Sam le Location Env. Pro ram No. Location Direct Radiation (TLD) 20 North Shoreline 0.1 mi 9 3154 NW (86)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 21 North Shoreline O.l mi 9 3414 NNW (87)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 22 Hickory Grove 4.5 mi. 9 974 E (88)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 23 Leavitt Road 4. 1 mi 8 1114 ESE (89)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 24 Route 104 4.2 mi 8 1354 SE (90)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 25 Route 51A 4.8 mi 8 156'SE (91)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 26 Maiden Lane Road 4.4 mi 9 183~ S (92)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 27 County Route 53 4.4 mi 8 2054 SSW (93)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 28 County Route 1 4.7 mi 8 2234 SW (94)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 29 Lake Shoreline 4.1 mi 8 2374 WSW (95)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 30 Phoenix, NY Control 19. 8 mi 8 163' (49)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 31 S. W. Oswego, Control 12.6 mi 9 226'W (14)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 32 Scriba, NY 3.6 mi 9 199 SSW (96)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 33 Alcan Aluminum, Route 1A 3. 1 mi 8 220'W (58)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 34 Lycoming, NY 1.8 mi 9 1434 SE (97)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 35 New Haven, NY 5. 3 mi 9 123'SE (56)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 36 W., Boundary, Bible Camp 0.9 mi 9 237'SW (15)

Direct Radiation (TLD) 37 Lake Road 1.2 mi 8 101' (98)

See Figures 5.1-1 and 5.1-2.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 58 December 1993

k TABLE 5.1 (Cont'd)

NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Map Collection Site .

T e of Sam le Location Env. Pro ram No. ~ocation Surface Water 38 OSS Inlet Canal 7.6 mi 9 2354 SW (NA)

Surface Water 39 JAFNPP Inlet Canal 0.5 mi 9 704 ENE (NA)

Shoreline Sediment 40 Sunset Bay Shoreline 1.5 mi 9 804 E (NA)

Fish 41 NMP Site Discharge Area 0.3 mi 9 315 NW (NA)

(and/or)

Fish 42 NMP Site Discharge Area 0.6 mi 9 554 NE (NA)

Fish 43 Oswego Harbor Area 6.2 mi 9 2354 SW (NA)

Milk 44 Milk Location ¹50 8.2 mi 9 93' Milk 45 Milk Location ¹7 5.5 mi 8 1074 ESE Milk 47 Milk Location ¹65 17.0 mi 9 220'W Milk 64 Milk Location ¹55 9.0 mi 8 954 E Milk 65 Milk Location ¹60 9.5 mi 8 904 E Milk 66 Milk Location ¹4 7.8 mi 9 1134 ESE Milk (CR) 73 Milk Location 13.9 mi 9 2344 SW (Woodworth)

Food Product 48 Produce Location ¹6** 1.9 mi 9 1414 SE (Bergenstock) (NA)

Food Product Produce Location ¹1** 17 mi 8 964 E (Culeton) (NA)

Food Product 50 Produce Location ¹2** 1.9 mi 8 1014 E (Vitullo) (NA)

Food Product 51 Produce Location ¹5** 1.5 mi 8 1144 ESE (C.S. Parkhurst) (NA)

Food Product 52 Produce Location ¹3** 1.6 mi 9 844 E (C. Narewski) (NA)

The Jones milk location has been deleted due to the herd being sold.

(Map location ¹46.)

Map See Figures 5.1-1 and 5.1-2.

- Food Product Samples need not necessarily be collected from all listed locations. Collected samples will be of the highest calculated site average D/Q.

e (NA)

CR Not applicable.

Control Result (location).

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 59 December 1993

TABLE 5.1 (Cont'd)

NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Map Collection Site T e of Sam le Location Env. Pro ram No. Location Food Product 53 Produce Location ¹4** 2.1 mi 9 110'SE (P. Parkhurst) (NA)

Food Product (CR) 54 Produce Location ¹7++ 15.0 mi 8 223 SW (Mc Millen) (NA)

Food Product (CR) 55 Produce Location ¹8** 12.6 mi 8 2254 SW (Denman) (NA)

Food Product 56 Produce Location ¹9** 1.6 mi 8 1714 S (O'onnor) (NA)

Food Product 57 Produce Location ¹10** 2.2 mi 9 1234 ESE (C. Lawton) (NA)

Food Product 58 Produce Location ¹11** 2.0 mi 8 1124 ESE (C. R. Parkhurst) (NA)

Food Product 59 Produce Location ¹12** 1.9 mi 9 115'SE (Barton) (NA)

Food Product (CR) 60 Produce Location ¹13** 15.6 mi 9 2254 SW (Flack) (NA)

Food Product 61 Produce Location ¹14** 1.9 mi 9 95' (Koeneke) (NA)

Food Product 62 Produce Location ¹15** 1.7 mi 8 1364 SE (Whaley) (NA)

Food Product, 63 Produce Location ¹16** 1.2 mi 8 2074 SSW (Murray) (NA)

Map See Figures 5.1-1 and 5.1-.2.

- Food Product Samples need not necessarily be'collected from all listed locations. Collected samples will be of the highest calculated site average D/Q.

(NA) Not applicable.

CR Control Result (location).

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZI 60 December 1993

APPENDIX A LIQUID DOSE FACTOR DERIVATION Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 61 December 1993

Appendix A Liquid Effluent Dose Factor Derivation, A A (mrem/hr per uCi/ml) which embodies the dose conversion factors, pathway transfer factors (e.g , bioaccumulation factors), pathway usage factors, and dilution factors for-the points of pathway origin takes into account the dose from ingestion of fish and drinking water and the sediment. The total body and organ dose conversion factors for each radionuclide will be used from Table E-11 of Regulatory Guide 1.109. To expedite time, the dose is calculated for a maximum individual instead of each age group. The maximum individual dose factor is a composite of the highest dose factor A( of each nuclide i age group a, and organ t, hence A,. It should be noted that the fish ingestion pathway is the most significant pathway for dose from liquid effluents. The water consumption pathway is included for consistency with NUREG 0133.

The equation for calculating dose contributions given in section 1.3 requires the use of the composite dose factor A for each nuclide, i. The dose factor equation for a fresh water site is:

Kit -1)t~

Dw

+ 69.3 UW e

-X,t-1f e (1-e ~

) (DpS),)

(D.) (Si)

Where:

Is the dose factor for nuclide i, age group a, total body or organ t, for all appropriate pathways, (mrem/hr per uCi/ml)

Ko Is the unit conversion factor, 1.14E5=1E6pCi/uCi x 1E3 ml/kg :- 8760 hr/yr U Water consumption (1/yr); from Table E-5 of Reg. Guide 1.109 Ug Fish consumption (Kg/yr); from Table E-5 of Reg. Guide 1.109 U, Sediment Shoreline Usage (hr/yr); from Table E-5 of Reg.

Guide 1.109 (BF)( Bioaccumulation factor for nuclide, i, in fish, (pCi/kg per pCi/1), from Table A-1 of Reg. Guide 1.109 (DFL)L, Dose conversion factor for age, nuclide, i, group a, total body or organ t, (mrem/pCi); from Table E-11 of Reg. Guide 1.109 (DFS) i Dose conversion factor for nuclide i and total body, from standing on contaminated ground (mern/hr per pci/mi); from Table E-6 of Reg. Guide 1.109 D Dilution factor from the near field area within one-quarter mile of the release point to the potable water intake for the adult water consumption. This is the Metropolitan Water Board, Onondaga County intake structure located west of the City of Oswego. (Unitless)

D, Dilution factor from the near field area within one quarter mile of the release point to the shoreline deposit (taken at the same point where we take environmental samples 1.5 miles; unitless)

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 62 December 1993

a'

~ 4 b I' t il

Appendix A (Cont'd) 69.3 conversion factor .693 x 100, 100 ~ K, (L/kg-hr)*40*24 hr/day/.693 in L/m~=.,d, and K, ~ transfer coefficient from water to sediment in L/kg per hour.

Average transit time required for each nuclide to reach the point of exposure for internal dose, it is the total time elapsed from release of the nuclides to either ingestion for water (w) and fish (f) or shoreline deposit (s), (hr)

Length of time the sediment is exposed to the contaminated water, nominally 15 yrs (approximate midpoint. of facility operating life), (hrs).

decay constant for nuclide i (hr')

Shore width factor (unitless) from Table A-2 of Reg. Guide 1 '09 Example Calculation For I-131 Thyroid Dose Factor for an Adult from a Radwaste liquid effluents release:

(DFS) i 2.80E-9 mrem/hr per pCi/m~

(DFL)~ 1.95E-3 mrem/pci t~ 40 hrs. (w ~ water)

BF( 15 pCi/Kg per pCi/L tg 24 hrs. (f ~ fish)

Ug 21 Kg/yr tb 1.314ES hr (5.48E3 days)

D 62 unitless U 730 L/yr D, 17.8 unitless Ko 1.14ES Ci uCi ml k U, 12 hr/yr (hr/yr)

W 0.3 t~ 7.3 hrs (s=Shoreline Sediment) 3.61E-3hr'hese values will yield an A Factor of 6.65E4 mrem-ml per uCi-hr as listed in Table 2-2. It should be noted that only a limited number of nuclides are listed on Tables 2-2 to 2-5. These are the most common nuclides encountered in effluents. If a nuclide is detected for which a factor is not listed, then will be calculated and included in a revision to the ODCM.

it In addition, not all dose factors are used for the dose calculations. A maximum individual is used, which is a composite of the maximum dose factor of each age group for each organ as reflected in the applicable chemistry procedures.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 63 December 1993

a ~

APPENDIX B PLUME SHINE DOSE FACTOR DERIVATION Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 64 December 1993

h ~

APPENDIX B For elevated releases the plume shine dose factors for gamma air (B,) and whole body (V,), are calculated using the finite plume model with an elevation above ground equal to the stack height. To calculate the plume shine factor for gamma whole body doses, the gamma air dose factor is adjusted for the attenuati'on'f tissue, and the ratio of mass absorption coefficients between-tissue and air. The equations are as follows:

Gamma Air B) =Z K~EZ Where: K' conversion factor (see s R8 V, below for actual value).

p, = mass absorption coefficient (cm /gd air for B;, tissue for V,)

E = Energy of gamma ray per disintegration (Mev)

V, = average wind speed for each stability class (s),

R = downwind distance (site boundary, m) 8 = sector width (radians) s = subscript for stability class I, = I function ~ I, + kIi for each stability class. (unitless, see Regulatory Guide 1.109) ki ~ Fraction of the attenuated energy that is actually absorbed in air (see Regulatory Guide 1.109, see below for equation)

W~hole Bod I atd Vi 1. 11SFB;e Where: tissue depth (g/cm )

SF shielding factor from structures (unitless) 1.11 = Ratio of mass absorption coefficients between tissue and air.

Where all other parameters are defined above.

'K aa conversion factor ~ 3.7 E10 dis 1.6 E-6 ~er Ci-sec Mev = .46 1293 100 ~er q

m g-rad

'k~~ Ida Where: p aa mass attenuation coefficient (cm~/gd air for B tissue for V,)

p, ~ 'efined above Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 65 December 1993

I APPENDIX B (Cont'd)

There are seven stability classes, A thru F. The percentage of the year that each stability class occurs is taken from the U-2 FSAR. From this data, a plume shine dose factor is calculated for each stability class and each nuclide, mu).tiplied by its respective fraction and then summed.

The wind speeds corresponding to each stability class are, also, taken from the U-2 FSAR. To confirm the accuracy of these values, an average of the 12 month wind speeds for 1985, 1986, 1987 and 1988 was compared to the average of the FSAR values. The average wind speed of the actual data is equal to 6.78 m/s, which compared favorably to the FSAR average wind speed equal to 6.77 m/s.

The average gamma energies were calculated using a weighted average of all gamma energies emitted from the nuclide. These energies were taken from the handbook "Radioactive Decay Data Tables", David C. Kocher.

The mass absorption (p,) and attenuation (p) coefficients were calculated by multiplying the mass absorption (p,/p) and mass attenuation (p/p) coefficients given in the Radiation Health Handbook by the air density equal to 1.293 E-3 g/cc or the tissue density of 1 g/cc where applicable. The tissue depth is Sg/cm~ for the whole body.

The downwind distance is the site boundary.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 66 December 1993

APPENDIX B (Cont'd)

SAMPLE CALCULATION Ex. Kr-89 F STABILITY CLASS ONLY Gamma Air

-DATA E

Pd 2.22MeV 2.943 E-3m k ~ ~Pd

= .871 K ~

V ~

.46 5.55 m/sec P 5.5064E-3m' = 1600m e .39 C75 19m.......vertical plume spread taken from "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering", John R. LaMarsh

-I Function Ucr, .11 II .3 Ig .4 I Ii + kIa = ~ 3 + ( ~ 871) (.4) = .65 dis ~

Bi 0.46 Ci-sec Mev er s 2.943E-3m'.22Mev .65 (mQ (g/m') (ercra) (5. 55 m/s) (. 39) (1600m)

(g-rad) 3.18(-7) rad s 3600 s hr 24 h d . 365 d 1E3mrad rad Ci/s (1E6uCi)

Ci 1.00(-2) ~mrad r uCi/sec

-(.0253 cm~/g) (5g/cd) 1.11 (.7) (lE-2) mrad rI [e pci/sec]

6.85(-3) meadr pCi/sec Note: The above calculation is for the F stability class only. For Table 3-2 and procedure values, a weighted fraction of each stability class was used to determine the B, and V, values.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL I1 67 December 1993

4 APPENDIX C DOSE PARAMETERS FOR ZODZNE 131 and 133, PARTICULATES AND TRITIUM Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZZ 68 December 1993

1 I APPENDIX C DOSE PARAMETERS FOR ZODINE - 131 AND 133i PARTICULATES AND TRITIUM This appendix contains the methodology which was used to calculate the organ dose factors for I-131., Z-133, particulates, and tritium. The dose factor, R/g was ca 1 cu 1 ated usi:ng the methodo logy out 1 ined in NUREG-0 1 33 . The radioiodine and particulate Radiological Controls (Section 3.11.2) is applicable to the location in the unrestricted area where the combination of existing pathways and receptor age groups indicates the maximum potential exposure occurs, i.e., the critical receptor. Washout was calculated and determined to be negligible. Q values have been calculated for the adult, teen, child and infant age groups for all pathways. However, for dose compliance calculations, a maximum individual is assumed that is a composite of highest dose factor of each age group for each organ and pathway. The methodology used to calculate these values follows:

C.l Inhalation Pathwa Q(I) K'BR),(DFA)g, where:

K'ose 4(I) factor for each identified radionuclide i of the organ of interest (units = mrem/yr per uCi/m~);

a constant of unit conversion, 1E6 pCi/uCi (BR), Breathing rate of the receptor of age group a, (units = m~/yr);

(DFA) 9, The inhalation dose factor for nuclide i, organ j and age group a, and organ t (units ~

mrem/pci).

The breathing rates (BR), for the various age groups, as given in Table E-5 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 Revision 1, are tabulated below.

A e Grou a Breathin Rate m~ r Infant 1400 Child 3700 Teen 8000 Adult 8000 Inhalation dose factors (DFA)>> for the various age groups are given in Tables E-7 through E-10 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 Revision 1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZI 69 December 1993

t t t II APPENDIX C (Cont'd)

C.2 Ground Plane Pathwa K'K 1-e

-l.,t Q(G) SF DFG Where:

K'ose Q(G) factor for the ground plane pathway for each identified radionuclide i for the organ of interest (units = m -mrem/yr per uCi/sec) constant of unit conversion, 1E6 pCi/uCi A

A constant of unit conversion, 8760 hr/year The radiological decay constant for radionuclide i, (units = sec')

The exposure time, sec, 4.73E8 sec (15 years)

(DFG)~ The ground plane dose conversion factor for radionuclide i; (units = mrem/hr per pCi/m~)

SF The shielding factor (dimensionless)

A shielding factor of 0.7 is discussed in Table E-15 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 Revision 1. A tabulation of DFG, values is presented in Table E-6 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 Revision 1.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 70 December 1993

J I1 k

APPENDIX C (Cont'd)

C.3 Grass- Cow or Goat -Milk Pathwa g(C) ~ K'- '

+

r DFL ~ff Yp

+ (~1-f Y,

f )(e-l,tg e -l,t, Where:

K'ose Q(C) factor for the cow milk or goat milk pathway, for each identified radionuclide i for the organ of interest, (units m2-mrem/yr per uCi/sec)

A constant of unit conversion, 1E6 pCi/uCi

=

The cow's or goat's feed consumption rate, (units ~ Kg/day-wet weight)

The receptor's milk consumption rate for age group a, (units =

liters/yr)

Yp The agricultural productivity by unit area of pasture feed grass, (units = kg/m2)

Y, The agricultural productivity by unit area of stored feed, (units ~

kg/m2)

Fm The stable element transfer coefficients, (units = pCi/liter per pCi/day)

Fraction of deposited activity retained on cow's feed grass (DFL) The ingestion dose factor for nuclide i, age group a, and total body or organ t (units = mrem/pCi)

The radiological decay constant for radionuclide i, (units~sec -1)

The decay constant for removal of activity on leaf and plant surfaces by weathering equal to 5.73E-7 sec -1 (corresponding to a 14 day half-life)

The transport time from pasture to cow or goat, to milk, to receptor, (units ~ sec)

The transport time from pasture, to harvest, to cow or goat, to milk, to receptor (units = sec)

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 71 December 1993

APPENDIX C (Cont'd)

Fraction of the year that the cow or goat is on pasture (dimensionless)

Fraction of the cow feed that is pasture grass while the cow is on pasture (dimensionless)

Milk cattle and goats are considered to be fed from two potential sources, pasture grass and stored feeds. Following the development in Regulatory Guide 1.109 Revision 1, the value of f, is considered unity in lieu of site specific information. The value of f~ is 0.5 based on 6 month grazing period. This value for f~ was obtained from the environmental group.

Table C-1 contains the appropriate values and their source in Regulatory Guide 1.109 Revision 1.

The concentration of tritium in milk is based on the airborne concentration rather than the deposition. Therefore, the Rz(C) is based on X/g:

+(C) K K F~QP~p(DFL) ~ 0 .75 (0 5/H)

~ ~

Where:

RT(C) Dose factor for the cow or goat milk pathway for tritium for the organ of interest, (units = mrem/yr per uCi/m~)

~ I A constant of unit conversion, 1E3 g/kg H Absolute humidity of the atmosphere, (units = g/m~)

0.75 The fraction of total feed that is water The ratio of the specific activity of the feed grass water to the atmospheric water Other values are given previously. *A site specific value of H equal to 6.14 g/m~ is used. This value was obtained from the environmental group using actual site data.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 72 December 1993

t V 4 t

C

'e,~

APPENDIX C (Cont'd)

C.4 Grass-Cow-Meat Pathwa f )(e -l~tq e -l~t~

Q(C) = K' F r DFL ~ff + (~1-f

. (1, + lg Yp Y, Q(M) Dose factor for the meat ingestion pathway for radionuclide i for any organ of interest, (units = m~-mrem/yr per uCi/sec)

Fr The stable element transfer coefficients, (units = pCi/kg per pCi/day)

The receptor's meat consumption rate for age group a, (units =

kg/year)

'h The transport time from harvest, to cow, to receptor, (units =

sec)

The transport time from pasture, to cow, to receptor, (units ~

sec)

All other terms remain the same as defined for the milk pathway. Table C<<2 contains the values which were used in calculating Q(M).

The concentration of tritium in meat is based on airborne concentration rather than deposition. Therefore, the R~(M) is based on X/g.

Rr(M) = K K Fgp~(DFL)LI [0'75(0 5/H)

~ )

Where:

R~(M) ~ Dose factor for the meat ingestion pathway for tritium for any organ of interest, (units = mrem/yr per uCi/m )

All other terms are defined above.

C.5 Ve etation Pathwa K'l,t The integrated concentration in vegetation consumed by man follows the expression developed for milk. Man is considered to consume two types of vegetation (fresh and stored) that differ only in the time period between harvest and consumption, therefore:

Q(V) = r (DFL)~ U Fe + U sFe Y(l, + 1)

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 73 December 1993

APPENDIX C (Cont'd)

Where:

Q(V) Dose organ of interest, (units = m~-mrem/yr per uCi/sec) i factor for vegetable pathway for radionuclide for the K'L A constant of unit conversion, 1E6 pCi/uCi The consumption rate of fresh leafy vegetation by the receptor in age group a, (units = kg/yr)

Us The consumption rate of stored vegetation by the receptor in age group a (units = kg/yr)

Fg The fraction of the annual intake of fresh leafy vegetation grown locally Fc The fraction of the annual intake of stored vegetation grown locally The average time between harvest of leafy vegetation and its consumption, (units ~ sec)

The. average time between harvest of stored vegetation and its consumption, (units = sec)

Yy The vegetation areal P density, (units ~ kg/m~)

All other factors have been defined previously.

Table C-3 presents the appropriate parameter values and their source in Regulatory Guide 1.109 Revision l.

In lieu of site-specific data, values for Fz and F~ of, 1.0 and 0.76, respectively, were used in the calculation. These values were obtained from Table E-15 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 Revision 1.

The concentration of tritium in vegetation is based on the airborne concentration rather than the deposition. Therefore, the R~(V) is based on X/Q:

Q(V) ~ K K [U a fL + U', fc) (DFL)~ 0 75(0 5/H Where:

+(V) dose factor for the vegetable pathway for tritium for any organ of interest, (units = mrem/yr per uCi/m~).

All other terms are defined in preceeding sections.

Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 74 December 1993

~ I TABLE C-1 Parameters for Grass - (Cow or Goat) - Milk Pathways Reference Parameter Value Re . Guide 1.109 Rev. 1 Q~ (kg/day) 50 (cow) Table E-3 6 (goat) Table E-3 1.0 (radioiodines) Table E-15 0.2 (particulates) Table E-15 (DFL)> (mrem/pCi) Each radionuclide Tables E-11 to E-14 F (pCi/liter per pCi/day) Each stable element Table E-1 (cow)

Table E-2 (goat)

Y, (kg/m~) 2.0 Table E-15

( kg/mz) 0.7 Table E-15 t~ (seconds) 7.78 x 10~ (90 days) Table E-15 t~ (seconds) 1.73 x 10~ (2 days) Table E-15 U (liters/yr) 330 infant Table E-5 330 child Table E-5 400 teen Table E-5 310 adult Table E-5 Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZI 75 December 1993

4 TABLE C-2 Parameters for the Grass-Cow-Meat Pathway Reference Parameter Value Re . Guide 1.109 Rev. 1 1.0 (radioiodines) Table E-15 0.2 (particulates) Table E-15 F, (pCi/Kg per pCi/day) Each stable element Table E-1 U~ (Kg/yr) 0 infant Table E-5 41 child Table E-5 65 teen Table E-5 110 adult Table E-5 (DFL)> (mrem/pCi) Each radionuclide Tables E-11 to E-14 Y (kg/m~) 0.7 Table E-15 Y, (kg/m ) 2.0 Table E-15 t~ (seconds) 7.78E6 (90 days) Table E-15 t, (seconds) 1.73E6 (20 days) Table E-15 0, (kg/day) 50 Table E-3 Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL ZI 76 December 1993

TABLE C-3 Parameters for the Vegetable Pathway Reference Parameter Value Re . Guide 1.109 Rev. 1 r (dimensionless) 1.0 (radioiodines) Table E-1 0.2 (particulates) Table E-1 (DFL)@ (mrem/pCi) Each radionuclide Tables E-11 to E-14 U") ~ - infant (kg/yr) 0 Table E-5 child 26 Table E-5 teen 42 Table E-5 adult 64 Table E-5 U'), (kg/yr) infant 0 Table E-5 child 520 Table E-S teen 630 Table E-5 adult 520 Table E-5 t (seconds) 8.6E4 (1 day) Table E-15 t~ (seconds) 5. 18E6 (60 days) Table E-15 (kg/m') 2.0 Table E-15 Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL IZ 77 December 1993

APPENDIX D DIAGRAMS OF LIQUID AND GASEOUS TREATMENT SYSTEMS AND MONITORING SYSTEMS Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 78 December 1993

AOV21 I I I I DEtIIHERAutER DEtIIH I I WASTE I RECOVERY WASTE CRL i DISCHARGE LT SAtA.E SURGE TN+ I f RADWASTE ILTfRS SAtA.E OTKRPS I TA!K I LT OTHER P4 TAHK RECIRC LINE I I I RECIRC LINE TK 5A.B AOV 80 A 7 OTKR P5 OlKR P4 SUCTIOHLINE SUCTINI LI%

I

. ~ Csrs I (

AOV 118 PS P4 WASTE CKL I TANKS I I

RECOVERY SAt%lE PQf'DVS AOV 314 AOV33 0

J AOV76 WASTE AOV 275 EVAP NtIP-I WASTE SAtA.E TKS REGEN AOV279 EVAP FV330 HIGH RANGE fE 33O SERVICE WATER DISCHARGE 8AY AOV 142 FV33'I FLgg DRAIH COLLECT% TAILS LOW RANGE FE 331 RECOVERY SAMPLE SYSTEM and WASTE DISCHARGE SAMPLE SYS

REGENEVAP DIST COOLER WAS'lE EVAP TYPICAL OF 2 DIST COOLER TYPICAL OF 2 N'-I WASTE I I F LONI DRAIN Shred TKS I I FIL TER I

RAOWASTE I AOV2I RADWASTE , AOV29 DEFIIN I DftIIHERALIKR I

I I WASTE RECOVfRY WASTE CRL i LT SAtA.E i RADWASTE FILTERS DISCHARGE SORGE TAP@

I SAtVLE TANl I OTHfR P5 I I OTRR P4 L TAtC I RECIRC LINE I RECIRC LINE I

I TKSA,S I

I I

I OTKR P4 OT%R P5 I

SUCTION Ll% SUCTIONLINE I

Pl CSTs (

I I AOV I I8 I P4 WASTE COLL I TANKS I RECOVERY AOV 3I4 I Self PQ%

AOV66 I. AOV33 AOV76 WASTE AOV2TS EVAP Mt-I WASTE SACR.E TKS REGfN FV33O AOV2>9 FVAP SERVICE WATER HIGH RAHGE ff 33O DISCHARGE SAY AOV I 42 fLOOR DRAIN FV33I COLLEC TN TAWS LW RANGE FE 33 I RECOYERY SAMPLE SYSTEM and WASTE DfSt.HUGE SAMPLE SYSTEM

WASTE REGEHEVAP CST BLDG FLOOR DRAIN RX BLDG SPEHT RESIN AUX BOILER WASTE DISCH DIST COOLER DIST COOLER DRAINS FILTER DRAINS TAlK BLDG SNIP DRA RW FILTER TANKS I

I I WASTE NEUT TURB BLDG 0$ '-I FLOOR DRAIN I TK MAINS DRAINS COLLECTOR TANK I

REGENEVAP TYPICAL OF CRL TK2AJ OTHER FLOOR DRAIN COLL PLNP I AOV 73B AOV 72 I WASTE EVAP OTHER P2 I RECIRC LINE I OILER FLOOR I DRN SUCT LINE I I RW FILTER

@PI CE TE I

AOV 73A

~

FLOOR DRN FILTER FLOOR DRAIN CRL TX WASTE 05CH AOV90A SAttlE TKS FLON DRAIH CIX.L SINGE AOV 28 I TK l7 FLON ORH FILTER FLOOR DRAIN COLL SURGE ~ FLOOR DRAIN COLLECTION SYSTE'8

WASTE Cm FV 122 QNGE TK FLONDRH AOV2 CST CRL SN6E TK AOV 236 SOY 2SI FLON1 DRAIN CQ.LECTOR Tt S SERVICE AIR 89)Y FEED TK (lg nf 6) COND VAKEOP RE6EN WASTE TKS AOV 271 AND DRAW Of f FLAT BED flLTER WASTE CRL TKS AOV 257 AOV 451 BODY FEED PRO NIPPER FEEDER EDUCTOR EFFLUENT CST FILTER F ILTER PRECOAT AOV21~

TAQl TA% I I RE6EN WASTE I Tl'OV I 127 I

(f)) WASTE DISCH SAl%l.E TK

\ AOV 123 LV251 fLOOR DRAIN CRL TK FLOOR DRAIN F ILIER FILTER EFFUKNT PRECOAT POP P27 RIP AOV 126 WASTE COLL TK FLOOR ORAIN FILTER SYSTEM

h y ~ L

~ ~

~~

~ ~

4 FLOOR DRAIN FILTER SEQUENCES

FL(KADRAIN TYPICAL OF 2 FILTER I I COO KNN I I

I RE6E%RATION I I I

RW FLOOR AN )

AOV34 I EQJIP DRAINS I I ~ ~

I I RW FILTER I I

BACK WASH Pt%5 I I REGE% RANT I r-- I WASTE TNK TK3 I

I I

AOV69 I I

I I

I OTIKR REGEWRANT WASTE ~

OTKR REGEN I

I I

L WASTE MK I AOV68, I I I REGENEVAP I

I AOV92 I

WASTE EVAP I

I I RE6EN WASTE TK I PEP P3Agl FLON DRAIN FILTER I AOV93~

L REGENERANT WASTE SYSTEI1

AOV 245 COlTACT COOENSER TBCLCW EVAP 01ST PV 146 TK I)

AOY 247 EVAP BOTTQtS PS%5 CQIENSATE 01ST TRANS Pt&

TRANSFER Ale STORAOE AOV 228 RW PBLR AUX STEAN RE6Ell WASTE IKS FLONL DRAI1 RECtRC PRO LV 141 CRL TKS COFIENSATE WASTE DlSCN LV 130 TRANSFER AOV2 lb SALABLE KS AOV 129 Ale ST%AGE SOY 279 WASTE COLL TKS AOV 187 EVAP FLOOR DRH COLL TKS BOTTOttS VeeS AOV 132 WASTE OlSCH SAt%l'E TXS AOV 1 7 HASTE/REGE HER ANT EYAPORATOR SYSTEM

Gaseous Treatment System Diagrams Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL IZ 89 December 1993

'VAOVVUOn(AI(4 TAGVVU Iin( Ar Cn VA(LAIUOn(AAftt AOVIOI UOVSG U Uovso It UOVSA U HV tee Irrteo HVteA UOV ISO U Ieger ISA It CCWOK HSC 4 Corto(tts(n cotetf Hsf 4 lc '8 1A Pn( COOL (4 pnc cooLK 4 Cto CKA HVtSO HVtSA Stlencer AOV I OS ILIsit t( G(tl GLAIIO SCAL AIO (IAV I IO UAVI S I (Au OOHO(HS(4 SOV ISA scpARAlon AR 4(VOTA(

PIPE' I0 OI lW Steoe Al Atr Kiectors IROU vretftt ln(AIU(41 Ot STSltu 1 ROII fROU AVIAIART AVIQIART Pit(RCOIOC st(AU sTSI(u SICAU STSI(u

~ LAP SCIL GOOL(4

~ I1(ICOHo(HS(n HS(R (SO CSA Silencer S IO UAH L Sf AGR scpARAIGR SOT I IO *R n(VOTA(

IIAR P IA 10 UAH 1 nou COr Ct(IIS(4 OITGAS n(CRG Ol PLAR PtA Al STSICU 2nd S tege Cot(I(US( 4 Alr Eiectors At ORAVI TAtrr ~ IA4'(AL fROU fROU COOL(4 Al/II,IART AVIILIART SIKAU SIKAU IO UAH COr(t(Its( 4 SOY S 11 fOOffGAS STSt(u CONDENSER AIR REMOVAL SYSTEM

A Vl~ A I IKnl AlllhlAnv I'V I IA FE If Au lf,ills ulvIOA I AQVI IA Offyss Oily u IA IA IA 10CICw Pleheolel Condenser IS Sf Cfvef sf f HXQ In w'f CA f A1 1 I IC nf Coulllg n AQV I A I

L SV10A IQ Onl(A I'I lf Hy AQVSA AOVSO IO uAVI IQ uAII CO eferxn ConOSnsfll csvenusfn An of uOVAI

$ 1$ lfu IIKASlf Il Ocv I I I AOV I II FF.

1 nou SCnvlC( An I *OVI III SVSIfu Offices Offices I II Io IO IOCICw Pteheolel Condenser l sf SOVIOO $

Colofvsfc SOV II 0 ffos olnhlne I I S

L Svfoo fnou Ausilsnv Pv I I 0 SISAu Svsf su

Title:
OFFGAS RECOMBINERS
Aovr A AOVSA Oryer IA LIS ICV fCV IA LVII A
'IO'A'ntfnrofnAIOnSLI IS AOVrn AOv Sn I norr Oryer to CHAACOAL OIICAS AOSOnetnS le Lls I
ICv ICV ICV I ee I IS ee Lvfee IO lyntrn+EAAforl$ II IL AovrC Oryer ntr lC IC LrS I
I I CV ICV soyez I sc IC L
Lvtec I SCLCvr nsr tC to vAVI Corrntrrtt4 teCLCvl CorrenLS~m ntr IC Aro fc SrrOrrrl ~ CVSIC lttpcAL or 1)
Title:
OFFGAS DRYERS
14Oro $ tnvtCt Ln $ v$ 1tu Fll tor IA 14 IC IO ~ VOIA Io(w OIICL$ OAIC4$ IA
~ IL LOv I AOVStL
~ IA I I
OrrLACOLI AS$ 040$ 4$
~ +AA rktt4$
I I
I AOV
~ 50 I I LOVStl I
10 I ~ IS I
I LOV I ot I
I
~ vr ~ tl Filter To Motn Stock OFFGAS SYSTEM CHARCOAL ABSORBERS
~s
VYSA ROY I A VII STAHObt OAS 0 IIIII I IIOVtA TAAIIA
~ ACAI &ACTIVI uOVSA SAOAQ YtlllAATKYI I Fen IA QOV 10 II IIOVIA VI I AII f(7l CCCAV I%AT COOL&0 fwc rid WVI StACK YSS flC
~ IIOltCt M TCN KCAV SCAT aXl.le
~ YIOI SOY IOT II IAOVI0 r--~
~ KSVIS ~ ST AICeV OAS ffKAIAKVAAAY TLTSK OOHTAtaCIII TAAVIQ YST Cen AOVIOI VST VSS 40 I STAICOV OAS TFCATICIIT SW.OVIO anSOC All STANDBY GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM
Liquid Radiation Monitoring Diagrams Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL IZ 95 December 1993
fasa a(5 $ (5ll ~
I Sa Cal I Sa Cal I sa Cal 0 I
aaa 5(laICt salts (aa J
f IS ISD alai V'aa SSCICO 0504 Sat tDt a(al I(ca(alla I IID s(5 5f Ill~
sa Cl( I sa cal I Io cas 5(5((s I
Sas 5tttlc( all(4 ll) Is CO5 SISII ~
aaa Dat I(ca(ac( ~ I 5at taat sa Cal I I I
IOD saa ata(ll. Ila laco cct Otal(i. Ila.la,lc I 4 ~ Cal 0 OOC aac( sn J faD Ds a(a(II. Ils (la(i)
(OD ccS a(illa. Ill.(O.IC IID 5(al ts(CD((45 lta.ls
~ sa ai COOl lac lla( ~
CDI(ac Ilats
~ ISCaaact Saf sasssDO sa Cal II J al (ISI'jj Cia(a(a(ID all(s flatS acf Isis(a(I(( i~losMI t(SC J ~ IC(l 0 all llssls caDI'lit Iff(s(a( slscaalc(5
$ (C tDtc 5(C fl(II~ 4( ~ lac sfc Otal llcaaactal 5(C 5(5I(S sa Cll I sa Cal 0 sl Cll I L(OUIO RADIATIONMON(TORING NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
I P P)NGEnEST COARCT) tBt OATA ACR)lslTIQi Nt)T MCE I tOAIB CONT.
T 5
I I I I Pl I I I I I I I I S I
I ~l I I I ~l ~l I I <>S CIN NITA IIL'IIA (III lUILDINC fllaUSI 1(NT
[IN s(lac[ aoc NAIN SIAN CIA[AIL [IN As[a 1[NI CAN OFF LINf
))44 CI ~ ISOIOFIC AATTASIf AT IO CIN Eff(DENT INI IT [IN NETA fl(IEN 4 I 104 Oa Caf O CAN a(ills(f all[OINC 2(4)SCIU aN. AT[a TIN[I[A(ION Nf TA I I L IfI 2)lll CI ~
(IN AI>> AD(I[a AN Cas 4 TAAIICULAIf~ [INAUSI Cas ac( IT[NIILAIIDN it(CION OUI(0 INC 4001t
~
lf ISO[lIION)
Ila OFF-LINf OKTUKL INC I LOOI )OOOOCfo
($ 0[OTIC Eff[UENT ~110 2[(NUN lf Cas 4 FAAIICULAI[~
ACI I 1(NII[lIION ISOLAIIONI iaf CAP CA ~ oa car o~oa caf s t oa cat o NONI10l StCIION 22( 220 IflCIOI OUI[DINE lf(al 14lllCf~
loot[INC I tool
~
CAS 4 0( TAITI(0[iI[
Ill otc[ACULAIION Noof ~ sssso ogsogIL Oa Caf f~<>>14 )sll oa caf CIN o oa caf 1
~ oa caf O lf CAS ~
0 5415 4
0 SCIS 105 CONTAINNfN(
ssll CI ~ CONIl INN(NI WICK CAN I404 CI ~
ACI CONTAINN[N: WICK IsaAIION CASS + oa cart& oa ca( o OA Caf O Ja cl( I SCIS tall I co( 4 IE 'E CAN all CI ~
OA CAI I 00 Saoo[f IAT TUAIINE SUILOINC 00000 CI ~
oa cat o TENT(lalION SANTA( TAT 'folo[Nf SANT(K IAF TUll)NE CEN(lafol C'LAND CLANO $ [ L C(lNO Sflt 4 f(NAUSI I L~foogfflf Nstls f
$ 1 AN Cls f ACI(offCAS SEAL OISCNAACE COND oa caf o ISOLA'(ION) lf If SANT(( IAF Isa I so OffCAS $ 1$ 1(N CNAI COAL 20 CIN Aosollfls Oa Car O Slot(t IAF NfCllNICl( TACUUN oa caf o WNF OISCNAACE INTA(I Clsi Casi (4N OINI III OU1$ 10f AIO (fAS I) 1 Ill fls ~ lf AC(IS[TATS AC(Isa[ION) oaf AC( OITASS AC(Isa(ION) s>> IA aol (Ill(I~
INIAAE fol I ST ISIN Ill Ill CON[lo( lOON I[CIAC KILHIS 22$ ICfo (ONIAOL Aol~ [Ny((ot[
TSTCfo IN'IAAE
'lf 'AE Oa CAI ISC Cas ~ TD CASi
( ~ ($ 1) ACf(l'ITASS ACIITAIIOII) Acf[OITASS ACIITAIION)
ACf < AUIONAIIC CONIlo( fUNCTION TAN ~ WST ACCIDKNI NON( 104 i ~ TAIIICU[lff4 IODINE Salt[INC CATAOILIII CAN < CONTINUOUS llllolNE NONI(ol 4 ~ SlFETT NELATEO INNNTON GASEOUS RADIATION MONITORING NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT USAR REVISION 0 APRIL I 989
PARTCU(ATE IODINE NOBLE GAS COLLECTION COLLECTION MEASUREMENT STATION STATION STATION FILTER FILTER NEW NEW STACK PART ICU.
IODINE LATE CARTRI. CARTRID. t GES GES I ~
P
/ V V~
FRESHET FETER P FLOW CONTROL TECIDR (ISOKINETIC) TEC CHECK FLOW SENSORS AMPLIFIER SOURCE VALVES. ETC d ADC AMPLIFIER AllPLIFIERd ADC d ADC MISTRIAL
'IDEOTERMINAL PROGRAMMABLE MULT CHANNEL CONTROLLER ANALYZER COMPUTER ~ " 'RINTER (MCA)
Q BLOCK DIAGRAM TYPICAL GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING SYSTEM NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANAlYSIS REPORT
Appendix E Nine Mile Point On-Site and Off-Site Maps Unit 2 Revision 9 004337LL II 103 December 1993

ML18041A024

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

Title:

Title:

Navigation menu

ML18041A024

Text

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

Title:

Title:

Navigation menu

Search