ML17207A713

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Response to NRC 791123 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-389/79-20.Corrective Actions:Qualified Person Will Be Assigned to Maintain Daily Log & Perform Site Surveillance During Absence of Environ Control Engineer
ML17207A713
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/07/1979
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML17207A709 List:
References
1-79-342, NUDOCS 8001030772
Download: ML17207A713 (4)


Text

P.O. BOX 529100, MIAMI,FL 33152 FLORIDA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY 3 j D t,' /g fI/Q-December 7, 1979 L-79-342 Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director, Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W. Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

RE: RI I:ALC Docket No. 50-389/79-20 Florida Power 8 Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and our response is attached. There is no proprietary information contained in the report.

Very tru yours, ert E. Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/MV/ah Attachment cc: T. E. Burdette Harold F. Reis, Esquire SOON OSO PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

1 RI I: ALC 50-389/79-20 This NRC Inspection resulted in one finding as described below:

Deficienc : As required by Section 8. 12.4 of licensee procedure SgP-15 as partial implementation of the environmental control program defined in Section 30 (2) of the Construction Permit),

the licensee is committed to maintain a daily log of site surveill-ance, findings and environmental protection activities to assure that all construction activities conform to the environmental conditions defined in the Construction Permit.

Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to maintain the daily log during the period October 15-17, 1979 and October 25, 1979.

~Res onse: Florida Power h Light has evaluated this finding and submits the following response:

The daily log that is required to be maintained was not maintained on the referenced dates because the site environmental control engineer was not on site on those days. For days that he is absent, the environmental engineer has been directed to assign a qualified person to maintain the daily log and perform the necessary site surveillance required by the site procedure.

Full compliance with this audit was achieved on November 5, 1979.

'J e>>

- P d