ML12305A416

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program
ML12305A416
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/15/2012
From: Welch R
US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
References
Download: ML12305A416 (158)
v • d • e


Text

U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region IlI One Independence Mall, Sixth Floor 615 Chestnut Street SFEMA Philadelphia, PA 19106-4404 OCT 15 2012 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Headquarters Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 To Whom It May Concern:

Enclosed is the final After Action Report/Improvement Plan for the North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plume Exercise that was held on July 10, 2012. Included in this report are the results of the June 7 and July 23-26, 2012 Out of Sequence Exercises.

Two Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) were identified as a result of the exercise; both of the ARCAs were successfully re-demonstrated. In addition, two new Planning Issues were identified and immediately corrected.

Based on the results of the exercise and a review of the offsite radiological emergency response plans and procedures for the Commonwealth of Virginia and the affected local jurisdictions, FEMA Region III has determined there is reasonable assurance that the plans are adequate and can be implemented, as demonstrated during this exercise.

If you have any questions, please contact Joseph Suders at (215) 931-5564.

Sincerely, Robert Welch Acting Regional Administrator Enclosure www.fema.gov K

North Anna Power Station After Action Report/

Improvement Plan Exercise Date - July 10, 2012 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program FEMA ...

Published October 11, 2012

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/improvement Plan North Anna Power Station This page is intentionally blank.

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/linprovement Plan North Anna Power Station North Anna Power Station After Action Report/Improvement Plan Published October 11, 2012 Contents Executive Summary 6 Section 1: Exercise Overview 7 1.1 Exercise Details 7 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership 7 1.3 Participating Organizations 10 Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 13 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design 13 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities 16 2.3 Scenario Summary. ... 18 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 20 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results 20 3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation 21 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 27 3.3.1 Virginia Jurisdictions 27 3.3.1.1 Virginia State Emergency Operations Center 27 3.3.1.2 Virginia Department of Health, Bureau of Rad 28 Health at VA SEOC 3.3.1.3 Local Emergency Operations Facility (Division of 28 Radiological Health & Virginia Department of.

Emergency Management) 3.3.1.4 Dominion Innsbrook Technical Center, Joint Public 29 Information Center 3.3.1.5 Virginia State Field Monitoring Team 1 29 3.3.1.6 Virginia State Field Monitoring Team 2 29 3.3.1.7 Caroline County Rescue Squad 30 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions 30 3.3.2.1 Caroline County Field Monitoring Team 30 3.3.2.2 Hanover County Field Monitoring Team 30 1

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.3 Louisa County Field Monitoring Team 31 3.3.2.4 Orange County Field Monitoring Team 31 3.3.2.5 Spotsylvania County Field Monitoring Team 31 3.3.2:6 Caroline County Emergency Operations Center 32 3.3.2.7 Caroline County Backup Route Alerting 32 3.3.2.8 Caroline County Exception Area Route Alerting 32 Assignment 5 - 10 Mi.

3.3.2.9 Caroline County Traffic and Access Control Points 33 3.3.2.10 Caroline County Reception Center (EAC), Caroline 33 County Middle, School 3.3.2.11 Caroline County Monitoring and Decontamination 33 Center (EAC), Caroline County Middle School 3.3.2.12 Caroline County Mass Care Center (EAC), Caroline 34 County Middle School 3.3.2.13 Caroline County Emergency Worker Monitoring and 34 Decontamination Station (EAC), Caroline County Middle' School 3.3.2.14 Caroline County Public Schools 34 3.3.2.15 Caroline County Public Schools, Caroline County 35 Middle School 3.3.2.16 Hanover County Emergency Operations Center 35 3.3.2.17 Hanover County Back-up Route Alerting 35 3.3.2.18 Hanover County Exception Area Route Alerting 36 Assignment 5 - 10 Mi.

3.3.2.19 Hanover County Traffic. and Access Control Points 36 3.3.2.20 Hanover.County Public Schools 36 3.3.2.21 Hanover County Public Schools, Beaverdam 37 Elementary School 3.3.2.22 Louisa County Emergency Operations Center 37 3.3.2.23 Louisa County Back-up Route Alerting 37 3.3.2.24 Louisa County Exception Area Route Alerting 38 Assignment 0 - 5 Mi.

3.3.2.25 Louisa County Exception Area Route Alerting 39 Assignment 5-10 Mi.

3.3.2.26 Louisa County Traffic and Access Control Points 39 3.3.2.27 Louisa County Public Schools 39 2

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.28 Louisa County Schools, Louisa HighSchool 40 3.3.2.29 Orange County Emergency Operations Center 40 3.3.2.30 Orange County Back-up Route Alerting 40 3.3.2.31 Orange County Exception Area Route'!Alerting 41 Assignment 5 - 10 Mi 3.3.2.32 Orange County Traffic and Access Control Points 41 3.3.2.33 Orange County Public Schools' 41 3.3.2.34 Orange County Public Schools, Prospdct Heights 42 Middle School (Host) 3.3.2.35 Spotsylvania County Emergency Operations Center 42 3.3.2.36 Spotsylvania County Back-up Route Alerting 42 3.3.2.37 Spotsylvania County Exception Area Route Alerting 43 Assignment 0 - 5 Mi 3.3.2.38 Spotsylvania County Exception Area Route Alerting 44

  • Assignment 5 - 10 Mi 3.3.2.39 Spotsylvania County Reception Center (EAC), 45 Courtland High School 3.3.2.40 Spotsylvania CountyEmergency Worker Monitoring 45 and Decontamination Station (EAC).,-Courtland High School 3.3.2.41 Spotsylvania County Mass Care Center (EAC), 45 Courtland High School 3.3.2.42 Spotsylvania County Monitoring and 46 Decontamination Center. (EAC), Courtlýan.High School 3.3.2.43 Spotsylvania County Schools 46 3.3.2.44 Spotsylvania County Traffic and Access Control 46 Points 3.3.2.45 Spotsylvania County Schools, Berkeley' Elementary 47 School 3.3.2.46 Spotsylvania County Schools, John J Wright 47 Educational and Cultural Center 3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions 47 3.3.3.1 Louisa County Reception Center (EAC), Moss- 47 Nuckols Elementary School 3.3.3.2 Louisa County Monitoring and Decontamination 48 Center (EAC), Moss-Nuckols Elementary School 3

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.3.3 Louisa County Mass Care Center (EAC), Moss- 48 Nuckols Elementary School 3.3.3.4 Louisa County Emergency Worker Monitoring and 48 Decontamination Station (EAC), Moss-Nuckols Elementary School 3.3.3.5 Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center 49 Section 4: Conclusion 50 Appendix A: Exercise Timeline 51 Appendix B: Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders 53 Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations 56 Appendix D: Exercise Plan 59 4

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repbrtimprovement Plan North Anna Power Station This page is intentionally blank.

5

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reportllmprovement Plan North Anna Power Station EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

On July 10, 2012, a full-scale plume exercise was demonstrated and evaluated for the"10; Mile*

Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) exposure pathway around the North Anna Power Station (NAPS) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Region III. Out-of-Sequence demonstrations were conducted on June 7, 2012 and the week of July 23-26, 2012. The purpose of the Exercise and Out-of-Sequence demonstrations was to assess the capabilities of State, county, and local jurisdictions to implement Radiological Emergency Plans and Procedures (RERP) to protect the property and lives of residents and transients in the event of an emergency at NAPS.

The findings in this report are based on the evaluations of the Federal evaluator team, with final determinations made by the FEMA, Region III Regional Assistance Committee (RAC)

Chairperson, and approved by FEMA Headquarters. These reports are provided to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and participating states. State and local governments utilize the findings contained in these reports for the purposes of planning, training, and improving emergency preparedness.

The most recent full-scale exercise at this site was evaluated on July 20, 2010.

The evaluation of this Exercise determined that there were no Deficiencies, (2) Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCAs), and (2) Planning Issues (PI). All prior (ARCAs) and Planning Issues were resolved during the previous exercise. Both (ARCAs) were successfully re-demonstrated during this exercise and both Planning Issues were resolved.

FEMA wishes to acknowledge the efforts of many individuals in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the risk jurisdictions of Caroline, Hanover, Louisa, Orange, and Spotsylvania. Protecting the public health and safety is the full-time job of some of the exercise participants and an additional assigned responsibility for others. Still others have willingly sought this responsibility by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities. Cooperation and teamwork of all the participants were evident during the exercise.

6

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

Aftet Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW 1.1 Exercise Details Exercise Name North Anna Power Station Type of Exercise Plume Exercise Date July 10, 2012 Program Department of Homeland Security/FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness.;,

Program Scenario Type Radiological Emergency 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership Joseph Suders Project Qfficer, North Anna Power Station FEMA Region 171 Technological Hazards Program Specialist One Independence Mall 615 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106 215-931-5564 joseph.suders@dhs.gov Martin Vyenielo Assistant Project Officer, North Anna Power Station FEMA Region III Technological Hazards Program Specialist 7

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station One Independence Mall 615 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106 215-931-5670 martin.vyenielo@dhs.gov Susan Binidey State Planner Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Emergency Management Radiological Planner 10501 Trade Court Richmond, Virginia, 23236 804-897-9783 susan.binkley@vdem.virginia.gov Stephen Wood Coordinator of Offsite Emergency Response Dominion Manager, Nuclear Emergency Preparedness 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia, 23060 804-380-9863 stephen.m.wood@dom.com Russell Savedge Emergency Prepardness Specialist Dominion Coordinator, Offsite Emergency Response 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia, 23060 757-899-0398 russellsavedge@dom.com 8

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repoft/lnprovement Plan North Anna Power Station William Detwiler Scenario Developer Dominion EP Specialist IV 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia, 23060 804-273-3418 william. 1.detwiler@dom.com Reginald Rodgers, Ph.D Scenario Reviewer RCR Consulting Group Consultant 59 School House Road Newington, Connecticut, 06111 860-667-9973 rodgersgroup@juno.com Ryan Paris Radiological Health Technical Planner Virginia Department of Radiological Health Radiation Safety Specialist 109 Governor Street, Room 9 Richmond, Virginia, 23219 804-864-8161 ryan.paris@vdh.virginia.gov Michael Gray Controller Commonwealth .of Virginia, Department of Emergency Management Chief, Operations Plans Section 10501 Trade Court Richmond, Virginia, 23236 9

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 804-674-2740 mike.gray@vdem.virginia.gov Jim Dishner Controller York County Department of Emergency Management Deputy Fire Chief 301 Goodwin Neck Road Yorktown, Virginia, 23692 757-890-3626 dishnerj@yorkcounty.gov John Pelchat NRC Exercise Plannihg Member Nuclear Regulatory Commission Senior Regional Government Liaison Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue N.E., Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia, 30301 404-997-4427 john.pelchat@nrc.gov 1.3 Participating Organizations Agencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the North Anna Power Station exercise:

State Jurisdictions Virginia Cooperative Extension Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Virginia Department of Aviation Virginia Department of Emergency Management Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Department of Fire Programs 10

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reporft/improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Virginia Department of Forestry Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Health, Division of Radiological Health Virginia Department of Military Affairs Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Virginia Department of Social Services Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Information Technology Agency Virginia State Police Risk Jurisdictions Caroline County Administration Caroline County Board of Commissioners Caroline County Communications, Dispatch and 911 Caroline County Fire, EMS and Emergency Management Caroline County Health Department Caroline County Manager's Office Caroline County Schools Caroline County Sheriffs Office Caroline County Social Services Fredericksburg Fire Department, Hazardous Material Unit Hanover County Administrators Hanover County Board of Supervisors Hanover County Department of Public Works Hanover County Department of Social Services Hanover County Fire and Emergency Medical Services Hanover County Health Department Hanover County Schools Hanover County Sheriffs Office Henrico County Fire Department Louisa County Board of Supervisors Louisa County Community Development Louisa County Community Emergency Response Team Louisa County Finance Department 11

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reporllimprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Louisa County Fire and EMS Louisa County Health and Human Services Louisa County Public Relations Louisa County Public Safety Louisa County School District Transportation Louisa County Sheriffs Office Louisa County Social Services Spotsylvania County Fire, Rescue and Emergency Management Spotsylvania County Sheriffs Office Orange County Emergency Management Orange County Fire, Department Orange County Health Department Orange County School Department Orange County School District Facilitites Personnel Orange County,.heriff s Department Private Organizations Amateur Radio: Emergency Services American Red Cross Dominion Energy Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service Federal Jurisdictions United States Army, 34th Civil Support Team United States Coast Guard 12

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After'Action Repori'lmprovement Plan North Anna Power Station SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN

SUMMARY

2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design On December 7, 1979, the President directed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to assume the lead responsibility for all off-site nuclear planning and response.

FEMA's activities were conducted pursuant to 44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 350, 351 and 352. These regulations are a key element in the Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program that was established following the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station accident in March 1979.

44 CFR 350 establishes the policies and procedures for FEMA's initial and continued approval of State and local governments' radiological emergency planning and preparedness for commercial nuclear power plants. This approval is contingent, in part, on State and local government participation in joint exercises with licensees. FEMA's responsibilities in radiological emergency planning for fixed nuclear facilities include the following:

A. Taking the lead in offsite emergency planning and in the review and evaluation, of Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERPs) and procedures developed by State and local governments; B. Determining whether such plans and procedures can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of exercises conducted by State and local governments; C. Responding to requests by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the NRC and FEMA dated June 17, 1993 (Federal Register, Vol. 58, No. 176, September 14, 1993; and D. Coordinating the activities of the following Federal agencies with responsibilities in the radiological emergency planning process:

- U.S. Department of Commerce,

- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 13

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station

- U.S. Department of Energy,

- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,

- U.S. Department, of Transportation,

- U.S. Department of Agriculture,

- U.S. Department of the Interior, and

- U.S. Food and Drug Administration Representatives of these agencies serve on the Region III Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by FEMA. A REP Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise was conducted during the week of July 9, 2012, along with Out-of-Sequence demonstrations conducted on June 7, 2012 and the week of July .23.-2.6, 2012, to assess the capabilities of State and local emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their RERPs and procedures to protect the public health and safety during a radiological emergency involving North Anna Power Station (NAPS).

The purpose of this exercise report is to present the exercise results and findings on the, performance of the off-site response organizations (OROs) during a simulated radiological emergency.

The findings presented in this report are based on the evaluations of the Federal evaluator team, with final determinations made by the FEMA Region III RAC Chairperson and approvedjby.>

FEMA Headquarters.

These reports are provided to the NRC and participating States. State and local governments utilize the findings contained in *these reports for the purposes of planning, training, and improving emergency response capabilities.

The criteria utilized, in the FEMA evaluation process are contained in the following:

A. NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, "November 1980; B. Radiological Emergency-Preparedness Program Manual, April 2012; Section 1 of this report, entitled "Exercise Overview," presents the "Exercise Planning Team" and the "Participating Organizations."

1.4

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repdrtlhmprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Section 2, of this report entitled "Exercise Design Summary", includes the "Exercise Purpose and Design", "Exercise Objectives, Capabilities, and Activities", and the "Scenario Summary".

Section 3 of this report, entitled "Analysis of Capabilities", presents detailed "Exercise Evaluation and Results" information on the demonstration for each jurisdiction or functional entity evaluated in a jurisdiction-based, issue-only format (Criteria Evaluation Summaries). This section also contains:

(1) descriptions of all Deficiencies and Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) assessed during this exercise, recommended corrective actions; and ithe State and local governments' schedule of corrective actions for each identifiedeexercise issue and (2) descriptions of ARCA assessed during previous exercises and resolved at this exercise; including the corrective action demonstrAed, as well as ARCA assessed during previous exercises and scheduled for demonstration at this exercise which remain unresolved.

Section 4, of this report entitled "Conclusion", is a description of the Region's overall.

assessment of the capabilities of the participating organizations.

The appendices, present supplementary information:

Appendix A - Exercise Timeline. A table'that depicts the times when an event or notifications were noted at participating agencies and locations.

Appendix B - Exercise Evaluators and Team leaders. Atable listing the evaluator names, organizations, and responsibilities of the evaluators and management.

Appendix C - Acronyms and Abbreviations. An alphabetized table defining the formal names used in this report.

Appendix D - Exercise Plan. A narrative description of information developed to implement the exercise, including the Extent of Play, which describes in detail the exercise criteria and participants' expected response to the exercise scenario.

15

Unclassified Radiological Emergenc, Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reppor/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Emergency Planning Zone Description The 10-mile plume Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) includes Caroline, Hanover, Louisa, Orange and Spotsylvania Counties. The North Anna Power Station, consisting of approximnately 1,856 acres, is located in Louisa County on the southern shore of Lake Anna in central Virginia, 40 miles northwest of Richmond, 38 miles east of Charlottesville, and 24 miles southwest of Fredericksburg. North Anna Power Station is located within the central Piedmont Plateau of Virginia. The topography is characterized as a gently undulating surface that varies from 60 m (200 ft) to 150 m (500 ft) above mean sea level. Lake Anna is a man-made reservoir, approximately 8 km (5 mi) upstream from the North Anna Dam. Forests, comprising primarily pine and hardwoods, cover.the majority of the peninsula on which North Anna is sited. The predominant land use in Louisa. County is forestry, a major contributor to the economy. Almost 70 percent of the total land area -is forest interspersed with small farm agriculture.

2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities Exercise Objectives The Emergency Preparedness Evaluation Areas - the elements and sub-elements for this exercise are those that are required to be demonstrated in every exercise, as required by the FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Manual (effective, April 2012). The Exercise Plan at Appendix D outlines the emergency preparedness elements that are required to.

be demonstrated in the 2012 North Anna Plume Exercise, along with the level of demonstration that will be displayed in the exercise (i.e. fully demonstrated, limited demonstration, simulated, out of sequence interviews, not demonstrated). The objective of this exercise is to demonstrate reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public can be protected through successful demonstration of tasks identified by the Exercise Planning Team (EPT). The selected objectives focus on evaluating emergency response procedures, identifying areas for improvement, and achieving a collaborative attitude.

Target Capabilities The establishment of the National Preparedness Priorities have steered the focus of homeland security toward a capabilities-based planning approach. Capabilities-based planning focuses on planning under uncertainty, since the next danger or disaster can never be forecast with complete 16

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repbrt/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station accuracy. Therefore, capabilities-based planning takes an all-haza'rds approach to planning and preparation which builds capabilities that can be applied to a wide variety of incidents. States and Urban Areas use capabilities-based planning to identify a baseline assessment of iheir homeland security eff0ts by comparing their current capabilities against the Target Capabilitief List (TCL) and the critical tasks of the Universal Task List-(UTL). This approach identifies gaps in current capabilities and focuses efforts on identifying and developing priority capabilities and tasks for the jurisdiction. These priority capabilities are articulated in the jurisdiction's homeland security*

strategy and Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan (TEP), of which this exercise is a component.

The capabilities listed below have been selected by the EPT from the-priorify capabilities identified in the Virginia Multi-Year TEP and the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Manual (effective April,2012). These, capabilities provide the foundation for development of the exercise objectives and scenario, as the purpose of this exercise is to measure and validate performancecof these capabilities and'their associated critical tasks.

- Interoperable Communications

-,Laboratory Testing

" CitizeniEvacuation -andShelter-in Place

  • Critical Resource Logistics and Distribution

" Emergency'Operations Center Management

" Emergency Public Information and Warning

  • Emergency Public Safety and Security Response

" Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment

  • Environmental Health

" Mass Care

" Mass Prophylaxis

" Medical Surge

" On-Site Incident Management

" Worker Health and Safety

" Food and Agriculture Safety and Defense "Weapons of Mass Destruction and Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination

" Economic and Community Recovery 17

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 2.3 Scenario Summary All information below is scenario simulated. The times for the events are approximate as the NRC Licensee's operations crew on the reactor training simulator will be provided some allowance for free play.

Abstract There are two nuclear units at the North Anna Power Station (NAPS) in Mineral, Virginia. Both are Pressurized Water Reactors. NAPS Unit 1 will be participating in the exercise. The key event timeline is provided below.

At 0800, on July 10, 2012, NAPS Unit 1 and Unit 2 are operating at 100 percent power. All safety systems are operable.

At 0800, the weather report is that there is a Tornado watch till mid-morning. It is clear, no precipitation, temperature is 74 degrees F, and wind speed at the 49 meter elevation is at 10 miles per hour (mph). The wind direction is from the South South West (SSW) into the North.

North East (NNE). The meteorology stability class is E. These conditions are expected to change by mid-morning with the: wind coming. out of the South (S) into the North (N) at 10 mph.

and then remain relatively unchanged until 1500.

At 0800, the exercise begins in the simulator control room. At 0805, the fire suppression system, activated in one of the emergency diesel rooms. By no later than 0820, an ALERT is declared in accordance with Emergency Action Level (EAL) HA3.1. There is no damage to equipment .

important to safety. There is no radioactive release as a result of this event. Unit I continues to operate at power.

At 0925, there is a small break loss of coolant accident, about 600 gallons per minute, into the primary containment. The reactor automatically shuts down. Emergency core cooling is actuated.

At 0926, the loose parts annunciator actuates. At 0935, the containment radiation monitor reads 300 R/hour as a result of mechanical damage to the fuel clad from loose parts and an increase in radioactive materials in the reactor coolant. At no later than 0950, a Site Area Emergency should 18

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repo-rt/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station be declared based on EAL FS 1.1, loss of reactor coolant system barrier and potential loss or loss of fuel clad barrier. There is no radiological release as a result of this event.

At 1005, a design basis loss of coolant accident occurs (large break). The containment spray pumps fail to operate and the atmospheric pressure in the containment rises, The containment radiation monitor reads over 3000 R/hour. At no later than 1022, a General Emergency should be declared based on EAL FG 1.1, loss of reactor coolant system barrier, loss of fuel clad barrier and potential loss of primary containment barrier. There is no radiological release. A Protective Action Recommendation is issued by NAPS as "Evacuate 0-2 miles 360' and from 2 to 5 miles in downwind sectors R, A and B (NNW, N and NNE)." NAPS will not recommend KI tablets for the public as there are no releases from the plant.

A relatively major airborne radiological release to the environment requiring off-site protective actions begins at 1036. This is a monitored, filtered release from both the plant vent stacks and the process vent stack. The release is caused by a leak of airborne radioactive materials from the containment into the Auxiliary Building. The air in the Auxiliary Building is 'processed through particulate filtersand. charcoal beds, and then released through the three Vent Stacks (elevation 49 meters).

At 1105, based on a dose projection, NAPS will upgrade the PAR to evacuation of the 0 to 5 miles ring, and from 5 to 10 miles in the downwind sectors R, A and. B. The wind direction is from the South into the North. NAPS will not recommend KI tablets for the public as the projected thyroid dose is below 5 rem.

At about 1040, simulated siren failures (one per county) will be injected into the scenario.

At 1145, the NAPS Evaluated Exercise will end if all objectives are met and, when announced by the Virginia State EOC.

19

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results The matrix in Table 3.1, on the following pages, presents the status of the exercise evaluation area criteria from the REP Exercise Evaluation Methodology that was scheduled for demonstration during this exercise by all participating jurisdictions and functional entities.

Exercise evaluation area criteria are listed by number and the demonstration status of the criteria is indicated by the use of the following letters:

(D) Deficiency: an observed or identified inadequacy of organizational performance in an exercise that could cause a finding that offsite emergency preparedness is not adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken in the event of a radiological emergency to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant.

(A) Area Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA): an observed or identified inadequacy of organizational performance in an exercise that is not considered, by itself, to adversely impact public health and safety.

(P) Plan Issue: an observed or identified inadequacy in the ORO's emergency plan or implementing procedures, rather than in the ORO's performance. Plan Issues are not exercise issues and are required to be corrected through the revision of the appropriate plans or procedures during the next annual plan review and update, submitted for FEMA review, and reported in the State Annual Letter of Certification.

(N) Not Demonstrated: term applied to the status of a REP exercise Evaluation Area Criterion indicating that the ORO, for a justifiable reason, did not demonstrate the Evaluation Area Criterion, as required in the extent-of-play agreement or at the 2 year/8 year exercise cycle required in the FEMA REP Program Manual.

(M) Met: status of a REP exercise Evaluation Area Criterion indicating that the participating ORO demonstrated all demonstration criteria for the Evaluation Area Criterion to the level required in the extent of-of-play agreement with no Deficiencies or (ARCAs) assessed in the current exercise and no unresolved prior (ARCAs).

20

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reporrt/Improvement Plan North Anna Power' Station 3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation,-,.

Contained in this section are the results and findings of the evaluations of all juiisdictions and locations that participated in the July 10, 2012, biennial Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Exercise, and the Out of Sequence Exercise evaluations conducted on June 7, 2012 and July 23-26, 2012. The exercise was conducted to demonstrate the ability of the Offsite Response Organizations of State and local government to protect the health and safety of the public in the 10 mile Emergency Planning Zone surrounding the North Anna Power Station.

Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated on the basis of its demonstration of the Exercise Evaluation Area Criteria contained in the REP Exercise Evaluation Methodology.

Detailed information on the exercise evaluation area criteria and the Extent of Play Agreement are found in the Exercise Plan in Appendix D.

21

Unclassified Radiological.Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Table 3.1 . Summary of Exercise Evaluation (5 pages)

DATE: 2012-07-10 >

SITE: North Anna Power Station, VA M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not U 0 Demonstrated .. '< . rti= W < M U U Uc. Ca Esii~r ency O rationsM an'ent :K:::::-: . ...... ;.*:, /** ...... .*,::.  ::3  ::

Mobilization lal MIM M Facilities lbl M Direction and Control lcl M MiM M Communications Equipment - Id M M M M M M M M. M, M.

Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M M M Emergenct Worker Exposure Control . a 2a] M M M Dose Assessment & PARs &-PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl M M I Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 M PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2cl M I M Radiological Assessment & Decision-making for Ingestion Pathway 2dl Radiological Assessment & Decision-making for Relocation/Reentry/Return 2el 6t-d:**-ACtI mi;aiu :ion::ementasiiW  :

Implementation of Emergency Worker/Exposure Control 3al M M M M M M M M M M Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl M M M Implementation of PADs for disabilities-& access/functional needs people 3cd M Implementation of PADs for Schools' "3c2 Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl M M Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 M Availability & use of Commodity & Resource Information 3el Preprinted Materials for Implementing, PADs for Commodities & Resources 3e2 __

Implementation of Relocation/Reentry/Return Decisions 3fl RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement &-Analyses 4a2 M M M Plume Phase Field Measurement & Analyses- 4a3 M M M M M M M Post Plume Phase Field Measurements & Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations_-_- 4c 1 Eneri nýuoý ' tficatior and Public Info .. .

Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System 5al M M RESERVED -*5a2 Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 M M Activation of the Exception Area ANS 5a4 Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl. M I MI IMI Snupu optwrationsFacilities, I I'~.> I ,

!Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al Monitoring/Decontamnination of Emergency Workers/EquipmentiVehicles 6b]

Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c1 Transportation/Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dl 22

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repofrt/lmprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 2/5)

L0 U2 U.

. DATE: 2012-07-10 U U 6 SITE: North Anna PowerStation,.VA , .

M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not U U 7- 6 U <0?

Demonstrated *U U CO11Z 0 0.0 00 00 00000 IElcmericy Operations Management ~ ~ >j~Ž .~ <

Mobilization lal M Facilities Ib]

Direction and Control lc1 M Communications Equipment Idl M M M M MMM Equipment and'Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M M M PrtcieAction Dec-ision d, i -

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2a] __ M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl1 Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2cl M Radiological Assessment & Decision-making for Ingesti on Pathway 2d Radiological Assessment & Decision-making for Reloca/tion/ReentrdpRetuo n 2el ImplemUventaton osplementatron - 3c2 _ - . MM Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control -3al M M M M .M M, M Implementation of Kl PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl ... M .. .. 'M Implemeiitatio'n of PADs for disabilities & aceegs/functional needs people 3cl  : ... ... '... M lImplementation ofPADs for Sch6ols "3c2 MIM I I Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3d] M - M Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 "M I Availability & use of Commodity & Resource Information 3e 1 Preprinted Materials for Implementing PADs for Commodities & Resources 3e2 _

Implementation of Relocation/Reentry/Return Decisions 3f1_

Fied ii~eii~'tand.Analvais '~- ~-~--

RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement & Analyses 4a2 ' M Plume Phase Field Measurement & Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements & Sampling 4b 1 Laboratory Operations 4c 1 Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System 5al ., I M RESERVED 5a2 I Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 M 'M M M M Activation of the Exception Area ANS 5a4 Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl M Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al M Monitoring/Decontamination of Emergency Workers/Equipment/Vehicles 6b] M Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cL M 23

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/improvement Plan North Annma Power Station Transportation/Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 16dlI I II I I I I l Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 3/5)

DATE: 2012-07-10 C> C z SITE: North Anna Power Station, VA - 0 z 00 M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not 0* , W WH FH 00 00 0 000 000 Demonstrated U U U U Uo o o o U o Emergency Operations Management /

Mobilization lal M Facilities lbl .M Direction and Control I cl M Communications Equipment -dl M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Supportperations lel M M M M M M MM M M Emergency Worker Exposur'e Control 2al M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b]

Dose Assessment &'PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PýAs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2cl iM Radioiogical Assessment & Decision-making for Ingestion Pathway 2d]

Radiological Assessment & Decision-making for Relocation/Reenry/Return 2el P o-,:L.........*

A ctio ..... . . . . . .

Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M Mi !M M Implementation of Ki PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl M M Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3dc M Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 M M Implementation of Traffic &8Access Contr'ol 3d1 M M, M Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 M Availability & use of Commodity & Resource Information 3el Preprinted Materials for Implementing PADs for Commodities & Resources 3e2 Implementation of Relocation/Reentrv/Return Decisions 3fl Field Mc"jigenent andknalysis 4 RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement & Analyses 4a2 M Plume Phase Field Measurement & Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements & Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl E ticiationhd.Piibljc Info.

1nkd ___

Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System 5al M M RESERVED . .5a2 Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 M M M Activation of the Exception Area ANS 5a4 Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl M Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al Monitoring/Decontamination of Emergency Workers/Equipment/Vehicles 6bl M Temporary Care of Evacuees 6cl Transportation/Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dl 24

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After'Action Reoii6tImprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Cdntinued. page 4/5)

DATE: 2012-07-10 C" SITE: North Anna Power Station, VA -"

M:. Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not

  • 0 < U U Demonstrated U U w
  • U U

,o

.- - 0 0 0 0 00 cM Mobilization lal IM .. . M Facilities 1bI M Direction and Control ll - M I M Communications Equipment ldl M MMM M M. I" M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations- lel M M M. M M M M.

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al . . M M Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl Dose Assessment.& PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 _..

PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2cl . M M ._

Radiological Assessment &-Decision-making for Ingestion Pathway 2d1 ... '

Radiological Assessment & Decision-making for Relocation/Reentrv/Return 2el . .

Protective Action Lwpinsli~ntauuioni -< ~->' 1 Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3a] M M M M IM M M Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3b1 ... M IM Implementation of PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 3c 1 .__ M. M Implementation of PADs for Schools 3c2 M' M ' M M Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3d1 M M M Impediments to.Eracuation 3d2 _ " M M Availability & use of Commodity & Resource Information 3el Preprinted Materials for Implementing PADs for Commodities & Resources 3e2 Implementation of Relocation/Reentry/Return Decisions 3fl. . .. .

Field Mcuuiweiiiend~kuatýsis,<Y ~ _ __ 2 RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement & Analyses 4a2 M M Plume Phase Field Measurement.& Analyses 4a3 ..... ""

Post Plume Phase Field Measurements & Sampling 4b 1...

Laboratory Operations , 4cl1'.

Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System Sal ,.M M M RESERVED 5a2 _-'.

Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a.3 M ._M M.-MM Activation of the Exception Area ANS 5a4 Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5b 1 M . M Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al I Monitoring/Decontamination of Emergency Workers/Equipment/Vehicles 6b I Temporary Care of Evacuees 6c1 Transportation/Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals 6dl 25

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Continued. page 5/5)

DATE:2012-07-10 SITE: North Anna Power Station, VA < U U M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not . 0.

000 0 0 0 0 0 Demonstrated . " C " 1 . Ie >

C/) C/) Ci) C4) C/) mi 6) CZ) 601 > U-Emierj4ýcen perations iManagement Mobilization lal1 Facilities 1b]

Direction and Control" 1cl1 Communications Equipment ldl M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M M Piitective~ACtIOn Decision Makini_____

Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2bl Dose Assessment & PARs & PADs for the Emergency Event 2b2 PADs for disabilities & access/functional needs people 2c 1 Radiological Assessment & Decision-making for Ingestion Pathway 2d1 Radiological Assessment & Decision-making for Relocation/Reentry/Return 2el

'Protcctve Action ipic tio Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control 3al M M M M M Implementation of KI PAD for Institutionalized Individuals/Public 3bl M lmplemeitation of PADs for disabilities-& access/functional needs people 3cl Implementation of PADs for Schools.: 3c2 M 1 M 1M Implementation of Traffic & Access Control 3dl I_M Impediments to Evacuation 3d2 Availability & use of Commodity & Resource Information 3el Preprinted Materials for Implementing PADs for. Commodities & Resources 3e2, Implementation of Relocation/Reentry/Return Decisions 3fl FPield Mea~surerment and Analysis ' .

RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement & Analyses 4a.2 Plume Phase Field Measur ement & Analyses 4a3 Post Plume Phase Field Measurements & Sampling 4b 1 Laboratory Operations . . 4c 1 Emergency Notification and Public 'Info,V Activation of the Prompt Alert & Notification System 5a]

RESERVED 5a2 Activation of the Back-up ANS 5a3 M Activation of the Exception Area ANS 5a4 Emergency Information & Instructions for the Public/Media 5bl Monitoring, Decontamination, & Registration of Evacuees 6al M Monitoring/Decontamination of Emergency Workers/Equipment/Vehicles 6bl _ M Temporary Care ofEvacuees Transportation/Treatment of Contaminated 11njured Individuals 6c IM 6dl __M M 26

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repbrt/Inprovement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3-Criteria Evaluation Summaries 3.3.1 Virginia Jurisdictions 3.3.1.1 Virginia State Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is-as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, l.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.b.2, 2.c.1, 3.b.1, 3.d.l, 5.a.1, 5.a.3, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 5.a.3.. .

ISSUE NO.: 4-1-12-5a3-A-01 CRITERION: Backup alert and notification of the public is completedwithin a -

reasonable time following detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alertpani notification system:

CONDITIONS There was a significant delay in notifyinig tthe counites that sirens had failed and to begin back up route alerting. The counties.did not know Ithe sirens had failed until about an hour after the siren sounding. -

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The State and risk counties do not.haavethe ability to poll-the' sirens for status, and must wait forthe report from the utility. This report is provided to the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) liaison at. the LEOF, who communicatid the information to the1VDEM Radiological Planner at the, State EOC. A Siren Failure form was then completed and.broadcasted to the counties via the Instaphone. This turned out to be a lengthy process. .

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.6, Appendix 3.B.2.c EFFECT: Delay in notification of siren failure prevents the public in impacted areas from being aware of critical information contained in an EAS message.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: After exercise play, the Commonwealth simulated receiving a call from the LEOF, completed the necessary form, and simulated sending an Instaphone message to the counties. This was 27

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North, Anna Power Station completed promptly, and in combination with the route alert times of the specific risk counties, the 45 minute time limit was met.

c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.2 Virginia Department of Health, Bureau of Rad Health at VA SEOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this, location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.b.1, 3.a.1, 4.a.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.3 Local Emergency Operations Facility (Division of Radiological Health & Virginia Department of Emergency Management)

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.c. 1, l.d.1, L.e. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b. 1, 3.a.1, 3.b. 1, 4.a.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 28

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Prepared ness Program (REP)

After'Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.1.4 Dominion Innsbrook Technical Center, Joint Public Information Center -

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.e.1, 5.b.I.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.5 Virginia State Field Monitoring Team 1 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, L.e. 1, 3.a.1, 4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.6 Virginia State Field Monitoring Team 2 In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 29

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.1.7 Caroline County Rescue Squad In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 6.d.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions 3.3.2.1 Caroline County Field Monitoring Team In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.2 Hanover County Field Monitoring Team In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1,4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 30

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reportllmprovement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.3 Louisa County Field Monitoring Team In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is-as follows:

a. MET: 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.4 Orange County Field Monitoring Team In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is' aslfollows:..
a. MET: 1.d.1, L.e. 1, 3.a.1, 4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.5 Spotsylvania County Field Monitoring Team In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as' follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, 1.e. 1, 3.a.1, 4.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 31

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.6 Caroline County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.a.1, I.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 4.a.2,.5.a.I, 5.a.3, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.7 Caroline County Back-up Route Alerting In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MiET: l.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.8 Caroline County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5 - 10 Mi.

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 32

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.9 Caroline County Traffic and Access Control Points' In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a.` MET: 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.d. 1.

b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.10 Caroline County Reception Center (EAC), Caroline County Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.11 Caroline County Monitoring and Decontamination Center (EAC), Caroline County Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as'follows:
a. MET: L.e.1, 6.a.I.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 33

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.12 Caroline County Mass Care Center (EAC), Caroline County Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.d.1, 1.e.1,6.c.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.13 Caroline County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station (EAC), Caroline County Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.e.1,3.a.1,6.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.14 Caroline County Public Schools In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 34

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Aima Power Station 3.3.2.15 Caroline County Public Schools, Caroline County Middle School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is'as follows:

a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None-
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.16 Hanover County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.a.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, i.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.d.1; 3.d.2, 4.a.2, 5.a.1, 5.a.3, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.17 Hanover County Back-up Route Alerting In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 35

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.18 Hanover County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5 - 10 Mi.

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION:,None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.19 Hanover County Traffic and Access Control Points In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, .e.l,3.a.l,3.d.I.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.20 Hanover County Public Schools In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 36

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Rep6fr/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.21 Hanover County Public Schools, Beaverdam Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.22 Louisa County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.a.1, l.c.1, l.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c:l, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 4.a.2;5.a.li, 5.a.3, 5.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.23 Louisa County Back-up Route Alerting In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, L.e. 1, 3.a.1, 5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: 5.a.3.

ISSUE NO.: 41-12-5a3-A-02 CRITERION: Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within a reasonable time following detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notification system.

CONDITION: Back-up route alerting of siren coverage area number 16 in Louisa 37

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report!Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station County was not completed within 45 minutes of detection of siren failure. .The back-up route alerting process was completed 49 minutes after the County was notified of siren failure.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The initial route, provided to the Sherriff s Deputy was, incorrect.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654, E.6, Appendix 3.B.2.c EFFECT: Some residents would not have been notified in a timely manner which could have impeded their ability to evacuate promptly.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The correct route was provided to the deputy; when the route was redemonstrated it was completed in 28 minutes.

c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.24 Louisa County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 0 - 5 Mi.

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.d.1, L.e.l,3.a.l,5.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 38

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Rep'ort/limprovement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.25 Louisa County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5-10 Mi.,

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.26 Louisa County Traffic and Access Control Points In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.1, L.e.1, 3.a.1, 3.d.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.27 Louisa County Public Schools In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 39-

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.28 Louisa County Schools, Louisa High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: - ,

a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.29 Orange County Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, l.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c,1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 4.a.2, 5.a.1, 5.a.3, 5.b. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.30 Orange County Back-up Route Alerting In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, L.e.l,3.a.1, 5.a.l1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 40

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Re6rt/Ilmprovement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.31 Orange County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5 - 10 Wi In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this 'location' is as follows:

a. MET: l.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.32 Orange County Traffic and Access Control Points In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as"follows:
a. MET: l.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.d. 1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.33 Orange County Public Schools In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as -follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 41

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.34 Orange County Public Schools, Prospect Heights Middle School (Host)

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.35 Spotsylvania County, Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 4.a.2, 5.a.1, 5.a.3, 5.b.l.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.36 Spotsylvania County Back-up Route Alerting In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 42

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reportlnprovement Plan North Anna Power Station 3.3.2.37 Spotsylvania County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 0 - 5 Mi In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as f6llows:

a. MET: 1.d.1, L.e.l, 3.a.l, 5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: 5.a.3.

ISSUE NO.: 41-12-5a3-P-01 CRITERION: Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within a reasonable time following detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notification system.

CONDITION: The Spotsylvania Plan, ESF-13 Public Safety, references an incorrectly labeled section and attachment (detailed information provided below).

The Spotsylvania Plan, ESF 13 Public Safety, Page 3, Letter G indicates officers should, "see section III.A for additional information on primary route alerting." The plan does not specify that section III.A is located in Attachment 5. In addition, Page 1 of Attachment 5 is incorrectly labeled as "Attachment 3" and Section HII.A is incorrectly labeled asSection II Site Area Emergency. The information is accurately captured in Section II Site Area Emergency, Section C, subsections 1-4, it only .needs to be correctly labeled asSection III.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Plan was not cross referenced for accuracy.

REFERENCE:

NUREG 0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.6 EFFECT: Incorrectly labeled information could create confusion for officers.

assigned to implement the primary route alerting procedures.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Spotsylvania County Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan was corrected to reference the appropriate sections and attachment as noted in the condition statement above.

43

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/hnprovement Plan North Anna Power Station

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.38 Spotsylvania County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5 - 10 Mi In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: l.d.l,l.e.l,3.a.l,5.a.3.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: 5.a.3.

ISSUE NO.: 41-12-5a3-P-02 CRITERION: Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within a reasonable time following detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notification system.

CONDITION: The Spotsylvania County Radiological Emergency Response Plan (SCRERP) does not. clearly state in the basic plan that there are FEMA approved exception areas in the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ).

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Since the plan assigns the Sheriffs Office the responsibility to conduct route alerting, and the Law Enforcement appendix discusses route alerting for areas not covered by sirens, this was likely an oversight.

REFERENCE:

NUREG 0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.6, Appendix 3.B.2.c EFFECT: The lack of the mention of FEMA approved exception areas in the basic plan could lead to the possibility that newly assigned and/or emergency operations center augmentees would fail to direct actions to alert and notify the public in areas not covered by sirens thereby placing them in danger.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Spotsylvania County Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan was updated to include appropriate 44

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station information regarding FEMA approved exceptions areas in the 10-mile EPZ.

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.39 Spotsylvania County Reception Center (EAC), Courtland High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location'is as-follows:
a. MET: 1.e.1, 3.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.40 Spotsylvania County Emergency Worker Monitoring andDecontamination Station (EAC), Courtland High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA. criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.e.1,3.a.1,6.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.41 Spotsylvania County Mass Care Center (EAC), Courtland High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, L.e.1, 6.c.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None 45

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station

d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.42 Spotsylvania County Monitoring and Decontamination Center (EAC), Courtland High School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.e.1, 6.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.43 Spotsylvania County Schools In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.44 Spotsylvania County Traffic and Access Control Points In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, L.e.l, 3.a.1, 3.d.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None 46

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North' Anna Power Station

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.45 Spotsylvania County Schools, Berkeley Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.46 Spotsylvania County Schools, John J Wright Educational and Cultural Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 3.c.2.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions 3.3.3.1 Louisa County Reception Center (EAC), Moss-Nuckols Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.b.1, L.e. 1, 3.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None 47

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.2 Louisa County Monitoring and Decontamination Center (EAC), Moss-Nuckols Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.e.l,6.a.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.3 Louisa County Mass Care Center (EAC), Moss-Nuckols Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.d.1, 1.e.l,6.c.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.4 Louisa County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station (EAC), Moss-Nuckols Elementary School In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: L.e.1, 3.a.l,6.b.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None 48

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.5 Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:
a. MET: 1.e.l,3.a.l,6.d.1.
b. AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None
c. DEFICIENCY: None
d. PLAN ISSUES: None
e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None
f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None
g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 49

Unclassified Radiological Emergency P*reparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station SECTION 4: CONCLUSION The Commonwealth of Virginia and local jurisdictions demonstrated knowledge of their Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERP) and,propedures during the North Anna Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise and Out of Sequence Exercise evaluations; and adequately implemented them.

The North Anna Power Station's 2012 Plume Exposure Pathway exercise evaluation included Five (5) Counties, consisting of Emergency Operations Centers, State and County Field Monitoring .Teams, Traffic and Access ControlException Area Route Alerting, Back-Up Route Alerting, and the Out-of-Sequence locations consisting of School Districts, risk schools, Evacuee Assembly Centers (EAC's), Medical Services (MS-1) Hospital, and Rescue Squad.

Risk jurisdictio0ns:

, Caroline County

- Hanover County

  • Louisa County

, Orange County

  • Spotsylvania County.

There were more than Sixty (60) Federal, State, Local, and Private Organizations .participating in the exercise, with a total of two hundred thirty-three (233) criteria evaluated by fifty-two (52)

  • Federal Evaluators.

There were two (2) Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCAs) assessed and successfully re-demonstrated and resolved. In addition, there were two (2) Planning Issues assessed and corrected through the process of submitting necessary plan changes. There were no open issues from a previous exercise.

Based on the review of the offsite radiological emergency response plans and procedures submitted, FEMA Region III has determined they are adequate and there is a reasonable assurance they can be implemented, as demonstrated during the North Anna Power Station Plume exercise.

50

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repor'tImprovement Plan North Anna Power-Statidn APPENDIX A: EXERCISE TIMELINE Table 1 - Exercise Timeline' DATE: 2012-07-10. SITE': North Anna Power Station. VA

__ .2.

Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A, N/A . N/A Alert 0815 0823 0830 0821 0823 0826 0821 Site Area Emergency 0928 0934 0937 0928 0934 0939 0933 General Emergency 1009 1020 1024 1009 1020 1026 '1019 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1038 1059 1049 1043 1059 1059 1059 Simulated Rad. Release Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Terminated "_:.____._'.

Facility Declared Operational 0831 0832 0838 0837 0827 0836 Governor's Declaration of State of Emergency 0947 0958 0947 1008 1022 1048 Exercise Terminated 1306 1306 N/A 1307 1300 1307 Precautionary Actions: Air, Rail, Waterways 0937 0937 0937 1008 N/A N/A Precautionary Actions: Evacuation of Schools N/A N/A 0928 N/A 1000 0845 Precautionary Actions: Livestock Advisory 0937 0934 0937 1008 1011 0950 (stored feed, water and shelter)

Precautionary Actions: Local N/A N/A N/A 0941 N/A 0950 1st A&N Decision: Evacuate 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 1046 N/A 1046 1046 1046 1046 1st Siren Activation 1055 N/A 1055 1055 1055 1055 1st EAS Message - 1056 N/A 1056, . 1056 1056 1056 2nd A&N Decision: Evacuate 18, 19, 20; Shelter 1146 N/A 1146 1146 1146 1146 4,6, 7,10,11, 15 2nd Siren Activation 1155 N/A 1155 1155 1155 1155 2nd EAS Message 1156 N/A 1156 1156 1156 1156 KI Administration Decision: Not to take KI (for N/A 1242 1242 N/A N/A N/A all groups) ..... .__

51

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Table 1 - Exercise Timeline

-DATE: 2012M07-10, SITE: North Anna Power Station, VA Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A Alert 0815 0817 0821 Site Area Emergency - 0928 0933 0933 General Emergency:" 009 1019 1020 Simulated Rad. Release Started 1038 1057 1057 Simulated Rad. Release Terminated Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Facility Declared Operational 0822 0825 Governor's Declaration bf State of Emergency 0958 1000 Exercise Terminated 1250 1301 Precautionary Actions: Air, Rail, Waterways 0937 N/A Precautionary Actions: Evacuation of Schools N/A 0936 Precautionary Actions: Livestock Advisory (stored 0937 0900 feed, water and shelter)

Precautionary Actions: Local N/A N/A 1st A&N Decision: Evacuate 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 1046 1046-I st Siren Activation 1055 1055 1st EAS Message 1056 1056 2nd A&N Decision: Evacuate' 18, 19, 20; Shelter 4, 11.46 1146 6, 7;,1]0, 11, 1"5 . .

2nd Siren Activation 1155 1155 2nd EAS Message 1156 1156 KI Administration Decision: Not to take K. (for all N/A N/A groups) "_"

52

- Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station APPENDIX B: EXERCISE EVALUATORS AND TEAM LEADERS This section lists the Evaluators and Team Leaders for the NAPS 2012 Plume Exercise evaluated on July 10, 2012.

The the managing staff for the Exercise Evaluation were:

Darrell Hammons, DHS/FEMA RPi, Radiological Assistance Committee Chairman Joseph Suders, DHS/FEMA RIII, Exercise Evaluation Program Manager and Site Specialist Richard Kinard, DHS/FEMA Rill, Team Leader, State Emergency Operations Center John Price,DHS/FEMA RiII, Team Leader, Spotsylvania County.- I - - -- "

Martin Vyenielo, DHS/FEMA RHi, Team Leader, Technical.-Evaliiations Barton Freeman, DHS/FEMA RH, Team Leader, Caroline County -. .

Matthew Weidemer, DHS/FEMA RII, Team Leader, Louisa County' Tina Lai Thomas, DHS/FEMA Rill, Team Leader, Hanover County:,

Daniel Lerch, DHS/FEMA RIII, Team Leader, Orange County Also, the following personnel evaluated locations as representatives of the Radiological Assistance Committee:

Bob Trojanowski, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission John Pelchat, US Nuclear Regulato0y Commission Chris Thompson, US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Additional evaluation assistance was provided by FEMA Regions I, II, V VI,("VIII and FEMA Headquarters by providing the following Radiological Emergency Pfeparedness Program personnel:

Bridget Ahlgrim, FEMA Hq David Jeremy, FEMA Hq Scott Hallett, FEMA Hq Kenneth Weirman, FEMA Hq Lisa Hamilton, FEMA Hq Bob Swartz, FEMA RI Don Carlton, FEMA Ri Laurel Ryan, FEMA RVII Bonnie Sheffield, FEMA RVIII The organization that each evaluator represents is indicated by the following abbreviations:

DHS - Department of Homeland Security FEMA - Federal Emergnecy Management Agency NRC - US Nuclear Regulatory Commission DOT/FAA - Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration ICF - ICF Consulting, Inc Contractor Administrative support was provided by ICF Consulting, Inc. by:

Acting Regional Coordinator - Marcy Campbell Administrative Specialist - Erica Houghton 53

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station DATE: 2012-07-10, SITE: North Anna Power Station, VA LOCATION j EVALUATOR~ AGENCY Virginia State Emergency Operations Center Bridget Ahlgrim FEMA HQ...

David Jeremy FEMA HQ_:-,

  • Richard Kinard FEMA RIII"
  • "Rosemary Samsel ICFi -

Virginia Department of Health, Bureau of Rad Health at VA SEOC Reggie Rodgers ICFI Local Emergency.Operations'Facility (Division of Radiological Health *Martin Vyenielo FEMA RIB

& Virginia Department of Emergency Management)

Dominion Irnsbrook Technical Center, Joint Public Information Robert Noecker . ICFI Center Virginia State Field Monitoring Team I Michael Shuler FEMA RHI Virginia State Field Monitoring Team 2 Marcy Campbell ICFI Caroline County Rescue Squad Martin Vyenielo FEMA RII Caroline County Field Monitoring Team Robert Walker ICF Hanover CountiyField Monitoring Team John Zeidler "CF Louisa County Field Monitdring Team Ronald Biemacki JCFI Orange .County Field Monitoring Team David Jacobson ICFI Spotsylvania County Field Monitoring Team Alan Bevan ICFI Caroline County Emergency Operations Center *Barton Freeman FEMA R111

- Laurel Ryan FEMA RVII Robert Swartz FEMA RI William Vocke ICFI Kenneth Wierman FEMA HQ Caroline County Back-up Route Alerting Laurel Ryan , FEMA RVII Caroline County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5 - 10 Richard Smith ICF Mi.

Caroline County Traffic and Access Control Points Quirino Iannazzo ICFI Caroline County Reception Center (EAC), Caroline County Middle *Joseph Suders . FEMA RUII School Caroline County Monitoring and Decontamination Center (EAC), Daniel Lerch . FEMA RIUT Caroline County Middle School Caroline County Mass Care Center (EAC), Caroline County Middle, Lee Torres FEMA RUT1 School Caroline County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Martin Vyenielo FEMA RIJI.

Station (EAC), Caroline County Middle School Matthew Wiedemer FEMA RIII Caroline County Public Schools *Joseph Suders FEMA RI1 Caroline County Public Schools, Caroline County Middle School' Martin Vyenielo FEMA RUT1 Hanover County Emergency Operations Center Frank Cordaro ICFl

  • Tina Lai-Thomas FEMA RUI Chris Thompson FAA Kent Tosch ICFI Hanover County Back-up Route Alerting Michael Burriss ICFI Hanover County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5 - 10 Wes Ryals ICF Mi.

Hanover County Traffic and Access Control Points Deborah Blunt ICFI Hanover County Public Schools Martin Vyenielo FEMA RI1 Hanover County Public Schools, Beaverdam Elementary School *Joseph Suders FEMA RHI 54

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Louisa County Emergency Operations Center Terry Blackmon ICFI Gary Goldberg ICFI' Lisa Hamilton FEMA HQ

  • Matthew Wiedemer' FEMA RIII Louisa County Back-up Route Alerting Samuel Nelson ICFI Louisa County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 0 - 5 Mi. Debra Schneck ICFI Louisa Coiu'mty Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5-10 Mi. Michael Meshenberg ICFI Louisa County Traffic and Access Control Points.- . . Clayto6n Spangenberg ICFI Louisa County Public Schools Martin.Vyenielo. FEMA RiIl Louisa County Schools, Louisa.High School *Joseph Suders FEMA RII1 Orange County Emergency Operations Center . Scott Hallett . FEMA - HQ
  • Daniel Lerch FEMA RIII:

LynriS'teffensen ICF Lee Torres FEMA RIII Orange County Back-up Route Alerting Robert Gantt ICFI Orange County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5 - 10 Mi Robert Lemneshka ICF Orange Countyý Traffic and Access Control Points Patrick Taylor ICFI Orange County Public Schools DanieliLerch - FENIA R-II Orange County Public Schools, Prospect Heights Middle School Matthew'Wiedemer FEMA PI*ll (Host) .,___'

Spotsylvania County Emergency Operations Center Don Carlton FEMA RI.

Henry Christiansen ICFI Robert Neff FEMA RIII

  • John Price FEMA RII Bonnie Sheffield FEMA -RVIII Spotsylvania County Back-up Route Alerting James Hickey ICFI Spotsylvania County Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 0 - 5 David Kayen ICFI Mi Spotsylvania C-ounty Exception Area Route Alerting Assignment 5 - Willis.Larrabee . ICFI 10 Mi Spotsylvania County Reception Center (EAC), Courtland High School Lee Torres FEMA RIII Spotsylvania County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Daniel Lerch. , FEMA RIII Decontamination Station (EAC), Courtland High School *Joseph Suders FEMA RhII Spotsylvania County Mass Care Center (EAC), Courtland High School Matthew Wiedemer FEMA R-11.

Spotsylvania County Monitoring and Decontamination Center (EAC), Martin Vyenielo -.. FEMA RIII Courtland High School Spotsylvania County Schools . Matthew Wiedemer . FEMA RIII Spotsylvania County Traffic and Access Control Points Keith Earnshaw - ICF Spotsylvania County Schools, Berkeley Elementary School' - Lee Torres, FEMA RMI Spotsylvania County Schools, John J Wright Educational and Cultural Daniel Lerch FEMA RPI Center Louisa County Reception Center (EAC), Moss-Nuckols Elementary *Joseph Suders FEMA RIII School Louisa County Monitoring and Decontamination Center (EAC), Moss- *Joseph Suders " FEMA RIII Nuckols Elementary School Louisa County Mass Care Center (EAC'), Moss-Nuckols Elementary *Joseph Suders FEMA RII School .

Louisa County Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Martin Vyenielo FEMA RIIl Station (EAC), Moss-Nuckols Elementary School Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center *Joseph Suders FEMA Rill i' ;'T&;d Le.adeiK>

55

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station APPENDIX C: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ARC American Red CroSs ARES Amateur Radio Emergency Services CCPS Caroline County'Public Schools' CERC Corporate Emergency Response Center CST Civil Support Team DAD Digital Alarming Dosimetry DRY Dosimetry Record Form EAC Emergency Assistance Center EAL Emergency Action Level EAS Emergency Alert System ECL Emergency Classification Level ECO Exposure Control Officer EMC Emergency Management Coordinator EMD Emergency Management Director EMS Emergency Medical Services EOC Emergency Operations Center EOF Emergency Operations Facility EPT Exercise Planning Team EPZ Emergency Planning Zone ERV Emergency Response Vehicle ESC Emergency Services Coordinator ESF Emergency Support Function EW Emergency Workers FD Fire Department FMT Field Monitoring Team FOC Forward Operations Center FRMAC Federal Radiological Monitoring Assessment Center FSE Full Scale Exercise FTC Field Team Coordinator GE General Emergency GIS Geographic Information Systems GPS Global Positioning System TWP Initial Warning Point JIC Joint Information Center 56

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station JPIC Joint Public Information Center LCD Liquid Crystal Display LCHD Louisa County Health Department LEOF Licensee Emergency Operations Facility LHDr., Local Health Department MSEL Master Scenario Events"LiSt..

NAPS North Anna Power Station OSD- Optically Stimulated Dosimeter PA Public Affairs PAD Protective Action Decision PAO Public Affairs Officer ,

PAR Protective Action Recommendation PAZ Protective Action Zone PIO Public Information Officer PPE Personal Protective Equipment PRD Permanent Record Dosimeter RAC Regional Assistance Committee RACES Radio Amateir Civil Emergency Services RAHD Rappahannock Area Health District RAO Radiation Assessment Officer RDO Radiation Defense Officer REA Radiation Emergency Area REP Radiological Emergency Plan RERP Radiological Emergency Response Plan RHP Radiological Health Program RO Radiological Officer ROO Radiological Operations Officer RTF Radiological Task Force SAC Staging Area Coordinator SAE Site Area Emergency SAIC Science Applications International Corporation SC Spotsylvania County SCEOC Spotsylvania County Emergency Operations Center SCRERP Spotsylvania County Radiological Emergency Response Plan' SEOC State Emergency Operations Center SERS State Emergency Radio System SRO School Resources Officer SSO Social Services Officer SWAN State Warning Alert Notification TEDE 'Total Effective Dose Equivalent 57

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station VEOC Virginia Emergency Operations Center VERT Virginiia Emergency Response Team VSP lVirginia State Police 58

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/improvement Plan North Anna Power- Station APPENDIX D: EXERCISE PLAN, 59

7 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station 60

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE) a,- ,-

This page is intentionally left blank 61

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna.Power, Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North AnnaPowerStation Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................................................

H andling Instructions .............................................................................................. ...................... , il Chapter 1: General Inform ation .................................................................................................. 1-1 Introduction .... ........................................................... ........................... 1-1 1.-............................1 Confidentiality .......................... ................................................................................... ..... 1-1 Purpose .................................... ............................ .............. ................... 1-1 Target Capabilities .................................................................................. 1-2 Exercise Objectives ..... ........................... ..................... 1-3

.Outstanding Issues ................................ ............................................... 1-3 Chapter 2: Exercise Logistics ...................................................................................................... 2-1 Exercise Summary ................................................................................................................... 2-1 General ....... ...................................................... 2-1 Assum ptions ....................................................................................................................... 2-2 Constructs and Constraints ....................................................... 2-2 Exercise Participants .................................................................... .................................. 2-2 Exercise Tools ................................................................................. .................... ...... .:... 2-4 Controller H andbook .............................................................................. .... .2-4-.......4.............

Master Scenario Events List .............................................. 2-4 Exercise Implem entation ............................................................................................ .......... .. 2-4 Exercise Play ................................................. ................................................. ......................... 2-4 Exercise Rules ......................... t................................ t............................................................. 2-5 Safety Requirem ents ............. !................................................................................................ 2-5 General ........................................................ ..........................................................................

2-5 Exercise Setup ..................... ................................... ...................... .............. 2-5 Accident Reporting and Real Em ergencies ............................................................................. 2-6 Site Access ......................................................................................................................... ..... 2-6 Observer Coordination ........................................................................................................... 2-6 D irections ............................................................................................................................. 2-_7 Exercise Identification .......................................................................................................... 2-7 Com munications Plan .............................................................................................................. 2-7 Exercise Start, Suspension, and Term ination Instructions ..................................................... 2-7 Player Com munication ........................................................................................................... 2-7 Player Br niefing ....................................................................................................................... 2-7 Public A ffairs ......................................................................................................................... 2-7 62

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness. (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station FullScale Exercise (FSE)

Chapter 3: Player Guidelines .............. . . 3-1 E xercise Staff ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 Exercise Director ....................................................................... 3-1 L ead C ontroller ...................................................................................................................... 3-1 Controllers ............................................................... 3-1 Lead Evaluator ....... .............. 3-1 E valuators .......................................................................... ............................................... 3-2 Player Instructions ......................

........................ ....... 3-2 B efore the E xercise .............................................................................................. ............ 3-2 During the E xercise ..................................................................................... .......................... 3 2 Following the Exercise ......................................  : ......... '.:.. 3-3 Simulation Guidelines ........................................................................................ ...... "...3:-3 .

Chapter 4: Evaluation and Post-Exercise Activities ........................................... ...... ............ 4-1 Exercise D ocum entation ........................................................................................ ... 4-1 Exercise Evaluation Guides................................................ 4-1 Players Critique ............... ...................................................... .......... 4-1

..Hotwash ....... ...... ................................................ 4-1

'. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .......4- 1 Controller and Evaluator Debriefing ......................................... 4-2 Participants and Public/Media Briefings ................................... ...-.. 4-2 A fter A ction Report ................................................................................................................... 4-2 After Action Conference and Improvement Plan ................................ 4-2 After Action C onference .................................. ..................................... 4............,........2.......

4-2 Improvem ent Plan ................................... ................................................................ ............. 4 2 Appendix A : Exercise Schedules ........................................................................................... A- 1 Appendix B: Method of Operations and Extent of Play .......................--... ......... B-l.....................B-1 Appendix C: Participating Agencies and Addresses ................................................................... C:I Appendix D: Directions ................................................... D-1 A ppendix E : O pen Issues ........................................................................................................... E -1 63.

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

ExercisePlan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

PREFACE The 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE) is sponsored by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM). This Exercise Plan (ExPlan) was produced with input, advice, and assistance from the Exercise Planning Team (EPT), which followed the guidance set forth in the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP).

The ExPlan gives officials, observers, media personnel, and players from participating organizations the information necessary to observe or participate in a nuclear power plant accident response exercise focusing on participants' emergency response plans, policies, and procedures as they pertain to this type of event, The information in this document is current as of the date of publication and is subject to change as dictated by the EPT.

The 2012 North Anna Power Station Evaluated Full Scale Exercise (FSE) is an unclassified exercise. The control of information is based more on public sensitivity regarding the nature of the exercise than on the actual exercise content. Some exercise material is intended for the exclusive use of exercise planners, Controllers, and Evaluators, but Players may view other materials deemed necessary to their performance. The ExPlan may be viewed by all exercise participants, but the ControllerHandbook is a restricteddocument intendedfor Controllersonly.

All exercise participants should use appropriate guidelines to ensure the proper control of information within their areas of expertise and to protect this material in accordance with current jurisdictional directives. Public release of exercise materials to third parties is at the discretion of DHS and the EPT.

64

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Aiina Powver Station Radiological Emergency Preparednegs (REP)/(HSEEP)

Program Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

This page is intentionally left blank.-....

65

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/lInprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program, (HSEEP)

ExercisePlan - 2012 North Anna Power Station FullScale Exercise (FSE)

HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS

1. The title of.this document is 2012 North Anna Power Station Evaluated Full Scale Exercise (FSE) Exercise Plan (ExPlan).
2. The information gathered in this ExPlan should be handled as sensitive information not to be disclosed. This document shoiild be safeguarded, handled, transmitted, and stored in accordance with appropriate"security directives. Reproduction of this document, in whole or in part, without prior approval from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management is prohibited.
3. At a minimum,' the attached materials will be disseminated only on a need-to-know basis and when unattended, stored in an area offering sufficient protection against theft, compromise, inadvertent access, and unauthorized disclosure.
4. For more information, please consult the following points of contact (POCs):

Federal POC(s):

Joseph A. Suders Technological Hazards Program Specialist Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region III" One Independence Mall .

615 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 191066 Office Phone: 215 931-5564 BB: 215 478-2925 Joseph.suders(&dhs.gov State POC(s):

Susan Binkley Radiological Planner Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) 10501 Trade Court Richmond, VA 23236 Office Phone: 804 897-9783 Cell Phone: 804 263-4768 susan.binkley(ivdem.virginia. gov Utility POC(s):

-Stephen Wood Dominion - Nuclear Emergency Preparedness 5000Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Office Phone: 804 273-4217 Cell Phone: 804 380-8963 stephen.m.wood(idom.com 66

Unclassified I.

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Rep6rtImprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Introduction The North Anna Power Station Exercise is a full-scale exercise (FSE) designed to establish a learning environment for players to exercise. emergency response plans, policies, and procedures as they pertain to Nuclear Power Plant accidents. An FSE is a complex. event that requires detailed planning. To conduct an effective exercise, subject matter, experts (SMEs) and local.,

representatives from numerous agencies have taken part in the planning process and will take.

part in exercise conduct and evaluation.

This Exercise Plan (ExPlan) was produced at the direction of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Virginia Department of Emergency Management with the input, advice, and assistance of the EPT. The 2012 North Anna Power.Station FSE is evidence of the growing partnership between State and local jurisdictions for response to the threats our Nation and communities face.

Confidentiality The North Anna Power Station Exercise is a full-scale exercise (FSE) is an unclassifiedexercise.

The control of information is based more on public sensitivity regarding the nature of the, exercise than on the actual exercise content. Some exercise material is intended for the exclusive use of exercise planners, controllers, and evaluators, but players may view other materials deemed necessary to their performance. This ExPlan may be viewed by all exercise participants, but the ControllerHandbook is a restricted document intendedfor controllers only.

All exercise participants should use appropriate guidelines to ensure the proper control of information within their areas of expertise and protect this material in accordance with current Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Virginia Department of Emergency Management directives.

Public release of exercise materials to third parties is at the discretion of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the EPT.

Purpose The purpose of this exercise is to evaluate player actions against current response plans and capabilities for a nuclear power plant-related incident, and to comply with the requirements of 44 CFR 350 and the guidelines of NUREG 0654/FEMA-REP,1. Exercise -planners utilized the Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Manual (effective 12/23/11) to develop this exercise.

The objective of [the Virginia Department of Emergency Management Agency, and Offsite Response Organizations (ORO's) is to demonstrate reasonable assurance that the public can be protected during a nuclear power plant emergency.

67

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station FullScale Exercise (FSE)

Target Capabilities The establishment of the National Preparedness Priorities have steered the focus of homeland security toward a capabilities-based planning approach. Capabilities-based planning focuses on.

planning under: uncertainty, since the next danger or disaster can never be forecast with complete accuracy. Therefore, capabilities-based planning takes an all-hazards approach to planning and preparation which builds capabilities that can be applied to a wide variety of incidents. States and Urban Areas use capabi.lities-based planning to identify a baseline assessment of their homeland security efforts by comparing their current capabilities against the Target Capabilities List (TCL) and the critical tasks of the Universal Task List (UTL). This approach identifies gaps in current capabilities and focuses efforts.on identifying and developing priority capabilities and tasks for the jurisdiction.. These priority capabilities are articulated in the jurisdiction's homeland security strategy and Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan (TEP), of which this exercise is a component.

The capabilities listed below have been selected by the EPT from the priority capabilities identified in the Virginia Multi-Year TEP and the Federal Emergency Management Agencies Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Manual (effective 12/23/11). These capabilities provide the foundation for development of the exercise objectives and scenario, as the purpose of this exercise is to measure and validate performance of these capabilities and their associated critical tasks.

" Interoperable Communications

" Laboratory Testing

  • Citizen Evacuation and Shelter in Place
  • Critical Resource Logistics and Distribution
  • Emergency Operations Center Management
  • Emergency Public Information and Warning

" Emergency Public Safety and Security Response

  • Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment

" Environmental Health

  • Mass Care
  • Mass Prophylaxis
  • Medical Surge

" On-Site Incident Management

  • Worker Health and Safety
  • Food and Agriculture Safety and Defense
  • Weapons of Mass Destruction and Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination
  • Economic and Community Recovery 68

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/improvement Plan North 'Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Pro'gram (HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise'(FSE)

Exercise Objectives The Emergency Preparedness Evaluation Areas the elements and' sub-elements-for this exercise are those that are required to be demonstrated in every exe.rcise,, as required by the FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Manual (effective 12/23/11); The Extent of Play agreement at Appendix B outlines the emergency preparedness elements that are required to be demonstrated in the 2012 North Anna Plume Exercise, along with the level of demonstration that will be displayed in the exercise (i.e. fully demonstrated, limited demonstration, simulated, out of sequence interviews, not demonstrated). The objective of this exercise is to demonstrate reasonable assurance that the health and safety of thepublic can be protected, through successful demonstration of tasks identified in A1pendix B; The EPT selected objectives that focus on evaluating emergency response procedures, identifying areas for improvement, and achieving a collaborative attitude. '

Outstanding Issues There are 0 Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCAs) as a result of-the FEMA-evaluated plume-phase exercises at the North Anna Power Station on July 20; 2010 and Surry Power Station on July 19,.2011.

69

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station FullScale Exercise (FSE)

CHAPTER 2: EXERCISE LOGISTICS Exercise Summary General The North Anna Power Station Exercise is a full-scale exercise (FSE) designed to establish a learning environment for players to exercise their plans and procedures for responding to an incident at a Nuclear Power Plant. The North Anna Power Station Exercise is a full-scale exercise (FSE) and will be conducted on. July 10, 2012. Exercise play is scheduled for approximately 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> or until the Lead Controller in consultation with FEMA and the Utility determine that the exercise objectives have been met at each venue. The Out of Sequence evaluations will be conducted as follows:

Thursday, June 7, 2012:

  • 9 a.m. - Medical Services (MS-l) Drill

" Caroline County Rescue Squad

  • VCU Medical Center
  • 5 p.m. - Evacuation Assembly Center (EAC) Drill

. Moss-Nuckols Elementary School (Louisa County)

Monday; July 23, 2012:

  • 10 a.m. - Caroline County School District Interview
  • Caroline County Middle School Interview
  • 2 p.m. - Hanover County School District Interview I, E Beaverdam Elementary School Interview Tuesday, July 24, 2012:
  • 9 a.m. - Evacuation Assembly Center (EAC) Drill a Caroline County Middle School Wednesday, July 25, 2012:

0 Evacuation Assembly Center (EAC) Drill m Courtland High School (Spotsylvania County)

Thursday, July 26, 2012:

  • 9 a.m. Spotsylvania County School District Interview N Berkeley Elementary School Interview 0 John J. Wright Educational and Cultural Center Interview 0 9 a.m. - Louisa County School District Interview 0 Louisa County High School Interview
  • 1 p.m. - Orange County School District Interview 0 Prospect Height Middle School Interview 70

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Impfovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Assumptions Assumptions constitute the implied factual foundation for the exercise and, hence, are assumed to be present before the start of the exercise. The following general assumptions apply, to the 2012 North Anna Power Station Exercise full-scale exercise (FSE):

  • The exercise will be graded against the REP criteria. Elements outside the scope of the REP criteria will not be graded.
  • This exercise will. be conducted in a no-fault learning environment wherein systems and processes, not individuals, will be evaluated.
  • Exercise simulation will be realistic and plausible, containing sufficient detail from which to respond.
  • Exercise players will react to the information and situations as they are presented, in the same manner as if this had been a real event.

Constructs and Constraints Constructs are exercise devices designed to enhance or improve exercise realism. Alternatively, constraints are exercise limitations that may detract from exercise realism. Constraints maybe.

the inadvertent result of a faulty construct or may pertain to financial and staffing issues.

Although there are a number of constructs and constraints (also known as exercise artificialities) for any exercise, the EPT recognizes and accepts the, following as necessary: .

  • Exercise communication and coordination will be limited to the participating exercise venues and the Simulation Cell (SimCell).

" Only those communication methods listed in the Communication Directory will be available for players to use during the exercise.

  • Out-of-Sequence play is allowed.
  • Certain simulations are allowed.

The participating agencies may need to balance exercise play with'real-world emergencies. It is understood that real-world emergencies will takepriority.

71

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station FullScale Exercise (FSE)

Exercise Participants The following are the categories of participants involved in this exercise which includes plume phase and Out of Sequence activities; note,that the term "participant" refers to all categories listed below, not just those playing in the exercise:

  • Players. Players are agency personnel who have an active role in responding to the simulated emergency and perform their regular roles and responsibilities during the exercise. Players initiate actions that will respond to and mitigate the simulated emergency.

Controllers.Controllers set up and operate the exercise site; plan and manage exercise play; act in the roles of response individuals and agencies not playing in the exercise.

Controllers direct the pace of exercise play and routinely include members from the exercise planning team. They provide key data to players and may or initiate certain player actions to ensure exercise continuity.

  • Simulators. Simulators are control staff personnel who role-play as nonparticipating organizations or individuals. They most often operate out of the SimCell, but may occasionally have face-to-face contact with players. Simulators function semi-independently under the supervision of SimCell controllers, enacting roles (e.g., as media reporters or next of kin) in accordance with instructions provided in the Master Scenario Events List (MSEL). All simulators are ultimately accountable to the Exercise Director and/or the Senior Controller.
  • Evaluators.Evaluators are chosen to evaluate and provide feedback on a designated functional area of the exercise. They are chosen based on their expertise in the functional area(s) they have been assigned to review during the exercise and their familiarity with local emergency response procedures. Evaluators assess and document participants' performance against established emergency plans and exercise evaluation criteria, in accordance with HSEEP standards and within the bounds of REP Program guidance and regulations. They are typically chosen from amongst planning committee members or the agencies/organizations that are participating in the exercise. FEMA Evaluators will not serve as Controllers.
  • Actors. Actors are exercise participants who act or simulate specific roles during exercise play. They are typically volunteers who have been recruited to play the role of victims or other bystanders.

" Observers. Observers visit or view selected segments of the exercise. Observers do not play in the exercise, and do not perform any control or evaluation functions. Observers will view the exercise from a designated observation area and will be asked to remain within the observation area during the exercise. VIPs are a type of observer, but are frequently grouped separately. A dedicated group of exercise Controllers should be assigned to manage these groups.

72

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Relormlmprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

ExercisePlan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise'(FSE)

Media Personnel.Some media personnel may be present as observers pending approval' by the appropriate EMA personnel and exercise support team members.,Media interaction may also be simulated by -the SimCell to enhance realism.and meet related exercise objectives. A dedicated group of exercise controllers should be.assigned to manage these groups.

Support Staff. Exercise support staff includes individuals who are assigned administrative and logistical support-tasks during the exercise (i..e. registration, technical support, janitorial, catering, etc.

73

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After. Action Report/mprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

Exercise Plan - 2012 North.Anna Power Station FullScale Exercise (FSE)

Exercise Tools Controller Handbook The 2012 North Anna Power Station Exercise full-scale exercise (FSE) Controller Handbook is designed to help exercise Controllers facilitate an effective exercise. This Handbook also enables Controllers to understand their roles and responsibilities in exercise execution, and evaluation.

Should a Player, Observer, or media representative find an unattended Handbook, it should be provided to the nearest Controller or Evaluator.

Master Scenario Events List The MSEL outlines benchmarks, as well as injects that drive exercise play. It also details realistic input to the exercise players as well as information expected to emanate from simulated organizations (i.e., those nonparticipating Organizations, agencies, and-individuals who would usually respond to the situation). An inject will include several items of information, such as inject time, intended recipient, responsible controller, inject type, a, short description of the event, and the expected player action.

For the 2012 North Anna Power Station Biennial Exercise, injects will be used primarily for the Field. Monitoring demonstrations and Public Inquiry (rumor control) messages during the Plume exercise on July 10, 2012, and for schools, Evacuee Assembly Centers (EACs), -and Medical "

Services (MS-i) during the Out of Sequence evaluations on June 7, 2012 the week of July 23-27,'

2012. These injects are provided in an older format, i.e. (inject packet or mini scenario) for controller use and will include a timeline or time stamp consistent with escalations of events during a simulated nuclear power plant incident and include other required information necessary to drive exercise play.

Notifications during the Plume Phase of the exercise will be driven by the simulator at the utility in accordance with events outlined in the MSEL included-in the approved exercise scenario, and will be communicated in the same manner as a -real event with all communications being -

preceded with and terminated by the phrase "This is an Exercise ".

74

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action'Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Powverý Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program:(HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Exercise Implementationi Exercise Play Exercise play will begin at approximately 0700 With a Situation uipdate going to each, participating venue. Play will proceed according to the'events outlined in the MSEL, and in -

accordance with established plans and procedures. The exercise Will conclude U'on the completion of operations and attainment of-the exercise objectives, and as determined by the lead exercise controller in consultation with FEMA and the utility. -'

Exercise Rules The following are the general rules that govern exercise play:

  • Real-world emergency actions take priority over exercise actions..
  • Exercise participants will comply with real-world response procedures, unless otherwise-..

directed by control staff.

  • All communications (written, radio, telephone, etc.) made during the exercise will begin and end With the phrase, "This is an exercise."

Exercise participants placing telephone calls or initiating radio communication with the SimCell must identify the organization, agency, office, and/or individual with-whom they wish to speak.

Safety Requirements General Exercise participant safety takes priority over exercise events. Although the organizations involved in the 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE) come from various response agencies, they share the basic responsibility for ensuring,a safe environment forall personnel involved in the exercise. In addition, .aspects of an emergency response are dangerous..,:

Professional health and safety ethics should guide all participants to operate in their assigned roles in the safest manner possible. The following general requirements apply to the exercise:

  • All exercise controllers, evaluators, and staff will serve as safety observers while the exercise activities are underway. Any safety concerns must be immediately reported to the Lead Controller.
  • Participants will be responsible for their own and each other's safety during the exercise.

It is the responsibility of all persons associated with the exercise to stop play if, in their opinion, a real safety problem exists. Once the problem is corrected, exercise play can be restarted.

  • All organizations will comply with their respective environmental, health, and safety plans and procedures, as well as the appropriate Federal, State, and local environmental health and safety regulations.

75

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After, Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station.

Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEX):

ExercisePlan - 2012 North,Anna Power Station FullScale Exercise (FSE)

Exercise Setup' .. . -

Exercise setup involves the.pre-staging and dispersal of exercise materials; including registration materials, documentation, signage, and other equipment as appropriate.

Accident Reporting and Real Emergencies

  • Anyone observing a participant who is seriously ill or injured will first advise the nearest controller, then if possible, render aid, provided the aid does not exceed his or her training.
  • The controller who is made aware of a real emergency will initiate the broadcast "Real-,

World Emergency" on the controller radio network, providing the following information to the Senior Controller and Exercise Director:

o Venue/function o Location within the venue/function o Condition o Requirements

o. The SimCell will be notified as soon as possible if a real emergency occurs.
  • If the nature of the emergency requires a suspension of the exercise at the venue/function;.

all exercise activities at that facility will immediately cease. Exercise play may resume at that venue/function once the "Real-World Emergency" situation has been addressed.

  • Exercise play at other venue/functions should not cea§e if one venue/function, has declareda "Real-World Emergency" unless they are reliant on.the affected venue.,

If a real emergency occurs that affects the entire exercise, the exercise may be suspended or terminated at the discretion of the Exercise Director and Senior Controller. The notification. will be made fromthe SimCell.

Site Access Security Exercise play for the 2012 North Anna Power Station Plume Exercise will be conducted at numerous sites with varying degrees of security requirements. The North Anna Power Station will control entry to the Utility and the Local Emergency Operations Facility. Security at the State and Local Emergency Operations Centers will be conducted according to their individual security procedures. To prevent confusion and interruption of the exercise, access to the exercise sites and the SimCell will be limited to exercise participants and approved Observers only.

Players should advise their venue's controller or evaluator if an unauthorized person is present.

Each organization should follow its internal security procedures, augmented as necessary to comply with exercise requirements.

76.

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

Aftdr Action RepIort/Improvement Plan North Anna PowerStation' Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program`(HSEEP)'

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE) .

Observer Coordination Each or *ganization with observers will coordinate with the Virginia Department of Emergency' Management (VDEM) for access to the exercise sile. Observers will'be escorted to an - -

observation area for orientation and conduct of the exercise. All observers will be asked to remain within the designated observation area during the.exercise.,- :

Directions Directions to each venue area are available in Appendix D.

Exercise Identification Identification badges may be issued to exercise staff. All exercise, personnel and observers will be identified by badges distributed by the staff from each participating agency.

Communications Plan Exercise Start, Suspension, and Termination Instructions The exercise is scheduled to run for approximately 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> or untilthe lead exercise controller, in consultation with FEMA and the utility determines that the exercise objectives have been met.

The Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM)' will'announce the exercise suspension orftermination through the exercise controller at each venueand/or by instaphone.

All spoken1 and wruittei.,na com~lmunicaior~i n 'mi w .i sta rtu and ien with theu sutateir~menti Player Communication Players will use routine, in-place agency communication systems. Additional communication assets may be made available as the exercise progresses. The need to maintain capability for a real-world response may preclude the use of certain communication channels or systems that would usually be available for an actual emergency incident. In no instance will exercise communication interfere with real-world emergency communications. Each venue will coordinate its own internal communication networks and channels.

The primary means of communication among the SimCell, Controllers; and the. venues will be telephone. A list of key telephone and fax numbers, and radio call signs will be available as a-Communication Directory before the start of the exercise.

Player Briefing Controllers/Evaluators may be required to read specific scenario details to the participants to begin exercise play. They may also have technical handouts or other materials to give to players in order to better orient them to the exercise environment.

77

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action ReportlImprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP,)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Public Affairs .

This exercise enables Players t6 demonstrate an increased readiness to deal with a nuclear power plant incident. Any nuclear power plant exercise may be a newsworthy event. Special attention must be given to the needs of the media, allowing them to get as complete and accurate a story as possible while ensuring their activities do not compromise the exercise realism, safety, or objectives.

A Joint Information Center will be established at the Virginia Emergency Operations Center.

Actors may-play the role of reporters and (simulate) "media briefings", and will be given as they would for a real incident.

Participation by actual media will be coordinated through the Exercise Director in conjunction with the VDEM Public Affairs Office. The Virginia Department of Emergency Management and FEMA areresponsible: for disseminating public information in advance of the exercise.

78

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

CHAPTER 3: PLAYER GUIDELINES Exercise Staff Exercise Director The Exercise Director has the overall responsibility for planning, coordinating, and overseeing all exercise functions. He/she manages the exercise activities and~maintains a close dialogue.with the Controllers regarding the status of play and the achievement of the exercise design objectives. The VDEM Radiological Planner has responsibility to organize and lead the Exercise Planning Team.

The FEMA Region Ill Site Specialist for North Anna Power Station has authority to make determinations concerning evaluation issues and re-demonstrations.

Lead Controller The Lead Controller is responsible for the overall organization of the 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE). The Lead Controller monitors exercise progress and coordinates decisions regarding deviations or significant changes to the scenario caused by unexpected developments during play. The Lead Controller monitors actions by individual Controllers and ensures they implement all designated and modified actions at the appropriate time. The Lead Controller debriefs the Controllers after the exercise and oversees the setup and takedown of the exercise.

Controllers At least one controller will be onsite with every facility and field team participating in the exercise, and at each out-of-sequence interview. The Lead Facility Controller at each location will coordinate any changes that impact the scenario or affect other areas of play through the Lead Controller. The individual controllers issue exercise materials to players as required and monitor the exercise timeline. Controllers also provide injects to the players as described in the MSEL.

Lead Evaluator The Lead Evaluator is responsible for the overall evaluation of the 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE). The Lead Evaluator monitors exercise progress and stays in contact with the Lead Controller regarding changes to the exercise during play. The Lead Evaluator monitors actions of individual Evaluators and ensures they are tracking progress Of the players in accordance with the Extent of Play. The Lead Evaluator debriefs the evaluators after the exercise and oversees the entire evaluation and After Action process. The Lead Evaluator duties are the responsibility of the FEMA Region III REP Site Specialist.

79

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP);

ExercisePlan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Evaluators Evaluators' work under the direction of the Lead Evaluator, and as a team with Controllers.

Evaluators are SMEs who record events that take place during the exercise and assess/submit documentation for review and -inclusion in the After Action Report (AAR). Evaluators should refrain from any direct interaction with the players during exercise play except discussion with a Controller for clarification of issues or during scheduled interviews.

Player Instructions Before the Exercise rt documents.

  • Be at the appropriate site at least 30 minutes before the start of the exercise. Wear

- appropriate uniform/identification badge.

  • If you gain knowledge of the scenario before the exercise, notify a controller so that appropriate actions can be taken to ensure a valid evaluation.

Read your Player Information Handout, which includes information on exercise safety.

  • Attend all required briefings for your venue.
  • Please sign in and out.

During the Exercise

  • Respond to the exercise events and information as if the emergency were real, unless otherwise, directed by an exercise controller.
  • Controllers will only give you information they are specifically directed to disseminate.

You are expected to obtain other necessary information through existing emergency information channels.

" Do not engage in personal conversations with controllers, evaluators, observers, or media personnel while the exercise is in progress. If you are asked an exercise-related question, give a short, concise answer. If you are busy and cannot immediately respond, indicate so, but report back with an answer at the earliest time possible. Remember, this is an open book test.

" If you do not understand the scope of the exercise or if you are uncertain about an organization's or agency's participation in an exercise, ask a controller.

  • Parts of the scenario may seem implausible. Recognize that the exercise has objectives to satisfy and may require the incorporation of unrealistic aspects. Note that every effort has been made by the trusted agents to balance realism with safety and the creation of an effective learning and evaluation environment.

80

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedn'ess (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

Exercise Plan - 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

  • All exercise communication will begin and end with the phrase "This is an exercise."

This is a precaution taken so anyone. oyerhearing the conversation will not mistake the exercise play for a real-world emergency.,

  • Verbalize out loud when taking an action. This will ensure that evaluators are made aware of critical actions as they occur.
  • Maintain a log of your activities. Many times, this log may include documentation of activities missed by a controller or evaluator.

Following the Exercise

  • At the end of the exercise at your facility, participate in the brief critique with the controllers and evaluators.
  • Provide any notes or materials generated from the exercise to your controller or evaluator for review and inclusion in the AAR. As an example, these materials may include sign-in rosters, logs, messages, press releases etc.

Simulation Guidelines Because the 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE) is of limited duration and scope, the physical description of what would fully occur at the incident sites and surrounding areas will be relayed to the Players by Simulators or Controllers.

If a real emergency occurs during the exercise, the exercise at your respective venue may be suspended or terminated 'at the discretion of the controller(s) at each venue. If a real emergency occurs, say "Real-World Emergency" and notify the nearest Controller and Evaluator.

81

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP.)

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

CHAPTER 4: EVALUATION AND POST-EXERCISE ACTIVITIES Exercise Documentation..,

The goal of the 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE) is to comprehensively exercise and evaluate the OROs' plans and capabilities as they pertain to 'a potential nuclear power plant incident. After the exercise, data collected by Controllers, Evaluators, the SimCell, and Players will be used to identify strengths and areas for improvement in the context of the exercise design objectives.,

Exercise Evaluation Guides DHS has developed Exercise Evaluation Guides (EEGs) that identify expected activities for evaluation, provide consistency across exercises, and link individual tasks to disciplines and expected outcomes.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region III has decided not to use EEG's as part of Exercise Documentation process.

Players Critique Immediately following the completion of exercise play, Controllers will facilitate, a critique with Players from their assigned location. The critique is an opportunity for Players to voice their opinions on the exercise and their own performance. At this time, Controllers can also seek clarification on: certain actions and what prompted Players to take them. The critique should not last more than 30 minutes.* Controllers should take notes during the critique and include these observations in their analysis.

Hotwash Prior to the Participants and Public /Media Briefing, The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will facilitate a Hotwash with the State, Risk and Support Counties, local jurisdictions and agencies participating in the exercise. The Hotwash is an opportunity for evaluators and participants to voice preliminary performance concerns, demonstrated strengths, and thank those who played. At this time, Evaluators can also seek clarification on certain actions and what prompted Players to take them. Evaluators should take notes during the Hotwash and include these observations in their analysis, if necessary. The Hotwash will be held on July 12, 2012, at 2:30 p.m. at the Marriott Richmond West, 4240 Dominion Blvd., Glen Allen, Virginia 23060.

82

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action RePort/Impr6vement Plan North Anma Powver Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program- (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station E*Plan', Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Controller and Evaluator Debriefing Controllers, Evaluators, and selected exercise participants will attend'a facilitated Controller and Evaluator Debriefing on July 10, 2012 at their assigned venues immediately following termination of the exercise. The debriefing should last no longer than 30-minutes. During the debriefing these individuals will discuss their observations of theexercise in an open environment to clarify actions taken during the exercise.

Participants and Public/Media Briefings The Participants Briefing will be conducted on July 13, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. at the Marriott Richmond West, 4240 Dominion Blvd., Glen Allen, Virginia 23060. The Public/Media Briefing will be conducted on July 13, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. at the same location.

After Action Report The AAR is the culmination of the exercise. It is a written report outlining the strengths and areas for improvement identified during the exercise. The AAR will include the timeline, executive summary, scenario description, performance issues, planning issues, deficiencies, and capability analysis. The AAR will be drafted by a core group of individuals from the exercise planning team.

After Action Conference and Improvement Plan The improvement -process represents the comprehensive, continuing preparedness effort of which the 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE) is a part. The lessons learned and recommendations from the AAR will be incorporated into theImprovement Plan (IP).

After Action Conference The After Action Conference (AAC) is a forum for jurisdiction officials to hear the results of the evaluation analysis, validate the findings and recommendations in the draft AAR, and begin development of the IP. The After Action Conference will be coordinated and conducted by the VDEM Radiological Planner at a time and date to be determined.

Improvement Plan The IP identifies how recommendations will be addressed, including what actions will be taken, who is responsible, and the timeline for completion. It is created by key stakeholders from the 2012 North Anna Power Station Exercise Planning Team during the AAC.

83

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Rep.ortImprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland-Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

APPENDIX A: EXERCISE SCHEDULE Table A.1 2012 North Anna Power Station Full Scale Exercise (FSE)Schedule Timeline:

.' InitiiiI notification will bý received from North Anna Power Station via instaphone to the Virginia EOC and local EOC's around 8 a.m. The exercise will terminate at approximately 3 p.m.

Participants:

  • Caroline County
  • Hanover County
  • Louisa County
  • Orange County
  • Spotsylvania County
  • 3 4 th Civil Support.Team (Fort Pickett) 0 Dominion Virginia Power (North Anna Power Station)

Evaluators:

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) - Onsite Evaluation 84

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reporv/Improvement Plan North Antia Power*Statiofi Radiological Emergency Preparedness`(REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation"Program '(HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan -"Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

APPENDIX B: METHOD OF'OPERATION AND EXTENT OF PLAY ASSESSMENT AREA 1: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Sub-element L.a - Mobilization Intent This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency personnel, and activate and staff emergency facilities.

Criterion1.a.1 : OROs use effective procedures to alert,notify, and mobilize emergency personnel and activatefacilities in a timely manner. (NUREG-0654/FEM4-REP-1,A.1-a, e; A.3, 4; C.1,4, 6; D.4; E.1, 2; H.3, 4)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this DemonstrationCriterion may be accomplishedduring a full-scale or functional exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to receive notification of an incident from" the licensee; verify the notification; and contact, alert, and mobilize key emergency personnel in a timely manner and demonstrate the ability to maintain and staff 24-hour operations. TWenty-four-hour operations can be demonstrated during the exercise via rostersor shift changes or otherwise in an actual activation. Local responders must demonstrate the ability to receive and/or initiate notification to the licensees or other respective emergency management organizations of an incident in a timely manner, when they receive information from the licensee or alternate sources. Responsible OROs must demonstrate the activation of facilities for immediate use by mobilized personnel upon their arrival. Activation of facilities and staff, including those.

associated with the Incident Command System, must be completed in accordance with ORO plans/procedures. The location and contact information for facilities included in the incident command must be available to all appropriate responding agencies and the NPP after these facilities have been activated.

The REP program does not evaluate Incident Command System tactical operations, only coordination among the incident command, the utility, and all appropriate OROs, pursuant to plans/procedures.

Pre-positioning of emergency personnel is appropriate, in accordance with the Extent-of-Play Agreement, at those facilities located beyond a normal commuting distance from the individual's duty location or residence. This includes the staggered release of resources from an assembly area. Additionally, pre-positioning of staff for out-of-sequence demonstrations may be used in accordance with the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

85

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After. Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anma Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland..Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan - Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Initial law enforcement, fire service, HAZMAT, and emergency medical response to the NPP-V(,

site may impact the ability to staff REP functions. The ability to identify and request additional resources or identify compensatory measures must be demonstrated. Exercises must also address the role of mutual aid in the incident, as appropriate. An integral part of the response to an HAB scenario at an NPP may also be within the auspices of the Federal Government (e.g., FBI, NRC, or DHS). Protocols for requesting Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement support must be demonstrated, as appropriate. Any resources identified through LOA/MOUs must be on the ORO's mobilization list so they can be contacted during an incident, if needed. All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an. actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

State Negotiated Extent of Play:

The State will notify and mobilize appropriate response agencies which have responsibilities in the Virginia EOC, at the appropriate emergency classification level and in accordance with established plans and procedures in a timely manner.'VDEM and DRH will provide staffing as per procedures. Pre-positionmg of personnel for VOPEX 12 is allowed for all locations.

The State will demonstrate the capability to receive notification of an emergency situation from the licensee and verify notification. The State will demonstrate the activation of facilities for immediate use by mobilized personnel when they arrive to begin emergency operations.

Risk and Host Jurisdictions Negotiated Extent of Play:

Local jurisdictions will notify and mobilize appropriate response agencies and key personnel assigned to the local EOCs and media centers, field workers and Evacuation Assembly Centers, (out of sequence) if activated, at the appropriate Emergency Classification Level (ECL) and as per procedures in a timely manner. Pre-positioning of personnel for VOPEX 12 is allowed for all locations.

The risk jurisdictions will demonstrate the capability to receive notification of an emergency situation from the licensee and verify notification. The risk jurisdictions will demonstrate the activation of facilities for immediate use by mobilized personnel when they arrive to begin emergency operations.

Outstandiny Issues:

None 86

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Rdpoirtlmprovement Plan North A-ina Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness ,(REP)!;

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluatio n Program (HSEEP).

2012 North Anna Power Station Exilan:: Full Scale Exercise (FSE).

Sub-'element L.b - Faciities Intent This Sub-element derives from NUREG-0654, which provides that Offsite Response' Organizations (ORO) have facilities to support the emergency response.

Criterion 1. b. 1. Facilities are sufficient to support the emergency response. (N.REG-0654, Extent of Play Facilities will only be specifically evaluated for this criterion if they are new or have substantial changes in structure or mission. Responsible OROs should, demonstrate the availability of facilities that support the accomplishment of emergency operations; Some of, the areas to be considered are: adequate space, furnishings, lighting, restrooms, ventilation, backup power and/or alternate facility (if required to support operations).

Facilities must be set up based on the ORO's plans and procedures and demonstrated as they would be used in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise indicated in theý extent of play agreement.

Risk and Support JurisdictionsNegotiated Extent of Play:

Spotsylvania County will participate from the new county Emergency Operations Center (EOC) in VOPEX 12 and will demonstrate that the facility has adequate space, furnishings, lighting, restrooms, ventilation and backup power are.sufficient, and support the accomplishment of emergency operations.

Louisa County Evacuation Assembly Center at Moss-Nuckols Elementary School will demonstrate that the facility has adequate space, furnishings, lighting, restrooms, ventilation and backup power are sufficient, and support the accomplishment of emergency operations during the Out of Sequence evaluations on June 7, 2012.

Outstanding Issues:

None 87

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After, Action ReportlImprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/.

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (F:SE)

Sub-element .c - Direction and Control Intent This Sub-element is derived from NIJREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to control their overall response to an emergency.

CriterionL.e. 1: Key personnel with leadershiprolesfor the ORO provide direction and control to that part of the overall response effort for which they are responsible. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.1.d; A.2.a, b; A.3; C.4, 6)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this DemonstrationCriterion may be accomplished in afull scale,functional, or tabletop exercise.

Leadership personnel must demonstrate the ability to carry out the essential management functions of the response effort (e.g., keeping staff informed through periodic, briefings and/or other means, coordinating with other OROs, and ensuring completion of requirements and requests.) Leadership must demonstrate the ability to prioritize resource tasking and replace/supplement resources (e.g., through MOUs or other agreements) when faced with competing demands for finite resources. Any resources identified through LOA/MOUs must be on the ORO's mobilization list so they may be contacted during an incident, if needed.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed, as they would be. in an actual emergency,. unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement..

State NegotiatedExtent ofPlay:

Overall direction and control of state activities will be demonstrated in the VIRGINIA EOC, Local Emergency Operations Facility (LEOF) and Joint Information Center (JIC). The Governor's representative or a simulated designee will be present and will simulate coordinating decisions with the Governor's Office. The State Coordinator or designee will demonstrate the ability, to keep staff informed, hold briefings and coordinate activities with other offsite response organizations. Both ,the State, risk and host jurisdictions should ensure the completion of requirements and requests. Demonstration wilt be in accordance with plans and procedures.

Risk and Host JurisdictionsNegotiated Extent of Play:

The emergency services coordinator or designee will demonstrate his ability to keep staff informed, hold briefings, and coordinate activities with other offsite response organizations.

Both the risk and host jurisdictions should ensure the completion of requirements and requests.

Demonstration will be in accordance with plans and procedures.

Outstanding Issues:

None 88

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Programi (REP)

Aftei Action Repor/Iimprovement Plan Norih AnnaPower Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Sub-element 1.d - Communications Equipment Intent This'Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, i*hich requires that OROs establish and operate reliable primary and backup 66mmunicationi systems-to ensure I communications with key emergency personnel at locations such as contiguous governments within the EPZ, Federal emergency response organizations, the iicefisee and its facilities, EOCs, Incident Command Posts, and FMTs.

Criterion 1.d2l: At least two communication systems are available, atfleast one.ofperates properly, and communication links are establishedand maintained with appropriatelocations.

Communicationscapabilitiesare managed in support of emergency operations.'(N.UREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, F.1, 2)

Assessment/Extent of Play "

Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionis accomplishedinitially in a baseline evaluation-and subsequently in periodic testing and drills. System familiarity'anduse must be demonstrated as applicable infull scale,functional and tabletop ex'ercises, or iftheir uise would be'required, during an actual 'event.

OROs must demonstrate that a primary system, and at least one backup system for fixed. .

facilities, is fully functional at all times. Communications systems are maintained and tested on a recurring-basis throughout the assessment period and system' statUs is available to all operators.

Periodic test results and corrective actions are maintained on a real time basis. If a communications system or systems are not functional, but exercise performance is not affected, no exercise issue will be assessed.

Cofmimunications equipment and procedures for facilities and field units are lused as needed for transmission and receipt of exercise messages. All facilities, FMTs, and incident command must have the capability to access at least one communication system 'that is indeoendent of the -

commercial telephone system. Responsible OROS must demonstrate the capability to manage the communication systems and ensure that all message traffic is handled without delays that might disrupt emergency operations. OROs must ensure that a coordinated communication link fdr'-.' ,"

fixed and mobile medical support facilities exists. Exercise scenarios may require the failure of a communication system and use of an alternate system, as negotiated in7.the Extent-of-Play ,.

Agreement.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be inn an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified inthe Extent-of-Play Agreement.

State, Risk andHost JurisdictionsNegotiatedExtent of Play:

This evaluation area will be demonstrated in all participating locations, in accordance with plans and procedures. OROs will demonstrate that a primary and at least one backup system are fully functional at the beginning of the exercise. Facility and field workers will have access to at least one communications system that is independent of commercial landline telephone.

89 Outstanding Issues:

None

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After.Action ReportL/mprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Sub-element i.e -Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations Intent This Sub-element is derived from NIJREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have emergency equipment and supplies adequate to support the emergency response.

Criterion 1.e.1: Equipment,maps, displays, monitoring instruments, dosimetry,potassium iodide (KI)and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations (NUREG-0654/FEMA -REP-1, H. 7, 10; 1.7, 8, 9; J.10.a, b, e; J.11, 12; K.3.a; K.5.b)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterion is accomplishedprimarilythrough a baseline evaluation and subsequentperiodic inspections.

A particular facility's equipment. and supplies must be sufficient and consistent with that facility',s assigned role in the ORO's emergency operations plans. Use of maps and other displays is encouraged. For non-facility-based operations, the equipment and supplies must be sufficient and consistent with the assigned operational role. At locations where traffic and access control personnel are deployed, appropriate equipment (e.g., vehicles, barriers, traffic cones, and signs) must be available, or their availability described.

Specific equipment and supplies that must be demonstrated under this criterion include KI inventories, dosimetry, and monitoring equipment, as follows:

KI: Responsible OROs-must demonstrate the capability to maintain inventories of KI sufficient for use by: (1) emergency workers; (2) institutionalized individuals, as indicated in capacity lists for facilities; and (3) where stipulated by the plans/procedures, members of the general public (including transients) withinthe plume pathway EPZ, In addition, OROs must demonstrate provisions to make KI available to specializedresponse teams (e.g., civil support team, Special-Weapons and Tactics Teams, urban search and rescue, bomb squads, HAZMAT, or other ancillary groups) as identified, in plans/procedures). The plans/procedures must include the forms to be used for documenting emergency worker ingestion of KI, as well as a mechanism for identifying emergency workers that have declined KI in advance. Consider carefully the placement of emergency workers that have declined KI in advance.

ORO quantities of dosimetry and KI available and storage locations(s) will be confirmed by physical inspection at the storage location(s) or through documentation of current inventory submitted during the exercise, provided in the ALC submission, and/or verified during an SAV.

Available supplies of KI must be within the expiration date indicated on KI bottles or blister packs. As an alternative, the ORO may produce a letter from a certified private or state laboratory indicating that the KI supply remains potent, in accordance with U.S. Pharmacopoeia standards.

90'

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Northi Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station Ex!iPan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Dosimetry: Sufficient quantities of appropriate direct-reading andrpermanent record dosimetry and dosimeter chargers must be available for issuance to all emergency workers who will be dispatched to perform an ORO mission. Inaddition, OROs mustdemonstrate provisions to make dosimetry available to specialized responseteams (e.g., civil support team, Special Weapons and-Tactics Teams, urban search and rescue, bomb squads, HAZMAT, or other ancillary groups) as identified in plans/procedures). . .

Appropriate direct-reading dosimetry must allow an individual(s) to read the administrative reporting limits and maximum exposure limits contained in the ORO's plans/procedures.  :

Direct-reading dosimeters must be zeroed or operationally checked prior to issuance.. The dosimeters must be inspected for electrical leakage at least annually and replaced when necessary. Civil Defense Victoreen Model 138s (CD V-138s) (0-200 mR), due to their documented history of electrical leakage problems, must be inspectedfor, electrical leakage'at least quarterly and replaced when necessary,.- This leakage testing will be verified during the exercise, through documentation submitted in the ALC and/or through an SAV.

Operational checks and testing of electronic dosimeters must be in accordance with the' manufacturer's instructions and be verified during the exercise, through documentation submitted in the ALC and/or through an SAV.

Monitoring Instruments: All instruments must be inspected, inventoried;, and operationally checked before each use. Instruments must be calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Unmodified CDV-700 series instruments and other instruments without a manufacturer's recommendation must be calibrated annually. Modified CDV-700 instruments must be calibrated in accordance with the recommendation of the modification manufacturer. A label indicating such calibration must be on each instrument or calibrated -frequency can be verified by other means. In addition, instruments being used to measure activity must have a sticker-affixed to their sides indicating the effective range of the readings.,The range of readings documentation specifies the acceptable range 'of readings that the meter should indicate when it is response-checked using a standard test source.

For FMTs, the instruments must be capable of measuring gamma exposure rates and detecting beta radiation. These instruments must be capable of measuring a range of activity and exposure, including radiological protection/exposure control of team members and detection of activity on air sample collection media, consistent with the intended use of the insfrument and the ORO's' plans/procedures. An appropriate radioactive check source must be used to verify proper operational response for each low-range radiation measurement instrument (less than 1R/hr) and for high-range instruments when available. If a source is not available for a high-range .

instrument, a procedure must exist to operationally test the instrument before entering an area where only a high-range instrument can make useful readings.

91

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan - Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

In areas where portal monitors are used, the OROs must set up and operationally check, the. :::

monitor(s). The monitor(s) must.conform to the standards set forth in the Contamination.

Monitoring Standardfor a PortalMonitor Usedfor Emergency Response, FEMA-REP-21 (March 1995) or in accordance with the manufacturer' s recommendations.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual-emergency, unless noted'above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

State andRisk JurisdictionsNe2otiated Extent of Play:

Equipment withinthe facility should be sufficient and consistent with the role assigned to that facility in the ORO's plans and/or procedures in support of emergency operations. Use of maps and displays will be demonstrated.

Sufficient -quantities of appropriate survey instruments and dosimetry should be available for issuance to all emergency workers in accordance with procedures.

Responsible ORO's should demonstrate the capability to:maintain inventories of KI sufficient for use by emergency workers, as; indicated on rosters.,

At locations where traffic 'and access control personnel are deployed (simulated at the staging area), appropriate equipment (e.g., vehicles, barriers, traffic cones and signs, etc.) should be available or their availability described.

  • TCP/ACP maps (pagesfrom the plans may be used)
  • Population by'protective action zone (pagesfrom the plans may be used)

Demonstration of the KI inventory rosters for the general public will occur'in the local EOC's by Health Representatives.

Out-of-Sequence Demonstrations Evacuation Assembly Centers (EACs):

  • Caroline County (Caroline County Middle School) 4 Louisa County (Moss-Nuckols Elementary School)
  • Spotsylvania County (Courtland High School) 92

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

Aftei Action RepotIlmýrovement Plan North Anna Power'Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation'Program, (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan . Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Health department personnel will provide, their respective KI inventories (through written documentation) for the general public at the EAC as well as the list of previously distributed KI.

Sufficient quantities of appropriate dosimetry should be available for issuance to designated emergency workers.

Virginia Departmentof Health, Division of RadioloeicalHealth Ne2otiatedExtent of Play: -

Two State Field Monitoring Teams (FMT), consisting of at least two individuals per team, will be staged at the Post Oak VDOT maintenance shop. The .teams will take measurements at a-minimum six (6) locations and/or while enroute and will operate according to procedures.:-

The field team will demonstrate the capability to determine the location of the plume. The team will communicate results, as necessary, to the DRH representative at, the LEOF. It .should be noted that the overall monitoring effort is coordinated by DRH from the LEOF. Controllers will provide data to the field teams. Laboratory operations will not be demonstrated for the sample at the mobile laboratory: Appropriate sample analysis information will be forwarded to DRH at the

LEOF. The State field monitoring team will demonstrate the collection of at least one air sample at the initial location the team is sent to. A second air sample may be taken if needed.

Risk JurisdictionsNegotiated Extent of Play:

Each jurisdiction will deploy one FMT, consisting of at least two individuals per team' to a minimum of two monitoring points located within their jurisdiction. 'Teams will take measurements and operate according to their procedures. The controllers will have the necessary data to provide raaliation levels to these teams. Note: Local field monitoring teams will not demonstrate the collection of air samples.

Outstanding Issues:

None 93

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action ReportlImprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security.,Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise, (FSE)

ASSESSMENT AREA 2: PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISION-MAKING Sub-element 2.a - Emergency Worker Exposure Control Intent This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to assess and control the radiation exposure received by emergency workers and have a decision chain in place, as specified in the ORO's plans/procedures, to authorize emergency worker exposure limits to be exceeded for specific missions.

Radiation exposure limits for emergency workers are the recommended accumulated dose limits or exposure rates that emergency workers may be permitted to incur during an emergency. These limits include any pre-established administrative reporting limits (that take into consideration TEDE or organ-specific limits) identified in the ORO's plans/procedures.

Criterion 2.a.1: OROs use a decision-makingprocess, consideringrelevantfactors and appropriatecoordination,to ensure that an exposure control system, including the use of K1, is in placefor emergency workers, includingprovisions to authorizeradiationexposure in excess of administrativelimits or protective action guides. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,C.6; J.lO. e, f,"K.4) o Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this DemonstrationCriterion must be assessed concurrentlywith a licensee exercise and may be demonstratedin afull scale,functional or tabletop exercise.

OROs authorized to send emergency workers into the plume exposure pathway EPZ must demonstrate a capability to comply with emergency worker exposure limits based on their emergency plans/procedures.

Participating OROs must also demonstrate the capability to make decisions concerning authorization of exposure levels in excess of pre-authorized levels and the number of emergency workers receiving radiation doses above pre-authorized levels. This would include providing KI and dosimetry in a timely manner to emergency workers dispatched onsite to support plant incident assessment and mitigating actions, in accordance with respective plans/procedures.

As appropriate, OROs must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the distribution and administration of KI as a protective measure for emergency workers, based on their plans/procedures or projected thyroid dose compared with the established PAGs for KI administration.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

94

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repoit/Imnprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPia"n Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

State NegotiatedExtent of Play:

VDEM and DRH working in the LEOF will rely on the facility's area monitor system and will not perform 30-minute dosimeter readings. If-the area monitoring system fails or facility dose rates are shown to increase, dosimetry will be issued to facility personnel in accordance with Dominion Generation procedures, and Dominion Generation faiclity monitoring personnel will monitor exposure. State field monitoring teams and mobile' lab 'workers" will demonstrate emergency worker exposure control, as per procedures.

As appropriate, DRH will demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the diStributi6i and administration of KI, as a protective measure, based on plan and/or procedures or projected thyroid dose compared with established protective action guides (PAGs) for'KI administration.

Risk JurisdictionsNeeotiated Extent ofPlay:

Risk Jurisdictions authorized to send emergency workers into the plume exposure pathway EPZ will demonstrate a capability to meet the criterion based on their emergency plans 'and procedures. As appropriate, risk jurisdictions will demonstrate the capability for the distributifrn and administration of KI, as a protective measure, based on the ORO's plan and/or p-ocedures or projected thyroid dose compared with the established protective action guides (PAGs) for KI administration.

Outstanding Issues:

None 95

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security.Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Sub-element 2.b. - Radiological-Assessment and Protective Action Recommendations and Decisions for the Plume Phase of the Emergency Intent This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to independently project integrated dose from projected or actual dose rates and compare these estimates to the PAGs. OROs must have the capability to choose, among a range of protective actions, those most appropriate in a given emergency. OROs base these choices on PAGs from their plans/procedures or EPA's Manual of ProtectiveAction Guides andProtective Actions for Nuclear Incidents and other criteria, such as plant conditions, licensee PARs, coordination of PADs with other political jurisdictions (e.g., other affected OROs and incident command), availability of in-place shelter, weather conditions, and situations, to include HAB incidents, the, threat posed.by the specific hostile action, the affiliated.response, and the effect of an evacuation on the,.threat response effort, that create higher than normal risk from general population evacuation.

Criterion2.b.1 : Appropriateprotective action recommendations (PARs) are based on available information on plant conditions,field monitoring data, and licensee and ORO dose projections,as well as knowledge of onsite and offsite environmental conditions. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, L 10 and Supplement 3)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this DemonstrationCriterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise and may be demonstrated in a full-scale,functional or tabletop exercise.

During the initial stage of the emergency response, following notification of plant conditions that may warrant offsite protective actions, the ORO must demonstrate the capability to use appropriate means, described in the plans/procedures, to develop PARs for decision-makers based on available information and recommendations provided by the licensee as well as field monitoring data, if available. The ORO must also consider any release and meteorological data provided by the licensee.

The ORO must demonstrate a reliable capability to independently validate dose projections. The types of calculations to be demonstrated depend on the data available and the need for assessments to support the PARs must be appropriate to the scenario. In all cases, calculation of projected dose must be demonstrated. Projected doses must be related to quantities and units of the PAG to which they will be compared. PARs must be promptly transmitted to decision-makers in a pre-arranged format.

96

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and EvaluationProgram (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

When the licensee and ORO projected doses differ by more than a factor of 10, the ORO and licensee must determine the source of the difference by discussing input data and assumptions, using different models, or exploring possible reasons. Resolution of these differences must be incorporated into the PARs if timely and appropriate. The ORO must demonstrate the capability to use any additionaldata to refine projected doses and exposure 'rates and revise the associated PARs.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

State Negotiated Extent of Play:

The initial Protective Action Recommendation (PAR) is based on plant conditions. Scenario driven doses may or may not exceed EPA PAGs, -as the plant condition-based PAR will dictate the appropriate evacuation/sheltering recommendation.

Dose projections will be developed by the Division of Radiological Health at the LEOF 'tb confirm or modify; as necessary, the PAR in effect. The protective action recommendation will be forwarded from the LEOF to the VIRGINIA EOC with any information necessary to sup.pbort the recommendation.

Outstanding Issues:

None 97

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/iprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency. Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan- Full Scale Exercise1 (FSE)

Criterion 2.b.2:,.A decision-makingprocess involving considerationof appropriatefactors and necessary coordinationis used to make protective action decisions (PADs)for the general public (including the recommendationfor the use of K1, if ORO policy). (NJUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,A.3; C.4, 6; D.4; J.9; J.IO.f m)

Assessment/Extent of Play * -

Assessment of this Demonstration:Criterionmust be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise and may be demonstratedin a full-scale,functional or tabletop exercise.

OROs must have the capability to make both initial and subsequent PADs. OROs must demonstrate the capability to make initial PADs in a timely manner appropriate to the incident, based on information from the licensee, assessment of plant status and potential or actual releases, other available information related to the incident, input from appropriate ORO authorities (e.g., incident command), and PARs from the utility and ORO staff. In addition, a subsequent or alternate PAD may be appropriate if various conditions (e.g., an HAB incident,.

weather, release timing and magnitude) pose undue risk to an evacuation, or if evacuation may disrupt the efforts to respond to a hostile action.

OROs must demonstrate the ability to obtain supplemental resources (e.g., mutual aid) necessary to implement a PAD if local law enforcement, fire service, HAZMAT, and emergency medical resources are utilized to augment response to the NPP site or other key infrastructure.

Dose assessment personnel may provide additional PARs based on the subsequent dose projections, field monitoring data, or information on plant conditions. In addition, incident command must provide input regarding considerations for subsequent PARs based on the magnitude of the ongoing threat, the response, and/or site conditions. The decision-makers must demonstrate the capability to change protective actions based on the combination of all these factors.

If the ORO has determined that KI will be used as a protective measure for the general public under offsite plans/procedures, then it must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the distribution and administration of KI to supplement sheltering and evacuation. This decision must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures or projected thyroid dose compared with the established PAG for KI administration. The KI decision-making process must involve close coordination with appropriate assessment and decision-making staff.

If more than one ORO is involved in decision making, all appropriate OROs must communicate and coordinate PADs with each other. In addition, decisions must be coordinated/communicated with incident command. OROs must demonstrate the capability to communicate the results of decisions to all the affected locations.

98

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reportlhnprovement Plan North Anna Power Station" Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation. Prograam: (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPkan' n -i Full Scale Exercise.(FSE)

All: activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and cormpleted as they would be in an actual'emergency, unless noted above of otherwise specified in the 'Extent-of-Play Agreement.

State Ne2otiated Extent of Play:

Decisions to evacuate and shelter any portion of the affected population will be demonstrated by the VDEM State Coordinator or his representative in the VIRGINIA EOC. These decisions will be coordinated with risk jurisdictions.

VDH decision.makers will demonstrate the capability to make decisions on-the distribution and administration of KI as a protective measure for the general public to supplement sheltering and/or evacuation.

Outstanding Issues:

None 99

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna, Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP).

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise(FSE)

Sub-element 2.c - PAD Consideration for the Protection of Persons with Disabilities-and.-.*"

Access/Functional Needs Intent .

This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l, which requires that OROs have the capability to determine PADs, including evacuation, sheltering, and use, of KI, if applicable, for groups of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs (e.g., hospitals, nursing homes, correctional facilities, schools, licensed daycare centers, mobility-impaired individuals, and transportation-dependent, individuals). The focus is on those groups of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs that are, or potentially will be, affected by a radiological release from an NPP.

Criterion2.c. 1: Protective action decisions are made, as appropriate,for groups of persons with disabilitiesand access/functionalneeds. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,D.4; J.9; J.lO.d, e)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this DemonstrationCriterion must be accomplished concurrently with a licensee exercise and may be demonstrated in afull-scale,functional or tabletop exercise that would include the use ofplant conditions transmittedfrom the licensee. Usually it is appropriate to implement evacuation in areas where doses are projected to exceed the lower end of the range of PAGs, except for incidents where there is a high-risk environmental condition or where high-risk groups (e.g., the immobile or infirm) are involved. In these cases, factors that must be considered include weather conditions, shelter availability, availability of transportation assets, risk of evacuation versus risk from the avoided dose, and precautionary school evacuations. In addition, decisions must be coordinated/communicated with the incident command. In situations where an institutionalized population cannot be evacuated, the ORO must consider use of KI.

Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to alert and notify all public school systems/districts of emergency conditions that are expected to or may necessitate protective actions for students. Demonstration requires that the OROs actually contact public school systems/districts during the exercise.

In accordance with plans/procedures, OROs and/or officials of public school systems/districts must demonstrate the capability to make prompt decisions on protective actions for students. The decision-making process, including any preplanned strategies for protective actions for that ECL, must consider the location of students at the time (e.g., whether the students are still at home, en route to school, or at school).

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

100

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After'Action Reporil/nprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency PrepOaredness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluatio'n P'r'ogram (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE).

Risk*JurisdictionsNegotiatedExtent of Play:

On July 10, 2012, all risk jurisdictions will have a school representative and social services representative available at their EOC. When dictated by events and according to procedures, officials will demonstrate what protective action decision they would makefor schools located within the 10 mile EPZ, schools located outside of the 10 mile"emergency planning zone (EPZ),

yet have students residing within'the 10 mile EPZ and for group's o6fpersons with disabilities and-access/functional needs. EOC representatives will consider relevant factors, such as weather, shelter availability and time evacuation estimates when determining what protective actions to -

recorfimend for special:populations. EOC representatives will also, considerrelevant factors such as the availability of transportation assets, risk of evacuation vs. risk from the avoided dose, precautionary school evacuation, and the administration of KI in situations where an institutionalized population cannot be evacuated.

Outstanding Issues:

None 101

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

ASSESSMENT AREA 3: PROTECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION Sub-element 3.a - Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control Intent This Sub-element is derived from NLTREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to provide for thefollowing: distribution, use, collection, and processing of direct-reading dosimetry and permanent record dosimetry; reading of direct-reading dosimetry by emergency workers at appropriate frequencies; maintaining a radiation dose record for each emergency worker; establishing a decision chain or authorization procedure for emergency workers to incur radiation exposures in excess of the PAGs, and the capability to provide KI for emergency workers, always applying the -as low as is reasonably achievable Iiprinciple as appropriate.

Criterion3.a.l]: The OROs issue appropriatedosimetry, K1, andprocedures, and manage radiologicalexposure to emergency workers in accordancewith the plans/procedures.

Emergency workers periodically,and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the.readingson the appropriateexposure record or chart. OROs maintain appropriate record-keeping of the administrationof KI to emergency workers. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-i, J.1O.e; K.3.a, b; K.44)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay be accomplishedduring afull-scale,functional or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminarsor training.activitiesthat would.

fully demonstrate technicalproficiency.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide emergency workers (including supplemental resources) with the appropriate direct-reading and permanent record dosimetry, dosimeter chargers, KI, and instructions on the use of these items. For evaluation purposes, appropriate direct-reading dosimetry is defined as dosimetry that allows an individual(s) to read the administrative reporting limits that are pre-established at a level low enough to consider subsequent calculation of TEDE and maximum-exposure limits, for those emergency workers involved in lifesaving actiyities, contained in the ORO's plans/procedures.

Each emergency worker must have basic knowledge of radiation exposure limits as specified in the ORO's plans/procedures. If supplemental resources are used, they must be provided with just-in-time training to ensure basic knowledge of radiation exposure control. Emergency workers must demonstrate procedures to monitor and record dosimeter readings and manage radiological exposure control.

102

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station' Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program, (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan- Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

During a plume phase exercise, emergency workers must demonstrkte the procedures to be followed when administrative exposure limits and turn-back values 'are reached. The emergency worker must report accumulated exposures during the exercise as indicated in the plans/procedures. OROs must demonstrate the actions described in the plans/procedures by determining whether to replace the worker, authorize the worker to incur additional exposures, or take other actions. If exercise play does not require emergency wcrkers to seek authorizations for additional exposure, evaluators must interview at least two workers to determine their knowledge of whom to contact in case authorization is needed, and at what exposure levels: Workers may, use any available resources (e.g., written procedures and/or coworkers) in providing responses.

Although it is desirable for all emergency workers.to each have a direct-reading dosimeter, there may be situations where team members will be in close proximity to each other during the entire mission. In such cases, adequate control of exposure can be achieved for all team members using one direct-reading dosimeter worn by the team leader. Emergency Workers assigned to low-'* "

exposure rate fixed facilities (e.g., EOCs and communications center within the EPZ,reception centers, and-counting laboratories) may have individual direct-reading dosimeters or they ma3y be" monitored using group dosimetry (i.e', direct-reading dosimeters strategically placed in the work area). Each team member must still have his or her own permanent record dosimetry. Individuals' authorized by the ORO to reenter an evacuated area during the plume (emergency) phase, must be limited to the lowest radiological exposure commensurate with completing their missions:'

OROs ma) have administrative limits lower than EPA-400-R-92-001 dose limits for emergency workers performing various services (e.g., life saving, protection of valuable property, all activities). OROs must ensure that the process used to seek authorization for exceeding dose limits does not negatively impact the capability to respond to an incident where life saving and/or protection of valuable property may require an urgent response.'

OROs must demonstrate the capability'to accomplish distribution of KI'to 'emergency' workers consistent with decisions made. OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists of emergency 'Workers who have ingested KI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s)"

they did so. Ingestion of KI recommended by the designated ORO health official is .voluntary' -

For evaluation purposes, the actual ingestion of KI shall not be performed. OROs must demonstrate the capability to formulate and disseminate instructions on using KI for those advised to take it.'Emergency workers must demonstrate basic knowledge of procedures for' using KI whether or not the scenario drives the implementation of KI use. This can be accomplished by an interview with the evaluator.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

103

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security- Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP).

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

State Negotiated Extent of Play-:

VDEM and DRH working in the LEOF will rely on the facility's area monitor system and will not perform 30-minute dosimeter readings. If the area monitoring system fails or facility, dose.

rates are shown to increase, dosimetry will be issued to facility personnel in accordance with Dominion Generation procedures,. and exposure will be monitored -by Dominion Generation facility monitoring personnel. State field monitoring teams will demonstrate emergency worker exposure control, as per procedures.

Risk JurisdictionsNegotiated Extent of Play:

Appropriate emergency workers in the risk jurisdictions will demonstrate emergency worker exposure control, as per procedures. Radiological Officers will be evaluated on their management (equipping and briefing) of field workers at the staging area location where field workers are equipped and briefed..

Emergency workers, as appropriate, will receive KI according to their procedures and will be briefed or given information on its use. Included organizations will demonstrate the ability to develop, and .-maintain lists of emergency workers who have ingested KI, including documentations of the date(s) and time(s) they were instructed to ingest RI. Simulated KI can be used. Emergency workers will demonstrate through interview the basic knowledge of procedures for the use of KI whether or not the scenario drives the use-of KI.

Out-of-Sequence Demonstrations:

Evacuation Assembly Centers (EACs):

  • Caroline County (Caroline County Middle School)

" Louisa County (Moss-Nuckols Elementary School)

  • Spotsylvania County (Courtland High School)

The EAC radiological officer will provide a briefing to demonstrate this evaluation area.

Designated emergency worker personnel (non-shelter personnel) who are assigned to the EAC will be provided with a radiological briefing, dosimetry, and appropriate forms. They will demonstrate the reading and recording of their dosimeter according to their plans and procedures and demonstrate their knowledge of emergency worker exposure control.

Outstanding Issues:

None 104

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anfia Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Sub-element 3.b - Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the General Public Intent- '. .

This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l, which requires that OROs have the capability to provide KI for insfitiitionalized individuals, and, if in the plans/procedures, to the general public for whom immediate evacuation may not be feasible, very difficult, or significantly delayed. While it is necessary for OROs to have the capability to provide KI to institutionalized individuals, providing KI to the general public is an ORO option and must be reflected as such in ORO plans/procedures. Provisions must include the availability of adequate quantities, storage, and means of distributing RI.

Criterion 3.b.1 : KI and appropriateinstructions are available if a decision to recommend use-of K! is made. Appropriaterecord-keepingof the administrationof K! for institutionalized, individuals and the generalpublic is maintaineL (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,J.1O.e,_t)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay be accomplishedduring afull-scale,functional or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or trainingactivities that would*'

fully demonstrate technicalproficiency.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to make KI available to institutionalized individuals, -and, where provided for in their plans/procedures, to members of the general public. OROs must demonstrate the capability to accomplish distribution of KI consistent with decisions made..

OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists of institutionalized individuals who have ingested RI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s)-they were instructed to ingest KI. Ingestion of KI recommended by the designated ORO health official is voluntary. For evaluation purposes, the actual ingestion of KI shall not be performed. OROs must demonstrate the capability to formulate and disseminate instructions on using KI for those advised to take it.

If a recommendation is made for the general public to take KI, appropriate information must be provided to the public by the means of notification specified in the ORO's plans/procedures. .

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in' an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Virginia Departmentof RadiologicalHealth NegotiatedExtent of Play:

The State Commissioner of Health (or designee) will determine whether and/or when to authorize the administration of KI to emergency workers.

105

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise, (FSE)

Risk JurisdictionsNezotiated Extent of Play:

Risk jurisdictions will have a sufficient quantity of KI on hand in their EOC or at some other storage location or be capable of demonstrating its availability through written documentation (inventory sheets or letter). The KI -intended for use will not exceed the expiration date.

Implementation of KI use by the general public will be demonstrated out-of-sequence .(see below).

Out-of-Sequence Demonstrations:

Evacuation Assembly Centers (EACs):

  • Caroline County (Caroline County Middle School)
  • Louisa County (Moss-Nuckols Elementary School)
  • Spotsylvania County (Courtland High School)

Local personnel will demonstrate the activation and operation of their EAC. As part of this demonstration, the health department representatives at the EAC will demonstrate the implementation of the KI decision for the general public and the implementation of the KI distribution plan and health annex. Participating jurisdictions will provide their respective KI inventories for the general public at the EACs as well as the list of previously distributed KI.

Health department representatives at the EAC will demonstrate the administration and ,

distribution of the tablets (simulated). The process for distribution will be in accordance with ORO plans and procedures.

Outstanding Issues:

None.

106

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Retpothnmprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation"Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan' Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Sub-element 3.c - Implementation of Protective Actions for Persons with Disabilities and Access/Functional Needs Intent .

This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1Iwhich requires that OROs have the capability to implement PADs, :including evacuationand/or sheltering, for all persons with.

disabilities and access/functional needs. The focus is on those persons with disabilities and.

access/functional needs that are (or potentially will be) affected by a radiological release from an NPP.

Criterion 3.c. 1: Protective action decisions are implementedfor persons with disabilitiesand access/functionalneeds other than schools within areas subject to protective actions.

(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.1O.c, d, e, g) "

Assessment/Extent of Play i Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay be accomplishedduring afull-scale or functional exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to alert and notify (i.e., provide PARs and' emergency information and instructions to) persons with disabilities and access/functional needs; including hospitals/medical facilities, nursing homes, correctional facilities, and mobility- -...

impaired and transportation-dependent individuals. OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide for persons with disabilities and access/functional'needs in accordance with.

plans/procedures.

Contact with persons with disabilities and access/functional needs and reception facilities may be actual or simulated, as agreed to in the extent of play. Some contacts with transportation ..

providers must be actual, as negotiated in the extent of play. All actual and simulated contacts must be logged.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Risk JurisdictionsNegotiatedExtent of Play:

Jurisdictions will demonstrate that a list of any persons with disabilities and access/functional needs within their portion of the 10-mile EPZ is maintained. If resources are needed to assist these individuals for areas included in the Protective Action Decision, the availability of these resources will be verified (e.g., through discussion and presentation of transportation methods or providers, available vehicles, etc.). Contact with any persons with disabilities and access/functional needs will be simulated. Contact with the transportation providers will occur in the EOC with transportation providers (e.g., rescue squad). All actual or simulated communications will be logged.

Outstanding Issues:

None.

107

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station RadiologicalEmergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE),

Criterion3.c.2: OR Os/School officials implementprotective actionsfor schools. (N-UREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.10.c, d, e, g)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay be accomplishedduring afull-scale,functional; or tabletop exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

Public school systems/districts must demonstrate, the ability to implement PADs for students.

The demonstration must be, made as follows: Each school system/district within the 10 mile EPZ must demonstrate implemeniation of protective actions. At least one school per affected system/district must participate in the demonstration. Canceling the school day, dismissing early, or sheltering in place must be simulated by describing to evaluators the procedures that would be followed. If evacuation is the implemented protective action, all activities to coordinate and complete the evacuation of students to reception centers, congregate care centers, or host schools may actually. be demonstrated or accomplished through an interview process.

If accomplished through an interview, appropriate school personnel including decision-making officials (e.g., schools' superintendent/principals and transportation director/bus dispatchers),

and at least onebus driver.(and the bus driver's escort, if applicable) must be available to demonstrate knowledge of their role(s) in the evacuation of school children. Communications capabilities between school officials and the buses, if required by the plans/procedures, must be verified.

Officials of the school system(s) must demonstrate the capability to develop and provide timely information'to OROs for use in messages to parents, the general public, and the media onthe status of protective actions for schools.

The provisions of this criterion also apply to any private schools, private kindergartens, and licensed daycare centers that participate in REP exercises pursuant to the ORO's plans/procedures as negotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Risk JurisdictionsNegotiated Extent of Play:

This evaluation area will be demonstrated out-of-sequence the week of July 23-27, 2012. Public school systems/districts will demonstrate the ability to make protective action decisions for students. Implementation procedures for closing schools, dismissing early or sheltering will be simulated by describing procedures to evaluators. The designated schools will demonstrate, by discussion, the implementation of protective actions.

108

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Rep6rlImp'r6vement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Scho6i demonstration activities will be initiated at the school administration/superintendents office following notification (controller inject) that a simulated Alert was declared by the utility and the local Emergency Management Coordinator upon advice from the school representative at the local EOC has decided to close schools.

A FEMA evaluator will be located in the Supernintendent's office or other school command location and will review the actions taken by the Superintendent/designee and school transportation officer in response to the notification. He/she will, in turn, simulate notifying the appropriate school representatives, i.e., the school principal or assistant principal at the designated school(s) in each jurisdiction of school protective action decision.

The actions taken by the Principal/designee (pre-staged at designated schools) will be evaluated.

No students will be moved from the simulated schools. Actions will be taken accordingto school emergency response plans and procedures. Ability of participating schools to implement.

the school protective action decisions will be by interview.

Designated schools will demonstrate, via interview, the capability to perform the following:

  • Discuss the ability to implement the school protective action decision.
  • Discuss procedure for students residing within the 10 mile EPZ who attend schools located outside. 10 mile EPZ.

Radiological Officers will be available at the school district/superintendents office to discuss their procedures regarding dosimetry and emergency worker exposure control.

Outstanding Issues:

None 109

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise. (FSE)

Sub-element 3.d. - Implementation of Traffic andAccess Control Intent This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP- 1, which requires that OROs have the capability to implement protective action plans/procedures, including relocation and restriction of access to evacuated/sheltered areas. This Sub-element focuses on selecting, establishing, and staffing of traffic and access control points, and removal of impediments to the flow of evacuation traffic.

Criterion3.d. ]:Appropriatetraffic and access control is established.Accurate instructionsare provided to traffic andaccess controlpersonnel.(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,A.3;C.1,4; J.1O.g, )

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this DemonstrationCriterionmay be accomplishedduring a full-scale or functional exercise, an actual event, or by means of drills conducted at any time.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to select, establish, and staff appropriate traffic and access control points consistent with current conditions and PADs (e.g., evacuating, sheltering, and relocation) in a timely manner. OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide instructions to traffic and access control staff on actions to take when modifications in protective action strategies necessitate changes in evacuation patterns or in the area(s) where access is controlled. Traffic and access control staff must demonstrate accurate knowledge of their roles and responsibilities, including verifying emergency worker identification and access authorization to the affected areas, as per the Extent-of-Play Agreement. These capabilities may be demonstrated by actual deployment or by interview, in accordance with the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

In instances where OROs lack authority necessary to control access by certain types of traffic (e.g., rail, water, and air traffic), they must demonstrate the capability to contact the state or Federal agencies that have the needed authority, as agreed upon in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

State Negotiated Extent of Play:

The VIRGINIA EOC, driven by Protective Action Decisions will need to demonstrate the requesting of control of air, rail and waterways to the appropriate organizations. All communication will be simulated and logged.

110

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Irfpi-bvement Plan Norm'Anna Power Station" Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Progra'm (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station Exl Ian'- . Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Risk JurisdictionsNegotiatedExtent ofPlay:

Risk Jurisdictions, driven by the Protective Action Decision (PAD) to activate traffic control points and access control points will'activate one traffic con'tr6l' point (TCP) and-one access control point (ACP) simulated at the staging area.: Boththe TCP and the ACP will be established and held until evaluated.' One unit (officer) will be provided to'demonstrate this evaluation area.

The personnel used to activate the TCP can also be'the' one to activate the .ACP..

Risk jurisdictions will demonstrate the capability to provide instructions to traffic and access control staff on actions to take when modifications to protective action strategies necessitate change in evacuation patterns or in the 'area(s) where access is controlled.'

The TCP/ACP officers will be knowledgeable of the following:

  • Traffic Control
  • Access Control
  • Location of the EAC
  • Dosimetry and exposure limits (reporting and turnback levels)
  • Required Protective Actions Outstanding Issues:

None.

111

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program- (HSEEP);

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise.(FSE)

Criterion3.d2: Impediments,to evacuation are identified and resolved. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.10.k)..,

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay be accomplished duringa full-scale or functional exercise, an actual event, .orbymeans of drills conducted at any time.

OROs must demonstrate the capability, as required by the scenario, to identify and take appropriate actions concerning impediments to evacuation. Actual dispatch of resources to deal with impediments, such as wreckers, need not be demonstrated; however, all contacts, actual or simulated, must,be logged. Theimpediment must occur during the evacuation and be on an evacuation route such that re-routing of traffic is required, triggering decision-making and.

coordination with the JIC to communicate the alternate route to evacuees leaving the area.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Risk JurisdictionsNegotiated Extent of Play:

Risk jurisdictions will demonstrate the capability and knowledge of procedures to identify and take appropriate actions concerning impediments to evacuation, as required by the scenario .or controller inject messages. Actual dispatch of resources to deal with impediments, such as wreckers, will not be demonstrated; however, all contacts, actual or simulated will be logged.

Outstanding Issues:

None 112

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Rep6rtoImpr6vement Plan NorthAdina Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland'Security Exercise and Evaluation-Program (HSEEP)

" " .2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan. Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

ASSESSMENT AREA 4: FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS.

Sub-element 4.a - Plume Phase Field Measurements and Analyses Intent This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l,' which-requires that OROs have the capability to deploy FMTs with the equipment, methods, andexpertise necessary to determine the location of airborne radiation and particulate deposition on the ground from an airborne plume. Inaddition, NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 indicatas.that OROs must have the" capability to use FMTs within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to detect airborne radiolodine in.

the presence of noble gases and radioactive particulate material 'in the airborne plume. In an.

incident at anNPP, the possible -release of radioactive material -may.psea :risk to the nearby population and environment. Although'incident assessment methods a-e available to projectthe extent and magnitude of a release, these methods are subject to large-uncertainties. During an incident, it is important to collect field radiological data to help characterize any radiological release. Adequate equipment and procedures are essential to such field measurement effortsý>. !

Criterion 4.a. 1: [RESERVED]

Criterion4.a.2: Field teams (2 or more) are managedto obtain sufficient information to help characterizethe release and to control radiationexposure. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,C,1;:

H.12; L 7, 8, 11; J.1O.a)

Assessment/Extent of Play-Assessment of this DemonstrationCriterion may be accomplishedduring afull-scale,functional, or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or trainingactivities that would fully demonstrate technicalproficiency.

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to brief FMTs on predicted plume location and direction, plume travel speed, and exposure control procedures before deployment. During an HAB incident, the Field Team management must keep the incident command informed of field monitoring teams' activities and location. Coordination with FMTs and field monitoring may be demonstrated as out-of-sequence demonstrations, as negotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Field measurements are needed to help characterize the release and support the adequacy of implemented protective actions, or to be a factor in modifying protective actions. Teams must be directed to take measurements at such locations and times as necessary to provide sufficient information to characterize the plume and its impacts.

If the 'responsibility for obtaining peak measurements in the plume has been accepted by licensee field monitoring teams, with concurrence from OROs, there is no requirement for these measurements to be repeated by ORO monitoring teams. If the licensee FMTs do not obtain peak measurements in the plume, it is the ORO's decision as to whether peak measurements are necessary to sufficiently characterize the plume.

113

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and.Evaluation Program (HSEEP).

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

The sharing and coordination of plume measurement information among all FMTs (licrnsee,* ...

Federal, and ORO) is .essential..Coordination concerning transfer of samples, including a chain-of-custody form(s), to a radiological laboratory (les). must be demonstrated.

OROs must use Federal resources. as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex and other resources (e.g., compacts or the licensee). Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

VirginiaDepartmentof Health, Division of RadiologicalHealth Two State, Field Monitoring Teams (FMT), consisting of at least two individuals per team, will be staged at the Post Oak VDOT maintenance shop. The teams will communicate results, as necessary, to the DRH representative at the LEOF. It should be noted that the overall monitoring effort, is coordinated by DRH from the LEOF.

Risk JurisdictionsNegotiated Extent of Play:

Each jurisdiction will deploy one FMT (at least two individuals per team) from the staging area within their jurisdiction. The Radiological Officer will provide a briefing, survey meters and appropriate, forms to field monitors. The field monitoring team will be in contact with the Radiological Officer (RO). The field teams will report field readings to the R.O. who will then forward the appropriate information to the LEOF. In addition, the R.O. will be responsible to inform the field teams, in a timely manner, all relevant information, including weather conditions, changes in wind direction, and all protective action decisions.

Outstanding Issues:

None.

114

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repoft/lriprovement Plan -Nor~th Anna Pow&er Staii6n Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation, Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station E xka n Full Scale Exercise(FSE)

Criterion4.a.3: Ambient radiationmeasurements are made and recordedat appropriate locations, and radioiodineandparticulatesamples are collected.' Teamns will move to an appropriatelow backgroundlocation to determine whether any significant (as specified in the plan and/orprocedures)amount of radioactivityhas been collected on the samplingmedia.

(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,C.1; H.12: L8, 9; J.1O.a) .

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay beaccomplishedduring a full-scale,functional, or tabletop exercise. Other means may include drills, seminars or trainingactivities th'at would fully demonstrate technicalproficiency.

Two or more FMTs must demonstrate the capability to make and report measurementsi of ambient radiation'to the field team coordinator, dose assessment team, or other appropriate' authority. FMTs must also demonstrate the capability to obtain an'air sample for measurement of' airborne radioiodine and particulates, and to provide the appropriate authority with field data -

pertaining to measurement. If samples have radioactivity significantly above background, the authority must consider the need for expedited laboratory analyses' of these samples.

OROs must share data in a timely manner with all other appropriate OROs. All methodology, including contamination control, instrumentation, preparation of samples, and a chain-of:custody form(s) for transfer to a laboratory(ies), will be in accordance with the ORO's plans/procedures.

OROs must use Federal resources as identified in the NRF Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex and other resources (e.g., compacts or'the licensee). Evaluation of this criterion will take into consideration the level of Federal and other resources participating in the exercise.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Virginia Departmentof Health, Division of RadiologicalHealth Ne2otiatedExtent of Play:

Two State Field Monitoring Teams (FMT), consisting of at least two individuals per team, will be staged at the Post Oak VDOT maintenance shop. The teams will take measurements at a minimum six (6) locations and/or while enroute and will operate according to procedures.

The field team will demonstrate the capability to determine the location of the plume. The team will communicate results, as necessary, to the DRH representative at the LEOF. It should be noted that the overall monitoring effort is coordinated by DRH from the LEOF. Controllers will provide data to the field teams. Laboratory operations will not be demonstrated for the sample at the mobile laboratory.

115

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security. Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE).

Appropriate sample analysis information will be forwarded to DRH at the LEOF. The State field monitoring team will demonstrate the collection of at least one air sample at the initial location that the team is sent to. A second. air sample may be taken if needed.

Risk JurisdictionsNegotiatedExtent of Play:

Each jurisdiction will deploy one FMT, consisting of at least two individuals per team, to a minimum of two monitoring -points located within their jurisdiction. Teams will take measurements and operate according to their procedures. The controllers will have the necessary data to provide radiation levels to these teams. Note: Local field monitoring- teams will not demonstrate the collection of air samples.

Outstanding Issues:

None 116

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan -. North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation' Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlaWn- Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

ASSESSMENT AREA 5: EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION AND PUBLIC INFORMATION Sub-element 5.a - Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System Intent This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l,1which requires that OROs have the capability to provide prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ. Specific provisions addressed in this Sub-element are derived-from the Guide for the Evaluation of Alert and Notification Systems for Nuclear PowerPlan'ts,FEMA-REP-10 (November 1985).

Criterion 5.a.1: Activities associatedwith primary alertingand notification of the public are completed in a timely mannerfollowing the initialdecision by authorizedoffsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. The initialinstructionalmessage to the public must include as a minimum the elements requiredby currentREP guidance. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.5, 6, 7)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay be accomplishedduring afull-scale or functional exercise, drills, or operationaltesting of equipment that wouldfully demonstrate capability.

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to sequentially provide an alert signal followed by an initial instructional message to populated areas (permanent resident and transient) throughout the 10-mile plume EPZ. Following the decision to activate the alert and notification system, OROs must complete system activation for primary alert/notification and disseminate the information/instructions in a timely manner. For exercise purposes, timely is defined as -with a sense of urgency and without undue delay. If message dissemination is identified as not having been accomplished in a timely manner, the evaluator(s) will document a specific delay or cause as to why a message was not considered timely.

Procedures to broadcast the message must be fully demonstrated as they would in an actual emergency up to the point of transmission. Broadcast of the message(s) or test message(s) is not required. The procedures must be demonstrated up to the point of actual activation. The alert signal activation should be simulated, not performed. Evaluations of EAS broadcast stations may also be accomplished through SAVs.

The capability of the primary notification system to broadcast an instructional message on a 24-hour basis must be verified during an interview with appropriate personnel from the primary notification system, including verification of provisions for backup power or an alternate station.

The initial message must include at a minimum the following elements:

LI Identification of the ORO responsible and the official with authority for providing the alert signal and instructional message; 117

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and. Evaluation Program (HSEEP)-

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan. Full Scale Exercise.(FSE)

El Identific6ationf of the coinmmercial NPP 'and a statement that an emergency exists there,; .-

  • E Reference to REP-specific emefgency information, (e.g.,.brochures, calendars, and/or information in telephone books)"fruse by the general'public during an emergency; and F-A closing statement asking that the affected and potentially affected population stay tuned for additional information, or that the population tune to another station for additional information.

If route alerting is demonstrated as a primary method of alert and notification, it must be done in accordance with the ORO's plans/procedures and the Extent-of-Play Agreement. OROs must demonstrate the capability to accomplish the primary route alerting in a timely manner (not subject to specific time requirements). At least one route needs to be demonstrated and evaluated. The selected route(s) must vary from exercise to exercise. However, the most difficult route(s) must be demonstrated no less than once every 8 years. All alert and notification activities along the route(s) must be simulated (that is, the message that would actually be used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast) as negotiated in the extent of play. Actual testing of the mobile public address system will be conducted at an agreed-upon location.

OROs may demonstrate any means of primary alert and notification included in their plans/procedures as negotiated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Virginia Department of Emergenct Management and Louisa County and Spotsylvania County Coordination will occur between the VIRGINIA EOC and the affected counties with respect to the Alert and Notification System (ANS) process. Louisa County and Spotsylvania County have the control equipment for activation of sirens. Sirens will be coordinated and the sounding simulated at the appropriate time with the simulated activation of EAS taking place following the simulated activation of the sirens. The VIRGINIA EOC is the initiating point for the activation of the EAS. Regular Broadcasting will not be interrupted on the EAS Stations. Broadcast of the message(s) or test message(s) is NOT required and NOT requested. Following the decision to activate the alert and notification system, in accordance with the ORO's plan and/or procedures, ANS activation should be accomplished in a timely manner for primary alerting/notification. This action will NOT be subject to specific time requirements. All actions to broadcast stations will be simulated. Systems that use automatic sending technology may be demonstrated by explanation during an interview. Each risk county will demonstrate, by interview, route alerting of the hearing impaired residents within their jurisdiction. Hearing impaired notification teams will not be deployed.

118

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness'Program'(REP)

After-Action Report/mprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/,

Homeland Security Exercise and EvaluationtProgram (HSEEP)'

2012 North Anna Power Station Exln.- .Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Louisa County and Spotsylvania County Ne2otiated Extent of Play:

Louisa County and Spotsylvania County will demonstrate primary. route- alerting (one route) for areas not covered by sirens within. the 0-5 mile radius. This action is. not subject to specific time requirements but must be completed within. a timely manner.

Outstanding Issues:

None.

119

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiologica.l Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP.)

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (ESE)

Criterion 5.a.2:I[RESERVEDJ] .

Criterion.5.a.3: Activities associated with FEMA approved exception areas (where applicable) are completed within 45 minutes following the. initial decision by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within 45 minutes following the detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notification system. (NUREG-0654, E.6, Appendix 3.B.2.c).

Extent of Play Offsite Response Organizations (ORO) with FEMA-approved exception areas (identified in the, approved Alert and Notification System Design Report) 5-10 miles from the nuclear power plant should demonstrate the capability to accomplish primary alerting and notification of the exception area(s) within 45 minutes following the initial decision by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. The 45minute clock will begin when the OROs make the decision to activate the alert and notification system for the first time for a specific emergency situation. The initial message should, at a minimum, include: a statement that an emergency exists at the plant and where to obtain additional information.

For exception area alerting, at least one route needs to be demonstrated and evaluated. The selected route(s) should vary firom exercise to exercise. However, the most difficult route should be demonstrated at least once every six years. All alert and notification activities along the route should be simulated (that is, the message that would actually be used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast) as agreed upon in the extent of play. Actual testing of the mobile public address system will be conducted at some agreed-upon location.

Backup alert and notification of the public should be completed within 45 minutes following the detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notification system. Backup route alerting only needs to be demonstrated and evaluated, in accordance with the ORO's plan and/or procedures and the extent of play agreement, if the exercise scenario calls for failure of any portion of the primary system(s), or if any portion of the primary system(s) actually fails to function. If demonstrated, only one route needs to be selected and demonstrated. All alert and notification activities along the route should be simulated (that is, the message that would actually be used is read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast) as agreed upon in the extent of play. Actual testing of the mobile public address system will be conducted at some agreed-upon location.

All activities for this criterion must be based on the ORO's plans and procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, except as noted above or otherwise indicated in the extent of play agreement.

120

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/lmprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station SExPlan -. Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Louisa County and Spotsylvania County will demonstrate exception area route alerting (1 route each) for areas not covered by sirens within the. 5-10 mile radius. Route alerting for exception areas should be completed within 45 minutes following the initial decision by offsite emergency officials to nofify the public of an emergency situationi..

All risk iurisdictions will conduct backup route alerting for a failed siren. (1 route each).

Backup route alerting should be completed within 45 minutes` f611owing the detection by the offsite response organization of a siren failure.

All alert and notification activities along the route should be simulated. The message that would actually be used should be read for the evaluator, but not actually broadcast..

Outstanding Issues:

None.

121

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report!Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness .(REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise.and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Sub-element 5.b - Subsequent Emergency Information and Instructions for the Puiblicand the Media Intent This Sub-element is derived firom NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l,.which requires that OROs have the capability to disseminate appropriate emergency information and instructions, including any recommended.protective actions, to the public. In addition, NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 requires OROs to ensure that the capability exists for providing information to the media. This includes the availability of a physical location for use by the media during an emergency.

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 also provides that a system must be available for dealing with rumors. This system will hereafter be known as thepublic inquiry hotline.

Criterion5.b.1: OROs provide accuratesubsequent emergency information and instructionsto thepublic and the news media in a timely manner. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,E.5, 7;,

G.3.a,.G.4a c),. of.Pla Assessment/Extent of Play .,,

Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay be accomplished duringa full-scale or functional exercise, or drills....

The responsible ORO personnel/representatives must demonstrate actions to provide emergency,.

information and instructions to the public and media in a timely manner following the initial alert and notification (not subject to specific time requirements). For exercise purposes, timely~is defined as -with a sense of urgency and without undue delay. 11if message dissemination is identified as not.having been accomplished in a timely. manner, the evaluator(s) will document a, specific delay or cause as to why a message was not considered timely.

Message elements: The ORO must ensure'that emergency information and instructions are consistent with PADs made by appropriate officials. The emergency information must contain all necessary and applicable :instructions (e.g., evacuation instructions, evacuation routes, reception center locations, what to take when evacuating, shelterrin-place instructions, information concerming protective actions for schools and persons with disabilities and access/functional needs, and public inquiry hotline, telephone, number) to assist the public in carrying out the PADS provided. The ORO must also be prepared to disclose and explain the ECL of the incident. At a minimum, this information must be included in media briefings and/or media releases. OROs must demonstrate the capability to use language thatis clear and understandable to the public within both the plume and ingestion exposure pathway EPZs. This includes demonstration of the capability to use familiar landmarks and boundaries to describe protective action areas.

The emergency information must be all-inclusive by including the four items specified under exercise Demonstration Criterion 5.a. 1 and previously identified protective action areas that are still valid, as well as new areas.

122

Unclassified Rkadiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Imprbvement Plan NiordtAnsia Power Station' Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation'Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan - .... Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

The OROs must demonstrate the capability-to ensure that emergency information that is no longer valid is rescinded and not repeated by broadcast media. In addition, the OROs must !Q demonstrate the capability to ensure that current emergency information is repeated at pre-established intervals in accordance with the plans/pro'cedures. OROS must demonstrate the capability to develop emergency informationi in a ndn-English lankguage when required by the plans/procedures. .

If ingestion pathway measures are exercised, OROs must demonstrate that a system exists for-rapid dissemination of ingestion pathway information to pre-determined individuals :and businesses in accordance with the ORO's plans/procedures.

Media information: OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide timely, accurate, concise, and coordinated information to the news media for subsequent dissemination to the public. This

,would include demonstration of the capability, to conduct timely and pertinent media briefings' and distribute media releases as the incident warrants. The OROs must demonstrate the-':..

capability to respond appropriately to inquiries from the news media. All information presenited in media briefings and releases must be consistent with PADs and other emergency information provided to the public. Copies of pertinent emergency information (e.g., EAS messages and media releases) and media information kits must be available for dissemination to the'media`.'

Public inquiry: OROs must demonstrate that an effective system is in place for dealing With*

calls received via the public inquiry hotline. Hotline staff must demonstrate the capability to' provide or obtain accurate information for. callers or refer them to an appropriate information source. Information from the hotline staff, including information that corrects false or inaccurate information when trends are noted, must be included, as appropriate, in emergency information provided to the public, media briefings, and/or media releases.

FLAB considerations: The dissemination of information dealing with specific aspects of NPP security capabilities, actual or perceived adversarial (terrorist) force or threat, and tactical law enforcement response must be coordinated/communicated with appropriate security authorities, e.g., law enforcement and NPP security agencies, in accordance with ORO plans/procedures.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be 'in" an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Virginia Departmentof Emergency Management NegotiatedExtent of Play:

This evaluation area will be demonstrated at the JIC located at the VIRGINIA EOC. A VDEM Public Affairs Officer at the VIRGINIA EOC will prepare news releases. The news releas'es will

  • becoordinated and exchanged with local jurisdictions. Dissemination of news releases may be accomplished by the use of fax or other means. One simulated media 'briefing -will be demonstrated at the JIC.

123-

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action ReporVllprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security.,Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

VDEM will-establish a public inquiry function at the JPIC with a minimum of two ,individuals.

Some calls will be designed so as to allow public inquiry staff to demonstrate the capability to identify trends in. rumors (e.g., frequently expressed false or misleading information). The hotline staff will demonstrate the capability to provide, or obtain accurate information for callers or refer them to an appropriate source. Information from the hotline staff, including information that correct false, or inaccurate information when trends are noted will be included as appropriate in emergency information provided to the public, media briefings and/or media releases. Public inquiry telephone number(s) will be. designated and published at the appropriate, time. Public information staff will simulate. monitoring EAS broadcasts to .determine whether false or misleading information is being disseminated to the public. Media monitoring equipment will.be available. Since no actual exercise related broadcasts will be made, the media monitoring equipment will be tested for operability and the staff will be demonstrate their capability to monitor area EAS stations. All subsequent emergency information and instruction will be provided to the public and the media in a timely manner. All ,emergency information and instructions are consistent with protective action decisions made by appropriate officials. The emergency information will contain all necessary and applicable instructions (e.g. evacuation instructions, evacuation routes, reception center locations, what to take when evacuating, information concern pets, shelter in place, information concerning protective action for schools and special populations, public inquiry telephone numbers, etc. The State will demonstrate the capability to use familiar landmarks and boundaries to describe protective action areas. The emergency information will be all-inclusive by including previously identified protective actions areas that are still valid as well as new areas. The State will demonstrate the capability to ensure that emergency information that is no longer valid is rescinded and not repeated by broadcast media. The State will demonstrate the capability to ensure that current emergency information is repeated at pre-established intervals.

Risk and Host JurisdictionsNegotiatedExtent of Play:

One simulated media briefing will be demonstrated. Each jurisdiction will establish a public inquiry phone line and will respond to calls. Some calls will be designed so as to allow public inquiry staff to demonstrate the capability to identify trends in rumors (e.g., frequently expressed false or misleading information). The public inquiry staff will demonstrate the capability to provide or obtain accurate information for callers or refer them to an appropriate source.

Information from the hotline staff, including information that correct false, or inaccurate information when trends are noted will be included as appropriate in emergency information.

provided to the public, media briefings and/or media releases. Public inquiry number(s) will be designated and published according to each jurisdiction's procedures. Since no actual exercise related broadcasts will be made, the media monitoring equipment will be tested for operability and demonstration of reception on local EAS stations, however, continued monitoring will not be demonstrated.

124

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reportmlhprovement Plan North'Anna Power Station' Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation!Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station EýPian - Full Scale Exercise' (FSE)

All subse4uent emergency information and instruction will be' provided to-the public 'and the media in a timely manner. All emergency information and instructions are consistent with protective action decisions made by appropriateT officials. The emergency information will contain all necessary and applicable instructions (e.g. evacuationi instructions, evacuation routes, reception center locations, what to take when evacuating, information concern pets, shelter in place, information concerning protective action for schools 'and special populations, public inquiry telephone numbers, etc. The jurisdictions will demjonstrate the capability to use familiar landmarks and boundaries to describe protective action areas. The emergency information will be all-inclusive by including previously identified protective actions areas that are still valid as well as new areas.

The risk jurisdictions will demonstrate the capability to ensure that' emergency information that is no longer valid is rescinded and not repeated by broadcast media. The jurisdictions wvill demonstrate the capability to ensure that current emergency information is 'repeated -at pre-'

established intervals. -

Outstanding Issues:

None 125

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security. Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

ASSESSMENT AREA 6: SUPPORT OPERATIONS/FACILITIES Sub-element 6.a - Monitoring, Decontamination, and Registration of Evacuees Intent This Sub-element is derived friom.NUREG-0654/FE.MA-REP-1, which requires that OROs have the capability to implement radiological monitoring and decontamination of evacuees, while minimizing contamination of the facility. OROs must also have the capability to identify and register evacuees at reception centers.

Criterion 6.a.1: The reception centerfacility has appropriatespace, adequate resources, and trainedpersonnel to provide monitoring,decontamination,and registrationof evacuees.

(NUREýG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.3; C.4; J.1O.h; .. 12)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this DemonstrationCriterionmay be accomplished duringa full-scale or functional exercise, drills, or SA V Radiological monitoring, decontamination, and registration facilities for evacuees must be set up and demonstrated as they would be in an actual emergency or as indicated in the Extent-of-Play Agreement. OROs conducting this demonstration must have one-third of the resources (e.g.,

monitoring teams/instrumentation/portal monitors) available at the facility (ies) as necessary to monitor 20 percent of the population within a 12-hour period. This would include adequate space for evacuees' vehicles. Availability of resources can be demonstrated with valid documentation (e.g., MOU/LOA, etc.) reflecting how necessary equipment would be procured for the location.

Plans/procedures must indicate provisions for service animals.

Before using monitoring instrument(s), the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process of checking the instrument(s) for proper operation. Staff responsible for the radiological monitoring of evacuees must demonstrate the capability to attain and sustain, within about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, a monitoring productivity rate per hour needed td monitor the 20 percent EPZ population planning, base. The monitoring productivity rate per hour is the number of evacuees that can be monitored, per hour, by.the. total complement of mnonitors using an appropriate procedure. For demonstration of monitoring, decontamination, and registration capabilities, a minimum of six evacuees must be monitored per station using equipment and procedures specified in the plans/procedures. The monitoring sequences for the first six simulated evacuees per monitoring team will be timed by the evaluators to determine whether the 12-hour requirement can be met.

OROs must demonstrate the. capability to register evacuees upon completion of the monitoring and decontamination. activities.: The activities for recording radiological monitoring and, if necessary, decontamination must include establishing a registration record consisting of the evacuee's name, address, results of monitoring, and time of decontamination (if any), or as otherwise designated in the plan and/or procedures. Audio recorders, camcorders, or written records are all acceptable means for registration.

126

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Proraim (REP)

After Action Repo6rtlmprovement Plan 6Nort Anna Povýer Statioh Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station Ex*Plan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Monitoring activities shall not be simulated. Monitoring personnel must explain use of trigger/action levels for determining'the need for decontamination. They must also explain the procedures for referring any evacuees who cannot be adequately decontaminated for assessmrient and follow-up in accordance with the ORO's plans/prcicedures.' Contamination of the evacuee(s) will be determined by controller inject and not simulated with anylow-levelradiation source. All activities must be based-on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in'the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Decontamination of evacuees may be simulated and conducted by interview. Provisions for separate showering and same-sex monitoring must be demonstrated or explained. The 'staff must" demonstrate provisions for limiting the spread of contamination. Provisionis could include floor coverings, signs, and appropriate means (e.g., partitions, roped-off areas) to-separate uncontaminated from potentially contaminated areas. Provisions must' also exist to separate contaminated and uncontaminated evacuees, provide changes of clothing for those with contaminated clothing; and store contaminated clothing and personal belongings to prevent further contamination of evacuees or facilities. In addition, for any evacuee found to be' contaminated, procedures must be discussed concerning handling of potential contamination 'of vehicles and personal belongings. Waste waterfrom decontamination operations does not need' to be collected.

Individuals who have completed monitoring (and decontamination, if needed) must have*means' (e.g., hand stamp, sticker, bracelet, form, etc) indicating that they, and their service animals'and vehicles, where applicable, have been monitored, cleared, and found to have no contamination or contamination below the trigger/action level.

In accordance with plans/procedures, individuals found to be clean after monitoring do not need to have their vehicle monitored. These individuals do not require confirmation that their vehicle is free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.

However, those individuals who are found to be contaminated and are then decontaminated 'ivll have their vehicles monitored and decontaminated (if applicable) and do require confirmation *'

that their vehicle is free from contamination prior to entering the congriegate care areas.

Risk and Support JurisdictionsNegotiatedExtent of Play:

The activated EAC will be set up according to established plans and procedures in a partial set-up to allow for exercise'evaluation. However, the EAC will be staffed with adequate Monitoring and decontamination personnel to allow exercise demonstration.

127

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station

. .Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/.

Homeland Security. Exercise and .Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (PSE).

All EA C personnel maybe prepositioned-and'actual facility setup (signs, equipment, etc.) may be begun prior to the start of the evaluated demonstration. The EAC will monitor and register, six persons consecutively. For demonstration purposes, these six persons can be emergency workers or EAC personnel acting as evacuees., The use of walk-through portal monitors will be demonstrated in all activated EACs. Eyacuee decontamination procedures and the referral of individuals tona medical facility will be simulated through interview. The decontamination of one person will be demonstrated through controller inject. Once the evacuees are monitored and found to be clean from contamination, sheltering staff will demonstrate the registration process.

Outstanding Issues:

None 128

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparddness Program (REP)

After Action Report!Implr ovement Plan North'AHa P*ower StatioIn" Radioloc8aIi Ermhergency Prepaedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise -and Evaluation Program. (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale.Exercise (FSE).

Su4b -lemnent 6.b - Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and'their Equipment and'Vehicles Intent This Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP- 1; which requires that OROs have the capability to implement radiological monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their equipment, inclusive of vehicles.

Criterion6. b. 1: The facility/ORO hasadequateproceduresand"reso'rces to accomplish..

monitoring and decontaminationof emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles.

(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, K.5.a, b)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay be accomplishedduring afull-scale or functional exercise, drills, or SA V.

The monitoring staff must demonstrate the capability to monitor emergency worker personnel and their equipment and vehicles for contamination in accordance with the ORO's plans/procedures.

Specific attention must be given to equipment, including any vehicles that Were in contact with contamination. The monitoring staff must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the need for decontamination of personnel, equipment, and vehicles based on trigger/action levels and procedures stated in the ORO plans/procedures. Monitoring of emergency workers does not have 'to meet the 12-hour requirement. However, appropriate monitoring procedures must be demonstrated for a minimum of two emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles.

Before using monitoring instrument(s), the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process of checking the instrument(s) for proper operation.

The area to be used for monitoring and decontamination must be set up as it would b1e in an actual emergency, with all route markings, instrumentation, record keeping, and contamination control measures in place. Monitoring procedures must be demonstrated for a minimum of one vehicle. It is generally not necessary to monitor the entire surface of vehicles. However, the capability to monitor areas such as radiator grills, bumpers, wheel wells, tires, and door handles must be demonstrated. Interior surfaces of vehicles that were in contact with contaminated individuals must also be checked.

Decontamination of emergency workers may be simulated and conducted via interview.

Provisions for separate showering and same-sex monitoring must be demonstrated or explained.

The staff must demonstrate provisions for limiting the spread of contamination. Provisions could include floor coverings, signs, and appropriate means (e.g., partitions, roped-off areas) to separate uncontaminated from potentially contaminated areas. Provisions must also exist to separate contaminated and uncontaminated individuals where applicable; provide changes of clothing for those with contaminated clothing; and store contaminated clothing and personal belongings to prevent further contamination of emergency workers or facilities.

129

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security -Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Monitoring activities shall not be simulated. Monitoring personnel must explain use of ..

trigger/action levels for determining the need for decontamination. They must also explain the procedures for referring any emergency workers who cannot be adequately decontaminated for assessment and follow-up in accordance with the ORO's plans/procedures. Contamination of the individual(s) will be determined by controller inject and not simulated with any low-level radiation source.

Decontamination capabilities and provisions for vehicles and equipment that cannot be successfully decontaminated may be simulated and conducted by interview. Waste water from decontamination operations does not need to be collected.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Risk JurisdictionsNegotiatedExtent of Plaw:

The-activated EAC will be set~up according to established plans and procedures in a partial set-up to allow for exercise evaluation. However, the EACs will be staffed with adequate monitoring and decontamination personnel to allow exercise demonstration. All EAC personnel may be prepositionedand actual facility,setup (signs, equipment, etc.) may be begun prior to the start of the evaluateddemonstration.

The emergency workers and monitoring staff will demonstrate according to their plans and procedures the equipment tool drop and monitoring of used appropriate field survey meters being returned from the field.

A minimum of one emergency worker and one emergency worker vehicle will be monitored.

The decontamination of one emergency worker vehicle will be demonstrated throu2h interview.

Outstanding Issues:

None 130

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

Aftef'Action Report/Improvement Plan North"Ahna Power Station' Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and' EvaluationProgram-(HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station EPan ,..Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Sub-element 6.c - Temporary Care of Evacuees Intent Thiý Sub-element is derived from NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,,;vhich requires OROs to have the capability to establish relocation centers in host/support jurisdictions.' The American Red Cross normally provides congregate care in support of OROs.under-existin g letters of agreemenat.

Criterion6.c.1: Managers of congregatecarefacilities demonstrate that.the centers have resources to provide services and accommodationsconsistent with American Red Cross.

planningguidelines. Managers demonstratetheproceduresto assure that evacuees have been monitoredfor contaminationand have been decontaminatedas appropriateprior to entering congregatecarefacilities. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1,J.1 O.h, J.12)

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this Demonstration Criterionmay be accomplishedduring a full-scale or functional exercise, drills, or SA V.

The evaluator must conduct a walk-through of the center to determine, through observation and"!

inquiries, that the services and accommodations are consistent with applicable guidance.

Forplanning puiposes; OROs must plan for a sufficient number of congregate care centers in host/support jurisdictions to accommodate a minimum of 20-percentf6f the-EPZ population. In this simulation, it is not necessary to set up operations as they would be in an actual emergency.

Alternatively, capabilities, may be demonstrated by setting up stations for various serviced and providing those services to simulated evacuees.:Given the substantial differences between demonstration and simulation of this criterion, exercise demonstration expectations must be clearly specified- in Extent-of-Play Agreements.

Congregate care staff must also demonstrate the capability to ensure that evacuees, service animals, and vehicles have been monitored for contamination, decontaminated as appropriate, and registered before entering'the facility. .... .

Individuals arriving at congregate care facilities must have means (e.g., hand stamp, sticker, bracelet, form, etc.) indicating that they, and their service animals and vehicles, where F applicable, have been monitored, cleared, and found to have no contamination or contamination below the trigger/action level.

In accordance with plans/procedures, individuals found to be clean after monitoring do not need to have their vehicle monitored. These individuals do not need confirmation that their vehicle is free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas.

However, those individuals who are found to be contaminated and are -then decontaminated will have their vehicles monitored and decontaminated (if applicable) and do need confirmation that their vehicle is free from contamination prior to entering the congregate care areas. This capability may be determined through an interview process.

131

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action R*eport/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radi-logical Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise, (FW)

If operations at the centerare demonstrated, material that would be difficult or expensive!to 7 transport (e.g., cots, blankets, sundries, and large-scale food supplies) need not be physically.

available at the facility (ies). However, availability of such items must be verified by providing.

the evaluator a.list of sources with locations and estimates of quantities.

All activities must be based on the ORO's plans/procedures and completed as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

Risk and Support JurisdictionsNegotiatedExtent of Play:

This objective will be demonstrated by interview. For demonstration purposes of congregate care, bedding, cots, food, etc. normally associated with mass care need not be moved to the site.

However, the source of these items will be explained to evaluators by an item and source list.

Outstanding Issues:

None. -,

132

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Programn (REP)

After Aýction RepoiImprovement Plan North Arna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station EXPlan . Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Sub-.element 6.d - Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals Intent This Sub-element is derived from NJUREG-0654/FEMA-REP- 1, :Whichbrequires that OROs have'-

the capability to transport contaminated injured individuals to medical facilities with the capability to provide medical services.98 98 See also Part IIID, REP Program Exercise Guidance: Evaluation of Emergency Medical Services Drills.:

Criterion 6.dl : The facility/ORO has the appropriatespace, adequate resources,and trained personnel to provide transport,monitoring,decontamination,and medical services to contaminated injuredindividuals. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, F.2; H. O; K.5:a, b; Li, 4)._

Assessment/Extent of Play Assessment of this DemonstrationCriterion may be accomplishedduring afull-scale or functional exercise, or drills.

Monitoring, decontamination, and contamination control efforts must not delay urgent medical" care for the victim.

OROs must demonstrate the capability to transport contaminated injured individuals to medical facilities.

An ambulance must be used for response to the victim. However, to avoid taking an ambulance out of service for an extended time, OROs may use any vehicle (e.g., car, truck, or van) to transport the victim to the medical facility. Normal communications between the ambulahce/dispatcher and the receiving medical facility must be demonstrated. If a substitute vehicle is used for transport to the medical facility, this communication must occur before releasing the ambulance from the drill: This communication would include reporting radiation monitoring results, if available. In addition, the ambulance crew must demonstrate, by interview, knowledge of where the ambulance and crew would be monitored and decontaminated, if required, or whom to contact for such information.

Monitoring of the victim may be performed before transport or en route, or may be deferred to the medical facility. Before using monitoring instruments, the monitor(s) must demonstrate the process of checking the instrument(s) for proper operation. All monitoring activities must be completed as they would be in an actual emergency. Appropriate contamination control measures must be demonstrated before and during transport and at the receiving medical facility.

The medical facility must demonstrate the capability to activate and set up a radiological emergency area for treatment. Equipment and supplies must be available for treatment of contaminated injured individuals.

133

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repor/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security .Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

The medical facility must demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the need for decontamination of the individual, follow appropriate decontamination procedures, and maintain records of all survey measurements and samples taken. All procedures for collection and analysis of samples and decontamination of the individual must be demonstrated or described to the evaluator. Waste water from decontamination operations must be handled according to facility plans/procedures.

All activities must be-based on the ORO's plans/procedures andcompleted as they would be in an actual emergency, unless noted above or otherwise specified in the Extent-of-Play Agreement.

  • Out-of-Sequence Demonstration:

Medical Services Dril-l (MS-I) - Caroline County Rescue Squad and VCU Medical Center

-Caroline County Rescue Squad personnel will be pre-positioned at Ladysmith Volunteer Rescue Squad Building and will be notified (controller inject) of a simulated injured/contaminated individual requiring transport to the hospital. Contamination levels will be provided to rescue squad personnel by controller inject. Rescue squad personnel will demonstrate appropriate contamination control measures before and during transport of the victim. Monitoring of the victim will be deferred to the medical facility. Communications*

between the ambulance/dispatcher and the receiving medical facility should be demonstrated.

If a substitute vehicle is used for transport to the medical facility, this communication must" occur before releasing the ambulance from the drill. This communication would include reporting radiation monitoring results, if available. Additionally, the ambulance crew should demonstrate, by interview, knowledge of where the ambulance and crew would be monitored and decontaminated, if required, or whom to contact for such information.

VCU Medical Center should. demonstrate the capability to set up and activate a radiological area for treatment of the victim. Equipment and supplies will be available for the treatment of the contaminated/injured patient. The medical center should demonstrate the capability to make decisions on the need for decontamination of the patient. Monitoring and decontamination of the pati.ent will be in accordance with plans and procedures.

Outstanding Issues:

None.

134

Unciassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Impiovement Plan North Anna'Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedn6ess (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and EvaluationýProgram (HSEEP)`

2012 North Anna Power Station Exian . Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

REP MANUAL DEMONSTRATION CRITERIA FREQUENCY MATRIX (04/2012)

Note: This matrix is for full implementation of 10/11 manual some criteria frequency listed are not effective until HAB. (lbl, 5a30,"5a4)

A.1.a, e:

1.a.l:OROs use effective procedures to alert, notify, A.3, 4; and mobilize emergency personnel and activate At least C.1,4, 6; YES YES NO facilities in a timely manner. biennially D.4: E.1, 2:

H.3. 4

b. Facilities~> . ' ~ K~ __

1 bl: Facilities are sufficient to support the H.3; G.3.a; No less than emergencylresponse. J 10.h. J.12: once every 8 YES YES YES emergency response K.5b yearsa c: irection

.and C:nt::ol' -

1.c. 1: Key personnel with leadership roles for the A. 1.d; ORO provide direction and control to that part of the A.2.a,b; A.3: At least NO NO NO overall response effort for which they are responsible. CA4, 6 biennially

d. Conmmunications Equipyqent____________

1.d.1: At least two communication systems are available, at least one operates properly, and communication links are established and maintained At leastN with'appropriate locations. Communications F2 biennially Y capabilities are managed in support of emergency operations. _ / - "

e.. Equipment and Supplies to Support >  : t Operations .... _....... _____.._____ ___ ___ __

H.7, 1.0, 1.e.1.: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, Ki, and 1.7. 8, 9; At least other supplies are sufficient to support emergency J.10.a, b. e; be neasl YES NO YES operations. J.11, 12; . .!e I ,

2. >>'PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISION-MAKING________
a. &mnergeh~WirkeV~r~aExPosure Control, ____ ______________

2.a.1: OROs use a decision-making process, considering releva'nt.factors and appropriate :6 coordination, to:ensureithat an exposure control

. J.10.e:6 t At least.

... .NO NO NO system, including use of Kt. is in place for emergency Ke biennially workers, including provisions.to.authorize radiation K.

exposure in~excess-of administrative ilmits or PAGs.

135

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Reportlhprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological -Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland S-ecurity Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station 2.b.1: Appropriate PARs are based on available information on plant condition, field monitoring data,

and.licensee and ORO dose projections, as-well as 1.10; At least Supp. 3 biennially NO NO .NO

!knowledge of onsite and offsite environmental conditions..

2.b.2: A decision-making process involving consideration of appropriate factors and necessary A.3; C.4 6; At least coordination is used to make PADs for the general D.4; J.9: NO NO NO public (including the recommendation for use of K1. if J.10.f, m biennially ORO policy). - ' . .. _

c. PADs forthePoeto of persons wifthi ~

disabilities and a~ccsstfunctionalneeds ___

2.2.1: PADs are made, as appropriate, for groups of D.4; J.9; At least people with disabilities and those with J.10.d.e biennially NO -NO NO

'access/functional needs.

d..Radlological Assessmnent and Dlecision- - 778' making for the Ingestion Exposure Pathway > --

2.d.1:. Radiological. consequences for the.ingestion A.3; C.1, 4' Every pathway are assessed and appropriate PADs are DA: J.9, 1 ingestion NO NO NO made based on the ORO planning criteria. exercise

e. >Radiological Assessment & Decision-making - .. .

Concerning Post-Flume PthaseRelocationh, >?'> - - *-

Reentry. and Return~

!2.e.1: Timely post-plume phase. relocation, reentry, .

and return decisions are made and coordinated as 1.10; J.9 No less than '

appropriate, based on assessments of radiological K.3.a: M.'1 once every 8 NO NO NO conditions and criteria in the ORO's plan and/or years procedures. ... . . ' . ' .  !

3, PPTCI CION IMPLEMWENTATION , ~ >

a. Implementation of Emergency Worker  !--.  :... -- ..

Exposure Control) ,

3.a;.t: The OROs issue appropriate'dosimetry, Ki, and .

procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the planstprocedures. Emergency-workers periodically J.10.e, At least and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters K.3.a, b, biennially YES NO NO and record the readings on the appropriate exposure K.4 record or chart. Appropriate record-lkeeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.

b. Imnplemnentation of Kl2Decision for-

,InstitutionalzdIndividuals and the Public ~

3.b.1: KI and appropriate instructions are made available in case a decision to recommend use of KI At least is made. Appropriate record keeping of the J.10.e, f bienniallyast YES NO N administration of KI for institutionalized individuals and the general public is maintained.

136

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action' Rport/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Stafion Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/ (HSEEP)"

Program Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation 2012 North Anna Power Station

...... .. - Full Scale Exercise (FSE) 3.c.1 PADs are implemented for people with No less than S e . ... A disabilities and those with access/functional needs J.10.c, d, e, once every 8 YES YES YES other than schools within areas subject to protective - g years actions.

3.c.2: OROs/school officials' implement protective J.1O.c. d, e, No less than.

once every 8 YES YES YES actions for schools. g years _ _

'd., IMplemnentation of Traffi and Access Cpntrolvl" 3.d.1: Appropriate traffic and access control is A.3:. Atleast established. Accurate instructions are provided to C.1 4; biennially YES YES YES traffic and access control personnel. ,J.10.g j biennially 3.d.2: Impediments to evacuation are identified and At least 3.d.2:~Jevcato idntfidn YES 'YES 7YES resolved. biennially .

e. Implementation of' Ingestion Pathway 9' ,.

'Decisions '

3.e.1: The ORO demonstrates the availability and appropriate use of adequate information regarding Eve water, food supplies, milk, and agricultural production A.3; C.1, 4; Evety E within the ingestion exposure pathway emergency J.1 1 exercises planning zone for implementation of protective actions. ...

3.e.2: Appropriate measures, strategies. and pre- Every G.1, J.9,11 ingestion YES NO NO printed instructional material are developed for implementing PADs for contaminated water, food exercise Y N exercise products, milk, and agricultural production.

f. Imlementation of Post-Plume Phase, .>

Relocation, Reentry, and Return Decisions '. _____ ,___ ____,__

3.f.1: Decisions regarding controlled reentry of .E.7; . N lssthn '

emergency workers and relocation and return of the J10j; J.12; once every.8 YaS NO public during the post-emergency phase are K.5.b;

  • Y .

coordinated with appropriate organizations and M.1.3 years, implemented.

.a..Plume Pliase Field Measurement and Analyses _ __  : 1.. :.

  • 2>.

4.a.1: [RESERVED] " "_'

4.a.2: Field teams (two or more) are managed to CA.; Every ful obtain sufficient information to help characterize the Eve8o patc1.7 full release, and to control radiation exposure. 1.7 exercise' 137

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/ .

Homeland Security. Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP),

2012 North Anna Power Station 4.a.3: Ambient radiation measurements are made and recorded at appropriate locations, and radioiodine and particulate samples are collected.

Teams -will move.to an appropriate low-background. Every full location to determine whether any significant (as participation YES NO NO specified in the plan and/or procedures) amount of H.12:J.10.a exercise radioactivity has been collected on the sampling media.,

b. Post Plume Pbhase Field Measurements and Sampling ~_____________ - ___

4.b.1: The field teams (two or more) demonstrate the capability to make appropriate measurements and / C.1; Every collect samples (e.g., food crops, milk, water, 1.8: ingestion YES NO NO vegetation, and soil) to.support adequate J.1I exercise assessments and protective action decision-making. _ _"_"

c.Laboratary ,Operations , 4 </

'4."c.,1: The laboratory is capable of performing C 1'; 3; No less than YE Y NO required radiological analyses to support PADs. J.1 1 once every 8 YES YES NO

..... years ,

EMERGENCY S. NOIICTO AN____CNFRAT

.a. Activation of the Promipt Alert and Notification ,<

5.a.1: Activitiesassociated with primary "alerting and-.. ..

notification of the public are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision by authorized At least offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an E.5, 6, 7 biennially YES NO NO emergency situation. The initial instructional message to the public must include as a minimum the elements required by current REP guidance.

5.a.2: [RESERVED]

5.a.3: Backup alert and notification of the public is E.6; No less than completed within a reasonable time following Appendix once every 8 YES NO NO detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert 3.B.2.c years and notification system.

5.a.4: Activities associated with FEMA approved exception areas (where applicable) are completed E.6: At least within 45 minutes of the initial decision by authorized Appendix biennially YES NO N offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an 3.B.2.c emergency situation.

`-1EmIergIeInIc Iytinformatidn and I nstr~u'6ton's foir>----

1b. ~4<

the::Public and the Media + ____________

5.b.1: OROs provide accurate emergency information E.5, 7:

and instructions to the public and news media in a G.3.a; At least YES NO NO biennially 6.a.1: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station E Full Scale Exercise (FSE) 6.b.1: The taciltty/ORO has adequate procedures and No less than resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their K.5.a, b once every 8 YES YES NO-years equipment and vehicles.

c. Temxporary CareoVf Evacuees__ g __

6.c.l: Managers of congregate care facilities demonstrate that the centers have resources to provide services and accommodations consistent with No less than planning guidelines. Managers demonstrate the J.N10 once o lh;every 8 YES YES YE procedures to assure that evacuees have been J.12 years" monitored for contamination and have been decontaminated as appropriate before entering congregate care facilities.

6.d.1: The facliltyJORO has the appropriate space, F2: H.10:

adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide K.5.a,b; At least YES YES NO transport, monitoring, decontamination, and medical LI, 4 biennially Y services to contaminated injured individuals. 1, I I 139

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After-Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiologi.cal Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and .Evaluation Program (HSEEP):

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise..(FSE).

APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING AGENCIES AND ADDRESSES Emergency Operations Centers Staging Areas Spotsylvania County EOC Spotsylvania County Staging Area 9119 Dean Ridings Lane, Room 2270 Station 1 Spotsylvania, VA 22553 7200 Courthouse Commons Blvd Sp'otsylvania, VA 22553 Caroline County EOC Caroline Staging Area 17202 Richmond Turnpike Ladyismith Volunteer Fire Department, Co.2 Bowling Green, VA. 22427 17401 Jefferson Davis Highway Ladysmith, Virginia 22501 Louisa County EOC Louisa County Staging Area I Woolfolk Ave Louisa Volunteer Fire Department' Louisa, VA 300 East Main Louisa, VA 23093 Hanover County EOC Hanover County Staging Area Hanover County Fire Administration Bldg. Beaverdam Fire Station 13326 Hanover Courthouse Rd. 16150 Trainham Road Beaverdam, VA 23015 Orange County EOC Orange County Staging Area 112 West Main Street Hilltop Store Gordon Building Basement Rt. 522 and 629 Orange, .VA 22960 1 Orange, VA 22960 Virginia Emergency Operations Center (Virginia State Police Headquarters) 7700 Midlothian Turnpike Richmond, VA 23225 State Field Team Staging Area Post Oak VDOT Residency Shop 7219 Block Rock Drive Spotsylvania, VA 22553 North Anna Power Station Local Emergency Operations Facility (LEOF) 1022 Haley Drive Mineral, VA 140

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Aima Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station EkPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

APPENDIX D: DIECTIONS Spotsylvania County EOC

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 ml
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St 0.3 mi
3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 0.7 mi
4. Take exit 177 to merge onto 1-295 S toward Washington/Norfolk 8.5 ml
5. Take exit 43D-C-B-A for US-1/1-95 toward Richmond/Washington 0.2 mi
6. Take exit 43 C on the left toward Interstate 95 N/Richmond 0.2 mi
7. Keep left at the fork to continue toward 1-95 N 0.4 mi
8. Take exit 43A on the left toward Washington 0.5 ml
9. Merge onto 1-95 N 33.6 mi
10. Take exit 118 for County Rd 606 toward Thornburg 0.3 ml
11. Turn left onto Co Rd 606/Mudd Tavern Rd Continue to follow Co Rd 606 5.2 mi
12. Slight right onto VA-208 E/Courthouse Rd The new Spotsylvania EOC is located in the Sheriffs Department/91 I Dispatch Building at 9119 Dean Ridings Lane, Room 2270. The building is in the back of the Courthouse Complex.

141

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North. Anna Power Station Radiblogical Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland .Security. Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

potsylvania County Staging Area Station 1 7200 Courthouse Commons Blvd Spotsylvania, VA 22553 A) 4240 Dominion Blvd Glen Allen, VA 23060,
1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 mi
2. Take the 2nd right onto, US-250 W/W Broad St 0.3 mi
3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 0.7 mi
4. Take exit 177 to merge onto 1-295 S toward Washington/Norfolk 8.5 mi
5. Take exit 43D-C-B-A for US-1/1-95 toward Richmond/Washington 0.2 mi
6. Take exit 43 C on the left toward Interstate 95 N/Richmond 0.3 mi
7. Keep left at the fork to continue toward 1-95 N 0.3 mi
8. Take exit 43A on the left toward Washington 0.5 mi
9. Merge onto 1-95 N 33.6 mi
10. Take exit 118 for County Rd 606 toward Thornburg 0.3 mi
11. Turn left onto Co Rd 606/Mudd Tavern Rd Continue to follow Co Rd 606 5.2 mi
12. Slight right onto VA-208 E/Courthouse Rd 4.0 mi
13. Turn right onto Courthouse Rd 0.5 mi
14. Turn right onto Courthouse Commons Blvd Destination will be on the right 289 ft B) 7200 Courthouse Commons Blvd Spotsylvania, VA 22553 142

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repoi*/ýpro&vement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

. .2012 North Anna Power Station Eilan Full Scale Exercise (FSEi Caroline Co. EOC:

1-95 North to Exit 104, merge right on to Route 207.

Follow sign to Route 301, approximately 10 miles.

Take a left, follow sign to Route 301 South.

Make a Left on to Richmond Turnpike.

Travel south approximately 1 mile.

Turn Right at big brick building, Community Service Center (formerly Union High School).

EOC is located in back of brick building, entrance oh right side of building.

  • "'*,i. "' .., : . "

143

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station

. . Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security, Exercise. and Evaluation Program (HSEEP).

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan' . Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Caroline County Staging Aiea-....

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 i
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St 0.3 mi
3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 0.7 ml
4. Take exit 177 to merge onto 1-295 S toward Washington/Norfolk 8.5 ml
5. Take exit 43D-C-B-A for US-1/I-95 toward Richmond/Washington 0.2 mi
6. Take exit 43 C on the left toward Interstate 95 N/Richmond 0.2 ml
7. Keep left at the fork to continue toward 1-95 N 0.4nil
8. Take exit 43A on the left toward Washington 0.5 mi
9. Merge onto 1-95 N 25.7 mi'
10. Take exit 110 for VA-639 toward Ladysmith 0.2 mi
11. Turn left onto VA-639 E/Ladysmith Rd 0.9 mi
12. Turn right onto U.S. 1 N/Jefferson Davis Hwy Destination will be on the right 0.3 mil
  • 17401 Jefferson Davis Hwy Ruther Glen, VA 22546 144

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action ReportnImprovement Plan North Anna Power'Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (RREP)I Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station E an- ... Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Louisa County EOC:

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 mi
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St 0.3 mi
3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 35.2 mi
4. Take exit 143 for VA-208 toward Louisa/Fern cliff 0.3 mi
5. Turn right onto VA-208 E/Courthouse Rd 8.3 mi
6. Turn left onto Elm Ave 0.4 mi °
7. Take the 2nd right onto Courthouse Square 197 ft
8. Take the 1st right onto Woolfolk Ave 276 ft
  • Woolfolk Ave Louisa, VA 23093 145

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/lmprgvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland-Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP).,

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSI)

Louisa County Staging Area - Louisa Vol Fire Department .

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 mi
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St.

0.3 mi

3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 35.2 ml
4. Take exit 143 for VA-208 toward Louisa/Fernctiff 0.3 mi
5. Turn right onto VA-208 E/Courthouse Rd 8.7 mi
6. Turn right onto E Main St Destination will be on the right 0.1 ml 300 E Main St Louisa, VA 23093 1.46

Unclissified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/lmpf6vement Plan Norti 'Anna Power Station-Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station E8lPlan- Full Scale Exercise (FSE).

Hanover County EOC:

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 ihi
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St.'

0.3 mi

3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 0.7 mi
4. Take exit 177 to merge onto 1-295 S toward Washington/Norfolk 8.5 mi
5. Take exit 43D-C-B-A for US-1/I-95 toward Richmond/Washington 0.2 mi
6. Take exit 43 C on the left toward Interstate 95 N/Richmond
7. Keep left at the fork to continue toward 1-95 N

ý0,24 nri

8. Take exit 43A on the left toward Washington 0.5 mi
9. Merge onto 1-95 N 7.1 mi
10. Take exit 92A to merge onto VA-54 E/E Patrick Henry Rd toward Hanover 5.6 mi
11. Turn left onto US-301 N/VA-2 N/Hanover Courthouse Rd Destination will be on the right 0.3 mi 13326 Hanover Courthouse Rd Hanover, VA 23069 147

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action ReportlImprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency P~reparedness (REP)!

Homeland Security, Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP).

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan. Full Scale Exercise (FSE),

Hanover County Staging-Area:'

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 mi
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St 0.3 mi
3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 0.7 ml
4. Take exit 177 to merge onto 1-295 S toward Washington/Norfolk 4.1 mi
5. Take exit 49A to merge onto US-33 W/Staples Mill Rd toward Montpelier Continue to follow US-33. W 12.2 mi
6. Turn left onto US-33 W/Mountain Rd 1.9 mi
7. Turn right onto Beaver Dam Rd/State Route 715 8.9 ml
8. Turn right onto State Route 760/Trainham Rd Destination will be on the left 0.2 mil 16150 Trainham Rd Beaverdam, VA 23015 148

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action R'eport/Improvement Plan Nortlh 'Anna'Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness. (REP)/

Homeland Security Ekercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)-

2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlIan . Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Orange County EOC:

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 mi
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W BroadSt-0.3 mi
3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 41.5 mi
4. Take exit 136 for US-15 toward Gordonsville/Palmyra 0.3 mi
5. Turn right onto US-15 N/James Madison Hwy Continue to follow US-15 N 11.9 mi
6. At the traffic circle, continue straight to stay on US-15 N 8.5 mi
7. Continue onto Caroline St 0.1 mi
8. Turn right onto W Main St Destination will be on the right 0..1 mi 112 W Main St Orange, VA 22960 149

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Imnprovement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan. Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Orange County Staging Area:

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 mi
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St 0.3 mi
3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 29.5 mi
4. Take exit 148, for State Route 605 toward Shannon Hill 0.3 mi
5. Turn right onto Shannon Hill Rd/State Route 605.

Continue to follow State Route 605 10.5 mi

6. Turn left onto US-522 N/Pendleton Rd Continue to follow US-522 N 2.2 mil
7. Turn right onto E 1st St 430 ft
8. Take the 1st left onto US-522 N/Louisa Ave Continue to follow US-522 N 14.6 mi U.S. 522 & State Route 629 2, VA 150

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Re port/Improvement Plan North Anna Power. Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise -and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

Virginia EOC:

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 mi
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St 0.5 mi
3. Turn left to merge onto 1-64 E toward Richimond 8.0 mi
4. Take exit 186 for Interstate 195 S/Laburnum Avenue toward Powhite Parkway 0.2 mi
5. Keep left at the fork, follow signs for 1-195 S/Powhite Pkwy/Dowfitown and merge; onto 1-195 S 2.2 mi
6. Continue onto VA-76 W Partial toll road 3.6 mi
7. Take the exit on the left onto VA-150 S/Chippenham Pkwy Partial toll road 1'6 mi
8. Take the US-60 W/Midlothian Tnpk exit toward Mffidlothian 0.2 mi
9. Merge onto US-60 W/Midlothian Turnpike Destination will be on the right 017 mi VA EOC 7700 Midlothian Tpke N Chesterfield, VA 23235 The Virginia EOc is located on the grounds of the Virginia State Police Headquarters, 7700 Midlothian Turnpike. When you arrive on the campus, drive through the large iron gate, proceed around to the back and park in the lot. The entrance is at the back, below the new wing.

There will be large stairwell and handicap accessible ramp leading you to the door to enter.

151

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After-Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security. Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station Exlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE).

State Field Team Staging Area: J,

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd 0.2 mi
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St 0.3 mi
3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 0.7 mi
4. Take exit (177 to merge onto 1-295 S toward Washington/Norfolk8

~8.5 nil

5. Take exit 43D-C-B-A for US-1/I-95 toward Richmond/Washington 0.2 mi
6. Take exit 43 C on the left toward Interstate 95 N/Richmond 0.2 mi
7. Keep left at the fork to continue toward 1-95 N 0.4 mi
8. Take exit 43A on the left toward Washington 0.51mi
9. Merge onto 1-95 N 33.6 mi
10. Take exit 118 for County Rd 606 toward Thornburg 0.3 mi
11. Turn left onto Co Rd 606/Mudd Tavern Rd Continue to follow Co Rd 606 8.9 mi
12. Turn left onto VA-208 W/Courthouse Rd 1.7 mi
13. Turn left onto Black Rock Dr/Co Rd 691 Destination will be on the left .

0.1 mi 7219 Black Rock Dr Spotsylvania, VA 22553 152

Unclassified.

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological -Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan ..... ..- Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

North Anna Power Station - Local Emergency Operations Facility (LEOF)

1. Head south on Dominion Blvd toward Sadler Rd' 0.2mi
2. Take the 2nd right onto US-250 W/W Broad St 0.3 mi
3. Merge onto 1-64 W via the ramp to 1-295/Charlottesville 0.7 mi
4. Take exit 177 to merge onto 1-295 S toward Washington/Norfolk'.

4.1 mi

5. Take exit 49A to merge onto US-33 W/Staples Mill Rd toward Montpelier Continue to follow US-33 W

" 12.2hfiPi

6. Turn left onto US-33 W/Mountain Rd

' i:9'ri

7. Turn right onto Beaver Dam Rd/State Route 715
8. Turn left onto Old Ridge Rd/State Route 631 1.1 mi
9. Slight right onto Shiloh Church Rd/State Route 680 3.4 1mi
10. Turn left onto State Route 680/Woodsons Mill Rd 0.5 mi
11. Turn left onto Belsches Rd/State Route 618 Continue to follow State Route 618 9.8 mi
12. Turn right onto Elk Creek Rd/State Route 614 3.9 mi

.13. Turn left onto Kentucky Springs Rd/State Route 652 2.8 mi

14. Turn right onto Haley Dr/State Route 700 Destination will be on the right 1.1 mi 1022 Haley Dr Mineral, VA 23117 153

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan North Anna Power Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)/

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 2012 North Anna Power Station ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

APPENDIX E: OPEN ISSUES None 154.

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Acti6n Report/Improvement Plan Norlh Anna Powe'r'Station This page is intentionally blank.

155

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12305A416&oldid=2460134"