ML12053A209

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
M120222B - Slides, Briefing on Fort Calhoun
ML12053A209
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/2012
From:
NRC/OCM
To:
References
M120222B
Download: ML12053A209 (24)


Text

SU.S.NRC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission ProtectingPeople and the Environment Briefing On Fort Calhoun Bill Borchardt Executive Director for Operations February 22, 2012

Objectives

" Overview of facility performance issues

  • Staffs review and assessment

" Agency actions 2

Agenda

  • NRC's performance assessment

- Elmo Collins

" Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0350 oversight

- John Lubinski

- Troy Pruett 3

Performance Assessment Elmo Collins Regional Administrator Region IV 4

Performance Assessment

" Confirmatory Action Letter

" Transition to Column IV

- Yellow (Flood Mitigation Plan)

- White (Reactor Protection System)

" Current performance concerns 5

IMC 0350 Oversight John Lubinski, Deputy Director Division of Inspection and Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 6

IMC 0350 Overview

" Purpose

" Enhanced oversight

" Entry conditions

" Process

IMC 0350 Oversight Troy Pruett, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region IV 8

IMC 0350 Activities

  • Panel Charter

" Panel Process and Plan

" Restart Checklist

" Inspection Plan

" Return to Reactor Oversight Process 9

Fort Calhoun Station IntegratedPerformance Improvement Plan Febm&,ý-ary 22, 2012

Discussion Topics

" Our Accountability

" Objectives

" IntegratedPerformance Improvement Plan 2

Our Accountability Fort Calhoun Station performance is unacceptable to us and we will do what is necessary to identify, analyze and resolve our issues.

3

Objectives

" Improved and sustainedstation performance, equipment reliability,and risk reduction

  • Identify and correct human performance issues

" Ensure ownership in the improvement initiatives

  • Reestablish regulatoryconfidence
  • Reinforce public confidence 4

Plan Attributes

" Site engagement

" External support

- Exelon

  • Oversight
  • Communication
  • Project scope 5

Integrated Performance Improvement Plan Organization Chart 6

Fort Calhoun Integrated Performance Improvement Plan 9i Flooding Recovery Plan 9

Reactor Safet, I

Identifying and Correcting Integrated Performance Performance Deficiencies Improvement Plan I

Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment I

I I

I I

I Engineering/Maintenance Issues A

I 7

Flooding Recovery Plan

  • Site restoration
  • Plant systems and equipment
  • Equipment reliability
  • Design and licensing basis
  • Security
3

Reactor Safety Review

  • Key attributes

- Design, equipment performance and configuration control

-Human performance

-Procedure quality Emergency preparedness

  • Identified deficiencies will be corrected 9

Identifying and Correcting PerformanceDeficiencies

  • Purpose
  • Major attributes

- Corrective action program

- Performancemetrics

- Employee concerns

-Historical data review

  • Identified discrepancieswill be corrected 10

Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment

  • Third Party Independent Assessment- Conger & Elsea

" Three key elements

- Behaviors and practices

-Safety culture survey

- Employee concerns program

" Finalreport with identified areas of improvement 1.1

Corrective Action Program Culture Improvements

. Cause analysis

  • Interim actions
  • Training
  • Programchanges 12

Engineering/Maintenance Issues

  • Programand process deficiencies have been identified

" Evaluation and analysis of deficiencies in progress

" Corrective actions will be taken 13

Sustainability

" Collective evaluation

" Cause analysis

  • Action development and closure rigor

" Management changes

" External support

  • Long term oversight 14

Closing Comments 15