ML111570296

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Licensee Slides from 5/26/11 Pre-Submittal Meeting to Discuss NFPA 805 Fire Protections
ML111570296
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 05/26/2011
From:
Omaha Public Power District
To: Lynnea Wilkins
Plant Licensing Branch IV
Wilkins, L E, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-1377
References
Download: ML111570296 (18)


Text

Nuclear Regulatory Commission NFPA 805 Fire Protection Transition Pre-Submittal Briefingg Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station 5/26/11

Introductions

  • Omaha Public Power District

- Joe McManis - Manager Projects

- Tom Shudak - Sr. Engineer Programs

- Gaston Riva - Sr. Engineer Systems Analysis

- Bill Hansher - Supervisor Nuclear Licensing

- Donna Lippy - Sr. Nuclear Licensing Engineer

  • Engineering Planning and Management

- Francesco Pellizzari - Project Manager

- Gerhard Samide - Project Manager

- Clarence Worrell - WEC Fire Risk Services Team 2

2

Agenda

  • Current Fire Protection Licensing Basis
  • Summary 3

3

Current Fire Protection Licensing Basis

  • Fort Calhoun Station

- Single Unit PWR 1500 MWt Combustion Engineering

- Licensed to operate August 9, 1973

  • Current Licensing Basis (CLB):

- 10 CFR 50 Section 50.48 (a) and (b)

- 10 CFR 50 Appendix A General Design Criteria (GDC) 3

- 10 CFR 50 Appendix R Sections III.G, III.J and III.O

- Appendix A to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Branch Technical Position (BTP) APCSB 9.5-1

- Renewed Facility Operating License (OL) No. DPR-40 4

4

NFPA 805 Transition Project Overview

  • Date committed to transition - June 9, 2008
  • Submittal date - June 9, 2011
  • License Amendment Request (LAR) - In final stages of assembly
  • Plan a complete submittal 5

5

Fire Protection Program Transition

  • License Condition being revised
  • Technical Specification(s) being revised
  • Reviewed regulatory orders and exemptions
  • Transition majority of exemptions with clarifications 6

6

Fire Protection Program Transition

  • Determined no significant hazards
  • Implement 18 months after receipt of safety evaluation report
  • Modifications completed within two refueling outages after receipt of safety evaluation report 7

7

Compliance with NFPA 805

- Performance-based methods applied

- No Hemyc or MT

- Request approval of pyrocrete barrier

  • Non-Power Operations per FAQ 07-0040
  • Radioactive release per FAQ 09-0056 8

8

Compliance with NFPA 805

  • Nuclear Safety Capability Assessment

- Fire Area byy Fire Area review

- Multiple Spurious Operations review for impact on deterministic requirements 9

9

Compliance with NFPA 805

  • Nuclear Safety Capability Assessment

- Result:

  • 54 Fire Areas
  • 42 Assessed Deterministic
  • 12 Assessed Performance-based 10 10

Compliance with NFPA 805

  • Recovery Action (RA) Feasibility Assessment

- Control Room RAs credited for Risk Reduction

- Remainingg RAs are Defense-in-Depth p

  • Sustain Mode 3, Hot Shutdown, per FCS Technical Specifications
  • Defines Safe and Stable
  • 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 11 11

Compliance with NFPA 805

  • Modifications

- Recover or ensure the availability of Offsite Power

- Minimize or eliminate Variances from Deterministic Requirements (VFDR)

  • Typical Modification

- Electrical Isolation

- Cable re-routing 12 12

Compliance with NFPA 805

  • Monitoring

- Following Draft FAQ 10-0059

- Phased approach pp for p program g

- Screening criteria to determine risk significant fire compartments using:

  • Risk Achievement Worth and either
  • Core Damage Frequency or

Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment

  • Peer review complete
  • No major technical issues

- Documentation

- Modeling enhancements

- Facts & Observations (F&O)

  • 50% Suggestions
  • F&Os resolved 14 14

Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment

- Severity factor / non-suppression probability for electrical cabinets

- Pump fire frequency

- Diesel Generator severity factor / non-suppression probability

  • Realism and focus on risk significant attributes
  • Aligns with operating experience 15 15

Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment

  • Severity factor / non-suppression probability for electrical cabinets

- In review by Industry New Methods Peer Review Panel

  • Pump fire frequency

- To be superseded by pump fire frequency method currently in review by Panel

  • Diesel Generator severity factor / non-suppression probability
  • To be submitted to Panel by June 9, 2011.

16 16

Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment

  • Draft FAQ 08-0050 Non-Suppression Probability

- Available version when FPRA task being performed

- Current version does not impact conclusions

  • Low frequency of fire events where FCS Fire PRA credits manual suppression 17 17

Summary

  • Fire Risk Evaluations

- Recovery Actions have no adverse impact

  • Net change in risk

- Meets M R Regulatory l G Guide id 11.174, 174 RRevision ii 1

  • Modifications and Implementation Actions

- Compliance with NFPA 805 18 18