Letter Sequence RAI |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0515302672005-06-0303 June 2005 6/3/05, Beaver Valley, RAI, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors Project stage: RAI L-05-123, Response to Request for Additional Information on Generic Letter 2004-022005-07-22022 July 2005 Response to Request for Additional Information on Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: Response to RAI ML0603803422006-02-0909 February 2006 Request for Additional Information Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design-Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors TAC Nos. MC4665 and MC4666 Project stage: RAI ML0613802732006-05-18018 May 2006 Request for Scheduler Extension from Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors (TAC No. MC46666) Project stage: Other L-08-054, Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors - Request for Extension of Completion Date for Corrective Actions2008-02-14014 February 2008 Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors - Request for Extension of Completion Date for Corrective Actions Project stage: Request L-08-035, Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized - Water Reactors2008-02-29029 February 2008 Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized - Water Reactors Project stage: Supplement ML0812301162008-02-29029 February 2008 Extension Request Approval Letter Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors,... Project stage: Other L-08-257, Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors, Request for Extension of Completion Date for Corrective Actions2008-08-28028 August 2008 Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors, Request for Extension of Completion Date for Corrective Actions Project stage: Request ML0827402412008-09-30030 September 2008 Extension Request Approval Letter Generic Letter 2004--02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors. Project stage: Other L-08-321, Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors2008-10-29029 October 2008 Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors Project stage: Supplement L-09-056, Downstream Effects for Recirculation Spray System Pumps and Low Head Safety Injection System Pumps2009-03-11011 March 2009 Downstream Effects for Recirculation Spray System Pumps and Low Head Safety Injection System Pumps Project stage: Other ML0909001932009-03-31031 March 2009 Extension Request Approval Letter Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors, Project stage: Other ML0910501002009-04-21021 April 2009 Correction Letter Extension Request Approval to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors Project stage: Other L-09-131, Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors - Request for Extension of Completion Date for Additional Corrective Actions2009-04-30030 April 2009 Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors - Request for Extension of Completion Date for Additional Corrective Actions Project stage: Request ML0912400302009-05-0505 May 2009 Extension Request Approval Letter Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors. Project stage: Other L-09-152, Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors.2009-06-30030 June 2009 Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors. Project stage: Supplement ML1002903182010-02-18018 February 2010 RAI, Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors Project stage: RAI ML1008407562010-03-31031 March 2010 Notice of Teleconference Meeting with Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company Regarding Mutual Understanding of NRR Staff'S Request for Additional Information and to Discuss Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: RAI ML1013206652010-05-18018 May 2010 Summary of Category 1 Teleconference with Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company to Discuss NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Generic Letter 2004-02 Project stage: RAI L-13-176, Generic Safety Issue 191 Resolution Plan2013-05-16016 May 2013 Generic Safety Issue 191 Resolution Plan Project stage: Other 2009-03-11
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARML24025A0922024-01-25025 January 2024 Requalification Program Inspection L-23-267, Submittal of Discharge Monitoring Report (Npdes), Permit No. PA00256152023-12-18018 December 2023 Submittal of Discharge Monitoring Report (Npdes), Permit No. PA0025615 IR 05000334/20230112023-12-0404 December 2023 Age-Related Degradation Inspection Report 05000334/2023011 and 05000412/2023011 L-23-229, Request for Additional Information Regarding the Spring 2023 Generic Letter 95-05 Voltage-Based Alternate Repair Criteria and Steam Generator F-Star Reports2023-11-29029 November 2023 Request for Additional Information Regarding the Spring 2023 Generic Letter 95-05 Voltage-Based Alternate Repair Criteria and Steam Generator F-Star Reports IR 05000334/20233012023-11-27027 November 2023 Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000334/2023301 L-23-247, Discharge Monitoring Report (NPDES) Permit No. PA00256152023-11-17017 November 2023 Discharge Monitoring Report (NPDES) Permit No. PA0025615 IR 05000334/20230032023-11-0606 November 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000334/2023003 and 05000412/2023003 L-23-227, Discharge Monitoring Report (NPDES) Permit No. PA0025615 for Third Quarter 20232023-10-20020 October 2023 Discharge Monitoring Report (NPDES) Permit No. PA0025615 for Third Quarter 2023 ML23279A0612023-10-0505 October 2023 Paragon Energy Solutions LLC, Part 21 Final Report Re Potential Defect with Eaton Jd and Hjd Series Molded Case Circuit Breakers (Mccbs) ML23198A3592023-10-0202 October 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 322 and 212 Analytical Methodology to the Core Operating Limits Report for a Full Spectrum Loss of Coolant Accident (EPID L-2022-LLA-0129) - Nonproprietary IR 05000334/20234022023-09-29029 September 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000334/2023402 and 05000412/2023402 (Cover Letter Only) ML23237B4222023-09-28028 September 2023 Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp. - Vistra Operations Company LLC - Letter Regarding Order Approving Transfer of Licenses and Draft Conforming License Amendments ML23269A1242023-09-27027 September 2023 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure IR 05000334/20234012023-09-21021 September 2023 Cybersecurity Inspection Report 05000334/2023401 and 05000412/2023401 (Cover Letter Only) ML23263A0192023-09-20020 September 2023 Operator Licensing Examination Approval ML23243A9272023-09-19019 September 2023 Review of the Fall 2022 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML23249A1842023-09-18018 September 2023 Authorization and Safety Evaluation for Alternative Request No. 2-TYP-4-RV-06 L-23-208, Submittal of Discharge Monitoring Report Cnpdes), Permit No. PA00256152023-09-14014 September 2023 Submittal of Discharge Monitoring Report Cnpdes), Permit No. PA0025615 L-23-167, Twenty-Third Refueling Outage Inservice Inspection Summary Report2023-09-13013 September 2023 Twenty-Third Refueling Outage Inservice Inspection Summary Report L-23-205, Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments2023-09-12012 September 2023 Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments IR 05000334/20230052023-08-31031 August 2023 Updated Inspection Plan for Beaver Valley Power Station Units 1 and 2 (Report 05000334/2023005 and 05000412/2023005) L-23-172, Quality Assurance Program Manual2023-08-31031 August 2023 Quality Assurance Program Manual ML23129A1722023-08-25025 August 2023 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2; Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; and Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 IR 05000334/20230022023-08-0909 August 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000334/2023002 and 05000412/2023002 ML23219A0592023-08-0707 August 2023 Steam Generator Inspection Reports - Spring 2023 Spring Refueling Outrage L-23-188, Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp., Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments2023-08-0707 August 2023 Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp., Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments L-23-179, Submittal of Discharge Monitoring Report, (NPDES) Permit No. PA00256152023-07-18018 July 2023 Submittal of Discharge Monitoring Report, (NPDES) Permit No. PA0025615 ML23188A0982023-07-17017 July 2023 Correction to the Safety Evaluation Issued Related to Amendment Nos. 321 and 211 Consolidate Fuel Decay Time Technical Specifications in a New Limiting Condition for Operation Titled Decay Time ML23188A0672023-07-10010 July 2023 Project Manager Assignment L-23-165, Discharge Monitoring Report (NPDES) Permit No. PA00256152023-06-26026 June 2023 Discharge Monitoring Report (NPDES) Permit No. PA0025615 L-23-139, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fall 2022 180-Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report2023-06-13013 June 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fall 2022 180-Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML23157A1072023-06-0707 June 2023 Request for Information and Notification of Conduct of IP 71111.21.N.04, Age-Related Degradation, Reference Inspection Report 05000334/2023011 and 05000412/2023011 ML23143A0272023-05-23023 May 2023 Licensed Operator Positive Fitness-For-Duty Test L-23-055, Submittal of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 342023-05-23023 May 2023 Submittal of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 34 ML23102A1472023-05-22022 May 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 321 and 211 Consolidate Fuel Decay Time Technical Specifications in a New Limiting Condition for Operation Titled Decay Time L-23-065, Annual Financial Report2023-05-22022 May 2023 Annual Financial Report ML23135A7872023-05-19019 May 2023 Summary of Conference Calls Regarding the Spring 2023 Steam Generator Tube Inspections L-23-137, Discharge Monitoring Report (NPDES) Permit No. PA00256152023-05-18018 May 2023 Discharge Monitoring Report (NPDES) Permit No. PA0025615 ML23124A1742023-05-17017 May 2023 Energy Harbor Fleet Vistra License Transfer - Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Commance Peak Plant, Units 1 & 2, Beaver Valley Station, Units 1 & 2, Davis Besse Station, Unit 1 and Perry Plant, Unit 1 L-23-125, Cycle 24 Core Operating Limits Report2023-05-17017 May 2023 Cycle 24 Core Operating Limits Report ML23124A3882023-05-16016 May 2023 Summary of Regulatory Audit in Support of License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.6.3, Core Operating Limits Reports (COLR) and TS 4.2.1 Fuel Assemblies ML23129A0112023-05-16016 May 2023 Notice of Consideration of Approval of Indirect and Direct License Transfer for Comanche Peak Plant, Units 1 & 2, Beaver Valley Station, Units 1 & 2, Davis Besse Station, Unit 1 and Perry Plant, Unit 1 (EPID L-2023-LLM-0000) (Letter) L-23-132, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-05-10010 May 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations IR 05000334/20230012023-05-0808 May 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000334/2023001 and 05000412/2023001 L-23-129, Response to Request for Additional Information for 10 CFR 50.55a Request 2-TYP-4-RV-06 for Alternative Repair Methods for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetrations2023-05-0505 May 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information for 10 CFR 50.55a Request 2-TYP-4-RV-06 for Alternative Repair Methods for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetrations ML23118A3812023-04-28028 April 2023 10 CFR 50.55a Request 2-TYP-4-RV-06 for Alternative Repair Methods for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetrations L-23-115, Submittal of 2022 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, and 2022 Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-Radiological2023-04-27027 April 2023 Submittal of 2022 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, and 2022 Annual Environmental Operating Report (Non-Radiological L-23-126, Discharge Monitoring Report (Npdes), Permit No. PA00256152023-04-22022 April 2023 Discharge Monitoring Report (Npdes), Permit No. PA0025615 CP-202300181, ISFSI, Beaver Valley, Units 1 and 2, ISFSI, Davis-Besse, Unit 1, ISFSI, Perry, Unit 1, ISFSI, Corrected Affidavit for Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments2023-04-20020 April 2023 ISFSI, Beaver Valley, Units 1 and 2, ISFSI, Davis-Besse, Unit 1, ISFSI, Perry, Unit 1, ISFSI, Corrected Affidavit for Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments ML23107A2502023-04-18018 April 2023 Requalification Program Inspection 2024-01-25
[Table view] Category:Request for Additional Information (RAI)
MONTHYEARML23143A0272023-05-23023 May 2023 Licensed Operator Positive Fitness-For-Duty Test ML23125A1462023-05-0505 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley - RAI Regarding Alternative Repair Methods for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetrations ML23125A1602023-05-0505 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Correction to Beaver Valley - RAI Regarding Alternative Repair Methods for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetrations ML23122A0342023-05-0202 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley - Request for Additional Information Regarding Unit 1 - 180 Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML22312A5912022-11-0808 November 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1&2 - Request for Additional Information LAR to Consolidate Fuel Decay Time Technical Specifications in a New Limiting Condition for Operation Titled Decay Time ML22278A0972022-10-0606 October 2022 Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request for Fire Protection Program Changes ML22178A1322022-06-24024 June 2022 Request for Additional Information for Beaver Valley Unit 2 Steam Generator Inspection Report - Fall 2021 Refueling Outage ML22068A1822022-03-0909 March 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 & 2 - Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.5 ML22013A7512022-01-13013 January 2022 Information Request to Support Triennial Baseline Design-Basis Capability of Power-Operated Valves Inspection; Inspection Report 05000334/2022010 and 05000412/2022010 ML21292A0482021-10-19019 October 2021 Ti 2515/194 Inspection Documentation Request ML21259A1642021-09-16016 September 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Regarding the LAR for Core Operating Limits ML21124A1322021-05-0404 May 2021 Notification of Conduct of a Fire Protection Team Inspection ML21102A1542021-04-0909 April 2021 Request for Additional Information (2nd Round) - Steam Generator Tube Sleeve LAR ML21082A4942021-03-23023 March 2021 Final RAIs for GL 04-02 Closure (Email) ML21068A3502021-03-0909 March 2021 Final Request for Additional Information for Reactor Coolant System (RCS) and Pressure and Tempature Limits Report(Ptlr) TS LAR ML21053A0252021-02-20020 February 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information (Rais) - LaSalle Request for Exemption from Pre-Access Drug and Alcohol Testing ML21015A5762021-01-14014 January 2021 Final RAIs for Steam Generator 180 Day Tube Inspection Report ML21007A3732021-01-0707 January 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) (External) Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Incorporate the Applicable Standard Technical Specification 5.2.2, Unit Staff, ML21004A1442020-12-30030 December 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Incorporate the Applicable Standard Technical Specification 5.2.2, Unit Staff ML20290B0082020-10-0808 October 2020 Draft Request for Additional Information - Steam Generator Letter ML20127H8672020-05-0606 May 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley, Davis-Besse, and Perry - Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Exemptions from Part 73 Security Requalification Requirements ML20072N0402020-03-12012 March 2020 Request for Additional Information - Control Envelope Habitability LAR ML19192A2222019-07-18018 July 2019 Request for Additional Information Regarding Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments ML19143A0732019-05-29029 May 2019 FENOC Fleet - Beaver Valley, Units 1 and 2; Davis-Besse, Unit 1, Perry, Unit 1 - Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action; Application for Order Consenting to License Transfer and Conforming Amendments ML18242A3642018-08-29029 August 2018 Request for Additional Information (Final) -Steam Generator Technical Specification LAR ML18102B0852018-04-12012 April 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Follow-up Request for Additional Information (RAI) FENOC FLEET-- Exemption Request for a Physical Barrier Requirement for Beaver ML18043A0102018-02-0909 February 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - FENOC--MG0010-MG0011, MG-0012, MG0013-- Request for Additional Information (RAI) - Exemption Request Security Barrier in Physical Plans ML18024B3642018-01-24024 January 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley 10 CFR 50.54(f) - NTTF 2.1 SPRA Review ML18019A0722018-01-18018 January 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley Unit No. 1: Request for Additional Information - Modified Rtpts Values and Reactor Vessel Surveillance Capsule Withdrawal Schedule ML17353A1582017-12-19019 December 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information: Beaver Valley Unit No. 1 - Proposed Alternative Request, 1-TYP-4-BA-01 ML17352B2612017-12-18018 December 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information: Beaver Valley Unit No. 1 - Proposed Alternative Request, 1-TYP-4-BA-01 ML17303B1582017-11-0707 November 2017 FENOC-Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 - Generic Letter 2016-01, Request for Supplemental Information ML17256A2502017-09-13013 September 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley Power Station Units 1&2: Request for Additional Information for Emergency Plan EAL Change to Adopt NEI 99-01, Rev. 6, ML17220A2342017-08-0808 August 2017 E-mail Regarding Request for Additional Information for NFPA 805 License Amendment Request ML17093A7622017-04-10010 April 2017 Request for Additional Information Regarding Emergency Action Level Scheme Change License Amendment Request ML17031A0362017-02-0303 February 2017 Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request Numbers PR6 and PR7 ML16333A0162016-12-0202 December 2016 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 ML16147A2842016-06-14014 June 2016 Request for Additional Infomation Regarding Fall 2015 Refueling Steam Generator Tube Inspections ML16071A1222016-04-0707 April 2016 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 ML16084A8442016-03-30030 March 2016 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 ML16060A0122016-02-29029 February 2016 FENOC - Email RAI to Licensee Regarding LAR for Changes to TS 5.3.1 CAC Nos. MF7118, MF7119, and MF7120 ML15320A4132015-11-24024 November 2015 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 ML15280A0742015-10-0909 October 2015 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 ML15279A1252015-10-0505 October 2015 Licensed Operator Positive for Fitness-for-Duty-Test ML15181A2142015-07-14014 July 2015 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Revise Steam Generator Technical Specifications to Reflect TSTF-510 and to Revise Alloy 800 Sleeve Technical Specifications (TAC Nos. MF6054 & MF6055) ML15125A4162015-05-11011 May 2015 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 (TAC Nos. MF3301 & MF3302) ML15016A4392015-01-20020 January 2015 Draft Request for Additional Information ML15007A5582015-01-15015 January 2015 Request for Additional Information Steam Generator Inspection Reports ML14218A7622014-12-11011 December 2014 RAI Request to Implement 10 CFR 50.61a Alternate Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events ML14316A3902014-11-14014 November 2014 Request for Additional Information Review of Licensee Security Plans 2023-05-05
[Table view] |
Text
February 9, 2006 Mr. James H. Lash Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station P. O. Box 4 Shippingport, PA 15077
SUBJECT:
BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RE: RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 2004-02, POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY RECIRCULATION DURING DESIGN-BASIS ACCIDENTS AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS (TAC NOS. MC4665 AND MC4666)
Dear Mr. Lash:
On September 13, 2004, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water Reactors, as part of the NRCs efforts to assess the likelihood that the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) and containment spray system (CSS) pumps at domestic pressurized water reactors (PWRs) would experience a debris-induced loss of net positive suction head margin during sump recirculation. The NRC issued this GL to all PWR licensees to request that addressees (1) perform a mechanistic evaluation using an NRC-approved methodology of the potential for the adverse effects of post-accident debris blockage and operation with debris-laden fluids to impede or prevent the recirculation functions of the ECCS and CSS following all postulated accidents for which the recirculation of these systems is required, and (2) implement any plant modifications that the above evaluation identifies as being necessary to ensure system functionality. Addressees were also required to submit information specified in GL 2004-02 to the NRC in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.54(f). Additionally, in the GL, the NRC established a schedule for the submittal of the written responses and the completion of any corrective actions identified while complying with the requests in the GL.
By letter dated March 4, 2005, as supplemented July 22 and September 6, 2005, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company provided a response to the GL. The NRC staff is reviewing and evaluating your response along with the responses from all PWR licensees. The NRC staff has determined that responses to the questions in the enclosure to this letter are necessary in order for the staff to complete its review. Please note that the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations Division of Component Integrity is still conducting its initial reviews with respect to coatings.
Although some initial coatings questions are included in the enclosure to this letter, the NRC might issue an additional request for information regarding coatings issues in the near future.
J. Lash Please provide your response within 60 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1402.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Timothy G. Colburn, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page
J. Lash Please provide your response within 60 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1402.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Timothy G. Colburn, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page Distribution:
PUBLIC RArchitzel MScott LPL1-1 Reading File WBateman THaffera RidsNrrDorlLpla RidsNrrPmJHopkins JLehning RidsNrrLASLittle RidsNrrDorlDpr HWagage RidsNrrPMTColburn MMurphy SLu RidsOgcRp PKlein JHannon RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter MYoder RidsRgn1Mailcenter Accession No.: ML060380342 *per e-mail OFFICE LPL1-1/PM LPL1-1/LA DSS/SSIB DCI/CSGB LPL1-1/BC NAME TColburn Slittle DSolorio* EMurphy RLaufer DATE 2/09/06 2/09/06 2/06/06 2/08/06 2/09/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 cc:
Gary R. Leidich James H. Lash President and Chief Nuclear Officer Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-GO-19 Beaver Valley Power Station 76 South Main Street Mail Stop A-BV-SEB1 Akron, OH 44308 P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077 Joseph J. Hagan Senior Vice Presdient of Operations Lew W. Myers and Chief Operating Officer Executive Vice President, Special Projects FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-GO-14 Beaver Valley Power Station 76 South Main Street Mail Stop A-BV-SGRP Akron, OH 44308 P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077 Danny L. Pace Senior Vice President, Fleet Engineering Manager, Site Regulatory Compliance FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-GO-14 Beaver Valley Power Station 76 South Main Street Mail Stop A-BV-A Akron, OH 44308 P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077 Jeannie M. Rinckel Vice President, Fleet Oversight Commissioner James R. Lewis FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company West Virginia Division of Labor Mail Stop A-GO-14 749-B, Building No. 6 76 South Main Street Capitol Complex Akron, OH 44308 Charleston, WV 25305 David W. Jenkins, Attorney Director, Utilities Department FirstEnergy Corporation Public Utilities Commission Mail Stop A-GO-18 180 East Broad Street 76 South Main Street Columbus, OH 43266-0573 Akron, OH 44308 Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Manager, Fleet Licensing Management Agency FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company 2605 Interstate Dr.
Mail Stop A-GHE-107 Harrisburg, PA 17110-9364 395 Ghent Road Akron, OH 44333 Ohio EPA-DERR ATTN: Zack A. Clayton P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, OH 43266-0149
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos 1 and 2 Dr. Judith Johnsrud Environmental Coalition on Nuclear Power Sierra Club 433 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16803 Director Bureau of Radiation Protection Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 8469 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 Mayor of the Borough of Shippingport P.O. Box 3 Shippingport, PA 15077 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 298 Shippingport, PA 15077
GL 2004-02 RAI Questions Plant Materials
- 1. Identify the name and bounding quantity of each insulation material generated by a large-break loss-of-coolant accident (LBLOCA). Include the amount of these materials transported to the containment pool. State any assumptions used to provide this response.
- 2. Identify the amounts (i.e., surface area) of the following materials that are:
(a) submerged in the containment pool following a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA),
(b) in the containment spray zone following a LOCA:
- aluminum
- zinc (from galvanized steel and from inorganic zinc coatings)
- copper
- carbon steel not coated
- uncoated concrete Compare the amounts of these materials in the submerged and spray zones at your plant relative to the scaled amounts of these materials used in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) nuclear industry jointly-sponsored Integrated Chemical Effects Tests (ICET) (e.g., 5x the amount of uncoated carbon steel assumed for the ICETs).
- 3. Identify the amount (surface area) and material (e.g., aluminum) for any scaffolding stored in containment. Indicate the amount, if any, that would be submerged in the containment pool following a LOCA. Clarify if scaffolding material was included in the response to Question 2.
- 4. Provide the type and amount of any metallic paints or non-stainless steel insulation jacketing (not included in the response to Question 2) that would be either submerged or subjected to containment spray.
Containment Pool Chemistry
- 5. Provide the expected containment pool pH during the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) recirculation mission time following a LOCA at the beginning of the fuel cycle and at the end of the fuel cycle. Identify any key assumptions.
- 6. For the ICET environment that is the most similar to your plant conditions, compare the expected containment pool conditions to the ICET conditions for the following items:
boron concentration, buffering agent concentration, and pH. Identify any other significant differences between the ICET environment and the expected plant-specific environment.
Enclosure
- 7. For a LBLOCA, provide the time until ECCS external recirculation initiation and the associated pool temperature and pool volume. Provide estimated pool temperature and pool volume 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after a LBLOCA. Identify the assumptions used for these estimates.
Plant-Specific Chemical Effects
- 8. Discuss your overall strategy to evaluate potential chemical effects including demonstrating that, with chemical effects considered, there is sufficient net positive suction head (NPSH) margin available during the ECCS mission time. Provide an estimated date with milestones for the completion of all chemical effects evaluations.
- 9. Identify, if applicable, any plans to remove certain materials from the containment building and/or to make a change from the existing chemicals that buffer containment pool pH following a LOCA.
- 10. If bench-top testing is being used to inform plant specific head loss testing, indicate how the bench-top test parameters (e.g., buffering agent concentrations, pH, materials, etc.)
compare to your plant conditions. Describe your plans for addressing uncertainties related to head loss from chemical effects including, but not limited to, use of chemical surrogates, scaling of sample size and test durations. Discuss how it will be determined that allowances made for chemical effects are conservative.
Plant Environment Specific
- 11. Provide a detailed description of any testing that has been or will be performed as part of a plant-specific chemical effects assessment. Identify the vendor, if applicable, that will be performing the testing. Identify the environment (e.g., borated water at pH 9, deionized water, tap water) and test temperature for any plant-specific head loss or transport tests. Discuss how any differences between these test environments and your plant containment pool conditions could affect the behavior of chemical surrogates.
Discuss the criteria that will be used to demonstrate that chemical surrogates produced for testing (e.g., head loss, flume) behave in a similar manner physically and chemically as in the ICET environment and plant containment pool environment.
- 12. For your plant-specific environment, provide the maximum projected head loss resulting from chemical effects (a) within the first day following a LOCA, and (b) during the entire ECCS recirculation mission time. If the response to this question will be based on testing that is either planned or in progress, provide an estimated date for providing this information to the NRC.
ICET 1 and ICET 5 Plants
- 13. (Not Applicable).
Trisodium Phosphate (TSP) Plants
- 14. (Not Applicable).
- 15. (Not Applicable).
- 16. (Not Applicable).
Additional Chemical Effects Questions
- 17. The aluminum and other submerged metallic coupons in ICET #4 experienced little corrosion. In this test, the calcium silicate appeared to produce a beneficial effect by contributing to the protective film that formed on the submerged samples. Given that individual plants have less calcium silicate insulation than was represented by the ICET and that a given plant LOCA could result in little or no calcium silicate in the containment pool, discuss how you are confirming your plant materials will behave similar to ICET #4 for your plant-specific conditions.
- 18. (Not Applicable).
- 19. (Not Applicable).
- 20. (Not Applicable).
- 21. (Not Applicable).
- 22. (Not Applicable).
- 23. (Not Applicable).
- 24. (Not Applicable).
Coatings Generic - All Plants
- 25. Describe how your coatings assessment was used to identify degraded qualified/acceptable coatings and determine the amount of debris that will result from these coatings. This should include how the assessment technique(s) demonstrates that qualified/acceptable coatings remain in compliance with plant licensing requirements for design-basis accident (DBA) performance. If current examination techniques cannot demonstrate the coatings ability to meet plant licensing requirements for DBA performance, licensees should describe an augmented testing and inspection program that provides assurance that the qualified/acceptable coatings continue to meet DBA performance requirements. Alternately, assume all containment coatings fail and describe the potential for this debris to transport to the sump.
Plant Specific
- 26. Provide test methodology and data used to support a zone of influence (ZOI) of 5.0 L/D.
Provide justification regarding how the test conditions simulate or correlate to actual plant conditions and will ensure representative or conservative treatment in the amounts of coatings debris generated by the interaction of coatings and a two-phase jet. Identify all instance where the testing or specimens used deviate from actual plant conditions (i.e., irradiation of actual coatings vice samples, aging differences, etc.). Provide justification regarding how these deviations are accounted for with the test demonstrating the proposed ZOI.
- 27. (Not Applicable).
- 28. (Not Applicable).
- 29. (Not Applicable).
- 30. The NRC staffs safety evaluation (SE) addresses two distinct scenarios for formation of a fiber bed on the sump screen surface. For a thin bed case, the SE states that all coatings debris should be treated as particulate and assumes 100% transport to the sump screen. For the case in which no thin bed is formed, the staffs SE states that the coatings debris should be sized based on plant-specific analyses for debris generated from within the ZOI and from outside the ZOI, or that a default chip size equivalent to the area of the sump screen openings should be used (Section 3.4.3.6). Describe how your coatings debris characteristics are modeled to account for your plant-specific fiber bed (i.e. thin bed or no thin bed). If your analysis considers both a thin bed and a non-thin bed case, discuss the coatings debris characteristics assumed for each case. If your analysis deviates from the coatings debris characteristics described in the staff-approved methodology, provide justification to support your assumptions.
- 32. Your submittal indicated that you had taken samples for latent debris in your containment, but did not provide any details regarding the number, type, and location of samples. Please provide these details.
- 33. Your submittal did not provide details regarding the characterization of latent debris found in your containment as outlined in the NRC SE. Please provide these details.
- 34. How will your containment cleanliness and foreign material exclusion (FME) programs assure that latent debris in containment will be controlled and monitored to be maintained below the amounts and characterization assumed in the ECCS strainer design? In particular, what is planned for areas/components that are normally inaccessible or not normally cleaned (containment crane rails, cable trays, main steam/feedwater piping, tops of steam generators, etc.)?
- 35. Will latent debris sampling become an ongoing program?
- 36. Your submittal indicated that you plan to use a debris interceptor as a method to impede transport of debris to the ECCS sump screen. What is the amount (in either volume or
percentage) of debris that is expected to be captured by the interceptor? Is there an evaluation for the potential to overload the debris interceptor?
- 37. You indicated that you would be evaluating downstream effects in accordance with WCAP 16406-P. The NRC is currently involved in discussions with the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) to address questions/concerns regarding this WCAP on a generic basis, and some of these discussions may resolve issues related to your particular station. The following issues have the potential for generic resolution; however, if a generic resolution cannot be obtained, plant specific resolution will be required. As such, formal RAIs will not be issued on these topics at this time, but may be needed in the future. It is expected that your final evaluation response will specifically address those portions of the WCAP used, their applicability, and exceptions taken to the WCAP. For your information, topics under ongoing discussion include:
ee. Wear rates of pump-wetted materials and the effect of wear on component operation ff. Settling of debris in low flow areas downstream of the strainer or credit for filtering leading to a change in fluid composition gg. Volume of debris injected into the reactor vessel and core region hh. Debris types and properties ii. Contribution of in-vessel velocity profile to the formation of a debris bed or clog jj. Fluid and metal component temperature impact kk. Gravitational and temperature gradients ll. Debris and boron precipitation effects mm. ECCS injection paths nn. Core bypass design features oo. Radiation and chemical considerations pp. Debris adhesion to solid surfaces qq. Thermodynamic properties of coolant
- 38. Your response to GL 2004-02 question (d)(viii) indicated that an active strainer design will not be used, but does not mention any consideration of any other active approaches (i.e., backflushing). Was an active approach considered as a potential strategy or backup for addressing any issues?
- 39. Has debris settling upstream of the sump strainer (i.e., the near-field effect) been credited or will it be credited in testing used to support the sizing or analytical design basis of the proposed replacement strainers? In the case that settling was credited for either of these purposes, estimate the fraction of debris that settled and describe the analyses that were performed to correlate the scaled flow conditions and any surrogate debris in the test flume with the actual flow conditions and debris types in the plants containment pool.
- 40. Are there any vents or other penetrations through the strainer control surfaces which connect the volume internal to the strainer to the containment atmosphere above the containment minimum water level? In this case, dependent upon the containment pool height and strainer and sump geometries, the presence of the vent line or penetration could prevent a water seal over the entire strainer surface from ever forming; or else this
seal could be lost once the head loss across the debris bed exceeds a certain criterion, such as the submergence depth of the vent line or penetration. According to Appendix A to Regulatory Guide 1.82, Revision 3, without a water seal across the entire strainer surface, the strainer should not be considered to be fully submerged.
Therefore, the NRC staff requests that, if applicable, the licensee explain what sump strainer failure criteria are being applied for the vented sump scenario described above.
- 41. What is the basis for concluding that the refueling cavity drain(s) would not become blocked with debris? What are the potential types and characteristics of debris that could reach these drains? In particular, could large pieces of debris be blown into the upper containment by pipe breaks occurring in the lower containment, and subsequently drop into the cavity? In the case that large pieces of debris could reach the cavity, are trash racks or interceptors present to prevent drain blockage? In the case that partial/total blockage of the drains might occur, do water hold-up calculations used in the computation of NPSH margin account for the lost or held-up water resulting from debris blockage?
- 42. What is the minimum strainer submergence during the postulated LOCA? At the time that the re-circulation starts, most of the strainer surface is expected to be clean, and the strainer surface close to the pump suction line may experience higher fluid flow than the rest of the strainer. Has any analysis been done to evaluate the possibility of vortex formation close to the pump suction line and possible air ingestion into the ECCS pumps? In addition, has any analysis or test been performed to evaluate the possible accumulation of buoyant debris on top of the strainer, which may cause the formation of an air flow path directly through the strainer surface and reduce the effectiveness of the strainer?
- 43. As stated in the GL response, NURGE-CR/6224 correlation is considered by the licensee to be applicable to the Nukon-Calcium Silicate debris bed and is conservative.
In addition, the correlation will be used if the prototype testing indicates the possible uniform debris distribution. As stated in the NRC SE, the staff indicated that the correlation could only be used for scoping analysis for the Nukon-CalSil debris bed.
Therefore, please provide justification for why the correlation can be directly applied to the new strainer design.
- 44. The September 2005 GL response stated that FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company is in the process of performing debris transport analysis. Please supplement your response after completing the analysis.