ML040370636

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of Telecommunication with Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) to Discuss Items Associated with the Environmental Site Audit for the Renewal of the Operating License for the Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML040370636
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/06/2004
From: Jack Cushing
NRC/NRR/DRIP/RLEP
To:
Cushing J, NRR/DRIP/RLEP, 415-1424
References
Download: ML040370636 (10)


Text

February 6, 2004 APPLICANT: Southern Nuclear Operating Company FACILITY: Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF TELECOMMUNICATION WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY (SNC) TO DISCUSS ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE AUDIT FOR THE RENEWAL OF THE OPERATING LICENSE FOR THE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 On January 23, 2004, the NRC staff (the staff) and its experts from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and representatives from SNC held a conference call (telecon) to discuss items resulting from the environmental site audit conduct on January 7, 2004. Enclosure 1 is the list of participants. SNC has had an opportunity to review and comment on this summary. During the site audit a number of documents were identified by the staff as potentially needed for the staff to complete its review.

The telecon was held to finalize the documents that SNC needs to submit.

The staff requested the following documentation.

1. Documentation describing the maintenance schedule for the transmission line right-of-ways (ROW) for the transmission lines within the scope of license renewal for Alabama, Florida and Georgia.

Response: SNC agreed to identify ROW contractors and provide a general schedule of maintenance activities. In addition SNC will provide selected sections of ROW contracts for transmission line maintenance that describe maintenance activities and requirements.

2. What type of training and procedures do the contractors that maintain the transmission lines ROWs have to identify threaten or endangered species?

Response: SNC will provide as an example a copy of a brush report that the contractors use to identify where threaten or endangered species are located.

3. The staff asked if there was any documentation of bird strikes on the transmission lines within the scope of license renewal.

Response: SNC said that there was no documented bird strikes on the transmission lines within the scope of license renewal.

4. The 1999 Wildlife Certification application.

Response: SNC agreed to provide the 1999 Wildlife Certification application.

2

5. What is the route for the gas pipeline for the alternative described in the environmental report (ER)?

Response: SNC stated that the gas pipeline route would follow an existing transmission line ROW. SNC will provide a drawing, showing the route of the gas pipeline.

6. What improvements are needed to the rail line relative to the alternative described in the ER?

Response: SNC stated that possible replacement of the track, ties, bed maintenance and upgrading to rail bridges. SNC will provide a statement of potential upgrades.

7. Is the rail loop in previously undisturbed area?

Response: SNC will provide response.

8. If a barge facility is needed for the alternatives, are there any modifications needed including maintenance dredging and permits required for this activity?

Response: SNC will provide response.

9. Discuss the issues related to releases of water for equipment delivery via barges to Farley Nuclear Plant. Include in the discussion the frequency of expected barge traffic for FNP.

Response: SNC will provide response.

10. Provide a general description of how the non-radioactive wasted streams are handled.

Response: SNC agreed to provide a general write up describing the non-radioactive waste streams.

11. The discussion of cooling water usage on page 4-4 of the ER is confusing. Please clarify.

Response: SNC agreed to provide a discussion and a one-line diagram showing the flow path annotated with the water usage for each path.

12. Provide a more detailed description of the radioactive waste processing system.

Response: SNC agreed to provide a description similar to the lesson plans used to train the operators.

3

13. The staff requested the following:
  • Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) letter of Air Quality compliance
  • 3 years of annual hourly meteorological data, including annual joint frequency summaries and the data used to develop it
  • Certificate of water use
14. Section 5.0 of the environmental report (ER) provides a description of the process used to identify new and significant information. The process description provides insufficient details for the staff to evaluate the conclusion that SNC is aware of no new and significant information regarding the environmental impacts of the proposed license renewals.

Provide the steps in the process which SNC followed to reach the determination that it was not aware of any new and significant information.

Response: SNC agreed to provide the steps in the process used to reach its conclusion on new and significant information.

15. Section 4.13, Electric Shock from Transmission-Line-Induced Currents, of the ER states that the Farley-Snowdown line analysis indicates a 5.1 milliampere induced current. The National Electric Safety Code (NESC) for preventing electric shock from induced currents recommends a limit of 5 milliamperes and the Code of Federal Regulations in 10 CFR 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(H) recognizes the NESC recommendation. By way of comparison the setting for ground fault interrupters used in residential electrical wiring is 4 to 6 milliamperes.

Please identify measures that could be taken to meet the standards and which measures, if any, SNC plans to undertake which will result in the transmission lines meeting the standard. If measures are not taken to meet the standards, identify the mitigation measures, if any that are planned to reduce the potential impact.

Response: SNC agreed to respond.

16. Section 3.1.3, Transmission Facilities, of the ER identifies all of the transmission lines from FNP to the first substation that connect FNP to the grid. One line, the Farley to Raccoon Creek transmission line was evaluated in the original Final Environmental Statement extending approximately 40 miles further to Tifton Georgia. The addition of a substation at Racoon Creek does not shorten the length of the transmission line within the scope of the environmental review. The staff requested that SNC provide the necessary information for the approximately 40-mile stretch of transmission line from Racoon Creek to Tifton Georgia.

Response: SNC agreed to provide the information.

4

17. In Section 4.21, Environmental Justice (EJ), of the ER, SNC states that because it has determined that there are no significant offsite environmental impacts associated with renewal of the operating licenses for FNP, then no member of the public will be substantially affected.

Therefore, there can be no disproportionately high impacts and/or adverse impacts on any member of the public including minority or low income populations. Based on the above, SNC concluded that a qualitative review of the potential EJ impacts is adequate and no mitigation measures need to be described.

The NRC guidance to the staff on this issue is provided in Office Instruction LIC 203, Procedural Guidance for Preparing Environmental Assessments and Considering Environmental Issues. The guidance states that:

Reviewers should recognize that the impacts to minority or low-income populations may be different from impacts on the general population due to a communitys distinct cultural practices. In addition, reviewers should take into account different patterns of living and consumption of natural resources, such as subsistence consumption.

A qualitative review based on a review of the potential impacts on the general population is not sufficient to determine the EJ impacts on a minority or low-income population due to the communitys distinct cultural practices.

Response: SNC agreed to provide its EJ review.

18. The NRC acknowledge that it had received a copy of the letter SNC had sent to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the attached CD. The information provided on the attached CD will not need to be resubmitted.

/RA/

Jack Cushing, Project Manager Environmental Section License Renewal and Environmental Impacts Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.: 50-348 and 50-364

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/enclosures: See next page

4

17. In Section 4.21, Environmental Justice (EJ), of the ER, SNC states that because it has determined that there are no significant offsite environmental impacts associated with renewal of the operating licenses for FNP, then no member of the public will be substantially affected.

Therefore, there can be no disproportionately high impacts and/or adverse impacts on any member of the public including minority or low income populations. Based on the above, SNC concluded that a qualitative review of the potential EJ impacts is adequate and no mitigation measures need to be described.

The NRC guidance to the staff on this issue is provided in Office Instruction LIC 203, Procedural Guidance for Preparing Environmental Assessments and Considering Environmental Issues. The guidance states that:

Reviewers should recognize that the impacts to minority or low-income populations may be different from impacts on the general population due to a communitys distinct cultural practices. In addition, reviewers should take into account different patterns of living and consumption of natural resources, such as subsistence consumption.

A qualitative review based on a review of the potential impacts on the general population is not sufficient to determine the EJ impacts on a minority or low-income population due to the communitys distinct cultural practices.

Response: SNC agreed to provide its EJ review.

18. The NRC acknowledge that it had received a copy of the letter SNC had sent to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the attached CD. The information provided on the attached CD will not need to be resubmitted.

/RA/

Jack Cushing, Project Manager Environmental Section License Renewal and Environmental Impacts Program Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.: 50-348 and 50-364

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/enclosures: See next page DISTRIBUTION: See next page ACCESSION NO.: ML040370636 DOCUMENT NAME: C:\ORPCheckout\FileNET\ML040370636.wpd OFFICE PM:RLEP:DRIP LA:RLEP:DRIP SC:RLEP:DRIP NAME J. Cushing Y. Edmonds J. Tappert DATE 2/6/04 2/5/04 2/6/04 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

LIST OF ATTENDEES TELECOMMUNICATION WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY JANUARY 8, 2004 TELECON PARTICIPANTS NAME ORGANIZATION Jim Davis Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC)/Tetra Tech Amy Green Chuck Pierce Tom Moore Ann Lovel John Cudworth Jack Cushing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Crystal Quinly Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Jessie Coty Los Alamos National laboratory (LANL)

Jennifer Garrison Bruce McDowell Paul Schumann Enclosure 1

DISTRIBUTION Summary of Telecommunication with SNC,Re: Farley, Dated: February 6, 2004 ML040370636 D. Matthews/F. Gillespie P. T. Kuo J. Cushing A. Kugler J. Davis J. Tappert T. Liu S. Peters C. Patterson, RII R. Fanner, RII B. Bonser, RII D. Cummings C. Quinley (LLNL)

RLEP R/F

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant cc:

Mr. Don E. Grissette Mr. William D. Oldfield General Manager - SAER Supervisor Southern Nuclear Operating Company Southern Nuclear Operating Company Post Office Box 470 Post Office Box 470 Ashford, Alabama 36312 Ashford, AL 36312 Mr. B. D. McKinney Mr. Charles R. Pierce Licensing Manager Manager - License Renewal Southern Nuclear Operating Company Southern Nuclear Operating Company Post Office Box 1295 Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201-1295 Birmingham, AL 35201 Mr. M. Stanford Blanton Mr. Fred Emerson Balch and Bingham Law Firm Nuclear Energy Institute Post Office Box 306 1776 I Street, N.W., Suite 400 1710 Sixth Avenue North Washington, DC 20006-3708 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Ms. Betty Forbus Mr. J. D. Woodard Director Executive Vice President Houston Love Memorial Library Southern Nuclear Operating Company 212 West Burdeshaw Street Post Office Box 1295 Dothan, AL 36303 Birmingham, AL 35201 Ms. Barbara Crawford State Health Officer The Lucy Maddox Memorial Library Alabama Department of Public Health 11880 Columbia Street 434 Monroe Street Blakely, GA 39823 Montgomery, AL 36130-1701 Ms. Crystal Quinly Chairman Task Leader Houston County Commission Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Post Office Box 6406 Mail Code L-654 Dothan, AL 36302 P.O. Box 808 Livermore, CA 94550 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. Lee Warner 7388 N. State Highway 95 State Historic Preservation Officer Columbia, AL 36319 Alabama Historical Commission 468 South Perry Street Mr. Lonice C. Barrett Montgomery, AL 36130-0900 State Historic Preservation Officer/DNR 156 Trinity Avenue, SW, Suite 101 Mr. Larry Goldman Atlanta, GA 30303-3600 Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Daphne Field Office P.O. Drawer 1190 Daphne, AL 36526

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant cc:

The Honorable R. Perry Beaver, Principal Mr. Steve Turkoski Chief P.O. Box 638 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Dothan, AL 36302 P.O. Box 580 Okmulgee, OK 74447 Ms. Diane Geeslin 109 Edinburgh Way The Honorable Eddie Tullis, Chairman Dothan, AL 36305 Poarch Band of Creek Nation 5811 Jack Springs Road Mr. Mike Schmitz Atmore, AL 36502 901 S. Oates Street Dothan, AL 36301 The Honorable Mitchell Cypress, Chairman Seminole Tribe of Florida Mr. W. J. Johnson, Jr.

6300 Stirling Road P. O. Box 462 Hollywood, FL 33024 Waynesboro, GA 30830 Mr. Jon Hornsby Ms. Beth Thomas Alabama Department of Conservation and 1400 Northfield Circle Natural Resources Dothan, AL 36303 Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Division 64 North Union Street Suite 567 Mr. Chadwick Taylor Montgomery, AL 36104 4209 Buckland Trail Greenwood, FL 32443 Mr. Greg Krakow Data Manager Mr. Steven Kornegay Georgia Department of Natural Resources 178 Allen Wells Road Wildlife Resources Division Dothan, AL 36301 Georgia Natural Heritage Program 2117 U.S. Hwy. 278 S.E., Social Circle Mr. Selden Bailey GA 30025-4714 P. O. Box 1106 Dothan, AL 36302 Dr. Dennis Hardin Forest Ecologist Mr. Charles Finway Division of Forest Management P.O. Box 6406 3125 Conner Blvd. C-25 Dothan, AL 36302 Tallahassee FL. 32399-1650 Ms. Shelby Womack Mr. Bob Hendrix EMA P.O. Drawer P.O. Box 8765 Dothan, AL 36302 Dothan, AL 36304 Mr. Paul Brown Mr. Matt Parker P.O. Box 636 P.O. Box 368 Abbeville, AL 36310 Dothan, AL 36302 Mr. Charlie Nesbitt 34 Hampton Way Dothan, AL 36305

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant cc:

Mr. Dave Hendrix Mr. Brad Moore City of Dothan 1925 Powell Trail P.O. Box 2128 Abbeville, AL 36310 Dothan, AL 36302 Ms. Lana Smitherman Mr. James H. Phillips P.O. Box 2128 Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Dothan, AL 36302 P.O. Box 1492 Columbus, GA 31902 Mr. John Hornsby AL Department of Conservation Ms. Barbara Alford Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Division Troy State University Dothan 64 N. Union Street P.O. Box 8368 Montgomery, AL 363130 Dothan, AL 36304 Mr. Clint Ludlam Mr. Steve Mashburn 729 Hatton Road 102 Sandy Springs Road Dothan, AL 36301 Dothan, AL 36303 Mr. Rich Lopez Mr. Tim Pitchford 1231 West Main Street Sweetwater Apartments, Apt #109 Dothan, AL 36301 Dothan, AL 36302 Ms. Sara Barczak, Safe Energy Director Ms. Rebecca Martin Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE)

Tri Rivers Association 3025 Bull Street, Suite 101 P.O. Box 2232 Savannah, GA 31405 Dothan, AL 36302 Ms. Michele Buck 3703 Brookside Drive Dothan, AL 36303