ML032250551

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision to EP-PS-121 - TSC Telecopier Clerk: Emergency Plan-Position Specific Procedure
ML032250551
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/2003
From:
Susquehanna
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
EP-PS-121
Download: ML032250551 (4)


Text

Jul. 31, 2003

. - ~--

Page 1 of 1 MANUAL kARD COPY DISTRIBUTION DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL 2003-34506 USER INFORMATION:

Name:GERLACH*ROSE M EMPL#:28401 CA#:0363 Address: NUCSA2 Phone#: 254-3194 TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION:

TO: GERLACH*ROSE M 07/31/2003 LOCATION: DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK . -

FROM: NUCLEAR RECORDS DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER (NUCSA-2)

THE FOLLOWING CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED TO THE HARDCOPY1'OR:ELECTRONIC MANUAL ASSIGNED TO YOU:

121 - 121 - TSC TELECOPIER CLERK: EMERGENCY PLAN-POSITION SPECIFIC PROCEDURE REMOVE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 06/23/2003

~ADD MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS DATE: 07/30/2003 CATEGORY: PROCEDURES TYPE: EP ID: EP-PS-121 ADD: PCAF 2003-1550 REV: N/A REMOVE: PCAF 2001-1132 REV: N/A REMOVE: PCAF 2003-1460 REV: N/A UPDATES FOR HARD COPY MANUALS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES. PLEASE MAKE ALL CHANGES AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX UPON RECEIPT OF HARD COPY. FOR ELECTRONIC MANUAL USERS, ELECTRONICALLY REVIEW THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETE IN YOUR NIMS INBOX.

A PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM

1. PCAF NO. 2. PAGE 1 OF Z 3. PROC. NO. EP-PS-121 REV. 9
4. FORMS REVISED - R_, - R R - R_, - R , - R
5. PROCEDURE TITLE TSC TELECOPIER CLERK: EMERGENCY PLAN POSITION SPECIFIC PROCEDURE
6. REQUESTED CHANGE PERIODIC REVIEW I NO 3 YES INCORPORATE PCAFS Z NO El YES # 2001-1132 # 2003-1460 # #

REVISION F1 PCAF DELETION El (CHECK ONE ONLY)

7.

SUMMARY

OF / REASON FOR CHANGE Incorporate previously approved PCAF's. The previous PCAF's documented periodic reviews. This is an administrative change.

Continued E

8. DETERMINE COMMITTEE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Section 6.1.4)

PORC REVIEW REQ'D? Z NO El YES 9. PORC MTG#

BLOCKS 11 THRU 16AREONPAGE2OFFORM

17. T.C. Dalpiaz / 3227 / 07/24/2003 18. COMMUNICATION OF CHANGE REQUIRED?

l ~~PREPARER ETN DATE >3NO [M YES (TYPE)

(Print or Type)

SIGNATURE ATTESTS THAT RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR HAS

19. CONDUCTED QADR AND TECHNICAL REVIEW UNLESS OTHERWISE OLD, i) ,;L,"!Plw $7/2v/0 DOCUMENTED IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.

mT aT, -ItsbtlD~n/.o^D CROSS DISCIPLINE A~t

°_ REVIEW (IFREQUIRED) HAS BEEN COMPLETED 5 !IDFB 9rW~orv ^;7JPER5 V I{VISOR ViaI L BY SIGNATURE IN BLOCK 16 OR ATTACHED REVIEW FORMS.

I0. _ 2" 9 d I fLIVM APiPROVAL DAfE0

21. RESPONSIBLE APPROVER ENTER N/A IF FUM HAS APPROVAL AUTHORITY IA-INITALS DATE FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8, Page 1 of 2 (Electronic Form)

-- ok -

PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS FORM

1. PCAF NO. OM j /4a) 12. PAGE 2 OF . 13. PROC. NO. EP-PS-121 REV. 9
11. This question documents the outcome of the 50.59 and 72.48 Review required by NDAP-QA-0726. Either 11a, b, c or d must be checked "YES" and the appropriate form attached or referenced.
a. This change is an Administrative Correction for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not [ YES s N/A applicable.
b. This change is a change to any surveillance, maintenance or administrative 3 YES [ N/A procedure for which 50.59 and 72.48 are not applicable.
c. This change is bounded by a 50.59172.48 Screen/Evaluation, therefore, no new I YES 3 N/A 50.59/72.48 Evaluation is required.

Screen/Evaluation No. =_=_ _

d. 50.59 and/or 72A8 are applicable to this change and a 50.59/72.48 [ YES 3 N/A Screen/Evaluation Is attached.
12. This change is consistent with the FSAR or an FSAR change is required. 3 YES Change Request No. -_-_
13. Should this change be reviewed for potential effects on Training Needs or Material? YES 3 NO If YES, enter an Action Item @ NIMS/Action/Gen Work Mech/PICN
14. Is a Surveillance Procedure Review Checklist required per NDAP-QA-0722? 2 YES 0 NO
15. Is a Special, Infrequent or Complex Test/Evolution Analysis Form required per [ YES 0 NO NDAP-QA-0320? (SICT/E form does not need to be attached.)
16. Reviews may be documented below or by attaching Document Review Forms NDAP-QA-01001-1.

REVIEWED BY WITH DATE REVIEW NO COMMENTS QADR -_:_ _

TECHNICAL REVIEW REACTOR ENGINEERING/NUCLEAR FUELS *  :

IST IFS OPERATIONS _ __X____

NUCLEAR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING NUCLEAR MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE - :_::

HEALTH PHYSICS - _

NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY _

CHEMISTRY  :-_X_ _

OTHER 10 CFR 50.540 _ _ _ _ _

  • Required for changes that affect, or have potential for affecting core reactivity, nuclear fuel, core power level indication or Impact the thermal power heat balance. (58)

Required for changes to Section Xl Inservice Test Acceptance Criteria.

FORM NDAP-QA-0002-8, Rev. 8. Page 2 of 2 (Electronic Form)

PROCEDURE COVER SHEET: P G F

\ ~~~~~~~~~PG PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC I NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE TSC Telecopier Clerk: Emergency Plan Position Specific Instruction EP-PS-121 Revision 9 Page 1 of 4 QUALITY CLASSIFICATION: APPROVAL CLASSIFICATION:

El QA Program 3 Non-QA Program 0 Plant El Non-Plant Instruction EFFECTIVE DATE: ____________

PERIODIC REVIEW FREQUENCY: Two Year PERIODIC REVIEW DUE DATE: two23 6O5 RECOMMENDED REVIEWS:

All Procedure Owner. Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Supervisor Primary TSC Administrative Coordinator Responsible FUM: Supervisor Nuclear Emergency Planning Responsible Approver V.P. Nuclear operations FORM NDAP-QA-0002-1, Rev. 3, Page 1 of I