IR 05000400/1987023
| ML18022A547 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 07/29/1987 |
| From: | Blake J, Newsome R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18022A545 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-87-23, NUDOCS 8708100438 | |
| Download: ML18022A547 (12) | |
Text
~gS Rf0y
~
. p+~
C
Cy
+~
~O
+4*4+
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W., SUITE 2900 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 Report No.:
50-400/87-23 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 1551.
Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:
50-400 Facility Name:
Harris
Inspection Conducted:
July 6-10, 1987 Inspector:
R.
W. Newso e
Approved by:
J. J. Blake, MPS Sectio Chief Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety License No.:
. 7-
-g Date igned 7~< E7 Date Signed SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection was in the areas of a general review of the maintenance program and how the program is being implemented, and previously identified enforcement items and licensee identified items.
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
8708i00438 8'70805 PDR ADOCN, 05000400 PDR
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- R. A. Watson, Vice President, Nuclear Power, Harris
- M. Wallace, Specialist Regulatory Compliance
- M. E. Jackson, Maintenance Engineer
+M. M. Pugh, Technical Support, Inservice Inspection (ISI)
- S. M. Pruitt, Technical Support, ISI
- J. S. Keisles, Specialist Document Services Other licensee employees contacted included maintenance craftsmen, engineers, technicians, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspectors
- G. Maxwell, Senior Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 10, 1987, with those persons indicated in the above paragraph.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters a.
(Closed) Violation 50-400/85-48-01, Preservice Examination Procedures Incorrectly Reference Subsequent Code Addenda's.
This item was written because the licensee had used an as yet NRR approved addenda of the ASME code.
This addenda has now been approved for use by NRR as noted in NUREG-1038, Safety Evaluation Report, October 1984, Supplement 4.
This matter is considered closed.
b.
(Closed)
Violation 50-400/85-48-03, Failure To Follow Procedure For Correction of Examination Data.
This item identified instances where the licensee had made correc-tions to PSI data sheets in a manner that was not in accordance with controlling documents pertaining to data sheet corrections.
The
data itself was not changed, however, the method used in making corrections was not in accordance with the controlling procedure.
Applicable personnel have been instructed in the proper use of the controlling procedure and the correct means by which revisions to examination data can be made.
The inspector has no further questions regarding this matter.
.c.
(Closed)
Unresolved Item 50-400/85-48-04, Independent Technical Review of Examination Data.
This item identified a situation in the controlling procedure, for examination data technical and administrative review, where it was possible for the data reviewer to be the same individual that was generating the examination data.
This method of data control is inappropriate when this situation arises.
The controlling procedure is currently being rewritten and will be issued under a different number.
The newly issued procedure, for the control of examination data, will be reviewed during a future inspection.
This matter is considered closed.
4.
Unresolved Items Unreso'Ived items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Maintenance Program and Maintenance Program Implementation (62700)
(62702)
a ~
The below listed documents and procedures were reviewed to determine if the licensee's maintenance program is in conformance with Technical Specifications, regulatory requirements, comnitments in the licensee application, and industry guides or standards.
Station Administrative Procedures Proc.
No. Rev.
AP-004 001 AMM-006 001 RMP-007 000 AP-020 001 OMM-005 001 Title Description of the Plant Operating Manual Document Service Conduct of Operations Project Required Records List Cl earance Procedure Operations Work Procedures
AP-600 003 Plant Change Request Initia-tion TI-113 003 Related Technical Training and on-the-job training for selected maintenance classifications, with Appendices C-1 thru C-5 Maintenance Mana ement Manual Procedures Proc No.
Title Rev.
MMN-001 MNM-002 MNM-003 NMM-004 NMM-005 MMM-006 NNM-007 NMM-008 MMN-010 MMM-011 MMM-012 NMM-013 Maintenance - Conduct of Operations Corrective Maintenance Preventive Maintenance Program Process
- Instrument Calibration Instrument Loop Calibrations Measuring and Test Equipment Calibration Program Maintenance Surveillance and Periodic Test Program Control of Maintenance Welding Threaded Fastener Tightening Procedure Cleanliness and Housekeeping Maintenance Work Control Procedure ANMS Maintenance History Records The above listed procedures, relative to the licensee's correc-tive maintenance program, were reviewed to confirm that: written procedures have been established for initiating requests for routine and emergency maintenance; criteria and responsibilities have been established for review and approval of maintenance requests including emergency maintenance requests; criteria and responsibilities have been established that form the basis for designating the activity as safety-related or not safety-related; criteria and responsibilities have been designated for performance of inspections and maintenance activities; provi-sions and responsibilities have been established for the identi-fication of appropriate inspection hold points related to maintenance activities; methods and responsibilities have been designated for performing functional testing of structures, systems, or components following maintenance work and/or prior to their being returned to service; administrative controls for maintenance activities require that applicable records wi 11 be prepared, assembled, and reviewed for transfer to records storage; responsibility has been established to assemble and review the maintenance records for transfer to record storage; a
program has been established for reviewing completed corrective
maintenance records to assess the adequacy of the preventive maintenance program, to identify repetitive failures of parts and components, and to identify design deficiencies; work control procedures have been established to require special authorization for activities involving welding, open flame, or other ignition sources and take cognizance of nearby flan@able material, cable trays, or critical process equipment; and, revisions to Technical Specifications have been incorporated into procedures and included in the master program.
The above listed procedures, relative to the licensee's preven-tive maintenance program, were reviewed to confirm that a
written preventive maintenance program for safety-related structures, systems, and components has been established that includes:
responsibility for the program; master schedule for preventive maintenance; documentation and review of completion of preventive maintenance activities; responsibilities and methods for establishing preventive maintenance frequencies; responsibility for periodic upgrading based on system or component fai lures; and, methods for incorporating revisions to Technical Specifications into procedures and the master program.
The above listed procedures, relative to equipment control, were reviewed to establish that methods and responsibilities for equipment control have been defined and specifically to confirm that:
procedures have been established to specify that the operating staff grants permission to release equipment or systems for maintenance; equipment that is environmentally qualified should be identified as such prior to maintenance and sufficient controls should exist to ensure it is returned to that status upon reassembly; procedures and responsibility have been established for returning equipment to service; when testing of redundant components or systems is required by Technical Specification, such testing is documented; measures have been established and responsibility has been assigned for determining when independent verification has been implemented correctly; and, revisions to Technical Specifications have been incorporated into procedures and included in the master program.
The above listed procedures, relative to special processes, were reviewed to confirm that responsibilities have been assigned to assure that the requirements of the administrative controls will be accomplished and that the administrative controls for special processes have been established as follows:
a requirement that only qualified procedures will be used; a requirement that only qualified personnel will be used; a requirement that a current file of special processes will be maintained to include qualifica-tion records of procedures and personnel; and, criteria to establish when the use of mock-ups or other special training will be require (5)
The above listed procedures, relative to cleanliness controls, were reviewed to verify that: procedures have been developed for cleaning safety-related components and systems and that respon-sibilities for implementing this requirement has been estab-lished; procedures have been established for maintaining the cleanliness of previously cleaned systems and that responsibili-ties for implementing this requirement has been established; and, the cleanliness classifications of plant systems have been established.
(6)
The above listed procedures, relative to housekeeping controls, were reviewed to confirm that administrative controls and responsibilities for general housekeeping have been established to include defining housekeeping zones and controlling house-keeping during work activities.
b.
In order to determine whether the maintenance program is being implemented in accordance with regulatory requirements and to evaluate the effectiveness of the program on important plant equip-ment and to assess the ability of the maintenance staff to conduct an effective maintenance program, a selection of completed work order packages and associated documentation was reviewed.
The specific work order packages and associated documentation are recorded in the following subparagraphs.
(1)
The below listed work order packages and reports were reviewed to determine whether:
the cause of the failure was evaluated and adequate corrective action was taken to reduce the probability of recurrence; the procedures specified in the maintenance package were adequate for the scope of the maintenance performed; vendor maintenance recommendations, if used, were correctly translated into or referenced by the maintenance procedures; and, the vendor technical manual for the equipment under repair was controlled and kept up to date.
Work Order 85-AKPB1 86-AAQR1 85-AKTM1 85-ABDS1 87-AHWB1 87-ABGS1 86-ADJY1 85-AAWS1 86-ABBR1 392-1A-5A PIX-TANK 049-1C CKB-Pump CYT-1B-BB KQP-MS-V1035A KQN-MS-V12-9 HDA-WC-3/SW-8306 HNH-CS-M545 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No
(2)
(3)
Breakdown/Repti tive Failure Investigation Reports 87-36 87-47 87-32 87-27 87-51 The above listed work order packages, associated with safety-related equipment, were also reviewed to confirm that; required administrative approvals were obtained before initiating the work; limiting conditions for operation were met while the component or system was removed from service; approved proce-dures were used where the activity appeared to exceed the normal skills possessed by qualified maintenance personnel; inspections were made in accordance with the licensee's requirements, and quality control records are complete; functional testing and calibrations, as necessary, were completed before returning the equipment to service; the personnel who performed the tests were properly qualified; the licensee evaluated system failures; corrective and preventive maintenance records were assembled and stored as part of the maintenance history; the Measuring and Test Equipment (MATE) used was identified and in calibration; parts and materials used were identified; and, special processes were controlled and documented.
The below listed maintenance procedures were in some cases used to conduct portions of the maintenance activities for the work order packages listed in paragraph 5.b.(1).
The inspector reviewed these procedures in order to confirm that:
the procedure conforms to the licensee's administrative require-ments, including format, approval, and control; the post-mainte-nance testing was appropriate for the repairs made; the inspection and hold points are identified in the procedure or in a documented plan and are based on a set of established guide-lines; supplementary reference material such as drawings and technical manuals is adequate and controlled; the activity is described in sufficient detail; consideration is given to radiological, temperature, pressure, and electrical hazards, as appropriate to the circumstances; the provisions for fire protection, cleanliness, and housekeeping are adequate; appropriate instructions and quality control checks are included to verify that environmentally qualified equipment is properly protected against moisture intrusion when reassembled; and, the provisions for control of equipment, including lifted leads, jumpers, bypasses, and mechanical blocks are presen Corrective Maintenance Procedures Procedure No.
Ti t1e Revision CM-I0002 CM-I0004 CM-I0007 CM-I0021 CM-I0050 CM-I0109
.,CM-.M0002 CN-M0007 CM-M0009*
CM-M0019 CM-M0021*
CM-M0031*
CM-N0034 CM-M0041 CM-M0046 CN-M0052 CM-M0056 CM-M0060*
Limitorque Cal ibration
Check and Stroking Limitorque Calibration
Check and Stroking of.
Special West Supplied Valves Paul Munroe Electrohydraulic Actuators for the Main Steam Atmospheric Relief Valves
Maintenance of ASCO NP8321 Solenoid Valve
Westinghouse 7300 Series MAC Card Test and Alignment
Torque Switch Setting Changes For IE Bulletin 8503 Motor Operated Valves
Ingersoll-Rand Air Compressor Piston Ring Wear Rate and V-Belt Inspection
Jamesbury Butterfly (Wafer Sphere)
Valves (3-12")
D&M
Jamesbury Butterfly (Wafer Sphere)
Valves - 14-20" D&M
Pacific Charging Safety Injection Pump 2k" RL Type IJ D&M
Westinghouse High Speed Gear Drives Type SU-10 for Charging/
, SI Pump D&N
. Yarway Valves 2" and Smaller Disassembly and Maintenance
Hammel Dahl V673 Metal Seated Butterfly Valves Disassembly and Maintenance Feedwater Isolation Valve Actuator Pilot Check Valve Shim Replacement
Limitorque Valve Actuator SMC-000 thru SMC-02 D&N
Limitorque Motor Operated Valve Actuators Models SNB-0 thru SMB-4T
Limitorque Actuators (SMB-STX)
D&N
Westinghouse Reactor Coolant Pump Model W11010A1 (93ACS)
Seal Removal and Installation
CM-M0061 CM-P0001 Preventive Maintenance Procedures Main Steam Isolation Valve D&M
Post Maintenance Testing Requirements for Limitorque Motor Operated Valves
- Procedures noted in work order packages Procedure No.
PM-I0020 PM-M006 PM-M0014 PM-M0022 PM-M0038 PM-M0039 Title Cleaning and Inspection Electrical Limit Torque Operators Monthly Lubrication Schedule Limitorque Inspection and Lubrication Waste Processing System Gas Filter Assembly Leakage Check Spent Fuel Pool Gate Seal Inspection Spent Fuel Pool Gate Seal Replacement Revision (4)
The inspector reviewed the qualification and training records for ten of the maintenance staff that were listed in the work packages noted in paragraph 5.b.(1)
as having performed mainten-ance activities.
This review was accomplished in order to assess whether the initial qualification and training, periodic retraining, and control of job assignments to individuals having a skill level appropriate to the specific maintenance activity is being achieved.
(5)
The records of Measuring and Testing Equipment (M&TE) listed below, that were used during maintenance activities, were reviewed to confirm the following: the M&TE was in calibration at the time of use; the calibration of the M&TE can be traced to nationally recognize standards; the M&TE is properly stored, controlled, identified with a unique number, and labeled with calibration status; and, the error of the M&TE was less than or equal to the instrument being calibrated.
Item Torque Wrenches Test Gauge Hytorc Wrench Dial Indicators Control No.
CT-629 CT-519 CT-344 CT-709 CT-605 CT-627 CT-554 CT-550
Micrometers 0-1" Depth Gauges Inside Micrometer Perkins Gauge with Dial Indicator Pyrometer CT-564 CT-575 CT-601 CT-602 CT-641 CT-656 CT-658 CT-169 (6)
Component historical records for completed maintenance activi-ties for several components were reviewed to verify that the historical records are being kept up to date and are properly stored as quality assurance records.
(7)
The preventive maintenance plan was reviewed in order to verify the following: a master schedule is available; a compilation of late and incomplete preventive maintenance activities is available for management review; in put was made to the preven-tive maintenance program, if appropriate, based on the equipment failures; preventive maintenance procedures are available and are sufficiently detailed; and, a lubrication control system is available and kept up-to-date.
. Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Licensee Identified Items (92700)
(Closed)
CDR 83-98, Sheared Pinion Keys on Limitorque Valve Motor Operators.
This item was reported by the licensee as a potentially reportable item as a result of information supplied by Westinghouse Electric Corp. regarding fai lures of this type and a previously issued NRC Information Notice 81-08, Repetitive Failures of Limitorque Operator SMB-4 Motor-To-Shaft Key.
Subsequent evaluation by the licensee has determined that the item is not reportable per the provisions of
CFR 50.55(e)
and 10 CFR, Part 21.
The inspector reviewed historical Licensee Event Reports (LER)
and historical maintenance work orders pertaining to problems with Limitorque operators and was unable to find any Limitorque Operator failures which resulted from sheared pinion keys.
Based on the above findings, this item is considered close II