IR 05000389/1979002
| ML17206A776 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 03/13/1979 |
| From: | Bryant J, Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17206A775 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-389-79-02, 50-389-79-2, NUDOCS 7905070358 | |
| Download: ML17206A776 (7) | |
Text
~R RE0Iyq Vp
+
O*
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report No. 50 389/79-02 Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 529100 Miami, Florida 33152 Facility Name:
St. Lucie, Unit 2 Docket No.:
50-389 License No.
CPPR-144 Inspection at St. Lucie Site near Ft. Pierce, Florida r
Inspector:
J.
. Harris Approved by:
let, J.
C. Bryant, Section ef, RCES Branch ate Signed
Date igned SUMMARY Inspection on January 31 through February 2, 1979 This unannounced inspection involved 24 inspector-hours on site of construc-tion status; concrete procedures, specifications and records; concrete placement and backfill operations in the Unit 2 intake structure area; ultimate heat sink barrier; licensee action on a previously identified item of noncompliance.
Results Of the eight areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or devia-tions were identifie DETAILS
. 1,.
Persons Contacted Licensee Em lo ees
-"J. D. Kirk, Assistant Site Manager, Unit 2-W. M. Gaines, Site Engineer Representative, Unit 2
+A. J. Walcott, Project QC Supervisor, Unit 2-0. J. Karch, gA Engineer, Civil, Unit 2
+D. R. Cooper, Supervising gA Engineer, Unit 2 C. Carlo, Civil gC Supervisor, Unit 2 K. V. Oeveren, gA Record Custodian, Unit 2 L. T. Page, gA Engineer, Civil, Unit 2 A. W. Bailey, gA Operations Supervisor, Unit 1 Other Or anization-R. A. Garramore, EBASCO V. J. Gerley, EBASCO
""LE V. Pelosi, EBASCO G. Swider, United Testing Co.
-Attended Exit Interview 2.
Licensee Action on Previous Ins ection Findin s (Closed)
Noncompliance (389/78-12-01);
Failure to test concrete for slump, temperature and air at the specified interval.
The licensee's response has been reviewed and the subject item reinspected.
Examination of records indicate inprocess tests are being performed at the specified interval.
3.
Unresolved Items No unresolved items resulted from this inspection.
4.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 2 with those persons indicated by an asterisk in Paragraph 1'above.
5.
Inde endent Ins ection Effort The inspector examined ongoing construction operations in the reactor control building (RCB), the reactor auxiliary building (RAB) and the
"2-intake structure area.
Records of inprocess testing for the following concrete placements were examined:
a.
RCB (inside containment),
placement numbers 36, 37, 38 and 39 b.
RCB (west annulus),
placement numbers 22, 24'nd 26 c.
RCB (east annulus),
placement numbers 21, 23 and 25 d.
RAB (slab east end of RAB) placement number 141 No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified within the areas examined.
Lakes Dams and Canals The inspector examined the ultimate heat sink dam.
Guidance documents examined by the inspector appear in Section 3.8 '
of the PSAR.
The ultimate heat sink dam is a concrete barrier separating Big Muddy Creek from the intake canal.
The dam serves both Units 1 and 2 and was constructed and inspected under the gC/QA program for Unit l.
Examination of the dam and discussion of its control and inspection with the Unit 1 site gA operations supervisor indicate the dam is being controlled and functioning as specified in the SAR.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified within the areas examined.
Containment (Structural Concrete II) - Review of ualit Records Unit 2 The inspector performed a followup inspection of quality records on structural concrete.
Records examined were on placement number 101 and 105 in the RCB basemat.
Acceptance criteria examined by the inspector appear in the following documents:
a.
PSAR, Section 3.8.1 and 3.8.3 b.
gI's 10.3, 10.7, 10.70, and 10.71 c.
Flo - 2998.473, Ebasco Specification Concrete Records examined included:
inprocess testing for slump, air, temperature and test cylinders, correlation data on inprocess testing, test cylinder break strengths, NCRs and DRs associated with concrete placement.
The inspector also examined concrete test cylinder data from July 1977 through September 1978.
Subsequent to examining the records and gA/gC procedures and specifications, the inspector held a meeting with responsible engineers concerning inprocess testing of pumped concrete.
Examination of records and discussions with responsible engineers indicate concrete testing is being controlled as required by the PSAR and specification No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified within the areas examined.
8.
Foundations - Observations of Work and Work Activities Unit 2 The inspector observed placement of the tunnel C foundation slab in the intake structure and backfill operations for the MH 213
-.
MH 214 duct bank.
Acceptance criteria examined by the inspector appear in the following documents:
a
~
b.
c ~
d.
e.
PSAR, Sections 2.5 and Appendix 2B QIs, 10.3, 10.4, 10.10, 10.70, 10.71 Flo - 2998.471 and DCN 513.278, Ebasco Specification Excavation and Backfill Flo - 2998.473, Ebasco Specification Concrete Drawings 2998-G-665, 2998-G-651 and 2998-G-482 Observations indicated that compaction of soils in the duct bank and that placement and post placement inspection and testing of the tunnel C
concrete foundation slab were made in accordance with acceptance criteria.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were indicated within the areas inspecte {