IR 05000364/1980038
| ML20002B502 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 10/27/1980 |
| From: | Ang W, Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20002B501 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-364-80-38, IEB-79-02, IEB-79-14, IEB-79-2, NUDOCS 8012110709 | |
| Download: ML20002B502 (3) | |
Text
O
.... _.
.....
. _ _ _ _
_
_
_
_
.
- p ** 880o9'o, s
.,
UNITED STA,TES
!"
~t NUCLEAR REGULATOflY COMMISSION
,
\\
$
- E REGION If
o,
- [
101 MARIETT A ST.. N.W., sO*TE 3100
%
g*
ATLANTA, GEORGI A 3o303
- ..**
Report No. 50-364/80-38 Licensee: Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Birmingha.n, AL 35202 Facilit. Name: Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Docket No. 50-364
'
T k.ase No. CPI-A-86 Inspection at Farley Nuclear Plant near Dothan, Alabama Inspector:
to N W. P. An
'
\\
Date Signed Approved by:
b I[
/O-17'89 A. R. Herdt, Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspectiot, on September 15-17, 1980 Aieas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 20 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of previous inspection findings relative to IEB 79-02 and IEB 79-14.
Results No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
I
,
J 8012110 M
-
-
_
-
k DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. A. Mooney - Project Manager, Construction
- R. Hollands - QA Supervisor
- R. L. George - Project Engineer
- C. L. Buck - Project Engineer
- R. S. Fucich - Project Engineer
- N. F. Kaup - Project Engineer
- J. C. Bozeman - Construction Supervisor
- J. G. Hegi - Project QC Engineer NRC Resident Inspector W. Bradford
- J. P. Mulkey
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on September 17, 1980 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings a.
(Closed) Infraction 80-19-01 Control and calibration of torque
-
wrench multipliers. A Daniel Construction Company calibration proce-dure for torque wrench and torque multiplier combination was reviewed.
The licensee indicated that all affected bolts had been retorqued.
The inspector had no further questions on this item.
b.
(Closed) Infraction 80-26-01 - Failure to Follow pipe support and piping system inspection p rocedure.
The licensee had reinspected support 2MS-R505 and recorded the spalled concrete adjacent to the support.
Abandoned bolt holes adjacent to the support were also identified. An Octobcr 1,1980 Alabama Power Company letter reported that both the spalled concrete and the abondoned bolt holes have been evaluated to be technically acceptable. The licensee indicated that this was an isolated case. An inspection of pipe supports by the NRC inspector did not reveal any additional similar conditions.
The inspector has no further questions on this item.
Orientation of the valve operator for valves QV-003C were marked "N/A" but the valves had operators and were requried to be inspected. The licensee re-inspected all valves whose inspection sheets were marked
"N/A".
All valves requiring inspection were inspected. The inspector has no further questions on this item.
_
.
-2-s Another example of infraction 80-26-01 cites dimensional discrepancies still existing between the Octual installation and as-built sketches j
for pipe supports 2MS-R814, 2RH-R96, 2RH-R95 and 2RH-R97. The licensee reinspected the above noted supports and 100 additional pipe supports to determine the extent of discrepancies. Discrepancies were noted in
+
approximately 63 of the 100 pipe supports. However, an architect /
engineer (AE) evaluation of the discrepancies revealed that two hangers could potentially have problems. The AE was still in the process of evaluating the sopports and their potential effect on the piping.
However, the licensee indicated that their sampling inspection shows that although discrepancies still existed, the pipe supports still showed a 95% confidence that less than 5% are defective as allowed by IEB 79-02.
The following pipe supports that were part of the 100 reinspected supports were inspected:
2MS-R79 2CVC-R63 2CVC-R241 2CVC-2A64 2CVC-R622 No additional discrepancies were noted. The inspector has no additional questions on this item.
(Closed) Deficiency 80-19-02 - Documentation of IEB 79-14 inspections.
c.
The first item of this deficiency cited the failure to identify during licensee inspections that a 3/4" diameter plug connected to boron transfer piping was in contact with reactor make-up water piping.
Construction work request (CWR) number 2-40.1074 was inspected. The CWR showed that the plug was cut to eliminate the piping contact and was satisfactorily QC-inspected. The licensee indicated that this was an isolated case. An inspection was conducted to determine if other similar conditions existed. No other similar conditions were identifed.
The inspector has no further questions regarding this item.
The second item of deficiency 80-19-02 cited QC for recording discrepan-cies on memo tablets in lieu of hanger discrepancy reports. Correc-tive action for the discrepancy had been noted on a hanger discrepancy report. An October 7, 1980 Alabama Power Compe y letter reported that i
100 hanger inspection packages were inspected to verify that no other a
discrepancies noted on tablet paper remain unresolved. No unresolved
discrepancies were noted.
The licensee also indicated that QC had
been instructed to follow existing procedure FQC S.4.2.1 addenda 1 and
.
document all discrepancies on hanger discrepancies reports.
The'
!
inspector has no further questions regarding this item.
!'
4.
Unresolved Items
!
l Unreso! 7ed items were not identified during this inspections.
.