IR 05000338/1980031
| ML19340D530 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 09/15/1980 |
| From: | Macarthur T, Potter J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19340D526 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-338-80-31, NUDOCS 8012310047 | |
| Download: ML19340D530 (3) | |
Text
.
Q, O
- pa recoq'o UNITED STATES
!"
,,
~ n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
$
E REGION 11
^
y b[
101 MARIETTA sT N.W.. SUITE 3100 o
o AT LANTA, G EORGI A 3o3o3
- ...+
Special Report: WASTE PACKAGING INSPECTIONS OF LICENSEE-SHIPPERS REPORT NO.
50-338/80-31 Licensee-Shipper:
Virginia Electric and Power Company P. O. Box 26666 Richmond, VA 23261 Disposal Sits-Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc.
P. O. Box 7', Barnwe
, South Carolina 29812 Dock
'o 5 0039 Inspector:
f / [/
T. C. jf/' cArthur Radiati/f/ Specialist, Dftep^gned FF&MS Se
'o MS Blanch i
,
Approved by:
/
J. P '
tter, Chief, FF&MS Section, FF&MS Branch Datejfigned SUMMARY Inspection Dates:
June 19, 1980 visit to Chem-Nuclear Waste disposal site, Barnwell, South Carolina for unannounced inspections of licensee-shippers.
Areas Reviewed: Each licensee-shipper vehicle was inspected for compliance with Department of Transportation (DOT) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regu-lations as follows: (1) shipping paper requirements; (2) DOT Placarding require-ments; (3) radiation levels; (4) removable contamination; (5) DOT marking and labeling requirements for packages; (6) DOT and NRC requirements for external package features, and (7) prohibited articles or contents.
Results: Of the seven areas inspected involving shipments, one item of noncom-pliance was identified.
8 012 31 coC
.
.
. -
..
.
_
_
_
. _.
__
_ _ _ _
._.
l
,
..
.
'
i i
t l
DETAILS
j 1.
Persons Contacted i
R. Sappington, South Carolina, DHEC l
W. House, South Carolina, DHEC D. Ebenback, CNSI
2.
Genero!
i
}
The NRC inspection consisted of a review of the shipping papers, radiation
'
survey of the vehicle, contamination surveys and radiation level surveys of selected packages.
General surveys and observations were conducted to
,
determine if the vehicle had proper placards, proper seals, and if any
obvious safety hazards existed. The contents of the vehicles were inspected for appropriate marking, labeling, tightness of seals, integrity of package
construction or any evidence of leakage.
Chem-Nuclear assigns a control number for each shipment upon arrival at the site.
These numbers were called " shipment survey report numbers" (SSR i
No.), and were used by the inspectors to identify _the licensee-shipper during this inspection.
3.
Shipments Inspected On June 19, 1980,. shipment of radioactive waste was received from Virginia Electric and Power Company at the Barnwell, SC burial site. The shipment
was carried by the Home Transportation Company on trailer #035 (SSR #02085).
As required by 49 CFR 173.392(c)(8), the outside of each cutside package must be stencilled or otherwise marked " Radioactive - LSA".
One shipment was observed not to have the required marking.
4.
Shipping Papers
>
The shipping papers were reviewed for completeness and to ascertain if the contents of the shipment were properly identified, and if emergency notifi-cation procedures and instructions were. included as required under 49 CFR 172, Subpart C.
Specific requirements.for shipping papers were reviewed as follows:
Material shipping name 49 CFR 172.100/172.200/172.202
-
Material class
-
49 rYR 172.200/172.202 Name sequence 40 CFR 172.200/172.202
-
Total quantity (volume)
.9 CFR 172.200/172.202
-
Limited quantity
-
49 CFR 172.200/172.203 Name of each radionuclide 49 CFR 172.203
-
Physical and chemical form
-
49 CFR 172.203 Activity in curies 49'CFR 172.203
-
Category or label
-
49 CFR 172.203
_ _
..
.
f
.
Notation of NRC/ERDA package approval
-
49.CFR 172.203 Proper certification 49 CFR 172.20
-
In addition to the above, 49 CFR 177.817 requires carriers to maintain the above shipping papers readily available for inspection and recognizable by authorities in case of an accident.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
5.
Each vehicle was inspected for conformance with DOT placarding requirements (49 CFR 172, Subpart F and 49 CFR 173.392). The vehicles were also inspected for compliance with the following:
Maximum transportation index of 50 - (49 CFR 177.842)
Loaded so as to avoid spillage (49 CFR 177.842)
Properly blocked and braced (49 CFR 173.392/177.842)
LSA vehicle survey (49 CFR 177.843)
No items of noncompliance were identified.
6.
Maximum Radiation Levels Each truck was surveyed for maximum radiation levels in the normally occupied portions of the vehicle, in a vertical plane at the edge of the flatbed or at the surface of the closed vehicles, in a vertical plane six feet from the sides of the vehicle where possible, and on the surface of a representa-tive package. Shipping cask were surveyed at the surface.
j No levels were in noncompliance with 49 CFR 173.393 limits.
i 7.
Packaging A representative sampling of packages teom each shipment was examined for conformance with DOT marking and labeling requirements. External features of the packages were examined for conformance with DOT and NRC requirments
,
as noted below:
i a
j Low specific activity (LSA) packaging
-
49 CFR 173.392 i
Tight packages - Itd. Qty.,
-
49 CFR 173.391 or 173.392 No release of material
-
49 CFR 173.392/173.393 Radioactive material markings
-
49 CFR 172.310 Security seals
--
49 CFR 173.393 49 CFR 172.310 Gross weight requirements
-
Proper shipping name
-
49 CFR 172.100/172.300 LSA labeling
-
49 CFR 173.392 Cask design specifications
-
49 CFR 173.38 No items of noncompliance were identified.
-
-......
_ ___._.-.____ _._,
_.,.. - _....
.- _. _ _-. _ - _, - _ _
-
..- -