IR 05000280/1980042
| ML18139B126 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/1981 |
| From: | Conlon T, Lenahan J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18139B125 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-80-42, 50-281-80-46, IEB-80-11, NUDOCS 8103040814 | |
| Download: ML18139B126 (5) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
. 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-280/80-42 and 50-281/80-46 Licensee: Virginia Electric and Power Company P. 0. Box 26666 Richmond, VA 23261 Fac.il i ty Name: Surry Power* Station Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License No DPR-32 and DPR-37 Inspection at Surry site near Williamsburg, VA Inspector Cj>>S 9/z.1/JM:l J /J. Lenahan Approved by i1'n,:?LL,/ d-~
.
T. E. Conlon, Se n Chief, RCES Branch SUMMARY Inspection on December 3-5, 1980 Areas Inspected
//;.;J_~/g-;
- tlate* Signed Date Signed This* special, announced inspection involved 19 inspector-hours on site in the areas of followup on IE Bulletin 80-11, Masonry Wall Design and the status of construction of the Unit 1 steam generator replacemen Re.sul t~
Of the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie '.
DETAILS Persons.Contacted Licensee Employee
- R.H. Woodall, Civil Engineer, Power-Station Engineering
- 0. P. Batala, Civil Engineer, Power Station Engineering
- M. S. Whitt~ Civil Engineer, Power Station Engineering
- J. L. Wilson, Station Manager
- R. F. Saunders, Asistant Station Manager
- G. E. Kane, Operations Superintendent
- L.A. Johnson, Maintenance Superintendent Other Organizations D. Friedrich, Civil Engineer, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation J. Robinson, Civil Engineer, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation
- Attended exit interview I--~~ *--;_,.:
Exit Interview The-inspection scope. and findings were summarized on December 5, 1980, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 abov The licensee's request for extension of-the deadline for* completion of the IE Bulletin 80-11 was discusse The licensee agreed to submit a letter to NRC Region II before January 1, 1981, summarizing the prioritized schedule for completing the* IEB 80-11 work:
- Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not. inspecte ~-
Unresolved Item~
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they a re acceptab 1 e or may i nvo 1 ve non comp 1 i ance or deviation New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed. in paragraph :
Independent Inspection Effort The* fnspector observed the: construction* status: of the* Unit 1 steam generator replacement during a walk-through inspection of the Unit 1 containment building, elevation 47~4 level. (Open) _IE Bu.lletin 80-11,. Masonry wa*11 Design - Units 1 and 2 Summary of Licensee I s Response to IE Bul 1 eti n 80-11 J
.2 Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO)
submitted its 60 day IE Bulletin 80-11 response to NRC Region.II for Surry Units 1 and 2 in a* report titled 11 VEPCO Surry Power Station, -units 1 and 2, IE Bulletin 80-11, 60 day Review".
This report:
was transmitted to NRC in a 1 etter dated July 7, 198 The report summarized the method used to identify the masonry walls and safety-related equipment in the.ir proximity, discussed the classification of the walls, the original wall data, and the method of wall reevaluation and listed the* reevaluation priority and schedul The report also included.original construction. drawings showing the. layout of plant structures and wall location In a letter dated October 24, 1980, VEPCO requested an extension of the deadline for completion of the IEB 80-11 design reevaluation-from November 4, 1980 to the end of July, 198 VEPCO submitted an interim report on tha masonry wall reevaluation program to NRC in a letter dated November 3, 198 This report discusses changes to the wall identification numbers assigned to the walls irr the 60 day report and the deletion of some of the walls from the reevaluation progra The report states that reeva 1 uat ion has* been comp 1 eted on 41 of 89 masonry. wa 11 s, and that field 11as-builts 11 have been completed for all the wall Revi~w of Procedures for Accomplishment of IE Bulletin 80-11 Requirements The inspector examtned *stone* & Webster Procedure for As-Built Veri fi ca,ti on. of Masonry-Block Wa 11 s 11 *
This procedure * addresses.*
field inspection' o~f the, Class I and IT ma-sonry walls. shown-on*
existing: drawings*, preparation of masonry* wa 11 as-built drawings, and* quality control requirements. to be applied* in verifiction of the. accuracy of the masonry wa 11 as-built drawing The. inspec.to.r no.ted: that_ this. procedure addressed only preparation of the 11as-built11 drawing for* existing walls shown arr drawi~gs, and does not address the initial identification* of walls in the proximity of safety-re*l ated equipmen. Discussions with 1 icensee engineers disclosed that the initial identification of wall in seismic Class I structures in the proximity of safety-related equipment was performced by Stone & Webster ( S&W)
engineers in the*i r'
Boston offi cec us.i ng_
as.-buil drawing Some fi e.l verification* work* was performed. in this rev.ie Masonry, wal 1 s:
classified. in: this: review, a,s: e:ither-Class L or-II walls: wer~ then**
i dent.i fi ed as:* requiring as-built. deta.il ed drawings for use i rr the*
reeva:l uati on p.rograln'.
A copy* of* t*he procedure used by S&W in the, initial identification and classification of walls in the proximity* of safe.ty-related equipment was not. available-at the site* for* review by-the* inspecto In addition there were no records available at*. the-site for review by the inspector which document that a 11 masonry wa 11 s were* included in the review. per-*
formed*by S& Licensee engineers indicated*that this documentation
- .I-
-*
~
( - )
/
("-.)'
~*
may be available in S&W's Boston offic The lack of the S&W IEB 80-11 review procedure and documentation was identified to the licensee as Unresolved Item 280/80-42-01 and 281/80-46-0l,
"IEB 80-11 Program" pending further review by NRC of the program used in accomplishing the IEB 80-11 requirement Field. Walkdown in Safety-Related Areas to Verify Accuracy,of Masonry.Wall As-Built Drawings The* inspector*, accompanied by S&W* and 1 i censee, engineers, examined the following walls to verify the accuracy of the as-built drawings which had been prepared for each of them:
(1) Auxiliary Building Walls (ID Numbers)
AB-45-10-4 AB-27-6-33 (West Elevation)
AB-15-0-4 (West Elevation)
AB-15-0-3 (North Elevation)
(2).Service Building Walls (ID Numbers)
SB-27-0-10 SB'-27-0-4 SB-27-0-3 SB-9-6-SB-9-6-4 SB-9-6-8 In review of the as-built drawings during the* fie 1 d** wa 1 kdown, the inspecto noted that wall dimensions, location and size of wall openings and penetrations, location of attachments to walls, including the manner* of attachment and* identification of the attachment, and type-of wacl l constructi.on,. i'ncl udi ng 1 ocati on. of joints and cracks had bee accurately recorded..
The inspector made a cursory review of as-built drawings for severa 1 walls on the* elevation 2.:-0 level of' the auxiliary building during a fi-eld walkdown in this a.re These walls have been identified by the licensee as be.ing Class III walls, there is no safety-related equipment. in proximity. to. these wall The inspector also examined wa*ll number-lC-47-4,-20 i'n* the* Unit 1 containment buildin This wall, which' provides shielding around the* pressurizer wi 11 be, removed during tha: Unit: 1 steam generator replacement:-
- However,. it is similar to the wall number* 2C-47-4'-20 in the, Unit 2. containment building, which was inaccessib.le during the inspectio Wa.11 2C-47-4-20 will remain in place and.is presently be:ing reevaluate The inspector also examined the diesel generator areas and the e.levation
level of the service building during the field wa 1 kdown to determine if there were any masonry wa 11 s in these areas
..
l,.
-;
-~-
~)
which had not been noted in the licensee's initial identification and wall classification progra There were no walls in the diesel generator areas, however, there were severa 1 masonry wa 11 s on the elevation 45 level of the service building which had not been listed in the licensee's reports.as either Class I, II, or Ill wall Discussions with licensee and S&W engineers disclosed that all Class III walls (those walls which do not require reevaluation)
were probabley not included. in the report This area will be reviewed further by NRC in the resolution of the unresolved item discussed.in pargraph 6 Review of Quality Rcords Related to IE Bulletin 80-11 The inspector examined the following records relating to IEB 80-11 (1)
Floor plan drawings showing the location of masonry walls* in the. * service building, the auxiliary building, the fuel building and the Unit 2 containment buildin (2)
Masonry wall checklists an as-built11 drawing packages for the-wal 1 s 1 i sted in paragraph c abov During the review of the above quality records, the..
inspector-noted that: copies of S&W Standard Drawings* were not available i'n*
document contro Discus*sions with * document control. personnel disclose that. these, drawings may be. available in the S&W construction offices at the. sit The, * drawings generally show standard. deta.i 1 s, such, as, preparation of joints in masonry wa 11 s, roofing, and. various architectural i terns, and * other non-safety detail These drawings will be reviewed by the* inspector in future inspection to determine jf. there is need to maintain them as quality records in the, document control area0 *.
This. was identifi'ed* to the, licensee as* inpsector" follow-up item*-
280/80-42-02 and:281/80-46-02, 11 S&W Standard Drawing Review, 11 * Review of status. of IE Bulletin 80-11 Work As s.tated in paragraph 6a, above, the licensee has requested an extension of* the: dead.line for completing the IEB 80-11 * work from November 4-,
1980: * t the end of July,.
1981:.
The:-
i nsepctor discussed the* progress~ of: the IEB 80-11 work with the* 1 i censee,.
inc:ludfng*the: methods and* steps. in the reevaluation analysis, the number* of walls completed to date,,. and. the prioritized: schedule for* comp.le.ting* the-remaining wor The* licensee: will submit letter to NRC Reg-ion 11 listing a
more detailed schedule for completing the wor' *
No deviations or*items of noncompliance were identified..
-~. - ~