IR 05000280/1980027
| ML18139A576 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 08/25/1980 |
| From: | Conlon T, Hardwick R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18139A575 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-80-27, 50-281-80-31, IEB-79-01B, NUDOCS 8010090019 | |
| Download: ML18139A576 (7) | |
Text
-~~--~--
-* ' __ * ~--**-. ----*-*--*- -----. -- -*-----* ~*-
,.,*
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 AUG 2 5 1980 Report Nos. 50-280/80-27 and 50-281/80-31 Licensee:
Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, VA 23261 Facility Name:
Surry Power Station Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 Inspection at Surry site near Williamsburg, Virginia Inspec~oC?Sfcf:~~ ~
R. J. Hardwick, J Accompanying Personnel:
N. Merriweather Approved~~
T..'conlon, Section Chief, RGES Branch SUMMARY Inspection on July 21-25, 198 Areas Inspected
~-z.s-7o Date Signed g>- ~s-- f"o Date Signed This. special, announced inspection involved 61 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of documentation review with respect to IE Bulletin 79-0lB respons Results Of the area inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
. so10090 OICfl
.
.
... --------~-~-~*-- ----- ----*-**------*---*- ----------------------* --
--- ~--*-- Persons Contacted Licens*ee Employees
- J. L. Wilson, Station Manager
- R. G. Smith, Staff Engineer DETAILS
- D. L. Padula, Associate Engineer Other Organizations Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation P.. Reilly, Electrical Engineer J. Bonner, Electrical Engineer D. Coughlin, Electrical Engineer NRC Resident Inspector
- D. J. Burke
- Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 25, 1980 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 abov.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspecte.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio.
IE Bulletin 79-0lB The inspectors examined documents pertaining to environmental qualificatio The examined documents were for electrical instrumentation and control components in the Inside Recirculation Spray (IRS) and Auxiliary Feedwater systems. Some of these documents were previously identified in the licensee's 45-day response to IEB 79-0lB and apply to instrumentation and components listed below. This equipment is located in the primary containment and was examined on a previous inspectio Unit No. 1 Inside Recirculation Spray System Electrical Plant ID N DescriEtion Cable N Penetration N LT-RS-151A Level Transmitter 1IT352 RCP-C8E PT-RS-152A Pressure Transmitter 1IT49 RCP-CllB RTD-RS-154A Temperature Detector 1IT455 RCP-C13D RTD-RS-150A Temperature Detector 1IT451 RCP-CllA 1-RS-P-lA Pump Motor 1H4PL2 RCP-C16D 1H4PL7 RCP-ClSD 1-RS-P-lB Pump Motor lJPLZ RCP-C2C 1JPL7 RCP-C6E RTD-RS-150B Temperature Detector 1IT453 RCP-C8E RTD-RS-154B Temperature Detector 1IT457 RCP-C6C PT-RS-152B Pressure Transmitter 1IT43 RCP-C8E LT-RS-151B Level Transmitter 1IT354 RCP-C13D Auxiliary Feedwater System Electrical Plant. ;rn No..
Description Cabl~ No..
Penetration N MOV-FW-151A Valve Operator 1HlOPL208 RCP-C12C 1H10PL210 RCP-C12C MOV-FW-151B Valve Operator 1JlOPL231 RCP-CSA
- 1J10PL233 RCP-CSA MOV-FW-151C Valve Operator 1H10PL224 RCP-C12c 1H10PL226 RCP-C12C MOV-FW-151D Valve Operator 1JlOPL219 RCP-CSA 1J10PL221 RCP-CSA MOV-FW-151E Valve Operator 1H10PL216 RCP-C12C 1H10PL218 RCP-C12C MOV-FW-151F Valve Operator 1JlOPL238 RCP-CSA 1JlOPL240 RCP-CSA FT-FW-lOOA Flow Transmitter 1IT25 RCP-C13E FT-FW-lOOB Flow Transmitter 1IT27 RCP-C13E FT-FW-lOOC Flow Transmitter 1IT29 RCP-C13E Unit No. 2 Inside Recirculation Spray System Electrical :
Plant ID N DescriEtion Cable N Penetration N LT-RS-251A Level Transmitter 2IT352 RCP-C8D PT-RS-252A Pressure Transmitter 2IT49 RCP-C6C RTD-RS-254A Temperature Detector 2IT455 RCP-CllE RTD-RS-250A Temperature Detector 2IT451 RCP-C6C 2-RS-P-lA Pump Motor 2H4PL2 RCP-C3B 2H4PL7 RCP-C6E
-3-Electrical Plant ID N DescriEtion Cable N Penetration N RS-P-IB Pump Motor 2J4PL2 RCP-C18D 2J4PL7 RCP-C14D RTD-RS-250B Temperature Detector 2IT453 RCP-C8D RTD-RS0254B Temperature Detector 2IT457 RCP-C13D PT-RS-252B Pressure Transmitter 2IT43 RCP-C8D LT-RS-25IB Level Transmitter 2IT354 RCP-Cl lE Auxiliary Feedwater System Electrical Plant ID N Description Cable N Penetration N MOV-FW-251A Valve Operator 2H10PL208 RCP-CSA 2H10PL1210 RCP-CSA MOV-FW-25 IB Valve Operator 2JlOPL231 RCP-C14A 2J10PL233 RCP-C14A MOV-FW-251C Valve Operator 2HlOPL224 RCP-CSA 2H10PL226 RCP-CSA MOV-FW-251D Valve Operator 2JlOPL219 RCP-C14A 2J10PL221 RCP-C14A MOV-FW-251E Valve Operator 2HlOPL216 RCP-CSA 2HlOPL218 RCP-CSA MOV-FW-251F Valve Operator 2JlOPL238 RCP-C14A 2JlOPL240 RCP-C14A FT-FW-200A Flow Transmitter 2IT25 RCP-C13A FT-FW-200B Flow Transmitter 2IT27 RCP-C13A FT-FW-200C Flow Transmitter 2IT29 RCP-C13A During review of the documentation, it was determined that additional information is needed to ensure equipment environmental qualification. The specific areas where additional information or clarification is required are listed belo It should be noted that the completion of outstanding items, identified in the licensee's 45-day IEB 79-0lB response, may resolve the need for additional information in some of the specific area For Motor OEerated Valves (MOV):
The documents provided for this equipment consisted of three letters regarding additional information requested from a vendor for the North Anna 2 site equipmen No documentation which addressed the Surry site MOV equipment was available for revie The licensee agreed to obtain the applicable qualification documents for review at a later dat For PumE Motors:
The inspector reviewed a topical report on General Electric Company (G. E.)
vertical induction motors for the IRS pumps dated June 12, 1973. Franklin Institute Research Laboratories (FIRL) report number F-C 3519, a part of
- **----- ---*--------------~-------.--------*
-4-the topical report, indicated a chemical spray solution with a value of ph between 5.5 to 6.5 was used during environmental testing. The licensee's IEB 79-0lB evaluation work sheet indicates a value of pH between 7 and 11 is required. No discussion or justification is provided for this discrepancy in the evaluation work shee The component's environmental qualification (EQ) status has been deferred to the Bulletin 90-day response. The licensee acknowledged this discrepancy and agreed to address it in the 90-day respons For Level Transmitters (Surry Unit 1):
The inspector reviewed the equipment purchase order, equipment specification, and vendor certification of conformanc Based on data contained in these documents, there is not sufficient information to conclude the equipment is environmentatlly qualifie The licensee's IEB 79-0lB evaluation.work sheets indicate the component EQ status has been deferred to the 90-day response and that it may be replaced due to insufficient informatio Discussions with the licensee and architect-engineer (AE)
personnel revealed that a letter has been sent to the equipment vendor requesting additional informatio The licensee agreed to provide a copy of the vendor letter and subsequent data received for review at a later dat For Pressure Transmitters:
The inspector reviewed the equipment specification and Wyle test report number 2630 The licensee indicated that the IEB 79-0lB evaluation work sheets contain a typographical error in that the applicable Wyle test report number is 23604 and not 2360 The review of the Wyle test report revealed the following two areas of concer A Fisher-Parter Model 50EP1041 transmitter was environmentally teste The evaluation work sheets indicate and the previous site inspection verified that a Fisher-Porter Model 50EP1031 BCXANS transmitter is installed. The licensee stated that they believed the two transmitters to be environmentally qualified by similiarity, but at present, had no written evidenc The fisher-porter model 50EP1041 failed 130 minutes into the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) tes The evaluation work sheets specify an operating time of greater than 120 minutes is require As indicated on the evaluation work sheets, the component EQ status has been deferred to the 90-day response. At that time, the separating times, accuracy, etc., will be addresse The licensee acknowledged these concerns and agreed to address them in the 90-day respons For Cables:
The inspector requested to see the qualification documentation for cable number 1IT4 The liceesee provided the cable "pull sheet", termination sheet, material receiving report, and cable specification number NUS 34 Except for a requirement that the cable must be capable of withstanding a l -*-*
-
---
- .-- -*;
.
--- {-
- -* - *------- -
.. -
,,,,,
.~--..*-~-~------.--------.*
.* -~
-
- ----....-----~-.....
.-
- -------
.....
-
..--------.,.....*--~--------* -- *
-
-
-5-total radiation dose of 10 rads, no discussion of environmental qualifica-tion tests was contained in these document The IEB 79-0lB evaluation work sheets indicate that the components EQ status has been deferred to the 90-day respons The licensee agreed to provide additional qualification data for review at a later dat For Electrical Penetration Assemblies (EPA):
The documents provided for this equipment consisted of two letters and a partial copy of a vendor test report regarding Type IIA EPA for the North Anna sit The licensee stated that the Type IIA EPA installed at the Surry site were orginally purchased for installation at the North Anna sit The partial vendor test report was document reference number 14 of the 45-day respons Based on the documents provided, it could not be concluded that EPA environmental qualification had been demonstrate The inspector requested that a complete copy of document reference numbers 13 and 14 be provide The licensee agreed to provide these documents for review at a later dat The additional information requested in the above five areas is identified as Inspector Follow-up Items 50-280/80-27-01 and 50-281/ 80-31-01, Additional IEB 79-0lB environmental qualification data required for documentation revie The inspector discussed with licensee and AE personnel the procedures that were being followed in providing their response to IEB 79-0lB, typical problems that have been encountered, and current status of the overall IEB 79-0lB Surry response effor During these discussions the inspector was informed that: The licensee has contracted the aid of their AE in providing the major manpower/review effort necessary to comply with IEB 79-0lB. The scope and procedure to be used during this review effort is established and documented using a procedural diagra There has been difficulty experienced in obtaining EQ test documents from vendors and subvendor The amount of time expended in locating and obtaining these documents will impact the number of outstanding items in the 90-day respons The "master-list" provided in the 45-day response per Action Item 1 of IEB 79-0lBis primarily based on the Engineered Safety Feature system equipment addressed in the FSAR. A detail review of the plant emergency procedures is currently being performed and additional eomponents may be added to the "Master-list". An inspection of the primary containment is planned in the near future to determine which components are physically located below the maximum flood level and would be subject to a submerged conditio..
-6-At the conclusion of this inspection effor The inspector discussed with site management the details of the above items and the current IEB 79-0lB response effor The present 90-day response commitment date is October 1, 198 The inspector expressed his concern that the Surry 90-day response would contain an inordinate number of outstanding items identified in the 45-day respons Also, the inspector discussed the memorandum and order dated May 23, 1980 relating to environmental qualification of electrical equipment and its implication J