IR 05000280/1980015
| ML18139A288 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry |
| Issue date: | 05/01/1980 |
| From: | Messitt B, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18139A287 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-80-15, 50-281-80-16, NUDOCS 8006060585 | |
| Download: ML18139A288 (4) | |
Text
1-
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-280/80-15 and 50-281/80-16 Licensee:
Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, VA 23261 Facility:
Surry Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37
- . Approved SUMMARY Inspection on April 15-18, 1980 Areas Inspected Virginia This routine, unannounced inspection involved 30 inspector-hours on site in the areas of records program implementation and technical working session with licensee and NRR concerning the inservice testing, pump and valve progra Results Of the two areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie '
'
~.
- .
. '<;
t;i
.,
~
- .<
DETAILS Persons Contacted.
Licensee Employees
- R. Blount, Engineer
- E. De Wandel, Staff Assistant
- C. Gullette, Engineer
- M. Kansler, Supervisor, Engineering Services
- J. Maciejewski, Engineering Suprevisor
- T. Peebles, Superintendent Technical Services
- F. Rentz, Resident QC Engineer
- D. Rickeard, VEPCO Operations
- A. Vig, Senior Engineer (VEPCO Corp.)
- J. Wilson, Station Manager Other licensee employees contacted included office personne Other Organizations
- J. Fehringer, EG&G Idaho
- H. Rockhold, EG&G Idaho
- P. Ruddle, Westinghouse NSD Other NRC
- G. Johnson, EB, NRR
- V. Nerses, DOR, NRR
- A. Wang, DOR, NRR NRC Resident Inspector 1/~':D. Burke
- Attended exit interview
- Attended Inservice Testing Meeting Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 18, 1980, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 abov !:..
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings This item concerning method of access to the vault was held""unresolved pending revision to the VEPCO Quality Assurance Manual (Closed) (Unresolved 280/79-30-02, 281/79-47-02).
The inspector reviewed the rev{sed section 5.4 of the Quality Assurance Manual and had no further question.
.
.
-
- *
- ~-------~~--
- ~~--*------*-*----- -*------------------------
- --
-
-2-Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio.
Record Program Implementation The inspector revieweo -tne-Ticensee' s implementing procedures for the records management program as follows:
ADM 43, Records Management ADM 5, Microfilming Documents The inspector held discussions with various licensee personnel concerning program implementatio The inspection of the retrievability aspect of the records-managemen-t-----
program is documented in inspection reports 50-280/79-30, 50-281/79-4 The inspector used one or more of the following acceptance criteria for inspecting the above areas:
ANSI N45.2.9 (1974)
10 CFR 50, Appendix B Technical Specifications (T/S)
VEPCO Quality Assurance Manual (QAM)
The above review was conducted to verify:
that requirements and provisions have been established to maintain designated types of records; that record storage controls consistent with FSAR and other commitments have been established; that provisions have been made that identify retention periods and disposal methoqs for records; that controls have been established to assure transfer and retention of construction phase records; and
...,...
that repsonsibilities have been assigned to ensure that the above provisions are me Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie ~
~
Meeting Attendance The inspector attended the working sessions, between NRR and--the licensee, that were held to discuss the licensee's proposed Inservice Testing Program,
. _,
-3-Pumps and Valves, which was submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g).
Among the items discussed were inspector concerns in the areas of program clarity, program implementation, and adequacy of proposed testing that were developed as a result of a previous inspection (280/80-03, 281/80-05).
These items and those identified by NRR will be addressed in a revision to
1~-am to be submitted by the license Inspector review of the implementation of the final program is identified as an inspector fol1owup item (280/80-15-01, 281/80-16-01).
-- ---~----** ------~--- ----~
---~---'... -:::--
1* *-.
- .-,
~~
- _**.-* -::,.,-:**-