IR 05000280/1980040
| ML18139B059 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/1980 |
| From: | Burke D, Kellogg P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18139B058 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-80-40, 50-281-80-44, NUDOCS 8102060027 | |
| Download: ML18139B059 (6) | |
Text
Report No Licensee:
-
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION.II 101 MARIETTA ST;, N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 50-280/80-40 and 50-281/80-44 Virginia Electric and Power Company Richmond, Virginia 23261 Facility Name:
Surry Units. l.and: 2 Docket No so;.280and: 50-281 License No DPR;;.32' and DPR:..37 SUMMARY Inspection on Oc.tober 5;..31-, 1980 Areas Inspected This routine inspection by the resident inspector involved 80 inspector-hours on site in the areas of plant operations and operating records, plant modifications, maintenance and testing, TMI task action plan items and plant securit Results No items of noncompliance or deviations were found in the four areas inspecte ;
'lo.**,
.
~.,
'
_ DETAILS Persons* Contacted Licensee *Employees*
- J~. l. Wilson,, Station Manager
- G'~,.Kane,. Superintendent,, Operations
- R~. L Saunders,-. Acting Superintendent, Technical Services
- L.:A *. J.ohnson,. Superintendent, Maintenance-
. *R., M. Smith,. Heal th Physics Supervisor.
- ff. J. Fortin*,. Engineering Se.rvices Supervisor*
Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included control room operators*., shift supervisors, QC,, HP,. plant maintenance, security, engfneering, Chemistry, administrative," records,. and con-
-tractor* personne *
- Attended exit interview Management Interviews (
The' inspection scope*. and findings were summarized on a biweekly basis::
- with those-persons indi.cated in Paragraph 1 above.*
3 *.
Licensee Action-on Previous Findings Not inspecte.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio.
Unit 1 Steam Generator Replacement. Project (SGRP)
. Unit 1 was shutdown on September 14, 1980, for the SGRP due to increasing* steam* generator* tube l eqkage in the l S: S The outage is expected to last some el even month During the reporting period, the*
inspector* routinely toured the Unit 1 control room and other* plant areas to verify that the plant testing, maintenance, and repairs were being conducted in accordance w_ith the Tech,:iicaT Specifications (TS)*
and facility procedure The first primary system piping cut was performed on-10/29/8 Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were* identified *
6~
Unit 2 9peration~
Unit. 2 ope.rated at power. during. the reporting. period*.
During this time:,. the. inspector routinely toured th.e Unit 2'* control room and* other
\\~
~--l *
t..
~-. -'..
- plant areas to verify that the plant operations, testing, and mainte-nance were being conducted in accordance with the facility Technical Specifications (TS} and procedure Specific areas of inspection and review included the following: Review of annunicated-a*l arms in* the control room and inspection of
- safety~rel ated valve-and pump alignments on the console No items of noncompliance. were-identified in the' areas inspecte Foll owi.rp on Unresolved Item 281/80-43-02 -- Evaluation detennined that the water head and volume was not sigri;i,f-icantl.Y * affected by the lower stoplog in* the-screenwell structures-since the. canal floor drops some six feet to the screenwell floor, leaving some three feet of stopl og above the canal floo One of the two portable pumps-which were lost in the 2A screenwel 1 was found in the 2A condenser waterbox on October 29, 1980. _ Since the-service water piping connects to the upper quadrant of the 96 inch circu-lating water lines, the possibility of the missing pump being transported into the service water system appears remot However, this item remains open pending the completion of li-censee evalua-tions, and NRC review of them~ The inspector is continuing followup on Unit 2 LER 79-08 regardin the recirculation spray system piping defect This LER remains open pending identification of the replacement piping used and the inspection of redundant trains of piping, as well as their inspec-1 tion techniques use The inspectors reviewed the following periodic tests (PT's) to determine Unit 2 systems were tested and operable in accordance with the Technical Specifications (TS}:
PT 15.4, Auxiliary Feed Systems Initiation on Loss of Both Main Feed Pumps PT 17.1, Contafnment Spray System PT 17.2, Containment Inside Recirculation Spray Pumps PT 17.3,- Conta.inment Outside Recirculation Spray Pumps PT 18.1, LHSI Test & Flushing of SS Piping PT 18.7 Charging Pump Operability PT 30.l RHR System Operability Gerta.in test data, and engineering reviews associated with the periodi tests are. being** retrieved-and* reviewed by the inspectors, to verify that the documentation and reviews of the tests were adequat Several PT's were not adequately revised and performed. while Unit 2 was shutdown
.~
r
- '
(defueled).
When the PT's were performed to verify system operability prior to Unit startup, the acceptance criteria for the ISI program baseline data was generated during performance of the test resulting in the lack of acceptance criteria in certain test This items remains open pending inspection review of certain test data and 1 icensee evaluations and revie-ws. *performed on PT deviation (281/80-44-01) Implementation of Category A TMI. Task Action Pl an Requirements The inspector reviewed documentation,_, procedures and pl ant modifica-tions to verify that the Task Action Plan (TAP) requirements had been completed on Units 1 and Areas inspected included the following: TAP I.A.1.1 and I.A.1.2 were completed prior to the required dates for Units 1 and The_ STA's were. SRO's until August 1, 1980, when-degreed STA's were* trained and placed on shift; the Assistant Shift Supervisor. (SRO) is on shift to assist the Shift Supervisor in his administrative dutie TAP I.A.1.3 was reviewed and meets the shift manning and overtime guidance from* NR Administrative procedures ADM-3 and ADM-29 assure that appropriate personnel staff the shifts. The inspector noted that while the reactor operators (RO) must be present in.the control - room as defined in ADM-29, the senior reactor operator (SRO) may make brief visits to the control room annex outside the keycard controlled access doors to the actual control room without being relieve NRC clarification of this item, dated October 30, 1979, includes the Shift Supervisor Office adjacent to the control room as part of the control roo The inspector had no further questions at this tim TAP I.C.1 was reviewed for Unit 1 in IE inspection report 50-280/80-06; the emergency procedures for Unit 2 are similar and were reviewed prior to Unit startup on_ August 14, 198 TAP I.C.2 and I. relief and turnover-responsibilities and properly define was reviewed for Unit 1 and 2;- the shift procedures are adequate,. and the duties, authority of the Shift Supervisor are TAP I.C.4 has been met regarding control room responsibl ities and acces TAP II.B.3 items regarding postaccident sampling; appropriate sampling systems have been installed and procedures for sampling implemente The primary sample. procedures CP..;;66 and CP-66A will be* used until an in-line* system is designed and installe EPIP-7, Containment Atmosphere Sampling, is being revised to include more-* specific details and instruction The short-term items. are* close *
-y 4 TAP II.D.3 for Unit 1 was addressed in IE inspection report 50-280/80-0 Unit 2 has a similar acoustic monitoring system to monitor each safety and power-operated pressurizer relief* valv The-valve-* tailpipe temperature monftors -and limit switches are also operable~. An* additional source. of ~afety-grade motive power (eme~gency air} has: been: installed' on the* PORV' The J icensee has had difficulty-obtaining spare-parts for - the-acoustic:.
monftoring_ -system from tha-manufactures;: components we.re removed from'. the* defueled Unit r to maintain-the Unit 2 system operabl Vital-power* supp.lies:*the* relief and block va*lve-systems,.
h-....
TAP-IT.El.2 for* Unit 1 was inspected in report 50-280/80-01', and the AFW flow instrumentation_ was recalibrate The auxiliary feedwater flow instrumentation was modified in each unit to provide power supply diversity and* independenc No modification* -
. was.. requ i red:* for the AFW. in i ti at ion sys terns.*. TAP II.L3.l. for* the pressurizer heater power supplies did not require modific~tions since certain heater banks are. on the emergency power syste {See IE Report 50-280/80-01).
j.:
TAP* 11..F.2 resulted_ in the installation of two core cooling monitors {saturation meters) on each unit~
One of the two monitors on the operating Unit 2 is currently 1noperable while the 1 icensee awaits: parts and assistance* from the manufacture {Al so see-IE Report 50-280/80-01). TAP III.A.1.2 is addressed in the licensee's responses to the TAP and: in the* site* Emergency Plan; the interim emergency support centers have been establishe.
TAP III.D.1.1 led to implementation* of a program for testing systems outside the containment structure *. TAP III.D.3.3 and II.F~r-resulted in the installation of addi-tional pl ant radiation monitoring instrumentation and sy~tem The inspector detennined that. certa:in of the new high-range-accident monitoring instrumentation has not been periodically tested; the licensee is* revising* his surveillance procedures: to assure* that these fnstruments: are-periodically teste (.See IE Report. 50-280/80-01).., Plant Physical Protection The inspector verified the fol lowing by observation: Gates and doors in protected and vital area barriers were closed and* locked when not attende Isolation zor;ies described in the physical *security pl ans,. were not compromised or obstructe *:
i
- 5 Personnel were properly identified,. searched, authorized, badged and escorted as necessary for plant access contro,_
l I
-.. ~,"~~ '-.. -