IR 05000266/1981002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-266/81-02 & 50-301/81-02 on 810202-27.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Occupational Safety Verification,Monthly Maint Observation,Monthly Surveillance Observation & Receipt of New Fuel
ML19350C610
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  
Issue date: 03/05/1981
From: Guldemond W, Hague R, Konklin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19350C608 List:
References
50-266-81-02, 50-266-81-2, 50-301-81-02, 50-301-81-2, NUDOCS 8104060386
Download: ML19350C610 (7)


Text

.

'N db U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO.TllSSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

Report Nos. 50-266 J1-02; 50-301/81-02

. Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27 Licensce: Wisconsin Electric Power Company 231 West Michigan Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53203 Facility Name:

Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At:

Point Beach Site, Two Creeks, WI Inspection Conducted: February 2-6, 9-13, 17-20, and 23-27, 1981

/%&

Inspectors:

W. G ulde%Qid 3/Sffl. _

-[

"

R.

. HagGP 3/5/f/

. 1 4 6/+

Approved By:

J.

Konklin, Chief Jgdf.

ojects Section 2A Inspection Summary Inspection on Fchruary 2-6, 9-13, 17-20, and 23-27, 1981 (Report Nos. 50-266/81-02; 50-301/81-02)

Areas Inspected: Routine resident inspection of Operational Safety Verification, Monthly Maintenance Observation, Monthly Surveillance 0bservation, Followup on-Licensee Event Reports, IE Bulletin and Circular

- Followup, Review of Plant Observations, Design, Design Changes, and System Modifications, Organization and Administration, Followup on Headquarters Requests, and receipt of new fuel. The inspection involved a total of-220 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors including 38 inspector-hours on offshifts.

.

R_esults:

In the ten-areas inspected, no items of noncompliance were identified.

eso40so %

-

_

.

.

DETAI LS 1.

Persons Contacted

  • G. A. Reed, Manager, Nuclear Power Division J. J. Zach, Superintendent, Technical Services T. J. Koehler, Operations Superintendent J. C. Reisenbuechler, I&C Engineer W. J. Herrman, Maintenance Superintendent R.,S. Bredvad, Health Physicist
  • R. E. Link, Assistant to the Manager
  • F. A. Zeman, Office Supervisor The inspectors also talked with and interviewed members of the Operations, Maintenance, Health Physics, and Instrument and Control sections.
  • Denotes those present at the exit interview.

2..

Operational Safety Verification

.The. inspector. observed contral room operations, reviewed applicable logs andiconducted discussions with control room operators during the month of February. _The inspector verified the operability of selected emergency systems, reviewed tagout_ records and verified proper return

_.

'to ' service of affected components. Tours of both auxiliary reactor

-

buildings and turbine buildings were conducted to observe plant equipment conditions, including potential fire hazards, fluid leaks,

,

and excessive ~ vibrations and'to verify that maintenance requests had been initiated for equipment in_need of maintenance. The inspector by observation and direct interview. verified that the physical security plan was being': implemented in~accordance with the station security plan.

~

.The inspector observed plant housekeeping / cleanliness conditions and

,~

-verified implementation of radiation protection' controls..During the month of February, the inspector walked down the accessible portions (of-the' safety _ injection, containment spray, auxiliary feedwater, and emergency diesel-systems to verify operability. The inspector also witnessed portions of the radioactive waste system controls associated

,1with'radwaste shipments. This: included-loading'of the truck, initial and.finalisurveys, instructions.to driver, and completeness of asso-Eciated paperwork.

1These reviewsLand observations were-conducted to verify'that; facility-

_

operations were,in conformance with.the~ requirements established under.

technical 1 specifications,;10 CFR, and administrative procedures.

-No items of< noncompliance;were identified.

'

v

,

F

,I f

u l-s

~. ' 2 : -

,

+.

-.

,

~^

.2

-

-.

_

-

.

$

3.

Monthly Maintenance Observation-Station maintenance activities of safety related systems and com-ponents listed below were observed / reviewed to ascertain that they were conducted in accordance with approved procedures, regulatory guides and industry codes or standards and in conformance with technical specifications.

The following items were considered during this review:

the limiting conditions for operation were met while components or systems were removed from service; approvals were obtained prior to initiating the work; activities were accomplished using approved procedures and were

'

inspected as applicable; functional testing and/or calibrations were performed prior to returning components or systems to service; quality i

control records were maintained; activities were accomplished by qualified personnel; parts and materials used were properly certified; radiological controls were implemented; and, fire prevention controls were implemented.

Ninety-five (95) work requests were reviewed to determine status of outstanding jobs and to assure that priority is assigned to safety related equipment maintenance which may affect system performance.

Virtually allfwork requests for safety related equipment were assigned the highest priority.

The.following maintenance activities were observed / reviewed:

Pipe restraint modifications on the auxiliary feed system.

Installation of fire barrier penetration seals.

Limit switch adjustment on an RHR pump section valve.

No items of. noncompliance were identified.

Following completion of maintenance on the RlIR pump suction valve, the-inspector verified that these systems had been returned to service-properly.

4.

Monthly Surveillance Observation The inspector observed technical specifications required surveillance testing on the Containment spray pumps for Unit 1 and verified that testing-was performed in accordance with adequate procedures, that test instrumentation was calibrated, that limiting conditions for operation were met, that removal and restoration of the affected components were

, accomplished, that test results conformed with technical specifications and procedure-requirements and were reviewed by personnel other than

-

'the; individual directing lthe test, and that any deficiencies identified during the testing were properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate uanagement; personnel.

>

--3 -

j t

.

The inspector also witnessed portions of the following test activities:

Unit 1 Reactor Protective System, Unit : In-Core Flux Mapping.

No items of noncompliance were identified.

5.

Licensee Event Reports Followup Through direct observations, discussions with licensee personnel, and review of records, the following event reports were reviewed to determine that reportability requirements were fulfilled, immediate corrective action was accomplished, and corrective action to prevent recurrence had been accomplished in accordance with technical specifications.

50-266/80-015/0lT-0 Inoperable Snubber There were no LER's for Unit 2 to be closed out during the inspection period.

No items of noncompliance were identified.

6.

IE Bulletin Followup For the IE Bulletin listed below the inspector verified that the written response was within the time period stated in the bulletin, that 'the written response included the information required to be reported, that the written response included adequate corrective action commitments based on information presented in the bulletin and the licensee's response, that licensee management forwarded

. copies of the written response to'the appropriate onsite management representatives, that 'information discussed in the licensee's written response was~ accurate, and that corrective action taken by the licensee was as described in the written response.

IEB 80-01 Surveillance of Mechanical Snubbers

~7.

IE Circular' Followup

~

.No' circulars could be' closed out during the inrpection period. The inspectors informed the. licensee that they had yet to address IE Circular 80-14.

The licensee tyreed to review this circular in a future. supervisory. staff meetini 8.

Review of Plant Operations

.

-During the month' of February the inspector reviewed the following activities:

,

a.

Procurement The' inspector reviewed. procurement and storage activities to

-

ascertain whether the purchase of components, materials and sup-w-

-;4

.n

,

.

o plies used for safety related functions is in conformance with the licensee's approved QA program and implementing procedures; non-conforming items are segregated and marked accordingly; applicable preventive maintenance is performed; housekeeping and environmental requirements are met; and, limited shelf-life items are controlled.

The following components were inspected:

(1) Zurn Strainer Bearings (2) Carbon Steel Nuts (3) Welding Rod (4) Agastat Relays One of the Zurn Strainer Bearings was not tagged es falling under QA scope. This component was immediately removed from the storage area.

No items of noncompliance were identified.

b.

Training Yhe inspector. attended two of the licenree's operator requali-fication lecture series and verified that lesson plan objectives were met and that training was in accordance with the approved operator requalification program schedule and objectives.

9.

Receipt of New Fuel The inspector verified prior to receipt of new fuel that technically adequate, approved procedures were available-covering the receipt,

-inspection, and storage of new fuel; observed ~ receipt inspections and storage of new fuel elements for Unit 2 and verified these activities were performed in accordance with the licensee's procedures. No

' deficiencies;were discovered during the inspection of the fuel.

No' items'of noncompliance were identified.

10.

Design, Design Changes', and Modifications

The inspectors ' reviewed selected modifications not requiring' approval-by NRR to verify that the changes were reviewed and approved in

_

accordance with 10 CFR 50.59. -Also verified were_that the design

changes were reviewed and. approved in accordance with Technical l

Specifications and established QC/QA controlshthat the changes were I

.' controlled by established' procedures, that tests of the changes were conducted and the results reviewed, and that. drawings and procedures

-

were changed'as appropriate.

l LThe followiag modifications were reviewed: -Hard-Piping of'the Fill.

[ '.

'and Vent. System for:the:RCS; Radwaste Steam Supply Line High Point

'

f Vent;' Install. control switch for MOV-427 fat 1B42.

p

'No_' items;of' noncompliance were identified.

Ie

-.5

-

,

^

u-

.

D The licensee is revising the procedures for making system modifications to streamline the paperwork and document an increased scope of on and off-site reviews.

11.

Organization and Administration The inspector s reviewed the licensee's onsite organization and per-sonnel qualifications to verify that both were in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 15.6.

Personnel qualifications for all personnel shown on Figure 15.6.2-2 were reviewed. With the exception of the Health Physicist and the Radiochemical Engineer, the licensee has committed to meet the qualification requirements specified in ANSI N18.1-1971. The qualifications for the Health Physicist and Radiochemical Engineer are specified separately in the Technical Specifications.

No itees of noncompliance were identified.

The licensee is planning a major organizational change. Technical specification and administrative procedure changes to support the organizational change are being prepared.

12.

Followup on Headquarters Requests The inspectors, ir response to a request from Headquarters, tabulated the number of days of outage since October 1,1979, for both units attributable to NRC requirements. The results of this effort are tabulated in se attached table.

13.

Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)

throughout the month and at the conclusion of the inspection period and summarized the scope and findings of the inspection activities. The licensee acknowledged the findings.

6-

-

.

n n

n t

o no e

e ti e

oi n

h l

e nk nt nr it d

r i cea t

i e t c a

a r n b amr bt ae ce h

ib rd u ef rrnt rt d p t o t u oedd c. t ucie ue nas it ft an t

an tl orn

.i w yt-t s gi r

ch a v r e

ne P, 8 Mwi P.

a np cG l

e

.

.

ed e e

e wo M

/

arc n v

1

H n

t S ci( o e

g g

ycl I

l e idNi a

a ee ane1 ei i

i r

no t

t G

t t

tkf cat bb t

ur N

ut i sea

/nr u

u e

oil e

,

E rahd S

o o

l n r. P l S t u ue pogt p2 t

T ee. cwt ar r

t d

d m

ncnm G

X h v f

E ti gt.el g od e

e onieooy

/ P.

a

/

t nieie f e c

c cotl icr St

.

t r

r iset a

E eainnt d G

kl l unn rnt C o

o ot e cou R

f f

t at tat r A

aee eueewi T

t ruec b womN m

n b

r k eI d e a

0 d

U fhi nuod r e

O oJ etl ot pt e

8 e oamM eF y

h up

9 df enTd a

t L r i

t na d

nnl F

a eetG oh

1 i

O td gkh a/t st ei aee m

,

,

t etht y c

o nat rS o o E

ndit e

dt n

1 xet nt xb n

r ed eo e

a R

er

,poei

1 f

cy d

t U

dt uorot ens il T

eadt e cua r

r svp b se u

d tA t u vreo w

e e

aomd ar o

e b

b wr ond wi 0 8,8 cl dd eevrd eaeewwipeyn m

m pcae.u f 81 9

rvrt oot rri e

e e

req o

a i eenH paoie c

c goosi ge d

va l t uv e

e att muar r

t.

b sD D

t eqt e

d or oe qo sac g

.t rnec ot usdt eus b

l n

m ah s g

ore r

r o n n s r o. o e. u o o

u oay

.

N w

.isnd ai L

l Cd aiet h r a. sf f

gi ss gi

.

eti wt ease.we nt s nntC r

s s

i cegoicH eN n scdid

.e k

k l et nil eN

s oneo srn c n r r

epait ep Y

O o neiot rd r

no a a

usrt ause R

ehti pee i

ct ass t pct eim m

f n acf nh A

rt i

d scoa H c e

e eih rieit M

rc l l aiit unN e r

r r

t tf r M

ue l

e p

k wei k m U

i rms cp e e

esond eso S

et gr yt aves ns e e

hi reohi r h ne eh ovih n on S S

Td gpmTdf TudP p n e gT i ci y

y y

n n

r r

r o

o o

o o

tG t G t G t P. k

<1P. k s

s i

i, t

a/

a/

a/

n

/

e s

r a

mS mS mS e

.s N

d d

r n

r nr n8 tmt mti i

t O

a a

iro i roiro7i cd icd S

er er f ui f oif oi5 me me A

b g b g nft nft nft 0 mpe mpe E

ue ue o

c o

co e

usn as n ni o ni H

TD TD C re C rec r-s cp ep N

ib ib G

G C! s Cd sC P C r

C r

/

/

H nn H

nUi ou H ou rnWL t

NNtt Nt t NOI

S NOI I

-

-

-

)

)

-

)

-

)

99 n 9.9 n

0 00n n

77 o7 7 o

8 8 8 o o

E 99i9 9i 99)

)

) 99i i

GN 1 1 s1 1 s 1 1 e

e - 0 e1 1 s s

n g

,0 g08 g n

n AO

,n

.

8 a8 9 a,, e

- 0 e e,, e

,,a TI

,

US 66t6 0t 1 3t 8 9t 91 t 90t 08t ON 1 2 x23 x 1 2 u 21 u1 u1 3 x 89 x

,O E

91 E E

E E

O

,O

,9 rr

FT rr rr rr y

OX eeeeee eed r6d6 d eee

,e E

bb gb b g bb e a

e2t ebb g

,4 g

S mmamma mmc ul c scmma 91 a EH eet e et eer riryureet t

TO vvuvvu cco b rol goccu yyu A

ooOooO eeF e pF uuF eeO aaO D

NN( NN(

DD(

FA( J A,( DD(

MM(

.

N HE CI AM

%

EU

-

HN 1'

2

1

1 TT NI I N OU O

P

-