ML20138G471

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Acks Receipt of Response to NRC Seismic Questions About SONGS
ML20138G471
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 03/19/1997
From: Dwyer S
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Fields M
NRC
Shared Package
ML20138G450 List:
References
NUDOCS 9705060307
Download: ML20138G471 (1)


Text

.- . .- . . ~ - . - . . . . . - .. . - . ~ - - - . - - - . , - . -- . - . . . .

l l

Froms, ' stephen dwyer <smd@wdc. net >

i To: WND2.WNP3 (mbf1) .,

Date: 3/19/97 11:01pm l

Subject:

SCE Response To NRC Seismic Questions I

Dear Mr. Fields,

i I just recieved from SCE their response to NRC Seismic Questions about SONGS.

1. Thank you, or whoever was responsible for taking this action.

It shows that NRC trying to get to the bottom of this very difficult i situation and assess these serious risks.  ;

2. Very good questions, and an excellent start. Who should I discuss these l questions with? Could I get a copy of NRC's letter to SCE?

I have a brief rebuttal to send to the questioner et al. 1

3. I am preparing a draft of the introduction to my seismic report.

J Should I send you this draft, or wait till the report is complete?

4. This draft raises a number of points that could be the basis of further questions to SCE,-while work continues on the report.
5. Can I submit questions for your consideration to ask SCE? ,

l

6. Can I split the petition into two parts. One dealing with the SFP problem and the other dealing with SONGS retrofitting or shutdown?

Sincerely, Stephen Dwyer smdswdc. net I

i i

i 9705060307 970501 PDR ADOCK 05000206 H PDR