ML17325B589

Rev 5 to PMP 7200.RST.004, Expanded Sys Readiness Review Program.

ML17325B589
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	05/07/1999
From:	FINISSI M, LARSON R E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17325B588	List: ML17325B587 ML17325B589 ML17325B590
References
PMP-7200.RST., PMP-7200.RST.00, NUDOCS 9905170136
Download: ML17325B589 (140)

Text

PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.SPage1of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMInformation RobertE.LarsonnterMichaelFinissiwnerEffective Date:NEogtuzantrgantzatton TABLEOFCONTENTS1PURPOSEANDSCOPEo~esses~esse~~~~~~oo~~~~~~~~~~ooooooo~~so32DEFIMTIONS ANDABBREVIATIONS

................

I~~063RESPONSIBILITIES o~~oo~~~~~oooo~oo~~~~~~~~~~ooooooo.~o~'o~~~.104DETAILS-~~~oo~~~~ooooe~~oeooo~~ooooooooo

~~~~~~~~oo~~oooo~~eooo~~ooooooo~~~~eoo~~~~ooooooeooo-13 4.14.24.34.44.54.6ScopeAndSelection OfSystemsForExpandedSystemReadiness Review...'......

13UseOfTheSystemAssessment Matrix,SIDS,AndTheAssessment DataBase....14Phase1-InitialExpandedSystemReadiness Review...........~.....................

16Phase2-RestartActivities Monitoring..........

...........................

27Phase3-FinalExpandedSystemReadiness Review......................

32Phase4-StartupAndPowerA.,ensiOn.................'..............................

374~7Reports......,...,........~..........,...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~41FINALCONDITIONS eoosoooooeooo~ooooooeeoo~eoo~~~~oe~~oooo~~~ooeooooooeoooooooooooooooooooeoooo~425REFERENCES

~~oooooooooooooo~oooooo~~~~ooeooooooo~ooooooooeooooooo~~~~oooeoooo~eooooooo~oo~~~oo~426ATTACHMENT 1SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWBOARD(SRRB)CHARTER..

44ATTACHMENT 221LEVEL1SYSTEMSINCLUDEDINTHEPREVIOUSSYSTEMADINESS~RE~VIEW esses'oooooeooooooooooooooooooo

~~eoooooooooooooeoooooo

~ooooooooo

~~46REATTACHMENT 3RATIONALE FORSELECTION LEVEL1SYSTEMSFOREXPANDEDADINESSREVIEWoo~ooeooooooeoo

~so~~eoo~~~sooooosoooooeooooooooooooooooeo.

~~~oo~~~o48REATTACHMENT 4EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWLEVEL1SYSTEMS~ooooooe~oooo~oooo~~osooo~ooooooooooo

~ooooooooeooeooosoo

~~~oooooooe~~ooooe~ooooo~~~~~~o49ATTACHMENT 5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWTRAININGQUIREMENTS ooo~oooooooooooooeoooo

~ooeoeoooooooo

~ooooooeeoooooooooooooooooo

~os~oo~ooo51REATTACHMENT 6SYSTEM'READINESS REVIEWDOCUMENTATION ANDDATAOURCESoooooo

~ooooooosoeooooooooooooeeoooooooooeoooooooooooooooooooe

~eooooooooooooeo

~~esses52Sf9905170136 9q0507PDRADOCK050003i5PPDR

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage2of101ATTACHMENT 7SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM(SYSTEMWALKDOWNUIDELINES) o~~~~oo~~oo~oeoooooooo

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oo~~oo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o54GATTACHMENT 8CRITERIAFORWORKINCLUDEDINRESTARTSCOPE....

62ATTACHMENT 9PHASE2OUTAGESCOPEAPPROVALPROCESS...............

69ATTACHMENT 10RESTARTREQUIREDSCOPEDEFERRALFORM.............

70ATTACHMENT 11EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWCLARIFICATION SHEET~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~oe~~~~~~~oo~eo~oo~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e~~o~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~71ATTACHMENT 12INITIALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORT~~ee~ee~~e~~~e~oeeo~e~o~~e~~~~o~e~o~e~e~o~o~e~e~~e~~~~e~~e~~~~o~e~oo~~o~~~~e~e~e~~~~72ATTACHMENT 13FINALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORT~~oooooo~eoooo~oooooooo~~~oo~~~oooooooooooo

~~oo~eo~~~~~~~~~ooooooo~ooeoo~~~~oooooo~~75ATTACHMENT 14EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWSINTEGRATED ULTSoooooooeooooo

~oo~ooooooooooooooooeooooooooooooooooo

~~oo~~~~~~~~~~oooooo~~~ooooo~oo~~78RESATTACHMENT 15SYSTEMWALKDOWNREPORT.....................................

83ATTACHMENT 16SYSTEMREADINESS AFFIRMATION REPORT................

84FIGURE1SYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICS........................

85FIGURE2SYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXEXA'MPLE-AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM~~~~oooooo~~~~~~~~~oooooo~~oo~~ooee~~oooo~oooo~oo~~oooooooooo

~~oooo~ooo~oo~~~~~~~~oo95FIGURE3READINESS REVIEWATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT FORM..............100 FIGURE4SAMPLECOMPLETED READINESS REVIEWATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT

.FORM~oo~~~~~ooo~~o'o~~ooooooooooooooooooooooooeoo

~oo~oooeoooooooooooo

~oo~~~oo~~oooooooeo101 Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage3of1011PURPOSEANDSCOPE[Ref.6.8]1.1ThepurposeofthisdocumentistodefinetheExpandedSystemReadiness Review(ESRR)Programandprovideguidanceinevaluating anddetermining systemrestartreadiness fortheCookplant.Thisdocumentalsodescribes theprocessforscopingworkitemsaseitherrequiredornotrequiredtosupportunitrestart.Theseguidelines supportstartupfromthecurrentextendedoutageinsupportofReference 6.1.1.2Severalindependent reviews,including aselfassessment oftheAuxiliary Feedwater

'ystemandanindependent Engineering IssuesReviewGroupreportidentified vulnerabilities inthepreservation oftheDesignandLicensing Basisthatsuggested aneedforamorerigorousreviewofoverallsystemreadiness, 1.3TheESRRwillprovidereasonable assurance that:~theplantsystemsarecapableofmeetingtheirsafetyandaccidentmitigation functions asdefinedintheirdesignandlicensing bases[Ref.6.11],and~inconjunction withotherongoingimprovement programsandresolution ofidentified issues,thattheplantismodified, tested,operatedandmaintained consistent withthedesignandlicensing bases.[Ref.6.12]1.4TheExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewconsistsoffourphasesPhase1:InitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewPhase2:RestartActivities Monitoring Phase3:FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewPhase4:StartupandPowerAscension 1.4.1Phase1istoincludethefollowing:

a.Formation andtrainingofsystemteamsforreadiness reviewusingrepresentatives fromvariousstationdepartments.

b.Areviewofsystemdesignandlicensebasisdocumentation.

c.Reviewofsafetyandaccidentmitigation functions foreachsystem.d.Verification, inconjunction withotherongoingimprovement programsandresolution ofidentified issues,thattheplantismodified, tested,operatedandmaintained consistent withthedesignandlicensing bases.

Information PMP7200.RST.004

.Rev.5Page4of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMe.Evaluation oftheextentofcondition foridentified problemsandidentification ofpotential programmatic orgenericissues.Performance ofmulti-disciplined systemwalkdowns.

Evaluation ofopenitemsintheSystemIndexedDataBaseSystem(SIDS)(seedefinitions) againsttheRestartScreening Criteria.

NOTE:ThePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC)ismakingatransition tobeknownasPlantOperations ReviewCommittee (PORC).Thisdocumentusestheacronym,PORC,butdocuments suchastheUFSARandTechnical Specifications mayusePNSRCthatrepresents thesamegroup.h.Presentation oftheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport'otheSystemReadiness ReviewBoard(SRRB)andthePlantOperations ReviewCommittee (PORC)./Beginscheduling restartworkintheRestartSchedule.

1.4.2Phase2istoincludethefollowing:

aoContinued reviewofopencorrective actionitemsthroughclosure.b.Continued evaluation ofemergentactionitemsforunitrestartagainsttheRestartScreening Criteria.

C.Scheduling ofrestartworkintotheappropriate SystemWorkWindow.d.Monitoring offield.work,including presenceatthejobsite,whenappropriate.

e.Development ofSystemTestPlans.Preparation forSystemWindowclosureandtheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness Reviews.g.Completion ofregularly scheduled walkdowns bytheSystemManager(Seedefinitions).

h.Management ofworkclosurethroughuseofperformance indicators andpriorities.

UpdateoftheSIDSdatabase,astheSystemManagerevaluates emergentandopenitems.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage5of1011.4.3Phase3istoincludethefollowing:

a...FinalSystemReadiness Walkdowncompleted bytheSystemManagerandanassignedOperations representative.

b.Presentation oftheFinalSystemReadiness Report,priortorestart,totheSRRBandPORCbytheassignedoperations representative andtheSystemManager.c.Reviewworkthatisnotcompletepriortorestartandreviewtheaggregate impactofdeferredwork.d.FinalizetheSystemTestPlans.e.SystemManagerwilldevelopperformance monitoring baselineforsystemperformance trackingandtrending1.4APhase4istoincludethefollowing:

a.Designated testresultsidentified bytheTestReviewBoard(TRB).b.SystemManagerwillimplement performance monitoring baselineforsystemperformance trackingandtrending.

c.SystemManagerwillmonitoranynewcorrective maintenance activities orcondition reports,andcontinuously monitorsystemreadiness.

d.Completion ofSystemReadiness Affirmation.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage6of1012DEFINITIONS ANDABBREVIATIONS TermSystemAssessment MatrixAttribute TopicReviewAreaDiscrepancy GenericIssueAssessment DataBaseMeaningThematrixconsistsofattributes (rows)andtopicreviewareas(columns) thatdefinethescopeoftheworkandwhencompleted providesthesummarybasisoftheconclusions oftheExpandedSystemReadiness Review.Figure1providestheAssessment MatrixForm.Figure2providesasamplecompleted assessment matrix.Keysystemparameters, including systemsafetyandaccidentmitigation functions, thatwillbeevaluated againstvarioustopicreviewareas.Theattributes makeuptherowsofthematrixandareselectedbytheExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewTeamsusingguidanceprovidedinSection4.3.4.Consistsofdocuments andsourcesofinformation inthefollowing areas:Design,Licensing, Operations, Maintenance, Surveillance, PhysicalPlant,andPrograms, Processes andProcedures.

Thereviewareasmakeupthecolumnsoftheassessment matrix.TheaddendumtoFigure1providesguidanceontheevaluation tobeperformed foreachtopicarea.Afindinggenerated asaresultofanactivityperformed inaccordance withthisprocedure whichindicates apotential needforcorrective actionorprocessimprovement.

Discrepancies identified duringtheExpandedSystemReadiness Reviewaredocumented viaCondition Reports(CRs)intheCookPlantCorrective ActionProgram(CAP)orasActionRequestsintheWorkControlSystem(NPM).ACondition ReportshallbeissuedforanyitemthatfallswithinthescopeoftheCorrective ActionProgram.Discrepancies identified inseveralsystemsforthesametopic..reviewareathatpotentially identifyaprocessorprogrammatic problem..

ThedatabaseusedtodocumentExpandedSystemReadiness Reviewassessments, confirming consistent useofdesignandlicensing information, andidentifying discrepancies.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage7of1012DEFINITIONS ANDABBREVIATIONS (Continued)

TermSystemIndexedDataBaseSystemCurrentLicensing BasisDesignBasis(asDefinedby10CFR50.2)MeaningTheSIDSdatabaseisusedtotrackopenitemsidentified asrequiredforrestart.Openitemsinthisdatabaseincludeopenitemsfromexistingplantdatasources,anddiscrepancies identified bytheExpandedSystemReadiness Review.Thus,discrepancies identified duringtheExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewgenerateentriesintheSIDSDatabase.

ThesetofNRCinformation applicable toaspecificplantandalicensee's writtencommitments forensuringcompliance with,andoperating withinapplicable NRCrequirements andtheplantspecificdesignbasis,including allmodifications andadditions tosuchcommitments overthelifeofthelicense,thataredocketedandineffect.TheCLBincludesNRCregulations contained in10CFRParts2,19,20,21,26,30,40,50,51,54,55,70,72,73,100andappendices thereto:Orders,LicenseConditions, Exemptions, andTechnical Specifications (TSs).Italsoincludestheplantspecificdesignbasisinformation definedin10CFR50.2asdocumented inthemostrecentUFSARasrequiredby10CFR50.71andNRCcommitments remaining ineffectthatweremadeindocketedlicensing correspondence suchasresponses toNRCBulletins, GenericLettersandenforcement actions,aswellaslicenseecommitments documented intheNRCSafetyEvaluations orLicenseeEventReports.Information thatidentifies thespecificfunctions tobeperformed byastructure, systemorcomponent ofafacilityandthespecificvaluesorrangeofvalueschosenforcontrolling parameters asreference boundsfordesign.These.valuesmaybe(1)restraints derivedfromgenerally acceptedstate-of-the-art practices forachieving functional goalsor(2)requirements derivedfromanalysis(basedoncalculations and/orexperiments) oftheeffectofapostulated accidentforwhichastructure, systemorcomponent mustmeetfunctional goals.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage8of1012DEFINITIONS ANDABBREVIATIONS (Continued)

TermEngineering DesignBasisVerticalSliceReviewHorizontal SliceReviewSystemReadiness ReviewBoard(SRRB)SystemManagerSystemManager"APPROVE" MeaningTheEngineering DesignBasisistheentiresetofdesign-restraints thatareimplemented, including (1)thosethatarepartofthecurrentlicensing basis,and(2)thosethatarenotpartofthecurrentlicensing basis,butareimplemented toachievecertain.economies ofoperation, maintenance, procurement, installation, orconstruction.

(SeeReference 6.2forfurtherclarification, including definitions ofDesignBasisDocument, DesignRequirements andDesignOutputDocument).

Astructured reviewapproachderivedfromtheSafetySystemFunctionInspection (SSFI)methodology thatallowsanassessment ofspecificaspectsoftheplantphysicalconfiguration andoperation againstselectedaspectsoftheplantlicensing anddesignbasis.ThescopeoftheESRRverticalslicereviewforeachsystemisdefinedbytheSystemAssessment Matrix.Areviewofaprogrammatic issueorplantdocuments acrossmultipleplantsystems,suchasareviewoftheUFSAR,evaluation ofAppendixRfireprotection requirements, reviewandupgradeofcalculations, etc.Aboardofpersonnel conducting businessinaccordance withtheCharterinAttachment 1.TheleaderoftheExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewTeamandengineering ownerofassignedsystemsforpurposesofthisprocedure.

Indicates thefactthattheSystemManagerhasreviewedthescope(i.e.,thescreening oftheitemasrequiredornotrequiredtosupportunitrestart)ofaniteminSIDSandtheassociated commentsthatjustifytheitem'sscope.This"APPROVAL" isdenotedintheInitialSystemManagerApprovalboxinSIDSandisusedbytheSystemManagerduringallPhasesfornewitemsinSIDS,meaningthattheSystemManageragreeswiththescopeandjustification.

fg%'\,

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage9of1012DEFINITIONS ANDABBREVIATIONS (Continued)

TermSystemManager"CONCUR"SystemManager"EXCEPT"SystemManager"PostRestartDeferred" SystemManager"RestartRequiredDeferred" MeaningDuringPhases3and4,"CONCURRENCE" isdenotedintheFinalSystemManagerApprovalboxinSIDSandisusedbytheSystemManagertomeanthatrestartitems,orpostrestartitemsthatarenotincludedintheaggregate impact,havebeencompleted tothesatisfaction oftheSystemManager.Indicates thatthisRestartscopedSIDSitemisnotcompleteandremainsanexception torestart(i.e.,completion oftheitemstillneededtoenterthemodeidentified inthemoderestraint boxinSIDS).This"EXCEPTION" isdenotedintheFinalSystemManagerApprovalboxinSIDSandisusedbytheSystemManagerduring.Phases3and4.Denotedonitemsassociated withacomponent thathas(2)or.morepostrestartdeferreditems,excluding PMpostrestartitems.Denotedonitemswithdeferredscopethatwereinitially

approved, asrestartrequired.

Theseitemsmustbeaccompanied byaRestartRequiredScopeDeferralForm(Attachment 10).

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage10of1013RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1TheDirectorofEngineering Restartisresponsible foroverseeing Engineering preparations forrestart,fortheESRRProgramand,whenneeded,forchairingtheSystemReadiness ReviewBoard;ensuringthattherequisite membersareinattendance.

3.2TheSystemReadiness ReviewManagerisresponsible for:3.2.1ExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewProgramcontentandoversight.

3.2.2Determination ofthescopeofthereviewforESRRsystems.3.2.3Ensuringadequatetrainingandlogistics supportisprovidedtoparticipating'eam membersj3.2.4Reviewing theresultsoftheindividual systemreadiness reviews,identifying anygeneric.concernsanddefiningprogranunatic corrective action(ifany).3.2.5Reviewing theattribute selection andthecorresponding Assessment Matrixforeachsystem(Figure1).3.2.6Maintaining andrevisingthisprocedure ontheExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewProgram,annotating thechangesmade,andobtaining appropriate approvals.

3.2.7OwnsandmanagestheSIDSDatabase3.3TheSystemEngineering Managerisresponsible fortheassignment ofSystemManagerstosystemrbeing

reviewed, andforproviding additional oversight fortheESRRProgram.3ATheSystemEngineering Supervisors areresponsible forsupervision andeffective implementation oftheExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewProgramthroughactivecoaching, counseling andoversight oftheSystemManager.TheSystemEngineering Supervisors jointlyowntheESRRresultswiththeSystemManagers.

3.5TheExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewProgramCoordinator isresponsible for:3.5.1ExpandedSystemReadiness Reviewprogramdevelopment andimplementation.

3.5,2Scheduleandcoordination Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage11of1013.5.3Reviewing andrecommending forapprovaltheattribute selection andthecorresponding Assessment Matrixforeachsystem.3.5.4ReviewtheAssessment DataBasetoidentifygenericissuesandtrends.3.6TheAssessment DataBaseCoordinator isresponsible for:3.6.1AssuringthattheAssessment DataBaseisoperational andavailable totheESRRteams.3.6.2Maintaining thedataintheAssessment DataBaseandproviding status.and summaryreportsregarding theESRR.3.7TheSIDSDataBaseCoordinator isresponsible for:3.7.1AssuringthattheSIDSDataBaseisoperational andavailable totheESRR.teams,andtoprogramownersandfunctional areamanagers(ordesignees).

3.7.2Makinganyrequiredchangesorimprovements totheSIDSDataBase.3.7.3EnsuringthatitemsrequiredtobescopedareenteredintotheSIDSDataBase.3.7.4Providing andmaintaining thequalityofSIDSreports.3.8SystemManagersareresponsible for:3.8.1Overallsystemhealthandperformance.

3.8.2Organizing andleadingeachESRRTeam.TheTeamwillbecomposedof'henecessary multi-discipline resources toconductPhase1oftheExpandedSystemRea'diness Reviews.TheSystemTeamswillincludethefollowing:

a.SystemManagerb.Operations Representative c.DesignEngineering Representative d.Maintenance Representative.

e.Licensing Representative f.Outsidemember(s) withvariedindustryexperience Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page12of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM3.8.3Coordinating teamrequestsforsystemdesignandlicensing basisdocumentation fromtheappropriate sources.3.8.4Performing Phases1,2,and3,andsupporting Phase4oftheESRR.3.8.5Coordinating preparation oftheESRRInitialandFinalReports,andpresenting thesereportstotheSRRBandPORC.3.8.6Assembling ESRRreviewresultsandrestartactionitemsintotheSIDSDatabasefortracking.

3.8.7Maintaining astatusofrestartactionitemsandsubmitting statusupdatestoplantmanagement asrequired.

3.8.8Coordinating andconducting system.walkdowns withappropriate teammembers.3.8.9Organizing andleadingeachworkwindowteam(seeSection4.4.2b.1).

3.9TheExpandedSystem'Readiness ReviewTeamsareresponsible for:3.9.1Identifying attributes appropriate totheirspecificsystemforassessment.

3.9.23.9.3Selecting topicareasappropriate totheidentified attributes.

Performing systemattribute checksandwalkdowns anddocumenting theresults,including anynoteddiscrepancies, intheassessment database.3.9.4Reviewing itemsintheSIDSdatabaseandscopingtheitemsasdiscussed insection4,3.12.3.9.5Enteringthedeficiencies intheCookPlantCorrective ActionProgramand/orWorkControlSystemasappropriate.

3.9.6Providing assistance totheSystemManagerasrequired.

3.10TheOperations Managerisresponsible forassigning appropriate Operations representatives tosupporttheESRRProgram.3.11TheDirectorofRegulatory Affairsisresponsible forassigning appropriate Licensing representatives tosupporttheESRRProgram.3.12TheMaintenance Managerisresponsible forassigning appropriate maintenance representatives tosupporttheESRRProgram.

I,ik.$g Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage13of1013.13TheDesignEngineering Directorisresponsible forassigning appropriate DesignEngineering representatives tosupporttheESRRProgram.3.14TheSRRBw'illperformmanagement oversight andassessment oftheExpanded=-SystemReadiness ReviewProgramandwillbethefinalapprovalauthority overworkitemscreening.

TheSRRBwillperformactivities applicable tothisprocedure, including approvaloftheSystemAssessment Matrices.

TheSRRBCharterisincludedinAttachment l.AnexpectedproductoftheSRRBoversight isimprovedconsistency andtechnical depthoftheESRRresults.3.15ThePORCisresponsible toprovideacross-discipline oversight oftheESRRProgrambyreviewing ESRRreportsforeachsystemandtheIntegrated Readiness ReviewReport.3.16TheOutageScopeManagement Team(OSMT)willreviewemergentworkitemsfollowing Phase1todetermine whetherornottheyarerequiredtosupportUnitrestart.4DETAILS4.1ScopeAndSelection OfSystemsForExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewNOTE:Theterm"TBDL"whenusedinthisdocumentreferstodetailToBeDeveloped Laterandincorporated inasubsequent revisiontothisdocumentorinotherdocuments.

4.1.1Previously, aplantSystemReadiness Reviewwasconducted asdiscussed inReference 6.3.Agradedapproachwasusedinperforming theprevioussystemreadiness reviews,withhigh-risk systemsreceiving morethoroughreviews.Theprevioussystemreadiness reviewswerebrokendownintothreelevels-with.

thefollowing attributes:

a.Level1Systems.1.Risk-significant Maintenance Rulesystems2.Someimportant non-risksignificant standbymaintenance rulesystemsb.Level2Systems1.Remaining non-risksignificant Maintenance Rulesystemsc.Level3Systems Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage14of1011.Non-Maintenance Rulesystemsthatsupportpowergeneration 2.Systemsthatarerequiredforplantoperation, areeasilymonitored inservice,andpresentlittleornochallenge tosafety4.1.2The21Level1systemsincludedinthepreviousSystemReadiness ReviewarelistedinAttachment 2.4.1.3Subsequent tothecompletion ofthepreviousSystemReadiness Review,severalindependent reviewswereconducted, including aSafetySystemFunctional Inspection (SSFI)oftheAuxiliary Feedwater System(Reference 6.4)andanEngineering IssuesReviewGroupfinalreport(Reference 6.5).Thesereviewsidentified vulnerabilities withrespecttothescopeofsystemsreviewedduringthepreviousSystemReadiness Review,additional systemdesignbasisandlicensing basisissues,andweaknesses inengineering programsandprocesses.

4.1.4Theclassification ofLevel1,2,and3systemsutilizedduringthepreviously performed systemreadiness reviewswerebasedsolelyonMaintenance Ruleinput.TheLevel1systemswereMaintenance RuleRisk'ignificant systems.Level2systemswerenon-risksignificant systems,butsystemsthatwerestillincludedinthescopeoftheMaintenance Rule.Level3systemsweresystemsthatwerenotincludedinthescopeoftheMaintenance Rule.4.1.5Theclassification ofLevel1and2systemsutilizedduringtheESRRProgramisbasedonMaintenance Ruleinput,systemsrequiredforsafeshutdown, significant attendant/support systems,andsystemsidentified bytheSystemEngineering Managerthathaveexperienced anabnormalamountofcorrective maintenance.

Thebasisfortheselection ofLevel1systemsisfoundinAttachment 3.4.1.6ExpandedSystemReadiness Reviewsunderthisprocedure willbeconducted onallofthepreviousLevel1systems,plusadditional systemsthatweredetermined towarrantanExpandedSystemReadiness Review(RefertoAttachment 4).ExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewsforthenewLevel2Systemswillbeaddressed inaseparateprocedure.

4.2UseOfTheSystemAssessment Matrix,SIDS,AndTheAssessment DataBase4.2.1TheESRRemploysaverticalsliceapproachderivedfromthemethodology ofaSafetySystemFunctional Inspection (SSFI).Thisapproachevaluates systemsafetyimportant tosafeoperation andaccidentmitigation functions (Attributes) againstplantconfiguration anddesign,licensing, operations andmaintenance documents (TopicAreas).

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage15of1014.2.2Thescopeoftheverticalslicereviewperformed onasystemisshowninaSystemAssessment Matrix.Thesystemattributes selectedforeachsystem'sreviewformtherowsofthismatrix,asfurtherdiscussed insection4.3.4.Thesourcesofinformation ortopicareasthatareincludedintheverticalsliceformthecolumnsofthematrix.4.2.3TheSystemManager,accompanied bythecognizant SystemEngineering Supervisor, presentsadescription ofthesystemscopeandthesystemspecificAssessment MatrixtotheSRRBforapproval.

ThishelpstheSRRBascertain thatattributes areappropriate.

4.2;4Therequirements associated witheachoftheattributes areevaluated againstspecifictopicareasorsourcesofinformation.

4.2.5Theassessments includecomparison,and evaluation ofdocuments aswellasobservations ofplantcondition andconfiguration duringsystemwalkdowns.

TheESRRwillemphasize thoseattributes, topicareasandactivities necessary tosatisfytheprogrampurpose.4.2.6Theresultsaredocumented usingAttribute Assessment Forms(Figure3)intheAssessment DataBase.Discrepancies areenteredintotheCookPlantCorrective ActionProgramand/orWorkControlSystem(NPM).Assessment DataBasemanipulation andreporting capabilities assistinreporting, trackingandidentification ofgenericissuesandtrends.4.2.7Byassessing theresultsforalltopicareasacrossallthesystemsreviewed, theESRRcanassistindetermining theextentofcondition ofvulnerabilities inplantprogramsandprocesses alreadyidentified bypreviousinspections andreviews(e.g.,References 6.4and6.5).TheESRRwillalsobeusedtoidentifyotherpotential vulnerabilities andthepotential needforfurtherimprovement inplantprocesses andprograms.

4.2.8Insummary,theESRRsresultinaverticalsliceevaluation ofselecteddesignandlicensing basesfortheESRRsystems.Theseevaluations donotguarantee thatfutureexternalorinternalassessments willnotuncoveradditional problemreviews.However,inconjunction withotherongoinghorizontal slicerestartprogramsatCookPlantandresolution ofissuesthatarerecommended forrestart,theESRRsprovidereasonable assurance thatkeysystemsarecapableofmeetingtheirsafetyandaccidentmitigation functions asdefinedintheirdesignandlicensing basis.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage16of1014.2.9TheSIDSDataBaseisbeingusedtotrackitemsbeingevaluated, scopedandjustified aseitherRestartorPostRestartforbothUnits.Thisdatabaseisthecentralrepository forsuchitems.SIDSwillgeneratereportslistingRestartandPostRestartitemsforSRRBandPORCapproval.

Thisdatabasewillbemanagedandcontrolled bytheSystemManagerforhisparticular system(s).

4.3Phase1-InitialExpandedSystemReadiness Review4.3.1ExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewTeamFormation a.TheSystemEngineering ManagerwillassignaSystemManagertoeachoftheExpandedSystemReadiness Reviewteams.b.TheSystemManagerwillleadtheExpandedSystemReadiness Review'eam comprised ofalicensedmemberfromOperations andmembers..fromDesignEngineering, Maintenance, Licensing, andoutsidememberswithstrongindustryexperience; 4.3.2Traininga.Priortoperforming thereviews,trainingwillbeconducted fortheAEPSystemManagersandtheESRRTeammembersonExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewProgramknowledge andskillneeds.Theseneedsaredefined-inAttachment 5.4.3.3b.ThetrainingfortheAEPSystemManagersandtheESRRTeamswasdetermined basedonanevaluation ofthetaskstobeperformed andlessonslearnedformtheoriginalSystemReadiness Reviews,theoriginalSystemEngineering ReviewBoard,andpreviously performed engineering andprogrammatic assessments.

AReviewDesignandLicensing BasisDocumentation a.TheESRRTeamshallbecomefamiliarwiththedesignandlicensing basisofthesystemtogainanunderstanding ofthesystemfunctional andsafetyrequirements undernormaloperating andaccidentconditions.

Thedesignandlicensebasisdocumentation listedinAttachment 6willbeavailable totheESRRTeam.b.Accesstothefollowing willbeprovidedtotheESRRTeams.1.EQinformation 2.AppendixRinformation Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage17of1013.StationBlackoutinformation 4.ISI/ISTProgramInformation 5;Seismicqualification information 6.Electrical designcriteria(separation, etc.)7.Maintenance RuleProgramInformation 8.Individual PlantExamination (IPE)Results9.HighEnergyLineBreakProgram'Information 10.GenericLettersGL89-13,GL83-28,GL96-01,andresponses thereto.11.GenericLetterGL89-10programinformation.

12.GenericLetterGL96-06information (asavailable) 13.LER97-021andassociated singlefailurecommitments 14.1998AFWSSFIReport15.1998Containment SpraySSFIReport16.Engineering IssuesReviewGroupReport(Reference 6.5)c.Theexpectation isthattheSystemManagerwillreviewtheaboveinformation todetermine itsimpactonhissystem.d.Licensing willprovidetheresultsofareviewoflicensing commitments onasystembasis.4.3.4DefineSystemSpecificAttributes a.Duringthereviewandevaluation ofdesignandlicensing information, eachESRRTeamwilldevelopalistofattributes tobeincludedintheassessment ontheSystemAssessment Matrix.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage18of101b.Attributes willbeselectedbyathoroughreviewofthedesignand,licensing basistoidentifythesystemsafetyandaccidentmitigation functions.

Additional functional requirements ofthesystemandcriticalcomponents mayalsobeselected.

Information fromtheLicensing ReviewProgramwillbeconsidered aswillPRAinsightsonrisksignificant components andfunctions.

Functionality ofattendant/support systemsandimportant passiveequipment (e.g.,tanks,bladders, strainers) willalsobeconsidered inselection ofsystemattributes.

Genericrequirements suchasStationBlackout, EQ,AppendixR,etc.willalsobeselectedassystemattributes whenappropriate.

Adetailedexampleofandsomerequirements forattribute selection andtheirbasesareprovidedintheFigure2addendum.

4.3.5Establish ScopeofReviewa.EachESRRTeamwillperformaverticalslicereviewofitsassignedsystembyevaluating thesystemandcommonattributes againstspecifictopicreviewareasasdocumented inthesystemAssessment Matrix.Thetopicareastobeassessedforeachattribute willbedefinedinaninitialSystemAssessment MatrixatthestartoftheESRR,takingintoaccounttheresultsofpreviousevaluations atCookPlant.ThisinitialSystemAssessment Matrixwillbereviewedandrecommended bytheESRRProgramCoordinator orManagerandtheNuclearLicensing ManagerorDirectorofRegulatory Affairs,andapprovedbytheSRRB.ChangesmadeinresponsetoSRRBcommentsneednotbere-reviewed bytheotherpartieswhopreviously reviewedthematrix.Thesereviewsandapprovals willbebasedonthematrixandothersupporting materialasdictatedbytheboard.Typically, thisinformation willconsistof:~Alistingofthesystemsafetyandaccidentmitigation functions

~Thematrixitself,showingtheattributes chosenandthetopicstobereviewedforeach~Amarked-up systemflowdiagramorschematic depicting systemboundaries

<<u~4 Information PNIP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage19of101~Aseparateworddescription'of systemphysicalboundaries andfunctional boundaries.

Functional boundaries arethoseinterfaces withothersystemsortheenvironment thatmustbeproperinorderforthesystemtofunctionasdesigned.

Anexamplewouldbeacircuitbreakerinanon-safety relatedsystemthatmustopentoprotectaconnected safety-related systemiftheaon-safety relatedsystemincursafault.~Adescription oftheattributes chosenandthesub-attributes ofeachwhichtheteamintendstopursue.b.TheSystemAssessment MatrixwillbeusedbyeachESRRteamasa"guideline toensureadequatecoverageoftopicareasandallattributes.

c.Basedontheadditional knowledge andunderstanding gainedinthecourseofthereview,specifically including theresultsofthereviewoflicensing commitments, actualcoverageofspecifictopicareasforparticular attributes mayexpandanddeviatefromtheinitialmatrix,providedthatcoverageofappropriate topicareasandallattributes ismaintained.

Ifongoinglicensing orESRR'reviews identifytheneedtoadd,attributes totheassessment matrix,theseadditions willbeapprovedbytheESRRManagerortheESRRProgramCoordinator.

Suchadditions willbecommunicated inatimelymannerbetweenLicensing aadtheESRRManager.Actualcoveragewillbedocumented inthefinalSystemAssessment Matrix,whichwillbereviewedbytheESRRProgramManagerorProgramCoordinator andwillbeincludedintheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness Reviewreport."4.3.6ReviewSystemCondition Documeatation a.DatasourcesinSIDSwillbereviewedbytheESRRTeamstogainacomprehensive understanding ofthecurrentsystemcondition, toassessthesystemfunctional requirements forreadiness, andtoevaluatetheconformance ofthesystemcondition toitsdesignbasis.Aspecificfocusofthiseffortshallbetheidentification offundamental vulnerabilities inthesystem'sabilitytoperformitssafetyandaccidentmitigation functions asdefinedintheDesignandLicensing Basis.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage20of101b.Duringthereviewandevaluation ofthesedatasources,theESRRteammaydevelopadditional specificrequirements tobechecked.For.example,ifapreviously conducted assessment identified adiscrepancy betweenacomponent capability andadesignrequirement, thisdesignrequirement wouldbeacandidate forinvestigation andthesatisfactory closureofthepreviously identified discrepancy wouldbeassessedaspartoftheESRR.Thesamestrategymaybeappliedtoassessthesatisfactory closureofopenitemsthatwereidentified whentheDesignBasisDocuments werecreated.4.3.7PerformAssessment ofSystemAttributes andTopicAreasa.Thechecksofspecificattributes againstthetopicareaswillassesstheinternalconsistency ofsystemdocuments, procedures, andplantconfiguration andtheirconformance withdesignandlicensing requirements.

TheESRRTeamwilldocumentconformance withrequirements aswellasdiscrepancies onanAttribute Assessment Form.Anexampleofacompleted Attribute Assessment FormisprovidedinFigured(Actualformmayvaryslightlyasitwillbecomputergenerated).

b.EachAttribute Assessment Formshalllistthedocumentation reviewedorwalkdownobservations madetoarriveattheassessment conclusions.

Thelistofrevieweddocuments shallcontainrevisionnumbersand/ordateifapplicable.

Theassessment formsshalldescribetheassessment andindicatethenumberofattribute checkscoveredbytheassessment formandthenumberofattribute checkswhichresultedinidentification ofdiscrepancies.

TheESRRteamshalldetermine theextentofcondition fordiscrepancies identified withintheirsystembyconducting additional checksasnecessary.

c.Asummaryoftheevaluation foreachattribute willbedocumented intheInitialSystemReadiness Report.Thissumtnarywilldocumentthechecksmadetoverifythecapability ofthesystemtoperformitssafetyandaccidentmitigation functions.

4.3.8PerformWalkdownofSystem Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page21of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMaoTheSystemManagershalldevelopthewalkdownstrategyinaccordance withtheSystemWalkdownGuidelines andbrieftheESRRTeam(seeAttachment 7).Thewalkdowns conducted aspartofthepreviousSystemReadiness Reviewstendedtofocusonmaterialcondition.

TheESRRwalkdowns willincludeevaluation ofmaterialcondition, butwillalsofocusonconfiguration orenvironmental issuesthatcouldalsoimpactthedesignandlicensing basis.[Ref.6.13]Systemsafetyandaccidentmitigation functionflowpathsshouldbeindicated onsystemflowdiagrams.

ThemarkedupdrawingswillbeusedtoassisttheSystemManagertoverifythesystemsafetyandaccidentmitigation functions duringthesystemwalkdowns.

Otherdrawingsmaybeusedbyteamstocheckspecificconfiguration oras-builtdetailsagainstdrawingrequirements.

C.Participants inthewalkdowns willincludetheSystemManager,theOperations representative, aMaintenance representative, andoutsideteammember(s).

Participation byrepresentatives ofdesignengineering andlicensing mayalsobeobtainedwhenrequiredbytheSystemManager;d.Theassessment performed duringthewalkdownwillbedocumented, togetherwithdiscrepancies noted,intheassessment database.e.Corrective actionitemsidentified duringthewalkdowns shallbe.enteredintotheCorrective ActionProgramand/orWorkControlSystembyinitiating aCondition ReportorActionRequestrespectively.

Thesecorrective actionitemswillalsobecapturedintheSIDSdatabaseandtheAssessment DataBase.AWalkdownReport(Attachment 15)istobeassembled bytheSystemManager-and includedintheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReportThereportwilldiscussthefollowing:

1.Walkdownpurposeandscope2.Walkdownfindings3.Necessary corrective actionsidentified 4.Summarization ofsystemconcernsandcondition 5.Suinmarization andjustification forportionsofsystemsthatarenotwalkeddown.

Information PMP'7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage22of101g.Duringthereviewandevaluation ofthewalkdowns, theSystemTeammaydevelopadditional checkstomakebeyondthoseontheWalkdown.Guidelines.

4.3.9IdentifyLongStandingorRecurring Equipment Performance Issuesa.EachESRRteamwillobtaininformation frompreviousReliability CenteredMaintenance (RCM)evaluations, theISTprogramselfassessment, andMaintenance Ruleevaluations toidentifypotential long-standing orrecurring equipment performance issues.Suchissues'hallbeidentified forfollow-up intheAssessment DataBaseandtheCorrective ActionProgramand/orWorkControlSystemandthe*resultswillbedocumented intheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.ACondition ReportshallbeissuedforanyitemthatfallswithinthescopeoftheCorrective ActionProgram.~4.3.10EvaluateExtentofCondition forIdentified Problemsa.Eachsystemteamshallassessrecurring issuestodetermine whetherfurtherextentofcondition determination isrequired(beyondtheplannedscopeasdocumented intheinitialsystemAssessment Matrix)anddocumentanysuchconditions intheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.[Ref.6.14]b.TheESRRProgramManagerandProgramCoordinator shallreviewtheresultsacrossallthereviewedsystemstoidentifypotential programmatic orgenericissues.Ifappropriate, thisinformation willbeusedtorecommend corrective actionsofaprogrammatic nature.Theresultswillbedocumented intheExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewIntegrated Results,described inAttachment 14.4.3.11Documen~view.results andenterdiscrepancies intoESRRAssessment DataBaseandtheCookPlantCorrective ActionProgramand/orWorkControlSystem.ACondition ReportshallbeissuedforanyitemsthatfallwithinthescopeoftheCorrective ActionProgram.a.Attribute checksperformed aswellasdiscrepancies foundinthisreviewaretobedocumented intheAssessment Data'ase.

Discrepancies shallalsobeenteredintotheCookPlantCorrective ActionProgrambyCondition ReportortheWorkControlSystembyActionRequest.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage23of101b.Condition ReportsandActionRequestswillautomatically beloadedintotheSIDSdatabase.ThisSIDSdatabasewillallowtrackingof..openitemsrequiredforrestartandwillallowevaluation ofpotential aggregate effectsofthoseitemsnotrequiredtoberesolvedpriortorestart.NOTE:Programownersorfunctional areamanagers(ordesignee) performscoping,monitoring, andclosureofnonsystem-specific programmatic orfunctional areadiscrepancies asdiscussed furtherinPMP7200.RST.009 andPMP7200.RST.010.

4.3.12Determine RestartWorkscope a.Allsystem-specific itemsintheSIDSdatabasewillbereviewedagainsttheRestartIssuesSelection/Screening Criteria(seeAttachment 8).TheSystemManagerisresponsible foraddinganyknownopencorrective actionitemsnotpresentinSIDSforhissystem.Theseitemsaretobeevaluated forRestartReadiness Scope.PRArisk-based insightsmaybehelpfulindecidingmarginalcases.b.Eachsystem-specific itemintheSIDSdatabasewillbeevaluated usingtheevaluation processoutlinedinAttachment 8.TheESRRTeamwillrecommend oneofthefollowing classifications foreachsuchiteminSIDSinordertoenablereturnoftheCookPlantUnitstooperation inasafeandreliablemanner:1.RESTART1-Activities requiredtobecompleted priortoenteringStartup/Power Ascension ofUnit1.Thisclassification includesnecessary restartandpowerascension testingactivities aswellasdefinition oftheapplicable moderestraint.

2.RESTART2-Activities requiredtobecompleted priortoenteringStartup/Power Ascension ofUnit2.Thisclassification includesnecessary restartandpowerascension testingactivities aswellasdefinition oftheapplicable moderestraint.

3.POSTRESTART1-Activities whichshouldbecompleted onascheduleconsistent withtheUnit1normalplantworkcontrolsprocess.4.POSTRESTART2-Activities whichshouldbecompleted onascheduleconsistent withtheUnit2normalplantworkcontrolsprocess.

Info'rmation

<PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page24of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM5.NOTAPPLICABLE

-Activities thatarenotrequiredtobecompleted.

c.Theseclassifications willbeusedtodetermine andscheduletheworkwithintheappropriate restarttimeframe;d.Preventive Maintenance activities areuniquesincetheyoftenprovideameansofenhancing equipment performance.

However,theequipment beingservicedmayrequirebeingremovedfromoperation.

Asaresult,theESRRmusttaketheseactivities intoconsideration whenevaluating PMactivities.

Thefollowing expectations areassociated withtheevaluations ofPMactivities:

~AllPMsscheduled forcompletion beforeAugust31,2001areto,bereviewed.

~PMsscheduled (nextrequireddate)priortoMarch31,2000aretobecategorized asRESTART1orRESTART2.

~PMsthatarescheduled orplannedduringtheoperating cycle,andrequireaunitoutagetocomplete, aretobecategorized asRESTART1orRESTART2's appropriate.

~PMsscheduled (nextrequireddate)priortoAugust31,2001thatarenotpartofon-linemaintenance oraFunctional Equipment Group(FEG)outage;andwillimpactasurveillance test,orinitiateanunplanned orunscheduled LCOduringtheoperating cycle,aretobecategorized asRESTART1orRESTART2.

~PMsthatarescheduled asafunctionofapre-planned orpre-sehedtQed FEGoutage,withorwithoutanensuingLCO,anddonotchallenge unit/system operability, aretobecategorized asPOSTRESTART1orPOSTRESTART2.

Somere-screening willbenecessary iftheassumeddatesabovechange.e.Allsystemleaksaretobeevaluated.

Scopedetermination guidelines areasfollows:ll~Anyleaklocationwithnoavailable isolation istobecategorized asRESTART1orRESTART2, unlessreasonable justification foradifferent categorization isprovided.

'3 Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage25of101~AnyASMEcodecomponent/vessel/piping leakageistobecategorized asRESTART1orRESTART2.

"~Leakagethatcanonlybeisolatedbyusinga"freezeseal"istobecategorized asRESTART1orRESTART2.

~Anyleakageidentified withincontainment requiring corrective actionistobecategorized asRESTART1orRESTART2.

Leakageidentified onsystemsoutsidecontainment, onnon-ASMEcodecomponents/vessels/piping, thatisisolable, andwouldnotchallenge systemoperability orreliability ifworkednon-outage, istobecategorized asPOSTRESTART1orPOSTRESTART2.

Leakagefromsystemsoutsidecontainment thatwouldorcouldcontainradioactive fluidsthatcouldviolateleakagerequirements inSection14.3oftheUFSARistobecategorized RESTART1orRESTART2.

4.3.13Labeling~Anylabelingissuesthathavepotential impacttoworkcontroltaggingaretobecategorized asRESTART1orRESTART2withthemodeidentified.,

~Anylabelingissueswithanypotential impacttosystemoperability orreliability aretobecategorized asRESTART1orRESTART2.

~Onlylabelingissuesthathavenoimpactoncomponents/systems workcontroltaggingaretobecategorized asPOSTRESTART1orPOSTRESTART2.

4.3.14PrepareInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReportandPresenttoTheSystemReadiness ReviewBoard.a.Theinformation gatheredthroughout thesystemreadiness reviewand.walkdown shallbecompiledbytheESRRTeamintoanInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.Eachmemberofthereviewteam,including participants inthewalkdowns, willbeidentified inthereport.

Information PMP7200.RST.004

'ev.5Page26of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMb.TheSystemManagerwillensurethateachopencorrective actionitemidentified duringtheESRRandwalkdownisinitiated eitherasaCondition ReportorActionRequest,and,ifsystem-specific, isevaluated andscopedintheSIDSdatabasepriortotheSRRBpresentation.

C.ThereportcontentisasdepictedinAttachment 12andwillbepresented totheSRRBforapproval.

Minorchangesinthereportformatarepermitted withtheconcurrence oftheESSRprogrammanagerorcoordinator.

TheSystemManagerwillbeaccompanied bytheEngineering Supervisor cognizant overthesystem.d.WhentheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReportisapprovedbytheSRRB,theSystemManagerwillnextpresentthereporttothePORCforapproval.

IfthereportisapprovedbytheSRRBwithcomments, theSystemManagerwillresolveallSRRBcommentsandtheoriginalsigneesofthereportwillre-review thereportandapprovecommentresolution.

IftheSRRBdisapproves thereport,theSystemManagermustre-present thereporttotheSRRBuntilapprovalisobtained, obtaining re-reviews asnecessary.

e.f.Afterthereporthasbeenpresented totheSRRB,theSRRBSecretary willprovidethecognizant Engineering Supervisor withalistofallcommentstheSystemManagerneedstoaddress.Insomeinstances whenthenewtechnical issuesareidentified duringSRRBreviews,theSystemManagerwillberequiredtowriteaCondition Reportontheissue.Inthiscase,therespective Engineering Supervisor istodebrieftheSystemManager,andrecordthedebriefintheCR.ThedebriefwilladdressallcommentsrecordedattheSRRBpresentation.

WhenESRRprogramimplementation problemsareidentified, theSRRBsecretary willwriteaCondition Reportohtheissue.AfterSRRBapproval, theSystemManagerpresentstheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReporttothePORC.ThePORCwillapproveordisapprove thereport,fromanuclearsafetystandpoint, keepinganoverviewperspective thatfocusesonensuringthatinter-disciplinary concernswereadequately addressed.

PORCshouldnotnormallyfocusonapproving SRRBactiononeachdiscrepant condition butrathershouldprobeintomethodsandoverallresults.Ifapproved, theactionitemswillbeincludedintherestarteffort.Anychangestothescope(restart/post restart)ofindividual itemswillberecordedinthePORCmeetingminutes.Ifdisapproved, theSystemManagerwilltakeappropriate actionsandre-present thereporttothePORC.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage27of101-g.Thecognizant Engineering Supervisor willensureincorporation ofPORCcommentswithinthereportandSIDSdatabase.PORCcommentsaretobeincorporated inSIDSbytheSIDSDataBase-Coordinator, andreviewedbytheSystemManager.PORCcommentswithinthereportaretobeincorporated bytheSystemManager.4.3.15Functional AreasandProgrammatic Issuesa.Openitemsassociated withfunctional areasandprogramswillbeloadedintotheSIDSdatabase.b.Iftheopenfunctional areaorprogrammatic itemsaffectspecificsystems,theseitemswillbetransferred totheappropriate system,withinSIDS,wheretheESRRTeamswillscopetheitems.c.TheSRRBwillreviewthescopingofprogrammatic andfunctional areaworkitemsthatarenotsystemspecificsubjecttoascheduleandprotocolestablished bytheDirectorofRestart.d.Functional areaandprogrammatic issueitemswillbereviewedandapprovedbySRRB.e.Foropenfunctional areaandprogrammatic itemsthatarenotsystemspecific, theappropriate functional areaorprogramownersareresponsible forensuringthatthefunctional areasandprogramsarereadytosupportrestartinaccordance withtheRestartPlan.4.4Phase2-RestartActivities Monitoring NOTE'rogram ownersorfunctional areamanagers(ordesignee) performscoping,monitoring, andclosureofnonsystem-specific programmatic orfunctional areadiscrepancies-as.

discussed furtherinPMP7200.RST.009 andPMP7200.RST.OIO 4.4.1GeneralDescription ofPhase2Activities a.TheSystemManagerwilluseSIDStomonitorapprovedsystemworkscopeandidentifyanynewactionitems.Workactivities shouldbefrequently fieldverifiedandmonitored toinsurecorrective actionsarebeingtakenandnoadverseplantconditions develop.b.TheSystemManagerwillperformthefollowing activities:

1.Monitorclosureofapprovedsystem-specific workscope itemsusingSIDSandavailable performance indicators.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage28of1012.Identifyandevaluatenewemergentsystem-specific actionitemsforrestart;considerusingrisk-based insightswhereavailable toenhancedecision-making inmarginalcases.3.Performroutinefieldwalkdowns 4.Makepresentations totheSRRBasrequested 5.Reviewsystemworkwindowplanningandscheduling toensureworkisbeingproperlyscheduled 6.ProvideinputtoandreviewSystemTestPlans7.UpdateSIDStoreflectpropercompletion ofopensystem-specific itemsandtodocumentexceptions tocompleted workc.ForRestartRequireditemsthatarenotplannedtobecompleted priortorestart,thesystem-specific RestartRequiredScopeDeferralForm(Attachment 10)istobereviewedthroughthesamelevelofapprovalaswhentheitemwasoriginally approvedforrestart.d.Applicable RestartRequiredScopeDeferralFormsaretobecompleted priortoclosureoftheapplicable SystemWorkWindow.ForCondition Reportsnotassociated withcorrective maintenance, thedeferralformistobecompleted nolaterthantheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness Review.4.4.2Management ofWorkscope NOTE:Emergentitemsscopedasrestartmustbescheduled intheappropriate SystemWorkWindows.a.IdentifyandScopeEmerging(New)OpenItems1.Phase2workitemsthatareevaluated andscopedforaccomplishment priortorestartaftertheExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewInitialReportispreparedwillbereviewedusingthefollowing processinaccordance withAttachment 9.a)TheSystemManagerwillreview,evaluateandscopeneworemergentsystem-specific itemswithinSIDSinaccordance withAttachment 8,"Criteria forWorkIncludedinRestartScope,"

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage29of101b)TheSystemManagerisalsoresponsible forreviewandevaluation ofanynewlyinitiated Operating Experience itemsimpacting hisrespective systems.ThenewOperating Experience itemsaretobescopedforapplicability totheunitrestart.TheSystemManageristoensurethatOperating Experience itemsthatarescopedasrestartitemsareresolvedandfollow-up actionscompleted priortorestart.c)System-specific itemsthatresultinnewlycreatedcorrective maintenance ornewdesignchangerequestsaretobemonitored forclosure.2.Phase2OutageScopeApprovalProcess-Additions a)Oncenewemergentfieldworkitems(ARs/JOs/JOAs) arescopedbytheSystemManager,theywillbepresented totheOSMTforreviewandapprovalbythecognizant Engineering Supervisor orhisdesigneeinordertobeaddedtotheRestartSchedule; Thesenewemergentworkitemsaresubsequently (usuallyweekly)presented totheSRRB(orsubcommittee thereof)forreviewandapprovalbytheSystemManager.PORCapprovalofrestartitemsisnotrequiredduringPhase2.b)Allotheremergentsystem-specific itemsthatarenotfieldworkrelated(broke/fix) arescopedbytheSystemManagerandpresented totheSRRB(orsubcommittee thereof)forreviewandapproval.

PORCapprovaloftheseitemsisnotrequiredduringPhase2.3.Phase2OutageScopeApprovalProcess-Deletions a~Whendeferring itemsthathavebeenpreviously approvedbytheSRRBandPORCasrestartitems,TheRestartRequiredScopeDeferralFormistobeused.Theformwillbereviewedthroughthesamelevelofapprovalthattherestartitemoriginally received.

b.SystemWindows-1.SystemWindowScheduling Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPOUNDED SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage30of101a)TheSystemManagerandOperations personnel shouldensurethattheapplicable restartworkiscontained withintherespective systemworkwindowor'therappropriate workopportunity.

Actualsystemworkwindowsaredeveloped andscheduled usingaSystemWorkWindowTeamthatassiststhescheduling organization.

Systemwindowplanningandscheduling willbeaccomplished bytheteamunderthesupervision oftheSystemManagerasfollows:~Interface withtheappropriate plannerandscheduler andobtaintheplannedsystemwindowsforreview.~Reviewthesystemscheduleforcompletion.

TheSystemManagershouldrecordsystemscheduleadditions, changes,conflicts, andomissions withinaninternalmemorandum senttoPlanningandScheduling.

~ThroughSystemWorkWindowTeammeetingstheSystemManagerwillensurethattheSystemWorkWindowTeamisawareofrestarttaskrequirements tosupportSystemWorkWindowschedules.

2.SystemWindowWorkManagement a)Thefollowing issuesaretobemonitored onsystemswithonlyoneworkwindow,ormonitored duringthefinalsystemworkwindowofasystem:~EnsureRestartRequiredscopeitemsarecompleted.

The,SystemManagerwillreviewcompleted itemstoensuretheworkwascompleted tohissatisfaction.

~TheSystemManageristoassurethatthefinalcommentfieldinSIDSiscompleted.

~ForRestartRequireditems,themodefieldandthetestrestraints withintheissuefieldaretobecompleted inSIDSbytheSystemManager.

<'.

Information PMP/200.RST.004 Rev.5Page31of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM~ClosedrestartscopeitemsaretobereviewedandapprovedbytheSystemManagerandcommentsenteredintotheFinalCommentsScreenofeachiteminSIDS.Anapprovaldesignates thattheresponsible department forcompleting theitemhasstatusedtheitemasclosedorcomplete.

b)Thefollowing issuesaretobemonitored bythesystemworkwindowteamonsystemswithmultiplesystemworkwindows.~Ensure"Evaluation Type"openitems(i.e.,CRs,AREvalsetc.)arecompleted.

~Corrective maintenance itemsgenerated from"Evaluation Type"activities arescopedwithinSIDS.~Ensureemergentworkitems'scoped asRestartare'cheduled forcompletion priortotheendofthelastavailable systemworkwindow.c.SystemTestPlans1.TheSystemManagersareresponsible forassisting inthedevelopment oftheStartupTestingProgramfortheirrespective systems.TheSystemManagerwillsupporttheStart-upandPowerAscension Organization/Operations organizations inthiscapacity.

2.TheSystemManagerwillstartdeveloping SystemTestPlansinaccordance withPMP-7200.RST.005 (whenapproved).

TestPlanswillbedeveloped forappropriate systemsbasedonthereviewsperformed inPhase1.3.ForsystemswheretheSystemManagerconcludes thatSystemTestPlansarenotappropriate, justification astowhyaSystemTestPlanisnotrequiredwillbedeveloped.

d..SystemWalkdown1.SystemManagershouldcompleteasystemwalkdownonaroutinebasis.Thepurposeofthesewalkdowns istomonitorsatisfactory completion ofworkandtoidentifyemergentdeficient conditions.

e.Interaction withtheSystemReadiness ReviewBoard

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage32of1011.Anynewtechnical issuesidentified inasystembySRRBduringPhase2willbedocumented inaCondition Report.TheCondition Reportwillbegenerated bytheSRRBsecretary orindividual SystemManagerswillwritetheCondition Reportsiftheissuewasidentified duringaSRRBmeetingorpresentation atwhichtheyarepresent.4.5Phase3-FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewNOTE:Programownersorfunctional areamanagers(ordesignee) performscoping,monitoring, andclosureofnonsystem-specific programmatic orfunctional areadiscrepancies asdiscussed furtherinPMP7200.RST.009 andPMP7200.RST.010.

4.5.1GeneralScope'.ForRestartRequireditemsthatarenotplannedtobecompleted priortorestart,theRestartRequiredScopeDeferralForm(Attachment 10)istobereviewedthroughthesamelevelofapprovalaswhentheitemwasoriginally approvedforrestart.b.Applicable RestartRequiredScopeDeferralFormsaretobecompleted priortoclosureoftheapplicable SystemWorkWindow.ForCondition Reportsnotassociated withcorrective maintenance, thedeferralformistobecompleted nolaterthantheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness Review.c.RestartActivities 1.SystemManagerswillreviewallitemsscopedRESTART1orRESTART2inSIDStoascertain theircompletion priorto"affirming finalsystemreadiness forRestart.2.Afinalsystemreadiness reviewwalkdownwillbecompleted bytheSystemManagerandalicensedoperations representative.

3.AFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReportwillbedeveloped.

4.TheSystemTestPlanwillberevisedtoincludeallitemsapplicable toRestartandPowerAscension thatwerenotapprovedinpreviousrevisions oftheTestPlan.

~mr~,

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page33of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM5.TheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness Reviewiscompleted whentheSystemTestPlanhasbeenrevisedandreceivedTestReviewBoard(TRB)(reference PMP-7200.RST.005 (whenapproved))

concurrence andtheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReporthasbeencompleted, presented totheSRRBandthePORC,andPORCapprovalhasbeengivenforsystemRestart.6.RestartRequiredsystem-specific itemsthatarenotcompleted aretobecodedasanException withinSIDS.RefertoAttachment 11,"FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewClarification Sheet,"fordetailedinformation.

7,ItemsthatarecodedasanException donotrequirecommentsintheFinalCommentfieldinSIDS.8.RestartRequiredsystem-specific itemsthatarenotplannedtobe.completed priortorestartaretobecodedasRestartRequiredDeferredintheFinalSystemManagerApprovalboxwithinSIDS.RefertoAttachment 11,"FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewClarification Sheet,"fordetailedinformation.

d.PostRestartActivities SystemManagerswillreviewallsystem-specific itemsscopedPostRestartlorPostRestart2asappropriate inSIDSforfinalapprovalforapplicability toRestart.TheythencompletetheFinalCommentfieldinSIDSforallPostRestartitems.2.Forcomponents thathavetwo(2)ormoreassociated PostRestartitems,thePostRestartitemsaretobecodedasPostRestartDeferredintheFinalSystemManagerApprovalboxwithinSIDS.Refer-.to Attachment 11,"FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewClarification Sheet,"fordetailedinformation.

3.PostRestartitemsrelatedtocomponents withmultiple(twoormore)deferredissues,excluding postrestartPMs,aretohavetheFinalCommentsectioncompleted inSIDSproviding technical justification forrestartbyevaluating theaggregate impactofthemultipledeferredtasksonthecomponent.

Thesecommentsaretobereferenced intheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage'34of1014.Marked-up drawingsidentifying thecomponents withmultipledeferredissueswillbeincludedwiththeFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.5;Theaggregate impactofalloutstanding itemsagainstagivencomponent willbereviewed, assessing theoperability ofthecomponent.

Justification forexclusion oftheitemsforFinalSystemReadiness willbeincludedintheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.6.Theaggregate impactofallaffectedcomponents willbeevaluated againstthegivensystemassessing theoperability ofthesystem,andthisevaluation willalsobeincludedintheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.4.5.2FinalRestartWorkClosurea.Allsystem-specific RestartScopeitemswithinSIDSaretobereviewedandconcurred withbytheSystemManager.Anapprovaldesignates thattheresponsible department forcompleting anitemhasstatusedtheitemasWorkCompleteorClosed.Anyknownexceptions totheitemsaretobenotedasspecified inSection4.5.1c.6priortoSystemManagerapproval.

Itemsnotadministratively closedaretobeaddressed withinthefinalcommentsastohowtheseitemsaretobeclosed.b.TheSystemManagercollectstheRestartRequiredScopeDeferralFormscompleted oneachsystemandreviewstheDeferredRestartRequiredWorkandPostRestartScopedWork,excluding postrestartPMs,foraggregate impacttothesystem,andpreparestechnical justification forsystemoperability inaccordance withitsdesignbasisfunctions=This reviewistobeincludedwithintheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReportasdiscussed inSection4.5.4a.4.5.3FinalSystemWalkdownandWalkdownReporta.TheESRRTeam,undertheleadership oftheSystemManager,willconductafinalsystemwalkdowninaccordance withtheguidanceofAttachment 7.Thepu'rposeofthewalkdownistoascertain properaccomplishment ofidentified, workandtoidentifyanypreviously undocumented systemdeficiencies.

b.Minimumwalkdownattendance willrequiretheSystemManagel.andalicensedoperations representative.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage35of101c.Uponcompletion oftheSystemTeamWalkdown, theSystemManagerwillcompleteaWalkdownReport.Thisreportwillcoverthetopicsidentified inAttachment 15andwillformapartoftheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.d.Discrepancies identified duringthiswalkdownwillbeenteredintotheCorrective ActionProgramand/orWorkControlSystem.4.5.4FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReporta.TheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReportwillincludethefollowing items:1.FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewSIDSReport.2.FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewSystemWalkdownReport(Attachment 15).3.ThereportwillincludeacoversheetsimilartoAttachment 13,titledFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.4.CopiesofallRestartRequiredScopeDeferralFormsforthesystemaretobeattached.

I5.Impactofdeferredworkassessment (See4.5.4bbelow).6.SystemTestPlanb.Theimpactofdeferredwork(workscopedasPost-restart) willbe~assessed, firstindividually, theninaggregate onindividual systemcomponents, thenonthesystemoverallreadiness forrestartasdiscussed'further below.1.Thefollowing itemswillbeevaluated individually regarding theimpactonacomponent basis,aggregate impactonacomponent basis,andaggregate impactonasystembasis:~PostRestartScope,systemcomponents withmultiple(Twoormore)deferredworkitems,excluding postrestartPMs.~AllRestartrequireddeferredscopeComponents.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page36of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM2.Theevaluation willfirstaddresssystemcomponents withmultipledeferredworkitems.Atthecomponent level,thedeferredworkissues,thentheaggregate impactofthedeferredworkforeachcomponent willbeaddressed.

3.Thisdiscussion willincludethetechnical justification allowingthecomponent toreturntoservicewiththeidentified deferredworkissue(s).

4Systemcomponents withmultiple(twoormore)PostRestartdeferredworkitems,oranycomponent withadeferredRestartRequiredworkitemaretobeidentified ontheapplicable drawing(s)

(FlowDiagrams, WiringDiagrams, GeneralArrangement Diagrams),

withthedeferredworkidentification number(s) notednexttotheaffectedcomponent.

Alternately, the-.component canbeidentified'on thedrawingandalistofthedeferredworkidentification numbersforeachaffectedcomponent attached.

5.Theaggregate impactevaluation willconcludewithadiscussion onsystemreadiness toreturntoservice.Theaggregate impactonthesystemanditscapacitytoperformitsdesignbasisfunctionistobediscussed, addressing thecumulative impactofsystemcomponents withdeferredwork.Astatement willbeincludedexplaining howthedeferredworkistobescheduled.,

c.FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewPresentations TheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReportsaretobereviewedbytherespective Operations andLicensing representatives, Engineering Supervisor, thenscheduled forpresentation totheSRRB.4tL'LMlI2.llTheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReportistobepresented totheSRRBandPORCbytheSystemManager,thecognizant Engineering Supervisor andalicensedoperations representative.

SRRBorPORCcommentsoropenitemsaretobeaddressed asdiscussed inSections4.3.14ethrough4.3.14gfortheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.d.SystemTestPlans

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage37of1011.SystemTestPlansaretobefinalized asspecified in(PMP-7200.RST.005 (whenapproved)).

Theplanswillincludeallitemsapplicable toRestartandPowerAscension whichhavebeenfinalized subsequent topreviousrevisions oftheTestPlan.2.SystemTestPlansorJustifications fornothavingSystemTestPlanswillbereviewedandapprovedbytheTestReviewBoard.3.SystemTestPlanswillbeimplemented throughPhase3andPhase4oftheESRRProgram.4.5.5Phase3EmergentWorkManagement a.Emergentcorrective actionitemsaretobecontinuously scopedforrestartapplicability throughout Phase3.UseofPRArisk-based insightsmayhelpwithmarginalcases.b.Afterinitialcommentsandscopingonanemergentsystem-specific workitemisincorporated intheSIDSdatabase, theitemiscoded"APPROVE".

TheSystemManageralsoreviewsthescopingoftheitemandifRestartrequired, thenannotates itintheSIDSdatabaseas"EXCEPT"(todesignate theitemasarestartexception ifnot.completed).

c.Forasystem-specific itemscopedasPostRestart,commentsare,enteredintheFinalCommentsfieldandtheSystemManagercodestheitemasPostRestartDeferred.

d.Foremergentsystem-specific fieldworkitems,refertoSection4.4.2a.2.a) fortheapprovalprocess.e.Forallotheremergentsystem-specific itemsthatarenotfieldworkrelated(broke/fix),

refertosection4.4.2a.2.b) fortheapprovalprocess..

f.Thesystem-specific Exception ListinSIDSistobecontinually managedbytheSystemManageruntilthesystemisturnedovertoOperations fortesting.g.Forthosesystemspecificitemsthatarecompleted andsatisfyrestartrequirements, changethe"EXCEPT"to"CONCUR"andcompletetheFinalCommentssectioninSIDS.4.6Phase4-StartupAndPowerAscension Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPMDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage38of101NOTE'rogram owners-or functional areamanagers(ordesignee) performscoping,monitoring, andclosureofnonsystem-specific programmatic orfunctional areadiscrepancies asdiscussed furtherinPMP7200.RST.009 andPMP7200.RST.010.

4.6.1GeneralScopea.Phase4activities includethefollowing:

1.Phase4commences oneachsystemwiththePORCapprovalofFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReportforthatsystem.2.TheSystemManageristomonitorthroughcompletion thosesystem-specific workitemsscopedException withinSIDS.3.Management ofemergentsystem-specific workitemsthroughthenormalworkcontrolprocessandScopeAddition/Deletion CoverSheet(TBDL).4.TheSystemManageristocompleteSystemReadiness Affirmation aftertheretestportionofthesystemworkwindowandpriortorestoration ofsystemoperability tosupportunitRestart.5.'ystemReadiness Affirmation andsubmittal oftheSystemReadiness Affirmation Report(Attachment 16).6.EachSystemManageristomonitortheconductoftheStationStartupandPowerAscension Planasitrelatestohissystem.7.TheSystemManageristoimplement thebaselinesystemperformance monitoring, trackingandtrending.

S.SystemWorkWindowTeamsaretocontinuetomeetonaregularbasis.TheSystemManagerwillleadtheteaminmanagingfuturesystemworkwindows,aswellasmonitoring opencorrective actionitems,operability issues,andreliability issuesonthesystem.9.Phase4iscompletewhenallpowerascension testingiscompleteandtherespective unitattains100%ratedunitloadfor-(TBDL)-days..4.6.2Phase4EmergentSystem-Specific WorkManagement, PriortoSystemAffirmation r0 Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage39of101a.Emergentissuesaretobereviewedtosupportthesystemworkwindowschedule.

b.Emergentcorrective actionitemsaretobepresented totheOSMTwithanattachedScopeAddition/Deletion CoverSheet(TBDL).c.EmergentitemsaretohaveinitialcommentsenteredintoSIDSandtobescopedasfollows:1,EmergentitemsthatarerequiredforrestartwillbescopedRestartlorRestart2, inaccordance withAttachment 8,"Criteria forWorkIncludedinRestartScope."2.Itemsthatareidentified tobeworkedinaccordance withthenormalWorkControlsystemrequirements aretobescopedasWORKCONTROLPROCESS(WCP).ItemsscopedasWCPwillincludethetechnical basisforwhentheitemshouldbecompleted.

Theseconditions shallsupportworkorderpriorities asdefinedinPMI-2291toensurecontinued systemreadiness.

3.Anexplanation, providing technical justification (Reference item6onAttachment 8)istobeenteredintheInitialCommentsFieldinSIDS.4.TheSystemManageristo"APPROVE" itemsintheInitialSystemManagerApprovalboxinSIDSonceheissatisfied withthescopeoftheitem-.d.Corrective maintenance workitemsaretobepresented totheOSMTwithaScopeAddition/Deletion CoverSheet(TBDL).Engineering issuesthatmayimpactthesystemaffirmation processaretobeincludedandmanagedviatheRestartSchedule.

e.RestartRequireditemsthatarenotcompletearetobecome"Exceptions,"

andaddedtothe"Exceptions" list.Whenanitemiscompleted, theSystemManageristoreviewanddenoteas"CONCUR"withintheFinalSystemManagerApprovalboxinSIDS.4.6.3SystemReadiness Affirmation a.TheSystemManagerwillcompleteaSystemReadiness Affirmation Reportwhichwillincludethefollowing information:

1.CurrentsystemLicenseChangeRequest(s).

Information PMF7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage40of1012.Currentlistofoperatorworkarounds.

3.Currentcorrective actionsthatinvolveControlRoomequipment.

4.Currently installed Temporary Modifications.

5.ActiveOperability Determinations (ODs)andJustifications forContinued Operation (JCOs),withtheassociated 10CFR50.59 screenorevaluation foreachODorJCO.6.Theremaining opensystem-specific "Exceptions" itemsandanysystem-specific "Exceptions" identified duringtheaffirmation process.Exceptions areremaining openrestartrequireditems.7.Anyotheroperations focuslistconcernsinvolving thesystem.8.Reference totheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport9.Reference tothesystemtestsspecified intheSystemTestPlan.b.TheSystemManagerandlicensedoperations representative willconductaSystemReadiness Affirmation walkdownanddocumentwalkdownonSystemWalkdownReport(Attachment 15).TheresultsofthewalkdownwillbeincludedintheSystemReadiness Affirmation Report.c.Thelicensedoperations representative willco-signtheSystemReadiness Affirmation ReportwiththeSystemManager.d.Anycorrective actionsidentified duringtheSystemReadiness Affirmation aretobeaddressed withintheworkcontrolprocessandidentifiedao theOutageControlCenterforresolution, Engineering actionitemsaretobeaddedtotheEngineering PriorityListwiththedesignated engineeridentified asthelead.toresolvetheissue.e.TheSystemManagerandthelicensedoperations representative willpresenttheSystemReadiness Affirmation ReporttoSRRBandPORC.f."AnycommentsreceivedfromSRRBduringthePhase4requireresolution andresponsewithinthreeweeksfromthedateoftheSRRBmeeting.g.Thesystemisturnedovertooperations afterPORCapprovaloftheSystemReadiness Affirmation Report.

~.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page41of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM4.6.4SystemTestPlansa.TheSystemManagersaretomonitortheresultsofeachrespective

'SystemTestPlan.TheSystemManagersaretofollow-through ondeficient testplanresultstheCorrective ActionProgramand/orWorkControlSystemasappropriate.

ACondition ReportshallbeissuedforanyitemsthatfallwithinthescopeoftheCorrective ActionProgram.b.SystemTestPlanresultsaretobeselectively incorporated withintheSystemManagerPerformance Monitoring Program(TBDL).4.6.5EmergentSystem-Specific WorkManagement AfterSystemAffirmation a.Allemergentissuesaretobescopedas"WCP"or"WorkControlProcess"intheSIDSdatabase.

Emergentworkistobeaddressed withinthe'workcontrolprocessasdescribed withintheStationAdministrative Procedures.

b.Emergentcorrective maintenance issuesaretobepresented totheOSMT.Emergentengineering issuesthatmayimpactunitstart-uparetobeaddressed withintheEngineering, PriorityList.4.7Reports4.7.1Phase1-InitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport.a.TheInitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReportsaretobecompleted inaccordance withSection4.3.14andAttachment 12.4.7.2Phase3-FinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReporta.TheFinalExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReportsaretobecompleted inaccordance withSection4.5.4andAttachment 13.4.7.3Phase4-SystemReadiness Affirmation Reporta.TheSystemReadiness Affirmation Reportsaretobecompleted IAWSection4.6.3a.4.7.4Integrated SystemReadiness Reporta.TheESRRManagerorhisdesigneeshallprepareareportwhichintegrates theresultsoftheindividual systemESRRefforts.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXUDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage42of101b.Theintegrated report(seeAttachment 14)shallsummarize theresultsoftheESRRactivities inPhases1and2,andidentifythestatusofotherprograms, reviewsandupgradesthataresupportive oftheESRR'nproviding reasonable assurance ofbeinginconformance withlicensing anddesignbasis.c.Theintentofthisintegrated reportandassociated backupinformation istoprovideassurance thattheplantdesign,testing,maintenance, operation andconfiguration conformstothelicensing anddesignrequirements andthattheplantisinacondition tosupportplantoperation forthenextruncycle.d.Thefinalintegrated SystemReadiness Reportwillbepresented totheSRRBforreviewandtothePORCforapproval.

5FINALCONDITIONS 5.1None6REFERENCES 6.1CookNuclearPlantRestartPlan6.26.3NUREG1397,AnAssessment ofDesignControlPractices andDesignReconstitution ProgramsintheNuclearPowerIndustryERestartStrategyforRestartIssue5455,PlantSystemsReadiness Assessment 6.4Auxiliary Feedwater SSFIReport(November 1998)6.56.6Engineering IssuesReviewGroupFinalReport(December 19,1998)PMP7200.RST.006, ExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewProgramForLevel2Systems6.7PMP-7200,RST.005 (whenapproved),

RestartStartupPowerAscension Program Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMPage43of1016.8CR98-8122,SystemReadiness Reviewsfor21SystemsMayNotbeEffective inVerifying SystemOperability 6.9PMP-7200.RST.009, Functional AreaRestartReadiness 6.10PMP-7200.RST.010, Programmatic RestartReadiness

,6.11Commitment Management SystemCommitment 72806.12Commitment Management SystemCommitment 71976.13Commitment Management SystemCommitment 73036.14Commitment Management SystemCommitment 67836.1SCommitment Management SystemCommitment 7319 Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page44of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 1SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWBOARD(SRRB)CHARTERPages:44-45SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWBOARDSRRBCHARTERPURPOSE:Performasystem-based, multidisciplinary technical reviewofpotential restartissuesassociated withrisksignificant plantequipment.

Thisboardisintendedtoensureconsistent application oftherestartcriteriacontained intheCookNuclearPlantRestartPlanamongsystemmanagers, andthatrestartdecisions reflectthesharedconcernsofOperations, Maintenance andEngineering.

Theresultofthisreviewwillbetodefinetheequipment relatedworkthatisneededtoprovidereasonable assurance ofasafeandreliablestanupandachieveasafe,reliable, andefficient poststartupoperating cycle.MEMBERS:DirectorofEngineering Restart(Chair)DirectorofPlantEngineering (ViceChair)SystemEngineering Manager(ViceChair)VicePresident ofNuclearEngineering ManagerofSystemReadiness ReviewsDirectorofDesignEngineering (ViceChair)DirectorofNuclearFuels,SafetyandAnalysis(ViceChair)Operations representative

-BobHeathcote (primary) orRodneyFoster(alternate)

EOPProjectrepresentative

-KevinWhite(primary) orJimAbshire(alternate)

Externalconsultants:

JohnDurham>>>>GregGibbs>>>>PhilHildebrandt>>>>

LarryDemick>>>>JeffBass>>>>(primary) orBiHBryant'(alternate)

Westinghouse representative Systemengineering supervisors BoardSecretary Non-voting members:Additional occasional attendance bymembersofthePlantOperations ReviewCommittee, theRestartgroup,andtheEngineering Effectiveness organization isexpectedtoreinforce expectations andprovideoversight fortherestartissuereviewprocess=.Additionally, theSRRBChairmanmayinviteguest,non-voting memberstosupplement theboardwhenreviewing nonwngineering programorfunctional areaassessment resultsorSIDSissues.QUORUM:(ESRRRelatedBoard-Functions)

Chair(orViceChair),anOperations andEOPProjectrepresentative, andaminimumoftwoofthedoubleasterisked namedmembers,andoneengineering supervisor, notassociated withthesystemordocument/program underreview.ASRRBSecretary shallalsobepresentbutmaybeoneoftheSRRBmembers.Noboardwillconsistofmorethansixvotingmembers.Othermembersmayparticipate attheirdiscretion asnon-voting membersinsuchcases.

55%QJ Information PMP'7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page45of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 1SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWBOARD(SRRB)CHARTERPages:44-45QUORUM(Programmatic andFunctional AreaReadiness BoardFunctions)

Chair(orViceChair),minimumoftwoofthedoubleasterisked membersandtwoothermembers.Oneoftheadditional membersshallbeanengineering representative forreviewsofengineering programs.

Noboardshallconsistofmorethanfivevotingmembers.AnSRRBSecretary shallalsobepresentbutmaybeoneoftheSRRBmembers.Othermembersmayparticipate attheirdiscretion asnon-votingmembersinsuchcases.ACTIONS:TheSRRBwill:l.Serveastheprimaryindependent engineering reviewbodyfor0350checklist itemrestartactionplansasrequiredbyPMP7200.RST.001'nd, asdelineated furtherinPMP7200.RST.004 andPMP7200.RST.006, expandedsystemreadiness reviewidentified issuesandreports.TheSRRBwillalsoperformfunctions relatedtoassuringproperdispositioning ofprogrammatic andfunctionareareadiness discrepancies asdetailedinPMP7200.RST.009 andPMP7200.RST.010.

TheSRRBaffirmsandapprovesthescopingofpotential deficient conditions aseitherrestartorpost-restart basedoncriteriadefinedintherestartplan.2.Initsreviews,enforcetechnical rigor,consistency ofapproach, andathoroughassessment ofsystemreadiness.

TheSRRBwillalsochallenge engineers toensuretheissuesarefullyunderstood.

3.Ensurearecordofdecisions andconcernsraisedbytheSRRBreviewisdocumented forfuturereview.Programmatic implementation concernsraisedbytheSRRBwillbedocumented oncondition reportsinitiated bytheSRRBsecretary.

4.Ensurethatnuclearengineering principles andtheattributes ofgoodengineering aredemonstrated bytheengineering staff.5.Ensurethattheengineers understand theirrolesandresponsibilities.

TheDirectorofEngineering Restartisresponsible formanagement oversight ofSRRBactivities andfordisbanding thisboardafterstartupwhendirectedbytheSiteVicePresident.

PORC=will'provide oversight oftheSRRBandapproveExpandedSystemReadiness Reportsasdiscussed inPMP.7200.RST.004 andPMP7200.RST.006 inthatoversight role.Thischarterbecomeseffective withtheissuanceofPMP7200.RST.004 REVISION5.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page46of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 221LEVEL1SYSTEMSINCLUDEDINTHEPREVIOUSSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPages:46-47THE21LEVEL1,SYSTEMS FORTHEPREVIOUSEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWWERE120voltAC/CRIDInverters AirRecirculation/Hydrogen Recombiner Auxiliary Feedwater 250voltDCStationBatteries Component CoolingWaterContainment Containment SprayControlAirECCSAccumulators ECCSCharging/CVCS HighHeadInjection ECCSResidualHeatRemovalECCSSafetyInjection Emergency DieselGenerators Essentiai ServiceWaterIceCondenser MainSteamNon-essential ServiceWaterPlantAirCompressors J0 Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page47of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 221LEVEL1SYSTEMSINCLUDEDINTHEPREVIOUSSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPages:46-47ReactorCoolantSystemReactorProtection System/Solid-state Protection/ESFAS Electrical SafetyBuses4000voltand600volt Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page48of101"-EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 3RATIONALE FORSELECTING LEVEL1SYSTEMSFOREXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPages:48-48Thefollowing rationale wasusedinselecting the39systemstobereviewedinaccordance withthisprocedure.

Allselectedsystemsareidentified inAttachment 4.Maintenance RuleRiskSiificantSstemsAllCookPlantMaintenance RuleRiskSignificant systemswereincludedintheLevel1ESRR.SstemsReuiredtoSuortSafeShutdownTheCookPlantspecificfireprotection/Appendix Rreports/documents werereviewedtoidentifysystemsrequiredtosupportsafeshutdown.

Allofthesesystemswereincludedint5escopeoftheLevel1ESSR.Attendant/Su ortSstemsAttendant systemswereconsidered duringtheidentification ofLevel1systemsbeingselectedfortheESRR.Heating,Ventilation andAirConditioning systemssuchasControlAreaVentilation, Switchgear Ventilation andContainment Ventilation wereincludedinthescopeoftheESRR.TheScreenwash andFireProtection Systemswerealsoincludedasattendant/support system.Historical Performance ofCookPlantSstemsThehistorical performance ofCookPlantsystemswasconsidered.

BasedoninputfromtheSystemEngineering ManagerandtheOperations Manageradditional systemssuchasEmergency

Lighting, andPostAccidentSamplingSystem(PASS)wereincluded.

ThirdPaReviewoftheScoThescopeofthesystemschosenforESRRwasreviewedbyapeergroupandanindependent thirdpartytoensurethatsuccessful completion oftheESRRonthesesystemswouldprovideareasonable assurance thattheCookPlantcanberestarted safelyandreliably.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page49of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 4EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWLEVEL1SYSTEMSPages:49-50SYSTEMDESCRIPTION ECCSCHARGINGECCSSIPOSTACCIDENTSAMPLINGSYSTEMAUXBUILDINGVENTESFCONTROLROOMCOMPLEXVENTILATION SWITCHGEAR VENTILATION 250VDCSTATIONBATI'ERIES ICECONDENSER CONTROLROD&CONTROLRODDRIVERPS/SSPS/ESFAS LOCALSHUTDOWNINDICATION SYSTEMRADIATION MONITORING RVLISCOMPONENT COOLINGWATERCNTMTISOLATION COMPONENTS SPENTFUELPITCOOLING120VACVITALBUSES&CRIDINVERTERMAINSTEAMAIRRECIRC/H2 SKIMMERCONTAINMENT VENTILATION VENTILATION

-DIESELGENERATOR EMERGENCY DIESELGENERATORS ABBCVCSIrPASSCRACSWGR250VDCICECRDMLSIRMSRVLISCCWCIVCRIDMS~CECVDGVENTSYSTEMLEVELRELATEDSYSTEMSIncludesChainLetdownBoronPathandSINJIncludesABVGEN&AF/ESWVIncludesNTRNIncludesRPIIncludesDUMP&N2forPORVsRISKSIGNNNSAFESHUTDOWNSIGSUPPORTSYSTEMSIGCORRECTIVE MAINT."S"inthe"SafeShutdownColumn"indicates asupportsystemforsafeshutdown Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page50of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 4EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWLEVEL1SYSTEMSPages:49-50SYSTEMDESCRIFTION ELECTRICAL SAFETYBUSESSCREENWASH FIREPROTECTION

-HALON&CARDOXAUXILIARY BUILDINGTURBINEBUILDINGCONTROLAIRPLANTAIRCOMPRESSOR CONTAINMENT CONTAINMENT SPRAYAUXFEEDWATER SYSTEMECCSACCUMULATORS RCS/RCSPRESSURERELIEFEMERGENCY LIGHTINGPACKSOFFSITEPOWERESSENTIAL SERVICEWATERNONESSENTIAL SERVICEWATERNUCLEARINSTRUMENTATION ABBTBUSSCRNPACCNTMTACCUMELTGOFPWESWNESWNISYSTEMLEVELRELATEDSYSTEMSIncludes4KV&600VIncludesScrecnhouse/Intake IncludesRCPFPIncludesComressedAirHeader&CNTMTControlAirHeaderIncludesBACIncludesDIS&H2REC&HDSIncludesCSTIncludesMLMSIncludesSWYDIncludesT/CRISKSIGSAFESHUTDOWNNNNSIGSUPPORTSYSTEMSIG-CORRECTIVE MAINT."S"inthe"SafeShutdownColumn"indicates asupportsystemforsafeshutdown Information PMP7200.RST.004

.Rev.5Page51of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 5EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWTRAININGREQUIREMENTS Pages:51-511.0TECHNICA'L TRAINING1.1HumanErrorReduction Techniques forEngineers*

(including recordreviewandverification) 1.2Electronic Corrective ActionSystem'.3FolioDatabase*

1.4Calculation Matrix1.5SystemDesignandLicensing Basis~1.6SROlevelselftaughtsystemstrainingwithtestandremediation*

1.7CausalAnalysisandeffective problemsolvingtechniques 1.8Operability Determinations*

1.950.59ScreensandEvaluations*

1.10PRA/Maintenance Rule1.11INPODatabase/NRC WebPage~1.12Environmental*Qualification 1.13GenericLetter89-131.14GenericLetter89-101.15HighEnergyLineBreakAnalysis1.16AppendixR1.17StationBlackout1.18Communications-Elevating IssuestoMgnt.2.0PROCESSTRAINING2.12.22.32.42.5TheEnhancedSystemReadiness ReviewProgramandProcedure UseoftheAssessment DatabaseSystemsIndexedDatabaseSystem(SIDS),accessanddataentryUseof.computers LessonsLearnedandVulnerabilities frompreviousindependent inspections andreviews.*ForSystemManagersonly.Senunarstoindoctrinate otherteammembersindesignandlicensing basisfundamentals andkeyconceptsanddefinitions relatedtooperability determinations and50.59screensandevaluations willalsobeconducted forotherteammembers.

0 Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page52of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 6SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWDOCUMENTATION ANDDATASOURCESPages:52-53DESIGNBASISDOCUMENTATION P&IDsElementary andOneLineDiagramsDBDs&Associated Notebooks Calculations Modifications

-OpenandClosedSafetyEvaluations andScreenings TMODS-~ComnentEvaluations DesignChangeDeterminations LICENSEBASISDOCUMENTS UFSAR,FSAR&SERincluding Amendments GeneralDesignCriteria&FSARQ&ALicensing HistoryBooksCommitment DatabaseRegGuidesLERs&NOVsTechSecsandBasesNRC0nItemListDATASOURCESOperating Procedures Abnormal0ratingProcedures Emergency Operating Procedures Annunciator ResponseProcedure Preventive Maintenance Procedures/PMCR Surveillance TestProcedures sTrainingLessonPlansCondition Reports-0enandClosedPreviously conducted audits,assessments (SSFIs,EDSFIs,QA/PA,3areviews)ResultsofrelevantNRC&INPOinstions(InstionRerts,etc.)GenericLettersandResnsesIENsIEBsandResonsesSOERsSERsPart21Notifications Westinghouse Information VendorManualsJO/ARsincluding AREvalsrabilityDeterminations

&,TDMsOps0nItemLogDATASOURCES(CONTINUED) 0ratorWorkarounds/Concerns RestartPlanStrategies Engineering Evaluations Sifications andStandards PRAComonentsBasedand0ratorActionBasedRiskRankingEngineering Memos Information

.PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page53of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 6SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWDOCUMENTATION ANDDATASOURCESPages:52-53ReceiptInsectionProcedures RelayDocumentTechnical DataBookPMI5023Dedication PlansLongStandingClearances/Caution TagsOperatorAids Information

'MP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page54of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 7'SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM(SYSTEMWALKDOWNGUIDELINES)

Pages:54-611.0PURPOSE'hiswalkdownguideline istobeusedasareference whileconducting theExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewTeam(orindividual) walkdowns.

Thecompleted walkdowns, duringtheinitialSRR,shouldbetakenintoaccountinsettingthescopeoftheESRRwalkdowns.

2.0GENERALMETHODS2.1Definethepurposeofthewalkdown,'areas tobevisited/observed, rolesoftheindividual teammembers,andassistance fromHealthPhysicsorotherdepartments toaccessareas.2.2Planthewalkdownexecution andimplementation.

Pre-define howthewalkdownwillassesstheconformance oftheplantwithdesignandlicensing basisrequirements (Forexample,pipingandcomponent configuration, electrical separation, etc.).Ensureremoteelectrical

cabinets, tanks,etc.andinstrumentation including controlRoomandRemoteShutdownPanelinstruments areincludedinthewalkdownplan.ContactHealthPhysicssupervision toobtainanyspecialALARAreviewspriortoactualsystemwalkdowns.

2.3Brieftheteamonthepurposeandplan.2.4Conductthewalkdown.

Focustheteamonobservation ofequipment.

Workindependently anddiscussconcernsforclarity.Takeconciseandaccuratenotestoquantifyanddescribefindingsinsufficient detailtopreventhavingtowalkdowntheitemtwice.2.5Conductaformalpostwalkdownbriefing.

Reviewthenotes,discussissuesanddocumenttheresultsontheESRRAssessment forms,enteringthedataintotheESRRAssessment database.

Identifyanyimpactonequipment orsystemoperation.

Immediate concernsaretobeidentified totheengineering supervisor andtheoperations ShiftManager.2.6Identifytheitemsthatneedtobecompleted forthesystemtomeetitsintendeddesignfunction.

Assesseachitemagainsttherestartcriteria, Attachment 8.Theitemsaretobedocumented fordisposition andtrackinginSIDS.

~

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5,Page55of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 7SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM(SYSTEMWALKDOWNGUIDELINES)

Pages:54-613.0GUIDELINES 3.1Theteam(leadbytheSystemManager)istooutlinethesystemwalkdownstrategy.

Keysystemcomponents andsystemconcernsaretobeidentified.

3.2Theteamistoidentifynecessary operational orplantconfiguration drawingstoaccompany theteamduringthewalkdown.

3.3Throughout thewalkdown, theteamistofunctionasacohesiveunit,maintaining focusoneitherindividual systemcoinponents orspecificsystemareas.3.4Thewalkdownistofocusonoperability issuesaswellasconformance with-systemdesignconfiguration anddesignbasis.Otherconditions including potential impactonequipment reliability shouldbenotedduringthewalkdown.

3.SEachTeammemberisexpectedtorecorddetailednotesidentified duringthewalkdown.

Anyareasofthesystemthatcouldnotbewalkeddownshallbenotedandjustified inthewalkdownreport.3.6Examplesofteamfocusareasinclude:Condition ofsnubbers, pipesupports, hangersandfasteners Condition andplacement ofcoatingsandinsulation Evidenceofcorrosion Evidenceofboricacidorboricacidbuildupespecially oncarbonsteelcomponents, andmaterialwastageUnauthorized modifications, partialmodifications ortemporary modifications notinaccordance withstationprogramsSurfacecondition ofvisiblestructural weldsCondition ofbarrierorpenetration sealsUseofunauthorized chemicals oncomponents Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page56of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 7SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM(SYSTEMWALKDOWNGUIDELINES)

Pages:54-61~Evidenceofbolttorquerelaxation.

Evidenceofdiscoloration onrelays,cableinsulation orelectrical components Condition insideelectrical cabinetsUnauthorized orexpiredscaffolding inunauthorized locations orimpacting equipment performance Hosesorotherconnections forventsordrainsPresenceofabandoned equipment notclearlylabeled3.7Thefollowing isagenerallistofelectrical andmechanical equipment physicalplantinspection items:3.7.1Electrical PanelsEquipment

~-Identifymissingwaterplugsorholes/openings incabinets(waterormoistureintrusion candegradeordamageequipment).

~Identifymissingorlooseboltsorthumbscrews(ifmissingcanviolateseismicevaluation anditisnotgoodworkpractice).

~Identifyopendoorsorbackpanels(ensureproperlyclosedandlatched,otherwise canviolateseismicevaluation orallowdirt,,,water,etc.,toenterpanel).~Identifymis-positioned breakerswitches(anything thatisdifferent).

Identifyimproperlabelingonkeycomponent breakers/switches (ensurethattheyareaccurateandlegiblepercontrolled drawings; alsoincludesmodules,relays,conduit).

Identifydirtordebriscoveringcoolinggratingsorfilters(ifblocked,canpreventcoolingandcauseheatbuildupandsubsequent equipment degradation).

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5,',Page57of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 7SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM(SYSTEMWALKDOWNGUIDELINES)

Pages:54-61Feelpanelsandequipment enclosures whereappropriate tocheckforexcessive heatbuildup(canbeanindication ofdegradedequipment; initiaterequestforthemography check).Checkcabletrays.(Cableshouldnotbehangingoutsideofcabletray;canoverstress cabletray).Checkcablesandconduitfordegradation (cracked, brittle,chafed,bendradius,etc.).CheckMCCsoverallforanythingthatisdifferent.

Noteanydeficiency tags,especially oldtagsnotbeingworked.Thesemayneedincreased priorityorhavehadworkcomplete'd butthetagshavenotbeenremoved.~Checkforanyabnormalsoundsorsmellscomingfromthe,cabinet(mayindicatedegradedequipment)

~Verifyequipment-grounding cableisconnected andintact.~Lookatgeneralmaterielcondition ofcabinet(rust,dirt,considerqualitative impactonheattransfer).

~Inspectseismicsupportsandtrays.~sInspectoverallcondition ofterminalstripsandmechanical connections (luglandings).

Inspectconduitandjunctionboxesforexternaldamage,looseconduitconnections andmissingpartsandfasteners.

~Inspectsolenoidvalvesandmotorcoversforevidenceofdamageorequipment degradation.

3.7.2Mechanical Components

~Identifyanyabnormalsoundsorsmellscomingfrompumpormotoroperation.

Bearinghousingsandmotorsandpumpsaretobeinspected forsignsofexcessive heator,vibration.

f Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Pago58of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM'ttachment 7SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM(SYSTEMWAIKDOWNGUIDELINES)

Pages:54-61~Lookatgeneralmaterialcondition ofpumpormotorforsteam,oil,waterleaks,properlevelsinoilreservoirs orsightglasses(andproperlymarked),missinginsulation, properconduitinstallation.,

Identifypinnedhangers.Inspectsystemgaugesforproperoperation ortypicalvalues.Lookforpumprotationorreverserotationifpartofadualtraincommonheadersystem(couldindicatecheckvalvedegradation orisolation valvesleakingby)Identifydirtordebriscoveringcoolinggratingsorfilters(ifblockedcanpreventcoolingandcauseheatbuildupandsubsequent equipment degradation)

Noteanydeficiency tags,especially oldtagsnotbeingworked.(Thesemayindicateaneedforincreased priorityortheymaybeanindication thattheworkwascompleted butthatthetagshavenotbeenremoved.)

Checkequipment/equipment skid/foundation bolting.,

(Areallboltspresentwithproperthreadengagement'?)(minimum offlushorbetter)~Reviewtrendsofparameters onkeysystemequipment; visuallyinspectidentified equipment'with degraded.performance.

.~Visuallyinspectforoldleakrepairfittings, ensureTemporary Modifications existtorestorecomponents withleakrepairfittings.

~Inspectequipment labeling/tags (ensuretheyareaccurateandlegiblepercontrolled drawings).

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page59of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 7SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM(SYSTEMWALKDOWNGUIDELINES)

Pages:54-613.8Thefollowing listcontainsmaterialconditions indicating equipment operability issues:3.8.1Operability IssuesLeaks(water,steam,oil,air-packing, flanges,rustoncomponents orfloor).Lubrication (sightglasses,bull'seyes,greasecups,greasefittings, valvestems).Handwheels/valve operators (missing, keyorpinmissing,unlocked, notlabeled).

HFilters,screenorlouvers(clogged, dirty,missing).

Instruments orgauges(outofcalibration, inoperable, bentpointers).

Drainsordrainholes(clogged, blocked,full,screensorgratingmissing).

Linesorpipes(loose,unbracketed, vibrating, insulation missingordamaged,notproperlysloped).Fasteners/bolts (loose,stripped,

corroded, missing).

Indicating lamps(missing, burnedout,missingcovers).Controlroomannunciators.

Panels(coversmissing,boltmissingornottightened, dirtanddebrisinside).Arealighting(bulbsmissingorburnedout,inadequate tosupportactivities).

Lookforconsistency betweensimilarparameters.

Packing(bottomed out,outofadjustment, dirtyorrustedglands).

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page60of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 7SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM(SYSTEMWALKDOWNGUIDELINES)

Pages:54-61~-Cablesorleads(unsecured, wornorfrayedinsulation, improperterminations).

Motorsorgenerators (dirty,brushriggingpigtailsbroken,carbondust,excessive noiseorvibration, groundstrapslooseormissing).

Preservation (rust,corrosion, missingordamagedinsulation or-lagging).

Checkvalves(oscillating lever,banging,stuckopen).MOVs(lubricant leaks,missingT-Drains).

Valves(driedgreasecakedonstem,packingorstemleaks,bentstem).3.9Thefollowing isagenerallistofadditional inspection itemsthatapplytobothmechanical andelectrical equipment:

3.9.1Mechanical orElectrical Equipment

~Identifyinadequate ordegradedstructural components.

~Inspectsystempipingforevidenceofwaterhammer,severetransients, orimproperventing.Damagedsupports, baseplategrouting, anchors(pulled-out ordeformed) aretobeidentified forfurtherrootcauseanalysis.

~Inspectfor,unauthorized loadssupported fromcabletrays,coiiduits orpipingsystems,~Identifyundocumented systemmodifications.

~Identifydamagedheattraceanddamagedormissinginsulation.

Notepipingexhibiting cyclicalvibration forpossiblehighcyclefatigueconcerns.

Safetypostings, radiological postings(properly positioned, legibleandunderstandable).

4 Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page61of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM..Attachment 7SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM(SYSTEMWALKDOWNGUIDELINES)

Pages:54-613.10TheSystemManageristoensurethatteammembersrecordidentified walkdownissuesinWalkdownReports,andduringPhase1ontheAttribute Assessment forms.TheSystemManagerisresponsible toensurethatanydiscrepancies haveappropriate follow-up corrective actionsinitiated toresolveanyidentified issues.

Information

~PMP7200.RST;004 Rev.5Page62of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 8CRITERIAFORWORKINCLUDEDIN.RESTARTSCOPEPages:62-68NOTECHANGESTOTHERESTARTCRITERIAREQUIRETHEAPPROVALOFTHESENIORMANAGEMENT REVIEWTEAM(SMRT)1.Reviewtheopencorrective actionitemagainsttheRestartScreening Criteria.

TheRestartScreening CriteriaisusedtoidentifyscopeofitemsreviewedduringPhases1,2,and3.Ifnoneofthecriteriaapply,thentheactionitemisnotapplicable totherestarteffort.Iftherestartscreening criteriaappliestheSystemManagershoulddetermine whentheactionitemmustbecompleted tosupportsafeandeventfreerestartandreliablepoweroperation.

Programownersandfunctional areamanagers(ortheirdesignees) shallalsofollowtheguidanceinthisattachment forscopingnonsystem-specific programmatic andfunctional areaSIDSitemswhendirectedbytheDirectorofRestart.Inthiscapacity; theseowners/managers/designees

function, ineffect,astheSystemManagerfortheseitems.Restartl-Activities requiredtobecompleted priortoenteringStartup/Power Ascension ofUnit1.Thisclassification includesnecessary restartandpowerascension testingactivities Restart2-Activities requiredtobecompleted priortoenteringStartup/Power Ascension ofUnit2.Thisclassification includesnecessary restartandpowerascension testingactivities.

PostRestartl-Activities whichshouldbecompleted onascheduleconsistent withtheUnit1normalplantworkcontrolsprocess.PostRestart2-Activities whichshouldbecompleted onascheduleconsistent withtheUnit2normalplantworkcontrolsprocess.NotApplicable

-Activities thatarenotrequiredtobecompleted.

2.Enterdescriptive textthatdescribes aspecificissueintheISSUESbox.Thisisasearchable textfieldofupto255characters andisdesignedtoassisttheSystemManagersinreadilyretrieving information onassociated issues.Someexamplesarepackingleaks,oilleaks,housekeeping, etc.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page63of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 8CRITERIAFORWORKINCLUDEDINRESTARTSCOPEPages:62-683Iftheissueissystem-specific butalsoisrelatedtoanexistingstationprogram,consideridentifying thePROGRAMbyscrolling, thenselecting themostappropriate programsourceanddraggingtheappropriate program(s) intotheRELATEDPROGRAMbox.Thisinformation mayhelpprogramownersidentifyprogrammatic weaknesses.

Examplesofprograms'ourcesincludeHighEnergyLineBreak,AppendixR,StationBlackout, etc.Fornewitemsplacedinthe"Nosystementered"bininSIDS,theESRRgroupwillreviewtheitemandassignittoasystemorprogrammatic and/orfunctional area.Ifaneededprogramisnotlisted,contacttheSIDSdatabasecoordinator.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page64of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 8CRITERIAFORWORKINCLUDEDINRESTARTSCOPEPages:62-684.Identifytheapplicable RestartScreening Criteriaasoutlinedinthisattachment.

EnterthiscriteriainSIDSbyscrolling andselecting themostappropriate criteria(e.g.RESTART1A, RESTART2A, RESTART2B, etc.).5.Identifytheapplicable moderestraint fortheitembyscrolling, thenselecting theappropriate mode(e.g.,1,2,3,4,etc.).6CompletetheINITIALCOMMENTfieldintheINITIALREVIEWscreen.Thecommentfieldshouldcontainspecificreasonsfortheitembeingincludedorexcludedfromtherestarteffort.Ensurethattheinformation isaccurateandconcise,technically justifying fromadesignbasisviewpoint,theSCOPEandRESTARTCRITERIAselected.

TheCOMMENTfieldmustbecomple'ted priortoSystemManagerapproval.

Note:TheFINALCOMMENTfieldontheFINALREVIEWscreenistobecompleted priortothefinalreadiness reviewpresentations.

Thisfieldistojustifythattheworkcompleted willsupportrestartreadiness.

7.DuringPhases1,2,and3,theSystemManagerwillapproveSIDSitemsasRestartl,

Restart2, PostRestartl, PostRestart2, orN/A.TheSystemManagerwillsignifyhisapprovalofthescopeby"Approving" thescopeandjustification commentsintheInitialSystemManagerApprovalBoxinSIDS.Later,duringPhase3,ifarestartitemisnotcompleted, theSystemManagerwilldenotetheitemasan"Exception" intheFinalSystemManagerApprovalBoxinSIDS.Ifanitemissatisfactorily completed, theSystemManagerwilldenotehis"Concurrence" intheFinalSystemManagerApprovalBoxinSIDS.8.DuringPhase4,itemswillbescopedasWCPorRESTART1orRESTART2.

9.Additional information isavailable intheSystemsIndexedDataBaseSystemsOperator's Manual.

J Information PMP7200.RST.004Rev.5Page65of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 8CRITERIA.

FORWORKINCLUDEDINRESTARTSCOPEPages:62-68RESTARTSCREENING CRITERIAIssueswillbeevaluated againstcriteria1through9.Ifcriteria1through7donotapply,thencategorize theissueusingcriteria8or9.Issuesshallberesolvedpriortorestartiftheyare:.1)NuclearSafetyRequiredtoaddressanuclearsafetyissue.Issuesmaybeclassified asfollows:a)Itemsthatcouldresultinsignificant personnel radiation

exposure, radioactivity releaseoreffluentdischarge, inexcessoflimits.b)Reducescumulative deficiencies, backlogsorconditions that,intheaggregate, areevaluated tohavesignificant negativeimpactonnuclearsafety.(Notapplicable toindividual workissues).2)Operability Requiredtoaddressanoperability issue.Issuesmaybeclassified asfollows:a)Eliminates anexistingcomponent failure,deficiency, orcondition thatcouldresultmoperation in,orentryto,anLCOactionstatement ifleftuncorrected.

b)Wouldresultinfailureorinability toperformarequiredsurveillance testduringthecurrentoutageorthefollowing operating cycleinaccordance withtheplanttechnical specifications.

c)Wouldincreasetherisktooperation orsafetyassociated withperforming asurveillance.

Information

'MP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page66of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 8CRITERIAFORWORKINCLUDEDIN'ESTARTSCOPEPages:62-68d)Testingorretesting thatmustbeperformed tocertify'system orcomponent operability, including testingonsystemsorcomponents duringpowerascension thatresultinbreeching asystemregardless oftheworkbeingclassified asarestartissueornot.e)Reducescumulative deficiencies, backlogsorconditions that,intheaggregate, areevaluated tohavesignificant negativeimpactonoperability.

(Notapplicable toindividual workissues).3)DesignBasisRequiredtorestoreacceptable designmarginorconformance.

withthedesignbasis.Issuesmaybeclassified asfollows:a)Correctsdesignbasisdeficiencies; i.e.,deficiencies insafety-related ortechnical specification equipment notinconformance withdesignbasisdocuments.

4)LicenseandLicensing BasisRequiredtoresolveunreviewed safetyquestions (USQs)ortorestoreconformance withthelicense,licenseconditions orlicensing basis.Issuesmaybeclassified asfollows:a)Restoreslicensing basisdeficiencies toconforming conditions.

b)TechmcaISpecification changestosupportsafeplantoperation.

5)Licensing Commitments Requiredtomeetrestartlicensing commitments suchasA/Einspection andrelatedprogrammatic issues,andconfirmatory actionletterissues.Issuesmaybeclassified asfollows:a)Resolvesexistingdeficiencies orconditions thatwouldresultinthefailuretomeetalicenserequirement orarestartcommitment toanoutsideagency.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page67of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 8CRITERIAFORWORKINCLUDEDINRESTART'SCOPE Pages:62-686)Configuration Management Requiredtoaddressanorganizational, programmatic, orprocessdeficiency thatcouldpreventmaintenance ofadequatedesignmarginsorconformance withthedesignorlicensing basis.Issuesmaybeclassified asfollows:a)Correctsdeficiencies inconfiguration management

programs, processes, engineering analysiscodes,oroperating, maintenance, ortestprocedures thathaveareasonable probability ofaffecting equipment OPERABILITY.

7)Reliability Requiredtoaddresssignificant equipment materialcondition deficiencies singlyorinaggregate; orrepetitive failuresthatcouldaffectsafetysystemavailability, impactplantreliability, orreducetheabilityofoperators tooperatetheplantsafely.Issuesmaybeclassified asfollows:a)Reducescumulative deficiencies, backlogsorconditions that,intheaggregate, areevaluated tohavesignificant negativeimpactonsafetysystemavailability orreliableplantoperation.

(Notapplicable toindividual workissues).b)Restoresdegradedcriticalcomponents orconditions thatcouldresultinaplanttransient, powerreduction orshutdown.

c)Resolves"conditions thathaveresultedinrepetitive safetysystemorequipment failures.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5.Page68of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 8CRITERIAFORWORKINCLUDEDINRESTARTSCOPEPages:62-68Issuesthatarenotclassified asrestartshouldbeclassified asfollows:8)PostRestartIssuesa)Issuecanbescheduled forasubsequent outage.b)Issuecanbereadilyworkedonline,doesnotaffectsafeandreliableoperation, doesnotrepresent asignificant challenge toMaintenance RuleGoalsorLCOallowedoutagetime,anddoesnotimpairoperations necessary toperformsurveillance ormonitoring.

c)Issueisclassified asminormaintenance, orhousekeeping, anddoesnotaffectplantoperation.

d)Issueisanadministrative issue.e)Issueisadocumentation deficiency thathasnosafetyimpact.9)Industrial SafetyConcernNOTE:Industrial safetyconcernswillnotbeclassified as"restart" becausethepriorityandresolution oftheseconcernswillbeaddressed undertheestablished workcontrolprocesspriorities andscheduling.

Althoughanindustrial safetyissueisnotclassified asrestart,itwillbeworkedpromptly, commensurate withthesafetyrisk.~td~

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page69of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 9PHASE2OUTAGESCOPEAPPROVALPROCESSPages:69-69NEWWORKSYSTEMMANAGERENGINEERING SUPERVISOR AllothernewworkFieldworkitems-SystemReadiness ReviewBoarde.g.ARs/JOsOutageScopeManagement Team(SeeNote)SIDSupdatetoNPMScheduling NOTE:SRRB(orsubcommittee thereof)reviewsthescopingoftheseitemsseparately.

SIDSisthenupdatedtoreflectSRRBcommentsbytheSystemManager.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page70of101"EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 10RESTARTREQUIREDSCOPEDEFERRALFORMPages:70-70UNIT:DATE:SYSTEM:DOCUMENTTYPE:(e.g.,Condition Report,ActionRequest)KEYI.D:(e.g.,Condition ReportorActionRequestNumber)ItemDescription:

InitialTechnical Justification forRestartScopeDesignation (ensuretheoriginalbasisforscopingtheitemasrequiredforrestartisaddressed);

Technical Justification forRestartDeferral:

NewScheduled Completion Date:(ScopeAddition/Deletion formattachedifapplicable)

Originator Date:SystemManagerDate:Designated Ops.Rep.Engineering Supervisor Date:Date:NuclearLicensing Manager/DirectorofRegulatory AffairsDate:SystemEngineerManagerDate:Date:PORCMtg.¹Date:

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page71of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM.Attachment 11EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWCLARIFICATION SHEETPages:71-71SstemManaerAroyalConcurItemclosedandworkcompleted satisfies restartrequirements, orforthosepostrestartitemsthatarenotincludedintheaggregate impact.ExceptOpenrestartitems(including thoseitemsthatare"workcomplete" butnotadministratively closed),oritemsthatareclosedbutdonotsatisfyrestartrequirements..

PostRestartDeferredDenotedonitemsassociated withacomponent thathastwo(2)ormorepostrestartdeferreditems,excluding PMpostrestartitems.RestartRequiredDeferredDenotedonitemswithdeferredscopethatwereinitially

approved, asrestartrequired.

Theseitemsmustbeaccompanied byaRestartRequiredScopeDeferralForm(Attachment 10).

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page72of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 12INITIALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORTPages:72-74INITIALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REPORTCOVERSHEETSYSTEMTITLESYSTEMREVIEWERS SystemManagerSignature

/DateOperations Representative

• Signature./

DateLicensing Representative

~Signature

/DateEngineering Supervisor Signature

/DateESRRManager/Coordinator

.--Signature

/DateSystemReadiness ReviewBoard.Signature

/DatePlantOperations ReviewCommittee PORCMTG.¹Chairman, Signature

/Date,~Thesesignatures maybeobtainedbyroutingthereporttobothindividuals simultaneously.

Retaincopiesofbothsignatures withtheoriginalofthereportintheSRRBmeetingminutes.

'

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page73of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 12INITIALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORTPages:72-74INITIALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORTFORMATEXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0INTRODUCTION

1.1Purpose1.2ScopeandApproach(Includespecificidentification ofthesystem'ssafetyandaccidentmitigation functions)

2.0 RESULTSANDCONCLUSIONS

2.1SummaryofAttribute Assessments 2.2SuimnaryofReviewofSIDSItems2.3SummaryofOpenItems2.4Observations andConclusions (including recurring itemsjudgedtoneedfurtherextentofcondition determination)

(seestep4.3.10a)3.0ATIRIBUTE ASSESSMENTS 3.1Assessment Matrix3.2.-Attribute Assessments andreviewofsystemfunctions.

3.3Discrepancies

'"4.0WALKDOWNRESULTS4.1WalkdownScope4.2Observations 5.0REVIEWOFSIDSITEMS5.1ReviewofOpenItems(SummaryInformation) 0 Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page74of101~,EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 12INITIALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORTPages:72-745.2Revie'wofClosedItems(SummaryInformation)

6.0REFERENCES

6.1ENCLOSURES:

Enclosure 1:Attribute Assessment FormsEnclosure 2:Enclosure 3:RestartItems(SIDS)Post-restart OpenItems(SIDS)Enclosure 4:ReviewofClosedItemsFromSIDSEnclosure 5:SystemBoundaries Enclosure 6:WalkdownPlan6.2FIGURESANDTABLESFigure1:SystemBoundaries Table1:FinalSystemReadiness ReviewAssessment MatrixTable2:Attribute Assessment SummaryTable3:Assessment Discrepancies Recommended forCorrective ActionPriortoRestartTable4:Assessment Discrepancies Recommended forClosurePostRestart Information PMP7200.RST.004Rev.5Page75of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMA~ichment 13FINALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORTPages:75-77FINALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REPORTCOVERSHEETSYSTEMTITLEDATESYSTEMREVIE%ERS SystemManagerDateOperations Representative

~DateLicensing Representative

~DateEngineering Supervisor DateESRRManager/Coordinator DateSystemReadiness ReviewBoardDatePlantOperations ReviewCommittee DatePORCMTG.¹~Thesesignatures maybeobtainedbyroutingthereporttobothindividuals simultaneously.

Retaincopiesofbothsignatures withtheoriginalofthereportintheSRRBmeetingminutes.

• A<gL Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page76of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 13FINALEXPA'NDED SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORTPages:75-77FINALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORTFORMAT1.0OVERVIEW1.1Summaryofitemsclosedsincetheinitialreportissuance91-18Operability Determinations (listeachitem)Engineering Evaluations (listeachitem)DCPs(listeachitem)IActionRequests(listeachitem)Condition Reports(listeachitem)NRCCommitment DataBaseitems(listeachitem)OperatorWorkarounds (listeachitem)OutageRequiredPMs2.0OPENITEMREVIEW2.1Items91-18Operability Reviews(listeachitem)Engineering Evaluations (listeachitem)DCPs(listeachitem)WorkRequests(listeachitem)Condition Reports(listeachitem)Commitment DataBase(listeachitem)OperatorWorkarounds (listeachitem)k

'I Information PMP7200.RST.004 "Rev.5Page77of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAM,Attachment 13FINALEXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWREPORTPages:75-772.1Items(Continued)

OutageRequiredPM'sthatwillbecomeoverduepriortonextplannedoutage2.2RestartScoping2.3ScheduleforResolution ofOpenItems3.0DESIGNANDLICENSEBASISISSUESSUMMARYExplainthesignificance ofeachissue(oneortwosentences onsafety,risk,orsystemoperability/reliability impact.Discusswhatplans(s)isinplaceforresolution ofeachissue.Includewhentheissueisscheduled toberesolved.

4.0WALEDOWN4.1Walkdownpurposeandscope4.2WalkdownTeam4.3WalkdownResults4.4,Conclusions 4.5RestartScoping5.0AGGREGATE IMPACTOFDEFERREDWORK

Attachment:

Markedupdrawingsshowingcomponents withmultiple(twoormore)Post-restart orrestartdeferredworkitems.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page78of101'XPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 14EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWSINTEGRATED RESULTSPages:78-82ESRRProgramCoordinator DateESRRProgramManagerDateDirector, Engineering RestartDateSystemReadiness ReviewBoardDatePlantOperations ReviewCommittee PORCMtg.¹Date Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page79of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 14EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWSINTEGRATED RESULTSPages:78-82EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWSINTEGRATED RESULTSFORMAT

1.0INTRODUCTION

ANDPURPOSE1.1Introduction 1.2Purpose2.0SCOPEANDSTRUCTURE FORLEVEL1ESRRs2.1OverallApproachandScope2.2SystemPrioritization 2.3Structure ofLevel1ESRRTeams2.4VerticalSliceMethodology 2.5Screening ofOpenItemsforRestartRequirements 2.6ReviewsandSelf-Assessments 3.0SUMMARYOFPHASE1RESULTS3.1VerticalSliceResultsandCharacterization ofFindings3.2Screening ofOpenItems3.3WalkdownResults4.0ASSESSMENT OFRESULTSBYTOPICAREA4.1LessonslearnedtobeincludedinLevel2ESRR4.2Identification ofPotential Programmatic Issues Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5:Page80of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 14EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWSINTEGRATED RESULTSPages:78-8

25.0CONCLUSION

S 5.1SystemReadiness 5.2Potential Programmatic Issues

6.0REFERENCES

APPENDICES ARESTARTISSUES,SELECTION/SCREENING CRITERIABEVALUATION OFDISCREPANCIES BYTOPICAREATopicArea1:Electrical Calculations andAnalysisTopicArea2:I&CCalculations andAnalysisTopicArea3:Mechanical

&Structural Calculations andAnalysisTopicArea4:AccidentAnalysisTopicArea5:DrawingsTopicArea6:LogicDiagramsTopicArea7:Configuration Management TopicArea8:Specifications TopicArea9:DBDTopicArea10:ChangeDocumentation/50.59 ReviewsTopicArea11:Temporary Modifications/Bypasses TopicArea12:FSARReviewTopicArea13:TSandBases

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page81of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 14EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWSINTEGRATED RESULTSPages:78-82TopicArea14:Licensing Commitments TopicArea15:Notices/Bulletins/Generic LettersTopicArea16:Procedures TopicArea17:OperatorWorkarounds TopicArea18:IndustryOperating Experience ReviewsTopicArea19:Maintenance Procedures TopicArea20:VendorTechnical Information TopicArea21:Preventive Maintenance TopicArea22:Surveillance andPeriodicTestsandInspections TopicArea23:ISVSection XIISTTopicArea24:As-BuiltVerification TopicArea25:ControlRoomDrawingsTopicArea26:Surveillance ProgramsTopicArea27:Corrective Actions~PTopicArea28:QAAuditsandSelfAssessments TopicArea29:TrainingLessonPlansTopicArea30:OpenItems(Backlog)

TopicArea31:StrategyDocuments

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page82of101EXPA'NDED SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 14EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWSINTEGRATED RESULTSPages:78-82CGROUPINGOFESRR-IDENTIFIED ITEMSBYTOPICAREAFIGURES2.1GradedApproachforEnh'anced SystemReadiness Review2.2TypicalTopicAreasforEnhancedSystemReadiness ReviewVerticalSlices2.3EnhancedSystemReadiness ReviewPlan2.4Level1EnhancedSystemReadiness Reviews2.5TypicalSystemAssessment Matrix4.1TopicReviewSutmnary-Level1SystemsChecksandDiscrepancies 4.2TopicRevjewSummary-Level1SystemsDiscrepancies asPercentofChecks4.3IssuesbyTopicAreas-Level1Systemsbyseverity-4AIssuesbyTopicArea-Level1Systems(RestartRecommended IssuesOnly)TABLES3-1SummaryStatistics forLevel1SystemReviews3-2SummaryofAreasCoveredDuringtheWalkdowns Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page83of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 15SYSTEMWALKDOWNREPORTPages:83-83DateofWalkdown:

.SystemManager/Team Leader:~Setem:PuoseofWalkdown:

Provideabriefdescription ofthepurposeofthewalkdown.

WalkdownScoe:Provideanoverallsynopsisastothescopeofthewalkdown, primaryobjectives, timespent'nthewalkdown, totalnumberofalldeficiencies notedaswellasnotingifanyoperability concernswerenoted.WalkdownTeaProvidealistingofthewalkdownteammembersaswellastheirrespective organizations.

WalkdownResults:Provideanoverallcharacterization astotheitemsidentified, andsafetyoroperability

concerns, etc.Conclusions:

Provideanoverallassessment ofthesystemcondition basedonobservations.

Summarize anyspecificneedforimprovements andallfollow-up actionsbeingpursued.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page84of101EXPA'NDED SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMAttachment 16SYSTEMREADINESS AFFIRMATION REPORTPages:84-841.0THEREADINESS AFFIRMATION REPORTWILLINCLUDETHEFOLLOWING INFORMATION 1.1CurrentsystemLicenseChangeRequest(s).

1.2Currentoperatorworkarounds.

1.3Currentcorrective actionsrequiredofcontrolroomequipment.

1.4Currently installed T-Mods.1.5Activeoperability determinations andJCOs,withthe10CFR50.59 foreachODorJCO.1.6Theremaining open"Exceptions" itemsandany"Exceptions" identified duringtheaffirmation process.Exceptions areremaining openrestartrequireditems.1.7AnOperations priorities listcompiledfromoridentical totheFocusListorOperations Priorities AddendumList(butnotnecessarily limitedtotheselists)forthesystem.1.8Reference InitialExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewReport1.9Reference FinalExpandedSystemReadiness Reviewreport.1.10Reference thesystemtestspertheSystemTestPlan.

0 Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page85of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure1SYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICSPages:85-94SYSIKMASSESShKNT hIATRIXMAJORTOPICSDESIGNBASISLICENSING DOCUMENTS OPERATIONS mi~~~NCP.

SURVPHYSICALPLANT'ROGRAMS, PROCESS4PROCEDURES 567891011121415161718192021222324252627282930ASSESShKNT ATTRIUTES K0K0 Information PMP7200,RST.004 Rev.5Page86of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure1AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICSPages:85-94OVERVIEWThefollowing guidanceforeachofthe31majortopicsinFigure1isprovidedregarding thetypesofdocuments andsourcesofinformation tobeusedandtoprovideaconsistent definition ofthetopicareasforgroupinganddocumenting theresults.Individual reviewers willusetheirexperience andthatoftheESRRTeamtodetermine thespecificdocuments andsourcesofinformation tobeassessed.

Completed scopeofthepreviousSystemReadiness Reviewsshouldbetakenintoaccount.DESIGNBASISElectrical Calcs/Analysis:,Calculations relatedtomotors,electrical devices,circuits, andassociated powersuppliesforsystemcomponents shallbereviewed.

Thereviewsshouldassesstheappropriateness ofdesigninputs,assumptions, consistency withas-builtconfiguration, andgeneralapproach.

Also,calculation resultsshouldbeverifiedforappropriate useinotherdesignbasisdocuments.

Thepotential effectofmodifications ontheemergency electrical loadcalculation, including loadsequencing, shouldbeconsidered.

Inaddition, fusecoordination shallbeaddressed againsttherequirements ofIEEE308.2I&CCalcs/Analysis:

Calculations relatedtotheperformance, setpoints,andstability ofI&Ccomponents andloopsforsystemcomponents shallbereviewed.

Thescopeofthereviewsshouldbe.similartotheelectrical calculations.

Inaddition, reference 6.5identifies apotential concernwithinstrument uncertainty calculations, suchasduetodynamicfioweffects,andwithlackoftrendingofinstrument driftanduseofunverified driftvaluesprovidedbytheequipment vendors.3MechandStructCalcs/Analysis:

Calculations relatedtohydraulics, heattransfer, equipment/support loads,equipment/pipe

stresses, andothermechanical performance issuesrelatedtosystemcomponents shallbereviewed.

Thescopeofthereviewsshouldbesimilartotheelectrical calculations.

ot' Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page87of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure1AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICSPages:85-944.AccidentAnalysis:

AnalysisofUFSARChapter14eventsshallbereviewedforassumptions regarding systemconfiguration, performance andconditions.

5.Drawings:

Controlled drawingsdocumenting systemdesign,configuration, layout,andconformance toprograms(e.g.,AppendixR,testing,andEQ)shallbereviewedforsystemdesignbasisinformation andsysteminteraction/dependency information.

Drawingsthatareexcludedfromthistopicarelogicdiagrams(coveredinTopic6),ControlRoomdrawings(coveredinTopic25),andvendordrawings(coveredinTopic20).6.LogicDiagrams:

Thelogicdiagramsshallbereviewedforsystemdesignbasisinformation andsysteminteraction/dependency information.

7.Configuration Management:

Cross-referenced documents shallbeverifiedtobecurrent,applicable, andappropriate.

Inparticular, ESRRteamsshallspecifically reviewseveralinputchangeslookingforalackofintegration betweencalculations, accidentanalysisassumptions, designvalues,designbasisdocuments, systemdescription andnormalandemergency operating procedures.

Additionally, thefacilitydatabaseshouldbecheckedforaccuracyandconsistency withdesignrequirements.

8.Specifications:

Equipment design,procurement, andinstallation

.specifications shallbereviewedforconsistency ofsystemdesignbasisinformation andforadherence tocodeandsafetyrequirements.

Generaldesignspecifications shallalsobereviewedforsystemdesignbasisinformation.

9.DBD:Relateddesignbasisdocuments shallbereviewedforsystemdesignbasisrequirements, identification ofpossiblecross-referenced documents, andappropriate applicability.

Potential vulnerabilities includeidentification ofandcompliance withsinglefailurecriteria.

Adequateclosureofopenitemsidentified duringpreparation oftheDBDsshouldbeconsidered.

Basedontheresultsinreference 6.5,thistopicareashouldbeafocusareafortheESRR.

Information

',PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page88of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICS"Pages:85-9410.ChangeDocuments/50.59 Reviews:Changedocuments, including DCPs,Component Evaluations (CEs)andUFSARchanges,shallbeassessedforcompleteness, consistency withthesystemsafetyandaccidentmitigation functions asdefinedinthedesignandlicensing basis,appropriate consideration ofinterdisciplinary impact/input, andeffective followthrough(changesmadeorpostedagainsttheappropriate documents).

50.59screensand50.59safetyreviewsshallbereviewedtoassesswhetherthechangemayhaveresultedinacurrentplantconfiguration oroperation thatisoutsidethedesignorlicensing basis,CookPlanthas,inthepast,notperformed some50.59screenswhenrequiredbecausestationpersonnel didnotrecognize thattheywerechangingthefacilityasdescribed intheUFSAR.AspartoftheESRR,teamsshouldreviewpast50.59screensassociated withchangedocuments beingreviewedtoensurethatanexcessively liberalinterpretation ofthewords"systemasdescribed intheUFSAR"wasnotused.SeeNEI9647foradditional guidanceandcurrentindustrystandards.

Lael+

Information

'PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page89of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure1AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICSPages:85-9411.Temporary Modifications/Bypasses:

Temporary modifications and"bypasses" shallbereviewedtoverifythattheywereevaluated againstappropriate designbasisinformation anddonotresultinanunreviewed safetyquestion.

Basedontheresultsofreference 6.5,"Bypasses" shouldbeafocusareafortheESRR.Additionally, teamsshouldbealertforengineering evaluations, actionrequests, partially installed modifications, andotherchangestoensurethatnecessary screenings weredoneineachcase,CookPlanthasidentified 23specificprocesses withapotential tobypassthe50.59processasfollows:Engineering Specifications ActionRequest/Job OrdersDrawingchangesOperability determinations Technical Direction MemosNPM(Engineering)

Evaluations Mechanical Engineering MemoElectrical Engineering MemosDesignChangeDetermination Condition ReportReceiptInspection Practices DesignStandards

~DesignChangeAddenda~Setpoints

~DCDIRs~Technical databooks~PMI-5023addressing plantfabrication andrepairs~Dedication Plans~Oldclearances/Caution Tags~OpenItemsLog~WorkArounds/Watch List~Temporary OperatorAids~Permanent OperatorAidsTheseitemsshouldbereviewedinassessing thehealthofthe50.59processforthesystem.Also,thetemporary modification shallbeassessedtoassurethedurationisnotexcessive.

50.59applicability evaluations and50.59reviewsshallbereviewedtoassesswhetherthetemporary modifications mayhaveresultedinacurrentplantconfiguration oroperation thatisoutsidetheregulatory designbasisorlicensing basis.Abandoned Equipment withouta50.59shouldalsobeconsidered.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page90of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure1AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICSPages:85-94LICENSING DOCUMENTS-12.UFSARReview:Chaptersrelatedtothesystem,interfacing systems(e.g.,powerdistribution, I&C,andsupportsystems),

accidentanalysis, andapplicable designcriteriashallbereviewedforregulatory designbasisandlicensing basisinformation.

ScopeofthisreviewshouldtakeintoaccounttheongoingUFSARvalidation effort(whichwasinitially restricted to21systemsoftheoriginalSRR).PendingUFSARchangesshouldbeassessedandselectedUFSARquestions andrequirements shouldbevalidated againstinstalled equipment specifications andoperational/test procedures asapplicable.

13.TS/Bases:

LCOs,Surveillance requirements, andtheirbasesforthe.systemanditscomponents shallbereviewedforregulatory designbasisandlicensing requirements Otherappropriate sections(e.g.,forinterfacing systems,EQ-related, andcontainment isolation-related)shouldalsobereviewedforsystem/component regulatory designrequirements.

14.Licensing Commitments:

OpenitemsfromNRCinspections, commitments inthelicense(andnotintheUFSARorTS),andothercommitments madetotheNRCbydocketedcorrespondence shallbereviewedforadditional licensing basisrequirements.

Forexample,reference 6.5notesthatnotallsystemsmaymeetthecriteriaoftheresponsetoLER97-021-01 regarding singlefailureinterpretation.

Alistofsystemspecificlicensing commitments willbeprovidedtotheESRRbytheLicensing BasisReviewGroup.15.Notices/Bulletins/Generic Letters:NRCgenericcommunications andevaluations andresponses tothemrelatedtothesystemshallbereviewedforadditional regulatory designbasisrequirements andinformation.

~t~

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page91of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure1AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MA'i'RIXMAJORTOPICSPages:85-94OPERATIONS 16.Procedures:

Operating andemergency operating procedures relatedtothesystemshallbereviewedforconformance withdesignbasisinformation.

Basedontheresultsofreference 6.5,Emergency Operating Procedures shouldbeafocusoftheESRR.17.OperatorWorkarounds:

Operatorworkarounds shallbereviewedforimpactonsystemoperation orperformance.

Theimpactshouldbeassessedforconformance withthedesignbasisinformation.

18.IndustryOperating Experience Reviews:Industryexperience reviewsrelatedtothesystemshallbeassessedandcomparedtocurrentdesignbasisinformation.

Specifically, Operating Experience information fromtheINPOIndustryDatabaseandgenericNRCinformation shallbereviewedandeffectiveness ofapplication/consideration reviewed.

Basedontheresultsofreference 6.5,industryoperating experience shouldbeafocusoftheESRR.[Ref.6.15tMAIN'IKNANCE'aintenance Procedures:

Procedures fortheoverhauloforgeneralrepairofsystemcomponents shallbereviewedforappropriate useofandconformance withdesignbasisinformation.

Also,.completed workdocumentation, including anyapplicable datasheets,should.be.assessedforadequacyoftheuseoftheprocedure.

Thistopicdoesnotcoverpreventive maintenance activities (coveredinitem21)andsurveillance typeprocedures (coveredinitem22).20.VendorTechnical Information:

Vendortechnical manuals,vendordrawings, anddesigndataforwarded bythevendorrelatedtosystemcomponents shallbereviewedforconformance withdesignbasisinformation.

Basedontheresultsofreference 6.5,vendortechnical information shouldbeafocusareaoftheESRR.

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5.,Page92of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure1AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICSPages:85-9421.Preventive Maintenance:

Regularly scheduled maintenance workitemstoassureproperequipment operation, including calibrations, lubrication, andfilterflushing/changing, shallbereviewedforappropriate schedules, timeliness ofperforming theactivity, andappropriate useofmaterials, Procedures forpreventive maintenance scheduling anddocumentation shallalsobereviewed.

SURVEILLANCE 22.Surveillance andPeriodicTests&Inspections:

EachESRRteamshall,inthecourseofitsassessment, verifythatdesignbasissafetyandaccidentmitigation functions ofthesystemarevalidated andverified, eitherbyperiodictestingorbyengineering calculation forthoseportionsofthesystemthatcannotbetestedperiodically.

Procedures fortestsandinspections requiredtoverifycompliance withTSSurveillance Requirements forsystemcomponents shallbereviewedtoassesscompliance withtheTSanditsBases,appropriate methodology, andconsistency withotherdesignbasisinformation.

Resultsofthemostrecentsurveillance andperiodicperformance testsshallalsobereviewedforcompliance withdesignbasisinformation andforthepresenceofadversetrendsthathavenotbeenaddressed.

23.ISIandSectionXIIST:Procedures forInservice Inspection andInservice testingofsystempumpsandvalvesandotherperformance tests(e.g.,heatexchanger performance tests,MOVtests,specialpump/system performance tests)shallbereviewedfor.appropriate useofandconformance withdesignbasisinformation.

Resultsof.the.mostrecenttestsshallalsobereviewedforcompliance withdesignbasisinformation.

~~+=IN~

Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page93of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure1AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICSPages:85-94PHYSICALPLANT24.As-BuiltVerifications:

Walkdowns ofthesystemtoverifyconformance withdesignbasisinformation, systemlayoutagainstthedrawings, systemcondition, component configuration, interactions withothersystems,andothercharacteristics shallbeperformed basedonchecklists developed fromthedocumentation reviews.Thesewalkdowns shouldconsidertheadequacyof"systemventprovisions andhowtheprovisions areincorporated intosystemprocedures.

25.ControlRoomDrawings(i.e.theOP-series andthe9800seriesdrawings) shallbereviewedforconformance withdesignbasisinformation.

Also,thetimeliness oftheincorporation ofchangestothecurrentdrawingsshouldbeassessed.

26.Surveillance Programs:

Surveillances notassociated withItems22and23,suchasErosion/Corrosion, FireProtection, orHELB,shallbereviewedfordirectorindirectapplicability tothesystemanditscomponents andconformance withdesignbasis.Resultsofthemostrecentsurveillances shouldbeassessedagainstdesignbasisinformation.

CInformation PMP7200.RST.004

'ev.5Page94of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure1AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXMAJORTOPICSPages:85-94PROGRAMS, PROCESSANDPROCEDURES 27.Corrective Actions:ClosedCondition Reports(CRs),Maintenance ActionRequests, NPMEngineering Evaluation

Requests, andothercorrective actiontypereportsrelatedtothesystemshallbeassessedforappropriate evaluation ofproblemagainstdesignbasis,genericconsiderations, appropriate resolution, timeliness ofresolution, andadversetrends.Includedinthisreviewshallbeanassessment todetermine ifanyexistingconditions shouldbethesubjectofanoperability Determination, 50.59screenorjustification forcontinued operation.

(SeeGenericLetter91-18forfurtherdetails).

28.PAAuditsandotherAssessments:

PAaudits,EDSFIs,SSFIs,andothercompleted similarsystemorprogramassessments relatedtothesystemincluding Maintenance RuleRiskSignificance determination shallbereviewedtoassesseffectiveness oftheaudit,appropriate resolution, including addressing extentofcondition, timeliness ofresolution, andadversetrends.Implementation ofanygenericlessonslearnedfromsystem-specificSSFIsandthe9/97ISTselfassessment shouldbeevaluated.

29.TrainingLessonPlans:Operations andengineering traininglessonplansforthesystemshallbereviewedforconsistency withdesignbasisinformation andoperating procedures.

30..OpenItems(Backlog):

Maintenance, engineering, andoperations openitemsxelated tothesystemshallbeevaluated withrespecttothecurrentRestartCriteriawithintheSIDSdatabase;31.StrategyDocuments:

SomeCookPlantsystemshadspecificstrategydocuments preparedtoarticulate actionstakeninresponsetoNRCIdentified Issues.,ESRRteamsshallreviewthesedocuments andmarkthemuptorefiectanychangesneededtofullyaddressissuesofextentofcondition, t'ransportability totheotherunit,ortoensureatechnically accurateandthoroughapproachtoresolving theissue.Thismarkupshouldbebriefbutshouldfocusonidentifying majorunaddressed orunresolved issuesinthesystemthatmayimpactonresolution oftheissueaddressed bythestrategydocument.

Information PMP7200.RST.

Rev.5Page95of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIE%PROGRAMFigure2SYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXEXAMPLE-AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMPages:95-99SYSrEMASSESSMENT MATRIXEXAMPLE-AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMMAJORTOPlCSDESIGNBASISLICENSING DOCUMENTS OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SURVPHYSICALPROGRAMS, PROCESSPLANTEcPROCEDURES I256910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031Cl9AFW01AFW02AFW03AFWOSAFWC01AFWC02ASSESSMENT ATIRIBVIKS WATERSUIH Yl4JKRDUVEHANDTD.AFWmIS X'lURHNEANDSIEAM SURDAFWIMWCKNIKLVALVES HHNGDBXiN CXÃl'AINMENrKXAlKN XXXXXXEK0XXXXXXXXXXXAFWC07AFWC08AFWC09AFWC10AFWCl1AFWC12AFWC13HKiHHIERGYIJNEBREAKS BA1KCblBIPALQIALRKhlKN AHEÃmRSNGZFAILURECRIIERIAICMF

(%&0'IEMP.HRCISCNSYS(XBIAB8LTY HCIHINALHA7AKS XXXXXXXXXXXXX Information

.PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page96of101EXPA'NDED SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure2AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXEXAMPLE-AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMATTRIBUTE SELECTION GUIDANCEPages:95-99(typicalexampleonly-notacompletetreatment oftheAFWsystemcriticalattributes ordesignconsiderations)

Note:Systemattributes areselectedbasedonathoroughresearchofthesystemdesignbasis.Attributes chosenfordetailedreviewshouldbethosevitaltoaccomplishing thevarioussafetyandaccidentmitigation functions asdefinedinthedesignandlicensing basisforthespecified missiontimes(whereapplicable) andinthedesignplantconditions.

CookPlanthassometimes overlooked thecriticalfunctions ofpassivecomponents (suchastanks,strainers, sprayheaders)toassurethatappropriate performance hasbeendemonstrated bytesting,calculatioh.

oranalysis.

Additionally, suchpassivecomponents havesometimes notreceivedthoroughmaterielcondition inspections toassurethatthecomponent containstheheattracing,instrumentation, andothernecessary featuresarefunctional suchthatthecomponent remainsoperableinallrequiredmodes.ESRRteamsshallassessobviouspassivecomponents forthesetypesofissues.SYSTEMFUNCTIONS BEINGASSESSEDAFW01WaterSupply:Anadequatewatersupplyinventory isrequiredfortheAFWsystemtoremovedecayheatfromthereactorcoolantsystem(RCS)following eventsresulting inalossofmainfeedwater; Issuesrelatedtowatervolumeandlevel'indication, switchover toothersources,andoverpressure/vacuum pressurearetobeassessed.

Includedinthisassessment shouldbeareviewofthecapability ofbackupwatersuppliestofunctionasdesigned.

AFW02~Motor-driven andturbine-driven auxiliary feedwater pumps(listcomponent IDs):theAFW-pumps arecriticalcomponents fordeliveryoftherequiredAFWflow.Issuesrelatedtopumpperformance, NPSH,mitiitnum flowrequirements, motorandpowersupplies, powersupplyreliability, anddesign'equirements aretobeassessed.

AFW03Initiation andcontrol:Theauxiliary feedwater systeminitiation andcontrolcircuitry isrequiredtoautomatically initiatethesystemandassureadequatedecayheatremovalandtoallowcontrolofcooldownrates.Issuesrelatedtoinitiation andcontrolsetpoints, instrumentation, flow,andlevelcontrolaretobeassessed.

Information PMP/200.RST.004 Rev.5Page97of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure2AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXEXAMPLE-AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMPages:95-99Turbineandsteamsupply:Theturbinedriverfortheturbine-driven auxiliary feedwater pumps(component IDs)anditssteamsupplyandexhaust'recriticalcomponents fortheoperation ofthepump.Thesecomponents haveanegativeindustryoperating experience history,andatCookPlanthaveaseismicclassification (inpart)thathasbeenquestioned inthepast.Issuesrelatedtosteamlinewarminganddraining, tripandgovernorvalvedesign,operation, andmaintenance, speedcontrols, overspeed protection, andpumpalignment aretobeassessed.

AFW05AFWflowcontrolvalves(FMO-212, 222,232,242,211,221,231,241).

Theflowcontrolvalvesarecriticaltolimitflowtospecified limitstoachieveadequatedecayheatremovalandtomiiumizeovercooling oftheRCS.Issuesrelatedtovalveandactuatordesignrequirements, powersupplies, andpositioning capability aretobeassessed.

GenericAttributes tobealiedwherealicableballESRRteams~Note:Thebelowlistedgenericorcommonattributes, including itemsAFWC01toAFWC13,arebroadlyapplicable basedonCookPlantoperating history,experience, andissuesand,assuch,eachESRRteamshallbeawareofpotential effectsoftheseattributes onfunctionality oftheirsystem.AFWC01Pipingdesign:ChangesinpipingdesigncriteriasinceoriginalplantdesignMAYresultinconfusion inpipingdesign,installation, andinspection forexistingpipingandnewpipinginstallation.

Otherexamplesincludematerialcondition ofburiedpipe,ASMECodeclassification boundaries, anddesigntemperature andpressures.

Containment isolation:

Exampleofpotential concernsaremodification, maintenance, andtesting(Appendix J)ofcontainment isolation features.

AFWC03Stationblackoutoperation:

Significant efforthasbeenmadebytheindustrytoaddressrulesregarding lossofallACpower.TheAFWsystemisanimportant mitigator forthisevent..Exampleissuesincludewatersupply,flowcontrolandmanualactionsfortheAFWsystemunderstationblackoutconditions.

-Information PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page98of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure2AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXEXAMPLE-AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMPages:95-99HighEnergylinebreaks:CookPlantsystemsshouldbeprotected againsttheeffectsofhighenergylinebreaks.Linebreakissuesareinterdisciplinary, involving pipingdesign,environmental qualification,

fiooding, bamerdesign,andaccidentanalyses.

Walkdownofphysicalbarriersintendedtoensureprotection againstsuchlinebreaksshallbeconsidered toverifytheirmitigation capability.

Additionally, considertestverification ofdetection andmitigation schemes.AFWC05Environmental qualification:

EQisahighlyregulated programtoassuresystemoperation duringadverseenvironmental conditions associated withdesignbasisaccidentconditions.

TheEQprogramisbeingassessedindependently ofthisreview.Potential issuesfromthatreviewaffecting systemfunctions important tosafeoperation andaccidentmitigation shouldbeconsidered.

AFWC06AppendixR:AppendixRisahighlyregulated programthatrequiredsignificant utilityefforttoaddress.TheAppendixRprogramisbeingassessedindependently ofthisreview.Potential issuesfromthatreviewaffecting systemfunctions important tosafeoperation andaccidentmitigation shouldbeconsidered.

Specificconsideration shouldalsobegiventofirebarriersandequipment requiredforsafeshutdown.

AFWC07Electrical separation:

Redundant electrical trainsandinstrument channelsarerequiredtobeseparated byRegulatory Guide1.75.Compliance withtheserequirements shouldbeconsidered inthesystemwalkdowns.

AFWC08Seismicqualification:

TheAFWsystemisgenerally classified asseismicCategory'.in.

accordance withRegulatory Guide1.29.Compliance withtherequirements andtheimpactondesignbasisshouldbeverifiedtotheextentthattheseismicclassification andcalculational basisareconsistent.

AFWC09.Year2000(Y2K):Considerable industryeffortisbeingexpendedtoensurethereliableoperation ofmicroprocessor-based controlandindication systemswillnotbevulnerable toyear2000relatedproblems.

Identifymicroprocessor basedcontrolswithinthesystem,confirmtheyarewithintheY2Kscope,andidentifyoutstanding workremaining.

Information'IMP 7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page99of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure2AddendumSYSTEMASSESSMENT MATRIXEXAMPLE-AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMPages:95-99AFWC10SingleFailureCriteria/Common ModeFailure(CMF):TheCookPlantsinglefailuredesignbasisisnotstraightforward andmisunderstanding ormisapplication hasledtoissuesofnonconformance inthepast.Additionally, someeventsatCookPlanthavebeenrelatedtoafailuretoadequately considerpossiblefailuremodesofbothsystemandsupporting orattendant systemcomponents, ESRRteamsmustclearlyunderstand thedesignbasisintheseareasandshouldevaluatewhetherpossiblefailuremodesofboththesystemandattending systemshavebeenassessedtoensurethedesignisrobust.(seeLER97-021)Additionally, ESRRteamsshouldbealertforandidentifycommonmodefailuremechanisms (ifencountered) duringtheirreviews.Thesemechanisms includeinappropriate-operations, maintenance, testing,orprocurement priorities orpoormaterialcondition..

AFWCIIGenericLetter89-13(GL89-13):CookPlanthashadproblems,implementing GenericLetter89-13onservicewatercoolingsystems.TheGL89-13programisbeingassessedindependently ofthisreview.Potential.

issuesfromthereviewaffecting systemfunctions important tosafeoperation andaccidentmitigation shouldbeconsidered.

ESRRteamsshouldalsobealertforinstances whereservicewatersystemdeadlegsarenotproperlyoreffectively addressed undertheprogramorwhereCookoperating experience showsthat,theexistingprovisions areinsufficient.

AFWC12Temperature EffectsonSystemOperability:

CookPlanthasnotyetproperlyaccounted forlaketemperature variations inallsystemdesignbases.ESRRteamsshallspecifically assess,whereapplicable, whetherthedesignbasisforthesystemorsystemcomponents isatoddswiththemaximumseasonallaketemperature

expected, whichcouldbeashighas87.5degreesduringcertainsummermonths.Wheresuchinstances arefound,theeffectonsystemoperability shallbeassessed.

AFWC13ExternalHazards:Potential externalhazardsthatmaybeapplicable includefloodingfrombothexternalandinternalsources,missilesfrombothinternalandexternalpotential sources,windloading,tornadoandelectricstormeffects.

Information PjVIP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page100of101EXPANDEDSYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure3READINESS REVIEWATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT FORMPages:100-100Readiness ReviewAttribute Assessment FormsReviewer:

ReviewerNumber:~Attribute Description MajortopicDate:SystemAttribute ChecksCRsMajorTopicItemNumberAttribute NumberAttribute ChecksCRsElectrical Calcs/analysis 11&CCalcs/Analysis 2Mech./struct Calcs/Analysis 3AccidentAnalysis4Drawings5LogicDiagrams.

6Config.Management Info.7Specifications 8DBDs9ChangeDocs/50.59 Reviews.10Temporary Mods/Bypasses 11UFSARReviews12TS/Bases13Licensing Commitments 14Notices,Bulletins andGLs.1516171819202122Operating Procedures OperatorWorkAroundsIndustryOpExpReviewsMaintenance Procedures Vendor/Technical InfoPreventive Maintenance Surveillance andPeriodicTests&inspections ISUSection XIIST'3As-BuiltVerification 24ControlRoomDrawings, 25Surveillance Programs26Correction ActionProgram27PAAudits/Other Assessments 28TrainingLessonPlans29OpenItems(Backlog) 30StrategyDocuments 31CRNumber:Documents ReviewedAttribute Assessment Information, PMP7200.RST.004 Rev.5Page101of101EXPA'NDED SYSTEMREADINESS REVIEWPROGRAMFigure4SAMPLECOMPLETED READINESS REVIEWATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT FORMPages:101-101Readiness ReviewAttribute Assessment FormReviewer:

RussellDate:2/5/99ReviewerNumber:~ABROiSystem~AFWItemNumberAttribute NumberAFWO1Attribute Description CONDENSATE STORAGETANKDESIGNBASISMajortopic,Attribute ChecksCRsMajorTopicAttribute ChecksElectrical Calcs/analysis 1&CCalcs/Analysis Mech/struct Calcs/Analysis AccidentAnalysisDrawingsLogicDiagrams, Config.Management info.Specifications DBDsChangeDocs/50.59 ReviewsTemporary Mods/Bypasses UFSARReviewsITS/Bases Licensing Commitments Notices,Bulletins andGLs8910111213141501000000Operating Procedures OperatorWorkAroundsIndustryOpExpReviewsMaintenance Procedures Vendor/Technical InfoPreventive Maintenance Surveillance andPeriodicTest&Inspections SectionXIIST/Perf.

TestsAs-BuiltVerification ControlRoomDrawingsSurveillance ProgramsCorrection ActionProgramPAAudits/Other Assessments TrainingLessonPlans,OpenItems(Backlog)

StrategyDocuments 16"17181920212223242526272829303100.0000000CRNumber:CR4984000toprovidebasisforthestatement that174,451gallonsissufficient toremovedecayheat.Documents Reviewed1.DBD-DB-12,AFWS,Auxiliary Feedwater System,Rev.0,Change6,Section3.0.2.UFSAR10.5.2,Rev.3.TS3.7.6andBases;Attribute Assessment NoCalculation orotherdocumentation ordatacouldbefoundtoestablish thebasisforthisminimumvalue.Thebasisforthe9hourdecayheatcoolingcapacityneedstobeestablished Attachment 2ExpandedSystemReadiness ReviewProcedure ForLevel2SystemsPMP7200.RST.006, Rev.1