ML20206C595

Memorandum & Order.* Oral Argument Will Be Heard on 870424 Re Joint Motion of Intervenors Seeking Direct Certification of Board 870320 Memorandum & Order & Atty General of State of Ma Application for Stay.Served on 870408

ML20206C595
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	04/08/1987
From:	Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	NEW ENGLAND COALITION ON NUCLEAR POLLUTION, NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
References
CON-#287-3041 OL, OL-1, NUDOCS 8704130101
Download: ML20206C595 (2)

Text

_.

/"Jhp'/

r ..

DOLMETED USNRC.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 17 MH -8 P2 :03 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD Administrative Judges:

[0C ET t G hvibf BRANCH Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman April 8, 1987 Gary J. Edles Howard A. Wilber

-SERVf9 APR -8 B87

)

In the Matter of )

)

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL & OL-1 NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL. ) 50-444-OL & OL-1

)

(Seabrook Station, Units 1 ) (Offsite Emergency Planning) and 2) ) (Onsite Emergency Planning

) and Safety Issues)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER We have decided to hear oral argument on Friday, April 24, 1987 in Bethesda, Maryland, on both (1) the joint motion of several intervenors seeking directed certification of the Licensing Board's March 20, 1987 memorandum and order in the offsite emergency planning phase of this operating license proceeding involving the Seabrook nuclear facility; and (2) the application of the Attorney General of Massachusetts for a stay pending appeal of the Licensing Board's March 25, 1987 partial initial decision in the.onsite emergency planning and safety issues phase of the proceeding. As noted in our April 3, 1987 memorandum and order, all responses to the directed certification motion will have been filed and served on or before April 16 and, therefore, should be in the hands of all recipients no later than April

20. All responses to the stay application will be due on b U Y

O 2

April 20. See 10 CFR 2.788 (d) ; 2.710. Where necessary to ensure that those responses are received no later than April 21, tiling and service shall. be by express mail . cur some comparable expedited delivery service.

A formal argument order will be issued at a later-date.* For planning purposes, counsel intending to participate in the_ argument on the directed certification motion and/or the stay application should_ assume that the argument might start as early as 9:30 a.m. and is likely to carry over into the afternoon.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD O . b - 3 b = .. N .

C. Jypn Shoemaker Secretary to the Appeal Board 4 e Prior to the issuance of that order, we may wish to conduct a telephone conference with counsel for the parties to determine, among other things, which parties will be represented by their own counsel at the argument.

, ,_ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ . - . _ . . .