ML20197G401

Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations

ML20197G401
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook, 05000000, Shoreham
Issue date:	06/04/1988
From:	Lane A AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00419, 53FR16435-419, NUDOCS 8806150133
Download: ML20197G401 (3)

Text

_

'l ANDREW LANE DOCKET tlUMBER g g

' PROPOSED J/bRULE N -.a I

g#'

3 177 Waltham Street .

Lexington, Massachusetts 02173 3EJ M IfiC hiii C -

E JN ~7 PS :41 June 4, 1988 00Cyti 0Ft u: lg,,; ~.;; ,;.;'f'

_ R A M.s Secretary of the Commission U.S. ?!uclear Regulatory Commission

.(, Y!ashington, DC 20555

Dear Sir:

!!uclear power _ is the safest, cheapest and cleanest means of generating electricity, North Caroline's Duke Power Company runs a single system with eight nuclear units with outstanding success, while political ignoramuses prevent the operation of Plymouth and Seabrook nuclear plants--all in the name of "safety" which has nothing to do with the drive to prevent nuclear power.

f- V! hat's beh3nd this political obstruction is a subversive movement ,

o "to so reduce the Amer $can standard of living that the USA can be comfortably merged with the USSR." If you want the evidence, I can supply it.

Please do not be taken in by the anti-nuclear nuts and their political panderers. Do whatever you must to clarify emergency planning requirements for low-power licenses and get Plymouth operating again, Seabrook open at long last, and save Shoreham if it is not too Inte. The safety issue is a total fraud.

Very truly you'rs

[. Andrew Lane f 8806 50133 000604

! PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR

l .. .

4 1

1 i

i i

i i

I e, ..

, , ' ." . . ~ . -

.r '

l 54 mTQstgg,Hersal, toss o  %

, r.

W

! .:. 1 .

_. > 2 W

~ WASHI v clahdar wtwiert W

,yh.

db ag4

.t-

.kers'iliving;htandsd%1ig the study.' ' ty to com'pete Internation-

'M the* ally

• said measured A:nerica's 'p 't '

J countries du s.

$ste m atacem 2 The Reagan admints- performance agaInst its ference.. le .evenJ

. striklag. . Americ 4hourogred from*foreig ers times as that'as the' U.RJ'rlsikt competitors In global nessfoer"hi

%ettle al-"_ _ MMue' the " tratlonmarkets. has dismissed workers' standard of M ' h %that,would have to be paideventually r-back.

standanil cf M isi.tles **d> P such concerns, contending The report said in all Ing has risen < only. -

- Despite the boom in

?[, post' 25.toffe/ $ tha*. the cous'try's t.ade half as fast as the a F to 'n study %sf4Weef* g - _ _ N Id"_d :emall '@ deficits adre begun td im-'

^ four artasit surveyed.the ~ Armoricsus _. export, sales E condpetitivammeds M i ^ .-sindo prove mult! 4 thei Uhtted ' Untied States 'had lost one-eeventh West German and ' ' last year, America *s share as fast as Myesterdayyt'rM#1 g chaerho kborc!* 8tates la emndh dajoyl 'groun#1 cdmpaled, with average .Tapanese. Be p,f of workt exports stood at D percent last year..be-

.M - f!W repet;74, 1 - lag the longest l iesectimeF the wor'kl*s slx othet'large lhdustrial 1lem6craeles " cause of these develop tvlow the 12 percent share

$ the c otabeenom W , , ; lot on t%eerd., s i

$3 M es! e M ni & 8tas y%r_-@] e_p_

" _ 7 ~1 M vely 6 ' to'stA "I -

theteoun'cll's rt8po

• MapaC. West I' Brital 79ance[

ments, the council's stan-p the country had in 1972.1 '

Germany - :dard of Ilving indeit/ ThLs pushed the trade in-k.Undhd WWC ..

~ k '8 (fiat the Administ' afnd I

, Canada nations dropped to 78.9, which la des down to 82.6 pereen

.sn gt%med tet DIEREW4enad neglects and' the .dthask it' t Q cf Svinge genGaa&;1bgh Wepet*ts"('er-T l icWa ptisitl6n' bnited 21.1 points below its 1972 of its 1972 base. This w Ftehnid e'eenoinic 'I facel a9ntselly for' States level of 100. .

.still an Improvement ed dee6tn the 4tuttSubtfees*h bcono-of I.tternaWedlWff&de W cuperrde-WYr%hds~

al t thsk lialmt a rhore * *mic su2nmits  :

Including Traditional measures of.a from 1986. when the lndex rohr authether dietrdesting pictun(e. h' ' ' an upcoming session this the standard of living fo. fell 1* prodtsetivity- andMvestf;' -%Is "We would hepe That' to 74.5 before ;the

• States'le be- ' bokh presidential month th Toronto. icus on total output divid- weaker dollar began to i

. meat. - h - A

• candl-

"ht an facreasingky g@(.Mieo&l Sisecohd-rate dates will have strong

~

Among the report's con- ed by the population.How- boost U.S. export sales.

ever, the council said it

<W. Critics programs to propose in clusions: - Productivity, the out-

- bal,%eonomy, others are%f $ administration - Since 1972 the United divided output by the put per worker. Lhowed this area ** Porter said. States' standard of living number.to of workers to re- the most lost ground. The or have serpetsted Ansert M*e)otstrpirthe status

. "This aseither will give feat guladng*ipri the Ameri-has grown usHI only o11&Becapoint one-fourth flect the fact the that more council's measure for pro-ca 18 the areas that will world*dflargest debtor na- can people a benchmark and more American faml- ductivity dropped to 68.7 i as fast as the average determine f sture compett- tion to highlight their con- ' with which to grde the standard of Ilving of the lies find they must have percent of its 1972 base.

3 tive success." said Mi- tention that a string of quality of each candl- two incomes to keep up (1-1 chael; Porter, a Harvard . record trade deficits dur- date's proposals." other summit countrics. nanelally. The council's

- teng-term U.S. In-Univeralty economics ing the 1980s shows that ' The . council presented When compared wit h living standard also in- vcstment, incIuding professor who served as a what it called a "competi- America's two tilggest cluded tbe r..untry s tra.lc spending f. r rescarch and America has lost t he abill- compctitors. West Ger- de r cl..p en e n t , , ipit a l itveness indes" which it mnny nnd Jan m. 'he dif- deficit

o on the nrmmds that c.pppnu ni -.H. ' I+

rent- *d ""n'v .- '

P

r D 31_

l 1p L

.j e

\.

! ' O ;: .

i si lj o, O o

g i

.) e'; e

((,gT an_e. e l

j 0j l

g

'1 oE L3 ol Qe

'No hope' for'.q German mine19 l'g 0Ik .

) .!

• 1 -Io' .t M .";'%.?"#I, W 5

"";*"d= " *" m" T / 3

&l0 1.

.t D i b N ; g*.: lC*."p4" ,E E -

4 ,, c; g&.g.j g

,  ;,lj i W "21

= ."4 _, =_

.. t =_t;"

- = _0 ,,"  !

i

)

i , e,- - -

=

Oc2:! .

.: = =

ie

- gel p; i i: ;.%l%ir';s=; ,12ts A i L* 1 " ~ pped eo d

• =le?

,I 9 kA .

.I

? -

AI" 6 i y";.*,4.'2*J"; "%i,*J g b g gi 1

.i near the . French

%."2"i" s 6 t!

";"J,"."up, border. <.

I@

z-h 1, . .

It e e;e.;eee .

, in e. -

e.

- _.s 0

- _ - . - _ _ _