Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Issue date | Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ML20211L514 | 2 September 1999 | Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-4006, Demonstrating Compliance with Radiological Criteria for License Termination. Author Requests Info as to When Seabrook Station Will Be Shut Down | |
| ML20211J145 | 24 August 1999 | Comment Opposing NRC Consideration of Waiving Enforcement Action Against Plants That Operate Outside Terms of Licenses Due to Y2K Problems | |
| ML20211J155 | 30 July 1999 | Comment Opposing That NRC Allow Seabrook NPP to Operate Outside of Technical Specifications Due to Possible Y2K Problems | |
| ML20204G767 | 23 March 1999 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54(a) Re Direct Final Rule,Changes to QA Programs | |
| ML20207H492 | 12 February 1999 | Comment on Draft Contingency Plan for Year 2000 Issue in Nuclear Industry.Util Agrees to Approach Proposed by NEI | |
| ML17265A807 | 6 October 1998 | Comment on Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Util Endorses Comments Being Provided by NEI on Behalf of Nuclear Industry | |
| ML20153C779 | 18 September 1998 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Util Endorses NRC Staff Focus on Operability & Funtionality of Equipment & NEI Comments | |
| ML20153E877 | 16 September 1998 | Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1633, Assessment of Use of Potassium Iodide (Ki) as Protective Action During Severe Reactor Accidents. Recommends That NRC Reverse Decision to Revise Emergency Planning Regulation as Listed | |
| ML20248L407 | 5 June 1998 | Comment on 980506 North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp License Exemption Request for Changes to TS to Permit 24 Month Refueling Cycle at Seabrook.Requested Exemption Involves No Significant Hazards Considerations | Exemption Request Fuel cladding |
| ML20248J675 | 1 June 1998 | Comment Opposing Proposed GL Re Guidance on Storage, Preservation & Safekeeping of Quality Assurance Records in Electronic Media | |
| ML20248J510 | 29 May 1998 | Comment Supporting NRC Proposed GL, Augmented Insp of Pressurized-Water Reactor Class 1 High Pressure Safety Injection Piping | |
| ML20248C586 | 22 May 1998 | Comment Opposing Several Requests for License Changes That Appeared in Fr on 980422,pp 19972-74 | Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance |
| ML20217N309 | 2 April 1998 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Stds: Amended Requirements 10CFR50.55a,Requirements for ISI & IST of NPP Components | Dissimilar Metal Weld |
| ML20217H298 | 27 March 1998 | Comment Opposing Proposed GL, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear Grade Activated Charcoal, Issued for Comment on 970225. Requests That NRC Consider Impact & Feasibility for Industry to Implement Requirements of GL | |
| ML20216C146 | 5 March 1998 | Comment Opposing Proposed GL, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps | |
| ML20203L607 | 27 February 1998 | Comments Re Draft Reg Guide DG-5008 (Proposed Rev to Reg Guide 5.62) Reporting of Safeguards Events | |
| ML20204A757 | 24 November 1997 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors | |
| ML20211H423 | 30 September 1997 | Comment Supporting Draft NUREG-1602 & DG-1061 & Encourage NRC to Carefully Consider Comments as Well as Encl Comments | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
| ML20141G969 | 3 July 1997 | Comment Opposing NUREG-1606 Re Proposed Regulatory Guidance Related to Implementation of 10CFR50.59.Licensee Supports Approach Proposed by Nuclear Energy Inst | |
| ML20148N056 | 19 June 1997 | Comment on Proposed Supplement to NRC Bulletin 96-001, Control Rod Insertion Problems. North Atlantic Endorses Concerns & Considerations Presented on Topic by NEI, Westinghouse & Wog,Specifically Control Rod Testing | Shutdown Margin Grace period Backfit |
| ML20093G454 | 18 October 1995 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning Procedures for Nuclear Power Reactors | |
| ML20077M743 | 27 December 1994 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lower Power Operations for Nuclear Reactors | |
| ML20078N028 | 30 November 1994 | Comment Supporting NRC Initiative to Issue GL to Reconsider Positions Re Certain Security Measures to Protect Against Internal Threats at Npp.Supports Comments Presented by NEI | |
| ML20071H076 | 29 June 1994 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-60 Which Requested That NRC Change Frequency That License Conducts Independent Reviews of Emergency Preparedness Program from Annually to Biannually | |
| ML20058E015 | 14 November 1993 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Exemptions in Accident Insurance for Nuclear Power Plants Prematurely Shut Down | |
| ML20057F718 | 13 September 1993 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercise Requirements | |
| ML20045F784 | 18 June 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Opposes Rule | |
| ML20011E486 | 7 February 1990 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 | |
| B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements | 20 September 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements | |
| ML20245K420 | 7 August 1989 | Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG 1003, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Funding Schedules Should Continue to Be Developed by Utils. Recommends That App B 3.1 Be Revised to Read as Stated | |
| ML20245G072 | 3 August 1989 | Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants | |
| ML20248B620 | 2 August 1989 | Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds | |
| ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement | 7 July 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement | |
| ML20246H885 | 6 July 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components | |
| ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 | 5 July 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 | |
| ML20246K480 | 5 July 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components | |
| ML20246D881 | 30 June 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components | |
| ML20245D248 | 16 June 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors | |
| ML20246Q297 | 15 May 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
| ML20245J019 | 14 April 1989 | Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
| ML20244B324 | 10 April 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
| ML20247A297 | 4 April 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | |
| B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel | 8 March 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
| ML20246N947 | 8 March 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
| ML20236B464 | 8 March 1989 | Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
| JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants | Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Exemption Request Backfit |
| B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague | Backfit |
| ML20235T358 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint Program | Backfit |
| ML20235V854 | 27 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better Maint | Backfit |
| ML20235T186 | 24 February 1989 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit Rule | Backfit |