ML20197G401

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20197G401
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook, 05000000, Shoreham
Issue date: 06/04/1988
From: Lane A
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00419, 53FR16435-419, NUDOCS 8806150133
Download: ML20197G401 (3)


Text

_

'l DOCKET tlUMBER g g ANDREW LANE

' PROPOSED RULE -. a I

g#'

177 Waltham Street.

3E J/b N

3 Lexington, Massachusetts 02173 J M IfiC hiii C -

E JN ~7 PS :41 June 4, 1988 0Ft u: lg,,; ~.;;,;.;'f' 00Cyti

_ R A M.s Secretary of the Commission

.(,

U.S. ?!uclear Regulatory Commission Y!ashington, DC 20555

Dear Sir:

!!uclear power _ is the safest, cheapest and cleanest means of generating electricity, North Caroline's Duke Power Company runs a single system with eight nuclear units with outstanding success, while political ignoramuses prevent the operation of Plymouth and Seabrook nuclear plants--all in the name of "safety" which has nothing to do with the drive to prevent nuclear power.

f-V! hat's beh3nd this political obstruction is a subversive movement o

"to so reduce the Amer $can standard of living that the USA can be comfortably merged with the USSR."

If you want the evidence, I can supply it.

Please do not be taken in by the anti-nuclear nuts and their political panderers.

Do whatever you must to clarify emergency planning requirements for low-power licenses and get Plymouth operating again, Seabrook open at long last, and save Shoreham if it is not too Inte.

The safety issue is a total fraud.

Very truly you'rs

[.

Andrew Lane f

8806 50133 000604 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR

l 4

1 1

i i

i i

e, i

I

.. ~. -

.r l

54 mTQstgg,Hersal, toss o

r.

.:. 1 W

.kers'iliving;htandsd%1ig 2

,yh.

~ WASHI db

.t-the study.' ' ty to com'pete Internation-v clahdar ag4 wtwiert W

'M the* ally

  • said measured A:nerica's W

'p

't J countries du

$ste m atacem 2 ference.. le.evenJ s.

4hourogred from*foreig ers performance agaInst its The Reagan admints-

. striklag.. Americ times as that'as the' U.RJ'rlsikt foer"hi _ _ MMue' the " tratlon has dismissed competitors In global workers' standard of M %that,would eventually r-ness %ettle al-"

markets.

post' 25.toffe/ $

tha*. the cous'try's t.ade The report said in all Ing has risen < only.

' h have to be paid back.

standanil cf M isi.tles

    • d>

P such concerns, contending

- Despite the boom in

?[,

half as fast as the a F to 'n study %sf4Weef* g - _ _ N Id"_d :emall '@ deficits adre begun td im-'

four artasit surveyed.the West German and

' ' last year, America *s share

~ Armoricsus _. export, sales

^

' Untied States 'had lost E condpetitivammeds M i ^.-sindo prove mult! 4 thei Uhtted Myesterdayyt'rM#1 g kborc!* 8tates la emndh dajoyl 'groun#1 cdmpaled, with one-eeventh as fast as of workt exports stood at the wor'kl*s slx othet'large average.Tapanese. Be p,f D percent last year..be-

.M - f!W repet;74, chaerho 1

- lag the longest iesectimeF lot on t%eerd., s lhdustrial 1lem6craeles "

cause of these develop tvlow the 12 percent share y%r_-@] e_p_ to'stA l

$ the c otabeenom W,, ;

"I -

  • MapaC. West ments, the council's stan-p the country had in 1972.1 '

$3 M es! e M ni & 8tas k.Undhd WWC

" _ 7 ~1 M vely 6 '

theteoun'cll's rt8po I' Brital 79ance[ Germany - :dard of Ilving indeit/ ThLs pushed the trade in-i (fiat the Administ'

, Canada

~ k '8 it' t afnd I

.dthask nations dropped to 78.9, which la des down to 82.6 pereen

.sn gt%med tet DIEREW4enad Q cf Svinge genGaa&;1bgh Wepet*ts"('er-T l icWa ptisitl6n' neglects and' the bnited 21.1 points below its 1972 of its 1972 base. This w Ftehnid e'eenoinic 'I facel a9ntselly for' States level of 100.

ed dee6tn the 4tuttSubtfees*h cuperrde-WYr%hds~ thsk lialmt a rhore * *mic su2nmits Including

.still an Improvement bcono-Traditional measures of.a from 1986. when the lndex W al t of I.tternaWedlWff&de dietrdesting pictun(e. h'

' ' an upcoming session this the standard of living fo.

fell to 74.5 before ;the 1* prodtsetivity-andMvestf;' -%Is r hr authether o

"We would hepe That' icus on total output divid-weaker dollar began to

  • States'le be-

' bokh presidential month th Toronto.

. meat. - h - A i

"ht an facreasingky g@(.Mieo&l Among the report's con-ed by the population.How-boost U.S. export sales.

candl-

~

Sisecohd-rate dates will have strong clusions:

ever, the council said it

- Productivity, the out-

<W. Critics

- bal,%eonomy, others are%f $ administration programs to propose in divided output by the put per worker. Lhowed this area ** Porter said.

- Since 1972 the United or have serpetsted Ansert M*e)otstrpir status aseither feat guladng*ipri usHI o11&Becapoint.to the

. "This will give the Ameri-States' standard of living number of workers to re-the most lost ground. The ca 18 the areas that will world*dflargest debtor na-can people a benchmark has grown only one-fourth flect the fact that more the council's measure for pro-and more American faml-ductivity dropped to 68.7 i

determine f sture compett-tion to highlight their con- ' with which to grde the as fast as the average lies find they must have standard of Ilving of the percent of its 1972 base.

3 tive success." said Mi-tention that a string of quality of each candl-other summit countrics.

two incomes to keep up (1-chael; Porter, a Harvard. record trade deficits dur-date's proposals."

- teng-term U.S. In-1 nanelally. The council's When compared wit h living standard also in-Univeralty economics ing the 1980s shows that

' The. council presented vcstment, incIuding professor who served as a America has lost t he abill-what it called a "competi-America's two tilggest cluded tbe r..untry s tra.lc spending f. r rescarch and itveness indes" which it compctitors. West Ger-de r cl..p en e n t,, ipit a l deficit on the nrmmds that mnny nnd Jan m. 'he dif-c.pppnu ni

-.H.

I+

o rent-

  • d

""n'v

l P

r 1p

.j

\\.

e 3

. L O ;:

D 1_

i si lj O

o, g

i((,gT j 0j

.) e';

o e

l l

an_e.

e 0Ik L

Q

'No hope' for'.ql'g g

'1 oE 3 ol e

German mine19

)

&l0 M.";'%.?"#I, W 5 1

-Io'

.t

"";*"d N ; g*.:,

= " *" m" T / 3 D i

.t lC*."p4" E

1.

b 4

c; g&.g.j E

,lj g

i W

"21

=."4 =_ t =_t;" = _0,,"

i, e,-

=.: =

=

i

)

- l p ;

- Oc2:!.

%l%ir';s=;,12ts i

i ie ge i

;. L* 1 " ~ pped eo d A
  • =le?

k.

,I 9

?

AI" y";.*,4.'2*J"; "%i,*J

.I 6

i g b

. %."2"i" ";"J,"."up, A

s 6 t!

g gi 1

.i near the French border. <.

I@

z h

It 1,

in e.

e;e.;e e

ee e.

_.s 0

_