ML20151F968

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:30, 25 October 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 2 to Emergency Operating Procedure 1.2.4-14, Emergency Operating Procedure Validation Program
ML20151F968
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 04/06/1988
From:
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20151C809 List:
References
1.3.4-14, NUDOCS 8804190101
Download: ML20151F968 (36)
v • d • e


Text

o s

i BOSTON EDIS0N I l

PILGRIM NUCLEAR P0HER STATION s Procedure No. 1.3.4-14 i E0P VALIDATION PROGRAM List of Effective Paaes 1.3.4-14-1 1.3.4-14-2 1.3.4-14-3 1.3.4-14-4 1.3.4-14-5 1.3.4-14-6 1.3.4-14-7 1.3.4-14-8 1.3.4-14-9 -

1.3.4-14-10 1.3.4-14-11 Attachments 1.3.4-14A-1 1.3.4-14B-1 1.3.4-14C-5 1.3.4-14A-2 1.3.4-148-2 1.3.4-14C-6 1.3.4-14A-3 1.3.4-14B-3 1.3.4-14C-7 1.3.4-14A-4 1.3.4-148-4 1.3.4-14C-8 1.3.4-14A-5 1.3.4-14B-5 1.3.4-14A-6 1.3.4-148-6 1.3.4-14A-7 1.3.4-14C-1 1.3.4-14A-8 1.3.4-14C-2 1.3.4-14A-9 1.3.4-14C-3 1.3.4-14A-10 1.3.4-14C-4 Approved /'N . $ nub xt / 4///ge Q. A. Manager Date Approve M Stati W 0irector

/ '/dh Date 8804190101 9s0406 ,

PDR ADOCK 0S000293 F pgg

) i k b!\

1.3.4-14-1 Rev. 2 (t s d ! ,),

3 <_

l I. PURPOSE This document provides appropriate requirements and instructions for validating the PNPS Emergency Operating Procedures (E0Ps).

II. APPLICABILITY I The requirements and instructions specified herein apply to the overall process of developing new E0Ps and revising existing E0Ps.

This document supplements existing PNPS procedures governing procedure preparation, revision, and control but does not supplant them.

III. DEFINITIONS EOP Source Documents Guidelines, procedures, data, and other records which comprise the technical basis of the E0Ps and requirements for their development.

E0P Ooerational Correctness An E0P characteristic that refers to the compatibility of the procedures with plant hardware, plant responses, operator capabilities, other plant procedures, and the composition and manning level of on-shif t personnel .

E0P Validation The process of confirming and documenting the operational correctness and usability of the E0Ps.

LOP Usability An E0P characteristic that refers to the adequacy of the procedures' level of detail and the understandability of the information presented ,

in the procedure. 1 IV. REOUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS ,

1 A. Validation Methodoloav and Evaluation Techniaues l I

As stated above, the general attributes of E0P usability and operational correctness are evaluated through the validation process. The specific E0P characteristics encompassed by this definition are as follows:

j Q lhp()yMj(ll(l;y 1.3.4-14-2 Rev. 2

~ l

l l

Attribute Procedure Characteristic Usability Level of detail Understandability Operational Correctness Compatibility with plant hardware Compatibility with plant response Compatibility with other plant procedures Compatibility with operator capabilities Compatibilty with normal shift composition and manning level The evaluation criteria against which each of these procedure characteristics is evaluated are listed in Table 1 (page 5).

The E0P Validation Program employs the following evaluation techniques:

Observation of licensed operators using the E0Ps during real-time execution of multiple transient and accident scenarios conducted on the PNPS simulator.

Halkthroughs/talkthroughs by licensed operators of those E0Ps (and steps of E0Ps) which cannot be effectively addressed through simulated exercises. Procedure walkthroughs shall be conducted in a control room setting (either at the plant or the PNPS simulator).

Collection of operator opinions using prepared questionnaires.

Performance of validation activities and the results of associated evaluation shall be documented on the forms illustrated in Attachments A, B, and C. Additional details regarding preparation for and execution of individual E0P Validation Program activities are provided in the remaining sections of this procedure.

/ M l / V j';) jg p/ 1.3.4-14-3 Rev. 2

__ h

1 l

Table 1: E0P Validation Evaluation Criteria l Characteristic Evaluation Criteria l l Level of detail Does the E0P provide the information l necessary for operators to evaluate key l plant conditions and take the l appropriate action?

Is the level of detail provided in the EOP l consistent with the knowledge and l capabilities of the intended users?

I I Where appropriate, are response times, l equipment limitations, instrument l inaccuracies, and contingency actions l adequately addressed in the E0P? l l Understandability Are operators able to correctly, and in a j timely manner, interpret each of the steps l of the E0Ps? l l Compatibility with Does the existing plant design permit the l plant hardware performance of prescribed actions as directed l (specifically considering the availability of l both information and controls), and in the l sequence specified? l l Compatibility with Are the specified actions effective in l plant response stabilizing plant conditions?

I I Compatibility with Is the wording that is used in the E0Ps l other procedures consistent with that of other plant l procedures?

I I Hhere references to plant procedures are l provided, does the specified procedure exist, l 1s the number and title correct, and does it l provide the appropriate instructions for the l task or activity intended by the context of l the reference in the E0P? l l Are the actions prescribed in the E0Ps l compatible with those specified in other l plant procedures which may have to be l executed concurrently?

I l 1.3.4-14-4 Rev. 2 )

1 i ()b l hb \ I'i t i ,

Table 1: E0P Validation Evaluation Criteria (Continued) l Characteristic Evaluation Criteria l l Compatibility with Are the task requirements imposed by the l operator prescribed actions within the physical and l capabilities mental capabilities of the control room l operators?

I I Compatibility with Is the normal complement of on-shift l shift composition personnel able to execute the specified l and manning level actions in a timely manner and at the proper l time? l l

l f ()jj )jNf I b 1.3.4-14-5 Rev. 2

' I _ i

8. Scenario Develcoment Detailed event scenarios shall be developed to guide the performance of E0P validation exercises. The scenarios shall be of varying complexity and shall exercise to the fullest extent possible the scope of plant conditions and key actions addressed by the E0Ps. The validation scenarios shall include multiple (simultaneous and sequential) failures. L For the validation of revisions to the E0Ps, the scope of scenarios need only encompass the changes made to the previously-approved procedures. If existing scenarios are determined to be adequate for this purpose, no new scenarios need be developed.

Scenario development should be a coordinated effort by a group of individuals having expertise in E0P development, plant systems and operations, and operator training. A trial check-out of the scenarios should be conducted prior to being used in the actual E0P validation exercises to ensure that the initial conditions and specified sequence of malfunctions will generate the desired plant symptoms and conditions. Also prior to actual use in validating the E0Ps, scenarios shall be reviewed and approved by the Nuclear Training Organization.

The following process is suggested for developing the scenarios:

1. Identify the E0P flowpaths to be exercised.
2. At each major decision point in an E0P flowpath, specify the plant symptoms or conditions which would constrain operators to the desired response pattern.
3. Define system degradations, instructor actions, or event complications which could cause the specified plant symptcms or conditions.
4. Select initial plant conditions and simulator malfunctions l which will initiate and cause plant conditions to progress in accordance with the desire response patterns. l
5. Record the necessary sequence of instructor actions, the anticipated plant response, and proper operator actions on an E0P Validation Scenario Outline (illustrated on page 3 of Attachment A.)

1

6. Prepare a simple matrix of EOP flowchart paths vs. scenarios l to confirm that the key plant conditions and operator actions l addressed by the E0Ps are, in fact, covered by the combined scope of the scenarios. l l

l gjg ) ji fI i he ib Ii ' **

  • 1 l
7. Complete an E0P Validation Scenario Cover Sheet (illustrated on page 4 of Attachment A) to accompany each Scenario Outline.

I An E0P Validation Test Plan (illustrated on page 5 of l Attachment A) shall be developed which specifies the sequence for running the scenarios. Simulator exercises for each day should progress from simple to complex scenarios. In order to minimize i

the possibility of the control room operators responding in l advance to "expected" events, the following factors should also be considered in developing the Test Plan:

Similar scenarios should not be executed consecutively.

The initiating event, plant symptoms, and the flowpath through each of the E0Ps should be varied in successive scenarios.

C. Validation Team Member comoosition and Oualifications The team formed to conduct E0P validation exercises shall be composed of a designated Director, a simulator instructor, a subject matter expert, a human factors expert (for major changes 7 only), and a group of licensed operators. The designated Director shall be fully knowledgeable of the new and revised E0Ps to be validated, and shall be experienced in BHR plant operations.

Licensed operators who are participating in a validation exercise shall be organized to form a normal minimum control room on-shift complement of licensed control room operators including a Hatch L Engineer and Shift Supervisor, each performing their respective duties and assigned responsibilities.

All exercise participants shall have previously completed a formal training session on the organization, structure, conventions, and l technical content of the E0P(s) being validated. l l

0. Performance of E0P Validation Exercises E0P validation exercises shall be executed in the approved sequence specified in the Test Plan. The Exercise Director shall coordinate execution of each scenario. The test plan can be revised with the approval of the Exercise Director.

l l

The names of the Director, the simulator instructor, and the participating control room operators shall be recorded on the E0P Validation Exercise Performance Record (illustrated on page 6 of Appendix A) for each exercise conducted.

Each exercise shall be conducted as follows:

1. Set the initial plant conditions as specified on the E0P Validation Scenario Cover Sheet and in the E0P Validation Scenario Outline.

(hh ilN h b N l I'; 1.3.4-14-7 Rev. 2

e 1

2. Describe the initial plant conditions to all exercise par + cipants.

For exercises conducted during the first part of a program for validating an entire set of E0Ps, a brief description should also be given on the scenario's expected progression of events, anticipated plant responses, and the E0P(s) and E0P flowpaths intended to be validated. As participants become familiar with the validation process, this pre-exercise briefing should become increasingly roore limited in scope and shall eventually be discontinued.

3. Run the scenario in accordance with the appropriate instructions detailed in the Scenario Outline. If a walkthrough/talkthrough sequence is required, the Director shall ask the control room operators to demonstrate and describe in detail the actions they would perform in response to the described plant conditions. As appropriate, the simulator instructor shall supply additional information specified in the Scenario Outline, including a description of the plant response to the actions the operators identify as having been taken.
4. Compare the actions taken (or described as having been taken) by the control room operators to the associated actions specified in the Scenario Outline. The Director (or designated assistant (s)) should note the following performance deviations at the appropriate location in the "Notes" column of the Scenario Outline:

Performance of an inappropriate step or action Formulation of an incorrect response to a decision Hisinterpretation of a procedure step Failure to perform a required (or expected ) step or action Violation of a Limit Failure to observe a specified caution If the Operator Actions listed on the Scenario Outline are performed correctly, a check mark ( ) should be placed in the "Notes" column alongside the action statement.

E. Recordina the Results of EOP Validation Exercises After finishing each scenario, the Director shall complete an E0P Validation Exercise Checklist (Attachment B) and each participating control room operator shall complete an E0P Validation Exercise Questionnaire or the operating crew can complete one questionnaire as a group (Attachment C.)

. 1.3.4-14-8 Rev. 2

{ jg { d !' [ I ti @ c

The Director shall review all significant observations from the completed scenario with the simulator instructor and control room operators who participated in the exercise prior to beginning the next scenario. Additional explanatory remarks shall be recorded directly on the respective Questionnaires as appropriate.

The Director shall assign a unique identification number to each performance deviation, procedure discrepancy, operator concern, and other deficiency identified on the completed Validation Scenario Outlines, the Exercise Checklists, and Exercise Questionnaires. Multiple occurrences of a particular deviation, discrepancy, concern or other deficiency may be assigned the same number.

The Director shall also complete a Part I E0P Validation Discrepancy Report (illustrated on page 7 of Attachment A) for each numbered performance deviation, procedure discrepancy, operator concern, and other identified deficiency. A complete description of the discrepancy shall be provided; if more space is needed for this purpose, a Continuation Sheet (illustrated on page 9 of Attachment A) shall be used and the "Continuation Sheet Attached" box on the report shall be checked. The sequential and total number of Continuation Sheets used for an individual discrepancy shall be identified in the appropriate blanks on each Continuation Sheet.

At the conclusion of all E0P validation exercises, the Director shall verify that all of the following items have been properly completed for each scenario:

1. E0P Validation Scenario Outlines and respective Cover Sheets
2. E0P Validation Exercise Performance Records
3. E0P Validation Exercise Checklists
4. E0P Validation Exercise Questionnaires
5. Part I E0P Validation Discrepancy Reports and associated ,

Continuation Sheets  !

1

6. E0P Validation Test Plan '

When completed, all of the items listed above shall be forwarded l to the Nuclear Operations Section Manager for subsequent evaluation, resolution, and correction of identified discrepancies as described in Section F.

1 l

1 fWi IMI ) i W;n hl\ j 1.3.4-14-9 Rev. 2 i

l

e F. Evaluatina. Resolvina. and Correctina Identified Discreoancies Each performance deviation, E0P discrepancy, operator concern, and other discrepancy identified through the validation process shall be analyzed to determine whether any corrective action is required. Resolution of all identified discrepancies and, if required, completion of associated corrective action (s) shall be documented on Part II of an E0P Validation Discrepancy Report (illustrated on page 8 on Attachment A.) If no corrective action is required, appropriate justification shall be provided.

The analysis and resolution of E0P discrepancies and the identification of appropriate corrective actions should be performed as a cooperative effort of several individuals having expertise in the E0Ps, the E0P source documents, plant operation, and control room operator training. The procedure author (s) and individuals who participated in the validation exercises should also participate in the evaluation and resolution of identified discrepancies if possible. The following process shall be followed in completing this task:

1. Review the description of the discrepancy. (If those who participated in the validation exercises are also participating in the discrepancy review and resolution process, they can supply additional information, as necessary.)
2. Determine whether any corrective action is necessary.
3. If corrective action is appropriate, develop a recommended solution which corrects the discrepancy. Solutions may include changes to the E0P, additions to the E0P training program, modifications to plant equipment, or revisions to E0P source documents.
4. Document the agreed-upon corrective action on Part II of the E0P Validation Discrepancy Report, using Continuation Sheets as necessary to completely record the action to be taken. If it is concluded that no corrective action is required, provide appropriate justification. The individual who prepares the description of the required corrective action (or the justification for no corrective action) shall sign 1 and date the Report in the space provided.  !
5. When the corrective action has been implemented, the individual who completes the corrective action shall sign and date the associated E0P Validation Discrepancy Report Part II in the space provided.
6. Satisfactory completion of the required corrective action shall be independently verified by an individual designated by the Nuclear Operations Section Manager. The person who performs this task shall sign and date the associated E0P Validation Discrepancy Report Part II in the space provided.

( > i\ l'VI'I iin/;ii' l.3.4-14-10 Rev. 2

G. Documentation Documentation of the validation of E0Ps shall consist of the following items:

1. EOP Validation Scenario Outlines and respective Cover Sheets
2. E0P Validation Exercise Performance Records
3. E0P Validation Exercise Checklists
4. E0P Validation Exercise Questionnaires
5. Part I E0P Validation Discrepancy Reports and associated Continuation Sheets for each identified discrepancy
6. Part II E0P Validation Discrepancy Reports and associated Continuation Sheets for each identified discrepancy The completed documentation package shall be returned to the Plant Manager. A review of all materials for compliance with the requirements and instructions of the E0P Verification Program shall be performed by the Plant Manager and the QA Director; these individuals shall sign and date the E0P Validation Record (illustrated on page 10 of Attachment A) when they have determir.ed that all requirements have been satisfactorily completed.

All records of E0P Validation shall be retained as specified by NOD Procedure 1.3.7.

V. ATTACHHENTS A. Forms For Develooment and Performance of E0P Validation Proaram Activities

8. E0P Validation Proaram Exercise Checklist C. E0P Validation Program Exercise Ouestionnaire i ~ () hi f (Y E ! It ' f[ c'.

1.3.4-14-11 Rev. 2 )

. - . - _ , . . . . - . . _ . . . . - . = . . - . . - .- . - . . . - .. .

Attachment A Page 1 of 10 1

ATTACHMENT A j FORMS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE O.E E0P VALIDATION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 4

l l

i i

k (0 ) lh $ $Yl\ l 1

t- '- OMLV 1.3.4-14A-1 Rev. 2 I

,---,- ,,.--,-.-ew wr-, =,y y~~ --.ge,-yr,-g-w-. ~,,---,,-,w--.-,w,-------,

- - , . - - , - - - - . --,,-..--w.we-- , - , . - - , "ra

Attachment A Page 2 of 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A-E0P Validation Scenario Outline ................. 3 E0P Validation Scenario Cover Sheet ............... 4 E0P Validation Test Plan . . .................. 5 E0P Validation Exercise Performance Record ........... 6 E0P Validation Discrepancy Report, Part I ............ 7 E0P Validation Discrepancy Report, Part II ........... 8 E0P Validation Discrepancy Report Continuation Sheet ...... 9 E0P Validation Record . . . . .................. 10 re

"- ' >/ e

'i' l!pj( ) ( Q I !' It { ih i \ ! I s l.3.4-14A-2 Rev. 2

t Attachment A PAGE 3 of 10 PNPS E0P VALIDATION SCENARIO OUTLINE Scenario # Page of TIME INSTRUCTOR ACTION PLANT RESPONSE OPERATOR ACTION NOTES l

e ,

N}i$ IIN I'(, i \ I)l; : ,

f 6 iii ! '\ ' l.3.4-14A-3 Rev. 2 ttsL1

. .- , _ - . _ , __ _ - - - _ , _ . - . - , _ - - . ,,m _-__ .- , ,

I Attachment A l Page 4 of 10 '

1 BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION E0P VALIDATION SCENARIO COVER SHEET SCENARIO #

DESCRIPTION OF EVENT (S)/ CONDITIONS (summary)

PROCEDURES EXERCISED (numbar and revision, and scope of coverage) 1 INITIAL CONDITIONS (simulator IC number and description) 4 SIMULATOR MALFUNCTIONS (number and description) 1 EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE (list)

ESTIMATED RUN TIME OF SCENARIO (hours)

Prepared by:

Date:

Reviewed / Approved by:

Nuclear Training Organization Date:

a .

i l-() g '

) j y i ; ) 1 ) > '. . .' s y.

1.3.4-14A-4 Rev. 2 i L ._ l

Y Attachment A Page 5 of 10 BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION Rev.

E0P VALIDATION TEST PLAN DAY #  : (Date )

Sequence Scenario # Run Time Remarks 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

DAY #  : (Date )

Sequence Scenario # Run Time Remarks 1.

2.

3. _

4.

5.

6.

Approved: Exercise Director

>R  ; NFORM"' oate 1.3.4-14A-5 Rev. 2

Attachment A Page 6 of 10 BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIH NUCLEAR P0HER STATION E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE PERFORMANCE RECORD SCENARIO #

PARTICIPANTS Exercise Director Simulator Director Control Room Operators (Name and shift _ _.

position) i PERFORW.NCE CHECKLIST l[l Initial Conditions Set l[j Participants briefed l l[] Scenario executed: Date Time l(( Performance deviations noted on Scenario Outline l[l E0P Validation Exercise Checklist complcted l[l E0P Validation Exercise Questiennaire completed l[l Exerc',se results reviewed with participants l[l Part I E0P Validation Discrepancy Reports completed for each identified performance deviation, procedure discrepancy, operator concern, and other deficiency All checklist items completed:

/s/

Exercise Director Date g, ,r < ,. . < , -

-() M l j \j F t ' l \ l'/i .h ' '

1.3.4-14A-6 Rev. 2

C Attachment A Page 7 of 10 BOSTON EDISON COMPANY pit. GRIM NUCLEAP N)HER STATION E0P VALIDATION DISCREPANCY REPORT Part I DISCREPANCY ID SCENARIO # DURING HHICH DISCREPANCY HAS NOTED i SOURCE OF DISCREPANCY l(( Validation Scenario Outline l[l Validation Exercise Checklist l[] Validation Exercise Questionnaire l[l Other (describe)

E0P APPLICABILITY I E0P number (s) Flowchart Elements and revision (describe) j i

DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY ContinuationSheet(s) Attached l[]

-e r i t 1 ,

J , (I l { lIIf \/I\)Ei! LI i

_l > 1.3.4-14A-7 3ev. 2 l

-v ,g -

,------v,-,e ,,, --

y , -

C Attachment A Page 8 of 10 BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION E0P VALIDATION DISCREPANCY REPORT Part II DISCREPANCY ID #

E0P APPLICABILITY (Number and revision)

CORRECTIVE ACTION (Description)

ContinuationSheet(s) Attached l[l Prep tred by:

dame (Print)

Signature Date Implemented by:

Name (Print)

Signature Date Completion verified by:

Name (Print)  ;

l Signature Date

-e -

! ,;3 ,.!

(fy) pie.- *i
.i-i e 1.3.4 14A-8 Rev. 2

( i

Attachment A Page ') of 10 BOSTON EDIS0N COMPANY PILGRIH NUCLEAR P0HER STATION E0P VALIDATION DISCREPANCY REPORT Continuation Sheet DISCREPANCY ID #

E0P APPLICABILITY (Number and revision)

Continuation of: Part I l[l Sheet of Part II l[j Sheet o f ___ __

I L i , *, y>s, t\ , b 1.3.4-14A-9 Rev. 2

\

i n L-

_ . - ~ _

I Attachment A Page 10 of 10 BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR P0HER STATION EOP VALIDATION RECORD E0Ps VALIDATED (Numtar and Revision)

ATTACHMENTS l[l E0P Validation Scenario Outlines ano respective Cover Sheets l[] E0P Validation Exercise Performance Records l[l E0P Validation Exercise Checklists l[l E0P Validation Exercise Questionnaires l[j Part I E0P Validation Discrepsncy Reports and associated Continuation Sheets for each identified discrepancy REVIEHED BY:

Nuclear Operations Manager _

Date QA Director Date f hQ h I. ) I I'eI I,hh ; i 1.3.4-14A-10 Rev. 2 3 y[f T

't I

i Attachment B Page 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT B E0P VALIDATION PROGRA2

' EXERCISE CHECKLIST l

i

-r, . .

l y ; j t' ' 'l i s i'/; r',

i

-(yf

' l.3.4-148-1 Rev. 2

/

Attachment B Page 2 of 6 i

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE CHECKLIST The questiont of this checklist shall be answered by the Exercise Director.

One set of reaponses should be completed at the conclusion of each scenario.

m '

Thischeckiistshouldbecompletedasfollows:

1. Use black ink.
2. Identify the scenario number upon which the attached answers and comments are based, and the date on which this scenario was run.

Scenario # Date

3. Enter the scenario number on the top of each attached page in the space provided.
4. Answer each of the attached questions "yes" or "no" based on observation of the actions of the control room operators during the scenario. In the "Comments" section under each question provide E0P references as appropriate for the answer given. Also provide any additional remarks necessary to fully explain identified discrepancies, deficiencies, etc. Comments should be as specific as possible. Use the attached Comment Continuation Sheet when additional space is necessary to adequately explain a response to a particular question. Do not use the same Comment Continuation Sheet for making comments that are applicable to different questions.
5. Whan answers to all questions are completed, sign below.

tiOIE Discrepancy ID numbers shall be assigned after all E0P va'4dation exercises have been completed.

Completed by:

Name (prir,t)

Signature l

r'

!y* )[g tht N I l

l k I O., I l.3.4-14B-2 Rev. 2 l

_, ' j i

m . _ . _ .

R Attachment B Page 3 of 6 SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE CHECKLIST

1. Did the operators recognize the occurrence of Yes No entry conditions and select the appropriate

.EOP(s)?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

2. Did the operators correctly perform all Yes No required actions, and do so in the proper sequence?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

3. Did the operators perform any inappropriate Yes No actions?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

, ( j h ., f \i I ' )i I I$ m '

l.3.4-14B-3 Rev. 2 h

r Attachment B Page 4 of 6 SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE CHECKLIST (Continued)

4. Did the operators appear to have difficulty Yes No understanding any of the decisions or instructional steps presented in the E0P(s)?

Coments Coment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

5. Here the operators able to comply with all Yes No prescribed instructions and actions?

Coments Coment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

6. Here the prescribed instructions and actions Yes No effective in stabilizing plant conditions?

Coments Coment Continuation Sheet attached l((

Discrepancy ID #

} ;hhhh \i  ! '-'

1.3.4-148-4 Rev. 2 m

Attachment B Page 5 of 6  :

SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE CHECKLIST (Continued) ,

7. Did the operators appear to need additional Yes NL guidance at any time durirg the transient?

Coments Coment Continuation Sheet attached l['

Discrepancy ID #

8. Here all necessary system controls and Yes No instrumentation available to the operators?

Coments Coment Cc,stinuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

9. Additional comments: ,

i 1

l t

t l

. ->. j.. <

p(Js i W r 9 if t"' '  !

(it x

i 1.3.4-148-5 Rev. 2 l

i l

Attachment B l Page 6 of 6 SCENARIO # ,

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE CHECKLIST Comment Continuation Sheet Continuation of comments on Checklist Question number:-

T l

4 h

i i '

f a

-(gg g jg V n ivin *

, L- -

(}f 1.3.4-140-6 Rev. 2 i

1 1

, --, - , - - . - - - - . - - . . , . . , , , . . - - - - - - . . _ . - , - - - , , , , . - _ , . , - , , , , .-n .- -

Attachment C Page 1 of 8 ATTACHMENT C E0P VALIDATION PROGRAM EXERCISE OUESTIONNAIRE l

l l

l l

'. ' ' ,= '

b ,.

ti4

{(ti)

, s

C i , ' 3 1.3.4-14C-1 Rev, 2

Attachment C Page 2 of 8 i .

INSTRUCT 20NS FOR COMPLETING E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE Each control room operator participant is requested to complete this questionnaire based on personal impressions and observations during the scenario just performed.

This Questionnaire should be completed as follows:

1. Use black ink.
2. Identify the scenario number upon which the attached wers and coments are based, and the date on which this scenarb .;as run.

Scenario # Date

3. Enter the scenario number on the top of each attached page in the space provided.
4. Answer each of the attached questions "yes" or "no" based on the results of the scenario just executed. In the "Coments" section

. under each question provide E0P references as appropriate for the answer given. Also provide any additional remarks necessary to fully explain identified discrepancies, deficiencies, etc.

Coments should be as specific as possible. Use the attached Coment Continuation Sheet when additional space is necessary to adequately explain a response to a particular question.

Additional copies of Coment Continuation Sheets are available; do not use the same Coment Continuation Sheet for making coments that are applicable to different questions.

5. When answers to all questions are completed, sign below.

HQlE Discrepancy ID numbers will be assigned by the Exercise Director after all E0P validation exercises have been completed.

Corrpleted by:

Name (print) .

l Si g na tu te ,._

-(g { W i d n Win j l.3.4-14C-2 Rev. 2

e Attachment C Page 3 of 8 SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Has it easy to determine when entry to an E0P Yes No was required?

Coments Coment Continuation Sheet attached l[j Discrepancy 10 #

2. Was any instruction or decision in any of the Yes No E0Ps difficult to understand? Ambiguous? etc.

Coments Coment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

3. Here you able to perform all the prescribed Yes No actions in the specified sequence?

Coments J

Coment Continuation Sheet attached ((]

Discrepancy ID #

i k'y h h!N YIN !

i 1.3.4-14C-3 Rev. 2 {

d

4 Attachment C Page 4 of 8 SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued)

4. Was the flowpath through the E0P(s) easy to Yes No follow?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet atta:hed l[l Discrepancy ID #

5. Did you need any additional procedural Yes No guidance at any time during the transient?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID # _

6. Has any unnecessary information present in Yes No the E0P(s)

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

I j hk) '

II\

1.3.4-14C-4 Rev. 2

- . . - ~ , . , - -

l Attachment C

  • Page 5 of 8 SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued)

7. Has the terminology used in the E0P(s) Yes No consistent with that used on the control panels and in other procedures?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

8. Here all graphs and tables in the E0P(s) easy Yes No to read and interpret?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

9. Here all required instrumentation and controls Yes No available in the control room?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID # }

~

()($ lIN T 4.Ifi hYIN ! '

1.3.4-14C-5 Rev. 2

Attachment C Page 6 of 8 SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued)

10. Did the available instrumentation provide Yes No the required range of indication and accuracy?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

11. Did the E0P(s) ever mislead you, specify Yes No inappropriate actions, or provide you with ,

incorrect information? \

Comments l l

Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

12. Here the prescribed actions compatible with Yes No those specified in other plant procedures that were being executed concurrently? j l

Comments l 2

a Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l

Discrepancy ID #

1 1

( gjf4 ( ) i i l 'd a l~ k i 1

((.m_

Attachment C Page 7 of 8  ;

SCENARIO # l E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued)  !

13. Where cross-references were provided in the Yes No E0P(s), was the specified procedure, section, step, etc., correct in each case?

Coments y

Coment Continuation Sheet attached l[l j Discrepancy ID #

14. Additional coments:

1 l

d i

7 I t  !'.

h(,IM i lM f k I) A h/lX !

1.3.4-14C-7 gey, g '

i

.)

i

. - . . . . - .. ... .. .~ - . = - . . . -. . - .. - .

Attachment C Page 8 of 8 ,

SCENARIO # l I

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE  ;

1 Coment Continuation Sheet e i

I Continuation of coments on question number:  :

?

i .

i >

1, i

l  :

1 +

l i

! r 1

. [

]  :

' I

+ .., u t ) t ( \'d g ri ' I i k*' j i

{~ U D ,,,

t,l'. i 1.3.4-14C-8 Rev. 2

! u - ,

1 '

. i

- - - - -.. , ~ . , - ~ . - . . -

, .-. ..,..,...-,,,-w- - , . - - -.-,,-;.-- ,

ATTACHMENT 3 to BECo Letter 88- 066 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Emergency Operatina Procedures (EOPs) Training Program Summarv Descrip1Lon (4 pages) i i

l I

_

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20151F968&oldid=2968307"