ML20155F917

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1 to Procedure 1.3.4-13, Emergency Operating Procedure Verification Program
ML20155F917
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 10/16/1987
From:
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20151H280 List:
References
FOIA-88-198 1.3.4-13, NUDOCS 8810130415
Download: ML20155F917 (49)
v • d • e


Text

____ ___

l DOSTON EDISON NUCLEAR OPERATIONS DEPARTHENT PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION Procedure 1.3.4.-13 EOP VERIFICATION PROGRAM Total Paaes: 49 FOR U03MA10.5 ON _Y l l Approved [W h /0//t~/f7 Qu'ality ssd ce anager Date' Approved C Nuci ar OperhMns ManagerADate

/k//l Safety Evaluation: "^;'1WNot Requi red gjol3g4js800907 r

JOHNSON 88-198 PDR Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 l Page 1 ef 49 l

4 Table of Contents Section 2121 1.

PURPOSE .................................................. 3 II.

A P P L I CA B I L I TY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. . . . .

III.

DEFINITIONS .............................................. 3 IV. REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS A. Ve ri fi c a t i on Proc edure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 B.

Pe r sonnel Quali fi cations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 C. Evaluating, Resolving, and Correcting Identi fi ed Di s c repanci es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 D.

Documentation ........................................ 8 ATTACHMENT A:

l E0P VERIFICATION PROGRAM CHECXLISTS l

1 i

l o i

l i

1 1

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.)

Page 2 of 49 i

I. BIRPOSE This document provides appropriate requirements and instructions for

! verifying the PNPS Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs).

II. APPLICABILITY The requirements and instructions specified herein apply to the overall process of developing new E0Ps and revising existing E0Ps.

' This document supplements existing PNPS procedures governing procedure preparation, revision, and control but does not supplant them.

III. DEFINITIONS E0P Source Documents - Guidelines, procedures, data and other records which comprise the technical basis of the EOPs and requirements for their development.

E0P Technical Acturgy - An E0P characteristic that refers to the compatibility of the orocedures with plant systems, hardware, and instrumentation; additionally, the conformity of the E0Ps with other plant procedures that are referenced therein, and with the content of the technical guidelines from which the E0Ps were developed.  !

EOP Verification - The process of confirming and documenting the '

technical accuracy and written correctness of the E0Ps.

EOP Written Correctness - An E0P characteristic that refers to the l conformity of the procedures to the standards of E0P format and editorial content presented in the E0P Writers' Guide. l IV. REOUIRENENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS A. Verif1 cation Procedure E0P technica: accuracy and written correctness shall be verified using the che;klists provided in Attachment A. New EOPs shall be evaluated in verms of all checklist criteria; one set of checklists shall be completed for each new E0P. Modifications of existing EOPs need be evaluated only in terms of those criteria directly applicable to new and modified steps; if the number of such steps is relatively small, only one set of checklists need be completed for all revised E0Ps.

The instructions listed below shall be followed during performance of verification checklist evaluations:

1. Fill in the following information on the E0P Verification Record (illustrated on page 6 of Attachment A):
a. The number, revision, and title of the EOP being verified.

b.

The PSTG the E0P being revision which was used as the source document for verified.

Proc. 1.3.4 13 Rev.1 Page 3 of 49

! IV. A. Ytti.fication Procedura (continued)

I

c. The Writers' Guide revision which was used as the source

.. document for the E0P being verified.

i

d. The name, organization (or department) and job title (including such information as RO, SRO, Shift Supervisor, i etc., as applicable) of the person performing the i verification.
2. Write the number of the EOP being verified on the top of each checklist page.
3. Apply each checklist evaluation criterion, one at a time, to each flowchart element of the EOP being verified. If necessary, refer to the E0P Writers' Guide for guidance on proper interpretation of the criteria presented in checklist Sections A, 8, and C. (The

. relevant paragraph of the E0P Writers' Guide is identified in parentheses after each Section A, 8 and C checklist item.)

1

4. If all E0P flowchart elements to which a checklist item is

' applicable are fully compliant with the evaluation criterton, circle "Yes' on the checklist form. If a checklist item does not apply to the E0P being verified, circle *NA". If one or more E0P flowchart elements are not fully compliant with the evaluation criterion, circle "No" and assign a unique discrepancy

, identification number of the format:

Checklist section - Criterion number - Sequence number Example: 82-14-2 (Checklist section 82, criterion 14, second discrepancy)

Multiple occurrences of the same discrepancy may be assigned the same identification number provided that each location of the discrepancy is documented.

5. Complete Part I of an E0P Verification Discrepancy Report (illustrated on page 7 of Attachment A) for each identified discrepancy.
i. Uniquely identify the flowchart element (s) to which the identified discrepancy applies; if the discrepancy is one of l omission identify the applicable part of the PSTGs.

! b.

i Provide a comprehensive narrative description of the nature of the discrepancy. If additional rpace is needed, use a 3

Continuation Sheet (illustrated on page 9 of Attachment A)

- and check the associated box on the Report indicating that a

continuation sheet is attached. The sequential and total

! number of continuation sheets used for an individual j discrepancy shall be identified in the appropriate blanks on tach continuation sheet.

i Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.)

Page 4 of 49

1

' IV. A. Verification Procadets (contin'lation)

6. When all checklist items have been completed, the person who l performed the verification shall:
a. List the checklist section(s) completed.

, b. Sign and date the E0P Verification Record.

c. Attach all completed checklists and Part I Discrepancy Reports including associated continuation sheets to the E0P <

Verification Record. -

l

d. Return the completed package to the Nuclear Operations Manager. ,

)

B. Personnel Oualifications Personnel performing the E0P verification must be knowledgeable in certain specific subject areas related to the activities to be performed. Minimum personnel qualifications for each task are listed in Table 1. l l

The E0P author (s) should not participate in the evaluation of the E0Ps relative to the checkIlst criteria, i j

i l

/

l i

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.I Page 5 of 49

Table 1:

Personnel Qualifications for ErP Verification Activities Activity Dualificatient

~

Application of Checklist Familiarity with the PNPS PSTGs and Sections A and 8 the EOP Hriters' Guide Application of Checklist Familiarity with the PNPS PSTGs, Sections C and D the EOP Hriters' Guide, and plant operations (licensed operator preferred)

Application of Checklist Familiarity with the E0P format.

Section E plant systems and control room instrumentation (licensed operator preferred) l I

I l r l ' Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.)

Page 6 of 49 4

1

l IV. C. Evaluatina. Resolvina. and correctina Identified Discrenancies Each E0P discrepancy identified through the verification process shall be analyzed to determine if any corrective action is required.

Resolution of all identified discrepancies and, if required, completion of associated corrective action (s) shall be documented on Part 11 of an EOP Verification Discrepancy Report (illustrated on i page 8 of Attachment A). If no corrective action is required, I

appropriate justification shall be provided.

The analysis and resolution of EOP discrepancies and the identification of appropriate corrective actions should be performed as a cooperative effort among several individuals having expertise in the E0Ps, the E0P source documents, plant operation, and control room t operator training. The procedure author (s) and the individual (s) who completed the verification checklists should participate in the

~ evaluation and resolution of discrepancies. The following process shall be followed in completing this task:

1. Review the description of the discrepancy. (If those who performed the verification are participating in the discrepancy review and resolution process they can supply additional information as necessary.)
2. Deterstne whether any corrective action is necessary. This decision should be made by :

(a) confitning that the identified discrepancy is actually a deviation from the evaluation criterion and (b) assessing the degree of deviation from the evaluation criterion, and (c) investigating whether extenuating or mutually conflicting requirements necessitate a deviation from the evaluation criterion.

3. If corrective action is appropriate, develop a reconnended  ;

solution which corrects the discrepancy. Solutions may include changes to the E0P, additions to the E0P training program,  !

i modifications to plant equipment, or revisions to EOP source I documents.

4. Document the agreed-upon corrective action on Part II of the E0P

' Verification Discrepancy Report, using Continuation Sheets as necessary to completely record the action to be taken. If no corrective action is required, provide appropriate justification.

The individual who prepares the description of the required

, corrective action (or the justification for no corrective action) shall sign and date the Report in the space provided.

i

\ '

l 1

i Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1  !

Page 7 of 49 l

(

IV. C, Etaluatina. Resolvina. and Correctina Identified D11ggp1K111

}

(continued)

5. When the corrective action has been implemented, the individual '

who completes the corrective action shall sign and date the associated E0P Verification Discrepancy Report Part II in the space provided.

6. Satisfactory completion of the required corrective action shall '

' ' be independently verified. The person who performs this task shall sign and date the associated E0P Verification Discrepancy Report Part II in the space provided. ,

O.

  • Documentation Documentation of each verified E0P shall consist of the following:
1. E0P Verification Record with all information and signatures.
2. One completed set of E0P Verification Checklists.
3. An E0P Verification Discrepancy Report Part I (including associated Continuation Sheets), appropriately completed for each discrepancy listed on the Verification Checklists.
4. An EOP Verification Discrepancy Report Part II (including associated Continuation Sheets), appropriately completed for each discrepancy listed on the Verification Checklist,s.

The coepleted documentation onckage shall be returned to the Nuclear Operations Manager. A review of all materials for compilance with the i requirements and instructions of the EOP Verification Program shall t be performed by the Nuclet.r Operations Manager and the QA Director. l These individuals shall sign and date the EOP Verification Record when they have determined that all requirements have been satisfactortly completed.

~

All records of E0P Verification shall be retained as specified by WOO Procedure 1.3.7.

l l -

I i

Proc. 1.3.4 13 Rev.1 Page 8 of 49

l' r

Attachment A

!. Page 1 of 41  ;

I

  • 6 L

ATT.M30 TENT A ,

I e

E0P VERIFICATION PRO @AM l.

OtECKLISTS 1

i i

4 i

i l

1 i

I i

4 i

i i

a

, Proc. 1.3.4 13 Rey,)

l Page 9 of 49

RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 2 of 41 Table of Contents Section list _A-INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING E0P VER CHECKLISTS ........................IFICATION ....................... 4 A fiQC EDU R E I D E N T I F I CA T ION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 ........

8. PROCEDURE FORMAT 81.

Forma t o f Flowc ha rt El eme n t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

82. Step Numbering ...................................... 17
83. Listed Items ........................................ 18
84. Use of Emphasis Techniques .......................... 15
85. Procedure layout and Asso Conventions .............ciated ............................ 20
86. Instructions for Printin and Storage . . . . . . . . . . . . g , Copying,

............................. 22

C. PROCEDURE

CONIENT C1.

Level of Detail ..................................... 23 C2.

Writing Style ....................................... 25 C3. Cautions and Notes .................................. 26 C4 Branching Instructions and Cross-References .................................... 27 C5.

Component Ide n t i fi c a t i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 C6.

Spelling. Gramar, and Punc tuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 C7. Nomenclature, Vocabular and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . .y,

.............................. 31 C8.

14umerical Values .................................... 39 D. CONF 0QHITT WITH PLANT. SPECIFIC TECHNICAL GUIDELINES 40 E . COMPA T I BillTY WI TH CON T ROL RO'H . . . . . . . . . .41. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

, P roc . 1. 3. 4.-13 Rev.1 Page 10 of 49 RTYPE H7.01 1

Attachment A Page 3 of 41 Table of Contents (Continued)

Forms Paes A-E0P Ve ri f i ca t i on Re co rd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 EOP Verification Discrepancy Report, Part ! ................. 7 EOP Verification Discrepancy Report, Part II ................ 8 EOP Verification Discre Shee t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .pancy Report , Conti nua tion

...................................... 9 Iablet Page A-A1: App 1tcation of Logic Terms ............................. 32 A2:

Stand:rd Terms and Definitions ......................... 33 A3: Standard Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 i

J l

J l s.

i i

1

\

Proc. 1.3.4 13 Rev.)

i Page 11 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

f Attachment A Page 4 of 41 i

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING EOP VERIFICATION CNECKLISTS

1. Use black ink on all checklists
2. ' Fill out an E0P Verification Record (page A6) as follows:

(a), Identify the number, revision, and title of the E0P being verified.

(b) Identify the PSTG revision which was used as the source document for the E0P being verified.

(c) Identify the Writers' Guide revision which was used as the source 4

document for the EOP being verified.

' (d) List the section(s) of the E0P Verification Checklists being completed by you.

(e) Print your full name, organization (or department) and job title (including such information as RO, SRO, Shift Supervisor, etc., as s appilcable) under "Verification Performance Completed By.'

3. Write the EOP sber on the top of aach checklist page.

) 4. Apply each checklist evaluation criterton, one at a time, to each flowchart element of the E0P being verified. If necessary, refer to the l

E00 Writers' Guide for guidance on proper interpretation of the criteria 4 presented in checklist Sections A, 8, and C. (The relevant paragraph of the Writers' Guide is identified in parentheses af ter each Section A, and B, and C checklist item.)

5. If all E0P flowchart elements to which a checklist item is appilcable are fully compliant with the evaluation criterton, circle "Yes" on the l checklist evaluateo, circle "NA".

form. If a checklist item does not apnly to the E00 being ,

i If one or more EOP flowchart elements are not i fully compliant with the evaluation criterion, circle "No" and assign a unique discrepancy identification number of the following format:

i Checklist section - Criterion number - Sequence ciumber Examole: 82-14-2 (Checklist section B2, i .

criterion 14. second discrepancy) j Multiple occurrences of the same dircrepancy may be assigned the same i

identification number provided that each location of the discrepancy is documented.

6. Cceplete Part I of an E0P Verification Discrepancy Report (illustrated on l

page A7) for each identified discrepancy.

i (a) Uniquely identify the flowchart element (s) to which the identified discrepancy applies. If the discrepancy is one of omission, identify

{ the appilcable part of the PSTGs. I 1

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 12 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 5 of 41 (b) Provide a comprehensive narrative description of the nature of the discrepancy. If additional space is needed, use a Continuation Sheet (illustrated on page A9) and check the associated box on the Report indicating that a continuation sheet is attached. The sequential and  ;

' total number of continuation sheets used for an individual '

- discrepancy shall be identified in the appropriate blanks on each continuation sheet.

t

7. When all checklist items have been completed:

(a) Sign and date the E0P Verification Record.

I (b) Attach all completed checklists and Part I Discrepancy Reports including associated continuation sheets to the E0P Verification Record.

(c) Return the completed package to the Nuclear Operations Manager.

I i ,

1 i

f e

4 1

)

P roc . 1.3,4 13 p,y g i Page 13 of 49 Riyft H7,o; l

Attachment A Page 6 of 41

(' BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION E0P VERIFICATION RECORD E0P # Revision E0P Title DESIGN INPUT

- F PSTG Revision __ . Dated E0P Hriters' Guide Revision . Dated VERIFICATION PERFORMANCE E0P Verification Checklist Section(s) -

Ccepleted by:

Name (Print) . -

Organization & Job Title Signature l i

Date Reviewed by:

Nuclear Operations Manager Date l

QA 01 rector ,

Date 8 .

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 14 of 49 RTYPE H7.01 I

Attachment A Page 7 of 41 i

80STON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION E0P VERIFICATION DISCREPANCY REPORT

~

Part I DISCREPANCY ID # CHECKLIST #

EOP # REVISION _

PROCEDURE ELEMENT (s); quote, or describe uniquely:

DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:

T l

1 l

l ContinuationSheet(s) attached l~l

, Proc. 1.3.4 13 Rev.1 Page 15 of 49 RTYPE H7.01 I

Attachment A Page 8 of 41 l BOSTON EDISON COMPANY j PILGRIM NUCLEAR PONER STATION E0P VERIFICATION DISCREPANCY REPORT Part II

! - DISCREPANCY 10 # CHE2KLIST #

E0P Number REVISION CORRECTIVE ACTION

Description:

=-

4 1

4 i ContinuationSheet(s) attached l[l "

Prepared by:

I 1

Name (Print)

Signature __ Date Implemented by:

i Name (Print) , I r-Signature Date L.

Completion Verlfled by:

Name (Print) '

j Signaturt Date l Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.) '

' Page IE of 49  !

RTYPE H7.01 i l

1

I I .

Attachment A Page 0 of 41 I

DOSTON EDISON COMPANY I

PILGRIM NUCLEAR PONER STATION I

E0P VERIFICATION DISCREPANCY REPORT CONTINUATION SHEET DISCREPANCY ID # CHECKLIST #

1 E0P Number REVISION l

Continuation of: Part!l-l Sheet of i

Part !! l - l Sheet of ,

4 -

t i

l t 1

)

i _

i l

l l

I I

l

~

l I

i J

Proc. 1,3,4-13 Rev.)

?

Page 17 of 49 RTYPE H7.01 l l l l l

Attachment A Page 10 of 41

E0P

$ECTION A: PROLIDURE IDENTIFICATION

1. Is the procedure number and title presented in Yts No NA large, boldfaced, underlined print, and placed it the top of the E0P?

l' (!!.A. III.D.I a. !!!.0.2.a. !!!.D.3) i -- Discrepancy ID #

2. Is the E0P number unique? (!!.A) Yes No NA Olscrepancy ID # _ . ,
3. Is the E0P title descriptive of the procedure Yes No NA content? (II.A)

Discrepancy ID # ,-

t

4. Does the ECP have a title block located in the '

Yes No NA lower right corner of the bordered area surrounding the E0P1 (II.B. III.E.5) t i

, Discrepancy ID #

r 4

5. Does the ECP title biock contain: Yes No NA (1) plant name, (2) approval signature, (3) effective date, (4) procedure title.

(5). procedure nt%er, and

} (6) revision number? (II.8)

{

Olscrepancy ID #  !

j l l

1 l

Proc. 1.3.4 13 Rev.)

Page 18 of 49 l RTYPE H7.01

\

i

Attach ent A P5ge 11 of 41

E0P L

SECTION B: PROCEDURE FORMAT

81. Format of Flowchart Elements
1. As appropriate, is entry to the EOP indicated at the top (i.e., beginning) of the procedure by either of the following:

' A tabular presentation of entry conditions Yes No NA enclosed in a heavy-bordered rectangle with rounded corners? (III.A.1)

  • '5e d ' START" printed in boldfaced uppercase Yes No NA C , enclosed in a heavy-bordered rectangle h rounded corners? (III.A.I. III.D.2.c)

Discrepancy ID #

2. Are concurrent execution statements enclosed Yes No NA within a shaded elongated rectangle with entry and exit arrows appropriately located? (!!I.A.2)

Discrepancy ID #

3. Are section designators printed in Yes No NA  :

boldfaced uppercase letters centered within i  !

shaded trapezoids? (III. A.3, III.D.I.d. III.D.2.d) '

Discrepancy ID # _ _ _ .

4. Are instructional steps presented as complete Yes No NA  !

sentences enclosed in rectangles? (III.A.4) l

, Di,screpancy ID #

k 5. Are individual decisions which constituti major branch points each phrased as Yes No NA "yes/no" questions and enclosed in diamonds?

(III.A.5) l Discrepancy ID #

l. -

l L s

6. Are "Yes' and "No' response path labels Yes No NA capitalized and placed adjacent to arrows l

, extending from decisio,1 diamonds?

(111. A.5, III. A.6.a. III. A.6.b)  !

Discrepancy 10 #

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1

, Page 19 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 12 of 41 EOP

81. Format of Flowchart Elements (continued)
7. Do conditional statements that are formatted as a single instruc;ional step:
a. Have the conditional part of the instruction

- Yes No NA l

stated first, followed by the contingent action? (This formatting requirement does not apply for conditional clauses that begin with "Until" or "Except"). (III.A.6)

Discrepancy ID #

b. Have the logic terms printed in uppercase letters and separated from the remainder of Yes No NA their respective clauses. (This formatting requirement does not apply for conditional clauses that begin with "Until" or "Except".)

(III.A.7.b. III.D.2.e)

Discrepancy 10 #

8. Where a prescribed action is to be performed until Yes No NA certain specified conditions occur, are the conditicas prefaced by the word "UNTIL" printed in uppercase letters? (III.A.7.c III.D.2.e)

Discrepancy ID #

9. Where a prescribed action is to be performed with Yes No NA certain specified exceptions, are the exceptions prefaced by the word "EXCEPT" printed in uppercase letters? (III.A.7.d. III.D.2.e)

Discrepancy ID #

10.

Where a prescribed action may be performed any Yes No NA time before a specified condition occurs, is the condition prefaced by the word "BEFORE" (separated by a double horizontal line) printed in boldfaced uppercase letters and enclosed in a trapezoid?

(III.A.7.e, III.D.I.g, III.D.2.e)

, Discrepancy ID #

11. Mhere an "and/or" decision structure is required, Yes No NA has one of the following formats (or an acceptable alternate format) been chosen to clearly depict the reittionship between the conditional clauses?

(III.A.6.e)

'5 A decision table An appropriately structured series of decision diamonds t

Discrepancy ID #

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rt. 1 Page 20 of 49 \

RTYPE H7.01

Attach ent A Page 13 of 41 f

EOP ,_..

I Bl. Format of Flowchart Elements (continued)

12. Where plant conditions art specified which cause Yes No NA procedure execution to imediately proceed from one instructional step to a subsequent

-flowchart element, are the continuation conditions prefaced by the word "HHEN" printed \

in uppercase letters and separated from the

remainder of the respective clause by two periods?

(III.A.8, III.D.2.e)

Discrepancy ID #

13. Are hold points expressed as instructions beginning with "NAIT UNTIL ..." printed in Yes No NA uppercase letters and enclosed in an octagon?

(III.A.9 III.D.2.e)

Discrepancy ID #

14. Are override statements formatted as decision Yes No NA tables enclosed in shaded heavy-bordered rectangles with rounded corners? ,

(III.A.10) ,

Discrepancy ID #

15. Do c,verride statements have heavy shaded lines extending Yes No NA dowevard from the Icf t and right sides of the enclosing rounded-corner rectangle to indicate the flowchart element (s) which the override statement applies? (Extension lines need not be used where an override statement applies to an entire procedure.) (III.A.10)

Discrepancy ID #

s

16. Are procedure exit statements and end points enclosed in heavy-bordered rectangles with rounded corners? Yes No NA (III.A.11)

\

Discrepancy ID #

17. Is supplemental information that applies to the performance of a step located outside the direct Yes No NA path of the flowchart elements, and is the association to the appropriate flowchart element indicated by a dashed line? (III.A.12)

Discrepancy ID #

i

' Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.)

Page 21 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

l<

! Attach;ent A Page 14 of 41 E0P

81. Format of Flowchart Elements (continued)
18. Are notes printed in italics and located Yes No NA l imediately adjacent to (either before or af ter) the text to which they apply? (III.A.12 III.O.4)

Discrepancy 10 #

~ 19. For notes, is the word "NOTE" printed in uppercase Yes No NA letters and punctuated with a colon prefacing the text of the note? (III.A.13, III.D.2.h)

Discrepancy ID #

20. Are references to cautions indicated within flowchart Yes No NA elemants through the use of a circled number with black background? (III.A.14)

Olscrepancy 10 #

21. Is the full text of each referenced caution enclosed Yes No NA in a rectangle and arranged in sequence around the periphery of the EOP, located to the left of or above any figures present? (III.A.14, III.E.6)

Discrepancy 10 #

22. Is each figure labeled with a number a. J title printed Yes No NA in boldfaced uppercase letters centered above the figure number having a prefix correspondir.g to the number of the E0P followed by a unique sequential decimal number?

,, (III . A.15 III. A.15.b, III .D.1.e III .D.2. f)

Discrepancy 10 #

23. Are all figures that are referenced within the E0P Yes No NA correctly arranged around the periphery of the procedure in proper numerical sequence? i (III. A.15 III.E.6) i Discrepancy 10 #  !
24. Are the text and graphics of each figure clear, Yes No NA

, simple, and easily read? (III.A.15.a)

Discrepancy 10 #

7:5. Are axes of all graphs labeled with parameters, Yes No NA units, and numerical values? (I!!.A.15.c)

Discrepancy 10 #

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 1 Page 22 of 49 RTrPE H7.01

i l Attachrent A Page 15 of 41 EOP B1. Format of Flowchart Elements (continued)

26. Are both horizontal and vertical grid lines provided Yes No NA on all graphs? (III.A.15.d)

Discrepancy ID # _

27. Are all graphical presentations of operating regions Yes No NA which are beyond the action level defined by the E0P deltneated through the use of cross-hatching or background shading? (III.A.15.e)

Discrepancy ID # _

28. Is each table labeled with a number and title printed Yes No NA in boldfaced uppercase letters centered above the table, with the table number having a prefix corres-ponding to the number of the E0P followed by a unique sequential decimal number?

(III . A.16, III . A.16b, III.D.1.e. III .D.2.g)

~

Discrepancy ID #

29. Are all tables that are referenced within the E0P Yes No NA correctly arranged around the periphery of the procedure in proper numerical sequence (small tables located adjacent to flowchart elements excepted)? (III.A.16. III.E.6)

Discrepancy 10 #

30. Are small tables placed alongside the flowchart Yes No NA element in which they are referenced, with a dashed line used to indicate step association?

(III.A.12. III.A.16)

Discrepancy ID # _

31. Are the text and graphics of ear.h table clear, Yes No NA simple and easily read? (III.A.16.a) l Discrepancy ID #

l

32. Are tables placed within a border? (III.A.16.c) Yes No NA l 6

Discrepancy ID #

33. Is an appropriate heading provided for each table Yes No NA column, printed in uppercase letters and centered l over the respective column? (III.A.16.d, III..D.2.g)

Discrepancy 10 # 1 l Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 23 of 49  !

RTYPE H7.01

I Attach ent A Page 16 of 41 l

EOP Bl. Format of Flowchart Elemenh (continued)

34. Is a double horizontal line placed below table column Yes No NA heaoings? (i!!.A.16.e) l Discrepancy ID #
35. Are table columns divided by vertical lines? Yes No NA (III.A.16.f)

Discrepancy ID # i

36. Are dashed horizontal lines or blank spaces used within Yet No NA tables to group (or divide) entries as appropriate?

(III.A.16.g) i Discrepancy 10 #

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 24 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attach ^ent A Page 18 of 41 E0P B3. Listed Items

1. Are multiple itees for which there is no Yes No NA unconditional pre-designated preference or priority \

arranged in a list format, with each entry in the list prefaced by a bul.let (o)? (III.C)

Discrepancy 10 #

2. Are bullets which precede listed items indented two Yes No RA spaces to the right of the lef t margin of the immediately preceding text? (III.C.)

Discrepancy ID #

a  ;

1 l

I Proc. 1.3.4 13 Rev.)  ;

Page 26 of 49 '

RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 19 of 41 l EOP

84. Use of Eschasis Techniaues I i
1. For the entry conditions element, are the words Yes No NA i
  • ENTRY CONDITIONS" and the column headings printed in boldfaced and uppercase print?  :

(III . A.1, III .D. I .b, III .D.2.b)

Discrepancy ID #

2. For the entry point element, is the word "START" Yes No NA printed in boldfaced and uppercase print?

(III. A.I . III.D.I .c, III.D.2)

Discrepancy ID #

3. Are figure axis labels (except for identified Yes No NA engineering units) printed in uppercase print?

(III.A.15.c, III.D.2.f)

Discrepancy.10 #

4. Are boldfaced letters used within flowchart elements Yes No NA of a slightly larger print size than that normally used for standard text? (III.D.1)

Discrepancy ID #

1

5. Are as-labeled cornponent/ instrument designators, Yes No NA control switch positions, and annunciator  !

engravings printed with uppercase letters enclosed in quotation marks? (III.D.2.j, III.D.5  ;

)

Discrepancy ID # i i

r. -

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 27 of 49 RTYPE H7.01 i

i

l' Attach 0ent A Page 20 of 41 i E0P B5. Procedure layout and Associated Conventions i

1. Is the EOP devoid of page breaks? (III.E.3) Yes No NA Discrepancy ID #

l 2. Does a border surround the page? (III.E.4) Yes No NA Discrepancy ID #

3. Is the page border of medium )ine thickness and at Yes No NA

. least 1/2 inch from the page edges? (III.E.4)

Discrepancy ID #

4. Mhere multiple E0Ps exist on a sing'ie page is there Yes No NA a bordered area surrounding each E0P? (III.E.5)

Discrepancy ID #

5. Is a title block connected to the lower right hand Yes No NA corner of each bordered area surrounding each E0P?

(III.E.5)

Discrepancy ID #

6. Are lines ending in arrows used to connect all Yes No NA flowchart elements? (III.E.7)

Discrepancy ID #

7. Is the general progression through the E0P down and Yes No NA to the right? (III.E.7) i Discrepancy ID #
8. Is at least a 1/2 inch spacing maintained between the Yes No NA page border and: 1 (a) The E0P title and (b) flowchart elements (including connecting lines and extension lines emanating from override statements)? (III.E.8)

Discrepancy ID #

1 Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 g l Page 28 of 49 l RTYPE H7.01 l 1

I I'

' Attachment A Page 21 of 41 E0P i

B5. Procedure Layout and Associated Conventions (ccatinued)

9. Is a spacing of at least 3/8 inch maintained between Yes No NA

- flowchart elements? (III.E.9)

Discrepancy ID #

10. Is a spacing of at least 3/8 inch maintained between Yes No NA )

parallel lines connecting flowchart elements, and between extension lines emanating from override statements (except for dotted intraprocedure branch s lines and dashed lines connecting supplemental Information)? (III.E.10)

Discrepancy ID #

11. Has the cross-over of lines connecting flowchart )

Yes No NA t elements been minimized? (III.E.11) l Discrepancy 10 #

i l

Proc. 1.3.4 13 Rev.1 Page 29 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 22 of 41 E0P B6. Instructions for Printina. CoDvina. and Storaae 1

1. Is text within flowchart elements single-spaced, with Yes No NA l

'one-and-a-half line spacing maintained between listed  !

items and between multiple instructions or statements i

enclosed within one flowchart element? (III.F.1)

I 1

Discrepancy ID #

' 2. Is text within instructional steps, exit statements, Yes No NA and endpcints left-aligned? (III.F.2)

Discrepancy ID #

3. Is text within the individual columns of entry Yes No NA conditions, override statements, and elements with decision table formats left-aligned? (III.F.3) i Discrepancy ID #
4. Is text within hold points and decision diamonds Yes No NA centered? (III.F.4)  !

Discrepancy ID # i

5. Is type size no smaller than 9-point? (III.F.5) Yes No NA Discrepancy ID # _

,. 6. Nas a type style been used that is simple, easy-to- Yes No NA read, and devoid of serifs and other character eebellishments? (III.F.6)

Discrepancy ID # _

9 L. 7. Are all portions of the copy of the E0P fully Yes No NA I legible? (II.F.7) l l

Discrepancy ID #

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1

! Pago 30 of 49 RiiPE H7.01 1

Attachment A Page 23 of 41 E0P SECTION C: PROCEDURE CONTENT

. C1. Level of DetA11 1

1. Is the level of detail presented in the E0P Yes No NA consistent with the knowledge and capabilities

. of a newly-licensed reactor operator (i.e.,

has the relative complexity of and an operator's familiarity with the evolutions to be performed been appropriately considered)? (IV.A.1)

Discrepancy ID #

2. Has excessive detail been avoided? (IV.A.2) Yes No NA Discrepancy ID #
3. Have expected results of routine actions Dat been Yes ho NA stated? (IV.A.2)

Discrepancy ID #

4. Have system response times been specified where Yes No NA appropriate? (IV.A.4)

Discrepancy ID #

5. Have equipment limitations been identified where Yes No NA appropriate? (IV.A.4)

Discrepancy 10 #

6. Have instrument inaccuracles been identified where Yes No NA approcriate? (IV.A.4)

Discrepancy ID #

7. Has alternate or backup instrumentation been Yes No NA identified where appropriate? (IV.A.4) l Discrepancy ID #

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.)

Page 31 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attach 2ent A Page 24 of 41 I E0P C1. Level of Detail (continued)

8. Have manual override instructions been incorporated Yes No NA where appropriate? (IV.A.4)

. ' Discrepancy ID #

9. Have methods of verifying correct plant response been Yes No NA specified where appropriate? (IV.A.3)

Discrepancy ID #

10. Are instructions succinct and precise with only short, Yes No NA simple sentences used? (IV.A.5)

Discrepancy ID #

11. Where required, has verification of automatic plant Yes No NA response been included as an instruction? (III.A.5)

Discrepancy ID #

I**

P Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 1 Page 32 of 49 3

RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 25 of 41

! C2. Writing Style l

1. Is the wording, gransnar, and sentence structure Yes No NA within all flowchart elements easily readable and interpretable? (IV.B.1)

Discrepancy 10 #

2. Are instructions written in the second person Yes No NA imperative mo0d with an implicit subject?

(IV.B.2)

Discrepancy ID # _

f 3. Does each instructional step only address one idea? Yes No NA l (IV.B.3)

Discrepancy ID # _ _

4. Are the objects of actions specifically stated Yes No NA (i.e., is it obvious exactly what is to be done to what?). (IV.B.4)

Discrepancy 10 #

5. Have multiple objects (3 or more) been Ilsted Yes No NA individually and separately from the preceding text? (IV.B.4)

Discrepancy 10 #

6. Mhere actions must be performed concurrently, are Yes No NA they specifically identified as such? (IV.B,5)

Discrepancy 10 #

7. Are limits expressed quantitatively? (IV.B.6) Yes No NA Discrepancy 10 # _.
8. Has the need for arithmetical calculations been Yes No NA avoided where possible? (IV.B.7)

Discrepancy 10 #

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.)

I Page 33 of 49 PTYPE H7,01

Attachment A Page 26 of 41 EOP ,,_

C3. Cautions and Notes

1. Have cautions only been used to identify potential Yes No NA hazards to personnel or equipment? (IV.C)

Discrepancy ID #

2. Have notes only been used to provide supplementary Yes No NA information related to performance of a particular action? (IV.C)

Discrepancy ID #

3. Has the use of .autions and notes been minimized? Yes No NA (IV.C)

Discrepancy ID #

4. Do notes and cautions HQ1 contain instructional Yes No NA steps? (IV.C)

Discrepancy ID #

I l

l l

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 34 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

l Attachment A

}, Page 28 of 41 E0P C4. Branching Instructions and Cross References (continued)

6. Does each intra-procedure branch correctly employ Yes No NA a unique letter designator format (i.e., capitalized, circled, and each pair connected by a dotted line)?

TIV.0)

Discrepancy ID #

7. Has forward and backward branching within the E0P Yes No NA been minimized? (IV.D.)

Discrepancy ID #

8. Have cross-references been minimized? (IV.0) Yes No NA Discrepancy ID #
9. For cross-references to supplemental procedures, has Yes No NA the referenced precedure teen identified by both number and title, with the tit?e enclosed in quotation marks? (IV.D)

Discrepancy ID #

10. Where figures and tables are referenced in the E09, Yes No NA are they identified by correct number? (Identification of the title is not required.) (III.A.15 III.A.16, IV.D) '

Discrepancy 10 #

j,.

b Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 36 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 29 of 41 E0P ,

C5. Component If tntification

1. Are components clearly a.13 completely Yes No NA

~

identified? (IV.E)

Discrepancy ID #

2. Where a specific control switch or instrument is Yes No NA referenced, are as-labeled designations printed in uppercase letters and enclosed in quotation marks?

. (IV.E.1) l Discrepancy ID #

3. Have system titles been capitalized? (The word Yes No NA "system" is not required.) (IV.E.2)

Discrepancy ID # __

4. For infrequently used components, have locations Yes No NA been specified? (IV.E.3)

Discrepancy ID # __

l Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 37 of 49

) RTYPE H7.01

--+-,-. - -

- . - . . , - - , - - . .v-- , -- - , - -,-,--------,--w-.--- -

{* Attachment A Page 30 of 41 EOP C6. Snellina. Grammar. and Punctuation

1. Is spelling, grammar, and punctuation consistent with Yes No NA

' standard rules and modern usage? (IV.F)

Discrepancy ID #

2. Has excessive use of commas, definite articles, Yes No NA pronouns, and adverbs been minimized to the extent possible? (IV.F.1, IV.F.2)

Discrepancy ID #

3. Are elements with columnar fornats (e.g., override Yes No NA statements) devoid of commas? (IV.F.1)

Discrepancy ID #

r

4. Have personal pronouns agi been used? (IV.F.2) Yes No NA Discrepancy ID #

u.

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 l

Page 38 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A

> Page 31 of 41 EOP C7. Nomenclature._Youbulary. and Abbreviations

1. Have simple, common words with specific, precise Yes No NA meanings been used? Have ambiguous terms been avoided? (IV.G.1, IV.G.2)
e. Discrepancy 10 # ,
2. Are logic terms used consistent with the definitions Yes No NA provided in Table Al? (IV.G.3) '

Discrepancy ID #

i I

3. Has terminology been consistent vith the definitions Yes No NA l provided in Table A27 (IV.G.4)

Discrepancy ID #

r

4. Has the use.of abbreviations and acronyms been Yes No NA minimized? Have only those immediately recognizable from Table A3 been used? (IV.G.5)

Discrepancy 10 #

l l

l l

. I Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 39 of 49 RTYPE H7.01 1

1

Attachment A Page 32 of 41 E0P i Table A1: Application of Logic Terms Loaic Term Definition AND Designates a combination of two or more conditions.

' Identifies the second and subsequent elements of a set condi tions.

BEFORE Indicates that the respective action is to be performed prior to the occurrence of a specified condition. Does not imply or require any specific margin be observed when a step states that action be taken "before" reach-ing a limit or value.

EXCEPT Specifies an exception to or exclusion from taking a prescribed action.

IF Indicates that perfornance of the associated action is contingent upon the existence of the identified condition (s). If the identified conditions do not exist, the presettbed action is not to be taken and execution of operator actions proceeds to the following

, step.

OR Designates alternative combinations of conditions.

Indicates that the associated action is to be performed if any one of the specified conditions occur. (Always used in the inclusive sense.)

THEN Designates the action portion of an instruction.

HAIT UNTIL Indicates that execution of subsequent operator actions is not permitted untti the identified condition exists.

WHEN Indicates that upon occurrence or existence of the identified condition (s), execution of the procedure should immediately proceed to the next identified flow chart element.

UNTIL Indicates that the associated action is to be terminated when the specified condition occurs.

Pro:. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 40 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 33 of 41 E09

(

i Table A2: Standard Nomenclature and Definitions Available:

The state or condition of being ready and able to be used (placed into operation) to accomplish the stated (or implied) action or function.

Cannot be determined:

The value or status of tha specified parameter relative to the procedure action level :annot be ascertained using available indications.

Cannot be maintained:

The value of the specified paramaeter cannot be kept above or below (as applicable) the identified limit. Implies an evaluation based on system performance and availability considered in relation to parameter values and trends. Neither implies that the parameter must actually exceed the limit before the action is taken nor that the action uust be taken before the limit is reached.

Cannot be restored:

The value of the specified parameter cannot be returned to within the specified limit. Implies an evaluation based on systes performance and availability considered in relation to parameter

, values and trends. Does not imply any specific time limit, but does not permit prolonged operation beyond the limit.

Close:

To position a valve or damper so as to prevent flow of the process fluid.

Confira:

Use available indications and, as appropriate, physical observation to establish that the specified action has occurred, conditions are as stated, etc. Includes an implied requirement to take corrective action if the identified conditions do not exist.

Contre!:

i Take action, as necessary, to maintain the value of the specified parameter within applicable limits.

Enter:

Comence psrforming, in sequence, the steps of the identified procedure.

Execute:

Perform the actions prescribed in the identified step.

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.)

, Page 41 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 34 of 41 E0P i 1

Table A2: Standard Nomenclature and Definitions (continued)

Exit:

Cease performing the steps of the identified procedure.

Initiate: I Operate the necessary controls so as to establish the specified system configuration or plant condition. Prolonged attempts to jumper interlocks, align alternate or backup power supplies, enter remote areas to manually operate valves, etc., are not intended by this term.

Line up:

Establish the prerequisites necessary for system operation. Does not encompass starting main system pumps.

Maintain:

Take action, as necessary, to keep the value of the specified parameter within the applicable limits.

Monitor:

Observe and evaluate at a frequency sufficient to remain apprised of the value, trend, and rate of change of the specified parameter.

open-To position a valve or damper so as to allow flow of the process fluid.

Place:

To align a switch to a specified position.

Prevent:

Take action to forestall or avert the state, condition, or action addressed by the step.

Purge:  :

I Force flow through an enclosed volume. Includes establishing both an influent and effluent flowpath. 1 Restore:

Take action, to within as necessary, applicable limits. to return the value of the specified parameter Set:

To position a control to a specified scale value.

Shut: I To position a breaker so as to permit the flow of current in the associated circuit.

Slowly:

Only as fast as can be accommodated and still maintain effective control of the associated parameter (s) within specified values or limits.

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.)

' Page 42 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 35 of 41 E09 lable A2: Standard Nomenclature and Definitions (continued)

Start:

To energize a pump or fan motor.

Tefninate:

Stop the stated action, process or evolution. The most direct action to stop the stated action / process / evolution is preferred, but many actions may be required.

Throttle:

To position a valve or damper so as to partially restrict flow of the process fluid.

Trip:

To deenergize a pump or fan motcr; to position a breaker so as to interrupt or prevent the flow of currtnt in the associated circuit.

Vent:

Open an effluent (exhaust) flowpath from an enclosed volume.

Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 43 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

Attachment A Page 36 of 41 EOP __,

Table A3: Standard Acronyms and Abbreviations Abbreviation Meanina ADS Automatic Depressurization System APRH Average Power Range Monitor ARI Alternate Rod Insertion BIIT Boron Injection Initiation Temperature

. CAC Containment Atmospheric Control CAD Cor,tainment Atmospneric Dilution CPS Counts Per Second CRD Control Rod Drive CS Core Spray CST Condensate Storage Tank Demin Demineralizer DSIL Drywell Spray Initiation Limit DH Drywell ECCS Emergency Core Cooling Systems Elev Elevation

  • F Degrees Fahrenheit u

ft Feet FH Feedwater GPH Gallons Per Hinute H&V Heating and Ventilation HCLL Heat Capaacity Level Limit HCTL Heat Capacity Temperature Limit HCV Hydraulic Control Unit

{ Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 44 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

i l

Attachment A Page 37 of 41 i E0P l

l Abbreviation Meanina j i

HPCI High Pressure Coolant Injection '

hr Hour 1 HX Heat Exchanger in. Inch lbs Pounds i

, LCO Limiting Condition for Operation LI Level Indicator LOCA Loss of Coolant Accident LPCI Low Pressure Coolant Injection LR Level Recorder MARFP Minimum Alternate RPV Flooding Pressure MCFI Minimum Core Flooding Interval

, MCUTL Maximum Core Uncovery Time Limit ain Minimum f

MPCHLL Maximum Primary Containment Hater level Limit I

mR N1111 roentgen /Hilliren (as appropriate to the context and the units of associated instrumentation.

MSIV Main Steam Isolation Valve i

N/A Not Applicable

,, NPSH Net Positive Suction Head N.W. North Hest {

PCPL Primary Containment Pressure Limit psig Pounds per square inch (gauge) l Proc. 1.3.4 13 Rev.1 Page 45 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

l l

l Attachment A l Page 38 of 41 l E0P f Ahkreviation Hennina PSP Pressure Suppression Pressure l

R8 Reactor Building RBCCH Reactor Building Closed Cooling Water RCIC Reactor Core Isolation Cooling l

RHR Residual Heat Removal I i

RPM Revolutions Per Hinute 1 e

l RPV Reactor Pressure Vessel RHCU Reactor Water Cleanup SBGT Standby Gas Treatment SBLC Standby Liquid Control S.E. South East SRV Safety Relief Valve SRVTyLL SRV Tail Pipe Level Limit SSH Salt Service Water S.H. South West TAF Top of the active fuel TBCCH

,. Turbine Building Closed Cooling Water TIP Traversing In-Core Probe

& Ampersand ("AH3")

Feet (units of elevation)

=

Inchas (units of elention)

% Percent Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev,1 Page 46 of 49 RTYPE H7,01

-- - - - - - _ = . . _ _ _ - _

I l Attachment A Page 39 of 41 EOP i C8. Eg_grical o Values r

[ 1. Have limits and values of operating parameters been Yes No NA expressed quantitatively? (IV.H)

~ '

. Discrepancy ID #

2. Have only Arabic numerals been used? (IV.H.1) Yes No NA Discrepancy ID #
3. Do parameter values include the units of measurement? Yet No NA (IV.H.2)

Discrepancy ID # _

4. Have parameter values been expressed to a precision Yes No NA consistent with the intent of the action (s) specified in the step? (IV.H.3)

Discrepancy ID # _

5. Are acceptance values expressed in terms of a range Yes No NA rather than a tolerance band to obviate the

' need for mental arithmetic (e.g., 20 in, to 30 in.,

rather than 25 in. 15 in.)? (IV.H.4)

Discrepancy ID #

6. Has a slash mark (/) been used in place of the word Yes No NA "per" (e.g., mR/hr)? (IV.H.5)

Discrepancy IB #

7. Are numbers between zero and one expressed in decimal Yes No NA form with a zero preceding the decimal point (e.g. , 0.12)? (IV.H.6)

Discrepancy 10 #

' Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 l

i Page 47 of 49 RTYPE H7.01

l Attachment A  !

Page 40 of 41 l E0P I  ;

SECTION D: CONFORMITY HITH PLANT-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL GUIDELINES '

. 1. Does the wording of each flowchart element comply Yes No NA ilth the content and intent of the corresponding L step of the technical gu1Glines?

Discrepancy ID # ___

2. Have all steps of the corresponding technical Yes No NA guidelines been incorporated into the EOP?

Discrepancy ID #

3. Are cautions referenced at the points specified in Yes No NA the technical guidelines?

Discrepancy ID i

4. Are all instructions and cautions in the E0P derived Yes No NA from corresponding tec5nical guideline 'eps and cL..tions? i Discrepancy ID # _
5. Do all numerical values in the E0P correspond to Yes No NA those specified in the technical guidelines?

Discrepancy ID i

6. Do the EOP entry conditions correspond to those Yes No NA specified in the technical guidelines?

Discrepancy 10 #

l

7. Does the sequence of operator actions and decisions Yes No NA correspond to that presented in the technical guidelines?

I Discrepancy ID i , l

8. Does the association of override statements correspond Yes No NA to that defined in the techr.ical guidelines?

Discrepancy ID #

9. Are cross-references consistent with those identified Yes No NA in the technical guidelines?

Discrepancy 10 #

t

' Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 48 of 49 c T'r P E H' .01 1

Attach m t A i Page 41 of 41 E0P l

SECTION E: COMPATIBILITf MITH THE CONTROL ROOM

1. Are as-labeled designattens used to identify specific Yes No NA

, components, alarms, controls, and instruments?

Discrepancy ID #

2. Are component locations specified when appropriate Yes No NA (e.g. the least-experienced intended user might be unfas '.elar with the location, o when failure to do so say cause confusion)?  ;

Discrepancy ID # _

3. Is the determination of identified status (value, Yes No NA trend, poG tion, etc.) of plant parameters as specified in the E0P adequately supported by plant instrements, approved instructions, or other appror late sources of information?

Discrepancy ID .7

4. Are the values of plant parameters specified in the Yes No NA E0P vithin the range of the respective control room instruments?

Discrepancy ID #

5. Are the units of measurement for values of plant Yes No NA parameters as specified in the E0P the same as those presented on the respective control room instruments?

Discrepancy 10 #

6. Are the values of parameters specified in the EOP Yes No NA expressed to a precision consistent with the accu .'sy and precision of the respective instru-m mentt 'W l

Di s t re" i: 3 ID # .

5 Proc. 1.3.4-13 Rev.1 Page 49 of 49 RTYPE H7.^'

_ . , _ _ ,, _ _ .____s __I

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20155F917&oldid=3044011"