ML20155F920

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Procedure 1.3.4-14, Emergency Operating Procedure Validation Program
ML20155F920
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 07/10/1987
From:
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20151H280 List:
References
FOIA-88-198 1.3.4-14, NUDOCS 8810130416
Download: ML20155F920 (37)
v • d • e


Text

--

P BOSTON EDISON t

(

I

. l l

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS DEPARTNENT PILGRIM WUCLEAR POWER STATION Procedure No.1.3.4-14 EOP VALIDATION PROGRAM Iotal Panet: 3*/

.()

Approved M b+--  :-- - 'T/7 / 27 ,

j

, . Quality Assurance Manager /Date l Approved 7 7 l i -

Nuct'4Tr Operafftfns Managaf/Dafe '

u

/ l Safety Evaluation: R;;;'nd!Not Required l

i h '

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. 0 Page "1 of 37 000907

?

esol9gh_190 pDR I J ~ FOR INFORMATIOb ONLY

u - -- ---. - - - - - - - - - - - .

1 An- a - - - - . - _ . ,

Table of Contents '

P.Agt section 3

I. PURPOSE .......................

3 II. AAPLICABILITY ....................

3 III. DEFINITIONS .....................

IV. REOUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCT 1QKS i

A. Validation Nethodology and Evaluation 4 Techniques ...................

7  !

B. Scenario Devehpment ...... . . . . . . . .

C. Validation Team Member Composition and 8

Qualifications .................

8 D. Performance of E0P Validation Exorcises . . . . .

E. Recording the Results of E0P Validation 10 Exercises ...................

', F. Evaluating, Resolving, and Correcting 11 v Identified Discrepancies ... . . . . . . . . .

12 G. Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

V. ATTACHMENTS 1

- A. FORMS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF E0P

, VALIDATION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES B. EOP VALIDATION PROGRAM EXERCISE CHECXLIST C. EOP VALIDATION PROGRAM EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE l

I Proct 1 3 '*I' '

I Page 2 Ci gggQj 1 L ,

ONLY

I PURPOSE This document provides appropriate requirements and instructions for

( validating the PNPS Emergency Operating procedures (EOPs). j l

II. APPLICABILITY I

The requirements and instructions specified herein apply to the overall

. process of developing new E0Ps and revising existing E0Ps. I This docume.it supplements existing PNPS procedures governing procedure preparation, revi,ston, and control but does not supplant them. l l

III. DEFINITIONS EOP Source Documents Guidelines *roceduras, data, and other records which comprise the technical basis of the 10Ps and requirements for their '

development.

E0P Ooerational Correctness - P. E0P characteristic that refers to the l compatibility of the procedures with-plant hardware, plant responses, operator capaullities, other plant procedures, and the composition and manning level of on-shift personnel.

[0P Validation - The process of confirming and documenting the operational correctness and usability of the EOPs.

E07 Usfbility - An E0P characteristic that refers to the adequacy of the f . procedures' level of detail and the understandability of the information V presented in the procedure.

l l

l 1 1 l l l l I

i

(

5 f

Proc."1.3,4 14 Rev. 0 Page 3 of F FOR INFORMATIOb r

ONLY

- - . - - _ . _ _ . - - , _ , - , _. _ _ _ . - , . _ , _ . , , . - , _ .._.._-_-,-7 ,_-_.r__., ,_-___.,_,,,_,_.,_-.,,,___m_,..

.m - __ - - - - - - --

'a i

l IV.

REOUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS A. yalidation Methodoloav and Evaluation T,chniaues  ;

As stated above, the general attributes of EOP usability and operattoral correctness are evaluated through the validation process. The specific E0P characteristics encompassed by this definition are as follows: .

Attribute Procedure Characteristic Usability Level of deta11 understandability Operational Compatibility with plant hardware Correctr. ass Compatib111ty with plant response Compatibility with other plant procedures Compatibility with operator capab111ttes Compatibilty with normal shift composition and manning level The evaluation criteria against which each of these procedure characteristics is evaluated are listed in Table 1 (page 5).

The E0P Validation Progran employs the following evaluation techniques:

l Observation of licensed operators using the E0Ps during real-time f!

\. execution of multiple trandent and accident scenarios conducted

' on the PNPS simylator.

Walkthroughs/talkthroughs by licensed operators of those E0Ps (and steps of E0Ps) which cannot be effectively addressed through simulated exercises. Procedure walkthroughs shall be conducted in j j a control room setting (either at the plant or the PNPS staulator).

I J* Collection of operator opinions using prepared questionnaires.

i Performance of validation activities and the results of associated evaluation shall be documentef on the forms illustrated in Attachments A, B, and C.

1 Additional deta~ll 7egarding preparation for and execution of individual E0P Validation Program activities are provided in the remaining sections of this procedure.

I

, I.

l y.

j (

{

) -

Proct 1.7.4 14 Rev. 0 1 l Page 4 of 37 i n

' FOR INFORMATl0t ONLY

l l

Table 1: E0P Validation Evaluaticn Criteria l Characterist,h__ i Evaluation Criteria l l Level of detail' Does the E0P provide the information l l necessary for operators to evaluate key

  • i l

plant conditions and take the l appropriate action?

I I l Is the level of detail provided in the E0P l

consistent with the knowledge and l capabilities of the intended users?

I I Mhere appropriate, are response times,  ;

l equipment limitations, instrument l ,

inaccuracies, and contingency actions I l

adeque.tely addressed in the E0P1 l l Understandability Are operators able to correctly, and in a l

' tinoly manner, interpret each of the steps l of the E0Ps? l l Compatibility with Does the existing plant design permit the plant hardware performance of prescribe /, actions as directed l l

(specifically considering the av:ilability of l

' both information and controls), and in the

) l sequence specified1 l l Compatibility with Are the specified actions offective in l plant response stabilizing plant conditions?

I I J

Compatibility with Is the wording that is used in the E0Ps l cther procedures consistent with that of other plant l procedures?

? I

'I i'

Mhere references to plant procedures are l

provided, does the specified procedure exist. l 1s the number and title correct, and does it l provide the appropriate instructions for the l task or activity intended by the content of j l the reference in the E0P? l I

l Are the actions preu ribed in the E0Ps l compatible with those specified in other l plant procedures which may hace to be l ,

J executed concurrently?  !

I I  !

J l

i i

4 , .. Proce 1.3.4-14 Rev. O i Page 5 of 37

? FOR INFORM ATIOb ' i '

i

ONLY

_. .- _ .__ _ _-_- _ _ - - _ _ _ - ~

IV. 8. Scenario Develonannt Detailed event scenarios shall be developed to guide the performance of I E0P validation exercises. The scenarios shall be of varying complexity and shall exerciss to the fullest extent possible the scope of plant conditions and key actions addressed by the E0Ps.

For the validaticn of r w isions to the E0Ps, the scope of scenarios need only encompass the changes made to the previously-approved procedures. If existing stenarios are determined to be adequate for this purpose, no new scenarios need be developed.

Scenario development should be a coordineted effort by a group of individuals having expertise in E0P development, I;1 ant systems and operations, and operator training. A trial check-out of the scenarios 4 should be conducted prior to being used in the actual E0P validation exercises to ensure that the initial conditions and specified sequence i of malfunctions will generate the desired plant symptoms and conditions. Also prior to actual use in validating the E0Ps, scenarios I shall be reviewed and approved by the Nuclear Training Organization. l The following process is suggested for developing the scenarios: j
1. Identify the E0P ilowpaths to be exercised. j i
2. At each major decision point in an E0P flowpath, specify the plant symptoms or condittens which would constrain operators to the 1

desired response pattern. I l

() 3. Define systen degradations, instructor actions, or event complications which could cause the specified plant symptoms or l

conditions.

4. Select initial plant conditions and simulator malfunctions which j will initiate and causw plant conditiens to progress in accordance ,

with the desired response patterns.  ;

s j . 5. Record the necessary sequence of instructor actions, the anticipated plant response, and proper operator actions on an E0P

]i Validation $cenario Outline (illustrated on page 3 of Attachment

i A.) . .

I l 6. Prepare a simple matrix of E0* flowchart paths vs. scenarios to j l confira that the key plant conditions and operator action!

addressed by the E0Ps are, in fact, covered by the combintJ scope of the scenarios.

1 i

j 4

i i

{ r ,

Proc,1.3.4 14 Rev 0

. ' )

Page 7 of 3,7 j i FOR INFORMATIOl 4

3 ONLY

--- _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ , - _ _ - - - _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , , _ _ ~ _ _ - , _ - - , - - _

IV. B. Scenario Develannent (Continued)

7. Complete an E0P Validation Scenario Cover Sheet (illustrated on l page 4 of Attachment A) to accompany each Scenario. Outline. l

(

An E0P Validation Test Plan (illustrated on page 5 of Attacheint A) l shall be developed which specifies the sequence for running the  ;

scenarios. Steulator exercises for each day should progress from staple to complex scenarios. In order to minimize the possibility of I

- the control room operators responding in advance to "expected" events, the following factors should also be considered in developing the Test ,

Plan .

  • Siellar scenarios should not be executed consecutively. i I
  • The initiating event, plant symptoms, and the flowpath
through each of the E0Ps should be varied in successive
scenarios, i ,

C. Validation Team Member Naotition and Oualificatient l The team formed to conduct E0P validation exercises shall be composed of a designated Director, a simulator instructor, and a group of licensed operators. The designated Director shall be fu'1y knowledgeable of the ntw and revised E0Ps to be validated, ar,d shall be experienced in SHR plant operations. Licensed operators who are

participating in a validation exercise shall be organized to form a standard on-shift complement of licensed control roca operators j including a Watch Engineer and Shift Supervisor, each performing their I 1 (, j' respective duties and assigned responsibilitirs.

All exercise participants shall have previously completed a formal

traintn;j session on the organization, structure, conventions, and l technic 11 contut of the E0P(s) being validated.

D. Egrformance of EOP Validation Exercitet

! . E0P validation exercises sha11 be executed in the approved sequence

{ specifted in the Test Plan. The Exercise Director s%all coordinate execut'ica of each scenario.

l The names of the Director, the simulator instructor, and the 3

l participating control room operators shall be recorded on the E0P l 1

i Valld; tion Exercise Performance Record (111ustrated on page 6 of Appendix A) for each exercise conducted.

l 1

l

(

Proc > 1.3. 4-14 Rev. O  !

)

Page 8 of 37 j }

FOR INFORMATIO I i 3 m ._

l ONLY  !

L - . . - - - -- -- --

i

l IV. Do Performance of E0P Validation Exercises (Continued)

[ach exercise shall be conducted as follows:

( 1. Set the initial plant conditions as specified on the E0P Validation Scenario Cover Sheet and in the E0P Validation Scenario Outline. >

2. Describe the initial plant conditions to all exercise participants.

For exercises conducted during the first part of a program for validating an entire set of E0Ps, a brief description should also i be given on the scenario's expected progression of events, anticipated plant resoonses, and the EOP(s) and E0P flowpaths intended to be valid.ted. As participants become fant11ar with the validation process, this pre-exercise briefing should become increasingly aore limited in scope and shall eventually be <

discontinued.

i

3. Run the scenario in accordance with the appropriate instructions detailed in the Scenario Outline. If a walkthrough/talkthrough sequence is required, the Director shall ask the control room operators to demonstrate and describe in detail the actions they ,

would perforw in response to the described plant conditions. As appropriate, the simulator instructor shall supply additional <

information spectfled in the Scenario Outline, including a '

description of the plant response to the actions the operators tehilfy as having been taken. ,

'b

4. Compare the actions taken (or described as having been taken) by the control room operators to the associated actions specified in i

the Scenario Outline. The Director (or designated assistant (s))

should note the following performance deviations at the l appropriate location in the "Notes" column of the Scenario Outline:

Performance of an inappropriate step or action

' r

  • Formulation of an incorrect response to a decision Misinterpretation of a procedure step ,

I Fa11ura to perform a required (or expected ) step or

action Violation of a Limit
  • Failure to obr.erve a specified caution

! f i

1 If the Operator Actions Itsted on the scenario Outline are performed correctly, a check mark M should t'e placed in the Motes" column alongs'de the action statement.

)

(

F -

Proc 7 1.3'.4-14 Rev. O Page 9 cf P FOR INFORMATlot j ONLY

___ __. _ - __ - ~_ - - . __ .. . - - - - - - - . - _---..-___-_ __

E. Anordina t,he Results of top Validation ruercises After finishing each scenario, the Director shall complete an E0P r ( Validation Exercise Checklist (Attachment 8) and each participating control roce operator shall complete an E0P Validation Exercise Questionnaire (Attachment C.)

The Director shall review all of the completed Validation Exercise Questionnaires with the simulator instructor and control room operators who participated in the exercise prior to beginninfi the next scenario.

Additional explanatory remarks shall be recorded d' rectly on the respective Questionnaires as appropriate.

The Director shall assign a unique identification number to each performance deviation, procedure discrepancy, operator concern, and 1

other deficiency identified on the completed Validation Scenario Outlines, the Exercise Checklists, and Exercise Questionnaires.

- Multiple occurrences of a particular deviation, discrepancy, concern or other deficiency may be assigned the same number.

The Director shall also complete a Part ! EOP Validation Discrepancy i Report (illustrated on page 7 of Attachment A) for each numbered performance deviation, procedure discrepancy, >perator concern, and other identified deficiency. A complete description of the discrepancy shall be provided; if more space is needed for this purpose, a continuation Sheet (illustrated on page 9 of Attachment A) shall be used and the "Continuation Sheet Attached" box on the report shall be checked. The sequential and total number of Continuation Sheets used i g for an individual discrepancy shall be identified in the appropriate

(_/ blanks on each Continuation Sheet. ,

I i At the conclusion of a11 E0P validation exercises, the Director shall l 1 verify that all of the following items have been properly completed for i each scenario: j

- i

1. E0P Validation Scenario Outlines and respective Cover Sheets j j
  • 2. E0P Validation Exercise Performance Records
3. E0P Validation Exercise Checklists i 4. E0P Validation Exercise Questionnaires 4 5. Part ! E0P Validation Discrepancy Reports and associated Continuation Sheets

- 6. E0P Validation Test Plan 3

1 i L 4

1 l I 5 I

) Proce 1. L 4 14 Rev. 0 Page 10 of.37 l g FOR INFORMATIOl, 4 3 s .

ONLY l

E. Recordina the Results of E0P Validation Exercitet (Continued)

( Mhen completed, all of the items listed above shall be forwarded to the Nuclear Operations Section fanager for subsequent evaluation, resolution, and correction of .dentified discrepancies as described in Section F.

F. Evaluatina. Resolvina. and correctino Identified 011erenancias Each performance deviation, E0P discrepancy, operator concern, and other discrepancy identified through the validation process shall be analyzed to determine whether any corrective action is required.

Resolution of all identified discrepancies and, if recuired. completion of associated corrective action (s) shall be documentet on Part !! of an EOP Validation Discreptf.:y Report (illustrated on page 8 on Attachment A.) If no corrective .ction is required, appropriate justification shall be provided.

The analysis and resolution of E0P discrepancies and the identification of appropriate corrective actions should be performed as a cooperative ,

effort of several individuals having expertise in the EOPs, the E0P  !

source documents, plant operation and control room operator train.ing. l Theprocedureauthor(s)andindividualswhoparticipatedinthe validation exercises should also participate in the evaluation and resolution of idt.ntifled discrepancies if possible. The following process shall be followed in completing this task:

1. Review the description of the discrepancy. (If those who

() participated in the validation exercises are also participating in the discrepancy review and resolution process, they can supply additional information, as necessary.)

2. Determine whether any corrective action is necessary.
3. If corrective action is appropriate, develop a recoszended solution which corrects the discrepancy. Solutions may include

= changes to the E0P, additions to the EOP training program, modifications to plant equipment, or ravisions to EOP source documents.

I i

\ . i l

l l

l l

1

( i

. - Proc.*1.3,4-14 Rev. O

[

Page 11 of 37

FOR INFORM ATI0l i ONLY i .

l

i F. Evaluatina. Resolvina. and correctina Identified Discrenaneigi (Continued) k 4. Document the agreed-upon corrective action on Part II of the E0P Validation Discrepancy Report, using Continuation Sheets as necessary to completely record the action to be taken. If it is concluded that no corrective action is required, provide appropriate justification. The individual who prepares the description of the required corrective action (or the

justification for no corrective action) shall sign and date the Report in the space provided.
5. When the corrective action has been implemented, the individual who completes the corrective action shall sign and date the associated E0P Validation Discrepancy Repcrt Part II in the space

- provided.

6. Satisfactory completion of the required corrective action shall be

' independently verified by an individual designated by the Nuclear Operations Section Manager. The person who performs this task sia11 sign and date the associated E0P Validation Discrepancy Report Part !! in the space provided.  !

G. Documentation Docusentation of the validation of E0Ps shall consist of the following j items:

1. E0P Validation Scenario Outlines and respective Cover Sheets
2. E0P Validation Exercise Performance Records
3. EOP Valide.tlon Exercise Checklists
4. E0P Validation Exercise Questionnaires
5. Pt.rt I E0P Validatic<n Discrepancy Reports and associated
  • Continuation Sheets for each identified discrepancy j i 6. Part II E0P Validation Discrepancy Reports and associated Continuation Sheets for each identifled discrepancy

)

i l (

a . . . . . . - Proc e 1.3.4-14 Rev. O Page 12 of,37 l

'. FOR INFORMATI0t ONLY

Go gcumentation (Continued) l I

The completed documentation package shall be returned to the Nuclear

( Operations Manager. A review of all materials for t w 11ance with the requirements and instructions of the E0P Verificaticn Program shall be performed by the Nuclear Operations Manager and she QA Director; these individuals shall sign and date the E0P Validation Record (illustrated on page 10 of Attachment A) when they have determined that all requirements have been satisfactorily completed.

l All records of E0P Validation shall be retained as specified by N00 Procedure 1.3.7.

V. ATTACHMENTS A. . f.g ns For Develonnent and Perfermance of t0P Validation Procram Activities B. top Validation Procram Exercise checklist I

C. top Validation Proaram Exercise Ouentionnaire )

i

, i

() l i

l l

! l e,

l  :

I . .

l l

I

! I I l J

l i

) w .

. , . . . . Proc < 1.1.4-14 Rev. 0 4 l Page 13 of,37  !

FOR INFORM ATIO. i ONLY

Attachment A PAGE I of 10 l

l l

l l

l l ATTACHMENT A l

l FORMS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE QE E0P VALIDATION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES l

I b

l l >

! 1 1

l' i

e <

l l I l

l

\

l 1

I l l 5

Proc.1.3.5-14 Rev. O Page 14 ef 3'  ;

RTYPE m7.0FOR INFORM ATIOf ONLY l

I Attachment A l PAGE 2 of 10

( Table of Contents Pana A-E0P Validation Scenario Outline ................. 3 E0P Validation Scenarlo Cover Sheet ............... 4

(

E0P Validation Test Plan .................... 5 E0P Validation Exercise Performance Record ........... 6 E0P Validation Discrepancy Report, Part I ............ 7 E0P Validation Discrepancy Report. Part II ........... 8 ,

i EDP Validation Discrepancy Report Continuation Sheet ...... 9 E0P Validation Record ...................... 10 l

i

(~

s l

l l

4 l

( -

., Proc..).3.4-14 Rev. O Page 15 of 37 l RTf?E

  • I F

.C' 'OR INFORM ATi C)t4L'r I

o

( .

8

  • I au s  :

Im 4"- ,

S .4 4 *! l tW g .

m '

.cm g

. E &I. l

.I.

- W 5

N E a E h

5 A "

8

( 5 1 $ .-

I E 1

> . g .

\ -

E .

l

, = .-

i t

2k  :

. I b;

W C

i 1

(

)

  • - FOR INFORMATIOf l ONLY i i

. - . - _ - _ -- -- . . - .__ __ - \

Attachment A PAGE 4 of 10

(

BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR PONER STATION E0P VALIDATION SCENARIO COVER $NEET SCENARIO #

DESCRIPTION OF EVENT (S)/ CONDITIONS (summary) r PROCEDURES EXERCISED (number and revision, and sope of coverage) i I

INITIAL CONDITIONS (simulator 1C number and description) l SIMULATOR MLFUNCTIONS (ntieber and description)

EQUIPMENT OllT OF SERVICE (list) i . . .

ESTIMTED RUN TIME OF SCENARIO (hours)

J Prepared by:

l Date:

Reviewed / Approved by:

Date:

(

! Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. 0

y. . .. ,. Page 17 of 37 RTYPl k7.01 FOR INFORMATIOb b .. . . . . .

ONLY

Attachment A PAGE 5 of 10 1

(

DOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR PONER STATION Rev. _

E0P VALIDATION TEST PLM DAY #  : (Date _ ) ,

l Sequence Scenario # Run Time Remarks

1. _. -
2. --
3. -
4. ,

5.

6. _

(' DAY #  : (Date )

Sequence Scenarlo # Run Time Remarks

1. ' _

, 2. ._

= 3. _ _

4.

l 5.

6.

l l

! l l

l Approved: Exercise Director ]

Date

(

Proc. 1.3.4 14 Rh 0

, ['rR% f0R INFORMATIO ;

ONLY i

1

Attachment A PAGE 6 of 10

(

BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE PERFORMANCE RECXMtD

- SCENARIO # -

l PARTICIPANTS Exercise Director i Simulator Director l Control R m Operators (Name and shift position) l PERFORMANCE CNECKLIST lll Initial Conditions Set lll Participants briefed l_l Scenario executed: Date itse l[] Performance deviations noted on Scenario Outline I

1 i l~_l EOP Validation Exercise Cliecklist completed l[l E0P Validat)on Exercise Questionnaire completed j l{ Exercise results reviewed with participants l[] Part 1 E0P Validation Discrepancy Reports completed for each identified performance deviation, procedure

' l discrepancy, operator concern, and other daficiency 1

All checklist itees completed:

Exercise Director i

k Proc. 1.3.4 14 Rev. O h ->. Page 19 of 3'l RTYPi H7.0\

FOR INFORMATIO 5 ..

ONLY

-~ -

Attachment A PAGE 7 of ID J

(

90STON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR PONER STATION E0P VALIDATION DISCREPANCY REPORT Part I DISCREPANCY ID #

SCENARIO # DURING 16(IQt DISCREPANCY HAS NOTED SOURCE OF DISCREPANCY lll Validation Scenar10 Outline l~_l Validation Exercise Checklist l~_l Validation Exercise Questionnaire lll Other (describe)

E0P APPLICALILITY

! E0P number (s) Flowchart Elecents and revision (describe)

- l i

= DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY I

ContinuationSheet(s) Attached l~.l Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. 0 Page 40 of 37 RTYPI M7.01 i i  : FOR INFORMATlot j

  • _ _ _ _ _ -_ . _ n m. v _

Attachment A PAGE 8 of 10

(

BOSTON EDIFCM COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION E0P VALIDATION DISCAEPANCY REPORT Part II DISCREPAMCY 10 #

E0P APPLICABILITY (Number and revision)

CORRECTIVE ACTION (Description)  :

(, ) '

ContinGetionSheet(s) Attached lll Prepared by:

= ..

. Naas (Print)  :

, i Signature Date 1 Implemented by:

Name (Print) ,

i Signature Date Completion vertfled by:

Name (Print)

Signature Date  ;

( l I

F" . .. Procr 1.3,4-14 Rev. O Page 21 e'.D

""M 4

i

" FOR INFORM ATIOb ! '

ONLY

l Attachment A PAGE 9 of 10

(

BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION E0P VALIDATION DISCREPAMCY REPORT Continuation Sheet DISCREPANCY 10 i E0P APPLICABILITY (Number and revision)

Continuation of: Part I l[l Sheet of Part !! l[l Sheet of i

O P

1 . . .

i l

~

(

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. O

p. , . . Page 77 of 37 RTYPt H7.01 FOR INFORMATIOt i

+.... .

ONLY ,

Attachment A PAGE 10 of 10

(

BOSTON EDISON COMPANY PILGRIM NUCLEAR PONER STATION E0P VALIDATION RECORD E0Ps VALIDATED (Number and Revision) l I

ATTACHMENTS l(( E0P Validation Scenario Outlines and respective Cover Sheets

(,) l[l E0P Validt.tlon Exercise Performance Records l[l EOP Validation Exercise Checkit u s l[\ EOP Validation Exercise Questionnaires

l[l Part ! E0P Validation Discrepancy Reports and associated
! Continuation Sheets for each identified discrepancy REVIEWED BY

] ,

l Nuclear Operations l Manager Date j QA Director g

Date l

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. 0 Page 23 of 37 I RTYPE H7,01 h

FOR INFORMATl0t

' '~

ONLY l

- Attachment t l PAGE I cf 6

k l l

i

l i
i ATTAOMENT B  ;

i 1

j E0P VALIDATION PROGRAM EXERCISE CNECKLIST i t L

) l i

f i

h i

i l  !

i l l * -

i i , ,

I .

) I l

l 1 I l

i 1

l I

l Proc. 1.3.4 14 Rev. O '

l Page 24 of 37

( RTYPE H7.01 i

g -. . . .

l  !

'. FOR INFORMATIOb ONLY

Attachment B '

PAGE 2 of 6 INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING E0P val.10AT10N EXERCISE CHECKLIST The questions of this checklist shall be answered by the Esercis6 Director.

One set of responses should be completed at the conclusion of each teenarlo.

This checklist should be cospleted as follows:

1. Use black ink.
2. Identify the scenario number upon which the attached answers and 1

. comments are based, and the date on which this scenario was run.

! Scenario i Date

3. Enter the scenario number on the top of each attached page in the space provided.

i

4. Answer each of the attached questions "yes" or "no' based on observation of the actions of tiie control room operators during

+

the scenarlo. In the "Cossents" section under each question i' provide E0P references as appropriate for the answer given. Also provide any additional remarks necessary to fully explain identified discrepancies, deficiencies, etc. Comments should be

! , as specific ts possible. Use the attached Comment Continuation Sheet when additional space is necessary to adequately explain a

  • response to a particular question. Do not use the same Comment Continuation Sheet for making connents that are applicable to different questions.
5. When answers to all questions are completed, sign below.

4 1 g .

MOII Discrtpancy 10 numbers shall be assigned after all E0P validation exercises have

been completed.

4 Completed by:

'- Name (print)

Signature Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. 0 Page 25 of 37

( RTtPE H7.01 l

. \

FOR INFORMATIOl

'" ONLY i

)

Attachment B PAGE 3 of 6 SCENARIO #

E0P W.LIDATION EXERCISE CHECKLIST

1. Did the operators recognize the occurrence of Yes No entry conditions and select the appropriate EOP(s)?

Comments i _

Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy ID #

f

2. Did the operators correctly perform all Yes No required actions, and do so in the proper j sequence?

Comments b

Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy 19 J

3. Did the operators perform any inappropriate Yes No actions?

Concents Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l f Discrepancy ID #

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. O Page 26 of 37 l RTYPE H7.01

> ; ~ , u . w .;-y . m.. , e '

e L

FOR INFORMATl0i
2. ONLY

I..

Attachment 8 PAGE 4 of 6 SCENARIO #

EOP val.!DATION EXERCISE CHECKLIST (Continued) j 4. Did the operators appear to have difficulty Yes No understanding any of the decisions or Instructional steps presented in the E0P(s)?

Comments Connent Continuation Sheet attached l~l Discrepancy ID #

5. Here the operators able to comply with all Yes No

, prescribed instructions and actions?

i Comments g __

f Comment Continuation Sheet attached lll Discrepancy ID #

= 6. .Nere the prescribed instructions and actions Yes No effective in sti.bilizing plant conditions?

Comments _

Consent Continuatica Sheet attached lll Discrepancy 10 #

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. O Page 27 of 37 RTYPE H7.01

(

FOR INFORMATiot ONLY

Attachment B PAGE 5 of 6 SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE CHE'XLIST (Continued) ,

i l

7. Did the operators appear to need additional Yes No  !

gutdance at any time during the transient? '

Comments l

l l

Comment Continuation Sheet attached lll Discrepancy ID #

8. Here all necessary systes controls and Yes No instrumentation available to the operators?

Coenents l

f l WI Coenent Continuation Sheet attached l~l Discrepancy ID # 1 l 9. Additional consents:

l l

l l

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. 0 l Page 28 of 37 i

~

RTYPE H7.01

( l w.,.,.. , ,

' i

FOR INFORMATIOb I ONLY '

l

Attachment B PAGE 6 of 6 SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE CHECKLIST Comment Continuation Sheet Continuation of consents on Checklist Question number:

I i

l i

l Proc . 1. 3.4-14 Rev. O

( Page 29 of 37 i 9,..y. ... .... , ., ,.

RTY.PE M.7.01 j'" r0R INFORMATIO! ;

ONLY I 1

j

1 Attachment C PAGE 1 of 8

( i l

l l

ATTACHMENT C IOP VALIDATION PROGRAM EXERCISE OUESTIONMAIRE

  • S 1

o

)

I l! -

i t

l 1

l Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. O I i Page 30 of 37 l RTYPE H7.01 1

{ l

- 1

p. .. . m ,, .

r -

FOR INFORMATIOf

  • ONLY l l

t Attachment C PAGE 2 of 8 k

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE Each control room operator participant is requested to complete this questionnaire based on personal impressions and observations during the

.. scenariojustperformed.

This Questionnaire should be completed as follows:

1. Use black ink.
2. ' Identify the scenario number upon which the attached answers and consents are based, and the date on which this scenario was run.

Scenario # _ Date __

3. Enter the scenario number on the top of each attached page in the *
  • space provided.
4. Answer each of the attached questions "yes" or "no" based on the results of the scenario just executed. In the "Comments" section i under each question provide EOP refersaces as appropriate for the

! answer given. Also provide any additional remarks necessary to fully explain identified discrepancies, deficiencies, etc.

Consents should be as specific as possible. Use the attached (1 Consent Continuation Sheet when additional space is necessary to adequately explain a response to a particular question.

Additional copies of Comment Continuation Sheets are available; do j not use the same Comment Continuation Sheet for making cogeents l that are applicable to dif tet ont questions.

5. When answers to all questions are completed, sign below, l

I mit Discrepancy ID numbers will be assigned i by the Exercise Director after I all E0P validation exercises have l been completed.

1 Completed by:

l l Name (print)

Signature i

k Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. O I

, Page 31 of 37 RT' PE H7,01 FOR INFORMATlot, ONLY

Attachment C PAGE 3 of 8

. SCENARIO #

(

E09 'lALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRF Has it easy to determine when entry to an E0P Yes No 1.

was required?

Coments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l 1

Discrepancy 10 #

Mas any instruction or decision in any of the Yes No 2.

' E0Ps difficult to understand? Ambiguous 1 etc.

Coments

()

Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l 1

Discrepancy 10 #

I

3. Here you able to perform all the prescribed Yes No actions in the specified sequence?

Consents 1

Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l 01screpancy 10 # __ _

l i

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. O Page 32 of 37 RTYPE H7.01

(

n. . . . .

NOR INFORMATIO L. , _ .

ONLY

Attachment C PAGE 4 of 8 SCENARIO #

k EOP VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued)

4. Mas the flowpath through the E0P(s) easy to Yes .No follow? l Cossents l

t.

Cossent Continuation Sheet attached lll Discrepancy ID #

5. Did you need any additional procedural Yes No guidance at any time during the transient?

Comments I

l i

, Coenent Continuation Sheet attached l[l l I Discrepancy 10 #

6. Mas any unnecessary information present in Yes No the E0P(s) l Comments l

l Coseent Continuation Sheet attached l[]

1 Discrepancy ID #

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. 0 ,

Page 33 of 37 {

RTYPE H7.01

. s.. . .

8 i

. FOR INFORMATIO,

.. ONLY

1 Attachment C I PAGE 5 of 8 SCENARIO #

(.

l E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued) l

, 7. Nas the terminology used in the E0P(s) Yes No i consistent with that used on the control l ptnels and in other procedures?

l l

. Consents i

1 Cossent Continuation $heet attached lll l Discrepancy ID # .

I

8. Here all graphs and tables in the E0P(s) easy Yes No to read and interpret?

Comments  ;

b Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l )

l l Discrepancy ID # i 1

} l

9. Here all required instrumentation and controls Yes No -

available in the control roca? ,

1

{ l

! Comments I

Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l l

!' Discrepancy 10 f 1

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. 0 l

'( Page 34 of 37 l t RTYPE H7.01 1 1

9 . ,.

'. FOR INFORMATlob

' " ~

ONLY j l

Attachment C PAGE 6 of 8 SCEMARIO #

(

EOP VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued)

10. Did the available instrumentation provide Yes No the required range of indication and accuracy?

Comments Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l 01screpancy 10 #

W

11. Old the E0P(s) ever mislead you, specify Yes No inappropriate actions, or provide you with incorrect information?

Comments

()

Cossent Continuation Sheet attached l[l Discrepancy 10 #

12. Here the prescribed actions compatible with Yes No those spectfled in other plant procedures that were being executed concurrently?

Comments r

Comment Contit.uation Sheet attached l[l Otscrepancy ID #

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev 0

( Page 35 of 37 RTYPE M7.01

.. r .

FOR INFORMATlot ONLY

f Attachment C  !

PAGE 7 of 8 l SCENARIO #

( .

EOP VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE (Continued)

13. Where cross-references were provided in the Yes 'N E0P(s), was the specified procedure, section, step, etc., correct in each case? l i Cosasents l

, Comment Continuation Sheet attached l[l I

Discrepancy 10 #

14. Additional coements:

i

( I I

I l

l 1

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. 0 ,

Page 36 of 37 I RTYPE H7.01 p ., . . . . .

'. FOR INFORMATIOf i...,,. .. .

ONLY

Attachment C PAGE 8 of 8 j SCENARIO #

E0P VALIDATION EXERCISE QUESTIONNA!RE I

Cossent Continuation Sheet .

Continuation of comments on question number:

1 l

i i

t , l y l l

1 l

Proc. 1.3.4-14 Rev. O Page 37 of 37 RyPEH,7.01 FOR INFORMATIOf ONLY

. _ - -- _- _. _ . _ .

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20155F920&oldid=3044009"