ML20154P883

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:05, 22 October 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 880815-0909.Violation Noted:Procedures Established to Control Vendor Equipment Technical Info Not Adequate to Ensure That Only Reviewed, Approved & Current Vendor Technical Info Used at Work
ML20154P883
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/27/1988
From: Harrison J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20154P871 List:
References
50-341-88-24, NUDOCS 8810030215
Download: ML20154P883 (1)


Text

'

l NOTICE OF VIOLATION Detroit Edisor. Company Docket No. 50-341 As a result of the inspection conducted on August 15 through September 9, 1988, and in accordar.ce with 10 CFR Part 2. Appendix C - General Stater:ent of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions (1988), the following violation was identified:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, requires that measures shall be established to control the issuance of docurrents and shall assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed and approved and used at the location where the activity is performed. The Fenni 2 Updated Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 17.2.6 requires that documents defining the perfonnance of quality related activities are controlled to ensure that only current and i correct infonnation is used at the work location.  ;

Contrary to the above, procedures established to control vendor equipnnnt technical information were not adequate to ensure that only reviewed, approved, and current vendor technical information is used at the work location.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1).

1 Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1)thecorrectiveactions '

i

' that have been taken and the results achieved; (2) the corrective actions that will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance

will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time i for good cause shown.  !

SEP 2 71988 J Dated J. J. Harrison, Chief Engineering Branch  ;

i i

P 1

  • !paaESQ g