ML20206L559
| ML20206L559 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 11/23/1988 |
| From: | Knop R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206L553 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-88-08, 50-341-88-8, NUDOCS 8811300060 | |
| Download: ML20206L559 (1) | |
Text
.The Detroit Edison Company Docket No. 50-341 As a result of the inspection conducted between March 8 and September 20, 1988, l
and in accordance with Appendix C to 10 CFR Part 2, "General Statement of Policy 6
and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions (1987)," the following violations were identified:
1.
Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, Criteria III, as implemented by the Fermi Unit 2updatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR)}onofstandardSection 17.2.4.2, requires design reviews be performed for the select commercial or previously approved items with safety-related functions to ensure that the characteristics of such items satisfy the requirements i
of the intended application and that appropriate quality standards are clearly delineated, j
Contrary to the above, the engineering evaluations used to select diodes, valves and gears that were not safety-related for applications that were safety-related did not ensure that the items' critical characteristics i
satisfied their intended performance requirements.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (supplement I).
2.
Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, Criteria XV, as implemented by the Fermi Unit 2 UFSAR, Section 17.2.15, requires that nonconforming items in storage be clearly identified with appropriate tags or other appropriate measures to indicate unacceptable status and segregated until proper disposition has been made.
Contrary to the above, safety-related Okonite tape, RTV foam, and
(
grout with expired shelf lives were stocked in the warehouse without being clearly identified as unacceptable or segregated.
[
t I
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to provide a I
written response to the Region III Office of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, t
l within 30 days of the date of this notice.
Your reply should include for I
i each violation (1) the corrective action taken and the results achieved.
(2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further violations, and (3) the i
date when full compliance will be achieved.
Consideration may be given to f
extending your resp ase time for good cause shown.
j i
i
((
hf Date R. C. Knop, Chief V
j
. p Reactor Projects Branch 3 j
i I
8811300060 881123 l
PDR ADOCK 05000341
[
G PNU
!