ML20137N989

Notice of Violation from Insp on 851116-860109

ML20137N989
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	01/30/1986
From:	Paperiello C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137N982	List: IR 05000440/1985081 ML20137N977 ML20137N989
References
50-440-85-81, NUDOCS 8602040309
Download: ML20137N989 (1)

Text

L._.c.._. .__.._.. r .- . . . .. . . . . __

. a...+ ~

NOTICE OF VIOLATION The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Docket No. 50-440 Company (CEI)

As a result of the inspection conducted on November 16, 1985 through January 9, 1986, and in accordance with the " General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the following violation was identified:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, as implemented by CEI's Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program (CNQAP), section 1100, Revision 6, states that " test results shall be documented and evaluated to assure that test requirements have been satisfied."

Contrary to the above, resolutions of failures to meet acceptance criteria in preoperational test procedure TP 1G43-P001, " Suppression Pool Makeup System,"

and TP IC71-P002, " Reactor Protection System (RPS) Motor Generator (MG) Sets" results represent inadequate documentation and evaluation to assure that test requirements have been satisfied.

In test procedure TP IC71-P002 results, the evaluation of failure to meet acceptance criteria per test exception E03 and field question 45000, pertaining to RPS MG set underfrequency trip, did not consider nonconservative aspects of the proposed justification for acceptance. This justification indicated that measuring and test equipment (M&TE) accuracy could account for the deviation from acceptable values. However, this rationale does not recognize that the M&TE accuracy could also indicate further deviation from acceptance criteria. The licensee did not review post-test calibration data to support the justification for acceptance. In test procedure TP 1G43-P001 results, failure to meet acceptance criteria per tct exception E-01 and field question 40640, pertaining to upper containment pool ta suppression pool dump times, l provided inadequate justification for disrega-ding specific suppression pool l data. In addition, calculations to determine suppression pool level from the l

change in upper containment pool levels did not account for construction tolerances as applied to the nominal design dimensions of the upper containment pool and suppression pool.

l This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

9602340309 e60130 0 DR ADOCK 0500

\ 30 /Sf,

/0 A0 ) */ /

f h A/wus'?Y Carl J. Paperie/lo, Director

! Dated / /

! Division of Reactor Safety

__ _ _ _. . - _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . , . _ .-