ML20059B483

Notice of Violation from Insp on 900625-0802.Violation Noted:Failure to Adequately Document Basis by Which No Unreviewed Safety Question Deemed to Exist for Listed Examples

ML20059B483
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	08/21/1990
From:	Wright G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20059B481	List: IR 05000440/1990013 ML20059B480 ML20059B483
References
50-440-90-13, NUDOCS 9008290111
Download: ML20059B483 (1)

Text

'

4 r

NOTICE OF VIOLATION x y s

Th'e Cleveland Electric Docket No. 50-440 '

Illuminating Company License No. NPF-58 f

[ As d' result of the inspection l conducted on June 25-through August 2,1990, and I in accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC

' Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, (1990) (Enforcement Policy)  ;

the.following violation.was identified:

10 CFR 50.59(b)(1) requires, in part, that the licensee shall maintain records-  ;

of changes in the facility as described in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR), and '

that these records must include a written safety evaluation which provides the 'I bases for the determination that'the change does not involve an unreviewed 4 c safety question. i

-Contrary to the alsove, the licensee failed to adequately document the basis by which no unreviewed safety question was deemed to exist for the following two ' 'i examples:

[

-a. DCP 880057 -- -This modification removed a test relay between the main  !

steam isolation valves-(MSIVs) and the reactor protection system-(RPS).  !

Although the MSIVs and RPS, including' failure modes and testing capabilities, are described in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR), the licensee did not perform a. written safety evaluation.

b. 'DCP 880068:- This modification provided an interlock between the emergency service water (ESW) inlet and outlet valves to the residual  !

heat removal (RHR) heat exchangers such that these valves would-

' automatically open upon start of the ESW pumps. The safety evaluation 1

.did not address the effect of this change upon the RHR heat exchanger although the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) specifically' discusses RHR heat exchanger operating modes.

This _is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this coffice within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or t

. explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved; (2) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance i will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

-f Dated 'Geoffrey C. Wright, ChieT Operations Branch 9008290111 900822 PDR ADOCK 05000440 o PDC