ML19337A860

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:28, 31 January 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Confirms That Jr Choukas-Bradley Was Authorized to Express Position of Miller,Balis & O'Neil,P.C. on Behalf of Tx Border Cooperatives at 800915 Status Hearing Re Leave to Intervene Out of Time
ML19337A860
Person / Time
Site: South Texas, Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 09/24/1980
From: Oneil R
MILLER, BALIS & O'NEIL
To: Mark Miller
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19337A861 List:
References
ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8009300488
Download: ML19337A860 (2)


Text

-

,)V" . .  !

r . LAW 099sm .

l MILLER, BALIS & 0'NEIL, P.C.

778 EXECUTIYK BUILDING 1030 FIFTEENTH STRECT. N. W.

(102) 755 1480 WASHINGTON. D. C. 20005 WILLf AM 7, uggggg CTANLEY W. S ALIS COBERT A. O'NElk kh ]

p s coccRE)

A t!SMEC 3

n
  • September 24, 1980  :: sep 26 E80 s Of BM

%h&

9

,, 4 l Honorable Marshall E. Miller  ;

Chairman l Atomic Safety and Licensing Board  !

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 i

Re: Houston Lighting & Power Company (South Texas l Project, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-498A and 50-499A; Texas Utilities Generating Company, et al.

(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-445A, and 50-446A.

Dear Chairman Miller:

At the September 15, 1980 status hearing in the above-referenced proceedings, Mr. James R. Choukas-Bradley, of this law firm, addressed the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board concerning the Petition of the Border Cooperatives for Leave to Intervene Out of Time. Prior to responding to the Board's questions, Mr.

Choukas-Bradley advised that he had not yet received the results of the District of Columbia Bar Exam and had not yet been admitted to the practice of law as an attorney. In the course of the ensuing discussion, it was requested that the record be supplemented with a confirming statement that Mr. Choukas-Bradley did have Authorization to act as a representative for the Border Cooperatives. As attorney of record for the Border Cooperatives I would like to confirm that Mr. Choukas-Bradley was authcrized to express the position of this I law reviewed have firm on behalf the of the Border transcript of.the Cooperatives. Furthermore, September 15, 1980 status conference, and the representations made by Mr. Choukas-Bradley at that time do accurately reflect the Border Cooperatives' position. .

e so f

8009300 % -

o  !

1 P' l

e {. .

~

Marshall Miller September 24,~1980 Page two I would like the record to be clear, however, that neither I nor Mr. Choukas-Bradley anticipated that the matter of the Border Cooperatives' intervention would be taken up at the September 15, 1980 status hearing. To the contrary, I personally telephoned your office on Friday, September 12, 1980, to ascertain whether the subject of the Border Cooperatives' intervention would be a topic of the discussion, and was advised that it would not. It was only after being so advised by a secretary that Mr.

Choukas-Bradley was designated to monitor the proceedings.

Very truly yours, e'

_[{ b!fE' $*ll. .I Robert A. O'Neil RAO/stp '

cc: All parties of record 4

e 9

e N

e e

, ,