ML19317G293

LER 78-009/03L-0:on 780122 Control Rod Driveline Breaker a Failed to Trip During Reactor Protection Sys Functional Test SP-110.Caused by Undercurrent Relay Failure.Breaker Replaced

ML19317G293
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	02/13/1978
From:	Cooper J FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19317G289	List: ML19317G288 ML19317G293
References
LER-78-009-03L, LER-78-9-3L, NUDOCS 8002280910
Download: ML19317G293 (2)

Text

_ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

.n. . . . . . . s. : . . . . . _

'

.

• g 3

- ~, ...

I l 7%' NRC FORM X,4 U. 5. NUCLEAR ReCutAfoRY CoMMIS53oM l

/ (7 778 l LICENSE 3 EVENT REPORT EXHIBIT A

( v )/ '

coNTRot stoex.1 I l l l t l <et Ass rRmr oR TYPE ALL ReoVIREO INFoRMATioNI

. s@

, lo}il lF l LI QRlPI3Jg[0J0l-1 0i O G ; 0;O i i t 0 g 0 ;gg4 '; 1,1[1 g 1 lg[ _; _ ; g I r a e v a % u cont ** u vCc.a s veta n .s

'

uce.a < <*t .a u -s w l

'

con r Iolil ,1%

W@l oi 510 ; -;0 J 3I0 1 2 'QI Ol so 64 l t Svt%iGagg 21217181@l o f 211131 71 7 4Jl @ ta 75 mgecae r ga rt 7 4 ta to 30Ga&T s. f3g e tvENT otscRinTioN Ano eRosiets consscuc~ cts @

, o ,,i ; In =ade 3 operation, while per:orming the RPS Functional Test SP-110 g  ;

l g , prior to change of code, the A" CDR breaker failed to trip when a simulatep

,, g , , trip signal was initiated. This created a condition centrary to Table I

,,,,,,3.3-1 of Tech Spec 3.3.1.1. No safety hazard as redundant CRD breakers werp l

,,,g, , available. and verified operable. Firs e ' occurrence. Replacement breaker 1 I 2 ! i t I installed and tested satisfactor r. l

.

101 s t l  !

Ca.sg

• svtTtts caust Coue vats g CCCS C0ct $b8P.CC S C3*.?7C%4%7 CO38 SuSCCDI 3uaCO3r l019l lb RI B l@ @@ W@ l ClKI TIB i RIK T@ l Al@ @ @

r & to na 12 13 15 si 22 t ,,, 54tCt.'t%ff AL QCO;t etsgg agsog? afvittog

'

go ao tytNTvtA4 4 t* CAT N11 Cocs

• vet mo

@ l(ig; I 7 I 81 l- -I [0,t0I9I l/i i O i 31 iLi 8 LoJ O ER WR oW25 %AP lCJ@Ld8 u <*

_u .:

L:J@ L.aIJ@ 3r

.2 u 1.

l o '

u eu.i of do 1,

@

4 f "

n L

LIJ@ lv!@ W@ lGI018iOl@

a; M

a E '

u d.'f 7.",'5 7;*

n

u dra'.'t,,

42 44 44 47 cause cascRt*Tionso coRReent: Acricas @

i, , o i l The cause of this event was due to the failure of the CRD breaker under - !

,, , , , , current relay. The breaker was replaced with a spara and was satisfactorily

,, , ,,.i teste. ming Preventive Maintenance Procedure PM-113. Subsequent to this l

. ,,,,, , event, all CRD breakers were satisfactorily tested as per FM-118 r

i. tai 1  !

F W 9 B2 sfa s .  % mga omte sta Tas [ g(-3ha.' gq:., gay gg;misf*Ts l NA 11 @! Operator observation

'lr i ! e l ( GJ@ l 01010 l@lo

,, l  !

a,j,,,,,, gd .,,,, ': ** *t- ** sa 4*/;.w.? ca a;*tssfv tocat.n os ettgatt j attd ast i , m t_.j @s O' *tt!&$tLzJ@l NA I I NA I

'

-

ste*0NsI6 E s*05 IS s e.. . . ,..,  :,, . ...e, @ .

Iii:]}01010l@l_l@l

> - - "

NA a

l

.....%s r.a. , l v

I' l-l 10 l.D,s.0 lgl:ssen .e.es@

l NA l r 8 7 tv t; so

. Oss ;e :. ,ava,; g *c raci.its

' set ?ts;eir nog s,,,,,

I i ( iI (Z.j@l NA l

, . , u ,,

(. *$ t , f (' Ot$8 'T *Q% *

'

I: 6 a I LN,j@tl NA I II IItfI: : ti!

e : ia n e, u

-

%A..se 3 grARgR.

. J. CocPer 6nf ,,, ., (904)795- 6426 0

'

-

8002 280 ff0

___

~

. . ,

, , . _ , ,

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION V~Nport No.: 50-302/78-009/03L-0

\ Y .

2.' fac111ty: Crystal River Uni.e #3

.

3. Report Date: 13 February 1978

4. Occurrence Date: 22 January 1978

5. Identification of Occurrence:

The "A" control rod drive breaker failed to trip contrary to Table 3.3-1 of Technical Specificatisa 3.3.1.1.

6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence:

Made 3 hot standby operation.

7. Description of Occurrence:

Ac 0400, during the perfor: nance of the RPS Functional Test SP-110, in preparation for ,-

unic startup, the "A" control rod drive breaker failed to trip when a simulated trip .,

,

signal was- initiated. The electrical supervisor was notified. and naistanance Work RequesC- )

1. 0-6041 was initiated. The "A" CRD breaker was renewed with a. replacement breaker and was tested satisfactorily in accordanca with Preventive Maintenance Procedure PM-ll8. l

8. Designation of Apparent Cause:

The cause of this evenn was due to the failure of the breaker undercurrent relay to function.

9. Analysis of Occurrence:

There were no safety 1:mplications as a result of this occurrence as redundant control rod drive breakers were available and verified operable.

10. Corrective Action:

Preventive Maintenance Procedure PM-118 was perfor:med en all CRD breakers with satisfacto: l results .

11. Failure Data: l

.

This is the first occurrence of this event.

n m

l