ONS-2016-097, Emergency Plan/Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Manual, Revised 10CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation(S)
| ML16333A019 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 11/17/2016 |
| From: | Teresa Ray Duke Energy Carolinas |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| ONS-2016-097 | |
| Download: ML16333A019 (436) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.} '* J~DUKE Thomas D. Ray
~;ENERGY Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy ON01 VP I 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 ONS-2016-097 o: 864.873.5016
- f. 864.873. 4208 Tom.Ray@duke-energy.com November 17, 2016 10 CFR 50.54(q)
Attn: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2746
Subject:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Docket Nos. 50-269, -270, and -287 Emergency Plan /Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Manual Revised 10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation(s) Please find attached for your use and review copies of revised 10 CFR 50.54(q) evaluations associated with previously submitted changes to the Oconee Nuclear Station Emergency Plan and Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures. Revisions to these 10 CFR 50.54(q) evaluations were the result of the Duke Corrective Action Program. There are no new revisions to the associated Emergency Plan or Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures. These revised evaluations are being submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q) and did not reduce the effectiveness of the ONS Emergency Plan. If there are any questions or concerns pertaining to these revisions please call Pat Street, Emergency Preparedness Manager, at 864-873-3124. By copy of this letter, two copies of this revision are being provided to the NRC, Region II, Atlanta, Georgia. Sincerely, Thomas D. Ray Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station
~'tl\S Attachments:
Revision Instructions Emergency Plan/EPIP Revised 10 CFR 50.54(q) Evaluation(s)
~w-www.duke-energy.com
, ~
- J ONS-2016-097 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission November 17, 2016 xc: w/2 copies of attachments Ms. Catherine Haney Administrator, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta GA 30303-1257 w/copy of attachments Mr. James R. Hall, Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 11555 Rockville Pike Mailstop: 0-8G9A Rockville, MD 20852 2738 (send via E-mail) w/o attachments Mr. Eddy Crowe - NRC Senior Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station ELL- EC2ZF
..... ,. October 18, 2016 OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION
SUBJECT:
Emergency Plan/EPIP 50.540 Revisions Please note the following revised 50.540 to the Emergency Plan and Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures Manual Revision that have previously been submitted: ONS EPlan rev. 2016-001 Screen/Evaluation RP/O/A/1000/001 rev. 5 Screen/Evaluation RP/O/A/1000/003 rev. 2 Screen/Evaluation RP/O/A/1000/015A rev.6 Screen/Evaluation RP/O/A/1000/0158 rev. 5 Screen/Evaluation Qc Pat Street ONS Emergency Preparedness Manager
Emergency Plan
- Rev. 2016-001 Appendix 8
Page 1 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Screening.and Evaluation Number::.* Applicable Sites* BNP D EREG #: 00031855 2069127 Revised EReg due to changes that 1--------------1-----1 CNS D were not editorial and needed to be moved from the editorial section. Justification was moved to Part IV. Changes are CR3 D annotated in bold and italic. D HNP MNS D SAD#:_________ ONS x RNP D GO D Document and Revision ONS Emergency Plan 2016-001 - Appendix 8 Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): Changes to the Emergency Plan include the following:
- 1) Updated SPCC Materials Inventory. Changes are highlighted, provided by the author and attached in EREG eFolder.
- 2) Removal of the SPCC from the body of the Emergency Plan (Appendix 8) and include by reference.
Reducing the administrative burden of changing the Emergency Plan due to changes in oil inventory on site. Note was added to the cover page of the SPCC to require evaluation under the 50.54q guidelines prior to changing.
- 3) p.4, 10, 46, throughout the document Tony Garland replaced John Estridge as the Lead EHS Professional and updated contact information, Work Phone and Mobile.
- 4) Added new Appendix G, Containment Calculations.
- 5) p. 6, Throughout the procedure replaced Duke Power with Duke Energy to reflect the current company name following the merger.
- 6) Appendix F changed to note the required change to provide containment, such as a concrete/asphalt berm or curb, to contain any leaks or spills from unloading diesel fuel. Based on the SPCC review in November 2014.
- 7) Appendix 8 of the Oconee Nuclear Station Emergency Plan. ONS Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC Plan), revise contents of the SPCC due to change in inventory on site, addition of new used oil storage area, update to contact information and name change from Duke Power to Duke energy..
- 8) Move the contents of the SPCC out of the Emergency Plan and include by reference the location as an implementing program of the Emergency Plan. Hard copy to be maintained by Environmental Services and retrievable electronically in Fusion
f-Jage :L ot b 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes 10 No Ix Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not 10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Justification: Attachment 4, Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) 10 Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes 10 No Ix Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IVand Justification: required. Enter address non justification and editorial complete changes Change 3)
- p.4, 10, 46, throughout the document Tony Garland replaced John Attachment 4, Estridge as the Lead EHS Professional and updated contact information, Work Part V & VI.
Phone and Mobile. Change 5) - p. 6, Throughout the procedure replaced Duke Power with Duke Energy to reflect the current company name following the merger. The changes above are editorial as defined in AD-EP-ALL-0602 Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section 11? If answer is yes, then check box. 1 1O CFR 50.4 7(b )(1) Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) *. 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. 10
Page 3 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. 2 1O CFR 50.47{b)(2) OnsiteEmergency Organization 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. D 3 1O CFR 50.47{b )(3) Emergency Response Support and Resources;, 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3) 4 1O CFR 50:4 7(b ){4) Emergency: Classification* System.;>:, 0 4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. D (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.) 5
- 1O CFR 50.47(b )( 5) Notification Methods* and: Procedures/:.*;>
Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification D of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions D to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) 5c The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
t-'age 4 ot b 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 6 10 CFR 50.47(b}(6) Emergency Communications; 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D T
- 10 CFR50.47(b)(7) PublicEducation'andlnforrrtation:"*
7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D 8 10 CFR50.47(b)(8)EiTiergencyFacilities and Equipment", 8a Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. D
.... --
9: * --10 CFR50A7(b)(9) Accident1Assessment'* --- 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D 1Q,;'. ( . ,1OCFR'.50:47(b}{1 O)'Protectivez Response*"_- ,*.*- ...... . '
.. *:. *.',
,! .*
~.. .. ' .. -- -*
10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3} D 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public. 11:; *::10CFR50:47(bJ(11)'RadiologicalEXposure:ControlY-,.:. - . 11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D 12:; . . 10*.CFR50.47(b)(12) Medical and Public.Health.SUpportc -
- 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D 13 -1OCFR50:4 7(b)(t3) Recovery.Planning and Post,.accidentOperations:2 *
- 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14- *-1OCFR50.47(b){t4)' Drills and Exercises/**-
14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D 15 10 CFR50.47(b){15} Emergency ResponseTraining** 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D
Page 5 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q} Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 16 10 CFR 50.4 7(b )( 16) Emergency Plan Maintenance*:' *. 16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete x , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. Conclusion* Note that the SPCC Plan ensures compliance with 40CFR112, Oil Pollution Prevention, an Environmental Protection Agency regulation, and is not related to and does not ensure compliance with NUREG 0654, 10CFR47, 10CFR50 or FEMA-REP-10. Given there is no inte"elationship between the SPCC Plan and NUREG 0654, 10CFR47, 10CFR50 or FEMA-REP-10, changes to the SPCC cannot result in a reduction in effectiveness in ONS's ability to implement the sixteen planning standards detailed above. A review of both the current and proposed revisions to this document reaffirmed that there is no interrelationship between the ONS SPCC Plan 0 and any structure, component, procedure or process utilized to implement the sixteen planning standards. Therefore, this revision to the ONS Emergency Plan does not result in a reduction in effectiveness. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. Partv; Signatures;::* . Preparer Name (Print): Eric White Preparer Signature:
- Date:
~\f.1..tfD"';'- ~t\ CJ\..~ -
Reviewer Name (Print): Don Crowl Reviewer Sigrratu~e: / Date:
'--..1-/
.:,
/ .. * . / ... _
/
I ..- I I iv/;'? //r. Approver (EP Manager Name (Print): Pat Street
~~ Da:;f(~/ft~
Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) N/A App~er Signature:'-N~ Date: NIA
;VP,.,_
\
Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions
Page oat 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D QA RECORD
Emergency Plan* Rev. 2016-001 Appendix 8 Original approved 6/3/16
-- EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
[ Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
<**S¢reening*anci.E\Jaluation :Number\fo:.)~
BNP D EREG #: 02031855 CNS D CR3 D HNP D MNS D 5AD #: _ _ _ _ _ __ ONS x RNP D GO D Document and Revision ONS Emergency Plan 2016-001 - Appendix 8 Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):
- 1) Appendix 8 of the Oconee Nuclear Station Emergency Plan. ONS Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC Plan), revise contents of the SPCC due to change in inventory on site, addition of new used oil storage area; update to contact information and name change from Duke Power to Duke energy ..
- 2) Move the contents of the SPCC out of the Emergency Plan and include by reference the location as an implementing program of the Emergency Plan. Hard copy to be maintained by Environmental Services and retrievable electronically in Fusion Part 11. Activity Previously Reviewed?
Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 1O CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not 10CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Attachment 4, Justification: Part V. _J
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Bounding document attached (optional) D
'... ~ :**' : . : , . ': ,;
Part Ill. Editorial Change x Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IVand required. Enter address non Justification: justification and editorial
- 1) *updated SPCC Materials Inventory. Changes are highlighted , provided by complete changes the author and attached in EREG eFolder. Attachment 4,
- 2) Removal of the SPCC from the body of the Emergency Plan (Appendix 8) Part V & VI.
and include by reference. Reducing the administrative burden of changing the Emergency Plan due to changes in oil inventory on site. Note was added to the cover page of the SPCC to require evaluation under the 50.54q guidelines prior to changing.
- 3) p.4, 10, 46, throughout the document Tony Garland replaced John Estridge as the Lead EHS Professional and updated contact information, Work Phone and Mobile.
- 4) Added riew Appendix G, Containment Calculations.
- 5) p. 6, Throughout the procedure replaced Duke Power with Duke Energy to reflect the current company name following the merger.
- 6) Appendix F changed to note the required change to provide containment, such as a concrete/asphalt berm or curb, to contain any leaks or spills from unloading diesel fuel. Based on the SPCC review in November 2014.
Note that the SPCC Plan ensures compliance with 40CFR112, Oil Pollution Prevention, an Environmental Protection Agency regulation, and is not related to and does not ensure compliance with NUREG 0654, 10CFR47, 10CFR50 or FEMA-REP-10. Given there is no interrelationship between the SPCC Plan and NUREG 0654, 10CFR47, 10CFR50 or FEMA-REP-10, changes to the SPCC cannot result in a reduction in effectiveness in ONS's ability to implement the sixteen planning standards detailed above. A review of both ttle current and proposed revisions to this document reaffirmed that there is no interrelationship between the ONS SPCC Plan and any structure, component, procedure or process utilized to implement the sixteen planning standards. Therefore, this revision to the ONS Emergency Plan does not result in a reduction in effectiveness.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-06S4/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box. 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. D 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan.
*3'~:: : '<JO'CFRSOi47(b)(3X;Ernergf3ncy
,___._.:.__. *-**-- .. --* .
~ . . .*. .
~espO,nsetSLlppolf:and,R~sources:L<
' . ,, ' .,,,.. ' - - .....
- 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made.
3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. (NA for CR3) 4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.) Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification D of the declared emergency within 1S minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions D to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
*6*;;,:;,z . '.tcf¢F~'50::4 i(t>)(~).E;ri~fgehc~;;Qoijfmunl¢atia~s;it:t??***u{*}~X:/.:*;*,:*r:; ,"'::***,5:.**L')>h't* *~*** :;:; ,.; :, . ;***:;' .**.*:* ;' '::L '* .**::.::'.";
6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D
**T ';:;:.'* *:1*9 *'cl=R'?OAf(~)f7tPu6i'ih;.E~Ucatio'Q:~rj~ informati~rif:*.!,:"*~*.(f!:.) .*,:~ >>/ ~'.');:**:;C:*,~;'.'f'.Jii:';;.Ji;fr:*.;0\'.'&:* * **.**.***::E**L, . '.:' ::: *:*:*~: ,w:.
7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D
.a.;:i:h J:JQGFR;eyo':47<~><&>rEh;i6r9enc'/:f~qilities,~nq*l:,t14iPfoe'1!t1:~~i:.~s~;;~: .::i*.*:;:~~;,;~G.*~:;~.~:r:;:::;,~;;;::t!/.*.'i'.~:,:;;~::::>>0g,,*;;*~... ;;*:~;,:'.ifH~*i~,
Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D . :1.*ti~f;s*. J;*1*oY¢R~'?.9::~?:<~)<;j.Q)r]:~rot~q\iy~*~~~*R9risE¥~0*~~1?::i}~1~~',)i1":;;];~fe<}::j::@,:j~~,:;'3,;;.~;;,f,~~::,~*:t;tfli:~~;F.*,,~i':Ptr~i,~~;;,1'~:r~::**.1:*1;::?':-.;;;?l.~*:8I:i;' 1Oa A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 1Ob Evacuation time estimates for the population located iri the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3} 1Oc A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 1Od Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public. 11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) x Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part Vand perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) 0 1 Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. Reviewer Name (Print): Don Crowl Apprcve,!:...(EP Manager Name (Print): Pat Street
. j/~1(1..L(U. t"' S\tt6~
Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) N/A Date: N/A Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is - put in effect. D QA RECORD
~J APPENDIXS SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUNTERMEASURE (SPCC)
PLAN Oconee Nuclear Station Keowee Hydro Station
!Note: This procedure is an implementing program to the Oconee Nuclear
~
'ite Emergency Plan and shall be:
- 1. Reviewed in accordance with 10CFRS0.54(q) prior to approval.
- 2. Forwarded to Emergency Preparedness within seven (7) days of a roval.
The SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUNTERMEASURE (SPCC) PLAN for the Oconee Nuclear Station, was submitted under separate cover and is considered to be incorporated as part of this document by reference. Hard copy of the SPCC Plan is located and maintained in the ONS Nuclear Environmental Field Support Office and is available in Fusion: Record Retention- 421734 & File Code - 720.02. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
RP/O/A/1000/001 Rev. 5 EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1of6 1O CFR 50.54( q) Screening Evaluation Form
.,
, .. ....
Screening and Evaluation Number:** ... * .. _
.. : '** ,*,, ..
*' *:*Aj:)pilcalJle sites :f~*
EREG #: ~ 2069534 Revised EREG to evaluate non BNP D Editorial Changes that were listed as Editorial. Revised sections CNS D
/AW with AD-EP-ALL-0602. Changes ta the EREG are annotated in Bald and Italic CR3 D HNP D MNS D SAD#: 02006477 ONS x RNP D GO D Document and Revision H.P/O/A/1000/001 Rev. 005 Emergency Classification
...__.
. ..
i:::1v11::n.\Ji::1'llv r IL/-\1'11 vflf"\1'11\.:JC: .:>vKC:t:.1\111\J\.:J Al\IU AU-C.t-J-ALL-Uo02 I EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1
*ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2of6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):
Editorial changes; 1 . p.1 and the body, changed from revision 4 to revision 5.
- 2. Entire document, removed page numbers in the footer of the procedure due to format constraints.
- 4. p. 6, removed page numbers from the table of contents due to format constraints
- 5. Encl 4.6, p.2 capitalized 'FRESHLY OFF-LOADED REACTOR CORE' to maintain consistency with other procedure formatting that capitalizes defined terms.
- 6. Encl 4.7 p.2 Replaced 'Condition B' with 'Potential Failure (Condition B)'. Replaced 'Condition A' with 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERG Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans,
- 9. Encl 4.12 p.1 Corrected the misspelling in the NOTE from 'judgement' to 'judgment' Changes to Procedure Body;
- 3. Added new step 1.4. 7 clarifying PLANNED vs UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01 on General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. Response to AR 01965160-01
- 7. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION A' to 'IMMINENT FAILURE (CONDITION A) and added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERG Guideline definition. Placed in alphabetical order.
- 8. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION B' to 'POTENTIAL FAILURE (CONDITION Band added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERG Guideline definition. Placed in alphabetical order
- 10. Encl 4.13 p.1 Added references used to support the clarification of change 3 and change 6.
Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes ID No IX Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not 10CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for ,concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Justification: Attachment 4, Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) ID Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes lo No IX
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3of6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54{q} Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IV and required. Enter address non Editorial changes; justification and editorial
- 1. p.1 and the body, changed from revision 4 to revision 5. complete changes
- 2. Entire document, removed page numbers in the footer of the procedure due Attachment 4, to format constraints. Part V & VI.
- 4. p. 6, removed page numbers from the table of contents due to format constraints
- 5. Encl 4.6, p.2 capitalized 'FRESHLY OFF-LOADED REACTOR CORE' to maintain consistency with other procedure formatting that capitalizes defined terms.
- 6. Encl 4. 7 p.2 Amended 'Condition B' to 'Potential Failure (Condition B)'.
Amended 'Condition A' to 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERG Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans, (AR 01910389}
- 9. Encl 4.12 p.1 Corrected the misspelling in the NOTE from 'judgement' to
'judgment' Justification: These changes correct the formatting, page numbering, capitalization, spelling and terminology. Due to FERC initiative, the Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. Terminology was modified to be consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program(HSEEP) Imminent Failure was part of the definition of Condition A and Potential Failure was part of the definition of Condition B, the change was intended to more clearly state the conditions of the dams to Offsite Organizations in the communications and do not change intent. The changes to the Emergency Plan have been evaluated per 10CFR50.54{q) under the EREG assignment 01999776 in CAS. Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen {Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box. 1 10 CFR 50.47(b}(1) Assignment of Responsibility {Organization Control) 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. jo
c.1v1c."'*::11:::P.1v r i-LAl'I 1vnA1'l~t: ~vKt:t:.NIN(.j ANU AD-EP-ALL-0602 I EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D {24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. 2_ 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2). Onsite El')l~rgency Oi"ganization *. '.' 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. D
-- ..
10 CFR 50.47(b)(3) Emergency Response Support and Resau*rces~:
*,
3 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3)
. **
4 10 CFR50.47(b)(4) Emergency Classification Sygtem * " 4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. x (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.) 5 10 CFR 50.47{b)(5) Notification Methods and Procedures,,-..-:- ' '. ;.:: Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification D of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions D to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5of6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
.... --.... ....
6 10-cFR so.47(b)(6) Emerg*eric:y*cornroi:m.icationt?-; * , .. .. 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response 0 organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. 0
..
7 10'CFR50.47(b)(7) Public Education and Information'-' ' ?a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) ?b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D
. ~ '-. .- .
B** 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergf;}ncy Facilities and Equipmemt** .. . . .. .* - Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D Sb Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. D 9 10 CFR 50.4('(b)(9) Accident Assessmenf * * .... ... .....
. . .
-*
9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releas_es are in use. D
-**. ..
10 10.CFR50.47(b)(10)Protective Respon!:!e . .*. 10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public. 11 10 CFR 50.4 7(b )( 11) Radiological Exposure Control '. 11a The resources for co.ntrolling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D
..
. ... ---
*. ..*" - ..
... ~*:'.
12 . 10CFR50.47(b)(12)MeditaiandPublicHealth.Support .. * : *_ - * ':.* -_ ~
; *--~ ' * :- * .' . ' . 1.' . * .
12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D
..-.. ' .., *-* .
13 *
- 10 CFR50.47(b)(13) Recovery _Planning ~nd Post-accident Operations , . *. ,* .. ,. ... '
'
13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14
- 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) Drills and Exercises 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established.
14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D 15 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) Emergency ResponseTraining
- 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D
1::.1v11::.r".:1t:.l\lv Y t-'Lf\N ~HANl::it:: ~t;Ht::t::NIN(:j ANU AD-EP-ALL-0602 I EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) f Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 6of6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 16.- 1 O CFR 50A7(b)(16) Emergency Plan l\IJaintenance-,--. - -- - --- --- - - -
'
16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D
--: .. * * : < ~ .. _ ' **
-- -- .."*:*' *~;; .-- '*- -- *-**
PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D , 1O CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) x Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. PartV. Signatures:*::* Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date: Jeff White e\t.c,.\"(M~ c.. i \/\ C.A.~-7 Reviewer Name (Print): Revie,Wer Sig _atme: / Don Crowl / 1\f/ Approver (EP Manager Name (Print): Pat Street Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 1O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D QA RECORD
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 t , EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) I ATTACHMENT 5 Rev.1 Page 1of6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form _, .- Screening and Evaluation Number- ;
* Ar:iplieable Slt~s ~; ~ .> \ .o:*
EREG #: 020064 95 2069534 BNP D Revised EREG to evaluate non Editorial Changes that were listed as CNS D Editorial. Revised sections /AW with AD-EP-ALL-0602. Changes to the EREG are annotated in Bold and Italic CR3 0 HNP D MNS 0 5AD #: 020064 77 ONS x RNP D GO 0 Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/001 Rev. 005 Emergency Classification
.. ,.
Part I. Description of Proposed Change: Changes to Procedure Bod~;
- 1. Added new step 1.4.7 clarifying PLANNED vs UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01 on General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. (Response to AR 01965160-01) . 7
- 2. p.2 Replaced 'Condition B' with 'Potential Failure (Condition 8)'. Replaced 'Condition A' with 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERG .
Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans, (AR 01910389)
- 3. Added new step 1.4.7 clarifying PLANNED vs UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01 on General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. Response to AR 01965160-01
- 7. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION A' to 'IMMINENT FAILURE (CONDITION A) and added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERC Guideline definition. Placed in alphabetical order.
- 8. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION B' to 'POTENTIAL FAILURE (CONDITION B and added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERC Guideline definition. Placed in alphabetical order
- 10. Encl 4.13 p.1 Added references used to support the clarification of change 3 and change 6.
This change is being performed in parallel and to support the change to the Emergency Plan, Rev 2015-007 which has been evaluated and documented in AR 01979258 , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes x Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form, is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No D
t:Ml:::KGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 2of6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change: ONS Emergency Plan Revision 82-2 (December 1981) 0.2 The initiating conditions given in appendix 1 and postulated accidents in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for Oconee Nuclear station are appended to this section and noted as Emergency Action Levels in Figures 01, 02, 03, and 04. Table D-2 (Emergency Action Levels) makes no mention of Dam Failure in the Severe Natural Phenomena being experienced or projected Initiating Conditions. ONS Emergency Plan Revision 2015-007(November) D.2 Initiating Conditions: Initiating conditions and their corresponding emergency actions levels are contained in the BASIS document beginning on page D-4. Classification procedure (RP/O/A/1000/001) provides the guidance necessary to classify events and promptly declare the appropriate emergency condition within 15 minutes after the availability of indications to cognizant facility staff that an emergency action level threshold has been exceeded. Specific response procedures are in place for the Control Room, Technical Support Center and the Emergency Operations Facility which delineate the required response during the appropriate classification. D. Enclosure 4.7 Contain the IC/EAL for Natural and Destructive Phenomena Affecting Keowee or Jocassee Hydro POTENTIAL FAILURE [Condition BJ and Imminent/actual dam failure exists involving any of the following: Keowee Hydro Dam, Little River Dam, Dikes A,B,C,D, Intake Canal Dike, or Jocassee Dam - IMMINENT FAILURE [Condition A ] RIS 2005-02, Clarifying the Process for Making Emergency Plan Changes, Rev. 1 states,
- 2) Emergency plan a) The document prepared and maintained by the licensee that identifies and describes the licensee's methods for maintaining emergency preparedness, and responding to emergencies. An emergency plan includes the plan as originally approved by the NRC, and all subsequent changes made by the licensee with, and without, prior NRC review and approval under 10 CFR 50.54(q).
i) The licensee's emergency plan consists of: (1) The emergency plan as approved by the NRC via a Safety Evaluation Report (SE}, or license amendment (LA} from the Offlce of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR} or the Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME). (2) Any subsequent changes to the emergency plan explicitly reviewed by the NRC through an SE, or LA from NRR or FSME, and found to meet the applicable regulations. (3) Any subsequent changes made by the licensee without NRC review and approval after the licensee concluded that the change(s) do not constitute a decrease in effectiveness under 10 CFR 50.54(q). The differences in ONS Emergency Plan, Revision 82-2, and the current revision of the ONS Emergency Plan have been determined to meet the regulatory requirements of the course of revisions. Each revision has been evaluated in the regulatory process has met the approval of the NRC during the inspection process. The changes described in this evaluation were made to ensure that dam failures are appropriately classified and the terminology is in alignment with FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans. There is no reduction in effectiveness and the change does not reduce the effectiveness of the emergency plan.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
- EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 3 of 6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, rather than under 10 CFR 50.54(q): Regulations 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) states A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures. 10 CFR App E.IV.C.2 states (in part) By June 20, 2012, nuclear power reactor licensees shall establish and maintain the capability to assess, classify, and declare an emergency condition within 15 minutes after the availability of indications to plant operators that an emergency action level has been exceeded and shall promptly declare the emergency condition as soon as possible following identification of the appropriate emergency classification level Compliance Change 1 added the step to provide the EC/SM with clarifying information to consider when reviewing IC/EAL's for planned evolutions which would not warrant an emergency declaration. Changes 2, 3, 7, 8, 10 adds terminology to Condition 'A' and 'B' that will be changing in 2016. The terminology 'Imminent Failure' and 'Potential Failure' are currently in the definitions of Condition 'A' and 'B'. Changes to the terms are a result of a change driven by FERG Hydro to more descriptive terms used to describe the status a dams when communicating to Offsite Response Organizations. The ONS Emergency Plan has been previously evaluated to comply with regulations and guidance for emergency classification. Due to FERC initiative, the Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. Terminology was modified.to be consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program(HSEEP). The IC/EAL scheme has not changed but information has been added that will enhance the EC/SM's ability to classify in a timely manner when notified by Duke Hydro of events that could lead to event declaration using the new terms under the FERC guidelines for Hydro Emergency Action Plans. Additionally, information is being provided for consideration when evaluating planned events that meet IC/EAL criteria that would conservatively not warrant an event declaration. The procedure, as revised, continues to comply with regulations and commitments.
t:.IVlt:.t(l:Jt:.l'Jlj Y t-'LAN <..;HANGI::. ::>CH.1::.1::.NING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 4of6 10 CFR 50.54( q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen): Standard 1 O CFR 50.47(b)(4) A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance ori information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures Function A standard emergency classification and action level scheme is established and maintained. Elements NUREG-0654, Criterion D.1 and D.2
- 1. An emergency classification and emergency action level scheme as set forth in Appendix 1 must be established by the licensee. The specific instruments, parameters or equipment status shall be shown for establishing each emergency class, in the in-plant emergency procedures. The plan shall identify the parameter values and equipment status for each emergency class.
- 2. The initiating conditions shall include the example conditions found in Appendix 1 and all postulated accidents in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for the nuclear facility.
Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures. Function A standard emergency classification and action level scheme is established and maintained.
- 1. Added new step 1.4.7 clarifying PLANNED vs UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01 on General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. Response to AR 01965160-01
- 2. p.2 Replaced 'Condition B' with 'Potential Failure (Condition B)'. Replaced 'Condition A' with 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans, No changes or deletions of information has been performed on the procedure but clarifying information has been provided/added therefore, there is no reduction in effectiveness.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
" EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 5 of 6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? YesX NoD 2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no YesX NoO reduction in effectiveness)? 3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? YesX NoO 4 Choose one of the following conclusions: a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRG x approval. b The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. 0 Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRG approval. Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or rejected? I Yes DI No D If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 10 CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:
c:.1v1c:.~\.:JC.Nv Y t"LAl\I ~HANl:it:. ~CH.t:.t:NING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 6 of 6 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date: Jeff White Reviewer Name (Print) Date: Don Crowl Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Date. Pat Street {o '{8 '/(p Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): Date: If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.
- D QA RECORD
RP/O/A/1000/001 Rev.5 Originally approved on 4/4/16
I*, EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 off~ t-" 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number . Applicable-Sites: */
- BNP D EREG #: 02006495 CNS D CR3 D HNP D MNS D SAD #: 020064 77 ONS x RNP D GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/001 Rev. 005 Emergency Classification
-- *.-
*-
Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): Editorial changes; \,~. p.1 and the body, changed from revision 4 to revision 5.
>'2. Entire document, removed page numbers in the footer of the procedure due to format constraints.
- 4. p. 6, removed page numbers from the table of contents due to format constraints
- 5. Encl 4.6, p.2 capitalized 'FRESHLY OFF-LOADED REACTOR CORE' to maintain consistency with other procedure formatting that capitalizes defined terms.
- 6. Encl 4.7 p.2 Replaced 'Condition B' with 'Potential Failure (Condition B)'. Replaced 'Condition A' with 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans,
- 7. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION A' to 'IMMINENT FAILURE (CONDITION A) and added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERC Guideline definition. Placed in alphabetical order.
- 8. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION B' to 'POTENTIAL FAILURE (CONDITION B and added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERC Guideline definition. Placed in alphabetical order
- 9. Encl 4.12 p.1 Corrected the misspelling in the NOTE from 'judgement' to 'judgment'
- 10. Encl 4.13 p.1 Added references used to support the clarification of change 3 and change 6.
Changes to Procedure Bod~;
- 3. Added new step 1.4.7 clarifying PLANNED vs UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01 on General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. Response to AR 01965160-01 Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? I Yes ID I No I x
-)
J
.. EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND
-~~~~~~~~--,.~~~~~~~~~~~~-..,
AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 4 ~ -n. Page 2 of PC j) 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not 10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Attachment 4, Justification: Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) D
~_..,._..,.~_..,._..,._..,._..,._..,._..,._..,._..,._..,.,__,___..,._..,._..,._..,._..,.,__,__,___..,._..,.~___.----1 Part 111. Editorial Change Yes D No x
" t:Mt:KC3ENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)
Rev.1 ATIACHMENT 4 / Page 3 of/ io 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form r--' Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IV and required. Enter address non Editorial changes: justification and editorial
- 1. p.1 and the body, changed from revision 4 to revision 5. complete changes
- 2. Entire document, removed page numbers in the footer of the procedure due Attachment 4, to format constraints. Part V & VI.
- 4. p. 6, removed page numbers from the table of contents due to format constraints
- 5. Encl 4.6, p.2 capitalized 'FRESHLY OFF-LOADED REACTOR CORE' to maintain consistency with other procedure formatting that capitalizes defined terms.
- 6. Encl 4. 7 p.2 Amended 'Condition 8' to 'Potential Failure (Condition 8)'.
Amended 'Condition A' to 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans, (AR 01910389)
- 7. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION A' to 'IMMINENT FAILURE (CONDITION A) and added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERC Guideline definition. (AR 01910389)
- 8. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION 8' to 'POTENTIAL
. FAILURE (CONDITION 8 and added the enhanced definition to be consistent
- ~vith the Revised FERC Guideline definition. (AR 01910389)
- 9. Encl 4.12 p.1 Corrected the misspelling in the NOTE from 'judgement' to
'judgment'
- 10. Encl 4.13 p.1 Added references used to support the clarification of change 3 and change 6.
Justification: These changes correct the formatting, page numbering, capitalization, spelling and terminology. Due to FERC initiative, the Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. Terminology was modified to be consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program(HSEEP) Imminent Failure was part of the definition of Condition A and Potential Failure was part of the definition of Condition 8, the change was intended to more clearly state the conditions of the dams to Offsite Organizations in the communications and do not change intent. The changes to the Emergency Plan have been evaluated per 10CFR50.54(q) under the EREG assignment 01999776 in CAS. 1 (
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING-AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 4'1 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form ATTACHMENT Page 4 of I"' \""" Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-06S4/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box. 1*:* 1d CFRS0:47(b)(1-)- Assignment of Responsibility: (Organization *Control}~:*** - ** 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. D 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. 2,. o 1 CFR50.47(b)(2) Oiisite*Erriergency Org~mization;c. -*. 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. D
.. ...
.. *,*- -*
3--: 10CFR5o:47(b)(3)-Eriiergency_ResponseSuppoi+and-.Resources"-- .. '* 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3)
.. , ***.--
4"' . _1oCFR:50A 7(b )(4} Eme_rgency Classiflditlon: System;:',:.) -- ._* --
- .*
. -
4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. x (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)
- 11'-,l.
~1~;::: J oicf:R so~47(b)(5}Notifi6at1on. iv1ethods*-an&Procedure's~J-~'r:<: -* - .,_ : ,; :~ .. *.. . *'
Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification D of the declared emergency within 1S minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions D to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
*, t:Mt:Kc.:iENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4. Page 5 of( \ " ' 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) a**-- '. 1o. CFR50.4 7(b)(6). Emergency Communications::* -* -- 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D
-_ . ,.
7:,* 1OCFR50.47(b)(7) Public Education and.* Information). :
- .,
7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D 8 :*:,. ' . 16.CFR'50.47(b)(8)~Emerge1JcyFacilities,and-Equipment>~- _: - -:: _ -- .. -**;
~ -:
--
--
Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. D
-."=*"- '*-
*9:,*_, *1oci=R 50:47(b)(9)*AccidentAssessment;~*-**. ,.. .... . -.
*'
. .
--
9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D
- '
10~*.. .10 CFR:50.47(b)(10) Protective' Response>-- -*
'1oa
- ~:; A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D
~*f.r 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public. 11' 10:CFR sm47(b)(1*1) Radiological* Exposure.Control: - * : - -- .
,.
- '
11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D 12' - 10 CFR50:47(b)(12)Medicarand-PubiicHealtfrSupport*-<' * *- 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D
-13::,; 1O.CFR 50.47(b )(13) RecoveryPlanning-:and Post...accldent Operations._,,; *:::.
13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14-_* 1o CFR 50A 7(b)(t4) Drills* and' Exercises'-< *':** 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D 15-
;~ -. 1O.CFR50.47(b)(15) Emergency Response Training**.\
fl5a Training is provided to emergency responders. D
. " EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 *L .. _ Page 6 of/('Lii/- 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
..
160.. * , 10 CFR.50.47(b}(t6) Emerg~ncy_l?lan Maintenancej, * * * .. 16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. 0
..
' ',-;:.
. '.
.. :~ .' .;** .
PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete 0 Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q)
. Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal.
If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part Vand perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) x Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. PattV; Sigri~tures:.:,
- Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date:
eter Kuhlman ~ 0>0. eviewer Name (Print): Reviewer Signature: Date: Don Crowl ~ (KS Approver (EP Manager Name (Print): Date: Pat Street 4 lb Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Date: Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 1O CFR 50.54(q), to 0 Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.
- 0 QA RECORD }\\
y
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 / _/ Page 1 otfro 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form ,.__,
. Applicable Sites : - _--.- *
.
.Screenirig._and EV.aluation* Number,:, -.* * -
BNP D EREG #: 02006495 CNS D CR3 D HNP D MNS D 5AD #: 020064 77 ONS x RNP D GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/001 Rev.005 Emergency Classification
. . .. .
_.. - -
- - '*
*-
..
. ._. - . .- .._ ...
.. - .. ... ..
, .-,: ~*
Part I. Description of Proposed Change: Changes to Procedure Bod~;
- 1. Added new step 1.4. 7 clarifying PLANNED vs UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01
>n General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. (Response to AR 01965160-01) Enclosure 4. 7
- 2. p.2 Replaced 'Condition B' with 'Potential Failure (Condition B)'. Replaced 'Condition A' with 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans, (AR 01910389)
This change is being performed in parallel and to support the change to the Emergency Plan, Rev 2015-007 which has been evaluated and documented in AR 01979258 Attachment 6, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes x Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form , is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No D
- -
..... ..
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT~, Page 2 of p 10
I
**)...
.,
~
*~
~v
;,
10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form .,.- Part 11. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change: ONS Emergency Plan Revision 2015-007(November) D.2 Initiating Conditions : Initiating conditions and their corresponding emergency actions levels are contained in the BASIS document beginning on page D-4. Classification procedure (RP/O/A/1000/001) provides the guidance necessary to classify events and promptly declare the appropriate emergency condition within 15 minutes after the availability of indications to cognizant facility staff that an emergency action level threshold has been exceeded. Specific response procedures are in place for the Control Room, Technical Support Center and the Emergency Operations Facility which delineate the required response during the appropriate classification. D. Enclosure 4.7 Contain the IC/EAL for Natural and Destructive Phenomena Affecting Keowee or Jocassee Hydro POTENTIAL FAILURE [Condition B] and Imminent/actual dam failure exists involving any of the following: Keowee Hydro Dam, Little River Dam, Dikes A,B,C,D, Intake Canal Dike, or Jocassee Dam - IMMINENT FAILURE [Condition A] *
~
J)
/
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 h Page 3 of A I'- 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, rather than under 10 CFR 50.54(q): Regulations 1 O CFR 50.47(b)(4) states A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures. 1 O CFR App E.IV.C.2 states (in part) By June 20, 2012, nuclear power reactor licensees shall establish and maintain the capability to assess, classify, and declare an emergency condition within 15 minutes after the availability of indications to plant operators that an emergency action level has been exceeded and shall promptly declare the emergency condition as soon as possible following identification of the appropriate emergency classification level NUREG-0654, Criterion D.1 and D.2
- 1. An emergency classification and emergency action level scheme as set forth in Appendix 1 must be established by the licensee. The specific instruments, parameters or equipment status shall be shown for establishing each mergency class, in the in-plant emergency procedures. The plan shall identify the parameter values and quipment status for each emergency class.
- 2. The initiating conditions shall include the example conditions found in Appendix 1 and all postulated accidents in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for the nuclear facility.
Compliance Change 1 added the step. to provide the EC/SM with clarifying information to consider when reviewing IC/EAL's for planned evolutions which would not warrant an emergency declaration. Change 2 adds terminology to Condition 'A' and 'B' that will be changing in 2016. The terminology 'Imminent Failure' and 'Potential Failure' are currently in the definitions of Condition 'A' and 'B'. Changes to the terms are a result of a change driven by FERC Hydro to more descriptive terms used to describe the status a dams when communicating to Offsite Response Organizations. The ONS Emergency Plan has been previously evaluated to comply with regulations and guidance for emergency classification. Due to FERC initiative, the Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. Terminology was modified to be consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program(HSEEP). The IC/EAL scheme has not changed but information has been added that will enhance the EC/SM's ability to classify in a timely manner when notified by Duke Hydro of events that could lead to event declaration using the new terms under the FERC guidelines for Hydro Emergency Action Plans. Additionally, information is being provided for consideration when evaluating planned events that meet IC/EAL criteria that would conservatively not warrant an event declaration. The procedure, as revised, continues to comply with regulations and commitments. !)..
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMEN~~b '1)\ Page4of"°r
- J 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen):
10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures A standard emergency classification and action level scheme is established and maintained.
*;..*'
"' ,. -,* ..
"
" _.::_.*.:*. '. ' "",
'"
Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response easures
- 1. Added new step 1.4.7 clarifying PLANNED vs UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01 on General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. Response to AR 01965160-01
- 2. p.2 Replaced 'Condition B' with 'Potential Failure (Condition 8)'. Replaced 'Condition A' with 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans, No changes or deletions of information has been performed on the procedure but clarifying information has been provided/added therefore, there is no reduction in effectiveness.
"'
Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? YesX NoD 2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no YesX NoD reduction in effectiveness)? 3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? YesX NoO 4 Choose one of the following conclusions: a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRC x approval. The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 f Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval. D
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 b "":\ Page5ofj~ y 10 CFR 50.54(q} Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or rejected? IYes D INo D If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 10 CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:
- ~
.)
)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING ANb. AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT~b Page 6 ofp Ir . ':\.* _y 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). Preparer Name (Print): Date: Peter Kuhlman Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signaturer---- Date: Don Crowl ~ ~'::, Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Pat Street Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): Approver Signature: {'J
*. -- _:. _;_.
If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 1O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 1O CFR 50.54(q}, to 0 Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 1O CFR 50.54(q} information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D
"'\
jJ QA RECORD
>i
_]}
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 6 Page 1 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form Screening or- Evaluation Number:*~ Part I. Identification of ICs and EALs Affected by Proposed Change: Enclosure 4.7 (p. D-83), 4.7.U.2 (p.D-86), 4.7.U.3 (p. D-87), 4.7.S.2 (p. D-98): Added terms in brackets; Imminent Failure prior to Condition A, Potential failure prior to Condition B. In response to FERC terminology pending change Change done in parallel with Emergency Plan Rev 2015-007 documented under AR 01979258-03 Part II. Determination of Validation Method by Site EP Manager: In-Plant Walkdown D Tabletop D Training D Other (Specify) 0 Simulator D NA; Completed under AR 01979258-03 x EP Manager Name (Print): /~ M~ger Signature: I Date:
~ ~~---r--
Pat Street \ 4-/f//(p
. .: ~*
2sc*'*'-',;_,: ..... * . .. .. .. ..*,.. . ',. ' ... ~Part Ill. Validation. (Answers marked No require resolution)
':_: ~: .* ** ** ; Validation Questicm:; ... **. , ; Yes,>:: No:i: :'NA Readouts, alarms, indications. etc., available in 0 D D the Control Room?
Monitor, gauge, etc., designations are correct? D D D Are correct units of measure displayed on the D D D monitor, aauae, etc.? All values are within instrumentation display D D D ranoe? Is instrument display finite enough to D D D distinguish between values? No miscellaneous issues were identified during D D D walkdown correct? Part IV. Verification (Answers marked No require resolution) Validation Question**. '.** Yes**...
- No' NA * . Resolution and Comments~'" *. ,
Is the IC/EAL change easy to use and does it flow well? Is sequencing logical and correct? Is it written to appropriate level of detail and D D D unambiguous? Is the IC/EAL Matrix legible and easy to use? D D D Are correct units of measure displayed on the D D D
- >;monitor, gauge, etc.?
** EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 6 Page 2 of 4
- -") 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form Part IV. Verification (cont.) (No answers require resolution))
..*- .
Validation Qu-estioni- -*~*- .
."
Yes-' No*:- :NA- .*. . Resolution and. Comments,_ . --- . Instrumentation; Plant Computer System (PCS); and/or Plant Process Computer System (PPCS) points specified?
- Correct instrument?
- Correct units
- Adequate instrument range? D D D
- Display unit readable?
- Proper significant digits?
- Instrument number and noun name provided?
- Consistent with operations procedures?
References specified in EAL Technical D D D Basis current and updated and source documents for inputs have been identified and verified to be appropriate for use? Does the change avoid human performance D D D challenges, latent weaknesses, and human erformance traps? No vague or missing critical detail(s).
- Decisions are not over-reliant on knowledae for successful performance Modifications, Emergency Plan, EAL Technical D D D Basis, reference manual and procedure revisions, setpoint changes, software changes, training, etc. are appropriately scheduled to correspond to the EAL revision?
Are alarm setpoints equal to or below EAL D D D thresholds? Do radiation monitor setpoints account for D D D backaround?
- . ..
Part V. Comments:
~
3
** EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND **--- -- ----AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 6 Page 3 of 4 .
) .
1O CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form Part VI. Completion Review and Approval Signatures Validation and Verification (Print Names) [Note1]: Validation and Verification Signatures: Date: N/A Site EP Manager Review (Print Name): Date: Pat Street JP~~agerS~ tf/~!t~
\ -*
\~
Senior Operations License Holder (Print Name): Senior Operations~
'--/
c* ns Holder Signature Date: N/A Qualified Emergency Coordinator (Print Name): Qualified Emergency Coordinator Signature: Date: N/A Engineering Review (Print Name) [Note2]: Engineering Signature: Date: N/A PSA Review (Print Name) [Note3]: PSA Signature: Date:
--~/A . i'.'
EP CFAM Review (Print Name): EP CFAM Signature: Date: N/A [BNP, CR3, HNP, RNP] Final PNSC Approval (Print [BNP, CR3, HNP, RNP] PNSC Signature Date: Name) N/A
' EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT6 Page 4 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form
.. .*.**. . . .. ..
.. ,. *- ....... - ,*
.' ~ . .. *. **"*
~ " -* '*
Part VII. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 1O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 1O CFR50.54(q}, to D Licensing. ~ One for Licensing to submit the 1O CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D Notes:
- 1. Validation and Verification can be performed by same individual but must be:
Qualified in the subject matter Separate from the author of change A cross-discipline reviewer
- 2. [BNP, CR3, HNP, RNP] System specific Engineering Review is required for EAL changes related to process equipment such as radiological instruments and environmental monitoring.
- 3. [BNP, HNP, RNP] PSA review is required for EAL changes to ensure any potential or actual impact to PSA calculations or assumptions are adequately addressed. (Not applicable to CR3)
QA RECORD
- c:.1v~cl"<\jt:.Nl;Y 1-'LAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
' EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT4 Page 1 off~ r--' 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites BNP D EREG #: 02006495 CNS D CR3 0 HNP 0 MNS 0 SAD #: 020064 77 ONS x RNP 0 GO 0 Document and Revision RP/O/AJ1000/001 Rev. 005 Emergency Classification Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): r:;:~jtorial chanaes*
.1 and the body, changed from revision 4 to revision 5.
- 2. Entire document, removed page numbers in the footer of the procedure due to format constraints.
- 4. p. 6, removed page numbers from the table of contents due to format constraints
- 5. Encl 4.6, p.2 capitalized 'FRESHLY OFF-LOADED REACTOR CORE' to maintain consistency with other procedure formatting that capitalizes defined terms.
- 6. Encl 4.7 p.2 Replaced 'Condition B' with 'Potential Failure (Condition B)'. Replaced 'Condition A' with 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans,
- 7. Encl 4.1 O p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION A' to 'IMMINENT FAILURE (CONDITION A) and added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERC Guideline definition. Placed in alphabetical order.
- 8. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION B' to 'POTENTIAL FAILURE (CONDITION B and added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERC Guideline definition. Placed in alphabetical order
- 9. Encl 4.12 p.1 Corrected the misspelling in the NOTE from 'judgement' to 'judgment' 1O. Encl 4.13 p.1 Added references used to support the clarification of change 3 and change 6.
Changes to Procedure Bod~;
- 3. Added new step 1.4.7 clarifying PLANNED vs. UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01 on General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. Response to AR 01965160-01
- Pl=lrt II. Activity Previously Reviewed?
'"":""*"..
I Yes I0 I No Ix
c:1v1ct<\.:it:N~Y t-JLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
- EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT4 ~ Page 2 of'C 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 1o CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not 10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Attachment 4, Justification: Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) 10 Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes ID No l x
t=Mt:K(.;;t:Nl,;Y PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATIACHMENT 4 / 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
,_....
Page 3 of/ 111 Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IV and required. Enter address non Editorial changes: editorial justification and 1 . p.1 and the body, changed from revision 4 to revision 5. complete changes
- 2. Entire document, removed page numbers in the footer of the procedure due Attachment 4, to format constraints. Part V & VI.
- 4. p. 6, removed page numbers from the table of contents due to format constraints
- 5. Encl 4.6, p.2 capitalized 'FRESHLY OFF-LOADED REACTOR CORE' to maintain consistency with other procedure formatting that capitalizes defined terms.
- 6. Encl 4.7 p.2 Amended 'Condition B' to 'Potential Failure (Condition B)'.
Amended 'Condition A' to 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans tha~ were driven by Revised FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans, (AR 01910389)
- 7. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION A' to 'IMMINENT FAILURE (CONDITION A) and added the enhanced definition to be consistent with the Revised FERC Guideline definition. (AR 01910389)
.8. Encl 4.10 p. 1 Amended definition of 'CONDITION B' to 'POTENTIAL ~ILURE (CONDITION B and added the enhanced definition to be consistent h the Revised FERC Guideline definition. (AR 01910389)
- 9. Encl 4.12 p.1 Corrected the misspelling in the NOTE from 'judgement' to
'judgment'
- 10. Encl 4.13 p.1 Added references used to support the clarification of change 3 and change 6.
Justification: These changes correct the formatting, page numbering, capitalization, spelling and terminology. Due to FERC initiative, the Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. Terminology was modified to be consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program(HSEEP) Imminent Failure was part of the definition of Condition A and Potential Failure was part of the definition of Condition B, the change was intended to more clearly state the conditions of the dams to Offsite Organizations in the communications and do not change intent. The changes to the Emergency Plan have been evaluated per 10CFR50.54(q) under the EREG assignment 01999776 in CAS. I
])\"
*"
1::1v1t:Kl:it:N(.;Y PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10,CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4J Page 4 ofr' {"-" 1O CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box. 1 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) Assignment of Responsibility(Organlzation Control)* 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. 0 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis 0 (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. 2 1o CFR 50.47(b)(2) Onsite Emergency Organization 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned 0 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. 0 3- 1O CFR 50.47(b)(3) Emergency Response. Support and Resources: 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. 0 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. 0 (NA for CR3) 4, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) Emergency Classification System 4a ,,.,.:,
- .,.,,
A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. x
-.~;;t}
(Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)
'~:~
10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) Notification Methods and:Procedures 0 Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification 0 of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions 0 to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and 0 Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
t::Mt:K(.;l::NCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4, Page5oft~ 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
"'
Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 6 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6) Emergency Communications* 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D T 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7) Public Education and Information, 7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D 8 1O CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilities and Equipment
- aa Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. D 9.* 1O CFR 50.47(b )(9) Accident Assessment 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D
-*
10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) Protective Response:.:
- {JBa A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events.
10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public. 11 1O CFR 50.4 7(b )( 11 ) Radiological Exposure Control* 11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D 12 10 CFR 50.47(b)(12) Medical and Public Health Support
- 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D 13 .. 1O CFR 50.4 7(b)(13) Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) Drills and Exercises 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established.
14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D i~ 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) Emergency ResponseTralnlng* j 1'5a Training is provided to emergency responders. D
.. EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)
Rev.1 ATIACHMENT 4 *LA_ .*)-~---
.,,. Page 6 of"/(If.A/- *jJ 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
16 10 CFR 50.47(b)(16) Emergency Plan Maintenance 16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) x Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. Part V. Signatures: P~:._'Leparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date:
. :'<>:
ter Kuhlman ~ 0>0-Reviewer Name (Print): Reviewer Signature: Date: Don Crowl ~ 00 Approver (EP Manager Name (Print): Date: Pat Street 4 tb Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Date: Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect.
-D QA RECORD
~
3
1::1v1t:Kl:;t=N<.;Y t-'LAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 I' Page 1 of/b . 1V. 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form ,._., Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites. BNP 0 EREG #: 02006495 CNS D CR3 D HNP 0 MNS 0 SAD#: 02006477 ONS x RNP 0 GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/001 Rev. 005 Emergency Classification Part I. Description of Proposed Change: Changes to Procedure Bod~;
~Added new step 1.4. 7 clarifying PLANNED vs UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01 General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. (Response to AR 01965160-01)
Enclosure 4. 7
- 2. p.2 Replaced 'Condition B' with 'Potential Failure (Condition B)'. Replaced 'Condition A' with 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans, (AR 01910389)
This change is being performed in parallel and to support the change to the Emergency Plan, Rev 2015-007 which has been evaluated and documented in AR 01979258 Attachment 6, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC} and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes x Bases Validation and Verification (V&V} Form , is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No [~
~
- _;;
1::1v1t:t"<~t:.Nt.;Y 1-'LAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT~ / 1O CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Page 2 of p,,_'° Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change: ONS Emergency Plan Revision 2015*007(November\ D.2 Initiating Conditions: Initiating conditions and their corresponding emergency actions levels are contained in the BASIS document beginning on page D-4. Classification procedure (RP/O/A/1000/001) provides the guidance necessary to classify events and promptly declare the appropriate emergency condition within 15 minutes after the availability of indications to cognizant facility staff that an emergency action level threshold has been exceeded. Specific response procedures are in place for the Control Room, Technical Support Center and the Emergency Operations Facility which delineate the required response during the appropriate classification. D. Enclosure 4. 7 Contain the IC/EAL for Natural and Destructive Phenomena Affecting Keowee or Jocassee Hydro POTENTIAL FAILURE [Condition BJ and Imminent/actual dam failure exists involving any of the following: Keowee Hydro Dam, Little River Dam, Dikes A,B,C,D, Intake Canal Dike, or Jocassee Dam - IMMINENT FAILURE [Condition A ] .} '
- ). .
c:1v1r::.~\.:lt:l'JvY t-'LAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 AITACHMENT 5 h
~ Page 3 of~ ,.._
' J;J 1O CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 1O CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, rather than under 1O CFR 50.54(q): Regulations 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) states A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures. 10 CFR App E.IV.C.2 states (in part) By June 20, 2012, nuclear power reactor licensees shall establish and maintain the capability to assess, classify, and declare an emergency condition within 15 minutes after the availability of indications to plant operators that an emergency action level has been exceeded and shall promptly declare the emergency condition as soon as possible following identification of the appropriate emergency classification level NUREG-0654, Criterion D.1 and D.2
- 1. An emergency classification and emergency action level scheme as set forth in Appendix 1 must be established
_by the licensee. The specific instruments, parameters or equipment status shall be shown for establishing each
~ergency class, in the in-plant emergency procedures. The plan shall identify the parameter values and
-a{luipmen~ status for each emergency class.
- 2. The initiating conditions shall include the example conditions found in Appendix 1 and all postulated accidents in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for the nuclear facility.
Compliance Change 1 added the step to provide the EC/SM with clarifying information to consider when reviewing IC/EAL's for planned evolutions which would not warrant an emergency declaration. Change 2 adds terminology to Condition 'A' and 'B' that will be changing in 2016. The terminology 'Imminent Failure' and 'Potential Failure' are currently in the definitions of Condition 'A' and 'B'. Changes to the terms are a result of a change driven by FERC Hydro to more descriptive terms used to describe the status a dams when communicating to Offsite Response Organizations. The ONS Emergency Plan has been previously evaluated to comply with regulations and guidance for emergency classification. Due to FERC initiative, the Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. Terminology was modified to be consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program(HSEEP). The IC/EAL scheme has not changed but information has been added that will enhance the EC/SM's ability to classify in a timely manner when notified by Duke Hydro of events that could lead to event declaration using the new terms under the FERC guidelines for Hydro Emergency Action Plans. Additionally, information is being provided for consideration when evaluating planned events that meet IC/EAL criteria that would conservatively not warrant an event declaration. The procedure, as revised, continues to comply with regulations and commitments.
t:.IVl't:.Kl;;t:Nt.;Y PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
' EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)
Rev. 1 ATIACHMEN~~ Page 4of,P~ 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 1OCFR50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen): 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State. and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures A standard emergency classification and action level scheme is established and maintained. Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans -~ for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response .:J; asures
- 1. Added new step 1.4. 7 clarifying PLANNED vs UNPLANNED Events extracted from the guidance in NEI 99-01 on General Considerations for the Emergency Coordinator to assess. Response to AR 01965160-01
- 2. p.2 Replaced 'Condition B' with 'Potential Failure (Condition B)'. Replaced 'Condition A' with 'Imminent Failure (Condition A)' due to terminology changes in the Hydro Dam Emergency Plans that were driven by Revised FERC Guidelines for Dam Emergency Plans, No changes or deletions of information has been performed on the procedure but clarifying information has been provided/added therefore, there is no reduction in effectiveness.
Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? YesX NoD 2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no YesX NoD reduction in effectiveness)? 3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? YesX NoD 4 Choose one of the following conclusions: a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRG x
.,, approval.
j' JThe activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. D Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRG approval.
t:IVlt:H.GENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 1_ Page 5 otJ..ro 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form ~ Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or rejected? I Yes DI No D If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 10 CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number: ~ j)
)
t:IVll:Kl:it:.NGY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT ~b Page 6 ofp 1 , - - - 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). Preparer Name (Print): Date: Peter Kuhlman Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signaturt;1{'--" Date: Don Crowl :r;..,- (fa';) Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Pat Street Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): Approver Signature: N f\ If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to 0 Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D QA RECORD
t:Mt:K(.:jt:Nt;Y PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 6 Page 1of4 1O CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form Screening or Evaluation Number:* Part I. Identification of ICs and EALs Affected by Proposed Change: Enclosure 4.7 (p. D-83), 4.7.U.2 (p.D-86), 4.7.U.3 (p. D-87), 4.7.S.2 (p. D-98): Added terms in brackets; Imminent Failure prior to Condition A, Potential failure prior to Condition B. In response to FERC terminology pending change Change done in parallel with Emergency Plan Rev 2015-007 documented under AR 01979258-03 Part II. Determination of Validation Method by Site EP Manager: In-Plant Walkdown D Tabletop D Training D Other (Specify) c Simulator D NA; Completed under AR 01979258-03 x EP Manager Name (Print): /E~ger Signature: I Date:
\~~~
Pat Street tr/f//r,
-...-
- it~ ~ )
Part Ill. Validation. (Answers marked No require resolution) Validation Question Yes* No NA Resolution and Comments Readouts, alarms, indications. etc., available in D D D the Control Room? Monitor, gauge, etc., designations are correct? D D D Are correct units of measure displayed on the D D D monitor, gauge, etc.? All values are within instrumentation display D D D range? Is instrument display finite enough to D D D distinauish between values? No miscellaneous issues were identified during D D D walkdown correct? Part IV. Verification (Answers marked No require resolution) Validation Question Yes No NA Resolution and Comments Is the IC/EAL change easy to use and does it flow well? Is sequencing logical and correct? Is it written to appropriate level of detail and D D D unambiguous? Is the IC/EAL Matrix legible and easy to use? D D D
'Y$ ~orrect units of ~easure displayed on the D D D *,i; nrtor, gauge, etc. . .
. c:.1v11:1"(\;;t:.l\l~Y 1-'LAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
. EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT6 Page 2 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form Part IV. Verification (cont.) (No answers require resolution)) Validation Question Yes. No NA Resolution and Comments Instrumentation; Plant Computer System (PCS); and/or Plant Process Computer System (PPCS) points specified?
- Correct instrument?
- Correct units
- Adequate instrument range? D D D
- Display unit readable?
- Proper significant digits?
- Instrument number and noun name provided?
- Consistent with operations procedures?
References specified in EAL Technical D D D Basis current and updated and source documents for inputs have been identified and verified to be appropriate for use? Does the change avoid human performance D D D ~lenges, latent weaknesses, and human -';:~ ormance traps?
> No vague or missing critical detail(s).
- Decisions are not over-reliant on knowledge for successful performance Modifications, Emergency Plan, EAL Technical D D D Basis, reference manual and procedure revisions, setpoint changes, software changes, training, etc. are appropriately scheduled to correspond to the EAL revision?
Are alarm setpoints equal to or below EAL D D D thresholds? Do radiation monitor setpoints account for D D D background? Part V. Comments:
.11\
_y
t:Mt:Klit:NGY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
*. EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 6 Page 3 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form Part VI. Completion Review and Approval Signatures Validation and Verification (Print Names) [Note1 ]: Validation and Verification Signatures: Date: N/A Site EP Manager Review (Print Name): Date: Pat Street
~-s~ 4/~/t~
Senior Operations License Holder (Print Name): Selifor Operations~ Holder Signature Date: N/A Qualified Emergency Coordinator (Print Name): Qualified Emergency Coordinator Signature: Date: N/A Engineering Review (Print Name) [Note2]: Engineering Signature: Date: N/A ~SA Review (Print Name) [Note3]: PSA Signature: Date: ~;y; fA . EP CFAM Review (Print Name): EP CFAM Signature: Date: NIA [BNP, CR3, HNP, RNP] Final PNSC Approval (Print [BNP, CR3, HNP, RNP] PNSC Signature Date: Name) NIA
.]\
._. JJ
c:,1v1t:.~~t::Nl,;Y 1-"LAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
' 'EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT6
- ~. Page 4 of 4
) 1O CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form Part VII. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments.
One for EP to provide the 1 O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR50.54(q), to D Licensing. - One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D Notes:
- 1. Validation and Verification can be performed by same individual but must be:
Qualified in the subject matter Separate from the author of change A cross-discipline reviewer
- 2. [BNP, CR3, HNP, RNP] System specific Engineering Review is required for EAL changes related to process equipment such as radiological instruments and environmental monitoring.
- 3. [BNP, HNP, RNP] PSA review is required for EAL changes to ensure any potential or actual impact to PSA
......._ calculations or assumptions are adequately addressed. (Not applicable to CR3}
QA RECORD J .
.
' I Fom1 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR} (ROS-10) RP/O/Nl000/001 Duke Energy (I) ID No. PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD R.:visionNo. 003004 ~Ji,;' Pagel of 3 PREPARATION (2) Station --------"""""O'"-'C=--'O""""N'"'"'E=E~N~U-=C=L=E~A=R"""'S"-'T'-"-A..::..;T::...::I=O-=-N;;....___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (3) Procedure Title Classification 2/9/2015 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) -Atta h NS
~ No (Revision with minor changes)
(6) Reviewed By* ~ Date '!;-7-/!S A~.-:1. ~4'.**" 11:~ ..-1'.. Cross-Disciplinary Review By* ~.t.c;<< ffi4'2"e.t"1.,,;#2. (QR)(KI) NA_ Date ~{.-:Jo{JS Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) NA:~Date ~-1.-1~
- Mgmt Involvement Review B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - -(Ops. Supt.) NA llAcf>ate ~-1=1~
(7) Additional Reviews ReviewedBy*--------------,,..-...------------ Date Reviewed By* --.:::::-----Jr-r~.-----tr--T-:r-:---r--,-;t.;;;t::=::~=-- Date
,~~R:~:::~:
Date ~s/i, lt\- (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number ( W O # ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: 0 Unit 0 0 Unit l 0 Unit 2 0 Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? 0 Yes 0 NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? 0 Yes 0 NA Required enclosures attached? 0 Yes 0 NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? 0 Yes 0 NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? 0 Yes 0 NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date ( 13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
)Printed Name and Signature
Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 04/23/2012 The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in information you want to appear on the various
~orms needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in Yf nformation on this form, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perform Step 3 below.
Step 1- press [Fl2] (Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- 1. ID No.: RP/O/A/1000/001 ~hh'5'
- 2. Revision No.: ~-001'tl~
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Emergency Classification
- 5. For changes only, enter procedure sections affected:_
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness 'tj~
- 7. Preparation Date: 2/9/2015
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision: ONS-2014-05916
_ Step 3- go to Print Preview to update this information in all the attached documents . . -*~tep 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional information needed. Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness.
'
.
,
RP IOI N l 000100 l Revision 004 Change No. _ Page 2of3 Procedure Title: Emergency Classification
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AJ.~D REASON) General Changes Revision 004 of RP/O/All 000/001 consists of changes resulting from a fleet wide initiative to replace the Selective Signaling System with "Duke Emergency Management Network (DEMNET)". The replacement of the Selective Signaling System with DEMNET is described in EC 113233. In general, this revision consists of equipment title changes from Selective Signaling to DEMNET in sections of the procedure describing notifications to Oconee County and Pickens County from the Control Room in the event of an unplanned or uncontrolled release/spill of a chemical or substance in excess of normal drips and splatters. These changes reflect the replacement of the Selective Signaling System with DEMNET which supports a fleetwide initiative to align State/county notification methodology at all Duke Energy nuclear plant sites. A new fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management Network (DEMNET), has been developed to provide instructions for notifying State/county organizations using DEMNET. Applicable sections of the Oconee Nuclear Station Emergency Plan, emergency plan implementing procedures, and support procedures are being revised to implement these changes. These changes are being screened I evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54( q) under separate cover. Revision 004 of RP/O/A/1000/001 consists of the following changes:
.
- Enclosure 4.2, Unusual Event Table, 4.B: Changed "Selective Signaling" to "DEMNET."
3D . PCR Numbers Incorporated ONS-2014-05916 Enclosure "};\ _j}
RPIOIAl I 000100 I Revision 004 Change No. _ Page 3of3 Attachment to 50.54q RPIOIA/10001001, Emergency Classification, Revision 004
# Page /Section Current Proposed Change Reason I. Enclosure 4.2 Loss of all onsite communications Loss of all onsite communications Editorial: changed capability (Selective Signaling, NRC ETS capability (DEMNET, NRC ETS Unusual Event Selective Signaling to lines, Offsite Radio System, AT&T line) lines, Offsite Radio System, AT&T line)
Table4.B affecting ability to communicate with offsite affecting ability to communicate with offsite DEMNET authorities. authorities. _)
3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attaclunent 3.10.7.2
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/A/1000/001, Emergency Classification, Revision 004 Revision 004 of RP/O/A/1000/001 consists of changes resulting from a fleet wide initiative to replace the Selective Signaling System with "Duke Emergency Management Network (DEMNET)". The replacement of the Selective Signaling System with DEMNET is described in EC 113233. In general, this revision consists of equipment title changes from Selective Signaling to DEMNET in sections of the procedure describing notifications to Oconee County and Pickens County from the Control Room in the event of an unplanned or uncontrolled release/spill of a chemical or substance in excess of normal drips and splatters. These changes reflect the replacement of the Selective Signaling System with DEMNET which supports a fleetwide initiative to align State/county notification methodology at all Duke Energy nuclear plant sites. A new fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management Network (DEMNET), has been developed to provide instructions for notifying State/county organizations using DEMNET. Applicable sections of the Oconee Nuclear Station Emergency Plan, emergency plan implementing procedures, and support procedures are being revised to implement these changes. These changes are being screened I evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q) under separate cover. Revision 004 ofRP/O/A/1000/001 consists of the following changes:
- Enclosure 4.2, Unusual Event Table, 4.B: Changed "Selective Signaling" to "DEMNET."
ctivity Scope: [8J The activity~ a change to the emergency plan D Change Type: Change Type: [8J The change~ editorial or typographical D The change does conform to an activity that has prior approval D The change is not editorial or typographical D The change does not conform to an activity that has prior approval .
~ '
Planning Standard Impact Determination: BLOCK 5">> *.* 0 §50.47(b)( l) -Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) 0 §50.47(b)(2) - Onsite Emergency Organization
*0 §50.47(b)(3) - Emergency Response Support and Resources *2D §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System*
0 §50.47(b)(5) - Notification Methods and Procedures* 0 §50.47(b)(6) - Emergency Communications 0 §50.47(b)(7) - Public Education and Information 0 §50.47(b)(8) - Emergency Facility and Equipment 0 §50.47(b)(9) -Accident Assessment* 0 §50.47(b)(l0) - Protective Response* 0 §50.47(b)(l l) - Radiological Exposure Control 0 §50.47(b)(l2) - Medical a~d Public Health Support 0 §50.47(b)(l3)- Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 0 §50.47(b)(14) - Drills and Exercises 0 §50.47(b)(l5)- Emergency Responder Training 0 §50.47(b)(l 6) - Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards 0 The ro osed activit does not im act a Plannin Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
0 The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment 0 The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: f8J The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation 0 The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation
':. reparer Name:
..*.: \J'atalie Harness Reviewer Name: Date: Don Crowl Revision 12 )
... VERIFY HARD COPY AGAINST WEB SITE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO EACH USE Nuclear Policy Manual- Volume 2 NSD 703 FORMS y Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (RI0-14) (l) ID No. Duke Energy RP/O/A/1000/001 _ _ PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. .J. _____ PREPARATION (2) Station OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title Emergency Classification (4) Prepared By* (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Detennination? 0 Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation D No (Revision with minor changes) (6) Reviewed By* ~~-£<__::_-=->=-=-~~~~_,,,...,r-+,,--r--r---.,.-,,(QR) (KI) ~Date t/*7~7-S Cross-Disciplinary Review By* f,) (QR) (KI) NA ,~ Date i" _,~*-1"5 Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA i)fi~ate (/-1.s'-z 6' Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (Ops. Mgr.) NA w{.e_., Date '{-,~ - ,IS Additional Reviews Reviewed By* - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - . , . . - - - - - - - - - - - - D a t e_ _ _ __ Reviewed By* G: ""t't-r-- Date_f___,l,_l___,. (8) Approved By* ~VJ1.l,6c) Date 4- __ vv_. J PERFORMANCE (Compare with co11trol copy every 14 ca (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date._ _ _ __ Compared with Control Copy* Date_ _ _ __ Compared with Control Copy* Date_ _ _ __ (10) Date(s)Perfonned _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number (WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Yes D NA Checklists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date_ _ _ __ (12) Procedure Completion A p p r o v e d * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date_ _ __ (13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
)
_;}
- Printed Name and Signature
Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 04/23/2012 The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in information you want to appear on the various ,'~rms ne~ded for ~ajor/~.~ino~ Procedure R.evisions, and Major/Minor Pro~edure C~ang~s. After you type in
- mformatlon on this form, 1t will be electromcally transferred to the appropnate locations m the attached forms when you perform Step 3 below.
Step 1- press [Fl2] (Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location.
- Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below:
Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing ..
- 1. ID No.: RP/0/A/1000/001
- 2. Revision No.: 3
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Emergency Classification _
- 5. For changes only, enter procedure sections affected: Enclosure 4.4
- 6. Prepared By: Mike Stephens
- 7. Preparation Date: 03/31/2015
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision: ONS-Step 3- go to Print Preview to update this information in all the attached documents.
. jtep 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional information needed. Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness. 1tl y
RP/O/A/1000/001 Revision _J _ Change No._ Page 1of1 J Procedure Title: Emergency Classification _
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Change to clarify EAL 4.4.S.2.C (Complete Loss of Shutdown Function Needed to Achieve or Maintain Mode 4 (Hot Shutdown) PCR Numbers Incorporated ONS-Enclosure ) .
.
)
I
)P/O/A/1000/001 (Emergency Classification) Rev. #3 Change Matrix Change Section Current wording Proposed wording Reason for change
# , page 1 Enc. C. EOP directs feeding SG C. Inability to feed SGs HPI Forced cooling 4.4 from SSF ASWP or PSW prior to RCS pressure represents the failure of S.2.C Pump. reaching 23 00 psig the steam generators to Page 12 and remove heat from the HPI Forced Cooling core. To use this mode of degraded by any of the cooling indicates that all following: feedwater (both main and
- Unacceptable HPI emergency) are not flow/pressure in available for use and the either header per pressure of the reactor EOP Rule4 coolant system is greater
- Only 1 HPI Pump than or equal to 2300 available psig. The power-operated
- Either PORV (*RC- relief valve must be
- 66) and/or PORV opened to initiate the Block (*RC-4) cooling through the high
).. ,
closed pressure injection system. In effect, a self-imposed loss of coolant is established. Declaration of a Site Area Emergency is warranted with the total loss of main and emergency feedwater with SSF and PSW unavailable coincident with degraded High Pressure Injection. 2 Enc. NIA PIP-0-14-13933 Update references 4.13 )
[.Type text] APPENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION Rev. 10) Page 1 of2'
- ' ),".:.:*_.*-'-.,.------'------------PAR_T_*_l_--'-A_C..--T_IV_I_T_Y_D_E_S_C_R_IPT_IO_N_._"--'-~---'---'--'--'---1 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC SITE UNIT(S)
[8] Oconee D McGuire D Catawba [8] Unit 1 [8] Unit 2 [8] Unit 3 ACTIVITY TITLE/DOCUMENT/REVISION:
.PARTU;,;:PROCESS*REVIEW' ** .
For. each 'activlty~~ddress aUof the qu~~tfons below/If the ~nsw~r i~J'YES" frir a~y* ~ortio~: of the activlty; apply: th~ id~ntified *:' rocess es tothat ortionoftheactMt rNote: Itisnotunusualtohavemorethalione rocessa r toil ivenactivi ;; Will implementation of the above activity require a change to the:
- 1. Technical Specifications (TS) or Operating rrl" D IfYES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227.
License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? ~ D If YES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
NO YES
- 3. Security Plans? ~ D IfYES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
NO YES (See Appendix H) D
~
- 4. Emergency Plan? If YES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area NO Manual.
- 5. Inservice Testing Program Plan? ~ D If YES, process per site !ST Program for ASME code
)
-~. -~:~(
NO YES compliance and related facility changes. 0
.
- 6. lnservice Inspection Program Plan? D If YES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping Inservice NO YES Inspection FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes.
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? ~ D If YES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
NO YES 7a -Utilize Appendix E to address Fire ~ Check to confirm use of Appendix E Screening Questions. Protection Program Plan Impact.
- 8. Regulatory Commitments? [t(' D lfYES, process per NSD 214.
NO YES
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? [2(' D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
NO YES
- 10. Programs and manuals listed in the ~ D YES If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
Administrative Section of the TS? NO
**~
- .Y
[.Type text] Page2 of2
.. . . i>ART n1a - 10 CFR n4s APPLICABILITY Fo~ each activity, address the questionc below. If the answer t~ questimi 1l is YES," and questions 14 and i rare answered: * . "NO"~ then process the activity per NSD:21r;.. 10 CFR 72A8 does apply;, *
- 11. Does the activity involve SSCs, procedures or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the loading or ~- D transport of the canister/cask to the ISFSI, the ISFSI facility, spent fuel cask design? NO YES PART IIlb-'-10 CFRso:s9APPLICABILITY . . *. ..**
For ea~h activity, ~ddress all of the questions below; if the answer to que~tion: is"YES," then 10 CFRS0.59 does not apply'. lfthe an~~~r to is questions 18 is."NO," then process: the activity. per NSD 209*.;:;; IO:CFR 5059 appliesL .: * * *
- 12. Does the activity involve a procedure, governed by NSD 703 that has been excluded from the I 0 CFR 50.59 ~ D process per NSD 703 and the exclusion status remains valid? NO YES
- 13. Does the activity involve an administrative procedure governed by NSD 100 or AD-DC-ALL-0201 that does g/' D not contain information regarding the operation and control of Structures, Systems and Components? NO YES
- 14. Does the activity involve a type of Engineering Change that NSD 301 excludes from the I 0 CFR 50.59 and/or I 0 CFR 72.48 Processes? Consult NSD 30 I for assistance.
0NO D YES
- 15. Does the activity involve (a) maintenance activities that restore SSCs to their as-designed condition ~ D (including activities that implement approved design changes) or (b) temporary alterations supporting NO YES maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
- 16. Does the activity involve a UFSAR modification that NSD 220 excludes from the 10 CFR 50.59 Process? Gr"' D Consult NSD 220 for assistance. NO YES Does the activity involve NRC and/or Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC approved changes to the licensing basis? ~D NO YES
- 18. Are ALL aspects of the activity bounded by one or more "YES" answers to questions I through 17, above? D ~
NO YES PARTIV*~UFSARREVIEW ..*.
- 19. Does the activity require a modification, deletion, or addition to the UFSAR to satisfy the UFSAR content ~ D requirements of 10 CFR 50.34 (b), 10 CFR 50.71 (e), or Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.70? Consult NSD 220 for NO YES Assistance.
IF YES, process per NSD 220. (Print Name) _Don Crowl_ _ __ DATE Applicability Determination Preparer
) .
VERIFY HARD COPY AGAINST WEB SITE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO EACH USE Nuclear Policy Manual - Volume 2 NSD 228 APPENDIX E. FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM SCREENING The following screening questions are used to assist the Appllcabilily Determination preparer to answer PART II - PROCESS REVIEW 11uestlon number 7. A ~ves" answer to any or the screening questions would Indicate the !'Ire Protecllon Program Licensing Basis may he arrected, and Question# 7 on the Applicability Determination l'orm (Appendix C) should be checked ~ves" and a review In accordance with :'oiSD 320 Is required. PART A New procedure or a major procedure change FPP Licensing Applicability impact screening: NOTE: IF the procedure change is a rcsull ofa Plant Modification or Engineering Change that has previously been evaluated for impact to the FPP, then question #7 should be checked "No". Yes No Al. / Docs the proposed activity change any plant responses, operator responses or emergency lighting associated with Post Fire Safe Shutdmm (PFSS) response procedures'! A2. / Docs the proposed activity add, remove or revise any fire protection features as described in the UFSAR or
"* SLCs from any performance test procedures"?
AJ. 'I / Docs the proposed activity add, remove or revise any procedures related to fire protection features as described in the UFSAR or SLCs'I M. i: :/ Docs the proposed activity add, remove or revise any performance test Acceptance Criteria for any fire protection features as described in the UFSAR or SLCs'! PART B Plant Modification/Engineering Change FPP Licensing Basis impact screening: Docs the proposed activity impact ...... '! ~ BI. II 11 Any fire rated assemblies/boundaries (walls. floors, ceilings, etc.), including fire doors, tire dampers, jJ penetration seals, fire rated wraps, radiant energy heat shields, structural fireproofing, etc. as described the UFSAR or SLCs? B2. fl r: Any water based fixed fire suppression systems (including water supply flow paths and main fire pumps) as described in UFSAR or SLCs? BJ. !l !~ Any gaseous fire suppression systems (C02, Halon) as described in the UFSAR or SLCs? B4. Any manual fire flghllng equipment such as hose stations and tire hydrants as described in the UFSAR or SLCs? B5. !j Any portable fire extlngulshen located in safety-related and/or safe shutdown areas oftheplant or power block? B6. !_) iJ Any fire detection systems as described in the UFSAR or SLCs? B7. i) 1 ~ Any water and/or combustible fluid containment devices such as curbs, dikes, drains. fire protection system spray shields, etc. located in safety-related and/or safe shutdown areas'? BS. i) Any administrative control documents for the Fire Protection Program such as NSD 313 (Control of Combustible1Flammablc Materials), NSD 314 (!lot Work Authorization), and NSD 316 (Fire Protection Impairment)'? B9. 'I ,\ny fire brigade equipment, Including communication equipment or fire brigade administrative controls as outlined in NSD 112 (Fire Brigade Organization, Training, and Responsibilities)'? BIO. 1: The Reactor Coolant Pump Lube Oil Collecllon System'? Bl I. The !'Ire Safety/Hazards Analysis as documented in the plant level Design Basis Document for Fire Protection (CNS-1465.00-00.0006, MCS-1465.00-00-0008, OSS-0254.00-00-4008)? Bl2. Any Pl'SS/!'iuclear Sarety Capability Assessment/Non-Power Operations equipment, emergency lighting, commnuclallons, circuits, and/or cable routet as described in the site PFSS DBD and associated analysis (CNS-1435.00-00.0002, MCS-1465.00-00-0022, OSS-0254.00-00-4008)? BIJ. I Combustible/Flammable Material or an Ignition Source? Bl4. Any Site !'Ire Brigade Response Strategies as described in the Emergency Plan and Fire Protection Planning guide'! Bl5. Any plant radiation control boundaries? Bl6. Any HVAC flow changes include air intakclc:ithaust changes in radiation control areas'? ) REVISION 10 25 VERIFY HARD COPY AGAINST WEB SITE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO EACH USE
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (R10-14) Duke Energy
*~
'Y PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) IDNo. _ _ _ _RP/O/A/1000/001 _ _ _ _ __ Revision No. _ J ____ Change No. Permanent/Restricted to - - - - - (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title Emergency Classification _ (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected _ (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? [gl Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation D No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) Revision 3 ofRP/O/A/1000/001 consist of the following: Change to clarify EAL 4.4.S.2.C (Complete Loss of Shutdown Function Needed to Achieve or Maintain Mode 4 (Hot Shutdown) (7) Reason for Change
]j; See attached change matrix (8) Prepared By* Mike Stephens (9) Reviewed By*'[).,14-f~ ~]'] ~JQR) (KI) l/JF~*. Date 03/31/2015 Date 'ln-t.<
Cross-Disciplinary Review By*~(QR) (KI) NNd:t!:_e-Date lf r-y~-£' 7 Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* --1't\'25 (QR) NA Mc:_Date 'f*-rs*zr-Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (Ops. Mgr.) NA A..k..< ¥-£-t.S-Date ------------------~ (10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By*------------::::=:=:::::::::---------=------- Date - - - Reviewed By* --.;-}----;--i-;;:--:-::--t-l~tr--;-&-j4;i:;::=::tt==---- Date (11) Approved By* --1--.::::..i..u........."-'---1--.,.___,==.iL....\-....c;.~--=----'~~--H,.1,,......."'----- Date~l)
- Printed Name and Signature
3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/A/1000/001, Emergency Classification, Revision 003 Revision 003 ofRP/O/A/1000/001 consists of the following change. Protected Service Water replaces the Station Auxiliary Service Pump as a result of a system modification. Change made to clarify sub-step of EAL 4.4.S.2.C (Complete Loss of Shutdown Function Needed to Achieve or Maintain Mode 4 (Hot Shutdown) See attached sheet for all changes pertaining to this procedure. Activity Scope: [8] The activity .!§ a change to the emergency plan D The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: Change Type: D The change .!§ editorial or typographical D The change does conform to an activity that has ['8J The change is not editorial or typographical prior approval
~ The change does not conform to an activity that has prior approval Planning Standard Impact Determination:
D §50.47(b)(l)- Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control)
~ §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization
-_:2] §50.47(b)(3)- Emergency Response Support and Resources [8] §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System* D §50.47(b)(5)- Notification Methods and Procedures* D §50.47(b)(6)-Emergency Communications D §50.47(b)(7)- Public Education and Information D §50.47(b)(8)- Emergency Facility and Equipment D §50.47(b)(9)-Accident Assessment* D §50.47(b)(10)- Protective Response* D §50.47(b)(l 1)-Radiological Exposure Control D §50.47(b)(l2)-Medical and Public Health Support D §50.47(b)(13)- Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations D §50.47(b)(14)- Drills and Exercises D §50.47(b)(15)- Emergency Responder Training D §50.47(b)(16)-Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards D The ro osed activity does not im act a Planning Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
D The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment Record the commitment or commitment reference: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
~ The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment
- )
_)'
Results: D The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54( q) effectiveness evaluation
- '~;f;t;=~=-=-=u3E~-=~'Y!~-!~-=-
Reviewer Name: Reviewer ignatur Date: ~~wl o/~7~ Revision 12
3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.3
§50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
Revision 003 ofRP/O/A/1000/001 consists of the following change. Protected Service Water replaces the Station Auxiliary Service Pump as a result of a system modification. Change made to clarify sub-step of EAL 4.4.S.2.C (Complete Loss of Shutdown Function Needed to Achieve or Maintain Mode 4 (Hot Shutdown). Clarification added to address a total loss of main and emergency feedwater with SSF and PSW unavailable coincident with degraded High Pressure Injection. See attached change matrix: Activity Type:
~ The activity~ a change to the emergency plan D The activity affects implementation of the emergency plan, but is not a change to the emergency plan Impact and Licensing Basis Determination:
Licensing Basis: 10CFRS0.47b (4) A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures. NUREG 065411.D.1 An emergency classification and emergency action level scheme as set forth in Appendix l must be established by the licensee. The specific instruments, parameters or equipment status shall be shown for establishing each emergency class, in the in-plant emergency procedures. The plan shall identify the parameter values and equipment status for each emergency class. __ : NS E-Plan Section D, EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM States; - Reg. Guide 1.101, Rev. 3, August, 1992, approved the guidance provided by NUMARC/NESP-007, Revision 2, as an Alternative Methodology for the Development of Emergency Action Levels. Oconee Nuclear Site used the NUMARC guidance for the development of initiating conditions and emergency action levels. The emergency action levels provided in this section have been modified to implement the guidance provided in NRC Bulletin 2005-02, NEI guidance as endorsed in Regulatory Issue Summary 2006-12 and to support the implementation ofNEI 03-12. Changes to ONS E-Plan Section D, EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM documented under separate 50.54q evaluation. Reg. Guide 1.219 lists the emergency planning function associated with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). A standard scheme of emer ency classification and action level is in use. Compliance Evaluation and
Conclusion:
- 1. Evaluation:
Basis Information for Fission Product Barrier Reference Table Enc. 4.1 (4) Reactor Coolant System Integrity. RPI Forced cooling represents the failure of the steam generators to remove heat from the core. To use this mode of cooling indicates that all feedwater (both main and emergency) are not available for use and the pressure of the reactor coolant system is greater than or equal to 2300 psig. The power-operated relief valve must be opened to initiate the cooling through the high pressure injection system. In effect, a self-imposed loss of coolant is established. This condition is classified as a potential loss of the reactor coolant system. HPI Forced Cooling is classified as an Alert from RP/O/A/1000/001 Enc. 4.1 Fission Product Barrier Matrix.
Conclusion:
) - The proposed activity ~ does I D does not continue to comply with the requirements. I
Reduction in Effectiveness (RIE) Evaluation and
Conclusion:
Evaluation: Current wording in Enc. 4.4.S.2.C states: "EOP directs feeding SG from SSF ASWP or PSW Pump. The installation of the PSW Pump enabled the Station to not require a blow-down of the SG's in order to commence feeding to achieve shutdown cooling, as the PSW pump is a high discharge head pump. The installation and use of the PSW pump provides a better margin of safety for the plant. The use of the PSW pump remains consistent with the technical bases of the EAL (NUMARC - NESP-007, IC - SS4-Complete Loss of Heat Removal Capability EAL 1 Loss of core cooling and heat sink (PWR). Core exit thermocouple readings are considered to be the average of the five (5) highest thermocouple reading shown on the Inadequate Core Cooling Monitor. The SSF can provide the following: (1) makeup to the Reactor Coolant Pump seals, (2) low pressure service water to the steam generators, (3) capability to keep the unit in hot shutdown for 72 hours following an Appendix R fire. This change is then in keeping true to the basis as currently written. The basis provides, "This EAL addresses complete loss of functions core cooling and heat sink required for hot shut down with the reactor at pressure and temperature. Under these conditions, there is an actual major failure of a system intended for protection of the public. Thus, declaration of a Site Area Emergency is warranted with the total loss of main and emergency feedwater with SSF and PSW unavailable coincident with degraded High Pressure Injection. Escalation to General Emergency would be via Abnormal Rad Levels/Radiological Effluent, Emergency Coordinator Judgment or Fission Product Barrier Degradation ICs".
Conclusion:
The ro osed activit D does / IZI does not constitute a RIE. ffectiveness Evaluation Results The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior approval. 0 The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior approval. Day,/<:'-/~ Preparer Name: Mike Stephens Reviewer Name: Don Crowl Approver Name: Pat Street Revision 12 j '
'
3.10 IOCFR S0.54(q) E'rnluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attaclunent 3. 10.7.2 EAL Change Review Form
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~-;-~~~~~---:~~~~-.-~~~-----,
~Change Description and
References:
f(f /r> !i;-/J{J~o /DIJ / /(,..1-v -~ I BLOCK L
- Revision 003 of E-Plan Section D consists of the following change. f.M..e,~ ~)-.>-<. Qlc-n . dJ. c_c-~ r-..
Protected Service Water replaces the Station Auxiliary Service Pump as a result ot'a system 0 modification. Change made to clarify sub-step of EAL 4.4.S.2.C (Complete Loss of Shutdown Function Needed to Achieve or Maintain Mode 4 (Hot Shutdown). Change Type: I BLOCK'2?:~ [8J The change is considered a difference from the approved wording. D The change is considered a deviation from the aonroved wording. Change Verification: I nI.o(;K:J:iL'. Item / Yes / No / NIA /Resolution/Comments Initiating Condition* IC identification number is com.-ct 0 0 Click here to enter text. Wording is consistent with the NRC approved IC 0 D Click here to enter text. EAL/ FPB-EAUFPB identification number is correct 0 0 Click here to enter text. , ./ L _
,,,,~ * 'J Wording is consistent with the NRC approved EAL I FPB 0 0 PSW rnodll"installcd and associated prncedure changes made.
Threshold values or conditions remain specific to ensure generic [8J 0 D Click here to entl!r text.
)riteria are not substituted reducing clarity and accuracy of the ,}AL.
Sequencing/nesting logic fonnat is correct [8J 0 D Click here to enter text. Source document inputs used for calculations and in thresholds arc [8J 0 0 Click here to enter text. corrt.-ct Site specific content wording/tables/values are correct and specific: 0 D Click lwre to enter text.
- Operations procedures are consistent with the change
- Instrument/display numbt.T and noun name are provided
- Alarm sctpoints are equal to or below EAUFPB values
- Radiation monitor values account for background
- Procedure references are correct The EAUFPB Matrix is legible and intuitively organized 0 D Click here to enter text.
Mode Aanllcablllty** Operational mode alignment is consistent with the EAL licensing 0 D Click here to enter text. basis Technical Bases* Site spt.-citic bases is consistent with the EAL threshold 0 0 Click here to enter text. Bast."S for calculations and threshold valut."S are consistent with the 0 D Click here to enter text. technical bases approved by the NRC Source document inputs ust.'li for calculations and in thrt.-sholds are 0 0 Click here to enter text. correct Site specific bases remains accurate and consistent with the EAL 0 D Click here to enter text. rcchnical bast."S approved by the N RC
~ spt.-citic bast."S has appropriate level of detail and is 0 D Click here to enter text. , -Zi'mbiguous
.
The change docs not cause a diange to the logic ufthe EAL scheme [8J D D Click here tn '-'nter tc.\I. (i.e. gaps in classification thresholds) Conflicts with the EAUFPB wording have not been introduced (8J D D Click here In enter te.\t. .) Revision 12
- 3.10 IOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2 References Source document references are corrL'Ct [8J D D Click here to enter text.
Source document references are current [8J D D Click here to enter text. Definitions..
- Wording is consistent with the license basis definitions approved [8J D D Click here to enter text.
by the NRC for the EALs and EAL technical bases Other Manual Content.;*,* Wording is consistent with the license basis definitions approved [8J D D Click here to enter text. by the NRC for the EALs and EAL technical bases Change Validation: Methotf... ** . *.* .. ,. D In-Plant Walk down D Simulator !8] Other (Specify) EOP Changes D Training D Tabletop ON/A Item Yes No NIA Resolution/Comments
- AL/FPB
;nformation and/or values are available in all facilities where D D Click here to enter text.
classifications arc required to be made Instrumentation and computer points arc compatible: 0 D rgJ Click here to enter text.
- Instrument/display designation matches
- Instrument/display units are correct
- Proper significant digits are indicated and within the accuracy capabilities of the instrument/display
- The instrument/display range is on scale for the threshold value
- Instrument/display provides separation for escalating values Conditions are easily recognizable and able to support declaration [gJ D D Click here to enter text.
within 15 minutes. Information and/or values are easily obtained and able to support [gJ D D Click here to enter text. declaration within 15 minutes The change docs not introduce a time delay to classification [gJ D D Click here to enter text. Change Justification: HPI Forced cooling represents the failure of the steam generators to remove heat from the core. To use this mode of cooling indicates that all feedwater (both main and emergency) are not available for use and the pressure of the reactor coolant system is greater than or equal to 2300 psig. The power-operated relief valve must be opened to initiate the cooling through the high pressure injection system. In effect, a self-imposed loss of coolant is established. Declaration of a Site Area Emergency is warranted with the total loss of main and emergency feed water with SSF and PSW unavailable coincident _)h degraded High Pressure Injection. I.. . ****---***--*-*-******----*--*-**------*-*---**--**--*-*-------------*----------------*--------*-*
EAL Change Review Results: BLOCK6
~ The EAL change can be implemented without prior NRC approval.
0 _ The EAL change cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval. }~;:~;1~;~ ~--=-~~ ~= E~~~_;;i=~-- ~~~;;;_~-- E~v~:~;~~~~~e:____________________ :iew ~Si~ ___ -------- ~:~tc[-2'~ Approver Name: Ap ro . ature Datej } "'1-(t r Pat Street T /;U Revision 12 ~ _j
' n Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 04/23/2012 The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in information you want to appear on the various
- ~forms needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in Anformation on this form, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perform Step 3 below.
Step 1- press [Fl2] (Save As) then save this fonn using standard file name.convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- 1. ID No.: RP/O/Nl000/001
- 2. Revision No.: 002 _
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Emergency Classification
- 5. For changes only, enter procedure sections affected: _
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness@)
- 7. Preparation Date: l l/25/2014
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision: ONS-2014-05916 Step 3- go to Print Preview to update this infonnation in all the attached documents.
*29tep 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional infonnation needed.
Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness.
*~ *y
Form 703-l. Procedure Process Record (PP,R) (ROS-10) RPIOI Al I 000100 l Duke Energy (I) ID No. PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 002 _ ~
.
' Page I of 5
..
PREPARATION (2) Station _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___,O:;....;:C~O"""'N-'-'E=E=-=--'N-=U-=C-=L=E"-'A=R'"""S"-"T'""-A=T"""'I-=O"""'"N'--------------- (3) Procedure Title Classification (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? [di' Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) -Att NSD 228 documentation. D No (Revision with minor chaies) (6) Reviewed By* -'-""-.L..--1..=:-m.~~*.-.==""--~-6-J.~......a...-..~---<QR)(KI) Date IOL1--I y
/Cross-Disciplinary Review By*--.LJitda.J~_SIJ~~rl_.Llilii£P-Lb.:M:f,j!!JQ...(Q!l)(KI) NA_Date 11-1-11 Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) NA~Date .bZ--'l-z y Mgmt Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) N1'1ik...Date Jd--~-t'(
(7) Additional Reviews R e v i e w e d B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date ReviewedBy*------..--=-----tt---:::1~t--=='--~-t--t=-:---t-~= Date
;~8) Approved By* Date JERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy every 14 ca endar days wh1 (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Work Order Number (WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes DNA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date ( 12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date ( 13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary) .) Printed Name and Signature
RP /0/N l 000/00 l Revision 002 _ Change No._ Page 2of5 Procedure Title: Emergency Classification SUM.MARY OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Revision 002 of RP/O/ N l 000100 l consists of the following changes:
- Many editorial changes made correcting grammatical corrections and other editorial issues.
- A clarification to the introduction note regarding the procedure is an implementing procedure for the E Plan and as such requires an effectiveness review under 50.54q for any changes and a cross disciplinary review.
- Safety Classification changes for several procedure references noted within the body of the procedure.
- Procedure Reference Change: from NSD-202 to AD-LS-ALL-0006 (Notification I Reportability Evaluation)
- PSW replaces the ASWP as a result of a system modification.
PCR Numbers Incorporated ONS-2014-05916 Enclosure
RP/O/Nl000/001 Revision 002 _ Change No. _ Page 3of5 Attachment to 50.54q RP/O/A/1000/001, Emergency Classification, Revision 002
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section I. Page 2 of6 Note: This procedure is an NOTE: This is an implementing Enhancement: Added Note section implementing Procedure to the Procedure to the Oconee Nuclear Site the following note to Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency Emergency Plan and must be: ensure evaluation for Plan and must be forwarded to
- Reviewed in accordance with a 10CFR50.54q Emergency Planning within seven (7) 1OCFR50.54q by Emergency effectiveness review working days of approval. Preparedness prior to approval. and the cross
- Cross Disciplinary Reviewed by disciplinary review.
Operations.
- Forwarded to Emergency Preparedness within seven (7) working days of aooroval.
- 2. Page 2 of6 Information relating to the problem(s) Information relating to the problem(s) on Safety Classification 1.4.4 A on the other unit(s) will be captured on the other unit(s) will be captured on the change to procedure the Emergency Notification Form as Emergency Notification Form as shown in references 11 8 11 to "A" shown in RP/O/A/1000/015A, (Offsite RP/O/A/1000/015A, (Offsite Communications From The Control Communications From The Control Room), RP/O/A/1000/0158, (Offsite Room), RP/O/A/1000/0158, (Offsite Communications From The Technical Communications From The Technical Support Center) or SR/0/8/2000/004, Support Center) or SR/O/A/2000/004, (Notification to States and Counties (Notification to States and Counties from from the Emergency Operations the Emergency Operations Facility).
Facility) .
- 3. Page 4 of6 ... Refer to NSD 202 for reportability ... Refer to AD-LS-ALL-0006 Procedure Reference 1.5.3 (Notification/Reportability Evaluation) Change: from NSD-for reportability 202 to AD-LS-ALL-0006 (Notification I Reportability Evaluation)
- 4. Page 4 of6 l. The event may be terminated in the l. The event may be terminated in the Editorial: margins l.5.4A same notification or as a separate same notification or as a separate corrected termination notification. termination notification.
- 5. Page 5 of6 for Control Room - RP/0/8/1000/002, for Control Room - RP/O/A/1000/002, Safety Classification 2.5 (Control Room Emergency (Control Room Emergency Coordinator change to procedure Coordinator Procedure) Procedure) references "B" to "A"
- 6. Enclosure 4.1 Average of the 5 highest Average of the 5 highest Editorial: CETC on Potential Loss CETC CETC ~ 700 F one line under Fuel ~700 F Clad
- 7. Enclosure 4.1 NOTE: RVLS is NOT NOTE: RVLS is NOT valid if either of the Editorial: clarified valid if one or more following exists:
Potential Loss note for reader and Note under RCPs are running OR if
- One or more RCPs are running underlined NOT, LPI pump(s) arc OR Fuel Clad running AND taking
- If LPI pump(s) are running AND taking bold underline OR suction from the LPI suction from the LPI drop line.
Jroo line.
- 8. Enclosure 4.1 Failure of secondary side of SG Failure of secondary side of SG Editorial: moved results in a dim:! opening to the results in a dim:t opening to the Loss (3 symbol ~ to next line
.-nvironment with SG Tube Leak~ *-nvimnment with SG Tube U.'llk
- -~ points) to aid reader 10 gpm in the SAME SG ~IO gpm in the SAME SG y
,-------------------------------------------~------- - - - ---- RP /0/ N l 000100 l Revision 002 _ Change No._ Page 4of5
-""".\
~*_)
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 9. Enclosure SG Tube Leak~ I0 gpm exists in SG Tube Leak~ I 0 gpm exists in Editorial: clarified 4.1 one SG. one SG. note for reader &
Loss (3 AND AND underlined AND points) the other SG has secondary side the other SG has secondary side failure that results in a direct failure that results in a direct opening to the environment AND opening to the environment is being fed from the affected unit. AND is being fed from the affected unit.
- 10. Enclosure AND AND Editorial: unbold "in Significant plant transient in progress Significant plant transient in progress 4.2 progress" ALERT second AND
- 11. Enclosure Valid indication on radiation monitor RlA-45 Valid indication on radiation monitor RlA-45 Editorial: moved of> 9.35E+05 cpm or RP sample reading of> of> 9.35E+o5 cpm or RP sample reading of symbol > to next 4.3 6.62E-2uCi/ml Xe 133 <'q for> 60 minutes >6.62E-2uCi/ml Xe 133 eq for> 60 minutes UE 1.8 (See Note I) (See Note I) line to aid reader
- 12. Enclosure Valid indication of RIA-46 of> 2.09 E+ 04 Va/id indication of RIA-46 of> 2.09 E+ 04 Editorial: moved cpm or RP sample reading of> 6.62 uCi/ml Xe cpm or RP sample reading of> 6.62 uCi/ml symbol "Xe" to next 4.3 133 eq for> 15 minutes. (See Note l) Xe 133 eq for> 15 minutt!S. (See Note l)
Alert I.A line to aid reader
- 13. Enclosure Valid reading on RIA 46 of> 2.09E+05 cpm or Valid reading on RIA 46 of> 2.09E+o5 cpm or Editorial: moved RIA 56 reading of> 17.5 R/hror RP sample RIA 56 reading of> 17.5 R/hr or RP sample symbol > to next 4.3 reading of6.62E+ol uCi/ml Xe 133 <'q for> reading of6.62E+Ol uCi/ml Xe 133 eq for SAE I.A 15 minutes (See Note 2) >15 minutes (See Note 2) line to aid reader
- 14. Enclosure Dose calculations result in a dose projection at Dose calculations result in a dose projection at Editorial: bold the site boundary of: the site boundary of: underline OR for 4.3
..".'\.-.:
. & l 00 mRem TEDE or 500 mRem CDE adult & l 00 mRem TEDE
;j) SAE 1.C thyroid OR emphasis 500 mRem CDE adult thvroid
- 15. Enclosure D. Field survey results indicate site bo11ndary D. Field survey results indicate site boundary dose Editorial: underline dose rates exceeding &100 mRad/hr expected to OR and correct 4.3 rates exct"Cding El 00 mRad/hr expected to continue for more than one hour SAE 1.D continue for more than one hour OR indent OR Analyses of field survey samples indicate adult Analyses of field survey samples indicate adult thyroid dose commitment of E 500 mRem thyroid dose commitment of E 500 mRem CDE (3.84 E-1 (Ci/ml) for one hour of CDE (3.84 E-1 rCi/ml) forone hour of inhalation inhalation
- 16. Enclosure Valid reading on RIA 46 of> 2.09E+06 cpm or Valid reading on RIA 46 of> 2.09E+o6 cpm or Editorial: moved RIA 56 reading of> 175 R/hr or RP sample RIA 56 reading of> 175 R/hr or RP sample symbol > 15 minutes 4.3 reading of6.62E+o2uCi/ml Xe 133 <'q for> 15 reading of 6.62E+o2uCi/ml Xe 133 <'q for GE I.A minutes (See Note 3) > 15 minutes (See Note 3) to next line to aid reader
- 17. Enclosure EOP directs feeding SG from SSF ASWP or EOP directs feeding SG from SSF ASWP or ASWP replaces 4.4 station ASWP station PSW Pump PSW as a result of a SAE2.C system modification
- 18. Enclosure AND AND Editorial: corrected 4.4 Manual trip from the Control Room was Manual trip from the Control Room was NOT formatting NOT succt!SSful in reducing reactor power to < 5%
GE I.A succt!SSful in reducing n.':lctor poW<'f to< and decreasing 5% AND and decn.=ing Average of the 5 highest CETCs e 1200° Fon AND ICCM Avt'r.lge of the 5 highest CETCs el200° F on lCCM
.
)
RP/O/ A/ l 000/00 l Revision 002 _ Change No. _ Page 5of5
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 19. Enclosure Restoration of power to at least one Rt."Storation of power to at ka.st one Editorial: corrected MFB within 4 hours is NOT likely MFB within 4 hours is NOT likely 4.5 formatting and OR OR GE I.A Indications of continuing Indications of continuing underline OR dt.-gradation of core cooling based degradation of core cooling based on Fission Product BarriL'T on Fission Product Barrier monitoring monitorine
- 20. Enclosure OPERATING MODE: All Editorial: added for 4.6 procedure Alert consistently prior to NOTE Page I of2
- 21. Enclosure OPERATING MODE: All Editorial: added for 4.6 procedure Alert consistently prior to NOTE Page 2 of2
- 22. Enclosure Repon/detection of flammable gases in Rt.-port/detection of tlammable gases in Editorial: corrected concentrations that will affect the safe concentrations that will affect the safe formatting (Bullets) 4.7 operation of the plant: operation of the plant:
Alert 2.B Reactor Building Reactor Building Page 2 of 3 Auxiliary Building Auxiliary Building Turbine Building Turbine Building '~ Control Room Control Room ~ 23. Enclosure AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: AND AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING; Plant control IS established from the Aux Editorial: removed 4.7 AND Plant control IS established from the Aux shutdown Panel or the SSF Alert4.A shutdown Panel or the SSF !IB Page 2 of3 OR Plant control IS BEING established from Plant control IS BEING established from the Aux Shutdown Panel or SSF the Aux Shutdown Panel or SSF
- 24. Enclosure 5. OTHER CONDITIONS EXIST WHICH Editorial: removed f, OT119C°'-""">>mmo.'\LU'f"HK!I WARRANT DECLARATION OF AN lines between 4 and 4.7 \T\JtlA..'Q'D<<LU.\llOf'l'Of '-"'
l:"o't'3t:dDrxT iaDll'J UNUSUAL EVENT (BO 88) UE under on.u n.'c °or. 5 & unbold All
"
4.8 &5.A OPERATING MODE: All under 5, correct
*"
~-- .......
~~c---..-e.i
~."--* .......
spelling of Warrant Page 3 of 3 A. Emergency Coordinator determines potential (missing the a) del!r.ldation of level of safety has occurred
- 25. Enclosure 3. OTHER CONDITIONS WRRANT 3. OTHER CONDITIONS WRRANT Editorial: consistent DECLARATION OF SITE AREA DECLARATION OF SITE AREA line under title 4.7 EMERGENCY !DD 98) EMERGENCY (BD 98)
UE3 Page 3 of3
- 26. Enclosure OR OR Editorial: corrected Potential for uncontrolled Potential for uncontrolled 4.7 indentations radionuclide releases that would radionuclide releases that would GE I.A result in a dose projection at the result in a dose projection at the Page 3 of 3 site boundary greater than I 000 mRt."111 site boundary greater than I000 mRL"lll TEOE or 5000 mRem COE Adult Thyroid TEOE or 5000 mRt.m COE Adult Thyroid
- 27. Enclosure l:.11 14. PIP 0-14-10064 and PIP 0-14-11470 Editorial: Added
- 15. PIP0-13-6662 4.13 PIPs from DocuTrack captured in Rev002
.)
[Type tex*tl APPENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Rev. 10) Page I of2 C8J Oconee 0 :\lcGuire 0 Catawba 181 Unit I 181 Unit 2 181 Unit 3 RP/O/A/1000/001, Emergency Classification, Revision 002 ACrIVITY ONS-2014-05916 TITLE/DOCU:\IENT/REVISION: PART 11- PROCESS REVIEW For each activity, address all of the questions below. If the answer Is "YES" for any portion of the activity, apply the Identified process(es) to that portion of the actlvltv. Note: It Is not unusual to have more than one orocess annlv to a 2lven actlvltv. Will implementation of the above activity require a change to the: I. Technical Specifications (TS) or ~ D If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227. Operating License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? D lfYES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
YES
- 3. Security Plans? D If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
YES (See Appendix H) D
~s
- 4. Emergency Plan? lfYES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual.
NO
~ D
- 5. lnservice Testing Program Plan? lfYES, process per site !ST Program for ASME code compliance and YES related facility changes.
,,.
lnservice Inspection Program Plan? ~ D If YES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping lnservice Inspection NO YES FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes.
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? D lfYES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
YES 7a -Utilize Appendix E to address Fire Protection Program Plan Impact.
¥1 Check to confirm use of Appendix E Screening Questions.
- 8. Regulatory Commitments? D lfYES, process per NSD 214.
YES
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
YES IO. Programs and manuals listed in the D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group. Administrative Section of the TS? YES
[Type text] Page 2 of2 PART Illa - 10 CFR 72.48 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address the question below. If the answer to question 11 ls "YES," and questions 14 and 17 are answered "NO", then process the activity per NSD 211 - 10 CFR 72.48 does apply.
- 11. Does the activity involve SSCs, procedures or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the !;; D YES loading or transport of the canister/cask to the ISFSI, the ISFSI facility, spent fuel cask design? NO PART lllb- 10 CFR 50.59 APPLICABILITY*
For each activity, address all or the questions below. If the answer to question 18 11 "YES," then 10 CFR 50.59 doe1 not apply. If the answer lo
- questions 18 Is "NO," then process the activity per NSD 209 - IO CFR 50.59 applies..
- 12. Does the activity involve a procedure, governed by NSD 703 that has been excluded from the I0 CFR ~ D YES 50.59 process per NSD 703 and the exclusion status remains valid? NO
- 13. Does the activity involve an administrative procedure governed by NSD I 00 or AD-DC-ALL-020 I that 1¥1 D YES does not contain information regarding the operation and control of Structures, Systems and NO Components?
- 14. Does the activity involve a type of Engineering Change that NSD 301 excludes from the 10 CFR 50.59 ~ D YES and/or I 0 CFR 72.48 Processes? Consult NSD 30 I for assistance. NO
- 15. Does the activity involve (a) maintenance activities that restore SSCs to their as-designed condition ~ D YES (including activities that implement approved design changes) or (b) temporary alterations supporting NO maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
- 16. Does the activity involve a UFSAR modification that NSD 220 excludes from the I 0 CFR 50.59 Process? ~ D YES Consult NSD 220 for assistance. NO
- 17. Docs the activity involve NRC and/or Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC approved changes to the licensing Ii D YES basis? NO
- 18. Are ALL aspects of the activity bounded by one or more "YES" answers to questions I through 17, D ~YES above? NO PART. IV- UFSAR REVIEW I Does the activity require a modification, deletion, or addition to the UFSAR to satisfy the UFSAR content [jJ DYES 9 requirements of 10 CFR 50.34 (b), 10 CFR 50.71 (e), or Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.70? Consult NSD 220 for NO Assistance.
IF YES, process per NSD 220. (Print (Sign) DATE Name) Applicability Determination Preparer 3 '
' .
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (ROS-10) Duke Energy PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD
~
y (l) lD No. RP/O/A/1000/001 Revision No. 002 _ Change No. Permanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Emergency Classification (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Pages 2-6, Enclosures 4.1 - 4.13 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination?
~ Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation.
D No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) Revision 002 of RP/O/N 1000/001 consists of the following changes:
- Many editorial changes made correcting grammatical corrections and other editorial issues.
- A clarification to the introduction note regarding the procedure is an implementing procedure for the E Plan and as such requires an effectiveness review under 50.54q for any changes and a cross disciplinary review.
- Safety Classification changes for several procedure references noted within the body of the procedure.
}).
'
*
- Procedure Reference Change: from NSD-202 to AD-LS-ALL-0006 (Notification I Reportability Evaluation)
PSW replaces the ASWP as a result of a system modification. (7) Reason for Change: See attached change matrix (8) Prepared By* Natalie Harness ...,..._~.p,..~,,-:=.+.....-->1;oc.=---- Date 11125/2014 (9) Reviewed By* ~O!i.£~~~...JJ.1Ud..!.J..1--J:...JL.1:!!!~""""-~l="""I""<& )(KI) Date /;J- f'-1 '(
' ~ t1" /2-9-t'f-
/Cross-Disciplinary Review By* ('3_R)(KI) NA~ate n;J c 1 '¥ Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA~ Date /~ 1¥ Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) NA~ Date ~ _, -t'(
(I 0) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* _________________________ Date _ _ _ __ Reviewed By* ~. Date ( 11) Approved By* -~~rS;:'(L___,_,__tf__µ___~f{------_fu_~____..-+....:--4-+'----f?,...c:;;...._-+-___,,___ f-Date _l_L-_{_(.P_l-r-t (
.
- Printed Name and Signature
.J '
3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/A/1000/001, Emergency Classification, Revision 002 Revision 002 of RP/O/ NI 000100 l consists of the following changes:
- Many editorial changes made correcting grammatical corrections and other editorial issues.
- A clarification to the introduction note regarding the procedure is an implementing procedure for the E Plan and as such requires an effectiveness review under 50.54q for any changes and a cross disciplinary review.
- Safety Classification changes for several procedure references noted within the body of the procedure.
- Procedure Reference Change: from NSD-202 to AD-LS-ALL-0006 (Notification I Reportability Evaluation)
- PSW replaces the ASWP as a result of a system modification.
Activity Scope: C8J The activity~ a change to the emergency plan D The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: :)i.~Q~~~ Change Type: *,:~~~~@~ij~~~TJl; ": D The change~ editorial or typographical D The change does conform to an activity that has prior approval C8J The change is not editorial or typographical ~ The change does not conform to an activity that has prior approval Planning Standard Impact Determination: D §50.47(b)(l)-Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) D §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization 0 §50.47(b)(3)- Emergency Response Support and Resources _}~ §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System* jtJ §50.47(b)(5)- Notification Methods and Procedures* D §50.47(b)(6)- Emergency Communications D §50.47(b)(7)- Public Education and Information D §50.47(b)(8)- Emergency Facility and Equipment D §50.47(b)(9)- Accident Assessment** D §50.47(b)(10)- Protective Response* D §50.47(b)(l l) - Radiological Exposure Control D §50.47(b)(l2) - Medical and Public Health Support D §50.47(b)(l3) - Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations D §50.47(b)(l4)- Drills and Exercises D §50.47(b)(l5)- Emergency Responder Training C8J §50.47(b)(l6) - Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards D The ro osed activit does not im act a Plannin Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
D The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment C8J The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: D The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation C8J The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation
-----------*
Preparer Name: Date:
'J.atalie Harness tJ A~--11 l/24/ 14 Jviewer Nam.-e-:- - - - -
- Date:
I Don Crowl
3.10 tOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.3 Effectiveness Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/A/1000/001, Emergency Classification, Revision 002 Revision 002 ofRP/O/NI000/001 consists of the following changes:
- Many editorial changes made correcting grammatical corrections and other editorial issues.
- A clarification to the introduction note regarding the procedure is an implementing procedure for the E Plan and as such requires an effectiveness review under 50.54q for any changes and a cross disciplinary review.
- Safety Classification changes for several procedure references noted within the body of the procedure.
- Procedure Reference Change: from NSD-202 to AD-LS-ALL-0006 (Notification I Reportability Evaluation)
- ASWP replaces PSW as a result of a system modification.
Activity Type: l:8J The activity~ a change to the emergency plan D The activity affects implementation of the emergency plan, but ~ a change to the emergency plan _,.,,,,,,,.,...........,.,.,,..,.,,,,,.. Impact and Licensing Basis Determination: Licensing Basis: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) states: A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effiuent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures. NUREG0654 Il.D, Emergency Classification System, A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures. ONS E Plan Section D states: RegGuide 1.101, Rev. 3, August, 1992, approved the guidance provided byNUMARC/NESP-007, evision 2, as an Alternative Methodology for the Development of Emergency Action Levels. Oconee Nuclear Site used the NUMARC idance for the development of initiating conditions and emergency action levels. The emergency action levels provided in this section ave been modified to implement the guidance provided in NRC Bulletin 2005-02, NEI guidance as endorsed in Regulatory Issue Summary 2006-12 and to support the implementation ofNEI 03-12. RG 1.219 lists the emergency planning function associated with IO CFR 50.47(b)(4): A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. 1OCFR50.47.b(16) Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained. NUREG 0654 P.7 states: Each plan shall contain as an appendix listing, by title, procedures required to implement the plan. The listing shall include the section(s)ofthe plan to be implemented by each procedure. ONS E Plan Section P. 7 states: Implementing Procedures. Written procedures will be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities associated with emergency plan implementation. Each procedure and changes thereto, shall be approved by the responsible manager prior to implementation. Implementing procedures are indexed and cross referenced to the section applicable in NUREG 0654. (Figure P-1) RG 1. 219 lists the (2) emergency planning functions associated with IO CFR 50.47(b)(l6) with 1 being impacted ( 1) Res onsibili for emer enc Ian develo ment and review is established
- ~
_;;}
Compliance Evaluation and
Conclusion:
BLOCK4~ Evaluation: . oes impact ONS EPlan Section D: The change from PSW to ASWP is a result ofa system modification. Appropriate changes were
** nade to ensure the EAL Technical Basis (Section D) remains correct and current with plant modifications. Therefore continued compliance with 10CFR50.47(b)4, 10CFR50 App. E.IV, and IOCFR50 Appendix E.IV.B.l is assured.
Conclusion:
The ro osed activi [8J does I D does not continue to com 1 with the re uirements. Reduction in Effectiveness (RIE) Evaluation and
Conclusion:
Change 1: Enhancement - Added the following note to ensure evaluation for a 10CFR50.54q effectiveness review. Change 2 & 5: Safety Classification change reference from B to A Change 3: Procedure Reference Change-NSDF-202 to AD-LS-ALL-0006 (Notification/Reportability Evaluation) Change 17: ASWP replaces PSW as a result of a system modification Change 4, 6-16, 18-27: Editorial clarifications for the reader Therefore as can be seen by the above evaluation the proposed changes do not reduce the effectiveness of the EPlan. D does I [8J does not constitute a RIE. Effectiveness Evaluation Results [8J The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior approval. D The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior approval.
-:~eparer Name:
- ~fatalie Harness Reviewer Name:
Don Crowl Approver Name: Pat Street Revision 12 ) '
'
3.10 IOCFR 50.5.t(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2
., EAL Change Review Form >thange Description and
References:
ONS E Plan Section DI RP/O/A/1000/001,
- BLOCK:.t"f~'
Emergency Classification . ,_,;xtI.A~~'.;;~}~;!~-} Revision 14-003 of the ONS E Plan and Revision 002 ofRP/O/A/1000/001 consists of the following changes:
- PSW pump replaces station ASW Pump as a result of a plant modification . . .. '"-. ,... ,~.:.-:- ..
Change Type: *~ BLOCK:lt11
' ' - - * -. * "*. :.,';!* *~ -
~ The change is considered a difference from the approved wording.
D The change is considered a deviation from the approved wording. .. ,..,. .. ,, ..,
\*,: .*~**~;* *: ... '." .
Change Verification: .BLOCK:J'
-" *~*-~* :._..:,;,,~-~ " ,.:-tz-,;~
0: ' ' Item I Yes I No I NIA j Resolution/Comments Inltlatinl! Condldon::* IC identification number is correct [81 D D Clid,,: here to enter text. Wording is consistent with the NRC approved IC [81 D D Click hl!rc to enter text.
...
EAL/ FPB:> *' EAUFPB identification number is correct [81 D D Click here to enter text. Wording is consistent with the NRC approved EAL/ FPB [81 D D Click here to enter text. Threshold values or conditions remain specific to ensure generic [81 D D Click here to enter text. criteria are not substituted reducing clarity and accuracy of the EAL. Sequencing/nesting logic format is correct [81 D D Click here to enter text.
*Jurce document inputs used for calculations and in thresholds are [81 D D Click here to enter text. '.-* rrect Site sgecific content wordingi'.tables/values are correct and sgecific: [81 D D Click here to t.:nter text.
- Operations procedures are consistent with the change
- Instrument/display number and noun name are provided
- Alarm setpoints are equal to or below EAUFPB values
- Radiation monitor values account for background
- Procedure references are correct The EAUFPB Matrix is legible and intuitively organized [81 D [81 Click here to enter text.
- . **. .. ".*. ,.,.;_.. ,._'
Mode Aoollcabilltyn':'* Operational mode alignment is consistent with the EAL licensing [81 D D Click here to enter text. basis Technical Bases-;c, ... Site specific bases is consistent with the EAL threshold [81 D D Click here to enter text. Bases for calculations and threshold values are consistent with the [81 D D Click here to enter text. technical bases approved by the NRC Source document inputs used for calculations and in thresholds are [81 D D Click here to enter text. correct Site specific bases remains accurate and consistent with the EAL r8J D D Click here to enter text. technical bases approved by the N RC Site specific bases has appropriate level of detail and is r8J D D Click here to enter text. unambiguous The change does not cause a change to the logic of the EAL scheme [81 D D Click here to enter text.
~i.e. gaps in classification thresholds)
- )ntlicts with the EAUFPB wording have not b\.-en introduced [81 D D Click here to enter text.
-
Revision 12 3.10 IOCFR 50.5..J(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area i\lanual Attachment 3.10.7.2
.. ~Aeferences
- Source document references are correct r8J D D Click here to enter text.
Source document reforcnces are current r8J D D Click here to enter text. Definitions, Wording is consistent with the license basis definitions approved by r8J D D Click here to enter text. the NRC for the EALs and EAL technical bases Other Manual Content: * ... Wording is consistent with the license basis definitions approved by r8J D D Click here to enter text. the NRC for the EALs and EAL tL"Chnical bases Change Validation: I*:_iiE,q~~~~ Methoch. ., D In-Plant Walkdown D Simulator [:gl Other (Specify) Mod package and EOP procedure changes D Training D Tabletop ON/A Item Yes No NIA Resolution/Comments EAL/ FPB.*;. . .
"
Information and/or values are available in all facilities where r8J D D Click here to enter text. classifications are required to be made
*~\9strumentation and comnuter noints are comnatible: D D r8J Click here to enter text.
- , Instrument/display designation matches
- Instrument/display units are correct
- Proper significant digits are indicated and within the accuracy capabilities of the instrument/display
- The instrument/display range is on scale for the threshold value
- Instrument/display provides separation for escalating values Conditions are easily recognizable and able to support declaration r8J D D Click here to enter text.
within 15 minutes. Information and/or values are easily obtained and able to support r8J D D Click here to enter text. declaration within 15 minutes The change does not introduce a time delay to classification r8J D D Click here to enter text. .. )
. '
Change Justification: BLOCKS/.* The change is a result of a modification to the station. The change from the station AS W Pump to the PSW pump enabled the station to not require a blow-down of the SG's in order to commence feeding to achieve
-~ shutdown cooling, as the PSW pump is a high discharge head pump. The installation and use of the PSW
- \,) pump provides a better margin of safety for the plant. The use of the PSW pump remains consistent with
"' the technical basis of the EAL (NUMARC - NESP-007, IC - SS4 - Complete Loss of Heat Removal Capability EAL 1 Loss of core cooling and heat sink (PWR). The EOP that previously referenced use of the station ASW pump has been modified to reflect use of the PSW pump. The basis provides, "This EAL addresses complete loss of functions, core cooling and heat sink, required for hot shutdown with the reactor at pressure and temperature. Under these conditions, there is an actual major failure of a system intended for protection of the public. Thus, declaration of a Site Area Emergency is warranted. Escalation to General Emergency would be via Abnormal Rad Levels/Radiological Effluent, Emergency Coordinator Judgment, or Fission Product Barrier Degradation ICs. Core exit thermocouple readings are considered to be the average of the five (5) highest thermocouple readings shown on the Inadequate Core Cooling Monitor. The SSF can provide the following: ( l) makeup to the Reactor Coolant pump seals, (2) low pressure service water to the steam generators (additional method for heat sink), (3) capability to keep the unit in hot shutdown for 72 hours following an Appendix R fire. This change is then in keeping true to the basis as currently written.
EAL Change Review Results:
~ The EAL change can be implemented without prior NRC approval.
D The EAL change cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval.
-*---------~-*--------*
D;~)q /~'-/ ---- Date:
- - - * - - !_r2_~ r-1.J!--
Ap~ver Name: oate: y~ Revision 12
)
Fonn 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR)
- ] (ROS-10)
Duke Energy (l)IDNo. RP/O/A/1000/001 PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 001 _ PREPARATION (2) Station --------""""""""'"""'=.:.:==~~==-=..=.:.:..::.::.::.=;....,___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (3) Procedure Title_ Emergency Classification (4) Prepared By* John Kaminski (Sigoature) _~=-.JA~~t/f£i,f:::__ _ _ _ Date 03/04/2014 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? t8T Yes (New procedure or revision with major c D No (Revision with minor changes) (6) Reviewed By* 4. ~ (QR)(KI) Date 'r~h~ I r Cross-Disciplinary Review B y * - - - - - - - - - - - -(QR)(KI) NA_!tt:.,Date 1tfu /,'t. Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) N~ate 1tf:iv~ Mgmt Involvement Review B y * - - - - - - - - - - - -(Ops. Supt.) N~te :~n~
~I (7) Additional Reviews ReviewedBy* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _...,....=::~,----------- Date ReviewedBy*_?T_ _ _-:-t-.:;;;---f--fa-='fjt-===---J-t--~.-=;ii:;:::::--- Date
.
])' (8) Approved By* -~~.&.M~.L.l~illJl=Z~~*~=~ttt=.:::+-~~=--- Date PERFORMANCE (Compan with control copy evdry
+lit/ff (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s)Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
WorkOrderNumber(WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit O D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
~
y
- Printed Name and Signature
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (ROS-10) Duke Energy PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/001 Revision No. 001 _ Change No. Pennanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Emergency Classification _ (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: _ (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination?
~Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation.
D No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, ifnecessary.)
- 1. Added Note to remind the Emergency Coordinator to refer to the fission product barrier matrix frequently.
y* (7) Reason for Change: Enhancements noted during drill (8) Prepar~ By* John Kaminski (Signature)1~~~'4-~~~~--- Date 03/04/2014 (9) Reviewed By* ~ ~. ~/ )(Kl) Date "f,b't/1'1 Cross-Disciplinary Review B~ (QR)(KI) NA~ Date .H k_ !JI( Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (QR) N~--Dare (Ops. Supt.) NA ~ate f41 k, /t.v (10) Additional Reviews ~/ Reviewed By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ __ Reviewed By* --------~~'f----+---=--.,...--*---r----Date _ _~....-- (11) Approved By* 'j1milJ(. }>.,, S~ Dare ffi,tf11-
"' Printed Name and Signature
)
[Type text] .77\APPENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION ev. 10
*YJ %!~~~~~~~~J.4~t~1~~~~~~~1.~~~:1i~~i~~~~f:t~~~1~~~~;f-i-11~~tJ~~~~:i~~1~iI&1~1!;hif~ir1~sr~1n~~~i~~~~~~~~~1~w~,.:ti*,~~irrjJJ~
i~[~t~~~tw.1~~~~r:~~t<~~~~m!~r.~~~~iAf~:iii~!~-~[r.t4lt~*~:A~~~~}~~i:~~~t£~1111f'.~~~~~w&~~~~~~1: DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC SITE UNIT(S) 181 Oconee 0 McCuln 0 Catawba 181 Unit I 181 Unll :Z 181 UnltJ Emergency Classification ACTIVITY TITLE/DOCUMENT/REVISION: RP/O/A/1000/001, REV 001 Will implementation of the above activity RqUire a change to the: I. Technical Specifications (TS) or Operating 181 D If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227. License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? 181 D If YES, seek assistance from lndcpcndait Nuclear Oversight.
NO YES
- 3. Security Plans? 181 D If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
NO YES (See Appendix H)
- 4. Emergency Plan? D 181 If YES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area NO YES Manual.
- s. Inservice Testing Program Plan? 181 D If YES, proc:css per site IST Program for ASME code NO YES compliance and related facility changes.
- 6. lnservice Inspection Program Plan? 181 D lfYES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping lnscrvice NO YES Inspection FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes.
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? 181 D If YES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
NO YES 7a -Utilm Appendix E to address Fire D Check to confirm use of Appendix E Scn:ening Questions. Protection Program Plan Impact.
- 8. Regulatory ConunibJlents? 181 D If YES, proc:css per NSD 214.
NO YES
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? 181 D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affilin group.
NO YES
- 10. Programs and manuals listed in the 181 D If YES, contact the Regulatory Aft'ain group.
Administrative Section of the TS? NO YES
~*o:\
y
[Type text]
- 11. Docs the activity involve SSCs, proc:edura or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the loading or 181 0 transport of the canister/cask to the ISFS[. the ISFSI facility, spent fuel cask design? NO YES
- 12. Docs the activity involve a procedure, governed by NSD 703 that has been excluded from the l 0 CFR S0.59 181 D process per NSD 703 and the exclusion status mnains valid?* NO YES
- 13. Does the activity involve an administrative procedure governed by NSD l 00 or AD-DC-ALL-020 I that does 181 0 not contain infonnatlon regarding the operation and conttol of Structures, Systems and Components? NO YES
- 14. Does the activity involve a type of Engineering Change thel NSD 30 l excludes from the I 0 CFR S0.59 181 0 and/or 10 CFR 72.48 Processes? Consult NSD 301 for assistance. NO YES IS. Does the activity involve (a) maintenance activities that restore SSCs to their as-designed condition 181 0 (including activities that implement approved design changes) or (b) temporary alterations supporting NO YES maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
- 16. Does the activity involve a UFSAR modification that NSD 220 excludes from the I0 CFR S0.59 Process? 181 0 0 Consult NSD 220 for assistance.... NO YES
- 17. Does the activity involve NRC and/or Duke Enefi)' Carolinas; LLC approved changes to the licensing basis? 18[ D NO YES
- 18. Are ALL aspects of the activity bounded by one or more "YES" answers to questions l through 17; above? D 181 NO YES
- 19. Does the activity require a modification, deletion, or addition to the UFSAR to satisfy the UFSAR content 181 D requimnents of 10 CFR S0.34 (b), l 0 CFR 50.71 (e), or Regulatory Guide (RG) 1. 70? Consult NSD 220 for NO YES Assistance.
IF YES, proc:css per NSD 220. (Print Name) (Sign) Applicability Detamination Preparer
3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluadons Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2 ) '
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
Emergency Classification, RP/O/A/1000/001 rev 001 See attached sheet for all changes pertaining to this procedure. Activity Scope: 181 The activity i! a change to the emergency plan 0 The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: Change Type: 0 The change i! editorial or typographical 0 The change does conform to an activity that has 181 The change is not editorial or typographical prior approval 181 The change does not conform to an activity that has prior approval Planning Standard Impact Determination: 0 §50.4 7(b)(1) - Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) 0 §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization 0 §50.47(b)(3)- Emergency Response Support and Resources 181 §50.47(b)(4)-Emergency Classification System* 0 §50.47(b)(S)- Notification Methods and Procedures* 0 §50.47(b)(6) - Emergency Communications 0 §50.47(b)(7)- Public Education and Information J 0 §50.47(b)(8)- Emergency Facility and Equipment 0 §50.47(b)(9)- Accident Assessment* 0 §S0.47(b)(10) - Protective Response* 0 §50.47(b)(l 1) -Radiological.Exposure Control 0 §50.47(b)(l2)- Medical and Public Health Support 0 §50.47(b)(l3)- Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 0 §50.47(b)(l4}- Drills and Exercises 0 §50.47(b)(l5}-Emergency Responder Training 0 §50.47(b)(l6}- Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards Standard The activity does involve a site specific EP co!Dllritment Record the conunitment or conunitment reference: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
C8l The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: 0 The activity~ be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation
~ The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation Preparer Name: Prep Sin;*tna~llfO' John Kaminski Revision 12
COnchislon: .* Tho proposCd activity D m /18[cioel rtot constitute a Rm* _)
Effectiveness Evaluation Results 181 The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of §S0.47(b) and §SO Appendix E and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity gn be implemented without prior approval. 0 The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of §S0.47(b) and §SO Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior approval. Preparer Name: John Kaminski Reviewer Name: Don Crowl Approver Name: Pat Street Revision 12
Attachment to SO.S4q Eme1"2encv Classification RP/O/A/1000/001rev001 Chanae Step number/ Current Wording Proposed Wording Reason For Chanae I# paae number I Enclosure 4.1 NA (New) Referencing this matrix frequently will Enhancement to assist the aid in determining a fission product barrier Emel'ICl1cy Coordinator in the Note failure or other upgrade critaia. identification of emergency classifications. 2 Enclosure NA (New) NOTE: These readings may also be Enhancement to assist the 4.3.2.B.a indicative of Fission Product Barrier concerns Emergency Coordinator in the which makes a review of the Fission Product identification of emergency Barrier Matrix necessary classifications. ?\ J
) '
Appendix C. 228. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Rev. 8) I Page I orl . ) PART I -ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC SITE UNIT(S) IZI Oconee 0 McGuire 0 Catawba 181 Unit I [81 Unit 2 !ZI Unit J f\V I,£ ACTIVITY TITLFJDOCUMENT/REVISION: Emergency Classification. revision 31 2.PJo/~ )1uoo/ oo/ PART 11- PROCESS REVIEW o m1'ls10"" V"' For each activity, address all of the questions below. lflhe answer Is ..YES" ror any portion of the activity, apply the identified ~ orocess(es} to that oorlion or the actlvltv. Note: It is not unusual to have more than one nrocess annlv to 11 ~iven activity. Will implementation of the above activity require a change to the: I. Technical Specifications (TS) or 181 NO DYES. If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227. Operating License?
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? f81 NO DYES If YES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
- 3. Security Plans? 181 NO DYES If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
(See Appendix H)
- 4. Emergency Plan? D NO 181 YES If YES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual.
- s. lnservice Testing Program Plan? 181 NO 0 YES lfYES, process per site IST Program for ASME code compliance and related facility changes.
- 6. Jnservice Inspection Program Plan? IZI NO DYES lfYES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping lnservice Inspection FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes.
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? 181 NO DYES If YES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
~ ]) . 7a- Utilize Appendix E to address Fire Protection Program Plan DYES Check to continn use of Appendix E Screening Questions.
Impact.
- 8. Regulatory Commitments? 181 NO DYES If YES, process per NSD 214.
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? r8J NO DYES If YES, contact the Regulatory Compliance Group.
- 10. Programs and manuals listed in the 181 NO DYES If YES, contact the Regulatory Compliance Group.
Adm inisrrative Section of the TS? 0\
. _j)
3.10 JOCFR S0.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3. I0.7 .2 T2. PI o/a //lX:o /001 av. 3~ & Cl~i/Jc14:h;,.,, q,l~/1<10 . -
/'('Jf>t.?,NlC;:J
).
. EAL l.;hange RcView 'Form
/YI *U 10'1 """
Change Description and
References:
I BLOCK.l
...VlN!r'L Revised the emergency classification procedure enclosure 4.3 to add threshold values for unit vent .
sampling as a compensatory measure. Unit vent sampling is performed on the 6th Door auxiliary building at sampllna equipment where manual grab samples are retriend per HP/0/B/I000/060-D. Additionally, the use or RIA 56 was added as a compensatory measure for site area emergency and general emergency classifications. This change allows for classification of gaseous radiological releases in the event of a loss or either RIA-45 or 46. This chance only clarifies the values to be used in the event normal monitoring is not available*
.
Change Type: j;}.~BL~~K 2 .. 1:81 The change is considered a difference from the approved wording. 0 The chanRe is considered a deviation from the aooroved wording. Change Verification: I BLOCK3 Item I Yes I No I I N/A Resolution/Comments lnitlatlne Condition JC identification number is correct 181 D 0 Click here to enter text. Wording is consistent with the NRC approved JC D 181 D Site specific inst111mentation is
"":'.
reforenc(d; however: the
~
- -
values used are consistent with NRC approved IC. EAL/FPB EAUFPB Identification number is correct D D 181 Click here lo enter text. Wording is consistent with the NRC approved EAL I FPB D 181 D Site specific instrwncntation is referenced; however, the values used are consistent with NRC approved IC .. Threshold values or conditions remain specific to ensure generic 181 0 0 Click here to enter text. criteria an: not substituted reducing clarity and accuracy of the EAL. Sequencing/nesting logic fonnat is correct 181 0 0 Click here to enter text. Source document inputs used for calculations and in thresholds arc 181 0 0 Click her( to enter text. c:orrcc:t Si!l:i :in"ific cgnieo1 ~grdiol!llab!S!lvalue5 are !i9!ESI !!!ld 5t:l~ili!ii 181 0 0 Click here lo enter teKt.
- Operations procedures are consistent with the change
- Instrument/display number and noun name are provided
- Alann setpoints arc equal to or below EAUFPB values
- Radiation monilor values account for background
- Procedure references are correct
"' --*;::
The EAIJFPB Matrix is legible and Intuitively organized 181 0 0 Click here to enter text.
' -~I
( Fonn 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (ROB-10) Duke Energy (l)IDNo. RP/O/B/1000/001
\ PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. oa1"03;2 d,k..
)
;.,
SUPERSEDED PREPARATION (2) Station ---------'O=C=O=N:..;.;E=E==-i..:N=U=Cc:.=L=E::..::A=R:..::S=T..:..:A=Tl..:..:O~N..:..-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (3) Procedure Title __..........---................._C=las=s....i"""fi""'ca=t=io__n____ (4) Prepared By4' Don Crowl (Signature)_.'..:.pA~~~---------Date 3/04/13 (S) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Detennination? es (New procedure or revision with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. o (Revision with minor changes) ({6) v1ewedBy*"'2'*"1 ~~\.ui~ (QR)(KI) Date 3-t6-\3 ~~ Cross-Disciplinary Review By4' (QR)(KI) N~Date 'i-le,-,~ ~ Reactivity Mgmt Review Br* (QR) NA~Date 3=ta-t~ Mgmt Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) N~ate ~-U?J-L3 (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Reviewed By* --;.;;---ir:;:::;-:-:---rt-r..;t::;~-;--;::;i:;;:;;r. ---- Date 9 J (8) Approved By* 'f~~ $'(~. Date * ;,Jsfl'? PERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy 'DY U calendar di.. r .....-......- work Is being perforlMd.) (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s) Perfonned _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number (WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification:
-0 Unit 0 *D Unit 1* *D Unit 2 -0.Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? .
D Yes 0 NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes DNA Required enclosures attached? 0 Yes 0 NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? 0 Yes 0 NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes 0 NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date ( 13) Remarks (.Attach additional pages, if necessary) y~
- Printed Name and Signature
fe:MeA(fflC.J cl~ Jt.:~) '"l,P I0 IB} JMO} OD\ rev- ~~ Attachment 3.10.7.2
,},;_ -L. ~
0.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form ~~Jr+;.}It -~-1fD -i ....,)d-\\4 j Activity Description and
References:
- Bffsi~~1t111tt11tiealtiOlri1m'ln-tlhe-!Fec~ic*:at-"Yr- -enc!i@K~l:.-:- I Suppert Ceater, RP-/Otll/1000/0ISB rew 17S11pe1seded"¥1/Jlaf 7'c 'ti * :~ -~"XE.-:*:.~.-.:.~.<f:~_'\t_:_'~.*.:s~.r :*
Activity Description;
- I) To align our E-Plan Implementing Procedures with NSD703 permanent technical procedure requirements as detennined by PIP 0-12-1590, ONS Emergency Planning will revise the procedure titles (as procedure revisions become necessary) to incorporate the Safety Classification to "A" instead of" B".
Reason for Change: I) NSD 703.5.1, Permanent technical procedlll'Cs are used to direct station activities during operating, testing, refueling, maintenance, and modifications. These procedlll'Cs provide guidance for activities that are of a repetitive nature, or when conditions requiring the procedure may occur in the future and the procedure is essential if the situation occurs. Pennanent technical procedures ere designated in the procedure number as follows: Procedure Type Abbreviation Emergency Response Procep~~ RP . RP/O/B/1000/001 revision ~Win be superseded and replaced with RP/O/Nl000/001 rev o This will not reduce the effectiveness of the E-Plan. Activity Scope: 8ioc1'2 121 The activity .ii a change to the emergency plan JJ 0 The activity iiJlQt a change to the emergency plan Change Type: BLOCK 3* Change Type: utoc*K 4
~ The change is editorial or typographical 0 The change~ confonn to an activity that has 0 The change is not editorial or typographical prior approval 0 The change does not conform to an activity that has prior approval y . ,
,.
(R08-IO) Duke Energy (l)IDNo. RP/O/B/1000/001_ PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 030 9PREPARATION (2) Station OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title Emergency Classification (4) Prepared By* Scott Boggs _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date 05129112 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Detennination? r;a" Yes cNew procedure or revision with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation Cl-- -@-No (Revision with minor changes) 1/()./:(~) ReviewedB~* ~~~~;;- " (QR)(KI) Date c.r. .i'i-/l..
.
Ool\t.. '11 Cross-Disciplinary Review By* (QRXKl)N.A,ta.J Date &-.J.'i -r.L .t,M.dt. Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR)NA ~ Date :s--~'1-r.1. Mgmt Involvement Review By* (Ops Supt) NA@LDate 6"-..l'i-t:L. (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Reviewed By* --:::=----,-....-=---4+-...,-~l----r-r--#t"'i'==;====-- Date
*5)(8) Approved By* Date
*~PERFORMANCE e wo'k l.s being pl!lformed.)
(9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s) Perfonned _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number(WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION (11) Procedure Completion Verification: 0 Yes 0 NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed. signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? 0 Yes DNA Required enclosures attached? 0 Yes 0 NA Charts, graphs, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? 0 Yes 0 NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced in this procedure? 0 Yes 0 NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion A p p r o v e d * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date
- Printed Name and Signature (13) Remarks (Attach addltlonalpaga, lfnecessary)
~* APPENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION Page I of2 ) DUKE ENERG\' CAROLINAS, LLC SITE PART I-ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION I - UNIT(S) 181 Oconee 0 McGuire 0 Catawbti I ra"Unll I lil'1inil l ~aill
. RP/O/B/1000/001 "Emergency Classfication" YP,i/. .3 0 ACTIVITY TITLEIOOCUMENT/R£VISION:
tr 1/a.po o 111.=./lw
~ .,l,ll/UL ro.1 I
PART 11- PROCESS REVIEW For each activity, address all of the questions below. If the answer is "YES" for .ny portion orthe adivity, apply the Identified nroc:~es) to that nordoa or the adivitv. Nott: It Is not unusual to have more than one nroecss ennlv to a lliven adivitv. Will lmplemcntllion oflhe above a:tivily requin: 1 c:hangc to the: I. Technical Specifications (TS) or Operating 181 0 If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227. License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? 181 0 If YES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
NO YES
- 3. Security Plans? . l8l 0 If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
(See Appendix H) NO YES
- 4. Emergency Plan? D 181 lfYES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area NO YES Manual.
- s. lnscrvice Testing Program Plan? 181 0 If YES, process per site IST Program for ASME code NO YES compliance and related facility changes.
- 6. lnservice Inspection Program Plan? 181 0 If YES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping lnscrvicc
' NO YES Inspection FAM for ASME code compliance and related fucility or proa:durc changes.
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? 181 D If YES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
NO YES 7a -Utilize Appendix E to address Fire 0 Check to confinn use of Appendix E Screening Questions. Protection Program Plan Impact
- 8. Regulatory Commitments? 181 0 If YES, process perNSD 214.
NO YES
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? 181 D If YES, contact ~e Regulatory Compliance group.
NO YES
- 10. Programs and manuals listed in the 181 0 If YES, contact the Regulatory Compliance &J'OUp.
Administrative Section of the TS? NO YES P11elol2 PART Illa - 10 CFR 72.48 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address the question below. If the 1nswer to question I I ls "YES." ind questions 12, 14 and 17 are answered "NO", then proc:ns the activity per NSl> 2l l
- 10 CFR 72.48 don *pply.
*-11.--*----------*--.*--*-*** *---*
Docs the activity involve SSCs, procedures or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the loading or 181 0 transport of the canister/cask to the ISFSI, the ISFSI facility, spent fuel cask design? NO YES J .
- --~-
Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual 3.10 lOCFR SO.S4(q) Evaluations Attachment 3.10.6.2
§50.54(q) S~reening Evaluation Form
*~,~--~~~~~~~~~
~J Activity Description and
References:
Click here to enter text. Revised procedure RP/O/B/I 000/001 "Emergency Classification" so that definitions of "Site Area Emergency" and General Emergency" align with those definitions of the same in the EP Rule making scheme as directed by the NRC and defined in RIS 2006-12.
Reference:
RIS 2006-12 1OCFRSO and 52 NRC Order EA-02-026 Bulletin 2005-02 NEI 03-l2
;**~23:
Activity Scope: *---* -- -- I 181 The activity .i! a change to the emergency plan 0 The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: l -* - Change Type: 0 The change is editorial or typographical 181 The change does confonn to an activity that has 181 The change is not editorial or typographical prior approval 0 The change does not confonn to an activity that has prior approval
~ Planning Standard Impact Determination: r~~-1
.. - .
_'. ~*'. 0 §S0.47(b)(l)-Assignment of Responsibility (Organimion Control) D §S0.47(b)(2)-0nsite Emergency Organi7Jltion
§S0.47(b)(3)- Emergency Response Support and Resources Cf:. §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System*
1d-l1' t D §50.47(b)(5) -Notification Methods and Procedures* 1
- 1 0 §S0.47(bX6)- Emergency Communications 1
)I\' rrtJ 0 §S0.47(bX7)- Public Education and lnfonnation ~ R)IJP- 0 §S0.47(bX8)- Emergency Facility and Equipment 0 §S0.47(b)(9) -Acddent Assessment* 0 §S0.47(b)(10) - Protecdve Response* 0 §50.47(bX11)-Radiological Exposure Control 0 §S0.47(bXl2)- Medical and Public Health Support 0 §S0.47(bX13)-Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations D §S0.47(bXl4)-Drills and Exercises D §50.47(bXJS)-Emergency Responder Training D §S0.47(bX16)-Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
0 The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment Record the commitment or commitment reference:
------------~~---------
The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Revision 11 7
Duke Energy Oconee Nuclear Station ~
- ) Emergency Classification Revision No.
000 Electronic Reference No.
'
OP009A63 Reference Use PERFORMANCE I This Procedure was printed on 03/20/13 at 13:32:27 from the electronic library as: (ISSUED)
- PDF Format Compare with Control Copy every 14 calendar days while work is being perfonned.
Compared with Control Copy* _ _ _ _ _ _ ___.Date - - - - Compared with Control Cop)'* Date _ _ __ Compared with Control Copy* Date Date(s) Performed I Work Ordertrask Number (WO#) COMPLETION I 0 Ycs 0 NA Checklists and/or blanks initialed. signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? 0 Yes 0 NA Charts, graphs, data sheets. etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? O Ycs D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to Ibis procedure? [] Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date Procedure Completion Approved* Date
*Printed Namt! and SIImatur~
Remarks (attach additional pages, if necessary) Printed Date: *omono13* IMPORTANT: Do till[ mark on barcodes. EnclosureNo.: *PULL* 1111m 01111111111m1111110111m11H 111111111111111111 IllllW Ill mu~l 1111111111 hvlsioa No.: *ooo-1111m 111111111111~ 1111 ProccduN No.: *RP/O/A/1000/001' 111111~1111111111mrn1111111111111111111H um 11m 11111111111111111111im011
. ' '
Site specific bases has appropriate level of detail and is 181 D 0 Clarification only. unambiguous The change docs not cause a change to lhc logic of the EAL scheme 181 D 0 Clarification only.
**~... (i.e. gnps in classification thresholds)
_) Conflicts wilh the EAUFPB wording have not been introduced 0 181 0 Clarification only. Revision 12 3.10 IOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2 References NESP-007, rev. 2 181 0 0 Source document references are current w 0 0 . Definitions I c.r ...... 17;;.1 /Cf Oln tJJ/ufl ~ CAJi fu. Wording is consistent with the license basis definitions approved 181 0 0 Clarification only, by the NRC for the BALs and EAL technical bases changed wording to be consistent with NESP-007 rev. 2. Other Manual Content Wording is consistent with the license basis definitions approved 181 0 0
- Clarification only, by the NRC for the EALs and EAL technical bases changed wording to be consistent with NESP*
007 rev. 2
*).*,
'*
.*.*
Change Validation: BllID@Kf:4
*--
Method
-------- -*-*** *--
0 In-Plant Walkdown 0 Simulator 0 Other (Specify) 0 Training 0Tabletop ~NIA Item Yes No NIA Resolution/Com menu EAL/ FPB lnfonnation nnd/or values are available in all facilities where 181 0 D Control room and OAC classificalions en: required to be made values are available 1ns!llmmtu1iszo l!l!d '2ml!Ylm: Roioti a!!l ~2m12111i~*~; ~ D D All values are within the
- lnstnnncnt/display designation matches capabilities of existing
- Instrument/display units an: correct instrumentation.
- Proper significant digits en: indicated and within the accuracy capabilities oflhe instrument/display
- The instrumcntldisplay range is on scale for the threshold value
- Instrument/display provides separation for escalating values Conditions arc easily rccogni7.able and able to support declaration 181 0 D No changes made to within IS minutes.
values, only providing a more specific value. Information nnd/or values arc easily obtained end able to support 181 0 0 No changes made to declaration within IS minutes values, only providing a
*~
\ **, more specific value ..
*, . .' **,';
,.... ,.,, **'.
': ...: '
--~ *,_*_:.:. ~/~~ __.f,
RP /0/A/1000/003 Rev. 2 EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 8
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
Screening* and Evaluation Number,*'. *Applicable Sites .*. BNP 0 EREG #: G2G4aa4~ 2069325 Revised EREG to evaluate non Editorial Changes that were listed as Editorial. Changes to the CNS 0 EREG are annotated in Bold and Italic CR3 0 HNP 0 MNS 0 SAD#: 02045332 ONS x RNP D GO 0 Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/003 A Rev 2 EROS OPERATION Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): Changes clarifying the reporting requirements and activation requirements as stated in 10CFR50.72(4) ensuring users activate EROS within one hour after declaration of Alert, Site Area Emergency or General Emergenc~/. Changes made throughout the procedure to align with Procedure Writers Guide (PWG). Added a new step to coordinate with the NRC prior to staff turnovers to plan for loss of data while logging in/out of computers. Added the Change matrix below
# Page /Section Current Proposed Change
- 1. cover/page 1 Revision No. 001 Revision 002 body
-
- 2. Section 1 page An Alert, Site Area Emergency, or EROS shall be started within one hour if an emergency 2 General Emergency has been classification of Alert, Site Area Emergency or declared and EROS is required to General Emergency has been declared per lOCFR provide data to the NRC. ERDS is 50.72(4). Effort should be made to perform this to be started within one (1) hour action as soon as possible.
of the emergency declaration.
- 3. Note before EROS can only be activated using EROS can only be activated using the following the following business business workstations:
Step 2.1.2 workstations: TSC NRC 0 TSC NRC Communicator page 2 Communicator, TSC Operations, 0 TSC Operations Unit 1 Control Room SRO, Unit 2 0 Unit 1 Control Room SRO Control Room SRO, Unit 3 Control 0 Unit 2 Control Room SRO
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2 of 8
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
Room SRO, Process Computer 0 Unit 3 Control Room SRO Systems Unit 1 OAC Room or 0 Process Computer Systems Unit 1 OAC Room Process Computer Systems OOB 0 Process Computer Systems OOB Computer Computer Room. Room.
- 4. Step 2.1.2 If required refer to ... IF required, refer to ...
- 5. Step 2.1.3 Log onto the TSC NRC Log onto any authorized business workstations for Communicator Business (BUS) EROS activation using your normal network login id.
workstation or other authorized business workstations for EROS activation using your normal network login id.
- 6. Step 2.1.5 Examine the OAC time Examine the OAC time information on the right side of information on the right side of the display and verify that OAC Time is current time the display and verify that OAC and OAC Time Rate is NOT zero for each Unit to be Time is current time and OAC activated.
Time Rate is anything other than D Unit 1 zero (O) for each Unit to be activated. D Unit 2 D Unit I D Unit 3 D Unit 2 n Unit 3
- 7. Step 2.1.6 IF OAC time issues are IF AT ANYTIME EROS does NOT connect with the NRC experienced, THEN go to step after several minutes OR activation problems (Such as 2.1.9. OAC Time Issues) are experienced, perform the following:
D Notify the NRC using the ENS Phone Line. D Record the Date and Time of this notification. Date Time Initials
- 8. note before The Status Column can indicate The Status Column may indicate (in order) step 2.1.8 Connecting, Reconnecting, "Connecting", "Reconnecting", "Connected", "LINK Connected, LINK Sent, Waiting Sent", "Waiting for ACCEPT", "ACCEPT Received",
first bullet for ACCEPT, ACCEPT Received, "Waiting for INITIATE", or "Transmitting Data" in the Waiting for INITIATE and process of connecting. Some statuses may NOT be Transmitting Data. However, seen during actual connection due to response time some responses may not have and update of display. The Status "Transmitting Data" been seen during actual with Messages Sent incrementing indicates connection due to response time appropriate connectivity for communications.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 AITACHMENT 4 Page 3 of 8
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
and update of display. The Status of Transmitting Data with Messages Sent incrementing indicates appropriate connectivity for communications.
- 9. note before If the connection is lost for some If the connection was lost then regained, the status step 2.1.8 reason, the Status Column will column will cycle through the same status sequence display Connecting then as the initial connection.
third bullet Reconnecting, followed by Connected, LINK Sent, Waiting for ACCEPT, ACCEPT Received, Waiting for INITIATE and Transmitting Data.
- 10. VERIFY that the EROS Link Verify the following is indicated on the EROS Link Control and Status Display for Control and Status Display for each unit activated:
step 2.1.8 each Unit activated, indicates Unit Unit Current Mode = Connect, Status l 2.
=Transmitting Data and D D D Current Messages Sent= "Incrementing". Mode=
D Unit 1 Connect D D D Status= 0 Unit 2 Transmitt ing Data 0 Unit 3 D D D Messages Sent=
"Increme nting"
- 11. step 2.1.9 IF EROS does not connect with moved to step 2.1.6 the NRC after several minutes or activation problem experienced, THEN notify the NRC using the ENS Phone Line.
A. Record the Date and Time of this notification Date __ Time_ _ Initials__
- 12. 2.1.10 IF-instructed by the NRC to IF AT ANY TIME instructed by the NRC to restart ONS restart ONS EROS EROS communication, re-perform step 2.1.7 and step communication, 2.1.8 THEN re-perform steps 2.1.7 and 2.1.8
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 8
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
- 13. new 2.1.10 !f ERDS data will be interrupted (turnover, etc.),
coordinate with the NRC regional office to determined desired timing for interruption.
- 14. Step 3.1 IF required to return to your login IF required to return to your login screen, refer to screen Step 2.1.2, Step 2.1.3 and Step 2.1.4 for guidance.
THEN refer to Steps 2.1.2., 2.1.3 and 2.1.4 for guidance
- 15. Step 3.2.2 VERIFY that the EROS Link Verify the following is indicated on the EROS Link Control and Status Display for Control and Status Display for each unit activated:
each Unit activated, indicates Unit Unit Unit Current Mode = Disconnect, l 2 l Status= Disconnected and D D D Current Messages Sent= 0. Mode= D A. Unit 1 Disconne ct D B. Unit 2 D D D Status= Disconne D C. Unit 3 cted D D D Messages Sent= 0
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5 of 8
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes I0 No j X Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4 Evaluation is not , 10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Justification: Attachment 4, Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes 10 No I X Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Refer to attached Change Matrix: Evaluation is not Part IV and required. Enter address non Change 1; Editorial to change revision number justification and editorial Change 3; Editorial, reformatted step from paragraph format to bulleted items to complete changes make it easier to read. Attachment 4, Change 4; Editorial, Bold and capitalized Part V & VI. Change 8, 9; Editorial, Replaced bold terms with quotations in the order that would be received during activation of EROS, highlighting and capitalized NOT. Removed redundant wording in same NOTE box. Change 10, 15, Editorial, Reformatted step to aid in place-keeping status for each unit Change 12, Editorial, IFfTHEN changed to IF At Any Time to aid in place-keeping, aligns with the intent of the step to be performed if requested by the NRC at any point in the procedure. Change 14, Editorial, Deleted THEN to align with PWG still refers to applicable steps. Justification: The changes described above are defined as editorial in accordance with AD-EP-ALL-0602
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 6 of 8
<< 10 CFR 50.54( q) Screening Evaluation Form >>
Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box.
- 1. 1O CFR50:47(b)(1}Assignmentof Responsibility (Organization Control): * *.**
- 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. D 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan .
2 .10CFR50:47(b)(2)0hsiteEmergencyOtganizatiorn<'r** 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. D 3
- 1o*cFR;50'.47(b)(3) Emergency ResponseSupportandResources:;,1;'.0 ..* **..
- 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3) 4.. .10CFR50:47(b)(4)EmergencyClassificaticmSystem:"*: ..
4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. D (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)
,*,.
5 1o Cl:R so:47( o)(!>) Notification. Methods"andi Procedures;;::~,**: : :':c ' .*. * . -' -
**.:-.
.
Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification D of the declared emergency within 15 minutes {60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions D to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) 5c The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
--~l
' EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 AITACHMENT 4 Page 7 of 8
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 6 .. 10-CFR 50.47(b)(6) Emergency Communications* 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response x organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. x 7 10 CFR50.47(b)(7) Public Education and.Information<
?a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the 0 plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) ?b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. 0 8 . ** 1O CFR50A7(b)(8) Emergency*Facilities:and.Equipment*.: * ..
8a Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. 0 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. 0 9 1O:CFR'50:47(b)(9)Ac::cident*Assessmenb:r .* 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. x 1Q'.,: 10CFR50:47(b)(.10) ProtectiveResponse,.~_, * ~. ' 10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) 0 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that 0 chose to provide Kl to the public. 11 1O"CFR50A7(b){11) Radiological Exposure Control ,-_ 11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. 0 12 10 CFRSOA7(b)(12) Medical:and Public Health Support< 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D
- 13. 10. CFR 50.47(b)(13) Recovery Planning*andPost-accidentOperations;::
- 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. 0 14 10 CFR50047(b)(14) Drills and Exercises*.
14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, 0 and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. 0 15' 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) Emergency Response~ Training 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. 0
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 ,, EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 AITACHMENT 4 Page 8 of 8
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 16.' 10.CFR 50.47(b)(16) Emergency: Plan Maintenance**. 16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) x Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. PartV Signatures:,;* * *
- Preparer Name (Print): Eric White Preparer Signature: Date:
Reviewer Name (Print): Don Crowl Date: Approver (EP Manager Name (Print): Pat Street Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments.
- One for EP to provide the 1OCFR50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), D to Licensing.
- One for Licensing to submit the 1O CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change -
is put in effect. D QA RECORD
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 cFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 1 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
-*.
Screening and Evaluation Number'
- Applicable Sites*
BNP 0 EREG #: 02045341 2069325 Revised EREG to evaluate non Editorial Changes that were listed as Editorial. Revised sections IA W with AD-EP- CNS 0 ALL-0602. Changes to the EREG are annotated in Bold and Italic CR3 0 HNP 0 MNS 0 SAD#: 02045332 ONS x RNP 0 GO 0 Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/003 A Rev 2 EROS OPERATION
-
Part I. Description of Proposed Change: Changes clarifying the reporting requirements and activation requirements as stated in 10CFR50.72{4) ensuring users activate EROS within one hour after declaration of Alert, Site Area Emergency or General Emergency. Changes made throughout the procedure to align with Procedure Writers Guide (PWG). Added a new step to coordinate with the NRG prior to staff turnovers to plan for loss of data while logging in/out of computers Added the Change matrix below
# Page /Section Current Proposed Change
- 1. Section 1 page An Alert, Site Area Emergency, or EROS shall be started within one hour if an emergency 2 General Emergency has been classification of Alert, Site Area Emergency or declared and EROS is required to General Emergency has been declared per lOCFR provide data to the NRC. EROS is 50. 72(4). Effort should be made to perform this to be started within one (1) hour action as soon as possible.
of the emergency declaration.
- 2. Step 2.1.3 Log onto the TSC NRC Log onto any authorized business workstations for Communicator Business (BUS) EROS activation using your normal network login id.
workstation or other authorized business workstations for EROS activation using your normal network login id.
- 3. Step 2.1.5 Examine the OAC time Examine the OAC time information on the right side of information on the right side of the display and verify that OAC Time is current time the display and verify that OAC and OAC Time Rate is NOT zero for each Unit to be Time is current time and OAC activated.
Time Rate is anything other than D Unit 1 zero (0) for each Unit to be
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 Page 2 of 7
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
activated. D Unit 2 D Unit 1 D Unit2 D Unit 3 n Unit 3
- 4. Step 2.1.6 IF OAC time issues are IF AT ANY TIME EROS does NOT connect with the NRC experienced, THEN go to step after several minutes OR activation problems (Such as 2.1.9. OAC Time Issues) are experienced, perform the following:
D Notify the NRC using the ENS Phone Line. D Record the Date and Time of this notification. Date _ _ _ __ Time _ _ _ __ Initials
- 5. note before If the connection is lost for some If the connection was lost then regained, the status step 2.1.8 reason, the Status Column will column will cycle through the same status sequence display Connecting then as the initial connection.
third bullet Reconnecting, followed by Connected, LINK Sent, Waiting for ACCEPT, ACCEPT Received, Waiting fcir INITIATE and Transmitting Data.
- 6. step 2.1.9 1f EROS does not connect with moved to step 2.1.6 the NRC after several minutes or activation problem experienced, THEN notify the NRC using the ENS Phone Line.
A. Record the bate and Time of this notification Date __ Time_ _ Initials_ _
- 7. new 2.1.10 IF ERDS data will be interrupted (turnover, etc.),
coordinate with the NRC regional office to determined desired timing for interruption. , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes 0 Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form , is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No X Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change: ONS Emergency Plan 82-2 December 1981 F.1.c The Crisis Management organization has the responsibility to ask for federal response. However, communication to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, from the station, would be by use of the Red Phone (ENS) located in the Control Room, or either in the Technical Support Center.
-- EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 3 of 7
<< 1O CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form >>
ONS Emergency Plan 82-2 December 1981 1.5 Meteorological information will be available to nearest Crisis Management Center, the Technical Support Center, the Control Room through plant status reports and by direct telephone communication. Meteorological information will be available to the NRC through the automatic ring down phone and by direct telephone communications with the individual responsible for making offsite dose assessments either at the Technical Support Center or the Crisis Management Center. ONS Emergency Plan Revision 2015-007 November 2015 F.1.c, The EOF organization has the responsibility to ask for federal response. However, communication with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission from the emergency response facilities, would be by use of the Emergency Telecommunication System (ETS) located in the Control Room areas, Technical Support Center, or the Emergency Operations Facility. ONS Emergency Plan Revision 2015-002 March 2015 1.5, Meteorological information will be available to the Charlotte Emergency Operations Facility, the Technical Support Center, and the Control Room through the automated plant data system. Meteorological data averaged over a period of 15 minutes, will be available to the NRC through the ENS phone, by direct telephone communications with the individual responsible for making offsite dose assessments at the Emergency Operations Facility or through the NRC Emergency Response Data System RIS 2005-02, Clarifying the Process for Making Emergency Plan Changes, Rev. 1 states,
- 2) Emergency plan a) The document prepared and maintained by the licensee that identifies and describes the licensee's methods for maintaining emergency preparedness, and responding to emergencies. An emergency plan includes the plan as originally approved by the NRC, and all subsequent changes made by the licensee with, and without, prior NRC review and approval under 10 CFR 50.54(q).
i) The licensee's emergency plan consists of: (1) The emergency plan as approved by the NRC via a Safety Evaluation Report (SE), or license amendment (LA) from the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) or the Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME). (2) Any subsequent changes to the emergency plan explicitly reviewed by the NRC through an SE, or LA from NRR or FSME, and found to meet the applicable regulations. (3) Any subsequent changes made by the licensee without NRC review and approval after the licensee concluded that the change(s) do not constitute a decrease in effectiveness under 10 CFR 50.54(q). The differences in ONS Emergency Plan, Revision 82-2, and the current revision of the ONS Emergency Plan have been determined to meet the regulatory requirements of the course of revisions. Each revision has been evaluated in the regulatory process has met the approval of the NRC during the inspection process. This review concludes that changes described do not affect the licensing basis of the emergency plan, or result in a reduction in effectiveness.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 .
>---~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
~ev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 4 of 7
<< 10 CFR 50.54 q Effectiveness Evaluation Form >>
Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 1O CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, rather than under 10 CFR 50.54(q): The proposed changes to RPIOIA/1000/003A revision 2 are being made for clarification to the procedure. Each of the proposed changes listed above have been added to support timely activation of the Emergency Response Data System. These enhancements and clarifications provide additional assurance the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6) and (9) continue to be met with Revision 2 of RPIO/A/1000/003A. Additionally, the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.E are supported as a result of clarifying information to ensure the responsibilities and duties of EROS activation during an emergency are well defined. The proposed changes described above for the RP/OIA/1000/003A provide additional clarification and are overall enhancements to the procedure. The proposed changes continue to comply with 10CFR50.47(b) and 10CFR50 Appendix E. Sections.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 5of7
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen): 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6}--Emergency Communications states the following: Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. Two emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard: (1) Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response organizations. (2) Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. 10CFR50 Appendix E Vl.(9) d Emergency Response Data System Provisions for communications by the licensee with NRC Headquarters and the appropriate NRC Regional Office Operations Center from the nuclear power reactor control room, the onsite technical support center, and the emergency operations facility. Such communications shall be tested monthly. NUREG0654 F.1.c. Emergency Communications, states; provision for communications as needed with Federal emergency response organizations 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9}--Emergency Assessment Capability states the following: Adequate methods, systems, and equipment for assessing and monitoring actual or potential offsite consequences of a radiological emergency condition are in use. The following emergency planning function has been defined for this planning standard: (1) Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. 1OCFR50 Appendix E VI. Emergency Response Data System Establishes the requirements pertaining to EROS, points required to transmit, transmit frequency ; maintaining and testing the system. NUREG 0654 1.5 Accident Assessment, states in part ... There shall be provisions for access to meteorological information by at least the nearsite Emergency Operations Facility, the Technical Support Center, the Control Room and an offsite NRC center... 10CFR50.72(4). "The licensee shall activate the Emergency Response Data System (EROS) as soon as possible but not later than one hour after declaring an Emergency Class of alert, site area emergency, or general emergency
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
~ev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 6 of 7
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: Content of the procedure remains the same, The revisions do not change the intent of the procedure to establish communication with the NRC for the transmission of data which will be used for emergency assessment. Revision improves clarity to ensure activation of EROS per 10CFR50.72(4). The proposed changes in Revision 2 of RPIO/A/1000/003A, ERDS Operation do not reduce the effectiveness of the Oconee Emergency Plan. Instead, these changes continue to provide additional assurance that the Oconee Emergency Response Organization has the ability and capability to:
- respond to an emergency;
- perform functions in a timely manner;
- effectively identify and take measures to ensure protection of the public health and safety; and
- effectively use response equipment and emergency response procedures*
The proposed changes in Revision 2 of RP/OIA/1000/003A enhance ERO readiness to support a classified emergency, resulting in an improved capability to ensure health and safety of plant personnel and the general public. These changes continue to meet NRC requirements, as described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E and are an overall improvement to the ONS Emergency Preparedness Program as described in the Oconee Emergency Plan.
. .
'* ... ;.* *,..: *,.**: ' . ... .. - ..
Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? YesX NoD 2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no YesX NoD reduction in effectiveness)? 3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? YesX No D 4 Choose one of the following conclusions: a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRC x approval. b The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. D Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval. Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or rejected? I Yes D I No D If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 1O CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
~FFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 7 of 7
<< 10 CFR 50.54 q Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b}(4). Preparer Name (Print):Eric White Date: Reviewer Name (Print):Don Crowl Date: Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Pat Street Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments.
- One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), 0 to Licensing.
- One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. 0 QA RECORD
RP/O/A/1000/003 Rev. 2 Original approved on 7-25-16
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
-~----~~~~~~~~~~~~----i EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 "":\ _y ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
,*:'*.
.*, ... . '."'*,
Screening and* Evaluation.Number.; .
- ApplicableSites :,
- BNP D EREG #: 02045341 CNS D CR3 D HNP D MNS D 5AD#: 02045332 ONS x RNP D GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/003 A Rev 2 EROS OPERATION
. --
'J< _. !'
* * ; i ., :-,
,,;/ .. _..*: ...
.;'
i* '\'.,,, ',
;*
>:r: ,.,,..
"
; )}]'-*.'
'*. '*
',. '. ~ :.
/ "
Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): ) Changes clarifying the reporting requirements and activation requirements as stated in 1OCFR50.72{4) ensuring users activate EROS within one hour after declaration of Alert, Site Area Emergency or General Emergency. Changes made throughout the procedure to align with Procedure Writers Guide (PWG). Added a new step to coordinate with the NRC prior to staff turnovers to plan for loss of data while logging in/out of computers.
. ,,
< .... " .
' '."*~ .. . ,_.,.
** ... " ;
. '.
- .
,, , .*. "
Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes 10 No x Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 1O CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4 Evaluation is not I 10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Justification: Attachment 4, Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) D
-
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR50.54(Q) Rev. 1 } .
'
ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Refer to attached Change Matrix: Evaluation is not Part IV and required. Enter address non Change 1; Editorial to change revision number justification and editorial Change 2; Changed to clarify that EROS is not a conditional step but is required complete changes to start within one hour following the declaration of Alert, Site Area Emergency Attachment 4, or General Emergency per 10CFR50.72(4) [PRR 02040624] Part V & VI. Change 3; Editorial, reformatted step from paragraph format to bulleted items to make it easier to read. Change 4; Editorial, Bold and capitalized Change 5; Editorial, removed extra reference to TSC workstation which is included in 'authorized business workstation' Change 6; Editorial, changed from anything other than zero to 'NOT' zero for clarity. Change 8, 9; Editorial, Replaced bold terms with quotations in the order that would be received during activation of EROS, highlighting and capitalized NOT. Removed redundant wording in same NOTE box. Change 10, 15, Editorial, Reformatted step to aid in placekeeping status for each unit Change 12, Editorial, IFrrHEN changed to IF At Any Time to aid in placekeeping, aligns with the intent of the step to be performed if requested by the NRC at any point in the procedure. Change 14, Editorial, Deleted THEN to align with PWG still refers to applicable steps. Non-Editorial Changes; Change 7, 11 moved step 2.1.9 to new step 2.1.6 and made it an 'If at any time' statement that establishes the contingency to contact the NRC if EROS fails to connect or has activation issues. Actions are the same but the branching is eliminated. Change 13, New step to ensure the NRC is aware of any potential brief loss in communication due to personnel turning over and logging in/out of computers. Justification: Content of the procedure remains the same, The revisions do not change the intent of the procedure to establish communication with the NRC for the transmission of data to be used for emergency assessment. Revision removes the potential for reading the step to activate EROS as conditional and reinforces the requirement to activate per 10CFR50.72{4).
-~
.Y
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box.
*.1;**:** 1:,1Q *.c~gisot41(t))<Jf/\~~i9n*rn~nfot:RespC>n~it>iiitv.t9r9anii~titin*;:c9nWd1>:;~1;:':'~;;_:,*Ev::::*:~:::~;* .. r}"',i:i\~>':*;'.:~fi:'~\>:,::.c :>**f:*f:;,:>
1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. D 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan .
. 2 i:: _:-.1 o[cp,~J;qi4r_<?>"P~~Jt~~i;mer9~n~Y.: 9fiQ~nizatib~:~~.cYi-P;_,j:,;;;;:*i:,~**;::r<~.J~~'.~;;;1*;,;,*:*~\,i:. ;,~*;; ;*:\.*,:£;,'.:Y,1::::~:,* ~::s1/:;1; :{);;t~:'.(.. (;. "':. **
- 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. D
. 3:;E:: ;.* *19:9.~Rc:9.Q:tt:i~~><<~>;~fo~r9~n~y:R~~P~!is~~*sµpgqrt:'andfR~~9\Jrc~~,~*::1-::'.<i'.i~:;;:~:;;N2~r*/*;::,i:~Jg.,,,.,\ft:~'.;.(;;\:f,J;t~fi1:.::*;;zr~:+;:*;;tf'<}t' 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3)
,;~+,'. t:.1'Q;'c~R.:~o~~i(Rl(41Lt=M:ei'g.~QcY'.G1~~sific~tfon:$Ysterri~,:;::;~~,.{.);._r;;,,'.:~F~.;:::;ri'(',,;'_;~L'.t};~J:;:'A'~j: "'*::,.U'i:Wr::\* .**:*':-**/.'.i'::::**.*/i~. . *:. ;.>;.*:.*.
4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. D (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)
.~* s,i!:; '.:.1q~9E ~:§qi;1'7{t?><$),*Natiflc~ti~H &tetlJodsianC:frRrdfaf<;tlii-~s!f:~~:J%,/::i~c ;:'.(?i";£t~f',~; ;*.~~;;,:/.'\ f:t~ti:~:.';r~. -~r,;\\i{;~*';::(: ~;:::'.\~: . **..,~;1:\ 1*
5a Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification D of the declared emergency within 15 minutes {60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. 5b Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions D to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) 5c The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3) ).
.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
*
- ai* ***** {19~¢E.R,*5Q,47(6)(er ~tn,~rg~hcy:$!:>1nrl;ttiri i9 a~i(ih~::,:::f: .. *.,Y ;;;rr.*\'.;t*;i>t::\'1'" **s, *: "?.',;: *.u'c)~.x. t,:.;*;'.;', ::~~,y,:p*.c;z::*;,:.**:.~;., \
1
/*.*
6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response X organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. X T ..* r ,~~1 qt~Fk:s6:4 t(b )<r>'P~~11c .* E9p2~~i~fr~~ria:1 ~torfria~i6,n>');1/t;,:;~;.:;,:1f;~;r .:*:):: :\:I\;.>>;:':;:.;,> ~.~:;:l**.*.;*:) ;: \;'f:;* A:;;:~;,.;: 1 :2,. ,,:"': . ~~~:
?a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D . .a'i~)* \i1 p.'.¢EJ~"§.q:~:trn>>cs>:$hier91i!ncy,: f~9il iti~~;cif}~:.Eqil.IRrtie,nt~f:;~?:t;*~r;~:.*;~~V;~*;,f :~;~'.~?J~~r :);4**, ~f>**;\~'.Wi*~'.;.s~:';t,;;};:;f1ffo:;;r~~;\:it~
Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. D 9.:t: :. l.19*¢E:R':$o~4i<b l(~}A¢pld~ht~A~~9,s~ro*~~tfs,,:,~3)'f::)~'.; i'?'.;'ii:~i~~/~:~it!'i~t:v,}~i*~,f:~:;j;::~'.~;;;:~:::0:~\~~ ,;::Y~i;fr;::!;~§i !}: ~'***,:; :, 0 ~, :'* *::
- r<'.. ',*:::;:,k 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. X
*'10;2:,,* >.1::9'(¢ ff~::,~Q,~'l(b >< i.q.) *~rot~c\ly~(R~s~~n~~;:~::;/1i.,t f 1 ,,,.,."'. ,*.*:*>~~1f:*:,~:;;,;im~;:i'."'*:::;:!::**;~};i~*~>k:!..'~~hf:j~;f~(i1kn:~:*'(iftc,,;:,r;;~9::.;h~*
1Oa A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 1Ob Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 1Oc A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public .
.*11'.' i:,' :,: 10:.:cF,1~l'~p:47(~){j:i) .**13adioi6gic~frt;~pbs~i'~ 1 c:<}ntro!~*'..1'.:~.(/j.S&':~.~\>;F ;f\j:(.f'.ifr~;*;/"}*,'.':v'c.</:::,i*:.'y:2:::,1,,L:7. :,zt::*'.*,~"::;';c't{F}
11 a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D
.* *.1.2,*:,,;* ,;}q*[eF.R*:~tl.47(~)(f2) :M~~icali~ilci\puqliq;*tf e~1th<.:Si.JPP~rt'y1~~ .\~*.(;*::.'.;.;*:h~'.lf:*;;; ~:'*}::'>>'~! z\<i~"';: -.;:*'::.:.* !:;:,;r;:,::*';i*l **':'.<i,I0,* ::.;;;~:,,2**.
12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D
.*. 13: ;;, * ,:1'o'cf;R'i?O;47<bR1.3),~ecoyer}i.f>1~hriin9,~n~'p6~t+atciderit: E?,t>erati~ii~;:s.:~ . ,.:R;.:, '.: ;{~1=*.: ;:;',]/, r::'i;; '.;'f:'.;\~ ,~.,IS *;1,:/;\~
13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D
. 14.:i': ;: 1o:.p*fRts!):47(h}( 1;4r*ori11$: ~J1&Exe~~i.se~{,:Z:~*:',.,~'. ,.;;;,:,,. ,\{; *;[,;:;~~*~*'.:~¥!~ :);;;\'F/;:.*;, . . ,,,:";,,;:*: ;*::.,;:!'>. :*t ,,/;*:,~t***. *;,; :,;::,,:'/) :,'.,: :)::::;:,~*
14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. ) 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D
*.1s:,,) '1.o:c~R*~0:47(~)f~5); i;foergf:}ncy*ft~sporise:fr~i~ing:}-~ *, .! ** ... * * "S, .*. *~:::<;; ".' :::* .* * *~>*:.:-,, '.;t-.;::; ... <*:.. ;;
15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 0\ J)' ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form>>
Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete X Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. Prepar~ame (Print): Pete Kuhlman Date:
'~-~~ -r(\fb flo Reviewer Name ( rint): Don Crowl Date:
7 *-J'i'--li.. Approver (EP Manager Name (Print): Pat Street Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Date: Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments.
- One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 1O CFR 50.54(q), D to Licensing.
- One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change
-
is put in effect. D -~ y QA RECORD
- --- - -
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1
- 3 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 1of5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
BNP D EREG #: 02045341 CNS D CR3 D HNP D MNS D SAD #: __0=2=0-"-45=3=3=2- ONS x RNP D GO D Document and Revision RP/0/A/1000/003 A Rev 2 ERDS OPERATION Part I. Description of Proposed Change: Changes clarifying the reporting requirements and activation requirements as stated in 10CFR50.72(4} ensuring users activate EROS within one hour after declaration of Alert, Site Area Emergency or General Emergency. Changes made throughout the procedure to align with Procedure Writers Guide (PWG}. Added a new step to coordinate with the NRC prior to staff turnovers to plan for loss of data while logging in/out of computers
- Attachment 6, 10 CFR 50.54(q} Initiating Condition (IC} and Emergency Action Level (EAL} and EAL Yes D Bases Validation and Verification (V&V} Form , is attached (required for IC or EAL change} No X Part 11. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change:
ONS Emergency Plan; F.1.c, The EOF organization has the responsibility to ask for federal response. However, communication with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission from the emergency response facilities, would be by use of the Emergency Telecommunication System (ETS} located in the Control Room areas, Technical Support Center, or the Emergency Operations Facility. 1.5, Meteorological information will be available to the Charlotte Emergency Operations Facility, the Technical Support Center, and the Control Room through the automated plant data system. Meteorological data averaged over a period of 15 minutes, will be available to the NRC through the ENS phone, by direct telephone communications with the individual responsible for making offsite dose assessments at the Emergency Operations Facility or through the NRC Emergency Response Data System
).
'
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 2 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47{b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, rather than under 10 CFR 50.54{q): 10CFR50.47(b) Emergency Plans (6) Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. (9) Adequate methods, systems, and equipment for assessing and monitoring actual or potential offsite consequences of a radiological emergency condition are in use. 1OCFR50 Appendix E VI. Emergency Response Data System Establishes the requirements pertaining to EROS, points required to transmit, transmit frequency, maintaining and testing the system. NUREG 0654 F.1.c. Emergency Communications, states; provision for communications as needed with Federal emergency response organizations 1.5 Accident Assessment, states in part ... There shall be provisions for access to meteorological information by -~ at least the nearsite Emergency Operations Facility, the Technical Support Center, the Control Room and an offsite NRC center ... 10CFR50.72(4).
"The licensee shall activate the Emergency Response Data System {EROS) as soon as possible but not later than one hour after declaring an Emergency Class of alert, site area emergency, or general emergency
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 3 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen): 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6)=Emergency Communications states the following: Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. Two emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard: (1) Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response organizations. (2) Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. 1O CFR 50.4 7(b )(9}=Emergency Assessment Capability states the following: Adequate methods, systems, and equipment for assessing and monitoring actual or potential offsite consequences of a radiological emergency condition are in use.
- The following emergency planning function has been defined for this planning standard:
(1) Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: Refer to the attached Change Matrix; Change 7, 11 moved step 2.1.9 to new step 2.1.6 and made it an 'If at any time' statement that establishes the contingency to contact the NRG if EROS fails to connect or has activation issues. Actions are the same but the branching is eliminated. The step continues to maintain the function of establishing communications with the emergency response organizations by establishing contingency actions in the event EROS fails to connect at any time in the performance of the procedure, therefore , no reduction in effectiveness. Change 13, New step to ensure the NRC is aware of any potential brief loss in communication due to personnel turning over and logging in/out of computers. The new step is an enhancement in maintaining the function of establishing communications with the emergency response organizations by preplanning any disruption in EROS transmittal due to personnel turnover, therefore, no reduction in effectiveness. Justification: Content of the procedure remains the same, The revisions do not change the intent of the procedure to establish communication with the NRG for the transmission of data which will be used for emergency assessment. Revision improves clarity to ensure activation of EROS per 1OCFRS0.72(4). } Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 1O CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? Yes X No D
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 4 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no Yes X NoD reduction in effectiveness)? 3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? Yes X NoD 4 Choose one of the following conclusions: a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRC x approval. b The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. D Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval. Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or Yes D No D rejected? If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 10 CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1
-~
yJ ATTACHMENT 5 Page 5 of 5
<< 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form>>
Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). Preparer Name (Print):Pete Kuhlman Date:
-rj13fl\.
Reviewer Name (Print):Don Crowl Date: Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Pat Street Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments.
- One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), 0 to Licensing.
'.Tu
- One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRG within 30 days after the change
- JJ is put in effect. D QA RECORD
Attachment to 50.54q J CHANGE MATRIX
.:.~t
"# Page /Section Current Proposed Change Reason
- 1. cover/page 1 Revision No. 001 Revision 002 editorial body
- 2. Section 1 page An Alert, Site Area Emergency, or ERDS shall be started within one hour perPRR#02040624.
2 General Emergency has been if an emergency classification of To ensure user will declared and ERDS is required to Alert, Site Area Emergency or start ERDS if an provide data to the NRC. ERDS is General Emergency has been emergency to be started within one (1) hour declared per lOCFR 50.72(4). Effort classification of of the emergency declaration. should be made to perform this Alert, SAE or GE action as soon as possible. has been declared.
- 3. Note before ERDS can only be activated using ERDS can only be activated using the editorial - to make the following business following business workstations: the note easier to Step 2.1.2 workstations: TSC NRC 0 TSC NRC Communicator read page 2 Communicator, TSC Operations, 0 TSC Operations Unit 1 Control Room SRO, Unit 2 0 Unit 1 Control Room SRO Control Room SRO, Unit 3 Control 0 Unit 2 Control Room SRO
~
.*,o.I'.'~.' Room SRO, Process Computer 0 Unit 3 Control Room SRO Systems Unit 1 OAC Room or 0 Process Computer Systems Unit Process Computer Systems DOB lOAC Room Computer Room. 0 Process Computer Systems OQB Computer Room.
- 4. Step 2.1.2 If required refer to ... IF required, refer to ... editorial formatting per procedure writer's guide.
- 5. Step 2.1.3 Log onto the TSC NRC Log onto any authorized business editorial, steps Communicator Business (BUS) workstations for ERDS activation mean the same workstation or other authorized using your normal network login id. thing.
business workstations for ERDS activation using your normal network login id.
~
3
- 6. Step 2.1.5 Examine the OAC time Examine the OAC time information editorial, information on the right side of on the right side of the display and rewording for the display and verify that OAC verify that OAC Time is current time clarity Time is current time and OAC and OAC Time Rate is NOT zero for Time Rate is anything otherthan each Unit to be activated.
zero (0) for each Unit to be activated. D Unit 1 D Unit 2 DA. Unit 1 D Unit 3 OB. Unit2 n c. Unit 3
- 7. Step 2.1.6 IF OAC time issues are IF AT ANY TIME ERDS does NOT This change is NOT experienced, THEN go to step connect with the NRC after several a technical change, 2.1.9. minutes OR activation problems and the same (Such as OAC Time Issues) are actions would be experienced, perform the following: performed had this D Notify the NRC using the ENS change not been Phone Line. made.
D Record the Date and Time of the content of step this notification. 2.1.6 (new) is what Date used to be step Time 2.1.9, with the Initials example of OAC ~ ,._-t,
- .-::"
time issues added in. this allows the user to perform this step if step 2.1.7 does not connect with the NRC. The sequence was changed to clarify intent.
,
- 8. note before The Status Column can indicate The Status Column may indicate (in editorial, step 2.1.8 Connecting, Reconnecting, order) "Connecting", "Reconnecting", rewording for Connected, LINK Sent, Waiting "Connected", "LINK Sent", "Waiting clarity
) first bullet for ACCEPT, ACCEPT Received, for ACCEPT", "ACCEPT Received", Waiting for INITIATE and "Waiting for INITIATE", or Transmitting Data. However, "Transmitting Data" in the process of some responses may not have connecting. Some statuses may NOT been seen during actual be seen during actual connection due connection due to response time to response time and update of and update of display. The Status display. The Status "Transmitting of Transmitting Data with Data" with Messages Sent Messages Sent incrementing incrementing indicates appropriate indicates appropriate connectivity for communications. connectivity for communications.
- 9. note before If the connection is lost for some If the connection was lost then editorial, step 2.1.8 reason, the Status Column will regained, the status column will cycle rewording for display Connecting then through the same status sequence as clarity third bullet Reconnecting, followed by the initial connection.
Connected, LINK Sent, Waiting for ACCEPT, ACCEPT Received, Waiting for INITIATE and Transmitting Data. VERIFY that the EROS Link Verify the following is indicated on editorial, Control and Status Display for the ERDS Link Control and Status reformatted to step 2.1.8 each Unit activated, indicates Display for each unit activated: make the step Current Mode = Connect, Status clearer to the user.
=Transmitting Data and Unit Messages Sent= "Incrementing". l D D D Current 0 Unit 1 Mode=
0 Unit 2 Connect D Unit 3 D D D Status= Transmitt ing Data D D D Messages Sent=
"lncreme nting"
- 11. step 2.1.9 !E ERDS does not connect with moved to step 2.1.6 non-technical, see the NRC after several minutes or change #7 activation problem experienced, THEN notify the NRC using the ENS Phone Line.
A. Record the Date and Time of this notification Date __ Time_ _ Initials__
- 12. 2.1.10 !.E instructed by the NRC to IF AT ANY TIME instructed by the Allows user to restart ONS EROS NRC to restart ONS EROS move on to the communication, communication, re-perform step next step, while THEN re-perform steps 2.1.7 and 2.1.7 and step 2.1.8 leaving this step 2.1.8 open per performance.
Editorial, not a change of intent.
- 13. new 2.1.10 !.E EROS data will be interrupted Added to ensure (turnover, etc.), coordinate with the users think about NRC regional office to determined possibility of losing desired timing for interruption. EROS and communicating that with the NRC prior to interrupting data flow.
- 14. Step 3.1 IF required to return to your login IF required to return to your login Editorial, screen screen, refer to Step 2.1.2, Step 2.1.3 formatted per THEN refer to Steps 2.1.2., 2.1.3 and Step 2.1.4 for guidance. Procedure writer's and 2.1.4 for guidance manual
*,;1--t-----------i-------------+--------------+------------i
_,,.;, 5. Step 3.2.2 VERIFY that the EROS Link Verify the following is indicated on editorial, Control and Status Display for the EROS Link Control and Status reformatted to each Unit activated, indicates Display for each unit activated: make the step Current Mode = Disconnect, clearer to the user. Status= Disconnected and Unit Unit Unit l 2 3 Messages Sent= 0. D D D Current D A. Unit 1 Mode= D B. Unit 2 Disconne D C. Unit3 ct D D D Status= Disconne cted D D D Messages Sent= 0 )
Duke Energy Procedure No. Oconee Nuclear Station RP/0/A/1000/003 A Revision No. ERDS OPERATION 002 Electronic Reference No. Reference Use OP009ADL
- "';\
y
..
) '
RP/0/A/1000/003 A Page 2 of5 ERDS Operation NOTE: This procedure is an implementing procedure to the Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency Plan and must be:
- Reviewed in accordance with 10CFR50.54(q) prior to approval.
- Forwarded to Emergency Preparedness within seven (7) working days of approval.
- 1. Symptoms ERDS shall be started within one hour if an emergency classification of Alert, Site Area Emergency or General Emergency has been declared per lOCFR 50.72(4). Effort should be made to perform this action as soon as possible.
- 2. Immediate Actions 2.1 ERDS Activation D 2.1.l ERDS Operation Started B y : - - - - - - - - - - -
) NOTE:
- ERDS can only be activated using the following business workstations:
0 TSC NRC Communicator 0 TSC Operations 0 Unit 1 Control Room SRO 0 Unit 2 Control Room SRO 0 Unit 3 Control Room SRO 0 Process Computer Systems Unit 1 OAC Room 0 Process Computer Systems OOB Computer Room.
- ERDS activation is performed by an SRO or the TSC NRC Communicator.
D 2.1.2 IF required, refer to KVM Usage Instructions to login to user console and select the Business (BUS) workstation menu selection. D 2.1.3 Log onto any authorized business workstations for ERDS activation using your normal network login id. D 2.1.4 From the Windows Desktop, Double-Click on the ERDS Activation Icon to activate ERDS Link Control and Status Display. )
RP/0/A/1000/003 A Page3of5 D 2.1.5 Examine the OAC time information on the right side of the display and verify that OAC Time is current time and OAC Time Rate is NOT zero for each Unit to be activated. D Unit 1 D Unit2 D Unit 3 D 2.1.6 IF AT ANY TIME EROS does NOT connect with the NRC after several minutes OR activation problems (Such as OAC Time Issues) are experienced, perform the fo Bowing: D Notify the NRC using the ENS Phone Line. D Record the Date and Time of this notification. Date - - - - - Time - - - - Initials - - - - - D 2.1.7 Select the Connect (Activate) Target Area with the mouse to initiate EROS communication for each ONS Unit requiring activation. D Record the Date and Time ERDS communication was initiated below: ). Unit 1 Date Time Initials Unit2 Date Time Initials Unit 3 Date Time Initials
RP/0/A/1000/003 A J '
.
Page 4 of5 NOTE:
- The Status Column may indicate (in order) "Connecting", "Reconnecting",
"Connected", "LINK Sent", "Waiting for ACCEPT", "ACCEPT Received", "Waiting for INITIATE", or "Transmitting Data" in the process of connecting. Some statuses may NOT be seen during actual connection due to response time and update of display. The Status "Transmitting Data" with Messages Sent incrementing indicates appropriate connectivity for communications.
- Other possible Statuses are:
Suspended-> NRC has suspended transmission temporarily. Denied -> Plant's request for a connection has been denied by NRC.
- If the connection was lost then regained, the status column will cycle through the same status sequence as the initial connection.
D 2.1.8 Verify the following is indicated on the ERDS Link Control and Status Display for each unit activated: Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 D D D Current Mode = Connect D D D Status = Transmitting Data D D D Messages Sent = "Incrementing" D 2.1.9 IF AT ANY TIME instructed by the NRC to restart ONS ERDS communication, re-perform step 2.1.7 and step 2.1.8. D 2.1.10 IF ERDS data will be interrupted (turnover, etc.), coordinate with the NRC regional office to determine desired timing for interruption. -~ J
RP/0/A/1000/003 A '\ )l Page 5 of5
- 3. Subsequent Actions 3.1 IF required to return to your login screen, refer to Step 2.1.2, Step 2.1.3 and Step 2.1.4 for guidance.
3.2 Stopping ERDS transmission after event termination. NOTE: The Status Column should indicate Terminating followed by Disconnected. D 3.2.1 On the ERDS Link Control and Status Display for ONS, Select the Disconnect (Deactivate) Target Area with the mouse to terminate EROS communication for each ONS Unit activated. A. Record the Date and Time EROS communication was terminated below: D Unit 1 Date ~~~~~ Time ~~~~- Initials - - - - - D Unit 2 Date ~~~~~ Time ~~~~- Initials - - - - - D Unit 3 Date ~~~~~ Time -~~~- Initials - - - - - D 3.2.2 Verify the following is indicated on the ERDS Link Control and Status Display for each unit activated:.
- Unit 1 Unit2 Unit3 D D D Current Mode = Disconnect D D D Status = Disconnected D D D Messages Sent = 0
)
Fonn 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (R08-IO) RP/0/A/l000/003A Duke Energy (IJIDNo. PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 00 l PREPARATION (2) Station _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _O=C-=0-=-N=E=E=-=N~U=-=C=L=EA::....::..:..::R:.-=S:....:T:.=..A=T:..::l=O-=-N'-------------- (3) Procedure Title EROS Operation ~ t-\ (4) Prepared By* Natalie Harness t\\P.b 0 ~OJ\;V\.Qd Date 5/ 14/2015 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (New procedure or revision with major chan es) -Attach NSD 228 documentation. [8'J No (Revision with minor changes) * (6) Reviewed By* ...se:~=:..L-L.:L.~~=..,1---A,.,,_~~---1r-~~-*(QR)(KI) Date S::_ r.q -IS-Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (QR)(KI) NA1.yJeDate S:-tS: -Jc; Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) NA~ate s -tg' -1~ Mgmt Involvement Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (Ops. Supt.) NA~ate 5-f'J. -I~ (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Reviewed By* -----.-------11---'"---iA--r-.j.,.+--=i==------ Date (8) Approved By* _1~~~.L.\~~~1-4-~~~~--\-~:::L------ Date -0\ j)l*ERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy every while work is being performed.) (9) Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (IO) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number (WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: 0 Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes 0 NA Required enclosures attached? 0 Yes 0 NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? 0 Yes 0 NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? 0 Yes 0 NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date ( 12) Procedure Completion A p p r o v e d - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date ( 13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary) Y Printed Name ancl Signature
Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 04/23/2012 The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in information you want to appear on the various )nns needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in
-mformation on this form, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perform Step 3 below.
Step 1- press [Fl2] (Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- l. ID No.: RP/O/A/l000/003A
- 2. Revision No.: 001
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: EROS Operation
...
- 5. For changes only, enter proced~ctions affected:_
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness ~
- 7. Preparation Date: 5/14/2015
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision:
- ~1tep 3- go to Print Prev
- ew to update this information ~~ all t~e attach~d documents.
- :..Jtep 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional mformatlon needed.
Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness. ) '
'
Page 1of4 Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (R08-10)
?.\ Duke Energy y
PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No.RP/O/N1000/003A Revision No.001 Change No. Permanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: EROS Operation (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Page 2of4 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (Procedure change with major changes)- Attach NSD 228 documentation. k8] No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) Per PIP G-14-00238, add the following update to the notes section on Page 2 of 4:
) '
'
NOTE: This procedure is an implementing procedure to the Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency Plan and must be:
- 1. Reviewed in accordance with 1OCFR50.54(q) prior to approval.
- 2. Forwarded to Emergency Preparedness within seven (7) working days of approval.
(7) Reason for Change: Editorial (8) Prepared By* ~~~~~.l-l...A...UL..b,...lLi....-.:l.A-~~~l:Z:;l~I---- Natalie Harness Date 5/14/2015 (9) '" .. 4. Reviewed By* ~~.i.;..;...;;..._~___,.""--='~--A~.4-.~~.-...~~-- Date {-tk -1~ Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KD NA ~ate ~ 1g- 6 Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR) NA~Date 5-/[{-1<{ Mgmt. Involvement Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(Ops. Supt.) NA ~te s -r 8- /'S (IO) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Date - - - - - Reviewed By* ~ Date ) (11) Approved By* ~~ Jl Sr~-~ Date~*
. Printed Name and Signature (~
3.10 lOCFR 50.5-t(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10. 7.2 ) Activity Description and
References:
j RPIO!Nl000/003A, Rev 001, EROS Operation, Rev 001 Activity Scope: 0 The activity~ a change to the emergency plan r8J The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: 'BLQC~~i.t::~f Change Type: *::~:j_\;£ijtpc~~4'. 1~~&f\'.~f.;,~{ r8J The change ~ editorial or typographical 0 The change does conform to an activity that has prior 0 The change is not editorial or typographical approval 0 The change does not conform to an activity that has prior Editorial approval Planning Standard Impact Determination: 0 §50.47(b)(l) - Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) 0 §50.47(b)(2) - Onsite Emergency Organization 0 §50.47(b)(3)- Emergency Response Support and Resources 0 §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System* 0 §50.47(b)(5)- Notification Methods and Procedures* 0 §50.47(b)(6) - Emergency Communications 0 §50.47(b)(7) - Public Education and Information 0 §50.47(b)(8) - Emergency Facility and Equipment 0 §50.47(b)(9)-Accident Assessment* 0 §50.47(b)(10) - Protective Response*
- _,, 0 §50.47(b)(l l)- Radiological Exposure Control 0 §50.47(b)(l2) - Medical and Public Health Support 0 §50.47(b)(l3) - Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 0 §50.47(b)(l4) - Drills and Exercises 0 §50.47(b)(l5)- Emergency Responder Training 0 §50.47(b)(l6) - Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards 0 The ro osed activit does not im act a Plannin Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
D The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment Record the commitment or commitment reference: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: f:~iiir~f!)~Q.~~,ti,~t,lg~*~YS
~ The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation 0 The activity 9!!l!1Q! be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation Preparer Name:
Natalie Harness Approver Name: Date: Don Crowl S'-1
RP /0/ All 000/003 AA Revision 00 l Change No. _ Page l of l ) Procedure Title: EROS Operation SUM.MARY OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Per PIP G-14-00238, add the following update to the notes section on Page 2 of 4: NOTE: This procedure is an implementing procedure to the Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency Plan and must be:
- l. Reviewed in accordance with l OCFR50.54( q) prior to approval.
- 2. Forwarded to Emergency Preparedness within seven (7) working days of approval.
PCR Numbers Incorporated Enclosure . ) .
-~-*;<".*\
.):' .
,:;:' ~
*.~
;* Fonn 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) 1 (R08-IO) (I) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/00JA Duke Energy PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. film PREPARATION (2) Station OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title ___==:...=~~~~-__,,.--
(4) Prepared By ~N:.::at=al::.:.ie=-H=am=es=s~~4'-A~~~+-11-~.-.-i""'-'-""""""'-'--'-'-----Date 7/16/2014 Prepared By & Mentor* John Kaminski Date 7116/2014 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination D Yes (New procedure or revision with maj IZI No (Creates procedure RP/O/A/1000/003 (6) Reviewed By* -~=--AM-<<-~~..:...:..!4..:..-.l.<'~u..._~~~!:.-.:.1..=o~_ _ _{QR)(KI) Date Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(QR)(KI) NA ~Date Reactivity Mgmt Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(QR) N~ Date Mgmt Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) N~ate (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date
~ Reviewed By* Date
*(8) Approved By* ---L:.=:~~L-.L..l,.......!::~C:!!~J-.......c::i.£..-=--t::l~=--+=--=--+----- Date 12/t ~lGf PERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy every (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s)Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Work Order Number (WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes DNA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _)3) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
'# Printed Name and Signature
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (ROB-10) (l) IDNo. RP/O/A/1000/00JA Duke Energy PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 000 Procedure Title: ERDS OPERATION
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Creates procedure RP/O/Nl000/003A. Rev 000 with revised Safety Classification PCR Numbers Incorporated NA Enclosure )
Form 703-~. Procedure Change Process Record (ROS-10) Duke Energy PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD ) (1) ID No. RP/O/Nl000/003A Revision No. 000 Change No. Pennanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: ERDS OPERATION (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Safety Classification Revision (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Detennination? D Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. 181 No (Procedure change with minor changes) ( 6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, ifnecessary.) To align our E-Plan implementing Procedures with NSD-703 permanent technical procedures requirements as determined by PIP 0-12-1590, ONS Emergency Planning will revise the procedure titles (as procedure revisions become necessary) to incorporate the Safety Classification to "A" from "B. (7) Reason for Change: Safety Classification Revision: this change is to renumber/reclassify procedures from RP/O/B/1000/003A to RP/O/A/1000/003A, no changes to intent or content. Reason for Change: NSD-703, Section 5.1, permanent technical procedures and used to direct station activities during operating, testing, refueling, maintenance, and modifications. These procedures provide guidance for activities that are of repetitive nature, or when conditions requiring the procedure may occur in the future d the e is essential if the situation occurs. (8) Prepared By Natalie Harness Date 7/16/2014 Prepared By & Mentor* ~Jo~hn!!!...!K!:!:am~in~s:!!!ki:!...~~fl-+.~4C'!~---------Date 7/16/2014 (9) Reviewed By* /.J. Ct."'J/ Date 1 h1 /1f
~1 Cross-Disciplinary Review B y * - - - - - - - - - (QR)(KI) NA*~ Date f'ji 1 /1 'f Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA o-te... Date B-'/ '1
'7 h1 Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) NA~ Date 9 /,3 /Jlf I '
(10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* _____________________ Date _ _ _ __ Reviewed By* ~ Date _ _ _ __ (11) Approved By*__..?~-&.;.;;;...;..~~~~~--=--~~(-+-~~~~~~~....._-_ _ Dale ~?l1~t{-'
)
- Printed Name and Signature
3.10 tOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluadons Emergency Planning Funcdonal Area Manual Attachment 3.10. 7.2
§S0.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form (1------------------------------ --ctivity Description and
References:
RP/O/B/1000/003A, Rev 012: SUPERSEDED RP/O/A/1000/003A, Rev 000, EROS OPERATION Activity
Description:
To align our E-Ptan implementing Procedures with NSD-703 permanent technical procedures requirements as detennined by PIP 0-12-1590, ONS Emergency Planning will revise the procedure titles (as procedure revisions become necessary) to incorporate the Safety Classification to "A" from "B". Reason for Change: NSD-703, Section 5.1, permanent technical procedures and used to direct station activities during operating, testing, refueling, maintenance, and modifications. These procedures provide guidance for activities that are of repetitive nature, or when conditions requiring the procedure may occur in the future and the procedure is essential if the situation occurs. Activity Scope: 181 The activity is a change to the emergency plan 0 The activity iulQ! a change to the emergency plan Change Type:
------------
Change Type: 181 The change is editorial or typographical 0 The change does conform to an activity that has prior
.&1 The change is not editorial or typographical approval 0 The change does not conform to an activity that has prior Safety Classification Revision from "B" to "A" approval Planning Standard Impact Determination:
0 §50.47(b)(l)-Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) D §S0.47(b)(2) - Onsite Emergency Organization 0 §S0.47(b)(3) - Emergency Response Support and Resources 0 §50.47(b)(4) - Emergency Classification System* 0 §50.47(b)(5) - Notification Methods and Procedures* 0 §S0.47(b)(6)- Emergency Communications 0 §S0.47(b)(7)- Public Education and lnfonnation 0 §S0.47(b)(8)- Emergency Facility and Equipment 0 §50.47(b)(9)- Accident Assessment* 0 §50.47(b)(l0)-Protective Response* 0 §S0.47(b)(l 1)-Radiological Exposure Control 0 §S0.47(b)(l2)- Medical and Public Health Support 0 §S0.47(b)(l3)-Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 0 §S0.47(b)(l4)- Drills and Exercises 0 §S0.47(b)(1S)- Emergency Responder Training 0 §S0.47(b)(l6)- Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards 0 The ro osed activi does not im act a Plannin Standard *11
_y
Commitment Impact Determination: D The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment ) Record the commitment or commitment reference:-------------- 'L.J The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: This title change is a result of an INOS PIP 0-12-1590 making the detennination that NSD-70, Section 5.1 requires all Emergency Response Procedures to be permanent technical procedures thus resulting in all ONS E-Plan Implementing Procedures having a Safety Classification designation letter of "A" and not "B" in the ID number of that procedure. This title revision in no way compromises the contents of the procedure or its effectiveness of use during an emergency event. Nor does this title ID change affect the required review period for this procedure of every 6 years. It has been determined that this revision will not reduce effectiveness of this emergency response procedure. The revision to the step number is an editorial change only. No changes to content or intent. This revision does not require a 50.54q effectiveness evaluation; there is not a reduction in the effectiveness of the E-Plan.
~ The activity~ be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation D The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation Preparer Name:
Natalie Harness Preparer Name: Signature ~entor) John Kaminski Reviewer Name: Date: Don Crowl Revision 12 )
- l!J>
Revision/Change Package Fill-In**Form Rev. 04/23/2012 )The purpose of this ~11-in ~orm is to provide a.l~cation to typ~ in i~fonnation you want to appear on the v~ous ,;fonns needed for MaJor/Mmor Procedure Revts1ons, and MaJor/Mmor Procedure Changes. After you type m information on this fonn, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perform Step 3 below. Step 1- press [Fl2] (Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic infonnation in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- 1. ID No.: RP/O/B/1000/00JA
- 2. Revision No.: 012
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: ERDS Operation
- 5. For changes only, enter rocedure sections affected:_
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness
- 7. Preparation Date: 5/22/2014
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision: NA
]ftep 3- go to Print Preview to update this info~ation in all the attached documents. Step 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional information needed. Step S- when all infonnation is entered, print package and review for correctness.
' .
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR)
. )ROS-10) RP/0/B/1000/003A JJ Duke Energy (I) ID No.
PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 012 Superseded PREPARATION (2) Station --------=O=C-=O=N=E=E""'NU.:..=.:C=L=E=AR.=.::...=-ST=i\.=T=I=O~N.:....-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (3) Procedure Title __....E=RD==S-=.i.....-.-="""t'-----.--'"--
-(4) Prepared By ~Nl.!!at~al:!!ie£...QH~am~es~s'---,\.....::~...&..A.14~~~bl...µ..L.::~~L----*Date 5/22/2014 Prepared By & Mentor* .J.,!JoQ.IhnmJK~ammui~n§kskig_'-~1::!::.:.IJ.~~,...:...._-------*Date 5/22/2014 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determinati D Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes - A NSD 228 documentation.
181 No (Supersede Procedure) (6) Reviewed By* u""" . . l~ )\. C_. I (QR)(KI) Date (, ~/,':{_
- Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (QR)(KI) NA~e "1~11 r-Reactivity Mgmt Review By* - - - - - - - - - - - - -(QR) NA~Date 4 /.U,h~
Mgmt Involvement Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (Ops. Supt.) NA11K.f>ate '-1~'£_
,
(7) Additional Reviews
~ R e v i e w e d B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date
- j)
ReviewedBy*---:~----;-r---:;;::;:-:--=-:--Y-C?.~-=----ir--t---:t;;:+:;;:=;:::==--- Date (8) Approved By* _JM~~D.......:'.$1~~(,l.~EG\~_J_~t_.::::::::~~~~l.__ _ Date (, tiilJ4-PERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy every (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ WorkOrderNumber(WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION (11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date _)(12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
- Prin_ted Name and Signature
..
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (R08-10) Duke Energy (1) ID No. RP/0/B/l 000/003A . ..,.,_*.
.
**11~
,., PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 012 Superseded Procedure Title: ERDS Operation
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Supersede Procedure: this change is to renumber/reclassify procedures from RP/0/8/1000/003A to RP/O/A/1000/0038, no changes to intent or content. Reason for Change: NSD-703, Section 5.1, pennanent technical procedures and used to direct station activities during operating, testing, refueling, maintenance, and modifications. These procedures provide guidance for activities that are of repetitive nature, or when conditions requiring the procedure may occur in the future and the procedure is essential if the situation occurs. PCR Numbers Incorporated NA Enclosure
) .' )
Form 703-l. Procedure Change Process Record (R08-10) Duke Energy ) PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No. RP/O/B/1000/003A Revision No.012 Superseded Permanent/Restricted to
.- ..* ~ '(2)' Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION* -
(3) Procedure Title: EROS Operation (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Safety Classification Revision (5) Requires NSD 228 AppliCability Determination?* 0 Yes- (Procedure change with majpr changes)*'." Attach NSD 228 dOcumentation;
~No__(Procedur~change:withminor_changes)_ ____________ ._________ _
(6) Description of Change:* (Attach additional pages, if necessary.)\ Superseded to create procedure RP/O/Nl000/003A, Rev 000 with revised Safety Classification ) (7) Reason for Change: Superseded *.
==...:.==.:=..._,,_~'-'+-~~"7'-+-------Date 5/22/2014 (9)- R)(KI) Date'/;tftr
- Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * (QR)(Kl) NA ~ate 1--~/J'f Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA Q'P..('Date ~Pt/JI(
Mgmt Involvement Review By*
- - - - - - - -(Ops. Supt.) N~ate r/.. b(,..r/l'I ~
(10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ __ Reviewed By* ~ Date (11) ApprovedBy* ~(CU. ti "JrtCSJ ~ii.Id Date
- Printed Name and Signature
)
--- --
*,
Fann 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (ROS-IO) (I) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/00JA Duke Energy ---\\ jJ PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 000 PREPARATION (2) Station _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _O=C=O=N=E=E=NU~C=L=E=-AR=:..:S=T=X=T:...:IO=N.:..:....._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (3) Procedure Title _E=RD=-=S'--=.I==~-....__ __,,.. (4) Prepared By ....,N=at=al=ie=-H=arn=es=s--+~~....:.;.~IEo-"-'f-~~*' Date 5/22/2014 Prepared By & Meritor* ~Jo:!!hn!:!!..!K~am!!illi~nsi?!lki~*----!:=:q..:2=::.J;~~:.__ Date - 5/22/2014 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determinatio D Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. 181 No (Creates procedure RP/O/Nl000/00 0 0 'th re *s Safety Classification) (6) Reviewed By* D~ \J ~ - G-..> (QR)(KI) Date Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(QR)(KI) N;.Mc.Date Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) NAb'leoate Mgmt Involvement Review By* (ops. Supt.) N~te (7) Additional Reviews R e v i e w e d B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date
- 3) ReviewedBy*--::::-----;,-----::---:-:----i~---:'-rf=---r,-~;:::;::::;:==--- Date
.- (8) Approved By* ---.:.1',_P\4.._lCU.~_...._4-------"'~~f--_,,,,_-+----.r~~-___,_--- Date PERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s)Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
WorkOrderNumber(WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION (11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date
)13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
- Printed Name and Signature
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (ROS-10) (I) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/003A Duke Energy PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 000 Procedure Title: ERDS Operation
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON)
- General Changes Creates procedure RP/O/ All 000/003A, Rev 000 with revised Safety Cla8sification PCR Numbers Incorporated NA Enclosure
)
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (ROS-10) Duke Energy ) PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No. RP/O/N1000/003A Revision No. 000 Change No. Pennanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR . . STATION (3) Procedure Title: ERDS Operation (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Safety Classification Revision (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Detennination? D Yes (Procedure change with major changes)* Attach NSD 228 documentation. 12] No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) To align our E-Plan implementing Procedures with NSD-703 permanent technical procedures requirements as determined by PIP 0-12-1590, ONS Emergency Planning will revise the procedure titles (as procedure revisions become necessary) to incorporate the Safety Classification to "A" from "B". (7) Reason for Change: Safety Classification Revision: this change is to renumber/reclassify procedures from RP/O/B/1000/003A to RP/O/A/1000/003A, no changes to intent or content. Reason for Change: NSD-703, Section 5.1, permanent technical procedures and used to direct station activities during operating, testing, refueling, maintenance, and modifications. These procedures provide guidance for activities that are of repetitive nature, or when conditions requiring the procedure may occur in the future d the procedure is essential if the situation occurs. (8) Prepared By Natalie Harness \ Date 5/22/2014
~~~~~~-44'7FJ~ISoJl~~-------Date 5/22/2014 (9) Date ~µfA.Jl't Cross-Disciplinary Review By*-------~- (QR)(Kl) N~ Date ~/.2-'}'f Reactivity Mgmt. Review Mgmt. Involvement Review By*
By* (QR) (Ops. Supt.) NA~ate N~ate ~ y
'#r (10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* ----------------------Date - - - - -
Reviewed By* ~ Date ( 11) Approved By*=~=~~W.-=--=--=-f1-=--=-&i-=-~-=-~--+/.__'~-=-~-:_~~-:L&ijit-_-:_-_~----~-_-Date-~{-u,_{_l4-- )- ( ~
- Printed Name and Signature
"
3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluadons Emergency Planning Funcdonal Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 1------------------------------------------------------------ ;'*
'Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/B/1000/003A, Rev 012 SUPERSEDED, RP/01All000/003A, Rev 000 ERDS Operation Activity
Description:
To align our E-Plan implementing Procedures with NSD-703 permanent technical procedures requirements as determined by PIE! Q-12-:1.590, ONS Emergency Planning will revise the procedure titles (as procedure revisions become nec~ssaiYfto incorporate the Safety Classification to "A" from '"B". Reason for Change: NSD-703, Section 5.1, permanent technical procedures and used to direct station activities during operating, testing, refueling, maintenance, and modifications. These procedures provide guidance for activities that are of repetitive nature, or when conditions requiring the procedure may occur in the future and the procedure is essential if the situation occurs. Activity Scope:
~ The activity i§ a change to the emergency plan D The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: Change Type: ~ The change is editorial or typographical D The change does conform to an activity that has prior
_fjJ The change is not editorial or typographical approval D The change does not conform to an activity that has prior Safety Classification Revision from "B" to *~" approval Planning Standard Impact Determination: D §50.47(b)(l)-Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) D §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization D §50.47(b)(3)-Emergency Response Support and Resources D §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System* D §50.47(b)(5)-Notification Methods and Procedures* D §50.47(b)(6)- Emergency Communications D §50.47(b)(7)- Public Education and Information D §50.47(b)(8)-Emergency Facility and Equipment D §50.47(b)(9)-Accident Assessment* D §50.47(b)(10)-Protective Response* D §50.47(b)(l 1) -Radiological Exposure Control D §50.47(b)(l2) -Medical and Public Health Support D §50.47(b)(13)-Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations D §50.47(b)(14)-Drills and Exercises D §50.47(b)(l5) -Emergency Responder Training D §50.47(b)(16) -Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards D The ro osed activit does not im act a Plannin Standard
)
"
Commitment Impact Determination: The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment Record the commitment or commitment reference: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ D The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: This title change is a result of an INOS PIP 0-12-1590 making the determination that NSD-70, Section 5.1 requires all Emergency Response Procedures to be pennanent technical procedures thus resulting in all ONS E-Plan Implementing Procedures having a Safety Classification designation letter of"A" and not "B" in the ID number of that procedure. 1bis title*revisioil in no way compromises the contents of the procedure or its effectiveness of use during an emergency event. Nor does this title ID change affect the required review period for this procedure of every 6 years. It has been determined that this revision will not reduce effectiveness of this emergency response procedure. The revision to the step number is an editorial change only. No changes to content or intent. This revision does not require a 50.54q effectiveness evaluation; there is not a reduction in the effectiveness of the E-Plan. [83 The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation D The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation Preparer Nmne: Date: Natalie Harness/ 5/22/2014 John Kaminski 5'/,p_ 91/t'I ,Reviewer Name: Date: _ion Crowl Revision 12 )
'*
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (ROS-IO) (!)ID No. RP/O/A/1000/003A Duke Energy PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 000 PREPARATION (2) Station ---------=O;....;:C::...::O=N..;.:E=E::....:NU:...:..=-=C=L=EA=-==Rc..=S:....:T~A=T=-IO=N'"-'--------------- (3) Procedure Title _E=RD=-=S'"-0====---,.=.----A-(4) Prepared By .:...:N=at=a=li=e-=H=a=m=e=s=s_ __.,~,....._."""""""'"'~:,......_.,._,.........._~ f\/Y\.~ Date 5/22/2014 Prepared By & Mentor* ~Jo~hn~K~am~in!f!;sk~i!....__~~=::::_!~~~- Date 5/22/2014 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Detenninatio 0 Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. [8] No (Creates procedure RP/O/Nl000/00 A, e 0 0 ith re *s~d Safety Classification) (6) Reviewed By**D*~ \ j *it\_ G.i-J (QR)(Kl) Date tflfalrt Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (QR)(Kl) N~ate 6h1.,'J/¥
~.;
Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) NAbieDate (..,. /_~ /1'/' Mgmt fuvolvement Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (Ops. Supt.) NA'.i~ate (,, 't_J...bIJ; -
' I
....f'f' (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed By*------------------------~ Date Date Date G /u(l cp_
PERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy (9) Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (10) Date(s)Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number (WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes DNA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date
)3) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
~* Printed Name and Signature
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (1) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/003A (ROS-10) Duke Energy PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 000 Procedure Title: ERDS Operation
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Creates procedure RP/O/ All 000/003A, Rev 000 with revised Safety Classification PCR Numbers Incorporated NA Enclosure -)
)
- Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (R08-10)
Duke Energy .J PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No. RP/O/A/l 000/003A Revision No. 000 Change No. Permanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: ERDS Op*eration (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Safety Classification Revision (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. C8l No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) To align our E-Plan implementing Procedures with NSD-703 permanent technical procedures requirements as determined by PIP 0-12-1590, ONS Emergency Planning will revise the procedure titles (as procedureTevisions become necessary) to incorporate the Safety Classification to "A" from "B". (7) Reason for Change: Safety Classification Revision: this change is to renumber/reclassify procedures from RP/O/B/1000/003A to RP/O/ All 000/003A, no changes to intent or content. Reason for Change: NSD-703, Section 5.1, permanent technical procedures and used to direct station activities during operating, testing, refueling, maintenance, and modifications. These procedures provide guidance for activities that are ofrepetitive nature, or when conditions requiring the procedure may occur in the future a d the procedure is essential if the situation occurs. (8) Prepared By Natalie Harness \ Date 5/22/2014
=~==~-.'-4~~1'P'91!4[......-+-+-------*Date 5/22/2014 (9) Date ~h~/*1 Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KI) NM~ Date &-fa, th 'f Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA6~ate le, bl.eb r J * /
Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) N~ate ~;~ 'I (10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* _______________________ Date _ _ _ __ Reviewed By* ~ Date
.'.1 (11) Approved By*=~=~=tc.=U==f=1=SQ=~===/=F====:*e:rr~~:~~~~~~Date-~{1-&{-l4--
.Y
- Printed Name and Signature
'* '
3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/B/1000/003A, Rev 012 SUPERSEDED, RP/O/A/1000/003A, Rev 000 ERDS Operation Activity
Description:
To align our E-Plan implementing Procedures with NSD-703 permanent technical procedures requirements as determined by PIP. Q-12~ 1.590, ONS Emergency Planning will revise the procedure titles (as procedure revisions become necessarY).to incorporate the Safety Classification to "A" from "B". Reason for Change: NSD-703, Section 5.1, permanent technical procedures and used to direct station activities during operating, testing, refueling, maintenance, and modifications. These procedures provide guidance for activities that are of repetitive nature, or when conditions requiring the procedure may occur in the future and the procedure is essential if the situation occurs. Activity Scope:
~ The activity!§ a change to the emergency plan D The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: Change Type:
D y
~ The change !§ editorial or typographical The change is not editorial or typographical D
The change does conform to an activity that has prior approval The change does not conform to an activity that has prior Safety Classification Revision from "B" to *~" approval Planning Standard Impact Determination: D §50.47(b)(l)-Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) D §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization D §50.47(b)(3)-Emergency Response Support and Resources D §50.47(b)(4)-Emergency Classification System* D §50.47(b)(5)-Notification Methods and Procedures* D §50.47(b)(6)-Emergency Communications D §50.47(b)(7)-Public Education and Information D §50.47(b)(8)- Emergency Facility and Equipment D §50.47(b)(9)-Accident Assessment* D §50.47(b)(10)-Protective Response* D §50.47(b)(l 1)-Radiological Exposure Control D §50.47(b)(12)-Medical and Public Health Support D §50.47(b)(13)- Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations D §50.47(b)(14)- Drills and Exercises D §50.47(b)(15)-Emergency Responder Training D §50.47(b)(16)- Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards D The ro osed activit does not im act a Plannin Standard y~
Commitment Impact Determination: {] The activity does involve a site specific EP cominitment ) Record the commitment or commitment reference: D The activity does not involve a site specific EP coIIlllli--.tm-e-nt_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Results: This title change is a result of an INOS PIP 0-12-1590 making the determination that NSD-70, Section 5.1 requires all Emergency Response Procedures to be permanent technical procedures thus resulting in all ONS E-Plan Implementing Procedures having a Safety Classification designation letter of "A" and not "B" in the ID number of that procedure. This title* revision in no way compromises the contents of the procedure or its effectiveness of use during an emergency event. Nor does this title ID change affect the required review period for this procedure of every 6 years. It has been determined that this revision will not reduce effectiveness of this emergency response procedure. The revision to the step number is an editorial change only. No changes to content or intent. This revision does not require a 50.54q effectiveness evaluation; there is not a reduction in the effectiveness of the E-Plan. [8] The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation D The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation Preparer N rune: Date: Natalie Harness/ 5/22/2014 John Kaminski
!/4- 1/rct Reviewer Name: Date: ;,*on Crowl Revision 12
) .
RP/0/A/1000/0lSA Rev. 6 EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 4 Page 1of10 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number** Applicable Sites - BNP 0 EREG #: Q2Qa7~ee 2069544 Revised EReg for changes made CNS 0 /AW AD-EP-ALL-0602. Changes are annotated in bold and italic. CR3 0 HNP 0 MNS 0 SAD#: 01953095 ONS [g) RNP 0 GO 0 Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015 A Revision 006 Offsite Communications From The Control Room Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): Change step before after Number
- 1. NOTE before The other unit that has now met a NOUE The other unit that has now met a NOUE
- 2. Immediate EAL classification should be noted under EAL classification should be noted under action line 13 Remarks section along with what line 13 Remarks section.
EAL condition is now met for that unit. If any other unit has a classification, the unit and classification should be noted under Line 13.
- 2. 2.3, 2.3.1, IF IF 2.3.3 2.3.4, 3.1.1, 3.1.2,3.1.3
- 3. 3.4 IAAT Turnover with the TSC has been WHEN any of the conditions are met:
completed or the event has been 0 The TSC has been activated. terminated. 0 EOF is activated. THEN Stop here. D The event has been terminated. THEN Exit this procedure.
- 4. First NOTE Pre-printed Emergency Notification Forms Pre-printed Emergency Notification Forms Enclosure 4.1 containing specific EAL# and EAL containing specific EAL# and EAL Description may be used in lieu of Description may be used in lieu of Enclosure Enclosure 4.1.A. 4.1.A or 4.1.B
- 5. First action Obtain one of the following, as Obtain one of the following, as appropriate:
under first appropriate, and complete the forms as NOTE follows: Enclosure 4. 1
- 6. Enclosure 4.1 NOTE: Given that available space for NOTE above handwritten information is limited on line 5, it line 5 is acceptable for what is written to soan
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-c!-J-ALL-uou~ EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2 of 10 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form multiple boxes' worth, as long as it is contained on line 5.
- 7. Enclosure 4.1 IF a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Keowee OR Jocassee Hydro Dam/Dike Line 5 "A" exists: Imminent Failure (Condition "A") exists:
- 8. Enclosure 4.1 IF a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Keowee OR Jocassee Hydro Dam/Dike Line 5 "A" exists: Imminent Failure (Condition "A") exists:
- Mark Box B and write "Move
- Mark Box E residents living downstream of the
- Write "Move residents living Keowee Hydro dams to higher downstream of the Keowee Hydro ground. dams to higher ground.
- AND mark Box E and write
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges identified on your inundation bridges identified on your maps until the danger has passed."
inundation maps until the danger c has passed." 1;
- 9. Enclosure 4.1 Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the IF any of the conditions stated in the note Line 6 conditions stated in the note above apply. above mark B (Is Occurring). IF THEY do If they do not apply mark None. Complete NOT apply mark A, 'None'. Complete Line 6 line 6, then mark Box A on this line and as directed by SM/EC.
qo to Line 8.
- 10. Enclosure 4.1 Enter the meteorological data if available IF available from RP Shift enter the Line 9 from RP Shift. If unavailable, leave this meteorological data. IF unavailable, leave line blank. Request RP Shift Dose this line blank. Request RP Shift Dose Assessor perform calculation for Line 9 Assessor perform calculation for Line 9 for for Follow-up notification. Follow-up Follow-up notification. Follow-up due in 60 notification due in 60 minutes minutes.
- 11. Enclosure 4.1 Mark or select ALL if events affects the IF the highest emergency classification for Line 11 emergency classification on more than this event applies to more than one unit one unit. select "All".
Mark or select one (1) unit if event affects one unit or one has a higher emergency classification.
- 12. Enclosure 4. 1 If IF Line 12
- 13. Enclosure 4.2 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition !.E..a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Line 5 "A" does NOT exist, mark Box A and go to Failure (Condition "A") does NOT exist, mark Line 6. Box A NONE.
- 14. Enclosure 4.2 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Line 5 "A" exists: Imminent Failure (Condition "A") exists:
- Mark Box B and write "Move residents
- Mark Box E living downstream of the Keowee
- Write "Move residents living downstream Hydro Dam to higher ground." of the Keowee Hydro Dam to higher
- AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit ground."
traffic flow across bridges identified on
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges your inundation maps until the danger identified on your inundation maps until has passed." the danger has passed."
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3of10 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
- 15. Enclosure 4.2 If, not IF, NOT Lines 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, AND 13
- 16. Enclosure 4.3 If, not IF, NOT Lines 6, 7, 9, 11 12, 13, I
and the note before line 11
- 17. Enclosure 4.4 If, not IF, NOT Lines 6, 7, 9, 11, 12,13,and the note before line 11
- 18. Enclosure 4.5 IF IF Line 5, 7, and Line 14 - 16
- 19. Enclosure 4. 7 D Fax Form - For guidance see Enclosure D Fax Form using group Dial 1 - - For 4.8 (Copy/Fax Operation) guidance see Enclosure 4.8 (Copy/Fax Operation)
- 20. Enclosure 4. 7 D Use Group Dial 001 DELETED
- 21. Enclosure 4. 7 Check off the following MINIMUM required D IF AT ANY TIME DEMNET is NOT agencies as they answer the phone and OPERATING CORRECTLY, refer to record time and date in table below. Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method And Sequencing To Contact Agencies) to manuallv transmit the messaqe.
- 22. Enclosure 4. 7 D IF Required minimum agencies did not D IF Required minimum agencies did not answer the phone answer the phone THEN Dial a point-to -point call to the THEN Dial a point-to -point call to the absent agency. absent agency.
- If agency does not answer, then call
- If agency does not answer, then the direct line form table in call the direct line form table in preceding step. preceding step.
- 23. Enclosure 4. 7 Check off the following MINIMUM required D Check off the following MINIMUM agencies as they answer the phone and required agencies as they answer the record time and date in table below. phone and record time and date in table below.
- 24. Enclosure 4. 7 D IF one of the required agencies did NOT D IF one of the required agencies did NOT answer DEMNET, try alternate method to answer DEMNET, try alternate method to reach agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 reach agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method And Sequencing To (Alternate Method And Sequencing To Contact Agencies) and the Emergency Contact Agencies) and the Emergency Telephone Directory for guidance as Telephone Directory for guidance as needed. Once agency contacted, read needed. Once agency contacted, read message and then record agency name, message and then record agency name, and date contacted in space above. and date contacted in space above.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-t:t-'-ALL-UOUL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 10 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
- 25. Enclosure 4. 7 0 IF A Keowee dam/dike condition "A" or 0 0 IF any of the following exists for the "B" or external flood condition exist for the site:
site,
- Keowee dam/dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
- Jocassee dam/dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
- Keowee dam/dike Potential Failure (Condition 'B")
- Jocassee dam/dike Potential Failure (Condition 'B")
- external flood condition
- 26. Enclosure 4. 7 FAX dial codes 003, 027, 026, 024, 025 FAX dial codes 3, 27, 26, 24, 25
- 27. Enclosure 4. 7 0 If one of the required agencies did not 0 IF one of the required agencies did NOT answer DEMNET, try alternate method to answer DEMNET, try alternate method to reach agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 reach agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method And Sequencing to (Alternate Method And Sequencing to Contac Agencies) and the Emergency Contac Agencies) and the Emergency Telephone Directory for guidance as need. Telephone Directory for guidance as need.
Once agency contacted, read message and then record agency name, time, and date Once agency contacted, read message and contacted in the space above. then record agency name, time, and date contacted in the space above.
- 28. Enclosure 4.8 0 1.1 FAX the notification form using the u 1.1 FAX the notification form using the following method: following method:
A. Insert notification form, adjust 1.1.1 Insert notification form, adjust document guide if needed document guide if necessary. B. Determine which Dial Code number to 1.1.2 Select "Fax". use 1 .1 .3 Select "Address' Book" (file folder C. Press the Dial Code number Icon). D. Press the START button 1.1.4 Select "Individual" or "Group" based on notification needed. 1.1 .5 Select "OK". Press the green "send' button.
- 29. Enclosure 4.8 Table of Group Dial Codes follows Table of Table of Group Dial Codes precedes Table Dial Codes. Dial codes have leading zeros. of Dial Codes. Dial codes do not have Leading zeros.
- 30. Enclosure 4.9 Note Box follows operating instructions for Note Box moved to precede operating Motorola 48.5 Mhz radio instructions for Motorola 48.5 Mhz radio.
Added the followinQ to the Note Box.
- 31. Enclosure 4.9
- If DEMNET does NOT work, any alternate method (in order of preference such as: land lines, Mhz radio, cell phones, may be used to satisfy the
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING -AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5of10 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form notification requirement.
- 32. Enclosure (Dial Code 008) (Dial Code 8) 4.10
- 33. Enclosure D To initiate a group call to the pre-selected
- Press and hold the "Push to Talk" 4.13 OROs during an Emergency: Button on the handset when speaking
- 1. Select the Home Button
- 2. Select the (Site) Notify Folder Icon
- Communicate with facilities per
- 3. Select the Orange (Site) Notify Button governing procedure D To initiate a Point to Point call to one D To initiate a group call to the pre-specific facility: selected OROs during an Emergency:
- 1. Select the Home Button 1. Select the "Home" Button
- 2. Select the Notify Folder Icon 2. Select the Orange (Site) Notify Button
- 3. Use Navigate Arrow(s) to access the 3. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR select desired Facility Button * "Cancel"
- 4. Select the Facility Button 4. Select "Hang up" at the completion of the D To initiate a custom Conference call to a call AND replace handset in the cradle selected set of facilities: D To initiate a Point to Point call to one
- 1. Select the Home Button specific facility:
- 2. Select (Site) Notify Folder Icon 1. Select the "Home" Button
- 3. Select the Custom Conference Icon (the 2. Select a Folder Icon (ONS Plant Devices icon will change color to red) or ONS ORO Devices)
- 4. Use Navigate Arrow(s) to access the 3. Select Facility Button desired Facility Buttons 4. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR select
- 5. Select each Facility Button to be included "Cancel" in the call 5. Select "Hang up" at the completion of the
- 6. Select the Custom Conference Icon call AND replace handset in the cradle again to initiate the call D To initiate an alternate Point to Point call D Press and hold the Push to Talk Button to one specific facility:
on the handset when speaking 1. Arrow right to Dial Icon and select the D Communicate with facilities per Dial Icon governing procedure 2. Input the five digit code for the facility into D Hang up the handset to terminate the the dial pad call 3. Select "Yes" to Initiate the call OR select "Clear" and "Home"
- 4. Select "Hang up" at the completion of the cal.I and replace the handset in the cradle.
- 5. Select "Clear" and "Home" D To initiate a custom Conference call to a selected set of facilities:
- 1. Select the "Home" Button
- 2. Select the "Custom Conference" Icon (The icon will change color to light purple)
- 3. Select the Folder Icon (ONS Plant Devices or ONS ORO Devices)
- 4. Select each Facility Button to be included in the call
- 5. Select "Home"
- 6. Select the "Custom Conference" Icon again.
- 7. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR select "Cancel"
- 8. Select "Hang up" at the completion of the call AND replace handset in the cradle.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-t:.1-"-ALL-UOUL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 6 of 10 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form This List Includes all organizations that receive the "ONS Notify" Call. 0 ONS EP ........................................ 45718 0 ONS JIC Assembly Room ............. 45721 0 ONS JIC Media Room .................. .45720 0 Oconee EOG Conference Room .. .45046 0 Oconee EOG Director................. .45246 0 Oconee Warning Point-1 ............ 45346 0 Pickens Conference Room .......... .45248 0 Pickens Warning Point... ............. 45649 0 SC Alt Warning Point-2 .............. .45301 0 ACWP Ops Center-2 ................... 45500 Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes I 0 No 1~ Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4, 1 Evaluation is not 0 CFR 50.54(q) If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter Screening ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification below Evaluation change is documented below: and complete Form, Part Ill Attachment 4, Justification: Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) jo Part 111. Editorial Change Yes I 0 No 1~
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 7 of 10 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10.CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numberinq, spellinq, or ounctuation that does not chanqe intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4,
- 2. 2.3, 2.3.1, IF IF Evaluation is not Part IV and 2.3.3 required. Enter address non 2.3.4, justification and editorial 3.1.1, complete changes 3.1.2,3.1.3 Attachment 4,
- 12. Enclosure If IF Part V & VI.
4.1 Line 12
- 15. Enclosure If, not IF, NOT 4.2 Lines 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, AND 13
- 16. Enclosure If, not IF, NOT 4.3 Lines 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, and the note before line 11
- 17. Enclosure If, not IF, NOT 4.4 Lines 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, and the note before line 11
- 18. Enclosure IF !E 4.5 Line 5, 7, and Line14-16 Justification:
These changes are editorial as defined by AD-EP-ALL-0602
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-t:.1-'-ALL-UbU~ EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 8of10 1O CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box. 1 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1}Assignmentof Responsibility(OrganizationControl) 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. D 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. 2 1O CFR 50.4 7(b )(2)0hsite Emergency Organization** 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. D 3' 10 CFR 50.47(b)(3) Emergency Response;Support and Resources::*. 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3) 4* .. 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) Emergency Classification System~* 4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. D (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.) 5 .*. 10:CFR 50.47(b)(5)Notification Methods and Procedures:' Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating ~ notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt ~ instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 9 of 10 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 6 1o CFR 50A7(b)(6) Emergency Communications;:_ ** 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response !Bl organizations. ~ 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D T 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7) Public Education and Information: .. la Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D 8 1O CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilities and Equipment:"
- 8a Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. !Bl 9 1O'CFR50.47(b )(9) Accident Assessment:'"
9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D 10* 10 CFR50'.47(b)(10)'ProtectiVe Re.sponse,,:: . 10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public. 11 1o CFR 50.47(b )(11) Radiological* Exposure Control'" 11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D 12 10 CFR50.47(b)(12) Medical and Public Health Support: 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D 13 10 CFR 50.47(b )(13)' Recovery Planning* and. Post~accident Operations 0
*
- 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) Drills and Exercises**
14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D 15 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) Emergency Response.Training 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-1::1-'-ALL-UbU/! EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 10of10 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 16 10 CFR 50.47(b)(16) Emergency.Plan Maintenance*, 16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete [g] , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. PartV. Signatures:: Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date: Jeff White d t.£,..t fOA i '- ; I\ C. .,\o. ~ Reviewer Name (Print): Date,: Ae_grover (EP Manager Name (Print): ri *aL 1'--'l Su/l~<Jr: Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Part VI. NRG Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 1O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is - put in effect. D QA RECORD
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 1 of 12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number . Applicable Sites;- BNP 0 EREG #: 02037166 2069544 Revised EReg for changes madelAWAD-EP- CNS 0 ALL-0602. Changes are annotated in bold and italic. CR3 0 0 HNP MNS 0 5AD #: 01953095 ONS IBl RNP 0 GO 0 Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015 A Revision 006 Offsite Communications from the Control Room Part I. Description of Proposed Change: Change step before after Number
- 1. NOTE before The other unit that has now met a The other unit that has now met a NOUE
- 2. Immediate NOUE EAL classification should be EAL classification should be noted under action noted under line 13 Remarks section.
line 13 Remarks section along with what EAL condition is now met for that If any other unit has a classification, the unit. unit and classification should be noted under Line 13.
- 3. 3.4 IAAT Turnover with the TSC has been WHEN any of the conditions are met:
completed or the event has been 0 The TSC has been activated. terminated. D EOF is activated. THEN Stop here. 0 The event has been terminated. THEN Exit this procedure.
- 4. First NOTE Pre-printed Emergency Notification Pre-printed Emergency Notification Forms Enclosure 4.1 Forms containing specific EAL# and containing specific EAL# and EAL EAL Description may be used in lieu of Description may be used in lieu of Enclosure 4.1.A or 4.1.B Enclosure 4.1.A.
- 5. First action Obtain one of the following, as Obtain one of the following, as under first appropriate, and complete the forms as appropriate:
NOTE follows: Enclosure 4.1
- 6. Enclosure 4.1 NOTE: Given that available space for NOTE above handwritten information is limited on line 5, line 5 it is acceptable for what is written to span multiple boxes' worth, as long as it is contained on line 5.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-m:m:l I EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 2of12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form
- 7. Enclosure 4.1 IF a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike IF a Keowee OR Jocassee Hydro Line 5 Condition "A" exists: Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
exists:
- 8. Enclosure 4.1 IF a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike IF a Keowee OR Jocassee Hydro Line 5 Condition "A" exists: Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
- Mark Box B and write "Move exists:
residents living downstream of
- Mark Box E the Keowee Hydro dams to
- Write "Move residents living higher ground. downstream of the Keowee Hydro
- AND mark Box E and write dams to higher ground.
"Prohibit traffic flow across
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges identified on your bridges identified on your inundation maps until the inundation maps until the danger danger has passed." has passed."
1:::; IJ
- 9. Enclosure 4. 1 Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the IF any of the conditions stated in the note Line 6 conditions stated in the note above above mark B (Is Occurring). IF THEY do apply. If they do not apply mark None. NOT apply mark A, 'None'. Complete Line Complete line 6, then mark Box A on 6 as directed by SM/EC.
this line and qo to Line 8.
- 10. Enclosure 4.1 Enter the meteorological data if IF available from RP Shift enter the Line 9 available from RP Shift. If unavailable, meteorological data. IF unavailable, leave leave this line blank. Request RP Shift this line blank. Request RP Shift Dose Dose Assessor perform calculation for Assessor perform calculation for Line 9 for Line 9 for Follow-up notification. Follow- Follow-up notification. Follow-up due in 60 up notification due in 60 minutes minutes.
- 11. Endosure 4.1 Mark or select ALL if events affects the IF the highest emergency classification for Line 11 emergency classification on more than this event applies to more than one unit one unit. select "All".
Mark or select one (1) unit if event affects one unit or one has a higher emergency classification.
- 13. Enclosure 4.2 . If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition !E..a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Line 5 "A" does NOT exist, mark Box A and go Failure (Condition "A") does NOT exist, to Line 6. mark Box A NONE.
- 14. Enclosure 4.2 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro Line 5 "A" exists: Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
- Mark Box B and write "Move exists:
residents living downstream of the
- Mark Box E Keowee Hydro Dam to higher
- Write "Move residents living ground." downstream of the Keowee Hydro
- AND mark Box E and write Dam to higher ground."
"Prohibit traffic flow across bridges
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across identified on your inundation maps bridges identified on your inundation until the danger has passed." maps until the danger has passed."
- 19. Enclosure 4. 7 D Fax Form - For guidance see D Fax Form using group Dial 1 - - For Enclosure 4.8 (Copy/Fax Operation) guidance see Enclosure 4.8 (Copy/Fax Operation)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 3 of 12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form
- 20. Enclosure 4. 7 D Use Group Dial 001 DELETED
- 21. Enclosure 4. 7 Check off the following MINIMUM required D IF AT ANY TIME DEMNET is NOT agencies as they answer the phone and OPERATING CORRECTLY, refer to record time and date in table below. Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method And Sequencing To Contact Agencies) to manually transmit the message.
- 22. Enclosure 4. 7 D IF Required minimum agencies did D IF Required minimum agencies did not answer the phone not answer the phone THEN Dial a point-to -point call to the I!fSM Dial a point-to -point call to the absent agency. absent agency.
- If agency does not answer, then
- If agency does not answer, then call the direct line form table in call the direct line form table in precedina step. precedinq steo.
- 23. Enclosure 4. 7 Check off the following MINIMUM required D Check off the following MINIMUM agencies as they answer the phone and required agencies as they answer the record time and date in table below. phone and record time and date in table below.
- 24. Enclosure 4.7 D IF one of the required agencies did D IF one of the required agencies did NOT answer DEMNET, try alternate NOT answer DEMNET, try alternate method to reach agency. Refer to method to reach agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method And Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method And Sequencing To Contact Agencies) and Sequencing To Contact Agencies) and the Emergency Telephone Directory for the Emergency Telephone Directory for guidance as needed. Once agency guidance as needed. Once agency contacted, read message and then record contacted, read message and then agency name, and date contacted in record agency name, and date space above. contacted in space above.
- 25. Enclosure 4. 7 D IF A Keowee dam/dike condition "A" D D IF any of the following exists for or "B" or external flood condition exist for the site:
the site,
- Keowee dam/dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
- Jocassee dam/dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
- Keowee dam/dike Potential Failure (Condition 'B")
- Jocassee dam/dike Potential Failure (Condition 'B")
- external flood condition
- 26. Enclosure 4. 7 FAX dial codes 003, 027, 026, 024, 025 FAX dial codes 3, 27, 26, 24, 25
- 27. Enclosure 4. 7 D If one of the required agencies did not D IF one of the required agencies did answer DEMNET, try alternate method to NOT answer DEMNET, try alternate reach agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 method to reach agency. Refer to (Alternate Method And Sequencing to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method And Contac Agencies) and the Emergency Sequencing to Contac Agencies) and Telephone Directory for guidance as the Emergency Telephone Directory for need. guidance as need.
Once agency contacted, read message and then record agency name, time, and Once agency contacted, read message date contacted in the soace above. and then record aaencv name time
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 I EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 4of12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form and date contacted in the space above.
- 28. Enclosure 4.8 D 1.1 FAX the notification form using the u 1.1 FAX the notification form using following method: the following method:
A. Insert notification form, adjust 1 .1.1 Insert notification form, adjust document guide if needed document guide if necessary. B. Determine which Dial Code number to 1.1.2 Select "Fax". use 1 .1.3 Select "Address' Book" (file folder C. Press the Dial Code number Icon). D. Press the START button 1 .1.4 Select "Individual" or "Group" based on notification needed. 1.1.5 Select "OK". Press the green "send' button.
'
- 29. Enclosure 4.8 Table of Group Dial Codes follows Table Table of Group Dial Codes precedes of Dial Codes. Dial codes have leading Table of Dial Codes. Dial codes do not zeros. have Leadinq zeros.
- 30. Enclosure 4.9 Note Box follows operating instructions for Note Box moved to precede operating Motorola 48.5 Mhz radio instructions for Motorola 48.5 Mhz radio.
Added the following to the Note Box.
- 31. Enclosure 4.9
- If DEMNET does NOT work, any alternate method (in order of preference such as: land lines, Mhz radio, cell phones, may be used to satisfy the notification reauirement.
- 32. Enclosure (Dial Code 008) (Dial Code 8) 4.10
- 33. Enclosure D To initiate a group call to the pre-
- Press and hold the "Push to Talk" 4.13 selected OROs during an Emergency: Button on the handset when
- 1. Select the Home Button speaking
- 2. Select the (Site) Notify Folder Icon
- Communicate with facilities per
- 3. Select the Orange (Site) Notify Button governing procedure D To initiate a Point to Point call to one D To initiate a group call to the pre-specific facility: selected OROs during an Emergency:
- 1. Select the Home Button 1 . Select the "Home" Button
- 2. Select the Notify Folder Icon 2. Select the Orange (Site) Notify Button
- 3. Use Navigate Arrow(s) to access the 3. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR desired Facility Button select "Cancel"
- 4. Select the Facility Button 4. Select "Hang up" at the completion of D To initiate a custom Conference call to the call AND replace handset in the a selected set of facilities: cradle
- 1. Select the Home Button D To initiate a Point to Point call to one
- 2. Select (Site) Notify Folder Icon specific facility:
- 3. Select the Custom Conference Icon 1 . Select the "Home" Button (the icon will change color to red) 2. Select a Folder Icon (ONS Plant
- 4. Use Navigate Arrow(s) to access the Devices or ONS ORO Devices)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING-AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 5of12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form desired Facility Buttons 3. Select Facility Button
- 5. Select each Facility Button to be 4. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR included in the call select "Cancel"
- 6. Select the Custom Conference Icon 5. Select "Hang up" at the completion of again to initiate the call the call AND replace handset in the D Press and hold the Push to Talk cradle Button on the handset when speaking D To initiate an alternate Point to Point D Communicate with facilities per call to one specific facility:
governing procedure 1. Arrow right to Dial Icon and select the D Hang up the handset to terminate the Dial Icon call 2. Input the five digit code for the facility into the dial pad
- 3. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR select "Clear" and "Home"
- 4. Select "Hang up" at the completion of the call and replace the handset in the cradle.
- 5. Select "Clear" and "Home" D To initiate a custom Conference call to a selected set of facilities:
- 1. Select the "Home" Button
- 2. Select the "Custom Conference" Icon (The icon will change color to light purple)
- 3. Select the Folder Icon (ONS Plant Devices or ONS ORO Devices)
- 4. Select each Facility Button to be included in the call
- 5. Select "Home"
- 6. Select the "Custom Conference" Icon again.
- 7. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR select "Cancel"
- 8. Select "Hang up" at the completion of the call AND replace handset in the cradle.
This List Includes all organizations that receive the "ONS Notify" Call. DONS EP ........................................ 45718 DONS JIC Assembly Room ............. 45721 DONS JIC Media Room .................. .45720 D Oconee EOC Conference Room .. .45046 D Oconee EOC Director ................. .45246 D Oconee Warning Point-1 ............ 45346 D Pickens Conference Room .......... .45248
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AIJ-1::.1-'-ALL-uou:L I EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 6of12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form. D Pickens Warning Point... ........... .. 45649 D SC Alt Warning Point-2
.............. .45301 D ACWP Ops Center-2 .................. .
45500 , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes D Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form, is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No 00 Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change: Oconee Emergency Plan Revision 82-2December1981 E. Notification Methodology Response Organization Notification (Figure E-1) E-1. Procedures have been developed that describe the basis for notification of response organizations that is consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme. These procedures are a part of the implementing procedures and are listed as Initial Determination of Emergency Action (Event Index); Emergency Action Level - Unusual Event; Emergency Action Level - Alert; Emergency Action Level - Site Area Emergency; Emergency Action Level - General Emergency. E-2. An Emergency Organization Recall has been developed for the augmentation of support during an emergency situation. E-3 & E-4. Initial and Follow-up Message Formats A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the Bureau of Radiological Health of an emergency situation at the facility. E-7. Protective Action Guides (PAG) Messages to the Public Duke Energy Company will make Protective Action recommendations to the State of South Carolina and Pickens and Oconee County (before the State EOF in Seneca is operational) by reporting meteorological conditions and offsite dose projections. The State and/or County (where appropriate) will use this information together with their own information, to provide recommendations to the public for their safety and welfare. F. Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations and to emergency personnel and to the public.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 7 of 12 1O CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Oconee Emergency Plan Revision 2015-006 Section E Notification E.1 & E:2 Response Organization Notification Procedures have been developed that describe the basis for notification of response organizations that is consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme. E.3 & E.4 Initial and Follow-up Message Formats A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility. Notification and authentication procedures are in place for all designated agencies. E. 7 Protective Action Guides Duke Energy Company will make Protective Action Recommendations PARs to the State of South Carolina and Pickens and Oconee County based on meteorological conditions, offsite dose projections, and plant status. Section F Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations, emergency personnel, and to the public. RIS 2005-02, Clarifying the Process for Making Emergency Plan Changes, Rev. 1 states,
- 2) Emergency plan a) The document prepared and maintained by the licensee that identifies and describes the licensee's methods for maintaining emergency preparedness, and responding to emergencies. An emergency plan includes the plan as originally approved by the NRC, and all subsequent changes made by the licensee with, and without, prior NRC review and approval under 10 CFR 50.54(q).
i) The licensee's emergency plan consists of: (1) The emergency plan as approved by the NRC via a Safety Evaluation Report (SE), or license amendment (LA) from the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) or the Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME). (2) Any subsequent changes to the emergency plan explicitly reviewed by the NRC through an SE, or LA from NRR or FSME, and found to meet the applicable regulations. (3) Any subsequent changes made by the licensee without NRC review and approval after the licensee concluded that the change(s) do not constitute a decrease in effectiveness under 10 CFR 50.54(q). The differences in ONS Emergency Plan, Revision 82-2, and the current revision of the ONS Emergency Plan have been determined to meet the regulatory requirements of the course of revisions. Each revision has been evaluated in the regulatory process has met the approval of the NRC during the inspection process. The changes described in this evaluation do not reduce the effectiveness of the emergency plan. The Control Room has redundant two-way communications with principal response organizations and emergency personnel. The changes in this revision do not change methods or ability to communicate with principal response organizations and emergency personnel. Communication to the public is not within the domain of the Control Room.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCRE:l::::NING ANU AU-t:.t-'-ALL-UOUL l EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 8 of 12 1O CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 1O CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, rather than under 1O CFR 50.54(q): 1o CFR 50.47(b)(5)-Emergency Notifications Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. 1OCFR50 Appendix E IV. Content of Emergency Plans D. Notification Procedures
- 3. A licensee shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency. The licensee shall demonstrate that the appropriate governmental authorities have the capability to make a public alerting and notification decision promptly on being informed by the licensee of an emergency condition.
1O CFR50.47(b) (6), Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. 10 CFR 50, Appendix E Section IV. Content of Emergency Plans E. Facilities and Equipment (applicable excerpts only)
- 9. At least one onsite and one offsite communications system; each system shall have a backup power source. All communication plans shall have arrangements for emergencies, including titles and alternates for those in charge at both ends of the communication links and the primary and backup means of communication. Where consistent with the function of the governmental agency, these arrangements will include:
- a. Provision for communications with contiguous State/local governments within the plume exposure pathway EPZ.
Such communications shall be tested monthly. The changes identified in this revision continue to comply with regulation ONS retains the capability required by regulation to notify the responsible State and local government agencies within 15 minutes of declaring an emergency.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 9of12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen): Standard 1 O CFR 50.47(b)(5)-Emergency Notifications Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. Function The emergency planning function defined for this planning standard: (1) Procedures-for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. Elements NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 Rev 1, II, E. Notification Methods and Procedures Criteria (applicable excerpts only) Each organization shall establish procedures which describe mutually agreeable bases for notification of response organizations consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme set forth in Appendix 1. These procedures shall include means for verification of messages. The specific details of verification need not be included in the plan. Standard 1O CFR50.47(b) (6), Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. Function Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response organizations. Elements NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 Rev 1, II, F. Emergency Communications (applicable excerpts only) The communication Plans for emergencies shall include organizational titles and alternates for both ends of the communication links. Each organization shall establish reliable primary and backup means of communication for licensees, local, and State response organizations. Such systems should be selected to be compatible with one another. Each plan shall include: 1a. provision for 24-hour,per day notification to and activation of the State/local emergency response network; and at a minimum, a telephone link and alternate, including 24-hour per day manning of communications links that initiate emergency response actions.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 [ EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 10of12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: 1o CFR 50.47(b)(5)-Emergency Notifications Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. Function The emergency planning function defined for this planning standard: (1) Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. Standard 10 CFR50.47(b) (6), Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. Function Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response organizations. The Emergency Plan does not address operating detail of WebEOC or fax machines. WebEOC version 7.5 and Xerox WorkCentre 3615 fax machines perform the same function as their predecessor and are easily capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Jocassee Dam/Keowee Dam natural and destructive phenomena affecting plant safety were added to ONS emergency plan as part of revision 2011-01 in May 2011. These additions include emergency classification conditions and protective action recommendations, which can be found in Section D Enclosure 4. 7. The transition to Imminent Failure from Condition A to be consistent with Guidelines for Dam Safety does not change the protective action required during this condition. Contingency actions upon loss of DEMNET are consistent with the description in the Emergency Plan: Relocation of procedure tables, elimination of redundancy, and consolidation of steps improve procedure usability. The changes identified in this revision maintains the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan functions. ONS retains the capability required by regulation to notify the responsible State and local government agencies within 15 minutes of declaring an emergency.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 Page 11 of 12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? Yes !Bl NoD 2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no Yes !Bl NoD reduction in effectiveness)? 3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? Yes !Bl NoD 4 Choose one of the following conclusions: a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current
!Bl Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRC approval.
b The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. D Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval. Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or rejected? I DI D Yes No If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 10 CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 I EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 12of12 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date: Jeff White Reviewer Name (Print): Date: Donald A Crowl Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Patrick M Street Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments.
- One for EP to provide the 1O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 1O CFR 50.54(q), 0 to Licensing.
- One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D QA RECORD
- - -
RP/O/A/1000/0lSA Rev. 6 Original approved 7/25/16
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602-EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4
) Page 1of5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number, Applicable-Sites':
BNP 0 EREG #: 02037166 CNS 0 CR3 0 HNP 0 MNS 0 SAD#: 019530951 ONS 00 RNP 0 GO 0 Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015 A Revision 006 Offsite Communications From The Control Room Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the
)1ergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):
- Changes 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 27, and 30 are editorial. These changes improve clarity or conciseness and provide formatting in accordance with the Procedure Writers Manual. These changes do not change intent.
- Change 4 added 4.1.B to the first note in Enclosure 4.1 to correct a previous omission
- Change 6 provides guidance in Enclosure 4.1 for hand written FERC PAR requirements to be contained on line 5 of Emergency Notification Forms
- Change 8 implements a fleet decision on Enclosure 4.1 for communicating FERG PARs for Hydro Dam/Dike
. Imminent Failure on line SE of WebEOC Emergency Notification Forms.
- Change 14 provides for transition in Enclosure 4.2 to Imminent failure from Condition "A" and to Potential Failure from Condition "B" in accordance with FERC initiatives of EAP
- Change 19 combines two steps on Enclosure 4. 7 for fax use instructions
- Change 20 removes leading zeros from Enclosure 4.7 Group Dial codes to reflect requirements of new fax machines
- Change 21 added contingency for loss of DEMNET to Enclosure 4.7
- Change 22 instructions moved from page 2 to page 3 of Enclosure 4. 7
- Change 24 Contingency for agency not responding to DEMNET was moved from page 4 to page 1 of Enclosure 4. 7
- Change 25 adds the five conditions applicable under FERC initiatives of EAP. This change also adds transition to Imminent Failure from Condition "A", and to Potential Failure from Condition "B." and "Jocassee" for clarity of applicability of Enclosure 4.7.
- Change 26 removes the leading zeros from fax machine group dial codes in Enclosure 4.7 .
- Change 28 replaces Enclosure 4.8 old fax operating instructions with new fax operating instructions .
- Change 29 relocates group dial codes within Enclosure 4.8 to correspond with their order of use .
- Change 31 adds contingency for DEMNET Failure .
)
- Change 32 removes leading zeros from (Dial Code 008)
- Change 33 adds DEMNET instructions that corresponds to the DEMNET menu .
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes Jo No I IBl Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not 10 CFR If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter 50.54(q) ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed justification Screening change is documented below: below and Evaluation complete Form, Part Ill Justification: Attachment 4, Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) 10 Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes 10 No I IBl Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Evaluation is not Part IV and Justification: required. Enter justification and address non editorial
)
Changes 4, 6, 8, 14, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, 32, and 33 are not complete changes editorial or typographical only. Attachment 4, Part V & VI. Changes 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 27, and 30 are editorial. These changes improve clarity or conciseness and provide formatting in accordance with the Procedure Writers Manual. These changes do not change intent. Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section 11? If answer is yes, then check box. 1 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. D 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. 2 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) Onsite Emergency Organization 2a Process ensures that onshift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. D ) 3 10 CFR 50.47(b)(3) Emergency Response Support and Resources. 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 4
) Page 3 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3) 4
- 1O CFR 50.4 ?(b )(4) Emergency Classification System0 >"
4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. D (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.) 5 1O CFR 50.4 ?(b )(5) Notification Methods and Procedures>* Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification [BJ of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions [BJ to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3) ) )
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 6 10 CFR50A7(b}(6}'EmergencyCommunications,.
- 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response 00 organizations.
6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. 0 7 10 CFR 50.4 7(b)(7) Public Education and Information- * ?a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the 0 plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ}. (NA for CR3) ?b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. 0 a* 10 CF.R50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilities: and Equipment:**'.. * .. *
- Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. 0 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. 00 9** 1O CFR 50.47(b)(9)':AccidentAssessment-...
- 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. 0 10 1oCFR50.47(b)(1 O)'. Protective* Response**:< )
10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3} 0 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available 0 to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including 0 those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that 0 chose to provide Kl to the public. 11 1O CFR 50.47(b}(11) Radiological. Exposure Control:
- 11 a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. 0 12 1O' CFR 50.4 7(b )(12) Medical and* Public Health Support
- 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. 0 13 1O CFR 50.47(b)(13) Recovery Planning and. Post-accident Operations 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. 0 14* 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14} Drills and Exercises*
14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) 0 is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, 0 and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. 0 15 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15} Emergency Response Training
)
15a Training is provided to emergency responders. 0
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4
) Page 5 of 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
16 10 CFR 50A7(b)(16) Emergency Plan Maintenance,. 16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 1O CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) 00 Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. Part V. Signatures: .
'"'.'eparer Name (Print):
Jcky Bowser Under Instruction of Pete Kuhlman Reviewer Name (Print): Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D lA RECORD )
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 1 of 8 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number.** Applicable Sites;* . BNP D EREG #: 02037166 CNS D CR3 D HNP D MNS D SAD#: 01953095 ONS [BJ RNP D GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015 A Revision 006 Offsite Communications from the Control Room ., ) )
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
.
EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 2 of 8 ) 1 O CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part I. Description of Proposed Change:
- Change 4: Added 4.1.B to Enclosure 4.1 Note above line 5 to correct a previous omission. Pre-printed Emergency Notification Forms containing specific EAL# and EAL Description may be used in lieu of Enclosure 4.1.A or 4.1.B
- Change 6: FERC PAR requirements for Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition A) are too lengthy to be reasonable hand written in the space provided by the manual version of the ENF. Enclosure 4.1 above line 5, Added "NOTE: Given that available space for handwritten information is limited on line 5, it is acceptable for what is written to span multiple boxes' worth, as long as it is contained on line 5.
- Change 8: Revised instruction to placed PARs for Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Failure on ENF 5E. This procedure provides instructions for both manual and electronic completion of ENF. Previous revision did not address the use of WebEOC.
- Change 14: Transition to Imminent Failure from Condition "A" and to Potential Failure from Condition "B."
(FERC initiatives of EAP) required revision to Enclosure 4.2 line 5.
- Change 19: Combined two steps in Enclosure 4. 7 to improve procedure guidance for use of fax group dialing.
- Changes 20, 26, and 32: Removed leading zeros from group dial codes in Enclosures 4. 7 and 4.1 O. This change reflects operation of new fax equipment. Also in Enclosure 4. 7 deleted "Use Group Dial 001." Group Dial 001 changed to Group Dial 1 and is addressed in first step of Enclosure 4.7
- Change 21: Added contingency for loss of DEMNET to Enclosure 4.7.
- Change 22: Moved conditional action for communication to emergency agencies from page 2 to page 3 of Enclosure 4. 7. This is a procedure use enhancement. )
- Change 23: Added place keeping aids to Enclosure 4. 7
- Change 24: Contingency for agency not responding to DEMNET was moved from page 4 to page 1 of Enclosure 4.7. This is a procedure use enhancement.
- Change 25: Enclosure 4.7, Transition to Imminent Failure from Condition "A", and to Potential Failure from Condition "B." Added the five conditions applicable under FERC initiatives of EAP. Added "Jocassee" for clarity of applicability.
- Change 28: Replaced fax operating instructions with new fax equipment operating instructions in Enclosure 4.8.
- Change 29: Enclosure 4.8, relocated tables to correspond with order of use. Removed dial code leading zeros.
Replacement fax machines group dial code does not require the leading zeros.
- Change 31: Enclosure 4.9, Added contingency for failed DEMNET communication.
- Change 33: Revised DEMNET operating instruction in Enclosure 4.13 to reflect revised DEMNET menu. , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes D Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form, is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No ~
)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 3 of 8 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change: Oconee Emergency Plan Revision 2015-006 Section E Notification E.1 & E.2 Response Organization Notification Procedures have been developed that describe the basis for notification of response organizations that is consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme. RP/O/A/1000/015 A (Offsite Communications from the Control Room) provides guidance for notifying offsite emergency response organizations of emergency classification and protective action recommendations. RP/O/A/1000/015 A revision 006 makes the following changes:
- Correction of a previous omission of reference to pre-printed HAB Emergency Notification Forms.
- Transition to Imminent Failure from Condition A and to Potential Failure from Condition B to be consistent with Guidelines for Dam Safety.
- Replacement fax machines required some revision to operating instructions.
- Contingency actions for DEMNET failure were added as an enhancement.
- Relocation of procedure tables, elimination of redundancy, and consolidation of steps improve procedure usability.
These changes do not change the basis for notification or the emergency classification and action level scheme. 1& E.4 Initial and Follow-up Message Formats A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility. Notification and authentication procedures are in place for all designated agencies. The Emergency Notification Form (ENF) is used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility in accordance with notification and authentication procedures. Revision 006 to RP/O/A/1000/015 A does not change the notification method. E. 7 Protective Action Guides Duke Energy Company will make Protective Action Recommendations PARs to the State of South Carolina and Pickens and Oconee County based on meteorological conditions, offsite dose projections, and plant status. Revision 006 to RP/O/A/1000/015 A does not change any basis of any Protective Action Guide. Section F Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations, emergency personnel, and to the public. The Control Room has redundant two-way communications with principal response organizations and emergency personnel. Revision 006 to RP/0/A/1000/015 A does not change methods or ability to communicate with principal response organizations and emergency personnel. Communication to the public is not within the domain of the
~ontrol Room.
_/
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 Page 4 of 8
)
10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 1O CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, rather than under 10 CFR 50.54(q): 10CFR50.47 (b) ,(5), and (6) require the following: (5) Procedures must be established to provide initial and follow up notification of offsite response organizations. (6) The content of initial and follow up messages to response organizations and the public has been established, and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. 1OCFR50, Appendix E.IV.D.3 states in part, "A licensee shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency. 1OCFR50 Appendix E. IV E. requires in part:
- a. Provision for communications with contiguous State/local governments within the plume exposure pathway EPZ.
- b. Provision for communications with Federal emergency response organizations.
- c. Provision for communications among the nuclear power reactor control room, the onsite technical support center, and the emergency operations facility; and among the nuclear facility, the principal State and local emergency operations centers, and the field assessment teams.
- d. Provisions for communications by the licensee with NRC Headquarters and the appropriate NRC Regional Office Operations Center from the nuclear power reactor control room, the onsite technical support center, and )
the emergency operations facility. NUREG-0654 provides the following planning standards: E. Notification Methods and Procedures have been established, by the licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organizations; the content of initial and follow up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. F. Emergency communications provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. NUREG-0696 1.3 Emergency Response Facilities, requires reliable communications between onsite and offsite emergency response personnel. NUREG 2.7 Communications requires the TSC to be the primary onsite communications center an emergency to have reliable voice communications to the control room, the OSC, the EOF, and the NRC. Facsimile transmission capability between the TSC, the EOF, and the NRC Operations Center shall also be provided. Compliance with the above regulations and guidance is as follows:
- Change 4 corrects a previous omission of reference to pre-printed HAB Emergency Notification Forms.
- Changes 6 and 8 address use of manual and electronic ENF to communicate FERG PAR requirements for Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition A).
- Changes 14 and 25 reflect change in Guidelines for Dam Safety terminology.
- Changes 19, 22, 23 improve procedure usability by relocation of procedure tables, elimination of redundancy, and consolidation of steps.
- Changes 20, 26, 28, 29, and 32 revise fax machine instruction for new equipment.
- Changes 21, 24, 31, 33 contingency actions related to DEMNET use were added, revised or moved to improve procedure usability. )
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 ) Page 5 of 8 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effective ness Evaluation Form Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachm ent4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen): 10 CFR 50.47(b) (5) Notification Methods and Procedures. Sa Procedures for notification of State and local govemmentaI agencies are capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilities and Equipment Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. )
)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 6 of 8 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sa Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. There is no reduction in effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions.
- Change 4 corrects a previous omission of reference to pre-printed HAB Emergency Notification Forms.
- Changes 6 and 8 addresses use of manual and electronic ENF to communicate FERC PAR requirements for Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition A).
- Change 14 and 25 reflects change in Guidelines for Dam Safety terminology.
- Changes 19, 22, 23 improve procedure usability by relocation of procedure tables, elimination of redundancy, and consolidation of steps.
- Changes 20, 26, 28, 29, and 32 revised fax machine instruction for new equipment.
- Changes 21, 24, 31, 33 contingency actions related to DEMNET use were added, revised or moved to improve procedure usability.
~e Emergency Plan does not address operating detail of WebEOC or fax machines. WebEOC version 7.5 and Xerox WorkCentre 3615 fax machines perform the same function as their predecessor and are easily capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification.
Jocassee Dam/Keowee Dam natural and destructive phenomena affecting plant safety were added to ONS emergency plan as part of revision 2011-01 in May 2011. These additions include emergency classification conditions and protective action recommendations, which can be found in Section D Enclosure 4. 7. The transition to Imminent Failure from Condition A to be consistent with Guidelines for Dam Safety does not change the protective action required during this condition. Contingency actions upon loss of DEMNET are consistent with the description in the Emergency Plan. Relocation of procedure tables, elimination of redundancy, and consolidation of steps improve procedure usability. Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 1O CFR 50 Appendix E? Yes 00 No D '\ Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no Yes 00 No D
./ reduction in effectiveness)?
3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? Yes 00 No D 4 Choose one of the following conclusions:
~**~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--,-~~~~~~~~~~~~---,
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 7 of 8 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current
!Bl Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRG approval.
b The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. D Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval. Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or rejected? I Yes D I No D If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 10 CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:
)
)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 Page 8 of 8 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). Preparer Name (Print): Ricky Bowser/Pete Kuhlman Reviewer Name (Print): Date: Donald A Crowl 7/;, Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): Patrick M Street Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments.
- One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), 0 to Licensing.
- One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRG within 30 days after the change is put in effect. 0 )
QA RECORD
)
~)
Change Matrix RP/OJA/015 A Revision 006 Change step before after why Number
- 1. NOTE before The other unit that has now met a NOUE The other unit that has now met a NOUE Editorial, to improve clarity.
- 2. Immediate EAL classification should be noted under EAL classification should be noted under action line 13 Remarks section along with what line 13 Remarks section.
EAL condition is now met for that unit. If any other unit has a classification, the unit and classification should be noted under Line 13.
- 2. 2.3, 2.3.1, IF IF Editorial, formatting per 2.3.3 2.3.4, PWM.
3.1.1, 3.1.2,3.1.3
- 3. 3.4 IAAT Turnover with the TSC has been WHEN any of the conditions are met: Editorial, reformatted per completed or the event has been D The TSC has been activated. PWM.
terminated. D EOF is activated. THEN Stop here. D The event has been terminated. THEN Exit this procedure.
- 4. First NOTE Pre-printed Emergency Notification Pre-printed Emergency Notification Forms Added 4.1.B to correct a Enclosure 4. 1 Forms containing specific EAL# and EAL containing specific EAL# and EAL previous omission.
Description may be used in lieu of Description may be used in lieu of Enclosure Enclosure 4.1.A. 4.1.A or 4.1.B
- 5. First action Obtain one of the following, as Obtain one of the following, as appropriate: Editorial, revised for under first appropriate, and complete the forms as conciseness.
NOTE follows: Enclosure 4.1
- 6. Enclosure 4.1 NOTE: Given that available space for FERG PAR requirements for NOTE above handwritten information is limited on line 5, it Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent line 5 is acceptable for what is written to span Failure (Condition A) are too multiple boxes' worth, as long as it is lengthy to be reasonable contained on line 5. hand written in the space provided by the manual version of the ENF.
- 7. Enclosure 4.1 IF a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Keowee OR Jocassee Hydro Dam/Dike Editorial, added "Jocassee" Line 5 "A" exists: Imminent Failure (Condition "A") exists: for clarity of applicability.
- 8. Enclosure 4.1 IF a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Keowee OR Jocassee Hydro Dam/Dike Duke Energy Fleet decision Line 5 "A" exists: Imminent Failure (Condition "A") exists: on best location on ENF to 1 of 15
\, .. ~
~
- Mark Box B and write "Move
- Mark Box E place PARs for Hydro residents living downstream of
- Write "Move residents living Dam/Dike Imminent Failure the Keowee Hydro dams to downstream of the Keowee Hydro was 5E. NOTE: This higher ground. dams to higher ground. procedure provides
- AND mark Box E and write
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across instructions for both manual "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges identified on your inundation and electronic completion of bridges identified on your maps until the danger has passed." ENF. Previous revision inundation maps until the danger D Enclosure 4.1 did not apply to has passed." WebEOC.
D
- 9. Enclosure 4.1 Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the IF any of the conditions stated in the note Editorial, formatting per Line 6 conditions stated in the note above apply. above mark B (Is Occurring). IF THEY do PWM.
If they do not apply mark None. Complete NOT apply mark A, 'None'. Complete Line 6 line 6, then mark Box A on this line and as directed by SM/EC. QO to Line 8.
- 10. Enclosure 4.1 Enter the meteorological data if available IF available from RP Shift enter the Editorial, formatting per Line 9 from RP Shift. If unavailable, leave this meteorological data. IF unavailable, leave PWM.
line blank. Request RP Shift Dose this line blank. Request RP Shift Dose Assessor perform calculation for Line 9 Assessor perform calculation for Line 9 for for Follow-up notification. Follow-up Follow-up notification. Follow-up due in 60 notification due in 60 minutes minutes.
- 11. Enclosure 4.1 Mark or select ALL if events affects the IF the highest emergency classification for Editorial, formatting per Line 11 emergency classification on more than this event applies to more than one unit PWM.
one unit. select "All". Mark or select one (1) unit if event affects one unit or one has a higher emergency classification.
- 12. Enclosure 4.1 If IF Editorial, formatting per Line 12 PWM.
- 13. Enclosure 4.2 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition !E_a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Editorial, reformatted per Line 5 "A" does NOT exist, mark Box A and go Failure (Condition "A") does NOT exist, mark PWM due to this being to Line 6. Box A NONE. conditional statements.
- 14. Enclosure 4.2 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Transition to Imminent Line 5 "A" exists: Imminent Failure (Condition "A") exists: Failure from Condition "A",
- Mark Box B and write "Move
- Mark Box E and to Potential Failure from residents living downstream of the
- Write "Move residents living Condition "B." (FERG Keowee Hydro Dam to higher downstream of the Keowee Hydro Dam initiatives of EAP).
ground." 2 of 8
l.. .J
\:2/
- AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit to higher ground."
traffic flow across bridges identified
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across on your inundation maps until the bridges identified on your inundation danqer has passed." maps until the danqer has passed."
- 15. Enclosure 4.2 If, not IF, NOT Editorial, reformatted per Lines 6, 7, 9, PWM due to these being 11, 12, AND conditional statements 13
- 16. Enclosure 4.3 If, not IF, NOT Editorial, reformatted per Lines 6, 7, 9, PWM due to these being 11, 12, 13, conditional statements and the note before line 11
- 17. Enclosure 4.4 If, not IF, NOT Editorial, reformatted per Lines PWM due to these being 6, 7, 9, 11, conditional statements 12, 13, and the note before line 11
- 18. Enclosure 4.5 IF IF Editorial, formatting per PWM Line 5, 7, and Line14-16 3 of 8
- 19. Enclosure 4. 7 D Fax Form - For guidance see Enclosure D Fax Form using group Dial 1 - - For Combines two steps 4.8 (Copy/Fax Operation) guidance see Enclosure 4.8 (Copy/Fax Operation)
- 20. Enclosure 4. 7 D Use Group Dial 001 DELETED Group Dial 001 changed to Group Dial 1 and is addressed in first step of Enclosure 4. 7
- 21. Enclosure 4. 7 Check off the following MINIMUM required D IF AT ANY TIME DEMNET is NOT Added contingency for loss of agencies as they answer the phone and OPERATING CORRECTLY, refer to DEMNET.
record time and date in table below. Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method And Sequencing To Contact Agencies) to manually transmit the messaqe.
- 22. Enclosure 4. 7 D IF Required minimum agencies did not D IF Required minimum agencies did Moved to from page 2 to answer the phone not answer the phone page 3 of Enclosure 4. 7 THEN Dial a point-to -point call to the THEN Dial a point-to -point call to the absent agency. absent agency.
- If agency does not answer, then call
- If agency does not answer, then the direct line form table in call the direct line form table in preceding step. preceding step.
- 23. Enclosure 4. 7 Check off the following MINIMUM required D Check off the following MINIMUM Added place keeping aids.
agencies as they answer the phone and required agencies as they answer the record time and date in table below. phone and record time and date in table below.
- 24. Enclosure 4. 7 D IF one of the required agencies did NOT D IF one of the required agencies did Contingency for agency not answer DEMNET, try alternate method to NOT answer DEMNET, try alternate responding to DEMNET was reach agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 method to reach agency. Refer to moved from page 4 to page 1 (Alternate Method And Sequencing To Enclosure 4.9 {Alternate Method And of Enclosure 4.7 Contact Agencies) and the Emergency Sequencing To Contact Agencies) and Telephone Directory for guidance as the Emergency Telephone Directory for needed. Once agency contacted, read guidance as needed. Once agency message and then record agency name, contacted, read message and then record and date contacted in space above. agency name, and date contacted in space above.
- 25. Enclosure 4. 7 D IF A Keowee dam/dike condition "A" or D D IF any of the following exists for the Transition to Imminent "B" or external flood condition exist for the site: Failure from Condition "A",
site,
- Keowee dam/dike Imminent and to Potential Failure from Failure (Condition "A") Condition "B." Added the five
- Jocassee dam/dike Imminent conditions applicable under Failure (Condition "A") FERG initiatives of EAP.
4 of 8
Relocation of tables corresponds with order of use.
- 30. Enclosure 4.9 Note Box follows operating instructions for Note Box moved to precede operating Editorial, formatting per Motorola 48.5 Mhz radio instructions for Motorola 48.5 Mhz radio. PWM.
Added the followina to the Note Box.
- 31. Enclosure 4.9
- If DEMNET does NOT work, any Added contingency for failed alternate method (in order of DEMNET communication.
preference such as: land lines, Mhz radio, cell phones, may be used to satisfy the notification reauirement.
- 32. Enclosure (Dial Code 008) (Dial Code 8) Replacement fax machines 4.10 group dial code does not reauire the leadina zeros.
- 33. Enclosure D To initiate a group call to the pre-selected
- Press and hold the "Push to Talk" Revised DEMNET menu.
4.13 OROs during an Emergency: Button on the handset when speaking
- 1. Select the Home Button
- Communicate with facilities per
- 2. Select the (Site) Notify Folder Icon governing procedure
- 3. Select the Orange (Site) Notify Button D To initiate a group call to the pre-D To initiate a Point to Point call to one selected OROs during an Emergency:
specific facility: 1. Select the "Home" Button
- 1. Select the Home Button 2. Select the Orange (Site) Notify Button
- 2. Select the Notify Folder Icon 3. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR
- 3. Use Navigate Arrow(s} to access the select "Cancel" desired Facility Button 4. Select "Hang up" at the completion of
- 4. Select the Facility Button the call AND replace handset in the cradle D To initiate a custom Conference call to a D To initiate a Point to Point call to one selected set of facilities: specific facility:
- 1. Select the Home Button 1. Select the "Home" Button
- 2. Select (Site) Notify Folder Icon 2. Select a Folder Icon (ONS Plant
- 3. Select the Custom Conference Icon (the Devices or ONS ORO Devices) icon will change color to red) 3. Select Facility Button
- 4. Use Navigate Arrow(s) to access the 4. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR desired Facility Buttons select "Cancel"
- 5. Select each Facility Button to be included 5. Select "Hang up" at the completion of in the call the call AND replace handset in the cradle
- 6. Select the Custom Conference Icon D To initiate an alternate Point to Point again to initiate the call call to one specific facilitv:
6 of 8
I'. *-1
"'=-:/
- Keowee dam/dike Potential Failure (Condition 'B") Added "Jocassee" for clarity
- Jocassee dam/dike Potential of applicability.
Failure (Condition 'B")
- external flood condition
- 26. Enclosure 4. 7 FAX dial codes 003, 027, 026, 024, 025 FAX dial codes 3, 27, 26, 24, 25 Replacement fax machines group dial code does not reauire the leadinq zeros.
- 27. Enclosure 4. 7 D If one of the required agencies did not D IF one of the required agencies did Editorial, formatting per answer DEMNET, try alternate method to NOT answer DEMNET, try alternate PWM.
reach agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 method to reach agency. Refer to (Alternate Method And Sequencing to Enclosure 4.9 {Alternate Method And Contac Agencies) and the Emergency Sequencing to Contac Agencies) and the Telephone Directory for guidance as need. Emergency Telephone Directory for Once agency contacted, read message and guidance as need. then record agency name, time, and date contacted in the space above. Once agency contacted, read message and then record agency name, time, and date contacted in the soace above.
- 28. Enclosure 4.8 D 1.1 FAX the notification form using the D 1.1 FAX the notification form using the Replaced fax operating following method: following method: instructions with new fax operating instructions.
A. Insert notification form, adjust 1.1.1 Insert notification form, adjust document guide if needed document guide if necessary. B. Determine which Dial Code number to 1.1.2 Select "Fax". use 1.1.3 Select "Address' Book" (file folder C. Press the Dial Code number Icon). D. Press the START button 1.1.4 Select "Individual" or "Group" based on notification needed. 1.1.5 Select "OK". Press the green "send' button.
- 29. Enclosure 4.8 Table of Group Dial Codes follows Table of Table of Group Dial Codes precedes Replacement fax machines Dial Codes. Dial codes have leading zeros. Table of Dial Codes. Dial codes do not group dial code does not have Leadin!=l zeros. reauire the leadinq zeros.
5 of 8
l, ' , "-..:,/ D Press and hold the Push to Talk Button 1. Arrow right to Dial Icon and select the on the handset when speaking Dial Icon D Communicate with facilities per 2. Input the five digit code for the facility governing procedure into the dial pad D Hang up the handset to terminate the 3. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR call select "Clear" and "Home"
- 4. Select "Hang up" at the completion of the call and replace the handset in the cradle.
- 5. Select "Clear" and "Home" D To initiate a custom Conference call to a selected set of facilities:
- 1. Select the "Home" Button
- 2. Select the "Custom Conference" Icon
{The icon will change color to light purple)
- 3. Select the Folder Icon (ONS Plant Devices or ONS ORO Devices)
- 4. Select each Facility Button to be included in the call
- 5. Select "Home"
- 6. Select the "Custom Conference" Icon again.
- 7. Select "Yes" to initiate the call OR select "Cancel"
- 8. Select "Hang up" at the completion of the call AND replace handset in the cradle.
This List Includes all organizations that receive the "ONS Notify" Call. DONS EP ........................................45718 DONS JIC Assembly Room ............. 45721 D ONS JIC Media Room .................. .45720 D Oconee EOC Conference Room .. .45046 D Oconee EOC Director ................. .45246 D Oconee Warnina Point-1 ............ 45346 7 of 8
D Pickens Conference Room .......... .45248 D Pickens Warning Point... ............. 45649 D SC Alt Warning Point-2 .............. .45301 D ACWP Ops Center-2 ................... 45500 8 of 8
- -
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) Duke Energy (LJIDNo. RP/O/A/1000/015A. PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 005 _ Page 2of4 PREPARATION (2) Station OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title Offsite Communications Fro (4) Prepared By* Natalie Harness (Signature) ~~lbl~-.J£~~~)LIL~q,.i.,,~-- Date 7/14/2015 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) - Att9Zrl.NSD 228 documentation.
~ No (Revision with minor changes) /} ) //
(6) Reviewed By* ;\,,,N, 1 1
~ (QR)(KI) Date Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KI) NA 1-'illate 7-;Z?.?*z.<
Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) N~ Date 7*-:;1 S --(,<; Mgmt Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) N~ate 2;;}? -(S: (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date ReviewedBy*,,,...,----;---.---::---++-~-1====-r-.---t\;""7"--7------ Date ?;/ 8) Approved By* ___..!._~-~----=--~_:_::::..i.ll.=-=--....J...---=+--=--.:J;1~--'1---=-__!__--- . PERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy (9) Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number ( W O # ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes DNA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
- .'\
__)
- Printed Name and Signature
Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 06/18/2015 (NH)
~The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in information you want to appear on the various yforms needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in information on this form, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perform Step 3 below.
Step 1- press [F12] (Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- 1. ID No.: RP/O/A/1000/015A
- 2. Revision No.: 005 _
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Control Room
- 5. For changes only, enter procedure sections affected:_
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness
- 7. Preparation Date: 7114/2015
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision:
-""J)Step 3- go to Print Prev~ew to update this information~~ all t~e attach~d documents.
*- Step 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional mformat1on needed.
Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness. ) ,.
[Type text]
- Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Control Room Page 3of4
.
)
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Editorial Change: Enclosure 4.8 Page 2 of2 Updating the fax numbers after verification and upgrade project, corrected 4 incorrect contact numbers, and added the A & B simulator fax units to listing. The tio11owmg "D"ia1 codes II have b een programmed.mto the Emergency Response Fac11hes T. (ERF) :tiaxmachines: Dial Codes Aeency I Location Number 001 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 9-1-301-816-5151 002 Pickens County EMA 9-1-864-898-5797 003 Oconee County EMA 9-1-864-638-4216 004 SC State Warning Point 9-1-803-73 7-857 5 005 Alternate SC State Warning Point 9-1-803-896-8352 006 SC Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) 9-1-803-73 7-8570 007 Department of Environmental Controls (DHEC/NEP) 9-1-803-896-4102 008 Common Emergency Operations Center (EOF) 9-1-704-382-0722 009 ONS Technical Support Center (TSC) 9-1-864-873-4308 010 ONS Operational Support Center (OSC) I Control Room 3 9-1-864-873-3 728 011 ONS Back-up TSC/OSC 9-1-864-873-3597 012 Control Room 1&2 9-1-864-873-3153 013 World of Energy (WOE) 9-1-864-873-4605 014 Clemson Joint Information center (JIC) 9-1-864-624-4373 015 ONSComplex 9-1-864-873-4300 016 Nuclear Suoolv Chain (NSC) 9-1-864-873-3558 017 State Forward Emergency Operations Center (FEOC) 9-1-864-654-9367 018 Pickens County Law Enforcement Center (LEC) 9-1-864-898-5531 019 Oconee County Law Enforcement Center (LEC) 9-1-864-63 8-44 34 020 Oconee County Forward EMD 9-1-855-713-3361 021 General Office Joint Information center (GO JIC) 9-1-704-382-0623 022 ECOC 9-1-704-382-3897 023 Security 9-1-864-873-3417 024 Hart County EMA 9-1-706-859-5316 025 Elbert County EMA 9-1-404-283-2022 026 National Weather Service 9-1-864-848-1582 027 Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA) 9-1-404-635-7205 028 Simulator A (DRILL) 9-1-864-873-3432 029 Simulator B (DRILL) 9-1-864-873-3482 ia o es"have b een programmed"mto the Emergency Response Fac1T. Th e tio11owmg "Grou:> D"lCd 1hes (ERF):tiax machines: Group Dial Codes Group A.eencv I Location Dia/Codes 001 State and Counties EOF 002,003,004,005,006,008,013,018,019,020,021, 022 002 Counties EMA 002 & 003 . 003 Keowee Flood/Georgia 024,025,026,027 004 Simulators 028 &029
' 005 EOF & OSC (RP/O/A/1000/015B, 3.12) 008 & 010
[TYPe text] Attachment to 50.54q
*,
_/ CHANGE MATRIX
# Page /Section Current Proposed Change Reason
- 1. Enclosure 4. 7 Use Speed Dial 14 {Speed Dial 17 Use Group Dial 001. fax validation and Page 1 of5 can be used as backup). revisions
- 2. Enclosure 4.7 THEN FAX form using Speed Dial THEN FAX form using Group Dial Code fax validation and Page 4 of5 #27 003 revisions
- 3. Enclosure 4.7 FAX Speed Dial 27 FAX Dial Code 027 fax validation and Page 4 of5 revisions GEMA
- 4. Enclosure 4.7 FAX Speed Dial 27 FAX Dial Code 026 fax validation and Page 4 of5 revisions NWS
- 5. Enclosure 4.7 FAX Speed Dial 27 FAX Dial Code 024 fax validation and Page 4 of5 revisions Hart Co
- 6. Enclosure 4.7 FAX Speed Dial 27 FAX Dial Code 025 fax validation and Page 4 of5 revisions Elbert Co
- 7. Enclosure 4.8 Determine which Speed Dial Code Determine which Dial Code number to fax validation and Page 1 of2 number to use use revisions 1.1.B
- 8. Enclosure 4.8 Press the Speed Dial Code number Press the Dial Code number fax validation and Page 1 of2 revisions 1.1.C
- 9. Enclosure 4.8 see attached see attached fax validation and
- ") Page 2 of2 revisions
_j 10. Enclosure 4.10 Fax this form to the Charlotte EOF at fax validation and Page 1of1 the following number 704-382-0722. revisions (Dial Code 008)
- 11. Enclosure 4.14 12. NCR 01936515 fax validation and
- 13. NCR 01937945 revisions
)
[Type text] APPENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION ) PART I - ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION. Page 1 of2 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC SITE UNIT(S) [81 Oconee D McGuire D Catawba [81 Unit l [81 Unit 2 [81 Unit 3 ACTIVITY TITLE/DOCUMENT/REVISION: RPIOI All 0001015A, Offsite Communications From The Control Room, Rev 005
' PART 11..:.. PROCESS REVIEW ..
For each activity, address all of. the questions below: If the answer is "YES" for any portion ofthe activity, apply ttie identified process( es) to that oortfon of the *activity;* Note: It is not unusual to have more* than one i>rocess aoolv to a 2iven activitv. *
- Will implementation of the above activity require a change to the:
,r L Technical Specifications (TS) or G,,.. D If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227.
Operating License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? if D IfYES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
NO YES
- 3. Security Plans? [;!/ D If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
NO YES (See Appendix H)
- 4. Emergency Plan? D NO w
YES If YES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual.
- 5. Inservice Testing Program Plan? Gr" D If YES, process per site IST Program for ASME code compliance and NO YES related facility changes.
- 6. lnservice Inspection Program Plan? [Ll/ D lfYES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping Inservice Inspection NO YES FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes.
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? o/ D If YES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
NO YES 7a -Utilize Appendix E to address Fire Protection Program Plan Impact. if Check to confirm use of Appendix E Screening Questions.
;
- 8. Regulatory Commitments? IZJ D If YES, process per NSD 214.
NO YES
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? if NO D
YES If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
- 10. Programs and manuals listed in the if D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
Administrative Section of the TS? NO YES )
[Type text] .")., Page}.of2
.)
- PARTma.-.io CFR72AsAPPLICABILITY':**** ',,;*
For:. ~ach.activity; address the q~~stion befow; If the ans~er t~ question U is .'.;YES;'~ and questions.14 aitd 17 ~re answered "NO", .*.* then process the;activity per NSD 211.; lOCFR 72.48 does apply; . . . . * *~* .*
- 11. Does the activity involve SSCs, procedures or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the 121 D YES loading or transport of the canister/cask to the ISFSI, the ISFSI facility, spent fuel cask design? NO
. .. *. . . . . .. ; .. PARTJHb~lO CFR 50$APPLICAB~i'.ITY . . , . . . . .. ...... .. .
For each acti.vity; address all of the questions befow>'If the answer. to. question.IS is \'YES,".the11'IO CFRS0.59 dc:ies not appty*.. lfth.eanswer to ** questic:ins.18 is "NO;,,*then pr01:ess the activity per NSD-209 :.:..10 CFRS0.59 applies. * * * * ** ***
- 12. Does the activity involve a procedure, governed by NSD 703 that has been excluded from the 10 CFR cz(' D YES 50.59 process per NSD 703 and the exclusion status remains valid? NO
- 13. Does the activity involve an administrative procedure governed by NSD I 00 or AD-DC-ALL-020 I that does not contain information regarding the operation and control of Structures, Systems and t1 NO DYES Components?
- 14. Does the activity involve a type of Engineering Change that NSD 301 excludes from the IO CFR 50.59 ~ D YES and/or l 0 CFR 72.48 Processes? Consult NSD 301 for assistance. NO
- 15. Does the activity involve (a) maintenance activities that restore SSCs to their as-designed condition ~ DYES (including activities that implement approved design changes) or (b) temporary alterations supporting NO maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
12(/
- 16. Does the activity involve a UFSAR modification that NSD 220 excludes from the 10 CFR 50.59 Process? D YES Consult NSD 220 for assistance. NO
- 17. Does the activity involve NRC and/or Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC approved changes to the licensing ~ DYES basis? NO
- 18. Are ALL aspects of the activity bounded by one or more "YES" answers to questions 1 through 17, EJ ~s above? NO
; .PARTJV.; UFSARREVIEW/ **
l Does the activity require a modification, deletion, or addition to the UFSAR to satisfy the UFSAR content D DYES 9 requirements of 10 CFR 50.34 (b), 10 CFR 50.71 (e), or Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.70? Consult NSD 220 for NO Assistance. IF YES, process per NSD 220. (Print Name) Applicability Determination Preparer
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (Rl0-14) Duke Energy
) PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/015A Revision No. 005 _ Change No.
Permanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Control Room (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Enclosure 4.8 Page 2 of2 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. [;8'.] No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) Please see attached Change Matrix (7) Reason for Change: Editorial Change: Enclosure 4.8 Page 2 of2 Updating the fax numbers after verification and upgrade project, corrected 4 incorrect contact numbers, -_ 3 - and added the A & B simulator fax units to listing. (8) \--3'""""~""'1l~~w.iu....Fv....~~"--- Date 7/14/2015 Date 7*-.2175" Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KI) NA~Date 7--;:;?,5 75,.... Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA~l1LDate-7*-:-;2S£ Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) NA_j-1..a.--Date 7;;;?s =75' ( 10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ __ Reviewed By* Date _ _ _ __ (11) Approved By* .!........1-!~c___::__L___,__~~~~d(-'....,,...~--,;;>"""'---\--V"-'~J.,,-.--- Date }-/u Ar
- Printed Name and Signature
) -
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 f-FFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
- i
Rev. O 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 4 i ,, Screening and* Evaluation Number.. -* .* ;. 1... .*. , Applicable Sites,,
- EREG #: 5AD#: ONS0 Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015A, Offsite Communications From The Control Room Rev 005
, ,
'
Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): No change to the emergency plan, editorial change
',' ,'
*, ,
.* ",-: ",'"
Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes 10 No I 0 Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4, 10 Evaluation is not CFR 50.54(q) )It yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and required. Enter justification Screening Evaluation Form,
- ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed below and Part Ill change is documented below:
complete Attachment 4, Justification: Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) 10 ,,
- '.*
Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes 10 No I 0 Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Part Evaluation is not IV and address Justification: It was incorrectly labeled as "Drill" but should be labeled required. Enter non editorial "Emergency" based on the section that was updated Section 2 of Enclosure justification and changes 4.11, Emergency ERONS Notification Codes. It was a cut and paste error as the complete same section for drills was revised during revision 9 Section 3 of Enclosure 4.11, Attachment 4, DRILL ERONS Notification Codes. Part V & VI.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) ~'~ Rev. O ATTACHMENT 4 Page J)tOf 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form "L Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-06S4/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box. 1', *. ,* 1.0: CFR S0:4:7(b)(t),Assigmnent ofResppnsibHity. {()rga'nizationControl)r\; .'
- 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned.
1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA forCR3) Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification D of the declared emergency within 1S minutes (30 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions D to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3} Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3) !:'\ _y
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 J
. EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)
':r'--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-'-~~-A-TTA_C~H~M~E=N-T=--'4 __ Rev. O Page ~of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 3~ Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D 1'O'CFR so':47{b )(7). Public: Education and, lnfor~atio~;,/.*
?a 7b 10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 1Ob Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities.
(NA for CR3) 1Oc A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 1Od Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public .
. 1*1<:* !tO:CFR.*so:47(J:>)(1,1}RadioiOgica1i~~p~sure::8ontroF:,.,:.
11a
.12:>;
14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D
'
JO ~FR 50A7(1))(15): Emergency Response Training/{ :
.;
,',""
15a Training is provided to emergency responders.
..
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Page Jfof 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 16 1O.CFR50.47(b)(16) Emergency* Plan' Maintenance 16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D
,.
PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete 0 Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRG required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete D Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part Vand perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. ) F?art V, Sigriatures: < Preparer Name (Print): Date: Natalie Harness 7/14/15 Reviewer Name (Print): Date: l
'4w /-:J,.3~5 Date*
~ lJ/tf'
. Approver (CFAM, a required) Name (Print) Date:
"'~-
Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments.
- One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing.
- One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRG within 30 days after the change is D
put in effect. )QA RECORD
Page 1of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. PROCEDURE NUMBER: RP/O/A/1000/015A Revision No. 005 _ Change No._
)Preparer: Natalie Harness Date: 7114/2015 PCRs Incorporated: _
- Preparer:
Initial Considerations:
- Yes NIA D Perform Procedure Change Planning Sheet.
D Review outstanding PCR(s) to determine what changes are needed. D Determine if revision/change is considered High Risk. D D If change is due to plant modification, ensure "EC Number" field is filled in on PCR. D D If revision, ensure all outstanding manual changes are incorporated. D D If procedure status is changed, ensure new status noted on top right corner of PPR sheet. (Deleted, Superseded)
- Perform ISYS search to determine if other procedures must be revised due to these changes and write PCRs as required.
- It may be necessary to place on Tech Hold or issue revisions to affected procedures at same time.
D D If revision is for OP/O/A/1107/003 orOP/O/A/1107/003 B, refer to Attach. 'R' ofOMP 1-09 for special instructions. {36} Document Quality/Format: Yes NIA D D If procedure renumbers, adds, or removes steps or enclosures, verify all references to all steps are correct. D D Ensure correct procedure number on all pages throughout the procedure. D D Ensure all pages print and are legible. D D Ensure all unit designators match unit procedure was intended to address.
* "Error Find" macro shall be run to help detect unit designator errors.
D D Replace "Duke Power Company" with "Duke Energy". (Not required for changes) {40} D D If procedure is excluded from 10 CFR 50.59 process, ensure this is stated on cover page of procedure. D D If PT, delete requirements for recording "Calibration Due Dates" or "Calibration Dates" if present. D D If procedure has steps for routing completed copies to others (i.e., Engineering), evaluate deletion of this guidance.
*'\.Q.ocument Quality/Format For New Procedure Or Major Revision/Change JY~ NIA D D Review all procedures/enclosures for proper use of "Reference Use" and "Information Use" classifications.
D D Add "EnsureNerify" step to ensure completion of step as appropriate for all "Notify/Begin" steps. D D Ensure Initial Conditions format/content comply with OMP 1-09 Attachment S. {39} D D Ensure Note and Caution steps do not contain direct or implied actions. D D Ensure L&Ps that apply to specific procedure steps are also identified in procedure at appropriate action step(s). D D Ensure Rl/R2/R3 designations applied as required to R.M.-related enclosures per OMP 1-09 Attach. 'P', Section 3. {38} D D Ensure checklists with two signoff columns having "IV" or "DV" designation replaced with "CV". {41} D D If this is a temporary procedure (TO or TT), a step has been included in procedure for NEDL closeout. Technical Accuracy: Yes NIA D D Reason and purpose of revision has been QV& V'd. D D Ensure Reactivity Management related procedure steps identified per OMP 1-09. {29} D D Ensure similar changes made throughout procedure by performing a WORD search. {23} D D If position/condition of plant equipment is changed, ensure it is either repositioned by this procedure, positioned as required for the plant conditions for which the procedure is written, or other procedures support the as-left position. { 1} D D If revision/change adds, deletes, or changes valve positions, perform OFD flow path verification to ensure: {22}
- Flow path is correct (either valves in flow path are listed or ISYS check verifies normal position is required position for flow path).
- Flow path is isolated from other systems/lines as required (either flow path boundary valves are listed or ISYS check verifies normal position is the required position for flow path boundary valves).
D D If as-left component positions are changed, an ISYS search shall be performed to identify other affected procedures.
- Ensure appropriate PCRs are written.
- Other affected procedures must be revised or placed on Tech Hold prior to issuing this revision.
~ D D
.) D If revision/change affects tagout boundaries, indicate "Additional Review" required by OWPG on cover sheet. {44} D If revision/change adds any equipment, location and name should match EDB .
- IfEDB information does not match equipment label, take actions to re-label or have EDB changed to match label.
D D If revision makes a step conditional, verify remaining steps have no adverse interactions if step is NOT completed. {42}
Page 2of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Preparer continued:
- '"\Technical Accuracy:
Aes NIA D D If surveillance PT, ensure a signoffstep in the procedure clearly documents evaluation of the acceptance criteria. (NSD-703, Appendix G) Proposed Cross-Disciplinary/Additional Reviews: Yes NIA D D Indicate any CDR/Additional Reviews required in "Qualified Reviewers" section of this form D D If review of hard copy is requested of Group outside Operations, fill out Procedure Review Request form with information such as Group responsible for review, sections/steps to review, and reason for review (if necessary). When Ready For Review: Yes NIA D Perform self check of revision. D D Review PDF version of procedure for:
- Instances of"Step 0","Steps O", "Enclosure O", "Section O" and "Error!"
- Enclosures that don't start with Step "l"
- Step numbering (duplicate step numbers, etc.)
- Wrong page numbering D D If interaction with AP/EP exists (see procedure Appendix), ensure CDR/Additional Reviews by AP/EP Group or OSM checked in "Qualified Reviewers" section of this form. {8}
D D Ensure all information on forms has correct procedure number, title, and Revision/Change number. D D Provide a comparison copy of old and new procedures to QR.
- A red marked copy of old and new revision or a computer-generated copy may be provided.
- This may be NI A'd for new procedures.
- If changes are so extensive that a comparison copy is unusable, notify QR to treat revision/change as a new procedure/enclosure.
yg D For all Minor and Major changes/revisions, include Reactivity Management Review Form in revision package. If procedure requires validation, provide a copy of original procedure to Validators. D Verify "Summary of Changes" covers .fil!.changes and reasons for changes. D D If procedure is removed from HOLD, complete "Actions Taken For Restoration" section of Hold Form.
- Include signed Hold Form with procedure package.
D D If this change is needed on other units, ensure PCR(s) are written. D D If this change requires changes to other procedures, evaluate proper method for tracking/correcting other procedures. (PCRs written, other procedures to be issued at same time, affected procedures placed on Tech Hold) {43} D D If this change corrects an error, ensure error does not exist on other units or in other procedures on this unit.
- If error exists, place applicable procedures on Tech Hold and ensure PCR(s) are written.
D D If revision is considered High Risk, discuss Procedure Change Planning Sheet with QR. D D Determine ifrevision affects system/component operability or availability, based on following type changes: {48}
- Component or system not performing design function.
- Flow paths altered.
- Taking a component out of service.
- Adding or removing equipment to the system.
- Adding or removing contingency plans.
- Adding or removing TS or SLC entries.
D D If system/component operability or availability affected, check the "Yes" box in the "After Approval - Preparer" section of this appendix and perform the following: {48}
- Determine when procedure scheduled or needed and record: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- Based on date needed, notify Ops Matrix Group as follows:
D Send email to Ops Matrix Group with "Summary of Changes" attached and the pertinent changes marked. D If changes needed right away and during normal work times, follow up email with a call to Ops Matrix Group to inform them of possible emergent changes. D If changes needed right away and it is nights or weekends, call STA or WCC SRO to inform them of possible ) emergent changes. 0 If STA or WCC SRO notified, provide them a copy of marked "Summary of Changes".
Page 3of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Preparer continued:
- "":\,When Ready For Review:
-~ NIA D D If the following applies, initiate an Action Tracking Request Form to provide for updating Passport and Station Surveillance Table: {17}
- New PT or deleting a PT
- OP needs to be scheduled in Passport or existing Work Order changed
- PT revision/major change adds/removes task assigned to another group
- PT revision/major change moves testing of a component from one procedure to another procedure
- PT revision/major change might affect accuracy of Station Surveillance Table information (procedure number, procedure title, SR number, frequency, mode of applicability).
D D If this revision/change contains activities not previously performed and is a "rush" revision, notify Ops Training Coordinator to evaluate whether Operator training is required.
- This should be considered a "High Risk" revision.
D Ensure independence between Preparer and QR by choosing a QR who did NOT have input to preparation of procedure revision/change. y'\ ) _I
Page 4of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Qualified Reviewers: )'lOTE: Review per requirements of NSD-110 and NSD-703. Reviews should QV&V all revised information; do NOT assume the Preparer's work is correct. Additional items below focus on the most likely errors. Scope of Review: Yes NIA D D If new procedure or major revision/change, ensure Applicability Determination form complete and accurate. (NSD-228 and NSD-703) D D If new procedure, perform a detailed line by line review of entire procedure. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If procedure revision/change, perform a detailed line by line review of all information that was changed. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D Verify independence between Preparer and QR maintained. Document Quality/Format: Yes NIA D D Review remaining parts of the procedure not revised or changed for the following obvious issues: (NSD-703)
- No missing procedure steps or pages.
- No obvious formatting problems created by the revision.
- No inappropriate page breaks.
- Notes and Cautions on same page with applicable step.
- No misnumbering of steps.
- Revision appropriately incorporated into all affected parts of procedure. {23}
Document Quality/Format For New Procedure Or Major Revision/Change Yes NIA D D Ensure level of use appropriate for task. (Continuous, Reference, or Information) (NSD-703, Appendix G) ...,, D D Ensure Independent or Concurrent Verifications are located at appropriate steps and match requirements of NSD-700 .
) (NSD-703, Appendix G)
D D Ensure Notes and Cautions contain no direct or implied actions. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure steps that reference other steps or procedures are correct. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure unit designators are correct, component names and numbers are consistent throughout the procedure, and consistent with design information (drawings, labels, etc.). (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure level of detail matches requirements necessary to satisfy safety classification of procedure (e.g., 'A' or 'B' procedure classification). (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure referenced or branched steps will appropriately complete the desired task. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D When procedure branches to another procedure, either verify all Limits & Precautions and prerequisites apply or verify applicable Limits & Precautions and prerequisites are identified. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D When procedure branches to another procedure, verify procedure gets into the other procedure and back out appropriately. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure calculations work and input variables are in units required to complete calculations. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure criteria are in the same units as the information requires or a conversion is documented. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- Examples of criteria: Acceptance criteria, data recorded (flows, pressures, etc.)
D D Ensure commitments are appropriately identified. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure software applications which incorporate or used to support portion(s) of this procedure are identified. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- Examples of software applications: Electronic logs, automatic calculation software, etc.
D D Ensure risk to personnel or equipment is appropriately covered by Cautions. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure purpose is clearly stated. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure scope of procedure is adequate to complete described tasks and/or test methods. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure has the appropriate flexibility to perform sections, but is not vague in when they can be performed. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure provides for appropriate interaction between site groups. (NSD-703, Appendix G) )
Page5of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Qualified Reviewers continued: ~echnical Accuracy: YYes N/A D D If revision/change adds any equipment, location and name should match EDB. D D Ensure isolation and restoration are described in accordance with NSD-500 criteria. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure entry and exit from Tech Specs/action statements and SLCs are clearly described. (NSD-703, Appendix G) Technical Accuracy For New Procedure Or Major Revision/Change Yes N/A D D Ensure intent of procedure is clear. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure can be safely accomplished in the sequence written. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure complies with current Design Basis Documents, Tech Specs, UFSAR, SLCs, NSDs, Site Directives, etc. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If position/condition of plant equipment is changed, ensure it is either repositioned by this procedure, positioned as required for plant conditions for which procedure is written, or other procedures support as-left position. { 1} (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If revision/change adds, deletes, or changes valve positions, perform OFD flow path verification to ensure: {22}
- Flow path is correct (either valves in flow path are listed or !SYS check verifies normal position is the required position for flow path).
- Flow path is isolated from other systems/lines as required (either flow path boundary valves are listed or ISYS check verifies normal position is the required position for flow path boundary valves).
D D Ensure appropriate modes and conditions required prior to proceeding with the procedure are identified. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure does not adversely affect other procedures or basis documents. (NSD-703, Appendix G) New PT Or Major PT Revision/Change ~ N/A JD D Ensure all expected alarms are identified and unnecessary alarms are eliminated. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- Consideration is given to alarms on other units for shared systems.
D D Ensure correct Tech Spec for task described is clearly addressed in the procedure. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure description of acceptance criteria is correct. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure all safety limits, setpoints, equations, operability limits and acceptance criteria are within those listed in the Tech Specs, SAR or other licensing documents. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure acceptance criteria are in the form of specific pass-fail criteria, if possible. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure a signoff step in the procedure clearly documents evaluation of the acceptance criteria. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If acceptance criteria, commitments, formulas, graphs, figures or calculations are changed/added, ensure the sources are listed as references. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure clear documentation of values for acceptability/unacceptability of test results are provided. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure test method ensures that redundant independent safety train functions are verified separately. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If the following applies, ensure an Action Tracking Request Form included in change package: (provides for updating Passport and Station Surveillance Table): (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- New PT or deleting a PT
- PT revision/major change adds or removes task assigned to another group
- PT revision/major change moves testing of a component from one procedure to another procedure
- PT revision/major change might affect accuracy of Station Surveillance Table information (procedure number, procedure title, SR number, frequency, mode of applicability)
)
Page 6of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Qualified Reviewers continued:
- ~ ross-Disci linar /Additional Review Determination:
*NOTE: Yes"/"N/A" blocks completed by procedure preparer. QR is responsible for.ensuring CDRs are identified as required.
Yes NIA QR Concurrence D D D If revision/change adds or changes system setpoints, operating lineups, acceptance criteria, or parameter values such as temperature, pressure or flow, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed. D D D If revision/change alters as-left position of any instrument root valve or adds any new instruments, a cross review by Maintenance Group shall be performed. { 13} D D D If revision/change involves filling/draining water/steam into/from a portion of a system that could cause water hammer concern, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed. D D D If revision/change involves primary system activities such as component flushes, returning idle components to service, or placing flow through stagnant systems, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed. {19} D D D If revision/change requires actions by Groups outside of Operations, a crew-level miscellaneous review by the affected Group shall be.performed. {28} D D D If revision/change was requested by Group outside of Operations, a cross review by the requesting Group shall be performed. {4 7} D D D If revision/change alters normal position of any SQUG-related valve, a cross review by Engineering Group shall be performed.
- SQUG-related valve: "SQUG SSEL" is "YES" under "Attrb" block on D030 screen for component in EDB.
D D D If revision/change affects AP/EP interaction (as determined from review of Appendix), indicate CDR/Additional Review required by AP/EP group or OSM. {8} New PT Or Major PT Revision/Change NOTE: Yes"/"N/A" blocks completed by procedure preparer. QR is responsible for ensuring CDRs are identified as required .
. Yes NIA QR J D D Concurrence D If revision/change adds or removes components that require testing or test method is being changed, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure test method satisfies intent of surveillance requirement. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
D D D If revision/change is to a valve stroke test which adds or deletes valves, alters direction a valve is currently being stroked tested, or adds a manual stroke to a power operated valve, a review by IST Engineer shall be performed. D D D If QA Condition 1-5 structures, systems, or components are in a configuration different from that shown in an approved design document (e.g., lifting leads or placing jumpers), QA must have the opportunity to review. D D D If instrumentation is changed/added, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure range of instruments used to measure acceptance criteria meet requirements (e.g. ASME Section XI In-Service Testing). (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D D If portable measuring and test equipment instrumentation are changed/added, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure instrumentation used to record surveillance data is included in station's measuring and test equipment calibration program in accordance with NSD-406. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D D If permanently installed measuring and test equipment are changed/added, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure equipment is included in station's PM program and periodically calibrated in accordance with NSD-406. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D D If acceptance criteria is new or changed, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure acceptance criteria are in same units as specification requires or a conversion is documented. (NSD-703, Appendix G) Procedure Process Record /Change Form Sign-Offs: Yes NIA D Perform Reactivity Management review per NSD-304. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If new procedure or major revision/change, determine if Management Involvement required per NSD-213 for infrequently performed tests and evolutions. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- If Ops Superintendent review is NOT required, initial NIA blank on PPR/Change Form.
).* :. D Indicate any reviews required or NI A on Procedure Process Record (PPR)/Change Form. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
Page 7of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. PROCEDURE NUMBER: RP/O/N1000/015A Revision No. 005 _ Change No._ ~reparer: Natalie Harness Date: 7/14/2015 PCRs Incorporated: _
- Before Approval - Preparer:
Yes NIA D D If major revision/change, perform ISYS search ofT&Q Guides to determine ifT&Q Guide changes required.
- Write PCRs for any affected T&Q Guides. {34}
D D If this revision contains activities not previously performed, contact Ops Training Coordinator to determine if Operator training is required prior to issue. Is training required? D Yes D No D D Ensure any training required prior to issuing procedure revision/change is complete as signified by signature of Ops Training Coordinator on "Additional Reviews" line on cover sheet. D D If revision is upgraded to meet requirements of Procedure Upgrade Project, indicate "Yes" for OpsProcReports program to be updated in "Person Issuing Procedure" section of this form. D D If this change required changes to other procedures, ensure proper method for tracking/correcting other procedures has been followed. (PCRs written, other procedures to be issued at same time, affected procedures placed on Tech Hold) {43} D D If new procedure, identify Control Copy locations and field locations (if any) to Ops Support Clerk for updating of OPINDEX and NEDL. {27} D D If Action Tracking Request Form initiated, send completed copy to David Nix so an electronic Action Tracking Request Form can be created to update Passport/Station Surveillance Table. {17} D D If this revision is an Autotour Electronic Procedure, verify revision number in Roundsmaker agrees with NEDL. {24} D D If procedure will remain on Tech Hold after revision, indicate "Yes" for Tech Hold in "Person Issuing Procedure" section of this form. D D If procedure will be removed from Tech Hold, attach removal sheet. D D If additional changes are made during the review process, ensure an independent review of changes is performed before submitting for final approval.
- QR must see any non editorial changes made during review.
~ _y For all changes/revisions, ensure Reactivity Management Review Form is completed. After Approval - Person Issuing Procedure: Yes NIA D D If procedure status (Deleted, Superseded) or field location is changed:
- Update OPINDEX record in OpsProcReports program.
- Update distribution location in NEDL Scribe.
- If procedure status changed, ensure new status noted on top right corner of PPR sheet. {27}
D D If"Yes" is checked, update OPINDEX record in OpsProcReports program with the following: insert approval date in "Upgrade Date" and revision number in "Upgrade Rev No". OYes. D D If "Yes" is checked, procedure will remain on Tech Hold. D Yes. D D If this is a change and not a revision, ensure the procedure is on Change Hold in NEDL. D D If this is a revision, ensure procedure is ISSUED in NEDL:
- Select "Modify Properties"
- Certified: Y
- Periodic Review Date: Insert date if Periodic Review form completed.
- Approved date: Insert date.
- V and V: Select "Y" ifV&V performed.
- Select "OK"
- Transition document to "ISSUED".
D D Issue revision or change per requirements ofOMP 1-09 (Administrative Control Of Operations Procedures). D D If procedure is Deleted or Superseded, remove and discard all associated Control and Information Copy folders. D D If this is a major revision/change, send Pre-Job Brief Coordinator and Asst. Outage Manager (AOM) a copy of "Summary of Changes". {21} ) '
Page 8of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. After Approval - Preparer:
- ~
... es N/A JtJ- D Verify all Change Requests listed in "Summary of Changes" are incorporated in this revision and clear these PCRs. {14} D D Close out any PIPs associated with this change. D D If this is a revision or change to a valve stroke test which changes the IST Program, notify IST Engineer that procedure is issued. D D If this revision adds/removes plant equipment, revises equipment labels, or changes tagging requirements, send notification of changes made to Ops Tagout Team. D D If WO placed on Procedure Hold in Passport and Rev/Chg removes the Hold, contact David Nix to update Passport. D D If "Yes" is checked, send Ops Matrix Group an email notifying them procedure is issued. D Yes D D If procedure revision incorporates changes that may be considered workarounds, send email to Operator Workaround Coordinator with "Summary of Changes" attached and the pertinent changes marked. {50} D D If this revision or change adds/deletes valves in the valve stroke test Refueling Frequency enclosure, notify Work Control to update Work Order. Retention requirements do not apply to this form. When the procedure is approved, this form may be discarded. From OMP 1-09; also stored in OP/PT on-line revision package ~
~ .J
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (ROS-IO) RP/O/A/ 1000/0 l 5A Duke Energy (I) ID No. PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 004 Page2 u f ; P l o~ lo PREPARATION (2) Station -----------=O"--'C=--'O=-=N:....;.;E=E~N-=U-=C=L=E"""'A=R::....;:S:;....;T=A"""'T=--"I-=0-=-N'---_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (3) Procedure Title Offsite Communications fro (4) Prepared By"' Natalie Harness (Signature) Date 4/18/2015 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? IZJ Yes (New procedure or revision with major c.hanges) -A~tachsp 228 documentation. 0 No (Revision with minor changes) ' /J (6) Reviewed By"' Up - . . A.. * * * -' (QR)(KI) Date 5* -/'i -/5 Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KQ N~Date s: - / 'i -1 S-Reactivity Mgmt Review By"' (QR) NA~ate ~ - Cl -/S-Mgmt Involvement Review By"' (Ops. Supt.) NAl>_k.Date _"!) -*19 -1 s:' (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed By"'------------------------~ Date ReviewedBy"'-=-------::--r--=-------if-r--..,....,=:...--tr;:--:Jf-==-_.,~-~ Date '7:~) Approved By"' Date dERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy eve rk is being performed.) (9) Compared with Control C o p y " ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y " ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y " ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number ( W O # ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 0 Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes DNA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date ( 12) Procedure Completion A p p r o v e d - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date ( 13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary) y?\
"' Printed Name and Signature
Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 04/23/2012 The purpose of this fill-in fonn is to provide a location to type in infonnation you want to appear on the various -?fonns needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in Ytnfonnation on this form, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perfonn Step 3 below. Step 1- press [Fl2] (Save As) then save this fonn using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic infonnation in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- l. ID No.: RP/O/A/1000/015A
- 2. Revision No.: 004 _
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Control Room
- 5. For changes only, enter procedure sections affected: _
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness @
- 7. Preparation Date: 4/18/2015
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision:
- _Step 3- go to Print Preview to update this information in all the attached documents.
~SJtep 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional infonnation needed.
Step 5- when all infonnation is entered, print package and review for correctness.
*';\
y
RP/O/ All 00010 I SA Revision 004 _ Change No._ Page 2of10 ')::
. --.. Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Control Room SUMi\-IARY OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON)
General Changes Selective Signaling System has been replaced with DEl\tlNET in support of a Duke Energy fleetwide initiative and is an overall enhancement for offsite notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.4 7(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. See attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Changed OSM to SM, ONS refers to the position as Shift Manager
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEMNET
- DEMNET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact information into Enclosure 4.7
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEMNET Notification Form Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET system.
- Added PIP 0-13-13560 regarding radio upgrade
- Added fleet procedure references AD-EP-ALL- 0102, 0202, & 0406 PCR Numbers Incorporated
- ~.:
...
- j)
Enclosure ~ y
- _j
RP/O/A/1000/0l5A Revision 004 _ Change No._ Page 3 of IO Attachment to 50.54q RP/O/A/1000/0lSA, Rev 004, Offsite Communications from the Control Room
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section I. Page 2 of6 This procedure is an implementing This procedure is an implementing Editorial: spelling Note Procedure to the Oconee Nuclear Site Procedure to the Oconee Nuclear Site correction Emergency Plan and must be reviewed Emergency Plan and must be reviewed in Preparedness (added in accordance with IOCFR50.54(q) by accordance with lOCFR50.54(q) by an e)
Emergency Prepardness and Emergency Preparedness and forwarded forwarded to Emergency Preparedness to Emergency Preparedness within seven within seven (7) working days of (7) working days of approval. approval.
- 2. Page 3 of6 Emergency Notification Forms (ENF) Emergency Notification Forms (ENF) for Editorial: changed Note for an Initial or Upgrade are typically an Initial or Upgrade are typically OSM to SM (3 completed by the OSM. When the completed by the SM. When the SM is places)
OSM is not available, or when not available, or when directed by the directed by the OSM, the Offsite SM, the Offsite Communicator will Communicator will complete the complete the Initial/Upgrade ENF per this Initial/Upgrade ENF per this procedure. Otherwise, the Offsite procedure. Otherwise, the Offsite Communicator will complete applicable Communicator will complete Immediate applicable Immediate and Subsequent steps for Follow-Up and and Subsequent steps for Follow-Up Termination notifications. and Termination notifications.
- 3. Page 3 of6 Obtain the portable phone (864-882- Obtain the portable phone (864-882- Editorial: changed
- ~.*;.. 2.1 7076) located on column in Unit 1&2 7076) located on column in Unit 1&2 or OSM to SM
/ or Unit3 CR Unit 3 CR and report to the OSM/EC. and report to the SM/EC.
- 4. Page 4 of6 PROTECTIVE ACTION PROTECTIVE ACTION Editorial: changed Note RECOMMENDATION (PAR) RECOMMENDATION (PAR) changes OSM to SM changes must be communicated to must be communicated to Offsite Offsite Agencies within fifteen (15) Agencies within fifteen (15) minutes minutes from the time they are from the time they are determined by the OSM Emergency determined by the SM Emergency Coordinator/Dose Assessment Liaison. Coordinator/Dose Assessment Liaison.
- 5. Page5of6 If directed by the OSM review the If directed by the SM review the SM/EC Editorial: changed 2.3 OSl\f/EC Log to determine plant Log to determine plant conditions. Verify OSM to SM (2 conditions. Verify correct enclosure for applicable places) correct enclosure for applicable emergency event is selected.
emergency event is selected.
- 6. Page 5 of6 If changes are made to PAR's, use If changes are made to P AR's, use NEI 99-02, Rev 6, Note Enclosure 4.5 (Guidelines for Enclosure 4.5 (Guidelines for Manually added statement :
Manually Completing a Completing a Follow-Up Message to This should be Follow-Up Message to complete complete Message Sheet). This should be marked as Message Sheet). marked as "INITIAL" on the Emergency "INITIAL" on the Notification Form. Emergency Notification Form.
- 7. Page 6 of6 ... ... Added4.13 Enclosures 4.13 References 4.13 DE!\.fNET Notification Form Quick DEMNET Reference Enclosure and 4.14 References changed Reference to 4.14
RP/O/ All 00010 I SA Revision 004 _ Change No. _ Page 4of10 ~
- ) # Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 8. Enclosure 4.1
- The initial notification is required
- The initial notification is required to Added statement to Page l of 3 to be made within 15 minutes be made within 15 minutes from the reference fleet Note from the otlicial declaration time otlicial declaration time on Line I 0. DEMNET on Line 10.
- Pre-printed Emergency Notification procedure
- Pre-printed Emergency Forms containing specific EAL# and Notification Forms containing EAL Description may be used in lieu specific EAL# and EAL of Enclosure 4.1.A.
Description may be used in lieu of
- DEMNET instructions are located in Enclosure 4.1.A. Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management Network (DEMNET).
- 9. Enclosure 4.1 Enter/Verify EAL# provided by Enter/Verify Emergency Classification Editorial: changed Pagel of3 OSM/EC (use Emergency Action and EAL# provided by SM/EC (use OSM to SM Line 4 Level Guideline Manual). Emergency Action Level Guideline Manual).
IO Enclosure 4.1 A liquid release is considered to be in per PIP G-14-1860, Page 2 of3 progress if any of the following are met: CCA 1 & procedure New NOTE
- A known unmonitored release SH/O/B/2005/001 AND radioactive material exists. (indications)
- Alternate method ofrelease determination.
- Field monitoring team results provide indications that a release is occurring.
11 Enclosure 4.1 Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the Editorial: changed Page 2 of3 conditions stated in the note above conditions stated in the note above apply. OSM to SM Line6 apply. If they do not apply mark None. If they do not apply mark None. Complete Complete Line 6 as directed by Line 6 as directed by SM/EC. OSM/EC. 12 Enclosure 4.1 Mark Box A, B, or C as directed by Mark Box A, B, or C as directed by the Editorial: changed Page 2 of3 the OSM/EC. SM/EC. OSM to SM Line 8 13 Enclosure 4.1 Enter Time in military units and Date Enter Time in military units and Date the Editorial: changed Page 2 of3 the OSM/EC otlicially declares a SM/EC otlicially declares a General OSMtoSM Line 10 General Emergency Event. Emergency Event. 14 Enclosure 4.1 Add any remarks as requested by the Add any remarks as requested by the Editorial: changed Page 3 of3 OSM/EC. If there are no remarks write SM/EC. If there are no remarks write OSM to SM Line 13 "None". "None". 15 Enclosure 4.1 Obtain the OSM/EC Obtain the SM/EC signature/time/date of Editorial: changed Page 3 of3 signature/time/date of approval. approval. OSM to SM Line 17
RP/O/NI000/015A Revision 004 _ Change No. _ Page 5of10
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section 16 Enclosure 4.2
- The initial notification is required
- The initial notification is required to Added statement to Pagel of4 to be made within 15 minutes be made within 15 minutes from the reference fleet Note from the official declaration time official declaration time on Line 10. DEl\ilNET on Line 10.
- Pre-printed Emergency notification procedure
- Pre-printed Emergency Forms containing specific EAL# and notification Forms containing EAL Description may be used in lieu specific EAL# and EAL of Enclosure 4.2.A.
Description may be used in lieu of
- DEMNET instructions are located in Enclosure 4.2.A. Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management Network (DEMNET).
17 Enclosure 4.2 Enter/Verify EAL# provided by Enter/ EAL# provided by SM/EC (use Editorial: changed Pagel of4 OSM/EC (use Emergency Action Emergency Action Level Guideline OSM to SM Line 4 Level Guideline Manual). Manual). 18 Enclosure 4.2 A liquid release is considered to be in per PIP G-14-1860, Page 2 of4 progress if any of the following are met: CCA l & procedure New NOTE
- A known unmonitored release SWOIB/20051001 AND radioactive material exists. (indications)
- Alternate method of release determination.
- Field monitoring team results provide indications that a release
"):*.. is occurring .
*" Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the Mark 8 (Is Occurring) if any of the Editorial: changed 19 Enclosure 4.2 Page 2 of4 conditions stated in the note above conditions stated in the note above apply. OSM to SM Line 6 apply. If they do not apply mark None. If they do not apply mark None. Complete Complete Line 6 as directed by Line 6 as directed by SM/EC.
OSM/EC. 20 Enclosure 4.2 Mark Box A, 8, or C as directed by Mark Box A, B, or C as directed by the Editorial: changed Page 2 of4 the OSM/EC. SM/EC. OSM to SM Line 8 21 Enclosure 4.2 Enter Time in military units and Date Enter Time in military units and Date the Editorial: changed Page 2 of 4 the OSM/EC officially declares a SM/EC officially declares a General OSMto SM Line 10 General Emergency Event. Emergency Event. 22 Enclosure 4.2 Add any remarks as requested by the Add any remarks as requested by the Editorial: changed Page 3 of4 OSM/EC. If there are no remarks write SM/EC. If there are no remarks write OSM to SM Line 13 "None". "None". 23 Enclosure 4.2 Obtain the OSM/EC Obtain the SM/EC signature/time/date of Editorial: changed Page 4 of4 signature/time/date of approval. approval. OSMtoSM Line 17
RP/O/A/1000/0lSA Revision 004 _ Change No. _ Page 6 of 10
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section 2-l Enclosure 4.3
- The initial notification is required
- The initial notification is required to Added statement to Pagel of3 to be made within 15 minutes be made within 15 minutes from the reference fleet Note from the official declaration time official declaration time on Line 10. DEMNET on Line 10.
- Pre-printed Emergency Notification procedure
- Pre-printed Emergency Forms containing specific EAL# and Notification Forms containing EAL Description may be used in lieu specific EAL# and EAL of Enclosure 4.3 .A.
Description may be used in lieu of
- DEMNET instructions are located in Enclosure 4.3.A. Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management Network (DEMNET).
25 Enclosure 4.3 Enter/Verify EAL# provided by Enter/Verify EAL# provided by SM/EC Editorial: changed Pagel of3 OSM/EC (use Emergency Action (use Emergency Action Level Guideline OSM to SM Line4 Level Guideline Manual). Manual). 26 Enclosure 4.3 A liquid release is considered to be in per PIP G-14-1860, Page 2 of3 progress if any of the following are met: CCA I & procedure New NOTE
- A known unmonitored release SH/O/B/2005/00 I AND radioactive material exists. (indications)
- Alternate method of release determination.
- Field monitoring team results provide indications that a release is occurring.
27 Enclosure 4.3 Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the Editorial: changed Page 2 of3 conditions stated in the note above conditions stated in the note above apply. OSMto SM Line6 apply. If they do not apply mark None. If they do not apply mark None. Complete Complete Line 6 as directed by Line 6 as directed by SM/EC. OSM/EC. 28 Enclosure 4.3 Mark Box A, B, or C as directed by Mark Box A, B, or C as directed by the Editorial: changed Page 2 of3 the OSM/EC. SM/EC. OSM to SM Line 8 29 Enclosure 4.3 Enter Time in military units and Date Enter Time in military units and Date the Editorial: changed Page 2 of3 the OSM/EC officially declares a SIVt/EC officially declares a General OSMtoSM Line 10 General Emergency Event. Emergency Event. 30 Enclosure 4.3 Add any remarks as requested by the Add any remarks as requested by the Editorial: changed Page 3 of3 OSl\il/EC. If there are no remarks write SWEC. If there are no remarks write OSMtoSM Line 13 "None". "None". 31 Enclosure 4.3 /NOTE: NOTE: Editorial: removed Page 3 of 3 the hash mark in 3rd NOTE front of the word box Note 32 Enclosure 4.3 Obtain the OSl\t/EC Obtain the SM/EC signature/time/date of Editorial: changed Page 3 of 3 signature/time/date of approval. approval. OSM to SM Line 17 ) '
RP/O/N l 000/0 l 5A Revision 004 _ Change No._ Page 7of10
- ~.** # Page Current Proposed Change Reason
- /Section 33 Enclosure 4.4 ( l) The initial notification is required
- The initial notification is required to Added statement to Page 1 of3 to be made within 15 minutes from the be made within 15 minutes from the reference tleet Note otlicial official declaration time on Line 10. DEMNET declaration time on Line 10.
- The SM can terminate an Unusual procedure and make (2) The OSM can terminate an Event on the same notification the numbered items Unusual Event on the same message sheet that an Initial Unusual bullets to be notification message sheet Event was declared on. consistent with the that an Initial Unusual Event was
- Pre-printed Emergency Notification entire procedure and declared on. Forms containing specific EAL# and changed OSM to (3) Pre-printed Emergency EAL Description may be used in lieu SM for bullet Notification Forms containing specific of Enclosure 4.4.A EAL# and EAL
- DEMNET instructions are located in Description may be used in lieu of Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, Enclosure 4.4.A Duke Emergency Management Network (DEMNET).
34 Enclosure 4.4 Enter/Verify EAL# provided by Enter/Verify EAL# provided by SM/EC Editorial: changed Page 1 of3 OSM/EC (use Emergency Action (use Emergency Action Level Guideline OSM to SM Line4 Level Guideline Manual). Manual). 35 Enclosure 4.4 A liquid release is considered to be in per PIP G-14-1860, Page 2 of3 progress if any of the following are met: CCA 1 & procedure New NOTE
- A known unmonitored release SH/O/B/2005/001 AND radioactive material exists. (indications)
- Alternate method of release determination.
- Field monitoring team results provide indications that a release is occurring.
36 Enclosure 4.4 Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the Editorial: changed Page 2 of3 conditions stated in the note above conditions stated in the note above apply. OSMto SM Line 6 apply. If they do not apply mark None. If they do not apply mark None. Complete Complete Line 6 as directed by Line 6 as directed by SM/EC. OSM/EC. 37 Enclosure 4.4 Mark Box A, B, or C as directed by Mark Box A, B, or C as directed by the Editorial: changed Page 2 of3 the OSl'Yf!EC. SM/EC. OSMto SM Line 8 38 Enclosure 4.4 Enter Time in military units and Date Enter Time in military units and Date the Editorial: changed Page 2 of 3 the OSM/EC officially declares a Sjlyf!EC otlicially declares a General OSMtoSM Line 10 General Emergency Event Emergency Event. 39 Enclosure 4.4 Add any remarks as requested by the Add any remarks as requested by the Editorial: changed Page 3 of 4 OSM/EC. If there are no remarks write SM/EC. If there are no remarks write OSMtoSM Line 13 "None". "None".
.io Enclosure 4.4 Obtain the OSl'YUEC Obtain the SM/EC signature/time/date of Editorial: changed Page -l of 4 signature/time/date of approval. approval. OSM to SM Line 17
- ~
j)
RP/O/Nl000/0l5A Revision 004 _ Change No. _ Page 8 of lO
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section 4 I. Enclosure 4.5
- Follow-up notifications are
- Follow-up notifications are NOT Added statement to Page 1 of4 NOT required to be verbally required to be verbally transmitted. reference fleet Note transmitted. Follow-Up Follow-Up messages may be faxed DEMNET messages may be faxed with with phone verification of receipt. procedure and make phone verification of receipt. This applies only if the message does the numbered items This applies only if the not involve a change in the bullets to be message does not involve a emergency classification or the consistent with the change in the emergency protective action recommendation or entire procedure and classification or the a termination of the drill/emergency. changed OSM to protective action
- A Follow-Up message is due 60 SM for bullet recommendation or a minutes from the notification time on termination of the line 2 of the previous message sheet.
drill/emergency.
- A change in Protective Action
- A Follow-Up message is due Recommendations (PARs) is due 60 minutes from the with" 15 minutes from the time they notification time on line 2 of e determined by the SM Emergency the previous message sheet. Coordinator/RP Shift Dose Assessor.
- 11 C change in Protective * = T instructions are located in Action Recommendations
- p ocedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, (PARs) is due within 15 Duke Emergency Management minutes from the time they Network (DEl'vlNET).
are determined by the OSM Emergency Coordinator/RP y~ 42. Enclosure 4.5 Shift Dose Assessor. For a change to Protective Action NEI 99-02, Rev 6 Page 1 of4 Recommendations (P ARs) mark clarification New NOTE Emergency Notification Form as "li~ITIAL. II
- 43. Enclosure 4.5 Copy the same Protective Action Copy the same Protective Action Editorial: changed Page 2 of4 Recommendations from the previous Recommendations from the previous OSM to SM and Line5 message Sheet if the OSM/EC has message Sheet ifthe SM/EC has NOT added Mark as NOT upgraded them. If they have upgraded them. If they have changed, "INITIAL" on changed, revise P ARs as directed by revise PARs as directed by the OSM/EC Emergency the OSM/EC or RP Shift Dose or RP Shift Dose Assessor. Mark as Notification Form Assessor. "INITIAL" on Emergency Notification per NEI 99-02, rev Form. 6 clarification
- 44. Enclosure 4.5 A liquid release is considered to be in per PIP G-14-1860, Page 2 of4 progress if any of the following are met: CCA 1 & procedure New NOTE
- A known unmonitored release SH/O/B/2005/001 AND radioactive material exists. (indications)
- Alternate method of release determination.
- Field monitoring team results provide indications that a release is occurring.
- 45. Enclosure 4.5 Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the Mark B (Is Occurring) if any of the Editorial: changed Page 2 of4 conditions stated in the note above conditions stated in the note above apply. OSMtoSM Line 6 apply. If they do not apply mark None. If they do not apply mark None. Complete
_) Complete Line 6 as directed by Line 6 as directed by SM/EC. OSM/EC.
RP/O/ All 00010 l 5A Revision 004 _ Change No. _ Page 9of10
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 46. Enclosure 4.5 Mark Box A, B, or C as directed by Mark Box A, B, or C as directed by the Editorial: changed Page 2 of4 the OS!YUEC. SM/EC. OSMto SM Line 8
- 47. Enclosure 4.5 Add any remarks as requested by the Add any remarks as requested by the Editorial: changed Page 3 of 4 OSWEC. If there are no remarks write Sl'vl/EC. If there are no remarks write OSMtoSM Line 13 "None". "None".
- 48. Enclosure 4.5 Obtain the OS!'vl/EC Obtain the SWEC signature/time/date of Editorial: changed Page 3 of 4 signature/time/date of approval. approval. OSMtoSM Line 17
- 49. Enclosure 4.6 Mark Box B and enter the time in Mark Box B and enter the time in military Editorial: changed Page I of I military units and date OSWEC units and date SM/EC terminated OSMtoSM Line JO terminated the event.
the event.
- 50. Enclosure 4.6 Obtain the OSWEC Obtain the SWEC signature/time/date of Editorial: changed Page I of I signature/time/date of approval. approval. OSMto SM Line 17 5 I. Enclosure 4.7 Emergency Action Level Guidelines
- DEMNET instructions are located in Added statement to Page I of 5 Manual and yellow folder are needed Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, reference fleet Note for this Duke Emergency Management DEMNET enclosure. Network (DEMNET). procedure and added
- Emergency Action Level Guidelines bullets Manual and yellow folder are needed for this enclosure.
- 52. Enclosure 4. 7 Dial *4 on selective signaling phone Select the orange oval group button for Added the new Page I of5 "ONS Notify" on the DEMNET phone. DEMNET Box bullet 3 instructions, replacing selective signaling
- 53. Enclosure 4. 7 Document on Line 2 of the ENF, the Document on Line 2 of the ENF, the Replacing selective Page I of5 time/date when the first agency time/date when the first agency answers signaling with Box bullet 5 answers the Selective Signaling the DEMNET phone. DEMNET phone.
- 54. Enclosure 4. 7 Selective Signaling 416 Removed all Page I of 5 Selective Signaling 417 reference to Table Selective Signaling 410 Selective Signaling Selective Signaling 419 Selective Signaling 518
- 55. Enclosure 4. 7 Alternate State of South Carolina Added the Alternate Page 1 of5 Warning Point 803-896-9621 FAX: 803- State of South Contacts 896-8352 Carolina Warning Table Point contact info per PIP G-15-0323
- 56. Enclosure 4. 7 THEN Dial the absent agency THEN Dial a point-to-point call to absent Instructions for use Page 2 of5 selective signaling nwnber. (get agency. of DEMNET phone first THEN agency number from table in
- If agency does not answer, then call
). preceding step) direct line from table in proceeding table.
- If agency does not answer, then go to next step.
RP/O/ Al 100010 I5A Revision 004 _ Change No. _ Page IO of IO
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 57. Enclosure 4. 7 South Carolina Warning Point South Carolina Warning Point (or added alternate Page 3 of 5 Alternate) contact into listing Initial Notification
- 58. Enclosure 4.7 South Carolina Warning Point South Carolina Warning Point (or added alternate Page 3 of 5 Alternate) contact into listing Follow-up Notification
- 59. Enclosure 4.7 A Keowee dam/dike condition "A" or A Keowee dam/dike condition "A" or "B" Editorial: correct the Page 4 of 5 "B" or external flood condition exist or external flood condition exist for the alignment for the First IF for the site site word site
- 60. Enclosure 4. 7 If one of the required agencies did not If one of the required agencies did not These calls are made Page 4 of 5 answer selective signaling, try answer, try alternate method to reach by land lines not Bullet box 4 alternate method to reach agency. agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate selective signaling Refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method and Sequence to Contact Offsite orDEMNET, Method and Sequence to Contact Agencies) and the Emergency Telephone removed the word Offsite Agencies) and Directory for guidance as needed. Once "selective signaling" the Emergency Telephone Directory agency contacted, read message and then (no replacement) for guidance as needed. Once agency record agency name, time, and date contacted, read message and then contacted in space above.
record agency name, time, and date contacted in space above.
- 61. Enclosure 4. 7 Provide OSM/Emergency Coordinator Provide SM/Emergency Coordinator with Editorial: changed Bullet box 2 with completed notification form. completed notification form. OSMto SM
- 62. Enclosure 4.7 Provide the OS!Vl/Emergency Provide the SM/Emergency Coordinator Editorial: changed Bullet box 3 Coordinator with a status of offsite with a status of offsite notifications: OSMtoSM notifications:
- 63. Enclosure 4.9 complete replacement of directions for radio contact to OROs (PIP 0-13-13560) The previous radio system was obsolete and replaced with a Motorola 48.5 Mhz
- 64. Enclosure SS Selective Signaling DEMNET Duke Emergency Management remove SS and add 4.12 [Network DEMNET
- 65. Enclosure l. PIP - G-07-0127 l. PIP - G-07-0127 added PIP regarding 4.13 2. PIP 0-11-9459 2. PIP 0-11-9459 radio replacement,
- 3. PIP0-12-1590 ~-PIP 0-12-1590 bullet 5 and added
- 4. PIP 0-13-04559 rt. PIP 0-13-04559 fleet procedure
- 5. PIP 0-13-13560 references AD-EP-
- 6. AD-EP-ALL- 0102 (WebEOC ALL- 6. 0102, 7.
Maintenance and Administration) 0202, & 8. 0406
- 7. AD-EP-ALL- 0202 (Emergency Response Offsite Dose Assessment)
- 8. AD-EP-ALL- 0406 (Duke Emergency
!Management Network)
)
[Type text] APPENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERl'\UNATION (Rev. 10)
!------ - - - - - - - Page PART I - ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
- I of2
-!
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC SITE UNIT(S) l8J Oconee 0 McGuire 0 Catawba t8J Unit I t8J Unit 2 t8J Unit 3 ACTIVITY TITLE/DOCUME:"IT/REVISION: RP/O/A/1000/015A, Offsite Communications from the Control Room, Rev 004 PART U~ PROCESS REVIEW For each activity, address all or the questions below. Ir the answer Is "YES". for any pordon or the activity, apply the identified process(es) to that oortion or the activitv. Note: It Is not unusual to have more than one orocess apply to a given acdvltv. Will implementation of the above activity require a change to the: I. Tt.-chnical Specifications (TS) or [8J 0 If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227. Operating License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? [8J 0 lfYES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
NO YES
- 3. St.-curity Plans? [8J 0 If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
NO YES (See Appendix H)
- 4. Emergency Plan? 0 [8J If YES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual.
NO YES
-..
- 5. lnservice Testing Program Plan? [8J 0 If YES, process per site IST Program for ASME code compliance and NO YES related facility changes.
[8J 0 _:,
- 6. lnservice Inspection Program Plan?
NO YES If YES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping lnservice Inspection FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes.
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? [8J 0 lfYES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
NO YES 7a -Utilize Appendix E to address Fire ~ Check to confirm use of Appendix E Screening Questions. Protection Program Plan Impact.
- 8. Regulatory Commitments"! [8J 0 If YES, process per NSD 214.
NO YES
- 9. Code ofFederal Regulations? [8J 0 If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
NO YES IO. Programs and manuals listed in the [8J 0 If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs !,'TOUp. Administrative Section of the TS? NO YES
-~
3
[Type text] Page 2 of 2
'"7;'!----------------------------------------------------i PART Illa - 10 CFR 72.48 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address the question below. If the answer to question 11 ls "YES," and questions 14 and 17 are answered "NO", then process the activity per NSD 211 - 10 CFR 72.48 does apply.
- 11. Does the activity involve SSCs, procedures or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the 1:81 DYES loading or transport of the canister/cask to the ISFSI, the ISFSI facility, spent fuel cask design? NO PART lllb - lO CFR 50.59 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address all of the questions below. If the answer to question 18 is."YES," then 10 CFR 50.59 does not apply. If the answer to questions 18 Is .. NO," then process the activity per NSD 209-10 CFR 50.59 applies.
- 12. Does the activity involve a proct'<iure, governed by NSD 703 that has bt-en excluded from the I 0 CFR 1:81 D YES 50.59 process per NSD 703 and the exclusion status remains valid? NO
- 13. Does the activity involve an administrative procedure governed by NSD I 00 or AD-DC-ALL-020 I that 1:81 D YES dot."S not contain information regarding the operation and control of Structures, Systtws and NO Components?
- 14. Does the activity involve a type of Engineering Change that NSD 301 excludes from the IO CFR 50.59 1:81 D YES and/or 10 CFR 72.48 Processes? Consult NSD 301 for assistance. NO
- 15. Does the activity involve (a) maintenance activities that restore SSCs to their as-designed condition 1:81 D YES (including activities that implement approved design changes) or (b) temporary alterations supporting NO maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
- 16. Does the activity involve a UFSAR modification that NSD 220 excludes from the I 0 CFR 50.59 Process? 1:81 D YES Consult NSD 220 for assistance. NO
- 17. Does the activity involve NRC and/or Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC approved changes to the licensing 1:81 D YES basis? NO
- 18. Are ALL aspects of the activity bounded by one or more .. YES" answers to questions I through 17, D ~ YES above? NO PART lV- UFSAR REVIEW Does the activity require a modification, deletion, or addition to the UFSAR to satisfy the UFSAR content 1:81 DYES 9 requirements of 10 CFR 50.34 (b), l 0 CFR 50.7 I (c), or Regulatory Guide (RG) I. 70? Consult NSD 220 for NO Assistance.
IF YES, process pc.or NSD 220. (Print (Sign) 5-tf-IS: Name) Applicability Determination Preparer 1i
- )
VERIFY fl..\RD COPY ,\G,.\l.'fST Wf.8 srn: m.\IEDf..\TELY PRIOR TO E..\Cll USE
~ude:sr Polley )f:snu:al - Volume Z ~SD Z28
) . " APPENDIX E. FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM SCREENING Tht follo1tln1 icrrrnln1 qur1llan1 ;1rt u1rd lo .Jnlu lht .\ppllcablllry Drlrrmlnarfo* prrparrr lo Hlitft' P.\RT II - PROC[SS R[~'l[\V qut1llom number 7*
.\ "Yn" 1n11trr lo In)' of 1111 Krtrnln1 quurfon1 ,.auld lndlnlt lht fin Prolttrfo* Pro1nm l.lcrn1ln1 81111 m*)' bt :afrrclrd, .1nd Quntlo*
- 7 011 lht .\ppllc.ablllly Drlrrmlnallom Form (.\pptndh C') dlould bt ch1d1rd "Vrt" ;1nd
- rir~ltw I* accordanct .. 1111 .'tSDJZO 11 rrqulrrd.
P.\RT .\ N.;w proc:*'\JW'll ur .J m;ijor pnx,'\IW'C .:h'111!1C f PP Lic.:nsin11.\pplinb1liry imP.JCI scm:nin11: NOTE: IF 1hc proo;,'\lure .:hml!C i1 .1 n.,ull of.J P'3n1 .\lollilintion or En11in*'l!rin11 Ch.ln!IC itw 113.1 p~iously b..-..'11 *"\'3IWl*'\l for impxt 10 1hc f PP, lhl.'l'I qu.:s1iun 117 should be ch<<k,'\l "No". y,., :-;., 1\I. / Oo.."S 1hc propm..'d ll:liviry ch31111C 3")' p'3nl n:spons.."S. "!"'nlor r*,ll'JI&"' or .:mcr11c:ncy liiifl1in1 ill11Xi31cd wi1h Post fire S:afc Shu1down (PfSS) n,,ponsc proccllurc1*! Al. / 0o.,., lhc propm..'d xliviry :aild, remove or revise :any lire proro:c1ion f,~tun:s .u Jo:scribcd in lhe UFSAR or SLCs from ;iny ~Tfomwice ICSI procedures'! AJ. v Docs 1hc propos..'d :ac1iviry :aild, remove or revise :any proccllum rel:tl*'d 10 lire prot.:clion fc:anun u Jcscribcd in 1he UfS,\R or SLCs? A4. / Do.:ll lhc propos.'d :icti11icy ildd, remove or revise 311)' po:r{onn:ancc lest Acccp1311cc Cri1cria for my lire prol*'l!lion fc::uun:s .u Jcscribcd in lhe UFSAR or SLC1? PART B Pl:anl Mollifk:alio111 En11in*'l!rinai Change FPP Lic."111in1 Buis imp:tet scn:cning: Docs 1he proPl*-"li xri~iry imp:ac:r ..... :/
- 81. 1\ny nn nltd H1tmllll1t1bou11darin(wall1, !loon, cc:ilinp, clc.). incluJin1 liredoon, llreibmpcn.
p.'11.:mlion sc:als, llre r:i1cd 'WT.lpt, r:iJi:inl *'llcrgy M:U shicl.U, slJ'Uctunl lirc:proolinir. .:le. .u described lhc UFSAR or SLC1'l
- 82. Any waler basrd R1rd Rn tuppnsllH 11)'1111111 (inclu\lin1 waler supply !low patht :and m:ain llre pump1) u described in UFSAR or SLC1?
BJ. Any 11-u Rn 1appntslam l)'tlHll (C02, Halon) u Jcscribcd in lhe UFSAJl or SLC1?
- 84. Any manual nn R1lutn1 rqulpmenr such u hose sr:a1ions vid llre hyllnn11 .u Jcxribcd in lhe UFSAR or SLC1?
BJ. 1\ny portabl* l1n nrln1ul11ltn loc31cd in uf.:ty-rc:l:tlcd ~or safe shuldoW11 ¥c:aa of1hcpl:anr or power block'! B6. 1\ny nn dtlrcrfo* ll)'tltma aa Jcscribcd in lhc UFSAR or SLCs?
- 87. 1\ny waler andlar combnrtlll* natd coat1lnma*I dnlcn nxh .u curbs, Jilrcs, Llrlin1, lire prorccrion t)*lcrn *in' shic:l.U, *'fC. localed in saf*'ty*rel:arcd W'or 1afc ~uldawn uat1 Bl. 1\ny adml*lslnlfvt co1trol iJocumcnll for IM Fire Pror<<tion Proiv:am such u NSD JI J (Conlr'DI of Combu.ilibl0Flammo1blcr Mo11Crialtl, NSD JI .. (tflll Won Authoti.r.11ion). mt NSD J 16 (Fire Pror<<tion lmpairmcnll?
- 89. 1\ny nn bn11d1 rq11lpmHl. l*d1dl*1commHlcallom1q1lpma*I or nn bn1ad11dml*ltlnd**
canlrol1 .u outlined in NSD 11 l (Fire 8ripdl Orpnintion, Tr:iinin" mt Rcspons1bdilia)1 BIO. The Rtaclll' CoolHI Pa"" L1be 00 CoURllH 5ftlt*? Bl I. The Fin !1t1rr1HU11"dl .\lalftll u documcn1cd in 1hc plo1111 level Dcsip lbli1 Document for Firw Pro1<<1ion (CNS.1"6J.00.00.0006, ~ICS-1 ~l004)..000t, OSS-OU4.00..00-IOOI)? Bil. .\n1 P~1el1v Sat*rr Capmb1urr ,\11n1ma*ll~o*P**tr Oper1dH1 rq*lpma1e. 'lllfrl'IMJ 111*11** to1H1Hdatl111, dn11lt1, H.Uw uble rHtn u Jambed in lhc 1i11 PFSS 08D -t usoci;11cd 1nal)1i1 (CNS.IOJ.~.OOOJ, MCS.l.f6.f flO.-OO..OOlZ, OSS-Ol'4 oo.40-.f001)1 Bil CombuM1blciflanvNbll Mllerial ar
- l1111ilioll Sown?
IJI ... An1 Siii f1n M1MI R"pm111 Stntflln .u Jacnbcd in Ille fmcrJCftC7 Plan llld Fire Prorccri011 Pl.11111in1 su""81 BU. .\n1 pin r:JJi~ conwl boun.Pnc.1 Bl&. .\n1 llV,,C 1low dlll!IJCll 1nch.Jr .ail 1nu.lictc\Jl1u cllolnp 1n rao.l1.aa1011 conllOI u-&*11? R£VISIO~ llJ VERIFY lf,\RD COPY .\G.\l~ST WEB SITE 1.\1.\IEDIA rELY PRtoR TO E.\Cll USE
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (ROS-10) Duke Energy PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/015A Revision No. 004 _ Change No. Pennanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Control Room (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Pages 2-6, Enclosures 4.1-4.4.7, 4.9, 4.12 & 4.13 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Detennination?
~ Yes (Procedure change with major changes) -Attach NSD 228 documentation.
D No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) (7) Reason for Change: Selective Signaling System has been replaced with DEMNET in support of a Duke Energy tleetwide initiative and is an overall enhancement for offsite notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. See attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Changed OSM to SM, ONS refers to the position as Shift Manager
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEMNET
- DEMNET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact information into Enclosure 4.7
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEMNET Notification Form Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET system.
- Added PIP 0-13-13560 regarding radio upgrade
- Added fleet procedure references AD-EP-ALL- 0102, 0202, & 0406 (8) Prepared By* Natalie Harness -\-.,~~~¥~bP~~fJ-J,...,,...,::::.~..., ...e
- 4/18/2015 (9) Reviewed By*U"iu.. '- Date S-Yf-1 S Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KI) NA ~Date S' 72 -r{
Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA ~Date S-t'j'-6 Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (Ops~ Supt.) NA ~ate .£-/9 -/S-(I 0) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ __ Reviewed By* Date _ _ _ __ ( 1 I ) Approved By* --'-P--'-~-'-""'--'-...L--->--'----'--+-,..._..,,f'-----+-::,..&--+-'=---1t----- Date r:Ju 4)
- Printed Name and Signature
.10 IOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations
~ Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2 _v §50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
~~:~~~:::;~~!i~;.::~h:~:~:~::~.!~0~~1~~1/0ISA, Offsite .* fi~~i\~~-~11 Selective Signaling System has been replaced with DEMNET in support of a Duke Energy tleetwide initiative and is an overall enhancement for offsite notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in l 0 CFR 50, Appendix E.
See attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Changed OSM to SM, ONS refers to the position as Shift Manager
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEMNET
- DEMNET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact information into Enclosure 4. 7
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEMNET Notification Form Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET system.
- Added PIP 0-13-13560 regarding radio upgrade
- Added fleet procedure references AD-EP-ALL- 0 l 02, 0202, & 0406 Activity Scope:
~ The activity~ a change to the emergency plan D The activity is not a change to the emergency plan I *\>e_to>;c:i(~3;1~_< I ;:;;:,JL~_!-¥51):.; o":r;~i%'Mf::,;:~~;,'\i."i' 0
Change Type: .. -~ ** .. ---~.. ,..;,: ~ -* * ~.~~*. , ri:fr~' Change Type** ->~~~~i:J~U<~~!~,*'* ~r- :~~.;~~~~'.~1-~~.~::*;~-"" ' SJ The change~ editorial or typographical D The change does conform to an activity that has prior ' ~ The change is not editorial or typographical approval
~ The change does not conform to an activity that has prior approval Planning Standard Impact Determination:
0 §50.47(b)(l)-Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) 0 §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization 0 §50.47(b)(3)- Emergency Response Support and Resources 0 §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System* 0 §50.47(b)(5)- Notification Methods and Procedures* D §50.47(b)(6)- Emergency Communications 0 §50.47(b)(7)- Public Education and Infonnation 0 §50.47(b)(8)- Emergency Facility and Equipment 0 §50.47(b)(9)-Accident Assessment* 0 §50.47(b)(l0)- Protective Response* 0 §50.47(b)(l l)-Radiological Exposure Control 0 §50.47(b)(l2) - Medical and Public Health Support 0 §50.47(b)(l3) -Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 0 §50.47(b)(l4)- Drills and Exercises 0 §50.47(b)(l5)- Emergency Responder Training 0 §50.47(b)(l6) - Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards 0 The proposed activity does not impact a Planning Standard
)
Commitment Impact Determination: D The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment
- Results:
D The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation
~-"!'!~e_!~~~~-~y ca~ot_be_ implemen~ed withou~ pe~forming a §50.54(q) eft~ctiveness e~~uat~~
Preparer Name: P e arer S
- atur Date: &
Nat~0arness **-*-**-------- \ ~ !_!J_!_::i__________,_ Reviewer Name: Don Crowl Revision 12 ':).: y )
3.10 IOCFR S0.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.3
" §50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form .,y -Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/ All 000/015A, Offsite Communications from the Control Room, Rev 004 Selt.-ctive Signaling System has bt.-en replaced with DEM NET in support ofa Duke Energy tleetwide initiative and is an overall enhancement for offsitc notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. St.>e attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Changed OSM to SM, ONS refers to the position as Shift Manager
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEM NET
- DEMNET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact information into Enclosure 4. 7
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEM NET Notification Form Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEM NET system.
- Added PIP 0-13-13560 regarding radio upgrade
- Added fleet procedure references AD-EP-ALL- 0 I 02, 0202, & 0406 Activity Type: .... *J.igq~$tJf;t~\;t1fe
[8] The activity~ a change to the emergency plan 0 The activity affects implementation of the emergency plan, but is not a change to the emergency plan Impact and Licensing Basis Determination: Licensing Basis:
- lOCFRS0.47 (b)(5): Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the
. )\ public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure
*y pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established.
- I OCFRS0.47 (b)(l6): Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.
- 10CFR50 Appendix E. D. Notltlcation Procedures:
I. Administrative and physical means for notifying local, State, and Federal otftcials and agencies and agreements reached with these otlicials and agencies for the prompt notification of the public and for public evacuation or other protective measures, should they become necessary, shall be described. This description shall include identification of the appropriate officials, by title and agency, of the State and local government agencies within the EPZs.
- 2. Provisions shall be described for yearly dissemination to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ of basic emergency planning information, such as the methods and times required for public notification and the protective actions planned if an accident occurs, general information as to the nature and effects of radiation, and a listing of local broadcast stations that will be used for dissemination of information during an emergency. Signs or other measures shall also be used to disseminate to any transient population within the plume exposure pathway EPZ appropriate information that would be helpful if an accident occurs.
- 3. A licenst.-e shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency. The licensee shall demonstrate that the appropriate governmental authorities have the capability to make a public alerting and notification decision promptly on being informed by the licensee of an t.mergency condition. Prior to initial operation gn."llter than 5 pt.-rcent of rated thermal powt.T of the first reactor at a site, each nucle-ar power reactor licensee shall dt.monstrate that administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ. The design objective of the prompt public alert and notification system shall be to have the capability to essentially complete the initial alt.'rting and initiate notification of the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ within about 15 minutes. The use of this alt.-rting and notification capability will range from immediate alt.'rting and notification of the public (within 15 minutes of the time that State and local otlicials are notified that a situation exists requiring urgent action) to the more likely events wh1.Te there is substantial time available for the appropriate governmental authorities to make a judgment whether or not to activate the public akrt and notification system. The akrting and notification capability shall additionally include administrative and physical means for a backup method of public alerting and notification capable of being ust.-d in the event the primary mt."lhod of alerting and notification is unavailable during an t.'ffit.Tg1."ncy to alert or notify all or portions of the plume exposure pathway EPZ population. The backup method shall have the capability to alert and notify the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ, but does not nC\.-d to 1m."t.."t the 15-minute dt.'Sign obj1.-ctive for the primary prompt public alert and notification syst1.m. When tht.Te is a d1.-cision to activate the alert and notification system, the appropriate govt.'Tilmcntal authorities will determine whctht.T to activate the entire alert and notification system simultan1."0usly or in a graduatt.'Cl or staged mannt.T. The responsibility for activating such a public alert and notification syst1."tn shall remain with the a ro riatc 1 ovemmental authoritit.'S.
- NUREG-0654, Section II. Planning Standards and Evaluation Criteria, o E. Notification Methods and Procedures, Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established.
- P. Responsibility for the Planning Effort: Development, Periodic Review and Distribution of the Emergency Plans, Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.
ONS Emergency Plan
- ONS E Plan Section E.3 & E.4, Initial and Follow-up Message Formats, A single message fonnat has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility. Notification and authentication procedures are in place for all designated agencies.
- ONS E Plan Section P. Responsibility for the Planning Effort: Development, Periodic Review and Distribution of the Emergency Plans, P. 7, Implementing Procedures Written procedures will be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities associated \vith emergency plan implementation. Each procedure and changes thereto, shall be approved by the responsible manager prior to implementation. Implementing procedures are indexed and cross referenced to the section applicable in NUREG 0654. (Figure P-1)
Compliance Evaluation and
Conclusion:
These functions continue to be provide timeliness as the Emergency Notification Fonn (ENF) must be transmitted within 15 minutes to state/local agencies. There has been no change in the timing ( 15 minute requirement) since the proposed revision continues to ensure that the Otfsite Communications from the Control Room to support the emergency plan is provided and maintained. The replacement of the selective signaling system to the Duke Emergency Management Network is a change in the notification I commination device and does not reduce effectiveness. Therefore all regulations and commitments continue to be met. D ' '
Reduction in Effectiveness (RIE) Evaluation and
Conclusion:
... BLOCK Si>~ ...
Evaluation: As can be seen by the above, compliance with regulations is assured .
.; I
~; fhe functions of 10CFR50.47b(5) per RG l.219 are: Three emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the three is impacted: ( l) Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. Thisf1111ction was maintained by ensuring notifications can be conducted through DEiHNETwhiclz replaced Selecti\.*e Signaling. The functions of 10CFR50.47b(l6) per RG 1.219 are: Two emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the two is impacted:: ( l) Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. This function was maintained by ensuring notifications can be conclucted through DEA/NET which replaced Selective Signaling. Therefore the proposed changes continue to ensure compliance with the regulations and the ONS Emergency Plan. The proposed changes are being made for the reasons as listed below: Selective Signaling System has been replaced with DEMNET in support of a Duke Energy t1eetwide initiative and is an overall enhancement for offsite notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. See attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Changed OSM to SM, ONS refers to the position as Shift Manager
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEMNET
- DEtvlNET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact infonnation into Enclosure 4. 7
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEMNET Notification Fonn Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET
'"> system.
- Added PIP 0-13-13560 regarding radio upgrade
- Added fleet rocedure references AD-EP-ALL- 0102, 0202, & 0406
Conclusion:
The change in RP/O/A/l000/015A associated with the replacement of the Selective Signaling system to the Duke Emergency Management Network is a change in the notification I communication device and does not reduce effectiveness. The system review was conducted and documented in the 50.54q review for AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management Network. The ro osed activi D does I l:8J does not constitute a RIE. Effectiveness Evaluation Results l:8J The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendi."< E and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior approval. D The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior approval. Preparer Name: Natalie Harness Reviewer Name: Don Crowl Approver Name: Pat Street )Revision 12
- <J /
- i Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form
;
Rev. 04/23/2012
.")The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in information you want to appear on the various
-:)rms needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in
'{nformation on this form, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perform Step 3 below.
Step 1- press [Fl2] (Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- 1. ID No.: RP/O/NI000/015A
- 2. Revision No.: 003 _
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a changy,_ replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Control Room
- 5. For changes only, enter procedu~sections affected:_
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness J
- 7. Preparation Date: 11/24/2014 j}* PCR Numbers Included in Revision: ONS-2014-05918 Step 3- go to Print Preview to update this information in all the attached documents.
Jep 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional information needed. Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness.
)
)
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) )ROS-10) RP/O/A/1000/0 I 5A Duke Energy (I) ID No. PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 003 _ Page 2 of 5 PREPARATION (2) Station OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title Offsite Communications fro (4) Prepared By* Natalie Harness (Signature)-::\\~~~~LL\.-.:\,,.AJ..:V.:~~~.,,/.__ _ Date 11124/2014 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination?
~ Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) - A ac S 228 documentation.
D No (Revision with minor changes) Date Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(QR)(KI) Nib~Date U- 2 -1 r Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) N~ate fd? t 'f Mgmt Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) N~ate le).. - 7 -1 y (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date -) Reviewed By* -:;::;::::::------r.--::::------\~~"'9----H-t-+/-i.::::=='1r---- Date i) Approved By* ' Date
- .flERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy every 14 cale1 dar days 1 (9) Compared with Control Copy* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Work Order Number ( W O # ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit l D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes DNA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes DNA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date )13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
)
- Printed Name and Signature
RP/O/N1000/015A Revision 003 _ Change No. _
- } Page 2of5
) Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Control Room SUMIVIARY OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON)
General Changes See attached change matrix. Minor editorial changes. (indentation corrections) Addition of an ENF form for compliance with 10CFR50, App E, Section IV.3, Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) guidance as provided in NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, "Guidance for Protective Action Strategies". (Hostile Action Based Event) PCR Numbers Incorporated ONS-2014-05918 Enclosure "\
;J '). ;)
)
)
RP/O/All 000/0 l 5A Revision 003 _ Change No. _ J Page 3 of 5
-)
Attachment to 50.54q RP/0/A/1000/0lSA, Rev 003, Offsite Communications from the Control Room
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 1. Page 2 of5 Note: This procedure is an NOTE: Enhancement:
Note section implementing Procedure to the
- This is an implementing Procedure to Added the following Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency the Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency note to ensure Plan and must be forwarded to Plan and must be reviewed in evaluation for a Emergency Planning within seven (7) accordance with lOCFR50.54q by IOCFR50.54q working days of approval. Emergency Preparedness within effectiveness review.
seven (7) working days of aooroval.
- 2. Page 2 of5 NOTE: Actions within the body of NOTE: Enhancement:
Notes this procedure are NOT required to be
- Actions within the body of this combined both Note performed in sequence. procedure are NOT required to be boxes into a single performed in sequence. box.
NOTE: This procedure is an
- Emergency Notification Forms implementing Procedure to the (ENF) for an Initial or Upgrade are Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency typically completed by the OSM.
Plan and must be forwarded to When the OSM is not available, or Emergency Planning within seven (7) when directed by the OSM, the working days of approval. Offsite Communicator will complete the Initial/Upgrade ENF per this ) procedure. Otherwise, the Offsite Communicator will complete applicable Immediate and
) Subsequent steps for Follow-Up and Termination notifications.
- 3. Enclosure 4.1 Obtain Enclosure 4.1.A (Nuclear Obtain one of the following, as This change is being Page 1 of3 Power Plant Emergency Notification appropriate, and complete the forms as made to adopt Form) for a GENERAL follows: Protective Action EMERGENCY EVENT and complete
- Enclosure 4.1.A (Nuclear Power Recommendations the form as follows: Plant Emergency Notification Form - (PARs) guidance as GENERAL EMERGENCY) provided in
- Enclosure 4.1.B (Nuclear Power NUREG-0654, Supp Plant Emergency Notification Form - 3, "Guidance for Hostile Action Based Event - Protective Action GENERAL EMERGENCY) Strategies" for compliance with 1OCFR50, App E, Section IV.3.
- 4. Enclosure 4.1 Line 1 Mark "DRILL" or "ACTUAL Line 1 Mark "DRILL" or "ACTUAL Page I of3 EVENT". EVENT".
Enter Message Number (very first Enter Message Number (very first Editorial: correct message is #I and then sequential message is #I and then sequential indentations numbering numbering required until event required until event terminated). terminated).
- 5. Enclosure 4.1 Line 2 Mark/verify "initial" Line 2 Mark/verify "initial" notification.
Editorial: remove Page I of3 notification. Time, date, and Time, date, and authentication to be un-necessary authentication to be completed completed spacing after line 17. after line 17.
- 6. Enclosure 4.1 Line 4 Enter/Verify EAL# provided Line 4 Enter/Verify EAL# provided by Page I of3 by OSM/EC (use Emergency Action OSM/EC (use Emergency Action Level Editorial: correct Level Guideline Guideline Manual). indentations Manual).
RP /0/ Al 1000/0 l 5A Revision 003 _ Change No. _ ""A Page 4of5 y
) # Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 7. Enclosure 4.1 Line 5 ... Line 5...
Page I of3 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition Condition "A" exists: "A" exists: Editorial: remove Mark Box B and write "Move Mark Box Band write "Move residents italics, not residents living downstream of the living downstream of the Keowee Hydro acceptable form of Keowee Hydro dams to higher dams to higher ground. emphasis in ground. AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit procedures writers AND mark Box E and write traffic flow across bridges identified on guide "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges your inundation maps until the danger has identified on your inundation maps passed." until the dan_f!,er has passed."
- 8. Enclosure 4.1 Line 7 If Box A was marked on Line Line 7 IF Box A was marked on Line 6, Page 2 of3 6, then mark Box A on this line and go then mark Box A on this line and go to to Line 8. Line 8.
If Box B was marked on Line 6, then IF Box B was marked on Line 6, then mark Box D (under Evaluation) mark Box D (under Evaluation) UNLESS Editorial: Bold and UNLESS RP has told you to mark Box B or C and underline action RP has told you to mark Box B or C go to Line 8. word IF & correct and go to Line 8. IF Box C was marked on Line 6, then indentations If Box C was marked on Line 6, then mark Box D (Under Evaluation) UNLESS -~ mark Box D (Under Evaluation) RP has told you to mark Box B or C and j) UNLESS go to Line 8. RP has told you to mark Box B or C
}) - -
- 9. Enclosure 4.1 and go to Line 8.
Line 9 Line 9 Editorial: correct Page 2 of3 Line 10 Line 10 indentations
- 10. Enclosure 4.1 Line 11 Line 11 Editorial: correct Page 3 of3 Line 12 Line 12 indentations
- 11. Enclosure 4.1 Lines 14, 15, & 16 - These lines are Lines 14, 15, & 16 are NOT required to Page 3 of 3 NOT required to be completed for an be completed for an initial Note3 initial notification.
Editorial: removed notification. DO NOT add or change information on "these lines" and DO NOT add or change information the form after it has been approved by the underline NOT on the form after it has been approved Emergency Coordinator. by the Emergency Coordinator.
- 12. Enclosure NOTE: same enclosure as 4.1.A but title Addition of a new 4.1.B is ENF to address Title Hostile Action Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Based Events per Notification Form NUREG-0654, Supp Hostile Action Based Event 3, "Guidance for GENERAL EMERGENCY Protective Action Strategies" for compliance with
) I OCFR50, App E, Section IV.3
- 13. Enclosure 4.2 Line 1 Line 1 Editorial: correct
) Pagel of4 Line 2 Line 2 indentations Line4 Line4
RP/O/ Al 1000/0 l 5A Revision 003 _ Change No. _ ") Page 5of5
"\
j)
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 14. Enclosure Line 5 ... Line 5... Editorial: remove 4.2 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition italics, not Page I of4 Condition "A" exists: "A" exists: acceptable form of
*Mark Box Band write "Move *Mark Box Band write "Move residents emphasis in residents living downstream of the living downstream of the Keowee Hydro procedures writers Keowee Hydro dams to higher ground. dams to higher ground. guide
- AND mark Box E and write *AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges traffic flow across bridges identified on identified on your inundation maps your inundation maps until the danger has until the danger has passed." passed."
- 15. Enclosure Line 6 Line 6 Editorial: correct 4.2 Line7 Line 7 indentations Page 2 of4 Line .10 Line 10
- 16. Enclosure Line 11 Line 11 Editorial: correct 4.2 Line 12 Line 12 indentations Page 3 of4 Line 13 Line 13
- 17. Enclosure Lines 14, 15, & 16 - These lines are Lines 14, 15, & 16 are NOT required to Editorial: removed 4.2 NOT required to be completed for an be completed for an initial "these lines" and Page 4 of4 initial notification. notification. underline NOT Note DO NOT add or change information DO NOT add or change information on
-~ on the form after it has been approved the form afl:er it has been approved by the j) by the Emergency Coordinator. Emergency Coordinator. C\ 18. Enclosure Line2 Line 2 Editorial: correct y 4.3 Line4 Line4 indentations Page I of3
- 19. Enclosure Line6 Line 6 Editorial: correct 4.3 Line 9 Line 9 indentations Page 2 of3 Line 10 Line 10
- 20. Enclosure Line 11 Line 11 Editorial: correct 4.3 Line 12 Line 12 indentations Page 3 of3 Line 13 Line 13
- 21. Enclosure Line 1 Line 1 Editorial: correct 4.4 Line 2 Line2 indentations Page 1 of3 Line4 Line 4
- 22. Enclosure Line 6 Line 6 Editorial: correct 4.4 Line 7 Line 7 indentations Page2of3 Line 9 Line 9 Line 10 Line 10
- 23. Enclosure Line 11 Line 11 Editorial: correct 4.4 Line 12 Line 12 indentations Page 3 of3 Line 13 Line 13
- 24. Enclosure Line 5 ... If a Keowee Hydro Line 5.. .If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Editorial: remove 4.5 Dam/Dike Condition "A" exists: Condition "A" exists: italics, not Page 1 of3 *Mark Box Band write "Move *Mark Box Band write "Move residents acceptable form of residents living downstream of the living downstream of the Keowee Hydro emphasis in Keowee Hydro darns to higher ground. dams to higher ground. procedures writers
)
- AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges
*AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges identified on guide .)\ identified on your inundation maps your inundation maps until the danger has
_y until the danger has passed." passed."
- 25. Enclosure Line3 Line3 Editorial: correct 4.6 Line 10 Line 10 indentations Page 1 of l
[Type text] _, PENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Rev. 10) Page I of2 J:l,__~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~P_A_R_T~I_-_A~CT~IV_I_T_Y_D_E_S_C_R_IPT~I-O_N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-1 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC SITE I UNIT(S) [8J Oconee 0 McGuire 0 Catawba I [8J Unit I [8J Unit 2 [8J Unit 3 RP/O/A/1000/015A, Offsite Communications from the Control Room, Rev 003 ACTIVITY TITLE/DOCUMENT/REVISION: ONS-2014-05918 PART II - PROCESS REVIEW For each activity, address all of the questions below. If the answer is "YES for any portion of the activity, apply the identified process( es) to that portion of the activitv. Note: It is not unusual to have more than one process anoly to a 2iven activity. Will implementation of the above activity require a change to the:
- l. Technical Specifications (TS) or D If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227.
Operating License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? D IfYES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
NO YES
- 3. Security Plans? D If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
NO YES (See Appendix H) ~
- 4. Emergency Plan? D If YES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Arca Manual.
I NO YES
- 5. Inservice Testing Program Plan? [gJ D If YES, process per site !ST Program for ASME code compliance and
-~
NO YES related facility changes. lnservice Inspection Program Plan? [gJ D If YES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping lnservice Inspection NO YES FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes.
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? D If YES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
NO YES 7a -Utilize Appendix E to address Fire Check to confirm use of Appendix E Screening Questions. Protection Program Plan Impact.
- 8. Regulatory Commitments? D If YES, process per NSD 214.
NO YES
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
NO YES I 0. Programs and manuals listed in the [gJ D lfYES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group. Administrative Section of the TS? NO YES ). y~
[Type text]
- ~
;JJ~---------------------------------------------------~
Page 2 of 2 PART Illa - 10 CFR 72.48 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address the question below. If the answer to question 11 is "YES," and questions 14 and 17 are answered "NO", then process the activity per NSD 211- 10 CFR 72.48 does apply.
- 11. Does the activity involve SSCs, procedures or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the ~ DYES loading or transport of the canister/cask to the ISFSI, the ISFSI facility, spent fuel cask design? NO PART Illb - 10 CFR 50.59 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address all of the questions below. If the answer to question 18 is ':YES," then 10 CFR 50.59 does not apply. If the answer to questions 18 is "NO," then process the activity per NSD 209- 10 CFR 50.59 applies.
- 12. Does the activity involve a procedure, governed by NSD 703 that has been excluded from the 10 CFR ~ D YES 50.59 process per NSD 703 and the exclusion status remains valid? NO
- 13. Does the activity involve an administrative procedure governed by NSD 100 or AD-DC-ALL-0201 that ~ DYES docs not contain information regarding the operation and control of Structures, Systems and NO Components?
- 14. Does the activity involve a type of Engineering Change that NSD 30 I excludes from the l 0 CFR 50.59 ~ D YES and/or lO CFR 72.48 Processes? Consult NSD 301 for assistance. NO
- 15. Does the activity involve (a) maintenance activities that restore SSCs to their as-designed condition ~ DYES (including activities that implement approved design changes) or (b) temporary alterations supporting NO
) maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less'?
- 16. Does the activity involve a UFSAR modification that NSD 220 excludes from the 10 CFR 50.59 Process? ~ D YES Consult NSD 220 for assistance. NO
- 17. Docs the activity involve NRC and/or Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC approved changes to the licensing ~ D YES basis? NO
- 18. Are ALL aspects of the activity bounded by one or more ;.YES" answers to questions 1 through 17, D ~YES above? NO PART IV - UFSAR REVIEW 1 Does the activity require a modification, deletion, or addition to the UFSAR to satisfy the UFSAR content ~ DYES 9 requirements of l 0 CFR 50.34 (b ), 10 CFR 50. 71 (e), or Regulatory Guide (RG) 1. 70? Consult NSD 220 for NO Assistance.
IF YES, process per NSD 220. p (Print (Sign) DATE ~ /4' Name) Applicability Determination Preparer _)
).
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (R08-10)
). Duke Energy PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD
)
(l) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/015A Revision No. 003 _ Change No. Permanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Control Room (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Pages 2-3, Enclosures 4.1, 4.2. & 4.3 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? [Kl Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. D No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) See attached change matrix. Minor editorial changes. (indentation corrections)
- )~**
,.
Addition of an ENF form for compliance with 10CFR50, App E, Section IV.3, Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) guidance as provided in NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, "Guidance for
) Protective Action Strategies". (Hostile Action Based Event)
(7) Reason for Change: compliance with 1OCFR50, App E, Section IV.3 & clarity of (8) Prepared By* (9) Reviewed By* Date 1~-7 -1 V Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KI) NA~Date 0- 7-lt/ Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR) NA~DateQ_,_, -tV Mgmt. Involvement Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Ops. Supt.) NA fyU Date !J-7-11/ (10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Date -~~~~- Reviewed By* Date
---,----+-~~~--Date-[2..--/r__,...(jl-<f-(11) Approved By*
- Printed Name and Signature
)
)
~* 3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/ All 000/0 lSA, Offsite Communications from the Control Room, Rev 003 See attached change matrix. Minor editorial changes. (indentation corrections, etc ... ) Addition of an ENF form for compliance with 10CFR50, App E, Section IV.3, Protective Action Recommendations (P ARs) guidance as provided in NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, "Guidance for Protective Action Strategies". (Hostile Action Based Event) 0 The activity~ a change to the emergency plan D The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: D The change~ editorial or typographical D The change does conform to an activity that has prior 0 The change is not editorial or typographical approval
~ The change does not conform to an activity that has prior approval Planning Standard Impact Determination:
D §50.47(b)(l)-Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) D §50.47(b)(2) - Onsite Emergency Organization D §50.47(b)(3) - Emergency Response Support and Resources
- rQ §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System*
- IlC:J §50.47(b)(5) - Notification Methods and Procedures*
'*'JJ §50.47(b)(6) - Emergency Communications "O §50.47(b)(7) - Public Education and Information D §50.47(b)(8) - Emergency Facility and Equipment D §50.47(b)(9)- Accident Assessment*
0 §50.47(b)(10) - Protective Response* D §50.47(b)(l 1) - Radiological Exposure Control D §50.47(b)(l2) - Medical and Public Health Support D §50.47(b)(l3)- Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations D §50.47(b)(l4) - Drills and Exercises D §50.47(b)(15)-Emergency Responder Training 0 §50.47(b)(l6) - Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards D The ro osed activity does not im act a Plannin Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
D The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment 0 The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: D The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation 0 The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation ,p~-- ---~-~-=-~m~~- ---~~1~~;~~---=-~- eviewer Name: Date: J on Crowl Revision 12
3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attaclunent 3.10.7 .3
§50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form jctivity Description and
References:
RP/O/A/1000/0lSA, Offsite Communications from the Control Room, Rev 003 See attached change matrix. Minor editorial changes. (indentation corrections, etc ... ) Addition of an ENF form for compliance with 1OCFR50, App E, Section IV.3, Protective Action Recommendations (P ARs) guidance as provided in NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, "Guidance for Protective Action Strategies". (Hostile Action Based Event) Activity Type: *7'.jJJ;'ii':~pt:('J~j{:;~~~tN1If~ C8J The activity _lli a change to the emergency plan 0 The activity affects implementation of the emergency plan, but is not a change to the emergency plan .) J )
)
lmpact and Licensing Basis Determination: Licensing Basis:
"
- lOCFRS0.47 (b)(5): Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response
_';) organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established.
- IOCFRS0.47 (b)(lO): A range of protective actions has been developed for the plume exposure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. In developing this range of actions, consideration has been given to evacuation, sheltering, and, as a supplement to these, the prophylactic use of potassium iodide (KI), as appropriate. Evacuation time estimates have been developed by applicants and licensees. Licensees shall update the evacuation time estimates on a periodic basis. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an emergency, consistent with Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed.
- lOCFRS0.47 (b)(16): Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.
- IOCFRSO Appendix E, D. Notification Procedures:
I. Administrative and physical means for notifying local, State, and Federal officials and agencies and agreements reached with these officials and agencies for the prompt notification of the public and for public evacuation or other protective measures, should they become necessary, shall be described. This description shall include identification of the appropriate officials, by title and agency, of the State and local government agencies within the EPZs.
- 2. Provisions shall be described for yearly dissemination to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ of basic emergency planning information, such as the methods and times required for public notification and the protective actions planned if an accident occurs, general information as to the nature and effects of radiation, and a listing of local broadcast stations that will be used for dissemination of information during an emergency. Signs or other measures shall also be used to disseminate to any transient population within the plume exposure pathway EPZ appropriate information that would be helpful if an accident occurs.
- 3. A licensee shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency. The licensee shall demonstrate that the appropriate governmental authorities have the capability to make a public alerting and notification decision promptly on being informed by the licensee of an emergency condition.
Prior to initial operation greater than 5 percent of rated thermal power of the first reactor at a site, each nuclear power reactor licensee shall demonstrate that administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within tl1e plume exposure pathway EPZ. The design objective of the prompt public alert and notification system shall be to have the capability to essentially complete the initial alerting and initiate notification of the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ within about 15 minutes. The use of this alerting and notification capability will range from immediate alerting and notification of the public (within 15 minutes of the time that State and local officials are notified that a situation exists requiring urgent action) to the more likely events where there is substantial time available for the appropriate governmental authorities to make a judgment whether or not to activate the public alert and notification system. The alerting and notification capability shall additionally include administrative and physical means for a backup method of public alerting and notification capable of being used in the event the primary method of alerting and notification is unavailable during an emergency to alert or notify all or portions of the plume exposure pathway EPZ population. The backup method shall have the capability to alert and notify the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ, but does not need to meet the 15-minute design objective for the primary prompt public alert and notification system. When there is a decision to activate the alert and notification system, the appropriate governmental authorities will determine whether to activate the entire alert and notification system simultaneously or in a graduated or staged manner. The responsibility for activating such a public alert and notification system shall remain with the appropriate governmental authorities. _)
)
- NUREG-0654. Section IL Planning Standards and Evaluation Criteria, o E. Notification Methods and Procedures, Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organizations; the
""'\
_;) content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. J. Protective Response, A range of protective actions have been developed for the plume exposure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an emergency, consistent with Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed. P. Responsibilitv for the Planning Effort: Development, Periodic Review and Distribution of the Emergency Plans, Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained. ONS Emergency Plan
- ONS E Plan Section E.3 & E.4, Initial and Follow-up Message Formats, A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility. Notification and authentication procedures are in place for all designated agencies.
- ONS E Plan Section J7, Protective Actions Recommendations, The Emergency Coordinator (Operations Shift Manager or Station Manager) or the EOF Director (depending on the facility activation) will be responsible for contacting the State and/or local governments to give prompt notification for implementing protective measures within the plume exposure pathway, and beyond it if necessary. Procedure RP/0/A/1000/024, "Protective Action Recommendations" and SR/O/A/2000/003, "Activation of the Emergency Operations Facility" has been written to provide specific guidance for issuing protective action recommendations under various plant conditions to the Emergency Coordinator in the TSC and the EOF Director in the EOF Figure (J-1) respectively. The decision to use sheltering as an alternative to evacuation for impediments and special populations is one that will be made by offsite officials. If dose projections show that PAGs have been exceeded at 10 miles, the dose assessment code and in-field
*~
measurements, when available, shall be used to calculate doses at various distances down wind to determine how far J from the site P AG levels are exceeded. The Radiological Assessment Manager shall forward the results to the EOF Director who will communicate this information to the offsite authorities. Figure J-IA (Protective Action Guides) is adopted from EPA 400 and guidance in state plans on use of KI and considers protective action based on projected avoided dose. Per Appendix 2, initial protective actions are predetermined for Control Room use for general emergency conditions. Meteorological conditions at Oconee require a complex method for determining appropriate sectors to evacuate. The Control Room will evacuate out to five miles and shelter out to ten miles which will simplify the process for determining the appropriate sectors to evacuate and to shelter.
- ONS E Plan Section P, Responsibility for the Planning Effort: Development, Periodic Review and Distribution of the Emergency Plans, P.7, Implementing Procedures Written procedures will be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities associated with emergency plan implementation. Each procedure and changes thereto, shall be approved by the responsible manager prior to implementation. Implementing procedures are indexed and cross referenced to the section a licable in NUREG 0654. (Fi ure P-1)
,)
)
~ompliance Evaluation and
Conclusion:
) * .. './'.1,.;;i3f(ick'4;f;!;\'.~;-:L'1 iThese functions continue to be provide timeliness as the Emergency Notification Form (ENF) must be tra;s*;:~;~~"":~,;~:*;~*~;~:t;~"""'
J state/local agencies. There has been no change in the timing (15 minute requirement) since the proposed revision continues to ensure that the Offsite Communications from the Control Room to support the emergency plan is provided and maintained. The Emergency Notification Form addition to the procedure, 4.1. b is an addition to the current ENF forms for compliance with 1OCFR50, App E, Section IV.3, Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) guidance as provided in NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, "Guidance for Protective Action Strategies". (Hostile Action Based Event). The ONS E plan was not impacted by the changes proposed in the revision. Therefore all regulations and commitments continue to be met:
Conclusion:
The proposed activity~ does I D does not continue to comply with the requirements. Reduction in Effectiveness (RIE) Evaluation and
Conclusion:
Evaluation: As can be seen by the above, compliance with regulations is assured. The functions of 10CFR50.47b(5) per RG 1.219 are: Three emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the three is impacted: ( 1) Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. This fimction was maintained by adding the ENF enclosure for Hostile Action Based (HAE) events. The functions of l OCFR50.4 7b( l 0) per RG 1.219 are: Three emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the three is impacted: ( l) A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. RG 1.219, Page 27
- -* Thisfimction was maintained by adding thejormfor HAE which includes "Shelter" only recommendations based on discussions with
... conee and Pickens Counties following the graded HAB exercise in 2014.
~e functions of 10CFR50.47b(l6) per RG 1.219 are:
../wo emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the two is impacted::
(1) Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. This fimction was maintained by the addition of the HAB enclosure that ensures the public shelters in the event of a hostile action based event. Therefore the proposed changes continue to ensure compliance with the regulations and the ONS E Plan. The proposed changes are being made for the reasons as listed below:
* #I Enhancement - Added the following note to ensure evaluation for a 10CFR50.54q effectiveness review.
* #2 & 11 Addition: This change is being made to adopt Protective Action Recommendations (P ARs) guidance as provided in NUREG-0654, Supp 3, "Guidance for Protective Action Strategies" for compliance with IOCFR50, App E, Section IV.3.
* #3, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 17-22, & 24 - Editorial: correct indentation
* #4 Editorial: remove spacing
* #6, 13, & 23 - Editorial: remove italics
* #7 Editorial: BOLD & underline introductory action words.
* #10 & 16 Editorial: underline NOT
Conclusion:
The change in RP/O/A/1000/015A associated with the additional ENF to adopt Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) guidance as provided in NUREG-0654, Supp 3, "Guidance for Protective Action Strategies" for compliance with l OCFR50, App E, Section IV.3. does not reduce the effectiveness. The proposed activity D does I ~ does not constitute a RIE. )
)
,}ffectiveness Evaluation Results *)~,;:"~;;;':BLOeK'g};tG; :, cjJ.':~:
f[SJ The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E and the ~~~:~~t~~~:~.,~~t.,,~;~~t~~:::,
-) a reduction in effectiveness, Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior approval.
D The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior approval. Preparer Name: Date: Natalie Harness 11/24/14 Reviewer Name: Date: Don Crowl
. .-_ --**-*------------*--*----***--**--*-*- ---'-~-~---l::=Lr.--------------------
Approver Name: Pat Street Date: 7_, l 0
<t--
Revision 12 ')\ J
)
Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 04/23/2012 The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in infonnation you want to appear on the various forms needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in infonnation on this form, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perform Step 3 below. Step 1- press [F12] (Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- 1. ID No.: RP/O/A/1000/0lSA
- 2. Revision No.: 002
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Control Room
- 5. For changes only. enter procedure sections affected: see attached change matrix
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness
- 7. Preparation Date: 4/23/2014
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision: ONS-2014-001421
,J Step 3- go to Print Preview to update this information in all the attached documents. Step 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional information needed~ Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness.,
Fonn 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) ) (ROS-10) RP/0/A/1000/015A Duke Energy (l)IDNo. PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 002 PREPARATION (2) Station _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ o__c__o=N=E=E;....::NU~C=L=E=AR==ST
....A
.....T
....I = O = N " - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(3) Procedure Title'-.-===..:===T===4~~~~=~===------------------ (4) Date 4/23/2014 (S) s17)JV D 228 documentation. (6) ;...:::l!.£al::2...Ji.:S.;.i~~LL--~=l...,'o~.-b~--(QR)(Kl) Date Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(QR)(Kl) NA,~ate Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) NA_IA., Date Mgmt Involvement Review By"' (Ops~ Supt.) NA ~te (7) Additional Reviews R e v i e w e d B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date ReviewedBy*~;:-----,-r--:;;;----:--'l-;-t---;;;;;:;f=:---rr:Cti:;::::=1=:::=----* Date ) (8) Approved By"' _t~~~c__!.4-..:£.~m._p,.~4~::::;~~~~4------ Date PERFORMANCE (9) Compared with Control C o p y " ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared.with Control Copy"' Date Compared with Control Copy* Date (10) Date(s) Performed'-.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Work Order Number (W.0#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes DNA Required enclosures attached? D Yes DNA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By"' Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
- Printed Name and Signature
RP/O/All 000/015A JY ~:;!s~o:r~02 Change No._ Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Control Room
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes See attached change matrix PCR Numbers Incorporated ONS-2014-001421 Enclosure
- -
} .' D .
.
Attachment to 50.54q RP/O/A/1000/0lSA, Rev 002, Offsfte Communications From The Control Room Chanee# Paee # Current Proposed Reason DocuTrack Section 2.2 ... 2.2 ... Making ONS- 2.2 Obtain the following items Obtain the following items the phone 2014- Page2 of from the Emergency from the Emergency numbers a 001421 s Procedures Cart (located in Procedures Cart (located in consistent TSC/OSC): TSC/OSC): JO digit number Emergency Action Level Emergency Action Level (XXX-Guideline Manual Guideline Manual XXX-Yellow folder containing: Yellow folder containing: XXti} in.
>Emergency Telephone >Emergency Telephone the body of Directory Directory... the
> Authentication Code List NOTE: For an outside line dial proeedures
>Emergency Notification "9" and for long distance dial and in
-__
Forms "l." some Enclosure procedures
,_ ,. a Remove all the "9-" and removing
.. __
... _.,.,.
4.7 0 0.-C'.... esr..JllN ~o.t\MI' Page 1 of s -----
---
~ILJAX!:~
. . . . ~.It
.... .......,
r::-:.==-
,........._
----
............
taWJMnl add the following: NOTE: .For an outside line dial "9" and for long distance dial the ~*9_" in front ofthe
~
~ ..... c_,~ ... ce a JO digit
-----
'""'C-.ll&I ... - ' *
....._...,.......,
...
-----
~~C'-
!::'~~-
. .......,....
.
----
-----
a ====.,~
.....__. . ."*
. . . . . . . .u
,......,,
,......~----
"1." phone numbers or adding 10llol
-
mm:_... ..... .s ......... a....,_. ......,Al-*al
... .. ..
(area code). . .**~ *"* Enclosure Georgia Emergency Georgia Emergency Adding a 4.7 Management Agency Management Agency NOTE to Page4of (GEMA) (9-404--635-7000 (GEMA) (404-635-7000 or state: For s or7200) 7200) *** an outside FAX Speed Dial 27 (Fax (removed "9-") line dial form for any Condition A or "9" and for long B dam/dike event) distance
.. Enclosure National Weather Service National Weather Service dial "l."
4.7 (1'iWS)(9-864-879~1085) (1'iWS) (864-879-1085) *** Page4 of FAX Speed Dial 27 (Fax (removed "9-") s form for any Condition A or B dam/dike event) *
)' .'
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record > y (ROS-10) Duke Energy PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No.RP/O/A/1000/015A Revision No.002 Change No. Permanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Control Room ( 4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Section 2.2 Page 2 of 5, Enclosure 4. 7 Page 1 of 5, and Enclosure 4. 7 Page 4 of 5 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. 1:8:1 No (Procedme change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) See attached change matrix (7) Reason for Change: Editorial
~ ~" K~ .nsK ~),/;q (8) Prepared By* Natalie Harness (Signature),..L~~~~...J.:J~~~~:,_- Date 4/23/2014 (9) Reviewed By'(V11-1 A.. 6.vu / Date Sh b'(
- I Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KI) NAMe. Date s/7 ~ 'f Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA~ Date s; Jt/rv Mgmt. Involvement Review By"' (Ops. Supt.) NA ~Date :s /, /1 'i I I (10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ __
Reviewed By"' Date _ _ _ __ (11) Approved By"' ~~~;..._.L..~~;..:.;:.J~-e:~=.-:::=-+--r--HPC~-- Date S"}-:l3/(Cf I I
"' Printed Name and Signature
J 3.10 lOCFR S0.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.l
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Scope:
1:81 The activity i§ a change to the emergency plan 0 The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: Change Type: [8J The change is editorial or typographical 0 The change does conform to an activity that has prior 0 The change 1s not editorial or typographical approval Making the phone numbers a consistent 10 digit number D The change does not conform to an activity that has prior (XXX-XXX-XXXX}, In the body of the procedures and in some approval procedures removing the Ng.* in front of the 10 digit phone numbers or adding (area code). Adding a NOTE to state: For an outside fine dial u9u and for long distance dial "1 .* Planning Standard Impact Determination: 0 §50.47(b)(l)-Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) 0 §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization 0 §50.47(b)(3)- Emergency Response Support and Resources 0 §50.47(b)(4) -Emergency Classification System* 1\ D §50.47(b)(5) - Notification Methods and Procedures* y 0 §S0.47(b)(6)- Emergency Communications 0 §50.47(b)(7)-Public Education and Information D §50.47(b)(8)-Emergency Facility and Equipment D §50.47(b)(9)-Accident Assessment* D §50.47(b)(10)- Protective Response* D §SOA7(b){l 1)~ Radiological Exposure Control D §50.47(b)(l2)- Medical and Public Health Support 0 §50.47(b)(13)-Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 0 §50.47(b)(14)-Drills and Exercises 0 §50.47(b)(15)-Emergency Responder Training D §50.47(b)(16)- Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards D The ro osed activi does not
- act a Plannin Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
D The activity does involve a site specific EP commitinent Record the commitment or commitment reference: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: [8J, The activity can be implemented without perfonning a §50.54(aj effectiveness evaluation D The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation Reviewer Name: ) ~fy'i>t-i-~ Revision 12
- Attachment to 50.54q RP/O/A/1000/0lSA, Rev 002, Offsite Communications From The Control Room Cban2e# Pa2e # Current Proposed Reason DocuTrack Section 2.2 ... 2.2 ... Making ONS- 2.2 Obtain the following items Obtain the following items the phone 2014- Page2of from_ the Emergency fromJhe Emergency numbers a 001421 5 Procedures Cart (located in Procedures Cart (located in consistent
.....
TSC/OSC): TSC/OSC): *: .. JO digit number Emergency Action Level Emergency Action Level (XXX-. Guideline Manual Guideline Manual XXX-Yellow folder containing: Yellow folder containing:: XXXX) in
>Emergency Telephone >Emergency Telephone thebodyof Directory Directory... the
>Authentication Code List NOTE: For an outside line dial procedures
>Emergency Notification "9" and for long distance dial and in Forms "1." some Enclosure 4.7 ::I -................ ..
.__._
o.-C'_,~~ a a.-c-riill'u-"..,. Remove all the "9-" and add the following: procedures removing Page 1 of -----
~ll.IAZ."""'1DMOI
.... ., -----
f:-'&1a f..-: W&IMllt __.......___
!'.-.. .......,, the "9- " in NOTE: For an outside line dial front ofthe
----- __
,~-----
5 ... -~~).*,
*,, ~"'
CJ ..... ~~- 1-~c-
................ *---
am a ,.._c-,i,111-1 u._,,. "9" and for long distance dial JO digit
----
~rauu..um
.._.
~ra.~r "1."
*:..}' ,._.,.._ phone CJ
----
=-==~=r--1**
,....,..._,
1tG111o
-
__
. . . . . . . . . .ti as-rA11Ls--.... a....,_._,."aa.....
numbers or adding (area
" -- -- code). --
Enclosure Georgia Emergency Georgia Emergency* Adding a 4.7 Management Agency Management Agency NOTE to Page4of (GEMA) (9-404-635-7000 (GEMA) (404-635-7000 or state: For 5 or 7200) 7200) *** an outside FAX Speed Dial 27 (Fax (removed "9-")- line dial form for any Condition A or "9" and for long B dam/dike event)
-distance Enclosure National Weather Service National Weather Service dial "l."
4.7 (NWS) (9-864-879-1085) (NWS) (864-879-1085) *** Page4of FAX Speed Dial 27 (Fax (removed "9-") 5 form for any Condition A or B dam/dike event)
)\
.;)
RP/0/A/1000/015 B Rev. 5 l::Ml::RGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites . BNP 0 EREG #: g~gg9~g3 2069579 Revised EReg /AW AD-EP-ALL* 0602. Changes are annotated in bold and italic. CNS 0 CR3 D HNP 0 MNS 0 SAD#: 01985101 ONS ~ RNP D GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015 8 Revision 005 Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center (PRR 01944106 and PRR01968803) Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):
# step before after
- 1. BODY RP /1000/019 ... RP/O/A/1000/019 ...
step 2.2 RP/1000/010 ... RP /0/A/1000/010 ... page 2 of 8 RP/1000/017 ... RP/O/A/1000/017
- 2. Body For WebEOC use: ... [Stated required deleted (used to be computer profile settings]
step 2.6) page 3 of 8
- 3. Body ... Significant changes in plant ... Significant changes in plant note before conditions (Evacuation/relocation conditions (Evacuation/relocation of step 2.6 of site personnel; fires onsite; MERT site personnel; fires onsite; MERT activation and/or injured personnel activation and/or injured personnel transported offsite; chemical spills; transported offsite; chemical spills; explosions; condition "A" or "B" for explosions; Imminent Failure Keowee Hydro project Dams/Dikes (Condition "A") or Potential Failure or any event that would cause or (Condition "B") for Jocassee or require offsite agency response) Keowee Hydro project Dams/Dikes or should be communicated as they any event that would cause or require occur...
- offsite agency response) should be communicated as they occur...
- 4. BODY ... OSM ... ... SM ...
Note before step 2.6.1 The other unit that has now met a The other unit that has now met a page 5 of 8 NOUE EAL classification should be NOUE EAL classification should be
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-t:.t-'-ALL-UUUL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev ..1 r , ATTACHMENT 4 Page 2of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form noted under Line 13 Remarks noted under Line 13 Remarks. section along with what EAL If any other unit has a classification, condition is now met for that unit. the unit and classification should be noted under line 13.
- 5. BODY IAAT An emergency classification is IAAT Any of the following occurs:
Step 3.1 being UPGRADED or a FOLLOW-UP
- An Emergency classification is page 6 of 8 message is due or a change in being UPGRADED PROTECTIVE ACTION
- A FOLLOW-UP message is due RECOMMENDATIONS (PARs) occurs
- A change in PROTECTIVE ACTION or an event is TERMINATED ... RECOMMENDATIONS (PARs occurs)
- An event is TERMINATED
- 6. BODY Using Group Dial Code 008 ... Using Group Dial Code 8 ...
Step 3.5 page 7 of 8
- 7. BODY ... RP/1000/009 ... ... RP/O/A/1000/009 ...
Step 3.8 page 7 of 8
- 8. BODY ... RP/1000/010 ... ... RP /0/A/ 1000/010...
Step 3.9 page 7 of 8
- 9. BODY ... RP/1000/017 ... ... RP /0/ A/1000/017 ...
Note before Step 3.10 page 7 of 8
- 10. BODY ... RP/1000/017 ... ... RP/O/A/1000/017 ...
Step 3.10 page 7 of 8
- 11. BODY ... Use Group Dial Code 005 ... ... Use Group Dial Code 5 Step 3.12 -
page 7 of 8
- 12. Enclosure Pre-Printed Emergency Notification 4.1 forms containing specific EAL number First NOTE and EAL description may be used in page 1of3 lieu of Enclosure 4.1.A or WebEOC AD-EP-ALL-406 AD-EP-ALL-0406
- 13. Enclosure Contact the OSC Chemistry Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager 4.1 Manager, (ext. 3495) to verify the (ext. 3495) or the OSC Operations Line 4, status of any liquid releases. Liaison (ext. 3496) to verify the status
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form substep 2 of any liquid releases. page 1of3
- 14. Enclosure If a liquid release is occurring then IF a liquid release is occurring, 4.1 complete lines 6 and 7 as directed complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by Line 4, by the OSC Chemistry Manager. the OSC Chemistry Manager or OSC substep 3 Operations Liaison.
page 1of3
- 15. Enclosure NOTE: Given that available space for 4.1 handwritten information is limited on Note before line 5, it is acceptable for what is line 5 written to span multiple boxes' worth, page 2 of 3 as long as it is contained on line 5. For WebEOC forms, all of this information can be entered on line 5 under box E, given that there is more available space for typing this.
- 16. Enclosure If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike !.E a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro 4.1 Condition "A" exists: Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition Line 5
- Mark Box Band write "Move "A") exists:
page 2 of 3 residents living downstream of
- Mark Box E the Keowee Hydro Dam to
- Write "Move residents living higher ground." downstream of the Keowee Hydro
- AND mark Box E and write Dam to higher ground."
"Prohibit traffic flow across
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges identified on your bridges identified on your inundation maps until the inundation maps until the danger danger has passed." has passed."
- 17. Enclosure Enter the meteorological data if IF available from the TSC Dose 4.1 available from the TSC Dose Assessor, enter the meteorological Line 9 Assessor. data.
page 2 of 3
- 18. Enclosure Mark or select All if event affects IF the highest emergency classification 4.1 the emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit.
Line 11 more than one unit. IF the highest emergency classification page 2 of 3 Mark or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than affects one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select "All". a higher emergency classification.
- 19. Enclosure If effected unit is shutdown, then IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the 4.1 enter the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date.
Line 12
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-t:l""'-.1-\LL-UOUL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form page 3 of 3
- 20. Enclosure ... If there are no remarks write ... !.E there are no remarks, write 4.1 "None". "None".
Line 13 page 3 of 3
- 21. Enclosure Lines 14, 15 & 16 - These lines are Lines 14, 15, and 16 are NOT required 4.1 NOT required to be completed for to be completed for initial notification.
Note before initial notification. Line 17 page 3 of 3
- 22. Enclosure Contact the OSC Chemistry Verify with OSC Chemistry Manager 4.2 Manager, (ext. 3495) to verify the (ext. 3495) and the OSC Operations Line 4, status of any liquid releases. Liaison (ext. 3496) to verify the status substep 2 of any liquid releases (to include page 1of3 Chemical Treatment Ponds and Radwaste).
- 23. Enclosure If a liquid release is occurring then IF a liquid release is occurring, 4.2 complete lines 6 and 7 as directed complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by Line 4, by the OSC Chemistry Manager. the OSC Chemistry Manager or OSC substep 3 Operations Liaison.
page 1of3
- 24. Enclosure NOTE: Given that available space for 4.2 handwritten information is limited on Note before line 5, it is acceptable for what is Line 5 written to span multiple boxes' worth, page 2 of 3 as long as it is contained on line 5. For WebEOC forms, all of this information can be entered on line 5 under box E, given that there is more available space for typing this.
- 25. Enclosure If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro 4.2 Condition "A" DOES NOT exist, then Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition Line 5 mark Box A NONE. "A") does NOT exist, mark Box A, page 2 of 3 NONE.
If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition "A" exists: IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro
- Mark Box B and write "Move Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition residents living downstream of "A") exists:
the Keowee Hydro Dam to
- Mark Box E higher ground."
- Write "Move residents living
t::MERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
- AND mark Box E and write downstream of the Keowee Hydro "Prohibit traffic flow across Dam to higher ground."
bridges identified on your
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across inundation maps until the bridges identified on your danger has passed." inundation maps until the danger has passed."
- 26. Enclosure Enter the meteorological data if IF available from the TSC Dose 4.2 available from the TSC Dose Assessor, enter the meteorological Line 9 Assessor. data.
page 2 of 3
- 27. Enclosure Mark or select All if event affects IF the highest emergency classification 4.2 the emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit.
Line 11 more than one unit. IF the highest emergency classification page 2 of 3 Mark or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than affects one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select "All". a higher emergency classification.
- 28. Enclosure If effected unit is shutdown, then IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the 4.2 enter the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date.
Line 12 page 3 of 3
- 29. Enclosure ... If there are no remarks write ... IF there are no remarks, write 4.2 "None". "None".
Line 13 page 3 of 3
- 30. Enclosure Lines 14, 15 & 16 - These lines are Lines 14, 15, and 16 are NOT required 4.2 NOT required to be completed for to be completed for initial notification.
Note before initial notification. Line 17 page 3 of 3
- 31. Enclosure Contact the OSC Chemistry Verify with OSC Chemistry Manager 4.3 Manager, (ext. 3495) to verify the (ext. 3495) and the OSC Operations Line 4, status of any liquid releases. Liaison (ext. 3496) to verify the status substep 2 of any liquid releases (to include page 1of3 Chemical Treatment Ponds and Radwaste).
- 32. Enclosure If a liquid release is occurring then IF a liquid release is occurring, 4.3 complete lines 6 and 7 as directed complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by Line 4, by the OSC Chemistry Manager. the OSC Chemistry Manager or OSC substep 3 Operations Liaison.
page 1of3
- 33. Enclosure Verify that Protective Action Verify Box A, NONE, is marked for
--------- -- ---
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-t:.t"-ALL-UOUL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATIACHMENT 4 Page 6of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 4.3 Recommendation is marked as Protective Action Recommendation. Line 5 none page 1of2
- 34. Enclosure Enter the meteorological data if .If available from the TSC Dose 4.3 available from the TSC Dose Assessor, enter the meteorological Line 9 Assessor. data.
. ..,
page?
- ~
-k or select All if event affects .If the highest emergency classification
.. .~emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit.
I Line 11 more than one unit. IF the highest emergency classification
, oage 'of 2 M.-,:k or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than 11 11
. af :cts one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select All
- j ,;.~her emergency classification.
*---
- 36. Enclosure If effected unit is shutdown, then !.E affected unit is shutdown, enter the 4.3 enter the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date.
. Line 12 page 2 of 2
- 37. Enclosure ... If there are no remarks write .. .IF there are no remarks, write 4.3 "None". "None".
Line 13 page 2 of 2
- 38. Enclosure Lines 14, 15 & 16 - These lines are Lines 14, 15, and 16 are NOT required 4.3 NOT required to be completed for to be completed for initial notification.
Note before initial notification. Line 17 page 2 of 2
- 39. Enclosure Contact the OSC Chemistry Verify with OSC Chemistry Manager 4.4 Manager, (ext. 3495) to verify the (ext. 3495) and the OSC Operations Line 4, status of any liquid releases. Liaison (ext. 3496) to verify the status substep 2 of any liquid releases (to include page 1of2 Chemical Treatment Ponds and Radwaste).
- 40. Enclosure If a liquid release is occurring then !f. a liquid release is occurring, 4.4 complete lines 6 and 7 as directed complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by Line 4, by the OSC Chemistry Manager. the OSC Chemistry Manager or OSC substep 3 Operations Liaison.
page 1of2
- 41. Enclosure Verify that Protective Action Verify Box A, NONE, is marked for 4.4 Recommendation is marked as Protective Action Recommendation.
Line 5 none page 1of2
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT4 Page 7of17 1 O CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
- 42. Enclosure Enter the meteorological data if IF available from the TSC Dose 4.4 available from the TSC Dose Assessor, enter the meteorological Line 9 Assessor. data.
page 2 of 2
- 43. Enclosure Mark or select All if event affects IF the highest emergency classification 4.4 the emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit.
Line 11 more than one unit. IF the highest emergency classification page 2 of 2 Mark or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than affects one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select "All". a higher emergency classification.
- 44. Enclosure If effected unit is shutdown, then IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the 4.4 enter the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date.
Line 12 page 2 of 2
- 45. Enclosure ... If there are no remarks write ... IF there are no remarks, write 4.4 "None". "None".
Line 13 page 2 of 2
- 46. Enclosure
- Verify with the TSC Dose
- Verify with the TSC Dose Assessor 4.5 Assessor that information for that information for lines 5, 6, 7, 9, Line 4 lines 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, and 16 14, 15, and 16 have NOT changed Page 2of4 have not changed since the last since the last message sheet.
message sheet.
- IF changes have NOT occurred
- If changes have not occurred since the previous message, copy since the previous message, then the same information from the last copy the same information from message sheet.
the last message sheet.
- IF changes have occurred, mark
- If changes have occurred, then applicable boxes and add new mark applicable boxes and add information as directed by the TSC new information as directed by Dose Assessor, the OSC Chemistry the TSC Dose Assessor and the Manager, and the OSC Operations OSC Chemistry Manager. Liaison.
- 47. Enclosure NOTE: Given that available space for 4.5 handwritten information is limited on Note before line 5, it is acceptable for what is Line 5 written to span multiple boxes' worth, page 2 of 4 as long as it is contained on line 5. For WebEOC forms, all of this information
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 4 Page 8of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form can be entered on line 5 under box E, given that there is more available space for typing this.
- 48. Enclosure If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike I~ a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro 4.5 Condition "A" exists: Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition Line 5
- Mark Box Band write "Move "A") exists:
page 2 of 4 residents living downstream of
- Mark Box E the Keowee Hydro Dam to
- Write "Move residents living higher ground." downstream of the Keowee Hydro
- AND mark Box E and write Dam to higher ground."
"Prohibit traffic flow across
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges identified on your bridges identified on your inundation maps until the inundation maps until the danger danger has passed." has passed."
- 49. Enclosure Verify plant conditions with Verify plant conditions with operation 4.5 operation support. If plant support. IF plant conditions have NOT Line 8 conditions have not changed since changed since the previous message page 2 of 4 the previous message sheet, repeat sheet, repeat the same information.
the same information. !E plant conditions have changed since If plant conditions have changed the previous message sheet, mark Box since the previous message sheet, A, B, or C as directed by Operations then mark Box A, B, or C as directed Support by Operations Support. so. Enclosure Mark or select All if event affects !Ethe highest emergency classification 4.5 the emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit. Line 11 more than one unit. IF the highest emergency classification page 3 of 4 Mark or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than affects one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select "All". a higher emergency classification.
- 51. Enclosure Examples of new information Examples of new information include:
4.5 include
Evacuation/relocation of Evacuation/relocation of site Note before site personnel; fires onsite; MERT personnel; fires onsite; MERT Line 13 activation and/or injured personnel activation and/or injured personnel page 3 of 4 transported offsite; chemical spills; transported offsite; chemical spills; explosions; Condition "A" or "8" explosions; Imminent Failure for a Keowee Hydro Project (Condition "A") or Potential Failure Dam/Dikes; or any event that would (Condition "B") for a Keowee Hydro cause or require offsite agency Project Dam/Dikes; or any event that response. would cause or require offsite agency response
- 52. Enclosure Write "None" if there are no IF there are no additional remarks, 4.5 - additional remarks. write "None".
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 9of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Line 13 If upgrade in classification occurs !f..upgrade in classification occurs prior page 3 of 4 prior to transmitting the message to transmitting the message, include then include "upgrade to follow" on "upgrade to follow" on this line. this line.
- 53. Enclosure Copy the same information from Copy the same information from the 4.5 the previous message sheet. If previous message sheet. IF changes Line 15 changes have occurred see TSC have occurred, see TSC Dose Assessor page 3 of 4 Dose Assessor for this information. for this information.
- 54. Enclosure Copy the same information from Copy the same information from the 4.5 the previous message sheet. If previous message sheet. IF changes Line 16 changes have occurred see TSC have occurred, see TSC Dose Assessor page 3 of 4 Dose Assessor for this information. for this information.
- 55. Enclosure Fax Form - For guidance see IF using manual fax, Fax Form to 4.7 Enclosure 4.8 (Copy/Fax Operation) Group Dial 1- For guidance see page 1of5 Use Group Dial 001. Enclosure 4.8 (Copy/FAX Operation).
IF using WebEOC, ensure the forms have been sent - for guidance see enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference). IF AT ANY TIME DEM NET is NOT operating correctly, refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method and Sequence to Contact Agencies) to manually transmit the message.
- 56. IF A Keowee dam/dike condition IF any of the following exists for the "A" or "B" or external flood site:
condition exist for the site THEN Fax form using Group Dial
- Keowee dam/dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
003.
- Jocassee dam/dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
- Keowee dam/dike Potential Failure (Condition 11 8 11 )
- Jocassee dam/dike Potential Failure (Condition "B")
- external flood condition THEN Fax form using Group Dial 3
- 57. FAX Dial Code 027 FAX Dial Code 27 FAX Dial Code 026 FAX Dial Code 26 FAX Dial Code 024 FAX Dial Code 24 FAX Dial Code 025 FAX Dial Code 25 -
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 10of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form (Fax form for any Condition A or B (Fax form for any Imminent Failure darn/dike event) (condition "A") or Potential Failure {Condition "B") dam/dike event)
- 58. Begin call by saying "You should Begin call by saying "You should have have received a fax indicating received a fax indicating Jocassee or Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike is in Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike is in condition A or B, or an external Imminent Failure (Condition "A") or t1ood condition exist for the site, do Potential Failure (Condition "B"), or an you have any questions?" external flood condition exist for the site, do you have any questions?"
- 59. If meteorological data was not IF meteorological data was NOT provided on the previous message, provided on the previous message, then initiate a Follow-up message initiate a Follow-up message and and include the met data. include the met data.
- 60. Enclosure 4.8 This enclosure grovides basic This enclosure erovides basic oeerating Note before ogerating instructions for the instructions for the erima!Jl faxes in the erima0t faxes in the TSC 1 U-1l2 TSC1 U-1l2 control room and U-3 section 1 control room and OSC. Procedure Room.
page 1of2
- 61. Enclosure 4.8 FAX the notification form using the FAX the notification form using the following method: following method:
1.1 page 1of2 A. Insert notification form, 1.1.1 Insert notification form, adjust document guide if needed. adjust document guide as B. Determine which Dial Code necessary. number to use 1.1.2 Select "FAX". 1.1.3 Select "Address Book" (file C. Press the Dial Code number folder icon). D. Press the START button 1.1.4 Select "Individual" or "Group" based on notification need. 1.1.S Select "OK". 1.1.6 Press the green "send" button.
- 62. Enclosure Insert notification form, adjust insert notification form, adjust 4.8 document guide if needed. document guide as necessary.
1.2, A page 1of2
- 63. 4.8 page 2 Group Dial Code moved to before of 2 Individual dial code as it is more
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 11 of 17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form likely to be used. individual dial codes specified to be individual dial codes Back-up TSC Alternate TSC
- 64. enclosure Note moved from bottom of page added 4th bullet IF DEMNET does NOT 4.9 to top of page. work, any alternate method (in order of preference) such as land lines, 48.5 MHz radio, cellphones, may be used to satisfy the notification requirement.
step 1 of radio directions: select channel 1 on the remote if ensure channel 1 selected on the not already selected. remote
- 65. 4.10 backup emergency response facility alternate emergency response facility (ERF) activated: (ERF) acted
- 66. 4.12 OSM - Operations Shift Manager SM - Shift Manager
- 67. 4.13 Line 5 changed to match previous instances Line 11 changed to match previous instances Line 17 removed Record the name of the communicator making the call
- 68. Enclosure 4. PIP 0-11-9459 4. PIP 0-11-9459/NCR 0182753 4.15 5. PIP 0-13-13560 5. PIP 0-13-13560/NCR01838559
- 9. PIP G-14-0577 9. PIP G-14-0577/NCR 01899821
- 10. PIP 0-14-7653 10. PIP 0-14-7653/NCR 01908986
- 11. 12.
- 13. NCR 01936370
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 12of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes 10 No I x Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 1O CFR 50.90 submittal 10CFR Continue to or Alert and Notification System Design Report? 50.54(q) Attachment 4, 10 Effectiveness CFR 50.54(q) If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and Evaluation is not Screening ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the required. Enter Evaluation Form, proposed change is documented below: justification Part 111 below and complete Attachment 4, Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) 10
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 13of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part Ill. Editorial Change Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Justification: Yes No x
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. ~ ATTACHMENT 4
,Page 14of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 10 CFR Continue to 50.54(q) Attachment 4, Effectiveness Part IV and Evaluation is not address non required. Enter editorial changes justification and complete Attachment 4, Part V & VI.
Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section 11? If answer is yes, then check box. t
- 1Q, CFR 50:47(b)(1) Assignment: of Responsibility (Organization, Control)/~;.*
1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. D 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. 2.*
- 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2):0iisiteEmergency.Organizationu , *,'.
2a Process ensures that on shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D 2b The process for timely augmentation of on shift staff is established and maintained. D 3 10'CFR 50:47(b){3) Emergency Response*Supportand Resources". 3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3) 4: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) Emergency Classification System.**
- 4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. D (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)
5 10 CFR50.47(b)(5) Notification Methods and Procedures> 5a Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating [!I notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt D instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3) Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 6 ! 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6) Em~rgency Communications*
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 AITACHMENT 4 Page 15of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response !Bl organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D 7 1O CFR50.47(b)(7) Public Education and.lnformatiom:< .. ?a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D 8 1O CFR 50A7(b )(8) Emergency. Facilities and Equipmentv.
- Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. D g*. .. ,, .
. . 1O CFR 50:47(b )(9)' Accident Assessment1, 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D 10:: 1o CFR 50A7(b)(1 O)' Protective Response.Bi:: * . ..
10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are D
. available to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events.
10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 16of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 11 10 CFR50A7(b)(t1) RadiologicaLEX:posureCcintroL:
- 11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D 12> . *1O CFR 50:47(b )( 12). Medical and Public: Health: Support*: * ..
12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D 13: 1O:CFR50;47(b)(13) Recovery.Planning and. Post'-accident Operations::;:,>.*** 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14:.:,, . 1o. CFR 50.47(b)( 14) Drills*. and EXercises:;.,, * . 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D
. ' .. ,. ......
15::<:.* *1Q; CFR 50:47{b )(:15) Emergency Responseffraining:::r **
'
,~
; ;.._ . ' ****:*?;**'
.. ' .. F*
- . ,,*
. ~ . ...
15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
,,,,
16\, *.1 o CFR 50'.4 7(b)(16): Emergency Plan Maintenance::vt.*~<' *' .**: ....
... .* .. "'
~
.. .- ::*-.. '\ .*. .:' .. .: . ...
; ~ .
16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D
.. .***.*. *' *.. : '
PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 1O CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete [&I , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. PartV. Signatures;: *
- Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date:
Jeff White Reviewer Name (Print): Date: c~.. Approver (EP Manager Name (Print):
/ Date:
~ a. L(. l-{ ._rt~ lD(n~ {b
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 17of17 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Approver Signature: Date: Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 1O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to 0 Licensing.
-
One.for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is 0 put in effect. QA RECORD
t:Ml::HGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 1 of 18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number: Applicable Sites:. BNP D EREG #: rnsarna 2069579 Revised EReg /AW AD-EP-ALL-0602. Changes are annotated in bold and italic. CNS D CR3 D HNP D MNS D 5AD#: 01985101 ONS ~ RNP D GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015 B Revision 005 Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center (PRR 01944106 and PRR01968803) Part I. Description of Proposed Change:
# step before after
- 1. BODY RP/1000/019 ... RP /0/A/1000/019 ...
step 2.2 RP/1000/010 ... RP/O/A/1000/010 ... page 2 of 8 RP/1000/017 ... RP/O/A/1000/017
- 2. Body For WebEOC use: ... [Stated required deleted (used to be computer profile settings]
step 2.6) page 3 of 8
- 3. Body ... Significant changes in plant ... Significant changes in plant note before conditions (Evacuation/relocation conditions (Evacuation/relocation of step 2.6 of site personnel; fires onsite; MERT site personnel; fires onsite; MERT activation and/or injured personnel activation and/or injured personnel transported offsite; chemical spills; transported offsite; chemical spills; explosions; condition "A" or "B" for explosions; Imminent Failure Keowee Hydro project Dams/Dikes (Condition "A") or Potential Failure or any event that would cause or (Condition "B") for Jocassee or require offsite agency response) Keowee Hydro project Dams/Dikes or should be communicated as they any event that would cause or require occur ... offsite agency response) should be communicated as they occur ...
- 4. BODY ... OSM ... ... SM ...
Note before
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-t:.t"'-ALL-UOUL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 Page 2of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form step 2.6.1 The other unit that has now met a The other unit that has now met a page 5 of 8 NOUE EAL classification should be NOUE EAL classification should be noted under Line 13 Remarks noted under Line 13 Remarks. section along with what EAL If any other unit has a classification, condition is now met for that unit. the unit and classification should be noted under line 13.
- 5. BODY IAAT An emergency classification is IAAT Any of the following occurs:
Step 3.1 being UPGRADED or a FOLLOW-UP
- An Emergency classification is page 6 of 8 message is due or a change in being UPGRADED PROTECTIVE ACTION
- A FOLLOW-UP message is due RECOMMENDATIONS (PARs) occurs
- A change in PROTECTIVE ACTION --
or an event is TERMINATED ... RECOMMENDATIONS (PARs occurs)
- An event is TERMINATED
- 6. BODY Using Group Dial Code 008 ... Using Group Dial Code 8 ...
Step 3.5 page 7 of 8
- 7. BODY ... RP /1000/009 ... ... RP /0/A/1000/009 ...
Step 3.8 page 7 of 8
- 8. BODY ... RP/1000/010 ... ... RP /0/ A/1000/010 ...
Step 3.9 page 7 of 8
- 9. BODY ... RP/1000/017 ... ... RP/O/A/1000/017 ...
Note before Step 3.10 page 7 of 8
- 10. BODY ... RP/1000/0J7 ... ... RP/O/A/1000/017 ...
Step 3.10 page 7 of 8
- 11. BODY ... Use Group Dial Code 005 ... ... Use Group Dial Code 5 Step 3.12 page 7 of 8
- 12. Enclosure Pre-Printed Emergency Notification 4.1 forms containing specific EAL number First NOTE and EAL description may be used in page 1of3 lieu of Enclosure 4.1.A or WebEOC AD-EP-ALL-406 AD-EP-ALL-0406
- 13. Enclosure Contact the OSC Chemistry Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager
l::Ml::HGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 3 of 18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form 4.1 Manager, (ext. 3495) to verify the (ext. 3495) or the OSC Operations Line 4, status of any liquid releases. Liaison (ext. 3496) to verify the status substep 2 of any liquid releases. page 1of3
- 14. Enclosure If a liquid release is occurring then .!£ a liquid release is occurring, 4.1 complete lines 6 and 7 as directed complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by Line 4, by the OSC Chemistry Manager. the OSC Chemistry Manager or OSC substep 3 Operations Liaison.
page 1of3
- 15. Enclosure NOTE: Given that available space for 4.1 handwritten information is limited on Note before line 5, it is acceptable for what is Line 5 written to span multiple boxes' worth, page 2 of 3 _ as long as it is contained on line 5. For WebEOC forms, all of this information can be entered on line 5 under box E, given that there is more available space for typing this.
- 16. Enclosure If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro 4.1 Condition 11 A 11 exists: Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition Line 5
- Mark Box Band write "Move 11 A11 ) exists:
page 2 of 3 residents living downstream of
- Mark Box E the Keowee Hydro Dam to
- Write "Move residents living higher ground." downstream of the Keowee Hydro
- AND mark Box E and write 11 Dam to higher ground. 11 Prohibit traffic flow across
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges identified on your bridges identified on your inundation maps until the inundation maps until the danger danger has passed." has passed. 11
- 17. Enclosure Enter the meteorological data if .!£available from the TSC Dose 4.1 available from the TSC Dose Assessor, enter the meteorological Line 9 Assessor. data.
page 2 of 3
- 18. Enclosure Mark or select All if event affects !.Ethe highest emergency classification 4.1 the emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit.
Line 11 more than one unit. IF the highest emergency classification page 2 of 3 Mark or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than 11 affects one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select All 11
- a higher emergency classification.
- 19. Enclosure If effected unit is shutdown, then IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-1:.1-'-ALL-UoU~ EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) 1--~~~~~~~~~~~-->*- Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 4 of 18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form 4.1 enter the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date. Line 12 page 3 of 3
- 20. Enclosure ... If there are no remarks write ... IF there are no remarks, write 4.1 "None". "None".
Line 13 page 3 of 3
- 21. Enclosure Lines 14, 15 & 16 - These lines are Lines 14, 15, and 16 are NOT required 4.1 NOT required to be completed for to be completed for initial notification.
Note before initial notification. Line 17 page 3 of 3
- 22. Enclosure Contact the OSC Chemistry Verify with OSC Chemistry Manager 4.2 Manager, (ext. 3495) to verify the (ext. 3495) and the OSC Operations Line 4, status of any liquid releases. Liaison (ext. 3496) to verify the status substep 2 of any liquid releases (to include page 1of3 Chemical Treatment Ponds and Radwaste).
- 23. Enclosure If a liquid release is occurring then !fa liquid release is occurring, 4.2 complete lines 6 and 7 as directed complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by Line 4, by the OSC Chemistry Manager. the OSC Chemistry Manager or OSC substep 3 Operations Liaison.
page 1of3
- 24. Enclosure NOTE: Given that available space for 4.2 handwritten information is limited on Note before line 5, it is acceptable for what is Line 5 written to span multiple boxes' worth, page 2 of 3 as long as it is contained on line 5. For WebEOC forms, all of this information can be entered on line 5 under box E, given that there is more available space for typing this.
- 25. Enclosure If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike !f a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro 4.2 Condition "A" DOES NOT exist, then Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition Line 5 mark Box A NONE. "A") does NOT exist, mark Box A, page 2 of 3 NONE.
If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition "A" exists: IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro
- Mark Box Band write "Move Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition residents living downstream of "A") exists:
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 5 of 18 1 O CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form the Keowee Hydro Dani to
- Mark Box E higher ground."
- Write "Move residents living
- AND mark Box E and write downstream of the Keowee Hydro "Prohibit traffic flow across Dam to higher ground."
bridges identified on your
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across inundation maps until the bridges identified on your danger has passed." inundation maps until the danger has passed."
- 26. Enclosure Enter the meteorological data if IF available from the TSC Dose 4.2 available from the TSC Dose Assessor, enter the. meteorological Line 9 Assessor. data.
page 2 of 3
- 27. Enclosure Mark or select All if event affects IF the highest emergency classification 4.2 the emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit.
Line 11 more than one unit. IF the highest emergency classification page 2 of 3 Mark or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than affects one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select "All". a higher emergency classification.
- 28. Enclosure If effected unit is shutdown, then IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the 4.2 enter the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date.
Line 12 page 3 of 3
- 29. Enclosure ... If there are no remarks write .. .IF there are no remarks, write 4.2 "None". "None".
Line 13 page 3 of 3
- 30. Enclosure Lines 14, 15 & 16 - These lines are Lines 14, 15, and 16 are NOT required 4.2 NOT required to be completed for to be completed for initial notification.
Note before initial notification. Line 17 page 3 of 3
- 31. Enclosure Contact the OSC Chemistry Verify with OSC Chemistry Manager 4.3 Manager, (ext. 3495) to verify the (ext. 3495) and the OSC Operations Line 4, status of any liquid releases. Liaison (ext. 3496) to verify the status substep 2 of any liquid releases (to include page 1of3 Chemical Treatment Ponds and Radwaste).
- 32. Enclosure If a liquid release is occurring then IF a liquid release is occurring, 4.3 complete lines 6 and 7 as directed complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by Line 4, by the OSC Chemistry Manager. the OSC Chemistry Manager or OSC substep 3 Operations Liaison.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-t:.1-'-ALL-UoUL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 6of18 10 CFR 50.54( q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form page 1of3
- 33. Enclosure Verify that Protective Action Verify Box A, NONE, is marked for 4.3 Recommendation is marked as Protective Action Recommendation.
Line 5 none page 1of2
- 34. Enclosure Enter the meteorological data if !E available from the TSC Dose 4.3 available from the TSC Dose Assessor, enter the meteorological Line 9 Assessor. data.
page 2 of 2
- 35. Enclosure Mark or select All if event affects IF the highest emergency classification 4.3 the emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit.
Line 11 more than one unit. IF the highest emergency classification page 2 of 2 Mark or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than affects one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select "All". a higher emergency classification.
- 36. Enclosure If effected unit is shutdown, then IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the 4.3 enter the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date.
Line 12 page 2 of 2
- 37. Enclosure ... If there are no remarks write ... IF there are no remarks, write 4.3 "None". "None".
Line 13 page 2 of 2
- 38. Enclosure Lines 14, 15 & 16 - These lines are Lines 14, 15, and 16 are NOT required 4.3 NOT required to be completed for to be completed for initial notification.
Note before initial notification. Line 17 page 2 of 2
- 39. Enclosure Contact the OSC Chemistry Verify with OSC Chemistry Manager 4.4 Manager, (ext. 3495) to verify the (ext. 3495) and the OSC Operations Line 4, status of any liquid releases. Liaison (ext. 3496) to verify the status substep 2 of any liquid releases (to include page 1of2 Chemical Treatment Ponds and Radwaste).
- 40. Enclosure If a liquid release is occurring then !Ea liquid release is occurring, 4.4 complete lines 6 and 7 as directed complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by Line 4, by the OSC Chemistry Manager. the OSC Chemistry Manager or OSC substep 3 Operations Liaison.
page 1of2
- 41. Enclosure Verify that Protective Action Verify Box A, NONE, is marked for 4.4 Recommendation is marked as Protective Action Recommendation.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 7of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Line 5 none page 1of2
- 42. Enclosure Enter the meteorological data if !f available from the TSC Dose 4.4 available from the TSC Dose Assessor, enter the meteorological Line 9 Assessor. data.
page 2 of 2
- 43. Enclosure Mark or select All if event affects !Ethe highest emergency classification 4.4 the emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit.
Line 11 more than one unit. !Ethe highest emergency classification page 2 of 2 Mark or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than affects one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select "All". a higher emergency classification.
- 44. Enclosure If effected unit is shutdown, then IF affected unit is shutdo_wn, enter the 4.4 enter the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date.
Line 12 page 2 of 2
- 45. Enclosure ... If there are no remarks write ... IF there are no remarks, write 4.4 "None". "None".
Line 13 page 2 of 2
- 46. Enclosure
- Verify with the TSC Dose
- Verify with the TSC Dose Assessor 4.5 Assessor that information for thafinformation forlines 5, 6, 7, 9, Line 4 lines 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, and 16 14, 15, and 16 have NOT changed Page 2 of 4 have not changed since the last since the last message sheet.
message sheet.
- IF changes have NOT occurred
- If changes have not occurred since the previous message, copy since the previous message, then the same information from the last copy the same information from message sheet.
the last message sheet.
- IF changes have occurred, mark
- If changes have occurred, then applicable boxes and add new mark applicable boxes and add information as directed by the TSC new information as directed by Dose Assessor, the OSC Chemistry the TSC Dose Assessor and the Manager, and the OSC Operations OSC Chemistry Manager. Liaison.
- 47. Enclosure NOTE: Given that available space for 4.5 handwritten information is limited on Note before line 5, it is acceptable for what is Line 5 written to span multiple boxes' worth,
..
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-l::t-J-ALL-UOUL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 8of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form page 2 of 4 as long as it is contained on line 5. For WebEOC forms, all of this information can be entered on line 5 under box E, given that there is more available space for typing this.
- 48. Enclosure If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike !fa Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro 4.5 Condition "A" exists: Dam/Dike Imminent Failure (Condition Line 5
- Mark Box Band write "Move "A") exists:
page 2 of 4 residents living downstream of
- Mark Box E the Keowee Hydro Dam to
- Write "Move residents living higher ground." downstream of the Keowee Hydro
- AND mark Box E and write Dam to higher ground."
"Prohibit traffic flow across
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges identified on your bridges identified on your inundation maps until the inundation maps until the danger danger has passed." has passed."
- 49. Enclosure Verify plant conditions with Verify plant conditions with operation 4.5 operation support. If plant support. IF plant conditions have NOT Line 8 conditions have not changed since changed since the previous message page 2 of 4 the previous message sheet, repeat sheet, repeat the same information.
the same information. IF plant conditions have changed since If plant conditions have changed the previous message sheet, mark Box since the previous message sheet, A, B, or C as directed by Operations
- -* then mark Box A, B, or C as directed Support by Operations Support.
- 50. Enclosure Mark or select All if event affects !f the highest emergency classification 4.5 the emergency classification on only affects one unit, select that unit.
Line 11 more than one unit. !f the highest emergency classification page 3 of 4 Mark or select one (1) unit if event for this event applies to more than affects one unit or one (1) unit has one unit, select "All". a higher emergency classification.
- 51. Enclosure Examples of new information Examples of new information include:
4.5 include
Evacuation/relocation of Evacuation/relocation of site Note before site personnel; fires onsite; MERT personnel; fires onsite; MERT Line 13 activation and/or injured personnel activation and/or injured personnel page 3 of 4 transported offsite; chemical spills; transported offsite; chemical spills; explosions; Condition "A" or "B" explosions; Imminent Failure for a Keowee Hydro Project (Condition "A") or Potential Failure Dam/Dikes; or any event that would (Condition "B") for a Keowee Hydro cause or require offsite agency Project Dam/Dikes; or any event that response. would cause or require offsite agency response
!:.MERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 9of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form
- 52. Enclosure Write "None" if there are no !f there are no additional remarks, 4.5 additional remarks. write "None".
Line 13 If upgrade in classification occurs !.E.upgrade in classification occurs prior page 3 of 4 prior to transmitting the message to transmitting the message, include then include "upgrade to follow" on "upgrade to follow" on this line. this line.
- 53. Enclosure Copy the same information from Copy the same information from the 4.5 the previous message sheet. If previous message sheet. IF changes Line 15 changes have occurred see TSC have occurred, see TSC Dose Assessor page 3 of 4 Dose Assessor for this information. for this information.
- 54. Enclosure Copy the same information from Copy the same information from the 4.5 the previous message sheet. If previous message sheet. IF changes Line 16 changes have occurred see TSC have occurred, see TSC Dose Assessor page 3 of 4 Dose Assessor for this information. for this information.
- 55. Enclosure Fax Form - For guidance see IF using manual fax, Fax Form to 4.7 Enclosure 4.8 (Copy/Fax Operation) Group Dial 1- For guidance see page 1of5 Use Group Dial 001. Enclosure 4.8 (Copy/FAX Operation).
IF using WebEOC, ensure the forms have been sent - for guidance see enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference). IF AT ANY TIME DEM NET is NOT operating correctly, refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method and Sequence to Contact Agencies) to manually transmit the message.
- 56. IF A Keowee dam/dike condition IF any of the following exists for the "A" or "B" or external flood site:
condition exist for the site
- Keowee dam/dike Imminent Failure THEN Fax form using Group Dial (Condition "A")
003.
- Jocassee dam/dike Imminent Failure (Condition "A")
- Keowee dam/dike Potential Failure (Condition "B")
- Jocassee dam/dike Potential Failure (Condition "B")
- external flood condition THEN Fax form using Group Dial 3
- 57. FAX Dial Code 027 FAX Dial Code 27 FAX Dial Code 026 FAX Dial Code 26
~ EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING ANLJ AU-t:t"-ALL-UOU~ EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1-ATTACHMENT 5 Page 10of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form FAX Dial Code 024 FAX Dial Code 24 FAX Dial Code 025 FAX Dial Code 25 (Fax form for any Condition A or B (Fax form for any Imminent Failure darn/ dike event) (condition "A") or Potential Failure (Condition "B") dam/dike event)
- 58. Begin call by saying "You should Begin call by saying "You should have have received a fax indicating received a fax indicating Jocassee or Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike is in Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike is in condition A or B, or an external Imminent Failure (Condition "A") or flood condition exist for the site, do Potential Failure (Condition "B"), or an you have any questions?" external flood condition exist for the site, do you have any questions?"
- 59. If meteorological data was not IF meteorological data was NOT provided on the previous message, provided on the previous message, then initiate a Follow-up message initiate a Follow-up message and and include the met data. include the met data.
- 60. Enclosure 4.8 This enclosure erovides basic This enclosure erovides basic ogerating Note before age rating instructions for the instructions for the grima!)l faxes in the grima!)l faxes in the TSC 1 U-1l2 TSC 1 U-ll2 control room and U-3 section 1 control room and OSC. Procedure Room.
page 1of2
- 61. Enclosure 4.8 FAX the notification form using the FAX the notification form using the following method: following method:
1.1 page 1of2 A. Insert notification form, 1.1.1 Insert notification form, adjust document guide if needed. adjust document guide as B. Determine which Dial Code necessary. number to use 1.1.2 Select "FAX". 1.1.3 Select "Address Book" (file
- c. Press the Dial Code number folder icon).
D. Press the START button 1.1.4 Select "Individual" or "Group" based on notification need. 1.1.S Select "OK". 1.1.6 Press the green "send" button.
- 62. Enclosure Insert notification form, adjust insert notification form, adjust 4.8 document guide if needed. document guide as necessary.
1.2, A page 1of2
t:.Ml=KGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 11 of 18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form
- 63. 4.8 page 2 Group Dial Code moved to before of 2 Individual dial code as it is more likely to be used.
individual dial codes specified to be individual dial codes Back-up TSC Alternate TSC
- 64. enclosure Note moved from bottom of page added 4th bullet IF DEMNET does NOT 4.9 to top of page. work, any alternate method (in order of preference) such as land lines, 48.5 MHz radio, cellphones, may be used to satisfy the notification requirement.
step 1 of radio directions: select channel 1 on the remote if ensure channel 1 selected on the not already selected. remote
- 65. 4.10 backup emergency response facility alternate emergency response facility (ERF) activated: (ERF) acted
- 66. 4.12 OSM - Operations Shift Manager SM - Shift Manager
- 67. 4.13 Line 5 changed to match previous instances Line 11 changed to match previous instances Line 17 removed Record the name of the communicator making the call
- 68. Enclosure 4. PIP 0-11-9459 4. PIP 0-11-9459/NCR 0182753 4.15 5. PIP 0-13-13560 5. PIP 0-13-13560/NCR01838559
- 9. PIP G-14-0577 9. PIP G-14-0577/NCR 01899821
- 10. PIP 0-14-7653 10. PIP 0-14-7653/NCR 01908986
- 11. 12.
- 13. NCR 01936370 , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes D Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form, is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No IS
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-c:r--/-\LL-uuu,e. EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 12of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change: Oconee Emergency Plan Revision 82-2 December 1981 E. Notification Methodology Response Organization Notification (Figure E-1) E-1 . Procedures have been developed that describe the basis for notification of response organizations that is consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme. These procedures are a part of the implementing procedures and are listed as Initial Determination of Emergency Action (Event Index); Emergency Action Level - Unusual Event; Emergency Action Level - Alert; Emergency Action Level - Site Area Emergency; Emergency Action Level - General Emergency. E-2. An Emergency Organization Recall has been developed for the augmentation of support during an emergency situation. E-3 & E-4. Initial and Follow-up Message Formats A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the Bureau of Radiological Health of an emergency situation at the facility. E-7. Protective Action Guides (PAG) Messages to the Public Duke Energy Company will make Protective Action recommendations to the State of South Carolina and Pickens and Oconee County (before the State EOF in Seneca is operational) by reporting meteorological conditions and offsite dose projections. The State and/or County (where appropriate) will use this information together with their own information, to provide recommendations to the public for their safety and welfare. F. Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations and to emergency personnel and to the public. Oconee Emergency Plan Revision 2015-006 Section E Notification E.1 & E.2 Response Organization Notification Procedures have been developed that describe the basis for notification of response organizations that is consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme. E.3 & E.4 Initial and Follow-up Message Formats A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify 'Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility. Notification and authentication procedures are in place for all designated agencies. E. 7 Protective Action Guides Duke Energy Company will make Protective Action Recommendations PARs to the State of South Carolina and Pickens and Oconee County based on meteorological conditions, offsite dose projections, and plant status.
1:::.1v1t:.t-<Gt:NCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 _ EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 13of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Section F Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations, emergency personnel, and to the public. RIS 2005-02, Clarifying the Process for Making Emergency Plan Changes, Rev. 1 states,
- 2) Emergency plan a) The document prepared and maintained by the licensee that Identifies and describes the licensee's methods for maintaining emergency preparedness, and responding to emergencies. An emergency plan includes the plan as originally approved by the NRC, and all subsequent changes made by the licensee with, and without, prior NRC review and approval under 10 CFR 50.54(q).
i) The licensee's emergency plan consists of: (1) The emergency plan as approved by the NRC via a Safety Evaluation Report (SE), or license amendment (LA) from the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) or the Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME). (2) Any subsequent changes to the emergency plan explicitly reviewed by the NRC through an SE, or LA from NRR or FSME, and found to meet the applicable regulations. (3) Any subsequent changes made by the licensee without NRC review and approval after the licensee concluded that the change(s) do not constitute a decrease in effectiveness under 10 CFR 50.54(q). The differences in ONS Emergency Plan, Revision 82-2, and the current revision of the ONS Emergency Plan have been determined to meet the regulatory requirements of the course of revisions. Each revision has been evaluated in the regulatory process has met the approval of the NRC during the inspection process. The changes do not reduce the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan. The Technical Support Center (TSC) has redundant two-way communications with principal response organizations and emergency personnel. Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 1O CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, rather than under 10 CFR 50.54(q): 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5)-Emergency Notifications Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. 1OCFR50 Appendix E IV. Content of Emergency Plans D. Notification Procedures
- 3. A licensee shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency. The licensee shall demonstrate that the appropriate governmental authorities have the capability to make a public alerting and notification decision promptly on being informed by the licensee of an emergency condition.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AU-C:.t"-1'\LL-uuu..::. EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 14of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form 10 CFR50.47(b) (6), Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. 10 CFR 50, Appendix E Section IV. Content of Emergency Plans E. Facilities and Equipment (applicable excerpts only)
- 9. At least one onsite and one offsite communications system; each system shall have a backup power source. All communication plans shall have arrangements for emergencies, including titles and alternates for those in charge at both ends of the communication links and the primary and backup means of communication. Where consistent with the function of the governmental agency, these arrangements will include:
- a. Provision for communications with contiguous State/local governments within the plume exposure pathway EPZ. Such communications shall be tested monthly.
The changes identified in this revision continue to comply with regulation. ONS retains the capability required by regulation to notify the responsible State and local government agencies within 15 minutes of declaring an emergency.
t:IVlt:K~t:l'Jlj Y t-'LAl\I ljHAl\ll:it:. ~l.;Kt:t:NING ANU AU-t:l-'-ALL-Uo02 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 Page 15of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 1O CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen): Standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5)-Emergency Notifications Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. Function The emergency planning function defined for this planning standard: (1) Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. Elements NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 Rev 1, II, E. Notification Methods and Procedures Criteria (applicable excerpts only) Each organization shall establish procedures which describe mutually agreeable bases for notification of response organizations consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme set forth in Appendix 1 . These procedures shall include means for verification of messages. The specific details of verification need not be included in the plan. Standard 10 CFR50.47(b) (6), Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. Function Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response organizations. Elements NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1Rev1, II, F. Emergency Communications (applicable excerpts only) The communication Plans for emergencies shall inelude organizational titles and alternates for both ends of the communication links. Each organization shall establish reliable primary and backup means of communication for licensees, local, and State response organizations. Such systems should be selected to be compatible with one another. Each plan shall include: 1a. provision for 24-hour,per day notification to and activation of the State/local emergency response network; and at a minimum, a telephone link and alternate, including 24-hour per day manning of communications links that initiate emergency response actions.
~IVIC:.1'\.:JC:.l'\lv T r-Ll-\1'\I vnl-\1'1\.:JC: vvr\C:C:l'\111'1\.:I /"\l'IU /"'\u-i::.r-/"'\L.L.-vuvL EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 16of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5)-Emergency Notifications Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. Function The emergency planning function defined for this planning standard: (1) Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. Standard 1O CFR50.47(b) (6), Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. Function Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response organizations. The Emergency Plan does not address operating detail of WebEOC or fax machines. WebEOC version 7 .5 and Xerox WorkCentre 3615 fax machines perform the same function as their predecessor and are easily capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Jocassee Dam/Keowee Dam natural and destructive phenomena affecting plant safety were added to ONS emergency plan as part of revision 2011-01 in May 2011. These additions include emergency classification conditions and protective action recommendations, which can be found in Section D Enclosure 4.7. The transition to Imminent Failure from Condition A to be consistent with Guidelines for Dam Safety does not change the protective action required during this condition. Contingency actions upon loss of DEMNET. are consistent with the description in the Emergency Plan. Relocation of procedure tables, elimination of redundancy, and consolidation of steps improve procedure usability. The changes identified in this revision maintains the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan functions. ONS retains the capability required by regulation to notify the responsible State and local government agencies within 15 minutes of declaring an emergency. Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? Yes !Bl No D 2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no Yes !Bl NoD reduction in effectiveness)? 3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? Yes !Bl No D
r::1v1t:Kl;;t:NL;Y 1-'LAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 17of18 1O CFR 50.54( q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form 4 Choose one of the following conclusions: a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 1O CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current 00 Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRC approval. b The activity does not continue to com ply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.4 7{b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. 0 Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval. Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or Yes 0 NoD rejected? If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 10 CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-Q002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING ANU EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) f'\U-c.r-Mr...r...-vvv.&.. I Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 Page 18of18 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date: Jeff White Reviewer Name (Print): Date: Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print):
,.. uK r\ Sr(,(t8f Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print):
If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRG within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D QA RECORD
-RP/O/A/1000/015 B Rev. 5 Original approved 4/15/16
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
'*EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites BNP D EREG #: 01985103 CNS D CR3 D HNP D MNS D 5AD#: 01985101 ONS !&I RNP D GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015 B Revision 005 Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center (PRR 01944106 and PRR01968803) 'i\ ~
)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
- EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev.1 ATIACHMENT4 Page 2of9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):
- Forty-nine (52) editorial changes throughout the procedure body and enclosures. Due to the structure of this procedure many of the editorial changes were repeated in Enclosures 4.1 through 4.5 and 4. 7. See Part Ill Editorial Changes for additional information.
- Change 2: Instruction for computer profile settings were deleted from the procedure body on page 3 of 8 because WebEOC version 7.5 automatically sets computer profile settings.
- Changes 3, 15, 16, 24, 25, 47, 48, 51, 56, 58 and 75: In the body note before step 2.6 and in Enclosures 4.1, 4.2, 4.5 4.7, and 4.10 changes were made to reflect transition to Imminent Failure from Condition "A",
and to Potential Failure from Condition "B." FERC initiatives of EAP which occurred since Chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans was last revised in 2007. The Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to Chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. The guidelines are revised to be consistent with the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety - Emergency Action Planning for Dams, FEMA P-64, July 2013. Other changes include:
*Incorporating FERC initiatives on EAPs which occurred since Chapter 6 was last revised in 2007.
*Making exercise terminology consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP).
*Including additional guidance and examples ori inundation maps.
Changes 6, 11, 57, 60, 61 and 77: Replacement fax machines required some revision to operating instructions within steps 3.5 and 3.12.of the body of this procedure and Enclosures 4. 7 and 4.10. Enclosure 4.8 was changed to correct the stated location of fax machine closest to the OSC.
- Changes 13, 22, 31, 32, and 39: Transfer of liquid radioactive waste processing responsibility, not subject to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1), from Chemistry to Operations required clarification in Enclosures 4.1through4.4.
Chemistry makes releases from the Chemical Treatment Ponds. Operations releases processed liquid waste from Radwaste Facility.
- Change 66: Contingency action upon DEMNET failure was added to Enclosure 4.9 .
- Change 67: Enclosure 4.10 - Back-up TSC changed to Alternate TSC correcting a change that was made in error on Rev. 2 of the procedure. Using guidance in NEI 13-01, ALTERNATE FACILITY: A temporary location that may serve as a Technical Support Center (TSC) or Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) in support of a planned work activity. [An acceptable ALTERNATE FACILITY must have sufficient capability to support effective direction and control of an emergency response; however, it need not meet the same design or operating requirements applied to a normally used ERF (e.g., it may not possess a protected ventilation system.)].
- Change 70: Enclosure 4.13 line 11, the order of conditional statements was reversed per training recommendations; line 17, removed " Record the name of the communicator making the call." The communicator's name is populated on line 17 of the ENF from the Fax Panel.
See Change Matrix for additional information. ~ JJ
---- ------------,--------------:-:-----..
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
*EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT4 Page 3 of 9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part 11. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes \ 0 No \ X Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 1O CFR 50.90 submittal 10 CFR Continue to or Alert and Notification System Design Report? 50.54(q) Attachment 4, 1O Effectiveness CFR 50.54(q) If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and Evaluation is not Screening ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the required. Enter Evaluation Form, proposed change is documented below: justification Part Ill below and complete Attachment 4, Part V. Bounding document attached (optional)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 4 of 9
'
- j 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part Ill. Editorial Change Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent?
Procedure Body Change 1, 7, 8, 9, and 10: Step 2.2, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 - to make referenced procedures match their respective procedure numbers. Change 4: Step 2.6.1 - OSM to SM title change per AD_OP-All-1000, and change ENF convention for communicating lesser classification for a 3 unit power reactor site. Change 5: Step 3.1 - Conditional step changed to improve readability per Procedure Writer's Manual (PWM). Enclosures Change 12: First note - Added " Pre-Printed Emergency Notification forms containing specific EAL number and EAL description may be used in lieu of _]~closure 4.1.A or WebEOC" between first and third bullet to be consistent
- ith Enclosures 4,2, 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5. Also changed AD-EP-ALL-406 to AD-EP-ALL-0406.
Changes 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21: Enclosure 4.1 lines 4, 9, 11, 12, 13, and Yes x No x note before line 17 - editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. Changes 23, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30: Enclosure 4.2 lines 4 substep3, 9, 11, 12, 13, and note before line 17 - editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. Changes 32, 34, 35, 36, and 37: Enclosure 4.3 lines 4 substep3, 9, 11, 12, 13, and note before line 17 - editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. Change 33: Enclosure 4.3 line 5 - Editorial to be consistent with the format of other lines in this enclosure. Change 38: Enclosure 4.3 note before line 17 - reworded for conciseness. Changes 40, 42, 43, 44, and 45,: Enclosure 4.4 lines 4, 9, 11, 12, and 13 - editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. Change 46 and 72: Enclosure 4.5 line 4 and note above line 11- editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing not to t!QI. lhange 41, Enclosure 4.4 Line 5 - editorial to be consistent with the format of other lines in this enclosure.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD.:.EP-ALL-0602
*EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5 of 9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Changes 49, 50, 52, 53, and 54: Enclosure 4.5 lines 8, 11, 13, 15, and 16 - 10 CFR Continue to editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. 50.54(q) Attachment 4, Effectiveness Part IV and Changes 55, 59, 73 and 74: Enclosure 4.7 pages 1, 2, 4,and 5 - editorial Evaluation is not address non formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. formatting per the PWM. required. Enter editorial changes Change 62: Enclosure 4.8 step 1 .2, A - editorial not a conditional statement. justification and Changed ... if needed to as necessary. complete Attachment 4, Change 63: Enclosure 4.8 page 2 - group dial code moved before individual Part V & VI. dial code and leading zeros removed from dial code. Change 64: Enclosure 4.8 page 2 - Back-up TSC changed to Alternate TSC.
'
Change 65: Enclosure 4.9 step 1 - reworded for conciseness. Change 68: OSM - Operations Shift Manager was changed to SM - Shift Manager. AD-OP-All-1000 specifies the title Shift Manager. Change 69: "Jocassee" was added to Enclosure 4.13 line 5 for clarity of applicability
-~ange 76: Enclosure 4.13, editorial, capitalize, underline, and bold "IF" and "Not" Change 71: Enclosure 4.15: PIP numbers were converted to NCR numbers; a numbering error was corrected, and NCR 01936370 was added.
Justification: These changes correct reference formatting, improve readability and clarity, correct numbering, and improve alignment with the Procedure Writer's Manual. These changes do not change the intent of the procedure. Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section 11? If answer is yes, then check box.
- 1. 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. 0 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis 0 (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan.
}). 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) Onsite Emergency Organization
,-~a Process ensures that on shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned 0
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
' EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 6 of 9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 2b The process for timely augmentation of on shift staff is established and maintained. D 3 ..
- 10. CFR 50.4 7{b )(3) Emergency Response Support and Resources .
3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3) 4
- 10.CFR 50.47{b)(4) Emerg~ncy Classification System; -
4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. D (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.) s _- 1O. CFR 50.4 7(b )(S): Notification Methods and: Procedures,:* '* Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating l&J notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt D instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS
~ design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
(Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 6- 1O CF.R 50:47{b)(6) Emergency Communications , , 6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D T 1O CFR 50.4 7{b )(7)Public Education and Information -* 7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D 8 1OCFR 50.4 7(b)(8)- Emergency Facilities and Equipment*... Sa Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. l&J ab Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. l&J 9 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9) AccidentAssessment 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D 10 10 CFR 50.47(b}(10} Protective Response 10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are D I' 3 ' available to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
- EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 7of9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
- EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 8of9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 11 10 CFR 50.47(b)(11) Radiological Exposure Control
- 11a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. 0
- 12. 10 CFR 50.47(b)(12) Medical and Public Health Support
- 12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. 0 13-~* 1OCFR50.47(b)(13) Recovery Planning and Post-accidentOperations,*
13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. 0 14-* 10 CFR 50.4 7(b )(14) Drills and Exercises,, *
- 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) 0 is established.
14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, 0 and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. 0 15 .. 10-cFR 50.47(b)(15) Emergency Response Training . 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. 0 Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
- p .
-;~!;; ' ;-:'. _ 10 CFR 50.47(b)(16):Emergency Plan Maintenance
- 1aa Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. 0 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. 0 PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q)
Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete Im Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. Part V. Signatures: . Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date: Ricky Bowser under auspices of Pete Kuhlman 3/31/16 Reviewer Name (Print): Date: Date:
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
- EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 9of9 ' *'*
.
~ 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Approver Signature: Date:
rJ tei. Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing.
-
One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is D put in effect. QA RECORD
~
.';JJ
"'\
y
t:Mt:K~t:Nl.;Y PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 I EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATIACHMENT~~ Page 1 ofI' U~ 3 '. 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites *
- BNP D EREG #: 1985103 CNS D CR3 D HNP D MNS D 5AD#: 01985101 ONS Im RNP D GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015 B Revision 005 Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center (PRR 01944106 and PRR01968803)
'"?\**. Jj)
-:')
y
t:.Mt:.1-<<.:it:.Nc.;Y PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 ,a. Page 2 ofjvVV-- ).. 10 CFR 50.54{q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part I. Description of Proposed Change:
*Change 2: Instruction for computer profile settings were deleted from the procedure body on page 3 of 8.
WebEOC version 7.5 automatically sets computer profile settings.
- Changes 3, 15, 16, 24, 25, 4 7, 48, 51, 56, and 58: In the body note before step 2.6 and in Enclosures 4.1, 4.2, 4.5 and 4. 7, changes were made to reflect transition to Imminent Failure from Condition "A", and to Potential Failure from Condition "B." FERC initiatives of EAP which occurred since Chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans was last revised in 2007. The Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to Chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. The guidelines are revised to be consistent with the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety- Emergency Action Planning for Dams, FEMA P-64, July 2013. Other changes include:
o Incorporating FERC initiatives on EAPs which occurred since Chapter 6 was last revised in 2007. o Making exercise terminology consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). o Including additional guidance and examples on inundation maps.
- Changes 6, 11, 55, 57, 60, and 61: Replacement fax machines required some revision to operating instructions within steps 3.5 and 3.12.of the body of this procedure and Enclosures 4. 7 and 4.10. Enclosure 4.8 was changed to correct the stated location of fax machine closest to the OSC.
- Changes 13, 14, 22, 23, 31, 32, 39 and 40: Transfer of liquid radioactive waste processing responsibility, not subject to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1 ), from Chemistry to Operations required clarification in Enclosures 4.1 through 4.4.
- ~hemistry makes releases from the Chemical Treatment Ponds. Operations releases processed liquid waste from
-Radwaste Facility.
- Change 66: Contingency action upon DEMNET failure was added to Enclosure 4.9.
- Change 67: Enclosure 4.10 - Back-up TSC changed to Alternate TSC correcting a change that was made in error on Rev. 2 of the procedure. Using guidance in NEI 13-01, ALTERNATE FACILITY: A temporary location that may serve as a Technical Support Center (TSC) or Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) in support of a planned work activity. [An acceptable ALTERNATE FACILITY must have sufficient capability to support effective direction and control of an emergency response; however, it need not meet the same design or operating requirements applied to a normally used ERF (e.g., it may not possess a protected ventilation system.)].
- Change 70: Enclosure 4.13 line 11, the order of conditional statements was reversed per training recommendations; line 17, removed" Record the name of the communicator making the call." The communicator's name is populated from line 17 of the ENF from the Fax Panel.
Attachment 6, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes D Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form, is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No !El
t:Ml::RC:iENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 . >i y 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form ATTACHMENT 5 , r Page 3 of O(- 0 Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change: Oconee Emergency Plan Revision 2015-006 Section E Notification E.1 &E.2 Response Organization Notification Procedures have been developed that describe the basis for notification of response organizations that is consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme. RP/O/A/1000/015 B (Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center) provides guidance for notifying offsite emergency response organizations of emergency classification and protective action recommendations. RP/O/A/1000/015 B revision 005 makes the following changes: Instruction for setting computer profile for the Emergency Notification Form (ENF) were removed. WebEOC version 7.5 automatically applies computer profile settings. Transition to Imminent Failure from Condition A to be consistent with Guidelines for Dam Safety. A drop down containing the protective action recommendation was added to the ENF. Replacement fax machines required some revision to operating instructions. Transfer of liquid radwaste processing responsibilities from Chemistry to Operations required clarification. Contingency action for DEMNet failure were added as an enhancement. The order of conditional statements in the ENF Quick Reference (Enclosure 4.13) was revised based on Training recommendation. In addition, WebEOC was revised to populated the Communicator's name on the ENF from the fax
=1:\anel.
iJhese changes do not change the basis for notification or the emergency classification and action level scheme. E.3 & E.4 Initial and Follow-up Message Formats A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility. Notification and authentication procedures are in place for all designated agencies. The Emergency Notification Form (ENF) is used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility in accordance with notification and authentication procedures. Revision 005 to RP/O/A/1000/015 B does not change the notification method. E. 7 Protective Action Guides Duke Energy Company will make Protective Action Recommendations PARs to the State of South Carolina and Pickens and Oconee County based on meteorological conditions, offsite dose projections, and plant status. Revision 005 to RP/O/A/1000/015 B does not change any basis of any Protective Action Guide. Section F Emergency Communications Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations, emergency personnel, and to the public. The Technical Support Center (TSC) has redundant two-way communications with principal response organizations and emergency personnel. Revision 005 to RP/O/A/1000/015 B does not change methods or ability to communicate with principal response organizations and emergency personnel. Communication to the public is not within the domain of the 3c.
t:.Nlt:.K~t:.N(.;Y 1-'LAN c.;HANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 0 Page 4 ofJvv-10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 1O CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, ratherthan under 10 CFR 50.54(q): 10CFR50.47 (b) (4), (5), and (6) requires the following: (4) Onsite emergency response plans for nuclear power reactors use a standard emergency classification and action level to determine minimum initial offsite response measures. (5) Procedures must be establish to provide initial and followup notification of offsite response organizations. (6) The content of initial and followup messages to response organizations and the public has been established, and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. 10CFR50, Appendix E.IV.D.3 states in part, "A licensee shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency. 10CFR50 Appendix E. IVE. requires in part:
- a. Provision for communications with contiguous State/local governments within the plume exposure pathway EPZ.
- b. Provision for communications with Federal emergency response organizations.
- c. Provision for communications among the nuclear power reactor control room, the onsite technical support center,
~jnd th~ emergency operatio~s facility; and among the nuclear facility, the principal State and local emergency _;J:>erat1ons centers, and the field assessment teams.
- d. Provisions for communications by the licensee with NRC Headquarters and the appropriate NRC Regional Office Operations Center from the nuclear power reactor control room, the onsite technical support center, and the emergency operations facility.
NUREG-0654 provides the following planning standards: E. Notification Methods and Procedures have been established, by the licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organizations; the content of initial and followup messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. F. Emergency communications provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. NUREG-0696 1.3 Emergency Response Facilities, requires reliable communications between onsite and offsite emergency response personnel. NUREG 2. 7 Communications, requires the TSC to be the primary onsite communications center an emergency to have reliable voice communications to the control room, the OSC, the EOF, and the NRC. Facsimile transmission capability between the TSC, the EOF, and the NRC Operations Center shall also be provided. Compliance with the above regulations and guidance is as follows:
- Change 2 made to delete WebEOC ENF profile settings.
- Changes 3, 15, 16, 24, 24, 47, 48, 51, and 58 reflect change in Guidelines for Dam Safety terminology.
-)\ Changes 6, 11, 55, 57, 60, and 61 revised fax machine instruction for new equipment.
3 Changes 13, 22, 31, and 39 clarify transfer of liquid radwaste processing from Chemistry to Operations.
- Change 66 contingency actions upon DEMNET failure were added.
- Change 70 order of conditional statements and to identify Communicator's name is populated from fax panel.
t:.Mt:K(.:;t:N<..;Y 1-'LAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Page 5 otJ Br-- Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen): 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) Notification Methods and Procedures. Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilities and Equipment Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response.
c:1v11::~1..;,t:l\lli Y t-'LAN l,;HANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev.1 ATIACHMENT~ Page 6 of;o (9~ 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. There is no reduction in effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions.
- Change 2 made to delete WebEOC ENF profile settings.
- Changes 3, 15, 16, 24, 24, 47, 48, 51, and 58 reflect change in Guidelines for Dam Safety terminology.
- Changes 6, 11, 55, 57, 60, and 61 revised fax machine instruction for new equipment.
- Changes 13, 22, 31, and 39 clarify transfer of liquid radwaste processing from Chemistry to Operations.
- Change 66 contingency actions upon DEMNET failure were added.
- Change 70 order of conditional statements and identify Communicator's name is populated from fax panel.
The Emergency Plan does not address operating detail of WebEOC or fax machines. WebEOC version 7.5 and Xerox WorkCentre 3615 fax machines perform the same function as their predecessor and are easily capable of _initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing j)11ow-up notification. Jocassee Dam/Keowee Dam natural and destructive phenomena affecting plant safety were added to ONS emergency plan as part of revision 2011-01 in May 2011. These additions include emergency classification conditions and protective action recommendations, which can be found in Section D Enclosure 4. 7. The transition to Imminent Failure from Condition A to be consistent with Guidelines for Dam Safety does not change the protective action required during this condition. A drop down containing the Imminent Failure/Condition A Protective Action Recommendation (PAR) was added to the Emergency Notification Form (ENF) so that the Communicator does not have to type the PAR on to the ENF. Transfer of liquid radwaste processing from Chemistry to Operations is a change in operational organization responsibility. Contingency actions upon DEMNET failure are consistent with the description in the Emergency Plan. The order of conditional statements improves the procedure flow. Populating the Communicator's name on the ENFfrom fax panel resolves a minor issue with approval sequence. Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? Yes IS No D 2 Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no Yes IS No D
*~ ~*::; reduction in effectiveness)?
1*3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? Yes IS No D
l::Nll::K~l::Nt.;Y ~LAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 7 of jl@f-'" 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form 4 Choose one of the following conclusions: a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47{b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current l!J Emergency Action Level {EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRC approval. b The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47{b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. D Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval.
.. *,, - ; ._ .--.
Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or YesD NoD rejected? If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 1O CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:
; ~.
. J
t:Mt:K\,;t:NliY 1-'LAN CHANGE-SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT~ Page 8 ot,,08~ 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date: Ricky Bowser/Pete Kuhlman j:.J (K> 3/30/16 Reviewer Name (Print): Date: Approver (EP Mana er) Name (Print):
~\,(µ. sr~
Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): Date:
*. ,: -
If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 1O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 1O CFR 50.54(q), to D ':}\ Licensing. JJsne for Licensing to submit the 1O CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRG within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D QA RECORD
t:.1v1t:.K~t:N(.;Y 1-'LAN GHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
,.
Screening and Evah.iation ('.Jum ber, . *. . Applicable Site~r *. ** BNP 0 EREG #: 01985103 CNS 0 CR3 0 HNP 0 MNS 0 5AD#: 01985101 ONS ~ RNP 0 GO D Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015 B Revision 005 Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center (PRR 01944106 and PRR01968803)
.. . . . .
C:IVll::t'(\,;;t:NliY 1-'LAN (.;HANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT4 Page 2of9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):
- Forty-nine (52) editorial changes throughout the procedure body and enclosures. Due to the structure of this procedure many of the editorial changes were repeated in Enclosures 4.1 through 4.5 and 4. 7. See Part Ill Editorial Changes for additional information.
- Change 2: Instruction for computer profile settings were deleted from the procedure body on page 3 of 8 because WebEOC version 7.5 automatically sets computer profile settings.
- Changes 3, 15, 16, 24, 25, 47, 48, 51, 56, 58 and 75: In the body note before step 2.6 and in Enclosures 4.1, 4.2, 4.5 4.7, and 4.10 changes were made to reflect transition to Imminent Failure from Condition "A",
and to Potential Failure from Condition "B." FERC initiatives of EAP which occurred since Chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans was last revised in 2007. The Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to Chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. The guidelines are revised to be consistent with the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety - Emergency Action Planning for Dams, FEMA P-64, July 2013. Other changes include:
*Incorporating FERC initiatives on EAPs which occurred since Chapter 6 was last revised in 2007.
*Making exercise terminology consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP).
*Including additional guidance and examples on inundation maps.
~* Changes 6, 11, 57, 60, 61 and 77: Replacement fax machines required some revision to operating instructions within steps 3.5 and 3.12.of the body of this procedure and Enclosures 4. 7 and 4.10. Enclosure 4.8 was changed to correct the stated location of fax machine closest to the OSC.
- Changes 13, 22, 31, 32, and 39: Transfer of liquid radioactive waste processing responsibility, not subject to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1), from Chemistry to Operations required clarification in Enclosures 4.1 through 4.4.
Chemistry makes releases from the Chemical Treatment Ponds. Operations releases processed liquid waste from Radwaste Facility.
- Change 66: Contingency action upon DEMNET failure was added to Enclosure 4.9 .
- Change 67: Enclosure 4.10 - Back-up TSC changed to Alternate TSC correcting a change that was made in error on Rev. 2 of the procedure. Using guidance in NEI 13-01, ALTERNATE FACILITY: A temporary location that may serve as a Technical Support Center (TSC) or Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) in support of a planned work activity. [An acceptable ALTERNATE FACILITY must have sufficient capability to support effective direction and control of an emergency response; however, it need not meet the same design or operating requirements applied to a normally used ERF (e.g., it may not possess a protected ventilation system.)].
- Change 70: Enclosure 4.13 line 11, the order of conditional statements was reversed per training recommendations; line 17, removed " Record the name of the communicator making the call." The communicator's name is populated on line 17 of the ENF from the Fax Panel.
See Change Matrix for additional information.
t:.Mt:.Kt;;ENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 3 of 9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
. *,.*_
Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes I0 No I X Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRC approved 1O CFR 50.90 submittal 10CFR Continue to or Alert and Notification System Design Report? 50.54(q) Attachment 4, 10 Effectiveness CFR 50.54(q) If yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and Evaluation is not Screening ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the required. Enter Evaluation Form, proposed change is documented below: justification Part Ill below and complete Attachment 4, Part V. Bounding document attached (optional)
. *.,*.,
- .: v **
. '*'.).._.*
c:1v1c:l"'(~t:NL;Y 1-'LAN c..;HANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT4 Page 4 of 9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part Ill. Editorial Change Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Procedure Body Change 1, 7, 8, 9, and 1O: Step 2.2, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.1 O - to make referenced procedures match their respective procedure numbers. Change 4: Step 2.6.1 - OSM to SM title change per AD_OP-All-1000, and change ENF convention for communicating lesser classification for a 3 unit power reactor site. Change 5: Step 3.1 - Conditional step changed to improve readability per Procedure Writer's Manual (PWM). Enclosures Change 12: First note - Added " Pre-Printed Emergency Notification forms containing specific EAL number and EAL description may be used in lieu of \~closure 4.1.A or WebEOC" between first and third bullet to be consistent .2 1th Enclosures 4,2, 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5. Also changed AD-EP-ALL-406 to AD-EP-ALL-0406. Changes 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21: Enclosure 4.1 lines 4, 9, 11, 12, 13, and Yes x No x note before line 17 - editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to !f. Changes 23, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30: Enclosure 4.2 lines 4 substep3, 9, 11, 12, 13, and note before line 17 - editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. Changes 32, 34, 35, 36, and 37: Enclosure 4.3 lines 4 substep3, 9, 11, 12, 13, and note before line 17 - editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. Change 33: Enclosure 4.3 line 5 - Editorial to be consistent with the format of other lines in this enclosure. Change 38: Enclosure 4.3 note before line 17 - reworded for conciseness. Changes 40, 42, 43, 44, and 45,: Enclosure 4.4 lines 4, 9, 11, 12, and 13 - editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. Change 46 and 72: Enclosure 4.5 line 4 and note above line 11- editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing not to NOT .
.1ange 41, Enclosure 4.4 Line 5 - editorial to be consistent with the format of other lines in this enclosure.
t:Ml:KGl:NGY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 5 of 9 ' 1 I 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Changes 49, 50, 52, 53, and 54: Enclosure 4.5 lines 8, 11, 13, 15, and 16 - 10 CFR Continue to editorial formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. 50.54(q) Attachment 4, Effectiveness Part IV and Changes 55, 59, 73 and 74: Enclosure 4. 7 pages 1, 2, 4,and 5 - editorial address non Evaluation is not formatting per the PWM. Changing if to IF. formatting per the PWM. editorial changes required. Enter justification and Change 62: Enclosure 4.8 step 1.2, A - editorial not a conditional statement. Changed ... if needed to as necessary. complete Attachment 4, Change 63: Enclosure 4.8 page 2 - group dial code moved before individual Part V & VI. dial code and leading zeros removed from dial code. Change 64: Enclosure 4.8 page 2 - Back-up TSC changed to Alternate TSC. Change 65: Enclosure 4.9 step 1 - reworded for conciseness. Change 68: OSM - Operations Shift Manager was changed to SM - Shift Manager. AD-OP-All-1000 specifies the title Shift Manager. Change 69: "Jocassee" was added to Enclosure 4.13 line 5 for clarity of applicability
- ]}.1ange 76: Enclosure 4.13, editorial, capitalize, underline, and bold "IF" and "Not" Change 71: Enclosure 4.15: PIP numbers were converted to NCR numbers; a numbering error was corrected, and NCR 01936370 was added.
Justification: These changes correct reference formatting, improve readability and clarity, correct numbering, and improve alignment with the Procedure Writer's Manual. These changes do not change the intent of the procedure. Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section 11? If answer is yes, then check box. 1
- 10 CFR50.47(b)(1) Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. D 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis D (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan.
)Y .*1 O CFR 50.47(b )(2) On site Emergency Organization
- I' a Process ensures that on shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned D
l:MERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT4 Page 6 of 9
) . '
10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 2b The process for timely augmentation of on shift staff is established and maintained. D 3~- *-1 o CFR 50.47(b)(3);Emergency. Response Support and:Resources*:. *' .. . ***.
. .
3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. D 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. D (NA for CR3)
.. .**
.... ;~. : .: : .. . .
.*.
.,
4\*:
- tO-CFR'50:47(b)(4)Emerger1CY*Classifieation System><.:< .:,:,_: .. * * : . *.. *. ,.:;,,*'**** ,. ..
. ' . . . .. . . . . . . .,' ... ...
~'. ,-,*-
4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. *~ D (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.) s~ . :*
- 1o:CFR50.47(b)(5) Notification. Method~ and Procedures;;'.,.: ,_:> .o:: .. **. .
...-
;
-~
t .;- '~ ** Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating IE! notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt D instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3} Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and D Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS
**:,. design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
~:*
- art IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
**:. ..
6~: ' 1o CFR. 50:47(b)(6):.Ernergency*Qommunfoatio.n$:\
- . - ' .- .. *
'
*> *.*_*.
*'
..
**. ': .. *.* " ..
6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D
...
T* ..*1o CFR' so .4 7(b )(7} Public. Educati~n* and: lnformatiom-:: * -'..*.
. ..
... ..
7a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D a*:: . .. 1O CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilitiesand Equipment:.> *. *. *.* Sa Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. IE! Sb Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. IE! 9' 10 CF.R50.47(b)(9) f.ccidentAssessment
- 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases.are in use. D 10 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) ProtectiveRespohse *,
10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) D 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are D
) .
available to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (NA for CR3) I
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 7 of 9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 10c A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public.
)i y
t:.Mt:K(.:H~N(.;Y PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
'EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0)
Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 8of9 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form 11 1O: CFR 50.4 7(b)(11) Radiologica~ Exposure Control
- 11 a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D 12 o
- 1 CFR 50.47(b)(12) Medieal and Public Health Support* .* .-*. ***.**
12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D 13 1O CFR50A7(b)(13) Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations.:> *- 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D 14- o 1 CFR 50.47(b )( 14) Di'ills and Exercises , ..- -...** 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D 1o CFR 50A7(b)(t5), Emergency ResponseTraining, ;;: *
'.'
15' " 15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) }ft+ *.10 CFR 50.47(b)(16) .Emergency Plan.Maintenance, *. , . * * .
- 16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained . D
. . . - .
-'
PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete D , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete IS , 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V and perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. PartV. Signatures::. Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date: Ricky Bowser under auspices of Pete Kuhlman 3/31/16 Reviewer Name (Print): Date: I
;)o ,v 4-....o y.{. ~._J /
,. "Y:f~E:anager NS-[== I Date: f-{{S/(f;
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 9of9 ~
- y 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print) Approver Signature: Date:
Part VI. NRG Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 1O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 10 CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing. One for Licensing to submit the 10 CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is
-
D put in effect. QA RECORD
;) -~
_;;/
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT5 Page 1 of 3 .~°)
- _.) 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Screening and Evaluation Number Applicable Sites ..
BNP 0 EREG #: 1985103 CNS 0 CR3 0 HNP 0 MNS 0 SAD#: 01985101 ONS I!! RNP 0 GO 0 Document and Revision RP/O/N1000/015 B Revision 005 Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center (PRR 01944106 and PRR01968803) .-:J
) .
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev.1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 2 of 3 '. __-...:,
)""_
,* 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part I. Description of Proposed Change:
*Change 2: Instruction for computer profile settings were deleted from the procedure body on page 3 of 8.
WebEOC version 7.5 automatically sets computer profile settings.
*Changes 3, 15, 16, 24, 25, 47, 48, 51, 56, and 58: In the body note before step 2.6 and in Enclosures 4.1, 4.2, 4.5 and 4. 7, changes were made to reflect transition to Imminent Failure from Condition 11A 11 , and to Potential 11 11 Failure from Condition B. FERC initiatives of EAP which occurred since Chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans was last revised in 2007. The Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, Office of Energy Projects, has finalized revisions to Chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. The guidelines are revised to be consistent with the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety- Emergency Action Planning for Dams, FEMA P-64, July 2013. Other changes include:
o Incorporating FERC initiatives on EAPs which occurred since Chapter 6 was last revised in 2007. o Making exercise terminology consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). o Including additional guidance and examples on inundation maps.
- Changes 6, 11, 55, 57, 60, and 61: Replacement fax machines required some revision to operating instructions within steps 3.5 and 3.12.of the body of this procedure and Enclosures 4. 7 and 4.10. Enclosure 4.8 was changed to correct the stated location of fax machine closest to the OSC.
- Changes 13, 14, 22, 23, 31, 32, 39 and 40: Transfer of liquid radioactive waste processing responsibility, not subject to 10 CFR 50.47(b){1 ), from Chemistry to Operations required clarification in Enclosures 4.1 through 4.4.
*}Jhemistry makes releases from the Chemical Treatment Ponds. Operations releases processed liquid waste from Radwaste Facility.
- Change 66: Contingency action upon DEMNET failure was added to Enclosure 4.9.
- Change 67: Enclosure 4.10 - Back-up TSC changed to Alternate TSC correcting a change that was made in error on Rev. 2 of the procedure. Using guidance in NEI 13-01, ALTERNATE FACILITY: A temporary location that may serve as a Technical Support Center (TSC) or Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) in support of a planned work activity. [An acceptable ALTERNATE FACILITY must have sufficient capability to support effective direction and control of an emergency response; however, it need not meet the same design or operating requirements applied to a normally used ERF (e.g., it may not possess a protected ventilation system.)].
- Change 70: Enclosure 4.13 line 11, the order of conditional statements was reversed per training 11 recommendations; line 17, removed Record the name of the communicator making the call. 11 The communicator's name is populated from line 17 ofthe ENF from the Fax Panel.
Attachment 6, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Initiating Condition (IC) and Emergency Action Level (EAL) and EAL Yes D Bases Validation and Verification (V&V) Form , is attached (required for IC or EAL change) No ~
~
y
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 3 of 3 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change: Oconee Emergency Plan Revision 2015-006 Section E Notification E.1 &E.2 Response Organization Notification Procedures have been developed that describe the basis for notification of response organizations that is consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme. RP/O/A/1000/015 B (Offslte Communications from the Technical Support Center) provides guidance for notifying offsite emergency response organizations of emergency classification and protective action recommendations. RP/O/A/1000/015 B revision 005 makes the following changes:
- Instruction for setting computer profile for the Emergency Notification Form (ENF) were removed. WebEOC version 7.5 automatically applies computer profile settings.
Transition to Imminent Failure from Condition A to be consistent with Guidelines for Dam Safety. A drop down containing the protective action recommendation was added to the ENF.
- Replacement fax machines required some revision to operating instructions.
Transfer of liquid radwaste processing responsibilities from Chemistry to Operations required clarification. Contingency action for DEMNet failure were added as an enhancement. The order of conditional statements in the ENF Quick Reference (Enclosure 4.13) was revised based on Training recommendation. In addition, WebEOC was revised to populated the Communicator's name on the ENF from the fax 1)pnel. ilfiese changes do not change the basis for notification or the emergency classification and action level scheme. E.3 & E.4 Initial and Follow-up Message Formats A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility. Notification and authentication procedures are in place for all designated agencies. The Emergency Notification Form (ENF) is used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility in accordance with notification and authentication procedures. Revision 005 to RP/O/A/1000/015 B does not change the notification method. E. 7 Protective Action Guides Duke Energy Company will make Protective Action Recommendations PARs to the State of South Carolina and Pickens and Oconee County based on meteorological conditions, offsite dose projections, and plant status. Revision 005 to RP/O/A/1000/015 B does not change any basis of any Protective Action Guide. Section F Emergency Communications Provisions' exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations, emergency personnel, and to the public. The Technical Support Center (TSC) has redundant two-way communications with principal response organizations and emergency personnel. Revision 005 to RP/O/A/1000/015 B does not change methods or ability to communicate with principal response organizations and emergency personnel. Communication to the public is not within the domain of the ye.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 4 of 3 _) 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part Ill. Description of How the Proposed Change Complies with Regulation and Commitments. If the emergency plan, modified as proposed, no longer complies with planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, then ensure the change is rejected, modified, or processed as an exemption request under 10 CFR 50.12, Specific Exemptions, rather than under 10 CFR 50.54(q): 10CFR50.47 (b) (4), (5), and (6) requires the following: (4) Onsite emergency response plans for nuclear power reactors use a standard emergency classification and action level to determine minimum initial offsite response measures. (5) Procedures must be establish to provide initial and followup notification of offsite response organizations. (6) The content of initial and followup messages to response organizations and the public has been established, and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. 10CFR50, Appendix E.IV.D.3 states in part, "A licensee shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency. 1OCFR50 Appendix E. IV E. requires in part:
- a. Provision for communications with contiguous State/local governments within the plume exposure pathway EPZ.
- b. Provision for communications with Federal emergency response organizations.
- c. Provision for communications among the nuclear power reactor control room, the onsite technical support center,
- J{ld the emergency operations facility; and among the nuclear facility, the principal State and local emergency _;perations centers, and the field assessment teams.
- d. Provisions for communications by the licensee with NRC Headquarters and the appropriate NRC Regional Office Operations Center from the nuclear power reactor control room, the onsite technical support center, and the emergency operations facility.
NUREG-0654 provides the following planning standards: E. Notification Methods and Procedures have been established, by the licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organizations; the content of initial and followup messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established. F. Emergency communications provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public. NUREG-0696 1.3 Emergency Response Facilities, requires reliable communications between onsite and offsite emergency response personnel. NU REG 2. 7 Communications, requires the TSC to be the primary onsite communications center an emergency to have reliable voice communications to the control room, the OSC, the EOF, and the NRC. Facsimile transmission capability between the TSC, the EOF, and the NRC Operations Center shall also be provided. Compliance with the above regulations and guidance is as follows:
- Change 2 made to delete WebEOC ENF profile settings.
- Changes 3,15,16, 24, 24, 47, 48, 51, and 58 reflect change in Guidelines for Dam Safety terminology.
.' Changes 6, 11, 55, 57, 60, and 61 revised fax machine instruction for new equipment. )
Changes 13, 22, 31, and 39 clarify transfer of liquid radwaste processing from Chemistry to Operations.
- Change 66 contingency actions upon DEMNET failure were added.
- Change 70 order of conditional statements and to identify Communicator's name is populated from fax panel.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5
. Page 5 of 3
.. *: "?\
~3 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change (Address each function identified in Attachment 4, 1O CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV of associated Screen):
1O CFR 50.47(b)(5) Notification Methods and Procedures. Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8) Emergency Facilities and Equipment Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response.
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 6 of 3
- 'j)."
*"
. *-~;{ 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions: Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (60 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. There is no reduction in effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions.
- Change 2 made to delete WebEOC ENF profile settings.
- Changes 3, 15, 16, 24, 24, 47, 48, 51, and 58 reflect change in Guidelines for Dam Safety terminology.
- Changes 6, 11, 55, 57, 60, and 61 revised fax machine instruction for new equipment.
- Changes 13, 22, 31, and 39 clarify transfer of liquid radwaste processing from Chemistry to Operations.
- Change 66 contingency actions upon DEMNET failure were added.
- Change 70 order of conditional statements and identify Communicator's name is populated from fax panel.
The Emergency Plan does not address operating detail of WebEOC or fax machines. WebEOC version 7.5 and Xerox WorkCentre 3615 fax machines perform the same function as their predecessor and are easily capable of
-:\~tiating noti~cati~n of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing J>'low-up not1ficat1on.
Jocassee Dam/Keowee Dam natural and destructive phenomena affecting plant safety were added to ONS emergency plan as part of revision 2011-01 in May 2011. These additions include emergency classification conditions and protective action recommendations, which can be found in Section D Enclosure 4.7. The transition to Imminent Failure from Condition A to be consistent with Guidelines for Dam Safety does not change the protective action required during this condition. A drop down containing the Imminent Failure/Condition A Protective Action Recommendation (PAR) was added to the Emergency Notification Form (ENF) so that the Communicator does not have to type the PAR on to the ENF. Transfer of liquid radwaste processing from Chemistry to Operations is a change in operational organization responsibility. Contingency actions upon DEMNET failure are consistent with the description in the Emergency Plan. The order of conditional statements improves the procedure flow. Populating the Communicator's name on the ENFfrom fax panel resolves a minor issue with approval sequence. Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion. Answer the following questions about the proposed change. 1 Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? Yes !!I No D Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no Yes !!I No D reduction in effectiveness)? 3 Does the proposed change maintain the current Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme? Yes !!I* No D
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(Q) Rev. 1 ATIACHMENT 5 Page 7 of 3 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form 4 Choose one of the following conclusions: a The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness or change in the current
~
Emergency Action Level (EAL) scheme. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior NRC approval. b The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) or 10 CFR 50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness or EAL scheme change. D Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior NRC approval. Part VII. Disposition of Proposed Change Requiring Prior NRC Approval Will the proposed change determined to require prior NRC approval be either revised or Yes D NoD rejected? If No, then initiate a License Amendment Request in accordance 1O CFR 50.90 and AD-LS-ALL-0002, Regulatory Correspondence, and include the tracking number:
'~
y
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 8 of 3 . }. 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Part VIII. Signatures: EP CFAM Final Approval is required for changes affecting risk significant planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4). Preparer Name (Print): Preparer Signature: Date: Ricky Bowser/Pete Kuhlman 3/30/16 Reviewer Name (Print): Date: Approver (EP Manager) Name (Print): f_,. _T(llLCLl Sliflf,C\ Approver (CFAM, as required) Name (Print): If the proposed activity is a change to the E-Plan or implementing procedures, then create two EREG General Assignments. One for EP to provide the 1 O CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 1O CFR 50.54(q), to D
*~ Licensing. *t>ne for Licensing to submit the 1O CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is put in effect. D QA RECORD ).'
Change Matrix RP~/015 B Revision 005 Change step before after why Number
- 1. BODY RP/1000/019 ... RP/0/A/1000/019 ... editorial, to make referenced step 2.2 RP/1000/010 ... RP/0/A/1000/010 ... procedures match their /
page 2 of 8 RP/1000/017 ... RP/O/A/1000/017 respective procedure number.
- 2. Body For WebEOC use: ... [Stated required deleted WebEOC version 7.5 (used to be computer profile settings] automatically sets computer step 2.6) profile settings.
page 3 of8 -
- 3. Body ... Significant changes in plant conditions ...Significant changes in plant conditions Transition to Imminent note before (Evacuation/relocation of site personnel; (Evacuation/relocation of site personnel; Failure from Condition "A",
step 2.6 fires onsite; MERT activation and/or fires onsite; MERT activation and/or injured and to Potential Failure from injured personnel transported offsite; personnel transported offsite; chemical Condition "B." FERC /
'/
chemical spills; explosions; condition "A" spills; explosions; Imminent Failure initiatives of EAP which or "B" for Keowee Hydro project (Condition "A") or Potential Failure occurred since Chapter 6 was Dams/Dikes or any event that would (Condition "B") for Jocassee or Keowee last revised in 2007. The cause or require offsite agency response) Hydro project Dams/Dikes or any event that Division of Dam Safety and should be communicated as they occur ... would cause or require offsite agency Inspections, Office of Energy response} should be communicated as they Projects, has finalized occur... revisions to Chapter 6 of the Engineering Guidelines for Emergency Action Plans. The guidelines are revised to be consistent with the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety-Emergency Action Planning for Dams, FEMA P-64, July 2013. Other changes include:
*Incorporating FERC initiatives on EAPs which occurred since Chapter 6 was last revised in 2007.
*Making exercise 1of15
<l.j
_terminology consistent with the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP).
*Including additional guidance and examples on inundation maps.
- 4. BODY ... OSM ... ... SM ... editorial, title change per AD-Note before OP-ALL-1000 step 2.6.1 The other unit that has now met a NOUE The other unit that has now met a NOUE page 5of8 EAL classification should be noted under EAL classification should be noted under ENF convention for LV Line 13 Remarks section along with what Line 13 Remarks. communicating lesser EAL condition is now met for that unit. If any other unit has a classification, the unit classifications for a 3 unit and classification should be noted under power reactor site.
line 13.
- 5. BODY IAAT An emergency classification is IAAT Any of the following occurs: editorial, to help readability Step 3.1 being UPGRADED or a FOLLOW-UP
- An Emergency classification is being perPWM .
page 6 of8 message is due or a change in UPGRADED *t/"' PROTECTIVE ACTION
- A FOLLOW-UP message is due RECOMMENDATIONS (PARs) occurs or
- A change in PROTECTIVE ACTION an event is TERMINATED ... RECOMMENDATIONS (PARs occurs)
- An event is TERMINATED
- 6. BODY Using Group Dial Code 008. .. Using Group Dial Code 8... Replacement fax machines Step 3.5 group dial code does not page 7of8 require the leading zeros.
- 7. BODY ... RP/1000/009 ... ... RP/O/A/1000/009 ... editorial, to make referenced Step 3.8 procedures match their page 7of8 respective procedure number.
- 8. BODY ... RP/1000/010 ... ... RP /0/A/1000/010 ... editorial, to make referenced Step 3.9 procedures match their page 7of8 respective procedure number.
- 9. BODY ... RP/1000/017 ... ... RP/O/A/1000/017 ... editorial, to make referenced 2 of 14
l,! ; ~ Note before procedures match their Step 3.10 respective procedure page 7 of8 number.
- 10. BODY ... RP/1000/017 ... ... RP/0/A/1000/017 ... editorial, to make referenced Step 3.10 procedures match their page 7of8 respective procedure number.
- 11. BODY ... Use Group Dial Code 005 ... ... Use Group Dial Code 5 Replacement fax machines Step 3.12 group dial code does not page 7of8 require the leading zeros.
- 12. Enclosure 4.1 Pre-Printed Emergency Notification forms Added between 1st and 3rd First NOTE containing specific EAL number and EAL bullet to be consistent with page 1of3 description may be used in lieu of Enclosure Enclosure 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 ...
4.1.A or WebEOC AD-EP-ALL-406 AD-EP-ALL-0406 editorial, to make referenced procedures match their respective procedure number.
- 13. Enclosure 4.1 Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager, Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager (ext. Chemistry makes releases Line 4, (ext. 3495) to verify the status of any 3495) or the OSC Operations Liaison (ext. from the Chemical substep 2 liquid releases. 3496) to verify the status of any liquid Treatment Ponds.
page 1of3 releases. Operations releases processed liquid waste from Radwaste Facility.
- 14. Enclosure 4.1 If a liquid release is occurring then IF a liquid release is occurring, complete editorial, formatting per Line 4, complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by the lines 6 and 7 as directed by the OSC PWM.
substep 3 OSC Chemistry Manager. Chemistry Manager or OSC Operations page 1of3 Liaison.
- 15. Enclosure 4.1 NOTE: Given that available space for FERC PAR requirements for Note before handwritten information is limited on line 5, Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Line 5 it is acceptable for what is written to span Failure (Condition A) are too page 2of3 multiple boxes' worth, as long as it is lengthy to be reasonable contained on line 5. For WebEOC forms, all hand written in the space 3 of 14
of this information can be entered on line 5 provided by the manual under box E, given that there is more version of the ENF. available space for typing this.
- 16. Enclosure 4.1 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Duke Energy Fleet decision Line 5 "A" exists: Imminent Failure (Condition "A") exists: on best location on ENF to page 2of3
- Mark Box Band write "Move
- Mark Box E place PARs for Hydro residents living downstream of the
- Write "Move residents living Dam/Dike Imminent Failure Keowee Hydro Dam to higher downstream of the Keowee Hydro Dam was SE. NOTE: This ground." to higher ground." procedure provides
- AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across instructions for both manual traffic flow across bridges identified bridges identified on your inundation and electronic completion of on your inundation maps until the maps until the danger has passed." ENF. Previous revision danger has passed." Enclosure 4.1 did not apply to WebEOC. Added "Jocassee" for clarity of applicability.
- 17. Enclosure 4.1 Enter the meteorological data if available IF available from the TSC Dose Assessor, Editorial! reformatted per Line 9 from the TSC Dose Assessor. enter the meteorological data. the PWM (due to this being a page 2 of 3 conditional step.}
- 18. Enclos.ure 4.1 Mark or select All if event affects the IF the highest emergency classification only Editorial, reformatted per Line 11 emergency classification on more than affects one unit, select that unit. PWM due to this being page 2 of 3 one unit. IF the highest emergency classification for conditional statements.
Mark or select one (1) unit if event this event applies to more than one unit, affects one unit or one (1) unit has a select "All". higher emergency classification.
- 19. Enclosure 4.1 If effected unit is shutdown, then enter IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the Editorial, reformatted per Line 12 the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date. PWM.
page 3 of 3
- 20. Enclosure 4.1 ... If there are no remarks write "None". .. .IF there are no remarks, write "None" . Editorial, reformatted per Line 13 PWM.
page 3 of 3
- 21. Enclosure 4.1 Lines 14, 15 & 16 - These lines are NOT Lines 14, 15, and 16 are NOT required to be Editorial, reworded for Note before required to be completed for initial completed for initial notification. conciseness.
Line 17 notification. 4of 14
page 3of3
- 22. Enclosure 4.2 Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager, Verify with OSC Chemistry Manager (ext. Chemistry makes releases Line 4, (ext. 3495) to verify the status of any 3495) and the OSC Operations Liaison (ext. from the Chemical substep 2 liquid releases. 3496) to verify the status of any liquid Treatment Ponds.
page 1of3 releases (to include Chemical Treatment Operations releases Ponds and Radwaste). processed liquid waste from Radwaste Facility.
- 23. Enclosure 4.2 If a liquid release is occurring then IF a liquid release is occurring, complete editorial, formatting per Line 4, complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by the lines 6 and 7 as directed by the DSC PWM.
substep 3 DSC Chemistry Manager. Chemistry Manager or OSC Operations page 1of3 Liaison.
- 24. Enclosure 4.2 NOTE: Given that available space for FERC PAR requirements for Note before handwritten information is limited on line 5, Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Line 5 it is acceptable for what is written to span Failure (Condition A) are too page 2 of 3 multiple boxes' worth, as long as it is lengthy to be reasonable contained on line 5. For WebEOC forms, all hand written in the space of this information can be entered on line 5 provided by the manual under box E, given that there is more version of the ENF.
available space for typing this.
- 25. Enclosure 4.2 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Duke Energy Fleet decision Line 5 "A" DOES NOT exist, then mark Box A Imminent Failure (Condition "A") does NOT on best location on ENF to page 2 of 3 NONE. exist, mark Box A, NONE. place PARs for Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Failure If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike was SE. NOTE: This "A" exists: Imminent Failure (Condition "A") exists: procedure provides
- Mark Box Band write "Move
- Mark Box E instructions for both manual residents living downstream of the
- Write "Move residents living and electronic completion of Keowee Hydro Dam to higher downstream of the Keowee Hydro Dam ENF. Previous revision ground." to higher ground." Enclosure 4.2 did not apply
- AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across to WebEOC. Added traffic flow across bridges identified bridges identified on your inundation "Jocassee" for clarity of on your inundation maps until the maps until the danger has passed." applicability.
danger has passed."
- 26. Enclosure 4.2 Enter the meteorological data if available IF available from the TSC Dose Assessor, Editorial, reformatted per 5 of 14
Line 9 from the TSC Dose Assessor. enter the meteorological data. the PWM (due to this being a page 2 of 3 conditional step.)
- 27. Enclosure 4.2 Mark or select All if event affects the IF the highest emergency classification only Editorial, reformatted per Line 11 emergency classification on more than affects one unit, select that unit. PWM due to this being page 2 of 3 one unit. IF the highest emergency classification for conditional statements.
Mark or select one (1) unit if event this event applies to more than one unit, affects one unit or one (1) unit has a select "All". higher emergency classification.
- 28. Enclosure 4.2 If effected unit is shutdown, then enter IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the Editorial, reformatted per Line 12 the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date. PWM. /
page 3 of 3
- 29. Enclosure 4.2 ... If there are no remarks write "None". ...IF there are no remarks, write "None". Editorial, reformatted per Line 13 PWM.
page 3 of 3
- 30. Enclosure 4.2 Lines 14, 15 & 16 - These lines are NOT Lines 14, 15, and 16 are NOT required to be Editorial, reworded for Note before Line 17 required to be completed for initial notification.
completed for initial notification. conciseness.
/
page3of3
- 31. Enclosure 4.3 Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager, Verify with OSC Chemistry Manager (ext. Chemistry makes releases Line 4, (ext. 3495) to verify the status of any 3495) and the OSC Operations Liaison (ext. from the Chemical substep 2 liquid releases. 3496) to verify the status of any liquid Treatment Ponds.
page 1of3 releases (to include Chemical Treatment Operations releases Ponds and Radwaste). processed liquid waste from Radwaste Facility.
- 32. Enclosure 4.3 If a liquid release is occurring then IF a liquid release is occurring, complete editorial, formatting per Line 4, complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by the lines 6 and 7 as directed by the OSC PWM.
substep 3 OSC Chemistry Manager. Chemistry Manager or OSC Operations page 1of3 Liaison.
- 33. Enclosure 4.3 Verify that Protective Action Verify Box A, NONE, is marked for editorial, to be consistent Line 5 Recommendation is marked as none Protective Action Recommendation. with the format of other page 1of2 lines in this enclosure.
- 34. Enclosure 4.3 Enter the meteorological data if available IF available from the TSC Dose Assessor, Editorial, reformatted per Line 9 from the TSC Dose Assessor. enter the meteorological data. the PWM (due to this being a page 2of2 conditional step.)
6 of 14
~. j
~
- 35. Enclosure 4.3 Mark or select All if event affects the IF the highest emergency classification only Editorial, reformatted per Line 11 emergency classification on more than affects one unit, select that unit. PWM due to this being page 2 of2 one unit. IF the highest emergency classification for conditional statements.
Mark or select one (1) unit if event this event applies to more than one unit, affects one unit or one (1) unit has a select "All". higher emergency classification.
- 36. Enclosure 4.3 If effected unit is shutdown, then enter IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the Editorial, reformatted per Line 12 the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date. PWM.
page 2of2
- 37. Enclosure 4.3 ... If there are no remarks write "None". ... IF there are no remarks, write "None". Editorial, reformatted per Line 13 PWM.
page 2 of2
- 38. Enclosure 4.3 Lines 14, 15 & 16 - These lines are NOT Lines 14, 15, and 16 are NOT required to be Editorial, reworded for Note before required to be completed for initial completed for initial notification. conciseness.
Line 17 notification. page 2 of2
- 39. Enclosure 4.4 Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager, Verify with OSC Chemistry Manager (ext. Chemistry makes releases Line 4, (ext. 3495) to verify the status of any 3495) and the OSC Operations Liaison (ext. from the Chemical substep 2 liquid releases. 3496) to verify the status of any liquid Treatment Ponds.
page 1of2 releases (to include Chemical Treatment Operations releases Ponds and Radwaste). processed liquid waste from Radwaste Facility.
- 40. Enclosure 4.4 If a liquid release is occurring then IF a liquid release is occurring, complete editorial, formatting per Line 4, complete lines 6 and 7 as directed by the lines 6 and 7 as directed by the OSC PWM.
substep 3 OSC Chemistry Manager. Chemistry Manager or OSC Operations page 1of2 Liaison.
- 41. Enclosure 4.4 Verify that Protective Action Verify Box A, NONE, is marked for editorial, to be consistent Line 5 Recommendation is marked as none Protective Action Recommendation. with the format of other page 1of2 lines in this enclosure.
- 42. Enclosure 4.4 Enter the meteorological data if available IF available from the TSC Dose Assessor, Editorial, reformatted per Line 9 from the TSC Dose Assessor. enter the meteorological data. the PWM (due to this being a page 2of2 conditional step.)
- 43. Enclosure 4.4 Mark or select All if event affects the IF the highest emergency classification only Editorial, reformatted per Line 11 emergency classification on more than affects one unit, select that unit. PWM due to this being 7 of 14
\C:,: ..J
~
page 2of2 one unit. IF the highest emergency classification for conditional statements. Mark or select one (1) unit if event this event applies to more than one unit, affects one unit or one (1) unit has a select "All". higher emergency classification.
- 44. Enclosure 4.4 If effected unit is shutdown, then enter IF affected unit is shutdown, enter the Editorial, reformatted per Line 12 the shutdown time and date. shutdown time and date. PWM.
page 2of2
- 45. Enclosure 4.4 ... If there are no remarks write "None". ...IF there are no remarks, write "None". Editorial, reformatted per Line 13 PWM.
page 2of2
- 46. Enclosure 4.5
- Verify with the TSC. Dose Assessor
- Verify with the TSC Dose Assessor that Editorial, reformatted per Line 4 that information for lines 5, 6, 7, 9, information for lines 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, PWM.
Page 2 of4 14, 15, and 16 have not changed and 16 have NOT changed since the last since the last message sheet. message sheet.
*
- If changes have not occurred since the previous message, then copy the same information from the last IF changes have NOT occurred since the previous message, copy the same information from the last message
---
message sheet. sheet.
- If changes have occurred, then mark
- IF changes have occurred, mark applicable boxes and add new applicable boxes and add new information as directed by the TSC information as directed by the TSC Dose Dose Assessor and the OSC Assessor, the OSC Chemistry Manager, Chemistry Manager. and the OSC Operations Liaison.
- 47. Enclosure 4.5 NOTE: Given that available space for FERC PAR requirements for Note before handwritten information is limited on line 5, Hydro Dam/Dike Imminent Line 5 it is acceptable for what is written to span Failure (Condition A) are too page 2of4 multiple boxes' worth, as long as it is lengthy to be reasonable 1.....---
contained on line 5. For WebEOC forms, all hand written in the space of this information can be entered on line 5 provided by the manual under box E, given that there is more version of the ENF. 8 of 14
available space for typing this.
- 48. Enclosure 4.5 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition IF a Jocassee OR Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Duke Energy Fleet decision Line 5 "A" exists: Imminent Failure (Condition "A") exists: on best location on ENF to page 2of4
- Mark Box Band write "Move
- Mark Box E place PARs for Hydro residents living downstream of the
- Write "Move residents living Dam/Dike Imminent Failure Keowee Hydro Dam to higher downstream of the Keowee Hydro Dam was SE. NOTE: This ground." to higher ground." procedure provides
- AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit
- Write "Prohibit traffic flow across instructions for both manual traffic flow across bridges identified bridges identified on your inundation and electronic completion of on your inundation maps until the maps until the danger has passed." ENF. Previous revision danger has passed." Enclosure 4.1 did not apply to WebEOC. Added Jocassee" for clarity of applicability.
- 49. Enclosure 4.5 Verify plant conditions with operation Verify plant conditions with operation Editorial, reformatted per Line 8 support. If plant conditions have not support. IF plant conditions have NOT PWM due to this being page 2 of4 changed since the previous message changed since the previous message sheet, conditional statements.
sheet, repeat the same information. repeat the same information. If plant conditions have changed since IF plant conditions have changed since the the previous message sheet, then mark previous message sheet, mark Box A, B, or C Box A, B, or C as directed by Operations as directed by Operations Support Support. so. Enclosure 4.5 Mark or select All if event affects the IF the highest emergency classification only Editorial, reformatted per Line 11 emergency classification on more than affects one unit, select that unit. PWM due to this being page 3of4 one unit. IF the highest emergency classification for conditional statements. Mark or select one (1) unit if event this event applies to more than one unit, affects one unit or one (1) unit has a select "All". higher emergency classification.
- 51. Enclosure 4.5 Examples of new information include: Examples of new information include: Transition to Imminent Note before Evacuation/relocation of site personnel; Evacuation/relocation of site personnel; Failure from Condition "A",
Line 13 fires onsite; MERT activation and/or fires onsite; MERT activation and/or injured and to Potential Failure from page 3of4 injured personnel transported offsite; personnel transported offsite; chemical Condition "B." (FERC chemical spills; explosions; Condition "A" spills; explosions; Imminent Failure initiatives of EAP. For or "B" for a Keowee Hydro Project (Condition "A") or Potential Failure additional information see Dam/Dikes; or any event that would (Condition "B") for a Keowee Hydro Project this column for change item 9of 14
*0Jd cause or require offsite agency response. Dam/Dikes; or any event that would cause 3.0 or require offsite agency response S2. Enclosure 4.S Write "None" if there are no additional IF there are no additional remarks, write Editorial, reformatted per Line 13 remarks. "None". PWM due to this being a page 3 of4 If upgrade in classification occurs prior to !Eupgrade in classification occurs prior to conditional statement transmitting the message then include transmitting the message, include "upgrade "upgrade to follow" on this line. to follow" on this line.
S3. Enclosure 4.S Copy the same information from the Copy the same information from the Editorial, reformatted per Line 1S previous message sheet. If changes have previous message sheet. IF changes have PWM due to this being a page 3of4 occurred see TSC Dose Assessor for this occurred, see TSC Dose Assessor for this conditional statement information. information. S4. Enclosure 4.S Copy the same information from the Copy the same information from the Editorial, reformatted per Line 16 previous message sheet. If changes have previous message sheet. IF changes have PWM due to this being a page 3 of 4 occurred see TSC Dose Assessor for this occurred, see TSC Dose Assessor for this conditional statement information. information. SS. Enclosure 4. 7 Fax Form - For guidance see Enclosure IF using manual fax, Fax Form to Group Dial Editorial, reformatted per page 1 of S 4.8 (Copy/Fax Operation) 1- For guidance see Enclosure 4.8 PWM due to this being a (Copy/FAX Operation). conditional statement. Use Group Dial 001. IF using WebEOC, ensure the forms have Added conditional been sent - for guidance see enclosure 4.13 statements for use of (WebEOC Notification Form Quick WebEOC; or failure of Reference). DEM NET. IF AT ANY TIME DEM NET is NOT operating correctly, refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method and Sequence to Contact Agencies) to manually transmit the message. S6. Enclosure 4.7 IF A Keowee dam/dike condition "A" or IF any of the following exists for the site: Transition to Imminent page 3of4 "B" or external flood condition exist for
- Keowee dam/dike Imminent Failure Failure from Condition "A",
the site (Condition "A") and to Potential Failure from
- Jocassee dam/dike Imminent Failure Condition "B." (FERC THEN Fax form using Group Dial 003. (Condition "A") initiatives of EAP. For
- Keowee dam/dike Potential Failure additional information see (Condition "B") this column for change item 3.) Added "Jocassee" for
- Jocassee dam/dike Potential Failure 10 of 14
(Condition "B") clarity of applicability.
- external flood condition Replacement fax machines group dial code does not THEN Fax form using Group Dial 3 require the leading zeros.
- 57. Enclosure 4.7 FAX Dial Code 027 FAX Dial Code 27 Replacement fax machines page 3of4 FAX Dial Code 026 FAX Dial Code 26 group dial code does not FAX Dial Code 024 FAX Dial Code 24 require the leading zeros.
FAX Dial Code 025 FAX Dial Code 25 (Fax form for any Condition A or B (Fax form for any Imminent Failure dam/dike event) (condition "A") or Potential Failure (Condition "B") dam/dike event)
- 58. Enclosure 4.7 Begin call by saying "You should have Begin call by saying "You should have Transition to Imminent page 3 of 4 received a fax indicating Keowee Hydro received a fax indicating Jocassee or Failure from Condition "A",
Dam/Dike is in condition A or B, or an Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike is in Imminent and to Potential Failure from external flood condition exist for the Failure (Condition "A") or Potential Failure Condition "B." (FERC site, do you have any questions?" (Condition "B"}, or an external flood initiatives of EAP. For condition exist for the site, do you have any additional information see questions?" this column for change item 3.)
- 59. Enclosure 4.7 If meteorological data was not provided IF meteorological data was NOT provided Editorial, reformatted per page 4of4 on the previous message, then initiate a on the previous message, initiate a Follow- PWM due to this being a Follow-up message and include the met up message and include the met data. conditional statement data.
- 60. Enclosure 4.8 This enclosure provides basic operating This enclosure provides basic operating The closest fax to the OSC is Note before instructions for the primary faxes in instructions for the primary faxes in the TSC, in the Unit 3 Procedure section 1 the TSC, U-1/2 control room and OSC. U-1/2 control room and U-3 Procedure Room.
page 1of2 Room.
- 61. Enclosure 4.8 1.1 page 1of2 FAX the notification form using the following method:
Insert notification form, adjust FAX the notification form using the following method: Revised fax instructions are applicable to Current Xerox WorkCenter 3615
-
A. 11 of 14
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) Duke Energy (l)IDNo. RP/0/A/1000/0lSB PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 004 _ Page 2of4 PREPARATION (2) Station _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _O-=-=C-"'0-=-N=E=E"--'N'-'-U=-=C=L=E"""'A~R'-"S~T=A=T=--=I=O-=-N'-------------- (3) Procedure Title Offsite Communications Fro (4) Prepared By* Natalie Harness (Signature) \--¥-"~!lo(::~~~LJJ...~~~---Date 7/14/2015 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) - Attach NSD'228 documentation.
!ZJ No (Revision with minor changes) /l ,) ~\.L~-/.
(6) Reviewed By* ~*-~'/, *!I / . ~ / l (QR)(KI) Date 7-J-r-;,,r;; I I ,. . I Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KI) NA~Date / -;; 3 1>: Reactivity Mgmt Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR) NAo~Date *7 -;13 -;15; Mgmt Involvement Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Ops. Supt.) NA~te / -:.-~? -jr;{ (7) Additional Reviews R e v i e w e d B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date ReviewedBy*------,--r-----++---H'------.11-t--,.._,,.-'="'-"'---- Date
)(8) Approved By* -4,....__,'"'-='-"'f----J..:>4---'-1,.41..!:::g..!'f--jr\--=:i---:=--~~~-+1:A.&<=-'od----- Date
. PERFORMANCE (9) Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number ( W O # ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes DNA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion A p p r o v e d - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary) )
- Printed Name and Signature
Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 06/18/2015 (NH) -)-The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in information you want to appear on the various
. *forms needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in information on this form, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perform Step 3 below.
Step 1- press [Fl2] (Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- 1. ID No.: RP/O/N1000/015B
- 2. Revision No.: 004 _
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Technical Support Center
- 5. For changes only, enter procedure sections affected:_
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness
- 7. Preparation Date: 7/14/2015
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision:
)Step 3- go to Print Preview to update this information in all the attached documents.
Step 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional information needed. Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness.
)
[Type text] Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Technical Support Center Page 3of4
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Editorial Change: Enclosure 4.8 page 2 of2 Updating the fax numbers after verification and upgrade project, corrected 4 incorrect contact numbers, and added the A & B simulator fax units to listing. The fio 11owmg 11 D"1a1 c odes II have b een programmed mto
. . (ERF) f;ax machines:
the Emergency Response Fac1T1t1es Dial Codes AJ!ency I Location Number 001 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 9-1-301-816-5151 002 Pickens County EMA 9-1-864-898-5797 003 Oconee County EMA 9-1-864-638-4216 004 SC State Warning Point 9-1-803-73 7-857 5 005 Alternate SC State Warning Point 9-1-803-896-8352 006 SC Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) 9-1-803-737-8570 007 Department of Environmental Controls (DHEC!NEP) 9-1-803-896-4102 008 Common Emergency Operations Center (EOF) 9-1-704-382-0722 009 ONS Technical Suooort Center (TSC) 9-1-864-873-4308 010 ONS Operational Support Center (OSC) I Control Room 3 9-1-864-873-3728 011 ONS Back-up TSC/OSC 9-1-864-873-3597 012 Control Room 1&2 9-1-864-873-3153 013 World of Energy (WOE) 9-1-864-873-4605 . ~:.,_ -*~* _,>' 014 Clemson Joint Information center (JIC) 9-1-864-624-43 73 015 ONS Complex 9-1-864-873-4300 016 Nuclear Supply Chain (NSC) 9-1-864-873-3558 017 State Forward Emergency Operations Center (FEOC) 9-1-864-654-93 67 018 Pickens County Law Enforcement Center (LEC) 9-1-864-898-5531 019 Oconee County Law Enforcement Center (LEC) 9-1-864-638-4434 020 Oconee County Forward EMD 9-1-855-713-3361 021 General Office Joint Information center (GO JIC) 9-1-704-3 82-0623 022 ECOC 9-1-704-382-3897 023 Security 9-1-864-873-3417 024 Hart County EMA 9-1-706-859-5316 025 Elbert County EMA 9-1-404-283-2022 026 National Weather Service 9-1-864-848-1582 027 Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA) 9-1-404-635-7205 028 Simulator A (DRILL) 9-1-864-873-3432 029 Simulator B (DRILL) 9-1-864-873-3482 The fio11 owmg llGroup D"al 1 codes II have been programmed"mto the Emergency Response Fac1T. 1tles (ERF) f:axmach'mes: Grouv Dial Codes Grouo Al!encv I Location Dial Codes 001 State and Counties EOF 002,003,004,005,006,008,013,018,019,020,021, 022 002 Counties EMA 002 & 003 003 Keowee Flood/Georgia 024,025,026,027 004 Simulators 028 & 029 ~
*.;} 005 EOF & OSC (RP/O/A/1000/015B, 3.12) 008 &010
[Type text] Attachment to 50.54q CHANGE MATRIX
# Page /Section Current Proposed Change Reason
- 1. Page 6 of8 Using Speed Dial 07, OR dialing Using Dial Code 008, OR dialing 704- fax validation and 3.5 704-382-0722, fax completed 382-0722, fax completed Enclosure 4.10 revisions Enclosure 4.10 (Turnover Checklist) (Turnover Checklist) to the EOF and close gap between to the EOF and review form with the review form with the EOF Offsite Agency dialing and 704-382-EOF Offsite Agency Communicator. Communicator. 0722
- 2. Page 7 of8 During back shift and weekends, During back shift and weekends, retrieve fax validation and 3.12 retrieve the Nuclear Call-out System the Nuclear Call-out System report. Use revisions report. Use Speed Dial 29 to fax Group Dial 005 to fax report to the OSC report to the OSC and the EOF .... and the EOF. ...
- 3. Enclosure 4. 7 Use Speed Dial 14 (Speed Dial 17 Use Group Dial 001. fax validation and Page 1of4 can be used as backup). revisions
- 4. Enclosure 4.7 THEN FAX form using Speed Dial THEN FAX form using Group Dial Code fax validation and Page 3 of4 #27 003 revisions
- 5. Enclosure 4.7 FAX Speed Dial 27 FAX Dial Code 027 fax validation and Page 3 of4 revisions GEMA
- 6. Enclosure 4.7 FAX Speed Dial 27 FAX Dial Code 026 fax validation and Page 3 of 4 revisions NWS
- 7. Enclosure 4. 7 FAX Speed Dial 27 FAX Dial Code 024 fax validation and Page 3 of4 revisions Hart Co
- 8. Enclosure 4.7 FAX Speed Dial 27 FAX Dial Code 025 fax validation and Page 3 of4 revisions Elbert Co
- 9. Enclosure 4.8 Determine which Speed Dial Code Determine which Dial Code number to fax validation and Page 1 of2 number to use use revisions 1.1.B
- 10. Enclosure 4.8 Press the Speed Dial Code number Press the Dial Code number fax validation and Page 1 of2 revisions 1.1.C
- 11. Enclosure 4.10 FAX this form to the Charlotte FAX this form to the Charlotte EOF at fax validation and Page 1of1 EOF at the following number 704- the following number 704-382-0722. revisions Note at end of 382-0722. (Dial Code 008) page
- 12. Enclosure 4.8 see attached see attached fax validation and Page 2 of2 revisions
- 13. Enclosure 4. 15 11. NCR 01936515 fax validation and Page 1of1 12. NCR 01937945 revisions
)
[Type text] APPENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION Pagel ort* PART £'-ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION' DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC SITE UNIT(S) C8J Oconee D McGuire D Catawba C8J Unit l C8J Unit 2 C8J Unit 3 ACTIVITY TITLE/DOCUMENT/REVISION: RP/O/A/1000/015B, Offsite Communications From The Technical Su1mort Center, Rev 004 PARTII-PROCESS REVIEW> . For each activity; address _ali of the questions. below. If the answer is ':'YES" for any portfon ofthe activity, apply the identified process( es)
- to that portion of the activity:* Note:;; It is not unusual to have more than one process aoolv to a given activity. -
Will implementation of the above activity require a change to the:
;
- l. Technical Specifications (TS) or 0 D If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227.
Operating License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? CT D If YES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
NO YES
/
- 3. Security Plans? o' D If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
NO YES (See Appendix H)
- 4. Emergency Plan? D NO 8
YES IfYES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual.
- 5. lnservice Testing Program Plan? IT D If YES, process per site !ST Program for ASME code compliance and NO YES related facility changes.
/
- 6. lnservice Inspection Program Plan? LJ D If YES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping Inservice Inspection
) NO YES FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes. I
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? 0 D IfYES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
NO YES 7a -Utilize Appendix E to address Fire ~ Check to confirm use of Appendix E Screening Questions. Protection Program Plan Impact. /, .
- 8. Regulatory Commitments? 8 D IfYES, process per NSD 214.
NO YES
/
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? G D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
NO YES IO. Programs and manuals listed in the [2( D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group. Administrative Section of the TS? NO YES )
[Type text] Page 2 of2 PAR'Jl Ufa -10 CFR 72.48 APPLICABILITY For each *activity, address the question below. If the answer to question 11 is. "YES," and questions 14 and 17 are answered "NO;
- then process the activity per NSD 211 - 10 CFR 72.48 does apply.
/
- 11. Does the activity involve SSCs, procedures or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the ca" NO DYES loading or transport of the canister/cask to the ISFSI, the ISFSI facility, spent fuel cask design?
PART Illb- 10....CFR 50.59APPLICABILITY For. each aetivity, address all of the questions below; If the answer to question 18 is "YES,"'then IO.. CFR 50:59 d~es not apply. If . the answer to questions 18 is "NO," then process the activity per NSD 209 -10 CFR 50.59 applies*..* ,
- 12. Does the activity involve a procedure, governed by NSD 703 that has been excluded from the I 0 CFR 0- D YES 50.59 process per NSD 703 and the exclusion status remains valid? NO
- 13. Does the activity involve an administrative procedure governed by NSD 100 or AD-DC-ALL-0201 that
[j/ DYES does not contain information regarding the operation and control of Structures, Systems and NO Components?
- 14. Does the activity involve a type of Engineering Change that NSD 30 I excludes from the I 0 CFR 50.59 and/or I0 CFR 72.48 Processes? Consult NSD 30 I for assistance.
s NO D YES
/
- 15. Does the activity involve (a) maintenance activities that restore SSCs to their as-designed condition @" DYES (including activities that implement approved design changes) or (b) temporary alterations supporting NO maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
/
- 16. Does the activity involve a UFSAR modification that NSD 220 excludes from the 10 CFR 50.59 Process? oNO D YES
) Consult NSD 220 for assistance.
- 17. Does the activity involve NRC and/or Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC approved changes to the licensing if DYES basis? NO
- 18. Are ALL aspects of the activity bounded by one or more "YES" answers to questions I through 17, D 0'YES above? NO
* . PART IV - UFSAR REVIEW
I Does the activity require a modification, deletion, or addition to the UFSAR to satisfy the UFSAR content -El,.. DYES 9 requirements of I 0 CFR 50.34 (b), I 0 CFR 50. 71 (c), or Regulatory Guide (RG) I. 70? Consult NSD 220 for NO Assistance. IF YES, process per NSD 220.
- /l
,.., ~
i PARTV/;SIGNOf~l / . /'~~.\.** /t: / (Print \')....,,.JJ\-(..'> t*\- . l J-;yJ \ (Sign) ..!.. Ui/~ I._ / ~------DATE ,7-:r1-1s* Name) ' i / ~ i.---~ ( Applicability Determination Preparer )
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (Rl0-14) Duke Energy PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/015B Revision No. 004 _ Change No. Permanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Technical Support Center (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Enclosure 4.8 Page 2 of2 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. [gJ No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) Please see attached Change Matrix (7) Reason for Change: Editorial Change: Enclosure 4.8 Page 2 of2 Updating the fax numbers after verification and upgrade project, corrected 4 incorrect contact numbers, ) and added the A & B simulator fax units to * "ng. 7/14/2015 7-:&7--z<;;
,, <
Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 7-¥.J---t ~ Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR) NA <Ve Date 7--:_23 -t<)' Mgmt. Involvement Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(Ops. Supt.) NA !)/k---Date 7-;?? -zs; ( 10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By*
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date - - - - - -
Reviewed By* Date (11) Approved By* ----1,--'-=.J.!=~-'--\----=::........::lJ--:::...-'-"--+-\-'-4----=---=-c1--=-.~-¥t1::hV'-tr--- Date -_-:}-~l~-3-i_,_l)---
"' Printed Name and Signature
)
~MERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602
~ FFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. O 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form ATTACHMENT 4 Page 1 of 4 Screening and Evaluation Number I Applicable, Sites EREG #: 5AD#: ONS0 Document and Revision RP/O/A/1000/015B, Offsite Communications From The Technical Sui:mort Center Rev 004
..
..
'. '
'.*
Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): No change to the emergency plan, editorial change
... . .*
...
*,
.*
Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? Yes ID No I 0 Is this activity Fully bounded by an NRG approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Effectiveness Attachment 4, 10 Evaluation is not CFR 50.54(q) required. Enter Screening
; f yes, identify bounding source document number or approval reference and Evaluation Form, justification ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the proposed below and Part Ill change is documented below:
complete Attachment 4, Justification: Part V. Bounding document attached (optional) 10 Part Ill. Editorial Change Yes I0 No I D Is this activity an editorial or typographical change only, such as formatting, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Continue to paragraph numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? Effectiveness Attachment 4, Part Evaluation is not IV and address required. Enter non editorial Justification: It was incorrectly labeled as "Drill" but should be labeled justification and changes "Emergency" based on the section that was updated Section 2 of Enclosure complete 4.11, Emergency ERONS Notification Codes. It was a cut and paste error as the Attachment 4, same section for drills was revised during revision 9 Section 3 of Enclosure 4.11, DRILL ERONS Notification Codes. Part V & VI. i~*kiJ
;J.; c~. *k
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) . -) Rev. 0 L-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-'-~~~A-T-TA-C~H-M_E_N_T_4~ Page 11 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
..
,,:
*,, : *, ,* '. **-..... -. ' ' ' . ~. , .
..
Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (Reference Attachment 1, Considerations for Addressing Screening Criteria) Does this activity involve any of the following, including program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II? If answer is yes, then check box. 1 1O CFR 50:47(b )(1} Assignment of Responsibility (Organi2ation,Cantrolk * .*. **
- 1a Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. 0 1b The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis 0 (24-7 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan.
2a Process ensures that on-shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned 0 2b The process for timely augmentation of on-shift staff is established and maintained. 0
*.** . . : *~. :'* ...... *.,* .: :'
3a Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. 0
-. 3b State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan . 0
...,.
*~
(NA for CR3)
. '.","'
"* " ., ... *:... :::
":.
4a A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. 0 (Requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM.)
.*."
5> )O'GfR50'.47(b)(5}Notification*Methods.andProc.~dures<*:< .*> * *, . **.* .*.... .* .: .... Sa Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of initiating notification 0 of the declared emergency within 15 minutes (30 minutes for CR3) after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notification. Sb Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions 0 to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (NA for CR3) Sc The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and 0 Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (NA for CR3)
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) .-~{.
*.; Rev. 0 ,7'.'
ATTACHMENT 4 Page 12 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.) 6 ! *
- 1o QFR 50:47(b)(~) . , -
Errrergency*Commllnicatibns,.
. . .
-*: ** .
6a Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations. 6b Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. D
?a Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the D plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (NA for CR3) 7b Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. D
',. . _;
Ba Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. D 8b Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. D 9a Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. D
.*:*,'i;it>;L~: ).m9,FR'5Q;47(b)(~*oxRtoi!3ctive(Respqn~.~r1*;-**::/:**:_:*.*::,'-'.:y:~*~,_ **.*._; * ;<;~\?:c*** _i::Jtf, . ;.** ::-:.::<, '..:.,:.:,;::{.:'***-.:-) .4:*::c:
~~~10a A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (NA for CR3) 10b Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available D to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities.
(NA for CR3) 1Oc A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including D those for hostile action events. 10d Kl is available for implementation as a protective action recommendation in those jurisdictions that D chose to provide Kl to the public. 11:- 19* GF:R 5_0A7(b )(1,1} Radiql6gical. Exposure control:;;*. *.. 11 a The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. D
- 12. . 10'CFRS0;47(b)(12)'Medical and.Putilic:Health*Support~:. * ** .... -*': ;-. L
- r:*
12a Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. D
- 13'; : 1o:CFRS0'.47(b)(:l3)' Recovery Pl~nning:andPost-accident Operations::~ , _ , .. *,*
i'. . ~. ,
- 13a Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. D
" ..,
14:* -- 10*CFR50A7(b)(.14)-DrillsandJ:xercises"' ;_.. : " .. *, *.-.: .. *~, . *- ,* 14a A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) D is established. 14b Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, D and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. 14c Identified weaknesses are corrected. D
)15 10,CFR 50A7(b)(1q) Emergency Response.Trainingc> * * * * * ,
15a Training is provided to emergency responders. D
EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE SCREENING AND AD-EP-ALL-0602 EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATIONS 10 CFR 50.54(0) Rev. 0 -.,.,,
..~ .... } - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - _ _ ,
ATTACHMENT 4 Page 13 of 4 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Part IV. Emergency Planning Element and Function Screen (cont.)
.16.'> * .1 o. CFR soA7(b )( t6) Em~rgency: Plan Maintenance ,;-:~
16a Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. D 16b Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. D
':**. .**.
> ';'*.
PART IV. Conclusion If no Part IV criteria are checked, a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation is not required, then complete 0 Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part V. Go to Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part VI for instructions describing the NRC required 30 day submittal. If any Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part IV criteria are checked, then complete o Attachment 4, 10 CFR 50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form, Part Vand perform a 10 CFR 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation. Shaded block requires final approval of Screen and Evaluation by EP CFAM. Preparer Name (Print): Natalie Harness Reviewer Name (Print):
' T) *)-1'-<i..-c.:~ A. '
Part VI. NRC Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure Submittal Actions Create two EREG General Assignments.
- One for EP to provide the 10 CFR 50.54(q) summary of the analysis, or the completed 1O CFR 50.54(q), to D Licensing.
- One for Licensing to submit the 1O CFR 50.54(q) information to the NRC within 30 days after the change is D
put in effect. QA RECORD J '
.
Page 1of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. PROCEDURE NUMBER: RP/O/N1000/015B Revision No. 004 _ Change No._ J:reparer: Natalie Harness Date: 7/14/2015 PCRs Incorporated: _ Preparer: Initial Considerations: Yes N/A D Perform Procedure Change Planning Sheet. D Review outstanding PCR(s) to determine what changes are needed. D Determine ifrevision/change is considered High Risk. D D If change is due to plant modification, ensure "EC Number" field is filled in on PCR. D D If revision, ensure all outstanding manual changes are incorporated. D D If procedure status is changed, ensure new status noted on top right corner of PPR sheet. (Deleted, Superseded)
- Perform ISYS search to determine if other procedures must be revised due to these changes and write PCRs as required.
- It may be necessary to place on Tech Hold or issue revisions to affected procedures at same time.
D D lfrevision is for OP/O/A/1107/003 or OP/O/A/1107/003 B, refer to Attach. 'R' ofOMP 1-09 for special instructions. {36} Document Quality/Format: Yes N/A D D If procedure renumbers, adds, or removes steps or enclosures, verify all references to all steps are correct. D D Ensure correct procedure number on all pages throughout the procedure. D D Ensure all pages print and are legible. D D Ensure all unit designators match unit procedure was intended to address.
* "Error Find" macro shall be run to help detect unit designator errors.
D D Replace "Duke Power Company" with "Duke Energy". (Not required for changes) {40} D D If procedure is excluded from 10 CFR 50.59 process, ensure this is stated on cover page of procedure. D D If PT, delete requirements for recording "Calibration Due Dates" or "Calibration Dates" if present. D D If procedure has steps for routing completed copies to others (i.e., Engineering), evaluate deletion of this guidance. Document uali /Format For New Procedure Or Ma'or Revision/Chan e I N/A D D Review all procedures/enclosures for proper use of "Reference Use" and "Information Use" classifications. D D Add "Ensure/Verify" step to ensure completion of step as appropriate for all "Notify/Begin" steps. D D Ensure Initial Conditions format/content comply with OMP 1-09 Attachment S. {39} D D Ensure Note and Caution steps do not contain direct or implied actions. D D Ensure L&Ps that apply to specific procedure steps are also identified in procedure at appropriate action step(s). D D Ensure Rl/R2/R3 designations applied as required to R.M.-related enclosures per OMP 1-09 Attach. 'P', Section 3. {38} D D Ensure checklists with two signoffcolumns having "IV" or "DY" designation replaced with "CV". {41} D D If this is a temporary procedure (TO or TT), a step has been included in procedure for NEDL closeout. Technical Accuracy: Yes N/A D D Reason and purpose ofrevision has been QV&V'd. D D Ensure Reactivity Management related procedure steps identified per OMP 1-09. {29} D D Ensure similar changes made throughout procedure by performing a WORD search. {23} D D If position/condition of plant equipment is changed, ensure it is either repositioned by this procedure, positioned as required for the plant conditions for which the procedure is written, or other procedures support the as-left position. { l} D D If revision/change adds, deletes, or changes valve positions, perform OFD flow path verification to ensure: {22}
- Flow path is correct (either valves in flow path are listed or ISYS check verifies normal position is required position for flow path).
- Flow path is isolated from other systems/lines as required (either flow path boundary valves are listed or ISYS check verifies normal position is the required position for flow path boundary valves).
D D If as-left component positions are changed, an ISYS search shall be performed to identify other affected procedures.
- Ensure appropriate PCRs are written.
- Other affected procedures must be revised or placed on Tech Hold prior to issuing this revision.
-o D If revision/change affects tagout boundaries, indicate "Additional Review" required by OWPG on cover sheet. {44}
Jo D If revision/change adds any equipment, location and name should match EDB.
- IfEDB information does not match equipment label, take actions to re-label or have EDB changed to match label.
D D If revision makes a step conditional, verify remaining steps have no adverse interactions if step is NOT completed. {42}
Page 2of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Preparer continued: ~Technical Accuracy: }\res NIA D D If surveillance PT, ensure a signoffstep in the procedure clearly documents evaluation of the acceptance criteria. (NSD-703, Appendix G) Proposed Cross-Disciplinary/Additional Reviews: Yes NIA D D Indicate any CDR/Additional Reviews required in "Qualified Reviewers" section of this form D D If review of hard copy is requested of Group outside Operations, fill out Procedure Review Request form with information such as Group responsible for review, sections/steps to review, and reason for review (if necessary). When Ready For Review: Yes NIA D Perform self check of revision. D D Review PDF version of procedure for:
- Instances of"Step O","Steps O", "Enclosure 0", "Section O" and "Error!"
- Enclosures that don't start with Step "1"
- Step numbering (duplicate step numbers, etc.)
- Wrong page numbering D D If interaction with AP/EP exists (see procedure Appendix), ensure CDR/Additional Reviews by AP/EP Group or OSM checked in "Qualified Reviewers" section of this form. {8}
D D Ensure all information on forms has correct procedure number, title, and Revision/Change number. D D Provide a comparison copy of old and new procedures to QR.
- A red marked copy of old and new revision or a computer-generated copy may be provided.
- This may be N/A'd for new procedures.
- If changes are so extensive that a comparison copy is unusable, notify QR to treat revision/change as a new procedure/enclosure.
For all Minor and Major changes/revisions, include Reactivity Management Review Form in revision package. ]§
- .::?.
" D If procedure requires validation, provide a copy of original procedure to Validators.
D Verify "Summary of Changes" covers .!!!!.changes and reasons for changes. D D If procedure is removed from HOLD, complete "Actions Taken For Restoration" section of Hold Form.
- Include signed Hold Form with procedure package.
D D If this change is needed on other units, ensure PCR(s) are written. D D If this change requires changes to other procedures, evaluate proper method for tracking/correcting other procedures. (PCRs written, other procedures to be issued at same time, affected procedures placed on Tech Hold) {43} D D If this change corrects an error, ensure error does not exist on other units or in other procedures on this unit.
- If error exists, place applicable procedures on Tech Hold and ensure PCR(s) are written.
D D If revision is considered High Risk, discuss Procedure Change Planning Sheet with QR. D D Determine if revision affects system/component operability or availability, based on following type changes: {48}
- Component or system not performing design function.
- Flow paths altered.
- Taking a component out of service.
- Adding or removing equipment to the system.
- Adding or removing contingency plans.
- Adding or removing TS or SLC entries.
D D If system/component operability or availability affected, check the "Yes" box in the "After Approval - Preparer" section of this appendix and perform the following: {48}
- Determine when procedure scheduled or needed and record:
- Based on date needed, notify Ops Matrix Group as follows:
D Send email to Ops Matrix Group with "Summary of Changes" attached and the pertinent changes marked. D If changes needed right away and during normal work times, follow up email with a call to Ops Matrix Group to inform them of possible emergent changes. D If changes needed right away and it is nights or weekends, call STA or WCC SRO to inform them of possible ) emergent changes. D If STA or WCC SRO notified, provide them a copy of marked "Summary of Changes".
Page 3of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Preparer continued: "")When Ready For Review:
}Yes NIA D D If the following applies, initiate an Action Tracking Request Form to provide for updating Passport and Station Surveillance Table: {17}
- New PT or deleting a PT
- OP needs to be scheduled in Passport or existing Work Order changed
- PT revision/major change adds/removes task assigned to another group
- PT revision/major change moves testing of a component from one procedure to another procedure
- PT revision/major change might affect accuracy of Station Surveillance Table information (procedure number, procedure title, SR number, frequency, mode of applicability).
D D If this revision/change contains activities not previously performed and is a "rush" revision, notify Ops Training Coordinator to evaluate whether Operator training is required.
- This should be considered a "High Risk" revision.
D Ensure independence between Preparer and QR by choosing a QR who did NOT have input to preparation of procedure revision/change. ) '
Page 4of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Qualified Reviewers: -)NOTE: Review per requirements ofNSD-110 and NSD-703. Reviews should QV&V all revised information; do NOT assume the Preparer's work is correct. Additional items below focus on the most likely errors. Scope of Review: Yes NIA D D If new procedure or major revision/change, ensure Applicability Determination form complete and accurate. (NSD-228 and NSD-703) D D If new procedure, perform a detailed line by line review of entire procedure. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If procedure revision/change, perform a detailed line by line review of all information that was changed. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D Verify independence between Preparer and QR maintained. Document Qualitv/Format: Yes NIA D D Review remaining parts of the procedure not revised or changed for the following obvious issues: (NSD-703)
- No missing procedure steps or pages.
- No obvious formatting problems created by the revision.
- No inappropriate page breaks.
- Notes and Cautions on same page with applicable step.
- No misnumbering of steps.
- Revision appropriately incorporated into all affected parts of procedure. {23}
Document Quality/Format For New Procedure Or Major Revision/Change Yes NIA D D Ensure level ofuse appropriate for task. (Continuous, Reference, or Information) (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure Independent or Concurrent Verifications are located at appropriate steps and match requirements of NSD-700 . (NSD-703, Appendix G) ) D D Ensure Notes and Cautions contain no direct or implied actions. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure steps that reference other steps or procedures are correct. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure unit designators are correct, component names and numbers are consistent throughout the procedure, and consistent with design information (drawings, labels, etc.). (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure level of detail matches requirements necessary to satisfy safety classification of procedure (e.g., 'A' or 'B' procedure classification). (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure referenced or branched steps will appropriately complete the desired task. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D When procedure branches to another procedure, either verify all Limits & Precautions and prerequisites apply or verify applicable Limits & Precautions and prerequisites are identified. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D When procedure branches to another procedure, verify procedure gets into the other procedure and back out appropriately. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure calculations work and input variables are in units required to complete calculations. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure criteria are in the same units as the information requires or a conversion is documented. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- Examples of criteria: Acceptance criteria, data recorded (flows, pressures, etc.)
D D Ensure commitments are appropriately identified. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure software applications which incorporate or used to support portion(s) of this procedure are identified. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- Examples of software applications: Electronic logs, automatic calculation software, etc.
D D Ensure risk to personnel or equipment is appropriately covered by Cautions. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure purpose is clearly stated. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure scope of procedure is adequate to complete described tasks and/or test methods. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure has the appropriate flexibility to perform sections, but is not vague in when they can be performed. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure provides for appropriate interaction between site groups. (NSD-703, Appendix G) )
Page 5of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Qualified Reviewers continued: -""rrechnical Accuracy: _./Yes NIA D 0 If revision/change adds any equipment, location and name should match EDB. D D Ensure isolation and restoration are described in accordance with NSD-500 criteria. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D 0 Ensure entry and exit from Tech Specs/action statements and SLCs are clearly described. (NSD-703, Appendix G) Technical Accuracv For New Procedure Or Major Revision/Change Yes N/A D D Ensure intent of procedure is clear. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure can be safely accomplished in the sequence written. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure complies with current Design Basis Documents, Tech Specs, UFSAR, SLCs, NSDs, Site Directives, etc. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If position/condition of plant equipment is changed, ensure it is either repositioned by this procedure, positioned as required for plant conditions for which procedure is written, or other procedures support as-left position. { 1} (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If revision/change adds, deletes, or changes valve positions, perform OFD flow path verification to ensure: {22}
- Flow path is correct (either valves in flow path are listed or ISYS check verifies normal position is the required position for flow path).
- Flow path is isolated from other systems/lines as required (either flow path boundary valves are listed or ISYS check verifies normal position is the required position for flow path boundary valves).
D 0 Ensure appropriate modes and conditions required prior to proceeding with the procedure are identified. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure procedure does not adversely affect other procedures or basis documents. (NSD-703, Appendix G) New PT Or Major PT Revision/Change
- -,_Yes N/A
_)D D Ensure all expected alarms are identified and unnecessary alarms are eliminated. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- Consideration is given to alarms on other units for shared systems.
D D Ensure correct Tech Spec for task described is clearly addressed in the procedure. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure description of acceptance criteria is correct. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure all safety limits, setpoints, equations, operability limits and acceptance criteria are within those listed in the Tech Specs, SAR or other licensing documents. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure acceptance criteria are in the form of specific pass-fail criteria, if possible. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D 0 Ensure a signoff step in the procedure clearly documents evaluation of the acceptance criteria. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If acceptance criteria, commitments, formulas, graphs, figures or calculations are changed/added, ensure the sources are listed as references. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D Ensure clear documentation of values for acceptability/unacceptability oftest results are provided. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D 0 Ensure test method ensures that redundant independent safety train functions are verified separately. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If the following applies, ensure an Action Tracking Request Form included in change package: (provides for updating Passport and Station Surveillance Table): (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- New PT or deleting a PT
- PT revision/major change adds or removes task assigned to another group
- PT revision/major change moves testing of a component from one procedure to another procedure
- PT revision/major change might affect accuracy of Station Surveillance Table information (procedure number, procedure title, SR number, frequency, mode of applicability)
)
Page 6of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. Qualified Reviewers continued: )cross-Disciplinarv/Additional Review Determination:
- NOTE: Yes"/"N/A" blocks completed by procedure preparer. QR is responsible for ensuring CD Rs are identified as required.
Yes NIA QR Concurrence D D D If revision/change adds or changes system setpoints, operating lineups, acceptance criteria, or parameter values such as temperature, pressure or flow, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed. D D D If revision/change alters as-left position of any instrument root valve or adds any new instruments, a cross review by Maintenance Group shall be performed. {13} D D D If revision/change involves filling/draining water/steam into/from a portion of a system that could cause water hammer concern, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed. D D D If revision/change involves primary system activities such as component flushes, returning idle components to service, or placing flow through stagnant systems, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed. {19} D D D If revision/change requires actions by Groups outside of Operations, a crew-level miscellaneous review by the affected Group shall be performed. {28} D D D If revision/change was requested by Group outside of Operations, a cross review by the requesting Group shall be performed. {47} D D D If revision/change alters normal position of any SQUG-related valve, a cross review by Engineering Group shall be performed.
- SQUG-related valve: "SQUG SSEL" is "YES" under "Attrb" block on D030 screen for component in EDB.
D 0 0 If revision/change affects AP/EP interaction (as determined from review of Appendix), indicate CDR/Additional Review required by AP/EP group or OSM. {8} New PT Or Major PT Revision/Change NOTE: Yes"/"N/A" blocks completed by procedure preparer. QR is responsible for ensuring CDRs are identified as required .
. Yes NIA QR
) Concurrence 0 0 0 If revision/change adds or removes components that require testing or test method is being changed, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure test method satisfies intent of surveillance requirement. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D D If revision/change is to a valve stroke test which adds or deletes valves, alters direction a valve is currently being stroked tested, or adds a manual stroke to a power operated valve, a review by IST Engineer shall be performed. D D D IfQA Condition 1-5 structures, systems, or components are in a configuration different from that shown in an approved design document (e.g., lifting leads or placing jumpers), QA must have the opportunity to review. D D D If instrumentation is changed/added, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure range of instruments used to measure acceptance criteria meet requirements (e.g. ASME Section XI In-Service Testing). (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D D If portable measuring and test equipment instrumentation are changed/added, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure instrumentation used to record surveillance data is included in station's measuring and test equipment calibration program in accordance with NSD-406. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- D 0 D If permanently installed measuring and test equipment are changed/added, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure equipment is included in station's PM program and periodically calibrated in accordance with NSD-406. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
D D D If acceptance criteria is new or changed, a cross review by Engineering shall be performed to ensure acceptance criteria are in same units as specification requires or a conversion is documented. (NSD-703, Appendix G) Procedure Process Record /Change Form Sign-Offs: Yes NIA D Perform Reactivity Management review per NSD-304. (NSD-703, Appendix G) D D If new procedure or major revision/change, determine if Management Involvement required per NSD-213 for infrequently performed tests and evolutions. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
- If Ops Superintendent review is NOT required, initial NIA blank on PPR/Change Form.
) :; 0 Indicate any reviews required or NI A on Procedure Process Record (PPR)/Change Form. (NSD-703, Appendix G)
Page 7of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. PROCEDURE NUMBER: RP/O/Nl000/015B Revision No. 004 _ Change No._ )Preparer: Natalie Harness Date: 7/14/2015 PCRs Incorporated: _ Before Approval - Preparer: NIA D If major revision/change, perform ISYS search ofT&Q Guides to determine ifT&Q Guide changes required.
- Write PCRs for any affected T &Q Guides. {34}
D D If this revision contains activities not previously performed, contact Ops Training Coordinator to determine if Operator training is required prior to issue. Is training required? D Yes D No D D Ensure any training required prior to issuing procedure revision/change is complete as signified by signature of Ops Training Coordinator on "Additional Reviews" line on cover sheet. D D Ifrevision is upgraded to meet requirements of Procedure Upgrade Project, indicate "Yes" for OpsProcReports program to be updated in "Person Issuing Procedure" section of this form. D D If this change required changes to other procedures, ensure proper method for tracking/correcting other procedures has been followed. (PCRs written, other procedures to be issued at same time, affected procedures placed on Tech Hold) {43} D D If new procedure, identify Control Copy locations and field locations (if any) to Ops Support Clerk for updating of OPINDEX and NEDL. {27} D D If Action Tracking Request Form initiated, send completed copy to David Nix so an electronic Action Tracking Request Form can be created to update Passport/Station Surveillance Table. {17} D D If this revision is an Auto tour Electronic Procedure, verify revision number in Roundsmaker agrees with NEDL. {24} D D If procedure will remain on Tech Hold after revision, indicate "Yes" for Tech Hold in "Person Issuing Procedure" section of this form. D D If procedure will be removed from Tech Hold, attach removal sheet. D D If additional changes are made during the review process, ensure an independent review of changes is performed before submitting for final approval.
- QR must see any non editorial changes made during review.
)o For all changes/revisions, ensure Reactivity Management Review Form is completed. After Approval - Person Issuing Procedure: Yes NIA D D If procedure status (Deleted, Superseded) or field location is changed:
- Update OPINDEX record in OpsProcReports program.
- Update distribution location in NEDL Scribe.
- If procedure status changed, ensure new status noted on top right comer of PPR sheet. {27}
D D If "Yes" is checked, update OP INDEX record in OpsProcReports program with the following: insert approval date in "Upgrade Date" and revision number in "Upgrade Rev No". DYes. D D If "Yes" is checked, procedure will remain on Tech Hold. D Yes. D D If this is a change and not a revision, ensure the procedure is on Change Hold in NEDL. D D If this is a revision, ensure procedure is ISSUED in NEDL:
- Select "Modify Properties"
- Certified: Y
- Periodic Review Date: Insert date if Periodic Review form completed.
- Approved date: Insert date.
- V and V: Select "Y" ifV&V performed.
- Select "OK"
- Transition document to "ISSUED".
D D Issue revision or change per requirements ofOMP 1-09 (Administrative Control Of Operations Procedures). D D If procedure is Deleted or Superseded, remove and discard all associated Control and Information Copy folders. D D If this is a major revision/change, send Pre-Job Brief Coordinator and Asst. Outage Manager (AOM) a copy of "SummaryofChanges". {21} ).
Page 8of8 Procedure Revision Routing Sheet NOTE: Pages 1-6 are NOT mandatory for minor revision/changes. After Approval - Preparer: '\Yes NIA
../o D Verify all Change Requests listed in "Summary of Changes" are incorporated in this revision and clear these PCRs. {14}
D D Close out any PIPs associated with this change. D D If this is a revision or change to a valve stroke test which changes the IST Program, notify IST Engineer that procedure is issued. D D If this revision adds/removes plant equipment, revises equipment labels, or changes tagging requirements, send notification of changes made to Ops Tagout Team. D D IfWO placed on Procedure Hold in Passport and Rev/Chg removes the Hold, contact David Nix to update Passport. D D If "Yes" is checked, send Ops Matrix Group an email notifying them procedure is issued. D Yes D D If procedure revision incorporates changes that may be considered workarounds, send email to Operator Workaround Coordinator with "Summary of Changes" attached and the pertinent changes marked. {50} D D If this revision or change adds/deletes valves in the valve stroke test Refueling Frequency enclosure, notify Work Control to update Work Order. Retention requirements do not apply to this form. When the procedure is approved, this form may be discarded. From OMP 1-09; also stored in OP/PT on-line revision package
Fonn 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (ROS-10) RP/O/ N l 000/0158 Duke Energy (I) ID No. ~ PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 003 _ y Page 2of5 PREPARATION (2) Station OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title Offsite Communications fro (4) 3/18/2015 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? 1:8] Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) - Attach N D 22 cumentation. 0 No (Revision with minor changes) (6) Reviewed By*~=~---~=---=-/l..i...:...*___..~~*:::....:../_*-+~r-..s:+-a.:::~,,c._*=~' Date ~ -f 8'-/S-Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ NA~ate $'---t;l-!'5 Reactivity Mgmt Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR) NA~te .s ~:g *-/.S: Mgmt Involvement Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Ops. Supt.) N~ate >-;J-rS (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* ------------::;:ooo......:------------ Date Reviewed By* r\---:-r-;;::-:;---f----;~~::::::::::~ff-t~~ ~~- Date 1
- ~~) Approved By* Date sjit {l[
)ERFORl\'IANCE (Compare with control copy every (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date
( 10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number (WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit O* D Unit l D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes D NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date ( 12) Procedure Completion A p p r o v e d - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date ( 13) Remarks (Attach aclclitiona/ pages, if necessary)
) '
- Printed Name and Signature
Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 04123120 I 2 The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in information you want to appear on the various
~rms needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in
"-1nformation on this form, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perfonn Step 3 below. Step 1- press [FI2] (Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing. I. lD No.: RP/O/A/1000/0158
- 2. Revision No.: 003 _
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center
- 5. For changes only, enter procedu
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness
- 7. Preparation Date: 3/ 18/2015
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision:
- ,Step 3- go to Print Prev~ew to update this information~~ all t~e attach~d documents .
.:Atep 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional mformatlon needed.
Step 5- when all infonnation is entered, print package and review for correctness. Th jl
RP/O/NI000/0158 Revision 003 _ Change No._ Page 2of7 J Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center SUM.MARY OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Selective Signaling System has been replaced with DEMNET in support of a Duke Energy tleetwide initiative and is overall enhancement for offsite notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. See attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEMNET
- DEl'v1NET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact information into Enclosure 4. 7
- Revised Enclosure 4.7, to reference new DEMNET system and not Selective Signaling
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEMNET Notification Form Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET system.
- Added PIP 0-13-13560 regarding radio upgrade PCR Numbers Incorporated
'
. .
Enclosure )
[Type text] APPENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Rev. 10) Page I of2 PART 1- ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION J~. ___D_U_K-.E-E_N_E_R_G_Y_C_,-\R_O_L_l_N_A_S_,_L_L_C_S_IT-E----r--------------U-N-IT_(_S_)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- i
- f-----------------------+-------------------------------i
[81 Oconee D McGuire D Catawba [81 Unit I [81 Unit 2 [81 Unit 3 ACTIVITY TITLEJOOCU:\IENTIREVISION: RP/O/A/1000/0158, Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center, Rev 003 PART II - PROCESS REVIEW For each activity, address all of the questions below. If the answer Is "YES" for any portion of the activity, apply the Iden titled process( es) to that portion of the activity. Note: It Is not unusual to have more than one process aoolv to a elven actlvitv. Will implementation of the above activity require a change to the:
- l. TL-chnical Specifications (TS) or 0 If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227.
Operating License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? [8J 0 If YES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
NO YES
- 3. Security Plans? [8J 0 If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
NO YES (See Appe~dix H)
- 4. Emergency Plan? 0 [8J lfYES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual.
NO YES
- 5. lnscrvice Testing Program Plan? [8J 0 If YES, process per site IST Program for ASME code compliance and NO YES related facility changes.
- 6. Inservice Inspection Program Plan? [8J 0 IfYES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping lnservice Inspection NO YES FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes.
- ,, Fire Protection Program Plan? 0 If YES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320 .
-.. NO YES 7a -Utilize Appendix E to address Fire Jl( Check to confirm use of Appendix E Screening Questions. Protection Program Plan Impact.
- 8. Regulatory Commitments? [8J 0 lfYES, process per NSD 214.
NO YES
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? 0 If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
NO YES
- 10. Programs and manuals listed in the 0 If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
Administrative Section of the TS? NO YES
)
[Type text] Page 2 of 2 PART Illa - 10 CFR 72.-t8 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address the question below. If the answer to question 11 is "YES," and questions 1-t and 17 are answered "NO", then process the activity per NSD 211- 10 CFR 72.-t8 does apply.
- 11. Docs the activity involve SSCs. procedures or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the l'8J D YES loading or transport of the canister/cask to the iSFSI, the ISFSI facility. spent fuel cask design? NO PART lllb - 10 CFR 50.59 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address all of the questions below. If the answer to question 18 ls "YES," then 10 CFR 50.59 does not apply. lflhe answer to questions 18 Is "NO," then process lhe activity per NSD 209 - 10 CFR 50.59 applies.
- 12. Docs the activity involve a proct.'tiure, governed by NSD 703 that has been excluded ti-om the 10 CFR l'8J D YES 50.59 process per NSD 703 and the exclusion sratus remains valid? NO
- 13. Dot.'S the activity involve an administrative procedure governed by NSD I 00 or AD*DC-ALL-020 I that l'8J DYES docs not contain infonnalion regarding the operation and control of Structures, Systems and NO Components?
- 14. Does the activity involve a type of Engineering Change that NSD 301 excludes ti-om the 10 CFR 50.59 l'8J D YES and/or I0 CFR 72.48 Processes'! Consult NSD 301 for assistance. NO
- 15. Does the activity involve (a) maintenance activities that restore SSCs to their as-designed condition l'8J D YES (including activities that implement approved design changes) or (b) temporary alterations supporting NO maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
- 16. Does the activity involve a UFSAR modification that NSD 220 excludes ti-om the I 0 CFR 50.59 Process? l'8J D YES
";) Consult NSD 220 for assistance. NO
_;I
- 17. Does the activity involve NRC and/or Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC approved changes to the licensing l'8J D YES basis? NO
- 18. Are ALL aspects of the activity bounded by one or more YES" answers to questions I through 17, D l'8J YES above? NO PART IV - UFSAR REVIEW Does the activity require a modification, deletion, or addition to the UFSAR to satisfy the UFSAR content l'8J DYES 9 rl-quiremcnts of I0 CFR 50.34 (b), I0 CFR 50:71 (e), or Regulatory Guide (RG) I. 70? Consult NSD 220 for NO Assistance.
IF YES, process per NSD 220. (Print (Sign) Name) Applicability Determination Preparer
)
VERIFY HARD COPY AGAINST WEB SITE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO EACH USE Nuclear Policy Manual- Volume 2 NSD 228 .)
., '
APPENDIX E. FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM SCREENING The following screening questions are used to assist the Applicability Determination preparer to answer PART II - PROCESS REVIEW question number 7 *
.\ ~ves" answer to any of the screening questions would indicate the Fire Protection Program Licensing Basis may be affected. and Question# 7 on the Applicability Determination form (Appendix C) should be checked "Yes" and a review in accordance with NSD 320 is required.
PART,\ New proct.'tlure or a major procedure change FPP Licensing Applicability impact screening: NOTE: IF the procedure change is a result of a Plant Modification or Engineering Change that has previously bl"Cn evaluated for impact to the FPP, thl"ll QUl'Stion #7 should be checked "No". Yc-s No Al. E ~ Doc-s the proposed activity change any plant responses, operator responses or emt.Tgency lighting associated with Post Fire Safe Shutdown (PFSS) response procedures? A2. E @ Does the proposed activity add, remove or revise any lire protection features as described in the UFSAR or S LCs from any performance test procedures"! A3. E @ Dol'S the proposed activity add, remove or revise any procedures related to lire protection ft."l!tures as dt.-scribed in the UFSAR or SLCs? A4. E @ Does the proposed activity add, remove or revise any performance test Acceptance Criteria for any lire protl'Ction features as described in the UFSAR or SLCs? PARTB Plant Modification/Engineering Change FPP Licensing Basis impact screening: Does the proposed activity impact ..... .'! BI. E @ Any fire rated assemblies/boundaries (walls, floors, ceilings, etc.), including lire doors, fire dampers, pem:tration sc-.ils, fire rated wraps, radiant energy heat shields, structural fireproofing, t:tc. as described the UFSAR or SLCs?
@ ) '
B2. E Any water based fixed fire suppression systems (including water supply llow paths and main lire pumps) as described in UFSAR or SLCs? B3. E @ Any gaseous fire suppression systems (C02, Halon) as described in the UFSAR or SLCs? B4. E @ Any manual fire fighting equipment such as hose stations and fire hydrants as described in the UFSAR or SLCs? BS. E @ Any portable fire extinguishers located in salety-related and/or safe shutdown areas of thcplant or power block? B6. E @ Any fire detection systems as described in the UFSAR or SLCs? B7. E @ Any water and/or combustible fluid containment devices such as curbs, dikes, drains, lire protection system spray shields, etc. located in safety-rclak-d and/or safe shutdown areas? BS. E @ Any administrative control documents for the Fire Protection Program such as NSD 313 (Control of Combustible/Flammable Materials), NSD 314 (Hot Work Authorization), and NSD 316 (Fire Protection Impairment)? B9. E @ Any fire brigade equipment, Including communication equipment or fire brigade administrative controls as outlined in NSD 112 (Fire Brigade Organization, Training, and Responsibilities)"? BIO. E 51 ll1e Reactor Coolant Pump Lube Oil Collection System? Bl I. E @ ll1e Fire Safety/Hazards Analysis as documented in the plant level Design Basis Document for Fire Protection (CNS-1465.00-00.0006, MCS-1465.00-00-0008, OSS-0254.00-00-4008)'? Bl2. E @ Any PFSS/Nuclear Safety Capablllty Assessment/Non-Power Operations equipment, emergency lighting, commnuclatlons, circuits, and/or cable routes as described in the site PFSS DBD and associated analysis (CNS-1435.00-00.0002, MCS-1465.00-00-0022, OSS-0254.00-00-4008)? Bl3. E @ Combustible/Flammable Material or an Ignition Source? Bl4. E @ Any Site Fire Brigade Response Strategies as described in the Emergency Plan and Fire Protection Planning guide? BIS. E 51 Any plant radiation control boundaries? 816. E 51 Any HV AC llow changes include air intakele~haust changes in radialion control areas"?
) .
REVISION 10 VERIFY HARD COPY AGAINST WEB SITE L\li\IEDIATELY PRIOR TO EACH USE
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (ROS-10) Duke Energy PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD
~
y (l) ID No. RP/O/A/1000/015B Revision No. 003 _ Change No. Pennanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Enclosures 4.1-4.4.7, 4.9, 4.12, 4.13 & 4.14 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? [8J Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. D No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) (7) Reason for Change: Selective Signaling System has been replaced with DEMNET in support of a Duke Energy tleetwide initiative and is an overall enhancement for offsite notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with l 0 CFR 50.47(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. See attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEMNET
- DEMNET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact infonnation into Enclosure 4. 7
- Revised Enclosure 4.7, to reference new DEMNET system and not Selective Signaling
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEMNET Notification Fonn Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET system.
- Added PIP 0- 13-13560 regarding radio upgrade (8) Prepared By* Natalie Harness (Signature) ~U#~~L'.t:W-~U~d::::::::: Date 3/18/2015 (9) Reviewed By* 'LJ,. v'A-&--> /f, (}~ Date $'7g -/$"
Cross-Disciplinary Review By* - - - - - - - - - (QR)(KI) NA ~IC- Date S -,f{ - / ( Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA~Date ~ ~f"'-/f; Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) NA~ Date ~ -Tf( - /.S ( l 0) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* Date
~------------------------ ------
Reviewed By* Date ----:--- ) (11) Approved By* Date r;/u /t \-
- Printed Name and Signature
3.10 IOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/ Al 1000/015 B, Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center, Rev 003 Sdective Signaling System has been replaced with DEMNET in support of a Duke Energy t1eetwide initiative and is an overall enhancement for offsite notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. See attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEl'vINET
- DEMNET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact information into Enclosure 4. 7
- Revised Enclosure 4.7, to reference new DE!'iINET system and not Selective Signaling
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEMNET Notification Form Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET system.
- Added PIP 0-13-13560 regarding radio upgrade C8J The activity ~ a change to the emergency plan D The activity g; not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: I .* . B~Q~~~;% Change Type:
0 The change~ editorial or typographical D The change does conform to an activity that has prior C8J The change is not editorial or typographical approval (g] The change does not conform to an activity that has prior
- } approval Planning Standard Impact Determination:
0 §50.47(b)(l)-Assigrunent of Responsibility (Organization Control) 0 §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization 0 §50.47(b)(3) - Emergency Response Support and Resources 0 §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System* C8J §50.47(b)(5)- Notification Methods and Procedures* 0 §50.47(b)(6)- Emergency Communications 0 §50.47(b)(7) - Public Education and Information 0 §50.47(b)(8) - Emergency Facility and Equipment 0 §50.47(b)(9)- Accident Assessment* 0 §50.47(b)(IO)- Protective Response* 0 §50.47(b)(l l)- Radiological Exposure Control 0 §50.47(b)(l2)- Medical and Public Health Support 0 §50.47(b)(l3)- Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 0 §50.47(b)(l4)- Drills and Exercises 0 §50.47(b)(l5)- Emergency Responder Training 0 §50.47(b)(l6)- Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards 0 The proposed activity does not impact a Planning Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
0 The activity docs involve a site specific EP commitment
)J The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment
Results:
- BLOCK7*' . .*.
D The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation [8J The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation ~-;~par~;N~;~~------------***-***- ---------- Date:
- (f.iatalie Harness 3/ 18/ 15 Reviewer Name
Don Crowl Revision 12
3.10 IOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional .Area Manual Attachment 3.10. 7.3 -'\ §50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form
~jActivity Description and
References:
RP/O/A/l000/015A, Offsite Communications from the Control Room, Rev 004 Selective Signaling System has been replaced with DEl\.lNET in support of a Duke Energy fleetwide initiative and is an overall enhancement for offsite notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. See attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEl\.lNET
- DEMNET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact infonnation into Enclosure 4. 7
- Revised Enclosure 4.7, to reference new DEMNET system and not Selective Signaling
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEMNET Notification Form Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET system.
- Added PIP 0-13-13560 regarding radio upgrade Activity Type: . c:~g!j~{ti!.PAQ(:;~j~~~k\~5$;,;
[8J The activity~ a change to the emergency plan D The activity affects implementation of the emergenc.y plan, but is not a change to the emergenc.y plan Impact and Licensing Basis Determination: Licensing Basis:
- lOCFRS0.47 (b)(5): Proce<lurL"S have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has bL-en established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established.
- I OCFRS0.47 (b)( 16): Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.
- lOCFRSO Appendix E, D. Notification Procedures:
I. Administrative and physical means for notifying local, State, and Federal officials and agencies and agreements reachL-d with these otlicials and agencies for the prompt notification of the public and for public evacuation or other protective measures, should they become nL'CL>ssary, shall be described. This description shall include identification of the appropriate otlicials, by title and agency, of the State and local government agencies within the EPZs.
- 2. Provisions shall be described for yearly dissemination to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ of basic emergency planning information, such as the methods and times required for public notification and the protective actions planned if an accident occurs, general information as to the nature and effects of radiation. and a listing of local broadcast stations that will be used for dissemination of information during an emergency. Signs or other measures shall also be used to disseminate to any transient population within the plume exposure pathway EPZ appropriate information that would be helpful if an accident occurs.
- 3. A liccnsL"C shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local govLT11mental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an em1..Tgency. The licensee shall demonstrate that the appropriate governmental authorities have the capability to make a public alerting and notification decision promptly on being informed by the licensee of an emergency condition. Prior to initial operation grL-ater than 5 p1..-rcent of rated thLTITial power of the first reactor at a site, each nuclL"UI' power reactor licensee shall demonstrate that administrative and physical means have bL-en established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ. The design objective of the prompt public alert and notification system shall be to have the capability to essentially complete the initial alerting and initiate notification of the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ within about 15 minutes. lne use of this alerting and notification capability will range !Tom immL"liiate alL>rting and notification of the public (within 15 minutes of the time that State and local otlicials are notified that a situation exists requiring urgent action) to the more likely events whLTC there is substantial time available for the appropriate governmental authorities to make a judgment whether or not to activate the public alert and notification system. The alerting and notification capability shall additionally include administrative and physical means for a backup method of public akrting and notification capable of being usL-d in the event the primary method of alerting and notification is unavailable during an c..'111LTgency to alert or notify all or portions of the plume exposure pathway EPZ population. The backup method shall have the capability to alert and notify the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ, but does not net.-d to mL-ct the 15-minute (IL-sign obj1..-ctive for the primary prompt public alert and notification system. When there is a decision to activate the alert and notification systL"ITI, the :1ppropriate governmental authoritic..-s will determine whcthLT to activate the entire a.lert and notification system simultaneously or in a graduated or stagL-d mannL'T. The rL"Sponsibility for activating such a public alert and notification systL'111 shall n:main with the appropriate governmental authorities.
- NUREG-0654, Section II. Planning Standards and Evaluation Criteria, o E. Notification Methods and Procedures, Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established.
P. Responsibility for the Planning Effort: Development, Periodic Review and Distribution of the Emergency Plans, Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained. ONS Emergency Plan
- ONS E Plan Section E.3 & E.4, Initial and Follow-up i\lessage Formats, A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility. Notification and authentication procedures are in place for all designated agencies.
- ONS E Plan Section P, Responsibility for the Planning Effort: Development, Periodic Review and Distribution of the Emergency Plans, P. 7, Implementing Procedures Written procedures will be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities associated with emergency plan implementation. Each procedure and changes thereto, shall be approved by the responsible manager prior to implementation. Implementing procedures are indexed and cross referenced to the section applicable in NUREG 0654. (Figure P-1)
Compliance Evaluation and
Conclusion:
These functions continue to be provide timeliness as the Emergency Notification Form (ENF) must be transmitted within 15 minutes to state/local agencies. There has been no change in the timing ( 15 minute requirement) since the proposed revision continues to ensure that the Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center (TSC) to support the emergency plan is provided and maintained. The replacement of the Selective Signaling system to the Duke Emergency Management Network is a change in the notification I commination device and does not reduce effectiveness. Therefore all regulations and commitments continue to be met. y~
Reduction in Effectiveness (RIE) Evaluation and
Conclusion:
. BLOCKS*::
Evaluation: As can be seen by the above, compliance with regulations is assured.
) e functions of IOCFR50.47b(5) per RG 1.219 are:
Three emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the three is impacted: ( 1) Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. This f11nctio11 was maintained by ens11ring notifications can be conducted through DEA/NET which replaced Selective Signaling. The functions of I OCFR50.47b(16) per RG 1.219 are: Two emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the two is impacted:: (I) Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. Thisf11nctio11 was maintained by ensuring notijlcations can be conducted thro11gh DE1\INETwhich replaced Selective Signaling. Therefore the proposed changes continue to ensure compliance with the reg11lations and tire ONS Emergency Plan. The proposed changes are being made for the reasons as listed below: Selective Signaling System has been replaced with DEMNET in support of a Duke Energy tleetwide initiative and is an overall enhancement for offsite notifications during an emergency. This change continues to comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standards and NRC requirements, as described in I 0 CFR 50, Appendix E. See attached change matrix.
- Minor typographical and spelling errors corrected
- Selective Signaling replaced by DEMNET
- DEMNET procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406 references
- Added Alternate State of South Carolina Warning Point contact information into Enclosure 4. 7
- Revised Enclosure 4.7, to reference new DElVINET system and not Selective Signaling
- Revised Enclosure 4.9, to reference new radio instructions Motorola 48.5Mhz from obsolete radio console (PIP 0-13-13560)
- Added Enclosure 4.14, DEMNET Notification Form Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET system .
. ?1. __ 1 A_d_d_ed_P_IP_0_-1_3_-1_3_5_60_re.....__-""-_ _........._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- t
Conclusion:
The change in RP/O/A/1000/0158 associated with the replacement of the Selective Signaling system to the Duke Emergency Management Network is a change in the notification I communication device and does not reduce effectiveness. The system review was conducted and documented in the 50.54q review for AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management Network. D does I [8] does not constitute a RIE. Effectiveness Evaluation Results .-:;)si"t:¥lJ!~0-(:!¢6f;~~~;f0~JW.'.* [8] The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior approval. D The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior approval.
~---------**-------*
Preparer Name: Date: Natalie Harness 3/18/15
!---------------~
Reviewer Name: Date: Don Crowl S-/g*t'S
-------
Approver Name: Date: Pat Street '5UL,\ Revision 12 . ) .
.
RP/O/ All 00010158 Revision 003 _ Change No. _ Page 3of7 Attachment to 50.54q RP/O/A/1000/0158, Rev 003, Offsite Communications from the Technical Supoort Center
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section I. Page 7 of7 4.14 References 4.14 DEl\.INET Notification Fonn Quick Added reference to
- 4. Enclosures Reference new Enclosure 4.14, 4.15 References DEMNET Notification Form Quick Reference which includes instructions to operate the DEMNET system (renumbered bullets)
- 2. Enclosure 4.1 The initial notification is required to
- The initial notification is Added this Page 1 ofJ be made within 15 minutes from the required to be made within 15 statement to Note official declaration time on Line 10. minutes from the official reference DEMNET declaration time on Line 10. fleet procedure
- DEMNET instructions are guidelines and located in Fleet procedure bulleted both AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management
- 3. Enclosure 4.2 . The initial notification is required . Network (DEMNET).
The initial notification is required to Added this Pagel ofJ to be made within 15 minutes be made within 15 minutes from the statement to ~ _jJ Note
.
from the otlicial declaration time on Line 10. . otlicial declaration time on Line 10. Pre-printed Emergency Notification reference D EMNET fleet procedure Pre-printed Emergency fonns containing specific EAL guidelines and Notification fonns containing number and EAL description may be bulleted all 3, specific EAL number and EAL used in lieu of Enclosure 4.2.A or removed space description may be used in lieu of Enclosure 4.2.A or WebEOC. . WebEOC. DEMNET instructions are located in between bulleted items Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management Network (DEl\tlNET).
- 4. Enclosure 4.2 Enter Message Number (very first Enter Message Number (very first Editorial: correct the Page 1 ofJ message is # 1 and then sequential message is # l and then sequential alignment Line l numbering required until numbering required until event event terminated). terminated).
- 5. Enclosure 4.2 Mark/verify "initial" notification. Mark/verify "initial" notification. Time, Editorial: correct the Pagel ofJ Time, date, and authentication date, and authentication completed after alignment Line2 completed after line 17. line 17.
- 6. Enclosure 4.2 Verify with Operations Support which Verify with Operations Support which Editorial: correct the Page 1 ofJ EAL# to use and enter the number on EAL# to use and enter the number on the alignment Line4 the form. form.
- 7. Enclosure 4.2 Enter Time in military units and Date Enter Time in military units and Date the Editorial: correct the Page 2 ofJ the Emergency Coordinator officially Emergency Coordinator o!licially alignment Line 10 declares a SITE AREA declares a SITE AREA EMERGENCY EMERGENCY EVENT. EVENT.
- 8. Enclosure 4.2 Mark affected unit(s) (reference line Mark affected unit(s) (reference line 11) Editorial: correct the
)' Page 2 ofJ Line 12
- 11) and enter percent power for each unit affected.
and enter percent power for each unit affected. alignment
RP IOI All 00010 15 B Revision 003 _ Change No._ Page 4of7 ) # Page
/Section Current Proposed Change Reason
- 9. Enclosure 4.2 Add any remarks as requested by the Add any remarks as requested by the Editorial: correct the Page 2 of 3 Emergency Coordinator. If there are Emergency Coordinator. If there are no alignment Line 13 no remarks write "None". remarks write "None".
If upgrade in classification occurs If upgrade in classification occurs prior to prior to transmitting the message then transmitting the message then include include "upgrade to "upgrade to follow" on this line. 10 Enclosure 4.3 . follow" on this line. The initial notification is required . The initial notification is required to Added this Page 1 of2 to be made within 15 minutes be made within 15 minutes from the statement to reference DEMNET Note from the official declaration time
. official declaration time on Line 10.
. on Line 10.
Pre-printed Emergency Pre-printed Emergency Notification forms containing specific EAL fleet procedure guidelines and Notification forms containing number and EAL description may be bulleted all 3, specific EAL number and EAL used in lieu of Enclosure 4.3.A or removed space between bulleted description may be used in lieu of Enclosure 4.3.A or WebEOC. . WebEOC. DEMNET instructions are located in items Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, Duke Emergency Management 11 Enclosure 4.4 ( l) The initial notification is required . Network (DEMNET). The initial notification is required to Added this Pagel of2 to be made within 15 minutes from the be made within 15 minutes from the statement to Note official declaration time on Line 10. (2) The Emergency Coordinator can . official declaration time on Line I 0. DEMNET instructions are located in reference DEMNET fleet procedure terminate an Unusual Event on the Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, guidelines and ) same notification message sheet that Duke Emergency Management bulleted all 4, an Initial Unusual Event was declared on. . Network (DEMNET). The Emergency Coordinator can removed numbering and spaces between
- Pre-printed Emergency Notification terminate an Unusual Event on the bulleted items forms containing specific EAL number same notification message sheet that and EAL description may be used in an Initial Unusual Event was declared lieu of Enclosure 4.4.A or WebEOC.
. on.
Pre-printed Emergency Notification forms containing specific EAL number and EAL description may be used in lieu of Enclosure 4.4.A or WebEOC. )
RP/O/All 00010158 Revision 003 _ Change No. _ Page 5of7
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section 12 Enclosure 4.5 . Follow-up notifications are NOT . Follow-up notifications are NOT Added this Page I of2 required to be verbally required to be verbally transmitted. statement to Note transmitted. Follow-up Follow-up messages may be faxed reference DEMNET messages may be faxed with with phone verification of receipt. fleet procedure phone verification of receipt. This This applies only if the message does guidelines and applies only if the message does not involve a change in the bulleted all 5 and not involve a change in the classification or the Protective Action removed the spaces classification or the Protective Recommendation or a termination of between bulleted Action Recommendation or a termination of this . this Drill/Emergency.
Follow-up message is due 60 minutes items
. Drill/Emergency.
Follow-up message is due 60 from the notification time on line 2 of the previous message sheet, except minutes from the notification time on line 2 of the previous message . for an Unusual Event. A change in Protective Action sheet, except for an Unusual Recommendations (P ARs) is due
. Event.
A change in Protective Action within 15 minutes from the time they are determined by the TSC Recommendations (PARs) is due Emergency Coordinator/Dose within 15 minutes from the time they are determined by the TSC . Assessor. Pre-printed Emergency Notification Emergency Coordinator/Dose forms containing specific EAL
. Assessor.
Pre-printed Emergency number and EAL description may be used in lieu of Enclosure 4.5.A or ). Notification forms containing specific EAL number and EAL . WebEOC. DEMNET instructions are located in description may be used in lieu of Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, Enclosure 4.5.A or WebEOC. Duke Emergency Management Network (DEMNET). 13 Enclosure 4.5 Mark the same box. and copy the same Mark the same box. and copy the same Editorial: correct the Page 3 of 3 information from the previous information from the previous message alignment Line 14 message sheet. If changes have sheet. If changes have occurred, see TSC occurred, see TSC Dose Assessor for Dose Assessor for this information. this information. 14 Enclosure 4.5 Copy the same information from the Copy the same information from the Editorial: correct the Page 3 of3 previous message sheet. If changes previous message sheet. If changes have alignment Line 15 have occurred see TSC Dose occurred see TSC Dose Assessor for this Assessor for this information. information. 15 Enclosure 4.5 Copy the same information from the Copy the same information from the Editorial: correct the Page 3 of3 previous message sheet. If changes previous message sheet. If changes have alignment Line 16 have occurred see TSC Dose occurred see TSC Dose Assessor for this Assessor for this information. information. )
~-------
' "
RP/O/NI 000/0158 Revision 003 _ Change No._ Page 6 of7
) ' # Pa2e /Section Enclosure 4.6 Current Only required to complete lines l, 3, .
Proposed Chan2e Reason
- 16. Only required to complete lines l, 3, Added this Pagel of2 10, and 17. All other lines are left 10, and 17. All other lines are left statement to Note BLANK.
. BLANK.
DEl\INET instructions are located in reference DEMNET t1eet procedure Fleet procedure AD-EP-ALL-0406, guidelines and Duke Emergency Management bulleted both Network (DEMNET).
- 17. Enclosure 4.7 Dial *4 on selective signaling phone Select the orange oval group button for Added the new Page I of4 "ONS Notify" on the DEl\INET phone. DEMNET Box bullet 3 - instructions, replacing selective signaling
- 18. Enclosure 4. 7 Document on Line 2 of the ENF, the Document on Line 2 of the ENF, the Replacing selective Pagel of4 time/date when the first agency time/date when the first agency answers signaling with Box bullet 5 answers the Selective Signaling the DEMNET phone. DEMNET phone.
- 19. Enclosure 4. 7 Selective Signaling 416 Removed all Pagel of4 Selective Signaling 417 reference to Table Selective Signaling 410 Selective Signaling Selective Signaling 419 Selective Signaling 518
- 20. Enclosure 4.7 Alternate State of South Carolina Added the Alternate Pagel of4 Warning Point 803-896-9621 FAX: 803- State of South Contacts Table 896-8352 Carolina Warning
) - - Point contact info per PIP G-15-0323
- 21. Enclosure 4.7 THEN Dial the absent agency THEN Dial a point-to-point call to absent Instructions for use Page I of4 selective signaling number. (get agency. of DEMNET phone firstTHEN agency number from table in
- If agency does not answer, then call preceding step) direct line from table in proceeding table.
* [f agency does not answer, then go to next step.
- 22. Enclosure 4.7 South Carolina Warning Point South Carolina Warning Point (or added alternate Page 2 of4 Alternate) contact into listing Initial Notification
- 23. Enclosure 4. 7 South Carolina Warning Point South Carolina Warning Point (or added alternate Page 2 of4 Alternate) contact into listing Follow-up Notification
RP/O/Nl000/0158 Revision 003 _ Change No. _ Page 7of7
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 24. Enclosure 4.7 If one of the required agencies did not If one of the required agencies did not These calls are made Page 3 of4 answer selective signaling, try answer, try alternate method to reach by land lines not Bullet box 4 alternate method to reach agency. agency. Refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate selective signaling Refer to Enclosure 4.9 (Alternate Method and Sequence to Contact Offsite orDEMNET, Method and Sequence to Contact Agencies) and the Emergency Telephone removed the word Offsite Agencies) and Directory for guidance as needed. Once "selective signaling" the Emergency Telephone Directory agency contacted, read message and then (no replacement) for guidance as needed. Once agency record agency name, time, and date contacted, read message and then contacted in space above.
record agency name, time, and date contacted in space above.
- 25. Enclosure 4.9 complete replacement of directions for radio contact to OROs (PIP 0-13-13560) The previous radio Pagel of l system was obsolete and replaced with a Motorola 48.5 Mhz
- 26. Enclosure SS Selective Signaling DEMNET Duke Emergency Management remove SS and add 4.12 Network DEMNET Pagel of 1
- 27. Enclosure Selective Signaling/Manual Faxing IDEMNET/Manual Faxing remove Selective 4.13 Signaling and added Page 2 of2 DEMNET Last box
- 28. Enclosure DEMNET Notification Form Quick Reference Selective Signaling
) '. 4.14 Page 1 of l replaced by DEMNET this provides the new addition of instructions for DEMNET
- 29. Enclosure l. PIP 0-06-6511 1. PIP 0-06-651 l Change enclosure 4-:-1-4 4 .15 2. PIP G-07-0127 2. PIP G-07-0127 from 4.14 to 4.15.
Pagel of l 3. PIP G-09-1159 3. PIP G-09-1159 Added PIP
- 4. PIP 0-11-9459 4. PIP 0-11-9459 regarding radio
- 5. AD-EP-ALL-0102 (WebEOC ~-PIP 0-13-13560 replacement, bullet Maintenance and Administration) 6. AD-EP-ALL-0102 (WebEOC 5 and added
- 6. AD-EP-ALL-0202 (Emergency Maintenance and Administration) DEMNET fleet Response Offsite Dose Assessment) [7. AD-EP-ALL-0202 (Emergency Response procedure reference Pffsite Dose Assessment) bullet 8
- 8. AD-EP-ALL-0406 (Duke Emergency Management Network)
)
3.10 IOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.2§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form
., ctivity Description and
References:
RP/0/1Vl000/158 Rev. 3 (Offsite Communications From The Control Room) PIP G-14-00577 & PIP 0-14-07653 See attached change matrix for all changes pertaining to this procedure. Activity Scope: D The activity ~ a change to the emergency plan 1:8:1 The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: -- B.i,9tj{i$f;~;f Change Type: * * )JEQ(i;.~!!rf4 D The change~ editorial or typographical D The change does conform to an activity that has 1:8:1 The change is not editorial or typographical prior approval [8J The change does not conform to an activity that has prior approval Planning Standard Impact Determination: D §50.47(b)(l)- Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) D §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization D §50.47(b)(3) - Emergency Response Support and Resources D §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System* D §50.47(b)(5)- Notification Methods and Procedures* D §50.47(b)(6)- Emergency Communications
§50.47(b)(7) - Public Education and Information
§50.47(b)(8)- Emergency Facility and Equipment
- 1:8:1 §50.47(b)(9) - Accident Assessment*
1:8:1 §50.47(b)(l0) - Protective Response* D §50.47(b)(l l)- Radiological Exposure Control D §50.47(b)(l2)- Medical and Public Health Support D §50.47(b)(l3) - Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations D §50.47(b)(l4)- Drills and Exercises D §50.47(b)(l5)- Emergency Responder Training D §50.47(b )( 16) - Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards D The ro osed activit does not im act a Plannin Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
D The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment Record the commitment or commitment reference: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 1:8:1 The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: D The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation l8] The activity~ be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation
R~vision 12 3.10 IOCFR 50.5-l(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10.7.3
~ ,/ §50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/A/1000/158 Rev. 3 (Offsite Communications .1° BLOCKi~~~ From The Control Room) PIP G-14-00577 & PIP 0-14-07653 See attached change matrix for all changes pertaining to this procedure. Activity Type: .. D The activity~ a change to the emergency plan 1:8] The activity affects implementation of the emergency plan, but is not a change to the emergency plan Impact and Licensing Basis Determination: Licensing Basis: Reg. Guide 1.219 (Guidance on Making Changes to E-Plans for Nuclear Power Reactors) 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9) Emergency Assessment Capability Adequate methods, systems, and equipment for assessing and monitoring actual or potential offsite consequences of a radiological emergency condition are iri use. 10 CFR Appendix E Part 50: ..B. Assessment Actions .:J* The means to be used for determining the magnitude of, and for continually assessing the impact of,
- the release ofradioactive materials shall be described, including emergency action levels that are to be used as criteria for determining the need for notification and participation oflocal and State agencies, the Commission, and other Federal agencies, and the emergency action levels that are to be used for determining when and what type of protective measures should be considered within and outside the site boundary to protect health and safety. The emergency action levels shall be based on in-plant conditions and instrumentation in addition to onsite and offsite monitoring. By June 20, 2012, for nuclear power reactor licensees, these action levels must include hostile action that may adversely affect the nuclear power plant. The initial emergency action levels shall be discussed and agreed on by the applicant or licensee and state and local governmental authorities, and approved by the NRC.
Thereafter, emergency action levels shall be reviewed with the State and local governmental authorities on an annual basis. ONS E-Plan Section J (Protective Response states): J. 7 Protective Actions Recommendations The Emergency Coordinator (Operations Shift Manager or Station Manager) or the EOF Director (depending on the facility activation) will be responsible for contacting the State and/or local governments to give prompt notification for implementing protective measures within the plume exposure pathway, and beyond it if necessary. Procedure RP/O/A/1000/024, "Protective Action Recommendations" and SR/O/A/2000/003, "Activation of the Emergency Operations Facility" has been written to provide specific guidance for issuing protective action recommendations under various plant conditions to the Emergency Coordinator in the TSC and the EOF Director in the EOF Figure
~~espectively. Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) provided to J: ffsite otlicials take into account a range of protective actions including sheltering and evacuation.
Discussions conducted with offsite officials determined that sheltering would be recommended during a hostile action based event in which no release of radioactive materials has occurred or is ex ected.
l The decision to use sheltering as an alternative to evacuation forimpediments and special populations s one that will be made by offsite otlicials. If dose projections show that PAGs have been exceeded at l 0 miles, the dose assessment code and in-field measurements, when available, shall be used to
- 32alculate doses at various distances down- wind to determine how far from the site PAG levels are
~;~xceeded. The Radiological Assessment Manager shall forward the results to the EOF Director who will communicate this information to the offsite authorities.
Reg. Guide 1.219 (Guidance on Making Changes to E-Plans for Nuclear Power Reactors) 10 CFR 50.47(b)(l0)-Emergency Protective Actions
- a. The regulation at IO CFR 50.47(b)(l0) states the following:
A range of protective actions has been developed for the plume exposure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. In developing this range of actions, consideration has been given to evacuation, sheltering, and, as a supplement to these, the prophylactic use of potassium iodide (Kl), as appropriate. Evacuation time estimates have been developed by applicants and licensees. Licensees shall update the evacuation time estimates on a periodic basis. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an emergency, consistent with Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed.
- b. Three emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard:
(I) A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. (2) Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. (3) A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies,
'~including those for hostile action events. ..leg. Guide 1.219 (Guidance on Making Changes to E-Plans for Nuclear Power Reactors) 1.4 Timeliness as an Evaluation Consideration
- a. By its very nature, an emergency instills a sense of urgency and dictates the necessity for prompt action, which is a fundamental aspect of the licensee's emergency plan. Consistent with this imperative, the NRC has specified timeliness criteria in regulations for three specific emergency response activities: emergency declaration, emergency notifications, and public alerts. The NRC's emergency planning guidance provides additional time-based criteria. Licensees commit to staff augmentation times for their ERFs as part of their compliance with the planning standard in l 0 CFR 50.4 7(b)(2). Licensees' initial emergency notifications must contain a PAR. Because the licensee must make the notification within 15 minutes of the emergency declaration, it must also deliver a PAR within 15 minutes. Proposed changes that could delay emergency declarations, notifications, or PARs may reduce the effectiveness of the emergency plan in that subsequent emergency response actions may not be timely and emergency response personnel, facilities, and equipment may not be in position if it becomes necessary to implement measures to protect the public health and safety. Generally, the licensee should view any change that could delay an activity or relax a timeliness criterion for the activity as a potential reduction in effectiveness and should evaluate it accordingly. This evaluation would include any change that modifies how the timeliness criterion is evaluated (e.g., "when the clock starts and stops"). For example, the purpose of the emergency response organization (ERO) activation is to augment the on-shift staff and relieve it of those functions assigned to the technical support center (TSC), the operations support center (OSC), and the emergency operations facility
)*~,pOF). The ERO activation is not complete until the ERO is actively perfonning those functions at the
- fsc, OSC, and EOF; actuating a "clock stop" before this would be premature.
A endix E to 10 CFR Part 50 does not contain an su ort re uirements.
NUREG- 0654 States: As demonstrated in biennial evaluated exercises, licensees include a PAR with the General
- : ; mergency notification. The 15-minute notification requirement remains in effect regardless of
*' Clifferences in the licensee PAR tools used by shift and augmented ERO personnel. The PAR must be made rapidly, in accordance with approved procedures, and the licensee should develop those procedures in partnership with the ORO(s) responsible for protective action
- decision making.
2.2 Notification of Protective Action Recommendations at a General Emergency Licensees are required to be able to provide immediate notification (i.e., within 15 minutes) to OROs upon the declaration of a General Emergency. The General Emergency notification is expected to include a PAR. The PAR must be developed in accordance with the approved onsite emergency plan the PAR procedure and should be coordinated with OROs. 2.6 Expansion of Initial Protective Action Recommendations The emergency action level scheme used at nuclear power plants is designed to be anticipatory. A General Emergency is expected to be declared, based on plant conditions, before a radiological release could potentially begin. Licensees will perform radiological assessments throughout the emergency and will recommend to OROs the need to take or expand protective actions if dose projections show that protective action criteria could be exceeded. Dose projections that are based on effluent monitor data and verified by field monitoring data would provide the strongest basis for a PAR; however, effluent monitor data alone can be sufficient if other data (e.g., plant conditions, area or process monitors) verify the
- ~ccu.rrence of a radiological release. Although .verifi~~tion of ~ose proj~cti?n data is desirable,
0 11e licensee should not delay PARs unduly while waitmg for field momtonng data or sample analysis. NEI 99-02 States: (17) Timely means:
- Classifications are made consistent with the goal of 15 minutes once available plant parameters reach an Emergency Action Level (EAL)
- PARs are made consistent with the goal of 15 minutes once data is available.
- Offsite notifications are initiated within 15 minutes of event classification and/or PAR develo ment.
Compliance Evaluation and
Conclusion:
I. Evaluation: The proposed changes continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations and ensure that all required license activities are completed in a timely manner as prescribed in the ONS E-Plan. The proposed changes continue to ensure that the primary responsibilities are defined and assigned (consistent response between OROs) and meet regulatory requirements.
Conclusion:
The proposed activity ~ does I D does not continue to comply with the requirements.
'
.
( '
Reduction in Effectiveness (RIE) Evaluation and
Conclusion:
BLOCKS*'*.
- 1. Evaluation:
The proposed changes are being made for the reasons as listed below:
*~;,
- Changes 1, 3, 8, 9, 10 & 11 are enhancements to ensure consistent response between OROs, as well as aligning with current ,guidance in NEI 99-02 Rev. 6 "Regulatory Assessment Performance lndicator Guidelines".
- Change 2 adds clarification to ensure consistent response/notification to off-site agencies for the case of dual notifications of Unusual Events on more than one unit with the same EAL classification.
- Changes 4, 5, 6 & 7 are enhancements to add notes defining "liquid release in-progress" taken from the list of indicators listed in SH/O/B/2005/00 l "ERO Dose Projections".
- Change 11 updates list of references.
Conclusion:
The ro osed activit 0 does I ~ does not constitute a RIE. Effectiveness Evaluation Results l'8J The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior approval. 0 The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior approval. Date: U"-"'=ooM-------t---~-_:t fr' -~s= Approver Name: Pat Street Date~ u_{l~- Revision 12 ' ) .
Attachment to )U.)4q RP/0/A/1000/015 B Revision 003 Offsite Communications From The Technical Supoort Center Change# Pa2e # Current Proposed Reason
- l. Page 4 of Protective Action Add the following: "Mark as Fleet EP has
) 8 Note: Recommendation (PAR) changes must. ....... [nitial on ENF". determined that the ENF used to report a change in initial PARs be treated as an "[nitial" notification rather than a "Follow-up" notification. This is consistent with industry and DEP practice, as well as, guidance given in NEI 99-02, Revision 6, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline". Clarification is ')
,, being added to ensure consistent response between ORO's.
)
- 2. Page 5 of 8 Clarification added to address For the case of dual Notifications Recent review and
-) NOTE I the following: Of Unusual Events (NOUEs) on discussion between more than one unit with different EP, OPS, and OPS
- What is the proper EAL entry conditions, the OSM Training on information to provide on an would declare the NOUE on the Emergency Action ENF if there are two units that first unit to meet an EAL Levels (EALs) and are under the same level threshold and perform an initial the subsequent Unusual Event classification ENF. filling out of but for different EALs Emergency
- When should a follow up When the subsequent unit meets a Notification Forms notification be provided for an different NOUE EAL condition, a (ENFs).
Unusual Event classification follow-up notification should be with two units affected but for completed in a timely manner Clarification has different EALs, how do you which is interpreted to be within been added to indicate the affected units, 60 minutes. The 60 minute ensure consistent what information should be timeframe follows the guidance response/notificati provided, and what is already in place for ALERT and on to off-site considered timely in above classification follow-up agencies for the performing this follow-up. notifications. case of dual notifications of The indicated affected unit(s) on Unusual Events the follow-up notification would (NOUEs) on more be marked ALL since more than than one unit with ) one unit is now affected with the the same EAL same level EAL classification. classification. The other unit that has now met a NOUE EAL classification should be noted under Line 13 Remarks section along with what EAL condition is now met for that unit.
- 3. Page 6of8 If changes in Protective Add the following: "Mark as See change # 1 Note Action Recommendations are Initial on ENF".
made ......
- 4. Enc. 4.1 NIA Note: A liquid release is Procedure page I of-3 considered to be in progress if a SH/O/B/2005/001, Above line known unmonitored release path Emergency 4 exists, AND radioactive material Response Offsite exists," "alternate method of Dose Projections, release determination," or "Field Revision 6, Step Monitoring Team results provide 4. 7.2 does not indication that a release is DEFINE release.
occurring" Rather, it provides a list of indicators ) than an Emergency
Release is ')',:' occurring or has occurred and needs to be reported as such on the emergency notification form. Re: PIP G-14-1860 CCA #I.
- 5. Enc. 4.2 NIA Note: A liquid release is Procedure page 1 of 3 considered to be in progress if a SHIOIBl20051001, Above line known unmonitored release path Emergency 4 exists, AND radioactive material Response Offsite exists," "alternate method of Dose Projections, release determination," or "Field Revision 6, Step Monitoring Team results provide 4.7.2 does not indication that a release is DEFINE release.
occurring" Rather, it provides a list of indicators than an Emergency Release is occurring or has I
"} occurred and needs to be reported as such on the emergency notification form.
Re: PIP G-14-1860 CCA #I. 6 Enc. 4.3 NIA Note: A liquid release is Procedure page 1 of 2 considered to be in progress if a SHIOIBl20051001, Above line known unmonitored release path Emergency 4 exists, AND radioactive material Response Offsite exists," "alternate method of Dose Projections, release determination," or "Field Revision 6, Step Monitoring Team results provide 4. 7.2 does not indication that a release is DEFINE release. occurring" Rather, it provides a list of indicators than an Emergency Release is occurring or has occurred and needs to be reported as
) such on the
emergency ') notification form. Re: PIP G-14-1860 CCA # l. 7 Enc. 4.4 NIA Note: A liquid release is Procedure page l of 2 considered to be in progress if a SH/O/B/2005/00 l, Above line known unmonitored release path Emergency 4 exists, AND radioactive material Response Offsite exists," "alternate method of Dose Projections, release determination," or "Field Revision 6, Step Monitoring Team results provide 4. 7.2 does not indication that a release is DEFINE release. occurring" Rather, it provides a list of indicators than an Emergency Release is occurring or has
) occurred and needs to be reported as such on the emergency notification form.
Re: PIP G-14-1860 CCA # 1. 8 Enclosure A change in Protective Action Add the following: "Mark as See change #1 4.5 Note #l Recommendations (PARS) is Initial on ENF". Page l of due ....... . 4 9 Enclosure Add the following above See change #1 4.5 Pagel N/A instructions for "Line 2": Note: If of 4 changes are made to Protective Action Recommendations (PARS), mark box A as Initial-riffi eN¥:- 10 Enc. 4.5.A Remove back ground on line 2 Form is currently Follow up is currently follow up used for follow up marked in Rev. 3 line 2 notification and also a change in PARs which will
/.) be marked initial. 11 Enclosure For Follow-Up or Added the following to note: If See change #I 4.7 Page 2 Termination ........... message is a change in Protective of 4 Note Action Recommendations
#1 (PARS), ensure box A is mark as INITIAL.
12 Enclosure NIA Add the following: Update references 4.15 PIP-G-14-00577 References PIP 0-14-07653
# 9 & JO ").. ;. )
I i I I I, I Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 04123120 l 2 The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in infonnation you want to appear on the various
;~fonns needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in Yinformation on this fonn, it will be electronically transforred to the appropriate locations in the attached forms when you perfonn Step 3 below.
Step 1- press [Fl2](Save As) then save this form using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic infonnation in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing. I. ID No.: RP/O/A/1000/0158
- 2. Revision No.: 002 _
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center
- 5. For changes only, enter procedure sections affected:_
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness @
- 7. Preparation Date: l l/24/2014
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision: ONS-2014-05919 Step 3- go to Print Preview to update this infonnation in all the attached documents.
})tep 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional information needed.
Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness.
Fonn 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) (R08-10) Duke Energy (I J ID No. RP/0/ Al 1000/015 8 PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD R~vision No. 002 _ Pagel of 6 PREPARATION (2) Station _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __::O::....:C::....O=N~EE=-=-N~U:....;:C=L=E::.::...A=R.:....:S=-T~A..;:..T:...:I=O-=-N.:..___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (3) Procedure Title Offsite Communications fro (4) Prepared By* Natalie Harness (Signature) +-:µ..<C"-"-"'""'-~-¥-Jbi"._,._~:....__---- Date 11124/2014 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? 00 Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) -Attach NSD 228 documentation. D No (Revision with minor changes) j /; (6) Reviewed By* Q..,.,.._..o fl (,,_ ,/ ~ J/l'-~ (QR)(KI) Date la. S-/y Cross-Disciplinary Review By* (QR)(KI) N~ate 49- -£--ry Reactivity Mgmt Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR) N~Date td--'7=1fj' Mgmt Involvement Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Ops. Supt.) NA~ate /,:)_ --<:j-1 £( (7) Additional Reviews Reviewed B y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Reviewed By* -r....:------.--?1"""----f---::;r:-.F=::.._--t---;t--::::;;s:--H------ Date ./8) Approved By* -~~6:1.C:....:::_~L____:_:___~...;:;:::---..4----\------lo.....---- Date _;;JERFORMANCE (9) Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date Compared with Control Copy* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number (WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION ( 11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes 0 NA Required enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached. dated. identified, and marked? D Yes D NA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date ( 12) Procedure Completion A p p r o v e d - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date ( 13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary) JPrinted Name and Signature
RP/O/A/l 000/0158 Revision 002 _ Change No. _ Page 2 of l l .~ Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center _*_y
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes Revision 002 ofRP/O/A/1000/0158 consists of the following changes to retlect replacement of Raddose V dose assessment model with Unified RASCAL Interface (URI):
- A clarification to the introduction note regarding the procedure is an implementing procedure for the E Plan and as such requires an effectiveness review under 50.54q for any changes.
- Changed "Alternate" to "Backup Emergency Facility (ERF)" per NEI 13-01.
- Many editorial changes made correcting grammatical corrections and other editorial issues.
- Addition of Enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference)
PCR Numbers Incorporated ONS-2014-05919 Enclosure
RP/O/A/I 000/0 I 58 Revision 002 _ Change No._ Page 3 of I I ) Attachment to 50.54q RP/O/A/1000/0158, Rev 002, Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- l. Page 2 of7 Note: This procedure is an NOTE: Enhancement: Added Note section implementing Procedure to the
- This is an implementing Procedure to the following note to Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency the Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency ensure evaluation for Plan and must be forwarded to Plan and must be reviewed in a 1OCFR50.54q Emergency Planning within seven (7) accordance with 10CFR50.54q by effectiveness review.
working days of approval. Emergency Preparedness within seven (7) working days of aooroval.
- 2. Page 2 of7 Events are in progress or have Events are "in progress" or "have Enhancement: quotes 1.1 occurred which require activation of occurred" which require activation of the around "in-progress" the Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency Oconee Nuclear Site Emergency Plan and and "have occurred" Plan and notification of offsite notification of offsite agencies. to pint out the agencies. specific lamruage
- 3. Page 2 of7 Obtain the following items from the Obtain the following items from the Editorial: changed 2.2 Emergency Procedures Cart. Emergency Procedures Cabinet or the cart to "Cabinet or Position Specific Notebook. the Position Specific Notebook."
- 4. Page 3 of7 NRC Inspector(s). NRC Inspector(s) Editorial: removed 2.4 last item period
- 5. Page 3 of7 NOTE: Enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC Addition: Note to below 2.6 Notification Form Quick Reference) step 2.6 referencing contains instructions for using WebEOC Enclosure 4.13, D ,
.
in filling out the Emergency Notification Form (ENF), including offsite agencies WebEOC Notification Form notification and documentation. Quick Reference
- 6. Page 4 of7 FOLLOW -UP FOR AN. UNUSUAL FOLLOW-UP FOR AN UNUSUAL Editorial: removed Note EVENT - A Follow-Up notification is EVENT - A Follow-Up notification is space between NOT required for an Unusual Event NOT required for an Unusual Event "FOLLOW-"
unless requested. unless requested.
- 7. Page 5 of7 If electronically completing a form, If electronically completing a form, use Editorial: reference 2.7.l use information in enclosures 4.1 - 4.6 infonnation in enclosures 4.1 - 4.6 the title of the or go to Enclosure 4.13. or go to Enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC enclosure Notification Form Quick Reference)
- 8. Page 5 of7 If an ALERT initial or upgrade exists, If an ALERT initial or upgrade exists, Editorial: unbold the 2.7.5 complete Enclosure 4.3 (Guidelines complete Enclosure 4.3 (Guidelines parenthesis and for Completing an Initial Message for for Completing an Initial Message for an period an Alert Event). Alert Event).
- 9. Page 7 of7 NOTE: EH&S will perform procedure NOTE: Environmental Services will Editorial: corrected NOTE& guidance in RP/O/A./1000/01 but may perform procedure guidance in EH&S to 3.10 ask TSC Offsite Communicator to RP/O/ All 000101 but may ask TSC Offsite Environmental make appropriate notifications to Communicator to make appropriate Services offsite agencies if necessary. notifications to offsite agencies if
- 3. l 0 Complete notification to off-site necessary.
agencies per RP/O/ A.I I 0001017 (Spill 3.10 Complete notification to off-site Response) as directed by EH&S. agencies per RP/0/ A.I I 0001017 (Spill Response) as directed by Environmental Services.
) . 10 Page 7 of7 4.13 4.13 WEB EOC - Notification Form Quick Reference 4.13 WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference Editorial: corrected reference to WebEOC and removed -
RP/O/ NI 000/0158 Revision 002 _ Change No. _ Page 4of11
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 11. Enclosure 4.1 Obtain Enclosure 4.1.A (Nuclear Obtain Enclosure 4.1.A (Nuclear Power Editorial: added title Page I of3 Power Plant Emergency Notification Plant Emergency Notification Fonn) for a reference Form) for a GENERAL GENERAL EMERGENCY EVENT and EMERGENCY EVENT and complete complete the form as follows or use the fonn as follows or use Enclosure Enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC Notification 4.13: Form Quick Reference):
- 11. Enclosure 4.1 If KI has been recommended, mark If KI has been recommended, mark Box Editorial: remove Page I of 3 BoxD D. italics, not Line 5 ... Line 5..* acceptable fonn of If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition emphasis in Condition "A" exists: "A" exists: procedures writers Mark Box Band write "i\fove Mark Box B and write "Move residents guide and added a residents living downstream of the living do\mstream of the Keowee Hydro period to first Keowee Hydro dams to higher dams to higher ground. sentence ground. AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit AND mark Box E and write tratlic t1ow across bridges identified on "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges your inundation maps until the danger has identified on your inundation maps passed."
until the dan.~er has passed."
- 13. Enclosure 4.2 Obtain Enclosure 4.2.A (Nuclear Obtain Enclosure 4.2.A (Nuclear Power Editorial: added title Page 1 of3 Power Plant Emergency Notification Plant Emergency Notification Fonn) for a reference Form) for a SITE AREA SITE AREA EMERGENCY EVENT and EMERGENCY EVENT and complete complete the fonn as follows or use
"'\ the form as follows or use Enclosure Enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC Notification y 4.13: Form Quick Reference):
- 14. Enclosure 4.1 Line 5.** Line 5... Editorial: remove Page 1 of3 If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition italics, not Condition "A" exists: "A" exists: acceptable form of Mark Box B and write "il.lo\'e Mark Box Band write "Move residents emphasis in residents living downstream of the living downstream of the Keowee Hydro procedures writers Keowee Hydro dams to higher dams to higher ground. guide ground. AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit AND mark Box E and write traffic flow across bridges identified on "Prohibit traffic flow across bridges your inundation maps until the danger has identified on your inundation maps passed."
until the dan.~er has passed. "
- 15. Enclosure 4.3 NOTE: The initial notification is NOTE: Editorial: added Page 1 of2 required to be made within 15 minutes
- The initial notification is bullets to both items NOTE from the official Declaration time on required to be made within 15 Line 10. minutes from the official
- Pre-printed Emergency Declaration time on Line 10 .
Notification forms containing
- Pre-printed Emergency specific EAL number and Notification forms containing EAL description may be used specific EAL number and EAL in lieu of Enclosure 4.3.A or description may be used in lieu
\VebEOC. of Enclosure 4.3.A or WebEOC.
- 16. Enclosure 4.3 Obtain Enclosure 4.3.A (Nuclear Obtain Enclosure 4.3.A (Nuclear Power Editorial: added title Pagelof2 Power Plant Emergency Notification Plant Emergency Notification Fonn) for a reference Block 1 Form) for a ALERT EVENT and ALERT EVENT and complete the form
) complete the form as follows or use Enclosure 4. l 3: ' as follows or use Enclosure 4.13 (WcbEOC Notification Fonn Quick Reference):
RP/O/A/IOOO/OI 58 Revision 002 _ Change No._ Page 5 of I I
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 17. Enclosure 4.3 Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager Editorial: added a Page 1 of2 (ext. 3495) to verify the status of any (ext. 3495) to verify the status of any period to the end of Line 4 #2 liquid releases liquid releases. the sentence
- 18. Enclosure 4.3 Mark or select one (I) unit if event Mark or select one (I) unit if event affects Editorial: added a Page 2 of2 affects one unit or one ( 1) unit has a one unit or one (I) unit has a higher period to the end of Line 11 higher emergency classification emergency classification. the sentence
- 19. Enclosure 4.4 Obtain Enclosure 4.4.A (Nuclear Obtain Enclosure 4.4.A (Nuclear Power Editorial: added title Page 1 of2 Power Plant Emergency Notification Plant Emergency Notification Form) for a reference Block I Form) for a UNUSUAL EVENT and UNUSUAL EVENT and complete the complete the form as follows or use form as follows or use Enclosure 4.13 Enclosure 4. 13: (WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference):
- 20. Enclosure 4.4 Mark or select one (I) unit if event Mark or select one ( l) unit if event affects Editorial: added a Page 2 of2 affects one unit or one ( l) unit has a one unit or one ( l) unit has a higher period to the end of Line 11 higher emergency classification emergency classification. the sentence
- 21. Enclosure 4.4 NOTE: Lines 14, 15, & 16 - These NOTE: Lines 14, 15, & 16 are NOT Editorial: removed Page I of2 lines are NOT required to be required to be completed for an initial un-necessary NOTE3 completed for an initial notification.... notification.... words"- These lines"
- 22. Enclosure 4.5 * ... Follow up messages maybe * ... Follow-up messages maybe Editorial: added a Pagel of3 faxed with phone verification faxed with phone verification of dash between NOTE of receipt. ... receipt .... Follow and up &
Bullets I & 3
- Follow-up message is due 60
- Follow-up message is due 60 "except for an minutes from the notification minutes from the notification Unusual Event" time on line 2 of the previous time on line 2 of the previous message sheet. message sheet, except for an Unusual Event.
- 23. Enclosure 4.5 Obtain Enclosure 4.5.A (Nuclear Obtain Enclosure 4.5.A (Nuclear Power Editorial: added title Page I of3 Power Plant Emergency Notification Plant Emergency Notification Form, reference and added Block l Form, FollowUp) and Follow-Up) and complete as directed a dash between complete as directed below for a below for a FOLLOW-UP message or use follow-up FOLLOW-UP message or use (WebEOC Notification Form Quick Enclosure 4.13: Reference):
- 24. Enclosure 4.5 Verify site is marked as Oconee and Verify site is marked as Oconee and Editorial: went from Page 1 of3 confirmation phone number is 864- confirmation phone number is 864-882- a double line of text Line 3 882-7076. 7076. to a single line of text (no change in language)
- 25. Enclosure 4.5 If KI has been recommended, mark If KI has been recommended, mark Box Editorial: remove Page 2 of3 Box D D. italics, not Line 5 Line 5 *.* Line 5 .** acceptable form of If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike If a Keowee Hydro Dam/Dike Condition emphasis in Condition "A" exists: "A" exists: procedures writers Mark Box B and write "Move * ', . Mark Box B and write "Move guide and added a residents living downstream of the residents living downstream of the period to the first Keowee Hydro dams to higher ground. Keowee Hydro sentence
*AND mark Box E and write dams to higher ground.
"Prohibit tratlic flow across bridges *:: AND mark Box E and write "Prohibit identified on your inundation maps tratlic flow across bridges identified on until the danger has passed." your inundation maps until the danger has passed."
RP/O/ A/I 000/0 I 58 Revision 002 _ Change No._ Page 6 of I I ) # Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 26. Enclosure 4.5
- Security event
- Security event Editorial: corrected Page2of3
- Seismic event
- Seismic event margin of last bullet Note
- Tornado on site
- Tornado on site
. Hurricane force winds on site
- Hurricane force winds on site
- SSF
- SSF
*Fire affecting shared safety related
- Fire affecting shared safety related equipment equipment
- 27. Enclosure 4.5 Mark or select one ( I) unit if event Mark or select one ( l) unit if event affects Editorial: added a Page 2 of3 affects one unit or one (I) unit has a one unit or one ( l) unit has a higher period to the end of Line 11 higher emergency classification emergency classification. the sentence
- 28. Enclosure 4.5 Write "None" ifthere are no Write "None" ifthere are no additional Editorial: unbold Page 3 of3 additional remarks. remarks. first parenthesis Line 13
- 29. Enclosure 4.5 Do NOT add or change infonnation Do NOT add or change information on Editorial: added a Page 3 of3 on the form after it has been approved the form after it has been approved by the period to the end of Note 2 by the TSC Emergency Coordinator TSC Emergency Coordinator. the sentence
- 30. Enclosure 4.6 Obtain Enclosure 4.6.A (Nuclear Obtain Enclosure 4.5.A (Nuclear Power Editorial: added title Pagel of l Power Plant Emergency Notification Plant Emergency Notification Form) and reference Form) and complete as directed below for a complete as directed below for a TERMINATION message or use TERMINATION message or use (WebEOC Notification Form Quick
'-~ Enclosure 4.13: Reference):
)J 31. Enclosure 4. 7 Date: Editorial: added date Pagel of 4 Initial Notification Time: - - blank at top of block Block Follow-up Notification Time: _ _ and under each agencies "Initial Notification Time:
& Follow-up Notification Time:"
- 32. Enclosure 4. 7 Georgia Emergency Management Georgia Emergency Management Editorial: removed Page 3 of4 Agency (GEMA) 404-635-7000 or Agency (GEMA 404-635-7000 or 404- middle parenthesis Block 404-635-7200) 635-7200)
National Weather Service (NWS) National Weather Service (NWS 864-(864-879-1085) 879-1085)
- 33. Enclosure 4. 7 Begin call by saying "You should have Begin call by saying "You Editorial: indent this Page 3 of4 received a fax indicating Keowee should have received a fax block as it is directly Hydro Dam/Dike is in condition A or indicating Keowee Hydro related to the B, or an external flood condition exist Dam'Dike is in condition A or B, instructions above for the site, do you have any or an external flood condition (dam/dike failures) questions?" exist for the site, do you have any questions?"
- 34. Enclosure 4.8 Alternate TSC TSC Backup Emergency Response Editorial: changed Page 2 of2 Facility (ERF) Alternate to Backup 10
- 35. Enclosure Alternate Facility Activated: Backup Emergency Response Facility Editorial: changed 4.10 (ERF) Facility Activated: Alternate to Backup
) Page I of I
RP/O/ All 000/0158 Revision 002 _ Change No. _ Page 7 of l l
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 36. Enclosure Log onto LAN with your ID and Select DAE; Search DAE for WebEOC. Editorial: remove 4.IJ Password. Select DAE; Search DAE Click WebEOC. On Login Screen for opening sentence, Page I of2 for WebEOC. Click WebEOC. On Position select ONS TSC Off-site WebEOC 7.5 does Block I Login Screen for Jurisdiction, select Communicator and for Incident select not require log-in, Oconee; for Position, select ONS TSC appropriate incident and click OK. Click jurisdiction or name Off-site Communicator; for Incident: EN Form. Click Add Emergency select appropriate incident and click Notification.
OK. Enter name in Name block of Additional Login Information screen and click OK. Click EN Form. Click Create Draft.
- 37. Enclosure (bottom of EN Form) Lines
- The required EN Form fields Editorial: placed all 4.13 1,3,4,5,6,9,IO,l l are required to be will have a green background. notes into single box Page l of2 correct for Performance Indicator
- Clicking on the "Save Draft" at beginning of form Block 2 credit. button on the EN Form will close the EN Form and open the Emergency Notification Messages Panel.
- For a Termination message, ONLY Lines l, 3, 10, and 17 are required.
- Lines l, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, and 11 are required to be correct for
"):
-.
Performance Indicator credit.
- 38. Enclosure Ensure or Record Message Number ~Ensure Message # is updated Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 (sequentially number messages until (message number is auto-populated 7.5 auto-populates#
Page I of2 event is terminated). sequentially with each new ENF). Line I
- 39. Enclosure NOTE: Notification Time/Date And NOTE: Notification Time/Date and Editorial: moved 4.13 Authentication will be auto-populated Authentication will be auto-populated note from single box Page 1 of2 during message transmission. during message transmission. to under Line 2 Line 2 message
- 40. Enclosure
- Ensure or record appropriate Site
- Select "Oconee" with the pull-down Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 (i.e. Oconee) menu 7.5 instructions Page 1 of2
- Ensure, Record. or Select
- Select appropriate Confirmation Line] appropriate Confirmation Phone Phone Number with the pull-doMI Number menu (e.g. TSC (864)-882-7076) 4 l. Enclosure Select/Ensure correct Event
- Ensure the appropriate Event Editorial: WebEOC
*U3 Classification: Select /Ensure correct Classification radio button is 7 .5 instructions Page 1 of2 EAL #: (Select/Ensure EAL selected.
Line4 Description matches EAL Number)
- Ensure the appropriate EAL # from Contact the OSC Chemistry Manager the "Based on EAL" drop-doMt to verify status of liquid releases(), if menu is selected.
release(s) is occurring complete Lines
- Verify EAL Description matches 6 & 7 as directed by Chemistry Mgr. EAL Number.
RP/O/ All 000/0 l 58 Revision 002 _ Change No._ Page 8 of l l
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 42. Enclosure Protective Action Protective Action Recommendations: Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 Recommendations:
- IF Unusual Event, Alert, or Site Area 7.5 instructions &
Page 1 of2
- IF Unusual Event, Alert. or Site Emergency, Select~ None (Except URI RASCAL Line5 Area Emergency, Select~ None for dam failure, see 3rd. bullet) replacement of Raddose dose (Except for dam failure, see 3rd.
- IF General Emergency, Select ffiJ assessment tool.
bullet)
- IF General Emergency, Verify Evacuate and 19 Shelter then select appropriate zones.
Raddose run has been completed, 0 IF circumstances warrant. Select THEN select Import Raddose button at bottom of screen. If !QI KI and/or [fil Other a~ appropriate Raddose is NOT run, select~
- IF Condition A/B dam failure exists, Evacuate and 19 Shelter then Select info in pull do\m menu by ffij select appropriate zones. If Evacuate and click on !!]other for circumstances warrant, Select IQ) traffic instructions.
KI and/or~ Other as appropriate
- IF Condition A/B dam failure exists, select info in pull down menu by select~ Evacuate and click on !!]other for traffic instructions.
- 43. Enclosure NOTE: Clicking on the "Import Dose Editorial: WebEOC
) 4.13 Data Projection Data" button will auto- 7.5 instructions & Page 1 of2 populate the fields in lines 14 through 16 URI RASCAL Under Line 6 if a Unified Rascal Interface (URI) dose replacement of run has been performed. Clicking on the Raddose dose "Clear Dose Data" button will clear the assessment tool. fields in lines 14-16.
- 44. Enclosure Meteorological data: not required on NOTE: Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 initial notifications but if available and
- Clicking on the "Import Plant/MET 7.5 instructions &
Page I of2 time allows import Met data. Data" will fill in the Meteorological URI RASCAL Under Line 8 Selecting the Import Plant MET/Data Data fields in line 9 and the unit replacement of button will auto-populate Wind power ifthe unit(s) is NOT in Raddose dose Direction, Wind Speed, Precipitation shutdown. assessment tool. and Stability Class Meteorological Data is NOT in
" required on initial notifications, but if available and time allows, import Met Data.
- 45. Enclosure Meteorological Data: Not required Meteorological Data: Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 Page 1 of2 on initial notifications but if available and time allows import Met data by
- Select the "Import Plant /MET Data" 7.5 instructions &
URI RASCAL button to auto-populate Wind Line 9 one of the following methods: Direction, Wind Speed, Precipitation replacement of
- Verify Raddose run has been and Stability Class. Raddose dose assessment tool.
completed, THEN select Import
- Ensure MET Data is correct.
Raddose button at bottom screen.
- Import Wind Direction and Wind Speed along with Precipitation
) and Stability Class.
RP/O/Nl 000/0158 Revision 002 _ Change No._ Page 9of11
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 46. Enclosure Select ~ for Declaration or~ for
- Select ~for Declaration or~ for Editorial: moved 4.13 Termination as appropriate and enter Termination as appropriate. "termination" note Page I of2 the time as follows:
- Enter the time . to single box to Line 10
- Select the Get Date button to acquire under Line 2 &
(Note: For a Termination message, WebEOC 7.5 the current time and date and adjust only Lines 1, 3, 1Q, and 17 need to be instructions as needed. completed.)
- Select the Get Time/Date button to acquire the current time and date, THEN, adjust as needed.
- 47. Enclosure Affected Units - IF the classification Affected Units: Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 affects more than one unit select or
- IF the classification affects more than 7.5 instructions Page 2 of2 check All. one unit select the "All" radio Line 11 buttons.
IF the classification only affects one unit, Select appropriate unit.
- IF the classification only affects one unit, select the radio button for the affected unit.
- 48. Enclosure Unit Status - IF the Unit is Unit Status: Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 Shutdown, record 0% power, THEN IF the affected Unit(s) is Shutdown, 7.5 instructions Page 2 of2 Line 12 record the Shutdown Time/Date.
- Record "O" in % Power.
IF the Unit is NOT Shutdown , record
- Record time of shutdown.
'!\ % power. Enter status for all 3 units.
- Enter the date of the shutdown.
y
- Select the "Get Date" button.
IF the affected Unit(s) is NOT Shutdown,
- Click "Import Plant /MET Data" button from field 9.
- Ensure correct plant status for the affected unit(s).
- 49. Enclosure Release Data: Not required on initial Release Data: Not required on initial Editorial: W ebEOC 4.13 notification but if available and time notification but if available and time 7.5 instructions Page 2 of2 allows enter information: allows enter information. Select Line 14-16
- Verify Raddose run has been "Import/Dose Projection Data" button from before Line 7 to auto-populate the completed, THEN select Import Raddose button at bottom screen. data in Lines 14 through 16.:
- If Raddose data changes THEN
- If URI data has changed, review review enlir!:_form. {3} entire form. {3}
- 50. Enclosure Select the Save Draft button to return to Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 the Emergency Notification Messages 7.5 instructions Page2of2 panel. (remains enabled to edit in draft) If Note above the Approved button is inadvertently Line 17 selected prior to the end of actions required to complete line 17, the form will be locked, and any edits that must be made or fields to be entered will require the entire form to be recomoleted.
) '
RP/O/ Al I00010158 Revision 002 _ Change No. _ Page 10of11 ) # Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 51. Enclosure Approved By: Assure all sections Approved By: Editorial:
4.13 are complete by clicking the
- Assure all sections are complete by WebEOC 7.5 Page 2 of2 Validate button at bottom of screen. clicking the Validate button. (except 17 instructions Line 17
- Enter the Approver's name Approved By)
(Emergency Coordinator) in the
- Review the EN Form in "Edit" mode with Approved by block on the ERO TSC facility personnel for validation screen. (Edit mode will allow for changes to be
- Select appropriate title from made during the review process).
the pull down menu & then click
- Enter the Approver's name (Emergency Get Time/Date button. Coordinator) in the "Approved by" field.
Select the appropriate title from
- Record the name of the 0 the "Title" pull-down menu.
Communicator making the call on the Notified by line. 0 Select the "Get Time" button and adjust as necessary.
- Select the Approval button at 0 Select the "Get Date" button and the bottom of the form. Ensure correct time when approved. adjust as necessary.
- Approval will take you to
- Record the name of the Communicator message list, click on latest making the call on the Notified by line.
number to view form.
- Select the "Approve" button at the bottom of the form.
- Hit "Control R" to refresh form (no additional edits can be made once for others to view latest information. Approved)
- Fax the form by selecting the
) Fax button at the bottom of the screen. Select AT &T sender in display box. Click on Print. Type
-oconee on name line, click on green check mark, then click on send button. (For Dam Failure events fax hard copy to NWS, Georgia agencies using Fax Speed Dial 27).
- Print the form and have the Emergency Coordinator review and sign.
- 52. Enclosure The Emergency Notification Fax Management Editorial:
4.13 panel will open automatically when the WebEOC 7.5 Page2of2 "Approve" button is selected on the EN Form instructions NOTE Panel.
- 53. Enclosure Fax the EN Form to the State and County Editorial:
4.13 Agencies: WebEOC 7.5 Page2of2
- Access the appropriate EN Form on the instructions FAX Emergency Notification Management panel.
- Verify Fax "Recipients name" list is correct.
- Verify the Fax Confirmation Email Address is correct.
- Select the "Send Fa"<" button.
)
- Select "OK" .
__
RP /0/N l 0001015 B Revision 002 _ Change No. _ Page 11 of 11
# Page Current Proposed Change Reason
/Section
- 54. Enclosure IF manually faxing (WebEOC is NOT Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 successful) perform the following to 7.5 instructions Page 2 of2 obtain hard copy approvals:
Manual Cl From the Emergency Notification Approved Panel, select the correct message and click View under the EN Form:
- Obtain Emergency Coordinator review and signature on the EN Form hard copy.
- Select the Edit button in the Details column to open the EN Form.
0 Correct any discrepancies identified in EC's review. 0 Upon review completion and the form is ready for the EC approval signature: Select the View button in the EN Form column to open a printable EN Form. 0 Select the Print button on the EN Form and follow the prompts to open a .pdf file. 0 Print the .pdf file. ~
- Select the printer
- J icon or print from the file drop down menu and follow the prompts to print the EN Form.
0 Select the Return button on the EN Form to open the Emergency Notification Messages panel
- 55. Enclosure Refer to Enclosure 4.7, Guidelines for Editorial: WebEOC 4.13 Transmitting a Message 7 .5 instructions Page 2 of2 Selective Signaling/Ma nual Faxing
- 56. Enclosure I. PIP 0-06-6511 I. PIP 0-06-6511 7. Editorial: added 4.14 2. PIP G-07-0127 2. PIP G-07-0127 bullets 5 & 6 to Page 1of1 3. PIP G-09-1159 3. PIP G-09-1159 reference new
- 4. PIP 0-11-9459 4. PIP 0-11-9459 Fleet
- 5. AD-EP-ALL-0102 (WcbEOC procedures AD-Maintenance and Administration) EP-ALL-0 I 02
- 6. AD-EP-ALL-0202 (Emergency & AD-EP-ALL-Response Offsite Dose Assessment) 0202
_)
[Type text] APPENDIX C. APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Rev. 10)
. Page I or?
""~ PART 1- ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 1--~~~~~~~~-,--,~~~~~~~~~~~~--1 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC SITE UNIT(S)
~ Oconee D :'\lcGuire D Catawba J ~ Unit I ~ Unit 2 ~ Unit 3 RP/O/A/1000/0158, Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center, Rev ACTIVITY 002 TITLE/l>OCU:'\IENT/REVISION:
ONS-2014-05919 PART II - PROCESS REVIEW For each activity, address all of the questions below. If the answer is "YES" for any portion of the activity, apply the ldeotlfled process( es) to that portion of the actlvltv. Note: It ls not unusual to have more than one process aooly to a 1dven activltv. Will implementation of the above activity require a change to the: I. Tt.'Chnical Specifications (TS) or t:8J D If YES, process as a license amendment per NSD 227. Operating License? NO YES
- 2. Quality Assurance Topical? D If YES, seek assistance from Independent Nuclear Oversight.
NO YES
- 3. Security Plans? t8J D If YES, process per the Nuclear Security Manual.
NO YES (St.>e Appendix H)
- 4. Emergency Plan? D If YES, process per the Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual.
NO YES
- 5. Inservice Testing Program Plan? t8J D If YES, process per site IST Program for ASME code compliance and
-"\ NO YES related facility changes.
'-10. lnservice Inspection Program Plan? t:8J D IfYES, process per Materials, Metallurgy and Piping lnservice Inspection NO YES FAM for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure changes.
- 7. Fire Protection Program Plan? D IfYES, evaluate activity in accordance with NSD 320.
NO YES 7a -Utilize Appendix E to address Fire Check to confirm use of Appendix E Scrt."Cning Questions. Protection Program Plan Impact.
- 8. Regulatory Commitments? t:8J D If YES, process per NSD 214.
NO YES
- 9. Code of Federal Regulations? t:8J D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group.
NO YES I 0. Progn1ms and manuals listed in the t:8J D If YES, contact the Regulatory Affairs group. Administrative St.'Ction of the TS? NO YES
)
[Type text] PART Illa - 10 CFR 72.48 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address the question below. If the answer to question 11 is "YES," and questions 14 and 17 are answered "NO", then process the activity per NSD 211 - 10 CFR 72.48 does apply.
- 11. Does the activity involve SSCs, procedures or conduct tests or experiments that support/impact the t8J 0 YES loading or transport of the canister/cask to the ISFSI, the ISFSI facility, spent fud cask design? NO PART lllb- 10 CFR 50.59 APPLICABILITY For each activity, address all of the questions below~ If the answer to question 18 ls "YES," then 10 CFR 50.59 does not apply. If the answer to questions 18 Is .. NO," then process the activity per NSD 209- 10 CFR 50.59 applies.
- 12. Dot.>s the activity involve a procedure, governed by NSD 703 that has been excluded from the I 0 CFR t8l 0 YES 50.59 process per NSD 703 and the exclusion status remains valid? NO
- 13. Does the activity involve an administrative procedure governed by NSD I 00 or AD-DC-ALL-020 I that t8l 0 YES does not contain information regarding the operation and control of Structures, Systems and NO Components'!
- 14. Dot.>s the activity involve a type of Engineering Change that NSD 30 I excludes from the I 0 CFR 50.59 t8l D YES and/or 10 CFR 72.48 Processes? Consult NSD 301 for assistance. NO
- 15. Does the activity involve (a) maintenance activities that restore SSCs to their as-designed condition r8'J 0 YES (including activitit.>s that implement approved design changes) or (b) temporary alterations supporting NO maintenance that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
- 16. Docs the activity involve a UFSAR modification that NSD 220 excludes from the 10 CFR 50.59 Process? r8'J 0 YES Consult NSD 220 for assistance. NO
- 17. Does the activity involve NRC and/or Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC approved changes to the licensing r8'J 0 YES basis? NO
- 18. Are ALL aspects of the activity boundt.>d by one or more "'YES" answers to qut.-stions I through 17, 0 r8'J YES above? NO PART IV - UFSAR REVIEW I Does the activity require a modification, deletion, or addition to the UFSAR to satisfy the UFSAR content r8'J DYES 9 requirements of I 0 CFR 50.34 (b), I 0 CFR 50. 71 (e), or Regulatory Guide (RG) I. 70? Consult NSD 220 for NO Assistance.
IF YES, process per NSD 220. PA~T V~ ~U'./N9FF, /'""I (Print ~°"}J A. C'~ (Sign) .// !HJ/ I I
.,
~1 J DATE lcl ~'l -1v
~
,...~
Name) I Applicability Determination Preparer
)
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (ROS-10) Duke Energy PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD ) .
.
(l) lD No. RP/O/Nl000/015B Revision No. 002 _ Change No. Pennanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Pages 2-7, Enclosures 4.1 - 4.13 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Detennination? ra Yes {Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation. D No (Procedure change with minor changes) (6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) Revision 002 of RP/O/N l 000/0158 consists of the following changes:
- A clarification to the introduction note regarding the procedure is an implementing procedure for the E Plan and as such requires an effectiveness review under 50.54q for any changes.
- Changed "Alternate" to "Backup Emergency Facility (ERF)" per NEI 13-01.
- Many editorial changes made correcting grammatical corrections and other editorial issues.
- Addition of Enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference)
) (7) Reason for Change:
See attached change matrix (8) Prepared By* Natalie Harness (9) Reviewed By* Date Q. -~-It Cross-Disciplinary Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR)(KI)NA~Date a-1-rr Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (QR) NA~Date 12-9-('f Mgmt. Involvement Review By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(Ops. Supt.) NA~ate p...-9--71..f (IO} Additional Reviews Reviewed By* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Date -~~~~- Reviewed By* Date ( 11) Approved By* ==================Date-[~lil=+-l.f
- Printed Name and Signature
_)
3.10 IOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10. 7.2
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/A/1000/0158, Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center, Rev 002 Revision 002 of RP/O/NI 00010158 consists of the following changes:
- A clarification to the introduction note regarding the procedure is an implementing procedure for the E Plan and as such requires an effectiveness review under 50.54q for any changes.
- Changed "Alternate" to "Backup Emergency Facility (ERF)" per NEI 13-01.
- Many editorial changes made correcting grammatical corrections and other editorial issues.
- Addition of Enclosure 4.13 (\VebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference)
Activity Scope: {~~;;~:(B~QCK i14:1~\;~~,~~;; [8J The activity~ a change to the emergency plan D The activity is not a change to the emergency plan Change Type: :,BL~lc~~-~~:fo~; Change Type: :;;~1,~~~~~B~!l~!(~~~!f::~;~J}If 0 The change~ editorial or typographical D The change does confonn to an activity that has prior [8J The change is not editorial or typographical approval
~ The change does not confonn to an activity that has prior approval Planning Standard Impact Determination:
0 §50.47(b){l)-Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) 0 §50.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization ,,O §50.47(b)(3) - Emergency Response Support and Resources
-:lJ §50.47(b)(4)- Emergency Classification System* 'iZ! §50.47(b)(5) - Notification Methods and Procedures*
[8J §50.47(b)(6) - Emergency Communications 0 §50.47(b)(7) - Public Education and lnfonnation 0 §50.47(b)(8) - Emergency Facility and Equipment 0 §50.47(b)(9)-Accident Assessment* 0 §50.47(b)(10)- Protective Response* 0 §50.47(b)(l l)- Radiological Exposure Control 0 §50.47(b)(l2)- Medical and Public Health Support 0 §50.47(b)(13)- Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations 0 §50.47(b){l4) - Drills and Exercises 0 §50.47(b)(15)- Emergency Responder Training [8J §50.47(b)(l6)- Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards 0 The ro osed activit does not im act a Plannin Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
0 The activity does involve a site specific EP commitment [8J The activity does not involve a site specific EP commitment Results: 0 The activity can be implemented without perfonning a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation [8J The activity cannot be implemented without perfonning a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation
~~-~-~--~~~--~-~---! ~cparer Name: Date:
_Jatalie Harne_s_s_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . 11124/14
~--~----~-
Reviewer Name: Date: Don Crowl
Revision 12 3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functional Area Manual Attachment 3.10. 7.3
§50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation Form *Activity Description and
References:
RP/O/A/1000/0158, Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center, Rev 002 Revision 002 ofRP/O/NI000/0158 consists of the following changes:
- A clarification to the introduction note regarding the procedure is an implementing procedure for the E Plan and as such requires an effectiveness review under 50.54q for any changes.
- Changed "Alternate" to "Backup Emergency Facility (ERF)" per NEI 13-0l.
- Many editorial changes made correcting grammatical corrections and other editorial issues.
- Addition of Enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC Notification Fonn Quick Reference)
Activity Type: *':1~~~£~?>>~§~1¢.~~~~f~~;~~i~l
~ The activity~ a change to the emergency plan D The activity affects implementation of the emergency plan, but is not a change to the emergency plan Impact and Licensing Basis Determination:
Licensing Basis:
- lOCFRS0.47 (b)(5): Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee, of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established.
- 10CFR50.47 (b)(6): Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public.
- lOCFRS0.47 (b)(16): Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.
- 10CFR50 Appendix E. D. Notification Procedures:
- l. Administrative and physical means for notifying local, State, and Federal officials and agencies and agreements reached with these officials and agencies for the prompt notification of the public and for public evacuation or other protective measures, should they become necessary, shall be described. This description shall include identification of the appropriate officials, by title and agency, of the State and local government agencies within the EPZs.
- 2. Provisions shall be described for yearly dissemination to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ of basic emergency planning infonnation, such as the methods and times required for public notification and the protective actions planned if an accident occurs, general infonnation as to the nature and effects of radiation, and a listing of local broadcast stations that will be used for dissemination of infonnation during an emergency. Signs or other measures shall also be used to disseminate to any transient population within the plume exposure pathway EPZ appropriate infonnation that would be helpful if an accident occurs.
. A licensee shall have the capability to notify responsible State and local governmental agencies within 15 minutes after declaring an emergency. The licensee shall demonstrate that the appropriate governmental authorities have the capability to make a public alerting and notification decision promptly on being infonned by the licensee of an emergency condition.
Prior to initial operation greater than 5 percent of rated thennal power of the first reactor at a site, each nuclear power reactor licensee shall demonstrate that administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ. The design objective of the prompt public alert and notification system shall be to have the capability to essentially complete the initial alerting and initiate notification of the ublic within the lume ex osure athwa EPZ within about 15 minutes. 1' y
The use of this alerting and notification capability will range from immediate alerting and notification of the public (within 15 minutes of the time that State and local otlicials are notified that a situation exists requiring urgent action) to the more likely events where there is substantial time available for the appropriate governmental authorities to make a judgment whether or not to activate the public alert and notification system. The alerting and notification capability shall additionally include administrative and physical means for a backup method of public alerting and notification capable of being used in the event the primary method of alerting and notification is unavailable during an emergency to alert or notify all or portions of the plume exposure pathway EPZ population. The backup method shall have the capability to alert and notify the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ, but does not need to meet the 15-minute design objective for the primary prompt public alert and notification system. When there is a decision to activate the alert and notification system, the appropriate governmental authorities will determine whether to activate the entire alert and notification system simultaneously or in a graduated or staged manner. The responsibility for activating such a public alert and notification system shall remain with the appropriate governmental authorities.
- NUREG-0654, Section II. Planning Standards and Evaluation Criteria, o E. Notification Methods and Procedures, Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organizations; the content of initial and follow-up messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established.
o G. Public Education and Information, Information is made available to the public on a periodic basis on how they will be notified and what their initial actions should be in an emergency (e.g., listening to a local broadcast station and remaining indoors), the principal points of contact with the news media for dissemination of information during an emergency (including the physical location or locations) are established in advance, and procedures for coordinated dissemination of information to the public are established. o P. Responsibility for the Planning Effort: Development, Periodic Review and Distribution of the Emergency Plans. Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.
- ONS Emergency Plan o ONS E Plan Section E.3 & E.4, Initial and Follow-up Message Formats, A single message format has been established that will be used by the Oconee Nuclear Site to properly notify Oconee and Pickens Counties and the South Carolina Emergency Management Division of an emergency situation at the facility. Notification and authentication procedures are in place for all designated agencies.
o ONS E Plan Section G. Public Information and Education. Information will be made available to the public on a yearly basis concerning notification of a nuclear plant emergency and the response that will be required from the public sector. o ONS E Plan Section P, Responsibility for the Planning Effort: Development, Periodic Review and Distribution of the Emergency Plans, P.7, Implementing Procedures Written procedures will be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities associated with emergency plan implementation. Each procedure and changes thereto, shall be approved by the responsible manager prior to implementation. Implementing procedures are indexed and cross referenced to the section a licable in NUREG 0654. (Fi ure P-1) Compliance Evaluation and
Conclusion:
. }~~Jl~Q~~.~:.:.:
- l. Evaluation:
The proposed revision continues to ensure that the Offsite Communications from the Technical Support Center to support the emergency plan is provided and maintained. Enclosure 4.13, WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference is an addition to the procedure, as an aid for the user. The ONS E plan was not impacted by the changes proposed in the revision. Therefore all regulations and commitments continue to be met.
Conclusion:
The ro osed activi [g) does I D does not continue to com )
Evaluation: As can be seen by the above, compliance with regulations is assured.
- The functions of 1OCFR50.47b(5) per RG 1.219 are:
~ Three emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the three is impacted: (I) Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the declared emergency within 15 minutes alter declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. This jimction was maintained by adding the Enclosure 4. JJ, WebEOC Notification Fonn Quick Reference, which is an aid for the Offsite Communicator. The functions of 10CFR50.47b(6) per RG 1.219 are: Two emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the three is impacted: (2) Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. Thisjimction was maintained by adding the Enclosure 4.13, WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference, which is an aid for the Ojfsite Communicator. The functions of IOCFR50.47b(16) per RG 1.219 are: Two emergency planning functions have been defined for this planning standard of which one of the two is impacted:: ( 1) Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. Tlzisfimction was maintained by the addition oftlze WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference, which is an aid for the Ojfsite Communicator. Therefore the proposed changes continue to ensure compliance with the regulations and the ONS E Plan. The proposed changes are being made for the reasons as listed below:
* #I Enhancement - Added the following note to ensure evaluation for a 10CFR50.54q effectiveness review. * #2,3,4,6, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,22-26-Editorialchangesorcorrections(minor) * #5, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 21, 27 Editorial: addition or reference to Enclosure 4.13 (WebEOC Notification Form Quick Reference) * #28 Reference chan es from "alternate" to "backu "
Conclusion:
- i The change in RP/O/A/I000/015B associated with the additional WebEOC reference and does not reduce the effectiveness. Effectiveness Evaluation Results
!2] The activity does continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E and the activity does not constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity can be implemented without prior approval.
D The activity does not continue to comply with the requirements of §50.47(b) and §50 Appendix E or the activity does constitute a reduction in effectiveness. Therefore, the activity cannot be implemented without prior approval. Preparer Name: Date: Natalie Harness 11124/14 Reviewer Name: Date: Don Crowl Approver Name: Pat Street Revision 12 )
Revision/Change Package Fill-In Form Rev. 04/23/2012 )The purpose of this fill-in form is to provide a location to type in infonnation you want to appear on the various fonns needed for Major/Minor Procedure Revisions, and Major/Minor Procedure Changes. After you type in information on this fonn, it will be electronically transferred to the appropriate locations in the attached fonns when you perform Step 3 below. Step 1- press [F12] (Save As) then save this fonn using standard file name convention in appropriate LAN storage location. Step 2-type in basic information in the blanks below: Note: place cursor in center of brackets before typing.
- 1. ID No.: RP/O/A/1000/015B
- 2. Revision No.: 001
- 3. Change No.:_ Note: if this package is for a change, replace hyphen with a letter.
- 4. Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Technical Support Center S. For changes only, enter procedure sections affected: see attached change matrix
- 6. Prepared By: Natalie Harness
- 7. Preparation Date: 4/23/2014 f
- 8. PCR Numbers Included in Revision: ONS-2014-001422 J Step 3- go to Print Preview to update this infonnation in all the attached documents.
Step 4- page down to affected pages and enter any additional infonnation needed *.
- Step 5- when all information is entered, print package and review for correctness.
Form 703-1. Procedure Process Record (PPR) y(ROS-10) Duke Energy (I) ID No. RP/O/A/l000/015B PROCEDURE PROCESS RECORD Revision No. 001 PREPARATION (2) Station _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _o"'-'c"'-'o-..:N-.:.;;E=E~NU-----=CL=EAR==--=--=ST=A=T=I=O..... N....___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (3) ProcedureTitle--'==:..=.;==~==~=~~~==-=-=~=-==~-------- (4) PreparedBy"'.:...;N:.::a:=tal=i=e-=H=am=e:::s=s~~~-'lw~......,,~~~~IP-~~~,..,,..-- Date 4/23/2014 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Detennination? 57r. /tr . D Yes (New procedure or revision with major changes) - A SD 228 docwnentation. 181 No (Revision with minor changes) (6) Reviewed By"' J).. "!J /J. J * (QR)(I<I) Date Cross-Disciplinary Review By*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _(QR)(I<I) NA~ate Reactivity Mgmt Review By* (QR) NAf'.Ag.Date Mgmt Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) N~ate (7) Additional Reviews R e v i e w e d B y " ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date ReviewedBy"'-;:;----:--""l.~~=-=-r--r-.,==j'f='.---rt""L:t4:;;:~:---- Date ~ (8) Approved By* -!!:~I~~;...1...~~S.n::~i..--~~~~~:;__.µ:c=.:;1r----- Date $/~/( 4-j) PERFORMANCE (Compare with control copy e1i work is being performed.) (9) Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date Compared with Control C o p y * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date (10) Date(s) Performed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Work Order Number (WO#) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ COMPLETION (11) Procedure Completion Verification: D Unit 0 D Unit 1 D Unit 2 D Unit 3 Procedure performed on what unit? D Yes D NA Check lists and/or blanks initialed, signed, dated, or filled in NA, as appropriate? D Yes DNA Required. enclosures attached? D Yes D NA Charts, graphs, data sheets, etc. attached, dated, identified, and marked? D Yes DNA Calibrated Test Equipment, if used, checked out/in and referenced to this procedure? D Yes D NA Procedure requirements met? Verified By* Date (12) Procedure Completion Approved _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date (13) Remarks (Attach additional pages, if necessary)
"' Printed Name and Signature
RP/O/N1000/015B Revision 001 Change No._ ) Page 1of1 Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Technical Support Center
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES: (DESCRIPTION AND REASON) General Changes See attached change matrix PCR Numbers Incorporated O'NS-2014-001422 Enclosure
)
Attachment to 50.54q ) RP/O/A/1000/0lSB, Rev 002, Offsite Communications From The Technical Support Center Chan2e# Pal!e # Current Proposed Reason DocuTrack Section 2.2 ... 2.2 ... Making ONS- 2.2 2.2 Obtain the following 2.2 Obtain the following the phone 2014- Page2 of items from the Emergency items from the Emergency numbers a 001422 7 Procedures Cart. Procedures Cart. consistent 2.2.1 Yellow folder JO digit 2.2.1 Yellow folder m1mber containing the Emergency containing the Emergency (XXX-Telephone Directory, Telephone Directory, XXX-Authentication Code List, Authentication Code List, XXXX) in Emergency Notification Emergency Notification the body of Forms ... Forms ... the NOTE: For an outside line dial procedures "9 and for long distance dial and in 01." some Section 3.5 Using Speed Dial 07, OR 3.5 Using Speed Dial 07, procedures 3.5 dialing 9-704-382-0722, fax OR dialing 704-382-0722, removing Page6 of completed Enclosure 4.10 fax completed Enclosure the "9-" in 7 (Turnover Checklist) to the 4.10 (Turnover Checklist) to front ofthe EOF and review form with the EOF and review form JO digit phone the EOF Offsite Agency with the EOF Offsite numbers Communicator. Agency Communicator. or adding -:':'\ (removed "9-") y (area Enclosure
-
................. . Remove all the "9-" code).
--- . -----
a-,_, _._ ........ 4.7 J;:J
,....
D dliilmC-,~1****-
~ .......
.........
~~ Adding a
---
---- -----_
~
~
Page 1 of ~ .. NOTE to 4 ... .. .. --.. state: For __
...._,....,............
,_._
p ...... a.t~-- ma ....... ~ .... _. ...
.....,
ll- ---- r:='i:!. rl& ....,....,,,
----
----
~ ::...::":t':l....
. ,....,......_._
an outside line dial
----
--- "9"and
-
reRi~-rA:!I_......_ ... ..._,,,,,...... for long distance dial"}, Enclosure Georgia Emergency Georgia Emergency II 4.7 Management Agency Management Agency Page3 of (GEMA) (9-404-635-7000 (GEMA) (404-635-7000 or 4 or 7200) 7200) *** FAX Speed Dial 27 (Fax form for any Condition A or B dam/dike event) Enclosure National Weather Service National Weather Service 4.7 (NWS) (9-864-879-1085) (NWS) (864-879-1085) *** Page3 of FAX Speed Dial 27 (Fax (removed "9-") 4 form for any Condition A or B dam/dike event) Enclosure FAX this form to the FAX this form to the 4.10 Charlotte EOF at the Charlotte EOF at the
)
_) following number 9-704- following number 704-382-382-0722. 0722. (removed "9-")
Form 703-2. Procedure Change Process Record (ROB-10)
- ~.* Duke Energy
-y PROCEDURE CHANGE PROCESS RECORD (1) ID No. RP/O/N1000/015B Revision No.001 Change No.
Pennanent/Restricted to (2) Station: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION (3) Procedure Title: Offsite Communications From The Technical Support Center (4) Section(s) of Procedure Affected: Section 2.2 Page 2 of7, Section 3.5 Page 6 of7, Enclosure 4. 7 Page 4 of S, and Enclosure 4.10 (5) Requires NSD 228 Applicability Determination? D Yes (Procedure change with major changes) - Attach NSD 228 documentation.
~ No (Procedure change with minor changes)
( 6) Description of Change: (Attach additional pages, if necessary.) See attached change matrix
~ (7) Reason for Change:
Editorial _J Diii\ l k~ .~ ~ j)~y.
'/I (8) Prepared By* Natalie Harness (Signature \-,j~.,p._~~~~~~~c...- Date 4/23/2014 (9) Reviewed By* Date S/i Tl f 1 'I Cross-Disciplinary Review By* (QR)(KI) NA £!:L. Date ;_;l /1 t Reactivity Mgmt. Review By* (QR) NA~Date S' h /;,,,
Mgmt. Involvement Review By* (Ops. Supt.) NA ~Date ~ ~( Tl ( 10) Additional Reviews Reviewed By* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _; Date _ _ _ __ Reviewed By* Date (11) Approved BY' '?.mi.i!!k I-\ 5~CT- Date $/ t~
- Printed Name and Signature
..'\ y
3.10 lOCFR 50.54(q) Evaluations Emergency Planning Functlonal Area Manual (
.';\.:
j) Attachment 3.10.7.l
§50.54(q) Screening Evaluation Form Activity Description and
References:
'RP/01A/1000/0lSB, Rev 001, Offsite Communications From The Technical Support Center (DocuTrack ONS-2014-001422)
Activity Scope: 181 The activity~ a change to the emergency plan 0 The activity i!.nfil a change to. the emergency plan Change Type: Change Type: [81 The change!.§ editorial or typographical 0 The change does conform to an activity that 0 The change is not editorial or typographical has prior approval Making the phone numbers a consistent 10 digit number (XXX-XXX-XXXX) In O The change does not conform to an activity the body of the procedures and In same procedures removing the -g..* In front that has prior approval of the 10 digit phone numbers or adding (area code). Adding a NOTE ta state: For an outside fine dial ug* and for tang distance dial "1.
- Planning Standard Impact Determination:
D §S0.47(b)(I)- Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) D §S0.47(b)(2)- Onsite Emergency Organization D §S0.47(b)(3)- Emergency Response Support and Resources D §S0.47(b)(4)-Emergency Classification System* . D §S0.47(b)(S) - Notification Methods and Procedures* ~ D §S0.47(b)(6)- Emergency Commwtlcations .Y D §S0.47(b)(7)- Public Education and Information D §S0.47(b)(8)- Emergency Facility and Equipment D §S0.47(b)(9) - Accident Assessment* D _§S0.47(b)(10) - Protective Response* . D §S0.47(b)(ll)-Radiologi.cal Exposure Control 0 §S0.47(b)(12)- Medical and Public Health Support 0 §S0.47(b)(13)- Recovery Planning and Post-accident Operations D §S0.47(b)(l4)-Drills and Exercises D §S0.47(b)(15)-Emergency Responder Training D §S0.47(b)(16)-Emergency Plan Maintenance
*Risk Significant Planning Standards D The ro osed activi does not
- act a Plannin Standard Commitment Impact Determination:
D The activity ~ involve a site specific EP commitment Record the commitment or commitment r e f e r e n c e : - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 The activity does not invol~e a site specific EP commitment Results: [8J The activity can be implemented without performing a §50.54(q) effectiveness evaluation D The activity cannot be implemented without performing a §S0.54(q) effectiveness evaluation Reviewer Name: ) ....__~~"--"-)) Revision 12 _f\..__--~-..i::::;;..V'_,___~~-t:::=;'f=--,~~~--r--r----'"
Attachment to 50.54q RP/O/A/1000/0lSB, Rev 002, Offsite Communications From The Technical Support Center Chanee# Paee # Current Proposed Reason DocuTrack Section 2.2 ... 2.2 ... Making ONS- 2.2 2.2 Obtain the following 2.2 Obtain the following the phone 2014- Page2 of items from the Emergency items from the Emergency numbers a 001422 7 Procedures Cart. Procedures Cart. consistent JO digit 2.2.1 Yellow folder 2.2.1 Yellow folder number containing the Emergency containing the Emergency (XXX-Telephone Directory, Telephone Directory, XXX-Authentication Code List, Authentication Code List, XXXX) in Emergency Notification Emergency Notification the body of Fonns ... Forms ... the NOTE: for an outside line dial procedures "9" and for long distance dial and in "l." some Section 3.5 Using Speed Dial 07, OR 3.5 Using Speed Dial 07, procedures 3.5 dialing 9-704-382-0722, fax OR dialing 704-382-0722, removing Page6 of completed Enclosure 4.10 fax completed Enclosure the "9- " in 7 (Turnover Checklist) to the 4.10 (Turnover Checklist) to front ofthe EOF and review form with the EOF and review form 10 digit phone the EOF Offsite Agency with the EOF Offsite numbers Communicator. Agency Communicator. or adding
~ (removed "9-")
-__ ..
(area J Enclosure Remove all the "9-" code). 4.7 ... _,,_ ... l:Jo...C'_ ........., a .._e--,,,..,ue-.1,111
~L.&...,...,w Adding a
__.. ... ---
---- ----
__...
~n.Jd ........
.w......-11*
Page 1 of ...... NOTE to 4 ., ..... __
,__._
-----
---
~~,.
--*
- a ... ._~_,
-----
** _..,. state: For
=-==*==---:.. . ----
.....-SllllH.Z.t-..wm ..-...-..r.a.~.,,
an outside
... line dial p
----- -
~~-r.q,9.-...,. ~..,._.. ..... _.,..,.......
"9" and for long distance Enclosure Georgia Emergency Georgia Emergency dial "I."
4.7 Management Agency Management Agency Page3 of (GEMA) (9-404-635-7000 (GEMA) (404-635-7000 or 4 or 7200) 7200) *** FAX Speed Dial 27 (Fax form for any Condition A or B dam/dike event) Enclosure National Weather Service National Weather Service 4.7 (NWS)(9-864-879-1085) (NWS) (864-879-1085) *** Page3 of FAX Speed Dial 27 (Fax (removed "9-") 4 form for any Condition A or B dam/dike event) Enclosure FAX this form to the FAX this form to the 4.10 Charlotte EOF at the Charlotte EOF at the .
])
'
'
'
' following number 9-704-382-0722.
following number 704-382-0722. (removed "9-")}}