ML17308A266

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:51, 18 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-335/86-18 & 50-389/86-17.Corrective Actions:Operating Procedure Re Condensate & Feedwater Sys Revised & Plant Work Order Written for Wind Direction Remote Instrument
ML17308A266
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/03/1986
From: Woody C
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
L-86-405, NUDOCS 8611250581
Download: ML17308A266 (5)


See also: IR 05000335/1986018

Text

P.O.BOX 14000, JUNO 8EACH, FL 33408 Ii"Oy 6'FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY OCTOBER 03 I9S6 L-86-405 Dr.J.Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II U.S.Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

IOI Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, GA 30323 Dear Dr.Grace: Re: St.Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos.50-335, 50-389 Ins ection Re ort 335/86-18 and 389/86-I7 Florida Power&Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection

report, and pursuant to the provisions

of IO CFR 2.20l the response is attached.There is no proprietary

information

in the report.Very truly yours,-iC.O.W y Group Vice President Nuclear Energy COW/GRM/gp

Attachment-

cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire 8611250581

861003 PDR ADOCK 05000335 G PDR GRM4/0 I 2/I PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE

Re: St.Lucie Units I and 2 Inspection

Report 335/86-18 and 389/86-17 L-86-405 ATTACHMENT

ITEM A During the Nuclear Regulatory

Commmission (NRC)inspection

conducted on June 17-August 4, 1986, a violation is listed below: Unit I and 2 Technical Specification (TS)6.8.l.a, states, written procedures

shall be established, implemented

and maintained

covering the activities

referenced

below: Applicable

procedures

recommended

in Appendix"A" of Regulatory

Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.Regulatory

Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978, Appendix"A", states in part, the following are typical safety-related

activities

that should be covered by written procedures;

Administrative

Procedures

and Procedures

for Startup,'peration

and Shutdown of Safety-Related

PWR Systems.The following system is an example that should have an operating procedure;

Feedwa ter System.Contrary to the above, a.On June 25, 1986, operating procedure (OP)2070020, Rev.8, Condensate

and Feedwater System-Normal Operation, was not properly established

or maintained

in that the procedure had numerous errors-wrong valve numbers, incorrect valve descriptions, wrong valve positons, and Unit I referenced

components

on the Unit 2 procedure.

Additionally, the procedure was not implemented

properly in that three valves which the procedure designated

as"open" and that operators, when performing

the procedure in April 1986, had initiated as"open" were found to be closed.RESPONSE A I)Florida Power 8 Light Company (FPL)concurs with this violation.

2)Deficient p'rocedural

review of the procedure requiring revision and failure by the operators involved to properly document and take action when discrepancies

between procedures

and actual plant conditions

are found are the cause for the violation.

R M4/012/2

St.Lucie Units I and 2 Inspection

Report 335/86-l8 and 389/86-I7 L-86-405 3)The subject procedure has been compared to the P 8 ID and a system walkdown conducted to ensure that the procedure accurately

reflects plant conditions.

The procedure has been revised accordingly.

The subject valves were in the correct position for plant operation.

This procedure was incorrect in regards to the required position;The operators have been counseled on the need for proper procedural

documentation.

Plant personnel responsible

for the ongoing review of procedures

have been reinstructed

on the need to perform indepth and detailed reviews of plant procedures.

4)FPL feels that the above actions will be sufficient

to avoid further violations

in this area.5)Full compliance

has been achieved.ITEM B On July I I, 1986 Plant Administrative

Procedure 00I0432, Rev.26, Plant Work Orders, paragraphs

5.l and 8.l.l, was not properly implemented

in that a plant work order (PWO)was not issued for a deficiency

on a plant system (190 foot wind direction remote instrument)

which had been identified

in the plant"Out-of-Service" log on July 9.RESPONSE B I)Florida Power 8 Light Company (FPL)concurs with this violation 2)FPL believes that the operators involved thought that verbal notification

to the Maintenance

Department

eliminated

the need for a written plant work order.3)A plant work order was written for this item per Administrative

Procedure (AP)00 I 0432.4)A night order has been issued to the Operations

Department

reiterating

the requirements

listed in AP 00I0432.FPL feels that the above actions will be suf ficient to prevent recurrence.

5)Ful I compliance

has been achieved.GRM4/0 I 2/3