IR 05000400/2008301

Harris March 05000400-08-301 Exam Administrative Documents

ML082200269
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	08/07/2008
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC/RGN-II
References
50-400/08-301
Download: ML082200269 (76)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:,.., fI1GE: rs 2WBJ-30 t}11l-l!L:_1f -c2 trO 8 ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS(YellowPaper)ExamPreparationChecklist ES-201-1ExamOutlineQualityChecklist ES-201-2/ Security Agreement(s) ES-201-3/TopicsOutline(Final) ES-301-11 A:OperatingTestQualityCheckSheetScenarioQualityCheckSheet ES-301-4/TransientandEventChecklist ES-301-o/CompetenciesChecklist ES-301-a/ExamQualityCheckSheet ES-401-6/XWrittenExam Review Worksheet ES-401-9ExamGradingQualityChecklist ES-403-1/'CheckSheet ES-501-1 XFacilitySubmittal Letters/-i-dl t')-t9 8 11-c9 CJ-cQ L7Z>.rr ES-201,Rev.9E Examination Preparation ChecklistFormES-201-1Facility:Harris2008-301ExaminationPreparedBy:DatesofExamination: Facility3/10-14andXX/2008 NRC Written I Operating TestWritten/OperatingTest Target Chief Date*TaskDescription (Reference) Examiner's Initials-1801.Examination administration date confirmed(C.1.a;C.2.aandb) 8/2007-1202.NRC examinersandfacility contact assigned(C.1.d;C.2.e) 10/XXl2008-1203.Facility contactbriefedonsecurityandother requirements (C.2.c)10/XXl2008 -120 4.Corporate notificationlettersent(C.2.d) 10/XXl2008 [-90][5.Referencematerialdue(C.1.e;C.3.c; Attachment 2)]01/07/2008{-75}6.Integratedexaminationoutline(s)due,includingFormsES-201-2,ES-201-3, 12/17/2007ES-301-1,ES-301-2,ES-301-5,ES-D-1 Is,ES-401-1/2,ES-401-3,andES-401-4,as applicable(C.1.eandf;C.3.d) {-70}{7.Examination outline(s)reviewedbyNRCand feedbackprovidedtofacility 01/09/2008 licensee(C.2.h;C.3.e)}{-45}8.Proposed examinations (including written, walk-throughJPMs,and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms 01/07/2008ES-301-3,ES-301-4,ES-301-5,ES-301-6,andES-401-6),andreference materialsdue(C.1.e,f,gandh:C.3.d) -30 9.Preliminary license applications(NRCForm398 1s)due (C.1.1;C.2.g;02/08/2008 ES-202)-1410.Finallicense applicationsdueandFormES-201-4prepared (C.1.1;C.2.i;02/25/2008 ES-202)-14 11.Examination approvedbyNRC supervisorforfacilitylicenseereview(C.2.h;C.3.f) -14 12.Examinationsreviewedwithfacility licensee(C.1.j;C.2.fandh:C.3.g)-713.Written examinations and operating tests approvedbyNRC supervisor(C.2.i;C.3.h) -7 14.Final applicationsreviewed;1or2 (if>10)applicationsauditedtoconfirm qualifications /eligibility; and examinationapprovalandwaiverletterssent (C.2.i;Attachment4;ES-202,C.2.e;ES-204)-715.Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewedwithfacility licensee (C.3.k)-716.Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributedtoNRC examiners (C.3.i)*Targetdatesare generallybasedon facility-prepared examinationsandarekeyedtothe examination date identifiedinthe corporate notificationletter.Theyareforplanning purposesandmaybeadjustedonacasebasisin coordinationwiththefacilitylicensee.[Appliesonly]{Doesnotapply}to examinations preparedbytheNRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 FacHit: HarrisDateofExamination: 3/10/2008 Author Facility Reviewer ("')NRC Chief Examiner (#)NRC Supervisorc.Assesswhetherthe outlineover..emphasizesany systems,evolutions,orgeneric topics.Date Z/ZkJ/O'?Initials Task DescriptionPrinte.d I To},,, b?t e;.... ..Checkforduplicationand overlapamongexamsections.

Determine ifthereareenoughdifferentoutlinestotestthe projectednumberandmixof applicants and ensurethatnoitems are duplicatedonsubsequentdays.

Check the entire examforbalanceofcoverage.EnsurethatKIA importanceratings(except for plant-specific priorities) are atleast2.5.Assesswhethertheexamfitstheappropriatejoblevel(ROorSRO).

Assesswhetherthe 10CFR 55.41/43and55.45 sampling is appropriate.

Assess whetherplant..specificpriorities(includingPRAandIPEinsights) are covered intheappropriateexamsection.

C.Tothe extent possible Iassesswhethertheoutline(s)conform(s)withthe qualitative andquantitativecriteriaspecified onFormES..301-4anddescribed inAppendixD.a.Verifythatsystemswalk-throuqh outlinemeetsthecriteriaspecifiedonFormES ..301..2:(1)theouUine(s)contain(s)therequirednumberofcontrolroom and in-plant tasks, distributedamongthesafetyfunctionsasspecifiedonthe form (2)taskrepetitionfromthelasttwoNRCexaminationsis within the Hmits specified ontheform,(3)*notasksare dupHcatedfromthe applicants)audittest(s} (4)the number of alternate path, low-power, emergencyandRCAtasksmeetthecriteriaontheform.

b.Assesswhetherthere are enoughscenariosets (and spares)totesttheprojected numberandmixof applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule withoutcompromisingexam integrity; andensurethateachapplicantcanbetestedusingat leastonenewor significantlymodifiedscenario,thatnoscenariosare duplicatedfromtheapplicants'audittest(s),andscenarios wiB not berepeatedonsubsequentdays.

b.Verifythattheadministrative outlinemeetsthe criteria specified on FormES-301-1:(1)thetasksare distributed among the topics asspecifiedon the form(2)at leastonetask isnewor significantly modified (3)nomorethanonetaskisrepeatedfromthelasttwoNRClicensingexaminationsa.UsingFormES..verifythattheproposed scenariosetscover therequirednumber ofnormalevolutions,instrument andcomponentfailures , technicalspecifications,and major transients.

b.Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with SectionD.1ofES..401andwhetherall KiA categories are appropriately sampled.d.Assesswhetherthe justifications for deselectedorrejectedKiAstatementsare appropriate.a.Verifythatthe outline(s) fit(s)the appropriate model per ES-401.c.4.a.G b.E N c.E d, R A e.L f.S I M U L A T o R 2.3.1.W I T W R I T T E N ltem b.c.d.a.NOTE:#Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column He", chief examiner concurrence required.NUREG-1021,Revision9 ES-201ExaminationOutlineQuality ChecklistFormES-201-2Facilit: HarrisDateof Examination: 3/10/2008 Initials Printdme I Signature Task Description Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities)areat least 2.5.Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.Assess whether the 10CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRAandIPE insights)are covered in the appropriate exam section.Assess whether the examfitsthe appropriatejoblevel (RO or SRO).c.Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.a.Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

a.Verify that the outline(s)fit(s)the appropriate model per ES-401.b.Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with SectionD.1ofES-401and whetherallKIA categories are appropriately sampled.d.Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.c.Tothe extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s)withthe qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.b.Assess whetherthere are enough scenario sets (and spares)to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordancewiththe expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; and ensure that each applicantcanbe testedusingatleastonenewor significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicatedfromthe applicants' audit test(s), and scenarioswillnotbe repeated on subsequent days.a.Verify that systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specifiedonForm ES-301-2:(1)the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, distributed among the safety functions as specifiedontheform (2)task repetitionfromthelasttwoNRC examinations is withinthelimits specified ontheform,(3)*no tasks are duplicatedfromthe applicants' audit test(s)(4)the number of alternate path, low-power, emergencyandRCA tasks meet the criteriaontheform.

b.Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specifiedonForm ES-301-1:(1)the tasks are distributed among the topics as specifiedontheform(2)at least one taskisnewor significantly modified(3)no morethanone task is repeatedfromthelasttwoNRC licensing examinations 2.1.S I M U L A T o R 3.c.4.a.G b.E N c.E d.R A e.L f.W R I T T E N W/T Item a.Author b.Facility Reviewer (*)c.NRC Chief Examiner (#)d.NRC Supervisor b*II-------t-----------------------------------+---+-- NOTE:#Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column"c", chief examiner concurrence required.NUREG-1021, Revision 9 DR From: To: Date: Subject:MarkBatesGerardLaska 12/11/20072:42:30PMRe:HarrisOutline commentsPerourdiscussiononthephone,youmaysignformepertelecon.Ihavereadyourcommentsandagreethattheyare satisfactoryforsendingtothelicensee.MarkA.BatesSeniorOperationsEngineerUSNRC-RegionIIOperationsBranch 404-562-4612 >>>GerardLaska 12/11/20072:32PM>>>Mark/Malcolm,attachedaremy commentsontheoutlinesthatHarrissubmitted.Overalltheyappeartobeacceptable.IhaveseveralquestionsthatIamgoingtoaskregardingmethodof developmentoftheoriginaloutline,andselectionof replacementK/As.Iwillcall J.Daltonthisafternoonwiththisinformation.Thanks,Gerry.GerryLaskaSeniorOperations Examiner 404-562-4626 lis 2002NRC 1.Pre-Examination-z; P CANT ATJ'AC:HMENT 3 I L c.F)(A-{Y)EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT Sac.U(L,T'/ AdR E..E(Y)E.rJl'" I acknowledgethatIhave acquired specialized knowledgeabouttheNRClicensing examinations scheduledforthe period indicatedbelowas ofthedate ofmysignature.IagreethatIwillnot knowinglydivulgeany informationaboutthese examinationstoany personswhohavenotbeen authorizedbytheNRC chiefexaminer.I understandthatIamnottoinstruct,evaluate,or provide performancefeedbacktothose applicants scheduledtobe administeredtheselicensing examinationsfromthisdateuntil completion of examination administration,exceptas specifically noted below and authorizedbytheNRC.Furthermore,Iamaware of the physicalsecuritymeasuresand requirements and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinationsand/oran enforcementactionagainstmeorthefacilitylicensee.Iwill immediately reporttofacility managementortheNRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examinationsecuritymayhavebeen compromised.

2.Post-Examination NOTE DATE __4:fIC../01-. __5-2.

_ __I.{-f-0t?4'3-ae__POST-EXAMINATION .IGNAlNRE (2)htfb 6 I'3 k'-/fog __uo-.:-.""""'....#A wr ) 3 rj,i;'P-- DATE v A l\c...\\).5:+S}(O (\0-SilO S-r.{'tiT£\(Lb PRINTED NAME 1.-2.&...-}Tothebest ofmyknowledge,Ididnotdivulgetoany unauthorized persons any information concerningtheNRClicensing examinations administeredduringthe period indicatedbelow.FromthedatethatI enteredintothissecurity agreementuntilthe completion of examination administration,Ididnotinstruct,evaluate,or provide performancefeedbacktothoseapplicantswhowere administeredtheselicensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorizedbytheNRC.Examination Periodj/1::>I 07 g?>/dL/d8 , 3k')08 JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILITY PRE-EXAMINATION SIGNATURE (1)NOTES: I TAP-410 IRev.9 IPage15 of 20 I

dIs EXf\l\tIINArrION f\GREElVIENrr1.Pre-ExanlinationIacknowledgethat1haveacquiredspecializedknowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduledforthe period indicated bel 0 v." asofthedate of Illy signature.Iagree that 1willnot knowingly divulge anyinformation about these examinations to any persons who have not beenauthorizedbythe N'RCchiefexaminer.1understand thatIam not to instruct,evaluate,or provide performance feedback to those applicantsscheduled to be administered theselicensingexaminations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted belowand authorized by the NRC.funhermoreI Jain aware of the physlcalsecudty measures and requirements and understand thatviolationoftheconditionsofthisagreementmayresult in cancellationoftheexaminationsand/or anenforcementaction against meorthe facility licensee.I\-vi II immediately report to lilcility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications orsuggestions that examination security may have.been compromised" 2" Post-ExaminationTothebest-of illyknowledge,1 didnotdivulge toany unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the period indicated below.Fromthedate that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct;evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicantswhowere administered theselicensingexaminations, except as specificallynotedbelow and authorized bytheNRC.Examination Period 3/'2-1'SLUe,v-

MS KO ,1lb\..-.l) 12.0 JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY PRINTED NAME NOTBS:sr} Or;.F\/\f>' I TAP41Q IRev.10 I Page15of 20 I <, l\-..i\.C t i-'I 3/5 EX/\IVII.NArriON 1.Pre...Exatninatiol1 I acknowledgethatIhave acquiredspecializedknowledge about the NR(;licensing examinations scheduled for the period indicated below as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge anyinformationabout these examinations to any persons who have not been authorizedbythechief examiner.I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, Of provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration ..except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Punhermore,1am awareofthe physical security measures and requirements and understand that violation of the conditionsofthisagreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.I wi U immediately report to t:1.cility management 01'the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.Post-Exarnination To the best of Illy knowledge, I did not divulgetoany unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the period indicated below.From the date thatIentered intothissecurity agreement until the completion of examination administration, Ididnot instruct,evaluate,orprovide performance feedback to those, applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Examination Period to 312.\l 0'8---------- 't;,{)y illior NOTE DATE DATE.... SIGNATURE (1)S'L-l:):t115't JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY PRINTED NAME*I.

3.SQ.)rr 4.(OiV1__ __6.__.7,;_9.10.___12._ 14.._N()TES: I IRev.10 I Page 150f201 I.i;. l!:Xj\IVlJ..Nt,\'[I()NSI£.*C tJIl I/\.(; I.Pre-ExanUIl3!l.£Hl1acknowledge that.I have acquired specializedknowledgeabout HGcnsing examinations scheduledforthe period indicated below as of the;dale of IllY 5ignature.

I thatI will not knowingly divulge any information about theseexaminationstoany persons who have not beenauthorizedby the chief examiner.1 understand tharl am not to instruct, evaluate, Of provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these.licensing examinations from this date until.cornpletion of examination violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examiaations and/or anenforcement action againstmeor the facility licensee.I\viH immediarely report it)fftcIHtji management or the NRC: chief examineranyindications ersaggestions that examinstion security may have.been compromised.

2.POSl.-EXHTnina.ti9i.J1 To the.best of n1Yknowledge,I did not divulg.e to any unauthorized persons any information concerning theNlcClicensing examinations administeredduring the period indicated those applicants who'w'ere administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by-the NRC.ExulllinMf()f\PeriQt:! to.\"L\\ifY ._.

_.-4.5.PRINTEI).N.AJ\ilE J()B 1'rrLE I RESPONSIBILITY N (1) IF::'" ( Dl\]]2;POST-.EX.AlvfIN.AJ]()N 1)ATI3 N(lT:E*

• • • • mmm 6..7.8.-------=--=----=""""""-=='='

9.

-10.J.

__............... 12, ............... __ ___........ __N I TAP41Q*.*Rev,10: Page 15 pf?QI ,#

eKAM..5/5 EXAIVIINA"fION* SEC'U*Ilrr\;f 1.Pre...E>uuninatlol1 2.Post-*Ex aminatiQ 11 were administered these speciflcaUynoted below and authorized by the*NRC.Ex;amina!ionPefiod DATE-..-,:::::::.s? (\rtf'.,Ml-..-r===r)"''.'"". JOB TITLE lRESPONSIBILITY PRINl'ED NAME rosTlEXAMINATION DAtE NOTE SIGNATURE (2)64?5tfi:l Z>f n ,lEah..

J<)!t

-- 5.. ON ON NOTES: CD C:J(1 eJ _ye-a-'T<2.\<.o.N\*t TAP410!101 Page 1 qof 20 I ES-301 Facility: HARRIS Administrative Topics OutlineDateof Examination:FormES-301-1March,2008 ExaminationLevel(circleone): IRol/SRO OperatingTestNumber: NRC Administrative Topic(seeNote)Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations Equipment ControlRadiationControl Emergency Plan Type Code*M M M MDescribeactivitytobe performed Determinethecold,xenonfreeboron concentration requirementpriorto commencinganaturalcirculation cooldown.(EPP-005/0ST-1036)G2.1.25(2.8/3.1)-Abilitytoobtainand interpretstationreference materialssuchasgraphs,monographs,andtableswhichcontain performance data.EstimatePrimaryto SecondaryLeakRate.(AOP-016,CurveBook)2.1.25(2.8)-Abilitytoobtainandinterpretstationreference materialssuchasgraphs,monographs,andtableswhichcontain performance data.Performa QuadrantPowerTiltRatio(QPTR) calculationwithacontrolrod misaligned.(OST-1039)2.2.12(3.0)-Knowledgeof surveillance procedures.Givenan emergency situation, determine the applicabledoselimitandthe numberofpeoplethatwillberequiredtoperformthetask,withnoone exceedingthelimit.2.3.4(2.5/3.1)-Knowledgeofradiation exposurelimitsand contaminationcontrol,including permissiblelimitsinexcessofthoseauthorized.

NOT SELECTEDFORRO NOTE:Allitems(5totalarerequiredforSROs.RO applicantsrequireonly4itemsunlesstheyareretakingonlythe administrativetopics,when5arerequired.*TypeCodes &Criteria:(C)ontrolroom (D)irectfrombankforROs;forSROs&ROretakes)(N)ew or (M)odifiedfrombank(>1)(P)revious2exams (s 1;randomly selected)(S)imulator NUREG-1021,Revision9HARRIS2008NRCRO301-1,Rev2 ES-301 Facility: HARRIS Administrative Topics OutlineDateof Examination:FormES-301-1March,2008 Examination Level (circleone):RO/ISROI Operating Test Number: NRC Administrative Topic(seeNote)Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations Equipment Control Radiation Control Emergency Plan Type Code*M P,M N M M Describe activitytobe performed Determinethecold,xenonfreeRCSboron concentration requirement prior to commencing a natural circulation cooldown.(EPP-005/0ST -1036)G2.1.25 (2.8/3.1)-Abilitytoobtainandinterpretstationreference materialssuchasgraphs, monographs,andtableswhichcontain performance data.Perform a Control Room Supervisor reviewofthe control board readingslog.(OST-1021, Attachment 4)G2.1.18(3.0)-Abilitytomakeaccurate,clearandconciselogs,records,statusboards,andreports.

Review the completed surveillance for Motor Driven AFWPump"A".(OST-1211)2.2.12(3.4)- Knowledge of surveillance procedures.'Givenan emergency situation, determine the applicabledoselimitandthe numberofpeoplethatwillbe requiredtoperformthetask,withnoone exceedingthelimit.2.3.4 (2.5/3.1)-Knowledgeofradiationexposurelimitsand contaminationcontrol,including permissiblelimitsinexcessofthoseauthorized.

Evaluate a change in conditionswithanEALineffectandtakethe required actions.2.2.41(4.1)- Knowledgeofthe emergencyactionlevelthresholds and classifications.NOTE:All items (5 total)are requiredforSROs.RO applicants requireonly4itemsunless they are retakingonlythe administrativetopics,when5arerequired.

• Type Codes&Criteria: (C)ontrol room (D)irectfrombank (=::;3forROs;=::;for SROs&RO retakes)(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (>1)(P)revious 2 exams (=::;1;randomly selected)(S)imulator NUREG-1021, Revision 9 HARRIS2008NRCSRO301-1,Revision2 ES-301 Facility: HARRIS Control Room/ln-Plant Systems OutlineDateofExamination:

Form ES-301-2 3/2008ExamLevel(circleone): RO I SRO(I)ISRQ(U)OperatingTestNo.: NRCControlRoom Systems@(8forRO;7forSRO-I;2or3forSRO-U,including1ESF) System IJPMTitlea.Initiate EmergencyBorationfollowingareactortrip(AOP-002)System:004/BankJPMCR-037 b.Align ECCS for long-term recirculation (EPP-010)System: EPE011/BankJPMCR-031c.InitiateRCSFeedandBleed(FRP-H.1) System: E05/2007NRCExamJPMdd.RespondtoalossofNormalServiceWater(AOP-022)System:076e.Placethe ContainmentHydrogenPurgeSysteminoperation 125)RO OnlySystem:028/BankJPMCR-021TypeCode*M,A,S M,A,S P,D,A,S N,A,S D,C Safety Function 3 4P 4S 5 f.Transfer an Emergency Bus toanEDG duetoa degraded grid N,A,S 6 condition (AOP-028, Attachment 2)System: 062g.RespondtoaFuelHandlingBuildingRMSalarm(AOP-005,OP-170)N, L,S 7System:072 h.Align CCW to support RHR Initiation (OP-145)D,L,S 8 System: 008/BankJPMCR-085 In-Plant Systems@(3forRO;3forSRO-I;3or2forSRO-U) i.Perform the local actions for a dropped rod recovery (AOP-001)System: 001/BankJPMIP-153 D,E 1NUREG-1021,Revision9 HARRIS2008NRC301-2,Revision2 ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2j.IsolatetheECCS Accumulatorsafteracontrolroom evacuation N,E 8 (AOP-004,Step38)System: APE068 k.Terminate a Waste Gas Release (OP-120.07) P,D,R 9 System: 071/2007NRCJPMk@AllROandSRO-Icontrolroom(andin-plant) systemsmustbe differentandserve different safety functions;all5SRO-U systemsmustserve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlapthosetestedinthecontrolroom.

• TypeCodes (A)lternate path(C)ontrolroom (D)irectfrombank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant (L)ow-Power

/Shutdown (N)ew or (M)odifiedfrombankincluding1(A)(P)revious 2 exams (R)CA (S)imulatorCriteriaforRO/SRO-I/SRO-U4-6/4-6/2-3 9/8/41/;;,:.:.1/ 11/1/1>:2/3/3/2 (randomly selected);'::::.1/1/:2:.1 HARRIS2008NRC 301*2 JPM SUMMARY STATEMENTSa.Initiate EmergencyBorationin accordance with AOP-002, EMERGENCY BORA TION, following a reactortrip.The alternatepathistotake correctiveactionfortwoormore stuckrodsas determined in EPP-004, REACTORTRIP.ModifiedfromBankJPM037byfailingfirst borationpathdriving candidatetouse secondary means.b.TransfertoColdLeg Recirculation in accordance with EPP-010, TRANSFERTOCOLD LEG RECIRCULATION, followingaLBLOCA.The alternatepathsare corrective actions for alignment failuresintwo different flowpaths.

ModifyBankJPMCR-031bychanging the misalignedvalveinoneRNOstepandtherunningpump combination.c.InitiateRCSFeedandBleedlAWFRP-H.1, RESPONSETOLOSSOF SECONDARY HEATSINK.The alternatepathisto establish an adequateventpathusingRVHead Vents followingfailureofone PORVtoopen.Randomly selectedrepeatfrom2007NRCExam(JPMd)notinthe facility bank.d.Respondtoalossoftheonly available Normal Service WaterPumpin accordance with AOP-022,LOSSOF SERVICE WATER.The'alternatepathistostartoneEssential Service WaterPumpandtotriptheMain Turbine with powerlessthanP-10.NewJPM.e.Placethe Containment HydrogenPurgeSystemin operation in accordancewith 125, POST ACCIDENT HYDROGEN SYSTEM.BankJPMCR-021.ThisJPMwillbe simulatedintheMain ControlRoom(usingcues) because some equipment important tothetaskisnot simulated.NUREG-1021,Revision9 HARRIS2008NRC301-2,Revision2 ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems OutlineFormES-301-2f.Witha degradedgridcondition, transfer an emergencybustoanEDGin accordance with AOP-028, GRID INSTABILITY -Attachment 2, ENERGIZING EMERGENCYBUSESFROMEDGS,by purposely de-energizingabus.The alternatepathisstartinganEDG following evaluation of Voltage/Frequencyonan emergencybusand manuallyresettingtheLoad Sequencerafterthecycleis complete.NewJPM.g.RespondtoaFuelHandlingBuildingRMSalarmin accordance with AOP-005, RADIATION MONITORINGSYSTEM,andOP-170,FUEL HANDLING BUILDINGHVAC.AFHB monitoralarmsandFHBHVAC componentsfailtoalignproperly.New JPM.h.AlignCCWto supportRHRInitiationin accordancewithOP-145, COMPONENT COOLING WATER.BankJPMCR-085.i.Performthelocal actionsfora dropped rod recovery in accordance with AOP-001, MALFUNCTIONOFROD CONTROL AND INDICATION SYSTEM.Bank JPM-IP-153.j.IsolatetheECCS Accumulatorsafteracontrolroom evacuation in accordance with AOP-004, REMOTE SHUTDOWN,Step38.NewJPM.

k.Terminate a WasteGasReleasein accordance with OP-120.07, WASTE GAS PROCESSING.

Randomlyselectedrepeatfrom2007NRCExam(JPMk).NUREG-1021,Revision9 HARRIS2008NRC301-2,Revision2 ES*301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES*301*32.Walk-Throu h Criteria 3.Simulator Criteriab*c#InitialsDateofExamination:1.General Criterialicateitemsfromthealicants'audittest s.seeSectionD.1.a.

Theo a.d.NRC Supervisorc.NRCChiefExaminer(#)b.FacilityReviewer(*)d.Overlapwiththewrittenexaminationandbetweendifferentpartsoftheoperatingtestiswithinaccetablelimits.e.Itappearsthattheoperatingtestwill differentiatebetweencompetentand less-than-competentalicantsatthedesinatedlicenselevel.a.EachJPMincludesthefollowing,asapplicable:initialconditionsinitiatingcuesreferencesandtools,includingassociatedproceduresreasonableandvalidatedtimelimits(averagetimeallowedforcompletion)andspecificdesignationifdeemedtobe time-criticalbythefacilitylicensee operationallyimportantspecific performancecriteriathatinclude:detailedexpectedactionswithexactcriteriaandnomenclaturesystemresponseandother examiner cuesstatementsdescribingimportant observationstobemadebytheapplicantcriteriaforsuccessfulcompletionofthetaskidentificationofcriticalstepsandtheirassociatedperformancestandardsrestrictionsontheseuenceofstes,ifaIicablea.AuthorTheassociated simulatoroperatingtests(scenariosets)havebeenreviewedinaccordancewithFormES-301-4andacoisattached.Facilit:b.Ensurethatanychangesfromthepreviouslyapprovedsystemsandadministrativewalk-throughoutlines(FormsES-301-1and2)havenotcausedthetesttodeviatefromanyoftheacceptancecriteria(e.g.,itemdistribution,bankuse,repetitionfromthelast2NRC examinations) specifiedonthoseformsandFormES-201-2.

c.b.Thereisnoday-to-dayrepetitionbetweenthisandotheroperatingteststobe administereddurinthisexamination.NOTE:ThefacilitysignatureisnotapplicableforNRC-developedtests.

1. IndeendentNRCreviewerinitialitemsinColumn"c";chiefexaminer concurrencereuired.ES-301,Page24of27 ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: HARRISDateofExam:

03/2008ScenarioNumbers: 1/2/3OperatingTestNo.: QUALITATIVE ATIRIBUTES Initials ab*c#1.Theinitialconditionsare realistic,inthatsomeequipmentand/orinstrumentation maybeoutof P k'1Jiservice.but it doesnotcuetheoperatorsintoexpectedevents.

2.Thescenariosconsistmostlyofrelatedevents.

iPf\.../..V , 3.Ea.cheventdescriptionconsistsof

• thepointinthescenariowhen itistobeinitiated
• themalfunction(s)thatareenteredtoinitiatetheevent 10..J*thesymptoms/cuesthat wHlbevisibletothecrew

";:!*theexpectedoperatoractions (byshiftposition)

• theeventterminationpoint (if applicable)

4.Nomorethanonenon-mechanisticfailure(e.g .*pipebreak)isincorporatedintothescenariowithout to 1])-acredibleprecedingincidentsuchasaseismicevent.

5.Theeventsarevalid withregardto physicsandthermodynamics.

rr{:)"..*....6.Sequencingandtimingofeventsis reasonable,andallowstheexaminationteamtoobtaincomplete/If'Ievaluationresultscommensuratewiththescenarioobjectives.

to i----7.Iftimecompressiontechniquesareused,thescenariosummaryclearlysoindicates.

Operators!\havesufficienttimetocarryoutexpectedactivitieswithoutunduetimeconstraints.

(10 l\1[)i:?**8.Thesimulatormodelingisnotaltered.t1 v yo 9.Thescenarioshavebeenvalidated.Pursuantto10CFR55.46(d),anyopensimulatorperformance Jodeficienciesordeviationsfromthereferencedplanthavebeenevaluatedtoensurethatfunctional /!...fidelity ismaintainedwhilerunningtheplannedscenarios.

<"v'10.Everyoperator winbeevaluated using at feastoneneworsignificantlymodifiedscenario.

AU other?fly.-scenarioshavebeenaltered inaccordancewith Section 0.5ofES-301.l'""Y: r--11.AUindividualoperatorcompetenciescanbeevaluated,asverifiedusingForm ES-301-6(submitthe If)1f;)_.formalong withthesimulatorscenarios).

0'"12.Eachapplicant wiltbesignificantlyinvolvedintheminimumnumberoftransientsandevents-tbspecifiedonFormES ..301-5(submittheformwiththesimulatorscenarios).

'.,J 13.Thelevelofdifficulty isappropriatetosupportlicensingdecisionsforeachcrewposition.

\rlf) ,., Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario;See Section D.5.d)Actual Attributes .-..1.Totalmalfunctions(5 ...8)9 IV..r*\J 2.Malfunctions afterEOPentry(1 ..2)2/2/2 it;:*3.Abnormalevents(2-4) 4/5/4 v1?.-11..4.Majortransients(1-2) 2/2/1....5.EOPsentered/requiringsubstantiveactions(1 ..2)2/2/3.:It, ,1 ,.'" 6.EOPcontingenciesrequiringsubstantiveactions(0 ..2)1/1 I 0iJ/57.Criticaltasks(2-3) 2/3 I i/ov-NUREG..1021 1 Revision 9HARRIS2008NRC 301-4,Revision2 ES-301 TransientandEventChecklistFormES-301-5 Facility: HARRISDateofExam: 03/2008 Operating Test No.: SROU/IAE Scenarios P VPE 1 2 3 4 T MLN 0 I I T CREW CREW CREW CREW T N C POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I A T L M N Y UTP M(*)E S ABSABSAB S A BRI URT 0RT 0RT 0 R T 0 0CP 0 C P 0CP 0 C P RX11 0 NOR 1 1 1/211 1 I/C 3,4, 2,3, 4/644 2 5,6 4,5, 6 SRO-U MAJ 7,9 7,9 2/4 2 2 1 TS 2,3 3,5, 2/2 0 2 2 6 RX 1 111 0 NOR 1 111 1 SRO-I I/C 3,4, 2,4, 744 2 5,6 6 MAJ 7,9 7,9 4 2 2 1 TS 2,3 3 0 2 2 RX11 0 NOR11 1 I/C44 2 MAJ22 1 TS 0 2 2 Instructions: 1.Circle the applicantleveland enter the operating test numberandFormES-D-1 event numbersforeacheventtype;TSare not-applicableforRO applicants.ROsmust serviceinboththe"at-the-controls(ATC)"and"balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROsmustdoone scenario, includingatleasttwo instrument or component (I/C)malfunctionsandone major transient,intheATC position.2.Reactivity manipulations may be conducted undernormalor controlled abnormal conditions (refertoSection D.5.d)but must be significant per SectionC.2.aof AppendixD.(*)Reactivityandnormal evolutionsmaybe replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctionsona1-for-1basis.

3.Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included;only thosethatrequire verifiable actions that provide insighttothe applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specifiedforthe applicant's licenselevelinthe right-hand columns.NUREG1021Revision9HARRIS2008NRCSRO301-5,Revision2 ES-301TransientandEvent ChecklistFormES-301-5 Facility: HARRISDateofExam: 03/2008 Operating Test No.: RO A E Scenarios P V P E 1 2 3 4 T M L N 0 I I T CREW CREW CREW CREW T N C POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I A T L M N Y U T P M(*)ESABSA BSAB S A B R I U R T 0RT 0RT 0 R T 0 0CP 0 C P 0CP 0 C P R01 RX 1111 0 NOR 1111 1 I/C 3,5 3,5444 2 MAJ 7-9 7-9 422 1 TS0022 R02 RX 1111 0 NOR 1 1 111 I/C 3,5 3,5 444 2 MAJ 7-9 7-9 422 1 TS0022 RX NOR I/C MAJ TS Instructions: 1.Circle the applicantleveland enter the operating test numberandFormES-D-1 event numbersforeach eventtype;TSarenot applicableforRO applicants.

ROs must serviceinboththe"at-the-controls (ATC)" and"balance-of-plant(BOP)" positions; Instant SROs mustdoone scenario, includingatleasttwo instrument or component (I/C)malfunctionsandone major transient,intheATC position.2.Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d)but must be significant per Section C.2.a of AppendixD.(*)Reactivity and normal evolutionsmaybe replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctionsona1-for-1basis.

3.Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included;only thosethatrequire verifiable actions that provide insighttothe applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specifiedforthe applicant's licenselevelinthe right-hand columns.NUREG1021Revision9HARRIS2008NRCRO301-5,Revision2 ES..301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: HARRIS Date of Examination: 03/2008 Operating Test No.: SRO APPLICANTS SRO-U SRO-I Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 123 412 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 3,5 2,3 , 2 ,3 Events and Conditions 5,7 7,8 5,7, 6,7 9 9.9 8,9 10 Comply With and Use An 1,3 1,3 1 AU Procedures (1)5 5 Operate Control NA 1,3 1.3, NA Boards (2)5,8 5,7, 9 , 9 10 Communicate and All 1.3 1.2 1 All Interact 5.7 3 15, 8.9 7,9 10 Demonstrate AU NA NA All Supervisory Ability (3)Comply With and Use 2,3 NA NA 3,5 Tech.Specs.(3)6 Notes: (1)(2)(3)Includes Technical Specification compliance foranRO.Optional for an SRO-U.Only applicable to SROs.Instructions:Circlethe applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbersthatwill allow the examiners toeveiuete every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG-1 021, Revision 9 HARRIS 2008 NRC SRO 301-6, Revision 2 ES-301 Competencies ChecklistFormES-301 ..6 Facility: HARRISDateof Examination: 03/2008 Operating Test No.: RO APPLICANTS R01 R02 R03 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 4,6 2,4 2,3, 3,5, 4,6 2,4 Events and Conditions .8,9 6 t9 5,7, 7,8, 8,9 6,9 10 9 9.10 10 Comply WithandUse 1,4 2.4 1,3, 1,3, 1,4 2,4 Procedures (1)6 6 5, 5 6 6 Operate Control 1,4 2,4 1,3, 1,3, 1A 2.4 Boards (2)6,8 6,7 5}, 5,8, 6,8 6.7 9, 9 9 9.10 9, 9 10 10 Communicate and 1.4 1,2 1,2, 1,3, 1.4 1,2 Interact 6,8 4,6 3,5, 5,7, 6,8 4,6 9, 7,9 7,9 8,9.9, 7.9 10 10 10 Demonstrate NA NA NA NA NA NA Supervisory Ability (3)Comply WithandUse NA NA NA NA NA NA Tech.Specs.(3)Notes:(1)Includes Technical Specification complianceforanRO, (2)Optional for an SRO-U.(3)Only applicabletoSROs.Instructions: Circle the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbersthatwill allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG...1 021, Revision 9 HARRIS 2008NRCRO 301-6, Revision 2 ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility:DateofExam: Exam Level: ROSRO QSJ Initial Item Description a b*c.#1.Questionsandanswersaretechnicallyaccurateandapplicabletothefacility.

\6)lit!I2.8.NRC K1Asarereferenced fOTallquestions.Del;-XI'/\b.Facility learning objectivesarereferencedasavailable.

3.SROQuestionsareappropriate in accordance withSectionD.2.dof ES-401 o elL1r 4.Thesamplingprocesswasrandomandsystematic(Ifmorethan4ROor2SROquestions

• W**

...wererepeatedfrom thelast2NRC Iicenstngexams,consulttheNRROLprogramoffice).

y 5.Questionduplicationfromthelicensescreening/auditexamwascontrolledasindicatedbelow(checktheitemthatapplies)andappearsappropriate:_theauditexamwassystematicallyandrandomlydeveloped;or Jr_theauditexamwascompletedbeforethelicenseexamwasstarted:or \()OtL_theexaminationsweredevelopedindependently;or 0helicenseecertifiesthatthereisno duplication; or_other(explain) 6.Bankusemeets limits(nomorethan75percent Bank Modified New tfromthebank,atleas110percentnew,andtherestnewormodified);entertheactualRO ISRO..only (1 1 q I3<,,(IOt Lquestiondistributionts)atright.

7.Between50and60percentofthequestionsontheROMemory CIA Iexamarewrittenatthecomprehensionlanalysislevel; \0theSROexammayexceed60percentjftherandomly60%68fl OtjlL selected KJAssupportthehighercognitivelevels;enter '3I iftheactualRO ISROquestiondistribution(s)atright.

c-::>it 8.References/handoutsprovideddonotgiveawayanswers \0 U:£J!or aidintheeliminationofdistractors.

9.Questioncontentconforms withspecificKIAstatementsinthepreviouslyapproved DC)(L.,examinationoutlineandisappropriateforthetiertowhichtheyareassigned;deviationsarejustified.

i, jI 10.QuestionpsychometricqualityandformatmeettheguidelinesinESAppendixB.

}'\11.Theexamcontainstherequirednumberof one-pointmultiplechoiceitems; \0 Ott1."iL.thetotal iscorrectandagreeswiththevalueonthecoversheet.

Printed Name I Date If 3a.Author ,j D\--\N)If)l:1'("'(,.j ."""'-::=')b.F acmty Reviewer{*} if.\1,/(./'-\v:..t'/\7J_.

c.NRC Chief Examiner (#) i:..t'LASk:A{.2 LP.AdZ#It.-Jd.NRCRegionalSupervisor /"'A.!pn.u-C\11\0"... f,A..fir'( Note: "It The facilityreviewer'sinitials/signaturearenotapplicablefor

1. IndependentNRCreviewerinitial itemsinColumn I4 C ll;chiefexaminerconcurrencerequired.

ES-401,Page29of33 ES-401,Rev.9Harris2008-301SRO Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 Stem IcuesIT/FI J?b-IMinutiaI#(I Back-IQ=I SRO IFocusDlst.Link Units ward KIA On!y 7.Explanation 6.5.Other 4.JobContentFlaws 3.Psychometric Flaws 2.LOD Iiiiiiiii I i I (1-5)1.LOK (F/H)Q#Instructions[RefertoSection 0ofES-401andAppendixBforadditionalinformationregardingeachofthefollowingconcepts.]1.Enterthelevelofknowledge(LOK)ofeachquestionaseither(F)undamentalor(H)ighercognitivelevel.2.Enterthelevelofdifficulty(LOO)ofeachquestionusinga1-5(easy-difficult)ratingscale(questionsinthe2-4rangeareacceptable).3.Checktheappropriateboxifapsychometricflawisidentified:*Thestemlackssufficientfocustoelicitthecorrectanswer(e.g.,unclearintent,moreinformationisneeded,ortoomuchneedlessinformation).*Thestemordistractorscontaincues(Le.,clues,specificdeterminers,phrasing,length,etc).*Theanswerchoicesareacollectionofunrelatedtrue/falsestatements.*Thedistractorsarenotcredible;singleimplausibledistractorsshouldberepaired,morethanoneisunacceptable.*Oneormoredistractorsis(are)partiallycorrect(e.g.,iftheapplicantcanmakeunstatedassumptionsthatarenotcontradictedbystem).4.Checktheappropriateboxifajobcontenterrorisidentified:*Thequestionisnotlinkedtothejobrequirements(Le.,thequestionhasavalidKIAbut,aswritten,isnotoperationalincontent).*Thequestionrequirestherecallofknowledgethatistoospecificfortheclosedreferencetestmode(Le.,itisnotrequiredtobeknownfrommemory).*Thequestioncontainsdatawithanunrealisticlevelofaccuracyorinconsistentunits(e.g.,panelmeterinpercentwithquestioningallons).*Thequestionrequiresreverselogicorapplicationcomparedtothejobrequirements.5.CheckquestionsthataresampledforconformancewiththeapprovedKIAandthosethatare designated SRO-only(KIAandlicenselevel mismatches are unacceptable).6.Basedonthereviewer'sjudgment,isthequestionaswritten(U)nsatisfactory(requiringrepairorreplacement),inneedof(E)ditorialenhancement,or(S)atisfactory?7.Ataminimum,explainany"U"ratings(e.g.,howtheAppendixBpsychometricattributesarenotbeingmet).

1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws 5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/FCredoPartial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 76 H 2 X X U 002G2.2.22 AppearstomatchKIA.Some Backwardslogicusedinstemand distractors.

Basis documentstatesthatthe assumptionisthatthePORVorsteamdumpvalvesfailtowork,weshouldworkthisintothe distractors, steam dumpsandPORVsfailto operateetc.Wecan discuss this.Doesnot appear that distractorsAandBarenotplausibleaswritten.

MOD ModifiedfromHarris 2007 Both independent examinersagreethat question is unsat.Changed all distractors and portionsofthestem Question appearstobe SAT 1/23/2008 77 H 2 X X U 005G2.4.50Doesnot appeartomatchtheKIA,unlesstheseactionsarelistedintheARP.As written, distractorscanddarenotcredible,iftherodwillnotmove,howcantherodberealigned.

The distractorsshouldreadalignthe other grouprodsto198,or =or-12steps.NEW* Both independent examinersagree.Timesarenotincludedin distractors BandDforwhen accidentanalysisneedstobe complete.TABLED QUESTIONTOBE WORKEDONLATER QuestionreplacedSAT 3/18/208 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.JobContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOKLOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Linkunitsward KIA Only S 78H1 X U 006G2.1.33 AppearstomeetKIA.This question appearedonseveralexams.

Distractors Band Ddonot appeartobe plausible.(Maintain linear heatinthecoreatorabove limits?).(Listedas modified)BANK Last Harris Audit and Summer 2007 and 2006 retake...Not modified Summer 2006hadsame parameter.

Both independent examiners agrees not modified Changedtolevel (insteadofboronor pressure)2 distractors changed.REFERTO BOSS LAST HARRIS AND SUMMER 2007/2006.

1/23/2008reviewedand determinedtobeSAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.JobContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 79 H 2 XXU 012A2.04Kindof MatchesKIA.Not SRO only DistractorsAandBarenot plausible (theyarethe same).TheKIA asksforthe impactontheRPS,andthe distractors stateRXtripornot tripped.Whilethisisan indirect resultofthelossof power the effectonRPSis nothing.This is really a question of whatisthe impactonalossofadcbus.

Try writing the questionwithoutthetripornotrip.

BANK WCNOC 2007 NRC Both independent examiners agree.That question is unsat for reasons given.Discussed using different componentsintheRPS systemi.e.UVcoilor other component.

LOOK AT AGAIN LATER.1/23/2008 Changed distractorsCandD addedUVcoils SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 80 H 2 X X U015A2.02AppearstomatchKIA.

What proceduredirectsthe operatortomaintainpowerasis.TheARPincludeddirectsthe operatortomaintainpowerlessthanP-10.NotsureitisSROonly.ThiswasanROquestiononthe Summerexam,anditisslightlymodified, (overcompensated versus undercompensated)butthereisnothingtomakeitSROonly(thereisanoteonyoursheettomaybeaddaTSbasis.

MOD Modified from Summer 2007 Both independent examinernoticedthat answer isopposite,butactionisthesame.Both independentexaminersagreethatquestionisUnsat,anditisaBankQuestion.

Changed Stem and Distractors, look at again later to determine if question still has discriminatory value.1/23/2008ChangedasrequestedSAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 81 H 2 X U 016A2.03KindofmeetstheKIA.

WhatistheimpactofthechannelfailingHigh,andwhat proceduresareusedtocontrolormitigatethefailure?Iknowthatthiswasusedonthevogtleexamin2005,andIreally don'tagreewiththe statementsthatweremadeastowhyismeetstheKIA.Butwillallow.ThisquestioncanbeansweredusingonlyTSentry conditionsandapplicability.

ThereforeitisnotSROOnly.Itappearsthatthe question assumesthatyouareinmodeonetobeginwith,butthisisnotstated.

MOD ModifiedfromVogtle 2005BothexaminersagreethatquestionisUsat.

Licensee made several changes to question appearstobeSAT.Willhave another Examinerreviewtoverify.

1/23/2008SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.PsychometricFlaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 82 X X U 025AA2.02AppearstomatchKIA.NotSROonly,thisisjustentry conditions for procedures.

DistractorsAandBarenotcredible.Tryusing variations from distractorsCandDalongwithactionsthatwould mitigatetheevent.NEW Both examinersagreethat questionisUsat.Forreasonsgiven.

Did not cometoa resolution to this question Large discussiononSRO (selection of procedures10CFR55.43(b)(5).

Plausibility of distractors still in question.1/23/2008ManuallyalignSIflowthroughBITSAT 3/18/2008 83H2 E 026AG2.1.27 Question appearstomatchKIA.Needtochangethe distractorsthatstate:Mode1 operations may continueifRCPcoolingis maintained.

WhatcoolsRCPsatHarris? Question does appeartobemodified.

BANK Sequyoah 2007 Made some changes to stem during meeting.Look at again after SRO portion changes are complete.1/23/2008 ModifiedReplacedwith 057AG.2.1.7 SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.JobContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 84 H 2 X X U026G2.4.31QuestionappearstomatchKIA.AppearstobeSROonly.

DistractorBisnotcredible,whywouldanyoneremaininEOP-10andperformactionsfrom anotherEOP?The applicantisinformedinthestemthatthe swapovertocoldlegrecirciscomplete,sowhywouldanyoneselectloss of emergencycoolantrecirc?Thismakes distractorsCandDnotplausible.

WhywouldthrottlingSIflowincreaseCtmtSpraysuctionand dischargepressure,dotheytakeasuctiononthesamesump points?NEWBothexaminersagreethatquestionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

80th examinersagreethat questionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.AddedsomeRHR parameters inthestemtomake distractorsmoreplausible.RemovedEPP-12 referencesin8andD distractorswilllookatagainafterSROportionofexamis complete.1/23/2008ChangesmadetoquestionasrequestedSAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.PsychometricFlaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 85 X U038G2.1.14DoesnotmeetKIA.ThisquestionisonS/GTubeleakage,notarupture.TheKIAaskforatuberupture.Youroriginalstatesthatitistied to 037G2.1.12.

MOD Modified from another NRC test question that was not listed.Replaced question with one that matches KIA.AppearstobeSAT.1/23/2008ReviewedagainSAT 3/18/2008 86 H 2 X U 040AA2.05appearstomatchKIA.

DistractorDisnotplausible.WhywouldanyonegotoSI terminationifthecriteriawereNOTmet?SI terminationcriteriaisROknowledge,and foldoutpagedirectionisROknowledge.ThisisnotSRO only MOD Modified from Harris 2007BothexaminersagreethatquestionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Another Large Discussion about SRO only.Will Discuss with Malcolm.1/23/2008MadechangeswithXferformEpp-14SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws 5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 87 F 2 X X U 068AA2.10AppearstomatchKIA.Thewholetopofthequestioniswindowdressing.WhichONEofthefollowingdescribeshowreactorpowerwillbemonitoredattheremoteshutdownpanelafterthecontrolroomisevacuated,andwhatisthe minimum emergency....Doestheplanthave intermediatemonitorsinthecontrolroom?Ifnot distractorsAandBarenotcredible.Iftheydoand the intermediate detectors are off-scalelowwhenthesourcerangefluxmonitorsbegintoindicatethenAwouldalsobecorrect.

Distractors Band Carenotplausible.EvacuatethecontrolroomanditsonlyaNOUE? NEWBothexaminersagreethatquestionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.Removedwindowdressing.

Changed other portions of the question.Added siteareaand alert in distractors.

Stillneedto determine if thisisa direct look up.With the reference for question 99.1/23/2008SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.PsychometricFlaws4.Job ContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOKLOD(F/H)(1-5)StemCuesT/F CredoPartialJob-Minutia

1. /Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation FocusDist.Linkunitsward KIA Only S 88 H 1 XXX U 073G2.1.32Isthisaprocessradiationmonitor?IfnotthisdoesnotmatchtheKIA.

Distractors BandDarenotplausible.Whenwouldanyoneenter3.03foroneofanythingbeinginoperable.These appeartobejusttechnical specification entry requirementswhichisalsoROknowledge requirements.Notsurethishasany discriminatory value.The distractors with 3.3.3.1 entries are subsets, if you were in 3.30 for this reason you would alsobein3.3.3.1 MOD Modified from Harris 2007BothexaminersagreethatquestionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Table and Replace.1/23/2008ReplacedquestionandaddedreasonsforSROonlySAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo PartialJob-Minutia

1. /Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 89 H 2 XXX U078A2.01MaynotreallymeettheKIAaswritten.NotSROonly knowledge.

The applicantdoesnotneedtoknowthe impacts becausealloftheactions are different.

Distractor Cisnotcredible.

Whywouldanyoneisolatetheair dryer first beforebypassingorplacingtheotherinservicefirstthiswouldcausealossofIA.This questioncanbe answeredusingRO knowledge.

Bank Harris 2005 NRC Both examinersagreethat questionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Tabled (Not SRO knowledge).

Wrote new question SAT 3/18/2008 90 H 2 X X E WE04/G2.1.33 AppearstomatchKIA.Lookingat the proceduresomeoneisgoingtoaskdidwestopRHRA,andclose1SI322priortoleavingEPP-013?This questionneedssome major enhancements.Butcanbe salvaged.NEW All examinersagreeE.Discussed Changing KIA.Operations did not believe the 3.0.3 statements should be tested while In the ERGs.1/23/2008.

ChangedKAto WE04EA1.3new question SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.JobContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOKLOD(F/H)(1-5) Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob-Minutia#/Back- Q=SRO U/EI Explanation FocusDist.Linkunitsward KIA Only S 91 H 1 X X X U WE06/G2.1.2AppearstomatchKIA.NotreallySROonlyknowledge ..Withcoreexit thermocoupleslessthan730 degreesF,noentryisevermadeintoC.1.

Therefore distractorsAandCarenotplausible,andwithC.1andC.2theonlychoicesmostoftheconditionsinthestemarewindowdressing.

Whatmakesthe distractors thatisolatethePORVsplausible?TherearenoindicationsofthePORVslifting,sowhywouldanyoneisolatethem?RO'sneedtoknowCSFentryconditions,andwithno indicationsofPORVproblemsother distractorsarenotcredible.

BANK BVPS 2007 NRCBothexaminersagreethatquestionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.ModifiedQuestionappearstobeSAT.

1/23/2008SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.JobContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 92 H 2 X X X UWE10/EA2.1AppearstomatchKIA.

Distractor 8 isnotplausible,thereareno indicationsofafaultedsteamgenerator.Twoofthechoicesstartwithtransitions.TheothertowshouldstartwithremaininEPP-05andrepressurizethe ReStominimizevoidgrowth,etc.Itis difficult to determineifthequestionis attemptingtoshowthatavoidispresent.With pressurizerleveltrendingupslowly an operatorcouldbelievethatchargingflowwas adequatetomake pressurizerlevelrise.(Ididnotthinkthattherewasavoid,butsomeonecouldlook at pressurizerlevelandthecooldownandclaimthatAwasacorrectchoice,IftheentryintoEPP-06usbasedonthecooldownratethenthisisROknowledge(entry conditions for procedure)unlessitisonlystatedinthebodyoftheEPP-05.

BANK Harris 2005 NRCBothexaminersagreethatquestionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Reworked DistractorsandStemappearstobeSAT.Willhave another examiner review.1/23/2008 SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.JobContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOKLOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob-Minutia

1. 1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation FocusDist.Linkunitsward KIA Only S 93H2 X U WE11/EA2.2 AppearstomatchKIA.Doesnot appeartobeSROonly.

Questioncanbe aswered using systems knowledgeandGSF entry conditions.

Distractors BandDwouldmemore plausibleifwasstatedtoreduceEGGSflowtothe values required in attachment1of EPP-012.Suggest putting the procedurefirstandthe actions second,ie,remainin EPP-012andstopall pumps taking a suction fromtheRWST.Remainin EPP-012andreduceEGGSflowtothevaluelistedin attachment 1.BANK WCNDC 2007 NRC Both examinersagreethat questionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Examiner does not believe that thisisSRO only knowledge.

Will have Malcolm look at question and decide fate.1/23/2008 Left questionasisSAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychom etric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Linkunitsward KIA Only S 94 H 2 X X U G2.1.20 AppearstomeetKIA.NotSROonly.

Answered from foldoutpage.ThisisRO knowledge.WithRCPsrunningcouldyoureachthe conditionslistedin current plant conditions? ARCS temperatureat520andthe otherloopsat550?Thisdoesnotseem plausibletome.(With pumpsrunningthiswouldallbemixed).

BANK (WBN)byFJE Both examiners agree that questionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Tabled Question 1/23/2008 added actionstakenSAT 3/18/2008 95 H 2 X X U G2.1.34Kindof matchesKIA.Itwouldhavebeen betterforthe questiontestwhatwas exceeded andhowtogetitbackwithinlimits.Aswritten DistractorBisno longer plausible.IfRCS activitywentdown and secondarywentup,howcouldthe problem behighRCS activity?Withthe parameterslistedinthe stem distractorsAandCarenot plausible, becausenoneofthe secondary parametersarelisted.This questioncanbe salvagedwithsomework.

NEW Both examiners agree that questionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Made changes to stem and distractors will look at final version when completed.

1/23/2008SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws 5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 96 F X X UG2.2.22AppearstomatchKIA.

Teachinginstem(applicableinmodes1and2).

DistractorsCand 0arenotplausible.Filmboiling?Couldwecomeupwithsomethingdifferent.

BANKBothexaminersagreethatquestionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Licensee to rewrite question.1/23/2008RewrotequestionSAT 3/18/2008 97 F 2 X X UG2.2.7AppearstomatchKIA.Withthewaythequestioniswritten,whywouldanyonechooseanyanswerbesides 0, especiallywiththewordsifrequiredasafetyevaluationhasbeenapproved?Distractorsa,b,andcnotplausibleaswritten.

BANK BVPS 2007 NRCBothexaminersagreethatquestionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Examiner to supplynewKIA.1/23/2008G2.2.2Questionreplaced,SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.JobContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOKLOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCues T/F CredoPartialJob-Minutia

1. 1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Linkunitsward KIA Only S 98 F 2 X U G2.3.6 Question appearstomatchKIA.The modifiedportionofthe questionisthetypeofreleasethatisallowedfromatank.AnNLOknowsthata continuousreleaseisnotallowedfromaWMT.The previous questionalsoaskedfromwhichtanka continuousreleasecouldbe conducted, and the WMTtankwaslistedasthetankthatthereleasewasnotallowedfrom.Notsurethisisreallymodified.MaynotbeSROonly knowledge,ifROandNLO conductreleases.Willhave another Examiner review.MOD Harris 2007 Two independent examiners stated question wasnotmodified, information was just rearranged.Licenseestill believesthatthismeetsthedefinitionofModified.Will consider changing.Tabled.1/23/2008Replacedwithnew question SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.JobContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo PartialJob-Minutia
2. 1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 99 H 1 X E G2.4.41 Question appearstomatchKIA.Givingthe applicant the referencelistedmayhelp answer question#87.Theonly differenceisthatinthefirst questiontheRxtrip breakers were openedfromtheMCBandinthe modified version the reactor was trippedlocally.Sowhywould anyone pick distractorsAandB?Willhave another examinerreviewto determineifitistruly modified.DistractorsAandBwillnot discriminate.

MOD Harris 2007 Appearstobe modified.If referencedoesnot answer any other questionsmaybeallowed.

Tabled 1/23/2008Replacedwithnew question SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.JobContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOKLOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCues T/F CredoPartialJob-Minutia#/ Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 100H2XX U G2.4.49 QuestiondoesnotmatchKIA.No immediate operationofplant systems, components or controls is indicated.NotSROonlythiscanbe answeredusing<1hour technical specification knowledge,withisRO knowledge.Willalossofoff-siteresultinalossofDC?Needtomakesurethebasis statements of distractorsAandBwillhappen.

BANK Both examinersagreethat questionisUsat.Forreasonsstated.

Added actions appearstobeSRO knowledge with basis statements and actions.Discussed with operations rep the plausibility of performing core alterations with a vital battery out of service.Licensee to check and will adjust question accordingly.

1/23/2008 SAT 3/19/2008 I I ES-401,Rev.9Harris2008-301RO Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 Stem Icuesl T/F I cred'lPartialI JOb-I Minutia I#/I Back-I Q=I SRO I U/E/Focus Dist.Linkunitsward KIAOnlyS 7.Explanation 6.5.Other 4.Job Content Flaws 3.Psychometric Flaws 2.LODI,,,,I,,,I (1-5)1.LOK (F/H)Q#Instructions[RefertoSection 0ofES-401andAppendixBforadditionalinformationregardingeachofthefollowingconcepts.]1.Enterthelevelofknowledge(LOK)ofeachquestionaseither (F)undamentalor(H)igher cognitive level.2.Enterthelevelofdifficulty (LaD)ofeachquestionusinga1-5(easy-difficult)ratingscale(questionsinthe2-4rangeareacceptabIe).3.Checktheappropriateboxifa psychometricflawisidentified:*Thestemlackssufficientfocustoelicitthecorrectanswer(e.g.,unclearintent,more informationisneeded,ortoomuchneedlessinformation).*Thestemordistractorscontaincues(i.e.,clues,specificdeterminers,phrasing,length,etc).*Theanswerchoicesarea collectionofunrelatedtrue/falsestatements.*Thedistractorsarenotcredible;singleimplausibledistractorsshouldberepaired,morethanoneisunacceptable.*Oneormoredistractorsis(are)partiallycorrect(e.g.,iftheapplicantcanmakeunstated assumptionsthatarenot contradictedbystem).4.Checktheappropriateboxifajobcontenterrorisidentified:*Thequestionisnotlinkedtothejobrequirements(i.e.,thequestionhasavalid KIAbut,aswritten,isnot operationalincontent).*Thequestionrequirestherecallofknowledgethatistoospecificfortheclosedreferencetestmode(i.e.,itisnot requiredtobeknownfrommemory).*Thequestioncontainsdatawithanunrealisticlevelofaccuracyor inconsistentunits(e.g.,panelmeterinpercentwithquestioningallons).*Thequestionrequiresreverselogicor applicationcomparedtothejobrequirements.5.Checkquestionsthataresampledfor conformancewiththeapproved KIAandthosethatare designated SRO-only (KIAandlicenselevelmismatchesareunacceptable).6.Basedonthereviewer's judgment,isthequestionaswritten(U)nsatisfactory(requiringrepairorreplacement),inneedof(E)ditorialenhancement,or(S)atisfactory?7."Ataminimum,explainany"U"ratings(e.g.,howtheAppendixBpsychometricattributesarenotbeingmet).

I 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (FfH)(1-5)Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia#f Back-Q=SAO UfEf Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 1 H 2 X E 001A3.04AppearstomatchKIA.Thestemstatesthedemandforrodmotion,andthecolumnintheanswersjuststatesRODMOTION,The demand willbeintheoutwarddirection,butwithrodsat216stepsandinautomatic,norodmotionwilloccur.Mayneedtoclearthisup.

Otherwise SAT BANK WCNDC 2007 Enhanced SAT 3/13/2008 2 H 2 X U002A2.02QuestiondoesnotmatchKIA.Thisquestionasksreallywhat happensonalossof pressurizer level.NEW Developed new question SAT 3/13/2008 3 H 2 S003AK1.11Question appearstomatchKIA.

BANK McGuire 2005 SAT 3/13/2008 4 H 2 X E 003K5.03Questionkindof matchesKIA.Thereasonsfor distractorsAandCarenotasindepthasthosefortheother distractors.

WhyistheaffectedloopTave unreliable? BANK modified distractors band d.SAT 3/13/2008 5 H 2 X E 004K5.19 Question appearstomatchtheKIA.Alloftheresponseshavea numberinthemexceptforthe 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws 5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCues T/FCredoPartial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S correct answer.Needto have a numberinitlike changingthepot settingfromone number to another.(That would increase boron concentration.

NEW Changed number of turns and distractor d.SAT 3/13/2008 6 F 2 X E 005K1.11 Question appears to matchtheKIA.DistractorsAandDdonot appeartobe plausible.

Whatisthe significanceofthe temperatureof345 OF?Whatisthe temperaturelistedintheP &Lfor placingRHRin serviceinthecool down mode?BANK Changed all distractors, and added temp and pressuretoall.SAT 3/13/20087H 2 S 005K6.03 Question appears to matchKIA.Needto make sure thatwith1-RH20fully closedand1RH30at 70%open flowwouldbe greater than 3750.Otherwise SAT MOD Wolf Creek 2007 SAT 3/13/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws 5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 8 H 2 X U 006K1.08 Question appearstomatchKIA.

With charging in automatic (normal operation) chargingflowwillnotbeoffscalehigh.(Mostarelimitedto about150gpmat NOP/NOT.I understandthatanSIhas occurred,andRCS pressure is reduced,butI don't thinkFI-122-1willbeoff scalehighat anytime in automatic.

This makes distractorsCandDnot plausible.

Enlighten me.NEW Changed distractorAto600gpm SAT 3/13/2008 9F2XU 006K4.05 Question does not meetKIA.This question essentiallyaskswhat 81 parameter isreachedandits coincidencetheKIAasksfor knowledgeofECCS design featuresandor interlocks which provideforthe following Auto start of HPI/LPI/SIPs.

There is nothinginthis question that address this.BANK (Harris)Changed all distractorsandstem SAT 3/13/200810H 2 E 007AG2.1.23, I believethisKIArelatestoRx TripI stabilization-Recovery.Ifit doesthenthis meets theKIA.NotSurethat distractorCis plausible.Itwouldalsohelptohavethe procedure direction.

For example:A.The reactor is tripped, performanormal boration as directed by EPP-004 using normal operating procedure XXX.B.The reactor is tripped, perform an emergency 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCuesT/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q==SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S boration asdirectedbyEPP-04using AOP-002C.Thereactorisnottripped, manuallyinsertcontrolrodsin accordancewithFRPS.1untilallrodsareonbottomandreactorislocallytripped.D.Thereactorisnottripped,initiatean emergencyborationofRCSin accordancewithFRPS.1until adequateSDMisverified.

')BANK Sequoyah 2007 Added procedure direction SAT 3/13/2008 11 H 2 X X E007K4.01Question appearstomatchtheKIA.

DistractorAisnotplausible.If pressurewashighwhywouldyoupurgeit(itshouldbeventedasstatedintheAPP) Proceduresshouldbelistedwithallchoices,i.e.,ventlAWOP-100ordrainlAWOP-100andgivethe correctsectionnumber.Thiswillmakethe distractorsmoreplausible.Inthestemchangesecondbulletto:A pressurizer PORVappearstohavesomeleakage,andthethirdbullettoThe associatedPORVisolationvalvefailedtoclosedwhenattempted.

BANKchangedpurgetovent,andadded procedure reference.

SAT 3/13/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 12 H X E 008A2.08 Question appears to matchKIA.Ifthe actionsarein accordancewitha procedure,thenthe procedure shouldbelistedinthestem.In accordancewithAPP... NEW Added APP SAT 3/13/2008 13 H 2 X X U 008AK2.03Doesnot appear to meettheKIA.Thereisno controller or positioner mentionedinthe question.I understand that the indicationforthe PORVisinthe correct distractorbutthe question really does not address howitgot there and how itrelatestothe accident.(Althoughitisthe cause).DistractorBisnot credible, nothinginthestemrelatestoa SGTR.NEW Changedstemandall distractors SAT 3/13/2008 14 H 2 S 009EK2.03 Appears to match KIA.SAT MOD Changes made to question still SAT 3/13/2008 15 H 2 S 010k2.01 Appears to match KIA.SAT MOD No changes madefrominitial submittal SAT 3/13/200816F 2 E011EA1.15 Appears to matchKIA.Needtoadd design basis large break LOCA.There are some defined large break LOCAs where RCS pressure 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S doeshangup about 400-500 poundsandRCS pressurewillbe abovetheRHR shutoff head.(10,000 gpm).NEW No changes madefrominitial submittal Added design basistostem SAT 3/13/2008 17 F 2 X U011K2.01 Appears to matchKIA.AandBdonot appeartobe plausible.

Please explain what makes them plausible,orfind other suitable plausible distractors.

MOD No changes madefrominitial submittal Used NSW pumps SAT 3/13/2008 18 X E 012A3.02 Appears to match KIA.Some teaching in stem"causing a reactor trip".There is more that youcandowiththis question.Rx tripped/bistables illuminated,Rxnot tripped/bistables illuminated.

BANK Changed B distractorandratetrips.

SAT 3/13/200819H 2 S 012K6.03 Appears to match KIA.SAT Changed from original submitted question.Listedasbank, however with changesitisnow: Modified.2006VCS CHANGED Question SAT 3/13/200820H 2 E 013K3.03 Appears to match KIA.Changed from original submitted question.Will both 1-CB2and6beingopen cause a release?IfsothencouldBbe correct?Listedasbank, however with changesitis 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S now: Modified.2007 VCS CHANGED Question SAT 3/13/2008 21 H 2 X U 015AK1.05 Appears to match KIA.WhichloopisRCP1Cin?I assumedloop3.WhywouldDeltaTremainthe same be plausiblewiththelossofan RCP?BANK No changes madefrominitial submittal Changed questionloop1and3, correct values added.ChangedtoRCS flows.SAT 3/13/200822H 2 E 016K3.03 Appears to matchKIA.Add steam dumps will receive an arming signalto"A" distractor for symmetry.Questionwillthenbe SAT NEW No changes madefrominitial submittal made changes as requested SAT 3/13/2008 23H2 S 017K6.01 Appears to matchKIA.Made changes to original submitted question.SAT BANK CHANGED SAT 3/13/2008 24 H 2 E 022AA1.01 Appears to matchKIA.Made changes to original submitted question.Please explain.differencebetween AH-3 and AH-4;How many fansetc.This question is worded much differentthanthe original submittial.

1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (FfH)(1-5)Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia#f Back-Q=SRO UfEf Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S NEW CHANGEDExplained,andmodifiedstem.

SAT 3/13/2008 25 F 2 E 022AG2.1.28 AppearstomatchKIA..Ifthe controllerfordiverttoRHTistakentomanualwouldthisbe consideredafunctionlost?Maybeweshouldsaywithoutany operator actions?NEW No changesmadefrominitialsubmittalModifiedstem SAT 3/13/2008 26 F 2 E022K1.01Question appearstomatchKIA.Someof the componentsofthis questionarethesameasthosein#24.TrainVRS coolerunit.Canwe change somethingtomakeitmore different.

LikeSWflowsetc.

NEWFormatchangedonlymade.Modifiedstem SAT 3/13/2008 27 F 2 E 024AK2.03 Question appearstomatchKIA.

WhatcontrolsborationflowthroughFI-110canthisbeadjusted?DoesFI-110scaleindicate90gpm? NEW No changesmadefrominitialsubmittal.

explained SAT 3/13/200828H 2 E 025AA1.20AppearstomatchKIA.Flowratesdonotreallymeananythinginthis questionbothBITflowsare500gpmandbothNormalcharginglinesare150gpm.Wecanleavetheflowsifitdoesnot help 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws 5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S answeranyother questions,butitisnotrequiredthewaythisquestioniswritten.(For instancewith2CSIPsrunningwiththeBITvalvesopenwouldnotflowbe greaterthan500?NEW No changesmadefrominitialsubmittal.

completely changed question.SAT 3/13/2008 29 H 2 E026A3.01Question appearstomatchKIA.WithaLOCAinprogressandRCSat1600psighasenoughsteamenteredthe containmenttocausepressureto10.5psig? MOD No changesmadefrominitialsubmittalmodifiedinitialconditionto600psig.

SAT 3/13/2008 30 H 2 S 026G2.2.22 Question appearstomatchKIA.SAT MOD No changesmadefrominitialsubmittal r-SAT 3/13/2008 31 H 2 E 027AA1.03 Question appearstomatchKIA.

DistractoranalysisforBisincorrect.The setpoint adjustment,isthisa potentiometer?Ifitisweshould use lower/raise the pressure setpoint potentiometer.

MOD No changesmadefrominitialsubmittal SAT 3/13/2008 32 H 2 E 029A4.04AppearstomatchKIA.Secondparto'f lquestionasksfortheactionrequired,butthesecond 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws 5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#1 Back-Q=SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only Spartofthe answersarenotwrittenlikean action from the procedure, the distractors should state something like Immediately evacuate containment, or Immediately dispatch radiation protection personnel to determineif....MOD No changesmadefrominitial submittal modified distractors SAT 3/13/2008 33 F 2 X U 029EA2.05 Question appearstomatchKIA.Thewaythe questioniswrittenthe applicantneedonly knowthereasonfor opening the PORVs in 8.1.If the question was changedsothatthe applicant had to determine what condition the plantwasinandwhatwasrequiredbasedon those conditions thismaybe acceptable.Orwecoulduse variations ofopen1 PORVorBoth PORVsanduse someofthe reasons stated.BANK No changesmadefrominitial submittal.

made changes SAT 3/14/2008 34 H 2 X U 033AK3.02Doesnot meetKIA.TheKIAasksfora knowledgeofthe REASONSforthe following responsesasthey applyto...The actions are acceptable,butthe question must cover reasons.NEW modified distractorsCandD SAT 3/14/2008 NEW No changes madefrominitial submittal 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 35 F 2 X E 034G2.1.14 AppearstomatchKIA.. DistractorDis not plausible.(Work would never get done).Needto develop another distractor to improve plausiblity.

NEW No changesmadefrominitial submittal changed distractor D.SAT 3/14/2008 36 F 2 E 036AA2.01 Question appearstomatchKIA.

Whichtrain.Dotheynothave separate nomenclature? AtrainFHBwillstart,AandBtrainFHB ventilation willstartetc.Thisisvery general.NEW No changesmadefrominitial submittal Modified as requested SAT 3/14/2008 37 H 2 X U 038EK1.03 Question appearstomatchKIA.Notsurethatthereisa correct answer.The WOG does discuss the problemswithanRCS depressurization withoutRCPs,but addresses only operating onePORV,notPORVs.

BandCcouldalsobe consideredsortof correct,asyou depressurize and loose subcooling,thereisalimitasto howfaryou can depressurize.

Typicallythestep states to depressurizeuntillevelisXX, Pressureisequaltoorlessthan ruptured S/G pressure, or subcooling is either10or20 degrees.Sothisisa concern.This question need some major revision.BANK No changesmadefrominitial submittal Modified Band C SAT 3/14/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 38 F 2 S039A4.01Question appearstomatchKIA.Notvery discriminating.

SAT NEW No changesmadefrominitialsubmittal SAT 3/14/2008 39 F 2 X X X U 040AK1.07QuestionAppearstomatchKIA.. Distractors CandDarenotplausible.NotsurethatBisatotally correct answer.While this statementmaybetrue,itisnotthestatedreasonintheWOGRev2reasonfornotfeedingthefaultedgenerator.Ifflowwasneededforcooldownflowcouldbeinitiated using guidanceforfeedingahotdrygenerator.Someofthe informationinthestemisnotrequiredto answerthequestionandmaybe teaching.Thisquestionneedssomework.

NEW No changesmadefrominitialsubmittal Made changes after discussion.

SAT 3/14/2008 40 H 2 X U041K1.05Question appearstomatchKIA.

DistractorsAandDnotcredible.Mayneedtoshortentotwoitemsin distractorsvice3.Will discuss.MODIFIED No changesmadefrominitialsubmittal 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 41 F 1 X U 045K5.23 Question appearstomatchKIA.DistractorsA,B,andCarenotplausible.

Why would anyone manually withdrawcontrolrodsabovethe 100%limit,orsetboron concentrationatthe1 00%limitpriortoaloadincrease? Distractorsneedtobefixedoranewquestion developed.

BANK No changesmadefrominitialsubmittalQuestionrewritten SAT 3/14/2008 42F2 X U 054AA2.04 Question appearstomatchKIA.

Distractors BandDarenotplausible.Thesevalvesarerequiredbytechnical specificationstobeopeninmode1.Doesanythinghavetoberesettoregaincontrolofthevalves?Ifsoyoucoulddosomeiterationsoffofthisto determinetheabilityofthe operators to determineiftheyhave proper operationoftheafwpumpsandregulatingvalves.C distractoranalysisisnottotallycorrect,the MDAFW pumpsstartedonalossofthelastrunningMFWpump.

NEW No changesmadefrominitialsubmittalQuestionrewritten SAT 3/14/200843H 2 X X X U 056A2.12Questionkindof matchestheKIA.Didnotreallyaddressthe procedureactions.Stem(secondbullet)states:AnExtremeHI-HI....ThelessonmaterialcallsthisanExtraHI-HIlevel.Whichisit?Itappearsthatthe answerisonlypartiallycorrect.IfIreadthematerial correctlyalsothe1 Band 2Bheaterswillalsobebypassedandpowershouldbereducedto70%. Distractorsshouldbe1Aand2A 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (FfH)(1-5)Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia#f Back-Q=SRO UfE/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S heaters are bypassed reduce turbineloadto 900/0.1 A,2Aand1 8,28 heaters are bypassed reduce Turbineloadto70%.Andyoucoulddoan iterationoffof ReactorPower.The procedure reference shouldalsobeused.

lAWOP-...orAR.

NEW No changes madefrominitial submittal SAT 3/14/2008 44 H 2 X U 056AG2.1.2 Appears to matchKIA..Cand Dare both correct answers.If natural circulation does notexist,(andfromthe indicationsgivenandthe procedurestepit appears thatitisnot)thenthe correct actionisto increase dumping steamfromthe intactS/Gsandinthiscaseit wouldbeviatheSG PORVs.Youcanalsotellfromthestem that heat is being removed, and nothing would be wrong with verifying that natural circulation existsinD.Thiscouldalsobe considered correct.Needto make one completely wrong,butstill maintain plausibility.

BANK No changes madefrominitial submittal Reworded all distractors.

Question rewritten SAT 3/14/2008 45 F 2 S 058AK3.02 Question appears to match KIA.SAT NEW No changes madefrominitial submittal SAT 3/14/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 46 F 2 S 059A3.02 Question appearstomatchKIA.SAT NEW No changesmadefrominitial submittal SAT 3/14/2008 47 H 2 X X U 059AG2.4.50 QuestiondoesnotmatchKIA.

There is no verification otsystemalarm setpoints.

DistractorsA,B,andCnot plausible.Ifthereleasewillbe automatically isolated,whywouldyou secure ESW?InB,ifthereleasewas terminated, the radwaste operator would verify isolation.

DistractorC,iftheESWsystemdoesnot connecttothe WPB whywouldanyone select this?BANK No changesmadefrominitial submittal Replaced question SAT 3/14/2008 48 F 2 X E 059K3.03 Question appearstomatchKIA.Needtoaddactual feedwaterflowtothestem.

Someone could selectandarguethatBisalsocorrect.

Otherwise SAT.BANK No changesmadefrominitial submittal Made changes as requested SAT 3/14/2008 49 F 2 S 060AG2.1.32 Question appearstomatchKIA.SAT NEW No changesmadefrominitial submittal SAT 3/14/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 50 F 2 X E 061G2.2.22 Question appearstomatchKIA.

Change DistractorDtoread immediately enter TS 3.0.3 andbeinhot.... Otherwise SAT.No changesmadefrominitial submittal SAT 3/14/2008 51 H 2 X X U061K5.01 Question appearstomatchKIA.

With an increase in AFW flow howcanyoubesureifthe heat transferratewillnot increase?Youare changing 2 variables and anyone of these parameters could changed enoughinone directionmorethanthe otherandresultinan increase the heat transfer rate.Theyallcouldbe argued as correct or incorrect dependingonthe values used.I.E.averylarge AFW flow increasealongwithasmallRCS temperature decreasemaystillresultin an increased heat transfer rate.BANK No changesmadefrominitial submittal Changed format and reducedtoone variable.SAT 3/14/2008 52 F 2 062A1.03 Question appearstomatchKIA.

Distractor S C shouldstate...whenthe instrumentbusandPIC!!]Lenergized.

Otherwise SAT.BANK2005 NRC-HARRIS No changesmadefrominitial submittal Made changes as requested SAT 3/14/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/FCredoPartial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Linkunitsward KIA Only S 53 H 2 X U 063AK3.02 Question does not matchtheKIA.Whatarethe reasonsforthe actions.Whyisthe DIG disabledoranyofthe other items listed that were disabled.NEW No changes madefrominitial submittal SAT 3/14/2008 54 F 2 S 063K3.02 Question appears to match KIA.SAT BANK No changes madefrominitial submittal SAT 3/14/2008 55 F 2 S 064K4.04 Question appears to match KIA.SAT NEW No changes madefrominitial submittal SAT 3/14/2008 56 F 2 X U 069AK2.03 Question does not matchKIA.The relation between containment integrityandthe doorsisnotbeing tested.Questionisnot modified.Nothing pertinentinthestemwas changed.Removeifanyfromthestem,noneofthe distractorslistNo action is required.Recommend: WhichONEofthe following correctly describes the status of containment integrity and states the TIS action required?A.Containment Integrity IS met;immediately verify the outer door is closed.B.Containment Integrity is NOT met;immediately 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only Sverifytheouterdoorisclosed.

C.Containment Integrity ISmet;verifytheouterdoorisclosedwithin1hour.

D.ContainmentIntegrityis NOTmet;verifytheouterdoorisclosedwithin1hour.

Modified 2007 NRC-HARRIS No changesmadefrominitialsubmittal Changed question SAT 3/14/2008 57 F 2 X U 073A4.02 Question appearstomatchKIA.Thelessonmaterialsuppliedwiththis questiondoesnotmentionanythingaboutRM-11 interfacingatallwith RM-23.Howeverallthree incorrect distractors haveRM-23listedinthem.(RM-80islisted)Ifthereisnot any interface/interactionthenhowcantheybeplausible?Pleaseexplain.

BANK No changesmadefrominitialsubmittalModifiedbankquestion SAT 3/14/2008 074EK1.06NotsurethismeetstheKIA.Needmore 58H2 X U information.

No changesmadefrominitialsubmittal Made changestomeetKIA SAT 3/14/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job ContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)StemCuesT/FCredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Linkunitsward KIA Only S 59 H 2 U 076A2.01 Question appears to match the KIA.DistractorsBandDdonotappeartobe plausible.

Nothinginthe stem relatestoESW.Arethese systems normally cross-connect? Wouldtheleak affect ESW in any way?BANKHARRIS2005 No changes made from initial submittal Rewrote distractors and explained.

SAT 3/14/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws 5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)Stem CuesT/FCredo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 60 F 1 X U 078G2.1.28 Question appearstomatchKIA..(Functionof1 SA-506), but does not describe the purpose.The lesson material statesthat1 SA-506 isolatesat90psig decreasingintheIA header, Twoofthe distractorsstatethatthe isolation will occur at90psig,andbothof these distractors are incorrect.Thismaybeinan efforttomakethem appear more plausible.

Recommend the following: WhichONEofthe following describes the operation of Service Air Header Isolationvalve,1 SA-506?A.Closes automaticallywhenIA header pressure reaches90psig decreasing; Automatically openswhenIA header pressure rises above90psig.B.Closes automaticallywhenIA header pressure reaches75psig decreasing; Automatically openswhenIA header pressure rises above75psig.C.Closes automaticallywhenIA header pressure reaches90psig decreasing;Mustbe manually openedwhenIA header pressure rises above 90 psig.D.Closes automaticallywhenIA header pressure reaches75psig decreasing;Mustbe manually openedwhenIA header pressure rises above 75 psig.NEW No changesmadefrominitial submittal No changesmadefrominitial submittal BANK Made changes as requested SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws 5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-.Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 61 H 2 X U103A1.01QuestiondoesnotreallymatchKIA.Wearenottesting exceedingthedesignlimit.Recommendthefollowing:Sameinitial conditionsandstem;A.ContainmentVacuumReliefsystemwill operate to restore containmentpressureto-1.5inchesH 2O.Containment purge operationisthenrequiredtorestoreto-1.0H 2O.B.ContainmentVacuumReliefsystemwilloperateto restore containmentpressureto-1.5inchesH 20.Nootheractionsarerequired C: ContainmentVacuumReliefsystemwill operatetorestore containment pressureto-1.0inchesH 2O.Containment purge operationisthenrequiredtorestoreto-0.5H 2O.D.ContainmentVacuumReliefsystemwill operatetorestore containment pressureto-1.0inchesH 2O.Nootheractionsarerequired.WithAbeingthe correctanswer.Or somethingsimilar.(Thisisa1hourtechspec thereforeitisRO Knowledge).

NEW No changesmadefrominitialsubmittalModifiedasrequestedabove.

SAT 3/18/2008 62 F 2 X U WE04EK2.2 Question appearstomatchKIA.DistractorsCandDare secondary monitor pointsthismakethemless desirableasplausibledistractors.(SIflowisbasedonRCSpressure,andradbuildingradiationlevelsloweringisbasedon 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S decay of activity)sowhywould anyone pick these?Tryusing some initial conditionswithaloca outside of containment in progressandthen workoffof which component would be isolatedfirst,and what parameterwouldbeusedto determineifthe leak is isolated.PZRlevelorRCS pressure rising.A.Correct ComponentandPZRLevel rising.B.Wrong ComponentandRCS pressure rising.C.Correct ComponentandPZRLevelrising.

D.Correct ComponentandRCS pressure rising.WereDwouldbethe correct answer.BANK (This particularKIAhasbeenon several ofthelast exams.No changes madefrominitial submittal Modified asrequestedabove.

SAT 3/18/2008 63H2 X E WE/05EA2.2 Question appears to match KIA.DistractorsCandDarenot plausible.

Feeding allS/Gsis okaybutit seems that the stopping point iswhenallS/Gsare greater than (value).These distractors shouldstateuntiloneS/Gis greater than the appropriate value.(15%WRor25%NR).BANK No changes madefrominitial submittal Modified as requested above.SAT 3/18/2008 64F2 X U WE/10EA1.3 Question appears to matchtheKIA.This questionislistedas NEW,butwasonthe McGuire 2007exam.Thewaythe question is asking two thingsthelevelandthereason, Withallthe 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F CredoPartialJob- Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S levels being different an applicant need only know the correct level and would nothaveto know the reason.Ifthe applicant knew the reason, he could eliminate twoofthe distractors (and their levels).The question shouldbesetup using two levels and two reasons for example;A.25%to ensure minimum inventory for pressure control.B.650/0 to ensure minimum inventory for pressure control.C.250/0 to ensure adequate volume for collapsing the void.D.65%to ensure adequate volume for collapsing the void.BANK No changes made from initial submittal Modified as requested above SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/FCredoPartialJob-Minutia

1. /Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S 65 F 2 X X U E11/EK3.3 Question appears to match KIA.The question asksforthe reason and requirements for depressurizingtheRCS.Iamnotsureofthe these requirements.

In distractor A (whichisthe correct answer)youstateto reduce CSIP flow, however reducing RCS pressure will increase CSIPflow,itwill allow later for CSIP flowtobe reduced.Question and distractorsarevery wordy and confusing.Notsure that as written thereisa correct answer.Distractor CandDarenot plausible.Ifyou maximize RCS subcooling howcanyou minimize RCS pressure.BANK No changes madefrominitial submittal Modified as requested above SAT 3/18/2008 66 F 2 X X U G2.1.3 Question appears to match KIA.Agree that question is modified.Distractor C does not appear to be plausible.

Whywouldyou perform a turnover using attachment5and attachment14,this doesn't make sense.In appeal space distractor D could be arqued as correctifthe S-SO desires.Needtofix distractors.

MODIFIED No changes madefrominitial submittal ChangedCandD distractors.

SAT 3/18/2008 67 H 2 E G2.1.32 Question appears to matchKIA.Canyou actuallygetto these conditions.

During a startup turbine power usually lags behindNIandDeltaT powerduetothe secondary plant being inefficient.

Change the powers around so thattheylook more 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)StemCuesT/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only Slikewhat normally happensintheplant,haveDeltaTbethe higher indicationandplaceitin distractor Dinsteadof turbine power.NEW No changesmadefrominitial submittal.

Changed as requested.

SAT 3/18/2008 68 F 2 S G2.1.12 Question appearstomatchKIASAT.

No changesmadefrominitial submittal.

SAT 3/18/2008\69 F 2 X E G2.2.26 Question appearstomatchKIA.Ifthe boron concentrationwas9ppm greaterthanthe amountrequiredintheCOLRthenCcouldbearguedascorrect.Needtoaddboronleveltothestemandhaveitbe greaterthanthe COLRsothatiftheboron concentrationwaslowered10ppmitwouldstillbeabovethe minimum amountlistedintheCOLR.BANK No changesmadefrominitial submittal.

Changedasrequested.

SAT 3/18/2008 70 H 2 S G2.3.2 Question appearstomatchKIA.SAT.

MODIFIED No changesmadefrominitial submittal SAT 3/18/2008 71 F 2 X U G2.3.4 Question appearstomatchKIA.

Similar to AdministrativeJPMA-3butis somewhat different.

DistractorsAandCarenotcredible.Replacethe individual's progress energy supervisor with 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job Content Flaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LOD (F/H)(1-5)Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia#/Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation Focus Dist.Link units ward KIA Only S Superintendent-Radiation Protection.

NEW No changesmadefrominitial submittal Changed as requested.

SAT 3/18/2008 72 H 2 X U G2.4.10 Question appearstomatchKIA.OistractorsCand0arenotcredible.

Another questionontheexam(#60)givessomeIA header pressure actionsandthese occurat90psig,sowhywould someone chooseCorO?NEW No changesmadefrominitial submittal Modified questiontoremove question 60 concerns Changed as requested.

SAT 3/18/2008 73 H 3 S G2.4.29 Question appearstomatchKIA,Isthis somethingyourequireRO'stoknow? SAT MODIFIED No changesmadefrominitial submittal SAT 3/18/2008 74 H 2 S G2.4.48 Question appearstomatchKIA..SAT BANK No changesmadefrominitial submittal SAT 3/18/2008 1.2.3.Psychometric Flaws4.Job ContentFlaws5.Other 6.7.Q#LOK LaD (F/H)(1-5)Stem CuesT/FCredoPartialJob-Minutia

1. /Back-Q=SRO U/E/Explanation FocusDist.Linkunitsward KIA Only S 75F2 X E G2.4.6 Question appears to match KIA.Stem should state: Whichoneofthe following describes the Rep configuration and its basis in accordance with EPP-009.BANK No changes made from initial submittal Changed as requested.

SAT 3/18/2008 I I ES-403,Rev.9 Written Examination Grading Quality ChecklistFormES-403-1Facility:Harris2008-301DateofExam: 03/21/2008ExamLevel: RO/SRO Initials 2.Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 3.Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers spot check>250/0 of examinations5.All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified c b a Item Description Clean answer sheetscopiedbefore grading 4.Gradingforall borderline cases(80+/-2%overalland70or80, as applicable,+/-4%onthe SRO-only)reviewedindetail 1.6.Performanceonmissed questionscheckedfor training deficiencies and wording problems;evaluate validity of questions missed by halformoreofthe applicants Printed Name/Si nature Date a.Grader L{/ls-)l>p b.Facility Reviewer(*) pA-.1/15//)/ .c.NRC Chief Examiner (*)QlM1l>OAllf,!62:> d.NRC Supervisor (*)(*)Thefacilityreviewer's signatureisnotapplicablefor examinationsgradedbytheNRC; two independent NRC reviewsarerequired.

ES-501,Rev.9Post-ExaminationCheckSheet Form ES-501-1Harris2008InitialLicenseExamination05000400/2008/301Post-ExaminationCheckSheetTaskDescriptionDateComplete 1.2.3.4.Facilitywrittenexam commentsorgradedexamsreceivedandverifiedcompleteFacilitywrittenexam commentsreviewedand incorporated andNRCgradingcompleted,if necessaryOperatingtestsgradedbyNRC examinersNRCchief examinerreviewofoperatingtestandwrittenexamgradingcompleted 03/26/2008 N/A 4/15/2008 4/15/20085.Responsible supervisorreviewcompleted 6.Management(licensingofficial)review completed7.Licenseanddeniallettersmailed8.Facilitynotifiedofresults9.Examinationreportissued(refertoNRCMC0612)10.Referencematerialreturnedafterfinalresolutionofanyappeals SERIAL: HNP-07-175 January4,2008 Mr.Malcolm T.Widmann, Region II United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center61ForsythSt.,SW,Suite23T85Atlanta,GA 30303-8931 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO.50-400/LICENSENO.NPF-63 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR INITIAL EXAMINATIONS 05000400/2008301

DearMr.Widmann:

Enclosedarethe proposed written examinations, operatingtests,and supporting reference materialsforthe ReactorandSenior Reactor Operator Initial Examinationstobegivenatthe Harris Nuclear Plant the week of March 10,2008.This submittal complies the requirement identifiedinyour letter dated October 19,2007, to provide these materialsbyJanuary7,2008.

The enclosed materialsshallbe withheld from public disclosureuntilafterthe examinations are complete.Ifyouhaveany questions regarding these materials, please contact Mr.John Dalton at(919)362-3500.

Greg Kilpatrick Superintendent -Operations Training Harris Nuclear Plant DGKlmgw Enclosuresc:Mr.P.B.O'Bryan(NRCSenior ResidentInspector,HNP) wlo EnclosuresMr.V.M.McCree (NRC Acting Regional Administrator, Region II)wlo EnclosuresMs.M.G.Vaaler (NRR Project Manager, HNP)wlo Enclosures Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.Harris Nuclear Plant P.O.Box 165 New Hill, NC 27562 Mr.RobertC.Haag SERIAL: HNP-07-175 be: (w/o Enclosures) Mr.J.R.DaltonMr.J.W.GurganiousMr.K.HendersonMs.T.M.Midgette'Mr.T.T.TolerMr.M.G.WallaceMr.J.C.Warner Nuclear Records Licensing File 55 ergy November30,2007SERIAL:HNP-07-161 Mr.Malcolm Widmann, Region II United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 ForsythSt.,SW,Suite23T85Atlanta,GA 30303-8931 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO.50-400/LICENSENO.NPF-63 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR INITIAL EXAMINATIONS 05000400/2008301 OUTLINES

DearMr.Widmann:

Enclosedarethe proposed examination outlinesforthe ReactorandSenior Reactor Operator Initial ExaminationstobegivenattheHarris Nuclear Plant the week of March 10,2008.This submittal complies with the requirement identifiedinyourletterdatedOctober19,2007,tofurnish the outlines by December17,2007.The enclosed materialsshallbe withheld from public disclosureuntilafterthe examinationsarecomplete.

Ifyouhaveany questions regarding these materials, please contactMr.John Dalton at(919)362-3500.

W.Greg Kilpatrick Superintendent -Operations Training Harris Nuclear Plant DGKJmgw Enclosuresc:Mr.P.B.O'Bryan (NRC Senior ResidentInspector,HNP) wlo EnclosuresMr.V.M.McCree (NRC Acting Regional Administrator, Region II)wlo EnclosuresMs.M.G.Vaaler (NRR Project Manager, HNP)wlo Enclosures Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.Harris Nuclear Plant P.O.Box 165NewHill, NC 27562 o 4 Mr.Malcolm Widmann SERIAL: HNP-07-161 be: (w/o Enclosures)Mr.J.R.DaltonMr.J.W.GurganiousMr.K.HendersonMs.T.M.MidgetteMr.T.T.TolerMr.M.G.WallaceMr.J.C.Warner Nuclear Records Licensing File }}