ML14090A455

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
301 Retake Final Administrative Documents
ML14090A455
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/31/2014
From:
NRC/RGN-II
To:
Progress Energy Carolinas
Shared Package
ML14091A073 List:
References
50-400/14-301
Download: ML14090A455 (10)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Harris 2014-301 Date of Examination: 2/28/14 Facility NRC Examinations Developed by: Written / Operating Test Written / Operating Test Chief Target Task Description (Reference) Examiners Date* Initials

  -180        1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)                          PGC
  -120        2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)                              PGC
  -120        3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)                     PGC
  -120        4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)                                              PGC

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] PGC {-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as PGC applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility PGC licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, PGC ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

   -30        9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202)            PGC
   -14        10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)         PGC
   -14        11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review                      PGC (C.2.h; C.3.f)
   -14        12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)                 PGC
    -7        13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor                      PGC (C.2.i; C.3.h)
    -7        14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent          PGC (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
    -7        15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee        NA (C.3.k)
    -7        16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to               PGC NRC examiners (C.3.i)
  • Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201 -2 Unto ol Ex,uwatujn f-acuity, ff .e.r,-,5 7 i-( Initials tri, task Description I a I °

1. a. Verify :hat the outtire(s) its) the appropriate model, In accordance with ES-401. 4/4 1 w

R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randcmly prepared in accordance with I Section D o ES-40 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselecled or rejected K1A statements are appropriate.

2, a. Using Form ES-301-5. veri that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures. technical specifications. i S arid major transients. M b Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L wthout comprom:sing exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A a: east one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the appicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 c. To the extent possiote, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix 0.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form

2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within tne limits specified on the form A ,j I ..

T t3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s -

4) the number of riewor modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums spefied on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b. verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specif:ed on Form ES-301-1 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form 7
7. /

at east one task is new or sgniflcantly modified

                   .3) no more than one task is repeatec from the ast two NRC licensing examinations
o. Deterrnir.e if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix faopiicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. - *
4. a Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA arid IPE insights) are covered - -

in the aPpropriate exam sections. -

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is apercpriate. -c >

L_ N c. Ensure that KA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at teast 2.5

d. Check for duplication and oierlap among exam sections.

ij, A e. Check the entire exam for b lance o coverage. Assess wtretner the exam s the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). .,-.

                                                                                                                                ,.-c.
                                                  )                 Printed Nan)eIS iature   ,                                      ,Da:e a Autho                                                j    ,

o Facil ty R. Iewer () 0Yt uA o NRC ChwtExam:ner() Note: # ni spendeot NRC. reviewer initial items in Column ; cii xarriiner concurrence required. N applicable to .RC.prepared examination audi as ES-201,Page26o 28

Harris 2014 NRC Retest JPM Exam ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of I of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of// 2, From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. I% J s+rt4- c /t4L, P1, ci I /3 /

2hL_.d 4 4L

2. wt ci e cc -i.-- \ //3-/ - 3--N 11.1Lf
3. Jc uo/J(r E,v /
4. K &i gI- 5tIFILY 7 ,_1_- I 14 ;;: /LL_
5. 1... )r, jO £4.-jk
6. rAcc+Y(kt fgfcf
7. /LL l.-iit.,c i 1. , -- /f/i y,
8. ¶C\?l 1.Liy Cv-nc i--l i4I)LL 9 / Z7 7 1o.jLr -{umJI( JUC oP flrJt .OiIZZIN 4// / /

ii. /L.rk cj25

  • IY2?//r/

4 4dM-4

12. eiZs L çi/isi 13:Tt ?tk 4>\,, 3/57/9 14.

15. NOTES:

                  )      k 4

Sjrie VAA 5L I -

                            \ 0 L-.)     s    i                         SO.-,

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: February 28, 2014 Examination Level: RO SRO Operating Test Number: 2014-301 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code* During a loss of shutdown cooling, determine the time that the RCS will reach core boiling and core boil-off Conduct of Operations M, R conditions (JPM ADM-005-c-SRO) K/A G2.1.20 Determine the amount of RCS inventory that will be drained from RCS during the performance of GP-008, Conduct of Operations N Draining the RCS (JPM ADM-070-a-SRO) K/A G2.2.25 Review (for approval) a completed surveillance procedure for PORV block valves. Equipment Control P, R (JPM ADM-035-b SRO) K/A G 2.2.12 Given a Declared Emergency, Determine the Dose Radiation Control D, R Rate, Dose Limit, and the Number of People to Perform a Task. (JPM ADM-046-c) K/A G2.3.4 Given a set of conditions, Classify an Event and make a Emergency Procedures/Plan N Protective Action Recommendation. (JPM ADM-071-a-SRO) KA G2.4.41 NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

  • Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes) 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1) 3 (P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected) 1 1 of 3 Rev. 0

2013 HNP NRC Retest Exam SRO Admin JPM Summary 2013 NRC Retest SRO A1 During a loss of shutdown cooling, determine the time that the RCS will reach core boiling and core boil-off conditions. (SRO JPM ADM-005-c-SRO) Modified K/A G2.1.20 - Ability to interpret and execute procedure steps. (CFR: 41.10 / 43.5 / 45.12) RO 4.6 SRO 4.6 This bank JPM was modified by changing the dates and times of plant shutdown and values of the core thermocouples. These changes have made the calculated answer substantially different than the bank JPM answer. The applicant will be provided with initial plant conditions. A plant shutdown for refueling is in progress with the Reactor Vessel head off when a loss of RHR has occurred. The crew is implementing AOP-020, Loss of RCS Inventory or Residual Heat Removal While Shutdown. The SRO applicants must first determine which of the four plant curves to use (H-X-8 through H-X-11) and then calculate the time the RCS will reach core boiling and core boil-off based on the figures. 2013 NRC Retest SRO A1 Determine the amount of RCS inventory that will be drained from RCS during the performance of GP-008, Draining the RCS (JPM ADM-070-a-SRO) New K/A G2.1.25 - Ability to interpret reference materials, such as graphs, curves, tables, ect. (CFR: 41.10 / 43.5 / 45.12) RO 3.9 SRO 4.2 The applicant will be provided with initial plant conditions. A plant shutdown for refueling is in progress with the RCS drain down required from a starting point of mid-loop level and drain down to -70 below the flange. They will be required to calculate the amount of RCS volume in gallons that this drain down will accomplish using GP-008 Attachment 5. 2013 NRC Retest SRO A2 - Review (for approval) a completed surveillance procedure for PORV block valves. (JPM ADM-035-b SRO) Previous - 2011 NRC Exam randomly selected K/A G2.2.12 - Knowledge of surveillance procedures. (CFR: 41.10 / 45.13) RO 3.7 SRO 4.1 The applicant will be provided with a handout of a completed copy of a PORV Block Valve full stroke quarterly surveillance. The procedure contains three (3) errors that the candidate must identify. 2013 NRC Exam Retest SRO A3 - Given an emergency situation, determine the applicable dose limit and the number of people that will be required to perform the task, with no one exceeding the limit. (JPM ADM-046-c) Direct KA G2.3.4 - Knowledge of radiation exposure limits under normal or emergency conditions. (CFR: 41.12 / 43.4 / 45.10) RO 3.2 SRO 3.7 Given an accident and a personnel rescue or protection of valuable equipment scenario, determine stay time and the number of people required to complete the task without exceeding the facility limit. 2 of 3 Rev. 0

2013 HNP NRC Retest Exam SRO Admin JPM Summary 2013 NRC Exam Retest SRO A4 - Given a set of conditions, Classify an Event and make a Protective Action Recommendation. (JPM ADM-071-a-SRO) New K/A G2.4.41 - Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications (CFR: 41.10 / 43.5 / 45.11) RO 2.9 SRO 4.6 This is a two part JPM. Part 1. The applicant will be provided a set of plant conditions and will be required to evaluate the EAL Network to determine if a classification is required. Part 1 of this JPM will be required to be completed within 15 minutes. Part 2. If the applicant determines that the classification is a General Emergency the examiner will then provide the applicant with a wind speed and direction and direct the applicant to perform a Protective Action Recommendation (PAR). Part 2 of this JPM will also require the applicant to complete their evaluation within 15 minutes. 3 of 3 Rev. 0

Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Harris Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: February 28, 2014 Exam Level: RO SRO-I SRO-U Operating Test No.: 2014-301 Control Room Systems (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF) Safety System / JPM Title Type Code* Function

a. Vent An Unisolable SI Accumulator during a Steam Generator Tube Rupture Event (JPM-CR-284-a)

A, EN, N, L, S 2 K/A 006 A4.02

b. Transfer to Hot Leg Recirculation (JPM-CR-066-d) A, EN, M, L, S 3 K/A 011 EK3.13
c. Fuel Handling Accident with Fuel Handling In Progress -

Dropped Fuel Assembly (JPM CR-035-b) A, P, L, S 8 K/A 034 A2.01 In-Plant Systems (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)

d. Local Makeup to the VCT Using the Manual Emergency Boration Valve (JPM IP-088-a)

D, E, R 1 K/A 004 A2.14

i. Perform Local Actions for Placing an OT (JPM IP-209-b) D, E 7 K/A 012 A4.04 All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
  • Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank 9/ 8/4 2 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1/ 1/1 2 (EN)gineered safety feature - / - / 1 2 (L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1/ 1/1 3 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) 2/ 2/1 2 (P)revious 2 exams 3/ 3/2 1 (R)CA 1/ 1/1 1 (S)imulator 1 of 3 Rev. 0

2013 HNP NRC Retest Exam SRO Simulator and In-Plant JPM Summary JPM a - Vent An Unisolable SI Accumulator during a Steam Generator Tube Rupture Event (JPM-CR-284-a) New K/A 006 A4.02: Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) - Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: Valves (CFR: 41.7 / 45.5 to 45.8) RO 4.0 SRO 3.8 The candidate will be assigned the OATC position. The initial conditions are a Steam Generator tube rupture has occurred on the A SG. The crew entered AOP-016, Excessive Primary Plant Leakage. During the implantation of AOP-016 RCS leakage exceeded VCT makeup capability and the crew manually tripped the Reactor and Safety Injected. The crew entered EOP-E-0. After identifying the A Steam Generator as ruptured the crew transitioned to and are implementing EOP-E-3, Steam Generator Tube Rupture. The CRS will direct the candidate to continue with E-3 starting at step 90 to check if SI accumulators should be isolated. The candidate will check RCS pressure below 1000 psig (Yes) then contact an Aux Operator to locally unlock and close both breakers for each SI accumulator discharge valve. After the discharge valves are energized the candidate will shut each SI accumulator discharge valve (1SI-246, 1SI-247 and 1SI-248). The A Accumulator discharge valve (1SI-246, Accum 1-A-SA Disc Vlv) will not shut and require the candidate to implement the RNO action to vent the unisolable Accumulator using OP-110, Safety Injection, section 8.3. The OP will require the candidate to shut 1SI-287, Accum N2 Supply Isol valve and open 1SI-295, Accumulator A N2 Supply and Vent valve. They will then slowly adjust HC-936, 1SI-298 Accum Vent Press Cntl control potentiometer output signal to open 1SI-298 and vent the Accumulator to Containment. The goal is to vent the A Accumulator to 0 psig. Verification of A Accumulator pressure reduction will be available by observation of MCB pressure indications, ERFIS screen plots, OSI-PI screen plots and annunciators. After the examiner observes both a low pressure alarm for the A Accumulator (ALB-01-7-1, ACCUMULATOR TANK A HIGH-LOW PRESS, setpoint = 602 psig) and approximately a 5 psig pressure reduction a cue for using time compression can be given stating that the A accumulator pressure now reads 0 psig. The candidate will then secure the vent process. The JPM will end when the A Accumulator line up is restored. JPM b - Transfer to Hot Leg Recirculation (JPM-CR-066-d) Modified K/A 011 EK3.3 EPE: Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirculation- Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply to the (Loss of Emergency Coolant Recirculation): Manipulation of controls required to obtain desired operating results during abnormal, and emergency situations. (CFR: 41.5 / 41.10, 45.6, 45.13) RO 3.8 SRO 3.8 The candidate will be assigned the OATC position. The turnover will be that the plant has experienced a Large Break LOCA 6.5 hours ago. The ESF equipment is presently aligned per EOP ES-1.3, Transfer to Cold Leg Recirculation. Enough time has passed since the LOCA to now require implementation of EOP ES-1.4, Transfer to Hot Leg Recirculation. The candidate will be required to complete this lineup. Modification of the JPM includes a failure of one of the Hot Leg injection valves to open (1SI-107). The candidate will be required to implement RNO actions to reopen the previously shut alternate high head SI to cold leg valve 1SI-52 and restart the Train A CSIP. Additionally, the RNO action statement directs consulting the plant operations staff to evaluate the use of Attachment 1 to open valves under pressure locking conditions. The implementation of the attachment will be directed after the candidate completes the B train equipment lineup. The JPM will end when the Hot Leg lineup is complete and both the A and the B CSIPs are in operation. 2 of 3 Rev. 0

2013 HNP NRC Retest Exam SRO Simulator and In-Plant JPM Summary JPM c - Fuel Handling Accident with Fuel Handling In Progress - Dropped Fuel Assembly (JPM CR-035-b) - 2012 NRC Exam JPM randomly selected from bank K/A 034 A2.01 Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the Fuel Handling System ; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Dropped fuel element (CFR: 41.5 / 43.5 / 45.3 / 45.13) RO 3.6 SRO 4.4 Initial conditions presented to the candidate will be that the plant is in Mode 6 and a core off-load is in progress. RCS temperature is 120°F and the refueling cavity water level is 236. The Containment area radiation monitors have gone into high alarm and are trending up. The Control Room has just received notice of a dropped fuel assembly. At this point the candidate will assume the watch. The candidate will be expected to identify that entry conditions to AOP-013 are met and obtain a copy of the AOP. The applicant will perform section 3.0 and transition to section 3.2 for a Fuel Handling Accident in Containment. The candidate will be expected to make a PA announcement and evacuate personnel from the Containment by sounding the Containment Evacuation alarm. While continuing with the AOP they will encounter an Air Handler that did not auto secure and a damper that failed to reposition. They will have to place the components in the correct alignment and report the failures to the CRS. JPM d - Local Makeup to the VCT Using the Manual Emergency Boration Valve (JPM IP-088-a) Direct - NOTE: This JPM will be performed in the RCA. 004 A2.14 Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the CVCS; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Emergency boration (CFR: 41.5/ 43/5 / 45/3 / 45/5) RO 3.8 SRO 3.9 The candidate will be informed that the Reactor Makeup Control System has malfunctioned requiring the candidate to locally makeup to the VCT in accordance with Attachment 2 of AOP-003, Malfunction of Reactor Makeup Control. Without a procedure the candidate will be directed by the Main Control Room to locate the manual Emergency Boration and Reactor Makeup Water valves and then simulate positioning these valves to the Control Rooms mark. JPM e - Perform Local Actions for Placing an OTT Channel in Test (JPM IP-209-b) Direct K/A 012 A4.04 Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: Bistable, trips, reset and test switches (CFR: 41.7 / 45.5 to 45.8) RO 3.3 SRO 3.3 The candidate will be given initial conditions of the plant was operating at 100% power when Loop 1 Hot Leg temperature input to Tavg and OTT failed low. They will also be told that all Master Test Switches are to be placed in test for troubleshooting and that the Control Room has placed Rod Control in MANUAL. The candidate will be directed to perform the local actions per OWP-RP-01 for troubleshooting and tripping bistables for Loop 1 Tavg and OTT to meet Technical Specifications. They will be instructed to inform the Control Room when all switches have been positioned to allow the Control Room to complete the actions required in the Control Room. 3 of 3 Rev. 0

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: IJrri / t/a / Date of Examination: Z 2? 1 Operating test Initials

1. General CriterIa a b c#
a. The oPerating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampl:ng recuirernents (e.g.. 10 CFR 55.45. operational importance, safety function distribution).
b. There is no day-to-day repetItion between this and other operating tests to be administered dunrg this examinalicn. -
c. The ooerating test shall not duplicate Items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.i.a.i . u-flt 4-
d. Oertap between different parts of the operating test is wittrn acceptable traits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -. --
a. Each PM ncludes the following, as applicable:
  • r.ital conditicrs
  • rhfiating cues
  • references and tools, including associated procedures
  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific uesignation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee
  • coerationally important specific performance criteria that include: , <

cetailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant uriteria for successful conotetion of the task identification of critical s aps and their associated performance standards restricl:Ons on the segunce of sleps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the reviously approved systems and administrative walk-thrcugrt outlines (Farns E5-3O1- and 2) hve not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance .
                                                                                                                                      ¶ç critena (e.g., item distribution, banK use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-20l*-2.
t. Simulator CrIteria The associated simulator operating tests icenar o sets) have been reviewed in accordance with t

Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached, Pnnted Name / Sigpature Date a, Author 4L

                                           -      _)       <,
b. Facility Reviewe(*) ..( T
c. NRC ChiefFxaminer(# - f
d. NRC Supervisor j<L.4.T h1b(i..L/

NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for N iC-develcped ests.

               #     Independent NRC rev war initial items in C lumn c; chi f examiner concurrence required.

ES-30., Page24of27}}