ML19308D807

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:35, 29 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Facility Antitrust Review by AEC & Concludes That City of Gainesville Conditional Request Has Been Resolved. Requests AEC to Enter Order Denying City of Gainesville Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene
ML19308D807
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/01/1972
From: Evertz H
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: Oleary J
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19308D808 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003180747
Download: ML19308D807 (2)


Text

'. ".. m o, yi ,,..,;:[

.

~

8 XA

t. 4 .,

' h3U.< h ,IAL. N ' '

-

g

-

o .

t $[pg -

  • -

1972 u 4 - i1

  • -
  • M. tr:.o;, QWr

,

  • ' to
    *1::

..f...,, s

'

.

, 'l'Lin~h p, 4

~

.

m -

Fictda l)gL Pows

<o"'***' September 1, 1972 -;c~g

-

,

( ,

r .,

'-

M r. J oh n F . O ' t.ca ry Direct.or - Directorate of !.icensing ' ,j' ,.

,y Uni ted Stat.cs Atomic Energy Convaission '

20545

.

,7f Washington, D. C.

,

etc ,N Crystal River No. 3 Nucicar Generating Unit - .

-

J/

Re:

.. , l[, c,. ..

Docket No. 50-302A - Antitrust Review

Dear Mr. O' Leary:

With regard to the above antitrust review by the Commis-sion, it appears to us that it would now be appropriate f or the for Com:nic:sf on t o deny the Cit / of Cainesville's Coaditional Request a llearing and Petit.iun to Intervena.

On February 11, 1972, pursuant to Section 105c of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, the Attorney Cencral rendered his advice to the Commission that there would be no need for an anti-trust review hearing on this matter if the several commitments made by Florida Power Corparation regarding bulk power supply inter-connections and coordinatien of roscrves ware incorporated in the operating license. The commitments are set forth in our letter of December 6,1971 to the United States Department of Justice. A copy was attached to the Attorney General's advice to the Commission.

A copy is enclosed herewith for your convenience.

In its Conditional Request for licaring, the City of Gaines-ville only raised a question wit.h regard to Conuitment No. 3, per-taining to Florida Power's obligation to facilitate the exchange of bulk power by transmission over its. system betueen or among other entitics with which it is connected. Contrary to the City of Gaines-ville's contention, Florida Power is obligated under this condition

' to transmit bulk power for other entitics, provided that such other entitics give sufficient advance notice as may be required to accom.modate the arrangement from a functional and technical stand-point and that the other entity will be obligated to compensate Florida Power fully for the use of its system.

g

'

8008180[f7

.

_

.w eenerai omce 320i in.n,aok:n succen. e o neioe. a re~~u nce am 8'3 m '0'

~_ _ _

~,

ee . m

  • a

.

- .

>

Mr. John F. O' Leary Septernher 1, 1972 The Co m ission Staff'has taken the sa.c positien, as stated in.the preceding paragraph, in its Ac.suar to the City of Cainesv111c's Conditional Request for !! caring and Petition to Intervene. The Staff, therefore, requested that the Conditional Request for !! caring and Petition to Intervene be denicd.

i From the foregoing, the entire matter of the City of Cainesville's Cenditional Request has been resolved and is now moot. -riorida Power Corporation requests that the Cocmission ad-minir.trat ively' mahn a determination that the City of Cainesville's Conditional Request for licaring and Petition to Intervene should be denied and enter its Order to that effect.

4 S Very truly yours, q l. d. h >"

  • 11. A. Evertz , III

'

Assistant Counsel

.

I!Af :y.c Enci

,

1

.

e 1

e t

e.

. . - _

._ ,

  • _ , .,_ _ ._ ;; ~ ' * * . _ . . .