ML17308A147

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:52, 18 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-335/85-17 & 50-389/85-17.Corrective Actions:Operating Procedure OP2-0400053 Revised & Engineering Staff Requested to Review Design of Plant Change/Mod-015-283
ML17308A147
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/16/1985
From: Williams J
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
L-85-315, NUDOCS 8508270069
Download: ML17308A147 (4)


See also: IR 05000335/1985017

Text

Iso rq~/A~ute tavw Cu Iu Q s FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY AUG 1 6 1886 L-85-315 Dr.3.Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region!1 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory

Cominission

Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street, N.W.Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Dear Dr.Grace: Re: St.Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-335, 50-389 Ins ection Re ort 335/85-17 and 389/85-17 Florida Power 2 Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection

report, and a response is attached.There is no proprietary

information

in the report.Very truly yours, I~~~3.W.Williams, 3r.Group Vice President Nuclear Energy 3W W/SA V:dkw Attachment

cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire8508270069

0335 PDR ADOCP, 05000 6 EOPLE.~SERVING p'

f

ATTACHMENT

Re: St.Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket iVos.50-335, 50-389 lns ection Re ort 335/85-17<<nd 389/85-17 FINDING 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as impleinented

by section 5.0 of FPRL Topical Quality Assurance Report, requires, in part, that activities

affecting quality be prescribed

by documented

instructions, procedures

and drawings and shall be accomplished

in accordance

with these instructions, procedures

and drawings.Contrary to the above, plant modifications

were performed on Unit 2 in 1980 per plant change/'modification (PC/M)-015-283

which added redundant over-current

devices to electrical

distribution

systems to comply with iVRC Regulatory

Guides 1.63 an'd 1.75.The addition of these devices resulted in some safety-related

relays no longer being testable with the unit at power.On 3une 26, 1985, an attempt was made to perform Operating Procedure (OP)2-0000053, Engineered

Safeguards

Relay Test, for Semi-annual

Surveillance.

The PC/M's did not modify~the procedures

to prevent testing of certain relays.This resulted in a plant transient that almost tripped tne reactor.RESPONSE 1.FPL concurs with the finding.2.The reason for the violation was due to an oversight in the review of the applicable

PC/i%i.It was not recognized

that a change to procedure OP2-0000053 (Engineered

Safeguards

Relay Test, for semi-annual surveillance)

would be required.3.The required change has been made to OP2-0000053.

Additionally, our Engineering

Staff has been requested to review the design of the PC/M.0.The imgortafice

of a thorough review of PC/M has been stressed to the appropriate

personnel.

The procedure update method is being expanded to ensure applicable

department

reviews are complete.This is expected to be completed by October 1, 1985, which is in time for the PSL Unit 1 Refueling Outage.5.Full compliance

will be achieved on October 1, 1985.

i