ML24031A640: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                               June Cochran <gradofcal@yahoo.com>
{{#Wiki_filter:From: June Cochran <gradofcal@yahoo.com>
Sent:                               Wednesday, January 31, 2024 2:58 PM To:                                 DiabloCanyonEnvironmental.Resource
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 2:58 PM To: DiabloCanyonEnvironmental.Resource


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 26: Line 26:
Please release the funds set to keep this plant open for no reason so they can be utilized to fund renewable energy. Let's stop giving subsidies to fossil fuels and nuclear. No company will even insure nuclear for very good reasons. Pease listen to your brain, not to those waving dollars at you. The California Public Utilities Commission has stated that complete costs are unknown but are expected to exceed $6 billion. The cost burden would be spread to other non-PG&E ratepayers throughout the State.
Please release the funds set to keep this plant open for no reason so they can be utilized to fund renewable energy. Let's stop giving subsidies to fossil fuels and nuclear. No company will even insure nuclear for very good reasons. Pease listen to your brain, not to those waving dollars at you. The California Public Utilities Commission has stated that complete costs are unknown but are expected to exceed $6 billion. The cost burden would be spread to other non-PG&E ratepayers throughout the State.
This is expected to exceed $500 for every family of four. How can you possibly justify this?
This is expected to exceed $500 for every family of four. How can you possibly justify this?
June Cochran Resident of Pismo Beach Federal Register Notice: 89FR4631 Comment Number:           4
June Cochran Resident of Pismo Beach Federal Register Notice: 89FR4631 Comment Number: 4


Mail Envelope Properties   (1252559270.3636007.1706731105281)
Mail Envelope Properties (1252559270.3636007.1706731105281)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Do Not Re-license Diablo Sent Date:         1/31/2024 2:58:25 PM Received Date:     1/31/2024 2:58:53 PM From:             June Cochran
[External_Sender] Do Not Re-license Diablo Sent Date: 1/31/2024 2:58:25 PM Received Date: 1/31/2024 2:58:53 PM From: June Cochran


Created By:       gradofcal@yahoo.com
Created By: gradofcal@yahoo.com


Recipients:
Recipients:
Line 39: Line 39:
Tracking Status: None
Tracking Status: None


Post Office:       mail.yahoo.com
Post Office: mail.yahoo.com


Files                     Size                 Date & Time MESSAGE                   1307                 1/31/2024 2:58:53 PM
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1307 1/31/2024 2:58:53 PM


Options Priority:                 Normal Return Notification:     No Reply Requested:         No Sensitivity:             Normal Expiration Date:}}
Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:}}

Latest revision as of 20:25, 5 October 2024

Comment (4) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping
ML24031A640
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 01/31/2024
From: Public Commenter
Public Commenter
To:
NRC/NMSS/DREFS
NRC/NMSS/DREFS
References
89FR4631
Download: ML24031A640 (2)
v • d • e


Text

From: June Cochran <gradofcal@yahoo.com>

Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 2:58 PM To: DiabloCanyonEnvironmental.Resource

Subject:

[External_Sender] Do Not Re-license Diablo

Don't you believe in science and facts? If so, please prove it and stop this unbelievable give out to an aging plant that is on many earthquake faults and should not have been built in the first place. We had an agreement with all parties to shut Diablo down at the end of the licenses of Units 1 and 2 in 2024 and 2025. Just like with Native Americans, the powers that be went back on their word for no reason -- there is NOT an energy emergency. California now has more than 8,500 MW of energy storage capacity with more being added each year, plus up to 5,000 MW of demand response - more than sufficient to ensure grid reliability during extreme weather events.

Please release the funds set to keep this plant open for no reason so they can be utilized to fund renewable energy. Let's stop giving subsidies to fossil fuels and nuclear. No company will even insure nuclear for very good reasons. Pease listen to your brain, not to those waving dollars at you. The California Public Utilities Commission has stated that complete costs are unknown but are expected to exceed $6 billion. The cost burden would be spread to other non-PG&E ratepayers throughout the State.

This is expected to exceed $500 for every family of four. How can you possibly justify this?

June Cochran Resident of Pismo Beach Federal Register Notice: 89FR4631 Comment Number: 4

Mail Envelope Properties (1252559270.3636007.1706731105281)

Subject:

[External_Sender] Do Not Re-license Diablo Sent Date: 1/31/2024 2:58:25 PM Received Date: 1/31/2024 2:58:53 PM From: June Cochran

Created By: gradofcal@yahoo.com

Recipients:

"DiabloCanyonEnvironmental.Resource" <DiabloCanyonEnvironmental.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None

Post Office: mail.yahoo.com

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1307 1/31/2024 2:58:53 PM

Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML24031A640&oldid=3681743"