ML20090G108

Responds to Re Meeting to Discuss NSC Audit Rept. Reconsideration of Appearance Requested.Served on 840723

ML20090G108
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	07/19/1984
From:	Naymark S QUADREX CORP.
To:	Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20090G096	List: ML20090G108
References
OL, NUDOCS 8407240233
Download: ML20090G108 (2)

Text

_~

1

.i Quadrex Corporation GbNUREXI -

170D De!: Avenue. Comonou.Ccinnmic 95005 6986' -

406 566 4510 r#X Mo 500 2435 Lillf;C 35 2031 IELECOPY 405 370 43M 84 JUL 23 til:M snermen Hermerk

, li.%

,g .

- h*8iD*n:

^

i 7. . . . .

. July 49,a'1984 Nunzio J. Palladino, Chaiman Nuclear Re.gulatory Ccmission , cer;C

~,

Es 2. ~ 'E3.4 1717 H Street N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20555 -

Attention: Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary

Dear Chaiman Palladino:

I have received and reviewed your letter of July 13,1984 with respect to n1y visit to.the Comission next week, including the list of questi.ons which accompanied it. Having previously indicated qy ,

willingness to come to Washington on this matter, I am still willing to do so. However, after reviewing the proposed questions, I again question the necessity for such a meeting' and the assistance I can ,

personally provide-the Comission. The answers to your questions are -

quite simple. ,

.. I have no reason to question the quality of the NSC report.

(Question 4). I also do not know of any discrepancy between what was requested and what was done. NSC audited paper work as requested.

(Question 5). The codelusions contained in the NSC report must represent the judgement of its employees based on the infomation made available to them. I knew of no reason to question the integrity or. qualifications of the people who perfomed the work. Quadrex requires and encourages its snployees to honestly and professionally. perfom their work.

(Questions 1 and 3). Likewise, I assume the'NRC findings were based on the judgement of its people diligently and professionally pursuing their responsibilities.. (Question 2).

I was.present at the exit interview held at the con'clusion of the NSC audit. I was there as a management observer to show management's interest in the work and its comitment to professionally serve its clients.

7/20...To Chairman's Office for Appropriate Action...Cpy.to: Cmrs RF, EDO.. 84-0752 e407240233 e40720 PDR ADOCK 05000275 0 PDR w ,

. g n _,

maar N. J. Palladino, Chaiman HRC July 19, 1984 . .

2 resence was a normal occurrence for such meetings with Atthattimemyp(Question major clients. 6). I have had no interaction with PG&E in the last year regarding the NSC audit.cther than to infom them cf your past inquiries. (Question 7). Finally, it is not my job, nor have I aeen requested, t6 resolve the " conflicts", if any, between the NSC audit findings .and those 'of'the NRC. As previously indicated, such a task is an enomous one, and Quadrex does not have the infomation available to it to undertake such a task nor has it been retained to do so. (Question 8).

. As you know, Quadrex is in the business of providing engineering and technical services to the nuclear p>ter industry. We fully understand ~

the important position and recognize the important role the NR,C plays in this business. Accordingly, we wish to cooperate with the NRC and reasonably respond to its requests. We do not, however, understand the substantive benefit of the scheduled meeting next week. In view of the ,

foregoing, we request that you reconsider the necessity _,of my appeavunce next week.

Respectfully kc.w~

F 'Sheman Naymark /

A" kca.

President .

SN:ng e

O e

e e

9 6

0 0

6 e

c -

- . - . -