ML060800003: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:March 21, 2006Mr. Jeffery ArchieVice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065
{{#Wiki_filter:March 21, 2006 Mr. Jeffery Archie Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION REGARDING INSTRUMENTATION TEST AND COMPLETION TIMES (TAC NO. MC8898)
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING INSTRUMENTATION TEST AND COMPLETION TIMES (TAC NO. MC8898)


==Dear Mr. Archie:==
==Dear Mr. Archie:==


The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the license amendment application forthe Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station dated November 15, 2005, concerning instrumentationtest and completion times and find that we need additional information as identified in the enclosure.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the license amendment application for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station dated November 15, 2005, concerning instrumentation test and completion times and find that we need additional information as identified in the enclosure.
This request for additional information was discussed with your staff on March 20, 2006, and your staff indicated that a response could be provided by May 1, 2006. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
                                            /RA/
Robert E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395


This request for additional information was discussed with your staff on March 20, 2006, and your staff indicated that a response could be provided by May 1, 2006. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, /RA/Robert E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395
==Enclosure:==
Request for Additional Information cc: See next page


==Enclosure:==
ML060800003                                                  NRR-088 OFFICE            NRR/LPL2-1/PM          NRR/LPL2-1/LA              NRR/LPL2-1/BC NAME              RMartin                CSola                      EMarinos DATE              3/21/06                3/21/06                    3/21/06
Request for Additional Information cc: See next page  
 
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RISK INFORMED JUSTIFICATION FOR EXTENDING ALLOWED OUTAGE TIME (AOT) BYPASS TEST TIMES VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS)
: 1. Westinghouse Commercial Atomic Power report (WCAP) -14333-P-A, Rev. 1, Probabilistic Risk Analysis of the RPS [reactor protection system] and ESFAS
[engineered safety feature actuation system] Test Times and Completion Times, dated October 1998, Section 11.0, Implementation of the Proposed Technical Specification Changes, Item 3, notes that a change to the action for an inoperable slave relay to following the expiration of the slave relay AOT, the component affected by the inoperable slave should be declared inoperable and the TS [Technical Specification]
action for this component should be followed. Is this modification required for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS) TS? Explain why or why not.
: 2. Confirm that the VCSNS RPS utilizes the solid state protection system for the logic portion of the RPS.
: 3. Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.174, An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis, Section 2.3 and RG 1.177, An Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking:
Technical Specifications, Section 3, as part of the key principles in implementing risk-informed decisionmaking, establishes the need for an implementation and monitoring program to ensure that extensions to TS AOT or surveillance test intervals do not degrade operational safety over time and that no adverse degradation occurs due to changes in the licensing basis due to unanticipated degradation or common cause mechanisms. An implementation and monitoring program is intended to ensure that the impact of the proposed TS change continues to reflect the reliability and availability of structures, systems and components impacted by the change. Provide information on the VCSNS implementation and monitoring program as applied to the incorporation of WCAP-14333 at VCSNS.
: 4. The analysis for WCAP-14333 assumed that maintenance on master and slave relays, logic cabinets, and analog channels while at power occurs only after a component failure, and that preventive maintenance does not occur. The topical report does not preclude the practice of at-power preventive maintenance but limits the total time a component is unavailable due to corrective or preventive maintenance to the values used in the analysis. If preventive maintenance is to be performed at VCSNS, confirm that the unavailability for components evaluated in WCAP-14333 are consistent with the plant specific estimates at VCSNS and do not exceed those assumed in the analysis.
Enclosure
 
See the submittal, Implementation Guideline, Table 1, Analog Channel Calibration as an example.
: 5. Provide the date of the VCSNS probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) industry peer review and date of certification.
: 6. Confirm that the WCAP-14333 reference plant assumptions for human reliability are applicable to VCSNS. As an example, see the B level Facts and Observations (F&Os) discussion for HR-06 on pages 18 and 19 of the submittal.
: 7. The licensees submittal states that due to the generic analysis of WCAP-14333 the second F&O concerning internal floods has no impact on the proposed changes.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff notes that internal flooding may have unique plant specific vulnerabilities and may not be bounded by the generic analysis.
Internal floods were not part of the implementation guidance for WCAP-14333. Provide a plant-specific assessment (either qualitative or quantitative) to confirm that VCSNS internal flooding results are bounded by WCAP-14333 for this F&O.
: 8. Provide an assessment of the external events risk impact including seismic, fire, and external floods and high wind risk with respect to the proposed completion time and bypass time extensions in RG 1.177 Section 2.3.2, Scope of the PRA for TS Applications.
: 9. Provide a discussion on the following aspects of PRA quality as applicable to the VCSNS PRA.
: 1.      The plant-specific PRA reflects the as-built, as-operated plant.
: 2.      Applicable PRA updates conducted since completion of individual plant examination (IPE) and individual plant examination of external events (IPEEE) and the status of any improvements identified by the IPE and IPEEE.
: 3.      Reference PRA quality assurance programs/procedures, including expected PRA revision schedules.
: 4.      PRA adequacy and completeness with respect to evaluating the proposed AOT and bypass time extensions with emphasis on Tier 3.
: 5.      Plant design or operational modifications not reflected in the WCAP-14333 PRA used in this application that are related to or could impact this license amendment application. Justify the acceptability of not including these modifications in the PRA as part of this application.
: 10. RG 1.174 states that as part of the evaluation of risk, the cumulative risk of the present TS change in light of past applications should be understood. Cumulative risks were not
 
addressed by VCSNS. Provide an evaluation of the cumulative risk impact of previous TS changes (including WCAP-10271) per RG 1.174, Section 3.3.2, as applicable to the implementation of WCAP-14333.
: 11. Regarding page 9 of 26 of the application, for the restriction listed under Tier 2 provide a procedure reference that incorporates these changes. Are these restrictions considered licensee commitments?
: 12. Page 9 of 26 of the licensees submittal states that the VCSNS Tier 3 requirements are addressed through VCSNS Operations Administrative Procedures consistent with the requirements Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), section 50.65(a)(4).
Provide a discussion on the applicability of the VCSNS 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) configuration risk management program (CRMP) to the additions and clarifications provided in RG 1.177, Section 2.3.7.2, Key Components 1 through 4, for CRMP programs that implement section a(4) of 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and the guidance provided by RG 1.182, Assessing and Managing Risk Before Maintenance Activities at Nuclear Power Plants.
In addition, identify the programs and procedures in place to implement the CRMP at VCSNS.


ML060800003 NRR-088OFFICENRR/LPL2-1/PMNRR/LPL2-1/LANRR/LPL2-1/BCNAMERMartinCSolaEMarinosDATE3/21/063/21/063/21/06 EnclosureREQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRISK INFORMED JUSTIFICATION  FOR EXTENDING ALLOWED OUTAGE TIME (AOT)  BYPASS TEST TIMES VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS)1.Westinghouse Commercial Atomic Power report (WCAP) -14333-P-A, Rev. 1,"Probabilistic Risk Analysis of the RPS [reactor protection system] and ESFAS[engineered safety feature actuation system] Test Times and Completion Times," datedOctober 1998, Section 11.0, "Implementation of the Proposed Technical SpecificationChanges," Item 3, notes that a change to the action for an inoperable slave relay to"following the expiration of the slave relay AOT, the component affected by theinoperable slave should be declared inoperable and the TS [Technical Specification]action for this component should be followed."  Is this modification required for the VirgilC. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS) TS?  Explain why or why not. 2.Confirm that the VCSNS RPS utilizes the solid state protection system for the logicportion of the RPS. 3.Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.174,  "An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment inRisk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis," Section 2.3and RG 1.177, "An Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking:Technical Specifications," Section 3, as part of the key principles in implementingrisk-informed decisionmaking, establishes the need for an implementation andmonitoring program to ensure that extensions to TS AOT or surveillance test intervalsdo not degrade operational safety over time and that no adverse degradation occursdue to changes in the licensing basis due to unanticipated degradation or commoncause mechanisms. An implementation and monitoring program is intended to ensurethat the impact of the proposed TS change continues to reflect the reliability andavailability of structures, systems and components impacted by the change. Provideinformation on the VCSNS implementation and monitoring program as applied to theincorporation of WCAP-14333 at VCSNS.4.The analysis for WCAP-14333 assumed that maintenance on master and slave relays,logic cabinets, and analog channels while at power occurs only after a componentfailure, and that preventive maintenance does not occur. The topical report does notpreclude the practice of at-power preventive maintenance but limits the total time acomponent is unavailable due to corrective or preventive maintenance to the valuesused in the analysis. If preventive maintenance is to be performed at VCSNS, confirmthat the unavailability for components evaluated in WCAP-14333 are consistent with theplant specific estimates at VCSNS and do not exceed those assumed in the analysis. See the submittal, "Implementation Guideline," Table 1, "Analog Channel Calibration" asan example. 5.Provide the date of the VCSNS probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) industry peer reviewand date of certification.6.Confirm that the WCAP-14333 reference plant assumptions for human reliability areapplicable to VCSNS. As an example, see the "B" level Facts and Observations (F&Os)discussion for HR-06 on pages 18 and 19 of the submittal.7.The licensee's submittal states that due to the generic analysis of WCAP-14333 thesecond F&O concerning internal floods has no impact on the proposed changes. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff notes that internal flooding may haveunique plant specific vulnerabilities and may not be bounded by the generic analysis.Internal floods were not part of the implementation guidance for WCAP-14333. Providea plant-specific assessment (either qualitative or quantitative) to confirm that VCSNSinternal flooding results are bounded by WCAP-14333 for this F&O.8. Provide an assessment of the external events risk impact including seismic, fire, andexternal floods and high wind risk with respect to the proposed completion time andbypass time extensions in RG 1.177 Section 2.3.2, "Scope of the PRA for TSApplications."9. Provide a discussion on the following aspects of PRA quality as applicable to theVCSNS PRA.1.The plant-specific PRA reflects the as-built, as-operated plant.
Mr. Jeffrey B. Archie                  VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION South Carolina Electric & Gas Company cc:
2.Applicable PRA updates conducted since completion of individual plantexamination (IPE) and individual plant examination of external events (IPEEE)and the status of any improvements identified by the IPE and IPEEE.3.Reference PRA quality assurance programs/procedures, including expectedPRA revision schedules.4.PRA adequacy and completeness with respect to evaluating the proposed AOTand bypass time extensions with emphasis on Tier 3.5.Plant design or operational modifications not reflected in the WCAP-14333 PRAused in this application that are related to or could impact this licenseamendment application. Justify the acceptability of not including thesemodifications in the PRA as part of this application.10. RG 1.174 states that as part of the evaluation of risk, the cumulative risk of the presentTS change in light of past applications should be understood. Cumulative risks were not  addressed by VCSNS. Provide an evaluation of the cumulative risk impact of previousTS changes (including WCAP-10271) per RG 1.174, Section 3.3.2, as applicable to theimplementation of WCAP-14333. 11.Regarding page 9 of 26 of the application, for the restriction listed under Tier 2 provide aprocedure reference that incorporates these changes. Are these restrictions consideredlicensee commitments? 12.Page 9 of 26 of the licensee's submittal states that the VCSNS Tier 3 requirements areaddressed through VCSNS Operations Administrative Procedures consistent with therequirements Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), section 50.65(a)(4). Provide a discussion on the applicability of the VCSNS 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) configurationrisk management program (CRMP) to the additions and clarifications provided in RG 1.177, Section 2.3.7.2, Key Components 1 through 4, for CRMP programs thatimplement section a(4) of 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and the guidance provided by RG 1.182,"Assessing and Managing Risk Before Maintenance Activities at Nuclear Power Plants." In addition, identify the programs and procedures in place to implement the CRMP atVCSNS.
Mr. R. J. White Nuclear Coordinator S.C. Public Service Authority c/o Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 802 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 Resident Inspector/Summer NPS c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 576 Stairway Road Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 Chairman, Fairfield County Council Drawer 60 Winnsboro, South Carolina 29180 Mr. Henry Porter, Assistant Director Division of Waste Management Bureau of Land & Waste Management Dept. of Health & Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin, General Manager Nuclear Plant Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 300 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 Mr. Ronald B. Clary, Manager Nuclear Licensing South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 830 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 Ms. Kathryn M. Sutton, Esquire Winston & Strawn Law Firm 1400 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-3502}}
Mr. Jeffrey B. ArchieVIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATIONSouth Carolina Electric & Gas Company cc:Mr. R. J. WhiteNuclear CoordinatorS.C. Public Service Authorityc/o Virgil C. Summer Nuclear StationPost Office Box 88, Mail Code 802Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065Resident Inspector/Summer NPSc/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission576 Stairway RoadJenkinsville, South Carolina 29065Chairman, Fairfield County CouncilDrawer 60Winnsboro, South Carolina 29180Mr. Henry Porter, Assistant DirectorDivision of Waste ManagementBureau of Land & Waste Management Dept. of Health & Environmental Control2600 Bull StreetColumbia, South Carolina 29201Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin, General ManagerNuclear Plant OperationsSouth Carolina Electric & Gas CompanyVirgil C. Summer Nuclear StationPost Office Box 88, Mail Code 300Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065Mr. Ronald B. Clary, ManagerNuclear LicensingSouth Carolina Electric & Gas CompanyVirgil C. Summer Nuclear StationPost Office Box 88, Mail Code 830 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065Ms. Kathryn M. Sutton, EsquireWinston & Strawn Law Firm1400 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-3502}}

Revision as of 21:55, 23 November 2019

V.C. Summer - Request for Additional Information Regarding Instrumentation Test and Completion Times
ML060800003
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 03/21/2006
From: Martin R
Plant Licensing Branch III-2
To: Archie J
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
Martin R, NRR/DORL, 415-1493
References
TAC MC8898
Download: ML060800003 (4)


Text

March 21, 2006 Mr. Jeffery Archie Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065

SUBJECT:

VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING INSTRUMENTATION TEST AND COMPLETION TIMES (TAC NO. MC8898)

Dear Mr. Archie:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the license amendment application for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station dated November 15, 2005, concerning instrumentation test and completion times and find that we need additional information as identified in the enclosure.

This request for additional information was discussed with your staff on March 20, 2006, and your staff indicated that a response could be provided by May 1, 2006. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Robert E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc: See next page

ML060800003 NRR-088 OFFICE NRR/LPL2-1/PM NRR/LPL2-1/LA NRR/LPL2-1/BC NAME RMartin CSola EMarinos DATE 3/21/06 3/21/06 3/21/06

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RISK INFORMED JUSTIFICATION FOR EXTENDING ALLOWED OUTAGE TIME (AOT) BYPASS TEST TIMES VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS)

1. Westinghouse Commercial Atomic Power report (WCAP) -14333-P-A, Rev. 1, Probabilistic Risk Analysis of the RPS [reactor protection system] and ESFAS

[engineered safety feature actuation system] Test Times and Completion Times, dated October 1998, Section 11.0, Implementation of the Proposed Technical Specification Changes, Item 3, notes that a change to the action for an inoperable slave relay to following the expiration of the slave relay AOT, the component affected by the inoperable slave should be declared inoperable and the TS [Technical Specification]

action for this component should be followed. Is this modification required for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS) TS? Explain why or why not.

2. Confirm that the VCSNS RPS utilizes the solid state protection system for the logic portion of the RPS.
3. Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.174, An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis, Section 2.3 and RG 1.177, An Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking:

Technical Specifications, Section 3, as part of the key principles in implementing risk-informed decisionmaking, establishes the need for an implementation and monitoring program to ensure that extensions to TS AOT or surveillance test intervals do not degrade operational safety over time and that no adverse degradation occurs due to changes in the licensing basis due to unanticipated degradation or common cause mechanisms. An implementation and monitoring program is intended to ensure that the impact of the proposed TS change continues to reflect the reliability and availability of structures, systems and components impacted by the change. Provide information on the VCSNS implementation and monitoring program as applied to the incorporation of WCAP-14333 at VCSNS.

4. The analysis for WCAP-14333 assumed that maintenance on master and slave relays, logic cabinets, and analog channels while at power occurs only after a component failure, and that preventive maintenance does not occur. The topical report does not preclude the practice of at-power preventive maintenance but limits the total time a component is unavailable due to corrective or preventive maintenance to the values used in the analysis. If preventive maintenance is to be performed at VCSNS, confirm that the unavailability for components evaluated in WCAP-14333 are consistent with the plant specific estimates at VCSNS and do not exceed those assumed in the analysis.

Enclosure

See the submittal, Implementation Guideline, Table 1, Analog Channel Calibration as an example.

5. Provide the date of the VCSNS probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) industry peer review and date of certification.
6. Confirm that the WCAP-14333 reference plant assumptions for human reliability are applicable to VCSNS. As an example, see the B level Facts and Observations (F&Os) discussion for HR-06 on pages 18 and 19 of the submittal.
7. The licensees submittal states that due to the generic analysis of WCAP-14333 the second F&O concerning internal floods has no impact on the proposed changes.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff notes that internal flooding may have unique plant specific vulnerabilities and may not be bounded by the generic analysis.

Internal floods were not part of the implementation guidance for WCAP-14333. Provide a plant-specific assessment (either qualitative or quantitative) to confirm that VCSNS internal flooding results are bounded by WCAP-14333 for this F&O.

8. Provide an assessment of the external events risk impact including seismic, fire, and external floods and high wind risk with respect to the proposed completion time and bypass time extensions in RG 1.177 Section 2.3.2, Scope of the PRA for TS Applications.
9. Provide a discussion on the following aspects of PRA quality as applicable to the VCSNS PRA.
1. The plant-specific PRA reflects the as-built, as-operated plant.
2. Applicable PRA updates conducted since completion of individual plant examination (IPE) and individual plant examination of external events (IPEEE) and the status of any improvements identified by the IPE and IPEEE.
3. Reference PRA quality assurance programs/procedures, including expected PRA revision schedules.
4. PRA adequacy and completeness with respect to evaluating the proposed AOT and bypass time extensions with emphasis on Tier 3.
5. Plant design or operational modifications not reflected in the WCAP-14333 PRA used in this application that are related to or could impact this license amendment application. Justify the acceptability of not including these modifications in the PRA as part of this application.
10. RG 1.174 states that as part of the evaluation of risk, the cumulative risk of the present TS change in light of past applications should be understood. Cumulative risks were not

addressed by VCSNS. Provide an evaluation of the cumulative risk impact of previous TS changes (including WCAP-10271) per RG 1.174, Section 3.3.2, as applicable to the implementation of WCAP-14333.

11. Regarding page 9 of 26 of the application, for the restriction listed under Tier 2 provide a procedure reference that incorporates these changes. Are these restrictions considered licensee commitments?
12. Page 9 of 26 of the licensees submittal states that the VCSNS Tier 3 requirements are addressed through VCSNS Operations Administrative Procedures consistent with the requirements Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), section 50.65(a)(4).

Provide a discussion on the applicability of the VCSNS 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) configuration risk management program (CRMP) to the additions and clarifications provided in RG 1.177, Section 2.3.7.2, Key Components 1 through 4, for CRMP programs that implement section a(4) of 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and the guidance provided by RG 1.182, Assessing and Managing Risk Before Maintenance Activities at Nuclear Power Plants.

In addition, identify the programs and procedures in place to implement the CRMP at VCSNS.

Mr. Jeffrey B. Archie VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION South Carolina Electric & Gas Company cc:

Mr. R. J. White Nuclear Coordinator S.C. Public Service Authority c/o Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 802 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 Resident Inspector/Summer NPS c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 576 Stairway Road Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 Chairman, Fairfield County Council Drawer 60 Winnsboro, South Carolina 29180 Mr. Henry Porter, Assistant Director Division of Waste Management Bureau of Land & Waste Management Dept. of Health & Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin, General Manager Nuclear Plant Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 300 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 Mr. Ronald B. Clary, Manager Nuclear Licensing South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 830 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 Ms. Kathryn M. Sutton, Esquire Winston & Strawn Law Firm 1400 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-3502