ML17333A484: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/11/1996
| issue date = 06/11/1996
| title = ISI & Testing.
| title = ISI & Testing.
| author name = FITCHUK J J, WORTHINGTON K
| author name = Fitchuk J, Worthington K
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  

Revision as of 14:39, 18 June 2019

ISI & Testing.
ML17333A484
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/1996
From: Fitchuk J, Worthington K
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:
Shared Package
ML17333A483 List:
References
PMI-5070, NUDOCS 9607020181
Download: ML17333A484 (4)


Text

JUN'.-26'6(%ED) 12:08 COOK PLANT MAINT.TEL:6164662621 P.001 Post-i6 Fax Note 7671 Oal~f p" P 3, FcQfll+/+Py+~~PhOAS I FIX I uclear Plant Safety Evaluation Screening Checklist PMP 1040.SES.001 SCREENING APPLICABLE TQ (Document Number, Rev.&CSP)Tl~: i n T tin

1.0 DESCRIPTION

OF CHANGE Summary of proposed change: Reason for proposed change: Re ired b 10CFFl.55a.2.0 SAFETY EVALUATION APPUCABILITY DETERMINATION Using a continuation page or pages, the screener must include a justification for each item marked No".Documents that were used as references must be listed, Including the specific sections.The screener must likewfse provide a reason for each item marked"Yes".A statement shall be made as to why a specific section of an affected document vril need to be changed.DOES THE PROCEDURE OR MODIFICATION TO WHICH TH)S SCREENING IS APPLICABLE REPRESENT:

NOTE: Refer to the procedure text as needed for full explanation of each question.Please circle the appropriate answer to each of the following questions:

2.1 NO A change to the plant as described In the FSAR, Emergency Plan or Security Plan?SeePa e3.2.2 YES 0 A change to procedures as described in the FSAR, Emergency Plan or Security Plan?See Pa e3.2.3 YES NO A test or experiment not described In the FSAR?SeePa e3.PMP 1040.SES.001 Revision 1 Attachment 1 Page1 of 3 9607020i8i 960M7 PDR ADOCK 050003i5i 9.PDR TEL:6164662621 P.002 PMP 1040.SES.001 2.4 YES 0 A change to procedures, design, or a test or experiment which could affect the environment, or a change to Appendix B of the Technical Specifications (Environmental Protection Plan)?SeePa e3.25 S NO A change to the Technical Specifications or the Operating License?SeePa e3.2.6 YES (1~$7 isa Safety Evaluation requested heoause there h douhtas to whether this change affects the FSAFI, the Emergency Plan or the Security Plan (MASP)?'rovkle reason.See P e3.3.0 If the answer to ALL of the above questions is"NO", neither a Safety Evaluation or an Environmental Evaluation Is required, 4.0 If the answer to any of the Questions 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5 OR 2.6 is"YES" or if the document ls a Design Change, a Safety Evaluation MUST be performed.

4.1 ES NO Is a Safety Evaluation required?5.0 lf the answer to Question 2.4 is"YES".then an Environmental Evaluation must be performed.

5.1 YES 0 Is an Environmental Evaluation required?Screening performed by: Print Name fgn Name Review performed by: Plant En.06 11 96 Department

/Date/K~RW rnt t"ttsnl Print Name c~)90 Quallflcatlon Date Sign Nam Department

/ate/QualiTication Date PMP 1040.SES.001 Revision 1 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 3'

'JUN.'-26'6(WED) 12:09 COOK PLANT MAINT.TEL:6164662621 P.003 PMP 1040.SES.001 SAFETY EYALUATION SCREENING CONTINUATION PAGE Document Title: PMI-5070 Rev.12 2.1-Per10CFR50$

5a, the third Intetval update to the IST Program requires Insetvlce testing be performed to ASME OM Standards and not ASME Sectton XI as referenced ln UFSAR 5.4.4.6.2.5.

9.35, 9.4.4, 9.5.6.R2-UFSAR 4 51.1, 4512,544, 825, 944 944,996 and QAPD 1.7125, 1.722, 1.710 were reviewed for procedures that would be changed and none were noted.There is no reference to the ISI Program in the Emergency Plan and Sectlity Plan per my discussion with Jeff Smith and Lany Smead and to the best of my knowledge.

2.3-The ISI/IST Program Is described UFSAR-see 22 references.

2.4-There Is no environmental Impact resulting from the change of the instruction and the ISI Program is not referenced in the EP Plan per discussion with Rocky Seem and to the best of my knowledge.

'2.5-Tech.Spec.4.0$must be changed to reflect the new regulatory requirements on the IST Program as stated in 2.1~2.6-There is no doubt that the Third Interval IST Program update affects the UFSAFL PMP 1040.SES.001 Revision 1 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 3

~q