ML15231A354: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 08/25/2015 | | issue date = 08/25/2015 | ||
| title = Nuclear Regulatory Commission Plan for Audit on Entergy Operations Inc'S Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report Submittal Relating to the Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Flooding for Waterford Steam Electric Station | | title = Nuclear Regulatory Commission Plan for Audit on Entergy Operations Inc'S Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report Submittal Relating to the Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Flooding for Waterford Steam Electric Station | ||
| author name = Hall V | | author name = Hall V | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/JLD | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/JLD | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
This letter documents the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's plan to perform a regulatory audit of Entergy Operations, lnc.'s (the licensee) supporting calculations for the Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report (FHRR) submittal related to the Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding, for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford). | This letter documents the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's plan to perform a regulatory audit of Entergy Operations, lnc.'s (the licensee) supporting calculations for the Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report (FHRR) submittal related to the Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding, for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford). | ||
This technical audit will be performed consistent with NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Office Instruction LIC-111, "Regulatory Audits," dated December 29, 2008 (Agencyw1de Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML082900195). | This technical audit will be performed consistent with NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Office Instruction LIC-111, "Regulatory Audits," dated December 29, 2008 (Agencyw1de Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML082900195). | ||
The audit will be conducted over multiple sessions, as needed, and the NRC staff will develop an audit summary report to document its observations and conclusions within 90 days of the final audit session. The audit will provide the NRC staff with a better understanding of the Waterford FHRR, which was submitted on July 21, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. | The audit will be conducted over multiple sessions, as needed, and the NRC staff will develop an audit summary report to document its observations and conclusions within 90 days of the final audit session. The audit will provide the NRC staff with a better understanding of the Waterford FHRR, which was submitted on July 21, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15204A344). | ||
Specifically, the audit will provide the NRC staff with a better understanding of the analyses of the flooding hazards presented in the Waterford FHRR. The audit is intended to support completion of the NRC staff's review of the FHRR and the subsequent issuance of a Staff Assessment. | Specifically, the audit will provide the NRC staff with a better understanding of the analyses of the flooding hazards presented in the Waterford FHRR. The audit is intended to support completion of the NRC staff's review of the FHRR and the subsequent issuance of a Staff Assessment. | ||
The enclosed audit plan outlines the process that will allow the NRC staff to identify additional information potentially necessary for licensees to supplement their FHRRs, and resolve potential technical concerns. | The enclosed audit plan outlines the process that will allow the NRC staff to identify additional information potentially necessary for licensees to supplement their FHRRs, and resolve potential technical concerns. | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Recommendation 2.1 of that document recommended that the staff issue orders to all licensees to reevaluate seismic and flooding for their sites against current NRC requirements and guidance. | Recommendation 2.1 of that document recommended that the staff issue orders to all licensees to reevaluate seismic and flooding for their sites against current NRC requirements and guidance. | ||
Subsequent Staff Requirements Memoranda associated with Commission Papers SECY 11-0124 and SECY-11-0137, instructed the NRC staff to issue requests for information to licensees pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). | Subsequent Staff Requirements Memoranda associated with Commission Papers SECY 11-0124 and SECY-11-0137, instructed the NRC staff to issue requests for information to licensees pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). | ||
By letter dated July 21, 2015, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) submitted its Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report (FHRR) for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. | By letter dated July 21, 2015, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) submitted its Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report (FHRR) for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML15204A344). | ||
The NRC staff has begun its review of the aforementioned submittals and plans to conduct a regulatory audit of Entergy to aid in its review of the licensee's FHRR. REGULATORY AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODOLGY The areas of focus for the regulatory audit is the information contained in the Waterford FHRR submittal, and all associated and relevant supporting documentation used in the development of the aforementioned document including, but not limited to, methodology, process information, calculations, computer models, etc. The audit will be conducted and completed over several meetings that are to be determined, as necessary. | The NRC staff has begun its review of the aforementioned submittals and plans to conduct a regulatory audit of Entergy to aid in its review of the licensee's FHRR. REGULATORY AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODOLGY The areas of focus for the regulatory audit is the information contained in the Waterford FHRR submittal, and all associated and relevant supporting documentation used in the development of the aforementioned document including, but not limited to, methodology, process information, calculations, computer models, etc. The audit will be conducted and completed over several meetings that are to be determined, as necessary. | ||
Enclosure INFORMATION AND OTHER MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR THE REGULATORY AUDIT The information required for the audit is the licensee's models and supporting calculations, as well as documentation related to the storm surge and site specific probable maximum precipitation analyses. | Enclosure INFORMATION AND OTHER MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR THE REGULATORY AUDIT The information required for the audit is the licensee's models and supporting calculations, as well as documentation related to the storm surge and site specific probable maximum precipitation analyses. |
Revision as of 19:38, 20 June 2019
ML15231A354 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Waterford ![]() |
Issue date: | 08/25/2015 |
From: | Victor Hall Japan Lessons-Learned Division |
To: | Entergy Operations |
Govan, Tekia NRR/JLD 415-6197 | |
References | |
TAC MF6086 | |
Download: ML15231A354 (5) | |
Text
Vice President, Operations Entergy Operations, Inc. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 25, 2015 Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057-0751
SUBJECT:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PLAN FOR THE AUDIT OF ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.'S FLOOD HAZARD REEVALUATION REPORT SUBMITTAL RELATING TO THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1-FLOODING FOR WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 (TAC NO. MF6086)
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter documents the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's plan to perform a regulatory audit of Entergy Operations, lnc.'s (the licensee) supporting calculations for the Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report (FHRR) submittal related to the Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding, for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford).
This technical audit will be performed consistent with NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Office Instruction LIC-111, "Regulatory Audits," dated December 29, 2008 (Agencyw1de Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML082900195).
The audit will be conducted over multiple sessions, as needed, and the NRC staff will develop an audit summary report to document its observations and conclusions within 90 days of the final audit session. The audit will provide the NRC staff with a better understanding of the Waterford FHRR, which was submitted on July 21, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15204A344).
Specifically, the audit will provide the NRC staff with a better understanding of the analyses of the flooding hazards presented in the Waterford FHRR. The audit is intended to support completion of the NRC staff's review of the FHRR and the subsequent issuance of a Staff Assessment.
The enclosed audit plan outlines the process that will allow the NRC staff to identify additional information potentially necessary for licensees to supplement their FHRRs, and resolve potential technical concerns.
The details of this audit have been discussed with Mr. Donald Bentley of your staff. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2915 or by e-mail at Victor.Hall@nrc.gov.
Docket No. 50-382
Enclosure:
Audit Plan cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv Victor Hall, Senior Project Manager Hazards Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC PLAN FOR THE AUDIT OF ENTERGY OPERATIONS INC.'S FLOOD HAZARD REEVALUATION REPORT SUBMITTAL RELATING TO THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1-FLOODING FOR WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION. UNIT 3 BACKGROUND AND AUDIT BASIS By letter dated March 12, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.54(f) "Conditions of license" (hereafter referred to as the "50.54(f) letter").
The request was issued in connection with implementing lessons-learned from the 2011 accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, as documented in The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident.
Recommendation 2.1 of that document recommended that the staff issue orders to all licensees to reevaluate seismic and flooding for their sites against current NRC requirements and guidance.
Subsequent Staff Requirements Memoranda associated with Commission Papers SECY 11-0124 and SECY-11-0137, instructed the NRC staff to issue requests for information to licensees pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f).
By letter dated July 21, 2015, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) submitted its Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report (FHRR) for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML15204A344).
The NRC staff has begun its review of the aforementioned submittals and plans to conduct a regulatory audit of Entergy to aid in its review of the licensee's FHRR. REGULATORY AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODOLGY The areas of focus for the regulatory audit is the information contained in the Waterford FHRR submittal, and all associated and relevant supporting documentation used in the development of the aforementioned document including, but not limited to, methodology, process information, calculations, computer models, etc. The audit will be conducted and completed over several meetings that are to be determined, as necessary.
Enclosure INFORMATION AND OTHER MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR THE REGULATORY AUDIT The information required for the audit is the licensee's models and supporting calculations, as well as documentation related to the storm surge and site specific probable maximum precipitation analyses.
Other information needs will be discussed as audit meetings are scheduled.
NRC AUDIT TEAM Title Team Member Affiliation Team Leader, NRR/JLD Victor Hall NRC Branch Chief, NRO/DSEA Chris Cook NRC Technical Lead Lyle Hibler NRC Technical ManaQer Laura Quinn-WillinQham NRC Technical Support Various Contractors Department of Energy National Laboratory LOGISTICS The audit meetings will be coordinated with Entergy staff. DELIVERABLES The NRC team will develop an audit summary report to convey the audit results. The report will be placed in ADAMS within 90 days of the completion of the final audit session, and will be publicly available.
The information discussed in the audit may be included, fully or in part, in the development of the NRC technical staff's assessments as a result of the FHRR review. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2915 or by e-mail at Victor.Hall@nrc.gov.
Docket No. 50-382
Enclosure:
Audit Plan cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC JLD R/F RidsNRRJLD Resource LHibler, NRO CCook, NRO JBowen, NRR RidsN rrDorllpl4-2 MShams, NRR ARivera, NRO BHarvey,NRO ADAMS Accession No.: ML15231A354 Sincerely, /RAJ Victor Hall, Senior Project Manager Hazards Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation LQuinn-Willingham, NRO RidsNrrPMWaterford Resource KErwin, NRO BHayes, NRO MFranovich, NRR OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NRR/JLD/JHMB/LA NRR/JLD/JHMB/BC NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NAME TGovan Slent MS hams VHall DATE 08/19/15 08/21 /15 08/21/15 08/25/15 OFFICAL RECORD COPY