ML20004C843

Forwards Response to 810521 Licensee Qualifcation Audit. Encl marked-up FSAR Pages Will Figure in Forthcoming Amend

ML20004C843
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	06/03/1981
From:	Heidel C DETROIT EDISON CO.
To:	Kintner L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
EF2-53-432, NUDOCS 8106050487
Download: ML20004C843 (40)

Text

.

/ .-a Harry Tauber iN Ng $ h no consnucson \, N Detroit

,Cdi n $ No$.*if $ o^a U s*228

& G[ 'Q[2.

wu 1 i taia) 237-e000 g3.g0,.7g g r-

)h '

6 June 3, 1981

\%'f EF2 - 53,432 Mr. L. L. Kintner Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Reference:

Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341

Subject:

Detroit Edison Response to the Licensee Qualification Audit During the exit critique of the Licensee Qualification Audit on May-21, 1981, the audit team identified five areas of concern. In addition, the team had several questions concerning a draft revision of Chapter 13 of the FSAR. The attachments document the NRC concern or request and Detroit Edison's response to each. Where appropriate, marked up pages of the FSAR have been included and will be formally amended in a forthcoming FSAR amendment. It is our understanding that the sub-mission of the attached responses satisfies the concerns and will be sufficient to allow preparation of the appropriate Safety Evaluation Report sections.

Sincerely,

( ^\ "

u Attachments 0 0'

bi cc: B. Little t I 810605 0 A .

+

9 Attachment A.

4 NRC CONCERN

1. Plant ana Corporate Staffing NRC is concerned about the lack of proper staffing. At present-there are 160 people-in Nuclear Operations, and the planned staff should include 490 people. There are many key positions still open. The Plant' staff shculd be functional not later than six months before fuel load in order to have a smooth operating organization.

DETROIT EDISON RESPONSE In order to provide sufficient experience as an operating organization, The Detroit Edison Company will have the essential elements of its Nuclear 4 Operations Organization in place from four to six months prior to fuel loading.

The specific plan to meet this commitment is as follows-(see attached organization charts):

Chart No. Commitment 1 All positions except the Director-Quality Assurance, The Director-Outage Management and the Director-Nuclear Plant Modifications are in place as of the present time. The Director-Quality Assurance will be in place and functioning within the next several months, but the Director will '

report to the Manager-Quality Assurance until four months prior to fuel loading, at which time the Director will report to the Vice President-Nuclear Operations.

2 These functions are presently being performed by the Project Quality Assurance Organization and Fermi PMO. The functionally comparable supervisory positions will' be filled and reporting to the Director-I Quality Assurance by December 1981. The organization will;be functioning and reporting to the Vice President-Nuclear Operations four months prior to fuel loading.

3 All supervisory positions will be filled six months prior to fuel loading and the organization - functioning according to the . plan four months prior to fuel loading.

4 This organizational unit will be in place at fuel loading and is not needed until that' time because the Fermi 2 PMO is performing this i function for the project as well as for Nuclear Operations.

1 GED/15/6.

m.

+

+-e-- ---g e - - - - - e=r.w e , ,.y- e e y- ,-w, ,m., +,,y--, +v - m- % A y y--.- .-

Attachment A ,

5 The couplete organizational unit covering the simulator does not have to be in place until the simulator is delivered to the site (scheduled for 1983). The other supervisory positions 'will be in place by December

- 1981 in order to meet .the training requirements prior to fuel loading.

6 All supervisory positions are filled -now, and will be functioning' four months prior to fuel loading.

6A The supervisory positions in Nuclear Safety and Plant Engineering will .

be filled and functioning at least four months prior to fuel loading.

6B These positions will be , filled to about 50 percent of the specific complement six months prior to-fuel loading, and the remaining needs will be filled as they arise. A large number of - these needs are beiag covered in the interim by the Generation Engineering Department and the Engineering Research Department of Detroit Edison as well as by outside -

consultants.

6C Those supervisory positions will be in place and functioning at fuel loading. Most of the functions shown on this chart are presently being performed in the Nuclear Engineering Division of the Generation Engineering Department, and many of them will be transferred to Nuclear Operations before December 1981.

All comparable supervisory positions have been filled and functioning since 1978. Significant programs now moving under the responsibility of the Vice President-Nuclear Operations as described in the accompanlying charts have been under development during the past four years including the anticipated required procedures.

7 All key positions will be filled as indicated on the attached pages 13.1-29,30 (Part of Attachment F) of the FSAR. Basically all key positions will be filled six months prior to fuel loading except for personnel performing compatible startup activities which will continue until commercial operation. Ninety percent of the complement of Nuclear Production will be filled four months prior to fuel loading.

8 This function is now being performed by the Fermi 2 PMO. It will continue to be performed by the PMO, but organized along the lines on Chart 8, and report to the Manager-Nuclear Operations at fuel loading.

GED/15/6.1 gi,- w-. p .y v - e m , _-<a, my,- _ g--. gyyg-4__-. --- - . - -m9 .-,r4- m e

Attachment A 6

i 9 The safety organizations (Nuclear Safety 'Consnittee, IRAG, ' NSPED) will all be staffed and functioning as shown on the chart four months prior to fuel loading. It' should be noted that ORSO has- been functioning as an organizational unit since 1977 and will continue to function through fuel loading and beyond. :IRAG will be organized -and functioning six -

months prior. to fuel loading.

The presently scheduled fuel load date is November 1982. : Most of the conunitments made are based on that schedule date; however, if for any reason that date is delayed, such as prolonged hearings, the commitments will be tied to the new fuel load date.

i l

I i

f l

GED/15/6.2 i

~ . - . - - - , ---,$.< -,e9 , -,-m, g,e e - . - - - - r,, - , -- . . - ye- c. ., + - - , --- , --v-- v . e y-

l Nuclear Operations Organization Chart 1 Level-e- "

spea -

o 7

Ce Vice President

, Nuclear Operations 2 W.H. Jens 4g0 6

Ma @

Nuclear i

Operations a W.R. Holland 4.3 l

I i

l l l l 1 2 Director a 2 d 5 Direct ~ Director 3 Director Director Plant 5 Director Quality Adtrunestration Outage Nuclear Nuclear Superintendent Nuclear Plant Assurance Management Training Engineering Nuclear Modifications 4 26 5 Produchon 117 2 5 4 26 4 65 4 233 2 8 l

Ch 2 Ch 3 Ch4 Ch 5 Ch 8 Ch 7 Ch 8 i

• Not inch _=*ng 74 security and medcalpe sonnel 4

4 4

.4 1

l I

l .

l l

l CMd2 -

( .

2 l

Director Quality Assurance

! 4 26 i

Matrixed to Nuclear Production i i Matrixed to Matrixed to Maintenance Matrixed to I Nuclear Engineenng

& Piar,t Modifications Material Controls i

I and Gen. Engr.

, JL { A t

i I I e i a a

' i l i i I I i l 1 1 e i i Sa'pervuior Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor Supervuior i O/A Staff Construction and Vendor and Receiving Operational Assurance Engineenng Assurance Maintenance Inspection and Quality Assurance Quality Assurance 3 inwth , , , ,

a 4, - Rehabshty Data 3 - Audit Leaders j - NRC Reports & Letters .

- Problem Solving Leaders i

i .

Matrixed from General ~

Purchasirg and Stores

' and Transportation 3 Mainxed kom Director Controller l

Administration j

l 5 117 l

l l 4 I i i l g I I f

Ii General Superwor CuWisor Superwsor Material Control g Supervisor Personnel Plantnag

. S@ Budgetog 20 29 21 35 4 I

I I 1 Matrixed from Supervisor- Superwsor - Clerical - Cost Estunating

! Nuclear - Ubrary - Capdal Budget Purchasing Warehouse i Quality Assurance s is g

- Convenhonal - Schedunng - Word Processing - O&M Budget 3 Tranng ,

h - PIMS

- Prof. & Mgmt. - Action item Lists - Doc. Control Vendor O!A - - Complement

{ Development

- Expeditin9 4 i - Admn.trators - Cc;Tputer - Procedures t- COOP Contract I

Operation Admnstrator l - Recemog inWinn l g - Manuals I i

- Vendor inspecison 4

Mainxed to l

Nuclear Produchon Edeng

& roduction Nuclear Engmeering +

Nuclear Tranng

- ARMS i'

i 4

l t

d

\

4 #

4 1

4 Chart 4 i

i Director Outage Management

2 5 4

}

i e

i

Contract Outage Coordmators l Admmistrator Outage Engmeets j 2 3 i

i

~ -Maintenance Contractor

-Specialbes Contractors 1

4 l

4 4

i e

S i.

4 1

i 4

w

f 9

3 s4 n

sg s o rng rn it a

ooni n oo si r i

siir t

n i v

t ad p e vaiecae e c efinO I

af phTi n g ir I

ph a ua ua gn s

2 r od 7

1 Sudn Su m sng QanE Q n m ian v a o

r te so n r esin i

T r

fD yit pna d& Sa u uor eP x

8 Yi gl i

StialT iO r n a v l

ca t

a nE aim ri f elar 5

d 4

M a r n o s- sn T eQuF r n gl rnga G oona oonyy sii i sii c t

ni i t nci t vain vainr I r efirh ca I r

ef ca e cu ir pliTc pliTgen ua e ua

. SudT Qa n SudiS Qao nn t

e C g2 n

I n

i 5

t r t o ar ri 3

cT a ir e r a

h De r

_ C l c on sie u

it N vc r

3 4 I

e pt ur r

o 7 u sn s Si i

r xe n

p%

u t

o i

St I ai m l

it a rS 3 mt os r r o e n

r i f in ga t

e rn dg n

dm nt r is G oai ed1ii ni ies m iAx r

inai r vr r am Tm I

t e

pwr a Mea ar d ud g A r o lc Sar u HP N

s s m e

r e deduI k ul c e no oh r c it c

PS A 4 j ,',!  ;  ; ji ; i' ,,Iii, . 4 i4 -

I Chart 6 4 Matrixed from Dire Nuclear Administration l Nuclear Engineering l Y

, 4 as  :

I Engmeeting Administrator

2

- Procedures i -Schedule

- Budget I .I

) [3 General Supennsor General Supervisor General Supervisor 1 Nuclear Safety & Nuclear Technology Nuclear Fuel Plant Engmeering 4 28 19 18 l

i Ch 6A Ch CB Ch 6C i

J n

4 1

4 4

l

i Chart 6A Matrixed frorn 2 Nuclear Quality Assurance General Superwsor i Nuclear Safety &

I Plant Engwieering I

Y 4 m I

I 1

I 'I I Superwsor Supenrism Engineenng Asswance Supenrism New issues Safety &

Perfornuance W h * '9 3 Engineering 12 to 3 l

I l

4 1 .:

Group Leader Group Leader i

i Contract Plant Engmeetwig V Engineering and Design 5 6

]' Shift Te'hriical Adnsors

is <ed to Nuck Produchon I

j .-

I i

i 1

i r

1 1

j Chart 6B 1

i Nuclear Technology 2 19 d

i i Group Leader Group Let%r

{ Malerials & Methods Radiological

, 9 9

-Malenals -Rado Chemmary

-Weidng -Health Physics

- NDT -Environmental Morutonn'g i

l - ASME Secton lli -Stwending

! -Codes & Standards Radah Nection Instrumentation j -Reg. Guides -AL ARA

-R&D Work -Decontamination 4

j -Computer Applications -Waste Disposal i

! -Meteorlogical i

e 1

1 I e4 t

Chart 6C -

32 j

General Supervisor Nuclear Fuel 3 to i I

• I

! Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor j Nuclear Fuel Fuel Engineering Reactor Engineering 6 3 8 i

- FuelCycle Analysis - Fuel Design - Fuel Accountability l

- Uranium & Enrichment - Fuel Fabrication - Control Sod Analysis Programming f Contract Administratior i

- Fuel Bumup Core Analysis - Fuel Assurance

- Reactor Dynamics - Fuel Storage & Shipping h j) -

- Fuel Performance l u Reactor Engineer matrixed to Nuclear Production i

i l

l

'f f

5 l .9

Chart 7 .

5 Plant Security Medical Superintendas Depanment Depanment Nuclear Producton

! Matrixed from 4 233 Nuclear Quality Matrixed from Assurance Administration I il 7

. Y U Supervisor Adm#nistrator Operational Nuclear Assurance Production s.

Supervisor  ; Coordination i R M at s i Protection 45 .

Assistant Supemsor Supenmor Plant Security Medical Superintendent as e iss I _ l _

i I Operations Engineei' Maintenance Engineer Technical Engineer Reactor Engineer Shift Technical Advisors >

71 89 47 4 s l

' 4 4 u--- >

T---

Matrixed from .

Nuclear Engineenng i

e

e i

l 1

Chart 8 .

Matrixed from Matrixed from

. Generation Engineenng Constructon 8

I I I

________, i , j l Nuclear j l Director i Engineering i Nuclear Pfard i I l 1 Modifications I l 2 a L__ Director______J

_____L__, l 1 I e l-- ' '

i

' t Requirements , Matrixed from 4 Matrixed from

! Nuclear Safety & Crit'oria Nuclear Quality Construction Nuclear Quality l Plant Engineenng ,

l Project Engineer Supenntendent Assurance L __y____ Assurance l

t__________J Drawings

& Specs l' 4

[ 4 8 Y

i Engineenng Constructon O/A &

Assurance inspechon 1

I Assistant Assistant Asst. Const. Supt. Asst. Const. Supt.

Project Engineer Project Engineer Edison Bechtel Contract Design Edison Design Construction Construction s

l t

.o

Nuclear Safety Organizations Board of Directors Chart 9 -

lN Nuclear Safety -

Chairman of the Committee Board Chief Executive Officer i

President Chief Operating Officer I

Executive Vice Presdent Operations l

N IRAG d Operations __

• "P I

I Manager Nuclear n Operations I

I I I I I I Director Director Director Director Drector Nuclear Quality w Outage Nuclear

• D@trat Nuclear Nuclear Plant Assurance nis a l Management Training j Engineenng p Modfications 1

I I I echn. uel Satyk + OSRO Onsite Review Organization l [I^"I, wo L

m _

i

~ Attachment B NRC CONCERN'

2. Training Organization and Training.

Training organization seems weak and fragmented. The training for licensed and non-licensed personnel is behind schedule. . The NRC has asked for a training schedule and the status of training. -

DETROIT EDISON RESPONSE Nuclear Operations Training Plan is attached.

" Number of individuals to be trained" means " minimum nu-ber required at fuel -

loading". However, it is our intent to train more than the minimum numbers.

l l - .

I GED/15/6.3 I

I ,

,.v ,-y y9-,, ,-

e,m- # y - - - - - + , . .-92,- 9 4 , , ,e,. ,- r - - - w --w y p--%g + , . , , -er ,

4 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING PLAN DATE :. 6/1/81 MONTH PRIOR TO FUEL LOAD GROUP TO g o g g g g gg g g 7 e g , , , , , ,

BE TRAIMED CHEMISTRY "d 175.5 1217l HEALTH PHYSICS  !

L3.J l582l MAlhiTENANCE N _

13 3 . 51 1694i LICENSED OPERATORS FJgt4%

C ' --

ajes'h'SN m" a'"

o*

o 3695l l2485l J s

NON-LICENSED [Li y 0PERATORS l185l l6751

• QUALITY ASSURANCE / b CONTROL L69J l645i SECURITY E

[.6J l1659l SHIFT TECHNICAL B ADv1SOR 1461 16961

~

IECHNICIANS 526 l l 409l LEGEND COMPLETED TRAINING T0-DATE TRAINING REMAINiliC

{;((.f;5 # BASE 0 ON t 0F TOTAL # BASED CN % OF TOTAL j # MAN-DAYS OF COMPLETE 0 l TRAINING T0-DATE l 4 i MAN-DAYS OF TRAINING REMAININC PRESENTLY UNDER MANAGEMENT REVIEW DUE TO:

A. NUREG - 0737 B. LETTER FROM HAROLD DENTON TO ALL POWER REACTOR APPLICANTS AND LICENSEES, DATED MARCH 29, 1980 C. CLARIFICATION OF THE N.R.C. STAFF POSITION RECARDING LICENSED OPERATOR EDUCATION D. POSSIBLE RE!CHEDULING OF LICENSED OPERATOR COLLEGE LEVI:L EDUCATION PROGRAM

- = p n y ye-9 g-w+---a-- p-g *w ---e-e w *, e - --

• --y^ -m- --

DATE: June 1, 1981 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS 'IRAINING PL_At4

1. INDIVIDUALS 'IO BE 'IRAINED ~ IATESTlDE3E GROUT TO 'IUIAL 'IO BE 'IRAINED CURRENT 10 BEGIN RE 'iRAINED B,Y EUEL ICAD STAFF PRIMARY TPAINING

• CHEMISIIT 5 2 1/82 HEAL'lE PHYSICS 10 7 1/82 MAINIENANCE 30 9 1/82 LICENSED OPERAIORS 20 19 'IRAINING IN PRCGISS NCN-LICCNSED CPERA'IORS 10 16 9/81 CUALITY ASSURNiCE/CDNIROL 10 9 1/82 SECURITY 45 23 1/82 SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR 4 , -0 7/81 THIINICIANS 10 23 TRAINING IN PROGRESS 144 108 i

• Primary training is the latest date that training nust begin to ccetpletely l~

train tne remaining minimum nturier of individuals.

I f

,..s e a , -, - --,, e -,e..a- s e ~ w--.-en-, -

• v.--, ..,y- ,, , - -e,-- ., ,.r-, - - -

-w-- ,,

DATE: . June 1, 1981 NAME OF GROUP: CHEMIS'IRY

'IDIAL #  %

EXPECITD INDIVIDUALS 'IRAINING

1. DAYS / PERSON 'IO BE 'IRAINED CCMPLETED I1OLEMENTED PROGRAMS RADIOCHEMIS'IRY 75 1 100 CARDIOPUIN0 NARY RESUSCITATICN 0.5 5 20 PROGRAMS 'IO BE IMPI2MENTED DEVEIDPED SAFEIY TAGGING 0.5 5 FIRST AID 1 5 RESPIRA'IOR 0.5 5 UNDER DEVEIDPMENT GENERAL EMPIDYE TRAINING 1 5 PLANT AININ PROCEDURES 5 5-RADIATIN PRCU5CTIN 10 5

'IO BE DEVEIDPED EME"ESKY PLAN 0.5 '5 FIFE Prom;nCN 0.5 5 SECURITY PLAN 0.5 5 FIRE BRIGADE 5 5 RESCUE TEAM 1 5 PM SEARG 2 5 OA/CC INDOCIRINATION 0.5 5 BWR CifEMISTRY 5 5 C5IEM METEDS 5 5 CFlM AEMIN PROCEDURES 5 5 J

l l

t l

MAN DAYS OF TRAINING CCNPLETED 'IO DATE 75.5

'IO BE CWPLEIED 217.0 .

'IOTAL 292.5 l

, r , _. -<~.-, r -- - - .vy ,,,.wv.. , . , - - . , 4 . , c. .,w.+

- ,. .u -~.3,,,

J

+

LDATE: June 1, 1981 NAME OF GROUP: HEALTH PHYSICS

'IUIAL #  %

EXPECIED INDIVIDUAIS 'IRAINING

1. DAYS / PERSON TO BE TRAINED CmPIETED IMPLEMENIED PROGRAMS CARDIOPUIbONARY RESUSCITATIN 0.5 10 30 FIRST AID 1 10 10 PROIECTIVE TAGGING 0.5 10 10 PROGRAMS 'IO BE IMPIDENIED

. DEVEIDPED RESPIRATOR TRAINING 0.5 10 UNDER DEVEIDPMENT GENERAL EMPICIEE 'IRAINING 1 10 PLANT A MI

N. PROCEDURE

S S 10 RADIATION PROIECTION 10 10

'IO BE DEVEIOPED EMERGENCY PIAN 0.5 10 FIRE PROIECTICH PIAN 0.5 10 FIRE ERIGADE 5 <

RESCUE TEAM 1 10 BCMB SEARCH 2 10 CA/OC INCOCIRINATION 0.5 10 RADIATION PROIECTIW IEEORY 10 10 H. P. Mh 6, 15 10 SECURITY PLAN 0.5 10 H. P. ADMIN. PROC. 5 10 j

l l

MAN DAYS OF TRAINING CCMPIEIED TO DATE 3 TO BE CCMPLETED 582 l IUTAL 585 t

,g,,,,,e , - ,nn--..-- --.e~m---. - - , g-,- ~ - -

,,--,,r . - , - .-~n-,nn.,, - . , , . , ,.-nm-, , . . - - --~,n .-,----

DATE: June 1, 1981

'NAME OF GROUP: MAINrDOWCE TOTAL #  %

EXPECTED INDIVIDUALS TRAINDG

1. DAYS / PERSON 'IO BE TRAINED OCMPIETED IMPLDENTED PROGRAMS DE:RGDCY DIESEL GD3ERATORS 5 5 100 SAFETY TAGGING 0.5 25 28 CARDIOPUDIONARY RESUSCITATION 0.5 30 13 FIRST AID 1 30 10 PROGRAMS TO BE IMPLDENTED DEVELOPED RESPIRATOR 0.5 25 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 5 10 UNDER DEVEIOPMENT PLANT AEMIN PROCEDURES 5 25 MAINT AEMIN PROCEDURES 10 25 TORCUE hEENCH 0.5 20 IOCKWIRING 0.5 20 GENERAL DfIDYE TRAINING ~

1 30 RADIATION PRCTIECTION 2 30 TO BE DEVEIDPED CA/QC INDOCTRDUCION 0.5 20 CODES AND STANDARDS 1 5 HOUSEKEEPING 0.5 25 DERGDCY PIAN 0.5 30 FIRE PROTDCITON 0.5 30 l SECURITY PLAN 0.5 30

[ DECONDMURTION PRACITCES 1 25 l

l l

MAN DAYS OF TRAINING COMPIETED TO DATE 33.5 TO BE CCMPIETED 694.0 TOTAL .727.5

--r , c -r , . - - - -e *= %,-- , ., , - - - - . ,,---y -, - - - 3

9 DATE: June 1, 1981 NAME OF GROUP: LICENSED OPERATORS MINIMUM TOIAL #  %

EXPECTED INDIVIDUAIS TRAINING

1. DAYS / PERSON TO BE 'IRAINED COMPIETED IMPLDENIED PROGRAMS ,

ACADEMIC REFRESHER 20 18 100 BASIC NUCLEAR 60 18 100 GENERIC SYSTENS AND PRCCEDURE3 10 20 100 SAFE 1Y TAGGING 1 20 100 FIRST AID /CPR 2 -20 100 RESEARCH REACICR 8 20 100 BWR TECHNOIOGY 20 20 100 BWR SIMUIATOR 40 20 100

, BWR OBSERVATION 20 20 100 BWR TRANSITICN 5 20 100 SYSTENS TRAINING 25 20 25 SYSTEMS CUAL PROGRAM 25 20 2 PROGRAMS TO BE IMPLDiENTED DEVEIDPED CE"M LEAK REPAIR 1 --

20 BmB SEARCH TEAM 1 20 UNDER DEVEIDPMENT PIANT AEMIN PROwxRES 0.5 20 OPERATIONS AIMIN PROCEDURES 0.5 20 GENERAL DiPIOYE TRAINING 0.5 20 RESPIPATOR TRAINING 0.5 20 COMPtJrER OPERATICNS 1 20 SECURITY PLAN 1 20 RADIATION PROTECTION 5 20 TO BE DEVEEOPED RADWASTE SYSTEMS 2 20 INTEGRATED PLANT OPERATIONS 10 20 INFREQUENT, ABNORMAL & DER OPS 20 20 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATICES 5 2C DERGENCY PLAN TRAINING 0.5 20 RESCUE TEAM TRAINING 1 20 TIEWODYNAMICS & HEAT TRANSFER S 20 l MITIGATE CORE DAMAGE 5 20 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONIROLS 4 20 REEUEL TRAINING 3 20 FIRE BRIGADE & LEADERSHIP 5 20 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN 2 20 QA/OC TRAINING 0.5 20 '

LEADERSHIP & CCNIROL ROCM MGff 5 20 LICENSE EXAM 2 20 l

l MAN DAYS OF TRAINDG

! CmPIEIED TO DATE - 3,695 TO BE CCMPIETED 2,485 TOTAL 6,180

-w, -- * * - * -

--e w we -

D+y , ,->-e- =,riw-e -M s-- - - ey---tS* - ' +-

4 DATE: - June 1, 1981 NME OF GROUP: NCN-LIGNSED OPEPA'IORS EXPh;1tu INDIVIDUALS TRAINING

1. DAYS /PERSW 'IO BE TRAINED CWPIEIED IMPLD1ENTED PROGRAMS GRERIC SYSTD1S AND Pie.c.uum 15 10 100 SAFEIY TAGGING 0.5 10 100 FIRST AID /CPR 2 10 100 FORK LIET 1 10 100 PROGRAMS 'IO BE IMPLDENTED DEVEIDPED NWE UNDER DEVEID1HE1T SYSTD1S TRAINING 25 10 JITS (AREA CUALIFICATIN) 25 10 REEUEL TRAINEG 5 10 GENERAL D4PLOYE TRAINING 0.5 -10 DERGENCY PLAN 0.5 10 RESCOE TFAM 1 10 SECURITY PIAN 1 10 RESPIRA'IOR TRAINING 0.5 10 FIRE BRIGADE 5 10 BCNB $TAPai 1 10 CHIDRINE LE7X REPAIR 1 10 RADIATICN PRCTTECTICN 2 10

'IO BF DEVEIDPED NCtE MAN DAYS OF TRAINDG CWPLETED 'IO DATE 185

'IO BE CCNPIETED 675

'IUIAL 860 g -gg.

. , , - - - , c , , . - , - . - ,- ,4 , , - - - , , -,w, , . ---r =g --

DATE: June 1,1981 NAME OF GROUP: g

'IUIAL #  %

EXvu;1w INDIVIDUALS TRAINING

1. DAYS /PERSCN TO BE TRAINED CCNEU.TED IMPLDIENTED PROGRAMS SAbETY TAOGING 0.5 10 80

, CARDIOPUIMNARY RESUSCIATICH 0.5 10 50 AUDIT TEAM MENBER 5 10 40 PROGRAMS 70 BE IMPLDENIED DEVEIDPED -

FIRST AID 1 UNDER DEVEIDPMENT GENERAL D!PIDYE TPAINING 0.5 10 NDE LEVEL I - ALL 5 10 PLANT AENIN PBOC 5 10 RADIATION P M1u n CN 10 70 BE DEVEIDPED E4ERGmCY PLAN 0.5 10 ~'

FIRE PMiu;nCN PIAN 0.5 10 SMTY PLAN 0.5 10 QA/QC IhMIATICN 0.5 10 QA/QC AEMS PPOC 10 10 AUDIT TETE LEADER 5 10 NDE LEVEL II D.P. 2 5 NDE LEVEL II VISUAL 5 -5 LEVEL I INSPEC'IOR - ALL 10 10 LEVEL II INSPEC"OR - VARIOUS 10 3-s l~

l MAN DAYS OF TRAINING l CCNPIrrED TO DATE 60 TO BE CDMPIETED 645

'IUrAL 705 -

t

.- _- -. . _ _ . _ , _ _ . - _ _ . - _ , - .. ~ . - _ --_ _ - _ _ - . _ . . _ , . . - . . _-

DATE: June 1, 1981~

NAME OF GROUP: SECURITY

'IUIAL  %

I:XPB"X INDIVIDUALS 'IRAINING

1. ' DAYS / PERSON 'IO BE TIGINED COMPLt.TED IMPLD4 DEED PROGRAMS FIRST AID 1 45 7 CARDIOPUINCNARY RESUSCITATION 1 45 7 PROGRAMS 'IO BE IMPLD4EIC!D DEVEIDPED NONE UNDER DEVEIOPMENT BASIC SECURITY 'IRAINING S 45 NUCLEAR SECURITY 'IRAINING 15 45 WEAPONS & TACTICS 10 45 DRILLS & EXERCISES 2 45 GENERAL EMPIDYE 'IRAINING 0.5 45 SECURITY PIAN 0.5 45 RADIATION PROIECTION 1 45

'IO BE DEVELOPED i D4ERGENCY PIAN 0.5 45 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN 0.5 45 l

l I

l i .

t MAN DAYS OF TRAINING I. CCNPIETED 'IO DATE 6

'IO BE CCMPIETED 1,659

'IUfAL T36T

.- ,,n. v- ..r-- ,--,,,a.. u- -

---a - -

. DATE: June 1, 1981 NAME OF GROUP: SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR-IOTAL #  %

DESIRED . INDIVIDUALS TRAINEG

1. DAYS /PERSCN 'IO BE TRAINED CCNPLM IMPLDECED PROGRAMS GDERIC SYSTDG & PROCEDURES 10 4 100 SAETIY TAGGING 0.5 4 100 FIRST AID 1 4 100 PROGRAMS 'IO BE IMPLDHEED DEVEIDPED EUNDAMENIAIS TRAINING 25 4 SYSTDG TRAINDU 50- 4 RESPIRATOR TRADiING 0.5 4 -

BASIC SUPERVISION PROGPAM 5 4 BWR TECHr0 LOGY 20 4 AIR QUALITY METERS 1 4 Ut: DER DEVEIOPMENT GENERAL DIPIDYE TRAINHC 1 4 SECURITY PIRI 0.5 4 -

SIMUIATOR TRAINDG 20 4 EDUCATICNAL UPGRADING

• 4 PIANT ACMIN Pid.wuw.s 1 4 CCNPUTER OPERATICES 1 4 RADIATICN Pi4J1wnON 2 4 TO BE DEVEIOPED ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 2 -4 DERGDCI OPERATING PROL'ww2d 8 4 GENERAL OPERATDG PROCEDURES 10 4 TRANSIENT /ACCIDDE ANALYSIS 20 4 MITIGATING CORE DAMAGE 5 4

( DERGENCY PLAN 0.5 4

! FIRE Ple>1wnCN PLAN 0.5 4 QA/QC 0.5 4 SEURITY PLAN 0.5 4 l

• DETERMINED BY ANALYSIS CN A CASE BY CASE BASIS.

MAN DAYS OF TRAINING CCNPLETED TO DATE 46 TO BE COMPIETED 696

'ICIAL T47 y y w, we ~ -, --- y+ga.ep *--,y --%,- - - - - 7 y , - - - y-ay- * --e '

,g w- e* me to

DATE: June 1, 1981 NAME OF GROUP: TEGNICIANS TOTAL  %

EXPECIED DOIVIDUAIS TRAINDG

1. DAYS / PERSON TO BE TRAINED CCNPLETED IMPLDEEED PROGR7NS INDOCIRINATION 1 10 100 GENERIC SYSTD4S AND PROCEDURES 15 10 100 NUCLEAR INSTRI.PERATION 10 10 100 PROCESS INST M E EATION 10 10 100 GD4AC 5000 INSTRUMEICATICN 5 10 100 REACIOR MANUAL CONTROL SYSTEM S 10 100 GIORINE LEAK REPAIR 1 10 100 QUALIFY W PLANT ADMIN PROCEDURES 2 10 100 SAFELY TAGGING 0.5 10 100 CARDIOPUIhmARY RESUSCITATICN 3.5 10 90 QUALIFY CN I&C AMIN PROCEDURES 2 10 9u FIRST AID 1 10 50 QUALIFY ON TEST EQUIPMENT 10- 10 3 PROGRAVS TO BE IMPLEME2EED DEVEIDPED BCNB SEARCH 2 10 UNDER DEVEIDPME2C GENERAL EMPLOYE TRAINDG 1 10 RESPIRATOR TRAINDG 0.5 10 SECURITY PIAN 0.5 10 RADIATICN PBuluinCN 1 10 10 BE DEVEMED EMERGENCY PLAN 0.5 10 RESCUE TEAM 1 10 FIRE Pit.nu;nCN PIAN 0.5 10 FIRE BRIGADE TRAINING 5 10 PPACTICAL DDONSTRATICNS 5 10 QA/QC DOOCTRINATION 0.5 10 QUALIFY ON PLANT DUTRUMENIS 10 10 INSERVICE INSPECTICN 2 10 CONTAINMEIE LEAK RATE 1 10 MAN DAYS OF TRAINDG COMPLETED TO DATE 526 - -

-'IO BE COMPLETED 409 TOTAL 935 p- --e e, w- - ,--,- ,,y, y- , , - , - . , -.,y

p a

Attachment C NRC CONCERN

3. Operators with Commercial Nuclear Experience The NRC has found that none of the operators have com:nercial experience on the same type of plant (BWR). They. request that at least one operator on each shift have this experience.

DETROIT EDISON RESPONSE-Detroit Edison will provide at least one additional person per operating shift with at least three months of BWR operating experience from fuel loading until consnercial operation, or 9 months, whichever is shorter. - This person will _be

, provided by a suitable contractor such as General Electric.

The contract person will have no responsiblity for reactor. operation, will be -

assigned duties by the Nuclear Shift Supervisor, and will provide guidance and assistance to the licensed Detroit Edison operators as required. The duties.and responsibilities of this contract employee will be similar to those of the Shif t ,

Technical Advisor.

t i-l

[

i l

l -

t l

GED/15/6.4 l

+- ,, ,. . . - , -. ,-n , ,. .-,- ~- - -- - , .,,---w,, - - y 7 . - + - ,es,--w- ,. .-

9

Attachment D NRC CONCERN

4. Staffing of Rad-Chem Section The NRC is concerned about the skeletal staffing of the Rad-Chem section and the apparent weak status of the radiation protection training program.

It is their opinion that only the Health Physicist qualifies for the position as Radiation Protection Manager (RPM). They suggested that Detroit Edison have a backup for the RPM.

DETROIT EDISON RESPONSE STAFFING Detroit Edison recognized Radchem staffing.as a priority problem about nine months ago. Since that tiac the 'following ' positive steps . have been taken.

1. Exceptions to the Detroit Edison administrative procedures which can facilitate the hiring of Radchem personnel have been adopted.

2. The President of Detroit Edison signed authorizations giEing blanket approval to hire 29 Radchem personnel in 1981.

3. An aggressive recruiting campaign was started in about February 1981.

Since then, approximately 24 prospective employes have ~ caen interviewed.

Offers of employment have been made to about 17 of these people and about eight of these individuals will be starting work within the next.two months. These eight individuals include one Water Plant Technician, one-

Chemistry Technician, one Ph.D. Haalth Physicist, one Environmental Engineer, three Health Physics Technicians and one degreed Chemistry / Health Physics training specialist.

The recruiting effort has included contact 1with numerous nationwide

! employment agencies, direct contact with associates in the nuclear industry, recruiting trips to various conferences, San. Francisco and Seattle.

l A recruiting trip by the Radchem Engineer to San Diego is scheduled for June 11. _. recruiting trip by the Health Physicist to the Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society is planned for mid-June.

l GED/15/6.5 w -

g --my, e wy--.ev'-,p.- y p w t+Ny-,+g-v--, - -e - y-g ,---,m yey ,--,- yg g.e c y

Attachment D 4.

~

Three summer school Health Physics professionals (two . Bachelors candidates and one Masters Degree candidate) are_ working at the plant this summer.

All will be available for potential employment in May cf 1982.

5. See the Radchem staffing plan and timetable (attached). We intend to follow this plan to accomplish the staffing goal.

6. Detroit Edison is presently in the process of selecting _a contract technician company or companies'from which the Radchem staff can be supplemented if necessary.

We believe that the necessary personnel will be hired to support the plant schedule.

RADCHEM TRAINING The Radchem training program is. included in the overall training program described in Attachment B.

Internal to Radchem, we will soon have two individual who will; dedicate the majority of their time to developing Radchem training in cooperation with our Nuclear Training Department. One individual has a B.S. Degree (Chemistry) with two years of experf ince in developing and conducting Health Physics and Chemistry training for the General Electric Company.

The other individual is a Ph.D. Health Physicist and will dedicate much of his time to providing subject. matter for the Health Physics theory and analysis.

BACKUP RPM It is Detroit Edison policy that there will be backup for all important company positions. A long term r.atomated personnel management program is in operation to meet this policy. The Radiation Protection Manager is considered a very important company position. Two indivir als presently in the Radchem section l can quality as the backup RPM in the absence of the General Supervisor-Health Physics. These individuals are the Radchem Engineer and one technician who will l soon be promoted to Health Physics Supervisor-Operations (this individual should be qualified in six to nine months).

We are presently attempting to recruit two people with at least a B.S. Degree in Health Physics and/or as much practical and professional operating experience as possible. These individuals would, in time, meet the requirements of the RPM.

In addition, we have already hired a Ph.D. in Health Physics whose educational .

background will be of great support to those in the organization with practical experience.

I GED/15/6.6 l

. ~ . . . . . . ., . _ , -.,. , _ . ~ . . . . , , _ , , _ .

PROPOSED RADCHEM SECTION COMPLEMENT AT FUBL LOAD 0"

POSITIONS TOTAL 6/1/81

1. RadChem Engineer 1 1

2. General Supervisor-Chemistry 1 1

3. General Supervisor-Health Physics 1 1

4. General Supervisor-Radwaste 1 1

5. Chemical Engineer 1

6. Chemist 1 1

7. Supervisor-Health Physic's (Operations) . 1

8. Supervisor-Health Physics (Dosimetry) 1

9. Specialist-Health' Physics' 1

10. Radwaste Superviror (Operations) 1

11. Radwaste Supervisor (Decontamination) 1

12. Special ist-Shipping 1

13. Enviror. mental Engineer 1 1

14. Senior Equipment Technician 2

15. Senior !(ater Treatment Technician 1 1

16. Water Treatmant Technician 2 1

17. Senior Chemical Technician 4

18. Chemical Technician 5 1

19. Health Physics Aide 2 1

20. Senior Health Physics Technician 4 1

21. Health Physics Technician 12

22. RadChem Supervising Operator 5' TOTAL 50 11 Current plans would also include appropriate numbers of decontami-nation / cleaning personnel not reflected in the above complement.

I

.* - ei - - , , , y- . -. . w . , - - , , , . -~ ,-. y

n Attachment E NRC CONCERN 5.- Status'of Shift Technical Advisors While the FSAR does not state that an STA will be available on all,. shifts, the quidelines of NUREG-0731 state that an STA should be avail.able on each ~

, shift.

DETROIT EDISON RESPONSE A qualified shift technical advisor will be available on each ' shift as outlined in the following FSAR Appendix H section:

i f

i t

I l

1 l

l l

l l

l l

l

. GED/15/6.7 s

e &- e. y *- y s , =-p,aw r m e ec- ei- -*wm- w t-w *-# - -

>**t'* se-*- ' + - ew 'ev **' F eve--~ D'* W * 'M --"9'-" --7'

• EF-2-FSAR -

.3.. .

[}

H.I.A l.1 Shift Technical Advisor H.I.A.l.l.1 Statement of Concern For an off-normal event in reactor operations, the shift-supervisor's primary responsibility is the command and control '

function. The other control room operators assume a manipula-tive, reactionary role in response to commands from the shift ,i '

supervisor and in response to the various alarms and other indi-cators of plant conditions caused by the event. _Having reviewed l

the facts available on the accident at TMI-2 and the general i

state of training and qualifications for present operators and senior operators, the Task Force has concluded that additional technical and analytical capability, dedicated to concern for the safety of the plant, needs to be provided in the control room to support the diarnosis of off-normal events and to advise the shif t supervisor on actions to terminate or mitigate the ..

1 consequences of such events.

l H.I.A.1.1.2 NRC Position Each licensee shall provide an onshift technical advisor to the

• l shift supervisor. The shift technical advisor may serve more i

than one unit at a multiunit site, if c,ualified to perfocm the advisor function for the various units.

( ) The shift technical advisor shall have a bachelor's degree or

, equivalent in a scientific or engineering discipline and have -

1 received specific training in the response and analysis of the

plant for transients and accidents. The shift technical advisor l shall also receive training in plant design and layout, includ'-

l ing the capabilities of instrumentation and controls in the control room. The licensee shall assign normal duties to the.

shift technical advisors that pertain to the engineering aspects of ensuring the safe operation of the plant, including the review and evaluation of operating experience (Reference 1) .

1 l

H.I.A.l.1.3 Detroit Edison Position Detroit Edison agrees with the intent of the NRC to upgrade the accident assessment and the operational experience assessment.

and u;11 I

ncure that addi*innal *arhnical and-en:1ytic:1 capabil-itics arc provided ir th centrol reem for the diagneci Of abner-

-mal evente $nd *n ad" ire the operstccs on actions to Lerminet.

or-mitig e Le the concagnancer cf cuch event..-

a.

This will be provi,ded by the assignment of ither qualified shif t technical advisor er nuclear shift j educaticn:1 qualigications.on each shift.rup'ercicor; with cpgrad:d Shift tcchnical advicors will serve ir er advisory cepseity to-l

' [p] the nuclear shift supervisuc. Ihc shift technical 2A"irer ch:11-(L Anua a bacheler'e degree in engineering Sv ralated sciences, I

. H.I.A.l.1-1 Amendment 33 - March 1981 l ,

/ .

e/

/4

,. EF-2-FSAR

• --including 50 ;c;;stc; heur: Of ;cliege-le'rel math = tics, scovius -

-phy;ics , ccactcc themmodynami ., end wicui4.iual engiuccuing. k f "pgraded nucleat snifc supervisors, in addlLica to =;intainini;i--

2

• eaior resc'ur operator's license, snali aave a Lechnical

. ; collega-1=eral adire n +-i nn af =hnue gn samacter h.eur; in mothcact .

j

. ics: reactee physics, .eocics th::medyn: ics, oud clavisival -

• ng4" ::in3.-

8 H.I.A.l.l.4 Reference '

1

1. U.S. Nuclear Regul.ory Commission, Clarification of TMI-2 I Action Plan Requirements, NUREG-0737, p. l.A.l.1-1, October 5

1980. '

t 1 .

I i

1 4

~

) .

!\

!I 1

1 1

]

'l 4 N

'i .

'i

i ,

1 l.

i, 6

H.I.A.1.1-2 Amendment 33 - March 1981 1 .

? $

• - - - - - .,n , , , . . . - ,, .- n,.

%1techmant F NRC Concern Chapter 13 " Conduct of Operations"

, Page 13.1-29 Question -

Several key positions are scheduled to be filled 'in 1982.'

1. Why so late?

2.- When are these people (specify. month) coming on board in 19827 Answer -

1. These positions were scheduled for staffing based on a scheduled Fuel

, Load date of November 1982.. Several of the' positions in question will be filled by empicyes who are presently in our organizaticn and are in various phases of training.

2. A marked up copy of 13.1-29,30 is attached which indicates the schedule ~

.to which these positions will ba fi'. led. This information will be _ >

included in a forthcoming FSAT. amendment.

Page 13.1-30

. Question -

1. Why have only 19 key positions out of 29 been filled?

2. How many of the back-up people (maintenance, etc.) are still missing in the organization?

3. How many people are now in the Nuclear Operation Organization (Projected 490)?-

4. Plant Staff prcjected for 233 people. How many are aow on board?

i Answer -

1. As mentioned previously, several of these positions will be filled by employes presently within the organization. ' We are actively recruiting internally and outside the Company to fill the ' remaining' positions to meet the need of our stated schedule.

2. In our op.nion, there are qply two key positions that lack back-up.

l (Asst. Maintenance Engineer and Reactor Engineer).

3. There are presently 131 people in Nuclear Production which are plant staff.

For further information, see Attachment A regarding staf fing. .

l l

I GED/15/6.8 l

l

-w, w o y -es--- g , w v , m

f .-

4 l

i EF-2-FSAR i

Fermi 2 Staff Position ANSI N18.1 Classification

! Assistant Maintenance Engineer Maintenance Manager

,j (Section 4.2.3) f Maintenance General Foreman Supervisor not requiring NRC license (Section 4.3.2)

.i N -

! Maintenance Foreman Supervisor not requiring NRC license (Section 4.3.2) l Journeyman Repairman (Section 4.5.3) i Randynan None Technical Engineer Technical Manager (Section 4.2.4)

Equipment Performance Engineer Technical Manager (Section 4.2.4) .

Nuclear Instrument and Control Instrumentation and Control Eng ineer (Section 4.4. 2)

Nuclear Instrument Foreman Supervisor not requiring NRC license (Section 4.3. 2) 35 l Nuclear Assistant Instrument Super 71sor not requiring

! Foreman NRC license (Section 4.3.2) l Nuclear Instr .ent Repairman Repairmen (Section 4.5.3)

l Engineer - General Non-Engineering Technicians Technicians (Section 4.5.2) 13.1.4.3.4 Accointment to Plant Positions a

Listed below are the positions that are filled as of this fil-ing date and a schedule for filling the other positions. See Subsection 13.1.4.3.5 for the qualifications of the assigned plant personnel.

Position Status Superintendent - Nuclear Production Filled Assistant Superintendent - Nuclear Filled Production Administrator - Nuclear Production Filled Supervisor - Operational Assur'ance Filled O

13.1-29 Amendment 35 - May 1981

EF-2-FSAR Position Status Radiation Protection - Chemical Filled Engineer

" June.

Environmental' Engineer Scheduled,4-1981 ,

Chemical General Supervisor Filled N Dece 4 er r9s t Chemical Engineer Scheduled, 11HH!

Chemist -

Filled Health Physics General Supervisor Filled 6 mm% Prior do Health Physics Supervisor Dosimetry Scheduled, -h999 .fue.\ load. -

Health Physics Supervisor Scheduled, N D.c.4ev Wal Opeeations

c. lI eA Radwaste General Supervisor S'c;.cduled,

. 1^01 .

fo Reactor Engineer Scheduled, m.4%.& ,\plrior

,4 35 Operations Engineer Filled Assistant Operations Engineer Filled 6 months prior io Nuclear Fuel-Handling Supervisor Scheduled, itSt .Cuel l aci Nuclear Shift Supervisor Filled (o mon % p rior 4o Assistant Nuclear Shift Scheduled, -1909.pyg { jed Supervisor Maintenance Engineer Filled Novemb e r Assis ant Main,enance Engineer Scheduled,+1981 Maintenance General Foreman Filled Technical Engineer Filled l Equipmen't Performance Engineer Filled l Nuclear Instrument Control Engineer Filled i tecemb ec 1991 l Evaluation Engineer 1cheduled, -1999 Nuclear Instrument Foreman Filled December 148 l Surveillance Engineer Scheduled, 1992-l l To n e. 19 e *i Technical Engineering Supervisor Scheduled, 1999 i

l 13.1-30 Amendment 35 - May 1981 1 ~

e

., ~ _ . . . . . - . - _ , .. _ , , . _ . ,

EF-2-FSAR '

The SPEG makes detailed recommendations for revised procedures, J.

equipment modifications, and other means of improving unit safety to the Director - Nuclear Engineering. Although this group interfaces with the onsite QA Organization, it is not an integral.part of the QA Organization.

4 Minimum qualifications for the nuclear SPEG engineers include the following: -

\

a. Education: Bachelor's degree in engineering or related sciences. The group will have a varied back-ground to cover the fields of mathematics, reactor physics, chemistry, materials, reactor thermodynam- 35 ics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, and electrical ,

and reactor control theory.

b. Experience: ] N$ yearsof professional-level nuclear power plant experience. Six months experience shall be associated with .the Fermi 2 plant. -

c. Training: Knowledge in the details of design, function, arrangement, and operation of the plant l systems, control room instruments, and control

! functions.

l t

13.4-11 Amendment 35 - May 1981

. - , , , , , . -_ . , . . , _ - . - - . . ,.,m, ,---r , . , . . ~ . _ -. , , , _ . - , _ . .